04-02-1990 (Planning & Zoning) Agenda Packet .
'
DATE POSTED 3/30/90
TEKE POSTED 10:00 A.M.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
MONDAY, APRIL 2, 1990
7:00 P. M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
2000 HIGHWAY 78 NORTH
CALL TO ORDER
ORDER OF PAGE
BUSINESS REFERENCE BUSINESS
1 1 - 9 Consider approval of
minutes of the March 19,
1990 meeting
2 10 - 12 Conduct PUBLIC HEARING on a
Replat of Lots 10 & 11 ,
Block B, Stone Grove Phase
II , into one lot
3 ------- Consider recommendation for
approval to City Council of
Replat of Lots 10 & 119
Block B, Stone Grove Phase
II , into one lot
4 ------- Consider recommendation for
approval to City Council on
Preliminary Plat for
Martinez Addition located
at southwest corner of
Kirby and Highway 78, known
as 4. 817 acres out of E. C.
Davidson Survey, Abstract
267
5 13 - 15 Conduct PUBLIC HEARING on
two acre tract of land
located in the Francisco De
La Pina Survey, Abstract
688, being rezoned from B-1
to B-2 (commonly known as
Wylie Junction on Hwy 78N5
requested by Richard
Parker)
6 ------- Consider recommendation for
approval to City Council
for two acre tract of land
located in the Francisco De
La Pina Survey, Abstract
688, being rezoned from B-1
to 9-2 (commonly known as
Wylie Junction on Hwy 78N,
requested by Richard
Parker )
7 ------- Discussion
8 ------- Adjourn
PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING
MINUTES
March 19 , 1990
The Planning and Zoning Commission met in regular session on
Monday, March 19 , 1990 , in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Complex . A quorum was present and notice of the
meeting had been posted in the time and manner required by
law. Members present were Chairman Brian Chaney, Vice
Chairman Bart Peddicord, Cecilia Wood, Bob Skipwith, Bobby
Jennings, Richard Eckman, and Jim Ferguson. Staff members
present were Code Enforcement Officer Roy Faires and
Secretary Candi White.
Chairman Brian Chaney called the meeting to order .
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE MARCH 5 , 1990 MEETING.
No corrections were made to minutes . Chairman Chaney stated
that the minutes would stand as written .
CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OF RE-
ZONING 301 N. BALLARD/ 13,14/15/ BLOCK 3 OF THE BROWN AND
BURNS ADDITION FROM SINGLE FAMILY TO B 1 . Chairman Chaney
stated that due to a conflict of interest on his part , he
would have to abstain from this item in its entirety and
turn it over to Vice Chairman Bart Peddicord . Chairman
Chaney left the discussion.
Cecelia Wood pointed out that the agenda did not list a
public hearing. Mr . Faires stated that a public hearing is
required and that it was announced in the paper but
misprinted on the agenda .
Vice Chairman Peddicord said that twenty-one (21) letters
were mailed to property owners in the required area . Eight
(8) were returned . According to those answered , there were
two (2) in favor and six (6) against .
Bill Lewis of 2614 S. Glenbrook in Garland, representing the
Land Board, stated that the purpose of the re-zoning is to
allow office space for the Land Board . After describing the
six (6) rooms downstairs , Mr. Lewis advised that they wanted
to use the office space behind the library room. There
would be an entrance in the back, coming off Jefferson to
alleviate any traffic congestion on Ballard and parking
would be in the back. Mr. Lewis said that the location is
attractive, there would be no traffic problem, and there
would not be any deterioration to the area. Mr . Lewis
stated that grass and flowers would be added and that would
be an improvement to the area .
Cecelia Wood asked Mr . Lewis how long the Land Board has
owned the property. He answered one year . Ms . Wood also
asked if the Land Board was aware of the zoning when they
purchased the property. He answered yes . Ms . Woods asked
if the Land Board knew they would require a zoning change .
Mr . Lewis answered yes . Ms . Wood stated that usually people
get zoning changed before building and wanted to know why
that was not the case with the Land Board . Mr . Lewis
explained that the Land Board, at the time, was in the
middle of a law suit and it was not convenient .
Ms . Wood asked Mr . Lewis what the office hours would be. He
said that they would be regular office hours . The Land
Board would be keeping all records there. Right now, they
are scattered. Ms . Wood then asked a final question of why
the Land Board was requesting B-1 rather than retail . Mr .
Lewis stated that they did not want to sell anything . They
feel that it would be a good buffer zone between B-2
Northside, Johnston' s and the residential area. The
property will stay like it is except grass and trees would
be added .
Jim Ferguson asked Mr . Lewis a follow-up question on why the
Land Board spent money on the property before re-zoning .
Mr . Lewis answered that the intent of the Land Board was to
use the property for business. Mr. Ferguson stated that
they intended to use it for something it was not zoned for .
Mr . Lewis stated that that was correct . He did not see any
problem with that since the property had not been changed
and only improved. Mr . Ferguson asked again why the Land
Board had not tried to re-zone the property before they
purchased it . Mr. Lewis stated again that they had been
involved in a law suit and they did not think that that was
a good time to see the Planning and Zoning Commission. He
felt that it would put undue pressure on the Planning and
Zoning Board as well as the Land Board .
Mr . Ferguson asked that since the Land Board had stated that
one portion of the building would be used as an office, what
was the rest of the building designated for? Mr . Lewis
stated that they do not have any specific plans at this
time. He advised that only one other room could be used as
a one or two desk office. They really do not know for sure
until the re-zoning is decided . Mr . Lewis stated that they
did not want a lot of people in the building . They do not
see selling anything .
Bobby Jennings then asked Mr . Lewis, if in fact , he foresaw
someone else sharing that building with them in the future.
Mr . Lewis said there was a chance but it would be a low
impact business .
Ms . Wood asked Mr . Lewis if this building would be
considered a privately owned building or a public type
building . Mr . Lewis said it was privately owned but would
still be used publicly. He said that different
organizations would be welcomed to use it .
Mr. Jennings asked Mr . Lewis if it would be used by these
organizations after 5 :00 in the evening . Mr . Lewis answered
yes but the building is situated where it would not disturb
anyone else.
Mr . Jennings asked how many parking spaces were on the
property. Mr . Lewis answered fifteen (15) .
Vice Chairman Peddicord asked Mr . Faires if that number met
the requirement of B-1 zoning . Mr . Faires answered that it
depended on how many square feet of office space they had .
Mr . Faires presumed that with the space Mr . Lewis was
describing , fifteen (15) parking spaces would be ample.
Vice Chairman Peddicord asked if anyone had any more
questions for Mr . Lewis . No one did . He then asked if
anyone else would like to speak for the re-zoning .
Jim Swartz spoke for the re-zoning . Mr Swartz stated that
there was a lot of money tied up in the building . He said
that if the building remained residential , there was no way
the house could be sold . He would like to hope that money
could somehow get back out of the house for our children .
Vice Chairman Peddicord asked if anyone would like to speak
against the re-zoning .
James L. Parker of 306 N. Ballard stated that he was against
the re-zoning because he wants the block to remain zoned
residential . He wanted to speak tonight to say again that
he is against it.
Vice Chairman Peddicord stated that Mr . Parker' s letter was
item number six (#6) . Mr. Jennings asked if Mr. Parker
lived across the street from the property. Mr . Parker
answered that he did.
Vice Chairman Peddicord asked if anyone else wanted to speak
against the re-zoning .
Marie Dillehay of 307 N. Ballard said she lived right next
to it and did not think it should be used for business . It
should stay like it is .
Rita Smith of 401 N. Ballard stated that she had sent her
letter in. Ms . Smith felt that Mr . Swartz had made a good
point. Ms . Smith said that her point was to find a buyer
and then ask for re-zoning . She did not know if changing
the zoning now would help get the money back to where it
belongs . Ms . Smith stated that she too wondered why re-
zoning was not attempted before the purchase of the
property. Ms . Smith stated that she had spent her own money
on Ballard and did not want it used as anything but home.
Ms . Smith said that she did not want her home to made
commercial , that this was the old part of town and it should
be left as residential .
Vice-Chairman Peddicord closed the public hearing and asked
the staff for their recommendations .
Mr . Faires clarified the parking requirements . These
requirements are set out very specifically in the zoning
ordinance. Any encroachment on parking will be dealt with
severely regardless of who the person is or the entity is
that does that . In the event that they try to put more into
this building than they have parking for, they will be cited
the same as any citizen. That is for sure.
Mr. Faires also spoke on the subject of other re-zoning in
the block. Except in very rare cases, your property cannot
be re-zoned without your request. This particular re-zoning
of this particular property will have no bearing on the
zoning of your particular property. Unless you or your
heirs request it , your property will remain as you have it .
Mr . Faires stated that while this is a controversial
subject , after reviewing the application, the Planning and
Zoning Commission would have to decide whether commercial
growth should move north toward Brown and Ballard or south.
Mr . Faires said he felt that the Planning and Zoning
Commission could make a positive step for the future.
Mr. Faires pointed out that the sales tax had been raised to
fund an economic development board and that access to a
building, such as the one the Land Board has proposed, would
be received well by prospective industries coming into the
area .
Mr . Jennings stated that the zoning ordinance had a section
under single family that allowed for public buildings such
as libraries and schools. He asked if it was really
necessary to change the zoning of this property.
Mr . Faires advised that the Land Board was a private trust
and could not be considered as a public building .
Mr . Jennings stated that he had mixed feelings about this
property. He stated that he felt sympathy for those
residents but also felt that the property is an asset to the
city as well in its current condition. Mr. Jennings advised
that he was a little miffed as to why the Land Board did not
come before this Board when the house was purchased knowing
full well that the house was to be used as an office at that
time. Mr . Jennings stated that he was not sure where he
stands on this issue yet .
Ms . Wood brought up the section of the zoning ordinance
under single family, specific uses public and private and
wanted to know if this property could be classified under
this . Mr . Faires answered none of those.
Ms . Wood asked what does the land use plan have for this .
Mr . Faires said that the land use plan is for property
outside the city and not within it . Ms . Wood asked if the
Land Board was applying for a B-1 which permits outside
sales . Mr . Faires answered no , B-2 permits outside sales .
The Land Board is asking for a B-1 which permits limited
outside storage. Ms. Wood wanted to know why they do not
just apply for retail if it will just be offices. Mr.
Faires said that with B-2 across the street , it would be a
natural transition from B-2 to B-1 . Mr. Faires added that
they would fit under retail with their proposed use and that
was an option for this Board . It could be used to restrict
the activity at the location.
Ms . Wood then asked if they would have to have a six (6)
foot fence. Mr . Faires said yes they would around the rear
and between the residential . To not have one would be an
offense.
Bob Skipwith stated that the timing of the request bothers
him. He stated that he could not imagine any business man
spending the amount of money that has been spent on this
property and not bringing it before the city beforehand .
Mr . Skipwith was also concerned that if this Board and the
City Council approves the B-1 zoning, it would then be out
of our hands . That as long as they had the parking , they
can put as many offices as they want in the building. If
someone else were to buy it , they could do what they wanted
to as long as it was within the B-1 zoning .
Mr . Skipwith asked if this was spot zoning . Mr . Faires
answered that is was not . He added that this would have
bothered him if it went retail because if the balance of the
block had gone into heavier zoning then this would have been
spot zoning . That is one reason to go for B-1 instead of
retail because of the possible future spot zoning case .
Mr . Skipwith stated that he was concerned that the citizens
of Wylie were led to believe that the building was being
restored for the good of Wylie and now they want to put
offices in it. He felt that this Board is looking at Wylie
as a whole but he also feels bad for the residents around
this home. He also said that he would feel sorry for the
Land Board if this Board did not approve the re-zoning after
so much money was put into it . Mr . Skipwith stated that it
was hard for him to recommend that the zoning be changed for
these reasons .
Jim Ferguson said he felt that when any entity purchases
property and intends to change the use of the land , they
should follow the rules of the community and the city in
which they plan on doing business .
Mr . Ferguson stated that he had a lot of concern for those
citizens who sent their letters in and came to the meeting .
This has been their homesteads for many years . He stated
that his understanding is that if the zoning was changed on
this property, it would not affect the other homes in the
area for zoning now or for your heirs or even if they sold
to somebody else as residential . The city needs to decide
if commercial use north of Jefferson is imminent and best
for the city. It is a hard decision especially since this
has become a political football instead of a simple zoning
request .
Vice Chairman Peddicord stated that he also thought the
timing was bad but that a decision now had to be made. It
was his opinion that the commercial growth would extend to
the north whether the decision was made now or in the
future. He said that he felt that the decision should be
made that would benefit all the citizens of Wylie. He
stated that this property re-zoned would be a great asset to
the community and would be beneficial in bringing new
business to the city.
Ms . Wood sated that she was concerned about the growth of
the business district going north. She stated that she had
no problem with the property being used as described but if
the zoning was changed to B-1 , we could have Morris' mob
Motorcycle shop in their next week and we could not do
anything about it. Ms . Wood said that she felt that that
would not be fair to those residents in the area .
Bobby Jennings asked Mr. Faires if this Board were to
recommend to the City Council , could we place restrictions
on the hours of business . Mr. Faires answered that it was
not allowed in the zoning ordinance. You could recommend B-
1, retail , or denial to council .
Mr . Jennings stated that the request was commendable as Mr .
Lewis and the Land Board were allowing meetings to be held
in the building , but he was concerned about meetings being
held late at night with cars all around. Mr. Jennings also
stated that he thought this proposed use fit better under
retail .
Ms . Woods motioned for a recommendation that the request be
denied . Mr . Skipwith seconded the motion .
Mr . Skipwith added that he felt that the proposal would hurt
the long time citizens of the area .
Vice-Chairman Peddicord took vote. Motion was carried to
deny recommendation of re-zoning four to two.
Chairman Brian Chaney took over the meeting .
CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OF A
SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR OUTSIDE PLANT SALES AND OUTSIDE SALE
OF FEED AND SEED, ITEMS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FEED AND
SEED STORE AT 207 N. HWY. 78 , LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 20 OF THE
RAILROAD ADDITION. Mr . Chaney stated that a one (1) year
specific use permit was issued last year. The heighths and
types of materials and the placement of those materials were
outlined because of fears of blocking of line of vision to
vehicles and parking problems .
Chairman Chaney opened the public hearing . He asked if
anybody wished to speak for this item. No one did. He
asked if anybody wished to speak against this item. No one
did .
Chairman Chaney closed the public hearing and brought it to
discussion of the Board .
Chairman Chaney asked Mr . Faires if the staff had the plan
that was approved last year . Mr . Faires stated that he did
not but that everything had been close to compliance to what
the Board had requested last year .
Chairman Chaney read into the record that of the seventeen
(17) letters that were mailed out , one was returned and it
was in favor .
Mr . Skipwith asked if part of it was for limited outside
sales . Chairman Chaney answered that this was just a
renewal . It had to be limited to eighteen (18) months if it
was temporary or leave it as is until the business ceases to
exist .
Mr . Skipwith stated that he had been by the business and he
was pleased .
Vice-Chairman Peddicord stated that he has noticed a number
of vehicles for sale on the property and does not feel it is
within the requirements of the specific use permit.
Chairman Chaney stated that if the Board wished to approve
this item, the stipulation could be made that he could not
sell used vehicles out there.
Chairman Chaney stated that he personally believed that Mr .
Pool had taken good care of it and kept it organized. Vice-
Chairman Peddicord stated that he did not have a problem
with it as long as he kept the used cars for sale off of it .
Chairman Chaney asked if the Board wanted to grant the item
for eighteen (18) months or grant him a specific use and not
require him to re-file as long as he retained ownership.
Mr . Skipwith stated that since Vice Chairman Peddicord
brought up the used vehicles for sale on the property that
the Board should give him another limited time so that the
Board could control this aspect .
Mr . Skipwith motioned for a recommendation that a specific
use permit be extended for eighteen months. Vice Chairman
Peddicord seconded the motion. The recommendation passed
with all in favor .
GENERAL DISCUSSION. Chairman Chaney asked if anyone had
anything to discuss .
Mr . Jennings thanked everyone for coming to the public
hearing. He stated that he felt the house on Ballard had
enhanced the look of Ballard St . He could not vote for
recommendation at this time because he felt that the
residents in the area had too much invested and he could not
go against their wishes .
Ms . Wood stated that it was nice to have people at the
meeting besides the Board . She felt that the house on
Ballard is also an asset to the community and that someday
it may be used as an office. Ms . Wood asked about the
status of Freeman Millican who came and talked to the Board
about some capital improvement things. Mr. Faires stated
that it was an impact study and they were still studying .
Ms . Wood saw in the paper that Morrow put in a yard and
Council approved . She wanted to know why he did not come
through the Board. Mr . Faires stated that the Council did
not require that he do so .
Mr . Jennings stated that he thought that Council wanted it
to come back to the Board to see if that use was
appropriate .
Chairman Chaney stated for the record and for those present
that the Board is strictly an advisory board. When the
Board denies an item, it will take seventy-five percent
(75%) of the Council to approve the item unless it is
brought before the Board again for a new hearing .
Vice Chairman Peddicord asked what had happened to the
Emergency Procedures program. Chairman Chaney stated that
Mr. Faires has several pamphlets to look at . The problem is
more involved than the Board first thought.
•
Mr . Faires stated that he did have a group of pamphlets in
the city hall .
Mr . Ferguson thanked everyone for coming tonight . He stated
that the decision made tonight was a hard one to make. He
also mentioned that he had not had the opportunity to do
much on the landscape ordinance. Mr . Ferguson also stated
that sometime in the near future we may be able to look at
excusing the downtown area from all ordinances .
Mr . Skipwith thanked everyone for coming out also . He
stated that it might be a good idea to show up before the
City Council whether you are for it or not . It is not final
until the City Council votes on it .
ADJOURN. The motion was made for adjournment by Cecelia
Wood and seconded by Jim Ferguson with all members in favor .
Brian Chaney, Chairman
Respectfully submitted,
Candi White, Secretary
•
CITY OF WYLIE
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
and City Council
FROM: Department of Public Works
DATE: March 2s 1990
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Replat
Final Plat Site Plan
NAME: A Replat of Lots 10 & 11, Block B Stone Grove Phase II
LOCATION: Foxwood Lane
OWNER: Carlos & Dwan Diaz
Date of P&Z Commission Meeting: March 5, 1990
Attached is a plat application and plat of the proposed
layout which has been reviewed by all concerned departments
in terms of their respective requirements. Comments are as
follows :
RECOMMEND APPROVAL YES YES, WITH STIPULATIONS NO
The owners wish to combine the two lots into one lot upon which they
wish to build one house.
P&Z RECOMMENDATION:
14,
e
so
```,`` GRAPHIC SCALE
13 .`., 0�500 200
to�0 �►� \ BLOCK B `.. �s,H 1 Inch • SO Feet
\ 12 `. a
` ��
I. �1
`94� • \ 1
>i 1
I
�% \ 1.1 St
22 0- 321r,o- 4 % 10—A____J:Fi
t g
` R . 20et 1\ % _ "6
T• 38.52' '"
L• met 11 I V
idimftkoor STONE GROVE PHASE 1 W ; ji /o
BLOCK A s gL i sj.1as bona I UNPLATTED
tont
20 21 z
I N 00391100' w
ACE OF 1 M L sir•iss•94r1.
OEWIN9r0 \ (014
I \.\ \\ 9
FOXW00D LANE � BLOCK B
•
•
\\l ,
0 ——\ 1 a
7
\\\� A REPEAT OF LOTS 10 & 11 OF BLOCK B
STONE GROVE PHASE I
Francisco De Lo Pine Survsy. Abstract No.666
Collin County. Texas
City of Wylie
Dote: February 1990 Scale: 1'150' Job. No. 90004
OMENS:
ae9se ACRES Premed Os
Colo' k Owe% ore Cu wl i s A rode. bs.
EXIS11N0 LAND USE PO/SF-1 Route 1. Sou 330 1470 Nd1e1•u1 Oita • M IX/
Pima Taos(214)44 4499 4 (21R )6 0-0M 70050
MELT 1 OF !
omen CERTIFICATE STATE OF TC(AI STATE OF TOAD
STATE OF TEATS COWIT OF COLLIIt cowry OF COLLMt
MOM*,COLLIN
BEFORE PE.Ve undrsi,isd authority,a Nitary NOIR In end fir the state BEFORE PE.W tdanlplMd wahsrtty,a Notary POW In aid for Ito SARA
VMENIAS.CARLOS DAZ Did Owe DIA2 et ee owners of Lau 10 Did 1 i. of look a VHS day arsaMihy saoeered Criss Olaf'hum to me to a if kilo.,en MN day prearW ly 100eaed George S imiti.mom tome to •
IWOs of Stone Owe Ohm I.an addition to the City or Wylls.Terra a the groin whose*me is arwaQlaed u the romping yMenwMrK One to the mile aarw whoa roe N eesuia la Vie fergaye oisine wit
more*in Corot 0.Pope 173 of the Plat Records of Collin County, aetrMwlaeped to ale (list ha ewe*to seta rr the wow ad more* aauewNepse u me Mot he Imihal w Ma fa tee Wawa aid
Too{.n w Francisco*N Pyle CerMwrret1M therein morels*are n w malty Charon staled
Test
rtloutn th aoa a to Pire��•restrict M.6OS,am being mare cone rstien Hann esermao,are n w iwatlty Deem Natal
OVEN MIER PM IWO NO SEAL OF OFFICE the _ eN of OVEN taw rw IWO NO SEAL OF OFFICE =
SESINNINS at inane at the arm o1 a said Lot 10, mint 990 an Me r ,1990.
Ong in the Esotrly rlpre ot—r or Ina of Femme Lae(50.0 fat width
T/ENCE sling the(overly rqN-N-way line or Rowed Lars es follows
North 1'20'O East,SUS feet to an Non rod at De beginning of a Mary Public n and for the State M Tar IYtaey AMR n and fir us Shale or Team
owe u the left;
Northwesterly Akre said or.,to the left having a cereal ogle of REOSelE DED FOR APPROVAL
32'37'10',a new M 200.0 feet me a tagont of sin feet.an arc •
*sera of 113.06 rat to en fen red at the Northwest carter 0 Lot
I I; STATE OF TONA& Minn"Planing aid Zoning Ca elision Deo •
COUNTY OF COU.Irt City of Wylie,Teas
T1EMCE North SV433'East aloe the Northerly line M Let I I,15130
feet to en Wand at the Nertbat peer of Let I I; BEFORE PE.w lriers►gMi authority,a Netay Public in Did for w State
TI1N Smith Sl'Ite0'East.Q119 feet to an iron mg of �ens 1aacre*to daI Dist.lawn u me a O. APPROVED NO ACCrFPTED
whose none is ongoing instrument One
srmwwlodge0 I.me trot She eroonted the OM for the amen and
T1EPQ South 17043'West,215.66 feet to an yen roe at the Solt/wait csmldrstlen therein oler'esle%WO n the amity Vertu staled Meyer,City of Wylie.Term Dote
DAWN Let 10;
OVEN LIVER Pis IWO NO SEAL OF OFFICE this — day M Wylie,Tess west'
TIEN J mirth
391r West aloe the South line of lot 10,130.0 feet to 1990 The Ireorsic ed,the City Secretoy of the City K
the PI.AU OF IIESINNN6,and ordaining 0.6449 aces of Ise,more r etis certllles that the Iir gong fYwl Not of'A REPLAT OF LOTS 10 L 11,
` 010019 OF STONE WOVE MAWS r.mwaivwlun or WOW u the City of
•
wow was elonitta to the City CINCH Mee ay if
4111441111111 Rotary Public n ad for w State of Tara till ma w Cowell ay aM. slush eon Did
POW THEREFORE 101Dw ALL FEN ST T1ESE PRESEIfflc lire mooted w M01pl9 0 Nthemats,allays,Salle,awanilk It aWllt
Places.MI water end sewer Inca m Mown ono at forth n one lain WI
THAT.CARL06 MN Ana MAN Sethi M homy SOW isle Nat as'A fEPIAT SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE Piet.end aid Council Heiler a therues the Meyer to seta the italPtawe
t1eflW ew sliming Ns nab as nominative sheared
OF LOTS 10 L 11,BLOCK 0 OF STOIC WOVE PHASE r.M addition to the
City of Who.Teak we a hereey Moscato u the relic uN tamer the KPOW ALL PEN Br THESE PICSENESe Witham my hand uas day Of AD,1990
streets mid Nlsye Moron; we is Purely*Note to aeseaent atrws
Mmrl en the Plot Ir the NAAS toe are occommet atica of III Pain THAT.I,Merge S Pewit',de eweoy certify that I manna tn1A Plat from
utilities empire to use.r wisp woe.is*wings,fops,trees.anal an actUsl missy of MO ale lad tha the peter mDlunents mown thereon
r seer Poreo rests Nell be CMMWCIN If Placed WAR Ova in Sala *WV primly Placed Mar my Prsawi 1Orvwirl n aareaks with the City 6sritay,City N WIN,Two
the Nowise t strips on aN Piet My polic utility Well hew w riteit to Plettop Ruin and Regulsllre of the City Plating CNMliairn of the City
renew ad Om removed all or art of My buildings,frees trees,Wee of Wylie.Trim
of our OntronmentO of*MOM Walt In any way ensaer r interfere
with the phauvctton maintenance or off Rimy of Its respsctee system
en sly of Nee nowise t Urea,are My'elk utility shell at NI tiles
. Iwo the ell*of Im rem we evens Le and trim ere Won any of said 6eerps I Peeett
eaMlad strips fr the otiose of constructing, recustructWL Registered Premiere!Lee Strayer•4171
yeactnp,atrslli e,imHsnye one aeing to r fancying all or owl of
Its relactlue 9yatM1 willed lei moiety at any MN M p50 1 p De
oorlalasla N angle.
WITNESS PN IWO TIIS day of 1990.
A REPLAT OF LOTS 10 & 11 OF BLOCK 8
Cares Ole Darin Die STONE GROVE PHASE I
Francisco De La Pino Survey, Abstract No.688
Collin County, Texas
City of Wylie
Dote: February 1990 Scale: 1'-50' Job. No. 90004
hyaena Dr
aesw ACRES ONNETtS Doan Din
EXISTING LAND USE PO/SF-I Rw%. Sew 336 14Q 5 flitmerewn Oen »
Plena, Twos 75074 Nehadart Toga 70000
(214)442-44et (214)110-011102
WIT2OF2
APPLICATION
TO
Board of Adjustment and Appeals (Building) ORDINANCE 83-15
1111 Board of Adjustment aVd Appeals (Zoning) ORDINANCE 81-5
EX) Planning and Zoning Commission ORDINANCE 81-5
NAME 1 Ck) ASV fl2/4"IZ— - .
ADDRESS /" 1V X 3 0 7 Wi // Le
LOT ( e y,4-C 4r7iK-I BLOCK , .
SUBDIVISION
BASIS OF APPLICATION: � ,a"' \
�,
s
r
Interpretation
1 Special exception for use or development
Variance
E] Rezoning .
[-I Exception to Building Code `
EXPL74T ON:
G� �.e-e.
FA e 13 f —Tr /3 _- '.
••
SIGNITURE of APPLICANT
DATE . 3. -/ --561
Must be accompanied by filing fee, 9f $ Io
,
. p4i .
a/0• 4d L� .
' 66 - 7 . of
Received: --A ar-/D '
Date: 3--g - f J
1
irr - .
Ci ' ENF EMENT OFFICER -- . 13 .
partial us ta/WinaW YyW4aWVW
. . Jiy) p rphip successors in interest to a general - - • _. -
or limited partnership which dissolves but does & DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS:
• not terminate;
(Iv)the successors in interest to a general or limited (a) In all cases where this policy provides for the
partnership resulting from the distribution of the defense of any action or proceeding, the Insured shall
assets of such general or limited partnership up- secure to the Company the right to so provide defense in
on partial or complete liquidation; such action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and
(v)the successors in interest to a joint venture re- permit It to use,at its option, the name of the Insured for
pelting from the distribution of the assets of such purpose.
such joint venture upon partial or complete (b) The Company shall have the right to select
liquidation; counsel of its own choice whenever It Is required to defend
(v1) the successor or substitute trustee of a trustee any action or proceeding, and such counsel shall have corn-
named In a written trust Instrument;or plete control of said defense.
(vii)the successors In interest to a trustee or trust re- (c) The Company shall have the right at its own
suiting from the distribution of all or part of cost to institute and without undue delay prosecute any
the assets of such trust to the beneficiaries action or proceeding or to do any other act which in its
des , opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title
eof
to the estate or interest as insured, and the.Company may
2. EXCLUSIONS FROM THE COVERAGE take any appropriate action under the terms of the policy,
OF THIS POLICY: whether or not it shall be liable thereunder, and shall not
thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this - --
! The land referred to in this policy is descrlbul as follows
Being a tract of land situated in the Francisco De La Pina Survey, Abstract
• No. 688, Collin County, Texas, and being that two acre tract as conveyed to
G.E. Alderman, Trustee, as recorded in Volume 1539, Page 189, Deed Records
of Collin County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the South line of State Highway No. 78, said Point
being the Northwest corner of said two acre tract, a 1/2' iron stake set for
corner.
t
Thence, N. 89° 21' 40" E. , along the South line of State Highway No. 78, a
distance of 417.42 feet to a 1/2" iron stake found for corner.
Thence S. 0° 35' 08" E. , leaving the South line of State Highway No. 78, a
distance of 208.45 feet to a 1/2" iron stake found for corner.
Thence, S. 89° 26' 06" W. , a distance of 417.59 feet to a 1/2" iron stake found
for corner.
Thence, N. 0° 32' 20" W., a distance of 208.64 feet to the Place of Beginning
and containing 2.00 acres of land. This description is based on the Land Title
Survey, and plat made by Bob 0. Brown, Registered Public Surveyor on April
23, 1987.
•
4
:nil itharkir a 7:41n
, 1 '
ti
ff.-- WOODLAKE VILLAGE.
3.z38!
i
3 6 C E NT E N N S A ‘•. A k .A"P,� N O
: •••• 5 EN . \/ ENT v.. R.
E.-
el‘
67Sy AG
�►c 3354 - 1;1 ;S
!/vg9)
. 14
SH 78
38 190 191 2 ,S N‘aa. 44 41
AiyRAd
WYLIE RANCH EAST wr�ix CITY ,k;
Romeo CORP.
��Rcc _.� 3 ,ems , _ 531 COMMERCIAL PARK 35 '•k
a ,_ •f3G-y4S ,y
A.
J y i11t�c /,y%67f�C \WYLIE H��/Y 78 J. V. �'
28G9- 628
•
lel-54/AG. P
S %a.s.S
1
u
. WYNDHAM-ES-T-ATES -# 1 ____ i P\ _ - - - -- — -
N
o85_ --' -i."'
iS 1 %81
• - --cc -WYLIE RANCH EAST 49
` - - s ' WYL(E NAVY 18 e
- g
•
I.
.--411 1849- 628 i
a.0%`�
WYNDHAM ESTATES #2 32. s79AC. c
_:-----
RAN f o/FP. M
YS3-53'7 — - nt
_
:. 989/ 4C. --