Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
06-22-1993 (City Council) Agenda Packet AGENDA
WYLIE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 22, 1993
7:00 P.M.
MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIENCE
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Consider Approval of the Minutes of May 3, May 25, and June 8, 1993
APPOINTMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. P&Z 93-2-Z/FP Hold Public Hearing and Consider Approval of a Replat and an
Ordinance Amending the Zoning for a Portion of Westgate Phase 1
3. P&Z 93-1-Z Hold Public Hearing and Consider Approval of an Ordinance
Amending the Stone Grove Planned Development to Provide Area Requirements
and Land Use Designation
4. Appointment with Ray Cox and Citizens from Windsor Drive to Discuss Masonry
Requirements of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
5. Appointment with Joanne Holtzclaw, Representing TCI, to Discuss Recent
Changes in Cable Service
ACTION ITEMS ,)-(,2-
6. Discuss and Consider Approval of an Ordinance Amending the TU Electric
Franchise to Amend the Franchise Fee from Three Percent to Four Percent
7, Discuss and Consider Approval of an Ordinance Amendingthe Animal Control
Ordinance Regarding Leash Requirements a . �•
8. Discuss and Consider Approval of a Resolution Adopting Tax Abatement
Guidelines
STAFF REPORTS; s --(14cAka.,/
Gf6e A al(')&-tAAX (4-36 (4-CC)11(6'‘<l-'
2 E
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
EXECUTIVE SESSION
9. Hold Executive Session Under Article 6252-17 V.A.C.S. to Discuss:
a. Land Acquisition: Industrial Building Site
b. Litigation: Southfork Settlement Agreement
c. Personnel: Appointments to Boards and Commission
Personnel: Appointment of Municipal Judge
10. Reconvene Into Regular Session and Take Any Necessary Action as a Result of
the Executive Sessions
ADJOURNMENT
Posted this a 18 h da of May, 1993 at 5:00 p.m.
City of Wylie
AGENDA COMMUNICATION
` SUBMITTED BY: City Secretary DIRECTOR: Mary Nichols
DATE REFERENCE NO. SUBJECT
6/22/93 1 Minutes of Past Meetings
SUMMARY OF SUBJECT:
Council minutes will be provided under separate cover.
ALTERNATIVES:
ACTION REQUESTED:
f
•
I .
City of Wylie
AGENDA COMMUNICATION
- SUBMITTED BY: City Secretary DIRECTOR: Mary Nichols
DATE REFERENCE NO. SUBJECT
6/22/93 2 Public Hearing and Ordinance Regarding Westgate
Phase I and Replat
SUMMARY OF SUBJECT:
Attached are the Agenda Notes and accompanying attachements that were sent to
the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Commission will hear this item on
- Monday night and we will provide you with their recommendation on Tuesday. In
addition the current chairman, Gilbert Welch, will be present Tuesday night to answer
any questions regarding the Commission's recommendation.
ALTERNATIVES:
(1) Adopt Recommendation of Commission Once it' Rendered
(2) Adopt One of the Other Alternatives Outined in the Attached Agenda Notes
(3) Continue Public Hearing to July 6th Meeting
(4) Close Public Hearing and Table Action Until July 6th Meeting
The Staff will withhold a recommendation pending the actions of the Planning and
Zoning Commission on Monday night.
ACTION REQUESTED: / i 2
vt_edtw
WYLIE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 21 , 1993
AGENDA ITEM: P&Z 93-2-Z/FP Hold Public Hearing and
Consider Recommending Approval of a
Change in Zoning from Multi-family to
PD Planned Development and a Replat
of a Portion of Westgate Phase
SUBMITTED BY: Mary Nichols, City Secretary
REQUESTED BY: Jim Meara, FM3412 Venture
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
P&Z 93-2-Z/FP Mr. Jim Meara, FM-3412 Venture, has submitted a
replat request for a portion of Westgate Phase I. This portion of Westgate
was originally platted for 76 duplex (2-F) lots. Streets, alleys, and utilities are
all in place for this portion of the subdivison. Mr. Meara has purchased the
property, secured a builder to develop single family homes and requested
a change in zoning. However, a couple of development issues exist as a
result of the lots being previously platted:
* The existing lot depths average 108 to 110 feet - SF-1 , and SF-2
require 120 foot minimum lot depths. SF-3 requires only 100
feet.
* The minimum dwelling footage requirements in our zoning
categories are:
SF-1 = 1800 sq.ft. SF-2 = 1500 sq.ft. SF-3 = 1100 sq.ft.
Mr. Meara proposes a minimum dwelling size of 1450 sq. ft. With the
lot depths already established by the streets and alleys, the only single
family zoning category that will accommodate the depths and a 1450 sq. ft.
minimum is SF-3 zoning. However, SF-3 also requires a minimum 7200
sq.ft. lot, minimum 6 ft. side yard setbacks, minimum 25 ft. front yard
setback, 25 foot rear yard, and a lot width of at least 60 feet. The applicant
proposes to plat 48 single family lots. In order to meet all of the minimum
setbacks in SF-3, he must reduce his number of lots by four. The applicant
does not believe this would be an acceptable number of lots to the builder.
He also prefers the 1450 sq.ft. dwelling minimum to the 1100 sq.ft. allowed
in SF-3.
Mr. Meara's proposal is to rezone the portion of Westgate Phase I that
he is replatting to "PD" Planned Development with a single family land use
and area requirements that will allow larger homes (1450 square feet to
2000 square feet) on lots averaging 6800 square feet to 7200 square feet.
While this is not the typical purpose for Planned Development zoning,
our zoning ordinance does define one of the purposes for a PD as "to
permit growth flexibility in the use and design of land and buildings in
situations where modification of specific provisions of the ordinance does
not conflict with the intent of the ordinance, is not inconsistent with the
planning on which it is based, and will not be harmful to the neighborhood."
There are several options available to the Commission and Council for
solving Mr. Meara's development problems:
(1) approve "PD" zoning with "SF-1", "SF-2", or "SF-3" single family
land use and area requirements that will accommodate the
replat with 48 homes. Should the Commission consider this
option, a list of proposed area requirements is attached.
(2) zone the property "SF-3" and require the applicant to either
reduce the number of lots from 48 to 44 in order to meet area
requirements or apply to the Board of Adjustments for variances
on just those lots that will not meet setback requirements
We have advertised in such a way that the Commission and Council
can approve either"SF-1", "SF-2", "SF-3" or Planned Development with single
family land use.
There were 93 public notices mailed to residents within Westgate
Phase 1 . Responses are attached. All seem to favor single family land use.
Attached are copies of the replat as well as the previous plat and lot
pad layout. Mr. Meara will be here Monday night to answer questions.
PROPOSED AREA REQUIREMENTS
WESTGATE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
Lots 1 , 7, 8, and 9, Westgate Phase
APPROVED LAND USE Single Family Detached
MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK 20 Feet
MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK 5 Feet
MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK ADJACENT TO STREET 15 Feet
MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK ADJACENT TO STREET 10 Feet
FOR SPECIFIED LOTS:
BLOCK 1, LOT 19
BLOCK 7, LOTS 15 AND 28
BLOCK 8, LOTS 1 , 6, 7, AND 12
BLOCK 9, LOTS 1 , 6, 11 AND 13
-.w MINIMUM REAR SETBACK 20 Feet
MINIMUM REAR SETBACK FOR SPECIFIED LOTS
BLOCK 9, LOT 13 6 Feet
BLOCK 9, LOT 11 10 Feet
MINIMUM DWELLING SIZE 1450 Square Feet
MINIMUM LOT SIZE 6200 Square Feet
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 58 Feet at Building Line
MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 100 Feet
MINIMUM MASONRY EXTERIOR FACADE 75 Percent
MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING Two Covered and Enclosed
MAXIMUM HEIGHT 30 Feet
MAXIMUM ACCESSORY BUILDING HEIGHT 15 Feet
1
ZONED. SF-3
•
P.11'I IL.'T.P.I I-T.raIa.G a1TR.
,P7 i 1 --37--- -.'.r--lY -_-QT--•�Yi��-Y7�•-sir_-�d• -fT�--�Y- Yr�__-17�--.��`ram- ,47t••-11�
19RIGIT
j
r I 2tR R 2TR 26R 25R ! 24R a 23R R 22R R 21R R 204 R 19R 1SR R ITR R l6R / �) ♦
ITTa 1 I we i •'•a P.M GAN + MIS y w.. 6 WO + we i WO i .M MO i MN d aft = //J/♦ /
,,♦
• PTTAA i — — — gyp/
I f.� --Au---_ 1 _�-fL--J1.--.L-JNL�- -Ja- —Jar au,.Q,t `��/,>r"
ITa. I `�ItV'/J
1..
' /
21R
"'I 1sf-- - _ y�/7 ZONED. SF-3
22R "'0 i Ilina
12R 6R / , ' <I.
onI ' I ia. I I �'TR n.. i NI' 1 nem i/ /♦ ^ a\
IA.
HC71 I 1I 6R 9R t OR �$�I .... I2 1IR1) SR ` / /wi fi w. . I _ I �y�: a��
rili
I Taw ' II -_ _ si_ I *rat- /
I MI
..�
U.If T.P..41111T.en.. nit
PM 11111111111111111.111111111111151 1F...t44 1J 2PRI / IIR IIIQ1tT![fWTIP1
TI Tape 9/ - Per aTT 1wCCC"" rq«I Iw a..."w.r.r.T We a+.iw• ♦R J i I f 1 JR T 1 /) /♦ ZONED. SF-3 �...~na-�"��iw:..`w+.riw.aTw w�.w+
I- /.
2SR I 1 I j P.1:4
! MI ♦ 1 JR
I
TI[a —I L SR !R I 2R I r jI .u1 / '
T F SR I lI I .» ) Fj
F 2u1 I I ; I ` \\ :
I es - I .. ..., 'f�V
I' •�I : I i sus ' .4 •,„ �sJ �/♦ <//
• LOT PAD R EXHIBIT
l I J 1 L—--wr 1 L: \(4tISL1
/IWESTGATE
i1 % .`\,�;;� r- `' - PHASE\ • ,- BLOCKS 1, T. B. I. 9
� ' � EXISTING ZONING. OLD 2F (SF-A)
`, ► ‘ PROPOSED ZONING. PD
I
IE
4.'7/( SITUATED A
L ZONED. SF-3 E. C. DAVIDSON SURVEY. AB
STRACT No. 2E
CITY OF WYLIE
COLLIN COUNTY. TEXAS
al1:141W laa 1
R[WA CO/MR UshilterAlarrasen it Associates. Ines LAI
a7..C.RL R RUT.
pR TM =-O IT 4.00RI ow M.IOO
T17
pews.T.1!!a •�. r a w r•••.w.f•••.
MO l.FRRe
AIRII. 1993 —w.
1 •II '
_
---
. . 1 ii - , i i iii;
,, • •
3 IA R i
.• FHi. 1a' ,. Wa s i .. 1
�Ai .� . �. }{I..ww __ _.`_ •:.l 'F I I\ ! •./ • ,z4- , �i f
_ir—. : . . i,i -_,1 ; 1i•+1.,—.. . II�!_ PIAT i l. .i.ii lli =1,%174 4•-•".8: -
•
:
04 \ ak - �} � . � . � . l "� . I. l 1 : I —bnj }` - ° :
' Al ' ' `4ai —tI_i :1� 1= =
A . ; — • .y. , —
I i_ �; ,
i ... r---- , "Tnr.v ! - -- •
— -.- I, _ � fa.... h
. - `,.•- . ,`-' ' .
•
.i t.✓; ii.A gQg •
I / '•�0 t ii`=3•
iI
4: 4»
11 d a• .At,. YGSe
;� .. I I �►�; ♦ • •;. •_ it
II ; ..1.ilas tt
t 1 I I pi 4\ "4,j
y
t
112114
; 2j.s fig.
b 14T
S f i f .yS �.- - - - --1 1t
1iE
tSa kf. i
!
_"` IIDE ��.rel
® -f SR 5,ike.~ws.....�•—..
E E it Ir.
riii f 4.1:i_1_;:_.!_1)i 1 1_2_132,, . ‘.z:ti . lit_
1 i 1 -a..,i 3 O i i E a �� .
\ \ .. ...._i iirguh
tt f
f i
i it . • i i I
,.,� •.! al i , g i
-X— ' • a! :il Ii L ��y_
t. I! tI
jil
_•
€1 i@t is i
r• . .
1... i .....
1 / .
•
•WC
.. ,.. ....1) 0•0.10,..•Ms,,•06.Se•.001
0C.0....Oa..••••1 a f...1. ._ ....,,,L..,..... .. 7_. .
_• ___ --
or..se r M.S.'
_ r.tli.,. 3,1 .
`"`.. ••••••••ser mot __ ______
MOM 0,11.810..11
.1%.„ • .
a sin, ,
1 r . • 9 ".. 1• I 2 f •
.../..• . .
41 { ',. _____,1 i
i 11:)........7 ..) .... .. I 7.'''..7 ••n”
.1/4.11. 3.7.4iVr 51. I
• RETAIL
••• NI I -
-- ....., •••••..••,,,..,
MOM'MAP 1 t.
•
•
•
. I-I•i,:r.i.L•N••.i-(
4••1,I.1.....1.......-_,.1i....-....•...-...-..e...;.,..-;.-..,".,,i,4,e
,.,..E....,....7.2.....
..,.,
i _
. l T.. ., ik•..‘!..1.:
.
,t...x..7........
..,...."....1......z....4'''.
....-
t....
...•
. •
I
....-
• .., r
• I .
• •••-• . '•• ....1.2,..,.... . ..
t . . • i• i i • Lituree.1
.............III; ...1.• •7! • o,..."j 0 I ' I
100 0.0 110
• . .
1 .:;.÷. • ....I•
111.11.V.... L.- t .E " ' t : .1. I: ler'
„.„,A ............ ..0 .100/0/10.0 00101.•MOM
• .:„,,• ri 4-. . Ik : 1 •-• ri i i=.4.--.1/4'a
• • . :...• . .:....v. . .:_i •1 'HI ... 1.' .1 . ...!
, .
. . . . . ''7.1 I "IF sosoarosoo.1•We olammo
• ORS • Is • t •
kr.i 1. ...4. k `.... .7;7. silmimi.w••••••••••••••11••••••• ••.•
10 1 •• .0• • ....... .0 • nrir it. ,1, Mill •••00...1.1011001.10.0
0.'I .... rd I i. ' . I i : 0...0 I
. SO .
i S. .,......• ..... i . . ...,• Ito.Iroadoosopoes
•
• i 1 • ; •• 4. IS • ,k I'• • -J.)11.... SI :A
__r , .•L: .. . 1, .i illa.0.111
1.0 .
1 •I .; 11 . i• . , . . ••••=1. [____...,..,
,.
• i • ,, -. . .' . .,.I - /''
r. r Bei'
[ . .• F. I
, ..4.. Or " 1• 'I '7•• \ / ' • .
• '
..... mai., •••=. (...s.....
...• I:
1:411..• '.•...41"'• ......... -,,,q- I ;IV ,11 . '
...N...., gur. • • • • --
••11,SO 11.• . .....''',.6t. -- 1COL" Lit t I,...J''.
10raleir T•1,0.111.
aralet 5.- • 01311:trif ......4 .. ..... .. a•a- ess...• ..".- wo.os' . ,
J.•••044.ef *
-..••••••• .... 0.0.00.
...-..... J.,
•, as ••••••1 ......
,0.1 •••• ...., .•.. I.4..,,,,„,„.. .
St.
• -. • • oo.
nti, • i ro"."."' ' 40.141001 si ifs%I il las.is*.1:•117.1.•11. ill I M.ill. 1111 I St 11111110. III.8 711.1".."foll"/ 4, ,-Ik--"A-- .--r-r----1---,,----,, , ,r...".-.0'
- '!.. ••••÷•-/I ; I-'I; 1 Li 1 I 1 1.!: .1-1 1_4_i••1__f•.1..".'"Ya e-.' 7'Z sr it.1".1f;"SI l'' • ' • ' II; .il I.•,_„..L.:' 'q •
I. ••••MI,Ing lion ti.ONO, Z.-$'
oltO nolo.mo.insooto of tio OS,of•01111.1 --- ..• •
:I: : •" '. o.-I.----A". • ......... ... 1182-WW. ... ' " ...-- --
11...1•111.... .
Z1. 0 . 7, ,. ...•... ...so ... 1. ....... , ,.. , ... o i
1
: --.
. .. ..iivy-s, ...---,i""1 -.7.- I. r , • 1.•••• - 1(.4 " 11,NO la [ la 1 III [It I le I. o•.0••11.• '""•• i
.. --;t•1:fL"....Ar", iliW"••••;1:7: A: :::•-rr-•', 141,11,,,,,,,: :.!2. '.- :•,•.._._•,; , _ . .• •._._. _1_9 i;:'i-=7.•:'. j. -. • •
I. All olloot on to lo 111 01.0 Ir.S.la samearl.). .
toobl ellen vs.oehomfoo. "-.."-.!, "--. . i g 1,-F--, !II__ -T. . ,.._' •Its.1' IN-I•'_L. r•,0., ..4,.k., . ....,- .---.. , ii- 4'0 '-,
a. All*MI moo.,ow...••••I nm,••••m•m• ..::.;::."-' IT,,G., .!--____ • . :...21• . •F- 0,0,-.;.......... 4.0..... .V.._. ‘.. .e.......... .iiii- (571707- . , • • no§I I , .
.040 waled 1.0.0.1.0. k.. j.;.. ,. i;04: .D. „77. . . .• . 4;.k•,_•4•• ,, _, .. .,# ••• . , a 1;.. .1__I._1..,1_ .1_..i_--i,•_7!I-I- I --7-- ii
. a-F-- .4.--1.1; •.- -„ ' -.1*. .0.‘,.. .4.-.•..ee . . ...•-. . . .1. . . . . i i a I •11 IVI • r--- . •
• ..... ,...\,,,,,•.N,...... el.i•es ,•• ••• !as 1 si I m !o il•mg,.! ..... 1
-.
. • 1,.-1,-: ••':.• : .:;:•ji 7's"-.‘„„'...:,':'.. .' .p. %\..•.1•'19......... •••••• 1.. ••.... • I Q 1 . 1 . I... .1.... 1.11 ".." i I -• ..•• .
. ,
2tt. ' i.'74:,......--•'i,j--1 f',..71-'7 ' r... / .• Z .•.. '`.‹,:'.-. •••••15; . - -.".'- 1 1 6.'" 'I P.0.0.11'
10.07 M.. ••••••••••,-/-4 1,00 .,
. ' .1C 1 0.4 .0 • ..0.....221. 2 ..r.7- --_,...- - ,/,.,c,••,,:* ;,:z•Ler •.., 0 0.01.,
r--------.7-ectiV-- .... ....I . '.=.11"-.="- • 1" x ..I ••••- ` 4" '. 0 .... •4 0......e k../ • COMM. . Ail cursomx Pump
,...--........- ....P.m is ' L.''.7 . •. ok o .s'. o. ''''' so ' i elNirAO,o1.• . t'.......
T..
.r .....,.,•,,,,, - ..........i.I. . -.?• .. ••. ..... .-- .. ., • I 214•Y I...-...'..... .
I
V WESTOATE
P I I 0.0.00. 4•.'''' / - ; ate .. -
IFS
r. i I SFS • ....,...:12%.,,,,,,...',#.t tm.„.' If•
Aol 1:110.1.17
.
0,111.011.30' 4 • MASI II
• i I b *•. •.""•
- • ..- i:i
-., ;•,;.,..f,t, • i ....... ,••••,.... •••••to
, • c•••••••••••-• 'ttt ::rilt.
41- SI III TIN
..
gn.tr.,t,,
ocolr
• • „II. MOSS i . L C.Os•Illsoa Ilimey,Abita.,N..IMO
i ,d• ............•
----....., .i. .:4.4. .sess.s.r• •:1: . City of Wylie.Cottla CooMy.Tease
-....., of,'
A• 44 V 1.•21,1'
•,•`,... •
0.4 vg:;.-• ..a
•.-.. 4 q .•••••on OM.11 Ns Me 01111.
•0.,
Lichliter/Jameson •
&Associates.li.c. LA
CCA•1.10.4.1.4•105.41 ammo Imm--
- , .1•0•1••••••••••1.•I..NO••...1•••••.1..•••••••••1111.1.0100.0
.. ... . .. ., .......... ..
. •
.� " 3t OtE-14 € \ \ 9 x
\ \ N �.
R+ 2 q3 - - Z./FP \
I cr2] \ \
r � \ \
o � \ \ •
z ri \ \
o \ \
� � \ \
* D \ \
/ r.
o � I CITY OF \ \
z WYLIE \
L0.9027 AC. A -
—• , \
tos. -Wp.�IN N N N N o iv" f'•T� \ \ .t.
I rt
;Er u n a I1•, it IVAii • Si .( .. c• \
I I � TOW NGATE DR
I I .faipit .. b \
W
:,,
31 ii .. .1150 ,..) ,....... ,i lig onrh. ..: •. Z 1.
, ... ,. ._ m w I Till • m d \\ \ �.,
BROWN •WN RD.o g •M.
CP 54-in 5 1. \
I 4 �55.3 4 . ^ fie9i \' \
1 ''�ikti ems. 'L T• \ \
I— 1----..-- - 11 kirk Mg ' ��� \
0CoQ la 85.9rc) \ \
It5s S'�� O�n C Z ��'p:.0A \ \
I `‘ ti ` j \ \
tit a
I 85. 3 t5''4.................____.________._.________1.: ,
<.1 .J of
8� .} ,� 1124� � n� '20 WAY
2,
'(\?1 S .?' "- — C73791 69.6 - Is n is " 69.6's
(11
I - ref N A � • •
� - • O
�• 119.4 .>8.0°D ' -696� .. ' , 69.6' 19
_ '+ y ' 57.24,
W •_ si" w > 80.18 6Z24 1 — ; . -
666 p _ Co e
1 m W— • A aHQ 3' 67.24� •`�. �•1... ••ll •�� L �T
..0 s= - :L7 . nl
4,. -1e
CITY OF VCTYLIL
2000 HWY.78N.-P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE,TEXAS 75098
(214)442-2236 • FAX 442-4302
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on Monday,
June 21, 1993 and the Wylie City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22,
1993 at the Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Hwy 78 North to consider the following:
(1) a request from Jim Meara for a replat of a portion of Westgate Phase I to combine
existing "2-F' multifamily lots into larger single family lots including lots 19-34 Block 1, Lots 15-36 Block
2, Lots 1-18 Block 8, and Lots 9-20 Block 9 and a change in zoning from "2-F' multifamily to either"PD"
Planned Development or "SF-3", "SF-2", or "SF-1" Single Family Zoning on said lots described above.
Please give the Commission and Council your opinion in writing regarding this matter by
returning the form below to: Mary Nichols, City Secretary, P.O. Box 428, Wylie, TX 75098.
Regarding Case #PZ 93-2-Z/FP
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
I am in favor of the proposed change for the following reasons:
1. /T kv 4 s„✓a L� I:-i'n"-y 2 !!`pr,4- / e,,, e./2-> 4-•-i
,.,.. Gvi Th' d T4,4G-.4 Z-o TS /.4.17,5�� 4�Z •J
2.
w- 3.
Signature
Printed Name "y,44"
Addressio,�� �Q• � .�6�� �✓- /
�Y�i ; Tsl 7✓09!
*, ie
CITY OF WYLIE
2000 HWY.78N.-P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE,TEXAS 75098
(214)442-2236 • FAX 442-4302
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on Monday,
June 21, 1993 and the Wylie City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22,
1993 at the Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Hwy 78 North to consider the following:
(1) a request from Jim Meara for a replat of a portion of Westgate Phase I to combine
existing "2-F" multifamily lots into larger single family lots including lots 19-34 Block 1, Lots 15-36 Block
2, Lots 1-18 Block 8, and Lots 9-20 Block 9 and a change in zoning from "2-F' multifamily to either "PD"
Planned Development or "SF-3", "SF-2", or "SF-1" Single Family Zoning on said lots described above.
Please give the Commission and Council your opinion in writing regarding this matter by
Pr returning the form below to: Mary Nichols, City Secretary, P.O. Box 428, Wylie, TX 75098.
Regarding Case #PZ 93-2-Z/FP
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
- X- I am in favor of the proposed change for the following reasons:
1. �r
2 - e441.4ZA4,-1 yy?Q.rc, - / 4-a ,0Y• fi ..���
3 % �� � /� �r� ate
Signatur
Printed Name#4-4Cff M. goi3£ 1-
Address /a Y 44 &sfe&2r 4 6 400S F L )a Y
-ie
CITY OP' WYLIE
2000 HWY.78N.-P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE,TEXAS 75098
(214)442-2236 • FAX 442-4302
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on Monday,
June 21, 1993 and the Wylie City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22,
1993 at the Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Hwy 78 North to consider the following:
(1) a request from Jim Meara for a replat of a portion of Westgate Phase I to combine
existing "2-F' multifamily lots into larger single family lots including lots 19-34 Block 1, Lots 15-36 Block
2, Lots 1-18 Block 8, and Lots 9-20 Block 9 and a change in zoning from "2-F' multifamily to either"PD"
Planned Development or "SF-3", "SF-2", or "SF-1" Single Family Zoning on said lots described above.
Please give the Commission and Council your opinion in writing regarding this matter by
returning the form below to: Mary Nichols, City Secretary, P.O. Box 428, Wylie, TX 75098.
Regarding Case #PZ 93-2-Z/FP
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
t/ I am in favor of the proposed change for the following reasons:
i ��f l'r l i 4 1�e.<.1 ,.c vl G� ^-f
CLC �f *t_sce
„AA— .t,u Z..Z..A ti - :z--A-ak
3.
Signature 0- =� ?
..w J
Printed Name ITS y M, M.. w 4 AD
Address �o�{ G� c u1nt,
fi
, . ie
CITY OP' WYLIE
2000 HWY.78N.-P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE.TEXAS 75098
(214)442-2236 • FAX 442-4302
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on Monday,
June 21, 1993 and the Wylie City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22,
1993 at the Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Hwy 78 North to consider the following:
(1) a request from Jim Meara for a replat of a portion of Westgate Phase I to combine
existing "2-F" multifamily lots into larger single family lots including lots 19-34 Block 1, Lots 15-36 Block
2, Lots 1-18 Block 8, and Lots 9-20 Block 9 and a change in zoning from "2-P' multifamily to either"PD"
Planned Development or "SF-3", "SF-2", or "SF-1" Single Family Zoning on said lots described above.
Please give the Commission r1 C;nuncil your opinion in writing regarding this matter by
returning the form below to: _tlichols City Secretaryi7509
Regarding Case #PZ 93-2-Z/FP
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
X I am in favor of the proposed change for the following reasons:
1. -i(PANSior4 G2estosNT I Ase 190 1\nwm2-IGIA S
2. DE L.oPrv\E►QT Of LiseLEss A 2-E•l •
IDS FutvN 2CAO Fo(L 1-{DUS Ims
3. C,UI!L12EN I -`� KNOt� IT WAS P► w u P.
of WE R
•
Signature N__, CR(9:
Printed Name BCD J N (J6(ci N l A15
Address I I to P U ui A N P!-AGE
7509g
10
CITY OF WYLIE
2000 HWY.78N.-P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE,TEXAS 75098
(214)442-2236 • FAX 442-4302
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on Monday,
June 21, 1993 and the Wylie City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22,
1993 at the Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Hwy 78 North to consider the following:
(1) a request from Jim Meara for a replat of a portion of Westgate Phase I to combine
existing "2-F" multifamily lots into larger single family lots including lots 19-34 Block 1, Lots 15-36 Block
2, Lots 1-18 Block 8, and Lots 9-20 Block 9 and a change in zoning from "2-F' multifamily to either"PD"
Planned Development or "SF-3", "SF-2", or "SF-1" Single Family Zoning on said lots described above.
Please give the Commission and Council your opinion in writing regarding this matter by
- returning the form below to: Mary Nichols, City Secretary, P.O. Box 428, Wylie, TX 75098.
Regarding Case #PZ 93-2-Z/FP
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
I am in favor of the proposed change for the following reasons:
1. S I N Gi-(5-- 'FA 11-1 1 0.71. 47 a-g Th-F De,�z,opi►.z.-.7 04 1.‘,”
tic/-?-ao vd,
2.
3.
1/El% it
-.0 Signature
Printed Name 4//Lgv iL /Q J/f(.E '
Address bop 7 iA/MX6f a� 1/I t-(.t'
!✓y1.4 67- Th. 73 g(
�I
*� ie
CITY OF VC7YLIE
2000 HWY.78N.-P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE,TEXAS 75098
(214)442-2236 • FAX 442-4302
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on Monday,
June 21, 1993 and the Wylie City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22,
1993 at the Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Hwy 78 North to consider the following:
(1) a request from Jim Meara for a replat of a portion of Westgate Phase I to combine
existing "2-F" multifamily lots into larger single family lots including lots 19-34 Block 1, Lots 15-36 Block
2, Lots 1-18 Block 8, and Lots 9-20 Block 9 and a change in zoning from "2-P' multifamily to either "PD"
Planned Development or "SF-3", "SF-2", or "SF-1" Single Family Zoning on said lots described above.
Please give the Commission and Council your opinion in writing regarding this matter by
returning the form below to: Mary Nichols, City Secretary, P.O. Box 428, Wylie, TX 75098.
Regarding Case #PZ 93-2-Z/FP
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
\,// I am in favor of the ro osed change for th
e p g o follcIng reasons:
1. - V�' L i��},,.►�,Q �1' abuStIS 6t, ( .
2. of Gm- Q- ° CO-' -'`'sWt_ P-t. `JC '.- l>4Ck. 911)11 .
j_) ,•\, 31Dj 174t-';° \ cuta, _d
Signature
Printed Name \
•
Address Q.C:. \ -1(\c\42_C 'c\ \P,
CITY OP' WYLIE
2000 HWY.78N.-P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE,TEXAS 75098
(214)442-2236 • FAX 442-4302
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on Monday,
June 21, 1993 and the Wylie City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22,
1993 at the Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Hwy 78 North to consider the following:
(1) a request from Jim Meara for a replat of a portion of Westgate Phase I to combine
existing "2-F" multifamily lots into larger single family lots including lots 19-34 Block 1, Lots 15-36 Block
2, Lots 1-18 Block 8, and Lots 9-20 Block 9 and a change in zoning from "2-F' multifamily to either"PD"
Planned Development or "SF-3", "SF-2", or "SF-1" Single Family Zoning on said lots described above.
Please give the Commission and Council your opinion in writing regarding this matter by
returning the form below to: Mary Nichols, City Secretary, P.O. Box 428, Wylie, TX 75098.
Regarding Case #PZ 93-2-Z/FP
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
I am in favor of the proposed change for the following reasons:
1. OA)L S F/ Zov%006 ' s .-4cce z'Z 16- ,2 779 5
o.
3. J ] -
Signature
-►
Printed Name STUART ALLISON
614 NICKELVILLE LN.
Address WYLIE,TX 75098
CITY OF WYLIE
2000 HWY.78N.-P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE,TEXAS 75098
(214)442-2236 • FAX 442-4302
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on Monday,
June 21, 1993 and the Wylie City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22,
,- 1993 at the Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Hwy 78 North to consider the following:
(1) a request from Jim Meara for a replat of a portion of Westgate Phase I to combine
existing "2-F" multifamily lots into larger single family lots including lots 19-34 Block 1, Lots 15-36 Block
2, Lots 1-18 Block 8, and Lots 9-20 Block 9 and a change in zoning from "2-P' multifamily to either"PD"
Planned Development or "SF-3", "SF-2", or "SF-1" Single Family Zoning on said lots described above.
Please give the Commission and Council your opinion in writing regarding this matter by
returning the form below to: Mary Nichols, City Secretary, P.O. Box 428, Wylie, TX 75098.
Regarding Case #PZ 93-2-Z/FP
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
I am in favor of the proposed change for the following reasons:
J, y1 �f ��i� "'g i4Cnv/y h S �1J C7 f�cv/'fiy:stn S
2. Pitoto_t/ L/O.".c.z-a Gi n c 0 e-e7L .
71z.
3. /-7/l?4 CZ-7/'a} GL ��'ssee-/n c 7 /9
C ernin c r-,1 iL r-A- Signature
ce- e c d -2 m-or e Printed Name AW r-,�
ovt, Address // 7 C4 i<<c e ,L j
ILSE G' L'ty
re-scu c es Lv fie✓
/r..-0-',/4;-/-G-t) X')
UIaSG
-1e
CITY OF WYLIE
2000 HWY.78N.-P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE,TEXAS 75098
(214)442-2236 • FAX 442-4302
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
The Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at
6:30 o'clock P.M. on the 7th day of
June, 1993 and the Wylie City Council will hold a
Public Hearing at 7:00 o'clock on the 8th day
of June, 1993 in the Council Chambers at the City of Wylie
Municipal Complex. 2000 Highway 78 North, Wylie, Texas at the request of
The Meara Corporation
' for a Replat and Zoning change from 2-F (Two Family) to P.D. (Planned Development)
on the following described property:
A portion of Westgate Subdivision, Phase I, located in the E.C. Davidson Survey,
Abstract Number 266, Blocks 1, 7, 8 & 9.
As an interested property owner, it is important that you attend this hearing
or notify the Commission / Council of your feelings in regard to the matter
by returning the form below.
City of ylie, Texas
The following form may be filled out and returned as soon as possible to the
City of Wylie, Community Development Department, P.O. Box 428 Wylie, Texa
75098.
I am in favor of the request for the reasons listed below. '/ e S
I am opposed tot he requeste for the reasons listed below.
1. j e 6. J w►4�w.4.-.1 T41
RD. Lv;"." rna.4,.,ta4..� _
•
_.a 2• !hz. Gv it u/ (,-- ,,
ur
nna A 1 � 11 --
b -b Xrc. Leas "Vt Address: Qo? �,L . Q 1. l-L�f
. Q �. -
rle
CITY OF VVYLIE
2000 HWY.78N.-P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE,TEXAS 75098
(214)442-2236 • FAX 442-4302
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on Monday,
June 21, 1993 and the Wylie City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22,
1993 at the Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Hwy 78 North to consider the following:
(1) a request from Jim Meara for a replat of a portion of Westgate Phase I to combine
existing "2-F' multifamily lots into larger single family lots including lots 19-34 Block 1, Lots 15-36 Block
2, Lots 1-18 Block 8, and Lots 9-20 Block 9 and a change in zoning from "2-F multifamily to either "PD"
Planned Development or "SF-3", "SF-2", or "SF-1" Single Family Zoning on said lots described above.
Please give the Commission and Council your opinion in writing regarding this matter by
returning the form below to: Mary Nichols, City Secretary, P.O. Box 428, Wylie, TX 75098.
Regarding Case #PZ 93-2-Z/FP
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
w X I am in favor of the proposed change for the following reasons:
1. 1* , ; F 5 ; F � 1�1� t �G— e C z
2. J, ,I I r, � L ; ;� �
i > n_I S A Q 1_ �.J v,?� , 0.1 /
f-s (—? I S
.. 3.
Signature •,-;�1.�C�� .
n
Printed Name 2
Address 1 ��', _ . ;�� �a C 1=
-ie
CITY OF WYLIE
2000 HWY.78N.-P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE,TEXAS 75098
(214)442-2236 • FAX 442-4302
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on Monday,
June 21, 1993 and the Wylie City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22,
1993 at the Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Hwy 78 North to consider the following:
(1) a request from Jim Meara for a replat of a portion of Westgate Phase I to combine
- existing "2-F" multifamily lots into larger single family lots including lots 19-34 Block 1, Lots 15-36 Block
2, Lots 1-18 Block 8, and Lots 9-20 Block 9 and a change in zoning from "2-P multifamily to either"PD"
Planned Development or "SF-3", "SF-2", or "SF-1" Single Family Zoning on said lots described above.
Please give the Commission and Council your opinion in writing regarding this matter by
returning the form below to: Mary Nichols, City Secretary, P.O. Box 428, Wylie, TX 75098.
Regarding Case #PZ 93-2-Z/FP
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
l/ I am in favor of the proposed change for the following reasons:
'
1. /1�'ie // �i;�' lv;f� P,-J,,,� 1�,, 11 i 4 I ,dam✓� Y��S �tl� 1
2. �,�,�� iOr,nCc �����'/�� :/i ✓?; /C%il/_'�/) n» /1. a—"11,11 . q.5 pe.56',171(y ��NJ
3. !"coLAr i.JC_: (j.+J/� ;hj/� r�/ K'v;n`�"'tic (ct ;l� 4t..t9147c.5 'j?1C 71(% / -.
Signature G�
C�
Printed Name /ter #2,
Address ' - G A/ /9, 7l%-� /oSC
*, r le
CITY OF WYLIE
2000 HWY.78N.-P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE,TEXAS 75098
(214)442-2236 • FAX 442-4302
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on Monday,
June 21, 1993 and the Wylie City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22,
1993 at the Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Hwy 78 North to consider the following:
(1) a request from Jim Meara for a replat of a portion of Westgate Phase I to combine
existing "2-F" multifamily lots into larger single family lots including lots 19-34 Block 1, Lots 15-36 Block
2, Lots 1-18 Block 8, and Lots 9-20 Block 9 and a change in zoning from "2-F' multifamily to either"PD"
Planned Development or "SF-3", "SF-2", or "SF-1" Single Family Zoning on said lots described above.
Please give the Commission and Council your opinion in writing regarding this matter by
returning the form below to: Mary Nichols, City Secretary, P.O. Box 428, Wylie, TX 75098.
Regarding Case #PZ 93-2-Z/FP
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
r
✓ I am in favorl of the proposed change for the following reasons:
_..- 1. S nq/ r�'rY)i`ly 2© . ,r.9 0n l y
2.
3.
Signature P.
Printed Name has. HoIdPQt')��S
Address I 0] Pu,LLrY)&n _p1 . W y!
RegardingCase #PZ 93-2-Z/FP �--------------------------�-__------------------------------------------------------
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
V I am in favor of the ro osed change for the
P g following reasons:
kot‘jes ‘\4\ 1 \I\ 1•14L-S iQC) SIMM't)--NVV\043 \%0D‘ko klIeb %cch-•
2.
3.
Signature
Printed Name � �� 11%\& \ c
Address.01/4 i‘) . � * C10&n V -`i
Regarding Case #PZ 93-2-Z/FP
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
I am in favor of the proposed change for the following reasons:
1. 12.e e 74-) Oci71- rn orte 1i17o`m4, on)
2. rep T d 1 iii 1 /7-'4 A./ov l
sI See S/i-i9le, mot % ovsii2� bv�'lf Sim,/gam
Signature
Printed Name /qirfCr
Address
The following form may be filled out and returned as soon as possible to the
City of Wylie, Community Development Department, P.O. Box 428 Wylie, Texas
75098.
I am in favor of the request for the reasons listed below.
I am opposed tot he request for the reasons listed below. 02
1. hec46E T ,,etz046 7"Do T. s7, 1t. e
s pa, (2655 `M0 9 �Es - /7.S /5 i s
1; tP2 /,S Signature ?Ir()14-ri - 7 .14)44-."
WQSS Address:
v` lA ���� L� y
CV- LV i I5c" f97TC4I6, -irk"
Regarding Case #PZ 93-2-Z/FP
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
1 am in favor of the proposed change for the following reasons:
i -et4-`t fA456-e-
`,,, �7
yt-c---=(-
3 ttj ---(AMilLfttAkol:Litir-vt..,r
yktuctco-e__
Signature
Printed Name 721 /V eT 7A1 f l
Address 10r7
City of Wylie
AGENDA COMMUNICATION
SUBMITTED BY: City Secretary DIRECTOR: Mary Nichols
DATE REFERENCE NO. SUBJECT •.
6/22/93 3 Public Hearing and Ordinance Adopting Area
Requirements for Stone Grove Addition
SUMMARY OF SUBJECT:
Attached are the Agenda Notes and accompanying attachements that were sent to
the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Commission will hear this item on
Monday night and we will provide you with their recommendation on Tuesday. In
addition the current chairman, Gilbert Welch, will be present Tuesday night to answer
any questions regarding the Commission's recommendation.
ALTERNATIVES:
(1) Adopt Recommendation of Commission Once it' Rendered
(2) Adopt One of the Other Alternatives Outined in the Attached Agenda Notes
(3) Continue Public Hearing to July 6th Meeting
(4) Close Public Hearing and Table Action Until July 6th Meeting
The Staff will withhold a recommendation pending the actions of the Planning and
Zoning Commission on Monday night.
ACTION REQUESTED:
4 A.;Lo-vtAAAajcv4-t__,
eej V cstr
,e_dre
(lee i sA
j
WYLIE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 21 , 1993
AGENDA ITEM: P&Z 93-1-Z Hold Public Hearing and
Consider Recommending Approval of an
Amendment to the Stone Grove Planned
Development to Adopt a Land Use and
Area Requirements
SUBMITTED BY: Mary Nichols, City Secretary
REQUESTED BY: City Initiated
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
P&Z 93-1-Z We have discovered that a Planned Development "PD"
zoning classification given to Stone Grove which was approved in 1985 was
adopted by an ordinance that did not designate a land use under the
planned development. This means that the property basically has an
"empty" zoning category that needs to be filled with a land use. We have
been issuing building permits for single family structures using "SF-1"zoning
standards and the property was apparently platted for "SF-1" structures.
The Planning and Zoning Commission and Council need to hold
public hearings to determine whether the PD zoning should:
(1) remain "PD" and if so designate a single family land use and
area requirements underneath that PD zoning. A list of
proposed area requirements are attached based on the existing
structures and the zoning requirements as we believe them to
have been originally proposed for adoption. They are basically
our "SF-1" requirements with additional masonry requirements.
(2) be changed to "SF-1" OR "SF-2". There are no obvious reasons
why the subdivision is zoned PD instead of "SF-1". It appears
that the lots can meet minimum area requirements.
We have provided the commission with a copy of the Stone Grove plat as
approved, and a reduced copy of the plat indicating the developed lots.
Also attached is a list of the structure sizes that have already been built.
The Commission also requested a copy of the Stone Grove deed
restrictions. These are attached as well.
These are a few major differences in our SF-1 zoning and the Stone
Grove Deed Restrictions. The Commission can adopt either requirement if
you retain the PD zoning:
DEED RESTRICTIONS SF-1 ZONING REQUIREMENT
Front Entry Garage No Requirement
2000 sq.ft. dwelling 1800 sq.ft.dwelling
Max. Height 36 ft. Max. Height 30 ft.
Most of the lots belong to First State Bank of Wylie so only 17 public
notices were mailed. Of those, one was returned by mail and we've spoken
to several people on the telephone who have requested that we keep the
development standards in line with what is already built.
The area requirements we have drafted do not reflect the deed
restrictions. Deed restrictions are a private contract that are not enforceable
by the City. However, we do understand that there are some residents of
Stone Grove who are asking the city to adopt at least one of their deed
restrictions which prohibits front entry garages. While we cannot stop the
front entry garage currently under construction, the PD could contain a
provision that would require future residences to have rear or side entry
garages.
PROPOSED AREA REQUIREMENTS
STONE GROVE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
APPROVED LAND USE Single Family Detached
MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK 25 Feet
MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK 8 Feet
MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK ADJACENT TO STREET 25 Feet
MINIMUM REAR SETBACK 25 Feet
MINIMUM DWELLING SIZE 1800 Square Feet
MINIMUM LOT SIZE 10,000 Square Feet
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 75 Feet at Building Line
MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 120 Feet
MINIMUM MASONRY EXTERIOR FACADE 90 Percent
MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING Two Covered and Enclosed
MAXIMUM HEIGHT 30 Feet
MAXIMUM ACCESSORY BUILDING HEIGHT 15 Feet
1 rtv*.itmita ; ; 6_�
6 - 3 *
15 ! c
Ms am
83-6 - ,'' 53I6 !pia
(-;ft'S-FT M ........
48 •
is I
•(1 III
gig I
•
•'' �� 8 4 4 0 �; 8 5-71 - ' III 11111- : . ., ___
-- -- -_- _--
' ' It, LtmitQ I,,,o
A � 1----jr.!l I _.l 1 1 _11• r aim . t:l _
r S F 3 �• //� cFE T1Tf11TT[ljf - II -, ... ,
2 . i J1 . '
pi �1► j r 8 3 - 4 I A
,.' �_ --, lC, P� j- tr--
___ -:__==== _ vs r���r_7- _,u�.t llf�l ll� ---Us 8� wn
In
9a.
�41 LJ� 5i - 2 _ _ : mF S F A „ P D
EE INSET =� 86-62 - 7of !tIJIj 85 -71 83 -4 ,I
:��a- �� 86-8 4
•, l= = A L. SF - 3
2F .. � : ; ':
��� 1111 140 8 6 8 ��
,�
., I
SF -3 A. . II �I I .a - . ,. - Lf1
jWit 8 3 -2 ; ati '
m r. -.-•= •J 0. - �j_ I qJ LICIPIJiIP ��i��� ----------------I
p se,,,t..
i--, 4 1: VII MIME Iiii mg MI 2$ p" ow Es ,,___ ,
0 04-
1.'0W_ — — 1- -_ - _ -may —'�- W1illhlTPr
/ , '•
9
. . 217 L_ Jl J . IL -1 ✓
•A'1t/I;tI1tF----
I".iO.4n
-t-'-o_A a-_t-__i_-f-i-)l-lFF_I_KLi_-A P_-2„I.
--3-3 z0i0,._.i__
a0op64
II1l.i1.vl.W.*p
l7',1:
:*
`\ i tl J „ ' ,` o — _ - - - ,„ one A*o7 .o.:- _------o•4•m=1orn.m4”=o•••=m•••••C•f,r L1M1 `
4 if410.g;'".
,,
,,,, .4 .. ',.,
11 NN.s.;
84-30 ¢ 1 .
84-30 ISF - 1 ' ' ' 4 Pt'4P 'Pt,
S2'ONl�GROVZ,' PI/ASE I
weir 6rgu&Tag- S
BLOCK A
LOTS: ADDRESS: SQUARE FOOTAGE:
3A 1011 FOXWOOD 2560
9 1001 FOXWOOD 2581
10 1000 FOXWOOD ?
11 1002 FOXWOOD 2600
12 1004 FOXWOOD 3030
13 1006 FOXWOOD 3185
15 1010 FOXWOOD 2209
16 1012 FOXWOOD 2246
21 1022 FOXWOOD 2934
29 1009 HEATHERWOOD 2365
BLOCK B
LOTS: ADDRESS: SQUARE FOOTAGE:
10/11 509 FOXWOOD 3801
12 505 FOXWOOD 3139
14 501 FOXWOOD 2841
19 403 FOXWOOD 2669
21 315 FOXWOOD 2795
27 303 FOXWOOD 2550
BLOCK C
LOTS: ADDRESS: SQUARE FOOTAGE:
3 1004 HEATHERWOOD 2943
7 306 FOXWOOD 2911
BLOCK G
LOTS: ADDRESS: SQUARE FOOTAGE:
1 300 W. A. ALLEN 3582
, .
.- - -
•
Harry nbbks ,-
I tgi I
.• '4 . • •Ana#0//ow is/ales Norib--* * **••.•••"' •
li01 '
0
I tis IS, ' I NJ Phose Z
•
I I l I I 1 I NJ
_I L / ig if - I ;.3 L.s. I / 4, 1
,1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 -
_
° ji • • -e.•1 '”,-2,1"----- • kJ, "••••••. I, N I % N88 rqp__..
1---;--i--•,,..--1....,-..,..,4 0-'"•••J I Vt
44 I 4.1
I Z I 1 1 I 3-- r------- • ‘e,.. (.. et V 1 • t,i ii.
""••••• '''..,4,' ---.....„ 0 1 I Z I I ii I il'( 1 7 •..,,
---..--5:••• -----1 14" I-- -I _J I ____1 a I _I ! --I .‘ L _
___ / -
Nr41.38E .,. moo,5' ec V P ---- _ A ,
493:0 • ..
PlAce Of OM/NA/INS•---.. i **rye 79' -...""' 9114497'
470/• k .P'*. '1710' , 97C 1711' mg,. 110' 1.17.10;74. ,..,,,. ‘,....9.4„....g.,,
/10• • rrIl. N.I
..'C. -
8
v . , -„
„,
./
.. _.3. v
., ...:.
'."' r-,' 10 ' . ,•
• ..../ ,, .. 46 ,y 7
'.' 84 a .CA 101. -1 4.,'Ir..--..,r 1'•..p9. t.. . t•07,6!,444..,..'•to \i
/II 4
,,• \ (re. ..• • igzk
,. -4. /
4,.,3,.,i,, A e.`'' 00 llkx , .' a 5? I .-,‘ .14 3, %f 1.--',-,,.. !,.• i? .0 . ear,gy 0.1.4.0.' ''
4110 kiliiiiihb 4 / :SI.). ',CA.' I 6.0 135 ii 2-;,• itl '4 4~k.. ...q; -= ..
1 • OE • . /
I N 4"tilf si,'2:. fra/. ''' .;'.`i 44. tac.A7.41
0
0 .• - \ g
1 .,j 41 1 r"le A ds ' a t3 3, .1 , zt..-7444rA i _)t. __ .
Gr of , .-
i 41 /...: .' • i'.".. .4" .... 1 6 i'r ey •ws.-..7%,.:., -.;;;;-•
. ,
t. . 4 i 133'
ts t 41: 14 00 . • . el. IC Oi 041 .--405.*
.1. fW.104,tt4 00 016 . • tit'
"4, ALL-. i t • •et• __low , .-04 s -. 1 „, .--0, _ ,,,, -.. '....„
t , - s 410 I
tt, tti . it4r§41' t" .1 44t
N , • .,...-----V..-‘,176 .., / /..
•,..M ''‘'.. "' ' ' .4.,.......- . .e -4-i 4 . 1,- ...0 ' t.. -a • I .4-'10' •
/Y061:41/2•24- 53705., 47•49'941'w '-i -.4ppr:: ..ta .,.., . ..„ , ....y. .41' .Z.:.:* 14 ,•• '0 ...;., 19 41: l'. 1............
49
.....,.".5/ / • jo. '.t1"4 r--/ ---
. k ,. ". . • It t.'"OLIC , 0'6 11..194,05
''A..1 Ci, '!111111Piltl, vg4 . AL: 4 )1,).1/
./..' -IR,r7ezo.
4• - ;;;:e N - ' ...
. 4._
' li rots'IP'' • . ,• ,„.•••1 s ,,,P,i
."SI
5 4-•?/1.0a. 1 '
0 .--.-.. tfP / , -,.•.$ i %; •• "//6
,ii , • C--' ""'
...----- j.-5..riVerd. " ' -w'w
.-- •
tiiiiiii .. \ ••4 ,.' /11:'PAIL111111 PIIIP '''' ,014 id •\ R.48'250' \ ..........2.21s, -..--Ir
.
VC Mir jromriv ' • tt • 4)," 'St it`1 ' ' / • . P°
11.... gl- • (4., .: • /t, ,„:',41..'-...-.-.1''...'-..-#1 .... \
to 4,-;--„,..., 6 t.,s.4‘.4111kii . N..,:.,,` /40 ,"tiotAililL ° 4 0 ' I I R I a -
t• ,66.1.'. _ ..T.01.4. ‘ _•,,,,A , ..iiiih....• ,4' . .,:-
'.-4. • . ? '
96 _ N , •
••• •'t
irr k 1 .4--...... ....,.. „„:„,. ... ,,,
.4,..... E.,,,......_
kl 4r r 4-0 ..c .: 0/ - e
:411111ri.
..,...1 Ow'4 , • 1 4 / , "› 0. 44,
,e
14 /
..--',... ....- 1 i,:flis . n _.
/ it ,--:- 14'til
•
• r /I .
% - /. i •' . . •" i 410 '4 I I• ?!.. a_
1 ' i.. / 4'41r. - . 4. ' ti1;4" " ° 4; ' ' 4 / 4.srhe'rr •• ,.-
'g.razw' -0/.,...--e,-..,--;-..::-". 1---- '
0 k•
I :it 4- 6.. .6).. 44. , 0. '/' •t' .41 / .'1'› • GO LINK* MP Olt MS VC .1.21.3 l*KI•,t 4 ,,,:i e a A ov, I, e , I. r• z.es•
, , „I, .... , 43-. . "'•P'' i ,i,g' ‘ -4,. ,,,,// / 4. 4153'1/4 -a , 3. i•,/ .to't•f , 1
' / ,./ i I
I •‘k• -S ‘.%. 17'0
/ Y 9/
• t / II MI NI 0 II 41 00 *0.
• .01 /:.-- ' /•,.0 " .\ t 't
v, -t,-, •,., ,,, --4! - t i
i'or ' -.-.„4 ti -/' .f '.•tb
‘,4,44.___ __, _
I (po 1 49 It, , "LW Ai,.....1., .4
i• kl I4 AI mx. 1) It .26•••. - IP . • N. '
7, sioke_
, ,.........;,_ . . :„
1 I .4ffiti 1 ,,,,A .e°° ......bg.g/etZeib t,triS
'11.z ,I 1 ° 1. • os.''' dilikit;h.
* ft , . seswer.r..„,....5.--60.00 4,1 !.)
a I • * / e "
I
u6 '
•
• 8
490 WS' ,:I 4. MO. ... ' 0404 ii "4... I
•
.. i
•
aR41/6.
•
•
• ` b 6,sfi ci/O/( 5 ;:
•
•
Li• -
a• •
I-
. L / ��
�' ', i / PROTECTIVE COVENANTS •......•. .. .
OF STONE GROVE DEVELOPMENT .
I, THE STATE OF TEXAS '
' THE COUNTY OF COLLIN ` .
• Harold Spence ("Owner"), being the cwner of the real
property ("Property") situated in Collin County, Texas, being described as: • c
All of chose lots contained in that certain tract and parcel of
land being Stone Grove, an addition tc the City of Wylie, Texas, '+,l
according to map are plat thereof recorded in Volume G
'' e - r' Page 1!3 of Map and Platt Records of Collin County, Texas ' •being more-/ully described in the attached Exluihit "A" which is •
• incorporated herein by refer reference for Ail purposes. '
Owner had adopted an overall plan for the orderly development of the
Property, and to implement such a plan desires to and does hereby
adopt the following Protective Covenants rhich, together with any `L '.e.
• . covenants and restrictions which may hereafter oy contained in leeds �r.' ..
from the covenants running with the land and shall be upon any purchaser,
grantee, owner or lessee of any land or building in the Property, and
upon the respective heirs, executors, administrators, devises, successors � '
and assigns of each purchaser, g:antee, owner or lessee, and shall
insure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Owner and the
Owner's successors and assigns:
. .. 1. There shall not be constructed or placed upon any 1 .
in the Property any structure except a single-family residenceoandiother •
`e:.4.:, _'. attached and detached buildings reasonably suited to the residential .'
�,• purposes of the main structure, none of whi_h shall exceed 36 feet
,. .- in height. `
h
2 Construction of new buildings only skill be permitted, it being ;
the intent of this covenant to prohite t the moving of eny existing v •
building onto lot and remodeling or convert top the same into n "''•;., --
_ y" dwelling ..wrlt upon the property. :' v
3. Any one-story residence erected shall have not less than ?OOO
square feet of living area, excluding all pooch, patio and garage `y '
areas. Any two-story residence erected shall have not less than 2000
square feet of living area, exclusive of all and �.perches, patios garage
areas. ' ,
4. The exterior walls of themen structure erected on c lot shall d
he a minimum of 75% of the total outside wall area of brick, brick
veneer, atone or stone veneer. Carports, garages and other out-buildings '-
• reasonably suited to the single-family
_ 8 y residential purpose of the lot •.
• .`• •,'.. .' . i ma} be of other material! other than metal, unless said garage or .
other buildings are attached to the residence in which event the
• computation of the 7S.ti minimum coverage of outside wall arca shall
�'� include said attaches: garage .. .a, or other buildings. .
i
�. Co -/ i 97
•
•
, • '
Slo
•
ill: . •
Ir.
•
/ 2646 779
de
PROTECTIVE (OVENAttiS
. OF STONE GROVE DEVELOPHCNT
5. The roof of any structure shall be Composition, Tile or Cedar
1 •
Shakes or shingles that have been treated fire
' approved the fire y retardant Composchemiitiondepartment
rooTh to be of variegated pitch, we-therwood, gra;,tonc
I appearance with a 240 lb. minimum. Zoof liner: of all resi-
dences must be et a minimum 7/12 pitch or steeper.
i 6. No garage or carport reall open, to the front of any lot. An
•
'NO' . Automatic garage door opener may be required on any garage opering.
aorta cache not to be n garreee or eerpert.
' •� 7. No building shall be located on any lot nearer to the front lines
than the building lines established on the recorded slat above described.
r• No main or out-building including,.but not limited to,garages,-carports; . t' r
- and storage buildings shall be erected closer than the greater of ten
*'>. ' (8 ) feet frun the sideproperty l±ne. On corner lots, buildings shall '
ue' be located to conform to the building line from the side street property P
r line as indicated on the recorded lat. •
•
8. No oil drilling, oil development operations, oil refining,
. quarrying or mining operations of any kind shall be permitted upon or on
any lot, nor shall oil well, tanks, tunnels, mineral excavation or shafts
ny
ot. No
or
for oarmitted upen or s in quarrying for oillor naturalrgaskshalltbererected,�maintailiede d
�+
.• • • _eIt or permitted upon or on any lot.
•
9. Trucks with conege in excess of ore 1.1) ton shall re-_ be permitted
• to park overnight on the streets, driveways or of ewise within this •
subdivision.
'. 10. No vehicle of any size which transports
• cargo may be kept in this Addition at anytime inflssssmatoty or explosive
11. No structure, fence, wall, hedge or shrub lantia�
e• „ . • • sight lines at elevations between twogand six feep which restricts
above roadways shall .
•
be placedpermitted to remain on any corner Jr'. within the triangular - -
- by the street property lines, and a line connecting them at
points 25 feet from the intersection of the street lines or in the case
of a rounded property corner, from the intersection of the street property :,'
line with the edge of a driveway. No trees shall be permitted to remain
` ,, • • within such distances of such intersections unless the foliage line is .;:'•,"_•
ie _.. i , , � maintained et sufficient height to prevent obstruction of such sight •
lines. Pertaining to Phase 1; Lot 1 of Block A, Lot 33 of Block A, fs e•
• • • Lot 1 of Block B, Lot 28 of Block B, lot 1 of Block C, and Lot 8 of `
Block C and pertaining to Phase II; Let t of Block O and Lot lof Block F, '
rights are reserved by the owner to construct a
' • ` ► the property within the 25 foot x 25 foot easements t
entry sign to
asementa shown on the recorded
... .._. , • - plait. •.
:.�, t.. .; Page a .
s
7
•
di 0
•
•
•
•
26I16 780
•
PROTECTIVE COVENANTS '.
. OF STONE GROVE DEVELOPMENT
r 12. No metal fencing of any type whatsoever, including but not limited
- to cyclone, chicken wire, barbed wire, hog wire, etc. shall be allowed.
• ' 13. Every residence constructed on any residential lot shall front
on the street en which it is platted.
14. After the acceptance of the streets by the City of Wylie, lots
• et. - $ .. .. .. must be kept moused and clear of underbrush so as not to be an annoyance.
nuisance, or eyesore to the neighborhood. if the lot is not mowed and/or
cleared within 10 days from receipt of notice the developer shall have the
right to have the said lot mowed, cleared, cleaned-up or whatever else a'
is necessary to bring the lot into conformance with this covenant. if
the developer has to take action under the terms of this covenant then it
shall be reimbursed by the lot owner for costs incurred.
' = 15. Constnution of any residence shall be completed v:thin one year ;
from the date of the building permit. During and upon completion of any -
• construction, the builder and owner of a lot shall be jointly and aevernlly
responsible for the removal of any trash or debris that may hate been
'• , thrown or placed on the premises or any adjoining property and shall
leave street adjoining premises clean. ;
•i 16. No structure of a temporary character - trailer, mobilehane, tent,
shack, garage, barn or other building shall be used on any lot at any
time as a residence either temporarily or permanently. No garage, servant f ..
house, garage house, or outbuiluing shall be occupied by owner or
• employee prior to the erection of the main dwelling.
17. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any �.
_ ' lot except one which is not more than five (5) square feet, rlvertiatng ;.
�,. •
the Property for sale or rent or signs used by a builder to advertise
the Property during the construction and sales p.:riod. •
. • i. 18. No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on upon any
lot nor ?henanything he done thereon wnich may be or nay become an
annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood.
• ` ' 19. No trade or businens of any kind shall be conducted upon the
ill ��. . .. Property of any part thereof.
+ 20. No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground fur
rubbish, trash, garbage or other waste trash; garbage or other waste
_ ' shall be kept in sanitary containers.
.I' • • • 21. No animals, livestock or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred .
or kept on any lot, except dogs, cats, or other household pets that may
• be kept in reasonable numbers so lona as they do not constitute en annoy-
. w • • truce or nuisance to the neighborhood and provided that theyare not kept,
bred or maintained for any'ccemcrcial ourvoses. Anything pertaini,tg to
Page 3 ..
It ... .
weµ ..-__--..
•
a ' .
•
•
•
•
,.,mob ' • [y y . - • •.•
26� 6 78 1 'f .a.`:'.
• PROTECTIVE COVENANTS 0'
OF STONE GROVE DEVELOPMENT j
this restriction is subject to all applicable City, County, State, and/or %
Federal laws, rules or regulations.
22. No radio, television towers, aerial wires, satellite disc or other
• similar apparatus shall be maintained on any lot that does not contain a -
• residential structure, and no commercial towers for that purpose shall be �-
, constructed. All television antennae and aerials shall be located inside '
the attic or 'alder the roof. Satellite dishr-s shall he screened within
• nn opaque fence or landscaped area
en be not to be visible fran outside e.'.
the lot. ..e
�: .
•
23. The restrictions herein set out shall be referred to, adopted c
and ,node a part of et.ary contract and deed executed by and en behalf of
, the undersigned conveying said property or any part thereof to n11 such
•intents and perpcutea as though incorporated in, full therein and eaLh such t't ��_•
contract and deed :+hall be conclusively held to have berm executed. :te r ; t
delivered, and accepted upon the expressed conditions herein staters.
- 24. All the restrictions, covenants, resolutions, liens anal charges !A,
' •i •• ;' !., appearing herein, as well as those appearing in any centrac:t, deed or .
other conveyance to or covering any part of this property, shall be '
construed together. If any one of the same shall be held to be invalid
or for any reason it: not enforced, none of the other provisions shall -
be affected or impaired thereby, but shall remain in full force and r`fect.
25. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claimingthem for a period of thirty (3(1) `....: ``
years from the date these covenants are recorded unless at any time after •
said thirty year period sn instrument signed by a majority (by number of •'ite : '
lutz) of the then owners of the lots has been recorded, agreeing to change 4
said covenants in whole or in part. In Addition to the Owner and to the '.`'
other parties for Whose benefit these covenants shall run, the owner shalt
further have the authority to enforce any and all of the covenants and _
- • • conditions set forth in these Protective Covenants against any person " I
• or persons violating or attempting to violate the same. The owr r and
any other party for whose benefits t)e3e covenants shall run may enter , '' •• ''
..' proceeding, at law or in equity to restzaiu riolaciun of these Protective ,'}w..I:
Covenants And to recover damages for the breach or violation thereof. `•
Not virhstendi.ng any express or implied term or provision hereof, the
• owner shah1 never be obligated to enforce any provision hereof arxi failure `
to do so shall never he grounds Der any liability for or recovery of any '•, •
damages rgainst Owner. ' •
• ' ' , 26. All construction shall comply with all applicable zoning ordinances. " "
,� building cedes, fire codes. and any ether laws, ordinrncee or regulations
of any applicable governmental body or agency including but not limited
r :; tc: city, ccxmty, state and federal governments or agencies. •
Page 4 • •
' •.� 4
11
ilr-1 . .
Ilc .
.IL . .. ..
...r
,, - ,
/1.. 2646 782
;t: PROTECTIVE COVENANTS r '
ti
•
OF STONE GROVE DEVELOPMENT
•
; '. 27. The Developer and Dedicator reserve the tight, so long as it is the • •
owner of fifty—onepercent (51%) or moreof the lots in the property,
• to amend, revise, or abolish any one or m•+re of the foregoing restrictions,
and to revise the plat of such subdivision by 2nstnsnent duly executed
and acknowledged by the Developer in the Deed Records of Collin C ,ty,
Ir :x Texas end the City of Wylie.
, 28. No autanoti•.•e maintenance or repair of any kind whatsoever shall
be permitted outside •.f the enclosed garage. - :.
FPCECI1TF.11 than the_Jo day of 1.4......__IL- . 1987
3 ;tis--. .j
By
• STATE OF TEXAS 1 •
•• COUNTY OF COLLIN I
• TLie Instrument was acknowledged before me on the loth day of June. 19R7. •,f
F.
— by HAROLD SPENCE. ....I:•
', •
My Commission 'moires:
No:.
State o Texsa
Notary's printed name: '••v.}- .
� I ow,Met 201111144.
�.." Pptr+.r,:s Esrey W u try 'WI PROVISION.MEM ENiI al RESTRICR 1111 S N
•' RENTAL OR USE OF ENE DESCRIBED REAL PBOPFRTF
,,•., BECAUSE OF COLOR UX RACE IS INVALID AND
• FORCEABLE UNDER FEDERAL U1. . •: ' .
t AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO:
e • ±.
Coaweree Title Company '�
l ., -, P.O. dos 1180
' • • e �. Wylie, Texas 75098 Page 5
II
: • •
•
.i ' `
/(,)
CITY OP' WYLIE
2000 HWY.78N.-P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE,TEXAS 75098
(214)442-2236 • FAX 442-4302
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing at 6:30 p.m. on Monday,
June 21, 1993 and the Wylie City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 22,
1993 at the Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Hwy 78 North to consider the following:
(1) a proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance to amend a Planned
Development known as the Stone Grove Addition, as adopted in Ordinance 85-60, located on Stone
Road. The proposed amendment would amend the Planned Development to establish minimum area
requirements and land uses as required by the Zoning Ordinance within the boundaries of the
subdivision known as Stone Grove and further described on the reverse of this page.
Please give the Commission and Council your opinion in writing regarding this matter by
returning the form below to: Mary Nichols, City Secretary, P.O. Box 428, Wylie, TX 75098.
Regarding Case #PZ 93-1-Z
I am opposed to the proposed change for the following reasons:
XI am in favor of the proposed change for the following reasons:
1. L ect�-2 to* s t s a s t 0-atr(Cil wt S
2. CA v L k.0 SO Z-t s G i h O.a-t CZ P4 llikc- c,
3. 1 Akre re (c)-( .-CQ lies krt. c+(/y 1 LtLA
Signature
Printed Name DAY( . 57er NS-
- Address I ocxo i , (A)00,) Z IA
City of Wylie
AGENDA COMMUNICATION
SUBMITTED BY: City Secretary DIRECTOR: Mary Nichols
DATE REFERENCE NO. SUBJECT
6/22/93 4 Appointment with Raynette Cox Regarding Windsor
Drive and Masonry Requirements
SUMMARY OF SUBJECT:
Ms. Cox plans to bring a group of citizens with her to object to the current masonry
standards in residentially zoned areas. The ordinance requires 75% masonry and
50% on the front face. A home at 123 Windsor has generated some neighborhood
objections due to its front fact of approximately 50% siding. The Planning and Zoning
Commission will discuss this on Monday night and hearings could be held in July to
amend the ordinance and provide a SUP process for structures unable to meet a
higher masonry standard.
ALTERNATIVES:
There is no action needed as a result of this agenda item. Public Hearings will be
advertised this week to amend the Zoning Ordinance. This does not presume that
the Council and Commission will amend the ordinance. It does, however, give them
- the opportunity to amend the ordinance after receiving public input.
ACTION REQUESTED:
I
, .
REQUEST TO BE PLACE ON AGENDA
Date of next Council Agenda _ _D1Z 4q,5
1 . Rare-i-le. COX wish to speak to
the City Council for the reason listed below:
—The, hme, a+ iiz Winc 5or Dr% ve. } V11 IiCreS'tQ
Lh c h C a a_►suL__bs*_{h.e 3+or na o rt
S TA Lq3 i 5 no-t- b ee i n r VC9Q1,,±r uC4 eta +c
meet p r eAt Dui bui id nc 5±0ndard
Thank you,
LA
Si gnat re
Street
LU4U.k.or 1S092
City, State Zip Code
(ZA 44z- 5UQ1
Phone Number
SECTION III
That the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Wylie, as set forth in Exhibit A to Section 1
of Chapter 12 of the Wylie City Code be, and it hereby is, further amended by addition of the
following section, to be known as Section 25.7 Minimum Structure Exterior Wall Standards.:
"Section 25.7 The exterior wall standards for construction in the various districts shall
be in accordance with the following standards:
25.7.1 Exterior Wall Standards, Residential
A. Exterior wall construction for structures of two stories of less chall consist of a
minimum of 75% masonry or masonry veneer. Masonry and masonry veneer shall be defined
as brick, stone, decorative concrete block or as otherwise approved by the Building Official.
The construction standards applies only to the first floor of a building in the following districts:
A
SF-1
SF-2
SF-3
MF
2F
SF-A
B. No single wall face of any residence shall contain less than 50% of it's exposed
surface of masonry construction as herein specified.
C. Exterior walls construction for all residential uses in districts where permitted other
than those listed above shall meet the requirements of this section.
D. Where more than 60% of existing number of residential structure along both sides of
a street and lying between the two nearest intersecting streets do not meet the above minimum
standards, the Building Official may allow new construction to be equal to that majority existing,
but in no case less than required by the Uniform Building Code.
25.7.2 Non Residential Exterior Wall Standards
A. Minimum exterior wall standards for non residential structures shall be of at least
75% brick, stone brick veneer, custom treated tilt wall, decorative concrete block, glass. These
standards shall apply to any wall or portion of wall fronting, siding or backing upon a
thoroughfare, and on all walls facing or abutting residential zoned districts.
4
City of Wylie
AGENDA COMMUNICATION
" SUBMITTED BY: City Secretary DIRECTOR: Mary Nichols
DATE REFERENCE NO. SUBJECT
6/22/93 5 Appointment with Joanne Holtzclaw with TCI
- Regarding Changes in Cable Service
SUMMARY OF SUBJECT:
Attached is a memorandum from the City Manager Regarding the changes in the TCI
cable service. The memo outlines the channels that Wylie residents will lose and the
cost break TCI proposes to provide for Nickelodeon.
M
ALTERNATIVES:
I
ACTION REQUESTED:
I
I
MEMORANDUM
DATE June 18, 1993
TO Mayor John Akin and City Council
FROM Steve Norwood, City Manager
SUBJECT TCI Cablevision
As next Tuesday's regular City Council meeting,JoAnn Holtzclaw of TCI Cablevision will
be here to explain the changes in the cable system for Wylie. Attached are the following:
1.) News Release June 16, 1993
2.) A letter to the City from JoAnn dated June 16, 1993
3.) Previous correspondence on FCC Cable Act, September 1992
4.) Copy of the Law regarding "must carry"
5.) Current Cablevision line up as of 6/10/93
The FCC requirements are favorable to cities in some respects. Cable carriers around the
country are required by federal law to carry "must carry" channels. In doing so, many
cities were nearly "maxed out" as far as number of stations allowed. Fortunately, Wylie
had approximately two stations remaining on its capacity.
As of July 6, 1993, the City of Wylie citizens will loose three channels, QVC, MTV and
CNBC. These three stations were the least watched and desired among residents here in
Wylie. Previously AMC was to be deleted. After careful reconsideration TCI chose not to
delete this station. The city received new channels, most of which were independent
broadcasters and PBS.
Furthermore, TCI will not be charging residents the 25-cent fee for Nickelodeon. In
talking with TCI representatives, it is very clear that they opposed this legislation because,
"must carry" means that some stations must be sacrificed. It is my feeling that TCI has
done everything within the scope of the law to work with the citizens here in Wylie. The
stations being deleted are not really popular except for MTV, possibly. However, AMC is
being restored and Nickelodeon will be provided at no extra cost.
Please understand that there may be further changes in the future since cable carriers
have until October of 1993 to make changes. These changes may come from the federal
level, not the individual cable carriers. JoAnn will be here Tuesday night to better explain
the impacts of the cable system on our Wylie citizens.
Contact: Ronda Dorchester
1I TCITCI Cablevision sion ofof DallasNorth,Inc.Texas
SM,�I (214) 320-7543
TCI Cablevision of the Metroplex
We're taking television into tomorrow.
NEWS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 16, 1993
TCI CABLEVISION OF NORTH TEXAS TO CHANGE LINEUP
TO MAKE ROOM FOR LOCAL BROADCASTERS
Dallas, Texas, (June 16, 1993) -- TCI Cablevision of North Texas
announced today that it must change its channel lineup to make room for
local broadcast stations that the system is now required by law to
carry. In the Wylie and Sachse areas, stations KLDT, KFWD, KDTN, KUVN
and KDTX will be added to our system. To make room for these new
stations the system will have to delete QVC, MTV and CNBC from the
system and change the positions of Sneak Prevue (to 3) , KXTX (to 7) , The
Family Channel (to 26) , The Weather Channel (to 20) , WTBS (to 29) and
Lifetime (to 35) . TCI Cablevision of North Texas which serves McKinney,
Allen, Stonebridge, Southfork, Princeton, Wylie, Sachse and St. Paul
will take this action on July 6, 1993 to comply with the "must carry"
provision of the 1992 Cable Act, which was adopted by Congress last
October. Under the "must carry" regulation, cable operators are required
to carry all qualified local television broadcast stations.
"We regret any inconvenience this may cause our customers and we are
doing our best to avoid disruptions, " said General Manager Joann
Holtzclaw. "However, since we have limited channel capacity, we need to
delete an existing cable channel to make room for the 'must carry'
stations. "
- More -
Contact:
1565 Chenautt Street
Dallas,Texas 75228-5499
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Contact: Ronda Dorchester
s.K1
TCI Cablevision of Dallas,Inc.
TC I TCI Cablevision of North Texas
TCI Cablevision of the Metroplex (214) 320-7543
We're taking television into tomorrow.
NEWS RELEASE
Holtzclaw explained that a telephone survey of customers was conducted
to determine the system's least-watched channels. Those channels turned
out to be QVC, MTV and CNBC. Holtzclaw added that new cable technology
will greatly increase channel capacity in the next few years. At that
time the system may be able to reinstate some channels.
In addition, the new Cable Act provision may mean other changes for
TCI Cablevision of North Texas viewers down the road. Qualified "must
carry" stations are entitled to specific channel positions, even if
those positions are already in use. As a result, TCI Cablevision of
North Texas may need to reposition certain channels several times. It is
expected that a final channel position lineup will be in place by
October 1.
TCI Cablevision of North Texas is committed to developing a good working
relationship with our local broadcasters, while at the same time
minimizing the inconvenience and confusion to our viewers, " said
Holtzclaw. "We will continue to provide top-quality programming and
service to our customers. "
TCI Cablevision of North Texas customers have been given notice of the
channel changes. The system also notified local television programming
guides about the new channel lineup.
— 30 —
Contact:
1565 Chenault Street
Dallas,Texas 75228-5499
An Equal Opportunity Employer
- We're taking television
into tomorrow.
_
SAA
TO C@b|eV's'{}nof Texas, Inc.
�
June 16. 199�
�
Citv of Wylie
P. D. Box 428
-- Wylie, Texas 75098
Dear Mr. Norwood ,
�
1 understand the concerns voiced by you in our recent telephone
conversation. I would like to make certain that the city
officials and citizens of Wylie are well aware that TCI fought
~ this legislation vigorously. We felt that it would impact our
subscribers and the industry negatively in a number of areas.
~ I am enclosing several items which will enable you to more
clearly understand TCI ' s prospective regarding the action which
the 1992 cahle act has made necessary. I would particularly like
_ to bring your attention to the letter dated September 10' 1992
which was addressed to Mayor Akin. This letter details a number
of our concerns including the forcing of cable operators to dryp
_ popular cablc networks in favor of additional local broadcast
net"orks. Please also note that in this letter , we urged you to
contact your CongressmEn to vote no to this form of cable
regulation. Also enclosem is a copy of a press reLaase again
-~ stating tne concerns of the cable i ,2ustry and a coPy OF the
Section cf the act which details the carriage requirevavts,
Although TCI opposed this legislation prior to its passage . we
are 70w taking all :ecessary action to comply fully. We will
continue to do so as the calendar triggers further measures. TCI
Cablevision of North Texas, Inc . is committed to serving its
~ comn,un1ty and subscribers and will attempt to cause as little
disruption and inconvenience as possible while acting as directed
by the law.
_
If I can assist you in further understanding the details of this
act I would appreciate the opportunity to do so.
�
Sincerely ,
~ �
J�Ann HoltzcIaw
3eneral Manager
~
'~
n Prestige Circle,Suite 1m
Allen,Tx75002-342s
~ (e14)727*723
FAX(214)n90-7s10
We're taking television
into tomorrow.
felICI Cablevision of Texas. Inc.
September 10, 1992
The Honorable John Akin
Mayor, City of Wylie
2000 N. Highway 78
Wylie, TX 75098
Dear Mayor Akin:
It has come to our attention that there are some serious
misconceptions with regard to cable legislation (S. 12 and HR4850)
currently being considered in a joint Congressional conference
committee.
First, and perhaps most importantly, this bill could raise, not
lower, monthly cable rates for the 1, 314 subscribers in Wylie.
Indeed, the U.S. Department of Commerce estimates that this
legislation could mean increased costs of $23 to $51 per year for
each cable subscriber. While cable legislation may have started
out as consumer protection legislation several years ago, it is far
from "consumer friendly" today.
Rather than protecting consumers, this bill has become a boondoggle
for our competitors which will stifle investment and innovation in
the cable industry. Let me give you just a few examples of how
this might occur.
First, the Senate bill contains retransmission consent provisions
which would allow the broadcasters to demand compensation for
carriage of their "free" signals. CBS Chairman Laurence Tisch
testified before a House subcommittee that retransmission fees
could reach $1 billion a year. The effect of this provision would
be to divert funds from the development of new and innovative cable
technology and programming to pay for over-the-air "free TV" .
Cable operators would have no choice but to pass such a massive new
expense on to subscribers.
Second, the bill's "forced program access" provisions mandate that -
cable networks sell their programming to all interested parties.
The effect of this legislation would be to deny cable networks the
right to determine who gets to purchase their product, as well as
to set the price, terms, and conditions under which their
programming will be made available. This is an unprecedented
denial of cable programmers' intellectual property rights. No
other media industry is required to sell its copyrighted property
to all comers - not even the broadcasters, whose programming rights
are protected under FCC rules.
:11 542
The Honorable John Akin
September 10, 1992
Page Two
Additionally, the impact of the federal, state and local
regulations imposed by this legislation will be felt by all
taxpayers. The following statistics are those of the Federal
government:
* The Federal government will spend at least $100 million to
implement the regulatory provisions of this legislation for
the first five years. (Congressional Budget Office)
* State and local governments are expected to spend another
$8-14 million per year to fulfill their regulatory
responsibilities. (Congressional Budget Office)
* Up to 44% of the FCC's current budget could be spent solely
on regulating the cable industry. (Department of Commerce)
Other legislative mandates would include:
* forcing cable operators to install federally designated
equipment, such as set-top converters, in all subscriber
homes.
* reserving up to 15 channels of a 36 channel system for
broadcast networks, forcing operators to drop popular cable
networks such as CNN or C-Span.
Only 9 of the 83 pages of the Senate bill dealt with rates,
customer service and picture quality. The House version is very
similar in its approach. The overwhelming remainder of both bills
is devoted to provisions fueled by our media rival's attempts to
gain a competitive advantage on the cable industry.
This legislation is extreme. The cable industry has acknowledged
there might be a rationale for some rate guidelines. However, the
cable reregulation bills impose so much regulation that they will
end up levying heavy costs on the industry, and driving rates up
for consumers.
We urge you to contact your Congressmen to vote no to this form of -
cable regulation legislation. Please don't add cable to the
growing list of depressed industries, which will likely happen if
Congress passes this excessive regulation.
Sincerely,
athi Noe
Area Manager, Government Affairs
PUBLIC LAW 102-385—OCr. 5, 1992 106 STAT. 1471
the receipt of such video programming, other than (A) video
programming carried on the basic service tier, and (B) video
programming offered on a per channel or per program basis.".
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 47 USC 543 note.
shall take effect 180 days after the date of enactment of this
Act, except that the authority of the Federal Communications Com-
mission to prescribe regulations is effective on such date of enact-
ment.
SEC.4.CARRIAGE OF LOCAL COMMERCIAL TELEVISION SIGNALS.
Part II of title VI of the Communications Act of 1934 is amended
by inserting after section 613 (47 U.S.C. 533) the following new
section:
"SEC. 614. CARRIAGE OF LOCAL COMMERCIAL TELEVISION SIGNALS. 47 USC 534.
"(a) CARRIAGE OBLIGATIONS.—Each cable operator shall carry
on the cable system of that operator,the signals of local commercial
television stations and qualified low power stations as provided
by this section. Carriage of additional broadcast television signals
on such system shall be at the discretion of such operator, subject
to section 325(b).
"(b)SIGNALS REQUIRED.—
"(1) IN GENERAL.—(A) A cable operator of a cable system
with 12 or fewer usable activated channels shall carry the
signals of at least three local commercial television stations,
except that if such a system has 300 or fewer subscribers,
it shall not be subject to any requirements under this section
so long as such system does not delete from carriage by that
system any signal of a broadcast television station.
"(B) A cable operator of a cable system with more than
12 usable activated channels shall carry the signals of local
commercial television stations, up to one-third of the aggregate
number of usable activated channels of such system.
"(2) SELECTION OF SIGNALS.—Whenever the number of local
commercial television stations exceeds the maximum number
of signals a cable system is required to carry under paragraph
(1), the cable operator shall have discretion in selecting which
such stations shall be carried on its cable system, except that—
"(A) under no circumstances shall a cable operator
carry a qualified low power station in lieu of a local corn-
_ mercial television station; and
"(B) if the cable operator elects to carry an affiliate
of a broadcast network (as such term is defined by the
Commission by regulation), such cable operator shall carry
the affiliate of such broadcast network whose city of license
reference point, as defined in section 76.53 of title 47,
Code of Federal Regulations (in effect on January 1, 1991),
or any successor regulation thereto, is closest to the prin-
cipal headend of the cable system.
"(3) CONTENT TO BE CARRIED.--(A) A cable operator shall
carry in its entirety, on the cable system of that operator,
the primary video, accompanying audio, and line 21 closed
caption transmission of each of the local commercial television
stations carried on the cable system and, to the extent tech-
nically feasible,program-related material carried in the vertical
blanking interval or on subcarriers. Retransmission of other
material in the vertical blanking internal or other nonprogram-
related material (including teletext and other subscription and
B-12
TCI CABLEVISION OF NORTH TEXAS
SACHSE/WYLIE
CURRENT CHANNEL REPOSITIONING CHANNEL AS OF
CHANNEL LINE—UP /DELETIONS JULY 6, 1993
2 Reserved KDTN (PBS-2),
3 KXTX (IND-39) To Channel 7 SNEAK
4 KDFW (CBS-4)
5 KXAS (NBC-5)
6 THE MOVIE CHANNEL
7 SNEAK To Channel 3 KXTX (IND-39)
8 WFAA (ABC-8)
9 KDAF (IND-33)
10 DISNEY
11 KTVT (IND-11)
12 KTXA (IND-21)
13 KERA (PBS-13)
14 ENCORE
15 KDFI (IND-27)
16 SHOWTIME
17 WTBS To Channel 29 KDTX (IND-58)
18 The Weather Channel To Channel 20 KLDT (IND-55)
19 Lifetime To Channel 35 KFWD (IND-52)
20 QVC Delete The Weather Channel
21 HBO
22 CINEMAX
23 The Family Channel To Channel 26 KUVN (IND-23)
24 WGN
25 CNN
26 MTV _ Delete The Family Channel
27 Discovery
28 TNN
29 CNBC Delete TBS
30 AMC
31 TNT
32 HSE
33 USA
34 ESPN
35 Reserved Lifetime
36 Nickelodeon
60 REQUEST Pay—Per—View
61 REQUEST Pay—Per—View
Revised 6/10/93
City of Wylie
AGENDA COMMUNICATION
SUBMITTED BY: City Manager DIRECTOR: Steve Norwood
DATE REFERENCE NO. SUBJECT
6/22/93 6 Ordinance Amending TU Franchise Fee
SUMMARYQF.$acnied is an ordiance provided by TU Electrict to amend the franchise fee
from /t�hjree percent to four percent and to extend the term of the franchise an
additional fifteen years to our existing agreement. We would propose that Council
approve the ordinance which does not obligate the City to extend the franchise an
additional fifteen years. However, we only just received this ordinance and the City
Attorney has not had opportunity to review it.
ALTERNATIVES:
(1) Approve Ordinance
(2) Table Approval
(3) Deny Approval
(4) Approval Alternate Ordinance Drafted by City Attorney
AdISItifF4MilTrWithhold a recommendation until the City Attorney makes sure that the
ordinance provided by TU does not remove any of our options or benefits. -If the TU
I ordinance is not satisfactory, we will provide an alternate ordinance for Council to
consider. 0 ._ p't'- year
_ ,'e C 0 Vey ' CC 1 i)` ,a-` 1A- f��s
/ 40 ' - 4r /NANCE NO.
Q/ I - ; ,r ' ` dEXISTING FRANCHISE BETWEEN p,HE CITY AND
DIFFEREN'T
E TO PROVIDE FOR FOR
,, .44)f` k ' =x A"". , ,;-0 RIC COMPANY EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING
` AN ELECTRIC FINDING AND
/-• • . 'x INGCOMPANY
-' - -,-,00 T. UTILITIES
C . ,- r ";- MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE
RDINDECLARINGEAI EMERGENCY.
PASSED IS
e� � K. �" S REQUIRED BY LAW; AND
ti» k
� an (hereinafter called
4/0 / `-' has Utilities Electric Company electric
_` ' providing
is engaged in the business of
"TU Elea_ /- the public streets,
utility service within the City and is using
grounds and rights-of-ways within the City
for that purpose
alleys, passed by
the terms of a franchise ordinance heretofore duly b
under accepted by TU Electric
the governing body of the City and duly
and
WHEREAS, TUElectric has, pursuant to said franchise
ordinance, been paying
to the City a sum equal to three percent
gross receipts from the retail sale of electric p h
(3%) of its g rivileges set fort
and energy within the City for the rights and p
said franchise ordinance and, in addition
thereto, has
in ursuant to Section
reimbursed the City for its ratemaking expenses p
24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act; and
WHEREAS, the City and TU Electric desire to
amend said
provide for a different consideration to
franchise ordinance to P of its gross receipts
consist of a sum equal to four percent (4%)
from the retail sale of electric power and energy within the City,
other things, TU
which different consideration includes, amongfor its ratemaking and
Electric' s obligation to reimburse the City
other regulatory expenses to be incurred by the City involving the
regulation of TU Electric;
Now, Therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF THE CITY OF
, TEXAS :
SECTION 1 . The consideration payable by TU Electric for the
rights and privileges granted to TU Electric by the franchise
ordinance heretofore duly passed by the governing body of this City
and duly accepted by TU Electric is hereby changed to be four
percent (4i) of its gross receipts from the retail sale of electric
power and energy within the corporate limits of the City, said
changed percentage to be applied to said gross receipts beginning
on June 1, 1993, and being payable as specified in said franchise
ordinance and based upon the same time periods as specified in said
franchise ordinance and being payment for the said rights and
privileges during the period specified in said franchise ordinance,
said payment being in lieu of and shall be accepted as payment for
all of TU Electric' s obligations to pay municipal charges, fees,
rentals, pole rentals, wire taxes, inspection fees, easement taxes,
franchise taxes, certain regulatory expenses under Section 24 of
the Public Utility Regulatory Act or any similar or successor law,
or other charges and taxes of every kind, except ad valorem taxes,
sales and use taxes, and special taxes and assessments for public
improvements .
-2-
SECTION 2 . TU Electric shall make a one-time adjustment to the
first payment due after June 1, 1993 , under the said franchise
ordinance heretofore duly passed by the governing body of this City
and duly accepted by TU Electric for the purpose of making the
changed consideration as specified in Section 1 hereof effective on
June 1, 1993 , without altering the payment dates specified in said
franchise ordinance, the amount of said adjustment being calculated
as follows : (a) TU Electric shall determine the monthly average of
its gross receipts from the retail sale of electric power and
energy within the City during the period upon which the next
franchise payment due to the City following June 1, 1993, is based;
(b) the said monthly average of its said gross receipts shall be
multiplied by 1% (0 . 01) ; and (c) the product so calculated shall be
multiplied by the number of whole months from June 1, 1993, through
the last day of the last month of the period for which the next
franchise payment due to the City following June 1, 1993 , is made.
The amount of said adjustment shall be added to the said next
franchise payment following June 1, 1993, determined in accordance
with the provisions of said franchise ordinance as was in effect
prior to this amendment .
SECTION 3 . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section
1 hereof, if TU Electric files general rate cases and the City
incurs cumulative expenses, otherwise reimbursable by TU Electric
under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act or similar or
successor law, in excess of $4 million, then in such event, TU
-3-
Electric shall reimburse all of the expenses incurred by the City
in connection with all general rate cases filed during the period
ended fifteen (15) years from the effective date hereof in excess
of said $4 million. The term "general rate case" as used in this
Section means a rate case initiated by TU Electric in which it
seeks to increase its rates charged to a substantial number of its
customer classes in the City and elsewhere in its system and in
which TU Electric' s overall revenues are determined in setting such
rates . City agrees to exercise reasonable best efforts,
considering the facts and circumstances, to keep its expenses on
average to under $1, 000, 000 per general rate case .
SECTION 4 . Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1 hereof,
TU Electric will continue to reimburse the City' s ratemaking
expenses, if any, in connection with the appeal and any remand of
Public Utility Commission of Texas Docket No. 9300 that are
otherwise reimbursable under Section 24 of the Public Utility
Regulatory Act, and will continue to reimburse the City' s
ratemaking expenses, if any, in connection with Public Utility
Commission of Texas Docket No. 11735 that are otherwise
reimbursable under Section 24 of the Public Utility Regulatory Act
to the extent that said ratemaking expenses are incurred through
the entry of the last action by the Public Utility Commission of
Texas (i .e. , the said Commission' s order overruling the last motion
for rehearing) in said Docket No. 11735 ; the City hereby agrees
that any ratemaking expenses incurred in connection with said
-4-
Docket No. 11735 that the City incurs on appeal of said order will
be the City' s sole responsibility and further agrees -- in the
events that the City is a participant in the joint intervention of
cities managed by the Steering Committee of TU Electric Service
Area Cities intervening in Docket No. 11735, that the City decides
to continue to participate with the Steering Committee in such
appeal of said order, and TU Electric is required to reimburse said
Steering Committee for ratemaking expenses under Section 24 of the
Public Utility Regulatory Act that are incurred on appeal of said
order in Docket No. 11735 -- to reimburse TU Electric the City' s
share of reimbursable expenses related to said appeal and owed by
TU Electric to said Steering Committee determined by the
methodology chosen by the said Steering Committee (the City to
notify TU Electric of the method so chosen by the Steering
Committee prior to the submission of an invoice by the Steering
Committee for the payment by TU Electric of said reimbursable
expenses related to said appeal) .
SECTION 5 . In all respects, except as specifically and
expressly amended by this ordinance, the said franchise ordinance
heretofore duly passed by the governing body of this City and duly
accepted by TU Electric shall remain in full force and effect
according to its terms until said franchise ordinance terminates as
provided therein.
SECTION 6 . This ordinance shall take effect from and after its
-5-
final passage and TU Electric' s acceptance. TU Electric shall,
within fifteen (15) days from the passage of this ordinance, file
its written acceptance of this ordinance with the Office of the
City Secretary in substantially the following form:
To the Honorable Mayor and City Council :
Texas Utilities Electric Company (TU Electric) ,
acting by and through the undersigned authorized officer,
hereby accepts, on this the day of , 1993 ,
Ordinance No. amending the current franchise
between the City and TU Electric . Further, in
recognition of the fact that the current franchise
between the City and TU Electric terminates prior to the
expiration of fifteen (15) years from the effective date
of said amendment, TU Electric hereby agrees to negotiate
in good faith with the City for a new franchise to be
effective on or before the termination of the current
franchise and to include in said new franchise a
provision that will give the City the full benefit of the
fifteen (15) year period provided for in Section 3 of
said amendment .
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY
By:
President
SECTION 7 . It is hereby officially found and determined that
the meeting at which this ordinance is passed is open to the public
as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and
purpose of said meeting was given as required.
SECTION 8 . An emergency exists necessitating the suspension of
any rule requiring multiple readings of this ordinance and all
multiple readings of this ordinance are hereby waived.
-6-
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF THE CITY OF
, TEXAS, this the day of
, 1993 .
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
-7-
City of Wylie
AGENDA COMMUNICATION
SUBMITTED BY: LEGAL DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: FN P . DF I TFR
DATE REFERENCE NO. SUBJECT
6-17-93 7 AMENDMENT OF ANIMAL RESTRIANT REQUIRMENTS
SUMMARY OF SUBJECT:
THE CITY ' S CURRENT LEASE LAW ALLOSW AN ANIMAL TO BE IN PUBLIC WITHOUT
ACTUAL PHYSICAL RESTRAINT, IF THE ANIMAL IS OBEDIENT TO THE COMMANDS OF THE I
PERSON IT IS WITH. DUE TO CITIZEN COMPLAINTS AN ORDINANCE HAS BEEN PREPARED
WHICH AMENDS THE CODE TO REQUIRE ACTUAL RESTRAINT .
THE ORDINANCE ALSO PLACES A LIMIT ON THE NUMBER OF ADULT ANIMALS WHICH MAY
BE KEPT AT A RESIDENCE. THERE IS CURRENTLY NO SUCH RESTRICTION AND A PERSON
COULD HAVE AS MANY ANIMALS AS THEY MIGHT DESIRE . MOST CITIES IN COLLIN
COUNTY HAVE SIMILAR ORDINANCES AND LIMIT THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ANIMALS TO THREE.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) PASS ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED
2) PASS ORDINANCE AFTER MAKING MODIFICATIONS DEEMED APPROPRIATE
3) DECLINE TO PASS ORDINANCE ON SUBJECT - TAKE NO ACTION
ACTION REQUESTED:
ALTERNATE 1 "ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE REQUIRING ACTUAL PHYSICAL RESTRAINT OF
ANIMALS AND PLACING A LIMIT ON THE NUMBER OF ADULT ANIMALS WHICH MAY BE
HARBORED AT A RESIDENCE"
I ,
1 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council Ook-
1101411111
FROM: Steve Deiter
SUBJECT: Amendment to "Leash Law"
DATE: June 16, 1993
A citizen recently expressed a conc- i to Councilwoman Allen regarding the City's
animal control people not wanting to enforce the City leash law. The problem being that the
animal control people are interpreting the current code provision on restraint(see attached copy)
to say than an animal under voice command or control is "restrained" as required by the
ordinance.
The same citizen was in to see me. In discussing the matter with him I read the above
referenced section and another section (see attached copy) which defines the word restraint as
it is used in the code. As you can see the code itself says that if the animal is under voice
control it he is restrained. The citizen was satisfied that animal control people had been correctly
interpreting the City Code but thought the code should be changed.
The obvious problem, and the reason the citizen was concerned, is summed up in the "Far
Side" cartoon which I came across minutes before typing this memo, and altered ever so slightly
to fit the situation (see attached copy).
Councilwoman Allen has requested the code be changed so that it requires actual physical
attachment of the animal to satisfy the restraint requirement. I have drafted an ordinance which
accomplishes the desired change by simply changing the definition of restraint A copy of the
proposed ordinance is forwarded herewith for your consideration.
Sherry Brennen collected copies of surrounding Cities' (Murphy, Allen, Plano, and
Garland) leash laws for comparison. All of the surveyed cities have a requirement of actual
physical restraint, and do not allow for restraint via voice control.
The City's animal control laws should also be amended in at least one other particular,
that of placing a limitation on the number of adult dogs or cats that may be kept at a given
residence within the City. Currently the City Code has no such limitation and an owner could
keep a dozen or even more dogs and/or cats at their residence. In talking with the animal control
office on the above issue she suggested that the City pass some type of ordinance placing a limit
1
such numbers.
She stated that people had actually asked her what towns in the County didn't have such
a limit, for the purpose of finding out where they might want to move. She of course has to tell
them that Wylie has no limit.
On the chance that the Council would like to take action on this issue as well, I included
a provision in the proposed ordinance creating such a limitation. The ordinance prohibits the
harboring of more than five adult dogs and/or cats per household. The number is an arbitrary
one and if the Council prefers a number that is lower or higher the ordinance can easily be
changed to reflect the change.
As usual I welcome any questions, comments, or concerns which you might have on this
issue.
cc: Steve Norwood
2
(f) Identification Photograph. All (b) No person shall give away any animal as a
owners of registered pit bulls shall prize for,or as an inducement to enter any contest,
provide to the city two (2) color game or competition,or as an inducement to enter
photographs of the registered animal in a place of amusement, or offer such animal as an
two(2) different poses showing the color incentive to enter into any business establishment
and approximate size of the animal. whereby the offer was for the purpose of attracting
trade.
(g) Reporting Requirements. All owners
of registered pit bull dogs shall, within (c) No person shall knowingly expose any known
ten (10) days of an incident, report the poisonous substance, whether mixed with food or
following information in writing to the not, so that the same may be eaten by any pet or
city: domestic animal.
(1) Removal from the city or death (Ord.87-57 adopted 10-13-87,Sec. 19
of said dog;
(2) Birth of offspring; § 18.00 RESTRAINT*
(3) New address if owner moves
within the city. (a) All animals shall be kept under restraint.
(b) That the city council shall, by resolution (b) No animal shall be permitted to run at large.
ratify all fees and charges to be collected under this
.� chapter for the registration, impoundment, (Ord.89-2 adopted 1-10-89,Sec.7)
boarding of animal, and for the pick up of dead
animals at veterinarian hospitals or clinics.
§ 19.00 3 DIM DIN!lilfilc si.Zme+•,isna"
(Ord.89-2 adopted 1-10-89,Sec.6) jV UI S A NC F,S t
§ 16.00 J.IYFSTOC'K & FOWL Every owner shall exercise proper care and control
of his or her animals to prevent them from
(a) No person shall engage in keeping livestock
becoming a public nuisance.
W within the corporate limits of the city, except in (Ord.87-57 adopted 10-13-87,Sec.21)
districts zoned by the comprehensive zoning
ordinance of the city as agriculture. No more than
one(1) animal defined as being livestock per four § 20.00 t1NIMAI. WASTE,
thousand five hundred (4,500) square feet of
available space may be kept in any agricultural
zoning district or residential lot of one(1)acre or (a) It shall be unlawful and considered a public
- more in size. nuisance for any person to allow any pen,
(b) It shall be unlawful to own or keep chickens, enclosure, yard or similar place used .for the
ducks, turkeys, geese,peacocks,or guineas within keeping of animals to become unsanitary,
the corporate limits of the city, except in offensive by reason of odor, or disagreeable to
agricultural zoned districts, lakes,and public park persons of ordinary sensibilities residing in the
lands vicinity thereof because of flies or other insects.
Any condition injurious to public health caused by
(Ord.87-57 adopted 10-13-87,Sec. 18) improper waste disposal will be considered a
violation of this chapter.
x. § 17.00 PROTECTION OF ANIMALS
*State Law reference—Authority to order
(a) Chickens or ducklings younger than eight(8) restraint of dogs and cats. V.T.C.A., Health & Safety,
weeks of age may not be sold in quantities of less § 826.033-826.034.
than ten(10)to a single purchaser. tState Law reference—Authority of city to define
and prohibit public nuisances, V.T.C.A.. Local
Government Code, § 217.042.
2-10
§ 1.00 DEFINITIONS Pet shop — Any person, partnership, or
corporation, whether operated separately or in
connection with another business enterprise,except
The following words, terms and phrases, when for a licensed kennel, that buys, sells, boards, or
used in this section shall have the meanings grooms any species of animal.
ascribed to them in this chapter,except where the
context clearly indicates a different meaning: Public nuisance — Any animal which molests
passersby or passing vehicles, attacks other
Animal—Any live vertebrate creature,domestic or animals, trespasses on school grounds, roams at
wild. large, damages public or private property, barks,
whines, meows, or howls in an excessive
Animal control officer—A person designated by continuous,or untimely fashion.
the city manager to represent and act for the city in
the impounding of animals,controlling of animals Restraint—Secured by a leash or lead or under the
running at large and as otherwise required in this control of a responsible person and obedient to that
section. person's commands, or within the real property
limits of its owner and under the control of a
Animal shelter—A facility operated by the city for responsible person and obedient to that person's
the purpose of impounding or caring for animals commands.
held under the authority of this chapter or state
law. Riding schoollstable — Any place which has
available for hire, boarding, and/or riding
At large— Off the premises of the owner and not instruction any horse, pony, donkey, mule, or
under the control of the owner or another person burro.
authorized by the owner to care for the animal by
leash,cord,chain or rope. Vaccination — An injection of United States
Department of Agriculture approved rabies vaccine
Circus — A commercial variety show featuring administered every twelve (12) months or as
animal acts for public entertainment. prescribed by the Texas Board of Health by a
licensed veterinarian.
Commercial animal establishment—Any pet shop,
auction, riding school or stable, zoological park, Veterinary hospital/clinic — Any establishment
circus,recurring animal exhibition or kennel, maintained and operated by a licensed veterinarian
for surgery,diagnosis and treatment of diseases and
Kennel — Any premises wherein any person injuries of animals.
engages in the business of boarding, breeding,
buying, letting for hire, training for a fee, or (Ord.87-56 adopted 10-13-87,Sec.2)
selling dogs and cats.
Vicious animal—Any individual animal which has
Livestock — All domesticated animals including, demonstrated an inclination, desire or intent to
but not limited to, horses, cows, mules, goats, attack another animal or a person without
sheep,and pigs. provocation as determined by the animal control
warden and/or a licensed veterinarian.
Owner— Any person, partnership. or corporation
owning, keeping or harboring one (1) or more (Ord.89-2 adopted 1-10-89,Sec. 1)
animals. An animal shall be deemed to be
harbored if it is fed or sheltered for three (3) Wild animal — Any live monkey (non-human
consecutive days or more. primate), raccoon, skunk, ferret, fox, wolf, bear,
leopard, panther, tiger, lion, lynx, or any other
Performing animal exhibition — Any spectacle, animal which can be normally found in the wild
display,act or event other than circuses in which state, including poisonous snakes, boa
performing animals are used. constrictors, alligators, crocodiles and other
reptiles.
pet — Any animal kept for pleasure rather than Zoological park— Any facility other than a pet
utility.
shop or kennel,displaying or exhibiting one(1)or
2-3
„.. I FAR $IDI By Gary Larson
•.. . :.:•:• • " ••••••• ••
liii
ii
II
•........ • ..
• . ..•
• . .. 4,1“ifam...„.11..4 . ”Oftsesag fru Poiie -. . •. .-. .
.... .
::: --',. ---:•:-:-.•.-:
1 I II I i NM,.f ' a...• . . • • .
—.
1 xt
1 '
Ills
4.. •
0.4i 1
•
1.. ... ' •..::::1:**:: i".?...7•11:*:
•
. Alpe.1 ril"i. IV\CAS k f i • •
•••• .••••
•.•.: . ••::::
•• <el V.14 1 j ..' UOICe SI*.:::::. ,......./••••••••••••••• • %....:•:•:*•••••:::<•:"•..:
•01' Cot&V1%.Ct v1/4d . ••
:-:-:-....!: .::::::::::;:pkx::::.:*•::.
line/.thien I cacht th• ... :.:„..:... . ..,...... :........... .•.......:•:•,),:x.:::...„ •
is ::::::-::::.::.::::::::::::.:::::::::::. k.--• -.....;,... :::::1:::*:1,1: .,:a:i..
1 .
.- :::•:.::::::::::-...... -.:,......-:•:::•:•:::.::;::::•:•:::•:•:•:.:
.„ „.
o0 lb. cat and really ic;cked ....:.:.:,:.::::....:..................:::. .::::.:.:.: :::::,.......:...„.......„,
.: : :. :: :::::. : ... :....,::•:::.:.::.
-.-:,::.:,::::::.:.:::::,K*1.....„... :.::::„::::.:, :::::,,,,::,:„,,•,:,:;::::,
--1- butt.Once ./ drove my
i i s
----:.:-..:-:------ 60,1.0,wilioir.
master's Car 1 C411 Mran
. -... .
4 greyhoond.... .1 can bark -.:;...- :-:.:.•-•:.:-...-.:-...2: ...-_I-.-:.....•:.:::::::::::::111:111:.:::0
.... 1 ri seven Idly,-P$ -• - ..• . - - -•:-:: -:::::::::::::*::.:.:.:::.
; - - • - :• ••- .:::::. ::::
-:--::' --- -!: -_.':.:-:::•.•.:.-- '.:.:::::.::-:::::..::::::.::::-...... .....'i::::::1:*:::::::.:::::::::::.:::::::::.::::.:.
7.31::.• . :::_ --._. - ::::•::.:::•:3:5: 5::,.•:-...x.:::::::
._ •-.. 7 : .:' '"-" -• •-:••••:•:••••:•:. •7••••••::::::::::.:•:.:.
v• .••- • :' . - • ..*:•::.::.:;::.::; :::::::::::*K•4::::.
_
..;:::•:•!•::::4:•..•:::•:;::::•:4.:':'.' ....... ...-- . • • • •• •••••• . ...
..::::::•:•:4::•:::::•::::..!•:•:•::::::::::i:4•••••• - .. .. ... ., . •••..:!.' ". ' • - " ....::,:•:•"•:. '•:•::::7•.:.:.:.:.:4::
•••••::• 4•,.:••:;::::::::1% ..Z •-*;•• .r.4..•
.:*i::::::::•...„. ••••4:::,:•::.t:::-409fJ.::::• (Yk. - ::: ...;;,,,-,7, ..*. - ..In.
P.;),idi."
'" •••:::::::::::::Kft:::' *:::::i:::;• :•*:-•••••-••:•:•:' ./". "%& 446%10'•i'•....... .:•--.V...1.• a. ....._..-
:::::::::.::::::::•:•%:§ •:•$:•••: • N. ;14:::•0,..:.„ ,.,. • 11 7.* •'''. '' ' •. - • - /-..414/, :..:•::i::.: f f if Iii.'if
7 c„.. .5,• :„.••-...••••'ys::..:.....:- . ::::•.V.Iv • %C.•e, :...:-....../--)..•- ——
- -- .-.•:•::•:•::.•••-.r ,,, ;r
... "•:"....,..' : _ ..:•:•!•:,!•:•:•" ,/, fir IA ."r • •
,,,„...--•.••,,,-*•• ,f,...../A•••••••• ..::::::::•:::." 7/ /Pt.,;, '
-,.. •
' // ,1: /:',1,1
... • , :::•:•:•:•:•' •,,/ly el,•i•;
;•:•:•:•:•:."-ff. I., , ii ,
- :::::::::-:-• 07, 1 _1 i• i 1
'••'- •...•::- ;1,.‘4
...'•'., ;11/ ,f
,
- . .:- .•.• ::•::::::-. '7./7 , 1,i,,,,., . .-:•:-:•::: .
. .. . •.-;-:.... ..:-;:ii:..* .-.k-
• / .
..ig:K: .-. .; . .•:•:•••• , ,,-..,,,,../;,,jfrif . •
:•::::i:::::. .• . • .....:
,..7.:77!7.:.•••••••
.- •—•-• . ."••:7*** ••••••••:•:•:::-:;:.:::::.:::::: 0 - •. . „, ...„,, ... .. . . .
- --•.•
-:•:-:--:-.•
_ -:•:•:••••••:•:-::.-:-:-:-:-:-:•.• . •
Y.4.4ogri" ••/5 :.0f-*:::•:•:.:•:•:•:•:•;:•:•;•:::):•:-.... ... . • .
. .. .• •
V. "Edgar! Leave him be! ... Always best to let
sleeping dogs lie."
.... .
. .
. .
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, AMENDING SECTION 1.0
OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE WYLIE CITY CODE BY CHANGING THE DEFINITION OF
"RESTRAINT"AS THEREIN DEFINED AND ADDING A DEFINITION FOR'ADULT
ANIMAL"; AND FURTHER AMENDING SAID CHAPTER 2 BY ADDITION OF A
NEW SECTION LIMITING THE NUMBER OF ADULT DOGS AND CATS WHICH
MAY BE KEPT BY A HOUSEHOLD; REPEALING ALL CONFLICTING
ORDINANCES; CONTAINING A PENALTY CLAUSE; CONTAINING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the definition of animal restraint currently contained in the Wylie City Code
is such that it includes within the definition those animals who are under the control of a
responsible person and obedient to that person's commands; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that allowing for restraint by voice command
does not provide citizens with sufficient protection from animal attacks, due to the possibility that
such animal may not always obey such commands, and therefore has determined to require actual
physical restraint; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has, in its legislative capacity, further determined that it is in
the best interest of the safety, welfare and enjoyment of the citizens to limit the number of adult
dogs and/or cats or other animals which may be kept or harbored at a residence and therefore
desires to place a reasonable limitation the number which may be kept;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WYLIE, TEXAS, as follows:
SECTION I
That Section 1.00 of Chapter 2, Animal Control, of the Wylie City Code be, and it
hereby is, amended by deleting the current definition of "restraint" as therein contained and
substituting the following in place thereof:
"Restraint - Completely confined by a building, wall or fence of sufficient strength or
construction to prevent the animals escape therefrom, except when such animal is either
on a leash, or held in the hands of the owner or keeper with sufficient strength to control
the animal, or under the direct supervision of the owner within the limits of the owners's
private property or within an automobile or other vehicle of its owner. "
1
and by the addition of the following definition:
"Adult Animal - Any dog, cat or other animal six months of age or older. "
SECTION II
That Chapter 2 of the Wylie City Code dealing with Animal Control be, and hereby is
amended, by addition of the following section:
"Section 23.00 Limitation on Number Q f Animals
It shall be unlawful for any owner to harbor more than five adult animals of any kind or
combination, unless such owner is lawfully operating a veterinary hospital/clinic,kennel,
pet shop or zoological park. "
SECTION III
Any person violating the provisions of this ordinance, or any part hereof, commits an
unlawful act and shall be subject to the general penalty provisions of the Wylie City Code as set
forth in Section 1-1.06 thereof, as the same now exists or is hereafter amended.
SECTION IV
Should any paragraph, sentence, sub-division, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be
adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid the same shall not affect the validity
of this ordinance as a whole or any part or provision thereof, other than the part or parts as
declared to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional.
SECTION V
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption by the City
Council and publication of its caption as the law and the City Charter provide in such cases.
SECTION VI
That all other ordinances and code provisions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the
extent of any such conflict or inconsistency and all other provisions of the Wylie City Code not
in conflict herewith shall remain in full force and effect.
2
SECTION VII
The repeal of any ordinance, of parts thereof, by the enactment of this Ordinance, shall not
be construed as abandoning any action now pending under or by virtue of such ordinance; nor
shall it have the effect of discontinuing, abating, modifying or altering any penalty accruing or
to accrue, nor as effecting any rights of the municipality under any section or provisions of any
ordinances at the time of passage of this ordinance.
DULY PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas, this
22nd day of June, 1993.
By
John W. Akin
Mayor
ATTEST:
Mary Nichols
City Secretary
Approved:
Steven P. Deiter
City Attorney
3
City of Wylie
AGENDA COMMUNICATION
SUBMITTED BY: City Manager DIRECTOR: Steve Norwood
DATE REFERENCE NO. SUBJECT
6/22/93 8 Resolution Adopting Tax Abatement Guidelines
S"lachea are t'ie tax abatement guidelines proposed for adoption by the City Council.
It is our hope that by taking this first step towards developing economic development
incentives, we can develop a cooperative program with the other governmental
entities.
.. i
MANNAApprove Resolution
(2) Table Resolution
(3) Deny Resoluton
Staff is reclaim-net-fluting that tl re City Ccunuil approve the resatution adopting tax
AC b t l guidelines.
vj
S d�L1 (V; ( ( 71/;sic eve
•
I I
Economic Development Incentives
I. Purpose and Objective
The City of Wylie is committed to the promotion of quality development in all parts
of the city and to an ongoing improvement in the quality of life for it's residents. In
so far as these objectives are generally served by the enhancement and expansion of
the local economy. The City of Wylie will, on a case by case basis, give consideration
to providing incentives as a stimulation for economic development in Wylie. Nothing
herein shall imply or suggest that the City of Wylie is under obligation to provide any
incentive to any applicant. All applications shall be considered on a case by case basis.
H. Criteria for Economic Development Incentives:
The following threshold criteria shall be used to determine whether any Economic
Development Incentives shall be granted to new projects:
1.) The proposed project must create at least ten (10) or more jobs by the end of
the abatement period.
2.) The proposed project must provide for an invest taxable assets within three (3)
years from the commencement of construction.
3.) The project must meet all relevant zoning requirements.
4.) Generally to be eligible, a project must consist of an industrial, commercial, or
warehouse use.
In addition to the minimum requirements stated above, the following subjective
criteria shall be considered prior to granting any economic development incentive.
V 5.) Is the project consistent with the comprehensive plan with or of the City of
Wylie?
6.) What types and costs of public improvements and services (sewer main
extensions, streets, alleys, etc.) will be required of the City? What types and
values of public improvements if any will be made by the applicant?
The City of Wylie recognizes the importance of expansion of the existing business as
,, a key element in the economic development of the City. Therefore, different
criteria for incentive eligibility have been developed for business expansion. In or
eligible for abatement, an expanding business must meet the following criteria:
1.) The project must create ten (10) or more jobs by the end abatement period.
2.) The project must result in an addition of$500,000 in assessed value within the
first year of the abatement.
3.) The project must also meet the criteria as stated p vio ly in this section.
(1(-)141`d— ?(.2
HI. Types of IncentivesW I C f71'
It is the intent of the City of Wylie to evaluate the offering of economic development
incentives on a case by case basis. This individualized design of a total incentive
package is intended to allow a maximum flexibility in addressing the unique concerns
of each applicant while enabling the City to better respond to the changing needs of
the community. Below is a chart which reflects the percentage amount to be abated:
<MAX1MUIiAX ABATEMENT
NEWLY CREATED VALUE OVER 5 YEAR PERIOD
$3 million + 400%
$2 million - $2,999,999 300%
$1 million - $1,999,999 200%
Abatements may be granted for terms from two to five (2 - 5) years but may be
extended to the limits as specified by state law. Abatements of greater than five (5)
years may be considered, only if it can be clearly demonstrated that it is economically
beneficial to the City to do so. Abatement periods in excess of five (5) years must be
approved by a three-quarter vote of the full City Council.
The above chart reflects the maximum tax incentive to be eligible for over a period
not to exceed five (5) years. No applicant may take a percentage greater than 100%
in any given year. For example, the qualified applicant may choose to take the 200%
abatement over a two (2) year period at 100% each year; or may extend it to 50% each
year for four (4) years. The same method would apply to the 300% and 400%
abatement. Please keep in mind that the percentages stated on the right are the
maximum amounts.
IV. Application Procedures
Any person applying for Economic Development Incentives will be required to comply
with several application procedures. Once the application has been completed, the
application will be forwarded to the joint committee on economic development
incentives consisting of elected officials from each of the taxing entities.
V. Recapture
The City of Wylie will have very specific performance standards that will be measured
to ensure that the qualified applicant is adhering to the guidelines, as set forth, and
the Economic Development Incentive Policy. In the event that the company or
individual fails to keep current on ad-valorem or other taxes, or violates the terms and
conditions of the abatement agreement in any fashion; the City of Wylie will have the
option along with the other taxing entities, to recoup any tax monies that were abated.
VI. Assignment
The abatement may be transferred and assigned by the holder to a new owner or lessee
of the same facility upon approval of the City Council; subject to the financial capacity
of the assignee and provided that all conditions and obligations in the abatement
agreement are guaranteed by the execution of a new contractual agreement with the
City of Wylie.
VII. Sunset Provisions
The guidelines and criteria are affective upon the date of their adoption and will
remain in force for two (2) years. At which time all reinvestment zones and tax
abatement contracts created pursuant to its provisions, will be reviewed by the City
Council of Wylie to determine whether the goals of the abatement program has been
achieved. Based upon that review, the guidelines and criteria may be modified,
renewed or eliminated.
VIII. Note
In order for Wylie to have a successful Economic Development Incentive Policy, the
City of Wylie must receive cooperation from the other taxing entities, i.e., Wylie ISD,
Collin County and Collin County Community College District. Should more than
one (1) entity grant tax abatements, it would be my recommendation that a joint
committee on tax abatement be established consisting of two (2) elected officials from
each of the taxing units to review and consider each applicant.
x`r
THE J . D. RUSSELL COMPANY
OUTLINE OF REQUESTS AND COMMITMENTS
FOR OUR EXPANSION PROJECTS
June 17, 1993
Development Corporation:
PHASE 1
( 1 ) Purchase, then Deed, fifteen ( 15 ) acres to The J D
Russell Company for relocation and expansion purposes .
( 2 ) Pay Roll-Back Taxes on 15 acres to be deeded to The J D
Russell company.
( 3 ) Provide funding to bring electric and gas service to
the Phase 1 property.
( 4 ) Fund items that the City of Wylie will not provide .
( 5 ) Provide the following documents at closing :
a . Warranty Deed
b. Survey full 51 . 531 acres with 15 acres
designated for The J D Russell Company and all
• all proposed roadways .
c . Owner ' s Title Policy without any exceptions or
easements
d . Phase 1 Environmental Study
indicating no environmental problems .
Development Corporation:
PHASE 2
( 1 ) Purchase 36 . 531 acres and hold for The J D Russell
Company giving them an exclusive option to purchase
within twenty-four ( 24 ) months from date of closing on
Phase 1 .
City of Wylie :
( 1 ) Provide industrial zoning, without fees, initially to
Phase 1, later to Phase 2 .
( 2 ) Timely planning and installation of adequate
water and sewer lines to the property, initially to
Phase 1, prior to development of Phase 2 .
( 3 ) Waive all impact fees for water and sewer .
( 4 ) Upgrade water pump station serving the area .
( 5 ) Make substantial improvements to Regency Road
north of Steel, prior to completion of Phase 1
of The J D Russell Company expansion project .
( 6 ) City, County, and Wylie ISD tax reduction for the
first five years after Phase 1 completion .
( 7 ) Provide building permit for Phase 1, without fees .
THE J . D. RUSSELL COMPANY
The J D Russell Company
Commitments Phase 1:
a, 'AA' ( 1 ) The J D Russell Company will extend Regency Road,
A)) south of the existing road approximately 450 feet .
This road will be built to City specifications and
donated to Wylie upon completion .
ri „�, ( 2 ) The J D Russell Company will meet or exceed all
y2C ( ° building codes during construction of our new
facilities .
( 3 ) The J D Russell Company will work with the City of
, Wylie and other businesses in Regency Business Park
toward the improvement and beautification of Hooper
Road when Maxwell Creek Landfill closes .
The J D Russell Company
Commitments Phase 2 :
( 1 ) The J D Russell Company will pay $160, 000 . 00 or
$4, 382 . 00 per acre for the remaining 51 . 531 acres held
with our exclusive option to purchase by the
Development Corporation .
( 2 ) The J D Russell Company will pay this option price not
later than twenty-four ( 24 ) months from the date of
closing on Phase 1 of this agreement .
(.3 ) If the Development Corporation has a prospect for the
tf area sooner than 24 months, The J D Russell Company
will accelerate our option on all or part of the
property necessary to meet the needs of the prospect .
This can only be accomplished with cooperation of
all parties involved .
( 4 ) When development of Phase 2 begins, The J D Russell
Company will re-zone to industrial, pay all Roll-Back
Taxes due on property (approximately $35, 000 ) , and
build a road to connect Regency Road and Hooper Road .
This road will be built to City specifications and
donated to Wylie .
A detailed explaination of these requests and commitments is in
the attached letter, dated June 17, 1993, addressed to Charlie
Womack, Executive Director of The Development Corporation of
Wylie .
THE J . D. RUSSELL COMPANY
June 17, 1993
Charlie Womack
Executive Director
Development Corporation
of Wylie, Inc .
108 West Marble
Wylie, TX 75098
Dear Mr . Womack,
The J D Russell Company is grateful for your efforts to acquire
property for our expansion project . Your have proven to be a
valuable asset to our team.
Before discussing the Proposal , there are a few points that we
would like to bring to your attention . Fab-Tech was planning to
relocate at the same time as The J D Russell Company. Their
plans have changed . They are not financially able to relocate at
this time . However, when Fab-Tech is ready to relocate, The J D
Russell Company will work with Fab-Tech, The Development
Corporation, and the City of Wylie to make property available for
Fab-Tech ' s relocation to the Regency Business Park area .
The property for our expansion project, as well as the buildings
on the property, will actually be owned by Penvesco . Penvesco is
synonymous with The J D Russell Company in that they are both
owned by Nicholas and Robert Danna . It will be Penvesco that
will purchase the additional property for development as well .
Penvesco maintains ownership and control of all J D Russell
Company properties for business purposes .
The J D Russell Company would like to look at your Proposal in
two phases . Phase 1, being how the Corporation can provide
The J D Russell Company with property to achieve our immediate
goal to expand to a new facility, increase our production, and
provide more jobs for the citizens of Wylie . Phase 2, being how
The Corporation can work with The J D Russell Company in a
business enterprise to make Regency Business Park a first class
industrial area to attract new businesses to Wylie .
1- {
THE J . D. RUSSELL COMPANY
First, I would like to address the immediate needs of The J D
Russell Company, Phase 1 . In reviewing the proposals of The
Development Corporation of Wylie, I have found no mention of
Roll-Back Taxes . At approximately $1000 per acre, this is an
issue that certainly needs to be addressed . We request that The
Development Corporation pay all Roll-Back Taxes on the 15 acres
that will be deeded to The J D Russell Company for our expansion
project . Previously, The Corporation was willing to pay $5000
per acre for the 15 acres, or $75, 000 . At the new negotiated
price, the Development Corporation will be paying less than $4000
per acre . Even adding in the Roll-Back Taxes, your expenses will
remain less than the previously agreed upon $75, 000 for the 15
acres to be deeded to The J D Russell Company.
For The J D Russell Company, Phase 1 of our expansion project
will cost in excess of $800, 000 . 00 . Phase 1 will include :
* extend Regency Road 450 feet - $50, 000
* two buildings - $550, 000
1 - 30, 000 square .feet
1 - 5, 400 square feet
* storage facilities
* administrative offices
* 85, 000 square feet paving - $200, 000
* new equipment
There will be additional costs involved for utility extension to
the property and City of Wylie impact and zoning fees, etc .
Our expansion project, as well as the overall plan for the
property, is very much dependent upon the City of Wylie providing
the following :
* industrial zoning, waive fees
* timely planning and installation of adequate
water and sewer lines to the property
Phase 1 initially, later Phase 2
* waive all impact fees for water and sewer
* upgrade water pump station serving the area
* improvements to Regency Road north of Steel,
prior to completion of our Phase 1 expansion
project
* City, County, and WISD tax reductions for
the first 5 years .
THE J . D. RUSSELL COMPANY
For Phase 1 of our expansion project, The J D Russell Company
request that the Development Corporation provide the property, to
include all 15 acres, and pay the Roll-Back Taxes . We also
request that the Corporation provide :
* electric service to the property
* gas service to the property
* Environmental Study
* survey of full 51 . 531 acres; showing 15 acres
designated for The J D Russell Company and all
proposed roadways
* fund any items on the City of Wylie ' s request
list that they will not provide .
Phase 2 of your Proposal addresses our option to purchase the
remaining 36 . 531 acres and an option for The Corporation to
purchase any of the undeveloped property within the option
period .
Phase 2 is actually a business venture that The Development
Corporation, the City of Wylie, and The J D Russell Company will
embark upon together . As with any business venture, the goal is
to come to an agreement that is mutually beneficial to all
parties involved .
Phase 1 of the expansion project for The J D Russell Company will
take at least twelve months . It would be beneficial for The J D
Russell Company and its affiliates (Penvesco ) to have adequate
time to absorb this major Phase 1 expense . Therefore, it is
essential that we have an option to purchase the remaining 36 . 531
acres in not less than 24 months from the date of closing . At
that time, we will pay $160, 000 . 00 or $4, 382 . 00 per acre . The J
D Russell Company will change the zoning to industrial, pay all
Roll-Back Taxes (approximately $35, 000 ) , and begin development of
roads and additional industrial lots on the property as soon as
there is a need . The J D Russell Company has also agreed to
assist the City of Wylie and other businesses in Regency Business
Park in the improvements and beautification of Hooper Road when
the landfill closes .
The benefits for The Corporation in this business venture are a
net gain of $18, 300 for "holding" the property 24 months . With
Phase 2 property readily available for development at The J D
Russell Company expense, and with the cooperation of the City of
Wylie, The Development Corporation will have an area that is
ready-to-go for new or expanding business in Wylie and providing
the ecomonic growth that this community so badly needs .
THE J . D. RUSSELL COMPANY
Evidence of our commitment to Phase 1 and 2 of the project and
our commitment to The Corporation, as well as the City of Wylie
is the 450 foot extension to Regency Road that we will construct
to City specifications prior to completion of Phase 1 of our
expansion project . This road will be donated to Wylie . At an
estimated cost of $50, 000, this is validation of our commitment
and should serve in lieu of any escrow.
The final part of your Proposal gives The Corporation the option
to purchase any of the undeveloped property within the option
period . The J D Russell Company absolutely objects to this
proposal .
We have a long range plan for the 51 . 531 acres and a goal to make
Regency Business Park a first class industrial area . Our plan
includes installation of a concrete road to connect Regency Road
and Hooper Road . This road will also be donated to the City of
Wylie . Not only is this road essential to the future expansion
plans for Phase 1, it is also important to the overall plan for
Regency Business Park . Controlling the quality of this road and
the buildings that go into Phase 2 are all part of our develop-
ment plan .
Should The Corporation purchase any part of Phase 2 and sell or
deed it to another company, The J D Russell Company would not be
able to control the integrity of the overall plan for Phase 2 .
There is potential for dispute over where buildings will be
placed and who will pay for development costs . The possibility
of this scenario would only complicate our Phase 2 development
plan, thereby rendering it a venture we would not be interested
in .
If The Corporation has a prospect for the area, The J D Russell
Company would be willing to work with The Corporation and the
City of Wylie to accelerate our option to purchase and develop
all or part of the property necessary to facilitate the needs of
the prospect .
The J D Russell Company, The Development Corporation, and The
City of Wylie must all work together for Phase 1 and Phase 2 of
our expansion project to succeed . Working together, we can all
come to agreements that are mutually beneficial .
THE J . D. RUSSELL COMPANY
Mr . Womack, The J D Russell Company would like to extend our
gratitude for your assistance in acquiring this property and
presenting our needs to The Development Corporation and the City
of Wylie . You have been very helpful and patient .
Sincerely,
Nicholas H Danna
President, CEO
The J D Russell Company
cc : NHD/jl
Norwood
encl
•
902 W. Kirby Street P 0 Box 1806 Wylie, TX 75098
( 214 ) 442-3568 ( 800 ) 888-8734 Fax ( 214 ) 442-3560
City of Wylie
AGENDA COMMUNICATION
SUBMITTED BY: LEGAL DEPARTMFNT DIRECTOR: ' STFVFN P nF TTFR
DATE REFERENCE NO. SUBJECT
'" 6-17-93 7 SETTLMENT NEGOTIATIONS SOUTHFORK MHP LITIGATION
SUMMARY OF SUBJECT:
k
AT THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING THE COUNCIL APPROVED AN AGREEMENT FOR SETTLE- 1
MENT OF THE SOUTHFORK MOBILE HOME PARK LITIGATION . THE AGREEMENT WAS NOT
ENTIRELY ACCEPTABLE TO SOUTHFORK THEREFORE THEY HAVE REJECT THE SETTLEMENT
OFFER AND SUBMITTED A COUNTER-OFFER IN THE FORM OF A REVISED SETTLEMENT AGREE
MENT .
THE AGREEMENT AND MY COMMENTS ARE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER AND ARE
NOT PART OF THE AGENDA PACKET .
THE MATTER IS BEFORE THE COUNCIL FOR ACCEPTANCE OF REJECTION OF THE OFFER.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) ACCEPT THE COUNTER OFFER WITHOUT MODIFICATION
2) ACCEPT THE COUNTER OFFER WITH MODIFICATION(S)
3) REJECT THE COUNTER OFFER AND STAY WITH CITY 'S LAST OFFER
J ACTION REQUESTED:
THE COUNCIL SHOULD CONSIDER THE LATEST PROPOSAL FROM SOUTHFORK AND MAKE
I SOME TYPE OF RESPONSE ROUGHLY ALONG THE LINES OF ONE OF THE ABOVE STATED
ALTERNATIVES .
NO RECOMMENDATION AS TO WHICH ALTERNATIVE TO TAKE IS MADE BY STAFF.
WYLIE CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 22, 1993
7:00 P.M.
MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
