02-28-2011 (Parks & Recreation) Agenda Packet Parks Recreation Board
lai
Meeting Agenda
Monday, February 28,2011 —6:30 p.m.
Wylie Municipal Complex—Council Chambers
300 Country Club Road, Building 100
Wylie,Texas 75098
Anne Hiney Chair
Brandi Lafleur Vice-Chair
Dan Chesnut Board Member
Cristine Price Board Member
Gary Robas Board Member
Matt Rose Board Member
Jim Ward Board Member
Robert Diaz Board Liaison
Nancy Williams Board Secretary
In accordance with Section 551.042 of the Texas Government Code, this agenda has been posted at the Wylie Municipal Complex, distributed to
the appropriate news media, and posted on the City website: www.wylietexas.gov within the required time frame. As a courtesy, the entire Agenda
Packet has also been posted on the City of Wylie website: www.wvlietexas.crov.
The Chairman and Board request that all cell phones and pagers be turned off or set to vibrate. Members of the audience are requested to step
outside the Council Chambers to respond to a page or to conduct a phone conversation.
The Wylie Municipal Complex is wheelchair accessible. Sign interpretation or other special assistance for disabled attendees must be requested 48
hours in advance by contacting the City Secretary's Office at 972.516.6022 or TD 972.516.6023.
CALL TO ORDER
Announce the presence of a Quorum.
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
Residents may address Board regarding an item that is not listed on the Agenda.Residents must provide their name and address.Board requests
that comments be limited to three(3)minutes.
BUSINESS ITEMS
1. Consider and act upon approving the Minutes from the January 24, 2011 meeting.
2. Consider and act upon recommending the art locations and attributes at the Community Park
project.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
3. Discuss Wylie Recreation Center.
4. Discuss Neighborhood Parks Master Plan concept by Teague, Nall and Perkins, Inc.
Presentation by Chris Seely, Project Manager with Teague, Nall and Perkins, Inc.
5. Discuss progress of Community Park project. Presentation by Chris Seely, Project Manager
with Teague, Nall and Perkins, Inc.
ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted on this 25th day of February 2011 at 5:00 p.m. as required by law in
accordance with Section 551.042 of the Texas Government Code and that the appropriate news media was contacted. As a
courtesy, this agenda is also posted on the City of Wylie website: www.wvlietexas.gov.
Carole Ehrlich,City Secretary Date Notice Removed
Wylie Parks and Recreation Board
CITY OF WYLIE
4Y
Meeting Minutes
Monday, January 24, 2011 — 6:30 p.m.
Wylie Municipal Complex—Council Chambers
300 Country Club Road, Building 100
Wylie, Texas 75098
CALL TO ORDER
Announcing the presence of a Quorum, Chairwoman Anne Hiney called the meeting to order at 6:33 p.m.
Board Members present: Dan Chesnut*, Cristine Price, Gary Robas and Matt Rose, Jim Ward and Brandi Lafleur
Staff members present: Public Services Director, Mike Sferra, Robert Diaz, Board Liaison and Park Board
Secretary, Nancy Williams.
CITIZEN COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
No citizens addressed the Board.
WORK SESSION
1. Overview and Training for the City Council Chambers Technology
Board Secretary Nancy Williams gave the Board Members a summary and instructions on use of the new
technology(checking in/out, voting, microphone use and presentations) in the City Council Chambers.
BUSINESS ITEMS
2. Consider, and act upon, approval of the Minutes of the December 20, 2010 meeting.
Board Action
Board Member Rose made a motion, seconded by Board Member Robas to approve the minutes from the
December 20, 2010 meeting. A vote was taken and passed at 7-0.
3. Consider and act upon ranking and selecting the top two architectural firms to make a
presentation to the City Council for the Trails Master Plan and Neighborhood Parks Master
Plan projects after presentations by second and third ranked candidates:
Presentation made by:
a. Philip S. Neeley Studio Director of Land Design Partners, Robert Cunningham, Project
Manager/Landscape Architect and Elizabeth Mcllrath, Landscape Architect, 5310 Harvest Hill
Rd., Suite 100, Dallas and
b. Thomas K. Yantis, Jeff Hogan, Tim Bargainer of Lochner-BWR Division, 12001 n. Central
Expressway, Suite 1050, Dallas, TX
Board Discussion
Parks Superintendent Diaz summed up the scoring process of the review committee for the Trails Master
Plan and the Neighborhood Parks Master Plan, consisting of Director Sferra, Board Members Robas and
Ward as well as himself. Each of the seven proposals was scored by individual committee members and the
highest score given to Teague, Nall and Perkins. The committee is recommending TNP give a presentation to
the Council second ranking was very close and it was requested that Land Design Partners and Lochner-
BWR Division team members make a presentation to the PAR Board for selection of the second candidate to
give a presentation to the City Council.
After the presentations Chairwoman Hiney requested input from the Board Members and specifically from the
Selection Committee. Director Sferra explained the normal process of recommending the top two firms for
projects to the City Council wherein they then make the selection of the firm to negotiate with. Director Sferra
also clarified that the Board can also make the decision to select one firm for the Trails Plan and another for
the Neighborhood Parks Plan.
Member Rose voiced his feeling that Lochner was more geared toward Neighborhood Parks and Land Design
toward Trails. Member Wards and Chair Hiney concurred but Chair Hiney noted that Lochner's municipal
experience would be a plus. Member Ward contributed that one of the discrepancies noted by the committee
was that Land Design was a local firm and Lochner was mainly out of the Metroplex. Member Price noted
Land Design made suggestions whereas Lochner asked a great many questions but also had the same feel
as members Rose and Hiney that there were separate strengths for each company that might benefit the City
on the separate projects. Member Robas concurred with the initial comments but he also perceived Lochner's
approach to the separate areas as problems with no specific solutions in that the Forrest Ross area would be
treated as a standard park instead of the special entrance to the Corps area the Board perceived it to be,
therefore, he was more impressed with Land Design's treatment of the area.
Board Action
Board Member Ward made a motion, seconded by Board Member Price to select Land Design Partners as
the second firm along with Teague, Nall and Perkins to make presentations to the City Council for the Trails
Master Plan and Neighborhood Parks Master Plan projects. A vote was taken and passed at 7-0.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
4. Discuss progress of Community Park project.Presentation was made by Chris Seely, Project
Manager with Teague, Nall and Perkins, Inc., 12160 N. Abrams Rd., Suite 508, Dallas, TX 75243.
Board Discussion
Mr. Seely informed the Board that they are currently at the 95% plan stage. Details are still being worked out
regarding fencing around backstops, pavement joints were not included in the plans and making sure notes
on plans are correct. Site plans submitted this week for review with Planning and Zoning and on agenda for
February 15, 2011. Goal is to bid the project by late February or early March.
Since last meeting a number of plan changes have occurred. Member Robas inquired as to the current
orientation of the building and placement of transformer. Mr. Seely informed the Board that no matter how
they adjusted the field to the current transformer it turned into a maintenance and grading issue. The cost
difference to work around the current 25 plus year-old transformer vs. moving to new location and installing a
new transformer was minimal so after numerous discussions with staff it was decided to have a new
transformer installed in a more viable location; which is why the building is placed in the current location. Mr.
Seely will have discussions with Oncor to see if they will give us any kind of credit or discount on the new
transformer.
There are two Atmos gas line easements in the ball fields and one petroleum gas line easement on the north
side on the school property. Atmos has agreed that our fence line can come within 10 feet of their easement.
Keeping the fence line of the fields at 280' will require Atmos to give us an additional allowance of 1 1/2 feet in
some areas; Mr. Seely will negotiate a 280' line with Atmos. Working with the leagues and staff toward this
goal with a possible 10' fence in places, perhaps with Ivy or other embellishments will continue. Chair Hiney
inquired as to depth of gas lines. Mr. Seely indicated a minimum of three feet. When a sidewalk intersects the
easements sidewalks are built one inch thicker with fiber reinforcements instead of rebar. Member Rose
asked Mr. Seely if they had looked into bringing the trail at Cooper closer to the fence. Mr. Seely indicated
they had not at this time but they would for safety reasons.
Pavement joints show plaza area with a "W"showed are joints in concrete (stained concrete at same level)
not extra pavers or inserts. Indicated circles on plans are for planted trees to give it the same green feel.
"Community Park"will be on the front of the concession stand. Mr. Seely is having architect look at the plans
to trim costs where possible without sacrificing quality. Split face CMU will be used instead on the face to cut
cost where possible.
Special Session Minutes January 24,2011
Wylie Parks and Recreation Board
Page 2
Chair Hiney asked about the resolution for the screening on the concession. Top openings have been
changed to louvers with solid metal panels making it more secure yet still decorative and the louvers serving
for ventilation. They are currently working on issues to solve insect ingress.
Member Rose asked why the electrical panels were shown in the league storage area, causing limited
storage space and why not on the City side. Mr. Diaz replied the rooms were almost identically sized and
could serve either purpose and could be recoded. It was also not finally determined if they would remain
inside or out along with irrigation controls. Member Rose indicated the league needed more shelf space
storage. He also inquired if there was top open ventilation with a drop ceiling. Mr. Seely said he would make
sure that wasn't the case.
Member Robas inquired as to the bleacher location and if there was additional seating throughout the park
planned. Mr. Seely said he would look into it. Member Ward suggested putting seating around the tree rings.
Site Plan submitted to Planning and Zoning will include all items intend but if everything doesn't get built at
this stage due to budgetary concerns it won't have to go back to P&Z when the time comes to build it.
Member Rose expressed concern over the curbs and younger park participants running and falling. Mr. Seely
said he would look into using something else in those areas near the T-Ball fields. Member Rose said the
league would look at putting in some fences if the contractors could not due to drainage and erosion issues.
Field fencing will be the same except for outfield at 6 feet. Mr. Seely requested input to make sure it works for
all. He will pass on to staff. Teague Nall and Perkins will continue to review the site plans and concerns
brought up at this meeting.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Chairwoman Hiney recessed the Board into Closed Session at 8:39 p.m. in compliance with Section 551.001, et.
seq. Texas Government Code to wit:
Section 5551.072 (Real Property) of the Local Government Code Vernon's Texas Code Annotated
(Open Meetings Act).
• Discuss vacant property on corner of Westgate and Fleming
Chairwoman Hiney reconvened into regular session at 9:02 p.m.
RECONVENE INTO REGULAR SESSION
Take any action as a result from Executive Session.
• Discussion and possible action on matters discussed in executive session.
There was no action taken by the Wylie Parks and Recreation Board as a result of executive session.
ADJOURNMENT
A motion to adjourn was made by Board Member Ward and seconded by Board Member Price. The meeting was
adjourned at 9:04 p.m. by unanimous consent.
ATTEST:
Nancy Williams, Park Board Secretary Anne Hiney, Chair
Special Session Minutes January 24,2011
Wylie Parks and Recreation Board
Page 3
Wylie Parks and Recreation
CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: February 28, 2011 Item Number: 3
Division: Parks and Recreation
Prepared By: Robert Diaz Account Code:
Date Prepared: February 23, 2011 Budgeted Amount: $
Exhibits: 1
Subject
Consider and act upon recommending the art locations and attributes for the Community Park project.
Recommendation
Motion to approve Areas 1-5 or combination with attributes (i.e. theme like play, family).
Discussion
The Community Park project will include some funding for art similar to the Founders Park project that is
currently under construction. The Board will need to recommend locations for art and attributes for the art
i.e. theme for the Public Arts Board to then review and make final recommendations to the City Council.
Included with this report are five locations for art proposed by Teague, Nall, and Perkins project architects
for Community Park.
Page 1 of 1
Q:1 Projects'1WYL10153\cad1,x-base,dwrm,2/22/2011 9:48:22 AM,HIIPL19000DN.pc3,MANS0N
_ ■■ I -4;
\ /--
____________ ®.......- 11___, _
Itigypillr*". ofo,,
0 i!g
ItirAtipi 411-7,—
�; ti 411NTA iimit, I I
-71/k z/i1;;;;,'0-/, idliViiionid iEuliWia ---- 'I% 1 .//17/7''/7/ rijk-41 110 l'A--'
dilli
posit. 1 I', iz„, 0 Eir,„,,A. , iv__
IN Mining illiiiiiiiiiiii11014 {, 44, iimintiiimm"
_x----- 4 144tvt-7 ii 1147 1
—._. =_=_ '+ � ■■" w— ,---\
I
t u i e_A o ,-�
I rC ie
}
\\\N `'----- _ q siiit '____.m..( jar/
x is 1fy //// flit,,
K1
r
Ns
�livill'� UJ/G ! / ��/ln rd
r /i i r " i/ /,v/
Nb.
Wilit
it it*
J Ma ® ®I,
INN /merrohlt// / .-. 1 NNW:ammo
,;,/,,/ /r�/��. /o,, / //��/��///!.i�J�l(/. /�iflr�c., / ... ,/ // „/, i/, / // // ail. /ii//
/.J/�/ �/ / /.0 /q/%/ / i; /v. ,, /,,, „ ,,% ✓ /ire//��//�, .a // / ,,.,
111
„ II /
� „t
/ 1 %7,-,,07 /��m �xy,6 , , ,
..,n 7 /;// �, 1 % / /
/ ,1/4Y r iii*,,,%e////�%-d0,,,X,;,,,/A lire///k/,ri ,m%�� tIT
I
TEA GUE NALL AND PERKINS
Cov,I Env wu we ring kxveyong Land s ai c:,. ,rGhit ut:luulP Mary v hun g
Memorandum
To: Mike Sferra
Public Services Director
From: Chris Seely, P.E.
Cc: Robert Diaz—City of Wylie Parks Department
Date: February 24, 2011
Re: Community Park—Potential Bid Package
Per the direction of the City of Wylie Parks and Recreation Department and through coordination with
the Parks and Recreation Board, Teague Nall and Perkins ("TNP") is nearing completion of the
design for the Community Park Improvements. On January 25, 2010, TNP met with the project
estimator for Hasen Construction to discuss potential project costs for all of the proposed
improvements. Since this meeting, TNP has developed an overall project cost for all of the proposed
master plan improvements as well as potential bid package and add alternates that are more in line
with the available project budget for Community Park. The following memorandum details the
available project budget, prepared cost opinions, as well as the thought process behind the
development of the potential bid package.
Available Project Budget
The following is a summary of the available budget for the Community Park Improvements.
- Portion of 2005 Bond set aside for Community Park = $ 1,495,000
- Matching grant from Collin County =$267,500
o The City of Wylie submitted a matching grant request to Collin County for$467,000 for
a portion of the parking, trail and additional restroom improvements for Community
Park.
o On October 26, 2009, the Collin County Commissioners announced a total grant
award to the City of Wylie of$267,500.
- Master Planning Conceptual Design Contract= $52,500 (TNP)
- Design Contract for Park Improvements = $243,000 (TNP)
- Total Available Community Park Budget=$ 1,467,000
12160 North Abrams Road, Suite 508 Dallas,Texas 75243 214.461.9867 phone 214.461.9864 fax
www.tnp-online.com
The wording of Proposition 4 of the 2005 Bond allowed for the use of shared funds between
Founders Park and Community Park. It is our understanding that the Founders Park project bid was
under the projected budget ($ 5,470,000). Change orders during the course of construction have
increased the overall cost of Founders Park; however, it appears that the City may have in excess of
$ 200,000 to apply to the Community Park project. This number will not be finalized until Founders
Park is 100% complete. Therefore, TNP recommends that any additional funds gained from
Founders Park would be applied to add alternates to the base bid for Community Park. The
Community Park bid will need to be close to the$ 1,467,000 that is available.
Overall Cost Opinion for Master Plan Improvements
As discussed with the City Council and Parks and Recreation Board prior to the beginning of the
project, TNP has designed the project for the master plan as if funds were available to perform all of
the proposed improvements. This method allows TNP to design for potential future improvements
that will not require a large amount of reconstruction or limit future uses. It also allows the entire
project to be bid so that add alternates can be established should additional funds be provided for the
project.
The opinion of probable construction costs for the master plan design of the park is approximately
$2.7 million. As stated above, this exceeds the amount of available budget. However, it does give
an approximate number for completing all of the needs of the park at this time. A breakdown of this
cost opinion is attached to this memorandum.
Priorities of the Park from the Stakeholder's Meetings
As a part of the Master Planning Conceptual Design Contract with TNP, two stakeholders' meetings
were held on January 14th and 18th, 2010. During these meetings, park stakeholders were asked
what the needs and wants were for Community Park. As a part of the meetings and per
improvements noted within the 2005 bond documentation, a list of 8 potential priorities were
developed. The stakeholders were asked by TNP to prioritize the list of 8 items from most needed to
less needed. The following is a list of the priorities in order of rank.
1. Baseball field improvements
2. Parking
3. Concession Stand/ Restroom (baseball field complex)
4. Hike/ Bike Trail
5. Athletic Field Lighting
6. Additional Restroom
7. New Bleachers
8. Landscape Improvements
With these priorities in mind, TNP developed two conceptual options to be developed within this
phase of the project. These options were presented to the Park and Recreation Board with a
recommendation for City Council.
Preliminary Direction from the City Council
On February 9, 2010, TNP presented the stakeholder meeting information and the Community
Park Master Plan document to the City Council for review within a joint work session between
the City Council and the Park and Recreation Board. The 2 conceptual options developed by
TNP were presented with the two groups weighing in on the priorities of the park for this phase
of construction.
Page 2 of 5
At the conclusion of the work session, the City Council directed TNP to prepare the proposed
improvements for this phase of construction as follows, not in order of priority:
- Complete baseball field improvements to Eldridge, Rowell and Tibbals fields (grading,
drainage, irrigation and sod)
- Partial baseball field improvements to Cooper field (grading and drainage only)
- Partial parking improvements based on budget
- Partial lighting improvements, saving existing lighting where possible
- Full football field improvements to Football Field #2 (grading, drainage, irrigation and sod)
- Trail improvements
- New baseball concession stand / restroom facility
- Restroom facility for football field side of the park
- Add alternative: Irrigation and sod for Cooper field
- Add alternative: Replacement of all existing lighting
- Add alternative: Construction of all parking improvements
- Add alternative: Secondary access point to the park from the school property
Potential Bid Package Options
TNP gathered the input from the City Council, Park and Recreation Board, stakeholders and
City staff and has attempted to develop a base bid package for Community Park Improvements
that establishes a base bid reflective of the available budget for the park ($ 1,467,000). It is our
recommendation that the base bid, as well as all add alternates, be bid by the contractors to
optimize the possibility of constructing as many improvements during this phase as funding
allows. All costs established within this bid package are per our discussion with Hasen
Construction and other contractors with which we have working relationships.
TNP has presented to City staff multiple options based on stakeholder priorities and funding.
Based on our understanding of the direction given by City staff, TNP has prepared the current
potential bid package (see attached). The base bid package presented meets the amount of
available budget without additional funding (see attached). Since the City has decided to use
the "most qualified low bid" when selecting the contractor, we may be able to lower this amount
and add some of the add alternates prior to finalizing a contract with the contractor. We have
considered adding and removing different improvements to come up with what appear to be an
optimum amount of improvements.
The following considerations were made in establishing the base bid package.
- Parking Improvements: As expected, the parking lot is a significant expense of the project.
Since parking was a significant priority to the stakeholders for the park, we have included
the construction of 156 spaces on concrete paving. This will provide 208 parking spaces
south of the existing volleyball court (156 spaces + 52 spaces on existing asphalt)
compared to the existing 122 spaces.
- Trail Cost and Condition: We have included the removal of all of the existing asphalt trail
and construction of the new trail and sidewalks within this base bid package. We can look
at saving the eastern portion of the trail (east of the parking area); however, we will want to
make sure we maximize the amount of possible grant money that we can receive from the
County for this construction. Since the plaza paving provides connectivity between
segments of the pedestrian trail, we believe that trail funding can also go toward plaza
construction.
Page 3 of 5
- Football restroom facility: Since $65,000 of the County grant is intended for a restroom
facility, we kept the restroom facility within the base bid. We have contacted a reputable
local contractor and had the proposed 12'x24' restroom priced at $48,050 plus utility
connections to the building (approximately $57,500 total). Depending on whether or not
funding is available for the baseball concession stand, the City may look at constructing a
second matching building between Cooper and Rowell close to T-ball fields 2 and 3 to
serve the baseball complex in the short term, also serving T-ball and Coach pitch fields long
term.
The following considerations were made in establishing the add alternate package.
- Baseball field lighting: The existing lighting is in need of replacement. The cost of replacing
all the existing light poles for the baseball field complex with Musco lighting would be
approximately $575,000. This is approximately 40% of the available budget. We have
evaluated the possibility of saving light poles. Each light pole that is saved is a reduction in
cost of almost $19,000. The salvaged light poles will not meet current safety requirements
and could not be relocated or fitted with new warranted Musco lighting. Due to the
importance of several other significant items, our current base bid package only accounts
for removing existing lighting within the plaza and installing only the light pole bases and
conduit in the plaza area. New lighting will be required for the plaza area to light the infields
on all four of the baseball fields at a cost of approximately $275,000. This should be
considered on of the first add alternate that is approved due to the need for infield lighting.
New lights in the plaza will be 50' to 60' tall instead of the existing 30' tall poles. All of the
outfield lighting is also expected to remain "as is". Parking space alignment will be modified
to retain the existing lighting in this area.
- Baseball concession stand / restroom: The baseball concession stand/restroom has been
removed from the base bid and shown as an add alternate. Due to the regrading necessary
to improve the drainage and to the re-alignment of the baseball fields to move the trail onto
the park property, the existing concession stand will need to be removed. If additional
funding is not available to construct the base bid and the baseball concession
stand/restroom, then the City will need to determine other options for restrooms and
concession stand needs. One option is utilizing the existing structure in the maintenance
area north of Cooper and Eldridge fields that will remain. This is not in the center of the
park, but it does allow for these uses at a greatly reduced cost. Another option is to
construct the additional restroom facility, currently planned for the football side of the park,
in a more neutral location.
Regarding cost, the original estimate for the concession stand / restroom facility at the
beginning of the project (prior to TNP involvement) was $350,000. Based on a review of bid
tabs and information acquired for similar sized facilities, TNP adjusted this estimate to
$250,000. Currently, the project architect has estimated the approximate cost of the
structure would be in excess of $250,000. In addition, the geotechnical report for the site
indicated that the soils in the location of the proposed concession stand will need to be
reworked for an approximate cost of $20,000 due to the existing expansive clays in the
area. TNP requested Jim Wilson Architects to seek possible options to reduce the costs in
this structure. The following items were adjusted to reduce the cost of the concession stand
structure. It is currently estimated at $310,000. (For reference, a similar sized concession
stand at Founders Park — north concession stand and restrooms — was estimated at
approximately $357,000 prior to bidding.)
Page 4 of 5
o Replaced stone veneer on the lower portion of the elevation with split-faced CMU
brick veneer.
o Removed cast stone window sills, caps and headers
o Replaced stainless steel fixtures (like Founders) with porcelain fixtures
o Removed all floor, ceiling and wall finishes
o Kept the countertops in the concession stand concrete.
o Removed all millwork within the building.
o Reduced the amount of louvers that are installed for ventilation
- Football improvements: Per the City Council's direction, we originally included the football
improvements of Field #2 (approximately $45,000) in the base bid. At a recent Parks Board
meeting, a representative from the Wylie Football League stated that the recent grading
improvements to Field #3 improved the drainage on the fields and the league was currently
satisfied with the existing conditions of the fields. Due to the lack of available funds for all of
the potential improvements, the City may want to determine the ultimate location where
football games may be played (Community Park or Founders Park). If the football league is
to move to Founders Park, it may be wise to use available funding on other areas of
Community Park. Therefore, we have removed these improvements from the base bid and
included it as an add alternate.
- Baseball field and plaza improvements: The realignment and re-grading of the baseball
field area requires new fencing, irrigation, surface treatments (sod or dirt) and
reconstruction of the plaza area. All of this is included in the base bid. As discussed with
the City Council, we have removed the irrigation and sod improvements on Cooper Field.
The three remaining fields will be of equal finished quality. The installation of irrigation and
sod on Cooper Field will be an add alternate.
- Bleachers: The approximate cost for 8 new bleacher stands with shade structures over the
bleachers is approximately $80,000. This appears to be a cost that may be removed from
the base bid and listed as an add alternate.
Direction Needed
The current construction plans as designed will serve as a master plan for the development of
improvements to the park both now and in the future. As stated above, the base bid is within
the funds budgeted for Community Park and does not require any additional funding from
Founders Park. TNP requests direction from the City in regards to the improvements to be
included in the base bid and add alternates based on the approximate costs we have
developed. Once we have gained this direction, we can finalize the bid packages and bid the
project. Plans must be bid in early to mid-March in order for construction to begin on schedule.
If you have any questions or need clarification on any item associated with this project, please
feel free to contact me. I plan to meet with you in the next couple of days to discuss this memo
and the bidding process.
Page 5 of 5
�.
i ....„.
- -- ''w
1
,yT4 j „ry✓` - ������� � �i��,�w mm'r, ..w v"�P:1I
Y IV
/ / Ic
sr
la NUM" a
440004000004.41.r, at
Lgi � ✓ �•.� j�
.\ ' 1 ./. J 1
• IPPIPP".- II.
G • .
x ;I / . ` \• = =AO
illiI1I- =
1 -
1 - - 1-MI
1 O i MIMIL ice=
MI IIIII
NEIe
°A in, Imo.
11111 - I�.. wi
Ai __ ME MI I�
0l il mu
No
IINN
IL •••11---®- - -Mil -
-1Ir-1Vi ■I{■ \ -
us 1.1
1■f■"II■1 I' I \ MI III1
-
u 11■■■I■■[ I I 1 - -
mdErj-�■1 I !1 I I -
a■I1i4,,�gni I �
ES 1 MI
` 1■I lflo■ ■ I/w / ----J
a■■■■I I■1 \ j MEM M.' IM 1 IOlWl
■■■■■■r■i 1 - 1
,� � fir■
mod, -Ass ��1���� ��i.01—..i/ "7mrsw �■■■■■■►im
a , ��■I �\■A mow► A5��L, ,I�l■■■■■11.11I111■■ i....„, 41.
oiC■■i' �•■�1■tlm■■roomm■■■- r■■■•=■■ ''� c'.
r J►■.W �I■I 11=■ a■►•■■■►'�:�■■■A�.r� -
s%■rl����f\� �r���=�1 �a�"■■■\A- �7 1■\ ME _ I® uri
L1 J o �Irr:f::1u/liiii►�I/I�►t���iiirl�1�iiiiiijr ... -' Imo
__w�
f.''' • A o`````.:�i....1ff���1f1 ,OQ�/%/11111D����iiii'■'i _1
V.1■■■■i!a■11■11',, /
II■1■■II■■■■■11■11 \ * r---- '
I ■y 11'1 ' r 1 `•1■ \ I PA
II■1■.■41/4iY.■11■1■11.111 I I 1 111111� I 1-
ii.■■■{j CWi■■■■, I �l I 1 I
•■■■rlk1�.■■1• I �:
■■■■Rrrl■■■1 I I 1 I
WEI
■■■■0■■■■■■1 I J /
■■■•r11/I,■■■1I
ENE■■■Ri1���,{■■1 ,• / I
■■■■n•w-mi■■■■
-
/;/' ' 11 1 "'`
/7 _..
i _ I
( " /; , 1
/ I MPH I I
/ I j ;
/ I '
II I I I
l,J/ / IASPH i ;
,//
• Tr �// I - \1 II
:$00 , ,,-, ,,,.
— i
„,,,, ,
, .... /...42„,.... -
- ---r
TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS,INC.
AINFMII• me- OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
PROJECT: COMMUNITY PARK OPINION BASED ON DEC.2010 PLANS
NUMBER: WYL10153 COSTS AS DISCUSSED WITH HASEN JAN.25,2011
CLIENT: CITY OF WYLIE
OPTION: BASE BUDGET OF$1,467,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION PLAN QTY. OPC QTY. UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL
GENERAL PROJECT COSTS
1 MOBILIZATION,GC OVERHEAD&PROFIT 1 1 LS $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00
2 ART(1.0%OF BUDGET ALLOCATED THROUGH BOND) 1 1 LS $ 14,950.00 $ 14,950.00
3 DEMOLITION(FIELDS,CONCESSIONS,LIGHTS) 1 1 LS $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00
4 SITE MASS GRADING AND IMPORT 1 1 LS $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00
5 RELOCATION OF TRANSFORMER 1 1 LS $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00
6 EROSION CONTROL 1 1 LS $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00
GENERAL COSTS SUBTOTAL $ 214,950.00
IMIIIMIIIMIIIIIIIMIIIMIIIMIIIMIIIMIIIIIIMIIIMIIIMIIIMIIIMIIIMIIIMIIIIIIIMIIIIMIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
PARKING IMPROVEMENTS-156 SPACES
1 MASS GRADING 1 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
2 5"CONCRETE 5,542 5,700 SY $ 27.00 $ 153,900.00
3 6"CONCRETE 3,033 3,200 SY $ 29.00 $ 92,800.00
4 7"LIME SUBGRADE W/LIME INCLUDED 3,282 3,400 SY $ 4.00 $ 13,600.00
5 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 2,886 3,000 LF $ 3.00 $ 9,000.00
6 STRIPING 1 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
PARKING IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $ 289,300.00
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
PLAZA IMPROVEMENTS(NO PAVEMENT STAIN)
1 MASS GRADING 1 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
2 5"CONCRETE 4,523 4,600 SY $ 27.00 $ 124,200.00
3 6"CONCRETE 1,095 1,200 SY $ 29.00 $ 34,800.00
4 7"LIME SUBGRADE W/LIME INCLUDED 1,150 1,300 SY $ 4.00 $ 5,200.00
5 PAVEMENT JOINTS(BEYOND 12'SPACING) 7,720 7,800 LF $ 0.30 $ 2,340.00
PLAZA IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $ 171,540.00
IIMINIIIIMMOMMIIMININIMININIMININIMININIMININIMININIMININIMMIIMINIMINIMINIMMINIIIIIIMINIIMINIIIIIIIIIIIMINIMIIIIMINIMINIMINIMII
TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS-COMPLETE
1 REMOVAL OF EXISTING TRAIL 1 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
2 8'WIDE CONCRETE TRAIL-STANDARD CONCRETE 6,322 6,500 SY $ 27.00 $ 175,500.00
3 BARRIER FREE RAMPS 6 6 EA $ 500.00 $ 3,000.00
TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $ 183,500.00
IIMINIIIIMMINIIIMININIMININIMININNMININNMININIMININIMININIMMIIMINIMINIMINIMMINIIIIIMINIIMINIIIIIIIIIIIMINIMIIIIMINIMINIMINIMII
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
1 STORM DRAINAGE-PIPES AND INLETS 1 1 LS $ 90,000.00 $ 90,000.00
2 STORM DRAINAGE-TRENCH DRAINS 860 900 LF $ 22.00 $ 19,800.00
WATER
3 8"WATER 400 400 LF $ 28.50 $ 11,400.00
4 6"WATER 400 400 LF $ 23.00 $ 9,200.00
5 TAPPING SLEEVES&VALVES 1 1 LS $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00
SANITARY SEWER
6 6"SEWER 350 350 LF $ 25.00 $ 8,750.00
7 MANHOLES 1 1 EA $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $ 151,150.00
IIMINIIIIMMINIIIMININIMININIMININNMININNMININNMININIMININIMMIIMINIMINIMINIMMINIIIIIIMINIIMINIIIIIIIIIIIMINIMIIIIMINIMINIMINIMII
FOOTBALL IMPROVEMENTS
1 RESTROOM BUILDING TOTAL(TURNKEY) 1 1 LS $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00
2 RESTROOM FOUNDATION 1 1 LS $ - $ -
3 RESTROOM SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION-LINE 1 1 LS $ 500.00 $ 500.00
4 RESTROOM SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION-SSMH 1 1 EA $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00
5 RESTROOM WATER LINE CONNECTION 1 1 LS $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00
FOOTBALL IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $ 57,500.00
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
COOPER FIELD IMPROVEMENTS
1 MASS GRADING 1 1 LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00
2 FENCING 1 1 LS $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00
3 FINISHED DIRT SURFACE 1 1 LS $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00
4 RESPREAD TOPSOIL 1 1 LS $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00
COOPER FIELD SUBTOTAL $ 79,000.00
IIMINIIIIMMINIIIMININIMININIMININIMININIMININNMININIMININIMMIIMINIMINIMINIMUNIMIIIIIIIMINIIMINIIIIIIIMINIMINIMIIIIMINIMINIMINIMII
ELDRIDGE FIELD IMPROVEMENTS
1 MASS GRADING 1 1 LS $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00
2 FENCING 1 1 LS $ 22,500.00 $ 22,500.00
3 FINISHED DIRT SURFACE 1 1 LS $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00
4 RESPREAD TOPSOIL 1 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
5 IRRIGATION 4,420 4,500 SY $ 3.00 $ 13,500.00
6 SOD 4,420 4,500 SY $ 3.00 $ 13,500.00
ELDRIDGE FIELD SUBTOTAL $ 84,000.00
IIIIIIIIINIII IIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIII
Mir
TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS,INC.
• 'me- OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
PROJECT: COMMUNITY PARK OPINION BASED ON DEC.2010 PLANS
NUMBER: WYL10153 COSTS AS DISCUSSED WITH HASEN JAN.25,2011
CLIENT: CITY OF WYLIE
OPTION: BASE BUDGET OF$1,467,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION PLAN QTY. OPC QTY. UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL
ROWELL FIELD IMPROVEMENTS
1 MASS GRADING 1 1 LS $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00
2 FENCING 1 1 LS $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00
3 FINISHED DIRT SURFACE 1 1 LS $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00
4 RESPREAD TOPSOIL 1 1 LS $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00
5 IRRIGATION 5,100 5,200 SY $ 3.00 $ 15,600.00
6 SOD 5,100 5,200 SY $ 3.00 $ 15,600.00
ROWELL FIELD SUBTOTAL $ 97,200.00
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111100111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
TIBBALS FIELD IMPROVEMENTS
1 MASS GRADING 1 1 LS $ 17,500.00 $ 17,500.00
2 FENCING 1 1 LS $ 22,500.00 $ 22,500.00
3 FINISHED DIRT SURFACE 1 1 LS $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00
4 RESPREAD TOPSOIL 1 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
5 IRRIGATION 4,420 4,500 SY $ 3.00 $ 13,500.00
6 SOD 4,420 4,500 SY $ 3.00 $ 13,500.00
TIBBALS FIELD SUBTOTAL $ 84,000.00
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110011111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
GENERAL BASEBALL FIELD IMPROVEMENTS
1 RELOCATIONS(FOUL POLES,SCOREBOARDS) 1 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
GENERAL BASEBALL FIELD SUBTOTAL $ 5,000.00
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111001111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS
1 LIGHT POLE BASES,CONDUIT AND RE-WIRING 1 1 LS $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00
GENERAL BASEBALL FIELD SUBTOTAL $ 50,000.00
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111001111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111101111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
TOTAL BASE BID FOR IMPROVEMENTS $ 1,467,140.00
ADD ALTERNATES
ITEM DESCRIPTION PLAN QTY. OPC QTY. UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL
IIIIE IUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII IIIII IIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIII
PARKING IMPROVEMENTS-131 SPACES
1 MASS GRADING 1 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
2 5"CONCRETE 2,458 2,600 SY $ 27.00 $ 70,200.00
3 6"CONCRETE 1,229 1,350 SY $ 29.00 $ 39,150.00
4 7"LIME SUBGRADE W/LIME INCLUDED 1,331 1,500 SY $ 4.00 $ 6,000.00
5 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 833 1,000 LF $ 3.00 $ 3,000.00
6 STRIPING 1 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00
PARKING IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $ 138,350.00
PLAZA IMPROVEMENTS
1 PAVEMENT STAINING 12,665 12,800 SF $ 2.00 $ 25,600.00
2 PAVEMENT JOINTS(BEYOND 12'SPACING) 7,720 7,800 LF $ 0.30 $ 2,340.00
PLAZA IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $ 27,940.00
BASEBALL CONCESSIONS/RESTROOM
1 BUILDING TOTAL 1 1 LS $ 310,000.00 $ 310,000.00
2 FOUNDATION REWORK 1 1 LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00
3 SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION-LINE 1 1 LS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
4 WATER LINE CONNECTION 1 1 LS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
BASEBALL CONCESSIONS/RR SUBTOTAL $ 334,000.00
FOOTBALL IMPROVEMENTS
1 RELOCATIONS(GOAL POSTS) 1 1 LS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
2 GRADING 1 1 LS $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00
3 IRRIGATION 6,000 6,000 SY $ 3.00 $ 18,000.00
4 SOD 6,000 6,000 SY $ 3.00 $ 18,000.00
5 RELOCATION OF LIGHT POLE IN FOOTBALL FIELD 1 1 LS $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00
FOOTBALL IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $ 60,000.00
IMUNIMINIMIENIU I MIMMIM MIMMIM MIMMIM MIMMIM I I MIMIMME MIMMIM I I I I IMMI I MIMNIM MIMNIM MIMMUI MIMMI I I I I I I I
COOPER FIELD IMPROVEMENTS
1 IRRIGATION 7,810 7,810 SY $ 3.00 $ 23,430.00
2 SOD 7,810 7,810 SY $ 3.00 $ 23,430.00
COOPER FIELD SUBTOTAL $ 46,860.00
Mir
TEAGUE NALL AND PERKINS,INC.
/MrC- OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
PROJECT: COMMUNITY PARK OPINION BASED ON DEC.2010 PLANS
NUMBER: WYL10153 COSTS AS DISCUSSED WITH HASEN JAN.25,2011
CLIENT: CITY OF WYLIE
OPTION: BASE BUDGET OF$1,467,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION PLAN QTY. OPC QTY. UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL
GENERAL BASEBALL FIELD IMPROVEMENTS
1 BLEACHERS 8 8 EA $ 7,000.00 $ 56,000.00
2 BLEACHER SHADE STRUCTURES 8 8 EA $ 3,000.00 $ 24,000.00
GENERAL BASEBALL FIELD SUBTOTAL $ 80,000.00
1111111111111111111111111111111111111.111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
FIELD LIGHTING-OUTFIELD
MUSCO FIELD LIGHTING
1 OUTFIELD LIGHTING 1 1 LS $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00
ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $ 300,000.00
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
FIELD LIGHTING-INFIELD
MUSCO FIELD LIGHTING
1 INFIELD LIGHTING (PLAZA) 1 1 LS $ 275,000.00 $ 275,000.00
ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL $ 275,000.00
1
TOTAL FOR ALL IMPROVEMENTS $ 2,701,350.00
Teague Nall and Perkins,Inc.has no control over the cost of labor,materials,equipment,or services furnished by others,or over methods of determining
price,or over competitive bidding or market conditions,any and all opinions as to the cost herein,including but not limited to opinions as to the costs of
construction materials,shall be made on the basis of experience and best available data.Teague Nall and Perkins,Inc.cannot and does not guarantee that
proposals,bids,or actual costs will not vary from the opinions on costs shown herein.
2 4'
280 4
— 14' 11 " - 8' 1 "
1
1LT1 ,. „ .
CHASE LOAD CENTER
42
UTILITY B L O C K O U Tom` 1111! ,-.;;.;,,,;;;.;,;
24'' ;•�
COUNTERTOP 1 1 '
.cml- •
, t
,- �' ,` o .,
11 '—8' Q
FLOOR
132 DRAIN
C
86
//I //I ,.
WOMENS CONCESSION AREA
MENS '•;
EXTERIOR SURFACE: SMOOTH PAINTED CONCRETE FINISH, COLOR (TBD)
FLOOR PLAN MAY BE BUILT MIRROR IMAGED"
na MODULAR CONNECTIONS, LLC P - - °"""'a' °', JOE NO
1090 Industrial Blvd F. 877-675-5851
o�.em,,..��wzz Emo�d...f.eom,w,co,,,,«uan„.,zCc I9
JR 7-13-10 ---
12'X 24'X 8'IH RESTROOM FLOOR PLAN w/CONCESSIONS AREA NA WTE
„0:77, ,,m,,,.a,o,.o 0000 ,'"'"".,,. �.,.a'-'"'.,."t" 72X24RR/CONCESSION �01
PULLIAM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Inc.
Budget Bid Proposal
Date: February 23, 2011
Contact: Chris Seely
Job Site: Community Park
Wylie, Texas
Scope of work: Design Build 12'X 24'
Thank you for the opportunity to submit a bid to design build 24' X 12' new Restroom /Concession's
Facility for the community park football fields. Pulliam Construction Management Inc is basing our pricing on
the following qualifications.
Clarifications:
1. Design and furnish drawings to city for permit.
2. Furnish and install concrete slab per engineered drawing.
3. Based on Steel or Wood stud framing
4. Based on manufactured wood trusses.
5. Sheet rock to be used moisture resistant.
6. FRP or epoxy paint all interior walls.
7. Plumbing fixtures to be Kohler Porcelain per Modular connection's drawings
8. Stainless steel counter top in concession area
9. Brick exterior walls
10. All exterior doors & frames to be steel.
11. Flooring to be sealed concrete.
12. Coil rollup door 4 lf.
13. Roofing to be shingles.
Exclusions:
1. Any city fees.
2. Any additional concrete beyond the slab of the building.
3. Any utility work beyond 5 lf of building
4. No HVAC included.
5. Sales tax.
Total Bid $ 48,050.00
If you have any questions,please call me @ 469-222-7039.
Pulliam Construction Management, Inc
Tommy Pulliam
President
P.O. Box 1132, Wylie Texas 75098