05-01-2001 (Planning & Zoning) Agenda Packet AGENDA
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS - WYLIE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
2000 Highway 78 North, Wylie, Texas 75098
Tuesday, May 1, 2001
7:00 p.m.
A Pre-Meeting Session will begin at 6:30 p.m. for staff/Commission review of Agenda items.
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Welcome new Commissioner Mike Phillips.
2. Consider excusing the absence of Commissioner Chapman from the April 17, 2001
Regular Meeting.
3. Consider and act upon approval of the Minutes from the April 17, 2001 Regular
Meeting and the April 23, 2001 Special Work Session.
ACTION AGENDA
1. Consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding a waiver of alleys for Lots
16 through 30 of Block L and Lots 78 through 97 of Block E of the Twin Lakes Phase
IV Addition, generally located to the east of Ballard Avenue (C.R. 819), north of
Alanis Drive and east and south of the Twin Lakes Phase II Addition, being situated in
the Allen Atterberry Survey, Abstract No. 23, City of Wylie, Collin County, Texas.
2. Consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding a waiver of alleys and a
Final Plat for the Harvest Bend Phase II Addition, generally located southeast of
Parker Road (F.M. 2514) and north of the Harvest Bend Phase I Addition, being all of
a certain 16.371 acre tract situated in the W.D. Penny Survey, Abstract No. 696, City
of Wylie, Collin County, Texas.
P &Z Agenda
May 1, 2001
Page 2
3. Consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding a Final Plat for the
Cimarron Estates Phase I Addition, including variances to the requirements for alleys
and thoroughfare screening, generally located north of Brown Street, east of Kreymer
Lane and east of the Wylie Ranch East Phase I Addition, being all of a certain 54.336
acre tract situated in the Francisco de la Pina Survey, Abstract No. 688, City of Wylie,
Collin County, Texas.
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
1. Hold a public hearing and consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding a
change in zoning from Agriculture (A) District to Industrial (I) District, generally
located north of West Kirby Street (F.M. 544) and west of Westgate Way, being a
3.66 acre tract situated in the E.C. Davidson Survey, Abstract No. 266, City of Wylie
Collin County, Texas. (Zoning Case No. 01-04)
WORK SESSION
1. Consider revisions to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
ADJOURNMENT
Posted Thursday, April 27, 2001, at 5:00 p.m.
THE WYLIE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX IS WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE. SIGN INTERPRETATION OR OTHER SPECIAL ASSISTANCE FOR DISABLED
ATTENDEES MUST BE REQUESTED 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE BY CONTACTING THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 442-8100 OR TDD AT 442-8170.
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
WYLIE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
2000 Highway 78 North, Wylie, Texas 75098
Regular Business Meeting
April 17, 2001
7:00 pm
Notice was posted in the time and manner required by law and quorum was present.
Commission Members Present: Staff Members Present:
Steve Ahrens Claude Thompson, Planner
Michael George
Carter Porter
Tony Snider
Gary Wiseman
Commissioners Absent:
William Chapman
Phillip Tramell
PREMEETING
The Premeeting was convened at 6:30 p.m.. Thompson reviewed the Planning Report and
addressed questions from the Commissioners.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman George called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
PLEDGE AND INVOCATION
Commissioner Snider offered the Invocation and Commissioner Porter led the Pledge of
Allegiance.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
No one appeared to speak.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM
1. Consider and act upon approval of the Minutes of the April 3, 2001 meeting.
P&Z Meeting
April 17, 2001
Page 2
Motion to approve the minutes as submitted was made by Commissioner Ahrens, seconded by
Commissioner Wiseman. Motion passed 5-0.
ACTION ITEMS
1. Consider and act upon approval of a Site Plan for Vintage Power, located at 2807 West
F.M. 544, and being all of a certain 0.448 acre tract of land described as Lot 1, Block A
of the Rapin Addition, Volume M, Page 416, Deed Records of Collin County, Texas.
Thompson reported that the applicant intended to construct a 4,500 square feet building for the
shop and office of a specialty automotive restoration and sales business which will not be open
for repair of vehicles of the general public. He showed illustrations of the building elevations.
The Site Plan complies with all applicable code requirements, and staff recommends approval.
Shane Acklie, 860 Wembry Street, #500, Lewisville, TX 75057, appeared to represent the
application.
Commissioners George and Snider expressed concern that the building was rather plain for
location along a major entry to the city, and asked what might be done to enhance the facility.
Mr. Acklie agreed to use a maroon colored brick for the majority of the wall with a soldier
course of white brick along the top above the bay doors and an awning over the office door and
perhaps a flat canopy projection over the bay doors.
Commissioner George expressed concern about the image of the chain link fence along the front.
Mr. Acklie agreed to relocate the fence behind the front line of the building.
Commissioner Porter asked how cars are brought to the facility and how many are stored on the
site at any one time. Acklie responded that the cars (all Camaros) are brought in individually,
usually driven but sometime carried on a flat-bed truck. No mare than 4 or 5 cars are ever on the
site at any one time and all are stored inside the building.
Commissioner Carter recommended that the dumpster be placed at a more accessible angle. Mr.
Acklie agreed.
Commissioner Porter asked about signage. Mr. Acklie responded that there would probably be
limited or no sign, because the specialty shop does not serve or wish to attract the general public.
Commissioner asked if the fire lane only in the front complied with code. Thompson responded
that it does comply.
P&Z Meeting
April 17, 2001
Page 3
Motion was made by Commissioner Porter, seconded by Commissioner Snider, to approve the
Site Plan, with the stipulations that no fencing be located to the front of the building, that the
brick be a dark color such as maroon with a white soldier course along the top, that an awning be
located over the office door and canopies be added over the bay doors. Motion passed 5-0.
2. Consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding a Final Plat for the Cascades
Apartment Wylie Addition, generally located east of Country Club Road (F.M. 1378) and
south of Parker Road (F.M. 2514), and being all of a certain 12.02 acre tract situated in
the James McUlmurry Survey, Abstract No. 629, City of Wylie, Collin County, Texas,
and being a portion of The Cascade Companies, L.L.C. tract as described in Volume
4607, Page 1881 of the Deed Records of Collin County, Texas.
Thompson reported that the subject Final Plat conforms to the approved Preliminary Plat and
complies with all technical requirements of the City codes. Staff recommends approval.
There was no discussion.
Motion to recommend approval was made by Commissioner Ahrens, seconded by Commissioner
Porter. Motion passed 5-0.
3. Consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding a waiver of alleys and a Final
Plat for the Twin Lakes Phase IV Addition, generally located south of Alanis Drive and
east of South Ballard Avenue (F.M. 2524) and east of Twin Lakes I, and being all of a
certain 32.782 acre tract situated in the Allen Atterberry Survey, Abstract No. 23, City of
Wylie, Collin County, Texas.
Thompson reviewed the history of the subdivision, stating that the initial phase was developed
with the alleys required by City code but that subsequent phases Two and Three were
constructed and accepted without alleys. He reported that the code provides that the City
Council may waive the requirement for alleys if determined to be in the best interest of the City.
No record can be found in the City minutes as to a waiver of the alleys in Phase II and III,
although there was discussion of other issues such as screening and drainage. Staff recommends
denial, and would not place the Final Plat on the agenda for consideration without the requested
waiver of alleys. Staff believes that acceptance of Phases II and III without alleys does not
provide the applicant a vested right to waiver of alleys in future phases, especially since the
applicant testifies that there has been and will be no substantial difference in the number of lots
created with or without alleys. He reported that, although the code provides that a waiver be
submitted and considered with the Plat, staff feels that waivers should be considered prior to the
preparation of the plat and its required engineering.
P&Z Meeting
April 17, 2001
Page 4
Brenda McDonald, 270 No. Denton Tap Road, Suite 100, Coppell, TX 75019, and Robert
Betancur, ZENA Land Development, L.P., 720 So. Kimball Avenue, Southlake, TX 76092,
represented the request.
Ms. McDonald testified that she had presented the Plats for Phases II and III and that a waiver of
the alleys was clearly intended by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council and
that similar waivers were anticipated for future phases, although such is not recorded in the
minutes of the meetings. She said that engineering has been completed for the subject phase of
the development, and that adding alleys at this point will be a financial hardship.
Commissioner Snider commented that the Planning and Zoning Commission has indicated
support for alleys in the past, but noted that Alanis Drive serves to divide the subdivision into
two portions with varied character and lot size. A compromise could eliminate alleys for the
north side of Alanis where smaller lots have been developed without alleys, but provide alleys in
the area to the south of Alanis where larger lots adjoin Phase I with alleys. Commissioner
Wiseman indicated support for such a split. Ms. McDonald argued that Canyon Creek Drive
provides a north/south connection of the entire development which is a significant as the central
Alanis division.
Commissioners Ahrens and George responded that, where as the desire for alleys has varied over
the years, the City Council now wants to require alleys. Commissioner Wiseman asked if there
was a record of the reasoning when alleys were waived for Phases II and III. Thompson
responded that there is no record of why alleys have been required at some times and not at other
times. He reviewed the general functions of alleys, and concluded that the developer has
accommodated these functions in other ways. He stated that he believes that the Council will
understand and accept the waiver of alleys when justified, and that the question before the
Commission is whether or not the waiver is justified in this case.
Commissioner George questioned the desirability of combining front and rear garages within the
same neighborhood. Thompson responded that that was not an appropriate issue for the platting
process, and that the current code allows both front and rear entry with alleys.
Matthew Butschek, 1755 F.M. 1378, Wylie, TX testified that the value of alleys for storm water
management, utilities and traffic control is well documented, and it is not logical to allow a
subdivision partially with and partially without alleys. Thompson responded that arguments both
for and against alleys have been well documented, and arguments against include security and
parking at front curbs.
Motion to recommend approval of the Final Plat with a waiver of alleys, except that an alley be
provided to the rear of Lots 37 through 47 of Block M in order to accommodate alleys in the
future Phase V, was made by Commissioner Snider. The motion died for lack of a second.
P&Z Meeting
April 17, 2001
Page 5
Motion to recommend denial of the waiver request and Final Plat because they do not comply
with the alley requirement of the Paving Standards was made by Commissioner Ahrens,
seconded by Commissioner Wiseman. Motion passed 3-2, Commissioners Snider and George
voting no.
4. Consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding a waiver of alleys for the Twin
Lakes Phase V Addition, generally located south of Alanis Drive and east of South
Ballard Avenue (F.M. 2524) and east of Twin Lakes IV, and being all of a certain 24.3
acre tract situated in the Allen Atterberry Survey, Abstract No. 23, City of Wylie, Collin
County, Texas.
The applicant requested that this action be withdrew. There was no further discussion.
Motion was made by Commissioner Snider, seconded by Commissioner Ahrens, to accept
withdrawal of the request without prejudice. Motion passed 5-0.
Following a 5-minute break, the meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m..
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Hold a public hearing and consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding a
change in zoning from Agriculture (A) District to Planned Development (PD) District for
Single-Family Residential uses, generally located west of Country Club Road (F.M.
1378) and north of McMillen Road (C.R. 298), being a 99.814 tract of land conveyed by
deed from Plano-Wylie Limited to Frederick Veningo, Trustee, as recorded in Volume
883, Page 628 of the Collin County Deed Records, and being situated in the William
Patterson Survey, Abstract No. 716, City of Wylie, Collin County, Texas. (Zoning Case
No. 01-02)
Thompson reported that the Comprehensive Plan recommends Suburban Residential uses for this
location, and defines this category as including the 8,500 square feet lots as proposed. However,
the recent revisions to the Zoning Ordinance include 8,500 square feet lots as Village Residential
and define Suburban Residential as lots of 10,000 square feet or greater. The proposal will meet
or exceed the required points of the new Residential provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, except
that it is requested that side yards be a minimum of 8.5 feet rather than the 10 feet required by
the ZO. The applicant had introduced this proposal and his concern that the wider side yard
dictates a narrower house to the Commission at the April 3 Work Session. Funds will be
provided in lieu of land for the required park donation, and the residents of the addition will use
parks located elsewhere. Staff recommends denial because of the smaller side yards.
P&Z Meeting
April 17, 2001
Page 6
Richard Hovas of Tipton Engineering, Inc., 6330 Broadway, Suite C, Garland, TX 75043,
represented the request and reported that the Conditions of Development and the Concept Plan
have been revised to include suggestions made by the Commission at the April 3 Work Session.
He said that the requested 8.5 feet side yard is necessary because the builders require a 56 feet
wide building pad. In order to achieve this desired pad width, the smallest lots will be 73 feet by
128 feet or 8,760 square feet and most lots will be larger than 9,000 square feet. All other
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance are met or exceeded.
Peter Shaddock, Shaddock Development, Ltd., 4975 Preston Park Drive, Suite 360, Plano, TX
75093 testified that the builders, Grand Homes and Paul Taylor Homes, want to build the same
product which they build throughout the region. This product requires a pad width of 56 feet
which can not be accommodated with a side yard of 10 feet. The project is not feasible and will
not continue with 10 feet side yards.
Commissioner noted that the currently requested 8.5 feet side yards is a compromise from the 7
feet which the developer earlier requested and was earlier required by the Zoning Ordinance
and the 10 feet currently required.
Commissioner George asked what features exceed the current code. Thompson responded that
both lot and house size are larger than required, an amenity center will provide for private
recreation and a landscaped entry feature is provided.
Commissioner George said that he does not favor lessening our requirements and would prefer to
wait until the area builders produce a narrower house design which accommodates our new side
yard requirements. He does not favor variance at this time.
Commissioner Ahrens questioned the need for the street extensions to the west and south, and
the wisdom of an alley along the north adjacent to lots within the gated, limited access
Riverchase Addition. He recommended that a reserve strip and perhaps wall or hedge screen be
provided along the north property line. Thompson responded that the extensions to west and
south are required to provide future developments with continuous circulation and additional
points of access/egress. He cautioned against a reserve strip, but said that staff will investigate
potential joint access problems of the northern alley and recommend appropriate solutions.
Commissioner George asked how drainage will be accommodated. Hovas responded that most
drains to the Muddy Creek floodplain west of the tract and that all storm water drainage will be
subsurface.
P&Z Meeting
April 17, 2001
Page 7
Matthew Butschek, 1755 F.M. 1378, Wylie, TX lives immediately to the south of the subject
property. He requested that streets be aligned with those on the east of 1378 in order to better
manage traffic. He noted that some of the property will drain to 1378, and that the developments
to the east of 1378 have created flooding and siltation problems along the 1378 roadway and on
to his property. Thompson noted that the streets have been aligned, and that he will investigate
the drainage problem.
Michael Geisler, 6230 Northwood Road, Dallas, TX 75225, real estate representative for the
original property owner, testified that the owner was very interested in a development which
honored the property and was careful to select the most sensitive developers and builders. He
recommended acceptance of the 8.5 feet side yard to allow larger houses, because the larger lots
will provide the image of open space desired by the code.
Motion was made by Commissioner Snider, seconded by Commissioner Ahrens, to recommend
approval with the stipulations that the minimum 73 feet lot width be added to the development
conditions, and that staff work with the developers to accommodate some buffer between this
development and the gated community to the north. Motion passed 4-1, Commissioner George
voting no.
2. Hold a public hearing and consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding
approval of a Specific Use Permit for a Commercial Amusement/Indoor, located at 600
North Highway 78, being all of a certain 0.0413 acre portion of Lots 1A and 2A, Block B
of the Railroad Addition, City of Wylie, Collin County, Texas. (Zoning Case No. 01-03)
Thompson reviewed the request, stating that Commercial Amusements are allowed within Retail
district with a Specific Use Permit. The SUP process allows the establishment of conditions
which will assure that the use is compatible with neighboring uses. He reported that the Zoning
Ordinance requires 30 on-site parking spaces for the game room, and there is currently
insufficient parking within the retail center to accommodate this demand. Staff recommends
denial unless the parking requirement can be accommodated in some way. He noted that
because more than 20% of the neighboring property owners have expressed written opposition to
the request, recommendation for approval will require a 3/4ths majority vote of the Commission.
Chi Nhan Truong, 2011 Glen Meadow Court, Richardson, TX 75081, testified that the proposed
45 games represents an ultimate estimate, and that the initial operation will have only 10 games
and not be open for 24 hours and, therefore, require fewer parking spaces. Thompson responded
that the requirement is 30 spaces for any operation less than 2,000 square feet of floor space and
that no prorated provision is allowed.
Richard Lleafgreen, 503 Seis Logos Trail, Wylie, TX 75098, speaking for the owner, encouraged
approval of the request, suggesting that the game room is a good combination with other tenants.
P&Z Meeting
April 17, 2001
Page 8
Commissioner Porter noted that several of the responses in opposition cited the limited parking
and he asked if parking can be accommodated in any, such as additional spaces constructed or
other tenant mixes. Leafgreen responded that the center is full except for this space, and he
believes the parking issue is over stated. The game room will operate and require parking when
other tenants are closed.
Commissioner Snider asked if there were any adverse proximity rules which apply to the request.
Thompson responded that the game room could not be located within 300 feet of a school, and
that it meets this requirement.
Commissioner George asked the applicant if they currently operated other game rooms and had
an understanding of the management requirements. Nhan Truong responded that they operate a
similar game room in Garland.
Motion to recommend denial due to insufficient parking was made by Commissioner Wiseman,
seconded by Commissioner Ahrens. Motion passed 5-0.
WORK SESSION
Following a short break, Commissioners reconvened in the Work Session Conference Room..
1. Discuss the attendance policy and trends of the Commission.
Thompson reviewed the Rules of Procedures of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the
Commissioner's Attendance record distributed for the April 3 meeting. He reviewed the
attendance requirements of the Commissions' Rules and of the City Charter, noting that both
provide for replacement of any member absent for three consecutive meetings. He noted that
Commissioner Tramell has been absent for the three consecutive meetings and is subject for
replacement. The City Council has waited until the Council elections were completed to make
replacements to all committees, boards and commissions, and make new appointments next
Tuesday, April 24.
Thompson further noted that the Charter does not mention reasons for excusing absences while
the Commission's Rules specify as valid excuses "illness, death in the family, or emergency".
Commissioner Ahrens recommended omitting the limited reasons for excused absences and
adding the wording from the Charted that the position shall be declared vacant and the
remainder of the unexpired term filled by the Council within 30 days. Commissioners expressed
general agreement.
P&Z Meeting
April 17, 2001
Page 9
Thompson suggested that excuse for absences be provided by majority vote of the Commission,
rather than by staff or Chairman as Commissioners suggested. However, excused absences
should not substitute for the entire 3 absences which support replacement. The Commission
needs to have present at each meeting the 3/4a` of members which is required by State law to
decide some issues.
Staff will draft revisions to the Rules of Procedure for consideration by the Commission at a
future meeting.
2. Discuss revisions to the Zoning Ordinance.
Ray Stanland, 5207 McKinney Avenue, Dallas, TX, and Janet Thorp, 7933 Goodshire Avenue,
Dallas, TX were present to discuss proposed revisions to the nonresidential districts of the
Zoning Ordinance.
Stanland suggested additional meetings in order to complete the revisions during May as desired
by the City Council. It was noted that recent several requests for rezoning have had to be
allowed without the standards which are anticipated to be in the revisions. Commissioners
decided to hold Work Sessions on the next several Monday nights for the sole purpose of
completing revision of the Zoning Ordinance.
Stanland distributed and led a review of Section 6.3, development regulations for the Downtown
Historic District. He noted change in the boundary of the district as recommended at the last
meeting, and provided a detailed review of the development requirements. He noted that the
draft regulations produce a classic retail development in keeping with the historic Ballard
Avenue frontage, and that standards for the more residential character need to be added.
Stanland reviewed the currently-adopted sign regulations highlighting areas for potential revision
and asking the Commissioner's opinion of various characteristics. He noted that the current code
does not limit the number of signs which may be erected and/or attached to a property. He
suggested that some entry feature sign and perhaps even uniquely designed street signs may be
considered. Proposed revisions to the signs will be provided in the next several weeks.
Thorp provided a copy of Article 5, which has been revised to accommodate the Commissions'
earlier review comments. Thompson will make copies available to each member prior to next
Monday's meeting and that will be the major topic of discussion. The Commissioners should
especially note the several highlighted areas which still need to resolved.
Thompson will remind members of the next Monday meeting.
P&Z Meeting
April 17, 2001
Page 10
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 11:05 p.m..
Michael George, Chairman b Claude Thompson, Planne
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
WYLIE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
2000 Highway 78 North, Wylie, Texas 75098
Special Work Session
April 23, 2001
7:00 pm
Notice was posted in the time and manner required by law and quorum was present.
Commission Members Present: Staff Members Present:
Steve Ahrens Claude Thompson, Planner
William Chapman
Michael George Consultants Present:
Carter Porter Ray Stanland
Gary Wiseman Janet Tharp
Commissioners Absent:
Tony Snider
Phillip Tramell
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman George called the Special Work Session to order at 7:08 p.m., in the Staff Conference
Room of the Municipal Complex.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
No one appeared to speak.
WORK SESSION
1. Consider revisions to the nonresidential districts of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
with the consultant.
Stanland led a discussion of Article 6, especially the design regulations for the Downtown
Historic District which were introduced at the last meeting. He noted that such regulations
normally follow adoption of a concept plan in order to implement the plan. However, in the
absence of a plan, the standards are intended to preserve the status quo while inssuring
compatible evolution and change.
P&Z Work Session
April 23, 2001
Page 2
Commissioner Porter raised concern that paint is not mentioned in Section C.3, suggested the
need to limit colors to some commercial pallet and to restrict inappropriate patterns. Stanland
responded that it could if desired to the choice point system, but that control of paint is difficult
to document and to administer. He illustrated appropriate use of paint by photographs of existing
downtown buildings. Commissioners generally expressed the desire that the regulations be
flexible rather than too restrictive.
Commissioner Porter questioned how the regulations will be administered, especially if they
allow broad choice or interpretation. He suggested the need for a review committee of
downtown interests and staff. Thompson responded that the flexible regulations will serve as a
generalized guide to achieve a balance of strict code and free choice.
Commissioner Porter asked if awning will be addressed. Stanland responded that such door and
window coverings are historically appropriate and will general guidelines will be included.
Commissioner Ahrens asked why interiors were no regulated. Stanland responded that
compatible adaptive reuse is the goal. Use id restricted in the Use Chart, but any allowed use
should be encouraged in any appropriate structure, regardless of its previous use or design
character.
Commissioner Porter question the restriction of residential to upper floors only D.2.(c), noting
that there is currently residential use at the ground level throughout the downtown. Stanland
responded that the goal of the statement is to encourage and preserve the immediate street
frontage for retail uses while residential can be allowed anywhere, and the statement will be
reworded to better express this goal. He suggested the need to consider an appropriate ratio for
residential/nonresidential use of the structures
Commissioner Wiseman noted that the list of allowed materials (page 11) favors nonresidential
masonry character and does not allow the wood and other materials used in residential buildings.
Stanland responded that appropriate material for historically residential buildings will be added.
Commissioner Ahrens stated that vinyl siding should not be allowed, as it was on the recent PD
at Ballard and Brown.
Tharp led a discussion of remaining questions within Article 5. Commissioners generally
endorsed the recommendations of the Land Use Tables.
Tharp noted the need to complete appropriate architectural and landscape requirements for the
Bed & Breakfast Inn and Boarding and Rooming House uses in order to fit the building style(s)
and character of the use (page 18).
P&Z Work Session
April 23, 2001
Page 3
Commissioner George recognized that Sexually-Oriented Businesses need to be screened, but
suggested that corrugated metal was an inappropriate material for screening of any use (page 33).
Commissioners requested that the provisions for Temporary Uses be more restrictive, including
limited definition, permitted districts and design regulations(page 65-66).
Commissioners concluded that 3 years is too long to allow temporary grazing (page 65), and
generally suggested deleting that as a use in order to limit discourage inappropriate "agricultural
tax exemptions".
Commissioners requested that the required drop-off lanes for Childs Day Care facilities be
encouraged in locations other than the front. It was determined to omit the 8 vehicle requirement
of C.5.e.(3) in favor of the 10 vehicle requirement of C.5.d..
Stanland reviewed the existing Sign Regulations and led a discussion of potential revisions. He
commented that the administrative procedures will not require significant revision. However, the
regulations currently do not limit the number of types of signs or total size of signage allowed.
Commissioners concluded that both the number and size of signs should be as restrictive as
possible.
Commissioners recommended that lighting of signs be limited, suggesting no internal lighting
and reduced intensity of lighting on to a sign.
Commissioners concluded that banners should be temporary, and that portable trailer signs
should be prohibited. Marquee signs and message boards should be allowed in intensive retail
centers but be limited. Projecting signs should be encouraged in heavy pedestrian nonresidential
centers such as unified shopping centers and downtown. Window signs should be temporary and
limited in sign.
Entry signs for residential subdivisions and apartment complexes should be controlled.
Commissioners requested provisions to remove nonconforming signs.
It was decided to have another Work Session on the revisions next Monday, April 30, and
continue such intensive review until revisions are ready for joint discussion with the City
Council.
P&Z Work Session
April 23, 2001
Page 4
ADJOURNMENT
Motion to adjourn was made by Commissioner Ahrens, seconded by Commissioner Wiseman.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m..
' .44-e-r-eee (:)//,‘,
Michael George, Chairman Claude Thompson, Pl r
A
- r
My Of Wylie
Action Item No. 1
Alley Waiver
Twin Lakes Phase IV
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting: May 1, 2001
Owner: Twin Lakes, LP
Surveyor/Engineer: Corwin Engineering, Inc.
Location: Generally located north of Alanis Drive and east of
South Ballard Avenue (F.M. 2524)
Existing Zoning: Single-Family—3 Residential(SF-3)
Summary:
Section 2.9 of the Paving Standards states that "Alleys shall be provided in all residential areas
and shall be paved with concrete. The City Council may waive the residential alley requirement
upon determination by the Council that it is in the best interest of the City."
The applicant is requesting that this requirement for alleys be waived for Lots 16 through 30 of
Block L and Lots 78 through 97 of Block E Phase IV of the Twin Lakes Addition. The subject
area is north of Alanis Drive, and completes the development begun by Phase III. On April 24,
the City Council denied a request for a waiver of alleys for the entire Phase IV Addition,
following a recommendation of the Commission on April 17.
Phase I of the Twin Lakes Addition was initially platted and developed at some time prior to
1987, and that phase incorporated alleys. A Preliminary Plat for Phase II, which includes the
area currently under consideration for the waiver, was approved in 1988, but no final plats were
approved and no further development occurred at that time beyond the initial Phase I. Another
version of a Phase II Preliminary Plat for the overall tract, very similar to the 1988 version, was
approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in January of 1998 and by the City Council in
February of 1998. That approved 1998 Preliminary Plat included alleys throughout the entire
development.
Alley Waiver—Twin Lakes Phase IV
However, two subsequent Phases of the Twin Lakes Addition have been approved and developed
without the required alleys. A smaller Phase II was completed in August of 1998 and Phase III
was completed in November of 2000. The infrastructure was accepted by the City and Final
Plats were filed with the County for both of the Phases.
The applicant contends that the City Council specifically granted a waiver of alleys for Final
Plats of both Phase II and Phase III (which have been developed and accepted without alleys) as
well as future Phases IV and V. However, neither the City staff nor the applicant has been able
to document the issuance of such an alley waiver.
Issues:
1. The Subdivision Regulations and the Paving Standards of the City of Wylie require that
alleys be provided in all residential subdivisions. No documentation is available to explain
why alleys were not required in two phases which have been approved and accepted by the
City, although alleys are required by the code, illustrated on the Preliminary Plat supporting
these phases, and the Addition's Phase I included alleys.
2. Twin Lakes Phase III, north of Alanis Drive, which this portion of the proposed Phase IV
completes was developed and accepted by the City without alleys. An alley id no appropriate
adjacent to Alanis to serve the majority of lots in Block E where the waiver is requested, and,
if required, the alley in Block L will be the only alley within the Addition north of Alanis.
3. Staff review of the request concludes that the land and development Phases to the south of
the Alanis corridor are sufficiently different in character to support alleys, while adding
alleys to the existing development north of Alanis will be contrary to the character of that
existing development. Drainage, utilities and vehicular access, the major function of alleys,
are accommodated for in other ways for the lots for which the waiver is requested.
Staff Recommendation:
Approval. Utilities and drainage are appropriately addressed in easements within the area of the
requested alley waiver, and alleys are inconsistent with the existing development of the
neighborhood which these lots complete.
The Departments of Development Services, Public Works and Fire concur with this
recommendation.
Attachments:
Applicant's letter requesting waiver of alleys
Illustration of lots covered by the request
Apr 24 01 01 : 53p ZENA 8174216910 p. 2
zENA
April 26, 2001
Mr. Claude Thompson
Director of Planning
City of Wylie
2000 Hwy. 78 North
Wylie, Texas 75098
Re: Twin Lakes, Ph IV
Partial Alley Waiver
Dear Claude,
Please accept this letter as my formal request for an"Alley Waiver" to accompany
our Plat to be placed on the Planning& Zoning agenda for May 1st, 2001 for a
portion of our proposed Twin Lakes Phase Four development. Zena Land
Development is requesting the consideration of an Alley Wavier for lots 16 thru
30, block L; and lots 78 thru 97, block E. This portion of Phase Four is located
north of Alanis Blvd. as shown on Exhibit attached.
I respectfully request your assistance in placing this item on the P&Z agenda. If
you should have any questions please contact me at(817)269-8528.
Sincerely,
Zena Lan velgnent LP
Robert J. etancur
Director of Development and Construction
P.O. Box 92864, Southlake,Texas 76092
Metro(817)424-1392 Fax (817)421-6910
Apr 24 01 O1 : 53p ZENA 8174216910 p. 3
04/26/2001 11:13 9723964987
COR4IN ENGINEERING PAGE 02
k Ewe iie ilia 6[4 I:
7 x
3
r
tb
>`
_LI__I la ' !II
__A l
_-I P
I '
---ii [ # '= optfts*,#,] =I 1.4t
_ _, , aim 6 -.
I 1*I ___
air sr� /ice ,
A F-Til-Pi 1---3 ,hjip
__12_11 3 1,6,.'"440afik _ / 1
-12;4 \--\ V I_ / I
1 9-1 --k NOV --I
a---1 C
�/ (fl ' . _ _-x i1 -P I
1k
_____ _11_
, t ),..r..4.._
I I 11 I .T, 1 / iir.
2
� r. r
fr
Cityr of Wylie
Action Item No. 2
Final Plat
Harvest Bend Phase II
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting: May 1, 2001
Owner: B & D Land, L.C.
Harlan Properties, Inc.
Surveyor/Engineer: Douphrate &Associates, Inc.
Location: Generally located in the southwest corner of the intersection
of North Ballard Avenue (F.M. 2514) and Dog Drop Road
Existing Zoning: Single-Family—3 Residential(SF-3)
Summary:
The Final Plat for Phase II of the Harvest Bend Addition includes 16.371 acres and will create 67
lots. The property is zoned Single-Family Residential — 3 (SF-3), requiring a minimum lot size
of 7,200 square feet.
The Preliminary Plat for the overall Harvest Bend Addition was approved by the City Council in
October of 1998. A Final Plat for Phase I was approved by the Council and filed with the
County in May of 2000, and is currently being developed for Single-Family— 3 Residential (SF-
3) lots of a minimum 7,200 square feet. That 1998 Preliminary Plat did not include alleys and
Phase I was accepted and is being developed without alleys.
The development of Phase I of Harvest Bend required a significant amount of off-site sanitary
sewerage, including the construction of an additional pump station, at the expense of the
developer, because the City system was inadequate to support the development at the time. This
additional system is, in part, already installed within the street rights-of-way to be created and
dedicated to the City within the subject Phase II. The pump station is to be dedicated to the City
as Lot 19A of Block B of the Phase II.
Final Plat—Harvest Bend Phase II
Section 2.9 of the Paving Standards states that "Alleys shall be provided in all residential areas
and shall be paved with concrete. The City Council may waive the residential alley requirement
upon determination by the Council that it is in the best interest of the City."
The applicant contends that the City Council specifically granted a waiver of alleys for both
Phases. However, neither the City staff nor the applicant has been able to document the issuance
of such an alley waiver.
The applicant is requesting a waiver of the alley requirement and approval of the subject Final
Plat of Phase II.
Issues:
1. The Final Plat substantially conforms to the approved Preliminary Plat, including the lack of
alleys. However, as submitted without alleys, the Plat does not comply with the Subdivision
Regulations of the City of Wylie.
2. Alleys were not anticipated in either the approved overall Preliminary Plat which includes
the subject phase or the accepted and filed Final Plat for Phase I. It is the conclusion of staff,
that the addition of alleys at this stage of review, while required by the code, will contrary to
the spirit and philosophy of the earlier reviews and approvals and will result in a significant
reduction in the number of lots created by this Phase as well as the disruption of the water
and sanitary sewer facilities already installed, and will thereby create an undue hardship on
the City as well as the applicant.
3. Both public and private utilities, drainage and vehicular access/egress, functions normally
accommodated by alleys, are adequately accommodated within streets, easements or by other
means for the subject development. Therefore, alleys are not needed.
4. Section 5.03 of the Subdivision Regulations requires that residential lots backing onto a
dedicated roadway be screen. This requirement will be accomplished by the installation and
maintenance of a living screen on private properties, in compliance with a condition
incorporated in to the Council's approval of the Preliminary Plat.
Financial Considerations:
Plat application fees—Paid
The applicant is aware that development impact fees must be paid before a Final Plat can be filed
with Collin County.
Final Plat—Harvest Bend Phase II
Staff Recommendation:
Approval of the Final Plat as submitted without alleys. The Plat is consistent with the approved
Preliminary Plat and with the extension of Phase I, and utilities and drainage are appropriately
accommodated by means other than alleys.
The Departments of Development Services, Public Works and Fire concur with this
recommendation.
Attachments:
Applicant's letter requesting waiver of alleys
Final Plat
FROM DAI FAX NO. 9727719005 Apr. 24 2001 01:26PM P2
DOUPEIRA'1 E & ASSOCIATES, INC.
k:NGINEERING PROJECT MANAGEMENT SURVEYING
2235 RIDGE ROAD SUITE 200 ROCKWALL, TEXAS 750S7 TEL 972.771.9004 FAX 972.771.9005
April 23, 2001
Mr. Claude Thompson
Planning Director
2000 Highway 78 North
Wylie,Texas 75098
Re: Harvest Bend Phase IT Final Plat
Mr. Thompson:
For your information,our office received the comments provided by the Development
Review Committee with regards to the Harvest Bend Phase ll final plat submission.
Our client, B & D Land, L.C./Harlan Properties Inc., respectfully request a waiver to the
following comments:
1. Revise the plat to include alleys
2. Construct a screening wall along FM-2314 frontage
The reasons why these waivers are being requested arc as follows:
1. Harvest Bend.Phase 1I Final Plat is identical to the preliminary plat which has been
approved by the City Council and filed of record with the City's planning
department.
2. The engineering design for both Phase I and II has been completed and approved by
the City's staff.
3. As part of the utility sanitary sewer design, our staff worked in conjunction with the
City's Staff to construct an offsite sanitary sewer line, so that both Phase I and II
would be served adequately with the present design and lot layout. Changing the lot
configuration could adversely affect the sanitary sewer presently in operation.
4. When the property was originally preliminary platted alleys were never a
consideration with the City Staff or Developer. Alleys, therefore,were not a
requirement to complete the project. The Developer would never have started the
project had alleys been a requirement.
FROM : DAI FAX NO. : 9727719005 Apr. 24 2001 01:27PM P3
5. It was the Developer's instruction from the City's staff that a live screening wall
was allowed and acceptable with both Phase I and II. Again,a masonry screening
wall request was never discussed as a requirement of the City Staff and therefore
never budgeted for this project.
In summary, your consideration of these waivers would be greatly appreciated.
Should any questions arise regarding this matter please call.
Sincerely,
AZ
W. L. ouphrate II, P.E.
cc: Bill Wait
dr i i o
fi', �.,',r' ^i" .,�;4`.;4
r .-
'4
•
I11N } ',Y ,4 t: 4 • d'�i•�-q�y'� +����a, ,k1't
.. ,',W 4�"S (�'�d'' b, ::vx,a - : .. �i' : "a,,,$.:x�;iah^k �. .:�€"tk.,,
: .....•rw .. i+},e`f.'.;"3',, v ., :, Y`•- .!` '' ,p .,t ?`r' p�{ n.C :�5.'
• 'CURVE TA@LE
�� pF
'�,'."^ �,^•yw=$^. PROVISION do M:IN
NTENANCE CURVE L,rNGiH�RADIUS TANGENT "CH SRO CH DISi' "D 4� n' � ' : � ��'"�r,�''
.qy -5 i t)Y' bE:- ELTA .:; t ' , '� ice:-/ e w;''+,4 �,,
u.„4, A ONE SCREENIG WALL '.. . € .} •.v.>
y;k s' 1«;' .. ',,. ClCt 1270 '365.00'56.60 S80'S8'02'W'11225 .17'41 2$ T.t ,,a i See {
PD>1�tT" {, ,},. ALONG PARKEROAD PER . ..,:,:,,,: ; ..,,,�r :
' �'i. �, � 3fisY 'C2' 140;29 -425.Oq::,70.79"N81'34 40"E'139.65''�18'54 44 '� ,�•„ A,
C1TY OF WYLIE EGUt.ATiONS ..,• .�.. .,.,,.,, "
. nkw " il�'as1►Q; C3 t9., , ,'45.00-.-44,.,'.'S44'24'37"E`'83.14''''89'06'42"' ,, ,,r+•^ k„a x,.,`,,,-t,,,.
,.': C4 59.99'.,..45.00 4279 ' -6202'° w ::I I t :'," ,,•
AT PR iOPERTY OWNERS EX- S4'�'12 0$W $7'O6 41 x a n tea'
4
r.z �,:.... PENSE(3 GAL RED'GP C5' 72.7$ 45.00:`47.15 54.3.44'31'W.65.1q.`'_2'40 i 1,;,,i,• ee . ., i,,,,,1 `
;:. x „': a a _ PHOTINIAS 4'APART MIN.) C8"` $1:$3', '225.00 4i.37; • I,p1 1th 11Tk.n
r t,, ? SOT40'35"W'"$1.38=. 2Q'S019 IIs a
i:N F Cl 81.83" :225.00:41,37 N47' '35"E 81.38 20'S019 I- ' %.. :,
�'r - ;,,t. MIT RQA. {iM.54p!+�1 w L W411F. - G8e +r r .. .t,.i'. ',5,,''I ,".,K,� t-',, ,,
'�'�S�t �. { t99,
«• a;a4 CS' �247 �25:00 43.52 N27'0a 43:35`'120't 4 39 ��f;1 1�"`���^ax�#' �,.,.:�,t
69 z,•. ,s•w.r(':?.�+ w. 's, .99,':R.4+W ,N'. SUr+�.Y _ 98 ti '•��: ',„;F ..
• r
SITE "",.'--•-�_ -- % an orr ,>.:..�;,. :s„ ,,-� _ , C9". 07.fi0'`623.51'330:37 5a3.84,.. ""`t, :'t x��,.
P w` • ,';. Ma.' PO 14a.. L.-102 51 $442314 W 55'S0 02 :.ro no--�" ":: 4 s«•,
///� �. w. ,,, 672.0 C10 12 54 45.00 46.89"S46 33'S8 E`64.93' 92'21 17" teuapcRwe, ,,. ay;'. .
ii 1,STRF "�'20:1" 1 2a t 7..,. .r,r'. , _?rr. .5 +. , ,.: t '
;�,�. a�o3':'T. L=1022.46 c1t 1o.1s 4250 5.1z 10.18` fi � �
, =�`::y ,--* �'" �re •'wr' w.f,'�^• '+.•..,.• *'.-„`-, .,•-,�•'�F�'� r; ' N07�5'14"E 13'43 34" x'rl,r,` �br i.�r���sa��a�;'t,e.z�rr' t"
t�l ! 'X ""! '.+. T=602.90 Cl2 to 25 4250 21.78•S24'2;2$"W 38 7'? 54'16 07" :. t "
1120.0D' Q, 1,,:,..R "' +;tt w e 1:I f�"`•- `� — • , `.,{+'ii+ •'y.?r a.,}r .4� i �; "' ,-,-,�,, �� 1.....'� *ai _ �}� Le u.E D-76 13 48 r �,�������
•
r. L. _.,, 1a ='F' '""' .o LINE TABLE' • ...�,. t
API
•
i$ '"` _ ._ 47.4. a, 11 a LINE LENGTH BEARING' I
t.s ,►`� 5.0'ME. qt,.` ` �. T:SZ11l "E .^'"'MiL1 ST0N OR1 E Ej,. ' 12 \atpf► L1 22.27 N89'S5'33"E _ m e ;
� !!!, 3 ", 4223.32. r..�-,, ,_-.,...,�- 6LZp. ,7t1. 1;
•74
,,c,, •
t �. \♦,. 04 a0 , B ne e
VICINITY MAP 1 tri a � ,. E® v' 1tY�k. a?e. !'rat°14 4` \ "�. ,�°t7 \�j ,f3,�f, a a r, n ,
N.T.S. . �Q °ti oa2i .
rr tz 3 *2 r i .,,`� ,,\\to \ C�
000 U UU �.r 1 b
S�,
iR �"' J ea,. �
i 87 AC. k «_7.1a i s' S •' ,a 7• a • 11 v.'•Y 11 ' 11.E dt'',9 •'� 13 \ +/• b�t8 ��`
•
WIWAM DOWNS ` DE t2 \
VOL 1820«PG.776 ,..4)1 _1�t,4l - ° t Y' ' y'+ •f , ` 9D2 E\,.• � ''„
aJ ,.,« 1 k 4+, Y I tt)tln Cst�s. _,_� _ -- Q
1..`: -'.1r ,j .w• Yet Y r It 'K ' t _ —_88'3.2i.�..... — "` jib'19 I:OT tYA
0 . =� r "�TRC�,.„. ,v ==+= 325.57 41' r 19f.,77 ro i
_ _ --.---_ �».. ---- 32 ., � �• GRAPHIC SCAIr ." 2 ,-
t �,,.,,, „��,,. r r J4S'- i«79RO20 % /\ .
'Or•
•
ESA1T � 90 �,, ,i i"7S_-... F4 23IIM3. ki '
'`' -... C? ...y`- p. •'''.4 l 1.'•.r. 5, {E� . \\' vei (1N,�E8r> r „ th*, 'll ", �� *,:, .•- ,,...- •. "Q 1a 17 . le .1Q N . • '"{63.76' 1 istah 30a 14 X° ,+ a"'.,•
1"�,Y�r '1 R tt. 1# 13 .,t4 - t� 'i. .' � �', tt -p S.QQ' Q�s�'. g^Z.'. �.�..�...... vein
1 ,.a ',a ,, ;,
SI
N00°O6'42"E I aa°!{� 'p�pr •'An,' "...marfj e�.. if �9fC r„ 1303.35 ta'F`oRcE t.4,1N USD. T t ,,,L.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,'",!..,,,,,,,}
rr.91, 1/2•IRf I w.. r7F[f�•41'F.5»rf ti
•
i t a .
\ t
I
\\\
t \ T e.k t RIGHT-OF wily I '
\ REMAINDER TRACT `- v04 t373 1r0 3t2 } ,.
\ \ RAY PRICE ' DRAIt}AGE ESMT 14C YAIN . - 0
71
k EASEMEN !- w�tER DtSntlCt.v_t28s P.45
T TD NOR1N TEAS 1AUN1CtPAL r4# w i
{ •
• \\ \ VOL.817,PG.596 -- "'/..,.....''
37!►t5'.4.» �77.:17L7-1
_ 1-,__ aaD Nut FND. Reatrtctklna for Tots 14.15,20 and 21 block A f
`"7—'77am ..�.. the NTMWD eaaament restrict aatatruction of pamonent structures auclioa'foundatTanit,walla,
�` -_ -r �-tASt,AGk'F TO►ODna`sxA9 NUNtgPAI WATER...CT ___.T�....._1/2YRF C.. ,,,�vr �-$'F^^�""^` � z '
-,�„�;_.....,.._...._ �,,, `` 12 �• '.o�, Dols and ,4 i,�.
. _ -`N.
t"6 ,�'� �,'.•�" A !i 30 31 I t•'32 ', � �Sp �1 !n � � .&!•• 9 �a •
i partnonalt atoroge'bttpdings.Items such as driveways,fenaas.sprinkler.systems artd;�� �;,��
\ 4A � 27 I1•� � I 1 t-I yt r 2s' 0 1' t{prrrla!landscaping plans.that ertcxoach on the NTMWD easements oro allowed.Hctrrevsr that��•^\\ \ Ip: 91 J 4 -- ;- \e t' dTMWDassumes no reaponsib0ity fordamagesresultingfrom the need to,repcir s+r malntotn th\ ° „, ,,I1 ..� _ - M' _ \� th m a "''ITMWDpipelinaaFurther,.anycoatforropair fordamage to thepipelines resulting troth a'N89 58 41 ' ,, -- -_ - -- OS __ _ tl construction by the developer will be the responaibftity of the developeK«. ,,,,I :,,,,,,,i,:,,i;;:,
3 7 AUT!!M DRIVE /57.48 Si, • x c;
•
r
24 25 15 1� y 0.48 • RFEZE 1R_,_ -a21, -"�. I h I
\ �' 1 c�' I `i - tt �1a. 2: t.L.i 1 >1 ' „ - r4 ,c v xa,
id f.' f—
•
GASTON DRIVE EAST v°i v �, 24 .4 I t i 1, , ��1/4 _,t ,�� I I 1 .:,,::, 71) '
..�
_ v���vy t- '° 7 _ -�—.N 1 1 e OWNER/DEVELOPER
' • POINT NO'TH ADDITION �\,�\ , � �to I�n'' t 2,t I 3 S a al I• 1 5 I RE;AL
INDER OF ' , 1 s i
\ I> I i ( IB &D LAND L.C•/HARLAN PROPERTIES INC,
PHASE ONE ,\ 22 Id B _I __ _ T 2 iI IvoLUME PAGE 221 °a\ \ 1 ,At _� �` _�) I N 2314.E. HEBRON PARKWAY xw_ AND.. aADDITION 107 t0 {�\�.\\ ""I � - TERRACEDRIVE� �_��_ ' N4WVOL ,PAGE 250''••. CARROLLTON, b r 3
7 A'�\` L.I .�. -.,, ,- ,,� ~--_ - I°° w 3 LL N, TEXAS 75Q10 x
\21 LL7f _z� I I 3 i ai Na
11 ����lll Na�,D3a , W 972--939,-8871
t" lat 12 11 m Qn
•
012 t"S i I I '1111 ZO�t\ �'' r" u G' I 1 • � t �
t ( 1 :••► .! 1 1 1 a'r°N89°48'46'E N �
tl I .J
A i\ ;2 3 ► .�. QE 7 a �� ' L zD.lam.—49� ,—
C- ::,. w ',I _ _ z5o.oo °,,�•IR5 67 LOTS4 '" t 3 00 \L elw .— ,5.I Z ,1fl ) F
•
Q O t ,•t �` T HARVEST BEND D V • _ �c=-''' 989.49'46, 243.9s- i w t
o - - ��__-. R!� —4:3� _x--1--""" __ .�_ . • FINAL FLAT �'`
1.
_ �. r ��_ .�_ ---.— 4 _ _—_-�— , 25' HARVEST '
Z 4 BEND ADDITIQN ,
IIIII
° ka�
Z 2 \ 9 7 , 4 'PHASE II ��r
15 2 15 __ t 17 ta''y 15, \ t4 t3' 12 11 10 e 5 4 3 2 1 n2 q ,k« •�rhi r
2
__. _`� -��. r_._.__ J 16.371 ;AC , { I,4,i. ,s,t r,,
1611111 t6 i g` NB7'57'58'-.W ,,.-,1 rzSS.-3z' -- - —._ ;�z .D. PENNY SURVEY
ANN DRIVE L ABSTRACT. NO. 6 6 ,,,. ,,,.rtn � °
' by • CIT ,��'OF4'YLIE•,. i
;t t 7.03,c �«,r, 4n,� COUSIN COUNTY TEXAS'. t r r I 1 ' , ^i
15 2$ +" JESUS'&SPlNOZA e/t n ,.tq ,,ry it ,_
,.... .
REY,errs a7Y NAYUglVS o o' 'I , 1
iiiii in
:i 184 1 Rev vcR nw ea+Rer o.z.".e t an;n„yt. t `,, �•',,:, 4,.
NqL- 1,RG. .. �u i S
•S - 4 s' PROJECT 9831FPL1PH,�, �, �" °�',En 7 l,, ;iy
^f t , z,' t *'REF.BEARING BASED ON DOUPRRA u rE, * ry«,$$s44,,,, rt.�,:„ , ,,,
'" '4 ,?• a t { _ DATA. 6/10/99 i _ '.t'n�'.Q{r'iCii Ctl7iA iNA+. i•4�y+.,^',"n F t'1�,`�S`%,'rM`.,»^ .{
17 t4Q' 27 NT NORTH ADDITION.PHASE ONE, , _., a{
y AS RECORDED INc, � z,. 1`
Y .t�?'.t.,SR .. •'^Y"+.'E k., +I'RO,ECT TR '4 " ,'' ;•^,y •:,,,,.A',, ,,,
VOLUME F PAGE 221 wivx. ,. •;,, •t:
i. w DRAWN, 'D.1..8. ''��`.RiAG'Bi��.� .+7rOQ''"�'��jM�' :'r�+7:^#� !n rY.Fcr.
PHONE,`'0172 9=-9004'FAX1 872 7�'0-900S ,,SH ta;OF`2�
CNK p w.�D
'J= ,., i r n.
�t faz.7- i•'� �. .• g� r
' U'1:.+C4,p.C1•\..J'.',JN+i t=! J u if,=,. ,
P +S-.. .;Y.� to. .xT•�h,r�;^��i"i.r�'��r„ r�,c..
:.'C a�. a .,, l.- Sr a •� " :{.,s'�
'?�N, .may. - Lam+ «,e. " .rs .,
r t,.Wn} 4: a 1'
-- Iffy Of Wylie
Action Item No. 3
Final Plat
Cimarron Estates Phase I
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting: May 1, 2001
Owner: Centex Homes
Surveyor/Engineer: Tipton Engineering, Inc.
Location: Generally located north of Brown Street, east of Kreymer
Lane and east of the Wylie Ranch East Phase I Addition
Existing Zoning: Single-Family—2 Residential(SF-2)
Summary:
The Final Plat for Phase I of the Cimarron Estates Addition includes 54.336 acres and will create
165 lots. The property is zoned Single-Family Residential — 2 (SF-2), requiring a minimum lot
size of 8,500 square feet.
The Preliminary Plat for the overall Cimarron Estates Addition was approved by the City
Council in January of 2001. The subject Final Plat substantially conforms to the earlier approved
Preliminary Plat.
Section 2.9 of the Paving Standards states that "Alleys shall be provided in all residential areas
and shall be paved with concrete. The City Council may waive the residential alley requirement
upon determination by the Council that it is in the best interest of the City." Alleys are provided
throughout the proposed addition, except for those lots which back on to Brown Street and those
which back on to the business-zoned properties fronting new State Highway 78. A
recommendation of approval of the Plat as submitted will constitute a recommendation of a
waiver of the required alleys for Lots 1 through 8 of Block K, Lots 35 through 42 of Block J and
Lots 17 through 42 of Block F.
Final Plat—Cimarron Estates Phase I
Section 5.03 of the Subdivision Regulations states that "Where subdivisions are platted so that
the rear yards of residential lots are adjacent to a dedicated roadway, the owner shall provide
screening at his sole expense." The required screening will be located on the private lots. In
order to provide a unified screen, the applicant has agreed to construct masonry columns at the
front/side building lines of lots siding on to Anson Parkway so that individual fences may be
affixed to these, and to connect the columns across the cul-de-sacs with wrought iron fencing.
The applicant has indicated agreement to install a wood fence along Brown. A recommendation
of approval of the Plat as submitted will constitute a recommendation that the required screening
be provided as described above.
Issues:
1. The Final Plat substantially conforms to the approved Preliminary Plat. However, as
submitted without alleys to serve all lots, the Plat does not comply with the Subdivision
Regulations of the City of Wylie. The Plat complies with all other requirements of the code.
2. The waiver of alleys, as well as the provision of unified screening of lots backing and siding
onto thoroughfares, will be made a condition of approval of the Final Plat as submitted.
Financial Considerations:
Plat application fees—Paid
The applicant is aware that development impact fees must be paid before a Final Plat can be filed
with Collin County.
Staff Recommendation:
Approval of the Final Plat as submitted, including as conditions of approval the waiver of alleys
serving Lots 1 thru 8 of Block K, Lots 35 thru 42 of Block J and Lots 17 thru 42 of Block F, and
the provision by the developer of a wood screen fence along Brown and masonry columns and
wrought iron fencing at the cul-de-sacs abutting Anson.
The Departments of Development Services, Public Works and Fire concur with this
recommendation.
Attachments:
Final Plat
iiroi‘ LOCATION MAP I ti.4,4v 0,,,, ,
igto
26 QH 27 -7.'h 28 .r,:k! 29 ,"-2,,H 30 .`r:?-t,,, 31 :•.7H
..>
-,-_-, -
4Vi&'W,iA.rr1i,t f,4ii4rPi1to.i•edjW 1.trr.1iI,r',MiA.,(•0-i4•u1.I,I7I:a
E... Wl
iga
),c r
,')
_C_
,'.':,,„:,u2' S6.5,U.30T'T:.,N,8,ER265'5S
i,
M 1I7,,a5Ll.0L,..0.
,‘1
1
5553,,0'._.,;,,,,‘,',,,''',,,' 6295.'3.1 30L.'-.'?!2'k'•,.''`,•W6A,9.3Y
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 41 40 39 38 37 3604'0
S i,,37,,•9-,4,,91-C'S'--,al12,-2i,l-,Wv
MOC%cLNooi
1,
k,SZA iIIt
a'C.iN)1 firfOf go.MON 101,SOA Oaf
,
T
69.30' 69.30' 69.30' 69.30' 69 30' 50.00'" /,/. 60 30 0 60 .0
ALLEY , 20'ALLEY :-.'
DONNA I•V °)r?, S 89°07'21"E
p,) 175.00' 65.30 65.30 65.30 65.30 65.30 65.30' 75.001 El 75.00' 65.30 65.30' 65.30 65.30' 65.30' 30.00 75.00' I k /"=60'
2 , , k , ',N) k , , , k k IP)) Bearings Based on True North
I , _, = :.. _ '0) from GPS observations
I *.'( ' 16,'"" 15 -.'', 14 P1-`, 13-''''''' 12-'''''c'' 11 l','c`l 10..°)',`, 9 x (.`' 1U,. 2 . , _.
,c(;1 .,(,, ,-, -, ,,."‹ '.g
4.1 1 9., `)' (.iii`,4' • ,,',N`; ,,,,,,d R, d E--,d 42 ,i . 43 ,;,2 44 ,,, 45 -,,p,d 46 ,,, 2 47',\),2,,48 ,`\,'49.6 (., . -
5'8L(., in ci.> 'di 1 Q4 '1' ' 4•,,
"(..
75.00' 65.30 _ 65.30' 65.30' 65.30 65.30' 65.30' 75 00' 25' 25' 75 00 65.30' 65.30' 6 25 30' 65 30' 65.30' 70.00' a4
59 80' KERNVILLE ''
2 DRIVE 62 75
I 6,,'? 6 9,21 113 I CP
4' ki
76.30 65.50 65.50 65.50' 65.50' 65.50 65.50' 65.50' I 15 65.50 65.50 65.50' 65.50' 65.50' 65.50' 6550' 70.00' 75.00' ',1 •
0 I ,
---, „--
k 25131_ k , ,
,1 ( , 25 .
'BL, ,
.' ,k ' 25'BL k
` . ,4,,,,' ECI 1,1,,2. '''( ,,,,, ';', .','' ''''),)_ ..' ''.;'v.(,', '.,',., '',1, iF•'-,' ,,,:, .',`,
,1c ',. N 1,'I ''''',1 ?,)..c(, 1;(1 ,('-',..,(,,, ,,;)-",,, .1,?),-c,', Pr,:*',c; ,Slci -`•
• ,
17.(',9, 16 r,;5), 15. ,,`' 14 ,)is9) 13 ,`;)r''' 12-''''' 11 ''',)'',' 10 F;I 1'',' 9 -•`("1„ 8 °';''',' 7 ''''i' 6 P,'''' 5 (.`, ''''' 4 'C,I,'"9 3 '''','':'-`" 2 '''''' 1
t' N
8 Cr)
75'Drainage .4.;
__
21 /6.30' 65.50 65.50 _ 65.50 65.50 65.50' 65.50 65.50 I I 65.50' I 65.50' 65.50' 65.50' 65.50' 89,7'21"
20'ALLEY i i, < 75.00' .(1
,,
65.30' 65.30' 65.30' 65.30' 50.00' NN,4,4,C ',2,'
i
-,.. ,• 1 , ',.„„-------7E5o'sDemraeThriatge
0 , ..' ,,,,,,P_.,,s ,,,,, q• ..,,,,,,,, I
O
ii , ,, , -,;,, ,.1 P, i, 1,"-.c,, 1,71' 1,;, ,,, ,,, ,, , ,
,.,,, 7-) 18 ,, 19 ,,, 20 (.,,,, 21 2 22 ,,,,,c, 23,.,,.2 24 p,.,, 25 ,26-,2 27 ,,,,,,,:, 28 4\,c, 29,,,,d 30 `,N,, 31 ',.,`,',,(1 32 `,, ,, 3 3.''''-- ;,,,34' k,
2 5 I
'a n 2'-' , 8'-' 'a , '', ':--) 8''-' I
so,\
LOT 43 3-- " - ' 2, u-) , ' 25'BL (i) , ,Th
ei 2581_. el e, '_ _ (') 25'BL
,,
j,.., 1\
City Park &. 6.146'
65.30' 65.30 65.30' 65,0 65.30 65,30' 65.30 [j54-65..30 65.30 65.30' 65.30 65.30 65.30 65.30' 46.70'
,, '
Drainageway ,.. GOLD HILL s 89,7'21"E r, 1109.881, DRIVE 1 STREET
4.517 Acres -
516
' 1 .Et-i..•,'. ' 23. 2E Ua.sm&enP
TYP. SIDEWALK EASEMENT
1 . 5 655 6 6 6 653Th. 6 6.14' 5 2 7 N8907,27.w3050. \,. ,,
,
:, Jutoic Lots , ,,
R=565.00'
..!_"".7.-7-,-,,'-••5?""I 1 '63'2, c'''' r`,2,'',",, i,T,,rp, r, -1,2 ,9,'- -,N.) P)''''I l'2 F',''' -. . L;- Of' ,rt., -°,2 1-0. -,' .- .,
_ D=08:3030"
8 E--Po 8 ,`,,), 7 ,,,,,
„, ,,,,___,__ ___\__ _. , -, (,\_. .,,,,,_ 6 ,,,,"`.?, 5 .''''', 4 ':,,,' 3-M l'2' 2 9=(' 1 '-±" =2'-'‘4%."coc)''2 =,' '42 ''''`C,,:i 41 ,,,'IN3.1%1 4 0 ..,;,„ 30 i,- -,., ;3a ;-.. J7',- '''.--- -,'-'--,
, ------- - - - ---- -------,- - •,,'
' 0
'14-7.51_'
Detoo(NTS) V)
25' 1....:,76 1°,,.....' , 65.7,5' 50' -65 30' L 65,o' --j6-5.30' L65.30' 66 3,' r-.,0• ±----- - ' ' ...,, ,
15 Wat7Lfne
fl 5 San-Sewer N 88:37'52"W 899.78' - ;----
Easement Easement '--20'N.T.M.W.D.Esmt.(Vol.3176,Pg.1002)
BROWN (OLD HIGHWAY 78) STREET R=50.00'
0=150'00'00"
____ T=186.60'
GARY R. URIE& - L=1.30.90' CURVE DATA
WIFE DONNA G. URIE
TIMMY RAY KRE'YMER MARK TRAMELL C.C. No. 99-0082431 CH=96.59'
CURVE RADIUS DELTA TANGENT LENGTH CHORD BEARING
C.C. No. 99-00980007 C.C. No. 96-0018834 I CB=S 7552'39"W
C-7 325.00 02,413" 7.,' 15.53' 15.52' N 00.10'00",,W
C-2 225.00' 12°13'19" 24.09' 47.99' 47.90' N 08.43,50,,W
275.00' 15.43'08" 37.96' 75.44' 75.21'
FINAL PLAT , ,6,1 ,, C-4 250.00' 15.43'08" .34.51' 68.59' 68.37'
74,7 21 E
C-5 50.00' 150'00,0" 186.60' 130.90'
,s C-6 375.00' 15,2'48" 49.53 98.48' 98.20 S 08,,36,,E
ill, ''''' LEGEND C-7 325.00' 06'05'40" 77.30' 34.57' 34.55', N 1328'11,,W
CIMARRON ESTATES PHASE I ,„,„---;„-,,,,c„; • BL-Building Line C-8 375.00' 17,3'07" 58.45' 115,97' 115.51, N 07..3927,, W
C-9 375.00' 2022'06" 67.37' 133.31' 132.61, S 11 46 1,4,,W
''''.E2 A-Indicates Front C-10 325.00' 4220'49" 125.89' 240.20' 234.78 S 04 3924,, W
C-11 .375.00' 24,7'10" 82.97 16.3.31 162.03; N 13:21
FRANCISCO DE LA PINA SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 688 ' r ' BOUNDARY TANGENT DATA ' - " 92' 112 69 112 13 N 1048 40 E
C-12 325.00 19,2 02 56. . . . , „
k, 0-Indicates Street C-13 275.00' 16°13'21" 39.19' 77.86' 77.60' S 06 44 33 E
C-14 225.00' 16°13'21" .32.07' 63.71', 63.49, S 06:44:33:E
CITY OF WYLIE, COT UN COUNTY, TEXAS ____, ,._--
TANGENT BEARING LENGTH Name Change
C-15 250.00' 16'12'37" 35.60' 70.73 70.49 S 06 44,11,,E
C-16 350.00' 4,'10" 77.44' 152.42' 151.23' N 13°21 13,,E
E OWNER 7;12 'NI::50;:27.: 27.60'5.0 NOTICE: Selling a portion of this addition by metes and 0-1/2"Iron pin with cap stamped
E stamped Tipton Eng.,Inc.set C-17 350.00 17,3'07" 108.24' 107.81', N 07:39,27,W
C-18 350.00 422049" /35.57 258.68' 252.83 S 04.3924:,VV
''',-;,, CENTEX HOMES bounds is a violation of City ordinance and state law and is . C-19 ,40.00 90,000" 40.00 62.83 56.57, S 45.52,39,W
C-20 40.00 90,0'00" 62.83 56.57, S 44 07,21,E
subject to fines and withholding of utilities and building permits. 0 5/8„fron pin,,,,cap
C-21 50.00' 300,0'00" 28 87 261.80' 50.00 S 00,2,39,,W
2800 Surveyor Blvd.,^-,Carrollton,Texas 75 006
C-22 40.00' 90'00'00" 40.00' 62.83' 56.57: S 45:52,39::W
°- e'rV. 972.417.3562 NOTICE: All franchise utilities to be located within alleys. stamped C&B found
C-23 40.00' 90,0'00" 40.00' 62.83' 56.57 S 44 07 21 E
C-24 50.00' 300'00,0" 28.87' 261.80' 50.00' S 00,2'39:W
\ ENGINEERING/SURVEYING/PLANNING EGO-Farmer's Electric and CoSery .08' 100.00' S 01.12 07 W
g22A 55S:00: 1980%.°020 C0(2" ,/\5/Ao, 1717.54' 70.7r N 46,2'07''E 0
A.??
Nt. ,,, /6 TIPTONBivENG,I,NcE ,,IIC43. Easement
:''..
z; 972.226.2967
165 LOTS 2,366,676SQ.FT./54.3360AC 4/24/01 PLAT\4554
-----
i
e ....
i
1/2"iron pin found
k LOCAY7ON MAP ti.,,
STATE HIGHWAY 78
.,,
, -
DAVEc.Wci.BELL 9&_IdE079VINABELL .1,7
•,.
8 LEGEND
\Line
A
wi
ndicates Front
h.-' Ilirillr I
R=5789.65'
(-,'"-i .-,:)„`8. '6'n <•`,),`' 0_INnadmici:tecshaSiitgreet
0=00'35'40'
1-2
1 VIZ 111"V44 111144 c';'),c',',,, I 40 37
60 30 0 60 120 T=30.04'
CH=60.08'
0
.1 stamped Tipton Eng.,Mc.set-5/8"Iron pin with
Bearings Based obsn True North CB
E4.
o) stamped C&B found
from GPS oervations
g „,„ L':( 1.8 Easement
t 8
F., N
12' 42 bounds is a violation of City ordinance and state law and is REMAINDER Lul 12
k .
subject to fines and withholding of utilities and building permits.
S 88'47'53"El __'.-; WYLIE HIGHWAY 78 SOUTH p,,I4 I 1 11),
130.17' ‘ci,
r: __, ,,',\',),. 35 NOTICE: All franchise utilities to be located within alleys. JOINT VENTURE
z 2 0
S 89'07'21-E 888.52'
S 8,07'21"E
Cii 82.26' 64.00't 64.00' \ 38.52' 6470'7 64 00' .64700' 64.00' 74.00' 64.00' 6470' 64.00' 7 6700' 64.00'7 74.00' 64.007 7 82.00'I ° 752.20' .
5/8"iron pin found
on East side of Old Hwy 78
t'l ' '., -c,,r'i l',.' 1: f'4(j' )' i7j'), ,ij,' :i i'L, 25 :',',,',', ..,,, -,R "cr'i cc,). ,7 ','•', ) 18
8 -
33 8,,,, 32 a_ 31 2,,,- 30 2 , 29 ,,,,, 28..R,.,-, 27 ,,,, 26. .,- 24 .8,,,_-. 23 :',-) 22,,,,,,,,. 21 g,(4).20 ,,,,,„.„ 1%,,
4 ,
5 I •-z 0 0 0 0 0 0 v, , 0 0 0 . 0 0 ,C
25'BL
82.68' 64.00' 64.0' 64.00' 64.00' 64.00' 6,00' 6,00' _64.00' 64,0a' 64.00' 64.00' 64.00' 64 00' . 64 00' 47 70'1:5''l'''-----
BISSELL ',-q S 89'0721"E 1092.83' WAY lc' s 87(7)?"6,E "`-'-F---------1'(2;seZirt7)1
556.33'
536.50'
Cr '
100.67' 65.30' 65.30' 65.30' 65.30' 65.30' 75.00' 75.00' 69.30' 69.30' 69.30' 69.30' 69.30' 46.70',
.,
_ --,____•,)- 3.2'g a p „
,)((.1 ?,)'c'.r, 0)•
/o '`.1)'9, // F,1,9 12',(1;''',' 13 ,c;',''- 14 ,,;`4 15,c'i: `9„)'• 'FiNj,' ''''' c)
to '
CALLIE COURT
LOT 43
175.00' 69.30'
75.27' 65.30' 65.30' 65.30' 65.30' 65.30' 75.00'1 '
City Park &
20'ALLEY
Drainageway ',,-N-•,II, , , 174.99' 65.30' 65 30' 65.30' 65.30' 65.30' 75.00] , 175.00' 65.30'
4.517 Acres .,%?-' I...,
14 -,\,..;':;, 13 -,) 12 1'0 9 8 ',,,0" '2,2'. V''' -'gij 1 C:1 8 -N''''),,'-'(1,,,,„. 7
0 L ,
k
' ' -
564 51, DEERBORN ..,`Q. STREET ,Q, ,
- s 89107'21"E 1186.03' 621.50'
TYP. SIDEWALK EASEMENT '''' (1C), -
76.96' 69 00' 69.00' 69.00' 69.00' 69 00' 69.00' 69.00' 69.00' 69.00' 69.00' 69.00' 69.00' 69 00' 70.00' 75.00' co
,
`,i ..`,, S;..,
I''' 15 ,c),9',) 14 P>,,,d 13 ,,,,` ,9; 12 P>,,c; // ,,), /0 )( , 9 tii,), 8 `,,,,, 7 (i,'), 6 ,',, 5 ,.')'" 4 ,',''d 3 ,(1cs 2 '') • c'' 1 - d
16 °(2:'_ 2 2_ 2_ s,_ ':..) s,r....? 2 n .2:2 ,°2'..2 ' N_,_ 2.,'..7. '''
. ,
I
','_.) 96.30' _ 69.00' 69.00 69.00' 69.00' 69.00' 69.2000',4LE69;roo'..,,c) 69.00' 69.00' 69.00' 6g.00' 69.00' 69.00' 30.00 C. S 89;5070'021,"E,
1 ..,
FINAL PLAT 25 25'
't,
175.30' 67.00' 67.00' 67.00' 67.00' 67.00' 67.00' I 67.00' I 20:16_7.00' 67.00 67.00' 67.00' 67.00' 67.00' 67.00' 50.00' ,NNN..,4,6,
6<''''''''''-'
! 't CIMARRON ESTATES PHASE I , , , , , Easement _.,i.....f 5, k
k , , , k
' .',1,)
- el'- ,,'
FRANCISCO DE LA PINA SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 688 `,)(3''''' 1'8)'` `c,\\31 -,,J 17'9,)',!, 18 l''',, 19 -'1');,'c'i!20 '',1.... 21 -',7),)',\ 22 '-'7,1', 23 ..'','"'! 24-",:,("1 li''j 25 ,,),)- ..,! 26 '):, -(1. 27'-', ,',, 28 ic,',)-,`;', 29 ..1,, 1;.,. 30 ,7,)..,(! 31 .:7\i')-.`,, '',;'1',?-,)33' ','`'
,- , P "O''n P N9
'.g n 'O'''' .2 n „,(,',,s2) in r,,8 ,r9, P r9) 'c'S'''' , 3, c,2
I
8_
CITY OF WYLIE, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS 4: 0 8-
- 8-
-
0 OWNER :„' ' 258L (-1) '
2
E `,,'
1
STTER S MILL 5.0,
CENTEX HOMES a 75.30' 67.00' 67.00' 67.00' 67.00' 67.00' 6,00 67.00 1,2(Y\67.00' 67.00' 67.00' 67.00' 67.00 67.00' 67.00 46' 70''''
'',i)
lo • N 89°07'21"W -'77- IgSeUrneirtliti
2800 Surveyor Blvd.,-.Carrollton,Texas 75006 , , U ' s 89.0,27"E , 1128 30' N WAY
NIEffiN S.108 Miat
,,- 972.417.3562
Th---7.7500 1---715 0 3.C/ r---6 5 0,5 1.---6 5.3 0). -r--755 30' I E.,,23,..,' 1 6.5 50' T ,Go' ,1 ,,,,,-T 620.3,2' 1-, C,,,,,30' -1, '3,3 0'
FA 6
r, T G.-/-N ci-G.7 i, 97,---ii
a__ ___}__ _______ ,______ ___,_ _ __ _._4 25 ,'
1 ,- °I 1
I H T 1257,1 I 1 ---It
972.226.2.7
I 1 I i
1 i i 1
1'-' 165 LOTS 2,366,876SQ.FT/54.3360AC. 4/24/01 PLAT\4554 .
,
it
of Wyiie
Public Hearing Item No. 1
01-04
Rezoning
Planning and Zoning Commission: May 1, 2001
Applicant: MJD & JHM Enterprises, L.L.C.
Location: Generally located north of West Kirby Street (F.M. 544)
and west of Westgate Way
Existing Zoning: Agriculture (A)
Requested Zoning: Industrial(I) District
Summary:
The applicant is requesting rezoning of the subject property in order to relocate his business to the
subject site. The applicant has stated that initially he will restore and utilize the existing house for
office uses and the barn for storage of equipment used in his business. He states that he intends
ultimately to construct a new office/warehouse on the property.
The subject property is not platted and zoned for Agriculture (A) uses. There is an existing but
vacant house and barn of the property. It contains 3.66 acres, and fronts 65 feet along 215 feet
along W. Kirby Street and backs to the railroad right-of-way.
The adjoining property to the east of the subject tract is unplatted, undeveloped and zoned
Industrial(I) uses. The property to the west is zoned for Agriculture (A) uses and is undeveloped
and occupied by an extensive floodplain which limits development potential. The property to the
north, across the railroad corridor, is undeveloped and zoned for Agriculture (A) uses. The
property to the south across W. Kirby Street is zoned Industrial(I) and is developed for such uses
(Sanden).
ZC 01-04
Public Comment Forms were mailed to ten (1) property owners within 200 feet of this request.
Four Public Comment Forms have been returned, and were for the request.
Issues:
1. The Future Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Master Plan recommends Business Center
uses for the subject property. The Plan defines this new Business Center as accommodating
"professional office and clean manufacturing/assembly". The applicant intends to use the
property for the central office of his business, the nature of which takes his service to outlying
work sites with little or no traffic to or from the office. All equipment will be stored inside the
renovated barn. The proposed use conforms to the recommendations of the Comprehensive
Plan.
2. The proposed office/warehouse use is more compatible to the heavy traffic of the W. Kirby
corridor than would be alternative professional services offices and retail uses.
3. The subject property was once under single ownership with the tract to the west, which is
occupied by a development-limiting floodplain, and to the north, separated by the rail
corridor. These constraints limit the coordinated development of the original larger tract as a
whole.
4. Approval of a site plan and plat is required before an occupancy permit can be issued.
Financial Considerations:
Rezoning application fee - Paid
Staff Recommendation:
Approval of the rezoning. The proposal is consistent with the mixed-use intent of the Business
Center category of the Comprehensive Master Plan as well as the existing industrial uses of the
adjacent properties.
The Departments of Development Services, Public Works, and Fire concur with this
recommendation.
Attachments:
Location Map
r 1 Li LI _L\AX__.:
TflTh
i IIII
i IN
, I , -? n ersonvi erTTr__)ane
L.._.._.! ....1
MP.
I
i al ..II
MOMo.
L-1-1-1-4e:2'
Nil
I
i i
i Subject
i
! i
1 i
i
i !
i i
i
i i
i
! i
i
.._.._..
-------- I !
i i
i i Business ay
i I
i i !
I i
i i i
I i
i i i
I I
i i i
i !
i -
i
I
I I
i
F. M . 544
...____..
i
4-
o
i
.9
0
• i
1...
0
i>
i
a)
5
i
i 0
CO
i -
•.../
i a
._.._.._..
i
i ..
i .
. •
. .
c—
LOCATION MAP
ZONING BOARD CASE #2001 _04