11-23-2004 (City Council) Agenda Packet NOTICE OF MEETING
WYLIE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
NOVEMBER 23, 2004
6:00 p.m.
Wylie Municipal Complex—Council Chambers/Council Conference Room
2000 State Highway 78 North
Wylie, Texas 75098
CALL '�O ORDER:
INVOCA' TIO &PL E 4F ALL GIANCE
Roc AMA rlo & ' ESE A ( NS
• Presentation to Star Students for the character trait of"Respect".
CfT •• •S PARTY PAT fI
CONS ',! T AGEN ►
All matters 1 ted the Cont .gend a+re considered ro be rou ti b the City C icil and; vi ll be ci ted by one:
motion. Th ' 1:ot be.s. arate d%scussien.ofth e i ems..11 dis ssiori s desired. at:::item will be re oved` m the
Conseia `Agenda and:l ll be consi red paraeely
A. Approval of the Minutes from the regular City Council Meeting of November 9, 2004 and the Special
Called Meeting of November 15, 2004.
(C. Ehrlich, City Secretary)
1NDW DU CO SWDERATION
Public Hearing
1. Hold the second of two Public Hearings for the annexation of a 66.194 acre tract out of the Francisco
De La Pina Survey, Abstract #688, Collin County, Texas and generally located west of Stone Road,
east of Kreymer. (C. Thompson,Planning&Zoning Director).
Executive Summary
This annexation is at the request of the property owners. A zone change request is being processed concurrently with the
annexation.
Before a municipality may begin annexation proceedings, the governing body of the municipality must conduct two (2)
public hearing at which persons interested in the annexation are given the opportunity to be heard. In compliance with
state law,staff has prepared the following public hearing schedule:
Notice published for Public Hearings October 27,2004
First Public Hearing November 9, 2004
Second Public Hearing November 23, 2004
Adoption of Ordinance December 14, 2004
Article 1, Section 3 of the Wylie City Charter authorizes the City Council to adjust boundaries. This annexation is being
conducted in compliance with Sections 43.052(h) (2)and 43.063 of the Local Government Code.
WORKS SION
• Hold a joint work session with the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider and provide
direction concerning certain potential revisions to the Comprehensive Plan.
(C. Thompson,Planning and Zoning Director)
• Water/Sewer Rate Study Update
(R. Hutchison,Interim Finance Director)
In addition to any specifically identified Executive Sessions,Council may convene into Executive Session at any point during the open
meeting to discuss any item posted on this agenda. The Open Meetings Act provides specific exceptions that require that a meeting be
open. Should Council elect to convene into Executive Session, those exceptions will be specifically identified and announced. Any
subsequent action,as a result of this Executive Session,will be taken and recorded in open session.
I certify that this Notice of Meeting was posted on this 19th day of November,2004 at 5:00 p.m. as required by law in accordance
with Section 551.042 of the Texas Government Code and that the appropriate news media contacted. As a courtesy,this agenda
is also posted to the City of Wylie Website at www.ci.wylie.tx.us
Carole Ehrlich,City Secretary Date Notice Removed
The Wylie Municipal Complex is Wheelchair accessible. Sign interpretation or other special assistance for disabled attendees must be
requested 48 hours in advance by contacting the City Secretary's office at 972/442-8100 or TD 972/442-8170.
MINUTES
Wylie City Council
Tuesday, November 9, 2004 — 6:00 p.m.
Wylie Municipal Complex—Council Chambers
2000 State Highway 78 North
CALL T r ORDEll
Mayor Pro Tem Eric Hogue called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Council Members present were:
Councilwoman Reta Allen, Councilman Chris Trout, Councilman Earl Newsom, Councilman Merrill
Young, and Councilman J. C.Worley. Mayor John Mondy was out of town.
Staffs present were: City Manager, Mark B. Roath; Assistant City Manager, Mindy Manson; City
Engineer, Chris Hoisted; Planning & Zoning Director, Claude Thompson; Interim Finance Director,
Ron Hutchison; Public Information Officer, Mark Witter, and City Secretary, Carole Ehrlich.
N O CA t)l i$,z Pg..#00 9F 44KOM Cg
Councilman Young gave the invocation and Councilwoman Allen led the Pledge of Allegiance.
`R. rMr 'f41 ,�.cct1`fi 'A 't11rS
• Presentation to Star Students for the character trait of"Respect".
Mayor Pro Tern Hogue announced that the presentation of the Star Students for the character trait of
"Respect"would be on the November 23, 2004 agenda due to a time issue with the six week period.
t'tIZ.�ENS P 1► T1 IPA' l
There was no one present to address council.
CO f' TT AGE1 D
All matters listed tinder o rsent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be
enacted b one m on I her i :separ :discu ion of th items di t iis+ dom ed,that
item will bereniovedl from tl e Consent Oida and'#4 lie considered separately
A. Approval of the Minutes from the regular City Council Meeting of October 26, 2004.
(C. Ehrlich, City Secretary)
B. Consider and act upon a request to waive the alley requirement of the Subdivision Regulations.
(C. Thompson,Planning&Zoning Director)
C. Consider and act upon Ordinance #2004-36, amending section 74-2 (Smoking in Municipal
Buildings) of the Wylie Code of Ordinances; providing for an effective date of this ordinance.
(C. Ehrlich, City Secretary)
D. Consider and act upon Ordinance #2004-37 establishing no parking areas on Foxwood Lane
and Lanwood Drive and repealing Ordinance 2004-27. (M. Sferra, Community Development)
Minutes—November 9,2004
Wylie City Council
Page 1
E. Consider and act upon a Preliminary Plat for Birmingham Ranch Addition (C. Thompson,
Planning &Zoning Director)
F. Consider and act upon a Re-plat for Woodlake Village Addition. (C. Thompson, Planning &
Zoning Director)
G. Consider and act upon a Preliminary Plat for Watermark Estates Addition. (C. Thompson,
Planning &Zoning Director)
H. Consider and act upon the withdrawal, by the applicant, of the Final Plat for Wylie Lakes,
Phase lA & 1B. (C. Thompson,Planning&Zoning Director)
I. Consider and act upon a Preliminary Plat for Akin Addition. (C. Thompson, Planning &
Zoning Director)
J. Consider and act upon a request from the Wylie Baseball Association to sell concessions at
Community Park during their tournament the weekend of November 12-14, 2004. (R. Diaz,
Parks Superintendent)
K. Consider and act upon a request from the Moms Club of Wylie for a spaghetti dinner
fundraiser at the Bart Peddicord Community Center on January 22, 2005. (R. Diaz, Parks
Superintendent)
L. Consider and act upon a request from the Blackland Prairie Playground Foundation to have
"Spa Days" at the Bart Peddicord Community Center on January 8, 2005 and February 19,
2005. (R.Diaz,Parks Superintendent)
Council Action
Councilman Newsom asked that Items B, C, and E be removed from the Consent Agenda and
considered individually. Councilman Trout requested Item I be removed from the Consent Agenda and
considered individually. Mayor Pro Tern Hogue asked Council if there were any objections to these
requests. Consensus of the council was to remove Items B, C, E,and I from the Consent Agenda.
Council Action
A motion was made by Councilman Young, seconded by Councilman Newsom to approve the Consent
Agenda as presented for Items A, D, F, G, H, J, K,and L. A vote was taken and passed 6-0 with Mayor
Mondy absent.
NDf Ai7A .CONSO. >E A ]L N
B. Consider and act upon a request to waive the alley requirement of the Subdivision Regulations.
(C. Thompson,Planning&Zoning Director)
Planning and Zoning Director Thompson addressed council stating that the alley waiver was requested by the
applicant. The proposed lots would have a minimum of 10,000 sq. ft. and it was noted by staff that there is
currently no alleys on the abutting developments nor will the undeveloped property have alleys in the future. Mr.
Thompson explained that the alleys would serve limited functions if required. He explained that there would be
positive financial cost as the City would not be required to maintain the alleys.
Minutes—November 9,2004
Wylie City Council
Page 2
Mayor Pro Tem Hogue asked Mr. Thompson why this item was presented on the Consent Agenda. Mr.Thompson
replied that the last three had been approved on consent. Mr. Thompson explained that alley waivers, in the past,
were approved when lots proposed were 10,000 sq. ft. and above. Councilman Newsom asked if this proposal was
Straight Zoning. Mr. Thompson stated that it was and a preliminary plat was also being presented this evening.
Mayor Pro Tern Hogue asked if Country Ridge had 10,000 sq. ft. lots that included alleys. Mr. Thompson stated
yes it did. Councilman Trout stated that there were developments in Wylie that had larger(10,000 sq.ft. mnimum
lots) that had alleys. Councilman Newsom asked if council waived alleys, could swing garages be required. Mr.
Thompson stated that was done in Planned Developments but could not be made a condition of Straight Zoning.
Councilman Newsom then asked if the alley waiver could be denied. Mr. Thompson stated that council could
deny the alley waiver along with the preliminary plat and the developer would come back with a final plat that
would include alleys. Councilman Worley asked council if it was the opinion of staff and council to approve
waivers of alleys in areas with larger lots,with the mindset of avoiding the city costs incurred with maintenance in
the future. Councilman Trout stated he believed it was more aesthetically pleasing for a community to have alleys
and avoid trash pick up and utilities in the front.
Council Action
A motion was made by Councilman Young, seconded by Councilman Worley to accept the waiver of
the alley requirement for the Birmingham Ranch on behalf of the applicant. A vote was taken and failed
3-3 for lack of a majority vote with Councilman Young, Councilman Worley and Councilwoman Allen
voting for and Councilman Newsom, Councilman Trout, and Mayor Pro Tern Hogue voting against.
Mayor Mondy was absent.
E. Consider and act upon a Preliminary Plat for Birmingham Ranch Addition (C. Thompson,
Planning &Zoning Director)
Council Action
A motion was made by Councilman Young, seconded by Councilman Worley to approve a Preliminary
Plat for the Birmingham Ranch addition. A vote was taken and failed 3-3 for lack of a majority vote
with Councilman Young, Councilman Worley, and Councilwoman Allen voting for and Councilman
Newsom, Councilman Trout,and Mayor Pro Tem Hogue voting against. Mayor Mondy was absent.
C. Consider and act upon Ordinance #2004-36, amending section 74-2 (Smoking in Municipal
Buildings) of the Wylie Code of Ordinances; providing for an effective date of this ordinance.
(C. Ehrlich, City Secretary)
Staff Comments
City Manager Roath addressed council stating that Ordinance#2001-23, passed in May of 2001, prohibits the use
of tobacco products and smoking in City facilities. The ordinance also authorized the City Manager to designate
smoking areas for employees and the public. Verbiage used in the ordinance did not specifically specify any
outdoor designation in and around the facilities; therefore it was the opinion of the City Attorney that an
amendment be made to address outdoor designations in Section 74-2 of the Code of Ordinances and amend
Ordinance#2001-23 to reflect those changes. Mr. Roath explained that he had appointed a panel to review possible
locations for smoking designations. Mr. Roath stated that he had not taken any action on those recommendations
pending tonight's meeting. He also commented that although there was no smoking in the facility, there was
smoking currently outside the buildings which at this time staff has no control over.
Minutes—November 9,2004
Wylie City Council
Page 3
Council Discussion
Councilman Worley asked Mr. Roath if the ordinance was approved tonight would he compile a policy with
outside smoking areas. Mr. Roath replied, yes he would. Councilman Trout asked Mr. Roath how many of the
panel members were smokers. Mr. Roath replied that he could not say,as that was not a stipulation of choosing the
panel. He went on to explain that the panel did speak to all departments as to where they would suggest placing the
smoking areas. Councilwoman Allen stated that she was not in favor of any type of tobacco on city premises either
indoors or in the atrium. She also stated that she would not want to see designations anywhere that the public had
to cross to enter or exit the buildings. Councilman Trout stated that he felt designating areas outside the buildings
would be too restrictive. Mr. Roath reiterated again that the purpose for this amendment was to include outside
areas and designate those areas which would be appropriate.
Council Action
A motion was made by Councilman Trout, seconded by Councilman Newsom to deny the approval of
Ordinance #2004-36 amending Ordinance #2001-23 and designating certain indoor/outdoor smoking
areas by the City Manager. A vote was taken and passed 5-1 with Councilwoman Allen, Councilman
Trout, Councilman Newsom, Councilman Young, and Mayor Pro Tem Hogue voting for the motion and
Councilman Worley voting against the motion,with Mayor Mondy absent.
I. Consider and act upon a Preliminary Plat for Akin Addition. (C. Thompson, Planning &
Zoning Director)
Staff Discussion
Planning and Zoning Director Thompson addressed council stating that the Preliminary Plat includes two phases
and totals 49.517 acres and will create 149 single-family detached lots and 14 single-family attached lots. Mr.
Thomson stated that an alley waiver had been granted on this plat at a previous meeting and all lots would be a
minimum of 10,000 sq.ft.
He explained that the Plat complies with the Subdivision Regulations and all pertinent code requirements of the
City of Wylie. Infrastructure for the entire 49.5 acres must be constructed and accepted prior to issuance of a
building permit for residences, rather than being constructed in phases. Mr. Thompson asked council if they had
any questions.
Council Discussion
Councilman Trout stated that he felt the waiver of the alleys should not have been granted in the first place. Mr.
Thompson stated that there were no alleys in the abutting areas of the preliminary plat. Councilman Trout stated
that he was not in favor of waiving alleys due to traffic problems in areas that currently have no alleys.
Councilman Worley asked if it was not the opinion of council, in the past, to allow alley waivers for lots that
would be a minimum of 10,000 sq.ft. He asked council why now the change in opinion.
Council Action
A motion was made by Councilman Worley, seconded by Councilman Young to approve the Preliminary Plat for
the Akin Addition. A vote was taken and passed 4-2 with Mayor Pro Tem Hogue, Councilwoman Allen,
Councilman Worley, and Councilman Young voting for and Councilman Newsom and Councilman Trout voting
against. Mayor Mondy was absent.
Mayor Pro Tern Hogue asked for a 10 minute recess at 6:45 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tern Hogue reconvened the meeting at 6:55 p.m.
Minutes—November 9,2004
Wylie City Council
Page 4
Public Hearing
1. Hold the first of two Public Hearings for the annexation of a 66.194 acre tract out of the
Francisco De La Pina Survey,Abstract#688, Collin County, Texas and generally located west
of Stone Road, east of Kreymer. (M. Manson,Assistant City Manager)
Staff Comments
Assistant City Manager Manson addressed council stating that this annexation is at the request of the property
owners. She explained that a zone change request is being processed concurrently with the annexation.
Before a municipality may begin annexation proceedings, the governing body of the municipality must conduct
two (2) public hearing at which persons interested in the annexation are given the opportunity to be heard. In
compliance with state law, staff has prepared the following public hearing schedule:
Notice published for Public Hearings October 27,2004
First Public Hearing November 9, 2004
Second Public Hearing November 23, 2004
Adoption of Ordinance December 14,2004
Public Hearing
Mayor Pro Tern Hogue opened the public hearing at 6:56 p.m. asking anyone wishing to address council
to come forward and limit their comments to three minutes.
With no one present to address council, Mayor Pro Tern Hogue closed the Public Hearing at 6:57 p.m.
The second public hearing on this annexation will be held on November, 23 2004 with the
proposed ordinance approval set for the December 14, 2004 meeting.
2. Consider and act upon an Agreement for the provision of Wastewater Services to a 4.68 tract
outside the City of Wylie jurisdiction. (M. Manson,Assistant City Manager)
Staff Comments
Assistant City Manager Manson addressed council stating that the developers of a 19.4 acre tract of land in
Rockwall County have requested City of Wylie wastewater services for a 4.68 portion of that tract which falls
outside of Wylie's jurisdiction. The balance of the property inside Wylie City limits received zoning approval on
September 14, 2004 for a residential development. Ms Manson explained that what makes this request different
from others that have requested wastewater services outside the City Limits is that the 4.68 acres was released from
the jurisdiction and ETJ of the City of Rowlett and does not fall into any municipal jurisdiction at this time. A 15%
surcharge would be added to the fees per the Wylie code. Ms. Manson stated she would be happy to answer any
questions.
Council Discussion
Councilman Trout asked Ms. Manson what effect the issue Garland is working in regards to their city limits would
impact this agreement. Ms. Manson stated that there would always be issues with surrounding municipalities as
long as the 100 foot strip of land was there. She reiterated that Rowlett did remove it from their jurisdiction with
the intent that Wylie would service the area. Councilman Trout stated that he felt the 100 foot strip was not in
Garland's easement for power lines and felt that the City of Garland could relinquish rights to the 100 feet and still
have room for their power lines. Ms. Manson concurred. She stated that the developers could possibly negotiate
this with the City of Garland and then at some point Wylie could readjust their limits.
Minutes—November 9,2004
Wylie City Council
Page 5
Developer Comments
Councilman Newsom asked the applicant/developer Harry James residing at 1771 International Parkway, Suite
127, Richardson Texas 75081, what he intended to build on the 4.68 acres in question. Mr. James stated that the
company intended to increase the value of the lots over the current value of$150,000. in this development that was
just approved by Council. He went on to explain that he and his associates were very concerned as to what was
built in this area. Mr. James commented that the company was more than willing to agree to annexation of this
property to the City of Wylie if requested to do so.
Council Action
A motion was made by Councilman Worley, seconded by Councilman Newsom to approve an
Agreement for the provision of Wastewater Services to a 4.68 tract outside the City of Wylie
jurisdiction between The City of Wylie and W. M. Watermark. A vote was taken and passed 4-2 with
Mayor Pro Tern Hogue, Councilwoman Allen, Councilman Worley, and Councilman Newsom voting
for and Councilman Young and Councilman Trout voting against. Mayor Mondy was absent.
II.EADINC ;OF ORDINANCES TITLE `CAPTION APPROVED BY COUNCIL AS
I EQUIRED::II WYLIE CITE CHARTER,A.RTIC t. SECTION13-W
City Secretary Carole Ehrlich read the caption of Ordinance#2004-37 into the official record.
ADJOURNMENT
A motion was made by Councilman Young, seconded by Councilman Newsom to adjourn the meeting at
7:01 p.m. A vote was taken and passed 6-0 with Mayor Mondy absent.
John Mondy,Mayor
ATTEST:
Carole Ehrlich,City Secretary
Minutes—November 9,2004
Wylie City Council
Page 6
MINUTES
SPECIAL CALLED MEETING
Wylie City Council
Monday, November 15, 2004 — 6:00 p.m.
Wylie Municipal Complex— Council Chambers
2000 State Highway 78 North
CALL TO ORDER:.
Mayor John Mondy called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Council Members present were: Mayor Pro
Tem Eric Hogue, Councilwoman Reta Allen, Councilman Chris Trout, Councilman Earl Newsom, and
Councilman Merrill Young. Councilman J. C.Worley was out of town.
Staffs present were: City Manager, Mark B. Roath; Assistant City Manager, Mindy Manson, and City
Secretary, Carole Ehrlich.
INvOCATII�i& ' ,EDE OF tLlalIANCE
Mayor Pro Tern Hogue gave the invocation and Councilman Trout led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Mondy recessed into Executive Session at 6:01 p.m.
EEC> Ti SESIG.
Recess into Closed Session in compliance with Section 551.001, etseq., Texas Government Code,
to wit:
Section 551.072. To deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property generally
located at:
• Brown and 1378
Mayor Mondy reconvened into Open Session at 7:00 p.m.
Take any action as a result of the Executive Session, including but not limited to:
Consider and act upon authorizing the City Manager to enter into an Agreement with the Trust
for Public Land for the purchase of land generally located at Brown and 1378.
Minutes—November 15,2004
Wylie City Council
Page 1
Council Action
A motion was made by Councilman Trout, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Hogue to authorize the City
Manager to enter into an Agreement with the Trust for Public Land for the purchase of land generally
located at Brown and 1378. A vote was taken and passed 6-0 with Councilman Worley absent.
J fURI MENT.
With no further business before council a motion was made by Mayor Pro Tern Hogue, seconded by
Councilman Newsom to adjourn the meeting at 6:11p.m. A vote was taken and passed 7-0.
John Mondy,Mayor
ATTEST:
Carole Ehrlich,City Secretary
Minutes—November 15,2004
Wylie City Council
Page 2
CITY OF WYLIE Item No. 1.
City Secretary's Use Only
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
MEETING FOR:
Regular X Meeting of: November 23, 2004
Other: Department: City Manager
Prepared By: Mindy Manson
Date Prepared: November 16, 2004
Exhibits: Service Plan, Area Map
Public Hearing
AGENDA SUBJECT: Hold the second of two Public Hearings for the annexation of a 66.194 acre tract out
of the Francisco De La Pina Survey, Abstract#688, Collin County, Texas and generally located west of Stone
Road, east of Kreymer.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Public Hearing only - no action required.
SUMMARY:
This annexation is at the request of the property owners. A zone change request is being processed
concurrently with the annexation.
Before a municipality may begin annexation proceedings, the governing body of the municipality must
conduct two (2) public hearing at which persons interested in the annexation are given the opportunity to be
heard. In compliance with state law, staff has prepared the following public hearing schedule:
Notice published for Public Hearings October 27, 2004
First Public Hearing November 9, 2004
Second Public Hearing November 23, 2004
Adoption of Ordinance December 14, 2004
Article 1, Section 3 of the Wylie City Charter authorizes the City Council to adjust boundaries. This
annexation is being conducted in compliance with Sections 43.052 (h) (2) and 43.063 of the Local Government
Code.
APPROVED BY: Initial Date
Department Director: MM \ 11-12-04
City Manager: ///8,C' \ //-/9 05'
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
SERVICE PLAN FOR ANNEXED AREA
KREYMER TRACT
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE NO.:
DATE OF ANNEXATION ORDINANCE:
ACREAGE ANNEXED: 66.174 acres
SURVEY, ABSTRACT & COUNTY: Francisco de la Pina Survey, Abstract 688, Collin County
Municipal Services to the acreage described above shall be furnished by or on behalf of the City of
Wylie, Texas (the "City"), at the following levels and in accordance with the following schedule:
A. POLICE SERVICE
1. Patrolling, responses to calls and other routine police services, within the limits of existing
personnel and equipment and in a manner consistent with any of the methods of the City, extends
police service to any other area of the municipality, will be provided within sixty(60) days of the
effective date of the annexation ordinance.
2. As development and construction commence in this area, sufficient police personnel and
equipment will be provided to furnish this area the maximum level of police services consistent
with the characteristics of topography, land utilization and population density within the area as
determined by the City Council within four and one-half(4-1/2) years from the effective date of
the annexation ordinance, or upon commencement of development within the area, whichever
occurs later.
3. Upon ultimate development of the area, the same level of police services will be provided to this
area as are furnished throughout the City.
FIRE SERVICES
1. Fire protection by the present personnel and the present equipment of the Fire Department,
within the limitations of available water and distances from existing fire stations, and in a
manner consistent with any of the methods of the City, extends fire service to any other area of
the municipality, will be provided to this area within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the
annexation ordinance.
2. As development and construction commence in this area, sufficient fire and emergency
ambulance equipment will be provided to furnish this area the maximum level of fire services
consistent with the characteristics of topography, land utilization and population density within
the area as determined by the City Council within four and one-half (4-1/2) years from the
effective date of the annexation ordinance, or upon commencement of development within the
area, whichever occurs later.
3. Upon ultimate development of the area, the same level of fire and emergency ambulance services
will be provided to this area as are furnished throughout the City.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND CODE ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
1. Enforcement of the City's environmental health ordinances and regulations, including but not
limited to, weed and brush ordinances, junked and abandoned vehicle ordinances and animal
control ordinances, shall be provided within this area sixty (60) days of the effective date of the
7
annexation ordinance. These ordinances and regulations will be enforced through the use of
existing personnel.
2. Complaints of ordinance or regulation violations within this area will be answered and
investigated within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the annexation ordinance.
3. Inspection services, including the review of building plans, the issuance of permits and the
inspection of all buildings, plumbing, mechanical and electrical work to ensure compliance with
City codes and ordinances will be provided within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the
annexation ordinance. Existing personnel will be used to provide these services.
4, The City's zoning, subdivision, sign and other ordinances shall be enforced in this area beginning
within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the annexation ordinance.
5. All inspection services furnished by the City, but not mentioned above, will be provided to this
area beginning within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the annexed ordinance.
6. As development and construction commence in this area, sufficient personnel will be provided to
furnish this area the same level of Environmental Health and Code Enforcement Services as are
furnished throughout the City.
D. PLANNING AND ZONING SERVICES
The planning and zoning jurisdiction of the City will extend to this area within sixty (60) days of
the effective date of the annexation ordinance. City planning will thereafter encompass this
property, and it shall be entitled to consideration for zoning in accordance with the City's
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
E. PARK AND RECREATION SERVICES
1. Residents of this property may utilize all existing park and recreational services, facilities and
sites throughout the City, beginning within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the annexation
ordinance.
2. Additional facilities and sites to serve this property and its residents will be acquired, developed
and maintained at locations and times provided by applicable plans for providing parks and
recreation services to the City.
3. Existing parks, playgrounds, swimming pools and other recreational facilities within this
property shall, upon dedication to and acceptance by the City, be maintained and operated by the
City of Wylie, but not otherwise.
F. SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
1. Solid waste collection shall be provided to the property in accordance with existing City policies,
beginning within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the annexation ordinance. Residents of
this property utilizing private collection services at the time of annexation shall continue to do so
until it becomes feasible because of increased density of population to serve the property
municipally. Commercial refuse collection services will be provided to any business located in
the annexed area at the same price as presently provided for any business customer within the
City, upon request.
2. As development and construction commence in this property and population density increases to
the property level, solid waste collection shall be provided to this property in accordance with the
current policies of the City as to frequency, changes and so forth.
3. Solid waste collection shall begin within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the annexation
ordinance.
G. STREETS
1. The City's existing policies with regard to street maintenance, applicable throughout the entire
City, shall apply to this property beginning within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the
annexation ordinance. Unless a street within this property has been constructed or is improved to
the City's standards and specifications, that street will not be maintained by the City.
2. As development, improvement or construction of streets to City standards commences within
this property, the policies of the City with regard to participation in the costs thereof, acceptance
upon completion and maintenance after completion, shall apply.
3. The same level of maintenance shall be provided to streets within this property which have been
accepted by the City as is provided to City streets throughout the City.
4. Street lighting installed on streets improved to City standards shall be maintained in accordance
with current City policies.
H. WATER SERVICES
1. Connection to existing City water mains for water service for domestic, commercial and
industrial use within this property will be provided in accordance with existing City policies.
Upon connection to existing mains, water will be provided at rates established by City
ordinances for such service throughout the City.
2. As development and construction commence in this property, water mains of the City will be
extended in accordance with provisions of the Subdivision Regulations and other applicable
ordinances and regulations. City participation in the costs of these extensions shall be in
accordance with the applicable City ordinances and regulations. Such extensions will be
commenced within two (2) years from the effective date of the annexation ordinance and
substantially completed with four and one-half(4 1/2) years after that date.
3. Water mains installed or improved to City standards which are within the annexed area and are
within dedicated easements shall be maintained by the City of Wylie beginning within sixty (60)
days of the effective date of the annexation ordinance.
4. Private water lines within this property shall be maintained by their owners in accordance with
existing policies applicable throughout the City.
I. SANITARY SEWER SERVICES
1. Connections to existing City sanitary sewer mains for sanitary sewage service in this area will be
provided in accordance with existing City policies. Upon connection, sanitary sewage service
will be provided at rates established by City ordinances for such service throughout the City.
2. Sanitary sewage mains and/or lift stations installed or improved to City standards, located in
dedicated easements, and which are within the annexed area and are connected to City mains will
be maintained by the City of Wylie beginning within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the
annexation ordinance.
3. As development and construction commence in this area, sanitary sewer mains of the City will
be extended in accordance with provisions of the Subdivision Regulations and other applicable
City ordinances and regulations. Such extensions will be commenced within two (2) years from
the effective date of the annexation ordinance and substantially completed within four and one-
half(4 1/2) years after that date.
a
J. MISCELLANEOUS
1. Any facility or building located within the annexed area and utilized by the City in providing
services to the area will be maintained by the City commencing upon the date of use or within
sixty (60) days of the effective date of the annexation ordinance, whichever occurs later.
2. General municipal administrative services of the City shall be available to the annexed area
beginning within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the annexation ordinance.
3. Notwithstanding, anything set forth above, this Service Plan does not require all municipal
services be provided as set forth above if different characteristics of topography, land use and
population density are considered a sufficient basis for providing different levels of service.
4. The Service Plan is valid for ten (10)years from the effective date of this Ordinance.
5
III ! I t I I 1 I I i lit lit 1 I 1
! -
.._
I
i
'1 !
i -
i
"-- i -
•---l. , !
'------.., i--..,.._i
i
!
i-..--_-......-..-..---..-----..-----..-..---..---..--..
,...,
i ..•
.,...:
'.,..
.....-..................-......-..-.-......-..---..---.......-.......---..
• .I i f.t?;;'.1
..;. 1....:':.-
...---..-----..-..---..-..---......----.._-_-_-..-..-..
. 1 ,,',""-• Zi'....::'-j.\-1
i i ; i .7.-----. ',7-'.•2•;:::::',.--
. , ,0 i ! • r.,.:,,,.:.-.-:-.i
- i...-..-1 ';,,'•,-'-,
' ' ' '' ' -• ':, nu A. ._.
„..,,
- „
°. ....i.j;.,,,„:..7-7:;;;:.-,....v.,.....,,,.:,.,'!.r.,,..„ •-..
-.'..A,
i I ....-i '
i !
. ,,,:„......,,„... ..,,,,.,:„...,:,
._
i
s.. .,..:-...•,T;?-
1111/44,
i
j !Irk
i
An..;j:-.•:";"
r..---. ? i I i Illy
i
i i 11
i i i i J
.....%,?:.
"
! ! i : r
_
i i ! i i --i---,
i i
! ! ! i ! i i '• i ' ! 'N i i i i
i r-..1_....
i _.. .
,.......-.--- ..
_;__.. ,-
.... i i
. : __..--.....•
. . .. -
L..-; ;
! !
! !
! !
...1.11111.1111.
!
! , .. •-• -
.!
,--- ,
v-,-10 11110
!
.-41111 1 ir . .
K g iiith
!
i
i
i
-. - .. . .. . . ..
,--
.,-.
... .
(
.s• ..
-.. %"•.. C.......
-..k.
LOCATION MAP
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
_ _ ....
CITY OF WYLIE Work Session
City Secretary's Use Only
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
MEETING FOR:
Regular: X Meeting of: November 23, 2004
Other: Department: Planning
Prepared By: Claude Thompson
Date Prepared: November 16, 2004
Joint Work Session Exhibits: 2
AGENDA SUBJECT:
Hold a joint work session with the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider and provide direction
concerning certain potential revisions to the Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Provide comment and direction.
SUMMARY:
Following extensive review, the P&Z is proposing certain revisions to the Comprehensive Plan. See attached
"Proposed General Revisions". These recommendations generally endorse the illustrated conclusions of the
Land Use Plan (low-density residential and limited retail centers), but reject the stated philosophy underlying
the Plan (Village Center retail cores supporting pedestrian-oriented high-density residential). These changes
will maintain the over-all results of the Plan (follow the illustrations of the map), likely slow new development
proposals (requiring larger lots than recently proposed), produce a lower built-out population (+/-50K rather
than 75K), lower demand for public services and infrastructure (smaller streets and utilities), and lower
potential tax revenue.
Financial considerations: NA
APPROVED BY: Initial Date
Department Director: CT \ 11/16/04
City Manager: '' 'I \ //-/9.-'O
1
PROPOSED GENERAL REVISIONS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
1. Eliminate Village Center concept (to limit both scattered small convenience retail and large
high-density residential) - remove the Village Center circles and substitute proposed
locational philosophy but generally maintain the map
2. Eliminate pedestrian orientation concept and criteria - accept and accommodate motor
vehicular dominance
3. Discourage additional multi-family or attached (duplex/townhouse) residential
4. Encourage low-density detached residential - eliminate Village 8.5K, set 10K minimum for
Suburban (delete 20K and 30K) and raise Country to 3-5 acres, but keep patterns as
illustrated on map - allow nothing smaller
5. Utilize in-fill or conversion/redevelopment of existing single-family lots for higher-density
detached residential
6. Require larger house sizes (1,900 minimum) with increased added-values (eliminate flexible
zoning requirements and make Desirable Incentives mandatory minimum Base) - but
encourage diversity of size and cost within neighborhoods
7. Locate all nonresidential uses/traffic destinations (retail, schools, churches) to exterior of
residential neighborhoods along thoroughfares - focus neighborhoods inward with interior
for houses and parks only
8. Centralize major/comparative retail within new CBD (78/544) - eliminate other
neighborhood retail zoning
9. Stretch major mixed retail along both sides of 78 and 544 - in connected unified centers
rather than independent strip
10. Expand industrial - convert dimensions of BC to light assembly/warehousing (Regency,
Century Wyndham) and keep I (Premier, rail-yard vicinity) for heavy manufacturing on
campuses
11. Preserve natural features (floodplain, trees, open space) as well as agricultural uses and rural
character
12. Revise Zoning accordingly and encourage straight zoning in compliance with Plan - use
PDs only for truly innovative proposals (not just variance to Plan/ZO code)
Comp Plan Issues
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE DISTRIBUTION PHILOSOPHY
The Comprehensive Plan provides general guidelines for the appropriate location and concentration of
development for the major types of land uses, and, thereby, provides a basis for planning public
services and infrastructure, within Wylie and its Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. The Plan offers
generalized criteria for the testing of zoning regulations and requests for changes in current use, as well
as for evaluating newly arising issues and uses. Both the quality and quantity of public as well as
private development can be directed by the philosophy of the Plan, in order to determine how best to
utilize Wylie's only nonexpendable resource—our land.
The following philosophy provides criteria for allocating commercial, residential, industrial and public
land uses within the Comprehensive Plan. Application of these criteria will assure the suitability of
future land development patterns to achieve the common goals of both the public and private sectors.
COMMERCIAL
Commercial land uses provide retail goods and personal services as well as employment opportunities
to support the local residential population, and public sales tax revenues to supplement property taxes.
However, commercial uses are also major traffic generators, and these uses should be located along
thoroughfares, preferably at major street intersections. Wylie's potential to support commercial land
uses is constrained by its limited ultimate population (+/- 75,000) and the competition of near-by
regional-scale commercial centers. To serve the future population, three types of commercial
categories are proposed, defined by their primary service function and named by the appropriate
zoning classification of the current Zoning Ordinance.
Neighborhood Services
These are smaller retail/office centers intended to serve immediately adjacent residential
neighborhoods with convenience goods and services, and accommodate the uses of the Neighborhood
Services (NS) and Office (0) zoning. These uses should be clustered in unified centers located at one
or two corners of major intersections (approximately 1-mile apart), and should be designed to reflect
the character of the adjacent neighborhoods which they serve.
Community Retail
Community commercial center(s) serve the populations of several residential neighborhoods with
comparison shoppers' goods as well as convenience goods and personal services. These should
accommodate the uses of the Community Retail (CR) zoning, be unified in plan and design, and be
located at major intersections 2 to 3 miles apart. The growing commercial complex at S.H. 78 and
F.M. 544 should be encouraged to become Wylie's New Town Center, attracting the broadest diversity
of functions and reflecting the community's overall character as its central place of focal point. Other
community retail centers should be more residential in character to blend with adjacent neighborhoods,
subordinate to and not competing with the Town Center.
Mixed-Use Corridor Commercial
This category should be the most diverse and intensive mixture of commercial uses. These uses are
located along major thoroughfares to accommodate vehicular access, but not along both sides of
thoroughfares to avoid congestion. They accommodate the broadly-varied uses of the Corridor
Commercial (CC) zoning district, ranging from convenience retail to light industry. Such uses are
normally planned and constructed as independent"strip" developments with little in common other
than required joint/cross access, but are guided by design regulations of the Zoning Ordinance and
screened from residential adjacency.
RESIDENTIAL
Wylie has historically been primarily a residential settlement, and most of its remaining land is suitable
for a variety of residential uses. The Plan should continue to encourage this function as a residential
suburb or"bed-room community". Future residential development should be planned to provide a
choice of dwelling types but in compatible neighborhoods which reflect this historic low-density rural
character. This philosophy demands that less land be allocated to nonresidential service uses, but more
to roads, parks, and schools and other residential-support uses. Three levels of residential density are
proposed, based on the current zoning classifications.
Urban/High-density
This category includes dwellings within 1,500 feet of nonresidential destination attractions such as
neighborhood retail, schools and parks/open spaces, requiring limited need for motor vehicles and
providing easy access by foot, bicycle. This area accommodates small-lot detached single-family
homes (SF 8.5/17), duplexes and townhouses, and apartments at densities of 5 or more dwellings per
acre. These should be clustered in to smaller neighborhoods of unified design, with highest densities
located closest to their nonresidential or open space attraction. Much of Wylie's older areas developed
in urban lots smaller than the smallest size currently allowed, and special concessions must be made to
accommodate in-fill development or redevelopment of such areas.
Suburban/Medium-density
This category includes only detached single-family dwellings on lots of between 10,000 square feet
and 1-acre in size (SF 10 thru SF 30). This density level is designed as traditional residential
neighborhoods, between 1,500 and 3,000 square feet from the perimeter schools and nonresidential
services, and therefore generate greater traffic volumes and requires wider thoroughfares. The
Comprehensive Plan recommends that much of the remaining undeveloped land within Wylie and its
ETJ develop at this density.
Country/Low-density
This category is to accommodate the rural residential development historically common around Wylie,
with lots exceeding 1-acre in size. Lots need not accommodate agriculture uses, and must be 2 acres or
larger to accommodate livestock or cultivated crops. Streets must be paved, but require no curb or
subsurface drainage. Most of the remaining undeveloped land encompassed by the Comprehensive
Plan is allocated to this level of density
INDUSTRIAL
Industrial land uses primarily provide employment for the local population while providing
manufactured products for the region and world beyond, as well as generating private revenues
through employment and sales and public revenues through taxes. Industrial uses can generally be
divided in to light or heavy categories, depending on the intensity of the operations and their
consequences.
Heavy Industry
Heavy industry generally includes the more-intensive processing and manufacturing of raw materials
into usable products, and such operations normally create the most obnoxious consequences. Heavy
industry requires access to transportation (highways and rail) and resources (water), but must be
isolated or buffered from other land uses on larger campus settings. The northeast area of Wylie, as
well as the existing Premier Business Park on the southwest, provide these unique locational criteria.
Light Industry
Light industry includes less-intensive assembly, warehousing and distribution of products, as well as
people-based office-oriented operations. Such operations can be located on the smaller lots within
existing Century, Regency and Wyndham industrial districts.
INSTITUTIONAL/PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC
All private development requires certain public or quasi-public support use, which must be planned in
coordination with the private uses.
Municipal Uses
Some municipal uses (such as offices) need to be centrally located and equally accessible by all
residents, while others (such as fire stations) need to be decentralized and equally accessible to all
residences. New municipal offices should be located within or adjacent to the planned Town Center to
help enforce the image of this area as Wylie's central address and destination place
Utilities normally have unique design criteria which largely dictate their design and location. Public
utilities must be within or adjacent to the other land uses which they serve, but should be located so as
to blend with rather than detract from the character of the surrounding primary uses.
Streets and roads make development possible, and their capacity should largely dictate the potential
density/intensity of the various uses of land. Thoroughfares should be planned in accordance with the
current Thoroughfare Plan and Engineering Design Standards.
Schools and Houses of Worship
Schools and day care operations as well as churches and other religious instructions generally belong
in proximity to the populations which they serve. However, as major traffic generators,these
institutional uses should be placed to the exterior of residential neighborhoods and combined together
when possible.
Parks and Recreation
Public parks and recreational facilities should be located in accordance with the adopted Parks,
Recreation and Open Space Master Plan. Both public and private leisure amenities should be designed
as an asset to the residential uses rather than detract from them with traffic and other nuisances.
CITY OF WYLIE Work Session
City Secretary's Use Only
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
MEETING FOR:
Regular X Meeting of: November 23, 2004
Other: Department: Finance
Prepared By: Ron Hutchison
Date Prepared: November 17, 2004
Exhibits: Water& Wastewater Rates-Maximus,Inc.
AGENDA SUBJECT: Work session for the presentation of the Water & Wastewater Rate Study by Bob
McClain consultant for Maximus, Inc., for City Council consideration.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action is required tonight. Council should direct staff to prepare an action
item concerning any rate increases for a future City Council meeting as may deemed appropriate.
SUMMARY: Proposals were received in February 2003 to provide a Water & Wastewater Rate Study. The
consultant chosen to provide this study was Maximus, Inc. Required revenue requirements were presented to the
City Council at a work session on January 27, 2004. The driving force behind the study has always been the
construction of the Muddy Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, "MCWTP". After the January 27, 2004, meeting,
the study was delayed to allow more accurate information in two areas. The first was actual debt service numbers
from the North Texas Municipal Water District, "NTMWD". Second, was the FY2005 operating budget
numbers for the operation of the MCWTP. These numbers were also received last summer.
Mr. Bob McClain will present his findings at the work session. As we have known since the study began, some
adjustment in rates will be required on the sewer side. This is primarily the result of the construction of the
MCWTP but as we have realized this summer we must also factor in an accelerated construction schedule for the
expansion of the soon to be completed MCWTP. We have tried to mitigate the total impact of the MCWTP by
utilizing sewer impact fees in future years to pay for debt service payments. The City Council also indicated an
interest in conservation rates for water and an alternative is included in the study.
APPROVED BY: Initial Date
Department Director: RH \ 10/17/04
City Manager: /Jm,F' \ //-/9,051
City of Wylie
Presentation on
Water & Wastewater Rates
November 23, 2004
Presented by:
Bob McLain
MAXIMUS
Workshop outline
■ Overview of Study Process
■ Key Planning Assumptions
■ Key Findings
■ Rate Design Alternatives
■ Customer Impact
MAXIMUS
Overview of Study Process
■ Identify revenues required from
rates (Multi-year financial plan , what
level of revenues will be needed
over the planning period?)
■ Develop rate design alternatives
(How should the required revenues
be recovered?)
MAXIMUS
Overview of KeyPlanning
Assumptions
• Growth in water customers, 750 units added per year for four years,
then 500 units per year added for five more years (Table 1 )
• Growth in wastewater customers, 1 ,000 units added per year for five
years, then 700 units per year added for five more years (Table 2)
• NTMWD Water Costs, $0.05 per 1 ,000 gallons increase per year (Table
4)
• Staffing levels (Table 5)
• Average Increase in salaries and benefits, 6% (Table 6)
• All other operating and maintenance expenditures, 3% per year
• Transfers to Infrastructure Renewal and Replacement (R&R) fund
3 MAXIMUS
H6'LP/NG GOVERNMf NT SERVE THE PEOPLE
Table 1
Key Findings
Growth - Water
Average Average Annual
Number Gals/ Volume
Fiscal Additional of % Meter/ % Billed 0/0
Year Meters Meters Growth Month Growth (Th. Gals.) Growth
2004 750 7,162 11 .7% 12,462 0.0% 1 ,071 ,018 11 .7%
2005 750 7,912 10.5% 12,465 0.0% 1 ,183,480 10.5%
2006 750 8,662 9.5% 12,468 0.0% 1 ,295,944 9.5%
2007 750 9,412 8.7% 12,470 0.0% 1 ,408,407 8.7%
2008 750 10,162 8.0% 12,472 0.0% 1 ,520,865 8.0%
2009 500 10,662 4.9% 12,472 0.0% 1 ,595,673 4.9%
2010 500 11 ,162 4.7% 12,471 0.0% 1 ,670,479 4.7%
2011 500 11 ,662 4.5% 12,471 0.0% 1 ,745,282 4.5%
2012 500 12,162 4.3% 12,471 0.0% 1 ,820,087 4.3%
2013 500 12,662 4.1% 12,471 0.0% 1 ,894,891 4.1%
A' 'Pl-t-L
4 MAXIMUS
HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE"
Table 2
Key Findings
Growth - Wastewater
Average Average Annual
Number Gals/ Volume
Fiscal Additional of % Meter/ % Billed 0/0
Year Meters Meters Growth Month Growth (Th. Gals.) Growth
2004 1 ,280 8,125 18.7% 9,858 0.0% 961 ,175 18.7%
2005 1 ,000 9,125 12.3% 9,858 0.0% 1 ,079,406 12.3%
2006 1 ,000 10,125 11 .0% 9,857 0.0% 1 ,197,639 11 .0%
2007 1 ,000 11 ,125 9.9% 9,857 0.0% 1 ,315,869 9.9%
2008 1 ,000 12,125 9.0% 9,856 0.0% 1 ,434,100 9.0%
2009 700 12,825 5.8% 9,856 0.0% 1 ,516,799 5.8%
2010 700 13,525 5.5% 9,855 0.0% 1 ,599,497 5.5%
2011 700 14,225 5.2% 9,855 0.0% 1 ,682,199 5.2%
2012 700 14,925 4.9% 9,854 0.0% 1 ,764,897 4.9%
2013 700 15,625 4.7% 9,854 0.0% 1 ,847,598 4.7%
er
t '
5 MAXIMUS
NELPlNG GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE`
1 I
Table 3
Key Findings
Water Purchases from NTMWD
Planned Annual Consumption Planned Rates
Take-or- Actual Amount Take-or- Actual NTMWD
Fiscal Pay Planned Over/(Under) Pay Planned Annual yo
Year Minimum Usage (000's) Minimum Minimum Usage Charges Change
2004 1,042,381 1,164,677 122,296 0.92 0.20 983,450 20.5%
2005 1,164,677 1,286,973 122,297 0.97 0.21 1,155,052 17.4%
2006 1,286,973 1,409,272 122,299 1.02 0.22 1,339,251 15.9%
2007 1,409,272 1,531,570 122,298 1.07 0.23 1,535,682 14.7%
2008 1,531,570 1,653,862 122,292 1.12 0.24 1,744,341 13.6%
2009 1,653,862 1,735,212 81,350 1.17 0.25 1,955,112 12.1%
2010 1,735,212 1,816,559 81,348 1.22 0.26 2,137,864 9.3%
2011 1,816,559 1,897,904 81,344 1.27 0.27 2,328,749 8.9%
2012 1,897,904 1,979,250 81,347 1.32 0.28 2,527,766 8.5%
2013 1,979,250 2,060,596 81,345 1.37 0.29 2,734,919 8.2%
Note - we have assumed that the City will continue the policy of passing through any rate increases from
NTMWD to the ratepayer.
A, • wilt...,
6 MAXIMUS
HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE TH£.PEOPLE'
Table 4
Key Findings
City of Wylie Utility Staffing Levels
Utility Utility
Fiscal Admin. Utilities Eng. Billing Total
Year (711 ) (712) (713) (715) Staffing
2004 3.50 14.00 3.00 7.50 28.00
2005 4.50 16.00 4.00 8.50 33.00
2006 4.50 17.00 4.00 8.50 34.00
2007 4.50 17.00 4.00 8.50 34.00
2008 4.50 17.00 4.00 8.50 34.00
2009 4.50 20.00 4.00 8.50 37.00
2010 4.50 20.00 4.00 8.50 37.00
2011 4.50 20.00 4.00 8.50 37.00
2012 4.50 20.00 4.00 8.50 37.00 Lw
2013 4.50 20.00 4.00 8.50 37.00
MAXIMUS
7 NH PING GOVERNME""NT SERVF,THE PF,OPLE`
Table 5
Key Findings
Personnel-Related Costs
Utility Water Sewer Utility
Fiscal Inflation Admin. Utilities Eng. Utilities Billing cyo
Year Driver (711) (712) (713) (714) (715) Total Notes Change
2004 6.00% 266,390 474,330 226,150 192,580 367,410 1,526,860 (1) 21.4%
2005 6.00% 315,190 580,640 306,170 249,000 425,330 1,876,330 (2) 22.9%
2006 6.00% 300,163 747,367 257,537 320,499 371,077 1,996,642 6.4%
2007 6.00% 318,172 792,209 272,988 339,728 393,341 2,116,438 6.0%
2008 6.00% 337,261 839,741 289,367 360,112 416,943 2,243,425 6.0%
2009 6.00% 357,498 1,047,207 306,729 449,081 441,961 2,602,476 16.0%
2010 6.00% 378,949 1,110,039 325,134 476,026 468,478 2,758,625 6.0%
2011 6.00% 401,686 1,176,641 344,643 504,588 496,588 2,924,146 6.0%
2012 6.00% 425,789 1,247,240 365,320 534,863 526,384 3,099,595 6.0%
2013 6.00% 451,336 1,322,074 387,240 566,955 557,966 3,285,570 6.0%
Note (1) - Sewer maintenance department was created. (2) - Due to additional staffing
I
rirolf Th '
MAXIMUS
8 HELPING GOV&RNMP.NP SERVE 7HE PEOPLE'
Table 6
Key Findings
Total Departmental Operating and Maintenance Costs
Including Departmental Capital
Excluding NTMWD Costs
Utility Water Sewer Utility Combined
Fiscal Admin. Utilities Eng. Utilities Billing Services %
Year (711) (712) (713) (714) (715) (719) Total Notes Change
2004 291,700 858,250 356,730 761,720 626,490 70,000 2,964,890 (1) 37.2%
2005 357,820 991,810 476,540 592,180 746,340 118,000 3,282,690 (2) 10.7%
2006 342,887 1,170,180 432,848 673,169 701,529 114,422 3,435,034 4.6%
2007 362,091 1,227,014 453,386 702,171 733,519 121,652 3,599,833 4.8%
2008 382,412 1,286,899 475,006 732,624 767,138 129,205 3,773,285 4.8%
2009 403,918 1,507,066 497,767 831,939 802,474 135,755 4,178,919 10.8%
2010 426,675 1,582,982 521,731 869,543 839,618 142,578 4,383,126 4.9%
2011 450,756 1,663,062 546,968 909,084 878,672 149,684 4,598,226 4.9%
2012 476,245 1,747,543 573,543 950,674 919,742 157,084 4,824,830 4.9%
2013 503,220 1,836,676 601,537 994,420 962,937 164,790 5,063,579 4.9%
Note (1) - Sewer maintenance department was created. (2) - Due to additional staffing
��JL-- �/C
MAXIMUS
9 HI LPING GOVERNMENT SERVI-7HE PEOPI,I-'
Table 7
Key Findings
Recap of Operating & Maintenance Costs
Departmental Water Wastewater
O&M Purchases Treatment
Fiscal From From From
Year Table 6 Table 3 Table 5 Total Change
2004 2,964,890 1 ,020,910 1 ,163,680 5,149,480 26.5%
2005 3,282,690 1 ,377,000 1 ,527,000 6,186,690 20.1%
2006 3,435,034 1 ,339,251 1 ,872,810 6,647,096 7.4%
2007 3,599,833 1 ,535,682 2,528,994 7,664,510 15.3%
2008 3,773,285 1 ,744,341 2,604,864 8,122,490 6.0%
2009 4,178,919 1 ,955,112 2,683,010 8,817,041 8.6%
2010 4,383,126 2,137,864 2,763,500 9,284,491 5.3%
2011 4,598,226 2,328,749 2,846,405 9,773,380 5.3%
2012 4,824,830 2,527,766 2,931 ,797 10,284,393 5.2%
2013 5,063,579 2,734,919 3,019,751 10,818,249 5.2%
PP
MAXIMUS
10 HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE T'HE PEOPLE'
Table 8
Key Findings
Revenue Debt - Existing
Fiscal Series Series Series
Year 1999 2000 2002 Total
2004 115,755 140,518 83,650 339,923
2005 112,505 137,149 86,775 336,429
2006 114,093 138,628 84,775 337,495
2007 110,518 139,799 82,775 333,092
2008 111 ,930 140,665 85,650 338,245
2009 113,473 141 ,224 83,400 338,097
2010 110,158 141 ,828 86,025 338,010
2011 111 ,680 142,549 83,663 337,892
2012 112,910 143,065 86,574 342,549 ,x)L`
2013 113,840 143,324 84,566 341 ,731 I
MAXIMUS„
HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE 7'HE PEOPLE`
Table 9
Key Findings
Non-Revenue Debt - Existing
NTMWD Contract Revenue Bonds
Wylie Wylie
Fiscal Series Series Series Series Plant Interceptor
Year 1993 1995 1997 1988 2004 (Note 1) 2004 (Note 1) Total
2004 387,989 232,825 98,778 203,325 - - 922,918
2005 395,145 230,115 97,776 196,325 845,860 180,000 1,945,220
2006 364,528 228,643 99,263 198,847 845,860 180,000 1,917,141
2007 239,831 230,936 98,790 200,077 845,860 180,000 1,795,494
2008 245,712 229,397 100,331 - 845,860 180,000 1,601,299
2009 167,175 230,556 101,609 - 845,860 180,000 1,525,199
2010 169,960 231,015 100,471 - 845,860 180,000 1,527,306
2011 - 233,918 101,341 - 845,860 180,000 1,361,118
2012 - 232,731 101,935 - 845,860 180,000 1,360,526
2013 - 235,140 102,296 - 845,860 180,000 1,363,296
Note 1 - The NTMWD Wastewater debt will be funded 100% with wastewater impact fees
�C3\
MAXIMUS
12 HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE.`
I 1 1 li 1 r I a i i u i i
Table 10
Capital Projects-Water
Planned Planned Planned Planned Planned Planned
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Description (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Beginning Balance S - $ - $ 460,800 $ 44,400 $ 1,467,000 $ 51,800
Bond Issue-Water $ - $ 3,100,000 $ - S 2,700,000 $ - $ 2,600,000
Impact Fees-Water(Note 1) 3,142,400 1,092,800 277,600 851,600 276,800 -
Drawdown of Operating Reserves-Water 302,950 89,350 89,350 89,350 89,350 89,350
Total Sources of Funds-Water $ 3,445,350 $ 4,282,150 $ 366,950 $ 3,640,950 $ 366,150 $ 2,689,350
2 MMG Elevated Tank Creekside $ 3,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Automated Meter Reading - 1,000,000 - - - -
NORTEX water tank(s)/pump station site - - - - 1,000,000 -
2 MMG Elevated Storage Tank on Ballard - - - - - 2,600,000
Easements 89,350 89,350 89,350 89,350 89,350 89,350
Total Water Non-Impact Fee CIP $ 3,089,350 $ 1,089,350 $ 89,350 $ 89,350 $ 1,089,350 $ 2,689,350
2005 Project 1-Creekside Tank $ - $ 561,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
2005 Project 2-Creekside Tank 356,000 - - - - -
2005-2008 Project 1-Newport Harbor/FM 1378 - - - 1,376,000 332,000 -
2005-2008 Project 2-Creekside Waterline - 439,000 - - - -
2008-2015 Project 3-Lakeside Waterline - - - - - -
2005 Project 1-Creekside Tank - 300,000 - - - -
2005-2008 Project 1-Westgate Bore - 85,000 - - - -
2005-2008 Project 2-SH 78 Waterline - 813,000 - - - -
2005-2008 Project 3-NTMWD Pump Station - - 694,000 - - -
2005-2010 Project 4-Hensley Lane - - - 683,000 - -
2010-2015 Project 5-Twin Lakes - - - 70,000 - -
2010-2015 Project 6-KCS - - - - 360,000 -
2010-2015 Project 7-Woodbridge - 534,000 - - - -
Total Water Impact Fee CIP-Note 1 $ 356,000 $ 2,732,000 $ 694,000 $ 2,129,000 $ 692,000 $ -
Total Uses of Funds $ 3,445,350 $ 3,821,350 $ 783,350 $ 2,218,350 $ 1,781,350 $ 2,689,350
Sources Minus Uses of Funds $ - $ 460,800 $ (416,400) $ 1,422,600 $ (1,415,200) $ -
Ending Balance $ - $ 460,800 $ 44,400 $ 1,467,000 $ 51,800 $ 51,800
Note-An average of 40%of the projects are eligible for impact fee funding.
3 MAXIMUS
HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE 7'HE PEOPLE'
1 1 1 1 I I a i a a i 6 I i
Table 11
Capital Projects - Wastewater
Planned Planned
2005 2006
Description (2) (3)
Beginning Balance $ - $ 1,000,000
Bond Issue - Wastewater S - $ -
Reimbursement from NTMWD 1,000,000 -
Impact Fees - Wastewater - 900,000
Drawdown of Operating Reserves - Wastewater 89,350 89,350
Total Sources of Funds - Wastewater $ 1,089,350 $ 989,350
Twin Lakes Outfall Sewer $ - $ 1,900,000
Easements 89,350 89,350
Total Wastewater Non-Impact Fee CIP $ 89,350 $ 1,989,350
Not Used $ - $ -
Total Wastewater Impact Fee CIP $ - $ -
Total Uses of Funds $ 89,350 $ 1,989,350
Sources Minus Uses of Funds $ 1,000,000 $ (1,000,000)
Ending Balance $ 1,000,000 $ -
4 MAXIMUS
1HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPI.t,'
Table 12
Key Findings
Planned Annual New Debt Service
(Water Only)
Fiscal 2006 2008 2010
Year $3,100,000 $2,700,000 $2,600,000 Total
2004 - - - -
2005 - - - -
2006 - - - -
2007 139,500 - - 139,500
2008 294,500 - - 294,500
2009 287,525 121 ,500 - 409,025
2010 280,550 256,500 - 537,050
2011 273,575 250,425 117,000 641 ,000
2012 235,600 244,350 247,000 726,950 /�\
2013 230,020 238,275 241 ,150 709,445 psi"- 1a
MAXIMUS
15 NEI l'ING GOVERNMENT SERVE 7HE PEOPLE"
Table 13
Key Findings
Recap of Debt Service
Revenue Debt Service Non-Revenue Debt
Fiscal Existing Planned Existing NTMWD (Note 1) %
Year Table 8 Table 12 Table 9 Planned Total Change
2004 339,923 - 922,918 - 1,262,841 -1.0%
2005 336,429 - 1,945,220 - 2,281,650 80.7%
2006 337,495 - 1,917,141 - 2,254,636 -1 .2%
2007 333,092 139,500 1,795,494 425,381 2,693,467 19.5%
2008 338,245 294,500 1,601,299 425,381 2,659,426 -1.3%
2009 338,097 409,025 1 ,525,199 425,381 2,697,702 1.4%
2010 338,010 537,050 1,527,306 425,381 2,827,747 4.8%
2011 337,892 641,000 1,361 ,118 425,381 2,765,391 -2.2%
2012 342,549 726,950 1,360,526 425,381 2,855,406 3.3%
2013 341,731 709,445 1,363,296 425,381 2,839,853 -0.5%
Note 1 - The NTMWD Wastewater debt will be funded 100% with wastewater impact fees
�Vwr ► V✓ V V V�
MAXIMUS
16 HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE'
Table 14
Key Findings
Recap of Non-Operating Costs
Transfers to the Infrastructure Renewal and Replacement Fund
Fiscal Annual Depreciation Percentage Funded Transfers
Year Water Sewer Water Sewer Water Sewer
2004 $ 595,000 $ 255,000 0.0% 0.0% $ - $ -
2005 620,000 280,000 0.0% 0.0% - -
2006 645,000 305,000 25.0% 25.0% 161,250 76,250
2007 670,000 330,000 35.0% 35.0% 234,500 115,500
2008 695,000 355,000 45.0% 45.0% 312,750 159,750
2009 720,000 380,000 55.0% 55.0% 396,000 209,000
2010 745,000 405,000 65.0% 65.0% 484,250 263,250
2011 770,000 430,000 75.0% 75.0% 577,500 322,500
2012 795,000 455,000 85.0% 85.0% 675,750 386,750
2013 820,000 480,000 100.0% 100.0% 820,000 480,000
VAPIL
MAXIMUS
1 7 HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE'
Table 15
Key Findings
Recap of Non-Operating Costs
Transfer
Transfer To
Debt To R&R Non-
Fiscal Service General Fund Operating %
Year Table 13 Fund Table 14 Revenues Total Change
2004 1 ,262,841 420,000 - (96,000) 1 ,586,841 -0.7%
2005 2,281 ,650 420,000 - (79,200) 2,622,450 65.3%
2006 2,254,636 437,000 237,500 (77,100) 2,852,036 8.8%
2007 2,693,467 454,000 350,000 (76,900) 3,420,567 19.9%
2008 2,659,426 472,000 472,500 (74,400) 3,529,526 3.2%
2009 2,697,702 491 ,000 605,000 (75,500) 3,718,202 5.3%
2010 2,827,747 511 ,000 747,500 (75,000) 4,011 ,247 7.9%
2011 2,765,391 531 ,000 900,000 (74,300) 4,122,091 2.8%
2012 2,855,406 552,000 1 ,062,500 (75,000) 4,394,906 6.6%
2013 2,839,853 574,000 1 ,300,000 (75,600) 4,638,253 5.5%
1 g MAXIMUS
HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE'
Table 16
Key Findings
Recap of Total Gross Cost of Service
Total
Total Non-
Operating Operating Total
Costs Costs Gross
Fiscal From From Cost of
Year Table 7 Table 13 Service Change
2004 5,149,480 1 ,586,841 6,736,321 18.8%
2005 6,186,690 2,622,450 8,809,140 30.8%
2006 6,647,096 2,852,036 9,499,132 7.8%
2007 7,664,510 3,420,567 11 ,085,077 16.7%
2008 8,122,490 3,529,526 11 ,652,016 5.1%
2009 8,817,041 3,718,202 12,535,244 7.6%
2010 9,284,491 4,011 ,247 13,295,738 6.1%
2011 9,773,380 4,122,091 13,895,471 4.5%
2012 10,284,393 4,394,906 14,679,299 5.6%
2013 10,818,249 4,638,253 15,456,503 5.3%
((��
MAXIMUS
19 HI[.PING GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE'
[ i i d ii
Table 17
Key Findings
Subsidy Between Water & Wastewater
Existing Collect Shift Required
Split Between Revenues Split Between Revenues Between Revenues
Waste- Waste-
Fiscal Watei Watei Watei Watei Watei Revenues Nastewatei Revenue!
Year Revenues Revenues Revenues Revenues
2004 $ 3,625,521 $2,717,582 $2,747,999 $ 3,595,104 $ (877,522) -24.2% $ 877,522 32.3%
2005 4,060,001 3,112,884 3,301,174 3,871,711 V58,827) -18.7% 758,827 24.4%
2006 4,504,745 3,522,913 3,621,167 4,406,492 (883,579) -19.6°.0 883,579 25.14:0
2007 4,959,746 3,948,096 3,989,551 4,918,290 (970,195) p6a a 970,195 24.6°0
2008 5,424,989 4,388,876 4,679,034 5,134,831 (745,955) -13.8% 745,955 17.0°0
2009 5,764,573 4,735,466 5,250,908 5,249,131 (513,665) -8.91).:0 513,665 10.8%
2010 6,110,975 5,094,163 5,736,885 5,468,252 (374,090) -6.1°0 374,090 7.3%
2011 6,464,189 5,465,318 6,316,547 5,612,960 (147,643) -2.3% 147,643 2.7°.0
2012 6,824,231 5,849,276 6,809,704 5,863,804 (14,528) -0.2% 14,528 0.2%
2013 7,191,088 6,123,934 7,209,336 6,105,686 18,248 0.3°0 (18,248) -0.3°0
Trrivf
MAXIMUS 20
HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE'
Table 18
Key Findings
Financing Scenario 1
With Annual Increases
Transfer Changes Ending Days of W/C
Fiscal To in WIC Working Working Reserve
Year Wastewater R&R Reserve Capital Capital Percent
2004 - - (24,717) 3,026,060 172 47.2%
2005 2.0% - (226,495) 2,799,565 137 37.6%
2006 2.0% 237,500 (22,040) 2,777,525 129 35.3%
2007 2.0% 350,000 (262,348) 2,515,177 103 28.2%
2008 2.0% 472,500 117,311 2,632,488 103 28.2%
2009 3.0% 605,000 (3,871 ) 2,628,617 95 26.1%
2010 3.0% 747,500 25,129 2,653,746 91 24.9%
2011 2.0% 900,000 187,424 2,841 ,170 94 25.6%
2012 2.0% 1 ,062,500 186,008 3,027,178 95 25.9%
2013 - 1 ,300,000 84,777 3,111 ,955 93 25.5%
Note - Water will also increase annually by $0.05 per Th. Gallons, due to expected
increases by NTMWD.
MAXIMUS
7 1 HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVP.THE PEOPLE,'
Table 19
Key Findings
Financing Scenario 2
With Increases Every Other Year
Transfer Changes Ending Days of WIC
Fiscal To in W/C Working Working Reserve
Year Wastewater R&R Reserve Capital Capital Percent
2004 - - (24,717) 3,026,060 172 47.2%
2005 4.0% - (164,358) 2,861,702 140 38.5%
2006 - 237,500 (22,994) 2,838,708 132 36.0%
2007 4.0% 350,000 (184,582) 2,654,126 109 29.8%
2008 - 472,500 115,137 2,769,263 108 29.7%
2009 4.0% 605,000 40,843 2,810,106 102 27.9%
2010 - 747,500 (81 ,520) 2,728,586 93 25.6%
2011 4.0% 900,000 180,874 2,909,459 96 26.2%
2012 - 1 ,062,500 59,964 2,969,424 93 25.4%
2013 4.0% 1 ,300,000 200,680 3,170,104 95 26.0%
Note - Water will also increase annually by $0.05 per Th. Gallons, due to expected
increases by NTMWD.
/17"1Y M I V-7 V .1`
22 MAXIMUS
HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE`
I I
Water Rate Design Alternatives
• Water rate design alternative 1 — only
difference between existing and alternative 1
is that we have increased the volumetric rate
by $0.05 per 1 ,000 gallons to pass the $0.05
increase from NTMWD.
• Water rate design alternative 2 -
conservation rate. Monthly minimum bills
are the same as existing , but higher rates for
residential consumption over 10,000 gallons,
as well as irrigation meters.
• Water rate design alternative 3 — seasonal
conservation rate.
23 MAXIMUS
MI PING GOVERNMENT SERVE 7'HE PEOPLE'
Table 20
Existing & Alternative Rate Structures - Water
Water Alternatives
Existing 1 2 Alternative 3
Peak (1) Non-Peak
Revenues Collected $ 4,006,036 $ 4,060,001 $ 4,060,001 $ 4,060,001
Monthly Minimum Bills:
Residential $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90
Commercial 12.15 12.15 12.15 12.15 12.15
Multi-Family 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15
Volumetric Rates per Th. Gallons
Residential:
1,001 to 2,000 Gallons $ 2.12 $ 2.17 $ 2.50 $ 3.28 $ 2.50
2,001 to 10,000 Gallons 2.85 2.90 2.50 3.28 2.50
Over 10,000 Gallons 2.85 2.90 3.26 3.28 2.50
Irrigation Meters:
1,001 to 2,000 Gallons $ 2.12 $ 2.17 $ 3.61 $ 3.63 $ 2.85
Over 2,000 Gallons 2.85 2.90 3.61 3.63 2.85
Commercial & Multi-Family:
1,001 to 2,000 Gallons $ 2.22 $ 2.27 $ 2.85 $ 2.85 $ 2.85
Over 2,000 Gallons 2.85 2.90 2.85 2.85 2.85
(1) - Peak months are June - October
/PwVIV LT V tt...,
MAXIMUS
24 HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE'
Wastewater Rate Design
Alternatives
• Alternatives 1a and 2a collect 2% more
wastewater revenues.
• Alternatives 1b and 2b collect 4% more
wastewater revenues.
• Alternatives la and 2a are across-the-board
increases to the existing wastewater rates.
• Alternatives lb and 2b only increase the
volumetric rates.
:04172t,
MAXIMUS
25 HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE 7'NE PEOPLE
Table 21
Existing & Alternative Rate Structures - Wastewater
Wastewater Alternatives
Existing la 1 b 2a 2b
Revenues Generated $ 3,051 ,847 $ 3,112,884 $ 3,173,921 $ 3,112,884 $ 3,173,921
Percentage Increase 2.0% 4.0% 2.0% 4.0%
Monthly Minimum Bills:
Residential $ 15.00 $ 15.30 $ 15.60 $ 15.00 $ 15.00
Commercial 21 .50 21.93 22.36 21 .50 21 .50
Multi-Family 23.00 23.46 23.92 23.00 23.00
Volumetric Rates per Th. Gallons
1 ,001 to 2,000 Gallons $ 1 .45 $ 1 .48 $ 1 .51 $ 1.53 $ 1.61
Over 2,000 Gallons (Note 1) 1 .45 1 .48 1.51 1 .53 1 .61
(2) - Residential volume for wastewater is capped at 14,500 gallons.
26 MAXIMUS
HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE'
I a I Y W It t i & 1 1 i
Table 22
Comparison of Selected Cities
Monthly Combined Water&Wastewater Bills
Residential Class
3
--1: F --Taw--55- Kank -$-- Kank - cr
Monthly Cons.(Gals.) 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000
1 Allen 1 29.20 1 54.10 1 67.05 1 80.00 4 110.20
2 Bedford 6 49.00 3 61.47 3 71.82 2 82.17 1 102.87
3 Carrollton 9 52.12 12 73.32 15 94.52 19 115.72 19 158.12
4 Colleyville 12 56.84 17 79.49 22 102.14 25 124.79 28 170.09
5 Commerce 40 80.35 40 110.90 39 141.45 39 172.00 39 233.10
6 Corinth 22 63.10 30 93.15 34 123.20 37 160.75 40 235.85
7 Corsicana 26 65.53 22 85.73 24 105.93 26 126.13 26 166.53
8 Denton 29 66.70 28 92.05 32 121.90 33 151.75 35 215.70
9 DeSoto 38 76.34 39 108.94 40 141.54 40 174.14 41 239.34
10 Duncanville 33 70.81 35 100.06 35 129.31 35 158.56 36 217.06
11 Ennis 25 64.72 16 78.07 12 91.42 8 104.77 8 131.47
12 Euless 13 58.05 14 76.84 9 89.84 7 102.84 6 128.84
13 Fairview 15 59.30 15 77.10 10 91.10 10 106.35 13 140.60
14 Flower Mound 18 61.18 24 87.98 29 114.78 30 141.58 31 195.18
15 Forney 5 49.00 10 71.75 14 94.50 21 117.25 24 162.75
16 Frisco 8 50.27 7 69.52 13 92.27 18 115.02 22 160.52
17 Garland 7 49.45 8 70.35 11 91.25 12 112.15 18 153.95
18 Grapevine 27 65.55 34 95.55 26 109.25 23 122.95 17 150.35
19 Greenville 42 97.28 41 134.83 42 172.38 42 209.93 42 285.03
20 HaltomCity 30 68.20 31 93.30 30 118.40 31 143.50 30 193.70
21 Highland Village 41 95.00 42 141.25 41 157.50 41 178.75 38 226.25
22 Hurst 31 69.15 29 92.72 28 111.87 28 131.02 27 169.32
23 Irving 3 46.11 9 70.86 16 95.61 22 121.11 29 172.11
24 Kaufman 35 74.00 37 103.00 37 132.00 38 161.00 37 219.00
25 Keller 32 69.49 32 93.99 31 118.49 29 132.69 25 165.59
26 Lancaster 39 76.65 38 104.30 36 131.95 36 159.60 34 214.90
27 Lewisville 28 65.62 33 94.22 33 122.82 32 151.42 33 208.62
28 Little Elm 11 56.20 11 72.70 7 89.20 9 105.70 10 138.70
29 McKinney 14 58.67 13 74.65 6 88.65 6 102.65 7 130.65
30 Mesquite 4 47.15 2 59.05 2 70.95 3 82.85 3 106.65
31 Murphy 17 59.98 6 69.23 5 78.48 4 87.73 2 106.23
32 North Richland Hills 24 64.62 26 88.82 27 111.46 27 127.86 23 160.66
33 Rockwall 2 44.48 5 65.45 8 89.20 14 112.95 21 160.45
34 Rowlett 37 76.10 27 91.90 25 107.70 24 123.50 20 160.10
35 Sachse 23 63.25 25 88.25 23 102.53 17 114.13 9 137.33
36 Terrell 10 53.30 4 64.90 4 76.50 5 88.10 5 111.30
37 Watauga 34 73.59 36 102.74 38 132.49 34 153.69 32 196.09
38 Waxahatchie 36 74.35 23 87.45 21 100.55 16 113.65 12 139.85
39 Wylie 19 61.87 18 82.65 17 96.90 11 111.15 11 139.65
39 Wylie-Alt 1 20 62.60 21 84.42 19 98.92 15 113.42 15 142.42 /�,�
39 Wylie-Alt 2 16 59.80 19 83.52 20 99.80 20 116.08 16 148.64 -�0(,`
39 Wylie-Alt 3(Average) 21 62.72 20 84.28 18 98.40 13 112.52 14 140.76
I s
MA)(IMUS
2 7 HELPING GOVF.RNMEN7 SERVE THE PEOPLE'
1 1 li Y
Table 22
Comparison of Selected Cities
Average Monthly Combined Water&Wastewater Bills
Commercial Class
3/4 Inch 1.5 Inch 3 Inch 4 Inch
Rank $ Rank $ Rank $ Rank $
Avg.Monthly Cons.(Gals.) 21,000 21,000 118,000 286,000
1 Allen 1 74.32 20 25.97 1 844.86 1 1,202.68
2 Bedford 3 83.43 40 58.37 2 1,062.84 4 1,545.83
3 Carrollton 2 82.42 32 42.24 3 1,068.28 3 1,531.35
4 Colleyville 13 106.67 16 20.60 18 1,307.12 16 1,855.25
5 Commerce 37 147.56 10 19.25 34 1,766.71 34 2,506.02
6 Corinth 28 130.71 11 19.50 42 2,489.86 42 3,580.07
7 Corsicana 16 109.97 37 52.83 16 1,287.77 18 1,856.16
8 Denton 40 164.52 33 42.60 36 1,819.12 36 2,609.84
9 DeSoto 38 148.06 5 13.90 37 1,875.86 37 2,664.78
10 Duncanville 29 135.16 6 14.88 30 1,685.41 30 2,393.26
11 Ennis 23 120.53 28 38.80 9 1,238.83 7 1,749.45
12 Euless 14 107.88 4 12.75 19 1,308.33 19 1,856.46
13 Fairview 36 142.40 26 35.15 38 1,936.75 38 2,759.55
14 Flower Mound 19 120.14 36 51.18 28 1,668.76 29 2,391.78
15 Forney 6 99.05 1 8.20 17 1,304.80 17 1,855.35
16 Frisco 9 100.43 34 45.45 7 1,226.37 8 1,752.45
17 Garland 4 95.43 2 9.45 6 1,203.13 5 1,708.91
18 Grapevine 30 135.27 41 73.25 33 1,746.87 32 2,450.85
19 Greenville 41 179.89 18 22.18 41 2,170.04 41 3,078.75
20 HaltomCity 25 124.22 9 18.80 24 1,454.52 23 2,061.94
21 Highland Village 42 185.25 31 40.00 39 1,974.00 39 2,790.75
22 Hurst 31 135.59 7 16.41 32 1,736.19 33 2,467.03
23 Irving 11 101.64 19 24.80 23 1,445.19 22 2,058.66
24 Kaufman 33 137.80 8 18.50 29 1,674.80 28 2,376.60
25 Keller 24 123.39 30 39.75 27 1,651.99 27 2,340.63
26 Lancaster 32 137.48 17 21.35 25 1,602.93 25 2,272.06
27 Lewisville 27 128.54 13 19.86 26 1,644.34 26 2,336.46
28 Little Elm 10 101.00 39 57.50 5 1,180.50 20 1,970.90
29 McKinney 15 109.27 35 50.56 21 1,426.94 21 2,037.03
30 Mesquite 8 99.85 3 11.45 14 1,271.15 14 1,805.97
31 Murphy 7 99.83 42 75.48 4 1,115.08 2 1,520.43
32 North Richland Hills 17 117.86 12 19.82 22 1,438.28 24 2,121.16
33 Rockwall 5 98.35 15 20.00 10 1,240.09 9 1,759.45
34 Rowlett 39 148.48 13 19.86 40 2,059.03 40 2,924.20
35 Sachse 12 106.28 25 34.46 20 1,317.35 15 1,853.38
36 Terrell 26 125.07 27 37.50 8 1,230.12 6 1,734.69
37 Watauga 34 138.55 38 55.41 35 1,804.61 35 2,594.30
38 Waxahatchie 35 139.53 29 39.63 31 1,693.23 31 2,449.88
39 Wylie 18 119.02 21 33.65 11 1,258.52 10 1,778.82
39 Wylie-Alt 1 22 120.53 24 33.87 15 1,277.12 13 1,805.22
39 Wylie-Alt 2 21 120.43 21 33.65 12 1,270.20 11 1,795.19 � CJ L.
39 Wylie-Alt 3(Average) 20 120.43 21 33.65 12 1,270.20 11 1,795.19
28rgligr,11CUL
MAXIMUS
HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE.•
Table 23
Comparison of Selected Cities
Average Monthly Water Bills
Sprinkler Meters
3/4 Inch 1 Inch 2 Inch
Rank $ Rank $ Rank $
Avg.Monthly Cons.(Gals.) 54,000 14,000 187,000
1 Allen 26 167.13 23 47.99 24 579.58
2 Bedford 5 121.98 26 49.38 8 452.37
3 Carrollton 4 108.85 5 37.61 3 386.96
4 Colleyville 19 156.04 18 45.24 19 524.45
5 Commerce 30 183.01 33 55.01 27 608.61
6 Corinth 39 230.00 6 38.00 41 1,028.00
7 Corsicana 6 127.51 27 49.91 9 463.68
8 Denton 15 149.95 22 47.80 15 504.30
9 DeSoto 18 154.21 14 43.81 18 521.29
10 Duncanville 12 143.21 10 40.41 11 485.02
11 Ennis 22 160.34 31 53.54 17 515.45
12 Euless 13 147.65 12 43.65 13 493.45
13 Fairview 41 241.45 40 60.55 40 893.15
14 Flower Mound 20 158.62 28 52.93 26 604.24
15 Forney 7 128.20 2 34.20 5 440.75
16 Frisco 10 133.94 13 43.68 12 488.42
17 Garland 1 101.50 1 29.50 2 340.90
18 Grapevine 17 152.23 11 42.59 16 513.77
19 Greenville 35 197.23 38 59.23 31 656.08
20 HaltomCity 31 185.22 36 56.02 28 614.81
21 Highland Village 42 250.50 17 45.00 42 1,115.00
22 Hurst 38 208.68 34 55.48 38 718.07
23 Irving 21 159.34 7 38.94 23 559.67
24 Kaufman 11 140.00 9 40.00 10 472.50
25 Keller 32 186.05 41 61.23 35 681.64
26 Lancaster 2 106.28 4 36.68 1 337.70
27 Lewisville 14 149.48 15 43.88 14 500.60
28 Little Elm 27 177.90 29 53.20 33 662.80
29 McKinney 16 150.10 19 45.77 22 552.93
30 Mesquite 8 130.79 3 35.59 7 447.33
31 Murphy 3 108.40 21 47.15 4 413.95
32 North Richland Hills 33 186.12 37 58.52 32 660.18
33 Rockwall 29 181.60 25 48.88 29 632.26
34 Rowlett 34 192.53 32 54.83 37 696.73
35 Sachse 36 199.82 39 60.40 36 693.63
36 Terrell 9 132.78 8 39.98 6 441.34
37 Watauga 40 233.79 42 64.31 39 838.79
38 Waxahatchie 24 162.32 16 44.61 30 647.88 �✓
39 Wylie 25 162.57 24 48.57 20 541.62 TerA�R39 Wylie-Alt 1 23 161.87 20 45.87 21 547.57
39 Wylie-Alt 2 37 200.01 35 55.78 34 679.57
39 Wylie-Alt 3(Average) 28 180.30 30 53.34 25 602.45
(�
MAXIMUS
2 9 HELPING GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE'