Ordinance 2014-29ORDINANCE NO. 2014-29
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE,
TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -25; SETTING A PUBLIC
HEARING FOR OCTOBER 14, 2014 TO DISCUSS AND REVIEW
UPDATES TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN OF THE CITY OF
WYLIE, TEXAS AND THOROUGHFARE IMPACT FEES ASSESSED BY
THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY MANAGER OR HER DESIGNEE TO NOTIFY THE PUBLIC OF
SUCH PUBLIC HEARING; PROVIDING FOR REPEALING, SAVINGS
AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE HEREOF.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas ( "City Council ") adopted
Ordinance No. 2014 -25 setting a public hearing for September 23, 2014 to discuss and review
updates to the Capital Improvements Plan of the City of Wylie, Texas ( "Wylie ") and the
thoroughfare impact fees assessed by Wylie in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local
Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has investigated and determined that it is necessary to
reschedule the public hearing for October 14, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby amends Ordinance No. 2014 -25 as set forth below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE WYLIE CITY COUNCIL:
SECTION 1: Findings Incorporated. The findings set forth above are incorporated into
the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2: Amendment to Ordinance No. 2014 -25. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 2014-
25 is hereby amended as follows:
"On the 14th day of October, 2014 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber of
the Wylie Municipal Complex, 300 Country Club Road, Wylie, Texas, the City
Council will hold a public hearing giving all interested persons the right to appear
and be heard on proposed updates and amendments to the thoroughfare impact
fees assessed by Wylie and to Wylie's Capital Improvements Plan.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the above stated date for public hearing may be
changed to any other date(s) that is in accordance with law and for which notice is
provided in accordance with law, if it is determined by the City Manager, or her
designee, that good reason exists for changing said date."
SECTION 3: Notice of Hearing. The Wylie City Manager, or her designee, is hereby
authorized and directed to cause notice of such hearing to be published in one or more
newspapers of general circulation in Collin, Rockwall and Dallas Counties and to send notice by
certified mail to any person who has given written notice by certified or registered mail to the
Ordinance No. 2014 -29
Amending Ordinance No. 2014 -25 (Hearing on Thoroughfare Impact Fee Amendments) Page 1
653576.1
City Manager requesting notice of such hearing within two (2) years preceding the date this
resolution is adopted in accordance with Section 395.049 of the Texas Local Government Code.
Said notices shall be published and mailed before the 30th day before the date of the public
hearing.
SECTION 4: Repealing/Savings. All provisions of any ordinance in conflict with this
Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent they are in conflict, but such repeal shall not abate
any pending prosecution for violation of the repealed ordinance, nor shall the repeal prevent a
prosecution from being commenced for any violation if occurring prior to the repeal of the
ordinance. Any remaining portions of said ordinances shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 5: Severability. Should any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of
this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional and/or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it
is expressly provided that any and all remaining portions of this Ordinance shall remain in full
force and effect. Frisco hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each
section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof regardless of whether any one or more
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and /or phrases may be declared unconstitutional and/or
invalid.
SECTION 6: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
its adoption.
DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE WYLIE CITY COUNCIL on the 9th
day of September, 2014.
yl ' ,
Eric Hogue, a o
ATTEST:
OF
Carole Ehrlich, C' ecretary
,► "' ` i t 1. , > .
Published in the Wylie News on September 17, 2014. oo F. E R*A
s Ntn 4r
TE OF
81'9Tp OF TES
Ordinance No. 2014 -29
Amending Ordinance No. 2014 -25 (Hearing on Thoroughfare Impact Fee Amendments) Page 1
653576.1
CITY OF WYLIE
THOROUGHFARE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
ROADWAY IMPACT FEES
The first step in the development impact fee process is the development of a 10 -year Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP). This capital improvement plan includes projects intended for
construction by the City of Wylie in the next 10 years to serve existing and future development.
Existing Facilities
The City of Wylie arterial and major collector street system is partially developed at this time.
Several roadways in developed areas are partially built to current thoroughfare plan standards.
Many existing streets are two -lane (20' - 40' width) asphalt roadways with open surface drainage.
The existing major arterial roadways within the City include State Highway 78 (SH 78), FM 544,
FM 1378, Ballard Avenue, Brown Street, and Stone Road. Several of the arterial roadways
including SH 78 and FM 544 are under the operation and maintenance jurisdiction of the Texas
Department of Transportation (TxDOT).
Proposed Facilities
The City of Wylie adopted a revised Comprehensive Plan in 2012 and an updated thoroughfare plan
in 2014 that is the basis for development of the future street system. The thoroughfare system is a
conventional network conforming to a hierarchical, functional classification system developed to
support the forecast traffic demands of future land use.
The highest classification of roadway is the Principal Thoroughfare type facility. These roadways
are generally multiple lanes (4 or 6) with medians that serve the function of controlling access,
separating opposing traffic movements and providing an area for the storage of left turning vehicles.
The lower classifications are the collector facilities that are developed to serve the adjoining
development. The character of the developments served should determine the sizes and alignments
of collector roadways.
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 1
Capital Improvement Plan for Roadway Impact Fees
The thoroughfare facilities determined for inclusion in the Capital Improvement Plan of this study
are tabulated in Table 1A and graphically illustrated in Figure 1. Each listed project includes a
description of the planned improvements, the approximate project length, and an engineer's opinion
of probable cost to the City. In addition, under existing State Statute, a municipalities' cost
associated with TxDOT facilities can be financed with impact fees. All roadways included in the
2014 CIP are identified in the City of Wylie Thoroughfare Plan. Recoupment costs for projects
completed as part of the previous CIP are shown in Table 1B and are also illustrated in Figure 1.
The engineer's opinions of probable construction cost were prepared without the benefit of a
detailed preliminary engineering study for each project. The costs are based on data provided by
the City of Wylie and on roadway project construction bids. Financing costs for the projects in the
thoroughfare CIP were also included in the total estimated cost and the interest rate of 5% was
provided by the City of Wylie.
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 2
C
f6
a
C
O G7
E
> a
Q
ad
d
f6 V
U-
0. a
m
U
i r
m CD
s cV
O i
O w
t O
r
1
a
G1
r
F-
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
O O
o O
o 0
0 0
0 o
0 0
0 0
(D 0
0 0
0 L7
In
U
W
0 0
O ltl
0 0
O Lo
0 0
L) V7
o o
V V
o o
M m
o o
m o
0 o
o cn
o
w
O L)
o hr
L) O
LJ
L) O
N L)
o L)
o (V
O L)
L) r,
D 0
cV o
0 0
o o
r- 0
co a)
0 0
L) V
0 n
O) a)
rl
n
7
O N
M O
ll] r
M m
W C-4
L) m
(D V
to M
m
O (N
L)
—
Lf) m
N co
M
c
m Cl)
V m
0 .-
O D)
L)
O O
O N
O V
L) V
V V
n m
V D)
M M
r-. O
m M
(q m
V N
M
N W
L) V
M
L)
O H
X U)
L) M
N
L) O
(D L)
0
L) m
N N
(D L)
r- CO
m L)
r- L]
M
m n
V m
N (3)
N m
M L)
N N
O M
.- N
L) O
m t-
L) O
L) o
O
V m
(D m
M a)
V
m V
OD
V O
N
d O
N V
CO -
L)
V
M—
M L]
r
(D L)
N or
m m
L)
a-
n
M —
r- N
L)
n (D
m f--
'- V
M N
o r-
m N
at
(D
J U
(n co
V L)
r
N
V
N(D
L) O
N
N V
(D r
L)
V N
N L)
V N
m N
(D
Q
N
F-
0
H
w (A 1-1-
w w
w 69
(A fA
f9 fA
fA 69
w
w (A
w w
w fA
w (A
fA (A
fA EA
(A fA
(A EA
(A fA
w w
w
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
O O
O o
0 o
o o
o 0
o 0
0 0
m 0
0 0
0 L)
L)
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
O L)
L) O
L) 0
0 L)
O L)
L) 0
0 0
n 0
0 0
0 r•
r`
O L)
O N
O LD
L) n
In L)
O) N
V V
M
M m
m
M O
L)
O m
L)
a0
a0
O
m M
O
L)
O N
(n V
m
O) M
M M
V
n V
M
LL U
M O
CO 0)
(D
_ L)
M
L) u
O
N t`
L)
N_ V
r` M
O) V
O L)
N L)
L) L)
r m
M L)
M M
M L)
r
O w
x
M N
M m
M M
(D f-
a) L)
L) m
M m
4') m
V m
L)
m V
M O
(D m
N n
w
L)
O
V O
m m
rl_ N
N o
M o
O m
N
m m
V m
O m
M N
(D O
0
O M
m
M m
O N
m L)
O V
a
O
F-
En w
m O
m r-
V (n
L) m
V M
M M
m
V
m L)
M M
r- O
M m
m a)
V m
m m
V m
M V
O M
m
N
n
Cl)
V r
L)
N N
N
M V
(D
U ?
o O
o o
O o
O O
O o
o O
O o
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
---------------
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
F
0 0
0 0
0 o
0 0
o 0
0 0
o 0
L) L)
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 o
0 L)
0
w
0 0
o o
0 0
o o
0 0
0 o
0 0
o o
0 0
o o
0 0
o o
0 0
o o
0 0
V o
0 0
o L)
0 0
N N
O
O
11J
O
O O
O O
m 0
L) F-
L) r-
— V
O m
0
N L)
M (D
(D
o O)
N W
D) V
m N
M M
CO CA
T
U W
N
V M
L) L)
N
Cl) m
L) mrl-
O m
O
0 0
V m
0 L)
L) r-
V
h
O m
N O
V m
(0 V
m N
O N
O O
m ('M
V m
V V
N r-
L) M
M V
(D L)
m M
r L)
r
N N
M (D
n
J
al m
V O
V7 r
V M
t`
m m
o m
r' (D
(D L)
m
N
u7 m
M m
c) L)
V O
o lh
t` L)
L] V
m m
L m
r N
oc
Q ?
M N
m M
V
N
M
M m
m M
— m
V L)
L) M
N
M
N
u7 N
N
O O
M
p
F 3
H _
O
0 0
L)000(n(n(DOOOOOL L
0 o
o 0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
oo(n
0°
°0000(n(n000000°oor_
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o O
o 0
0
0 0
rn
J
L)
V—
m
L) M
f m
m r
r m
N
m
N V
m 0
0
r- L)
M M
m
W
c L
m L]
V
M
N
m m
r
m
N L)
L) M
N
N LJ
co N
J
V)
(n
O
F
C C
o o
C O
o
a) a)
m m
o '-
U
0 0
--
U U
C
O
O C
- O
-O C
m 0
C C
0 0
C C
0 0
C -O
o 0
C C
o o
O O
'- -
U
C (A
O m
N C
a) O
U
LU
u
U
u m
C C
m m
C C
m m
m
m m
U '-
a
>_
>>
u
o o
'-
a
O
tm/1 N
N -O
m (D
m m
tq .O
-O -°
m a)
N
u) d
-O N
m
N
m o
N m
d m
N N
a)
N
m a)
N N
w w
-° -O
o
N m
m
m (n
w
Z
-o -D
-o m
a) a)
a) m
a Q)
m a)
m -o
a) M
a) -p
-° -o
-0 -D
-o m
-° -o
N Q)
a N
N "O
p
d
O
m m°
-2
-o
-O
>
j o
°-o
'>
-m g
'j 'j
U °
-O
a o
'>
c a)
a) a)
a) a)
-D -D
m e
-2
a)
-p a
'> '>
a)
m
-o
U H
W a.
=
2 2
>
i a
- —
-
a
a
a a
a)
> >
"O
a >
'0
4 >
'O 'O
> >
> >
>
-0 -0
2
> >
=o -o
-o
.> -
"O
w >
m`
d
O
a
m
'O C
d 3
0 0
0 0
a C
o o
C C
o>
0 a
d
c 'o
> °
.5 a
m
'o a
m
s 'o
a
m _
a 'O
a
C C
o c
a
O
'o
O
d
m
U
U
C C
c
C m
N (A
N (A
C a)
a) a)
E C
N C
O C
c
C C
c c
C C
C O
c
C C
Q) a)
C (A
c
N C
O
LL
m m
m C
C C
C C
m C
C C-
m
C m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
C C
m C
c m`
p
ui Lim
@
m m
m m4
m
m m
ov
`—°v'
vv
v
v cv-6
2
m
-2 (D
m m
m N
V V
V V
m N
N N
m
V m
c m
m m
m m
m C
m m
N N
m V
V m
aa-a
m-o-o-o-o-o
- -o
m
m m
-
m-a
-o-
- -o
-
-°-o
- -
-a
- --
-o --o-o
m
= --o
m maao
a-
:2
0 3
O —
- -
> >
- --
>
a
O
a
m
m m
m m
m m
O
m m
m
m
m m
Z
w u!
Q) a)
a)
o
N
N
N
m
(n
a
N N
QC )
N N
N N
L)
2
U) Ul
m a)
U) N
Q) m
N to
a) Q)
N
U N
a
H
(n
c
m m
C
m
C
m
C
m
c
m
c
m m
c C
m _
C C
m m
m
m m
m m
m m
C
m
C C
m m
X
N V
V
N
N
N
N N
M N
N N
N
N N
N N
N N
N
N V
W
-a
a)
°
m
E m
J 3
_
m
p
o d
m
a) >
°
-O C
E
J
J
3
d
m"_
> LL
ii
Y
t`
E
m J
d.
a)
m J
O
m J
O
m
O
E O
.?
E O
E
U
a)
m
"'
J
C
U
U) O
""
Of ...
x
J LL
c
C_
J LL
3
N
a)
d
°
a)
U m>
L
Y
x Y
LO C
Q) C
Y 3
C m°
3
m c
o
U
L U
U
0
U
L O
N
J❑
N
m
x
Z°
`p x
LL U
7 m
>
U
m
m O
m
O Y
(n O
U
C
>
in
j
U W
C°
oo
U W
Y
U
>
LL
d
m
(o
W
(n
L)
a .`
Q
Lo
(n
U
co
Z
7
O
m
m
m
3
IX -o
_
-o
m
f
_
E
c°
m
a`mi
°
m
>
m
o c_
> m
J
E
c
J
m E
E m
m
o
W
m E
cL m
Y C
a)
O
al
m L)
m
L)
(n in
f
❑
Q
-p
Q'
LL
oo
Oo UY
a
E
C m
3-2
o
N
ux) c
mQU
o xi
?xnUU
mm
o U
x
x
U)
m
O`
'm
m—
m-
U
UU t
U
U
c U
Z
Y
o
Q
m
c
U
Lu
w m
N<
m m
O
N M
V L)
m
m O)
^
Q m
N
M V
u7
W
LLB W
W W
W W
W W
W W
W W
W W
W W
w
>
a Z
m
a
m
>
O
m
m
J
a
D
o
a "O
>
o
C Q°.
Q
°)
O
m
o -O
'O -P
-O
W
°)
m m
°
m
°)
m m
m
o U>
> E
m
Q
-°
m m
m
a) o
-o
o c
o
m
m
.N m
w c
u, m
m
m m
o a)
m
a)
m
o
m a)
o
L
o
J
m
o
m
C
0
0 0
?
C
❑ m
C
O CY
N
O
O W
U
N
0
N m
0 0
m m
0
m
'o
_
7a m
m m
Q) U
U) .0
m N
NC
N L
h V
to p
E
(r
Y
O
°
: C
O Y
m
.X Y
m m
Y E
m
m
o
o
o
O
O m
m m
m
U m°
dddU
m C@
4]ZLL
o
p
UJdLL
(n
m p
W U
YHH3
U U
LL d
dad
d
CL
m
O
O
M
O
C)
L
01
O
a
a;
f6
O.
m
c
m „
O c
08 o
ma
c
> o
Mm
CL
m Z
m
0 0
0
N U m
Q `o a
C M
a O_ N
x C LL
T O.
a O 5
U c
a ° E
U U
Li
C) m
N 3
m m
C) ❑
L) O
C
O o O
N
Q O
° T
N a
m
O m O
U
a
N
O
L
CL m
3 a
d
d LL
a
E
O
V a C
O NJ _
er
O O
N
a d
c
m
E
. o
O
U
d
m
r
G1
a
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
O
U
0 0
00owLri
0 0
0 0
o
0
o
0
v
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
W
O
Lo N
-n
O O
O
O
- nu)owowL,Lnp
O W
W I
Lo h
N N
Q
W O
O
(0 Lo
Lo
M
r oc
N
N M
aD N
Q Q
A
0
O H
K
MNOLALo
Lo
O
M
w r-
mmood'N
Lo
N'
(/)
d o
n W
Lo N
W n
O O
M O
N r
0
O
N
aD
O N
LD cPl
O N
Lo
O
M Lo
r O
r M
N
V
N
M
J U
r M
d•
N
r
co N
r r
N r
t-
a
°f
H
O
H
di fIY
f9 H
H fA
H
H
H H
H H
H H
H H
H
H
0 0
0 0
0 0
O
O
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
O
0 0
0 0
0 0
O
O
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
O
O M
N to
N O
O
N
Lo
O Lo
O to
Lo Ln
m
e-
O
h N
0 M
M
0
I- W
m h
N P-
N N
O
LL NO
O O
N (0
O Lo
Ln
M
n O
O vL
N M
oc N
/t
O
o W
O(3)Mr
LO
O
MI-
LO
M
I- Lo
00
H w
O
Lo
Lo M
v
Lo
v
v O
O N
Lo LL)
Lo O
Lo Cl)
Lo
A
(
r N
n
O
M O
W O
O
O)
O F
o
Lo
N
Ln
N
r N
V N
N
U ?
(9 HA
(!H
(<Hv
AflH
H-
H
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
O
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
O
0 0
0 0
0 0
O
O
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
O
H y
o Lo
v o
M o
o
LV
o
M
o o
o o
o o-
e'1
W
O
c aD
V o
x 0
0 o
0 0
0
0
0
0
O
M o0
O O
O O
O O
c c
O O
O O
M
h
M
A
O K
U W
N M
M O
f- Lf)
N V
O
00 N
O
(14
N
V, n
O N
Lo M
r 0)
O Lo
Cl) Lo
M 0)
LO N
r)
N
O
J H
O W
W R
)-- R
N
V
V Cl)
r 0)
L0 O
N 00
V
w
a Z
- 0
06
a -7
-
W
C 7
M V'
O) --i
O
a
0 O
N
M
LO
u) V3
fA H
Vi H
fA
H
-M
fA fA
(A d9
H fA
H H
H
H
_
F
O Q
0 0
0 0
0
O O
O O
O O
O
w
(
_
O
G O
O N
O
0 0
0 0
0 0
O
Q
J
Z .Y-'
Z
Lo
im
LlY
Lo Cl)
(D
v M
Oct (0
N
W
T (M
Ln L7
N
O N
r 00
N Cl)
M
7
F
J
(n
(n
O
C
c c
o
c
c o
o r
N c
o o
c
o
c c
0 o
c c
o 0
c c
0 0
o
c v
o a)
U
W
_o
C. U
a)
UUUUUUU`
a) a)
a) m
a)
w
y a)
a) d
m a)
m m
O
z
O
aaadmam
a)a)daom
maaaaaar
@a)ddddd
d
0
U
W d
a a
>!2'6
a >
a
Z:c
>
voavao'-
v >
> >
> >
>L
H
aooa
O
moyoo
cw
a
m
c
aaaaaoa
ommmmma)mo
W
U
a W
c C
m m
c m
m c
y c
m
N
c
N
mmmmmm
d
0
mmv
— m
!DV
m
mvvvLnv<
d
m m
m
m m
M m
m m
m m
m
O
m m
commm
m
mmmmmmm=
m
Z
N N
a)
N y
a)a)a)a)a)da)
c o
m m
N N
H
Dann
C C
C
C c
m m
C C
m m
C c
m m
c c C m
X
N N
N
N m
N
N N
N N
W
J J
'O
'O
LL
m>
3 aa`)
U
o
mvL`mc y
m
m
O
m r
L L
7O
m i
m
a m
y U
>
a
3 om
m=
> >
mLLmm
0
(° in
c
0
°
(n
°
0
m
C
I
to
Y
oo L
oD Y
O
Lo 3
y<v
N
N to
a
ll'l
co
n J
m LU
@
LL
L
LL_
LL LL
y
N
m o
y
LL
F
m
y
W
H ar
W
iV
rj
e
N
W
M V
Lo (0
W
O
?
S
W
W W
W W
w W
IX
Z
J
a
m
dWwooa
m
m
W
y Nm
a
>>
O N
m Q
C
J
U
m
3
a
m
3
3
0 0
y
w°
o
O
m
U
`
N rn
a)
N@
m O
N r
a)
O
m m
0
0 m
LLLL
2U
(n
X(A
t0 co
W (n
a
1
1
z
a
Wd
IF
az
Waw
m m m e W3»
y K C
o }O (L
ID000 xLL o
ad
t o
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
I. INTRODUCTION
The next step of the Development Impact Fee process is the determination of the maximum
fee per service unit that can be charged by the City for new developments. The fee is
calculated by dividing the costs of the capital improvements identified as necessary to serve
growth forecast to occur during the 10 -year planning period by the number of service units of
growth forecast to occur. The specific steps, as described in following paragraphs of this
section include:
1. Determination of a standard service unit;
2. Identification of service areas for the City;
3. Identification of that portion of the total capital improvements necessary to serve the
projected growth over the next 10 -year period;
4. Analysis of the total capacity, level of current usage, and commitment for usage of
capacity of existing improvements;
5. Determination of the "standard service unit" and equivalency tables establishing the ratio
of a service unit to the types of land use forecast for growth.
II. SERVICE UNIT
To determine the impact fee rate applied to thoroughfare facilities the standard service unit
selected was "PM Peak Hour Vehicle- Miles." This service unit can be obtained by
multiplying the number of trips generated by a specific land use type during the PM peak
hour (vehicles) by the average trip length (miles) for that land use. The PM peak hour was
chosen because it is usually considered the critical time for roadway analyses. The trip
generation data were directly obtained or derived for each defined land use type from "Trip
Generation Manual, 9th Edition" of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, which is the
standard data reference to determine vehicle trip generation characteristics of particular land
use types and densities. Trip length information for each land use specified was based on data
developed for the Dallas -Fort Worth area by the North Central Texas Council of
Governments (NCTCOG). The trip length was set at a maximum of three (3) miles for any
land use, as this trip length was assumed to be the maximum average distance a trip would
travel on roadways within each service area in the City of Wylie. Table 2 shows the typical
service units for each land use type.
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 6
Table 2 - Service Unit Calculation by Land Use Type
City of Wylie 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update
' Based on /TE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition
z Based on NCTCOG data
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 7
Variable
PM Peak Trips'
(vehicles)
Trip Length2
(miles)
Vehicle -Miles
Residential
Dwelling Unit
1.00
3.0
3.00
Office
1,000 ftz
1.49
3.0
4.47
Commercial / Retail
1,000 ftz
3.71
2.4
8.90
Industrial
1,000 ftz
0.97
3.0
2.91
Public and Institutional
1,000 ft2
1.01
2.1
2.12
Parks and Recreational
Acre
13.01
2.1
27.32
' Based on /TE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition
z Based on NCTCOG data
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 7
SERVICE AREAS
The State Statute governing the imposition of development impact fees require that collection
and expenditure of fees imposed for street facilities "...is limited to an area within the
corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six miles." To comply
with this State Law, two service areas (West and East) were established for the City of Wylie
to ensure that funds are spent within six miles of where they are collected. The service areas
include most of the developable land within the city limits of Wylie. Within Wylie, the
growth and intensities of growth for the ultimate development of the City and that portion of
the service area expected to occur during the 10 -year period, 2014 -2024, is forecast. The two
service areas were shown in Figure 1.
III. ASSUMPTIONS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA
Determination of the eligible costs of capital improvements to serve the forecast growth over
the 10 -year period from 2014 to 2024 was based on data provided by the City of Wylie. The
basic criteria and assumptions made for this study include the following:
1. Costs of existing facilities constructed to serve new development have been included, and
City of Wylie staff identified projects of this type.
2. Bond interest costs are included.
3. Street facility improvements, although necessary for additional capacity by new growth,
will logically serve all existing and future growth by improved safety and drainage
characteristics. Therefore, the 10 -year eligible costs have been proportioned as the ratio
of the 10 -year growth to the total number of service units determined for the build -out.
Table 3 shows the portion of ultimate build -out service units that will be attributable to
growth within the next 10 years and is used to pro -rate the identified costs in the service area.
In order to maintain the equity of impact fee assessment, the cost for streets included in the
10 -year Capital Improvement Plan will include the total cost of the street facilities, not
reduced by any expected participation. Rather, construction by a developer of an arterial
facility within or off -site should be treated as a credit to the impact fee assessment.
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 8
Table 3 - Summary of Vehicle- Mileage Distribution by Development Period
City of Wylie 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 9
Existing
2014-2024
Year 2024 - Ultimate
Vehicle-
Portion of
Vehicle -Miles
Portion of
Vehicle -Miles
Portion of
Ultimate
Service
Miles
Ultimate
Added
Ultimate
Added
Ultimate
Vehicle -
Area
2014
Vehicle -Miles
2014 -2024
Vehicle -Miles
2024 - Ultimate
Vehicle -Miles
Miles
W
58,711
0.904
4,255
0.066
1,953
0.030
64,919
E
33,470
0.789
7,040
0.166
1,922
0.045
42,432
Total
92,181
11,295
3,875
107,351
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 9
ELIGIBLE COSTS
Table 4 presents a summary of the roadway capital improvement costs for the two service
areas. The 10 -year portion of the total costs was calculated using the data from Table 3.
Costs of each of the individual street projects were accumulated, or apportioned, for the
service area in which they were located. Boundaries of the service areas were located to be
coincident with natural barriers, the center of existing or proposed street facilities included in
the capital improvements plan or along city limit lines. Costs of these projects included only
those costs that will be paid for by the City of Wylie.
IV. DETERMINATION OF STANDARD SERVICE UNIT AND EQUIVALENCY
The determination of growth of service units and resulting impact fee rates were then made.
Table 5 presents the derivation of service unit equivalents for each of the six defined land use
types. The service unit equivalents are referenced to and based on the residential land use.
Table 6 presents a summary of the calculations and resulting eligible costs per service unit.
Under current State law, municipalities are required to administer a detailed financial analysis
to support the use of an impact fee higher than 50 percent of the eligible costs. As an
alternative to performing the financial analysis, the impact fee can be set at or below 50
percent of the total eligible costs. The total eligible costs per service unit are shown in
Table 6. The City will use either a detailed financial analysis to adjust for tax credits or will
use 50 percent of these eligible costs.
V. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY
The methodology for calculating the maximum allowable impact fee for roadway facilities
can be summarized in the following three steps. First, determine the cost of the roadway
facilities (existing roadways eligible for recuperation of construction cost and proposed
roadways) that can be attributed to new growth over the 10 -year period. This calculation for
Service Areas W and E are summarized on pages 14 and 15.
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 10
Table 4 - Summary of Capital Improvement Cost by Service Area
City of Wylie 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 11
Portion of Capacity of
Cost of Thoroughfare
Service Area
Zone Cost of
Thoroughfare
Thoroughfare Attributed
Attributed to Growth
to Growth (2014 - 2024)
(2014 - 2024)
W
$95,566,342.00
0.066
$6,307,378.57
E
$172,380,939.75
0.166
$28,615,236.00
TO
$267,947,281.75
$34,922,614.57
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 11
Table 5 - Thoroughfare Land Use Equivalency
City of Wylie 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update
Land Use
Development
Unit
Veh -Miles / Development Unit
(1)
SU Equivalency
(2)
Residential
Dwelling Unit
3.00
1.00
Office
1,000 ft2
4.47
1.49
Commercial / Retail
1,000 ft2
8.90
2.97
Industrial
1,000 ft2
2.91
0.97
Public and Insitutional
1,000 ft2
2.12
0.71
Parks and Recreational
1,000 ft2
27.32
9.11
Notes:
(1) Based on data from the /TE Trip Generation Manual and NCTCOG
(2) Ratio of each land use to service unit of Residential
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 12
Table 6 - Impact Fee Calculation for Thoroughfare by Service Area
City of Wylie 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 13
Cost of Thoroughfare
Number of New
Cost Per
Service Area
Attributed to Growth
Service Units
Cost Per
Service Unit
Service Unit
(2014 - 2024)
(2014 - 2024)
(Rounded)
W
$6,307,378.57
4,255
$1,482.35
$1,482
E
$28,615,236.00
7,040
$4,064.66
$4,064
TO
$34,922,614.57
11,295
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 13
Calculation for Service Area W
Cost of Roadway Facilities (Tables I and 1B - Service Area W) = $95,566,342.00
Proportion of Capacity Attributable to New Growth (Table 3 - Service Area W) = 0.066
Cost of Roadway Facilities Attributable to Growth (2014 -2024 - Service Area W):
$95,566,342.00 x 0.066 = $6,307,378.57
The second step is to determine the maximum calculated impact fee. The maximum calculated
impact fee is the ratio of the total cost for roadway facilities attributable to growth in the next ten
years (2014 -2024) divided by the total growth in equivalent service units (ESU). The maximum
calculated impact fee for Service Area W is:
Maximum Roadway Impact Fee = Eligible Thoroughfare Cost Attributed to Growth (Table 4)
Total Growth in Equivalent Service Units (Table 3)
_ $6,307,378.57
4,255 ESU
= $1,482.35 / ESU = $1,482 / ESU (Rounded Service Area W)
This amount represents the maximum calculated impact fee for roadway facilities. For the final
step, the current impact fee legislation requires the City to produce a financial analysis to support
a fee greater than 50 percent of the eligible costs or to reduce the maximum calculated impact fee
by 50 percent. If the City chooses to use a maximum allowable impact fee of 50 percent of the
maximum calculated fee the amount would be $1,482 x 50% = $741.00.
Calculation for Service Area E
Cost of Roadway Facilities (Tables I and 1B - Service Area E) = $172,380,939.75
Proportion of Capacity Attributable to New Growth (Table 3 - Service Area E) = 0.166
Cost of Roadway Facilities Attributable to Growth (2014 -2024 - Service Area E):
$172,380,939.75 x 0.166 = $28,615,236.00
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 14
The second step is to determine the maximum calculated impact fee. The maximum calculated
impact fee is the ratio of the total cost for roadway facilities attributable to growth in the next ten
years (2014 -2024) divided by the total growth in equivalent service units (ESU). The maximum
calculated impact fee for Service Area E is:
Maximum Roadway Impact Fee = Eligible Thoroughfare Cost Attributed to Growth (Table 4)
Total Growth in Equivalent Service Units (Table 3)
_ $28,615,236.00
7,040 ESU
= $4,064.66 / ESU = $4,064 / ESU (Rounded Service Area E)
This amount represents the maximum calculated impact fee for roadway facilities. For the final
step, the current impact fee legislation requires the City to produce a financial analysis to support
a fee greater than 50 percent of the eligible costs or to reduce the maximum calculated impact fee
by 50 percent. If the City chooses to use a maximum allowable impact fee of 50 percent of the
maximum calculated fee the amount would be $4,064 x 50% = $2,032.00.
Impact Fee Calculation Example
The land use equivalency table is provided in Table 7. This table identifies the total service units
generated by specific uses within each land use category. To obtain the impact fee to be charged
for a particular land use, the impact fee per service unit adopted by the City and the service units
per development unit generated for that particular land use from Table 7 are used. Examples for
calculating the impact fee for both a single family dwelling unit and a 50,000 ft2 shopping center
(commercial / retail facility) assuming impact fees of $741.00 per service unit (Service Area W)
and $2,032.00 per service unit (Service Area E) are shown on page 17.
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 15
Table 7 - Land Use Equivalency
Citv of Mile 2014 Roadwav Impact Fee Studv Uodate
CATEGORY LAND USE
DEVELOPMENT
UNITS'
ITE TRIP
RATE'
TRIP
LENGTH'
PASS -BY
TRAFFIC°
SERVICE
UNITS'
MAX ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE I
DEVELOPMENT UNIT'
Service Area W
Service Area E
RESIDENTIAL
Single - Family Detached
Dwelling Unit
1.00
3.0
0
3.00
$2,223.00
$6,096.00
Apartment/Multi -Family
Dwelling Unit
0.62
3.0
0
1.86
$1,378.26
$3,779.52
CondominiurNTownhouse
Dwelling Unit
0.52
3.0
0
1.56
$1,155.96
$3,169.92
Mobile Home
Dwelling Unit
0.59
3.0
0
1.77
$1,311.57
$3,596.64
OFFICE
Office Building
1,000 ft GFA
1.49
3.0
0
4.47
$3,312.27
$9,083.04
Medical Office
1,000feGFA
3.57
3.0
0
10.71
$7,936.11
$21,762.72
COMMERCIAL
Automobile Care Center
1,000 fe GFA
3.11
2.5
0.3
5.44
$4,031.04
$11,054.08
Building Materials/Lumber
1,000 ft' GFA
4.49
2.0
0.2
7.18
$5,320.38
$14,589.76
Convenience Stores/Gas Pumps
1,000 ft' GFA
50.92
0.4
0.63
7.54
$5,587.14
$15,321.28
Drive -In Bank
1,000 ft' GFA
24.3
1.7
0.47
21.89
$16,220.49
$44,480.48
Fast Food Restaurant
1,000 fe GFA
32.65
2.0
0.5
32.65
$24,193.65
$66,344.80
Free - Standing Discount Store
1,000 ft' GFA
4.98
2.5
0.17
10.33
$7,654.53
$20,990.56
Garden Center /Nursery
1,000 ft' GFA
6.94
2.5
0.2
13.88
$10,285.08
$28,204.16
Golf Course
Acres
0.3
2.5
0
0.75
$555.75
$1,524.00
Hardware/Paint Store
1,000 ft' GFA
4.84
2.5
0.26
8.95
$6,631.95
$18,186.40
Home Improvement Store
1,000 ft' GFA
2.33
3.0
0.48
3.63
$2,689.83
$7,376.16
Hotel
Rooms
0.6
3.0
0
1.80
$1,333.80
$3,657.60
Pharmacy /Drugstore
1,000 ft' GFA
9.91
2.5
0.49
12.64
$9,366.24
$25,684.48
Self- Service Car Wash
Stalls
5.54
2.0
0.6
4.43
$3,282.63
$9,001.76
Service Station
Pumps
13.87
0.5
0.42
4.02
$2,978.82
$8,168.64
Sit -Down Restaurant
1,000 ft' GFA
9.85
2.4
0.43
13.47
$9,981.27
$27,371.04
Shopping Center
1,000 ft' GFA
3.71
3.0
0.34
7.35
$5,446.35
$14,935.20
Supermarket
1,000 ft' GFA
9.48
2.5
0.36
15.17
$11,240.97
$30,825.44
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial
1,000 f? GFA
0.97
3.0
0
2.91
$2,156.31
$5,913.12
Mini - Warehouse
1,000 fe GFA
0.26
3.0
0
0.78
$577.98
$1,584.96
Warehouse
1,000 fe GFA
0.32
3.0
0
0.96
$711.36
$1,950.72
INSTITUTIONAL
School
Students
0.15
2.1
0
0.32
$237.12
$650.24
Day Care Center
Students
0.81
2.7
0.9
0.22
$163.02
$447.04
Nursing Home
1,000 fe GFA
0.74
2.5
0
1.85
$1,370.85
$3,759.20
House of Worship
1,000 ft' GFA
0.55
2.1
0
1.16
1 $859.56 1
$2,357.12
' GFA = Gross Floor Area
' (Vehicles); Based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition
' (Miles); Based on NCTCOG Data
° Percentage of traffic already passing by site - land use is an intermediate destination
e (Vehicle - Miles)
e Based on 50% of maArnum calculated impact fee for each service area
The land uses and trip generation characteristics listed in this chart are intended as examples. The complete table of land uses and trip generation
characteristics is contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, Ninth Edition, which is incorporated herein by reference.
City of Wylie - 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 16
Service Area W — Example Calculations
SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLING (Service Area W)
• Vehicle -Miles per Development Unit for Single- Family Dwelling Unit
(1 Dwelling Unit) x (3.00 Vehicle -Miles / Dwelling Unit) = 3.00 Vehicle -Miles
• Assume 50 percent of the Maximum Calculated Roadway Impact Fee = $741.00 / Service Unit:
(3.00 Vehicle - Miles) x ($741.00 / Vehicle- Miles) _ $ 2,223.00
50,000 ft2 SHOPPING CENTER (Service Area W)
• Vehicle -Miles per Development Unit for Shopping Center
(50,000 ft2) x (7.35 Vehicle -Miles / 1,000 ft2) = 367.50 Vehicle -Miles
• Assume 50 percent of the Maximum Calculated Roadway Impact Fee = $741.00 / Service Unit:
(367.50 Vehicle - Miles) x ($741.00 / Vehicle - Miles) _ $ 272,317.50
Service Area E — Example Calculations
SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLING (Service Area E)
• Vehicle -Miles per Development Unit for Single - Family Dwelling Unit
(1 Dwelling Unit) x (3.00 Vehicle -Miles / Dwelling Unit) = 3.00 Vehicle -Miles
• Assume 50 percent of the Maximum Calculated Roadway Impact Fee = $2,032.00 /Service Unit:
(3.00 Vehicle- Miles) x ($2,032.00 / Vehicle - Miles) _ $ 6,096.00
50,000 ft2 SHOPPING CENTER (Service Area E)
• Vehicle -Miles per Development Unit for Shopping Center
(50,000 ft2) x (7.35 Vehicle -Miles / 1,000 ft2) = 367.50 Vehicle -Miles
• Assume 50 percent of the Maximum Calculated Roadway Impact Fee = $2,032.00 /Service Unit:
(367.50 Vehicle - Miles) x ($2,032.00 / Vehicle - Miles) _ $ 746,760.00
City of Wylie — 2014 Roadway Impact Fee Update Page 17
(V )v -1farnur bille Crnucs • Murp6y ;Monitor • The Princeton Herald • ?l-S,td-c New • THE WYLIE NEWS
Off media
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF COLLIN
Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Chad Engbrock,
publisher of C & S Media, dba The Wylie News, a newspaper regularly published in
Collin County, Texas and having general circulation in Collin County, Texas, who being
by me duly sworn, deposed and says that the foregoing attached:
City of Wylie
Ordinance No. 2014 -29
was published in said newspaper on the following dates, to -wit:
September 17, 2014
Tkwo�
Chad Engbrock, Publisher
Subscribed and sworn before me on this, the _ f j, day of , 2014
to certify which witness my hand and seal of office.
6t.-It �, Sonia A. Duggan Notary Publi d for
"' The State of Texas
s, =, %' - Commission Expires
�F�� 09 -02 -2016
My commission expires
'v4urphy'Sac li.sclWyIic 011'i cc • 110 N. Ra lIard • P.O. Boy 369 • Wt Iic.'I X 75099 • 972 -412 -551 S • 1a\ 972 - 412 -d I8
Farm °rstiille%l'rinceton ()flice • 101 S. 'Brill • P O. H I I x 512 - }-arrner:sN iIIe TX 75442 • 9-2 784._6397 • far 972 -7212 -702:3
tp
6C September 17 -18, 2014
ORDINANCE
NO. 2014-29
AN ORDINANCE
OF.., . THE` CITY
a.m.,
�. v
; r.r $LIC
FOR
,14,.",2014
IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN OF THE CITY
OF WYLIE, TEXAS
AND THOROUGH
FARE IMPACT FEES
ASSESSED BY
THE CITY ' OF WY_
LIE, TEXAS; AU-
THORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE
CITY MANAGER
OR HER DESIGNEE
TO NOTIFY THE
PUBLIC OF SUCH
PUBLIC HEAR-
ING; PROVIDING
FOR REPEALING,
SAVINGS AND
SEVERABILITY
CLAUSES; AND
PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE
DATE HEREOF.