10-25-2004 (Zoning Board of Adjustment) Minutes MINUTES
Zoning Board of Adjustment
City Council Chambers, Wylie Municipal Complex
2000 Highway 78 North Wylie, Texas 75098
Monday, October 25, 2004
7:00 p.m.
Notice was posted in time and manner required by law, and a quorum was present.
Board Members Present: Staff Members Present:
Eric Alexander Claude Thompson
Marilyn Herrera Mary Bradley
Linda Jourdan
Layne LeBaron
Jan Sargent
Board Members Absent: Staff Members Absent:
Weldon Bullock Renae 011ie
Wayne Morman
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman LeBaron called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m.
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Consider and act upon approval of the Minutes of the September 27, 2004
Meeting.
A motion was made by Mr. Alexander, and seconded by Ms. Jourdan, to approve the
minutes as submitted. Motion carried 5 — 0.
SWEARING IN OF ADJUDICANTS
Mary Bradley, Secretary, administered oath.
ZBOA Commission Meeting
October 25, 2004
Page 2 of 6
PUBLIC HEARING
1. Hold a public hearing to consider and act upon a request by Greg Seamen
for variances to Sections 5.1.F and 9.2 of the Zoning Ordinance in order to
allow a legally nonconforming use to be renovated and continue, this property
being located at 2809 Exchange Street and being Lot 41 of Block C of the
Regency Business Park Phase 2 Addition. (ZBOA Case No. 2004-11).
Thompson stated that the subject property has been platted since 1987 as Lot 41, Block
C of the Regency Business Park Phase II. The applicant, M.L. Johnson and
Associates, is an irrigation and landscape construction company and has occupied the
property since 1998.
The property was zoned Industrial (I) and in November 2001 with the adoption of the
new city-wide Zoning Ordinance and Map the tract was rezoned to Business Center
(BC). Contractor's Maintenance Yards and Outdoor Storage are not allowed within the
BC District.
The owner/applicant is proposing to expand the existing office space from 920 square
feet to a total of 2,455 square feet, which results in 11% of the lot being covered. Sixty
(60) percent of the back portion of the property cannot accommodate building
construction or storage of equipment due to TXU Transmission Line and Explorer
Pipeline easement.
The new construction will comply with all requirements of the current Zoning Ordinance.
Exterior wall will be two types of masonry, the entry will be emphasized by wall off-sets
and the roof is pitched. Landscaping exceeds the current requirement and loading
areas are screened from the street. The applicant stores plants and other landscape
equipment on the rear of the lot.
Twelve surrounding property owners within 200 feet of the subject property were
notified as required by State Law. One form was returned favoring the variance.
With no questions for the applicant or staff a motion was made by Mr. Alexander, and
seconded by Ms. Jourdan, to GRANT the variance. Motion carried 4 — 1, with Ms.
Sargent abstaining.
ZBOA Commission Meeting
October 25, 2004
Page 3 of 6
2. Hold a public hearing to consider and act upon a request by Gilbert Delgado
for a variance to Section 20.3(1) (a) of the 1985 Zoning Ordinance in order to
reduce the front yard from the required 20 feet to 8.2 feet, this property being
located at 1011 Squire Drive and being Lot 3 of the Wyndham Estates Phase
3 Addition. (ZBOA Case No. 2004-12)
Thompson stated that the subject property was platted in 1986 as Lot 3, of the
Wyndham Estates Phase Ill Addition, and is zoned Industrial (I).
When the building was built in 1997, the southwest corner was built 11.8 feet into the
required building setback line. The minimum front yard setback is 20 feet according to
Section 20.4 (1) (a) of the Zoning Ordinance in place at the time of platting. The
building has a front building line setback of 16.8 feet at its narrowest point on the
western side. It is not known why the existing structure was permitted to be constructed
and occupied contrary to this requirement. At the time of selling the building, the new
finance institution noticed the error, and the owner/applicant desires the variance in
order to make the lot and building legal for sale.
With no questions for the applicant or staff, a motion was made by Ms. Herrera, and
seconded by Ms. Jourdan, to GRANT the variance to the front yard setback. Motion
carried 5 — 0.
3. Hold a public hearing to consider and act upon a request by Glenn Sparks
for a variance to Article XI, Section 22-394 of the Building Regulations of the
Code of Ordinances in order to construct a 4 feet high picket fence within the
front yard, this property being located at 301 Duncan Way and being Lot 12 of
Block 2 of the Caldwell Estates Addition. (ZBOA Case No. 2004-13)
Thompson stated that the subject property was created as Lot 12, Block 22 of the
Caldwell Estates Addition. The property is located on a corner lot. The front yard
measures approximately 30 feet deep and 77.5 feet wide.
The owner/applicant constructed a four foot high decorative picket fence within the
required front yard to provide safety for their three children while playing in the front
yard. The fence has 50% visibility. Section 22.394 of the Code of Ordinances restricts
fences within residential front yards.
Mr. Glenn Sparks, 301 Duncan Way, Wylie, the owner/applicant of the subject property,
stated that another purpose for the fence is safety issue from the speed of the traffic
along Duncan Way and Second Street. A Junior High School and the Pirate Stadium,
all of which are located behind Duncan Way, creates heavy intense traffic during school
and special functions.
ZBOA Commission Meeting
October 25, 2004
Page 4 of 6
Board Members questioned the ability to change the type of fence if the current property
owner was to move. Thompson stated that the variance goes with the land and if a
motion to grant is made, stipulations can be made for the type of fence but not to control
any time for its existence.
A motion was made by Ms. Jourdan, and seconded by Mr. Alexander, to GRANT the
variance to allow an ornamental four foot height fence in the front yard. Motion carried
5 - 0.
4. Hold a public hearing to consider and act upon a request by Jal Dennis for
variances to Sections 2.5.4.b and 2.5.4.e. (3) of the Zoning Ordinance in
order to increase the maximum size of an accessory building from 600 square
feet to 650 square feet and to allow metal exterior walls rather than the
required masonry, this property being located at 811 Crestview Lane and
being Lot 2 of Block C of the Stonebridge Farms Phase 1 Addition. (ZBOA
Case No. 2004-14)
Thompson stated that the subject property was created as Lot 2, Block C in Stonebridge
Farms Phase I. The property was developed according to the regulations of the Single
Family-1 (SF-1) Residential District of the 1985 Zoning Ordinance, and is not zoned SF
10/19.
The owner/applicant desires to construct a metal shop and carport on the subject
property, which claims to have been in the construction process the new regulation for
accessory building were adopted in before September 2003. The proposed carport and
shop will total 1,300 square feet. The shop will be 675 square feet, or 7.7% larger than
the maximum allowed 600 square feet.
Section 2.5.4(e) (3) of the Zoning Ordinance also states that accessory buildings over
three hundred (300) square feet in area be constructed with exterior walls composed of
the same masonry content required of the main structure. The proposed shop and
carport will be constructed of metal, rather than of masonry resembling the main
residence.
Mr. Jal Dennis, 811 Crestview, Wylie, owner/applicant of the subject property, stated
that after the concrete was poured, money was saved to pay cash for the material to
build the metal shop and carport. In the meantime, the regulations for accessory
buildings were revised in the Zoning Ordinance, and completing the building under the
new regulations is not feasible. The existing concrete does not have a brick ledge or
foundation beneath in order to support masonry building, but will support a metal
building. Thompson stated that the building official will require substantiation from a
licensed Engineer that the concrete and foundation will support whatever type of
building allowed.
ZBOA Commission Meeting
October 25, 2004
Page 5 of 6
Board Members discussed with the applicant the size of the shop and the materials for
the exterior of the surrounding accessory buildings. Mr. Dennis stated that there is no
consistency in the neighborhood, but most of the accessory buildings are made of metal
exterior.
A motion was made by Mr. Alexander, and seconded by Ms. Jourdan, to GRANT the
variance to allow non-masonry exterior materials, but DENYING the variance to
increase the size of the accessory building from 600 square feet to 675 square feet.
Motion carried 5 — 0.
5. Hold a public hearing to consider and act upon a request by James
Patterson for variances to Sections 7.3.F.2 and 7.7.B.1 of the Zoning
Ordinance in order to allow off-premises compliance with required parking
and landscaping requirements, this property being located at 2015 State
Highway North and being Lot 1 R-3 of Block C of the Woodlake Village
Addition. (ZBOA Case No. 2004-15)
Thompson stated that the subject property is currently zoned Corridor Commercial
(CC), but has been zoned for such diverse commercial uses since at least 1985. It was
initially created in 1987 as Lot 1 of Block C of the Woodlake Village Addition, and is the
rear portion (Lot 1 R-3) of the 7 acre remnant created by replanting of the Wal-Mart tract
in June of 2004. Two lots of approximately one (1) acre each front State Highway 78 to
the south of the subject tract.
The subject property is to be further subdivided into two (2) lots totaling 5.311 acres
which will be developed in phases and possibly as separate ownerships. The applicant
intends to construct a single-story, multi-tenant building of 20,250 square feet on Lot
1 R-3R2, which is 2.9 acres. Lot 1 R-3R1 will be 2.411 acres, but no finalized plans have
been made for its development.
Access to the lots is provided by joint access easements from the undeveloped pad
sites on the south and the Wal-Mart to the east. The two lots will be developed and
maintained as a coordinated single unit. The Zoning Ordinance requires all landscaping
and parking be provided on the lot on which the main structure is located. The tract of
land is being subdivided in such a way that more parking will be accommodated than
required on Lot 1 R-3R1 and will be shared with Lot 1R-3R2. On the other hand, Lot 1 R-
3R2 will provide more landscaping than required, and will be shared with Lot 1 R-3R2.
Mr. James Patterson, Omni Plan, 1845 Woodall Rodgers, Suite 1500, Dallas, Texas,
represented the architect for the subject property, stated that during the development of
Lot 1, phase 1, the Site Plan shows where future landscaping will be once Lot 2, phase
2 is developed. Lot 1 will be fully compliant with all parking requirements, until Lot 2 is
developed and the need for additional parking is required at that time.
ZBOA Commission Meeting
October 25, 2004
Page 6 of 6
Mr. Kim Sutton, Wilcox Development, 14001 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, Texas,
represented the developer of the subject property, stated that no planning is completed
for phase 2 at this time, but the applicant wanted to confirm that the parking and
landscaping requirements are met for both phases 1 and 2, ahead of time and there will
be no additional problems down the road. However, once both Lots have been
developed there will be no definite property lines, and the property will resemble a
single complete developed lot.
A motion was made by Mr. Alexander, and seconded by Ms. Jourdan, to GRANT the
variances to the parking and landscaping requirements. Motion carried 5 — 0.
MISCELLEANOUS
Thompson questioned the upcoming dates for a meeting, due to the holidays. Board
Members agreed that if there are items to discuss, the next meeting will be on
December 6, 2004, combining both the November and December Meetings.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to discuss, a motion was made by Ms. Sargent, and seconded
by Ms. Herrera, to adjourn the meeting at 8:40PM.
6,4
L eBaron, Chairman Ma =V:dley, Secr ry