10-24-1989 (City Council) Agenda Packet DATE POSTED 10-19-89
TIME POSTED 4:00 P.M.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING, CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24 , 1989
7:00 P. M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
2000 HIGHWAY 78 NORTH
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ORDER OF PAGE
BUSINESS REFERENCE BUSINESS
1 1 - 16 Consider approval of the minutes for the
October 2nd, October 3rd, and October
10th Council meetings
2 17 Consider approval of a Proclamation for
the Second Annual Christian Care Week -
November 19th thru November 25 , 1989
benefiting Wylie Community Christian
Care Center
3 18 Consider approval of endorsing proposal
to require state to reimburse local
units of government for all costs
incurred in implementing state imposed
mandates
4 19 - 31 Consider approval of engineering firm
for engineering and planning services
for the development of a Capital
Improvement Plan and Impact Fee
5 31 - 35 Consider approval of an Interlocal
Agreement for the fiscal year 1989-90
between Dallas County and the City of
Wylie allowing Dallas County to perform
work on Type B and Type E roadways
within a city when requested
6 36 - 42 Consider approval of award of bid for
annual Motor Fuel Contract
7 47 Consider approval of purchasing the
following items for the park with part
of the $3 ,000 revenue received from WSA:
a . Rockite Wave Slide w/canopy $698 .
b. Portable backstops $500 .
c. Broadcast Spreader $275 .
8 44 - 46 Consider approval of a Resolution casting
votes on the Candidates for the Board of
Director for Collin County Central
Appraisal District
9 Insert Consider appointment of Project Admini-
strator of Wastewater Collection System
Improvements
ORDER OF PAGE
BUSINESS REFERENCE BUSINESS
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
10 47 - 51 Industrial Waste Program Quarterly
Report presented by Mr . Ron Homeyer ,
Assist . City Engineer
11 Financial Report presented by Mr . James
Johnson, Finance Director
APPROVAL OF PURCHASES/PAYMENTS
12 52 - 63 Consider approval of pay request from
Lane & Associates for appraisals of
easement parcels required for Wastewater
Collection System Improvements in the
amount of $8, 500
GENERAL DISCUSSION
13 Citizen Participation
14 Council Discussion
15 Recess open meeting
16 Convene Council into Executive Session
under the authority of Article 6252-17
V. A. C. S. , Section 2 paragraph "g"
Personnel Matters - Six month Review of
City Manager
17 Reconvene open meeting
18 Consider any action necessary regarding
discussion in Executive Session
19 Adjourn
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES
OCTOBER 2 , 1989
The City of Wylie City Council met in a called work session
on Monday, October 2 , 1989 at 7 : 00 P.M. in the Council
Conference Room in the Municipal Complex . A quorum was
present and notice of the meeting had been posted in the
time and manner required by law. Those present were Mayor
Pro Tem Bud Naish, Council Members Pat Stemple, Jim Swartz ,
Steve Wright, Ortie Messenger , and John Akin, City Manager
Charles Norwood, and City Secretary Carolyn Jones.
DISCUSSION ON WEEDY LOT ORDINANCE: City Manager Charles
Norwood stated that this ordinance was brought up at the
last meeting regarding the time frame staff has to go
through in order to have a lot taken care of . State statue
says 10 days notice, notifying the property owner of the
grass and weeds prior to any other action being taken. In
1989 we have worked 341 grass and weed complaints , of this ,
we have had 275 come into compliance. Over the past three
months , we have had over 200 lots come into compliance.
There are still some lots that have not come in to
compliance as of last Friday. Councilman Akin wanted to
know if Don White' s crews did the mowing and then charges it
to Roy Faires ' s budget . City Manager Charles Norwood said
yes, that is a way of record keeping . The City' s ordinance
says seven days for compliance , where the State says 10
days , I do not feel we can be in conflict with the State
Laws. The city has three ways of handling weedy lots , 1) is
continue as we are now, 2 ) is can continue giving seven
days , then file compliant with Municipal Court and get it on
the next docket, 3) can have contractors mow after 10 days ,
but we have to budget funds to do this, about $2 ,500 . City
Manager Charles Norwood said he would talk to the Municipal
Judge and get them on the docket as soon as possible. City
Manager requested that Council let him talk with the judge
and begin writing citations . Staff will be sure the judge
has a copy of the violations on each property, so he will
know if this is a one time offense or multi-offenses .
Mayor Pro Tem Naish recessed the work session and convened
Council into Executive Session at 7 :50 P.M. under the
authority of Article 6252-17 V.A.C.S. , Section 2 paragraph
"g" Personnel Matters - interview audit firms for fiscal
year 1988-89 audit .
Mayor Pro Tem Naish reconvened Council into open session at
9 :15 P.M. There being no other matters for discussion, a
motion was made to adjourn with all in favor .
Bud Naish, Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST :
Carolyn Jones , City Secretary
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES
OCTOBER 10, 1989
The City of Wylie City Council met in regular session on
Tuesday, October 10 , 1989 at 7 :00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers of the Municipal Complex . A quorum was present and
notice of the meeting had been posted in the time and manner
required by law. Those present were Mayor Chuck Trimble,
Mayor Pro Tem Bud Naish, Council Members Jim Swartz , John
Akin , Ortie Messenger , Pat Stemple and Steve Wright, City
Manager Charles Norwood, City Secretary Carolyn Jones ,
Finance Director James Johnson, Assist . City Engineer Ron
Homeyer , Public Works Superintendent Don White and Chief of
Police James Gilmore.
Mayor Trimble called the meeting to order and Mr . Faires
gave the invocation which was followed by the pledge of
allegiance lead by Mr . White.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 12 , 19TH AND 26TH
COUNCIL MEETINGS: Mayor Pro Tem Naish corrected the
September 26th minutes to reflect his statement during the
discussion of the pit bull ordinance to read as follows:
"that part of the problem was that we were miss informed ,
legislation had voted to appeal the special breed
ordinances, so therefore the pit bull ordinance was not in
effect , we did not know until the next day, the Governor had
vetoed the bill , leaving our ordinance in effect. City
Manager has asked Code Enforcement, Police Department and
Animal Control Officer to patrol this area to try and catch
this dog running loose. If anyone sees the dog running
loose , if they will come in and file a complaint, then we
can do something. We do not go out and bull doze
substandard houses, we give them a length of time to comply
with our ordinance. I think the city is trying to do
everything within its means to help you" . Mayor Pro Tem
Naish also corrected the spelling of skunk on the September
12th minutes. Motion was made by Councilman Akin to approve
the minutes with the above corrections . Seconded by
Councilman Messenger . The vote was as follows : Mayor
Trimble - in favor, Mayor Pro Tem Naish - in favor ,
Councilman Akin - in favor , Councilman Swartz - in favor ,
Councilman Wright - in favor , Councilman Messenger - in
favor, and Councilwoman Stemple - in favor . This motion
carried with all in favor .
APPROVAL OF FILLING VACANCY ON PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION: Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Naish to
appoint Richard Eckman to Planning and Zoning , term will
expire in July, 1991 . Seconded by Councilman Messenger .
The vote was as follows : Mayor Trimble - in favor , Mayor
Pro Tem Naish - in favor , Councilman Akin - in favor ,
Councilman Swartz - in favor , Councilman Wright - in favor ,
Councilman Messenger - in favor , and Councilwoman Stemple -
in favor . This motion carried with all in favor .
APPROVAL OF PROCLAMATION FOR CANDI WHITE - EMPLOYEE OF THE
QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30 , 1989 : Motion was made by
Councilman Akin to approve the Proclamation for Candi White
- Employee of the quarter ending September 30 , 1989 .
Seconded by Councilman Swartz. The vote was as follows :
Mayor Trimble - in favor , Mayor Pro Tem Naish - in favor ,
Councilman Akin - in favor , Councilman Swartz - in favor ,
Councilman Wright - in favor , Councilman Messenger - in
favor , and Councilwoman Stemple - in favor . This motion
carried with all in favor .
Mayor Trimble read the Proclamation as follows :
S
WHEREAS, Candi White has been selected as the City of Wylie
Employee of the Quarter ending September 30 , 1989 ; and
WHEREAS, Candi White has been an employee of the City of
Wylie for four years and has served in numerous positions;
and
WHEREAS, Candi White has an exceptional attitude regarding
her position with the City and relationship with the
citizens and community; and
WHEREAS, Candi White is considered a very conscientious and
dedicated employee by all City employees; and
NOW, THEREFORE, I , CHUCK TRIMBLE, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF
WYLIE, TEXAS, do hereby proclaim Candi White as Employee of
the Quarter ending September 30 , 1989 .
Mayor Trimble presented the proclamation to Candi White
along with a savings bond.
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO
INSTALL GOLF DRIVING RANGE AND TEMPORARY OFFICE BUILDING:
This request is being made for Lots 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , & 5 of Wylie
Ranch East Commercial Park which is located on Highway 78
and Kreymer Lane. Mayor Trimble opened the public hearing
and requested those wishing to address this matter to come
forward and state their name and address for the record.
Mr . Roy Faires stated that the Planning and Zoning
Commission heard this request and recommends approval with
the following stipulations:
1. City Engineer should designate the appropriate location
for the entrance drive off of Kreymer Lane
2 . Portable building on concrete slab not to exceed 1000
square feet
3 . Seven 1000 watt light poles as shown on plans, not to
exceed three additional 1000 watt poles at the Code
Enforcement Officer ' s discretion. The Code Enforcement
Officer shall have the authority to make adjustments in the
lighting direction if deemed necessary
4 . Business shall open no earlier than 9 : 00 A.M. and all
business operations shall cease at 10: 00 P .M. with all
lights out by 10 :00 P.M.
5. Minimum four foot, one inch mesh fence to be erected on
the North and East property lines around driving range
6. Liability Insurance - minimum limits as advised by the
City Attorney
7 . No outside speakers
8 . Specific use permit not to exceed 24 months from date of
approval .
Councilman Akin asked , prior to this person opening for
business , Mr . Faires , you will see that all of these
stipulations have been taken care of . Mr . Faires said yes.
Mayor Pro Tem Naish asked if two years was normal on special
use permit, thought it has been one year in the past . Mr .
Faires said it usually is for one year , but the Planning and
Zoning felt with the cost of putting in this project with
the above stipulations , the time period should be for two
years .
6
Mayor Trimble asked if the neighbors were notified . Mr .
Faires said yes and felt from the attendance at Planning and
Zoning they were all satisfied with the stipulations.
Mayor Trimble asked if there were any citizens wishing to
speak at this time. There being no other comments or
questions , Mayor Trimble closed the public hearing .
APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO INSTALL GOLF DRIVING
RANGE AND TEMPORARY OFFICE BUILDING: This golf driving
range and temporary office building would be for Lots 1 , 2 ,
3 , 4 , & 5 of Wylie Ranch East Commercial Park , which is
located on Highway 78 and Kreymer Lane. Councilman Akin
asked Mr . Faires if staff kept a record of when these
special use permits are up. Mr . Faires said we try. Motion
was made by Councilman Swartz to approve the Special Use
Permit to install golf driving range and temporary office
building with the above stipulations . Seconded by
Councilman Wright . The vote was as follows : Mayor Trimble
- in favor , Mayor Pro Tem Naish - in favor , Councilman Akin
- in favor , Councilman Swartz - in favor , Councilman Wright
- in favor , Councilman Messenger - in favor , and
Councilwoman Stemple - in favor . This motion carried with
all in favor .
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A
PORTABLE SALES OFFICE TO SELL FIREWOOD AND LANDSCAPE
MATERIALS AND PLANTS: This request has been made for the
property on 1 .34 Acres out of the E. C. Davidson Survey,
located on FM 544 east of Hardcast . Mayor Trimble opened
the public hearing and requested those wishing to speak to
come forward and state their name and address for the
record .
Mr . Faires stated that Planning and Zoning had heard this
request for the portable building. The sell of firewood and
landscape materials and plants can be done on this property
under its present zoning. Planning and Zoning Commission
did stipulate that the portable building must be tied down
and under skirted, and does recommend approval .
Mayor Trimble asked if there was anyone wishing to speak at
this time. There being no comments or questions Mayor
Trimble closed the public hearing .
APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A PORTABLE SALES OFFICE:
The property is on 1 .34 acres out of the E . C. Davidson
Survey and is located on FM 544 east of Hardcast .
Councilman Akin wanted to be sure that this is well
landscaped and kept looking neat as it was one of the main
entrances to our city. Mayor Pro Tem Naish wanted to know
if staff had trouble with the other person that had the same
type of business there before. Mr . Faires said not to my
knowledge. Motion was made by Councilman Akin to approve
the special use permit for a portable sales office with the
stipulation that the portable building be under skirted and
tied down . Seconded by Councilwoman Stemple. The vote was
as follows : Mayor Trimble - in favor , Mayor Pro Tem Naish -
in favor , Councilman Akin - in favor , Councilman Swartz -
against - Councilman Wright - in favor , Councilman Messenger
- in favor , and Councilwoman Stemple - in favor . This
motion carried with six in favor and one against .
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING FURTHER PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT PLANS OF REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT :
City Manager Charles Norwood stated that the City of Wylie
is asking the Cities of Rowlett, Sachse and Murphy to join
in with us in the investigation of a Regional Wastewater
Treatment Plant. Sachse and Rowlett have approved this
resolution and there is a good possibility that Murphy will
approve this next Tuesday. The cities are asking North
Texas Municipal Water District to participate as a member of
7
the Policy Steering Committee and to work with the Committee
to determine the roll NTMWD will take in the development,
construction and operation of the regional facility. The
cities have made this request because of the experience
NTMWD has in wastewater treatment plants. Staff recommends
approval of this resolution.
Councilman Messenger asked if Murphy was questioned about
their financial commitment . City Manager Charles Norwood
said when Murphy passes this resolution, they are making a
financial obligation. The City of Murphy has paid for an
engineering survey a few years ago regarding their treatment
plant . Some of these plans were used in the survey done for
Rowlett, Sachse and Wylie. This may be the reason Murphy
did not feel they should pay on this first set of reports
and planning . City Manager Charles Norwood said there has
been $20 ,000 . set aside in this years budget for these
expenses. Motion was made by Councilman Akin to approve the
Resolution supporting further planning and development plans
of a Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Seconded by
Councilman Swartz . The vote was as follows : Mayor Trimble
- in favor , Mayor Pro Tem Naish - in favor , Councilman Akin
- in favor , Councilman Swartz - in favor , Councilman Wright
- in favor , Councilman Messenger - in favor , and
Councilwoman Stemple - in favor. This motion carried with
all in favor .
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROPOSITION NO. 8 FOR
FUNDING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES: City
Manager Charles Norwood said this item was tabled at the
last meeting until everyone could have the wording of
Proposition No . 8 . This proposition will allow the
legislature to authorize the issuance of up to $400 million
in general obligation bonds . The resolution also states
that Council is encouraging the citizens to vote "yes" on
November 8th for Proposition No. 8 .
Councilman Wright stated that he attended the Collin County
Public officials meeting and the discussion was on the over
crowded jails . Basically what is going to happen is the
State is going to force County to take the prisoners from
the Texas Department of Corrections when they are full . It
would be best for each City to back this proposition on the
Nov. 8th ballot .
Councilwoman Stemple said she was very supportive of this
resolution, but she would not tell anyone how to vote.
Motion was made by Councilman Akin to approve the Resolution
supporting Proposition No. 8 . Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Naish. The vote was as follows : Mayor Trimble - in favor ,
Mayor Pro Tem Naish - in favor , Councilman Akin - in favor ,
Councilman Swartz - in favor , Councilman Wright - in favor ,
Councilman Messenger - in favor , and Councilwoman Stemple -
in favor . This motion carried with all in favor .
APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NOMINATING CANDIDATES FOR THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS FOR CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT : City Manager
Charles Norwood said this item was tabled at the last
meeting and staff was ask to contact the School District to
see who , if anyone, they had nominated. The School has not
nominated anyone at this time, but will support the names of
anyone Council wishes to nominate.
Mayor Trimble said he talked to Plano and Allen City
Managers and they have pooled together names for nomination.
These cities do an extensive review on these people to be
sure they are qualified in this field . I feel we can
support the parties they put on the ballot.
Councilman Akin said this has been going on for years, I
feel like we need to have an east county meeting with the
8
cities so maybe we can put someone on the ballot. There was
no action taken on this item.
STATUS REPORT ON WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS:
Mr . Ron Homeyer said in the last month we have made good
stride in keeping in line of awarding a contract in
December , 1989 . The plans have been delivered to the Texas
Water Commission on September 22nd and these are still being
reviewed by them. We have had no contact with them
regarding the plans , we were anticipating a response from
Texas Water Commission sooner than this. Staff is ready to
bring to Council a request to advertise for bids and to
open bids on the 16th of November and awarding a bid on the
28th of November so we can have a contract signed in
December , 1989 . Currently we are waiting for approval from
the Soil Conservation Service for the crossing of two of
their easements with the sewer line. This item has to be
addressed as we are going through two of their reservoirs,
in order for us not to be responsible for these reservoirs,
we need approval of our plans from them. Councilman Akin
wanted to know who was president of this group. Mr . Homeyer
said Mr . Ernest Scholz . We have also submitted a request to
the railroad company for crossing their property as well as
we have sent the plans off to the highway department for
their approval . Staff has received about 15 of the
easements needed, there are several more that should be
completed in a few weeks , and there are some we will have to
recommend condemnation on . Mr . Homeyer also stated the
contractors are in the final clean up stage at the treatment
plant, the expansion is complete and is on line.
Mayor Pro Tem Naish wanted to know when we go out for bids
if the bid specs will be written to where contractors can
bid on the entire job or on sections. Mr . Homeyer said
there will be three sections , they can bid on the entire
project or one section. Mayor Pro Tem Naish also wanted
an update on the progress with San Antonio Savings & Loan.
Mr . Homeyer said at this point and time we have not heard
anything about the agreement we have sent it back to them.
City Manager Charles Norwood said he talked with them today.
Mayor Pro Tem Akin wanted to know when we go out for bids
will we have a time frame and a penalty clause. Mr . Homeyer
said yes .
Councilman Messenger wanted to know what the time frame was
on condemnation . City Manager Charles Norwood said it is a
long time, but once we start condemnation, the property
belongs to us .
Councilwoman Stemple asked Mr . Homeyer what the bid dates
were. Mr. Homeyer said advertise Oct . 23rd, receive and
open bids on Nov . 16th and award bids on Nov. 28th and
construction could start mid December .
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO 1988-89 BUDGET REALLOCATING
REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: Mr . Johnson, Finance Director ,
stated that this reallocating of revenues and expenditures
is clean up on last years budget. This past year workers
compensation was raised some $28 ,000 after the budget was
adopted . Mr . Johnson stated that staff would be closing the
1988-89 budget tomorrow. Motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem
Naish to approve the amendment to the 1988-89 budget
reallocating revenues and expenditures. Seconded by
Councilman Messenger . The vote was as follows : Mayor
Trimble - in favor, Mayor Pro Tem Naish - in favor ,
Councilman Akin - in favor , Councilman Swartz - in favor ,
Councilman Wright - in favor , Councilman Messenger - in
favor , and Councilwoman Stemple - in favor . This motion
carried with all in favor .
AWARD OF BID ON EQUIPMENT AT NORTEX TANK SITE: City Manager
Charles Norwood said that staff only received one bid , there
were five or six bid request sent out . It is very important
to get this tank on line. City Manager CHarles Norwood said
that the water tower could not be painted until this tank
was put on line. City Manager Charles Norwood stated that
there has been $20 ,000 budgeted, staff has spent $4 , 285 , we
need an additional $8 ,285 . to meet this bid proposal and
staff is recommending that we use part of the $17 ,000
interest earned in this reconstruction fund.
Councilman Akin said that shocked me when I saw only one
bid , is there no one that does that type of work.
Mr . Homeyer stated that it is a small project, and there is
so many areas of this project that others have done, and
the contractor will be responsible for all of this when he
begins this project .
Councilman Akin said it was to be on line in 1985 and is not
on line yet . Mr . Homeyer said yes .
City Manager Charles Norwood stated that this bid proposal
is giving a one year warranty and staff recommends approval
of award of this bid .
Councilman Wright wanted to know if staff has checked their
references and have they done work locally. Mr . Homeyer
said yes, they have done work for the North Texas Municipal
Water District , and the water district did give them a good
recommendation.
Councilman Swartz wanted to know if the contractors we had
before were not interested in coming back. Mr . Homeyer said
the problem with this is it is very technical and
specialized and there are not that many that can do this .
Motion was made by Councilman Akin to approve the award of
bid to Electrical Generation Technology in the amount of
$24 ,000 .00 . Seconded by Councilman Wright . The vote was as
follows : Mayor Trimble - in favor , Mayor Pro Tem Naish - in
favor , Councilman Akin - in favor , Councilman Swartz - in
favor , Councilman Wright - in favor , Councilman Messenger -
in favor , and Councilwoman Stemple - in favor . This motion
carried with all in favor .
APPROVAL OF PAY REQUEST TO SHIMEK, JACOBS, FINKLEA FOR
PRELIMINARY PLAN AND REPORT FOR REGIONAL WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT: This pay request is in the amount of
$388 . 12 and is one third of the invoice amount. City
Manager Charles Norwood stated this is one third of the
total invoice, as this was split between the three cities.
Motion was made by Councilman Akin to approve the request
for payment to Shimek, Jacobs, Finklea for preliminary plan
and report for regional wastewater treatment plant in the
amount of $388 . 12 . Seconded by Councilman Messenger . The
vote was as follows : Mayor Trimble - in favor , Mayor Pro
Tem Naish - in favor , Councilman Akin - in favor , Councilman
Swartz - in favor , Councilman Wright - in favor , Councilman
Messenger - in favor , and Councilwoman Stemple - in favor .
This motion carried with all in favor .
APPROVAL OF PAY REQUEST FROM HUNTER & ASSOCIATES FOR
ENGINEERING SERVICES ON THE WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS: This payment request is in the amount of
$28 ,687 . 50 . City Manager Charles Norwood said this is part
of the $60 ,000 amount agreed to in this contract . Motion
was made by Councilman Akin to approve the pay request in
the amount of $28 ,687 .50 for engineering services on the
wastewater collection system improvements. Seconded by
Mayor Pro Tem Naish. The vote was as follows : Mayor
Trimble - in favor , Mayor Pro Tem Naish - in favor ,
Councilman Akin - in favor , Councilman Swartz - in favor,
Councilman Wright - in favor , Councilman Messenger - in
/O
favor , and Councilwoman Stemple - in favor . This motion
carried with all in favor .
APPROVAL OF PAY REQUEST FROM LEON HURSE CO. FOR ACQUIRING
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITIONS FOR WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS: This payment request is in the amount of
$3 ,400 . City Manager Charles Norwood said the total amount
of this contract is $13 ,400 . and up to this point Mr . Hurse
has completed 25% of his contract . Staff recommends
approval . Motion was made by Councilman Messenger to
approve the request for payment in the amount of $3 ,400 . to
Leon Hurse Co . for acquiring right of way acquisitions for
wastewater collection system improvements . Seconded by
Councilman Swartz. The vote was as follows : Mayor Trimble
- in favor , Mayor Pro Tem Naish - in favor , Councilman Akin
- in favor , Councilman Swartz - in favor , Councilman Wright
- in favor , and Councilwoman Stemple - in favor. This
motion carried with all in favor .
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: Patricia Love of 509 Kamber Lane
thanked Councilwoman Stemple and others for getting the
grass cut at Brown and Winding Oaks . Mrs. Love said her
only regret was that it took six and a half weeks to get it
done. I know that in the paper it said we did not
understand, but you have to understand we have children
playing in this area . Mrs . Love also wanted to know why her
husband could not put in an application for police reserve.
Chief Gilmore said he keeps no list unless we have an
opening and until I get the ones I have now trained , we will
not be asking for more.
Councilman Wright asked Mrs. Love what qualifications her
husband has for requesting application for police reserve.
Mrs . Love said he was a police officer in the City of Baton
Rouge for 8 years and is now applying for his private
detective license .
Mayor Pro Tem Naish said on this weed ordinance, we had a
meeting last Monday on this and we have hopefully laid out
some steps that will help speed up this process of getting
lots mowed.
Councilman Swartz said unfortunately sometimes the paper
only brings out certain parts of our meetings and you do not
get the entire picture. There are certain steps the State
sets out for us to follow on getting these lots mowed.
COUNCIL DISCUSSION: Councilman Akin requested an update on
Brookshires. Mr . Homeyer said staff has not heard recently,
but as far as we know they are still coming . City Manager
Charles Norwood said it has been about two months since we
last heard from them.
Councilman Akin wanted to know if staff had talked with Sgt .
Major Lee regarding the National Guard/Army Reserve units
coming to Wylie. City Manager Charles Norwood said we have
been calling each other , but have not been able to make
contact as yet. City Manager Charles Norwood stated that
maybe staff should write them a letter letting them know
that the City is in support of their moving here. City
Manager Charles Norwood stated there would be a resolution
for this on next Tuesday' s agenda showing the City ' s
support .
Councilman Akin stated that in the City' s newsletter and in
the local paper , it listed a pool in the park with the other
items for grant. In the past the State would not let a pool
be part of the grant funding . City Manager Charles Norwood
said yes, it can be part of the grant funding if and when we
can apply for a grant . City Manager Charles Norwood said
the $1 .00 contribution will go out in the November billings
and I hope the monies received from these contributions will
//
be enough to begin some of the smaller projects for the
park.
Councilman Wright stated that the Council asked about an
inquiry from the newspaper on number of circulations within
the city limits, did we ever get an answer. City Manager
Charles Norwood said we called several but one news paper
received a letter requesting this, but never responded .
Councilman Wright stated that he was concerned about Mrs.
Love coming up with this statement tonight . Councilman
Wright said he would like to state that the important thing
here is the opportunity for public relations even if you are
not considering applications , there is an opportunity for
any man or woman being turned off from the initial contact
with the City. How many of our reserve officers are
actually riding in the cars .
Chief Gilmore said the problem is the city has to outfit
them, train them and it is very expensive and then they only
want to work on week ends. Councilman Wright said the
reason why I even brought it up was I was concerned about
the fact that our officers are working such long shifts and
that if we have a man that is qualified that maybe he could
serve in some way for us . Chief said he would be glad to
talk with Councilman Wright after the meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Naish stated that $2 ,000 was budgeted for
revenues from Code last year and Mr . Faires has collected in
excess of that .
City Secretary Carolyn Jones wanted to know how many of the
Council would be going on the tour of Comanche Peak on
Tuesday, to let her know tonight.
There being no other business for discussion, a motion was
made to adjourn with all in favor .
Chuck Trimble , Mayor
ATTEST :
Carolyn Jones , City Secretary
/02,
PARK BOARD MEETING
MINUTES
OCTOBER 5, 1989
The City of Wylie Park and Recreation Board met in regular
session Thursday, October 5th, 1989 at 7: 15 p. m. in the
Council Chambers at the Municipal Complex . Those present
were Vice Chairman Joanie Zeeb, Board Members Bill Emsoff,
Cheri Albin, and Bryan Glenn, Public Works Superintendent
Don White, Park Maintenance Foreman Philip Bounds, and
Secretary Lisa Keith. Chairman Jill Tomek, Board Members
Bill Burge and Mike Miller were absent.
Vice Chairman Joanie Zeeb chaired the meeting in Chairman
Tomeks absence.
Vice Chairman Joanie Zeeb called the meeting to order.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER MEETING: Bill Emsoff
submitted a change to page 3, paragraph 3, last sentence,
changing the word proposition to propose.
There being no other corrections, additions, or deletions a
motion was made to approve the minutes of the September
meeting with the submitted change. The motion was seconded
with all in favor.
DISCUSSION OF PURCHASING A MARQUEE SIGN: Joanie Zeeb said
she had talked to Ken Lane from American National Bank in
regards to them donating a sign. He said that they do such
things and they would probably be happy to do it but that he
needs a proposal from us to take to the banks board of
directors. Maybe we can get all the sign makers in the city
to submit proposals to us.
Don White said that if the Park Board decided what size they
preferred the sign to be and exactly where they wanted the
sign installed that he could get the prices. There are
alot of things that we will have to consider before giving a
proposal to the bank. The sign must comply with the sign
ordinance.
Bill Emsoff asked if they could get a copy of the sign
ordinance. Don White said yes.
Joanie Zeeb said she also had a discussion with the bank
regarding them not putting their name permanently on the
sign stating that they donated it. They did suggest that
they would probably want to at least put their logo on a
small area in one of the corners of the sign.
3
Don White said that he would get with Charles Norwood and
Roy Faires and put a proposal together.
Joanie Zeeb said that the Park Board may have to take this
to City Council to get a waiver on the sign ordinance.
Don White said that we definitely would want to comply to
the sign ordinance.
DISCUSSION OF ACCESS TO VALENTINE PARK: Don White read a
memo he had written to Charles Norwood about what was
discussed in the September meeting.
Don White said that Charles Norwood asked Roy Faires to look
in to this and he came up with a solution that might get us
by for a while.
Don White and the Board Members viewed a map of Valentine
Park that Roy Faires had put together.
Don White pointed out the existing access and dedicated
alleyway on the map and said that because of the location of
the park and the problem of getting in and out, Charles
Norwood, Roy Faires, and myself are all in agreement that
this park should be for foot traffic only or a neighborhood
park.
Don White explained that it would be very easy to build a
sidewalk in the alleyway with maybe a little foot bridge.
Don White said the Park Board could maybe retrain their
thoughts from developing access to concentrating on
generating a five year master plan for a small neighborhood
park. Children from several housing additions could
utilize this park facility.
Cheri Albin asked if the park perimeter could possibly be
fenced so the children could not go directly into the
alleyway. Don White said the Park Board could include a
fence on the master plan that would be presented to Council .
Bryan Glenn brought up an idea of possibly adjoining the
walking/jogging trail in Community Park to Valentine Park.
The Park Board asked Don White to obtain costs of building
the sidewalks.
Bill Emsoff made a motion that Valentine Park be designated
as a neighborhood foot traffic park. Bryan Glenn seconded
the motion with all in favor.
DISCUSSION OF WSA REVENUE SPENDING: Bill Emsoff stated he
had found out that the Park Board can only propose spending
to City Council . The Park Board does not have the authority
to make the final decision.
Joanie Zeeb said Jill Tomek has really been trying to get a
slide for the playground. Approximate cost $500.
Bill Emsoff said he had mentioned to some council members
that we possibly wanted to purchase a broadcast spreader for
an ant control program and they said that was a maintenance
item and that the WSA revenue was to be spent on park
improvements. Cheri Albin said that the biggest complaint
is ants . Joanie Zeeb said that everyone would benefit from
an ant control program; WSA, the City, and anyone who uses
the parks.
Bill Emsoff said that WSA wanted portable backstops for the
teeballers.
When asked, Don White said he would get a cost on completing
the sprinkler system in Community Park.
Joanie Zeeb motioned to recommend to City Council that a
slide, broadcast spreader for ant control , and two teeball
backstops be purchased from the WSA revenue fund. The
motion carried with all in favor.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: There being no citizens present the
Board moved on to the next order of business.
GENERAL DISCUSSION: Bill Emsoff asked Don White why Council
had tabled the business of accepting dollar donations for
the park system with the water bills. Don White said that
he was sure it would be put back on Councils agenda, but
that he was unable to answer the question as he was not
present that Council meeting. Bill Emsoff said he would
contact a Council member and find out.
Don White stated that he had a small problem with the water
fountain that was donated by Mr. Cooper. There is a
sprinkler system in the park so everyone relunctantly thinks
there is water there. I do not want to tie into this system
for drinking water. We will have to run a separate water
line. I just wanted you to know the reason for delay. It
won' t take alot of money but will take some time.
Philip Bounds showed the water fountain to the Board and
explained that a brick structure would have to be built
around it to deter vandalism. Cheri Albin asked if the
water fountain could be sent back and get something better.
Don White said he did not know but that he would ask the
purchasing agent if we could do that.
s
There being no other business or discussion, a motion was
made by Bill Emsoff to adjourn, seconded by Cheri Albin with
all in favor.
Joanie Zeeb, Acting Chairman
Respectfully Submitted,
Lisa Keith, Secretary
/f
i y 4.
c a �, ._ , _ 4
ice of the mayor
j' . III jtir, �i xa
. P. to ttamatton
...
WHEREAS, the Christian Care Center has been established to
help citizens in our Community; and,
WHEREAS, the Christian Care Center is seeking donations for
staples, and each Church and each citizen of the
community will be asked to donation certain items;
and,
WHEREAS, the Christian Care Center is requesting the week
of November 19th thru November 25th, 1989 to be
the Second Annual CHRISTIAN CARE WEEK benefiting
Wylie Community Christian Care Center; and ,
NOW, THEREFORE, I , CHUCK TRIMBLE, MAYOR, of the City of
Wylie, Texas do hereby proclaim the period of
November 19th thru November 25th, 1989 as the
SECOND ANNUAL CHRISTIAN CARE WEEK benefiting Wylie
Community Christian Care Center , with special
activities and benefits each day of this week.
IL
..(in witness ar4ettof g Rave IE'tunto set mJ
I and and caused tcis star to 1 t affixed.
i Chuck Trimble, Mayor
AT TEST:
Carolyn Jones, City Secretary
DATE: October 24, 1989
i
/ 7
»,�+4r,,* State of texas _
7( = 1 'ouSe of iepresentatibeg
• austin 0
DAN MORALES COMMITTEES:
STATE REPRESENTATIVE September 28 , 1989 CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE, CHAIRMAN
WAYS AND MEANS
The Honorable Charles Trimble
Mayor, City of Wylie
Post Office Box 428
Wylie, Texas 75098
Dear Mayor Trimble:
As you very well know, recent months have seen an
unprecedented increase in property tax rates at the local level.
Cities, counties, school districts and other local taxing
jurisdictions have been forced to seek additional revenue, due in
significant part, to state-imposed mandates. As a result, Texas
property tax rates are now among the highest in the nation.
To address this concern, I intend to re-introduce in the
November special session of the Legislature, my proposal to
compel the state to reimburse local units of government for all
costs incurred in implementing state-imposed mandates. As you
may recall, my bill won committee approval last session, but
was caught in the end-of-session crunch and died before coming up
for a full House vote. I believe we have a good shot at finally
getting this proposal passed this special session and I need
your help.
Last session, the Texas Municipal League, Texas Association
of School Boards, Texas Association of Counties and other local
government groups joined together in support of this crucial
legislation, but if we are to be successful in November, strong
support from individual local elected officials is critical.
Please send a resolution or letter of endorsement for my proposal
to my Capitol office before October 31, 1989 . I am planning to
submit your letters and resolutions to the Governor's office
early in November as part of my formal request that the call be
opened to include my bill.
Our state's fiscal problems will not be solved by simply
transferring those problems to local taxpayers. State government
has a moral obligation to pay for its mandates. It's time to put
the brakes on property tax hikes. I look forward to hearing from
you soon.
S . ely,
Dan Morales
State Representative
DM:rjb
P.O. BOX 2910 • AUSTIN,TEXAS 78768.2910 • 512.463.0634
301 S. FRIO • SAN ANTONIO,TEXAS 78207 • 512-270-4597
U
* - ie
CITY OF VVYLIE
2000 HWY. 78 N. — P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE, TEXAS 75098
(214) 442-2236
October 19, 1989
TO: Charles Norwood, City Manager
Carolyn Jones, City Secretary o
FROM: James Johnson, Finance Director 5;4 ,...-, ,_ ---X-0.
RE: Staff Recommendation on Selection of a Firm
for Engineering and Planning Services for a
Development of a Capital Improvement Plan and
Impact Fee
In July of 1989 the City of Wylie sent out RFP's (request for pro-
posals) for professional engineering/planning consulting services for
a proposed development of a capital improvement plan and impact fee
study. This study has been mandated by Senate Bill 336, enacted in
1987 by the Texas Legislature and amended by legislative action in
1989. The act, in essence, requires that every Texas city that has
adopted or plans to adopt impact fee, must adopt an ordinance (or
revise their existing ordinance) to meet the requirements of the Impact
Fee Act.
FUNDING: $30,000 allocated in the Street Reconstruction Fund-this
money was transferred at the end of the fiscal year 88-90 (Sept. 30,
1989 end) to the Street Reconstruction Fund so as to set the funds
aside for this purpose. Originally $24,447.65 of this $30,000 came
from the remaining/unused funds from the Sanden Sewer Project performed
by the NTMWD. As we'll see futher on this memo, this funding level may
or may not be sufficient for this year-depending on study duration.
Each RFP asked for proposals on four (4) major areas:
A. Land Use Plan
B. Water and Wastewater Systems Master Plan
C. Transportation and Drainage Systems Plan
D. Impact Fee and Capital Improvement Plan
These four major areas could, additionally be broken down further,
/47
PAGE--2
i.e. , Drainage and Transportation could be separated.
In response, the City received three (3) excellent proposals from the
following firms:
1. Freeman-Millican, Inc.
2. Schrickel, Rollins & Associates, Inc.
3. Freese & Nichols
A breakdown of projected cost of services for these firms is as follows:
Firm Land/U Trans. Water/ Drainage CIP & Impact
Plan Plan Wastewater Plan Fee
Freeman $13,000 $21 ,000 $26,000 $20,000 $17,000
Millican, Inc.
Schrickel, 10,000 20,000* 30,000 20,000
Rollins &
Associates
Freese & 15,000- 25,000-* 40,000- 7,000-
Nichols 19,000 32,000 50,000 10,000
*Transporation & Drainage Plan bid as one.
To comply with the state impact law requirements only the land use plan
and CIP (Capital Improvement Plan)/Impact Fee parts absolutely have to be
completed by June 1990. The costs by company for those services are:
Firm Land Use CIP & Impact Total
Fee
Freeman- $13,000 $17,000 $30,000
Millican, Inc.
Schrickel, 10,000 20,000 30,000
Rollins & Assoc.
Freese & 15,000- 7,000- 22,000-
Nichols 19,000 10,000 29,000
After review of the proposals by Ron Homeyer and myself and a dis-
cussion with Mr. Norwood, we agreed that the Freeman-Millican, Inc.
was the best proposal. The organizational chart (attached) shows Mr.
Larry Freeman, P.E. of Freeman-Millican, Inc. as the project coordinator
with J. T. Dunkin & Assoc. performing the land use and planning aspects
and Keith Reed of Reed-Stowe performing the impact fee analysis. Mr.
04 0
PAGE--3
Freeman will work CIP (Capital Improvements Plan) development. Both
J. T. Dunkin and Assoc. and Reed-Stowe, Inc. have prior experience in
the City of Wylie, Reed-Stowe, Inc. on water rate analysis/study and
J. T. Dunkin with the Birmingham Land Development Plan. Additionally,
Freeman-Millican has performed this type of work (CIP part) for Sunny-
vale (City) and was participany in the same type planning/impact fee
study for The Colony. Reed-Stowe, Inc. updated the CIP and Impact Fee
thru a study for the City of Grapevine that is currently going thru
the hearings and the review process. They also performed the impact
fee study for the City of Lewisville. Additionally, Reed-Stowe has
been hired to do a feasibility study, that is in progress, for the
City of Euless on the impact fee on their water/wastewater plan.
Mr. Larry Freeman of Freeman-Millican, Inc. , Keith Reed of Reed-Stowe
and J. T. Dunkin of J. T. Dunkin and Associates should be here on Tues.
evening with exhibits and hand-outs demostrating their work in this area.
Moreover, J. T. Dunkin and Associates, the planning part of this, has
sterling reputation in this area and is recognized for it's excellent
planning capabilities. I would encourage the Council to note that in
the public review process (once the study is complete) , expenses by these
firms sometimes exceed original forecast due to intense developer/
builder/real-estate interest and feedback. These cases vary, however,
from city to city. The development of this plan is essential, I believe,
to meeting the state's requirements on impact fees, as well as, providing
the Council and Staff a valuable planning tool for the City's future and
the developer's/builder's share in sharing development/growth cost (future) .
Please see supporting information on the subject.
/
a
'j A T..
, i 45 e ,
,,.,
C ITY 0 F WYLIE 4.
A
A
Larry J. Freeman, P. E. I'
Freeman-Millicon, Inc.
PROJECT COORDINATORi.,..
.
r
Don Sefko J. Terry Millicon, P. E. Fred Bolster, P. E. Keith Reed
J. T. Dunkin & Assoc., Inc. Freeman-Millicon, Inc. Kimley-Horn & Assoc., Inc. Reed-Stowe & Co. : '
Land Planner Water & Wastewater Transportation & Drainage Fiscal Consultant , nS
Master Plan Coordinator For Impact Fee
i.
Mike Hoffman Norman Allen Roy Wilshire, P. E. Ron Morrison
J. T. Dunkin h Assoc., Inc. Freeman-Millicon, Inc. Kimley-Horn & Assoc., Inc. Kimley-Hom & Assoc., Inc.
Land Planning & Senior Technician Transportation Master Plan Drainage Master Plan
Technical Support
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Municipal Utility Impact Fee Programs In
Texas Face Upcoming Compliance Deadline
by Mickey Fishbeck,AICP and Tony Bagwell
Principals of Rimrock Consulting Company,Austin,Texas
As the 71st Texas Legislative yes SB336 Requirements Eased as Texas Cities Benefit from
sion drew to a close, lawmakers left Deadline Approaches Experience in Other States
intact a June, 1990 deadline for corn- Many Texas cities have been await- Although some Texas cities have
pliance with last session's Senate Bill ing the outcome of the recent 7lst legis- been reluctant to enact impact fees in
336 regulating municipal water and lative session in the hope that the ex- the face of the legislation, there are
wastewater impact fees. On the other emptions would be expanded and that actually several "up" sides to SB336.
hand, they also relaxed the legal re- the technical notice and public hear- First, impact fees are an excellent
quirements for compliance,making it ing requirements would be changed. form of alternative revenue generation
easier and less expensive for cities to Lawmakers gave half a loaf—without under growth conditions.Texas is one
enact and update the fees. expanding the exemptions they sim- of the very few states which has expli-
Impact fees,or capital recovery fees, plified the process by: allowing cities cit enabling legislation empowering
are a method for cities to help fund to use systemwide planning informa- cities and other governmental entities
major off-site utility facilities through tion in some cases(instead of develop- (river authorities, municipal utility
fees assessed to new development.Over ing individual studies for each service districts)to charge these fees. In other
a period of time,fee revenuesaccumu- area); allowing (in the absence of an states, cities only have presumptive
late and can be used for cash-funding objection)a single public hearing for powers based on subdivision authority.
of capital improvement expansions. new fees instead of the mandatory two Secondly, impact fees have been
Impact fees are popular with many hearings in the earlier bill;and repeal- subjected to numerous constitutional
cities and towns because they can be ing (again in the absence of an objec- challenges in other states. Some gen-
used to reduce the need for utility rate Lion) the requirement for a full fee eral guidelines have evolved from that
or tax increases necessitated by in- update every three years. process which are embodied in SB336.
creased bond financing. They also Of critical concern now is the pend- In other words,while SB336 is perhaps
diversify the sources of utility financ- ing deadline for updating utility im- overly specific in its technical and
ing and can help improve municipal pact fees in those cities which already procedural requirements,it does never-
ratings. have them.If existing fee programs are theless mirror the mainstream of opin-
On the other hand, many cities not brought into compliance with ions which have evolved through court
which need to attract population SB336 by June, 1990, they ma be sub- decisions regarding impact fees.Thus
growth and employment centers fear ject to challenge as illegal fees, thus a city complying with SB336 should
that impact fees will deter develop- jeopardizing all impact fee revenues have a measure of protection from
ment. And some communities simply from that time forward. Some cities successful lawsuits.
find that their existing funding mech- are concerned that although they do Thirdly, the technical difficulties
anisms are sufficient without the addi- not have formal impact fee programs, for enacting impact fee programs have
Lion of impact fees. they may have de facto impact fees in been largely resolved by cities, both
As numerous Texas cities began to the form of prorata, approach main, inside and outside Texas, which al-
adopt utility capital recovery fees (as frontage, or acreage fee ordinances. ready have fees consistent with consti-
well as fees for roads, drainage and These too should be examined to de- tutional law and SB336. An excellent
park improvements),the 70th Legisla- termine whether they are exempt or example of this is the Equity Residual
ture passed Senate Bill 336(SB336) to should be revised to comply with state Model for capital recovery fees which
regulate the development of these ex- law. is used by utilities in Austin, Cedar
actions. SB336 requirements apply to
fees for water; sewer; storm water, THE EQUITY RESIDUAL MODEL
drainage and flood control; and per- PAL COFT FOMENT
manent local roads.The requirements
in SB336 apply to all impact fees
I
adopted in Texas after June 20, 1987. '„E„0` i
Of equal importance, impact fees N0E1f0'f°B -41-- ATtfrm
.:, ,
adopted on or before that date must,in
order to be collected after the compli- ; •., ECISTNO .I.- PATEmu
•
ance deadline, be replaced by impact ffi '"`"E""
fees in accordance with SB336 by June, .oQ°ED.,o
1990.The bill requires cities to develop '� .40C� orl ',Oar - Ems"
planning information and a utility .K. : , "'r'""°E
capital improvements program (CIP) a, .• ` � ;';�',; "� i i. I
on which the fees are based, and to car `��` OW '10M "'
hold public hearings prior to enacting �E
a fee ordinance. SB336 also contains -----
penalty provisions for non-compliance EXUSTPNG UNIT DEMAND FUTURE UNIT DEMAND
and for overcharges.
4/August, 1989 Southwest dr Texas Water Works Journal
1
02_3
Hill and Tomball. This approach Is the Gain Worth the Pain? division exactions. The new fees are
basically allows new growth to buy In an informal survey of many Tex- set substantially less than the maxi-
-equity" in an infrastructure system as cities last fall, it was found that mum amount allowable under the
in order to be on a par with existing many communities either were put- law,partially due to a desire by the city
utility customers. New'customers are ting oft decisions on enacting impact to remain competitive in attracting
allowed to pay for a portion of their fee programs until this year's legis- development. Nevertheless, city offi-
service through utility rates (or taxes lative session was concluded, or were cials think they will collect as much
in the case of general obligation bond simply rejecting impact fees due to the revenue as before and over the long
funding),similar to existing users,but perceived complexity of legislative re- run the fee revenues will justify the
must pay an upfront fee to mitigate quirements.However,a few cities have cost of fee development.
rate or tax increases to fund new since completed impact fee programs That assessment seems to be borne
facilities. under SB336,and other cities have ex- out by two cities which enacted water
While impact fees can be a valuable isting fees which were developed with and sewer fees consistent with the
funding tool, they are best viewed as a the same detailed technical require- technical requirements of SB336 prior
longer-range and supplementary solu- ments as those in the legislation. The to the bill's enactment. One,a city of
tion to capital improvements funding. experience of these cities is instructive. 10,000,has collected almost;2 million
Roughly six to twelve months are A large north Texas city has recently in three years,has funded one-third of
required under SB336 to proceed enacted three new impact fees under the cost of upcoming facility expan-
through the entire planning and hear- SB336. In part because there were few sions with cash (thus mitigating util-
ing process required to enact a new fee. other cities on which to rely for ex- ity rate increases)and has improved its
Once the fee is enacted,SB336 provides amples, this city expended more than bond ratings partially due to the diver-
for a one-year grace period in which a year and considerable expense in fee sification of its revenue sources.
much new construction can be ex- development. However, a formal im- The second city, a large central
empted from fee payments. Thus a pact fee program was necessary to Texas community, collected over $30
lead time of one and one-half to two replace de facto impact fees in the form million in water and sewer fees during
years is necessary for a fully operation- of frontage and acreage fees.Although a five-year period,in spite of extensive
al fee program. Finally, a municipal the city faced opposition from the development moratoria due to capa-
utility must collect fee revenues for building industry(as occurs in virtual- city limitations. Both cities are now
several years before it has sufficient ly every city), the new program is faced with the necessity to replace their
cash funds to fully or partially finance generally perceived by builders to be existing utility impact fees with new
capital improvement projects. more equitable than the previous sub- (continued on next page)
Your Moyno° Representative: A Partner in
• Satisfaction
"t Your Authorized Moyno Municipal Representative is a specialist...an expert in the
water and wastewater field.With years of experience and knowledge of the latest
industry trends,he is a partner in your pumping application,providing value and
l- satisfaction beyond the sale.
y Your Moyno Representative offers:
4. 'Atli) -, . „:1 •• Reliable expertise in specifying Moyno pumps for water and
wastewater applications
- /�� el!l' '- • Attentive customer service,either on site or in-house
At Moyno progressing cavity pumps offer:
- • High viscosity capabilities for sludges
Y • Low-shear pumping action for polymers
t^ • Consistent,smooth,metered flow for chemical feed
- • Capacities to 2500 gpm;pressures to 2000 psi
�, Call your Moyno Representative today..,your Partner in Satisfaction.
A....,, ,
t
i Arkansas Louisiana Texas
.....
t Jones&Sweany,Inc.
..li
5119 Summer Avenue.
McCumin,Swan&Assoc. Hahn Equipment Co..Inc.
4500 York Street 5636 Kansas St.
Suite 311 Metairie.LA 70001 Houston.TX 77007
,. ----Nt Memphis,TN 38122 Telephone 504-888-4800 Telephone 713-868-3255
Jr Telephone 901-682-6655 Facsimile 504-888-7850 Facsimile 713-868-9725
Facsimile 901-761-5620 Oklahoma Texas
D.J.Shubeck Co. Newman Engineered Equipment
JROBBINS 2424 E.21st.St.,Suite 205 4215 Bettwood Parkway.#103
Tulsa,OK 74114 Dallas,TX 75244
1MyERSTelephone 918-742-0732 Telephone: 214-387-8288
i Facsimile 918-742-4529 Facsimile 214-490-8038
l
Southwest ell Texas Water Works Journal August, 1989/5
fees under S13336,but both know that be timed to capture as much of the may be faced with future refunds of
the financial rewards are likely to be growth revenues from impact fees as overly-high fees. Compliance with
greatly in excess of the procedural possible. The long lead time for full SB336 will define the maximum pos-
costs. fee enactment suggests that such pro- sable fee; local judgement applied to
On the other hand,some communi- grams should begin now to respond to setting actual fee amounts less than
ties, particularly small cities and a much higher rate of growth antici- the maximum will both protect the
towns,face substantial cash flow prob- pated two years hence. city's ability to attract desirable growth
lems in funding detailed planning Moreover, past experience suggests and at the same time ensure that future
studies now in anticipation of possible that periods of rapid growth present refunds will be unnecessary.
fee revenues in the future.Moreover,as the most controversial periods for
one Houston-area city discovered, enactment of new fees. The current
communities which have already slower growth conditions reduce the About the Authors: Mickey Fishbeck
bond-financed considerable excess political pressures involved in fee and Tony Bagwell are principals of
capacity (in anticipation of growth development. Rimrock Consulting Company, an
which has not yet occurred)often can- And finally,all communities should Austin planning and economics con-
not charge high impact fees. This keep in mind that impact fees do not suiting firm. They have performed
occurs because fee payers must be al- have to be so high that they put a impact fee studies for numerous Texas
lowed a credit for their future rate pay- damper on desired growth or make cities, both before and after SB336
ments to fund already-bonded capital city administrators nervous that they enactment. wj
facilities.Withoutsuch credit,fee pay-
ers could complain of being double-
charged for utility expansions—a sit- SUMMARY OF RECENT LEGISLATIVE CHANGES
uation which is not allowable under TO SENATE BILL 336 CONCERNING IMPACT FEES
SB336 provisions.
Finally, there are dangers to enact- • Planning requirements for water and sewer fees simplified.
ing an impact fee program which is Communities may use system-wide land use assumptions for
not in compliance with S8336. One developing water and sewer fees. Specific land use studies for
Texas city which enacted a fee pro- geographic service areas of these utilities are no longer required.
gram after the passage of SB336 has
already experienced a lawsuit alleging • Abbreviated process for new fees. Earlier legislation required a
non-compliance,which resulted in an three-step process: develop land use(planning) assumptions and
out-of-court settlement and refund of hold a public hearing on these;develop a CIP;and develop a fee and
fees. hold a hearing on the fee derivation. If there is no public objection,
cities may now opt to derive the planning assumptions and CIP in a
"Down to the Wire" consolidated effort and hold a single hearing.
Impact fees are not a cure-all and are
not appropriate for every community. • Changes In mandatory update process.Under SB336,cities were
But whether or not they are a good required to update the fee process in full every three years. Now,
choice for a community, Texas mu- cities may choose to publish a public notice that no update of
nicipalities are"down to the wire"re- planning assumptions,CIP or fee is needed.If there is no objection
garding impact fee decisions. within a specified time, no update or hearing is required.
For those cities which already have
impact fees,the June 1990 deadline for • Geographic limitations on storm water, drainage and flood
fee update and compliance is immin- control fees.The service area for these fees has been limited to the
ent. If cities are going to keep their particular area served by appropriate CIP projects and cannot
impact fees operational, they must extend beyond watershed boundaries.
•
begin now to appoint the required
Advisory Committee and begin the
formal updating process. Landmark Award Nominations Sought
For those cities which have fees
which may be de facto impact fees,the The Texas Section of the American natural water resource do not meet
city's legal department should review Water Works Association is seeking eligibility requirements. Additional-
those fee programs now so that action applicants for the American Water ly, the landmark must be at least 50
can be taken before the deadline, if Landmark Award. The purpose of years old and be recognized within its
necessary, to change existing ordin- this award is to recognize and preserve own community or region as a popu-
ances or formally enact an impact fee an American water landmark that has lar,valued,or historically significant
program. had a direct and significant relation- property.
Cities which do not have impact fee ship with water supply, treatment, The landmark candidate must be
programs currently are, of course, distribution, or technological devel- submitted with entry form and sup-
under no obligation to respond to opment.This award is in the form of a porting documents to the Texas Sec-
SB336. But if a city is anticipating sturdy bronze plaque to be mounted tion's Award Committee for approval
future growth and the possibility of on the water landmark. prior to submission to AWWA. The
using impact fees to fund and mitigate The landmark must be a tangible, entry form and further details may be
the effects of that growth, there is no physical property and should be of a obtained from Len Klandrud, Chair-
better time than the present to begin. permanent and nonexpendable na- man of the Awards Committee. 2408
Growth is not likely to be any slower ture, such as a building, dam, res- So. 37th St., Temple, Texas 76504-
in the future and fee programs should ervoir, tower, etc. Machinery or a 7168,(817) 778-6744. wj
6/August, 1989 Southwest tr Texas Water Works Journal
0?‘.
•
/e
CITY OP' WYLIE
2000 HWY. 78 N. — P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE, TEXAS 75098
(214) 442-2236
To: Ron Hameyen, Asst. City Fng.ineek
From: Jamey Johnson, Finance Di tecton
Re: Impact Fee/Li Station-Capital Recovery Fee Study (RFP's)
Date: July 7, 1989
The bottowLng .ems a List ob eng.ineen ing and negated b.vuns that I have
assembled that have done an have t noweedge of the type of study we cute
.interested .in having comp,t ed L or us. Most o b these have some Fznow2edg e o b
cap i to e pe.anni.ng and ante ass ac iated with Lium6 that can do
the Land use plan and Sinanc,iat p.2an that are such an i-ntegrat part ob
.this study that, in turn, w.itt be the bas e2ine Lout amending out cul 'tent
capdta2 necovay See strut tune:
(Cities noted when appop i,a to that the Om has done to, date)
1. K,i.m.2ey-Horn Fng.tneens, 12660 Coda Rd. , Suite 200, Datta6,Texas 75251
Attn: Fried Ba. stet (LewLsvate) 214-386-7007
2. White-Lohntze Fngdneexing, 2501 Pcvtkv.iew Drive, Suite 300, Ft. Worth,
Texas 76102 , Attn: B.iLL Ldhnke, 817-429-9321 '
3. Knowlton-Fngti.6h-F.eowe.k4 (KEF) Inc., 1901 Central D2.ive, Suite 550,
BedLond, Texas 76021, Attn: NitPhl.Up, 817-283-6211 (Futeos,N. R.i.eheand Hinz)
4. Freese g Nicho.es FngdneeAs, 811 Lamar, Ft. Worth, Texas 76102,
817-336-7161 , Attn: Susie Peden
5. Reed-Stowe Fdnanciat ConsuQtants-Pta.nner6, 12770 Cost Rd.-Suite 1107,
Da.J2a.s, Texas 75251 Attn: Keith Reed, 214-458-9388 (Grapevine,Lew.Lovitte 8
N. R cichtand HLU.o)
6.-l7SchAiek t, Rotti.n6 S Associates Eng-ineeAs, 1161 Corporate Dnive,West, SuJte200,
Att2.ington, Texas 76006 Attn: Hershel Lind2y, 817-640-8212 (AnUngton)
The S.inanciat pant, I be .ieve can be mixed with. the Land use and cap ctat �acc e i i es
plan and we shou.2d be ab.2e to o66.et some cash with out in.-hou6e data. Studies,
pitmaA4-t y wti. dty/.land use an,ieneted are comp.eete Lou MLLngton, N. R.ich-&tnd Wiz
6 LewL vitte. The areas we may want to examine cute: titi 2 hies (wateh/sewer) , .land
CITY OF WYLIE
2000 HWY. 78 N. — P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE, TEXAS 75098
Memo to R. Homeyer (214) 442-2236
RFP-Impact Fees Page 2
use, thoroughosares and drainage. We may want to stage the development os this
.study, that is,- do one pant os it (the pf.an) one year, budget more Sunda and
continue .its development. My concern is that the $30K Sot this yeah wi e
not be enough Son aU areas and we may want to pn,ion,(,tize the pangs we want
Si/Est or not do it ate, though by the act we need to do .o. Whichever pant
we do, the Land use is mandatory. Thio .cA by no means a compeete fist, only
a .start Uot and Seed. Sue to add/deeete whatever SiAno you wish to do 4o
when the RFP 'd- are sent out. I suggest that the S.ihm a zo be present at
and dun,i,ng the pubt i.c heaii, ng process once the study is done and the
enabling ordinance:.rs-dAgted.
0? 7
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
for
PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
for
THE CITY OF WYLIE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT MASTER PLAN
AND IMPACT FEE / LIFT STATION-CAPITAL RECOVERY FEE STUDY
City of Wylie, Texas
Engineering Department
2000 N. Hwy 78, P. O. Box 428
Wylie, Texas 75098
July, 1989
1
I . PROJECT INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTION
The City of Wylie is proposing the revision of its
current impact fee/ lift station capitol recovery fee in
accordance with the parameters delineated by Senate Bill
336, including all of the recent amendments. This study
will be prepared in stages, with each stage being completed
and approved before the authorization for any subsequent
stages will be forwarded.
II . SCOPE OF WORK
This study shall be divided into the following phases.
This is presented as a guide for your proposal preparation
but may not be inclusive of all individual design tasks .
A. Land Use Plan
This phase will consist of reviewing the current
land use plan and revising it as is deemed necessary.
City Staff members will be available for discussion of
the history of the land use plan as well as the logic
used during its preparation.
B. Water and Wastewater Systems Master Plan
This phase will consist of designing a master plan
for the water and wastewater systems based upon the
approved land use plan. A copy of the engineering
design software used to prepare the water system master
plan will be supplied to the city with the existing
system analysis and the final master plan analysis data
included. City Staff will be available to analyze the
existing system in regards to current line sizing and
expected system improvements.
C. Transportation and Drainage Systems Master Plan
This phase will consist of designing a master plan
for the City' s transportation system and the City' s
drainage system based upon the approved land use plan.
The current City and County thoroughfare plans will be
available for review.
D. Impact Fee
This phase will consist of preparing a capital
recovery fee based upon the estimated cost of
constructing the facilities determined in the
individual master plans. Current policies for
developer contributions during the construction of all
of the infrastructure facilities must be incorporated
into the final fee structure.
r.,
0?
III . PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
All proposals submitted should be limited to 50 pages
total and should include the following:
Statements demonstrating an understanding of the
project including a discussion of the overall project
strategy, demonstrating how all of the work tasks will
be integrated into a total effort.
A man-hour estimate per Phase shall be provided
with a breakdown for principals, project manager,
survey personnel , and other key personnel .
A current copy of the firms standard rates for
professional services or an estimated maximum cost per
phase.
A list from the firm submitting the proposal
identifying all supporting professional services
entities to be employed during the development of the
study, including an explanation of the allocation of
responsibility. . Said entities must also supply all of
the required information provided by the principal
firm.
A list from the firm submitting the proposal
identifying all previous studies equivalent in nature
to the proposed study along with references.
A statement of other qualifications of the firm
submitting the proposal , and all supporting
professional services entities, including the size,
history and experience of the firm.
IV. PROPOSED SCHEDULE
The proposed schedule for the submittal of the
proposals is as follows :
Mail Request for Proposal for Professional Services
July 10, 1989
Submittal Deadline for Request for Proposal for
Professional Services
July 27, 1989
Award Contract for Professional Services
August 8, 1989
Deadlines for each of the project phases will be
negotiated along with the project scope.
3
Jo
V. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL
Three (3) copies of each proposal should be submitted
to Mr. Ron Homeyer, P. E. , Asst. City Engineer, City of Wylie
Engineering Department, P. O. Box 428, 2000 State Highway 78
N. , Wylie, Texas 75098, no later than 5:00 p. m. , July 27,
1989.
Should any questions arise in the preparation of the
proposal , please contact Ron Homeyer or Charles Norwood at
the above address or call 442-2236.
VI . SELECTION
Proposals will be evaluated on:
The capability and qualifications of the firm to
prepare the necessary land use and master plans .
The approach and methods the firm will use to
accomplish the tasks.
Past record of performance on similar projects.
The consultant selected will be required to submit a
Professional Services Agreement contract to the City of
Wylie for execution within 10 days.
4
/
JNTY Oi
DALLAS COUNTY __
PUBLIC WORKS
• �rf Of fit+
OCT 13
October 9, 1989 '
Ms. Carolyn Jones
City Secretary
City of Wylie
P.O. Box 248
Wylie, TX 75098
Dear Ms. Jones:
Please consider execution of the enclosed City/County Agreement for Fiscal Year
1939-90. The Interlocal Agreement will allow the County to participate in items
identified in Section I and, in some cases, a timely response to emergency
conditions (e.g. , sanding for winter ice storms) . All existing agreements
expire on September 30, 1989.
Our current Road and Bridge Policy allows County Forces to perform work on both
Type B and Type E roadways within a city when requested. Type "B" work is
defined by the designation of the roadway (i.e. , major arterial) on the regional
thoroughfare plan and is shared 50-50 with the City. Type E work, on a
nondesignated roadway, can be performed if the cost is reimbursed to the County
by the City.
Please note that part six of the agreement requests the City to provide a
listing of maintenance projects anticipated to be performed during Fiscal Year
1990-91. We have attached a brief discussion of this request.
We will be happy to provide any additional information you would find helpful.
Sincerely,
Richard L. Peterson, P.E.
Transportation Planning Director
DID:gj�
Attachments (3)
cc: Dave Davis, Traffic Engineer
Files (Interlocal Agreements, City)
411 Elm Street Dallas, Texas 75202 653-7151
ii
LISTING OF ANTICIPATED WURA
DISCUSSION
1 . What level of detail should be provided?
In identifying maintenance activities for planning purposes ,
a high level of detail is not essential. Attached is
an example of the type of project listing which would
be helpful to us. Also attached is a blank form which
can be used to provide the requested information.
At
the City's option, the information can be provided in
other formats more convenient to them. _
2 . If maintenance work is needed during the year which
is not included in the list, can the county participate?
Yes . We recognize that the nature of maintenance activities
often makes it difficult to precisely predict needed
activities . Therefore , it is neither necessary nor
desirable to attempt to identify all activities which might conceivably be requested . Instead, we would appreciate
each city including in its list the work it reasonably
anticipates for County participation during FY 1989 .
3 . How will the listing affect emergency maintenance?
The County Road and Bridge Policy and State Law recognizes
the need for intergovernmental cooperation in response
to emergency situations . While it is desirable to plan
for possible emergencies , it is the County' s position
to provide emergency maintenance assistance within cities
whenever possible , at the Cities ' request, and to the
extent our resources allow.
4 . Why is the listing being requested?
The County , just as any other organization benefits
from planning its work . Especially in times of tight
budgets , it is helpful to know approximately how much
labor, equipment , and materials will be required to
perform needed work. In addition the County, like the
Cities, has a role to play in regional planning and
project reporting to meet the requirements imposed by
State and Federal programs . The requested information
will help to ensure that the County is prepared to provide
services when they are needed .
5 . What should be done if a City is not prepared to provide
the requested listing?
A city may wish to attach a brief note explaining that
while they may wish to arrange for maintenance projects
during the year, they cannot reasonably predict the
nature, scope, or location at this time .
The City has the option of deleting the paragraph from
the agreemtent . The agreement , in the form executed
by the city, will be placed on the Commissioners ' Court
agenda for their consideration .
L3
SAMPLE LISTING OF PROJECTS
TYPE OF
QUANTITY OF WORK LOCATIONS
WORX
3 miles Main St. (1st. to 10th)
Seal Coating Elm Ave (Main to Maple)
Striping
3 miles Same
Various Locations
Patching
i
STATE OF TEXAS ) (
COUNTY OF DALLAS ) (
CITY/COUNTY AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City of as, hereinafter
called "City" , and the County of Dallas, Texas, hereinafter
called "County" , desire to enter into an annual agreement for the
maintenance and improvement of city streets by the County;
WHEREAS, Article 4413 ( 32c) , Vernon' s Annotated Civil
Statutes, provides authorization for local governments to enter
into intergovernmental contracts;
WHEREAS, the Dallas County Commissioners' Court has
adopted Order No. 84-659, establishing the County Road and Bridge
Policy and Order No. 89-1526, establishing the 1989-90 County
Road List;
NOW, THEREFORE, THIS MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT is hereby
made and entered into by the City and the County upon and for the
mutual consideration stated herein:
WITNESSET H:
I .
City may request the County to make minor street repairs
to be performed by the County during the period from October 1,
1989 through September 30, 1990. Repairs include scarifying,
stabilizing, grading, patching, seal coating, signing, pavement
it
V.
The City agrees to notify the County Department of Public
Works within 30 days of any annexations or deannexations to
allow the County to accurately maintain the Official Road List.
VI .
City further agrees to provide County, for planning and
scheduling purposes, a listing, by July 1, 1990, of anticipated
work to be performed by the County that the City expects to
request during the period from October 1, 1990 through September
30, 1991. A listing of work previously requested to be
performed during the period October 1, 1989 through September
30 , 1990 is attached.
The City of , Texas, has
executed this Agreement pursuant to duly authorized City Council
Resolution dated , the County of Dallas has
executed this Agreement pursuant to Commissioners ' Court, Court
Order No. , on this day of
, 1989 .
CITY OF COUNTY OF DALLAS
BY: BY:
COUNTY JUDGE
c3S
*i t- 1e
CITY OF WYLIMO
2000 HWY. 78 N. - P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE, TEXAS 75098
(214) 442-2236
October 18, 1989
TO: James Johnson, Finance Director
FROM: Jim Holcomb, Purchasing Agent
RE: Bids for Annual Motor Fuel Contract
Of the ten fuel distributors who received bid invitations, only
Reeder Distributors and Advance Petroleum submitted bids on the
City's Motor Fuel Contract (see attachments) . A preliminary review
of the bids revealed a striking disparity between the cost figures
presented by the two vendors. Further analysis of the apparent
discrepancies unearthed two critical differences in the preparation
of each of the bids. The first discrepancy relates to the Oil Price
Information Service Index which, under the contract, determines the
selling price at the time of purchase (OPIS + Mark-Up= Selling
Price) . There was some confusion as to the date of the OPIS Index
which was to be used as the basis for the bid price and consequently,
the vendors were using totally different OPIS average prices in their
bids. Since the OPIS Index is a variable subject to drastic fluc-
tuation; and the total selling price also varies in direct propor-
tion to the OPIS average, neither of these are of any real signifi-
cance in determining the low bid. The key factor in evaluating the
bids is the vendor's mark-up, which is the only constant factor in
the contract. This brings us to the second (and more significant)
difference between the two bids, involving House Bill 1588 which
imposes a loading fee on all deliveries of motor fuel. This is a
flat rate fee added to the cost of each load of fuel and is based on
the number of gallons delivered. The bid from Reeder Distributors
includes the loading fee required for a fuel transport load of
8,000 gallons ($50.00 or .006 per gallon) . Advance Petroleum chose
not to include the fee because it is invoiced as a separate line
item. To make an equitable "apples to apples" comparison, one
would have to either add the loading fee to the Advance bid or
subtract it from the Reeder bid. If we include the applicable
transport load fee in both bids, the resulting mark-up is as follows.
Reeder Distributors- $.0270/Gal.
Advance Petroleum- $.0275/Gal.
It is my recommendation that Council award to Reeder Distributors
the annual motor fuel contract, commencing November 1,1989 with
an option to renew at the end of the initial contract period.
For purposes of general information, it is estimated that annual
savings under the contract (versus open market pricing) would be
approximately $2,000.00. The total budget for fuel and lubricants
this fiscal year is $34,725.00 for all departments. Based on past
usage and mid-September OPIS averages, total F.Y. '89-'90 expen-
ditures can be projected at $30,956.00. It should be noted that
contracting for our annual fuel requirements is absolutely neces-
sary in order to comply with the State's competitive bidding
statutes.
( 7
BID SHEET (S)
State minimum number of gallons for transport loads to the City
of Wylie if any:
(0000 &CL .— D/OSEL- 7, 0o c/4L .— CAS gallons
DFW OPIS +MARK-UP TOTAL
AVERAGE OR SELLING
TYPE FUEL NET PRICE -MARK-DOWN PRICE
(using ( indicate WITHOUT
8-28-89 + or- ) STATE TAX
OPIS)
PREMIUM UNLEADED $ . 707 /GAL ± $ . D 7 /GAL =$ ,7N07 GAL
REGULAR UNLEADED $ , (0(c X /GAL ± $ 0 27 /GAL =$ 043F GAL
#2 DIESEL $ , 5'7(R /GAL ± $ , 017 /GAL =$ 59�9 GAL
REGULAR (LEADED) $ , (0 , 4/ /GAL± $ 027 /GAL =$ , 476,21 GAL
DELIVERY RESPONSE TIME AFTER RECEIPT OF ORDER: 2 y Hie�f ,
METHOD FOR TEMPERATURE ADJUSTMENT: (DC n
HAVE REQUESTED ANALYSIS SHEETS BEEN INCLUDED WITH THIS BID
RESPONSE: V YES NO
BIDDER DOES ( N//) DOES NOT ( ) MEET ALL SPECIFICATIONS
EXCEPTIONS:
FIRM/BIDDER: IPEe / Ef DLc RlI3UTores
BY : PeOS •
Si ature Title
ADDRESS: j! O,X g37
F7• l'0ie1t-i , 7 X. -7" / '/
PHONE: f1L 'O 5 / 7- L/29SIS7
cm Mobil
AUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTOR AUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTOR
Iffy
REEDER DISTRIBUTORS,INC. .
Wholesale Petroleum Products
: 3
October 12, 1989
Pwcchas.cng Agent
City o (yt i.e
2000 Hwy 78 N.
! O Pox 428
cvyt_i.e, Texas 75098
Attention: Pwcchae.ing Agent
Sid WO: 89-05 ffotot Fue e
The toad.ing ice on yowt. +duet hid was .included .in out pn i.ce.
The toading +fee t <50.00 pur, toad and hased on 8000 cute
mote gatto ns.
S.incetety,
_4' 911 • 7)
U
Ca ty M. Reedet
Ptes.ident
(MR/jc.
Gasoline • Diesel • Oils • Bobtail & Transport Deliveries
P.O. Box 8237 Fort Worth, Texas 76124 Telephone: 817/429-5957
4. /
BID SHEET (S)
State minimum number of gallons for transport loads to the City
of Wylie if any:
7,500 gallons
DFW OPIS +MARK-UP TOTAL
AVERAGE OR SELLING
TYPE FUEL NET PRICE -MARK-DOWN PRICE
(using ( indicate WITHOUT
( * ) See Note On Price 8-28-89 + or- ) STATE TAX
OPIS)
PREMIUM UNLEADED $ .6450 /GAL ± $ +.0215 /GAL =$ .6665 GAL
REGULAR UNLEADED $ .5485 /GAL ± $ +.0215 /GAL =$ .5700 GAL
#2 DIESEL $ .5278 /GAL ± $ +.0215 /GAL =$ .5493 GAL
REGULAR (LEADED) $ .5686 /GAL ± $ +.0215 /GAL =$ .5901 GAL
MID GRADE (Unleaded 5993 / GAL +.0215 / GAL =$ .6208 GAL
DELIVERY RESPONSE TIME AFTER RECEIPT OF ORDER: WITPTN 2L untie PFPTGA
METHOD FOR TEMPERATURE ADJUSTMENT: TERMINAL COMPUTER TEMPERATURE CORRECTED
HAVE REQUESTED ANALYSIS SHEETS BEEN INCLUDED WITH THIS BID
RESPONSE: X YES NO
BIDDER DOES ( ) DOES NOT ( ) MEET ALL SPECIFICATIONS
EXCEPTIONS: We have bid in Mid-Grade 89° fuel because Regular Leaded 89°
fuel is becoming very hard to get. We will furnish an 89° leaded as long as
we have supply. There will be a point in time when Regular Leaded will no
longer be available.
FIRM/BIDDER: ADVANCE PETROLEUM DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC.
BY : £J v �^ Commercial Sales
Sig ature CORKY CHILDERS Title
ADDRESS: 2451 Great Southwest Parkway
Fort Worth, Texas 76106
PHONE: (817) 626-5458 METRO (817) 429-7712
'/D
Advance
Petroleum
DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. ' �-
October 6 , 1989
I
City of Wylie
Purchasing Department
2000 Hwy 78N
P. 0. Box 428
Wylie, Texas 75098
RE: Bid No 89-05
Dear Jim:
In our telephone conversation on Friday, you asked about House Bill
1588 . HB 1588 is not included in our bid price because under this
new law everyone is required to pay this fee. The fee is a bulk
sum that is broken down after delivery on net gallons . It would
only cause a mess were I to break it down to a per gallon basis .
In order to make the bid correct the following applies . The bid
sheet prices remain the same and the HB 1588 fee schedule is an
add-on , separate line item on the invoice. I am giving you an
example based on my submitted bid sheeet to show you how it would
price on a transport load of 7500 gallons gross fuel of Premium No
Lead.
Invoice
Gross Gallons 7 ,500
Net Gallons 7 ,350 @ .6665 gallon = $4 ,898 .78
HB 1588 Schedule Price Fee
5 ,000 to 7 ,999 gallons = 37 .50
Taxes = N/A
Invoice Amount Due $4 ,936 .28
The above would be our billing procedue. The fee will be an add on
separate line item.
Enclosed in this mailing is a copy of a Certificate of Insurance.
I was not able to enclose one at the time of the bid. I have also
included a customer reference list. If I may be of further
service , please call me .
Sincerly,
(! rk,(Ck,
Corky Childers
Commercial Sales
Enclosures :
2 4 5 1 GREAT SOUTHWEST PARKWAY FORT WORTH, TEXAS 7 I 1 0 1• 2 3$7 PHONE $ 1 7/8 2 S-S I S•
TEXAS HOUSE BILL NO. 15f8
FEE ON DELIVERY OF PRODUCTS
1. TAXABLE PRODUCTS INCLUDE MOTOR GASOLINE, AVIATION GASOLINE,
KEROSENE, #1 AND #2 DIESEL FUEL. IT DOES NOT INCLUDE
JP-4, JP-5 AND TURBINE FUEL.
2. COMMON CARRIER RAILROADS ARE EXEMPT FROM THE FEE.
3. FEE IS TO BE BILLED TO ALL TEXAS DESTINATION CUSTOMERS,
WHETHER THEY HAVE A MOTOR FUEL LICENSE (TAX-FREE) OR
NOT.
4. RATES ARE STAIR-STEPPED BASED ON VOLUME IN TANK AS
FOLLOWS:
LESS THAN 2,500 GALLONS - $12.50
2,500 TO 4,999 GALLONS - $25.00
5,000 TO 7,999 GALLONS - $37.50
8,000 TO 9,999 GALLONS - $50.00
10,000 TO 15,000 GALLONS - $75.00
5. THE FEE IS TO BE COMPUTED ON THE NET PRODUCT.
6. TILE FEE MUST BE A SEPARATE LINE ITEM ON THE INVOICE.
7. THE FEE IS EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, 1989.
/at
CITY OF WYLIE
PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
DATE : OCTOBER 17, 1989
TO : CHARLES NORWOOD - CITY MANAGER
FROM : DON WHITE - PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT
RE : BUSINESS TO BE PLACED ON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
At the October 5th meeting the Park Board made a
recommendation to City Council regarding the WSA revenue
spending . Their recommendation for approval is as follows :
Rockite Wave Slide with canopy. $698. 00
10 ft. long. 2 ft inside dimension, 3 ft
outside dimension. (For Community Park
playground. )
Portable Backstops - Frame 1" Galvanized $500. 00
tubing, heavy duty weather treated nylon
net . Back panel 8x10, overhang 4x8. 2 ea.
(WSA needs for Teeballers and early
baseballers. )
Broadcast Spreader - ant control program. $275 . 00
TOTAL $1473. 00
Please insure that this business is placed on the October
24th agenda. A park board member will be present at the
meeting to make the presentation.
If any further information is required please contact me.
DW/ lk
xc : Carolyn Jones . City Secretary
RESOLUTION NO. 89-18-24-89-1
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
VOTING ON THE CANDIDATES FOR THE BOARD
OF DIRECTOR FOR COLLIN COUNTY CENTRAL
APPRAISAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, The City of Wylie has 33 votes to cast on the ballot
for t he candidates for the Board of Directors for
Collin County Central Appraisal District; and,
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Wylie must cast
these 33 votes in an open meeting; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WYLIE , TEXAS,
SECTION 1 That the City Council of the City of Wylie did cast
their 33 votes during the regular Council meeting on
October 24 ,, 1989 ,
SECTION 2 The 33 votes were cast as follows:
DR. LEO FITZGERALD VOTES
ANTHONY GEER VOTES
DONIVAN GUNN VOTES
DIXIE POOL VOTES
DONALD RODENBAUGH VOTES
JACK SCOTT, JR. VOTES
BOB SHINN VOTES
HAL STRINGER VOTES
HOWARD THORNTON VOTES
DULY PASSED AND APPROVED ON THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1989 .
Chuck Trimble, Mayor
ATTEST :
Carolyn Jones , City Secretary
CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT . __
OF I; �� g o M _g
COLLIN COUNTY , '
OCT 1989
1201 W. 15th Street, Room 136 1 19
Plano, Texas 75075
214/423-8802 -
214/542-0306 October 18, 1989
Carolyn Jones, City Secretary
City of Wylie
P. O. Box 428
Wylie, TX 75098
Dear Ms. Jones:
Enclosed you will find the ballot listing the nominees for the
Board of Director positions for the Central Appraisal District of
Collin County. The candidates are listed alphabetically by their
last name.
Each voting unit must vote in open meeting, report its vote by
written resolution, and submit it to the Chief Appraiser by
November 14, 1989. Each unit may cast all its votes for one
candidate or distribute the votes among any number of the
candidates listed. Since their is no provision for write-in
candidates, the Chief Appraiser may not count votes for someone
not listed on the official ballot.
If any questions should arise prior to your voting, please feel
free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jimmie C. Honea
Chief Appraiser
JCH/dlw
15
OFFICIAL BALLOT
ISSUED TO: Wylie City NUM ER OF VOTES: 33
FOR: BOARD OF DIRECTORS, CENTRAL NIPAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT OF CIOLLIN COUNTY.
DR.. LEO FTTZGERAID VOTES
ANTHONY GEER VOTES
DONIVAN GUNN VOTES
DIXIE POOL VOTES
DONALD RODENBAUC { VOTES
JACK SCJOTT, JR. VOTES
BOB SHINN VOTES
HAL STRINGER VOTES
HOW ARD THORNTON VOTES
OCIOBER 18, 1989 C " ° 4L1. 0
'e C. Honea, Chief Appraiser
Section 6.03 (g) of the State Property Tax Code requires the above
action be taken by resolution, therefore, please attach a copy of the
resolution to this ballot and return to the Chief Appraiser, 1201 W.
15th Street, Roan 136, Plano, Texas 75075, no later than November 14,
1989.
Cam"'-1 Vr, -'
d `
MEMORANDUMPm, 17"' '
TO : Charles Norwood, City Manager FROM : Ron Homeyer , P. E. , Staff Engineer (-179
DATE : October 17, 1989
RE : Industrial Waste Program
Quarterly Report to City Council
Attached is a copy of the quarterly : epor- of the City' s
activities associated with the industrial waste program for
inclusion in the Wylie City Council Regular Meeting Agenda
for October 24, 1989. I will make an oral presentation of
the highlights for the record.
air ,-
V fie
CITY OF WYLIE
2000 HWY 78 N — P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE, TEXAS 75098
Certified Return Mail # P 270 298 153
October 9, 1989
Mr . Charles D. Gill
TWC, District 4
1019 N. Duncanville Road
Duncanville, Texas 75116-2201
RE : Industrial Waste Program
Dear Mr . Gill :
The City of Wylie has enclosed herewith the third quarter
report of the activities associated with our Industrial
Waste Program for your review. I feel that we are making
good progress with our program at this time and hope to
continue at our current pace.
If you have any questions or comments please feel tree to
call .
Sincerely,
jelvt gt"-14-
Ron Homeyer, P. E.
Staff Engineer
RH/ Ip
cc : Charles Norwood, City Manager
J . M. (Mike ) Wagner , TALEM, Inc.
City Council
Enclosure
�8
CITY OF WYLIE
2000 HWY 78 N — P.O. BOX 428
WYLIE, TEXAS 75098
October 9, 1989
Mr . Charles D. Gill
TWC, District 4
1019 N. Duncanville Road
Duncanville , Texas 75116-2201
RE : industrial Waste Program
Dear Mr . i l i .
The City of Wylie has enclosed herewith the third quarter
report of the activities associated with our Industrial
Waste Program for your review. i feel that we are making
good progress with our program at this time and hope to
continue at our current pace.
It you have any questions or comments please feel free to
gall .
Sincerely,
g-vt".14-
Ron Hcmeye , P. E.
Staff Engineer
RH, I o
cc : Charles Norwood, City Manager
' . M. ( Mike Wagner , TALEM, Inc.
City Counci 1
Enclosure
4( 9°
3rd Quarter Report
Industrial Waste Program
City of Wylie
October 6, 1989
During the third quarter of 1989, the City has completed the permit renewal
process for all of the currently identified Significant Industrial Users
(SIC) . In addition, the city has established procedures for notifying SIUs of
industrial monitoring activities conducted by the City as well as permit and
ordinance violations identified by those activities.
During the second quarter there were 8 industrial effluent violations:
INDUSTRIAL USER: NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS
1. Oklahoma Animal By Products 2
2. Extruders 6
3. Hardcast 0
4. Holland Hitch 4
All SIUs in the City were under Administrative Order by the City to correct,
on a permanent basis, previous effluent violations. To date Hardcast is the
only SIU to arrive at a permanent solution. Hardcast has essentially
eliminated their industrial wastewater by reuse of the wastewater in their
process. The only wastewater being discharged to the City system is domestic
wastewater. Oklahoma Animal By-Products is currently installing new equipment
and changing their processes to insure that their effluent is consistently in
compliance. Holland Hitch has had recurring problems with effluent compliance
during the third quarter. A meeting will be scheduled in October to discuss
these problems and to set out the requirements of the compliance order which
will set a deadline for having the problems solved.
Extruders has been identified as having a significant and recurring discharge
problem. The City received an anonymous tip the Extruders was shutting down
their industrial discharge while the City was monitoring them and then
releasing high strength industrial wastewater after sampling was completed.
On September 3, 1989, the City collected an unannounced grab sample to see if
the information from the tip might be true. The effluent at the time of
sampling was green and had a pH of 4.2 with a total chromium concentration of
38 mg/L and a total aluminum concentration of 42 mg/L. When confronted with
the results of the tests Extruders refused to acknowledge the validity of the
sampling technique or the analytical results or even that they might have had
an effluent violation because the City failed to provide them a split of the
sample per a verbal agreement between the City and Extruders.
Subsequently, the City arranged to take 24 hour composite samples of Extruders
effluent for 7 consecutive days. Two of those days yielded effluent
violations. On 08/28/89 the pH for the composite was 5.2 and the chromium
concentration was 7.5 mg/L, and on 09/01/89 the pH for the composite was 5.6
and the chromium concentration was 4.0 mg/L. Extruders will be confronted
with these results in a meeting during October. Extruders was provided splits
of all composite samples.
` o
In addition to these activities the City is expanding the number of industries
in the Industrial Waste Program. A data base of all nonresidential users is
being developed by the City. The plan is to issue Nonresidential Discharge
Permits to all nonresidential discharges who only have domestic wastewater
discharges. All nonresidential dischargers who's effluent also consists of
waters other than domestic wastewater will be issued an Industrial Wastewater
Discharge Permit.
Other actions being taken by the City include amending the fee ordinance to
include surcharge rates for treatment of high strength industrial wastewater,
completion of the Enforcement Policy for the Industrial Waste Program, and
reviewing and amending the Industrial Waste Ordinance to comply with North
Texas Municipal Water District requirements.
1242/2-3
MEMORANDUM
TO : Charles Norwood, City Manager
FROM : Ron Homeyer , P. E. , Staff Engineer I
DATE : October 18, 1989
RE : Wastewater Collection System Improvements
Payment Request - Lane & Associates
Lane & Associates has forwarded a final invoice for all of
their services rendered in association with the easement
parcels required for the construction of the wastewater
collection system improvements . The invoice includes a
summary of ail of the costs associated with the first set of
easements as well as the easements associated with the
Southfork Mobile Home Park Extension. The amount remaining,
and hereby requested for payment is $8, 500.
I have reviewed the attached invoice from Lane & Associates
and have found the work invoiced to be complete and the fees
appear to be appropriate ; therefore, I recommend the payment
to Lane & Associates in the amount of $8, 500.
52
LANE & AssocIAms
Professional Real Estate Appraisers&Consultants
October 2, 1989
Charles Norwood
City Manager, City of Wylie
P.O. Box 428
Wylie, Texas 75098
Dear Mr. Norwood:
Enclosed is a copy of the original bill which has been paid.
The bills for the first and second sets of additional parcels
are also enclosed. You have previously reviewed and approved
the bill for the first set of additional parcels.
We were unable to send you a fee estimate for the second set
of additional parcels prior to our deadline for sending the
final values on all parcels. The second set of additional
parcels apparently got lost in the mail. In any case, we did
not receive them in time. The bill for all services
rendered, as well as amounts previously paid, is enclosed for
your review. If you have any questions , please do not
hesitate to call us at (214) 235-1515.
Sincer
Tom R. Lane S /SRWA
Chad L. Campbell
John C. Lloyd
TRL;CLC;JCL/jf
1414 South Tennessee Street • McKinney, TX 75069
214/548-0715 • (Metro) 214/235-1515
COPY OF THE BILL FOR THE ORIGINAL PARCELS
AND THE INITIAL RESEARCH
LANE & ASSOCIATES
Professional Real Estate Appraisers&Consultants
September 5, 1989
Mr. Charles Norwood
City Manager
City of Wylie
Wylie, Texas
RE : Wylie Wastewater Collection System
Improvements Easement Appraisal
Dear Mr. Norwood:
The fee for the research and documentation
of the appraisal process $ 8 ,400 .00
Appraisal fees for the following parcels:
Henry & Elida Martinez $ 300 .00
Chemical Recycling, Inc 200.00
City Contractors Service Co. , Inc 600 .00
( 2 parts)
Melvin K. St. John & H. F. Tibbals, Jr. . . 200.00
Patsy Sue Flanagan 250 .00
Juan C. Diaz 300 .00
W. L. & Evelyn Brown 400 .00
Wiley Housewright 400.00
Worth Montyque Speed 300 .00
Ronald Franklin Miller 300.00
Brownie Thomas Bradshaw 400 .00
Jerry C. Caldwell 250.00
Robert L. Joslyn 300 .00
1414 South Tennessee Street • McKinney, TX 75069
214/548-0715 • (Metro) 214/235-1515
Appraisal Fees Cont 'd
Donald P. Kreymer 300.00
Clyde Randall Martin 250 .00
Ray Dean Miller 450.00
( 2 tracts )
Sherwood E. Blount, Jr 200.00
Archie Eubanks 600.00
(2 tracts)
Lowry Graham & Lottie B . Kinzer 300 .00
Richard Parker, Trustee 300 .00
Total appraisal fees $ 6,600.00
TOTAL APPRAISAL FEE DUE $ 15,000 .00
Sinc- ely
",/ 17
ii'
o R. L ane, SRA/SR
7
Chad. L. Campbell
, k'rk Ac al ,f-
John C . Lloyd
TRL;C1C;JCL/j v
BILL FOR FIRST SET OF ADDITIONAL PARCELS
(PREVIOUSLY APPROVED)
Robert_V._Thurmond, Jr.
Tract I
Permanent Easement: 24 ,598 sq. ft.
Temporary Easement: 73 ,794 sq.ft. $ 600 .00
Damages: Yes
Tract II
Permanent Easement: 26 ,518 sq. ft.
Temporary Easement: 79 ,554 sq.ft. 600 .00
Damages: Yes
J .B. Prince
Permanent Easement: 31 ,500 sq.ft.
Temporary Easement: 94,500 sq. ft.
Damages: Yes 600 .00
Sunbelt Savings & Loan Assoc.
Permanent Easement: 35,198 sq. ft.
Temporary Easement: 105 ,594 sq.ft. 400 .00
Damages: Possible
Lot 13, Lake Ranch
Permanent Easement: 4 , 146 sq.ft.
Temporary Easement: 12 ,438 sq. ft. 300 .00
Damages: No
Lot 12, Lake Ranch
Permanent Easement: 5 ,938 sq.ft.
Temporary Easement: 17 ,814 sq.ft. 300 .00
Damages: No
Lot 11, Lake Ranch
Permanent Easement: 6 ,622 sq.ft.
Temporary Easement: 19 ,866 sq. ft. 300 .00
Damages: No
Lot 10, Lake Ranch
Permanent Easement: 1 ,458 sq.ft.
Temporary Easement: 4 ,374 sq. ft. 300. 00
Damages: No
Lot 9 , Lake Ranch
Permanent Easement: 10 ,452 sq.ft.
Temporary Easement: 31 , 356 sq. ft. 300 .00
Damages: No
Lot 8 ,_Lake Ranch
Permanent Easement: 7 ,788 sq.ft.
Temporary Easement: 23 ,364 sq. ft. 300 .00
Damages: No
Lot 7 , Lake Ranch
Permanent Easement: 7 ,240 sq.ft.
Temporary Easement: 21 ,720 sq. ft. 300 .00
Damages: No
Lot 6, Lake Ranch
Permanent Easement: 5 ,478 sq.ft.
Temporary Easement: 16 ,434 sq. ft. 300 .00
Damages: No
Lot 5 , Lake Ranch
Permanent Easement: 33 ,410 .8 sq. ft.
Temporary Easement: 100,232.4 sq. ft. 300.00
Damages: No
Total $ 4 ,900 .00
BILL FOR SECOND SET OF ADDITIONAL PARCELS
(NOT YET APPROVED OR REVIEWED)
J . L. Brand (Parcel 13)
Permanent Easement: 32, 186 sq.ft.
Temporary Easement: 96,558 sq.ft. $ 600.00
Damages: Possible
B. C . Woods (Parcel 18)
Permanent Easement: 64 ,526 sq. ft.
Temporary Easement: 193,578 sq. ft. 600.00
Damages: Possible
Jack Harvard Trust (Parcel 19)
Permanent Easement: 26 ,818 sq. ft.
Temporary Easement: 80,454 sq. ft. 400 .00
Damages: No
B. C Woods (Parcel 17)
Permanent Easement: 18 ,500 sq. ft.
Temporary Easement: 55,500 sq. ft. 400 .00
Damages: No
T. P. & L. (Parcel 16 )
Permanent Easement: 1 ,420 sq. ft.
Temporary Easement: 4 ,260 sq. ft. 400 .00
Damages: No
Clarinda Mathews (Parcel 14 )
Permanent Easement: 29 ,658 sq. ft.
Temporary Easement: 88 ,974 sq. ft. 600.00
Damages: Possible
Clarinda Mathews (Parcel 15)
Permanent Easement: 15 ,382 sq. ft.
Temporary Easement: 45 ,984 sq. ft. 600. 00
Damages: Possible
Total $ 3,600.00
RECORD OF TOTAL BILL FOR SERVICES RENDERED
AND AMOUNTS PREVIOUSLY PAID
Approved bill for the original parcels and
initial research $ 15 ,000 .00
Approved bill for the first set of additional
parcels $ 4 , 900 .00
Bill for second set of addition parcels (Not yet
approved or reviewed by Charles Norwood, City
Manager) $ 3 ,600 .00
Total fee for services rendered $ 23 ,500 .00
Less amounts previously paid $ 15,000 .00
Total bill outstanding $ 8 ,500 .00
InfoRmAL
REpoRrs
w
.
ANIMAL CONTROL MONTHLY REPORT �• .
SEPTEMBER 19 89 `:"
TTRIS EtnsT % SAME MO. ; X : THIS YR. 'LAST YR.
;MONTH MONTH ; +!- LAST YR. ; +/- ;TO DATE TO DATE +/- •,
1 1 1 1 1 '-
_ i1H..._
1 1 d
TOTAL CALLS 128 81 906 777,
.'
ANIMALS PICKED UP LIVE
( (IMPOUNDED) 72 50
1 1 1 1 1 1 511
1 1 1 1 1 4r
ANIMALS DIED IN KENNEL #;
3 ; 2 I I 11 -- _
1 1 -• i 1 1 1
ANIMALS PICKED UP DEAD 9 9 62 '.
1 -• 1 1 1 1 1 --!.
ANIMAL BITE REPORTS ; 1 0 10 - ,
ANIMAL OBSERVATIONS 0 ; O ; ; ; ; 8 .
ANIMALS TAKEN TO
GARLAND HUMANE SOCIETY 54 54 425
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ANIMALS CLAIMED C n 1t1' OWNERCSis ; 10 ; - - 3 ; 56
C...N\
ANIMALS ADOPTED '
CASH RECEIPTS 1317,00 $_146200 16
__ $3195.00
1 1 1 1 1 1
REGISTRATIONS 10 4 156
CITATIONS ISSUED 12 5 2
' 1 1 1 1 50 1 1
� ,2'E
CITATION $ AMOUNT (APPX. ): 1469.00 $167.00 ; $1455.00 ` :x
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .r
MILES TRAVELED 4-.-- -16. _ '_ 911 1 1 1 1 8397 _„_
ANIMALS EUTHANIZED 1 2 7 - a
PREPARED BY: -- y`'/ DATE: OCTOBER 5., 1989
D r�'
rti,'
•
:}
;z
• �7
WYLIE HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MEETING-MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 7, 1989
The Wylie Historical Commission met Thursday, September 7, 1989
at the Wylie Municipal Complex for our regular Monthly Meeting.
Members present were John Spillyard, Ellen Smith, and Gail Clem-
mons . The main purpose of our meeting was to formulate our
Goals for Historical Preservation in our City of Wylie, Texas .
And to make an Official Report for the City Council .
Our next regular monthly meeting will be October 5, 1989 at
- 7 : 00 P. M. at the Wylie Municipal Complex.
Gail G. Clemmons
Secretary/Treasurer
Wylie Historical Commission
WYLIE HISTORICAL COMMISSION
MEETING-MINUTES
OCTOBER 5, 1989
The Wylie Historical Commission met on Thursday , Oct-
ober 5 , 1989 for our monthly meeting . Present were
John Spillyard , Gail Clemmons , and Pat Guess . We were
honored to have as our Guest Speaker Tommie Ruthinger
from Jane Henry Realator ' s Office .
We have received our book from the State on the
Mainstreet U. S . A. Program. Work is still in process
on setting our Goals for the Committee.
We are always happy to have Kathy Spillyard with
us and the many helpful suggestions she has since she
has worked in Historical work before and is a Real Est-
ate Broker .
Our next meeting will be November 2 , 1989 at the
Wylie Municipal Complex, time 7 :00 P.M. .
Gail G. Clemmons
Secretary/Treasurer
Wylie Historical Commission
COMPLAINT REPORT
OCTOBER 1989
<: 190
509 S. JACKSON DONALD KREYMER (SUBSTANDARD HOUSE)
JANUARY 10, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
JANUARY 10, 1989 PLACARDS PLACED.
JANUARY 10, 1989 PICTURES TAKEN.
JANUARY 12, 1989 GREEN CARD RECEIVED.
JANUARY 20, 1989 MET WITH J I M MCKNIGHT WITH KREYMER,
WE PERFORMED AN INSPECTION OF THE
HOUSE TOGETHER AND MADE OUT A
HOUSING CODE. CHECK LIST.
JANUARY 24, 1989 MAILED MR. MCKNIGHT A COPY OF THE
CHECKLIST.
FEBRUARY 21 , 1989 NO ATTEMPT TO COMPLY.
MARCH 28, 19S9 CHARGES FILED.
APR I L. 28, 1989 MR. KREYMER AND CITY STAFF MET FOR
MEDIATION AGREEMENTS.
MAY 5, 1989 DUE TO FAILURE TO SIGN AGREEMENT
i
WAS FORCED TO FILE CHARGES.
Mr, Ti. ,: 1989 WENT TO COUNTY
COURT 1j!A S POSTPONED
TILL MAY 14, 1989.
JUNE 14, 1989 QUASHED IN COUNTY DUE TO TECHNICAL
ERROR.
WINE 730, 1939 CONTRACT SIGNED.
11 'i 1 1989 WE WERE ADVISED OF REPOSSESSION E Y
LENDER.
AUGUST 8, 1989 REQUESTED HELP FROM TITLE COMPANY
TO IDENTIFY RESPONSIBLE PARTY.
_C T E`BE ; 18, 1989 WEEKLY CHARGES ARE BEING FILED.
1 `1
108 N. FIFTH DONALD KREYMER
SEE FILE 191—b
(SUBSTANDARD HOUSING)
JANUARY 10, 1989 PICTURES TAKEN.
JANUARY 11 , 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
JANUARY 12, 1989 GREEN CARD RECEIVED,
JANUARY 19, 1989 MRS. TAYLOR WHO WAS RESIDING AT
THIS ADDRESS CAME IN AND ADVISED
THAT MR. KREYMER HAD THEM EVICTED.
MARCH 28, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
{P R I _ 23,� 1989 R. KREYMER AND CITY T i
STAFF M E..l.. F 1=1 F,,
MEDIATION AGREEMENTS.
JUNE ..S..
:., 1939 i_��a.-1�_H E r� IN COUNTY DIE�_ TO TECHNICAL
ERROR.
, IONE 0 1929
r8 _ CoNTRACT SIGNED.
JUL' '3 „ 1989
WE WERE ADVISED OF REPOSSESSION BY
AUGUST 8, 1989 REQUESTED ED HELP FROM TilEE `._,.. r',-M.
TO IDENTIFY
DENTIF.,, RESPONSI3EE _ T
V.
S ::.r' S :_MB l"' ) 8 1 __..,. WEEKLY`�: CHARGES ,E FILED,
,...�q `+ F._ _'';` L;r r-�;+. .:�.___ ARE BEING 1' 1i....i_.!_?,.
401 N. JACKSON DON KREYMER (SUB—STANDARD HOUSE)
AUGUST t!. 1988;, _ CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
AUGUST i.),- ..t.. 1 ..?., 1988 GREEN CARD RECEIVED.
OF:.: DENOLISH 1HE HOUSE.
DECEMBER 21 , 1988 MR. KREYMER REQUESTED 90 DAY
EXTENSION TO REPAIR OR DEMOLISH.
EXTENSION WAS DENIED, AND 45 DAYS
WERE GRANTED. COMPLIANCE DUE
FEBRUARY 15, 1989.
FEBRUARY 14, 1989 INSPECTION SHOWS NO ATTEMPT TO
COMPLY AT THIS TIME.
FEBRUARY 15, 1989 TIME EXPIRED. MR. KREYMER CALLED
AND ASKED FOR EXTENSION. I DENIED
IT. HE ASKED AGAIN BY EXPLAINING
THAT THE WEATHER HAS BEEN TO BAD TO
WORK ON DEMOLISHING THE HOUSE. I
TOLD MR. KREYMER THAT HE HAD ENOUGH
TIME TO REMEDY THE PROBLEM. MR.
KREYMER STATED HE WOULD LIKE FOR ME
TO SEE WHAT I COULD DO ABOUT AN
EXTENSION. I TOLD MR. KREYMER I
WOULD CHECK INTO IT. MR. KREYMER
BROUGHT A LETTER STATING HE WOULD
HAVE THE HOUSE RAISED BY 3/5/89.
MR. FAIRES AGREED TO EXCEPT THE
LETTER.
MARCH 6, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
MARCH 21 , 1989 FINED $500' 00 APPEALED TO COUNTY
COURT.
APRIL 28, 1989 MEDIATIONS HELD
JUNE 14, 1989 QUASHED IN COUNTY DUE TO TECHNICAL
ERROR.
JUNE 30, 1989 CONTRACT SIGNED.
JULY 31 , 1989 WE WERE ADVISED OF REPOSSESSION BY
LENDER.
AUGUST 8, 1989 REQUESTED HELP FROM TITLE COMPANY
TO IDENTIFY RESPONSIBLE PARTY.
BEPTEMBER 19, 1989 WEEKLY CHARGES ARE BEING FILED.
<222>
306 N. FIRST DON KREYMER (SUB-STANDARD HOUSE)
JANUARY 24, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
JANUARY 20, 1989 MET WITH JIM MCKNIGHT WITH KREYMER,
WE PERFORMED AN INSPECTION OF THE
HOUSE TOGETHER AND MADE OUT A
HOUSING CODE CHECK LIST.
JANUARY 24, 1989 MAILED MR. MCKNIGHT A COPY OF THE
CHECK LIST.
JANUARY 25, 1989 GREEN CARD RECEIVED.
FEBRUARY 21 , 1989 NO COMPLIANCE.
MARCH 29, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
APRIL 28, 1989 MR. KREYMER AND CITY STAFF MET FOR
MEDIATION AGREEMENTS.
MAY 5, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
JUNE 149 1989 QUASHED IN COUNTY DUE TO TECHNICAL
ERROR,
JUNE 30, 1989 CONTRACT SIGNED.
JULY 31 , 1989 WE WERE ADVISED OF REPOSSESSION BY
LENDER.
AUGUST 81 1989 REGUESTED HELP FROM TITLE COMPANY
TO IDENTIFY RESPONSIBLE PAR0:.
SEPTEMBER 19, 1989 WEEKLY CHARGES ARE BEING FILED.
<240>
206 N. SECOND K. C. SWAYZE QSUBSTANDARD HOUSING)
FEBRUARY 16, 1089 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
FEBRUARY 181 1989 ]REEN CARD RECEIVED.
MARCH 23, 1989 MR. SWAYZE ADVISED HE WOULD NEED 3
6? MONTHS TO COMPLY.
AUGUST 8, 1989 CHARGES TO BE FILED BY AUGUST 10,
1989.
AUGUST 11 , 1989 CHARGES FILED.
SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
<242>
301 N. SECOND HARTY C. WOOTEN (SUBSTANDARD HOUSE)
FEBRUARY 16, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
FEBRUARY 17, 1989 GREEN CARD RECEIVED.
APRIL 9, 1989 DEMO HAS BEEN STARTED.
MAY 12, 1989 INSPECTION SHOWED NO PROGRESS HAS
BEEN MADE. PHOTO TAKEN TO VERIFY
PROGRESS.
1989 CHARGES FILED.
JULY 7,
AUGUST 31 , 1989 COMPLAINTS HAVE NOT BEEN PROCESSED.
OCTOBER 2, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
<243>
300 W. BROWN JESSE HOUSEWRIGHT (SUBSTANDARD
HOUSE}
FEBRUARY 17, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
FEBRUARY 22, 1989 GREEN CARD RECEIVED.
APRIL 23, 1989 TIME EXPIRED.
MAY 5, 1989 NO SIGN OF REPAIRS OR DOME STARTED.
MAY 7, 1989 NO SIGN OF REPAIRS OR DOME STARTED.
JULY 7, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
AUGUST 31 , 198 HAS NOT GONE TO COURT.
SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
<248>
408a N. JACKSON DONALD DRAIN (SUBSTANDARD HOUSE)
FEBRUARY 17, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
FEBRUARY 17, 1989 MR. DRAIN CALLED ME AND STATED HE
HAD SEEN THE YELLOW TAGS ON THE
HOUSE AND WANTED TO KNOW WHY I
CONDEMNED THE HOUSE. I ADVISED I
HAD CONDEMNED FROM OUTSIDE
APPEARANCE.
FEBRUARY 17, 1989 MARK (NO LAST NAME) CALLED FROM 410
N. JACKSON AND WANTED TO KNOW WHY I
CONDEMNED THE HOUSE. I ASKED HIM
OF WHAT CONCERN IT WAS, ARE YOU ANY
RELATION TO THE OWNER. HE SAID NO,
HE WAS JUST CONCERNED ABOUT THE
HOUSE AND IF "DUSTY" (MR. DRAIN}
TORE THE HOUSE DOWN IF IT WOULD
FALL ON HIS. I TOLD MARK IF HE
TORE IT DOWN lT WOULD BE SO THAT IT
DIDN' T FALL ONTO HTS HOUSE BUT HE
mAY REMODEL AND HE ��5 THE OFTlO�.
HE REPLIED "OH HE �OES" . (YES)
MAR�' SrATED THAT HE WAS AFRAID HIF
HOUSE MAY BE NEXT, I TOLD MARK THAT
I INSPECTED THE AD\ UN TO HIS HOUSE
AND THAT HIS HOUSE WAS GOOD ENOUGH
AND DlDN` T HAVE TO WORRY.
NOTE: WHEN MR. DRAIN CALLED HE
TOLD ME THAT IT WAS FROM NExl DOOR.
FEBRUARY 17, l9B9 DRAIN ADVISED THAT HIS OFFICE WAS
IN THE HOUSE. I TOLD HIM
*�T �5E AN OFFICE 7HERE ANY4/,' ^
BE["LSE
;IOLAT]ON. I TOLD MR. DRAIN [p HE
-;70WISHED TO MEET ME AT TH�T HOU�E WE
COULD INSPECT IT TOGETHER AND I
WOULD GIVE HIM A COPY OF THE
HOUSING CHECK LIST. HE SAID THAT
HE HAS BEEN TRYING TO WORK ON THAT
HOUSE. I TOLD HIM THAT I HAVE
WATCHED THIS HOUSE FOR 8 MONTHS AND
HAVEN' T SEEN ANYTHING DONE TO IT.
I ASKED HIM AGAIN IF HE WOULD LIKE
TO MEET UP THERE AT 1 P. M. , HE
AGREED.
FEBRUARY 17, 1989 MR. DRAIN RECALLED THE OFFICE,
ASKED SECRETARY FRANCIS IF I WAS
ABOUT 575" . SHE REPLIED YES, HIS
REPLY WAS "OH GREAT' '
FEBRUARY 17, 1989 ADVISED MR. AKIN OF POSSIBLE
TROUBLE WITH THIS CASE. CAROLYN
JONES ADVISED THAT MR. DRAIN HAD
TRAVELED UNDER AN ALIAS, HAD SERVED
IN MILITARY PRISON FOR A. W. O. L.
OFFICER MAURIE ADVISED HE HAS DEALT
WITH THIS PARTY ON SEVERAL
OCCASIONS. HE HAS BEEN KNOW TO
HAVE RODE WITH THE HELLS ANGELS.
HE IS ALSO THE PARTY BEHIND THE
ALLEGATIONS OF ME STEALING AN A. C.
UNIT WHICH WAS LATER TURNED UP Al
302 S. THIRD. HE IS ALSO
ACQUAINTED WITH SIDNEY MOUNSE WHO I
HAD TEAR DOWN A GARAGE HE AND
RAYMOND STRICKLAND, WHO HAD SENT
THREATENING NOTES THROUGH MY WIFE.
MR. DRAIN" S GRANDFATHER HAS THE
WORKSHOP WHERE MOUNSE WORKED AFTER
HAVING HIM TEAR DOWN THE GARAGE.
FEBRUARY 21 , 1989 GREEN CARD RECEIVED.
APRIL 4, 1989 DON DRAIN CALLED AND ADVISED THAT
HE HADN' T BEEN ABLE TO WORK DUE TO
AN INJURY TO HIS FOOT BUT WILL
START AGAIN THIS WEEK WITH SIDING
BEING REPAIRED. HE STATED THAT HE
HAD REMOVED THE JUNK FROM THE HOUSE
AND WORKED ON PORCH PRIOR TO
GETTING HURT. I DID OBSERVE AN
ATTEMPT TO COMPLY FOR AWHILE. I
ADVISED MR. DRAIN TO KEEP ME
ADVISED AND AS LONG AS HE ATTEMPTED
WORK ON THE HOUSE, I WOULD WORK
WlTH HIM.
JULY 20, 1989 MR. DRAIN WAS INSTALLING SIDING.
AL/GUST 4, 1989 MR. DRAIN APPROACHED AND ASKED
PERMISSION TO MOVE AN ELDERLY LADY
INTO THE DOWNSTAIRS SECTION' I
ADVISED THAT SINCE THE PROGRESS HAD
BEEN STEADY I AGREED TO ALLOW USE
OF DOWNSTAIRS ONLy PROVIDED THE
HOUSE WAS TRIMMED AND PAINTED ANL
COMPLETED BY AUGUSl 31 , 1989,,
AUGUST 31 , 1989 ONLY PAlNTI�S �EM�,IN�
OCTOBER 18, 1989 STATUS IS SAME.
\26u>
337 S. SECOND GRETTA DUER (SUBSTANCARD GARAGE IN
REAR YARD) .
MARCH 1 , 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
MAY 9, 1989 DEMO HAS BEEN STARTED'
JUNE 12, 19B9 TOOK PHOTO 07 PROPERT/' NO
PROGRESS HAS �EEN q�Dn Slwnp MY
LAST IW5f'EL7! 0}i' ] � �! PRwrEsn,
MADE Bv `JUNE 30 CHAR&ES WILL BE
FILED'
`
JUNE 30, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
AUGUST 31 , 1989 COMPLAINTS HAVE NOT BEEN SIGNED.
OCTOBER 18, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
<296>
305 W. BROWN CAROLYN CHERRY BRIDGES (SUB
STANDARD
' APRIL 13, 1989 CERTIFIE»
APRIL 14, 1989 GREENxv J� ARIVED.
SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 TED.
OCTOBER 12, 1989 ���/ l��MPLIANCE
'
<419>
409 S. FOURTH T. W' P TURE
(WEEDS
JUNE 9, 1989 CERTIFoo
.
JUNE 26, 1989 NO . CHARGES FILED'
AUGUST 31 , 1989 HA TO COURT.
SEPTEMBER 10, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
<493>
402 VALENTINE !WEEDS)
JUNE 205 1989 CLERK UNABLE TO LOCATE OWNER.
JUNE 21 , 1989 LOCATED MANAGEMENT CO. FOR HOUSE.
WILL BE ADVISING BY CERTIFIED MAIL.
SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
OCTOBER 10, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
<527>
205 DUNCANWAY D. SPRAGLE (WEEDS)
JULY 11 , 1989 TALKED WITH MR. SPRAGLE. HE
ADVISED HE WOULD MOW BY
JULY 16, 1989.
SEPTEMBER IS, 1989 MORTGAGE COMPANY HAS TAKEN OVER
PROPERTY.
SEPTEMBER 19, 19B9 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED.
:•JC��y
•. 0
414 S. BALLARD K. MARTIN (WEEDS AND SUBSTANDARD
BUILDING)
JULY 14, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
JULY 25, 1989 MR. MARTIN CALLED AND ADVISED THAT
HE WOULD HAVE BUILDING TORN DOWN BY
AUGUST 15, 1989.
JULY 27, 1989 GRASS HAS BEEN MOWED.
AUGUST 15, 1989 BUILDING IS STILL AS IT WAS WHEN
COMPLAINT WAS ORIGINATED.
SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 DEMOLITION STARTED.
OCTOBER ::: 1989 STATUS IS SAME. NO FURTHER ATTEMPT
HAS BEEN MADE TO FINISH DEMOLITION.
RUSTIC TRAIL & 3412 CAPITAL BANK (WEEDS)
JULY 10, 1989 ADVISED BY A SOURCE THAT CAPITAL
BANK MAY BE RESPONSIBLE.
JULY 12, 198:9 CALLED AND SPOKE WITH NANCY. SHE
ADVISED SHE WOULD CHECK TO SEE IF
THEY OWN IT AND CALL ME BACK TODAY.
JULY 14, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
JULY 17, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIVED.
JULY 26, 19 COMPLIANCE DUE.
AUGUST - 1989 PHOTOGRAPHED PROPERTY TO FILE
CHARGES. CALLED BADE: F NAME OF
PRESIDENT. THEY A ) AT.
BLUEBONNET BAI'dF- c CAPITAL
ASSETS.
S E aocTS. ( ! vE TO START CASE
OVER. iota t
U 1989F'ROPEF INSPECTED NO
AUK: _'�T �9, . COMPLIANCE.
AUGUST __ , 1':='9 ATTEMPTED CONTACT WITH MR. MORSACK
TO ADVISE HIM THAT I WAS FREPARIi'•.[;
TO FILE: CHARGES AND TO GIVE HIM THE
OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE SOMEONE aE THERE
TO MOW BY AUGUST 31 , 1999
! MR. MORSACK .L L AND- 9 1 '`�-* CALLED AD',%I:Ft;-?
CLAUDE HART I NG IS HANDLING THIS
CASE AND HE WOULD HAVE MR. HARDING
CONTACT ME.
T E a r- -8 9 I i
�E'F ± c.i:.c{E:�� 1:T. I.9�, : 1 h•± COMPLIANCE.
• .. n
r-+ r
413 GASTON 1 ,.ANSAM R I. A 1 (WEE.
MI 1989
._.....
CERTIFIED
AUGUST 10 1 ,� —, CEf F 1:F- 1EE MAisL. RECEIVED.
,.•,. I; is ' `'89 CHARGES FILED.
r,.
415 GASTON i RAN'_AMEF I C r'1N (WEEDS)
JUL.. , 1 , c 1:_ ;8c CERTIFIED M L_ :,
_ MAIEl.11 :,
AUGUST 10. 1929 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIVED.
_I _U ! ._ I ._ ".HOT OGr�l-FH:. TAKEN.
i:i_i 1 L.. -::!-IAR6ES FILED.
Z.3 I V
<559>
1102 S. BALLARD
JULY 31 , 1989 D-. .AIL SENT
0K`w ~��`_^. ^� ,
SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
<56O/
1102 S. BALLARD (JUNK At
JULY 31 1989
'
SEPTEMBER IS, 1989 Pik lANCE.
<562>
403 VALENTINE J. MIKELS (WEEDS)
JULY 31 , 1989 ATTEMPTED PHONE CONTACT-NO ANSWER.
AUGUST 89 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
AUGUST 23, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT TO MORTGAGE CO.
THAT FORECLOSED ON PROPERTY.
AUGUST 30, 1989 CERTIFIED NOTICE RECEIVED.
OCTOBER 71 1989 CHARGES FILED.
<563>
409 WILLOW WAY J. MIKELS (WEEDS)
JULY 319 1989 ATTEMPTED PHONE CONTACT-NO ANSWER.
AUGUST 8, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
AUGUST 91 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIVED.
AUGUST 22, 1989 ADVISED PROPERTY HAD BEEN
FORECLOSED ON. MAILED CERTIFIED
LETTER TO SOUTHLAND MORTGAGE CO.
AUGUST 30, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIVED.
OCTOBER 75 1989 CHARGES FILED.
<574>
107 S. BIRMlNGHAM G. WEBB (SUBSTANDARD STORAGE
BUILDING)
AUGUST 3, 19% CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
AUGUST 4, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIVED.
AUGUST 7, 1989 MR. WEBB CAME IN AND REQUESTED AN
EXTENSION ON DEMOLISHING THE
BUILDING. HE WANTED TO KNOW IF I
THOUGHT HE COULD FIX IT UP. I SET
UP A MEETING FOR AUGUST B, 1989 TO
LOOK OVER BUILDING MORE THOROUGHLY.
AUGUST B, 1989 I ATTEMPTED CONTACT TWICE TODAY.
<s76 �
ALLEY BEHIND GASTON B. ABBOTT (WEEDS)
AUGUST it , 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
AUGUST 14, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIVED.
SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
<577>
103 W. WINDING OAKS SAVINGS OF TEXAS
AUGUST 8, 1989 CERTIFI
AUGUST 10, 1989 lVED
AUGUST 30, 1989 ATT���T��PO~—ACT WITH MR' NEWTOWN
TO SEE IF HE WOULD MOW PROPERTY.
OCTOBER 8, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
<583>
413 N. JACKSON J. JACKSON (JUNK MOTOR VEHICLE)
AUGUST 14, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SEN
T
�
AUGUST 15, 1989 CERTIFIE
AUGUST 25, 1989 PHOT
AUGUST 251 1989 CHAR IILED.
OCTOBER 11 , 1989 VEHICLE HAS BEEN REMOVED.
<589>
331 HILLTOP C. MOORE (LIMBS IN ALLEY)
AUGUST 14, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
AUGUST 23, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIVED.
AUGUST 25, 1989 ADVISED OF A NEW OWNER.
SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED.
<591 >
305 DOGWOOD D. KREYMER (WEEDS)
AUGUST 14, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
AUGUST 15, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIVED.
AUGUST 29, 1989 PHOTOGRAPHED.
AUGUST 30, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 CHARGES FILED.
�592>
402 W. OAK H. HOG ICLE)
AUGUST 14, 1989 CERQJWI ~-~
OCTOBER 2° 1989 IN I�q�P��4 �"~
��� "==.Cc.
RETAIL STRIP OF
POINT NORTH V. KREYhER (WEEDS)
AUGUST 16, 1989 CERTIFIED
AUGUST 18, 1989 CERTIFIED
AU6UST 25, 1989
AUGUST 25, 1989
AUGUsT 30, 198 MR. NWMER CALLED AND ADVISED HE
MOW BY SEPTEMBER 1 , 1989.
OCTOBER 29 1989 NUMEROUS CHARGES HAVE BEEN FILED.
OCTOBER 8, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
<602>
105-113 S. WINDING OAKS D. KREYMER (JUNK N.0 DEBRIS)
AUGUST 17, 1989 CERTIFIED
AUGUST 18, 1989 CE ` ' ED
AUGUST 25 1989 m�� � =`���^` ^
, 0�� �� `� n�u.
AUGUST 25, 1989 ���A 'GES FILED.
OCTOBER 8, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
<610>
701 S. BIRMINGHAM C. PEACOCK (SUBSTANDARD HOUSE)
AUGUST 18, 1989 PICTURE TAKEN.
AUGUST 18, 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL SENT.
AUGUST 21 , 1989 MRS. PEACOCK CALLED IN TO FIND OUT
WHY HOUSE WAS CONDEMNED. SHE DID
NOT LEAVE PHONE NUMBER FOR ME TO
RETURN THE CALL.
AUGUST 28, 1989 RUCKER LEWIS CALLED AND WANTED TO
KNOW WHAT REPAIRS WERE NEEDED. I
ADVISED HIM OF HOUSE LEVELING,
REPLACE BROKEN WINDOWS, REPLACE THE
PLYWOOD UNDERPENDING WITH AN
APPROVED MATERIAL, ADD FLOOR
COVERING AND I STATED IN THE
CONDITION OF THE ENTIRE SHINGLE
SIDING WAS IN, I COULD NOT FORCE
HIM TO PAINT THE HOUSE, BUT IF HE
DID REPAIR IT, I WOULD APPRECIATE
HIM PAINTING IT. HE WANTED TO CALL
ME LATER AND SET UP AN APPOINTMENT
TO REVIEW THE REPAIRS NEEDED.
<612>
419 N. WINDING OAK R. C. FISHER tW
AUGUST 25, 1989 AlW LEFT
M COWIE
CORDER'
OCTOBER B, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
<613>
418 KYLIE CUSTOMAX (WEEDS)
AUGUST 24, 1989 ATTEMPTED PHONE CONT . THE
NUMBER I ORRECT'
MAIL
AUGUST 30, 1989 IEn~` IL SENT.
SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 I�� COMPLIANCE.
501 KYLIE D. KREYMER (WEEDS/
AUGUST 29, 1989 CERTIFI
AUGUST 3l , 1989 CEP IsApup
~-
OCTOBER 8, 1989 IN ���P���\ICE.
<616>
406,412,427,430 KAMBER D. KREYMER (WEEDS)
AUGUST 24, 1989 MORTGAGE CO. ADV EBLIC
SERVICE TH• T LD SEE TO IT
THAT i O •o MOWED.
AUGUST 29, 1989 NO C 'E. CERTIFIED MAIL
O SENT D. KREYNER.
AUGUST 31 ., 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIVED.
OCTOBER 8, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE,
i
421 , 423, 425
N. WINDING OAKS D. KRE'i MER (WEEDS)
AU ._ID F 2.4, 198 MORTGAGE CO. ADVI :l L_Il:
SERVICE THA
V trk zIE TO I I
THAT t • A- MOWED
AUGUST 29, 19;'89 NO Cl, L RCE. CERTIFIED MAIL
SENT TO D. KF.EYMER.
AUGUST 31 , 1`=89 CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIVED.
OCTOBER 8, 1'TS'7 1.i'J COhir'i_Ir=ii•JLE.
c.18j.
420, 422, 424, 426 KYLIE D. F::REYMER (WEEDS)
AUGUST 24, 1989 MORTGAGE CO. ADVISED U� BLIC
SERVICE THAT TH Y 'J '{ 1+ TO I T
THAT F'ROF: ClkS- Il v )-
AUGUST 29, 1989 NO F'. 0 _ CERTIFIED MAIL
SEh'J KREYMER
AUGUST 31 , 1989 CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIVED.
OCTOBER 8, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
1':
' Z (WEEDS)
#.�1 STEEL RD. _. DID-i.�
AUGUST 25 1989 CERTIFIED MA
1 4
iL
AUGUST. 31 , 1 85 } R ZL i� lilt[�
Gi
SEFTLMtLR , 1,� r, !OIAh.4'�E.
620
18, 20, 24, 26 DECKER CT. M. W. PROPER , I 9!:71siriE S
like ,
!' f
AUGUST 31 , 1989 lQ IA .- F�
LOT 1 , BLK B JACOBS ADD. D. C. AUTO !.
AUGUST ? 1 C-_ci; _ER', IF
T
! ; i
SEETEMDER 8, 1989
0C , OSE_.R Y, 1969 !1.J' .: AN E,
77
<624>
LOT 28,BLK A STEEL RD. D. DAVIDSON (WEEDS)
AUGUST 29, 1989 CERTI ~
SEPTEMBER 7 1989 Nfti �6
��, ` ' m ����-T�El��IVEDSEPTEMBER 14, 1989 I ����^NCE. ^
<625>LOT 1 & 2 OF
HELMBERGER ADDITION D. HELMBERGER (
AUGUST 29, 1989 CERTIFIED � ��
AUGUST 30 1989 CE � ," '
, apNCE.
�@�uL nECEIVED.
SEPTEMBER 25, 1989 I
<626>
LOT 14 OF REGENCY M. STEEL (WE
AUGUST 29, 1989 CERTIFIED "
. � ~_
AUGUST 30, 1989 CERT '` IVED.
SEPTEMBER 25, 1989 IN �^&� , ---
. '��v�� ~ ^
<627>
401 W. OAK D. KR
AUGUST 29, 1989 CERTIFIED
AUGUST 30, 1989 CER T I ECEI. ED.
OCTOBER 85 1989 I .
<628>
PRESIDENTIAL ESTATES D. KREYMER (WEEDS)
AUGUST 29, 1989 CERTIFIED MA q�� ^
AUGUST 30, 1989 CERT F �
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1989 IN t
� ^
uw ~
<632>
121 FAIRMOUNT S. COBB (WEEDS)
SEPTEMBER 15, 1989 NOTICE OF ILED.
SEPTEMBER 20, 1989 ` � VISED
J�--AVCTIONED OFF 9-5-89
ADVISED NAME OF MORTAGE
«��j�. 14, s COMPANY.
<634>
KREYMER LN & HWY 78
AUGUST 28, 1989 ��
�� � �" r�r -
�
��"~^
<635>
PICADILLY & BROWN
WYNDHAM IV SUBDIVSION (WEEDS)
AUGUST 30, 1989 CONTACTED SUBJECT WHO CAN AND WILL
ADVISE ME �EPTEMBER 1 , 1989 OF
.
SEPTEMBER 14 1989
, 0M MAILED.
SEPTEMBER 28, 1989 �0�m - IANCE.
<638>
311 S. THIRD M. TATCHER (THEFT OF SERVICE)
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1989 SPOKE TO TATCHER HE ED WATER
WAS ON WHEN HE Mm I ADVISED
THAT HE WO L/T UP
K =�N�° ,
�� - -
DEPOS 1� ��'\' , L ��AGE TODAY OR I
WOULD��A�- O FILE. ALSO HAVE METER
DEPT. LOCK METER UNTIL SUCH TIME.
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1989 PAID ALL FEES.
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
<639>
2801 W. 544 R. VARNEER (WEEDS)
SEPTEMBER 9, 1989 N IVED.
��^� 0&& 8�UK ���
- ~'' ���� /� �� ���Y�� Vy-�» m����
<640>
307 W. BROWN R. MILLER (DEMO. WITHOUT PERMIT)
SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 MRS. MILLER ADVISED THAT A
CONTRACTOR HAD AGREED TO TEAR DOWN
A STORAGE BUILDING AND REBUILD IT
FOR $200. THE SUBJECT DEMOLISHED
THE STORAGE BUILDING USING KARATE
SKILLS. AFTER BEING PAID $150 BY
MRS. MILLER, THE SUBJECT ADVISED
MRS. MILLER HOW GOOD HE WAS WITH
KARATE AND THAT HE HAD BROKEN THE
LEG OF ONE OF HIS TEACHERS. MRS.
MILLER TOOK THIS AS A THREAT BY THE
WAY THE SUBJECT PRESENTED HIMSELF.
THE SUBJECT NEVER RETURNED TO
COMPLETE THE JOB.
SEPTEMBER 7, l989 THROUGH RESEARCH ON THIS SUBJECT I
HAVE LOCATED PLACE OF FULL TIME
EMPLOYMENT BUT NO HOME ADDRESS.
SEPTEMBER 8, 1989 MRS. MILLER PHONED AND ASKED THAT I
DO NOT DO ANYTHING. SHE IS AFRAID
THE SUBJECT MAY HARM HER.
<641 >
PROPERTY BETWEEN THIRD T ' SMITH (WEEDS)
AND POURTH ON HWY. 78
SEF [EMBER 7, 1989 1POkE WITH MR. SMITH ABOUT MOWING
PROPERTY. HE ADVISED THAT HE HAD
TOMEONE TO DO IT BUT HE DIDN' T KNOW
-
WHEN HE WE MRS.
SM �� "NhNE| BY 9-11-89
W1/%4- * / BY MAIL. )
SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
�642>
LAKESIDE VILLAGE APTS.
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1989 MEET WITH A CONTRACTOR FOR
MANAGEMENT COMPANY. ADVISED AND
SHOWED HIM WHERE GROUND WIRES
NEEDED CONNECTING. ALSO SHOWED HIM
THE AREA WHERE CONDENSATION WATER
WAS RUNNING DOWN EXTERIOR Wt`,LLS.
ADVISED OF AREA WHERE SEWER
CLEANOUT NEEDED CUPPED.
SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 NO ATTEMPT TO COMPLY HAD BEN EN MADE.
ADVISED CHRISTY MILLS I WATED THE
SEWER CLEANOUT CUPPED TODAY AND
THAT WAS NO REASON FOR CAUSING THE
OCCUPANTS IN THAT AREA TO SMELL
SEWER. I SUBMITTED IN WRITTEN FORM
AND DIRECTIVE TO REPAIR LINE.
SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 SEWER CLEANOUT WAS REPAIRED.
SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED.
S E
EPTEMBR 15, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION RECEIVED.
<643>
408 DUNCANWAY ( � l �k ������
u ��� ��8���_
SEPTEMBER .1. 1989 I^& . ^' , ' -
<644>
600 E. OAK T. RUT H I N G E R (SUBSTD
S Er`
TEMBER 11 , 1989 MRS' RUTH AIRS
WITH ME' AM
�~
SEPTEMBER 14 1989 NOTIC ��^
, ���� _,"�� ' ION MAILED.
SEPTEMBER 16, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION RECEIVED.
OCTOBER 6, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
<645>
TR�CT 34 ABST 82O E. W' SWITZER
SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED.
SEPTEMBER 19, 1989 MR. SWITZER CALLED AND ADV]SED NEW
OWNERS. PHONED DEP. GUARANTEE. THEY
WERE TO RETURN CALL.
646
HWY. 78 E. OF LAWN BOYD (WEEDS)
MOWER REPAIR SHOP
SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED.
SEPTEMBER 15. 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION REC I
SEPTEMBER 15. 1989 MR. BOYD CALLED AN AT HE
WAS GROWING �'F-I :r1 ADVISED
I-!I M THAN �,' -�`��', '��,` " ' HERS WERE
GROWING AND HAD ALREADY BAILED
TWICE THIS YEAR. ALSO ADVISED HIM
THAT WE WOULD APPRECIATE IT„
SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 IH COMPLIANCE.
PROPERTY BETWEEN ALPHA OMEGA FLOORS AND HOMETOWN
ABST c:•Gc TRACT 196 F',: ME
EEP (�_11rEF: 149 i'-';� N M O h �EL_EL�.
SEPTEMBER 22, 1989 N T CE OF VIOLATION RECEIVED.
648?'
R. O. W. PIRATE DRIVE ;JUNK:: MOTOR VEHICLE)
SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 REFERRED TO POLICE OFFICER *41 C
649
110 COLLEGE I . REV I L_LA (,J UNf:. MOTOR VEHICLE)
SEPTEMBER 14. 1 T,C9 NOT I CE. OF VIOLATION MAILED.
SEPTEMBER 15. 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION RECEIVED.
f, ,9 S. -"11-``.SON
D, RE:YMER \UN LAWFUL OCL LFA NC
SEPTEMBER 17,, 1989 IT WAS REPORTED THAT SEVERAL
SUBJECTS . .
WERE ATI.EMPTINS 1_0 OC:CUP',::
SUBSTANDARD
r�Ti\�.
A .SUBS E ANDARD HOUSE. M'r.
INVESTIGATION SHOWED NO
SUBSTANT I AT{E THESE CLAIMS.
Lam'i
LP- .:: :'E 12
9r fir-., INIli-C--OMPLIANCE -r-
-_EL- '{:,i;r- - ,cis
Hi PE. CLEAN.
V
<652>
1206 DEVONSHIRE EMPI 'm»OPAMEEDS)
SEPTEMBER 15, 1989 c �� �� / I IO AILED.
SEPTEMBER 19, 1989 Owr `~ OF VIOLATION RECEIVED.
OCTOBER 6 1989 g
, IN COMPLIANCE.
<653>
413 KAMBER (FENCE)
SEPTEMBER 16, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION RECEIVED.
SEPTEMBER 18, 1989 MET WITH MRS. BAILEY. ADVISED HER
T '^- ' '� `� HAT DEVIDED
T .~.� �_0v^ .V��@�9ED
ST�AI `� ` -/lED UP) . SHE REQUESTED 30
oc� \ 61� ve DAY EXTENSION. IT WAS GRANTED.
Cpw°10 � '����
<654>
417 KAMBER (FENCE)
SEPTEMBER 15, 1989 NOT
SEPTEMBER 16, 1989 MRS �40
Lclf`�AIL
STED A
D rENSION. TIME WAS GRANTED.
COIVIPIW4--�C�C
<655>
205 N. BALLARD G. VAUGHN (SIGN>
SEPTEMBER 15, 1989 CALLED AND TALKED T
ADVISED �BLIC
PROPERTY DAND MUST BE
RE / . 11',—AS POSSIBLE' SHE
AD D -,HE WOULD TELL MR. VAUGHN'
SEPTEMBER 15, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
<65�>
600 BLk GRAHAM CT. D.
SEPTEMBER 19, 1989 ElLED.
SEPTEMBER 22, 1989 I�'�` ~�ON RECEIVED'
SEPTEMBER 25, 1989 ~- CTOR ADVISED LOTS WOULD B�
MOWED TODAY.
<657>
6(�o BLK GRAHAM CT. D. KREYMER (WEEDS)
SEPTEMBER 19, 1989 NOTICE OF VI ILED'
SEPTEMBER
�-owl CEIVED'
SEPTEMBER 25, 1989 N �n� �" ' S WOULD BE
~~
�OWED TODAY.
<65B>
T. U. EASEMENT
PR NORTH � �^
SEPTEMBER 19 1989 ������ `-
, vD
�/ �TION MAILED'
SEPTEMBER 22, 1989 ��I E OF VIOLATION RECEIVED.
SEPTEMBER 29, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
<659>
605 S. BIRMINGHAM P. VEHICLE)
SEPTEMBER 19, 1989 ILED'
SEPTEMBER 26, 1989 ATION RECEIVED'
OCTOBER 2, 1989 I� COMPLIANCE.
<660>
605 S. BIRMINGHAM P. BARDIN (SUBSTD. HOUSE)
SEPTEMBER 19, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED.
(661 >
632 STONEYBROOK J. PAYNE (WEEDS)
SEPTEMBER 19, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED.
SEPTEMBER 21 , 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION RECEIVED.
SEPTEMBER 26, 1989 LETTER RETURNED WITH MORTGAGE CO.
INFORMATION.
SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED.
OCTOBER 2, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION RECEIVED.
<662>
416 KYLIE L. W. SELF (WEEDS
SEPTEMBER 19, 1989 LED.
SEPTEMBER 22, 1989
OCTOBER 2, 1989 0I ~COMPLIANCE.
/663>
705 COOPER (JUNK MOTOR VEHICLE)
SEPTEMBER 22, 1989 PHOTOGRAPHED.
<664>
706 COOPER ( ZONING JUNK YARD)
SEPTEMBER 22, 1989 PHOTOGRAPHED.
<665>
709 COOPER ( ZONING JUNK YARD)
SEPTEMBER 22, 1989 PHOTOGRAPHED.
<666>
401 S. BALLARD K. RAINS (BLDG. WITHOUT PERMIT)
SEPTEMBER 22, 1989 TALKED WITH A 1TE WHO
ADV U ���LACING
.KA0oFv
^
/ �� ��n����LUE TH` '~~
E WORK DID
REQUIRE A MIN. PERMIT.
SEPTEMBER 26, 1989 PERMIT WAS PULLED.
<667>
504, 506 N. GASTON R. HOSTETLER (WEJD�133 %;
SEPTEMBER 26, 1989 MR. HF OUGHT D.
KREY E LOTS MOWED,
HOWE���� HE WOULD TRY AND GET
SOMEONE TO MOW THEM BEFORE THE END
OF THE WEEK.
<668>
308 W. OAK R. COOLEY (JUNK MOTOR VEHICLE)
SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED.
OCTOBER 21 1989 MR. COOLEY C VISED HE
HAD A CURRENT REGISTRATION � -� � ��K�� T ATTACHED
HE AGREED TO LEAVE THE TAG �'' ^ ` ^- - — `
&&�� ��� l COULD VERIFY IT.
OCTOBER 39 1989 V�0��FIED.
OCTOBER 3, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
<669>
707 S. BALLARD I ' BARKER (WEEDS)
SEPTEMBER 27 1989 'At
" �� --ILED'
<670>
TRAILS PLACE (JUNK & DEBRIS)
SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 CONTACTED A REPRESENTATIVE WITH
F. D. I . C. . HE ADVISED HE DID NOT
HAVE CONTROL OF THAT LOT.
<671 >
210 RUSH CREEK H. TIBBALS (WEEDS)
SEPTEMBER 22, 1989 ATTEMPTED CONTACT. HE WAS NOT IN.
SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 ATTEMPTED CONTACT AGAIN.
OCTOBER 3, 1989 CALLED AND ADVISED MOWER WAS DOWN
BUT HE WOULD NOT TAKE CARE OF
PROPERTIES.
<672>
215 RUSH CREEK D. KREYMER (WEEDS)
SEPTEMBER 22, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED.
<673>
217 RUSH CREEK H. TIBBALS (W
SEPTEMBER 22" 1989 AFFMCD '.lSEPTEMBER 27 1989 M � /OCTOBER 3, 1989 C � -ED AND ADVISED MOWER WAS DOWN
BUT HE WOULD NOT TAKE CARE OF
PROPERTIES.
<674>
216 RUSH CREEK H. TIBBALS (WEEDS)
SEPTEMBER 22, 1989 ATT T -
SEPTEMBER 27 1989 AT �8�l
" � �L »���
OCTOBER 3, 1989 CAL *Nm ADVISED MOWER WAS DOWN
BUT HE WOULD NOT TAKE CARE OF
PROPERTIES.
<675>
103-211 RUSH CREEK H. TIBBALS (WEED0
SEPTEMBEP 22, 1989 ATT T - .1-
SEPTEMBEP 27, 1989 AT! T
OCTOBER 5, 1989 CAL P61I1-1 AINA,OWN BUT
HE WOULD NOT TAKE CARE OF
PROPERTIES'
;
<676>
606 E. OAK B. RUSHIN (WEEDS)
SEPTEMBER 20, 1989 CALLED MRS. RUSHIN. SHE ADVISED SHE
WOULD GET SOON AS
PO SSW � wcEs
OCTOBER 6, 1989 IN ���P�������~ --
<677>
B04 DOUGLAS CT. D. GARRIOTTE ( ZONING, GARAGE
CONVERSION)
SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED.
SEPTEMBER 28, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION RECEIVED.
SEPTEMBER 29, 1989 MR. GARRIOTTE CALLED AND ADVISED HE
WAS NOT AWARE OF ANY SUCH
ORDINANCE. HE FELT SINCE HE HAD THE
STRUCTURE FOR 5 YEARS THAT IT
SHOULD BE GRANDFATHERED. I ADVISED
HIM THAT IT WAS NOT AND ADVISED HE
SPEAK TO MR. FAIRES TO DISCUSS WHAT
BOARD HE COULD APPEAL TO AND FEES.
<678>
200 BLK. DOUGLAS F. D. I . C. (WEEDS)
SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 ATTEMPTED CONTACT WITH
REPRESENTATIVE OF F. D. I . C. . SHE WAS
NOT IN. LEFT MESSAGE FOR HER TO
CALL.
SEPTEMBER 29, 1989 ATTEMPTED CONTACT WITH SAME PARTY.
NOT AVAILABLE. LEFT MESSAGE.
3, 1989 AGAIN ATTEMPTED CONTACT AND LEFT
OCTOBER
ANOTHER MESSAGE TO RETURN MY CALL.
<679>
508 STONEYBROOK H. BLACK
�CTOBER 4, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED
OCTOBER 12, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION RECEIVED
<680>
506 VALEN�'INE C' KING (PLMBG/
O�TOBER 3, 1989 LEFT CARD ADVISING RESI�ENT TO
CALL. OUR INSPECTION D THE
PROPERT ��M Ah
APP PEISLAB OR AT
A N IB'
UCTOBER 3, 1989 MRS. w��NG CALLED AND I ADVISED HER
SHE HAS 7 DAYS TO REPAIR LEAK.
OCTOBER 4, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
3 5 S SECOND H E M( -��� 4
u��� ��~�1�U . PERMIl )
O�T�BER 4, 1989 INSPECTION SHOWE.D ONLY WINDOWS WERE
REPLACED. MET WITH OWNER. HE
REPLACING CARPET AND PAINTING.
- ^ OCTOBER 4» 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
<682> AI 710 ��ORFORK (WEEU�I CoMpUANCE
<683>
303 W. JEFFERSON M. HOUSEWRIGH�'P*F'qVIOLATIONS.
E SIGN ON
POLE ��
OCTOBER 6 1989 SMOVED
,
' /��� SIGNS.
OCTOBER 6, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
<684>
J09 QUAIL CREEK P. SPURGIN (NO PERMI GAR
SALE)
OCTOBER 6, 1989 ADVI WtED PERMIT
FOR ����E.- RESIDENT SENT HER SON TO
PURCHASE PERMIT,
OCTOBER 6, 1989 IN COMPLIANCE.
' 6B�)
200 STONE ROAD J. BRANNON (LIMBS)
<6B6>
704 S' BALLARD (LIMBS)
OCTOBER 10, 1989 INT `' E ���� �F' ��IOLATION'
SUB REMOVED OFFENDING PROPERTY
PRIOR TO NOTICE.
OCTOBER 10, 1989 IN COMF'LIANCE.
<687>
GO2 S. BALLARD R. DELOROSA (LIMBS)
<68B>
1z2 LIBERTY H. SPENCE (WEEDS)
OCTOBER 10, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED.
OCTOBER 13, 1989 �R. SPENCE CALLED. ADVISED
HAD CONTROL OF PROPERTY.
O�TOBER �3, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MAILED TO
F. D. I . C.
��TU£ER 16, 1989 NOTICE OF VIOLATION RECEIVED'
(689>
106 S' RU�TIC TRAIL M. AMMONF (WEEDS)
OCrO��� 10, 1989 �H�NE CO�T4CT MADE �lTH MR5^
AMMON5. SH� ADVISED 5HE WOUL� G�l
PROPERTv MJWED.
(690)
202 N. RUSTIC TRAIL AMERICAN OMEGA ENERGY CO. (WEED5)
<�91 >
� �� �. �/USTlC TRAIL R. C. FISHEF ,WEEDS)
� �
102, 104 S. RUSTIC TRAIL AMERICAN OMEGA ENERGY CO. (w±±06/
' ~
<693>
108 S. RUSTIC TRAIL AMERICAN OMEGA ENERGY CO. (WEEDS)
<694>
1945 E. BROWN J. COFFER (WEEDS)
OCTOBER 111 19% TALKED WITH MRS. COFFER. SHE
ADVISED SHE THOUGHT IT HAD BEEN
TAKEN CARE OF. HOWEVER SHE WOULD
SEE TO IT THAT IT WAS MOWED.
<695>
512 E. STONE CIRCLE PUBLIC ROW (WEEDS)
OCTOBER 91 1989 REFERRED TO PUBLIC WORKS.
<696>
3V8 MEMORIAL D
OCTOBER 51 1989 �.����� I W"%-�- WORKS.
n� �---
OCTOBER 12 1989 � unPLIANCE