09-03-1987 (Planning & Zoning) Agenda Packet DATE POSTED 8-28-8;
TIME POSTED 4:00 P.
AGENDA
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 1987
7 : 00 P. M. COMMUNITY ROOM
800 THOMAS STREET
CALL TO ORDER
ORDER OF PAGE
BUSINESS REFERENCE BUSINESS
1 1 - 5 Consider approval of minutes
of August 6 , 1987 meeting
2 6 - 7 Consider recommendation to
City Council for the replat of
1 Acre out of the W. Penney
Survey, Abstrct 696 (Steve
Anderhub Addition)
3 8 - 10 Consider recommendation to
City Council for the
Preliminary Plat of 22 .0186
Acres out of the D. W.
Williams Survey, Abstract No .
1021 commonly known as
Birmingham Farm Tract 16
4 Adjourn
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING - MINUTES
7 : 00 P. M.
AUGUST 6, 1987
The City of Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission met in
regular session on Thursday, August 6 , 1987 in the Community
Room. A quorum was present and notice of the meeting had
been posted in the time and manner required by law. Those
present were Chairman Brian Chaney, Bart Peddicord , Cecilia
Wood , Marty Stovall , Bobby Skipwith, and R. P. Miller, Code
Enforcement Officer Roy Faires , City Secretary Carolyn
Jones , Acting City Manager James Johnson. Mr . Ben Scholz
was absent .
ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE: City Secretary Carolyn Jones
administered the oath of office to Cecilia Wood, Bart
Peddicord, and Marty Stovall . Chairman Brian Chaney
welcomed the new members to the board .
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes submitted for approval
were for the July 16th and July 23rd meetings . Chairman
Brian Chaney corrected his statement on the July 16th
minutes of the zoning of the Pendry tract . Mr . Chaney
stated that he did not say "has always gone with cluster
zoning" but that he said "has been using cluster zoning" .
There being no other corrections or additions to the
minutes , a motion was made by Cecilia Wood to approve with
noted correction. Seconded by Bobby Skipwith. This motion
passed with all in favor .
PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONING OF LOTS 1-6 , N 1/2 OF 7 , 8 & 9 ,
BLOCK 28 , RAILROAD ADDITION: The request for zoning is for
a Planned Development . The current zoning is for multi-
family. This is a Developmental Plan and it will not come
back to Planning and Zoning again . Roy Faires , Code
Enforcement Officer, stated that this property is located
across from the Wylie Cemetery. The Funeral Home is located
in the downtown area today and there is a problem for them
with the parking . The present owners have gone before the
Zoning Board of Adjustments , as the City' s Ordinance for
Planned Development stated you must have five (5) acres and
this does not have the five (5) acres . The Zoning Board of
Adjustments granted the variance for a Planned Development
Zoning for a new Funeral Home in this area. There is
approximately 4 , 000 square feet of building . The front of
the building will face Masters Street . Staff will be
supportive of this request . Chairman Brian Chaney reminded
the board that this was a Development Plan and it would only
come before the board this one time.
Chairman Brian Chaney opened the public hearing . There was
a question about the fence that would need to go around this
area. Mr . Faires stated it would have be fenced due to the
single family homes adjacent to it . Chairman Brian Chaney
stated this would be an opaque fence. Mrs . Allen wanted to
know if they could put in shrubbery instead of a wooden
fence. Mr . Faires stated no, that they would have to have a
fence . There being no other questions , the public hearing
was closed .
APPROVAL OF THE RECOMMENDATION OF REZONING OF LOTS 1-6 , N
1/2 OF 7 , 8 , & 9 , BLOCK 28 RAILROAD ADDITION: Mr . Stovall
wanted to know if there was a creek behind this property .
Chairman Brian Chaney stated no, there is some drainage. It
was noted for record that the city staff mailed out fifteen
(15) letters and four (4 ) were returned in favor . Mr .
Miller asked about the parking and was there enough. Mr .
Faires said there is more than enough parking , and that the
plans shows thirty-four (34 ) parking spaces . Mr . Skipwith
stated that when he accepted this position on this board , he
said he would do what was best for the City of Wylie . I
believe this is something that is needed and will be an
asset . A motion was made by Mr . Skipwith to recommend to
the City Council approval of this Planned Development .
Seconded by Mr . Peddicord . This motion passed with all in
favor .
APPROVAL OF RECOMMENDATION OF AMENDMENT TO IMPACT FEE
ORDINANCE: Mr . Faires stated that this amendment was in
connection with the new Senate Bill that was just passed .
Mr . Skipwith stated that before this Senate Bill was passed ,
these fees would only be used for improvements . Mr . Faires
said yes , but now these fees can be used for the engineering
cost and the research study. James Johnson, City Manager
stated that the new law will actual force cities to do
better planning . I think the City should act speedily and
put this plan into force. This bill forces cities to do
long term planning . Mr . Stovall wanted to know if this law
applied to all cities , or just cities with impact fees .
James Johnson , City Manager , said only the cities that have
an impact fee. Mr. Peddicord wanted to know if Council
would have to approve the monies being spent . James Johnson
City Manager said yes . Motion was made by Mr . Miller to
recommend approval of the amendment to the Impact Fee to the
City Council . Seconded by Mr . Stovall . This motion carried
with all in favor .
APPROVAL OF RECOMMENDATION OF FINAL PLAT FOR WOODLAKE
VILLAGE: Mr . Roy Faires stated that this plat does comply
with all the City Ordinances and complies with what the
preliminary plat showed . Staff does recommend approval .
Motion was made by Mr . Peddicord to recommend approval of
the construction plans of the final plat of Woodlake
Gi
CL'
Village to the City Council . Seconded by Mrs . Wood . This
motion carried with all in favor .
APPROVAL OF RECOMMENDATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WESTGATE
INDUSTRIAL PARK: Mr . Faires stated that this will divide
the Westgate Industrial Park and will have a oroughfare
b
through the middle of the property. This aythe site for
the new post office . This thoroughfare does comply with the
City Ordinances and thoroughfare plans . Mr . Jerry Lands ,
who is representing the owners , stated that when this
thoroughfare is completed , it will connect the FM 544 and FM
3412 and will also connect the water and sewer system in
this same area . A motion was made by Mr . Stovall to approve
the recommendation of the preliminary plat for Westgate
Industrial Park to the City Council . Seconded by Mr .
Skipwith . This motion carried with all in favor .
PRESENTATION BY BARON COOK: Chairman Brian Chaney asked Mr .
Faires to give an introduction to what Mr . Cook was
presenting . Mr . Faires stated that Mr . Cook did not want to
talk about Canterbury Hill per-say, but about the rules and
regulations in the City ' s Subdivision Ordinance for the ETJ
areas . Mr . Faires stated that the council does have the
authority to extend the Subdivision Ordinance into the ETJ
areas . Mr . Faires also stated that the City Staff and all
the City Boards have enforced these rules and regulations .
Mr . Cook said the result he is seeking is to get the
Subdivision Ordinance amended . I do not have a problem with
the Subdivision Ordinance, except when it is governing the
ETJ areas . The problem that is arising is that Wylie has a
large ETJ and services are not extended out to these areas
yet . Today I have property in Branch, if I developed this
property, I would have to comply with Wylie' s ETJ rules and
yet Wylie can not serve this area .
Mr . Cook stated that if a developer has a piece of property
in Wylie ' s ETJ and there is another water company, why can ' t
this company service the water . Mr . Faires stated that a
developer could use an existing water service, but would
have to bring the lines up to standard . Mr . Cook said the
point is there is already a 6" water line and yet your
Ordinance said an 8" water line. Why should the developer
have to put in another line .
Mr . Cook also stated that there was no sewer in the area and
why should a developer have to lay sewer lines , when it is
not feasible . Mr . Cook also stated that this was a lot of
cost , but it the Council so wishes , he would do it .
Mr . Cook then addressed the roads in the ETJ. Why should
the developer have to put in concrete streets or money in
lieu of these streets when everything in the area is e in
asphalt . Why should the developer have to put in large
l
street than what is already there . Chairman Brian Chaney
said the reason for the larger water lines is to build for
the future . In ten years , we do not want to have to come
back and put in larger lines with City funds just because we
of do our planning . The sewer is required so that when
�� sewe ets to this property, all the property owners have to
f\' do is' kill the septic system and tap into the main sewer
line. Chairman Chaney then stated that the perimeter street
fees are required and that the developer either put in the
street or money in lieu of the street . This is done to
protect the citizens from having to pay for this street
later with a bond issue. Mr . Faires stated that part of
what has been presented/ the City would have no problems
with. Mr . Faires also stated that the State requires a
certain size line for fire protection , and these
requirements are for the future and is the best way to
protect our citizens Just because property is in our ETJ
does not mean it %e in our City within a few years .
Chairman Chaney stated that we are planning and future
planning is important , I believe that these items in our
Subdivision regulations in regards to the ETJ are fair and
just . Mr . Cook stated that the way the City Ordinances are
set up, he is restricted in developing . Mrs . Wood asked how
long he has had this property. Mr . Cook said since_in the
70 ' s when he purchase the land for Beaver Creek. 1rs Woo d
,aske i e new that some of the peop er . __ Beayer Creek are l
-Irte�- s-at-3s f i e d with their water
sup y Mr . Cook said -no .
'Mr . Faires �-
would not
be consider a perimeter street because it, goes .through the__.!
,miaddle of the property,. Mr . Cook would have to put in the
entire street . Mr . Skipwith asked the width of the
pavement . Mr . Faires said in the beginning it was stated to
be 44 ' of concrete, but I believe 37 ' of concrete is all
that is needed . Mr . Stovall stated that when all the
streets in the area are asphalt , why want the city let the
developer put in asphalt streets . Chairman Chaney said
because of the City Ordinance . Mr . Cook said he is only
wanting to amend the ordinance to state that if the area in
question already has water lines and roads , then do not make
the developer tear out these and put in new ones .
Chairman Chaney stated again that he feels the rules and
regulations for the ETJ areas are fair and just . Mr . Miller
said he feels that the ordinance should be up held as
written . Mr . Stovall stated he did not have a problem with
the water and sewer lines , but he likes to see consistency
within the area and if it has asphalt streets , why put in
concrete streets . Mr . Faires said the job of this board is
to look for tomorrow. Is there going to be future
development that will bring more traffic . I believe in the
future that this street will bring people through connecting
with I-30 . Mr . Stovall stated that in consideration of
development , if the street is not a major thoroughfare than
asphalt should be allowed . Mr . Peddicord said that
regulations have been set up by past boards and this board
should not make an exception . Chairman Chaney said he
feels the ETJ requirements meet the needs of the City at
this time.
There being no other business , a motion was made by Mrs .
Wood to adjourn. Seconded by Mr . Peddicord . This motion
carried with all in favor .
Brian Chaney, Chairman of Board
Respectfully Submitted:
Carolyn Jonec, City Secretary
MEMORANDUM •
•
DATE: Air Z 71 /96 7
TO: James Johnson, Interim City Manager
FROM: Ron Homeyer, Asst. City Engineer
SUBJECT: Plat and/or Plans Approval
I /T/CA1
The material attached is approved by the Engineering
Department as being complete and acceptable for placement on
the next appropriate agenda.
❑ Preliminary Flat to Planning and Zoning
❑ Preliminary Flat to City Council
C F/inal Flat to Planning and Zoning
❑ Final Flat to City Council
❑ Construction Plans to City Council for '
construction approval only
OFinal Flat to City Council for subdivision
acceptance along with final inspection statement
COMMENTS:
RH/am
cc: Public Works Director
Code Enforcement Officer
Subdivision File
y- Chronological File
---4•
i J ' •
. , ....MP - _
1> �� -'._ . — —
•
•
• 1
•
•
_ t .
•
•
• mil' =
r
- tea• "= . = _ •
• r
1 .t
L• � f 4rj.t
_ 'si ... . -Ai.]•.
ice ••••• .
•• •
171T ate• �ayn Pa►tt•at 7.1.74
s �
-•-.•„.7.17._-,...-7.I:. _-.-_• -41 41 11;it id
as-
11
' , ! [ __La _1— - — -- -1 1:11PCMIF
•
a. ;000r/441-.4• 4,.1#• :11.4
•
�.
• cam
� �.�
MI Be Ili� I
' ` SR ill DI alt: am .j >e sas = -or as IR AL s as IN•
--� -�••—
•
sa 1�R.srt >r x xi MIA"
ars
. 1Qr// '/ •� a as •• w stin•• ON
+ ws V
/
MD III MI s.s In /''r
IIII NM NM MI IND/
w Tam aa^-a•ss !aa a•
/•
' i ��a:as a.! T! �'� _.r
1a ww sgbh.s.mmmmmm t w /
i >• r >• on�,s,. =_ -A _Pal= s':-
-' a•611.4 DXA•Iwwla•w as ma - ••• .. •
i
�� , amen. ��uuRxlxns t i
-•�
Z r _ . _ R• I
-
L •
^::
•
4111:1
t14iffIi '
ehr Ii � a
_•• ^ ��• Ea 1 ! sias w 'as •
. O. " NZ
�/ . / 23 ,. ••'Z'_ . awn ,
V,� ... .. ' :.?1 •3l- :: � ;amen r
�. �i� •
b . •• •• •. •. ifr.
•k 4 a•s!� I ail rr•
',,:lop.tc=itql=t.....:'11.....-3 t• 1 i 1614 .•IF it 7:Elli •
1—_....._--__
k4r. D tar.. ..7.ts'+l v At. e k
...
..
~ __ -_-- .• - � , • •epee.
a i,
I-d
--- ; .x=�.X —: .,; r :gam .l•."••.. a9iI.krt•p.a
•. y L
,~ n •( I iroo sci
iuma.a.118 Lass LB Mr
• �� � ' Vts p�EiIL !
" • AAAr,
- f
f I ' -Lit:: • '.�"'4 a • 1\''
.L`;'! /!E a v, g u cos v
1 3 •ix ID 2 s a On v
1/,,-..,
name -•—'1-'��.�-_ 1 • a •
•r. �• �� -S.• QA.RQ-NQ �-
t ' ^1 1r/
' t1•>� • i�•� t rite
le• Nur -.1•11,111 go sh.. ..1.7.--Ti..-..i.,:
IIr
__ R U ae••,a. • +.ram • ltil11 1:
_.-_ , .,,.o., / ..• n iip g u • • ..•a♦ 1+�"t 1111. hP0• "r:
`.. . _..; 1 • i , ante `;! itfva"•'• f /h.... �'•'_`-
af • r•
7
MEMORANDUM
DATES .411 1t.5 — 2(c / %�' 7
TO: James Johnson, Interim City Manager
FROM: Ron Homeyer, Asst. City Engineer
SUBJECTS Plat and/or Plans Approval
5,61-i/A/4 j/•4/t,( /�icM ,4k j l�
The material attached is approved by the Engineering
Department as being complete and acceptable for placement on
the next appropriate agenda.
e4eliminary Plat to Planning and Zoning
(reliminary Flat to City Council
❑ Final Plat to Planning and Zoning
❑ Final Flat to City Council
❑ Constru-ict ion Plans to City Council for
construction approval only
❑ Final Flat to City Council for subdivision
acceptance along with final inspection statement
COMMENTS: /TA S AC ' c,. ,7S `r j i rn .z i// <'u l� , 4G� S
49
4 fia-0,1.;_ci 4.-..‘c1.-(7.7/71.Z7, '.•4 Fr rc - L_f l';t"e AtI-r- c
bS /1 or{r v_k 7 T Cf S S1j
" ` rr) ` — /0 S -
RH/am
cc: Public Works Director
Code Enforcement Officer
Subdivision File
Chronological File
F
FIELD NOTES
BEING a tract of land situated in the D.W. Williams Survey, Abstract No.
1021, City of Wylie, Collin County, Texas and being more particularly
described as follows:
COMMENCING at a point in the west line of Pointe North Addition Phase II,
an addition to the City of Wylie, Texas, as recorded in Cabinet F, Page 264,
Plat Records of Collin County, Texas, said point also being the northwest
line of 150' Texas Power & Light Company Easement recorded in Volume 581, Page
236, Deed Records of Collin County, Texas;
THENCE S 49°35'26" W, with the northwest line of said Texas Power & Light
Company Easement, a distance of 1824. 63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 49°35'26" W, continuing with the norhtwest line of said Texas Power
& Light Company Easement a distance of 1177. 50 feet to a point for corner;
THENCE N 40°24'34" W, leaving said Texas Power & Light Company Easement,
a distance of 795. 00 feet to a point for corner;
THENCE N 49°35'26" E, a distance of 1105. 00 feet to the beginning of a curve
to the right having a central angle of 28°01'07", a radius of 450. 00 feet, and
a tangent length of 112. 28 feet;
THENCE in a northeasterly direction along said curve to the right, an arc
distance of 220. 06 feet to the end of said curve, said point being in the
centerline of future Westgate Way (a 65' R.O.W.) and being the beginning
of a nontangent curve to the left having a central angle of 35°25'53", a
radius of 750.00 feet, a tangent length of 239. 58 feet, and a chord bearing
S 22°41'38" E, 456.44 feet;
THENCE in a southeasterly direction along said curve to the left, and with
the centerline of future Westgate Way, an arc distance of 463. 79 feet to the end
of said curve;
THENCE S 40°24'34" E, with the centerline of future Westgate Way, a distance
of 307.46 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and CONTAINING 22. 0186 acres of
land.
•
II
- ay.
•
-.
—• —. . — t N
I -• •
- •
''_4
I
I
i _
•
r
AM
4.
L
`�. MI• ..- ... .•-•-•••--.
\' , btT urns ...0tLRlea.Ilia•ice •
— l,1
II
___....__Os..._,..=_L----- ..7 ••••
v •• _
1Y. f
41/... ..r....1.7 114.1.••• ill
II .; __
: Up 4r0III.Migililla .'
•
44
• se !>R!ir. -Ill III !
f - j to WI r -IV -it r
/ na s•a r s IN 1 , PM !a I♦ w ND! s
• a as WV Ow sOs w
sls as is la'•
w in um r,,.�s� a
-� / , ��.. .. .w w
ii ,. ass maw �.ns
11 INI VW VW
w as al in IV�ow Jo�.f.
�-
..• ..... I SpaPO s�.wgO s a w
it i.i E
.,
) .)'-.7•'-'-,-:.1-•--....—,'
IF II%
„ ir 0 ••••
O r UYrt+ •
II/
•
T'/•• i
l Arta. •
r.
irr
............j - ..-.-::---
( "
/2
•
I
era `� ;r I
/ 0