05-18-1998 (Planning & Zoning) Agenda Packet Planning zoning
Commission
a,,, Wylie
R egular Busi ness Meeting
May 18 , 1998
AGENDA
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
WYLIE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
2000 Highway 78 North, Wylie, Texas 75098
May 18, 1998
7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
ACTION ITEM
1. Discuss and Consider approval of the Minutes from the May 4, 1998, Regular Business
Meeting.
2. ZC. No. 98-03: Hold a public hearing and consider a recommendation to the City Council for
a request from R. Parker for approval of a zone change from A(Agricultural)to B-2
(Business) for the property generally located along the north side of FM 544 between FM
1378 and Sanden Boulevard and being all of a .768 acre tract out of the John W. Curtis
Survey, Abstract No. 196, City of Wylie, Collin County, Texas.
DISCUSSION ITEM
1. Review of the Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Plans
2. Review of Water and Sewer Impact Fees Collected
ACTION ITEM
1. Consider Report to City Council
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
ADJOURNMENT
GAM'AUL:1\4"N‘A-.L0
Posted Friday, May 15, 1998, at 5:00 p.m.
THE WYLIE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX IS WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE. SIGN INTERPRETATION OR OTHER SPECIAL ASSISTANCE FOR DISABLED
ATTENDEES MUST BE REQUESTED 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE BY CONTACTING THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 442-8100 OR TDD AT 442-8170.
itit,
i
of Wylie
Action Item No. 1
Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Business Meeting: May 18, 1998
Action Item No. 1 RE: Approval of the Minutes from the May 4, 1998, Regular
Business Meeting.
1. Consider approval of the Minutes from the May 4, 1998,Regular Business Meeting. Please
note any changes or additions which need to be made.
MINU tES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
WYLIE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
2000 Highway 78 North, Wylie, Texas 75098
Regular Business Meeting
May 4, 1998
7:00 P.M.
A quorum was present and a notice was posted in the time and manner required by law.
Members Present: Staff Present:
Richard Eckman, Chairman Tobin Maples, Planning Director
Steve Ahrens, Vice Chairman Carrie Smith, Secretary
Mark Clark Mindy Manson, Assistant City Manager
Sharon Dowdy
Eric Hogue
Cecilia Wood
Members Absent:
Ray Capley
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Eckman.
ACTION ITEMS
1. Approval of April 20, 1998, Regular Business Meeting Minutes.
Motion: A motion was made by Steve Ahrens, Seconded by Cecilia Wood to approve the April 20,
1998, Regular Business Meeting Minutes. Motion carried all in favor (6).
2. Recommendation to the City Council regarding a Preliminary Plat for Wylie Fire Station No.!,
proposed by the City of Wylie, generally located along the east side of South Ballard just north
of Alanis and being all of a 1.502 acre tract out of the Allen Atterberry Survey, Abstract No. 23,
City of Wylie, Collin County, Texas.
• Tobin Maples gave the Commission an update:
The applicant is platting this property to facilitate an expansion to the fire station
and to bring the property into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and
Subdivision Regulations. A public hearing was held on April 20, 1998 regarding a
zoning change (ZC. No.98-04) for this property. The zoning change was
recommended to the City Council. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat and found
it to be in compliance with the Subdivision Regulation. Staff is recommending
approval, subject to City Council Approval of ZC. No. 98-04.
• Cecilia Wood asked about sidewalks, drives, and screening. Tobin Maples said no
screening in required.
Motion: A motion was made by Cecilia Wood, Seconded by Mark Clark to recommend approval of
Preliminary Plat for Wylie Fire Station No. 1 to City Council. Motion carried all in favor
(6).
3. Recommendation to City Council regarding a Preliminary Plat of Wylie Fire Station No. 2,
proposed by the City of Wylie, generally located along the west side of FM 1378 just north of
Brown Street and being all of a 7.505 acre tract out of the G.W. Gunnel Survey, Abstract No.
351, City of Wylie, Collin County, Texas.
• Tobin Maples gave the Commission an update:
The applicant is platting this property to facilitate the construction of Wylie Fire
Station No. 2. The property is currently vacant, unplatted, and zoned for A
(Agricultural) uses. Staff has reviewed the proposed plat and found it to be in
compliance with the Subdivision Regulations and other pertinent ordinances of the
City of Wylie. Staff is recommending approval.
• Cecilia Wood asked Fire Chief Shan English, the projected time for completion.
Chief English said they will go out to bid next week, accept a bid by the end of the
month, and have complete construction by October 1998. The department will start
as a volunteer station with 24 hour ambulance service and trucks. In two to four
years, Station No. 2 will be fully staffed.
• Cecilia Wood asked Tobin Maples about the zoning change.
Tobin Maples explained, the A (Agricultural) does allow for a Fire Station and it is
not necessary to do a zoning change on this property.
Motion: A motion was made by Eric Hogue, Seconded by Sharon Dowdy to approve
recommendation of the Preliminary Plat for Wylie Fire Station No. 2 to City Council.
Motion carried all in favor(6).
Minutes-Planning and Zoning Commission
May 4, 1998,Regular Business Meeting
Page 2
DISCUSSION ITEM
1. Review of the Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Plans
2. Review of Water and Sewer Impact Fees Collected
• Mindy Manson handed out a Capital Improvement Program Funding Summary and
a 10-Year Capital Improvement Program Cost Projection Water System Table 3.
Mindy Manson will provide the Commission with a survey of the different cities water
system and street impact fees.
ACTION ITEM
1. Consider report to City Council.
Motion: A motion was made by Steve Ahrens, Seconded by Cecilia Wood, to table this report until
the surveys requested have been provided. Motion carried, all in favor(6).
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
No one responded.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion: A motion was made by Steve Ahrens, Seconded by Eric Hogue for adjounment. Motion
carried, all in favor (6).
Minutes-Planning and Zoning Commission
May 4, 1998,Regular Business Meeting
Page 3
•
- :City of Wylie
Action Item No. 2
98-03 Rezoning
Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing: May 18, 1998
Owner/Applicant: R. Richard Parker
Location: Generally located along the north side of FM 544
between FM 1378 and Sanden Blvd.
Existing Zoning: A (Agricultural)
Requested Zoning: B-2 (Business)
Summary:
The applicant is requesting rezoning on .768 acres in order to develop the property with business
uses. Currently, the property is being utilized as a legal non-conforming use (storage for
landscape contractor with minor accessory office use). The surrounding properties are vacant and
zoned for A(Agricultural) uses.
Public Comment Forms were mailed to six (6) property owners within 200 feet of this request.
One (1)Public Comment Forms in support of the request has been returned.
Issues:
• The Comprehensive Plan recommends industrial uses for the property. The proposed zoning
and land use are compatible with Comprehensive Plan as uses permitted within the B-2
(Business) zoning district are less intensive than those permitted within the I (Industrial)
district.
Department of Planning, 05/15/98
98-03
• The applicant is aware that the existing C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) on this property is for
a non-conforming use (storage for landscape contractor with minor accessory office use) and
prohibits retail sales of any sort. City Council approval of a rezoning request does not change
the status of an existing C.O. or establish compliance with applicable city codes.
• The applicant is aware that if it is his desire to change the use of the property, including
adding retail sales activity at this location, application for a new C.O. must be made prior to
the occurrence of said change.
• The applicant is aware that the property will have to be brought up to code prior to the
issuance of a new C.O. or any building permits for future development.
• The B-2 (Business) zoning district requires a 10' minimum side yard. The existing structure
on the property encroaches the 10' side yard requirement by 7'. The applicant is aware that
the Board of Adjustment would have to approve a variance to the side yard requirement
before staff could issue a new C.O. on this property.
Financial Considerations:
Zoning application fee - $225
Staff Recommendation:
Approval
The Departments of Public Works, Fire, and Community Development concur with this
recommendation.
Attachments:
Public Comment Form
Location Map
Area Zoning Map
Property Owner Notification Map
Property Owner Notification Report
Public Hearing Notice
Site Survey
Zoning Change Application
Department of Planning, 05/15/98
PUBLIC COMMENT FORM
(Please type or use black ink)
Department of Planning
2000 Highway 78 North
Wylie,Texas 75098
x I am FOR the requested zoning as explained on the attached public notice for Zoning Case#98-03.
I am AGAINST the requested zoning as explained on the attached public notice for Zoning Case#98-03.
Date,Location&Time of
Planning&Zoning
Commission meeting: Monday,May 18, 1998,7:00 pm
Municipal Complex, 2000 Highway 78 North, Wylie,Texas
Date,Location&Time of
City Council meeting: Tuesday,June 9, 1998,7:00 pm
Municipal Complex, 2000 Highway 78 North, Wylie,Texas
Name: Frances Bates Wells
(please print)
Address: 6800 Coit Road
Plano, Texas 75023-1003
Wylie Tax Account Number
(if shown on enclosed map): R-6563-000-0020-1 Signature: 'C mo Q. e►'y\_, LUG\\,
Date: May 12 , 1998
COMMENTS:
l McMillen f J Road 'i rimiummu-
MN
Lu1
e t. PooEJ L�.n City Lt) ..
bpi1_13
Nick---/iii
fi
IiTiui*II
mg.
.....-.. -- .Mimunlannul B —I— in la
- - .O F. FIT =I==i==__�
rnmommansm
tumult int
emits'aft
II ►.unsi uil
1
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII iAIMrMIIIMMINIMINImm ilMIE I MN'RI1M M.t SS,1 .... r-ilIMINV
—.-. / Wes' Brown Stre-
rt:
III1 I,,+ rnnD� !_
00,.zilartras,84.1,..e.
muuunni es �wu •rMe ►►i:• ui�0•
':::is-_- virtu 4 torrid
Ilk iik
IMp2
_��_._suunnn °� ,-..
4b ":� 0`�i ii111UM e ?S,III�O 1 111
' •4 1.11f illMinuu.►►a l i= i n11U► i
11I111111111111��
4.
11,111UIIIUIIIIUII U
<c-4161111bi
s^w.
.111111111119
LIVIIRIllair 1111— Luta% ill ik - 4
les
iiiiiiiiiii II Is le
Immo
Ida A
SIPA
pp _i;........0 Or Wria ilIVIIIMMT777 in r.L.i.
V Me
1.1.11111 Ar ' ' 1; I' .....
,,,,ed * v E fie
•• ••i t'l_ PIIIIII1111111ulttiti t
• .," ivniali II nw: ®uQWW111
/' ' 111®1WIIIlnl
- 1111 1111'Utltlti
.1.-- • a
in
1 . I "esimml=1"1-A21.16e
-Ts 14iiiih, impLomill
_...... III MMMIEMP,
Ail
~ 1111161111,:\ III
1MINE
INEnulll_n= !.
4 mw BMW
viuIIuu uu»r ♦ _
'MUM Ill///
\ _ I Illlllllllll ) •
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
ZONING CASE #98-0003
..-
../
„-- _:-
1
. ..„
.7---- 7
SUBJECT .
7/ . ...,
7 // '
PROPERTY ...
/
7/
.,..,. /
/ i
/ ., /
,.... /
„,._„/ .../.
/ I\
/
, ./.
, / 1•=500' i
i
i .
/ ...
i
/
/
A ,
_
7/ „/
„„
, / ../
_
__,.„ ,,,, .
_ ,_ ,,,,,,_
__
......„
, , ,
..______ , 1
________1 I ----,... _______________.
/
A / ....,..
\ ...„. ,
/ /
/-_-7'--
-------_______
. / / C---t ------
. ."
(-01
1 >1
1 / / A
A /-_,„
../
_._
,--- ,./
/ /
,
a,
Cl)
, ,..,,,
v A,
‘,„..... ,
Ns, ,
. .
A ,
•
.•
f '
i r 1
ZONING AREA MAP
ZONING CASE #98-0003
i N
NW
Frances Bates Wells 1 "=200'
R-6563-000-0020-1
__ __ _ _ ______ _ ____ _ _____. . ,.
T _ q. R T . —
. _ y
Richard Parker ,' R 0 � 'R-6196-000-0050-1 _ vV O y • — •— •. • • _
• �S bj-ct • -
. P'O• =dy Frances Bates Wells — — • • _ _ _
/ , . Park=r
R-6563-000-0020-1
�� -• '6-000-a 050-1
./ ./ a/z
/
,••TU Electric,•• Wylie I.S.D.,R=6563-000 QO 10-1 R-6563-000-0030-
1
/' \.
/*
. PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION MAP
_ . . _ . _ . _ .. _. . _ _. ._ . . _. T-ZONING CASE #98-03
i
i
NOTIFICATION REPORT ,
APPLICANT: Richard Parker APPLICATION FILE # 98-0003
P.O. Box 307 Wylie, Texas 75098 .
# BLK/ABST LOT/TRACT TAX I.D. # PROPERTY OWNER NAME ADDRESS
TU Electric P.O. Box 219071
1 Abst. 563 Tract 1 R-6563-000-0010-1 State & Local Tax Department Dallas, Texas 75221-9071
6800 Coit Road
2 Abst. 563 Tract 2 R-6563-000-0020-1 Frances Bates Wells Plano, Texas 75023-1003
1001 S. Ballard
3 Abst. 563 Tract 3 R-6563-000-0030-1 Wylie I.S.D. Wylie, Texas 75098
601 Pacific Avenue
4 Abst. 563 Tract 4 DART Railway Dallas, Texas 75202-3356
P.O. Box 307
5 Abst 196 Tract 5 R-6196-000-0050-1 Richard Parker (Applicant) Wylie, Texas 75098
210 S. McDonald Street
6 Abst 196 Collin County Commissioners Court McKinney, Texas 75069
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING``��
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AND CITY COUNCIL
An application has been received by the City of Wylie for a:
PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE
Zoning Case Number: 98-03
Applicant: R. Richard Parker
Location: Generally located across the street from the high shool along the north side of FM 544 between FM
1378 and Sanden Blvd.
Property Description: Being all of a .768 acre tract out of the John W. Curtis Survey, Abstract No. 196,Collin County,
Texas(See the attached Exhibit"A"for full legal description)
Present Zoning: A(Agricultural)
Requested Zoning: B-2 (Business)
Landscape Contractor's Yard
This public hearing is held to consider the application as an amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Wylie, Texas and the Official Zoning Map. The request will be considered as follows:
Planning and Zoning Commission: Monday,May 18,1998,7:00 PM
City Council: Tuesday,June 9,1998,7:00 PM
Each public hearing will be held at the following location:
City Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex
2000 Highway 78 North,Wylie,Texas
This notice has been sent to all owners of real property within 200 feet of the request, as such ownership appears on the last
approved city tax roll. Action by the Planning and Zoning Commission serves as a recommendation to the City Council and is
not a final action on the request. If the Commission recommends denial,a three-fourths majority vote by the City Council shall
be required for approval. Zoning districts, amendments and conditions recommended by the Commission for approval by the
City Council may be more restrictive than those described in this notice.
All interested persons are encouraged to attend the public hearing and express their opinions on the zoning change request. If
you are unable to attend,but wish to have your opinions made a part of the public record,please complete the enclosed form and
return it prior to the public hearing. Please print your name, address of the property you own and the tax account number(if
applicable)on the enclosed form and return it to the following address:
•
City of Wylie
Department of Planning
2000 Highway 78 North
Wylie,TX 75098
If the property owners of 20%or more of the land within the 200 foot notification area file a written protest prior to the public
hearing, state law provides that approval of the zoning change request shall require an affirmative vote of 3/4 of the members of
the City Council.
The application is on file for public examination in the Planning Department at 2000 Highway 78 North, Wylie,Texas. For
additional information,please contact the Planning Department at 972/442-8150. Please reference the zoning case number when
requesting information.
This facility is wheelchair accessible and handicapped parking spaces are available. Requests for interpretation services or
assistive hearing devices must be made 48 hours prior to the meeting. Contact the Office of the City Secretary at(972)442-8103,
or(TDD) (972)442-8170 for assistance.
Ds
,,,\.'<z's. -<•D /(0 —.----- --' . ,
•
v (� 1/7 LR. 3E1 I ► -
` `? �A. •1 C, T -i or bti I, e
-7/10 P.A.
yy GD` \ / y FENCE POSE N /r) (�`/�
\ , 1
/
4I \3_
i w=
,,)� V 191.4 ACRE'/ ?.3.5.S L � M.F. MATH
,/� oicki l a F S"4 VOLUME 165, )
0.70 ACRES Ipc6t'-` If.e
, R. RICHARD PARKER 1 ,\
CCU 93-0094964 ► w.4 w
------\A-,_
o I ; 0.766 AC RES
— pg 9 ca i /s'
---: IL---,
P.P. y"` !
------.. --.___. i i .. \ NY-
I J
1/2 l.R. 3ET i {
l� N 7p 48
0 ` \
\ \
READ t P.P. k ` POIN1
�`'� � ,2p,e 93 BEGIr,
No. lit 1.R. MD. ,
544
J iv �WirreR /S I/1aihocs� f.. ,
i Cr7 Y ,c- 'JAI f I. e.
Page 1 of 2 5/y
CITY OF WYLIE
P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE, TEXAS 75098
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
Case No. Fili Fee •
Date A/ i
Applicant fe cc-1.Q,eO eE2
�� Phone No.
Mailing Address: Work No. �'f 72 -Wz•,S"//
eX- 3a
ZA 7- 9r
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SOUGHT TO BE REZONED: (If additional space is
needed for de ri tion, the description may be put on a separate sheet and attached hereto).1
I hereby,request that the above described property • changed from its present zoning which
is /f6 District Classificati b
on to /� • ,1 Dis
for the following reasons: tact Classification
(attach separate sheet if necessary) uAi e,i) The P o p crz,Ty c..%s Avviv e-a ElD /•✓
1995 /T r d is ",.1)4 v s Fo ,.,i f3 "0 44/ivErt c,c.i rt 'c L r� ae-r t,; 13-Z
There (are) (are not) deed restrictions pertaining to the intended use of the property.
2 /
Status of Applicant Owner ✓ Tenant
Prospective Purchaser
I have attached hereto as Exhibit "A" a plat showing the property which is the subject of this
requested zoning change and have read the following concerning the importance of my submitting
to the City a sufficient legal description.
A@ - Signed —
RECD MAR 3 l 1998
RECD MAR 311998
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Being all that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the John Jr'. Curtis Survey.Abstract No.
196. Collin County, Texas. and being a part of a tract of land conveyed to R. Richard Parker by
deed recorded by County Clerks No. 93-0094964, Collin County, Texas and being more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a 1/2 inch iron rod found in the northeast right-of-way line of F.M. Road No. 544
and being the southeast corner of a 191.4 acre tract of laird conveyed to rtl.F. Mathews by deed .
recorded in Volume 165, Page 556, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas;
36 Thence, A' 76'43'00" I3', along said right-of-way line,a distance of 202.93 feet to a 112 inch iron
rod set for corner;
Thence. A' 16' 24'06" E, a distance of 201.74 feet to a metal fence post for corner;
Thence, :S' 27' ,3.1' 31" I3', a distance of 65.26 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod set fbr corner in the •
southeast line of a tract of land conveyed to Texas Power Light Company by deed recorded in
3 olrrnre 575. Page 224, Deed Records, Collin County, Texas;
Thence. 49' 53'41" li, along the southeast line of said Texas Power R Light Company tract
of land, a distance of 7-1.05 feet to a 112 inch iron rod set for corner in the west line of
aforementioned Mathews tract of land:
Thence. S 16' 34'l,3" E. along the west line of said Mathews tract of land, a distance of 384.44
feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 0.768 acres of land.
All of the above property lies within Zone".•11i' (Base flood elevation determined)according to the
['load Insurance Rate clap Community Panel;Vumber 48085(.0465 G dated January /9, 1996.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
1, Donald J. Jackson do hereby certify that this .survey was made on tire ground and correctly
P.P. shorts the boundary lines with dimensions of the land indicated hereon, correctly shows the
location of cr1l structures and other noticeable improvements and visible items on the subject
property. correctly shows the location of all rollers, streets. eersernenh. and other matters of record
of which 1 have been advised affecting the subject property, and except trs .how ry. there are no
visible easements. partyrrulls. or conflicts on subject property.
MEMO
To: Planning & Zoning Commission �,M
From: Mindy Manson, Assistant to the City Manager (���
Subject: Water and Sewer Impact Fee Review •
Date: May 15, 1998
During the May 4 Planning Commission meeting, staff presented information pertaining to the
status of the projects listed within the water and sewer Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). In
addition, staff presented information regarding the collection of the water and sewer impact fee.
State Law states that a report be filed semi-annually with the City Council regarding the progress
of the CIP and any perceived inequities in the plan or the adopted Impact Fee. During the
meeting, the Commission requested additional information which is included.
Attached you will find a Water and Sewer Impact Fee Comparison which was compiled by staff
utilizing a survey completed by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG).
The survey indicates that the water impact fee for the City of Wylie is below the average, while
the sewer impact fee is above average. In cities of high growth, the fees tend to be higher due
to the demand that growth places on the community's water and sewer infrastructure. The sewer
rate reflects the demand being placed on the capacity of Wylie's existing wastewater treatment
system and a portion of the costs associated with the construction of a new plant. State law
requires that the land use assumptions, the infrastructure needs, and the fees be reviewed in detail
every three years.
Also included for the Commissions review is the background information submitted to the City
Council on the adoption of the current fees on March 11, 1997. This packet is a comprehensive
review of the information considered by the Impact Fee Advisory Committee and the City
Council, including a review of alternate options for funding the necessary infrastructure expansion
required by new development. The minutes from the March 11 Council meeting are attached to
include the comments received from developers.
Finally, additional information requested by the Commission on various fees associated with water
and sewer connections is included. The source of this data is also from the NCTCOG. The City
of Wylie did not participate in the survey at the time it was distributed, however, where pertinent,
City of Wylie fees are indicated at the bottom of the survey page.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to let us know.
IMPACT FEE COMPARISON
•
EST. SERVICE WATER SEWER TOTAL
CITY TOTAL MAXIMUM
POPULATION UNIT FEE FEE
ALLOWED
ADDISON 10,150 none none none none none
ALLEN 30,119 5/8" meter $547.00 $92.00 $639.00
CARROLLTON 92,514 acre $920.00 $310.00 $1,230.00 $2,502.00
CEDAR HILL 24,150 5/8" meter $769.00 $231.00 $1,000.00
COLLEYVILLE 16,000 per lot $815.00 $51.00 $866.00
COPPELL 25,700 5/8" meter $450.00 $450.00 $900.00
CORINTH 6,100 5/8" meter $1,960.00 $375.00 $2,335.00 $2,335.00
DESOTO 35,650 5/8" meter $325.00 $75.00 $400.00
DUNCANVILLE 35,100 none none none none none
FLOWER MOUND 33,800 3/4" meter $674.00 $1,396.00 $2,070.00 $5,000.00
FRISCO 20,000 acre $1,589.00 $1,589.00 $3,178.00
GARLAND 192,200 5/8" meter $238.00 $0.00 $238.00 $953.00
GEORGETOWN 18,500 3/4" meter $825.00 $600.00 $1,425.00
GRAND PRAIRIE 110,000 5/8" meter $290.00 $145.00 $435.00 $637.00
GRAPEVINE 33,358 per lot $764.00 $140.00 $904.00
HEATH 2,800 5/8" meter $2,250.00 $5,000.00 $7,250.00
KELLER 18,850 5/8" meter $750.00 $750.00 $1,500.00
KERRVILLE 17,384 3/4" meter $500.00 $475.00 $975.00
LANCASTER 22,500 3/4" meter $615.00 $606.00 $1,221.00 $3,306.00
LEWISVILLE 57,500 3/4" meter $900.00 $1,103.00 $2,003.00
MANSFIELD 18,250 3/4" meter $680.00 $350.00 $1,030.00 $2,476.52
MCKINNEY 34,000 3/4" meter $385.00 $490.00 $875.00 $1,365.00
MESQUITE 111,550 5/8" meter $408.00 $286.00 $694.00
PLANO 176,408 3/4" meter $758.00 $378.00 $1,136.00
RICHARDSON 79,800 none none none none none
ROCKWALL 14,000 5/8" meter $412.00 $1,640.00 $2,052.00 $4,189.00
ROWLETT 31,800 acre $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
SACHSE 7,200 per lot $693.00 $418.00 $1,111.00 $4,648.00
SCHERTZ 13,500 5/8" meter $750.00 $1,300.00 $2,050.00
SOUTHLAKE 14,950 1" meter $1,250.00 $1,000.00 $2,250.00
SUNNYVALE 2,232 $2,995.00 $834.00 $3,829.00
THE COLONY 24,300 per lot $125.00 $450.00 $575.00
IWYLIE 11,698 5/8" meter $700.00 $1,412.00 $2,112.00 $2,112.00 I
•
WYLIE CITY COUNCIL
ACTION AGENDA COMMUNICATION
ITEM NO 4 •
March 11, 1997
Issue
Hold a Public Hearing to receive public input regarding the 10-Year Capital Improvements
Program (1997-2006) and Maximum Calculated Impact Fees recommended by the Impact Fee
Advisory Committee and consider adoption of the 10-Year Capital Improvements Program
(1997-2006) and consider adopting or amending the Impact Fees.
Back: send
The review process for updating the Impact Fees by the Impact Fee Advisory Committee is now
complete. The committee has reviewed and made a recommendation to the City Council for
approval of the Land Use Assumptions, 1997-2006. A Public Hearing was held at the January
28, 1997 City Council meeting on the recommendation of the Land Use Assumptions by the
Advisory Committee. The Council agreed with that recommendation and adopted those
Assumptions by resolution that evening. The adoption of the resolution approving the Land Use
Assumptions, 1997-2006 allowed the City Council to set a Public Hearing on the 10-Year
Capital Improvements Program (1997-2006) (CIP) and the Impact Fees calculated from that CIP.
The Notice of the Public Hearing to consider the CIP and the Impact Fees was published more
than 30 days prior to the Hearing and was published for three consecutive weeks.
The final meeting of the Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFAC) was held on January 16, 1997.
At that meeting, the IFAC reviewed the CIP and determined that all of the projects on the CIP
were appropriate infrastructure improvements for the estimated growth of development in the
upcoming ten years. The IFAC made a recommendation to City Council to adopt the CIP. The
City Council must evaluate the projects listed on the CIP and, if they agree with the IFAC,
should adopt the CIP.
The 10-Year Capital Improvements Program (1997-2006) (CIP)'outlines the Capital projects
required to support the future development in the City based on the Land Use Assumptions,
1997-2006 and the Water and Waste Water Master Plan Update. This CIP, prepared by The
Hogan Corporation, outlines six water projects and four sewer projects. The water projects
include current water system improvements being built under the 1995 Bond Program, a future
12" main along Sanden Blvd., a future 8" line along Hensley Lane, a 12" main along Kirby St.,
a future 12" main along future Park Blvd., and a future oversized 12" main through the
Woodbridge Addition. The sewer projects include a future sewer main from Newport Harbor
to the Muddy Creek Interceptor. Also included are a group of sewer mains: A future 48" sewer
from Muddy Creek south, a future 30" sewer from the existing waste water treatment plant, and
a future 54" sewer to a proposed, future waste water treatment plant south on Muddy Creek.
The current Capital projects in the 1995 Bond program are also included.
Action Agenda
Item No 4
Page 1
11ackground - Continued
We have an existing plant capacity of almost two million gallons per day that will be fully
utilized very soon. During the next ten year period, new growth will create a requirement for
an additional two to four million gallon capacity. We are unable to determine today if the
capacity of the existing/current facility can be utilized in the future until the city completes a
permitting process through the TNRCC. Therefore, for planning purposes in the ten year CIP,
we must plan for a worst case scenario in which none of the capacity of the current plant can
be used. We must budget for a four or six million gallon per day plant. A detailed explanation
is provided as an attachment regarding Wastewater Treatment Plant issues.
The new plant will be required as a direct result of development within the City and as a result
of Discharge Permit quality standards. Therefore, 100% of the projected $6,984,750 is eligible
for Impact Fee consideration.
The IFAC also recognized the Maximum Calculated Impact Fees allowable for adoption. These
Impact Fees were calculated from the estimated costs of the CIP projects and may, by State Law,
"be imposed against new development to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs
for capital improvements or facility expansions". State Law also requires that the published
Impact Fees in the advertising for the Public Hearing be the Maximum Calculated Impact Fee.
Council must determine whether the actual Impact Fee will be established at or below the
Maximum Calculated Impact Fee. If the cost of the Capital projects is not recouped through
Impact Fee assessment, then alternate funding for those infrastructure requirements will have
to be realized. Additional funding requirements would have to be met by issuing bonds that
will be paid for by increasing water and sewer rates. Those additional burdens will be shared
by all the residential and commercial customers.
Board Recommendations
The Impact Fee Advisory Committee recommends adopting the 10-year Capital Improvements
Program (1997-2006) and recognizes the maximum Calculated Impact Fees at $1,412 for sewer
and $700 for water with a total of $2,112 maximum.
Financial Considerations
Impact Fee means "a charge of assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new
development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital
improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development".
It does not include "the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing facility
to better serve existing development". The current Impact Fees charged by the City of Wylie are
$600 per LUE for water and $500 per LUE for sewer. The Maximum Calculated Impact Fees at
that time were $1267 per LUE for water and $957 per LUE for sewer.
Action Agenda
Item No 4
Page 2
Financial Considerations - coat/west
The total cost of the capital improvements to the water system is an estimated $4,246,000. The
amount eligible for inclusion in the Impact Fee calculation is $3,954,000. The reduced number
is a result of the capacity of the system being calculated and attributed to future development.
Over sizing and existing capacity are not allowed to be included in the computations for Impact
Fees. Using the 10-year Marginal Living Unit Equivalents (LUEs) of 5646, the Maximum
Calculated Water Impact Fee would be $700 per LUE or 3,954,000 divided by 5,646. (The LUE
is a unit that consumes the amount of water or discharges the amount of waste water equal to
that of a standard low density residential unit). The total cost of the capital improvements to
the waste water system is $12,585,160. The amount eligible for inclusion in the Impact Fee
calculation is $7,969,712. Once again using the 10-year Marginal LUEs, the Maximum
Calculated Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee for water and wastewater is $1,412 or 7,969,712 divided
by 5646. The total Maximum Allowable Impact Fees would be $2,112. Attached is a draft of
the 10-Year Capital Improvements Plan (1997-2006) which will detail all of the specific water
projects (Table 3) and the sanitary sewer projects(Table 4). The Tables give a description of the
projects, their estimated costs, and the percentages of the projects which will be directly
attributable to new development and therefore eligible to be included in the calculation of the
impact fees.
City Council has been provided with supplemental financial information included in the March
4, 1997 Work Session packet. A matrix has been provided showing Impact Fee reconciliation
and how optional funding in lieu of Impact Fees will affect bond purchases or other funding.
A comparison of the water and sewer rates of area cities is also included attached herein. A
comparison of Impact Fees charged by other cities was also made available. A thorough
understanding of where a city is in its development cycle must be appreciated when trying to
make any relevant comparisons. Each city has its own infrastructure needs, amount of
developable property remaining and financial resources. Wylie is young city with major
infrastructure requirements necessary to compete in the future. Development assumptions
regarding the number of new dwellings calculated are available in the new Land Use
Assumptions adopted by the City Council at the January 28, 1997 Council meeting.
Legal Considerations
The Texas Local Government Code, Section 395 establishes the City's authority to establish or
amend Impact Fees.
Notice of the Public Hearing must be published once a week for three consecutive weeks in a
paper of general circulation in the counties where the City lies. The first notice will appear
before the 30th day but on or after the 60th day before the date set for the hearing. The notice
of public hearing may not be in the part of the paper in which legal notices and classified ads
appear and may not be smaller than on-quarter page of a standard size or tabloid size
newspaper, and the headline on the notice must be in 18-point or larger type. The notice must
contain: (1) A headline to read as follows: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON ADOPTION OF
IMPACT FEES; (2) the time, date, and location of the hearing; (3) a statement that the purpose
of the hearing is to consider the adoption of an impact fee; (4) an easily understandable map
Action Agenda
Item No 4
Page 3
Legal Considerations - Continued
of the service area on which the proposed fee will be levied; (5) the amount of the proposed
impact fee per LUE; (6) a statement that any member of the public has the right to appear at the
hearing and present evidence for or against the plan and the proposed fee.
Staff Recommendations
Staff recommends adopting the 10-Year Capital Improvements Program (1997-2006) and the
Maximum Calculated Impact Fees of $1,412 for sewer and $700 for water.
Attachments
10-Year Capital Improvements Program (1997-2006) Draft.
Impact Fee Matrix.
Minutes from the final Impact Fee Advisory Committee meeting.
Comparison of area cities Impact Fees.
Comparison of water and sewer rates.
Ordinance approving CIP and amending Impact Fees for water and sewer.
Detailed Explanation of Wastewater Treatment Plant Issues
ik(k
Prepared by Revi ed by Financ ity Manager Approval
Action Agenda
Item No 4
Page 4
ORDINANCE NO.
•
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, AMENDING ORD. 90-10 OF THE
CITY OF WYLIE, ADOPTING IMPACT FEES; AMENDING DEFINITION "ADVISORY
COMMITTEE"; APPROVING AN UPDATED 10-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
(1997-2006); AMENDING THE IMPACT FEES; REPEALING CONFLICTING PORTIONS
OF ALL OTHER ORDINANCES; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas has given notices and held
the public hearings required by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code for the
imposition of impact fees for the financing of capital improvements required by new
developments in the City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas has heretofore adopted
land use assumptions within the designated service area, and such assumptions have
been used to develop the capital improvements plan; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the City has complied with Chapter 395 in
all respects necessary to amend impact fees; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
WYLIE, TEXAS, as follows:
SECTION I
Section 1.a. of Ord. 90-10 be amended to add to the definition of "Advisory
Committee" the wording "or a committee of not less than five members that contains not
less than 40 percent membership from representatives of the real estate, development, or
building industries who shall be appointed by a majority vote of the City Council" after the
wording ". . . Planning or Zoning Commission".
SECTION II
The "Land Use Assumptions, 1997-2006" heretofore approved by resolution by the
City Council on January 28,1997 and is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and is approved
hereby and incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
SECTION III
A capital improvement plan styled "10-Year Capital Improvements Plan (1997-
2006)" is hereby adopted and is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "B" for
all purposes.
SECTION IV
An impact fee of$ per service unit or Living Unit Equivalent(LUE) for
water supply, treatment, and distribution facility is hereby imposed in accordance with the
LUE for water set out in Table 3, Exhibit"B". An impact fee of$ per service unit
or LUE of new development for sanitary sewer collection and treatment facilities is hereby
imposed in accordance with the LUE for sanitary sewer set out in Table 4, Exhibit "B".
SECTION V
Should any paragraph, sentence, sub-division, clause, phrase or section of this
ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid the same shall
not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any part or provision thereof, other
than the part or parts as declared to be invalid, illegal or unconstitutional.
SECTION VI
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from March 19, 1997 after its
adoption by the City Council and publication of its caption as the law and the City Charter
provide in such cases.
SECTION VII
That all other ordinances and code provisions in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed to the extent of any such conflict or inconsistency and all other provisions of the
Wylie City Code not in conflict herewith shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION VIII
The repeal of any ordinance, or parts thereof, by the enactment of this Ordinance,
shall not be construed as abandoning any action now pending under or by virtue of such
ordinance; nor shall it have effect of discontinuing, abating, modifying or altering any
penalty accruing or to accrue, nor as effecting any rights of the municipality under any
section or provisions of any ordinances at the time of passage of this ordinance.
DULY PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Wylie,
Texas, this day of , 1996.
By
James D. Swartz
Mayor
ATTEST
Susan Shuler
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Minutes of Impact Fee Advisory Committee Meeting
January 16, 1997
CALL TO ORDER
Richard Parker, Chairman called the Impact Fee Advisory Committee Meeting to order,
January 16, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. with the following committee members present: James Blakey, Rita
Smith, Tom Pritzkau and Don Raburn. Richard Eckman, Merrill Young and Beth Fultz came after
the minutes were approved. Bart Peddicord was absent. Staff members present were: Susan Shuler,
Mike Phillips, Mike Collins, Jim Jenks, Greg MacLean and Brady Snellgrove.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
With no corrections to the minutes, Smith made the motion to approve the minutes and
Pritzkau seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and passed unanimously.
REVIEW OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN (C.I.P.) AND IMPACT FEES
MacLean gave an overview of the City's Master Plan. He stated that he had made a
presentation to Council to update the City's overall Water and Sewer Master Plans. These are used
as guidelines when developers and others that come into the city to make sure the infrastructure that
is already installed is part of the new development and to make sure the current citizens and service
connections are not compromised. He said in order to update the Capital Improvements Plan, a
review of the Comprehensive Plan and Master Plan were studied. MacLean stated that growth with
the proposed Woodbridge Development and Newport Harbor Development was used in the planning
process. He also said the Capital Improvements Plan is developed from the Master Plan. MacLean
then displayed a current map of the Sewer System and identified future development. He stated that
there was a proposed interceptor plan for Newport Harbor. He also stated that a new wastewater
treatment plan will be needed.
MacLean then gave an overview of the Water Master Plan. He said that lines have been
completed to the new water storage tank. He also said that this plan does not take into consideration
areas served by Wylie Northeast and East Fork Water Supply Corporation. Smith asked if one day
the City would take over these corporation. MacLean said that if the provider could not provide a
development water, it may require steps to ensure that the area is being adequately handled. He also
went over the summary of the projected cost for water services.
MacLean said that the two main areas of growth have been identified, one being the
Woodbridge Development and the Newport Harbor Development. He stated that the new
development would require a new wastewater treatment plant down stream. He said a site has been
recommended off of Elm Grove Road and Pleasant Valley. The Century Park Lift Station would be
eliminated. He said a 54" sewer would serve the lower half of the City. Phase II of Newport Harbor
will use the existing lift station and at some point they would need to either build a bigger lift station
Minutes from the Impact Fee Advisory Committee,January 16,1997,Page 1
or tie on to the new wastewater treatment plant. MacLean stated that projects eligible for impact fees
were a future sewer from Newport Harbor, future 48" sewer from Muddy Creek South, future 30"
sewer from existing WWTP South, future 54" sewer to future WWTP, future 6" MGD WWTP, and
current capital projects(1995 bond program). He stated that the construction and engineering make
up the Sewer System total projected cost and the per cent eligible for impact fees which are
proportioned out because you can not charge new development the full cost since others in the City
are using these services. He said these amounts are carried forward to represent the amount of
dollars that are eligible for impact fees. MacLean said that the total maximum calculated sanitary
sewer impact fees would be $1,412.
MacLean then explained the services eligible for the charge of impact fees concerning the
Water System. He described the projects as current water system improvements projects (1995 bond
program), future 12" water main along Sanden Blvd., future 8" line along Hensley Lane, 12" water
main along Kirby St., future 12" water main along future Park Blvd. Ext., and future oversize 12"
water main through Woodbridge Development. He said the maximum calculated water impact fee
would be $700.
He then described the 10 year living unit equivalents summary. He stated as part of the
summary was based on land use category, 10 year marginal acres, number of living unit equivalents
per acre and the 10 year marginal LUE's. He said listed under the land use category was residential;
public and semi-public, schools, library etc.; parks and open space; retail and office; commercial;
railroad; industrial and street/alley rights of way and parking. He said in calculating the total for
water and sewer connections you use the 10 year marginal acres multiply by the#LUE's per acre for
a total of the 10 year marginal LUE's. He said total LUE's for the next ten years are 5,646 which
could equate to the number of water/sewer connections. MacLean explained to figure the projected
impact fee the 10 year marginal LUE's are divided into the total 10 year Capital Improvement Plan
Project and in the case of water is $700 and $1,412 which would be the maximum the City could
charge. He emphasized that this was the maximum.
Parker asked for an explanation of the new wastewater treatment plant and what determines
the need and the time frame for the treatment plant. MacLean explained that there is a law of the 75-
90 rule which is when a wastewater plant has a MPDS permit and when the plant exceeds the 90%
capacity for 10% of the time, then the City is required by law to begin planning for improvements,
either expansion or new facility. He said the current plant has been expanded a couple of times and
it is not feasible to expand to due to its physical size. He also stated there is a new development that
would not be able to use the current plant. He said that the current plant is 3 MGD and the new plant
would be planned to be 6 MGD. Parker wanted to know when would Wylie need to think about
expansion. MacLean stated that the current plant has been notified they are close to capacity. Collins
stated that whatever development is using the current facility and is paying their share. He said that
from this day forward any new development that comes on line would take up additional capacity
from the existing sewer plant, then you are all ready creating the need today for capacity that is
needed in the new plant. He said if you don't start paying for the sewer plant until it is actually built
in two to three years when a bond election is passed, then the impact fee in four years would be
higher because you did not start paying for it today. He stated that do you agree with the capital
Minutes from the Impact Fee Advisory Committee,January 16,1997,Page 2
projects in the 10 year plan identified and do you agree that the cost are reasonable and whether you
think it is too high or too low for the developer, do you believe the number has creditability.
Pritzkau wanted to know why two plants can't be used and divide the sewer lines with 3 MGD going
to each and phase out one plant a little at a time. MacLean said that this could be done but the old
plant would be operating off of old equipment and in need of consistent repair. He said you would
need to operate off of two permits, and NTMWD may not want to operate two plants. He said if
the plant was dropped off to a 4 MGD plant the new plant would be about $7 million and would only
drop the impact fees to $1,000 which only be a savings of about $400. MacLean stated that it was
his understanding that the committee would like to see a smaller plant built initially and use the
existing plant but then phase the old plant out and add to the new plant. Young asked if the impact
fees could be graduated. Phillips stated that the graduated fees would be a bookkeeping nightmare
due to the different fees that would be charged.
Parker stated that he would like the committee to pull together and make a decision on
whether the figures are accurate and instruct MacLean on the direction to take. Young asked that
if the committee accepts the capital improvements plan would that be close to $18 million. Parker
stated that it would be the maximum. Young made the motion to accept the figures for the capital
improvement plan and Pritzkau seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and passed
unanimously.
Eckman made the motion to recommend to Council the Capital Improvements Plan. Pritzkau
seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and passed unanimously.
Pritzkau made the motion to recognize the maximum of$700 for water and $1412 for sewer.
Eckman seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and passed unanimously.
Collins asked if the committee wanted to make a specific amount recommendation for impact
fees and Parker stated that they did not. Parker said he felt like it was up to the elected officials to
make the final decision.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned.
Richard Parker, Chairman
Susan Shuler, City Secretary
Minutes from the Impact Fee Advisory Committee,January 16,1997,Page 3
Memorandum
DATE: February 28, 1997
TO: Mike Collins, City Manager
FROM: Brady Snellgrove, Director of Finance
RE: IMPACT FEE MATRIX
Attached to this memo is the Impact Fee Matrix that has been prepared for the City
Council. Also included with the memo are debt schedules that have been used in the
preparation of the matrix and the assumptions used in the development of the impact
fee matrix. A table of contents is listed below
Impact Fee Matrix 1.
$6,000,000 Sewer Bonds - 10 Year Pay 2.
$6,000,000 Sewer Bonds - 20 Year Pay 3.
$2,000,000 Water Bonds - 10 Year Pay 4.
$2,000,000 Water Bonds - 20 Year Pay 5.
Matrix Development Assumptions 6.
IMPACT FEE MATRIX- 1997
IMPACT FEE versus MARGINAL LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENT (MLUE)
$6,000,000 in BONDS
MONTHLY 10 YR DEBT 20 YR DEBT
MLUE MLUE MLUE REVENUE SEWER BILL MONTHLY MONTHLY
FEE REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE SHORTFALL INCREASE SEWER BILL SEWER BILL
AMOUNT (MLUE x FEE) REQUIRED SHORTFALL PER MLUE (10 YEARS) INCREASE INCREASE
SEWER
200 1,129,200 7,972,152 (6,842,952) 1,212 5.66 5.87 3.85
300' 1 693 800 7 972152 (6 278 352) 1,112 5 20 5 39 3 62
400 2,258,400 7,972,152 (5,713,752) 1,012 4.73 4.92 3.38
500_,. 2,823,000 7,972,152 15,149,152), 91.2... 4.26 4 44.. 3'15
600 3,387,600 7,972,152 (4,584,552) 812 3.79 3.97 2.92
700 ...3,952,200... ._..7,972152 (4,019,952)` 712. .. .3.33 3 48
800 4,516,800 7,972,152 (3,455,352) 612 2.86 3.02 2.45
,900 z. 5,081. 400. . . 7,972152... ,(2,890,752)
1,000 5,646,000 7,972,152 (2,326,152) 412 1.93 2.07 1.98
100 6 2,10 600 k 7 972'152. 1 761 552) =a M 312 1 46 a 1600 ` 1 a 5'
� �t a..d.�'`, 1 ..5 1.:..„xa�.,". � <,...a�.. caura...��;,.;L< e.+e':a
1,200 6,775,20'0 7,972,152 (1,196,952) 212 0.99 1.12 1.51
7,339,800 7,972 152 .4., (632,352) . .,0.65 1 28
$1,412 $7,972,152 $7,972,152 $0 $0 $0.00 $0.12 $1.02
TOTAL BOND COSTS $8,111,300 $10,434,875
$2,000,000 in BONDS
MONTHLY 10 YR DEBT 20 YR DEBT
MLUE MLUE MLUE REVENUE SEWER BILL MONTHLY MONTHLY
FEE REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE SHORTFALL INCREASE SEWER BILL SEWER BILL
AMOUNT (MLUE x FEE) REQUIRED SHORTFALL PER MLUE (10 YEARS) INCREASE INCREASE
WATER
$100;, $564,600 $3,952 200 y($3,387,600) $600 $2 85 $1.80 , z $1 21
200 $1,129,200 3,952,200 (2,823,000) 500 2.37 1.32
.300 ,$1,693,800 ,.. 3,952200 `. 4da. ...,. ._ . 90
400 $2,258,400 3,952,200 (1,693,800) 300 '1.42 0.37 0.50
50t1 $2$23 000 3 952 00,r (t, f 29,200) 200 0 95 010 0 27
600 $3,387,600 3,952,200 (564,600) 100 0.47 -0.57 0.04
20)
TOTAL BOND COSTS $2,703,767 $3,478,292
PROPOSED SEWER FEE $1,412 CURRENT CUSTOMER BASE:
PROPOSED WATER FEE $700 SEWER 4,422
MLUE 5,646 WATER 4,272
03/11/974V1ARGLEUS.WK4(07:38 AM) 1
$6,000,000- 10 YEAR PAY
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
SEWER BONDS
REVENUE CERTIFCATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1999
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST TOTAL P& I
- - 134,000.00 134,000.00
9/30/1999 450,000.00 6.000% 346,500.00 796,500.00
9/30/2000 480,000.00 6.000% 318,600.00 798,600.00
9/30/2001 510,000.00 6.000% 288,900.00 798,900.00
9/30/2002 540,000.00 6.000% 257,400.00 797,400.00
9/30/2003 573,750.00 6.000% 223,987.50 797,737.50
9/30/2004 607,500.00 6.000% 188,550.00 796,050.00
9/30/2005 648,750.00 6.000% 150,862.50 799,612.50
9/30/2006 686,250.00 6.000% 110,812.50 797,062.50
9/30/2007 727,500.00 6.000% 68,400.00 795,900.00
9/30/2008 776,250.00 6.000% 23,287.50 799,537.50
9/30/2009 6,000,000.00 2,111,300.00 8,111,300.00
2.
$6,000,000-20 YEAR PAY
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
SEWER BONDS
REVENUE CERTIFCATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1999
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST TOTAL P & I
9/30/1999 - - 134,000.00 134,000.00
9/30/2000 161,250.00 6.000% 355,162.50 516,412.50
9/30/2001 168,750.00 6.000% 345,262.50 514,012.50
9/30/2002 180,000.00 6.000% 334,050.00 514,050.00
9/30/2003 191,250.00 6.000% 323,662.50 514,912.50
9/30/2004 202,500.00 6.000% 311,850.00 514,350.00
9/30/2005 217,500.00 6.000% 299,250.00 516,750.00
9/30/2006 228,750.00 6.000% 285,862.50 514,612.50
9/30/2007 243,750.00 6.000% 271,687.50 515,437.50
9/30/2008 258,750.00 6.000% 256,612.50 515,362.50
9/30/2009 273,750.00 6.000% 240,637.50 514,387.50
9/30/2010 292,500.00 6.000% 223,650.00 516,150.00
9/30/2011 f 307,500.00 6.000% 205,650.00 513,150.00
9/30/2012 330,000.00 6.000% 186,525.00 516,525.00
9/30/2013 348,750.00 6.000% 166,162.50 514,912.50
9/30/2014 371,250.00 6.000% 144,562.50 515,812.50
9/30/2015 393,750.00 6.000% 121,612.50 515,362.50
9/30/2016 416,250.00 6.000% 97,312.50 513,562.50
9/30/2017 442,500.00 6.000% 72,300.00 514,800.00
9/30/2018 472,500.00 6.000% 44,100.00 516,600.00
9/30/2019 498,750.00 6.000% 14,962.50 513,712.50
TOTAL 6,000,000.00 4,434,875.00 10,434,875.00
3.
$2,000,000- 10 YEAR PAY
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WATER BONDS
REVENUE CERTIFCATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1999
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST TOTAL P & I
- - 44,666.67 44,666.67
9/30/1999 150,000.00 6.000% 115,500.00 265,500.00
9/30/2000 160,000.00 6.000% 106,200.00 266,200.00
9/30/2001 170,000.00 6.000% 96,300.00 266,300.00
9/30/2002 180,000.00 6.000% 85,800.00 265,800.00
9/30/2003 191,250.00 6.000% 74,662.50 265,912.50
9/30/2004 202,500.00 6.000% 62,850.00 265,350.00
9/30/2005 216,250.00 6.000% 50,287.50 266,537.50
9/30/2006 228,750.00 6.000% 36,937.50 265,687.50
9/30/2007 242,500.00 6.000% 22,800.00 265,300.00
9/30/2008 258,750.00 6.000% 7,762.50 266,512.50
9/30/2009 2,000,000.00 703,766.67 2,703,766.67
4.
$2,000,000-20 YEAR PAY
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WATER BONDS
REVENUE CERTIFCATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1999
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST TOTAL P & I
9/30/1999 - - 44,666.67 44,666.67
9/30/2000 53,750.00 6.000% 118,387.50 172,137.50
9/30/2001 56,250.00 6.000% 115,087.50 171,337.50
9/30/2002 60,000.00 6.000% 111,350.00 171,350.00
9/30/2003 63,750.00 6.000% 107,887.50 171,637.50
9/30/2004 67,500.00 6.000% 103,950.00 171,450.00
9/30/2005 72,500.00 6.000% 99,750.00 172,250.00
9/30/2006 76,250.00 6.000% 95,287.50 171,537.50
9/30/2007 81,250.00 6.000% 90,562.50 171,812.50
9/30/2008 86,250.00 6.000% 85,537.50 171,787.50
9/30/2009 91,250.00 6.000% 80,212.50 171,462.50
9/30/2010 97,500.00 6.000% 74,550.00 172,050.00
9/30/2011 102,500.00 6.000% 68,550.00 171,050.00
9/30/2012 110,000.00 6.000% 62,175.00 172,175.00
9/30/2013 116,250.00 6.000% 55,387.50 171,637.50
9/30/2014 123,750.00 6.000% 48,187.50 171,937.50
9/30/2015 131,250.00 6.000% 40,537.50 171,787.50
9/30/2016 138,750.00 6.000% 32,437.50 171,187.50
9/30/2017 147,500.00 6.000% 24,100.00 171,600.00
9/30/2018 157,500.00 6.000% 14,700.00 172,200.00
9/30/2019 166,250.00 6.000% 4,987.50 171,237.50
TOTAL 2,000,000.00 1,478,291.67 3,478,291.67
5.
IMPACT FEE ASSUMPTIONS
1. MLUE -Marginal Living Unit Equivalent as defined in the Hogan Corporation calculations.
The MLUE calculations were used as the basis for developing the matrix.
2. It was assumed that the impact fee revenues/growth would be even over a ten year period.
3. The monthly sewer/water bill increase assumes a period of ten years.
4. The bond schedules were prepared on a level payment basis for ten and twenty years. The bond
interest rate used was six percent.
5. The customer base used in the calculations was a combination of current customers plus the
number of MLEU's identified in the study.
6
IMPACT FEE COMPARISON
•
EST. SERVICE WATER SEWER TOTAL
CITY TOTAL MAXIMUM
POPULATION UNIT FEE FEE
ALLOWED
ADDISON 10,150 none none none none none
ALLEN 30,119 5/8" meter $547.00 $92.00 $639.00
CARROLLTON 92,514 acre $920.00 $310.00 $1,230.00 $2,502.00
CEDAR HILL 24,150 5/8" meter $769.00 $231.00 $1,000.00
COLLEYVILLE 16,000 per lot $815.00 $51.00 $866.00
COPPELL 25,700 5/8" meter $450.00 $450.00 $900.00
CORINTH 6,100 5/8" meter $896.00 $368.00 $1,264.00 $2,335.00
DESOTO 35,650 5/8" meter $325.00 $75.00 $400.00
DUNCANVILLE 35,100 none none none none none
FLOWER MOUND 33,800 3/4" meter $674.00 $1,396.00 $2,070.00 $5,000.00
FRISCO 20,000 acre $3,178.00 $3,178.00
GARLAND 192,200 5/8" meter $238.00 $0.00 $238.00 $953.00
GEORGETOWN 18,500 3/4" meter $825.00 $600.00 $1,425.00
GRAND PRAIRIE 110,000 5/8" meter $290.00 $145.00 $435.00 $637.00
GRAPEVINE 33,358 per lot $764.00 $140.00 $904.00
HEATH 2,800 5/8" meter $2,250.00 $5,000.00 $7,250.00
KELLER 18,850 5/8" meter $750.00 $750.00 $1,500.00
KERRVILLE 17,384 3/4" meter $500.00 $475.00 $975.00
LANCASTER 22,500 3/4" meter $615.00 $606.00 $1,221.00 $3,306.00
LEWISVILLE 57,500 3/4" meter $900.00 $1,103.00 $2,003.00
MANSFIELD 18,250 3/4" meter $680.00 $350.00 $1,030.00 $2,476.52
MCKINNEY 34,000 3/4" meter $385.00 $490.00 $875.00 • $1,365.00
MESQUITE 111,550 5/8" meter $408.00 $286.00 $694.00
PLANO 176,408 3/4" meter $758.00 $378.00 $1,136.00
RICHARDSON 79,800 none none none none none
ROCKWALL 14,000 5/8" meter $412.00 $1,640.00 $2,052.00 $4,189.00
ROWLETT 31,800 5/8" meter $525.00 $270.00 $795.00 $1,596.00
SACHSE 7,200 per lot $693.00 $372.00 $1,065.00 $4,648.00
SCHERTZ 13,500 5/8" meter $750.00 $1,300.00 $2,050.00
SOUTHLAKE 14,950 1" meter $1,250.00 $1,000.00 $2,250.00
SUNNYVALE 2,232 $2,995.00 $834.00 $3,829.00
THE COLONY 24,300 per lot $125.00 $450.00 $575.00
CURRENT WYLIE 11,698 5/8" meter $600.00 $500.00 $1,100.00 $2,224.00
PROPOSED WYLIE 11,698 5/8" meter $700.00 $1,412.00 $2,112.00 $2,192.00
Comparison of Monthly Bills for Water & Sewer Service
Selected Area Cities
March 3, 1997
8,000 GALLON CONSUMPTION
RESIDENTIAL
80
tft
70
60
m 50 fi . . .
c 40
0
2 30
20
10
Wylie Plano-Winter Rockwall Sachse
Allen Plano-Summer Rowlett
Winter averages are used by Rockwall&Sachse for Sewer Billing.
COMMERCIAL
80
70
60 �_
y
50 ��
. 40 ` s A srtm t' r rx -x. s
C �
"
use I � ,�
2 30
z
20
fi {
10 ,
'Ali
Wylie Plano-Winter Rockwall Sachse
Allen Plano Summer Rowlett
No Commercial rates are based on Winter averages.
03/04/97 04:51 PM UTILRATE.WK4
Comparison of Monthly Bills for Water & Sewer Service ,
Selected Area Cities
March 3, 1997
15,000 GALLON CONSUMPTION
RESIDENTIAL
110 41
..a
100
I'm
90
80
m 70 ti
_ y;
>, 60 3
0 50 44
40
30
20
10
0 I =I =
Wylie Plano Winter Rockwall Sachse
Allen Plano Summer Rowlett
Winter averages are used by Rockwall&Sachse for Sewer Billing.
COMMERCIAL
110 iil
100
X fi S'm
50
fie
<!
,, t � 640 � 1 of g a, �,r � , .30 � '' � f 20 A
Wylie Plano-Winter Rockwall Sachse
Allen Piano-Summer Rowlett
No Commercial rates are based on Winter averages.
03/04/97 04:51 PM UTILRATE.WK4
Comparison of Monthly Bills for Water & Sewer Service
Selected Area Cities
March 3, 1997
RESIDENTIAL RATES for WATER & SEWER COMBINED
Consumption
(Gallons)
Wylie Allen Piano-Winter Plano-Summer Rockwall Rowlett Sachse
2,000 22.27 19.34 19.66 19.80 17.20 18.82 26.52
4,000 30.47 25.14 27.88 28.30 24.90 28.00 38.36
6,000 38.67 30.94 36.10 36.80 32.60 37.18 50.20
8,000 46.87 36.74 44.32 45.30 40.30 46.36 62.04
10,000 55.07 42.54 49.39 50.65 48.00 55.54 73.88
12,000 63.27 47.26 51.31 52.85 55.70 59.72 85.72
15,000 74.84 54.34 54.19 56.15 67.25 65.99 94.50
20,000 88.09 66.14 58.99 62.75 86.50 76.44 107.00
25,000 101.34 77.94 63.79 69.35 105.75 86.89 119.50
30,000 114.59 89.74 68.59 77.10 125.00 97.34 132.00
40,000 141.09 113.34 78.19 92.60 163.50 118.24 157.00 ,
50,000 167.59 136.94 88.79 109.20 202.00 139.14 182.00
75,000 233.84 195.94 115.29 150.70 298.25 191.39 244.50
100,000 300.09 254.94 141.79 192.20 394.50 243.64 307.00
COMMERCIAL RATES for WATER & SEWER COMBINED
Consumption
(Gallons)
Wylie Allen Plano-Winter Plano-Summer Rockwall Rowlett Sachse
2,000 29.62 19.34 20.10 20.13 20.95 18.82 26.52
4,000 37.82 25.14 29.20 29.29 28.65 28.00 38.36
6,000 46.02 30.94 38.30 38.45 36.35 37.18 50.20
8,000 54.22 36.74 47.40 47.61 44.05 46.36 62.04
10,000 62.42 42.54 56.50 56.77 51.75 55.54 73.88
12,000 70.62 48.34 65.60 65.93 59.45 64.72 85.72
15,000 82.92 57.04 79.25 79.67 71.00 78.49 103.48
20,000 103.42 71.54 102.00 103.87 90.25 101.44 133.08
25,000 123.92 86.04 124.75 128.07 109.50 124.39 162.68
30,000 144.42 100.54 147.50 152.27 128.75 147.34 192.28
40,000 185.42 129.54 193.00 200.67 167.25 193.24 251.481
50,000 226.42 158.54 239.80 249.07 205.75 239.14 310.68
75,000 328.92 231.04 356.80 370.07 302.00 353.89 458.68 1
100,000 431.42 303.54 473.80 491.07 398.25 468.64 606.68
03/04/97 04:49 PM UTILRATE.WK4
Comparison of Monthly Bills for Water & Sewer Service
Selected Area Cities
March 3, 1997
WATER RESIDENTIAL RATES
Consumption
(Gallons)
Wylie Allen Plano-Winter Plano-Summer Rockwall Rowlett Sachse
2,000 10.82 8.93 9.36 9.50 7.40 11.11 12.00
4,000 16.12 13.65 11.28 11.70 12.70 15.29 17.00
6,000 21.42 18.37 13.20 13.90 18.00 19.47 22.00
8,000 26.72 23.09 15.12 16.10 23.30 23.65 27.00
10,000 32.02 27.81 17.04 18.30 28.60 27.83 32.00
12,000 37.32 32.53 18.96 20.50 33.90 32.01 37.00
15,000 45.27 39.61 21.84 23.80 41.85 38.28 44.50
20,000 58.52 51.41 26.64 30.40 55.10 48.73 57.00
25,000 71.77 63.21 31.44 37.00 68.35 59.18 69.50
30,000 85.02 75.01 36.24 44.75 81.60 69.63 82.00
40,000 111.52 98.61 45.84 60.25 108.10 90.53 107.00
50,000 138.02 122.21 56.44 76.85 134.60 111.43 132.00
75,000 204.27 181.21 82.94 118.35 200.85 163.68 194.50
100,000 270.52 240.21 109.44 159.85 267.10 215.93 257.00
SEWER ' RESIDENTIAL RATES
Based on Water
1
Consumption I
(Gallons) Wylie Allen Plano-Winter Plano-Summer Rockwall Rowlett Sachse
2,000 11.45 10.41 10.30 10.30 9.80 7.71 14.52
4,000 14.35 11.49 16.60 16.60 12.20 12.71 21.36
6,000 17.25 12.57 22.90 22.90 14.60 17.71 28.20
8,000 20.15 13.65 29.20 29.20 17.00 22.71 35.04
10,000 23.05 14.73 32.35 32.35 19.40 27.71 41.88
12,000 25.95 14.73 32.35 32.35 21.80 27.71 48.72
15,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 25.40 27.71 50.00
20,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 31.40 27.71 50.00
25,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 37.40 27.71 50.00
30,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 43.40 27.71 50.00
40,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 55.40 27.71 50.00
50,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 67.40 27.71 50.00
75,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 97.40 27.71 50.00
100,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 127.40 27.71 50.00
03/04/97 04:49 PM UTILRATE.WK4
Comparison of Monthly Bills for Water & Sewer Service
Selected Area Cities
March 3, 1997
WATER COMMERCIAL RATES
Consumption
(Gallons)
Wylie Allen Plano-Winter Plano-Summer Rockwall Rowlett Sachse
2,000 14.17 8.93 9.65 9.68 7.40 11.11 12.00
4,000 19.47 13.65 12.15 12.24 12.70 15.29 17.00
6,000 24.77 18.37 14.65 14.80 18.00 19.47 22.00
8,000 30.07 23.09 17.15 17.36 23.30 23.65 27.00
10,000 35.37 27.81 19.65 19.92 28.60 27.83 32.00
12,000 40.67 32.53 22.15 22.48 33.90 32.01 37.00
15,000 48.62 39.61 25.90 26.32 41.85 38.28 44.50
20,000 61.87 51.41 32.15 34.02 55.10 48.73 57.00
25,000 75.12 63.21 38.40 41.72 68.35 59.18 69.50
30,000 88.37 75.01 44.65 49.42 81.60 69.63 82.00
40,000 114.87 98.61 57.15 64.82 108.10 90.53 107.00
50,000 141.37 122.21 70.95 80.22 134.60 111.43 132.00
75,000 207.62 181.21 105.45 118.72 200.85 163.68 194.50
100,000 273.87 240.21 139.95 157.22 267.10 215.93 257.00
SEWER COMMERCIAL RATES
Based on Water
Consumption
(Gallons) Wylie Allen Plano-Winter Plano-Summer Rockwall Rowlett Sachse
2,000 15.45 10.41 10.45 10.45 13.55 7.71 14.52
4,000 18.35 11.49 17.05 17.05 15.95 12.71 21.36
6,000 21.25 12.57 23.65 23.65 18.35 17.71 28.20
8,000 24.15 13.65 30.25 30.25 20.75 22.71 35.04
10,000 27.05 14.73 36.85 36.85 23.15 27.71 41.88
12,000 29.95 15.81 43.45 43.45 25.55 32.71 48.72
15,000 34.30 17.43 53.35 53.35 29.15 40.21 58.98
20,000 41.55 20.13 69.85 69.85 35.15 52.71 76.08
25,000 48.80 22.83 86.35 86.35 41.15 65.21 93.18
30,000 56.05 25.53 102.85 102.85 47.15 77.71 110.28
40,000 70.55 30.93 135.85 135,85 59.15 102.71 144.48
50,000 85.05 36.33 168.85 168.85 71.15 127.71 178.68
75,000 121.30 49.83 251.35 251.35 101.15 190.21 264.18
100,000 157.55 63.33 333.85 333.85 131.15 252.71 349.68
03/04/97 04:49 PM UTILRATE.WK4
Waste Water Treatment Plant
Detailed Summary
The highlight of the sewer system summary is the proposed, future four million gallons a day
waste water treatment plant, located on our southern boundary on Muddy Creek. The
proposed plant will be necessary because the current plant is beginning to approach its design
limits. The current waste water treatment plant is permitted by the State to treat 2 million
gallons per day (mgd). State regulations require that an owner/permittee of a waste water
treatment plant must begin planning a new facility, or improvements to an existing plant, if
the monthly average flow through the current facility exceeds 75% of its permitted average
daily flow capacity for three consecutive months. The owner/permittee of a facility must have
construction under way if that facility reaches 90% of its capacity. The current facility has
reached the 75% range on two or more occasions over the last several years, and the TNRCC
is aware of and has notified North Texas Municipal Water District of this condition.
The permit application process, according to NTMWD in a recent case, could take three years
for approval. Application for a permit may begin after the acquisition of the real estate. The
design phase for a new facility could run concurrently with the permit process and would take
approximately six months to a year to complete. The actual construction, depending on
topography and design, would take an estimated one to one and a half years to finish. The
existing plant capacity will be reached with the addition of approximately 700 LUE's within
the City's service area. Using the projected growth rate in the recently adopted Land Use
Assumptions, the new plant should be under construction within the next three to four years.
In addition, existing Discharge Permits must be periodically renewed and a new Discharge
Permit must be obtained to continue to operate the current plant. Effluent water quality
standards defined in the Discharge Permit are set when the permit is obtained and can be
made more stringent when permits are up for renewal. If the effluent quality standards of the
Discharge Permit for the existing plant are made more stringent when the permit is up for
renewal, the viability of the existing plant may be in doubt altogether. If not, the City may be
able to rely on the available capacity in the plant today (approximately 1.7 mgd according to
NTMWD) for the ten year planning period. Regardless of whether the current facility's
capacity can be depended upon through the ten year period, a new plant will be required.
Attachment
Action Item No 3
for the property? Mr. Lenarduzzi replied by stating that he wants to buy one of th- - -e
lots for a boat sale and manufacturing shop.
George Jackmon - He owns the property adjace. • e proposed zone change.
He has his property listed and has had inquirie : F-2 and SF-3. He ask that the B-1
classifications be read. Shaw replied • -ading the definition for B-1.
With no other ..• is comment, the public hearing was closed. Mondy made the
motion to de. - request with a request for the City Staff to re-evaluate the B-1 and B-2
def• *ins. Sparks seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and passed
unanimously.
APPROVAL OF IMPACT FEES AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
MacLean gave an overview of the impact fees and the citywide benefit. He said
what was prepared is the current water rates and the 10 year CIP's which is the basis for
the Impact Fees due to the LUE's. He said that Council may decide that the maximum rate
is too high and you may not want to charge this amount.
MacLean gave an overview of the 10 year CIP cost projection of water system. He
said when calculating the sewer cost projection for the next 10 year CIP cost. He said the
big ticket item for sewer projections would be the wastewater treatment plant, which would
be a 4 million gallon a day capacity plant. He stated that within 10 years the City of Wylie
the estimated population would be increased by 7,500. MacLean said a 10 year Capital
Improvement was done for Impact Fee purposes but the Impact Fee Committee should
meet on a regular basis. MacLean stated that the Impact Advisory Committee recognized
the maximum amount for sewer to be $1,412 and $700 for water.
Mayor Swartz opened the public hearing to receive public comment.
Stephen Stolte, 700 Highlander Blvd., Suite 160, Arlington, Texas - He stated
that he is a developer with Centex Homes in the Newport Harbor area. He stated that they
will be paying for the future and some of the past if the proposed impact fees are
approved. He said he would like the fees collected at the time of the building permit.stage
and not the developer stage.
Paul Canduro - He stated he represented home owner developers. He would like
impact fees held as low as possible. He asked if the impact fees being imposed would
bring the whole system up to date or would it be for future use. He said new homes are
built with water saving features. He thinks the charges for the sewer treatment plant
should only be collected in 5 years when the facility is needed. He also said that the home
buyer is ultimately going to have to pay the impact fee.
Don Herzog, Herzog Development Corporation - He said he would like to see the
fees paid at building permit time and not up-front from the developer. He suggested that
Minutes of the Wylie City Council, March 11, 1997, Page 3
the developer use a letter of credit to be used in the event the development does not get
built out.
With no other public comment, the public hearing was closed. Scott stated he
would like the calculations looked at very closely. Collins stated that the cost is passed
on to the homeowner when purchases the house. He asked MacLean to again explain the
process for reaching the calculations. MacLean stated that in two years the wastewater
treatment plant would need to obtain a permit and that the existing facility would not be
able to handle the treatment. He stated that a plan must be submitted to correct the
problem. He said as part of the permit a new treatment plant site will need to be
determined, designed, and interceptor collection lines in place. He said as soon as land
is acquired the process to receive a permit is about three years. MacLean explained that
-the cost of constructing a 5/5/2 plant has almost doubled. He said currently there is a debt
service of$2million that has about another two years to pay.
Mondy made a motion based on the recommendation of the Impact Fee Advisory
Committee recommended the maximum of $700 for water and $1,412 for sewer. Collins
noted that for the record, the Impact Fee Advisory Committee did not make the
recommendation for the proposed amount but recognized the maximum amount and stated
that it was up to Council to decide on the amount. Mondy restated his motion based on
the recommendation of the Impact Fee Advisory Committee recognizing the maximum of
$700 for water and $1,412 for sewer be adopted as the maximum amount to charge for
impact fees. Adams seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and passed
unanimously.
STAFF REPORTS
Collins stated that Westgate Way would soon be opened. He said the fi
improvements to the railroad crossing and striping were being completed.
Adams asked that the street lights near the Tannella Clinic light i ill burned out
and he has also noticed street lights burning during the day.
Manson stated that tremendous progress had bee ade to the parking situation
at Community Park. She also stated that the gaz=•o in Olde City Park was almost
completed.
Collins stated that a meeting wit e homeowners at Wylie Ranch East Estates will
be held on March 27, 1997 at 7:00 •.m. to discuss the drainage study for that area.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATI•
Sharo %owdy, 325 Callie Court - Wanted to know what the next step would be
for the ar-- at the Neely's requested a zone change. She asked if they could refile for
the ing? She also wanted to know what was the latest news on the railroad proposal.
Minutes of the Wylie City Council,March 11, 1997, Page 4
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
AFTERMOURSTURNONTEENEm.... ...............
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
ROWLETT 30.00 Turn on A F I 69,804 Total service connect fees
SACHSE 20.00
SOUTHLAKE $40-$60-$80 1st-2nd-3rd A 0 E 2,000
STEPHENVILLE 20.00 Call 0 L E 6,612
TERRELL 15.00 4,431
TROPHY CLUB 25.00
WAXAHACHIE 10.00 Each 1,874 Included in Misc. Rev.
WEATHERFORD 35.00 A F I
WYLIE - AFTER HOURS RESTORATION FEE - $45.00
O
Utility Fe- Water/Wastewater Fees
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
MCIOKOWANSREPTIONIFEEPON
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
ARLINGTON 25.00
BENBROOK 25.00
BLUE RIDGE 20.00
COPPELL $20-$40 Residential/Non-residential A 0 I
DALLAS $12.50- $30.00 Each A F I
FERRIS 0.00
•
PANTEGO 25.00
RED OAK 50.00 Each 0 0 E 0 7
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
FERRIS 0.00
ry MCKINNEY 80%water vol. x 8.34x.08
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 1.53 Class 1 per 100 cubic feet 0 F I
97¢ Class 2 per 100 cubic feet
87¢ Class 3 per 100 cubic feet
85¢ Class 4 per 100 cubic feet
68¢ Class 5 per 100 cubic feet
•
Utility Fees-WaterNVastewater Fees
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
ADDISON 2 times monthly average
ALLEN 50.00
ARLINGTON $50-$80 Apartment per unit-Residential $80 comm. min. or 2 mos bill
BENBROOK $50- $100 Owner- Renter
BLUE RIDGE 130.00
BURLESON 75.00 Customer A F I 69,984 904
CARROLLTON $50- $100 Resident.-Comm. or 1/6 annual
CEDAR HILL 40.00
CELESTE $100- $150 Residential-Business 0 2,550
THE COLONY 65.00 Residential, New resident A 0 I
COPPELL $50- $30 Inspection-Reinspection A 0 I 28,050
CORINTH 50.00 0 F C 16,885
CORSICANA 40.00 Customer A Does not cover 2 bills
DALLAS $40-$100 Each A L I
rn DE SOTO 40.00 Residential A L I
Commercial $80.00 minimum 2x average bill
DUNCANVILLE $50- $100 Residential - Business A
ENNIS $50 and up A F I 19,695 Based on average usage
• EULESS • 75.00 Unit A 0 I Minimum
FARMERS BRANCH 50.00 +
FARMERSVILLE 0.00 With letter of credit Based on prior usage
$10- $51 Homeowner, Renter, Comm. A F Based on prior usage
FERRIS 100.00
FLOWER MOUND $60-$75 Residential-Commercial _
FT. WORTH 35.00 Residence 0 L E Commercial is variable
FRISCO 75.00 Per residence
GARLAND Varies Equal to 60 day service E
GLENN HEIGHTS 75.00 0 _
GRANBURY 50.00 Account 0 0 2,278
GRAND PRAIRIE Varies $50 minimum for residential 0
A,
Utility Fees-Water/Wastewater Fees
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS • FEE NOTES
GRAPEVINE $40- $50 Commercial-Residential, Unit
HURST $70-$80 Varies w/commercial, 2 x bill
IRVING $50- $100 min. Residential - commercial A 0 I
KAUFMAN $50- $75 Residential -commercial ,
KEENE 60.00 Residential - commercial 0 F I
KENNEDALE 60.00 Based on 1/6 of annual bill
KERENS 70.00 0 0 I
MANSFIELD 100.00 Meter 0 F I 386,309 Resid. &comm. combined
MCKINNEY 40.00 Residential A All other based on 1 mo avg
MILFORD 75.00,
MINERAL WELLS 85.00 Minimum, up to 1/8 annual avg. A F I
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 55.00 '/," meter 0 0 C
OVILLA $25- $75 Buyer- Renter
c.,, PANTEGO 75.00 Unit, Residential
a PALMER 100.00 A F I
PILOT POINT 90.00
PROSPER 60.00 I
QUINLAN 110.00 Connection 0 F E
RED OAK 100.00 Each account 0 • 0 I Water
RICHARDSON $45-$50-$100 Yardsprinkler-Res.-Comm. A F I No rev.-debit & credit daily
RICHLAND HILLS $25- $35 Owner- Renter, Location 0 0 I
RIVER OAKS $60 - $110 Owner- Renter, Account 0 F I Residential
ROCKWALL $40- $50 Residential-Commercial, Meter 0
ROWLETT $45 - $100 Residence- Business A 0 I
SACHSE 50.00
SOUTHLAKE 50.00 • Account A 0 E 14,385
STEPHENVILLE 30.00 Connection A L E 25,442
SUNNYVALE $35 to $135 .
TERRELL 125.00
TROPHY CLUB $40-$75-$100 Owner/Realtor-Tenant-Builder
Utility Fees-WateriWastewater Fees
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
:BUST liRgi :: >•< > {>::::::>;<::><::><<::>»:>::
::::.:.....::.:>:t�lVl .�I��.:,.: SST'.::<:::::.:::<�><:�<::_�::>:::::.;;� .:<::: ;
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
UNIVERSITY PARK $35- $65 Own- Lease
WAXAHACHIE 50.00 Each 10,505 210
WEATHERFORD 1/6 annual bill A F I
WYLIE RESIDENTIAL WATER DEPOSIT - $30.00
CDRESIDENTIAL SEWER DEPOSIT - $30.00
COMMERCIAL WATER DEPOSIT - $62.50
COMMERCIAL SEWER DEPOSIT - $62.50
Utility Fee^"Vater/Wastewater Fees
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
p9pINEERINGAINSITMONIEEPRI
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
BENBROOK 7.5%
BLUE RIDGE 20.00
CORSICANA None
DALLAS $100-$200 Each A L I
FLOWER MOUND 3%
FRISCO 2.5% Of construction costs
GARLAND 10.00 Each
GLENN HEIGHTS $20-$35 Inside city- Outside city 0
GRAPEVINE 15.00
HURST 4% Construction costs
IRVING $250-$40-$50 A F I
KENNEDALE 1% bid price w/s, 2% drainage
KERENS 25.00 0 0 I
PROSPER 25.00 $1.00/$1,000 value I
QUINLAN 15.00 Hour 0 L E
ROWLETT 30.00 Occurrence A F I 21,937
SOUTHLAKE 5% Actual construction cost A 0 E 225,000
SUNNYVALE Actual cost
TROPHY CLUB 5%
WYLIE SUBDIVISION INSPECTION FEE IS EQUAL TO 1 % OF THE CONSTRUCTION
COSTS OF THE STREETS AND UTILITIES THAT ARE TO BE DEDICATED TO
THE CITY OF WYLIE
Utility Fees-Water/Wastewater Fees
III
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
7E.tC1 1l "C1N ...# Vt 1 :...1.
CITY V CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
ARLINGTON 25.00
BENBROOK Actual cost- Sent out
BURLESON 120.00 Customer A F I ' 0 0
COPPELL $60 to $150 Test A 0 I Depends on meter size
DALLAS 5.50 Each A L
DE SOTO 55.00 A F
EULESS 150.00 A 0
FERRIS $100-$125 1/="-2"
FLOWER MOUND $15-$20 '/2'-2" meter, calibration 0 L I
FRISCO At cost 1"
GRANBURY 25.00 Meter Pass thru
GRAPEVINE Cost Plus
HURST 25.00 Or actual cost,whichever is greater Free if City is wrong
IRVING N/C
co
KENNEDALE Actual charge-$5
V MCKINNEY 25.00 A
QUINLAN 35.00 0 L E
RED OAK 7.00 Each meter 0 F I
RICHARDSON 65.00 Test A L I
RICHLAND HILLS 10.00 Request 0 0 I
RIVER OAKS 25.00 Meter 0 F I Revenue not tracked
ROWLETT 37.00 Meter A F I
SUNNYVALE 54.00
TROPHY CLUB Cost
UNIVERSITY PARK 15.00 Meter
Utility Fees-Water/Wastewater Fees
.11
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
CITY
CHARGE ($) PER . REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
ARLINGTON 25.00
BENBROOK Actual cost-Sent out
120.00 Customer A F I 0 0
BURLESON COPPELL $60 to 550 Test A 0 I Depends on meter size
DALLAS .50 Each A L
DE SOTO 55.00 A F
EULESS 150.00 A 0
FERRIS $100-$125
'/Z'-2"
FLOWER MOUND $15-$20 '/2'-2" meter, calibration 0 L
FRISCO At cost 1"
Pass thru
25.00 Meter
GRANBURY GRAPEVINE Cost Plus
Free if City is wrong
HURST 25.00 Or actual cost, whichever is greater
IRVING N/C
KENNEDALE Actual charge-$5 A
V MCKINNEY 25.00
35.00 0 L E
QUINLAN Each meter 0 F I
RED OAK 7.00
RICHARDSON 65.00 Test A L I
RICHLAND HILLS . 10.00 Request 0 0 I Revenue not tracked
RIVER OAKS- 25.00 Meter 0 F I
ROWLETT 37.00 Meter A F I
SUNNYVALE 54.00
TROPHY CLUB Cost
UNIVERSITY PARK
15.00 Meter
WYLIE METER CALIBRATION FEE - $20.00
Utility Fees-Water/Wastewater Fees
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
.............................................................................................................
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
BURLESON 20.00 Customer A F I 780 39
CEDAR HILL 10.00 48 hours only
DE SOTO 20.00 A F E
ENNIS 10.00 Base + any extra usage A F I
EULESS 10.00 48 hours only
FLOWER MOUND 24.54 Request F I
GRAPEVINE $750 deposit $2.10 per 1,000 gallons
KAUFMAN 20.00
KENNEDALE 10.00 Day 80 8
MCKINNEY 15.00
RED OAK 25.00
STEPHENVILLE $20 + Cost 1,000 gallons A F C
UNIVERSITY PARK 35.00
0 tt
:SpWEg:.REGE3N Cd Ea�:.�EE::::::::::::.�:::::::.:::..::.
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
ARLINGTON $500 repair resid. sewer line
DALLAS $7.50 + 20.00 Each A L I Charge plus unplug
GRAPEVINE Cost Plus
OVILLA 15.00
PANTEGO 15.00
QUINLAN 25.00
RED OAK 40.00
ROWLETT 17.50 Occurrence A F I
TERRELL 20.00
UNIVERSITY PARK _ 20.00 _ Incl. sewer&water reconn.
WYLIE TEMPORARY SERVICE FEE - $20.00
Utility F 'tater/Wastewater Fees
,
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
SWERMAKEEEMBE
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
ADDISON $110-$120-$160 4"-6"-8"
ARGYLE 1,300.00 Tap 0 F I 182,000 182 $1,000 at installation
ARLINGTON 1,000.00 4" line: dep. up to 6', len. up to 25'
1,150.00 6" line: dep. up to 6', len. up to 25'
BLUE RIDGE 125.00
CEDAR HILL 375.00 4", each _
CELESTE 250.00 0 0 3,275
CLEBURNE 150.00 4"tap
160.00 6"tap
170.00 8" tap
10.00 Sewer tie on
THE COLONY Material+ Labor Connection A F
COPPELL $400-$600 + Cost
w DALLAS 300.00 Each new line A F I $100 existing line
4" DUNCANVILLE 325.00 Connection 12,378
ENNIS $250 and up Each 4"tap A F I 3,400
FARMERS BRANCH 100.00 4"tap
FARMERSVILLE $300- $350 4"tap-6"tap A F
FERRIS 375.00
FLOWER MOUND Cost Tap F I
FT. WORTH 600.00 Dep. on size and paved st/easement
FRISCO $380- $450 4"-6" 5,960
GARLAND $326 to $1,480 Dep. on size, excavation, repair, etc.
GLENN HEIGHTS $250-$1,000 Inside city, outside city Meter set fee—$50
GRAPEVINE 400.00
HURST 4% Construction costs
IRVING $1,325 - $2,550 Residential-commercial A F I
KEENE 350.00 4" A 0 I Inside city limits i4
KENNEDALE 275.00 1,375 5
KERENS 125.00 ? _:.
Utility F- 'Nater/Wastewater Fees
,
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
BLUE RIDGE 12.50
CEDAR HILL 9.25 Foot
CLEBURNE • 5.00
DALLAS 0.018¢ Square foot of tract A F I Or$785 per acre
DUNCANVILLE $2 to $8 Linear foot 3,662
GARLAND 9.79
GRAPEVINE 140.00
IRVING $2.00 frt foot 0 L I 1,011
MCKINNEY 450.00 4", if pavement is replaced
140.00 4", if pavement not disturbed
500.00 6", if pavement is replaced
140.00 6", if pavement not disturbed
Cost > 6" in diameter, cost of labor, equip.
time, overhead
PANTEGO 5.10 Linear front foot
QUINLAN 500.00 + Cost
ROWLETT 1,000.00 Acreage A F I 51,699 Incl.water& impact fees
SOUTHLAKE 1,300.00 0 0 C
AgYVggiaMOREMERNMEME
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
BENBROOK 25.00
DALLAS Actual cost A F I
GRAPEVINE Cost Plus
PANTEGO 35.00
QUINLAN 25.00
TERRELL 15.00 .
TROPHY CLUB 10.00
UNIVERSITY PARK 15.00
WYLIE PRO RATA - SEE ATTACHED
Utility Fr Water/Wastewater Fees
•
1.10 WYLIE CODE
Meter § 1.12 Pro rata water and sewer charges.
Meter Size Only Meter and
[(inches)] Cast Tap Cost (a) The city may extend water and sanitary
l 280.00 280.00,pluscostofma- sewer mains in the streets, alleys and utility
terials and labor easements in the City of Wylie in order to permit
Y2 560.00 560.00,plus cost of ma- connections for those persons desiring water and
terials and labor sewer service.The individual,corporation or part-
2 and over Total costof meter,ma- nership requesting the service shall pay the city
terials and labor an amount equal to the cost of all materials,labor,
44 x s/B 25.00 per pre-tapped equipment and other costs to provide the re-
(pre-tapped) subdivision mains to
property line; for in- quested extension.At any time additional connec-
spection per tap unit. tions are made to the water and/or sewer mains,
(b) Water taps. The tapping fee for master the city shall collect from the individual connect-
meter connections for multifamily dwell- ing to the main(s) an amount equal to the propor-
ings, mobile home parks, office buildings, tional amount of footage of the connectors land
etc.,shall be$25.00 per living unit plus the abutting the sewer and repay the same to the
cost of meter, materials and labor. original requestors of service or designated recip-
ients.
(c) Sewer taps. The tapping fee for single unit
residences and commercial connections with (b) Existing mains adjacent to property other
the city sanitary sewer collection system than subdivisions.
shall be:
(1) Where an area, lot or tract of land abuts
Size of any existing water or sanitary sewer main,
Service Line and when such water or sanitary sewer
[(inches)] Cost main spans the complete frontage of the
4 $160.00, plus cost of materials and area, lot or tract of land, the following
labor charges, known as pro rata shall be made
6 and over $220.00, plus cost of materials and against the owner of the area,lot or tract of
labor land seeking a connection to the water or
4 and over $25.00 for pre-tapped subdivision sanitary sewer main. The charge shall be
mains to property line;for inspection 50 percent of the total cost for the installa-
per tap unit tion of the water or sanitary sewer main at
(d) Sewer taps. The tapping fee for single san- the time the main was constructed, as
itary sewer for multifamily dwellings, mo- determined by the city engineer,based upon
bile home parks,office buildings,etc.,shall the greater amount determined by the front
be$20.00 per living unit or separate place foot method and the acreage method. The
of business plus the cost of materials and cost assessment is to be determined from
labor. existing cost records maintained by the city
(e) Water and sewer connection inspection fees. with the total cost (construction, engineer-
The fee for inspecting developer made wa- ing and inspection)distributed for the total
ter and sewer taps shall be $25.00 per length of the project on a linear footage
connection made. basis and the total service area on an
(Ord. No. 87-48, § 1-K, 9-22-87) acreage basis. Front foot cost is defined as
the total cost of the project divided by the
§ 1.11 Resetting meter charge. total length of the main extension (i.e.
$100,000.00 divided by 1,000 L.F.=$10.00/
The charge for resetting a water meter at the L.F.). Acreage cost is defined as the total
request of the customer shall be the rate shown in cost of the project divided by the service
section 1.10(a) hereinabove. area of the main extension(i.e.$100,000.00
(Ord. No. 84-12, § 1-K, 3-13-84) divided by 100 acreage). In no instance
CDC:6
APPENDIX C-FEE SCHEDULE 2.01
shall the front foot cost be less than $7.50 replaced with an accurate one at the expense of
per front foot nor shall the acreage cost be the city, and the $20.00 deposit shall be returned
less than $500.00 per acre. to the customer.If the test shows that the meter is
(Ord. No. 84-12, § 1-L, 3-13-84; Ord. No. 90-5, § registering consumption at less than actual flow
2.01, 3-8-88) or in excess of actual flow by two percent or less,
the$20.00 deposit shall be retained by the city to
§ 1.13 Development/subdivision water defer the cost of such test.
charges. (Ord. No. 90-18, § 4, 10-9-90)
All developers or subdividers who are tieing
into the water and sewer system of the City of § 2.00 Construction Permits and Fees.
Wylie shall pay an initial fee equivalent to the
gallon capacity of their water system distribution § 2.01 Project permits.
lines multiplied by a factor of three at the prevail-
ing rate per 1,000 gallons of the lowest rate per (a) For the purposes of this section a project fee
1,000 currently in effect at the time actual usage shall mean a permit that encompasses all phases
occurs. The final determination of the amount of and subphases of construction of a new structure
gallons to be charged shall be determined by the (including single-family, multifamily, commercial
city engineer.Any water used subsequent to the and industrial installations), and is inclusive of
initial loading and flushing of the installed lines all building, plumbing, mechanical and electrical
shall be accomplished by the developer or subdi- installations that are usual and customary to new
vider securing a meter attachment to a fire hy- building erection; but shall not include signage,
drant. This fee shall be due and payable prior to fences,irrigation systems,fire sprinklers or other
approval of the final plat. installations not customary and usual to typical
(Ord. No. 86-87, § 1-M, 9-23-86) new structure construction. A project permit for
reconstruction and/or extensive remodel or addon
§ 1.14 Charge for replacing meter box. may be issued only with the prior approval of the
building official.
The cost for replacement of any plastic water
meter box is $15.00. (b) A nonrefundable application processing fee
(Ord. No. 86-87, § 12(1), 9-23-86) of$50.00 per project shall be paid at the time of
submittal.
§ 1.15 Charge for replacing sewer cleanout
caps. (c) In addition to the application processing fee
the following permit fees shall be imposed:
The cost for replacement of property line sewer (1) New dwellings,up to four units
cleanout caps is $5.00.
(Ord. No. 86-87, § 12(2), 9-23-86) (per unit) $420.00
(2) Pool or spa 80.00
§ 1.16 Meter testing fee. (3) Temporary buildings 80.00
When any utility customer is of the opinion that (4) New commercial,apartments,
a water meter is registering incorrectly, the cus- , accessory, additions, remod-
tomer may make a request to the city for testing els, and finish outs/per 1,000
of the meter.A field test will be provided for the ($50.00 minimum) 3.00
customer's meter without charge once every two
years. If the customer desires a calibration and (d) A determination of value or valuation under
certification test, then at the time such request is any provision of this section shall be made by the
made, the customer shall make a $20.00 deposit building official. The value to be used in comput-
with the city. If the test shows that the meter is ing the permit fees shall be the total value of all
registering consumption in excess of actual flow construction work for which the permit is issued
by more than two percent, the meter shall be as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, elec-
CDC:7
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
SEW..................................REEMBION
................................:.
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
MANSFIELD 600.00 Tap 0 F 6,600
MCKINNEY 450.00 4", if pavement is replaced
140.00 4", if pavement not disturbed
500.00 6", if pavement is replaced
140.00 6", if pavement not disturbed
Cost > 6" in diameter, cost of labor, equip.
time, overhead
MILFORD 350.00
MINERAL WELLS 190.69 4"tap A F I
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 305.00 ' ", 1", 2", 3", 4", Undeveloped A F I
50.00 '/.", 1", 2", 3", 4", Undeveloped
OVILLA 300.00
PALMER 350.00 Each
PANTEGO 175.00 •
w PILOT POINT 350.00
PROSPER 400.00
QUINLAN 500.00
RED OAK 300.00 Each tap
RICHARDSON $280- $350 4"- 6"+ $70 paving cut fee A F I 1,850 Sewer&water rev. comb.
RICHLAND HILLS 350.00 Tap 0 0 I 2,100
ROCKWALL 40.00 Tap 16,167
ROWLETT 278.35 Tap A F I
SACHSE 150.00
SOUTHLAKE 75.00 Tap A 0 E 47,850
STEPHENVILLE $100- $125 4"-6", Per tap 0 F E 100
TERRELL 100.00
UNIVERSITY PARK 900.00 $1,300 for water& sewer at same time $1,300 wat &sew comb.
WAXAHACHIE $465 to Act. Cost 4"to all above 4" 11,863
WEATHERFORD 635.00 4" A F
WYLIE 4" - $160.00, 6" + - $220.00 (BOTH PLUS COST OF LABOR AND MATERIALS)
Utility Fer WaterlWastewater Fees
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
:woe RITAKEREiiiiiiiiM
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
ALLEN 400.00 5/8 and' 0 F I 109,000 273 •
ARLINGTON 450.00 w
500.00 1"
625.00 11/2
800.00 2"
BENBROOK 150.00 Up to 1" meter
Cost + 30% Meter larger than 1"
BLUE RIDGE 125.00
BURLESON 611.00 ' " A F I 5,044 4
690.00 1"
945.00 11/2"
1,050.00 2"
CEDAR HILL 300.00 3/4", each
CELESTE 250.00 0 3,275
c 1 CLEBURNE 110.00 3/4"tie-on
190.00 ' "tap
265.00 1"tap
365.00 1"tap
535.00 2"tap
THE COLONY Material + Labor Connection A F I
COPPELL $250 to $325 +Costs A 0 I 56,770
DALLAS $175-$1,050 Each A F I Based on size
DUNCANVILLE $250 to $410 Tap 21,730
ENNIS $300 and up Each short tap A F I 26,148
EULESS 470.00 Minimum
FARMERS BRANCH 325.00 Each tap Stand. '/4"tap & meter
FARMERSVILLE $300-$350-$400 ' "-1"-2"
FERRIS 300.00 w
FLOWER MOUND 275.00 Tap A F I
FT. WORTH 550.00 Dep. on size and paved/impry street
Utility FP Water/Wastewater Fees
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
WATEMMIREEMEN
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
FRISCO 162,210
GARLAND $326 to $1,480 Dep. on size, excavation, repair, etc.
GLENN HEIGHTS $375-$1,000 Inside city, outside city
GRANBURY $325-$400-$285 '/."- 1"-2" 2,840 8
GRAPEVINE 500.00 5/8"x 1"
HURST 4% Construction costs
IRVING $160- $1,650 A F I
KEENE 350.00 '/,"tap inside city limits
KENNEDALE 200.00 3/11
275.00 1" 1,950 6
450.00 11/2"
575.00 2"
KERENS - 125.00 0 0 I
MANSFIELD $560- $655 '/,"- 1", Tap 0 F I 17,768
N.) MCKINNEY 373.00 '/."service, 5/8" meter set
112.00 sib"x 'A" meter set w/meter box
82.00 5/8"X%" meter set w/o meter box
406.00 1"service, 1" meter set
• 218.00 1" meter set w/meter box
188.00 1" meter set w/o meter box
875.00 1'/2'service and 1'/2" meter set
500.00 11/2"meter set w/meter box
432.00 11/" meter set w/o meter box
968.00 2"service , 2" meter set
687.00 2" meter set with w/meter box
573.00 2" meter set w/o meter box
MILFORD 350.00
MINERAL WELLS 299.10 '/."tap A F I
NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 305.00 '/,", 1", 2", 3", 4", Undeveloped A F I
50.00 '/.", 1", 2", 3", 4", Undeveloped
Utility F- 'Vater astewater Fees
N
WATER/WASTEWATER FEES
:WATERITAKEERNER
CITY CHARGE ($) PER REV COST METH REVENUE USERS FEE NOTES
PALMER 350.00 Each
PANTEGO $10- $100
PILOT POINT 300.00
PROSPER 400.00 I
QUINLAN 500.00
RED OAK 300.00 Each tap
RICHARDSON 350.00 Each '/."tap A L I
410.00 Each 1"tap
800.00 Each 1'/:"tap
1,020.00 Each 2"tap+ paving cut fee of$70
Cost + 15% Each 4"tap
RICHLAND HILLS $235-$720 Tap 0 0 I 2,286
ROCKWALL 154.28 Tap Not inc. impact
ROWLETT Act. cost+ 25% Acreage A F I
cn SACHSE $165-$200-$245 '/,"-1"-2"
•
`"' SOUTHLAKE $360 - $600 1"-2" A 0 E 234,000
STEPHENVILLE $210- $890 Tap 0 F E 1,068
SUNNYVALE $200 to $500 12,620
TERRELL 200.00
TROPHY CLUB 350.00 + $350 impact fee
UNIVERSITY PARK 900.00 $1,300 for water&sewer at same time
WAXAHACHIE $445 to $1204 '/."to 8"tap, Each 72,171
WEATHERFORD 733.00 1" A F I
WYLIE 5/8" - $125.00; 1" - $280.00; 1 1/2" - $560.00 (PLUS MATERIALS AND LABOR)
Utility Fr Vater/Wastewater Fees
Summary of Council Actions at the May 12, 1998 Meeting
Southplace Estates Phase I: Final Plat proposed by Ballpen Venture II, L.P.
Approved for construction
ZC. No. 98-02: Zoning change form R(Retail), B-1 (Business), and MF (Multifamily)to
PD (Planned Development)by Pat Atkins for Lakeside Estates Phase III.
Denied
ZC. No. 98-04: Zoning change form A(Agricultural to R(Retail)by City of Wylie for
Fire Station No. 1.
Approved
Lakeside Estates Phase III: Preliminary Plat/Development Plan from Pat Atkins.
Denied
Fire Station No. 1: Preliminary Plat proposed by City of Wylie.
Approved
Fire Station No. 2: Preliminary Plat proposed by City of Wylie.
Approved