The URL can be used to link to this page

Ordinance 2006-25 ORDINANCE NO. 2006-25 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 90-10, 93-4, 97-4 AND 2001-19 REGARDING WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES TO BE ASSESSED BY THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS; ESTABLISHING A COLLECTION DATE; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE APPROPRIATE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT; PROVIDING FOR REPEALING, SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas (the "City Council") has previously adopted Ordinance Nos. 90-10, 93-4, 97-4 and 2001-19 of the City of Wylie, Texas ("Wylie") establishing water and wastewater impact fees to be assessed by Wylie; and WHEREAS, Wylie has fully complied with Chapter 395, Local Government Code, concerning the notice, adoption, promulgation and methodology necessary to adopt land use assumptions and a capital improvement plan establishing impact fees and has properly adopted Ordinance Nos. 90-10, 93-4, 97-4 and 2001-19; and WHEREAS, the City council has amended the land use assumptions and amended the capital improvement plan by Ordinance No. 2006-10 and desires to amend the amount of impact fees for water and wastewater based thereon; and WHEREAS, Wylie has reviewed the impact fees for water and wastewater adopted under Ordinance Nos. 90-10, 93-4, 97-4 and 2001-19 of Wylie in compliance with Chapter 395, Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing to discuss the proposed amendments to the impact fees for water and wastewater; and WHEREAS, the Advisory Committee, created under Section 395.058, Local Government Code, filed its written comments on the proposed amendments to the impact fees for water and wastewater before the fifth (5th) business day before the date of the public hearing on the amendments; and WHEREAS, within thirty (30) days after the public hearing on the proposed amendments to the impact fees for water and wastewater, the City Council is approving amendments as more fully set forth below; and WHEREAS, Wylie has fully complied with Chapter 395, Local Government Code, to approve the proposed impact fees for water and wastewater charged per service unit; and Ordinance No. 2006-25 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee 448720.vl Page 1 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the best interest ofthe citizens of Wylie to amend the impact fees for water and wastewater. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE TEXAS: SECTION 1: Findings Incorporated. The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: Amendments to Ordinance Nos. 90-10. 93-4. 97-4 and 2001-19. Ordinance Nos. 90-10, 93-4, 97-4 and 2001-19 are hereby amended, and Wylie's impact fee regulations for water and wastewater are adopted as follows: Article 1. Purpose. This Ordinance is intended to assure the provision of adequate public facilities to serve new development in the city by requiring each such development to pay its share of the costs of such improvements necessitated by and attributable to such new development. Article 2. Definitions. Area-related facility means a capital improvement or facility expansion which is designated in the impact fee capital improvements plan and which is not a site-related facility. Area-related facility may include a capital improvement which is located offsite or within or on the perimeter of the development site. Capital improvement means any ofthe following facilities with a life expectancy of three (3) or more years that are owned and operated by or on behalf of Wylie: (a) water supply, treatment and distribution facilities; wastewater collection and treatment facilities; and storm water, drainage and flood control facilities, whether or not they are located within the service area. Capital Improvements Plan means a plan adopted by the Ordinance No. 2006-10 that identifies capital improvements or facility expansions for which impact fees may be assessed. City or Wylie means the City of Wylie, Texas. City Council means the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas. Facility expansion means the expansion ofthe capacity of an existing facility that serves the same function as an otherwise necessary new capital improvement, in order that the existing facility may serve new development. The term does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization or expansion of an existing facility to better serve existing development. Final plat or final plat approval or approved final plat means the point at which the Ordinance No. 2006-25 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Page 2 448720.vl applicant has complied with all conditions of approval and the plat has been released by the city for filing with Collin, Rockwall or Dallas County, whichever is appropriate. Impactfee means a charge or assessment imposed as set forth in this Ordinance against new development. The term does not include: (a) Required dedications ofland for public parks or payments in lieu thereof; (b) Dedication of rights-of-way or easements or construction or dedication of onsite or off-site water distribution, waste water collection or drainage facilities, or streets, sidewalks, or curbs if the dedication or construction is required by a valid ordinance and is necessitated by and attributable to the new development; (c) Lot or acreage fees or pro-rata fees to be placed in trust funds for the purpose of reimbursing developers for oversizing or constructing water or sewer mains or lines; or (d) other pro rata fees for reimbursement of water or sewer mains or lines extended by Wylie. Land use assumptions means a description ofthe service area and the projections of changes in land uses, densities, intensities, population and employment growth in the service area over at least a ten (10) year period and adopted by the city by Ordinance No. 2006-10, as may be amended from time to time, upon which the capital improvements plans are based. New development means a project involving the construction, reconstruction, redevelopment, conversion, structural alteration, relocation or enlargement of any structure, or any use or extension of the use of land, any of which has the effect of increasing the requirements for capital improvements or facility expansions, measured by the number of service units to be generated by such activity, and which requires either the approval of a plat pursuant to the city's subdivision regulations, the issuance of a building permit or connection to the city's water or wastewater system, and which has not been exempted from these regulations by provisions herein or attached hereto. Installation of a larger water meter will constitute new development. Off-site means a facility or expansion that is not a Site-related facility, as defined herein. Plat shall mean a final plat as described in the city's subdivision regulations. Plat includes replat. Property owner has the same meaning as the term "applicant" in the city's subdivision regulations. Property owner includes the developer for the new development and the owner of the property. Ordinance No. 2006-25 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee 448720.vl Page 3 Recoup means the imposition of an impact fee to reimburse the city for capital improvements which the city has previously oversized to serve new development. Service area means the area of the city's corporate limits and the city's extraterritorial jurisdiction, as they exist or may be altered, to be served by the capital improvements or facilities expansions specified in the capital improvements plan. Service unit means the standardized measure of consumption, use, generation or discharge attributable to an individual unit of development, that had been calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering and/or planning standards, as indicated in the land use equivalency tables located in the "Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update", which is attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated by reference herein, as may be amended from time to time. Single-family residential has the meaning given the term in the city's zoning regulations. Site-related facility means an improvement or facility which is for the primary use or benefit of a new development and/or which is for the primary purpose of safe and adequate provision of water or wastewater facilities to serve the new development, and which is not included in the capital improvements plan and for which the property owner is solely responsible under subdivision or other applicable regulations or which is located at least partially on the plat which is being considered for impact fee assessment. Site-related facility includes that portion of an off-site water or wastewater main, equivalent to a standard size water or wastewater main, which is necessary to connect any new development with the city's water or wastewater system, the cost of which has not been included in the city's impact fee capital improvements plan. Utility connection means authorization to install a water meter for connecting a new development to the city's water system or to the city's wastewater system. Wastewater facility means a wastewater interceptor or main, lift station or other facility or improvement used for providing wastewater collection and treatment included within the city's collection system for wastewater. Wastewater facility includes, but is not limited to, land, easements or structures associated with such facilities. Wastewater facility excludes a site-related facility. Water facility means a water interceptor or main, pump station, storage tank or other facility or improvement used for providing water supply, treatment and distribution service included within the city's water storage or distribution system. Water facility includes, but is not limited to, land, easements or structures associated with such facilities. Water facility excludes site-related facilities. Water meter means a device owned by the city for measuring the flow of water to a development, whether for domestic or for irrigation purposes. Article 3. Applicabilitv. The provisions of this Ordinance regarding water and wastewater impact fees apply to all new development within the corporate boundaries of the city and its extraterritorial jurisdiction, as they exist or may be altered. Ordinance No. 2006-25 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Page 4 448720.vl Article 4. Impact Fees Adopted for Water and Wasewater. The previously adopted impact fees for water and wastewater have been reviewed, evaluated, updated and revised. The City Council finds that: (1) the impact fees for water set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated for all purposes, representing fifty percent (50%) of the total projected costs, are hereby adopted and approved; and (2) the impact fees for wastewater set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated for all purposes, representing fifty percent (50%) of the total projected costs, are hereby adopted and approved. Article 5. Impact fee as condition of development approval/permit issuance. No final plat for new development shall be released for filing with the appropriate county, or in the cases within Wylie's extraterritorial jurisdiction for which no plat is submitted to Wylie, no application for a utility connection shall be approved, without assessment of an impact fee pursuant to this Ordinance. No building permit shall be issued, or in the cases within Wylie's extraterritorial jurisdiction for which no plat is submitted to Wylie, utility connection made, for new development, until the property owner has paid the impact fee imposed by and calculated herein or a contract for payment is approved by Wylie and executed by the parties. Article 6. Assessment of impact fees. (a) The assessment ofthe impact fee for any new development shall be calculated and made at the time of final plat approval (as defined in Article 2); however, for the sole purpose of phasing in the application of this Ordinance, for complete applications for final plats submitted to the city for consideration, on or before April 9, 2006, that are subsequently approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, or deemed approved due to the Planning and Zoning Commission's failure to act, pursuant to the city's subdivision regulations and for which no replatting is necessary prior to issuance of a building permit, assessment for the new development to which the final plat applies shall be calculated and made in accordance with the impact fees existing on April 9, 2006. (b) Following initial assessment ofthe impact fee for a new development pursuant to subsection a), the amount of the impact fee per service unit for that development cannot be increased, unless the approved final plat expires or lapses under applicable ordinances or law or the owner proposes to change the approved development by the submission of a new development application or application to increase the number of service units, in which case the impact fee will be reassessed for increased meter size or additional meters or service units at the impact fee rate then in effect. (c) Following the lapse or expiration of a final plat that has received approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission, or a final plat deemed approved due to the Planning and Zoning Commission's failure to act, pursuant to the city's subdivision regulations, a new assessment shall be performed at the time of new final plat approval in accordance with this Ordinance. Ordinance No. 2006-25 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Page 5 448720.vl Article 7. Computation and collection of impact fees. (a) The impact fees due on new development shall be collected at the time of application for a building permit or, in the cases within Wylie's extraterritorial jurisdiction for which no plat is submitted to Wylie at the time of application for utility connection, unless an agreement between the developer and the city has been executed providing for a different time of payment. (b) At the time of final plat approval, or the request for a utility connection for an area in the city's extraterritorial jurisdiction for which a final plat was not submitted to the city, for all new developments, the city shall compute the impact fees due for the new development in the following manner: (1) The amount of each type of impact fee due (water and/or wastewater) shall be determined by multiplying the number of each type of service units generated by the new development by the impact fee due for each type of service unit in the applicable service area set forth in Exhibits A and/or B, respectively. (2) The amount of each impact fee due shall be reduced by any allowable credits for that category of capital improvements in the manner provided by this Ordinance. (c) Whenever a property owner proposes to increase the number of service units for a new development, the additional impact fees collected for such new service units shall be determined by using the amount of impact fee per service unit in Exhibits A and/or B then in effect, and such additional fee shall be collected at the time of issuance of a new building permit, or for an area in the city's extraterritorial jurisdiction for which a final plat was not required to be submitted to the city, prior to or at the time of enlargement of the connection to the city's water or wastewater system. Article 8. Credits aeainst impact fees. (a) Any construction or contributions to or dedications of any area-related facility appearing in the capital improvements plan that is required to be constructed by a property owner as a condition of new development shall be credited against the impact fees otherwise due on that new development from the same category (water or wastewater) of impact fees assessed on the new development. (b) All credits against impact fees shall be subject to the following limitations and shall be granted based on this Ordinance and any additional administrative guidelines that may be adopted by the city. (1) No credit shall be given for the dedication or construction of site-related facilities. (2) No credit shall exceed an amount equal to the assessed impact fee. Ordinance No. 2006-25 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee 448720.vl Page 6 (3) If a credit applicable to a final plat has not been exhausted within ten (10) years from the acquisition of the first building permit issued or, in the cases within Wylie's extraterritorial jurisdiction for which no plat is submitted to Wylie, connection made after the effective date of the adoption ofthe applicable impact fees, or within such period as may otherwise be designated by contract, such credit shall lapse. (4) In no event will the city reimburse the property owner or developer for a credit when no impact fees for the new development can be collected pursuant to city ordinance or for any amount exceeding the total impact fees due for the new development for the category of capital improvement, unless otherwise agreed to by the city. (c) The available credit associated with new development shall be applied against an impact fee in the following manner: (1) For single-family residential lots in a new development consisting only of single- family residential development, such credit shall be prorated equally among such lots, to be applied at the time of application of a building permit for each lot, against impact fees to be collected at the time the building permit is issued. (2) For all other types of new development, including those involving mixed uses, the credit applicable to the new development shall be applied to the impact fee due at the time of approval. (3) At its sole discretion, the city may authorize alternative credit agreements upon written agreement with the property owner in accordance with the city's administrative guidelines. Article 9. Establishment of accounts. (a) The city shall establish an account to which interest is allocated for the service area for each type of capital facility for which an impact fee is imposed. Each impact fee collected within the service area shall be deposited in such account. (b) Interest earned on the account into which the impact fees are deposited shall be considered funds of the account and shall be used only in the same manner as which the underlying funds may be used. (c) The city shall establish adequate financial and accounting controls to ensure that impact fees disbursed from the accounts are utilized solely for authorized purposes. (d) The city shall maintain and keep financial records for impact fees, which shall show the source and disbursement of all fees collected in or expended within the service area. The records of the account into which impact fees are deposited shall be open for public inspection and copying during ordinary business hours. The city may establish a fee for . . copymg servIces. Ordinance No. 2006-25 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee 448720.vl Page 7 Article 10. Use of proceeds of impact fee accounts. (a) The impact fees collected for the service area may be used to finance or to recoup the costs of any capital improvements or facility expansion identified in the capital improvements plan for the service area, including but not limited to the construction contract price, surveying and engineering fees, land acquisition costs (including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney's fees and expert witness fees). Impact fees may also be used to pay the principal sum and interest and other finance costs on bonds, notes or other obligations issued by or on behalf of the city to finance such capital improvements or facility expansion. (b) Impact fees collected pursuant to this Ordinance shall not be used to pay for any of the following expenses: (1) Construction, acquisition or expansion of public facilities or assets other than capital improvements or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan; (2) Repair, operation or maintenance of existing or new capital improvements or facility expansIOn; (3) Upgrade, update, expansion or replacement of existing capital improvements to provide better service to existing development; or (4) Administrative and operating costs ofthe city. Article 11. Refunds. (a) Upon application by an owner of property, any impact fee or portion thereof collected pursuant to city ordinance, which; (i) has not been expended within ten (10) years from the date of payment, or (ii) existing facilities are available and service is denied, or (iii) the city has, after collecting the impact fee when service was not available, failed to commence construction within two (2) years or service is not available within a reasonable period considering the type of improvement or expansion, but in no event later than five (5) years from the date of payment; shall be refunded to the record owner ofthe property for which the impact fee was paid or, if the impact fee was paid by another governmental entity, to such governmental entity, together with interest calculated from the date of payment to the date of refund at the statutory rate as set forth in the Texas Finance Code, Section 302.002, or its successor statute. The application for refund pursuant to this article shall be submitted within sixty (60) days after the expiration of the ten-year period for expenditure of the fee. An impact fee shall be considered expended on a first-in, first-out basis. (b) An impact fee collected pursuant to this Ordinance shall also be considered expended ifthe total expenditures for capital improvements or facility within the service area within ten (10) years following the date of payment exceed the total fees collected within the service area for such improvements or expansions during such period. Ordinance No. 2006-25 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee 448720.vl Page 8 (c) If a refund is due pursuant to subsections (a) and (b), the city shall divide the difference between the amount of expenditures and the amount of the fees collected by the total number of service units assumed within the service area for the period to determine the refund due per service unit. The refund to the record owner shall be calculated by multiplying the refund due per service unit by the number of service units for the development for which the fee was paid, and interest due shall be calculated upon that amount. (d) Upon completion of all the capital improvements or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan for the service area, the city shall recalculate the impact fee per service unit using the actual costs for the improvements or expansions. If the impact fee per service unit based on actual cost is less than the impact fee per service unit paid, the city shall refund the difference, if such difference exceeds the impact fee paid by more than ten (10) percent. If the difference is less than ten (10) percent, no refund shall be due. The refund to the record owner shall be calculated by multiplying such difference by the number of service units for the development for which the fee was paid, and interest due shall be calculated upon that amount. Article 12. Updates to plan and revision of fees. (a) The city shall update its land use assumptions and capital improvements plans at least every five (5) years, commencing from the date of adoption of such plans, and shall recalculate the impact fees based thereon in accordance with the procedures set forth in Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395 or in any successor statute. (b) The city may review its land use assumptions, impact fees, capital improvements plans and other factors such as market conditions more frequently than provided in subsection (a) to determine whether the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan should be updated and the impact fee recalculated accordingly, or whether any Exhibits hereto should be changed. (c) If, at the time an update is required pursuant to subsection (a), the city council determines that no change to the land use assumptions, capital improvements plan or impact fee is needed, it may dispense with such update by following the procedures in Texas Local Government Code Section 395.0575 or its successor statute. (d) In addition to the reviews required by this Article, the city shall also conduct the reviews required by Article 4, Impact Fees Adopted for Water and Wastewater above. Article 13. Use of other financinl! mechanisms. (a) The city may finance capital improvements or facility expansion designated in the capital improvements plan through the issuance of bonds, through the formation of public utility districts or other assessment districts, or through any other authorized mechanism, in such manner and subject to such limitations as may be provided by law, in addition to the use of impact fees. Ordinance No. 2006-25 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Page 9 448720.vl (b) Except as herein otherwise provided, the assessment and collection of an impact fee shall be additional and supplemental to, and not in substitution of, any other tax, fee, charge or assessment which is lawfully imposed on and due against the property. Article 14. Impact fee as additional and supplemental ree:ulation. Impact fees established by this Ordinance are additional and supplemental to, and not in substitution of, any other requirements imposed by the city on the development of land or the issuance of building permits or certificates of occupancy. Such fee is intended to be consistent with and to further the policies ofthe city's comprehensive land use plan, the capital improvements plan, the zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations and other city policies, ordinances, codes and resolutions by which the city seeks to ensure the provision of adequate public facilities in conjunction with the development ofland. Article 15. Relief procedures. Any person who has paid an impact fee or an owner of land upon which an impact fee has been paid may petition the city council to determine whether any duty required by this Ordinance has not been performed within the time so prescribed. The petition shall be in writing and shall state the nature ofthe unperformed duty and request that the duty be performed within sixty (60) days of the request. Ifthe city council determines that the duty is required pursuant to this Ordinance and is late in being performed, it shall cause the duty to commence within sixty (60) days of the date of the request and to continue until completion. SECTION 3: Certificate of Compliance Statement. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign the appropriate annual compliance statement required under Section 395.082 of the Texas Local Government Code or its successor statute acknowledging compliance with the requirements thereof. SECTION 4: SavingfRepealing Clause. Unless otherwise set forth herein, Wylie Ordinance Nos. 90-10, 93-4, 97-4 and 2001-19 shall remain in full force and effect for final plats receiving approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to the city's subdivision regulations, or for a final plat deemed approved due to the Planning and Zoning Commission's failure to act, on or before April 9, 2006, for which no replatting is necessary, as set forth in Article 6, save and except as amended by this or any other ordinance. All provisions of any other ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed; but such repeal shall not abate any pending prosecution for violation ofthe repealed Ordinance, nor shall the repeal prevent prosecution from being commenced for any violation if occurring prior to the repeal of the Ordinance. Any remaining portions of conflicting ordinances shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason, held to be unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions of this Ordinance. Wylie hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause Ordinance No. 2006-25 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee 448720.vl Page 10 or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, and phrases be declared unconstitutional. SECTION 6: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS on this 11th day of April, 2006. \\\\\1 \\\\\ 0"" ndy. ,\ _I f"" r " " ^ "' ..,...... ',. '" ,"' .9 .. /' "" $ CJ .... ...fJ~/ ~ 2 / e~ ...{<\ ~ = f SEti-L ; ~ _ 9 I. -_.1" . = -= "" e.:::=::~ ... :: ;. -".. Q."t; 2 ~ .~" Q1Co~ ~ "';,. /..t.-riC"~...9."'. ~ ,~ """'/ Z!E T'C.'f.-~\\\" '"""',, \I H\\\\ ATTEST: Date of Publication in The Wvlie News - April19. 2006 Ordinance No. 2006-25 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee 448720.vl Page 11 Ordinance 2006-25 (Exhibit A) . WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE . 2005 - 2015 . Prepared For . . . CITY.OF WYLIE . Prepared By D BIRKHOFF, HENDRICKS & CONWAY, L.L.P. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DALLAS, TEXAS . February 2006 Ordinance No. 2006-25 BIRKHOFF, HENDRICKS & CONWAY, L.L.P. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 7502 Oreenville Ave., #220 Dallas, Texas 75231 Fax (214) 361-0204 Phone (214) 361-7900 JOHN W. BIRKHOFF. P.E. RONALDV. CONWAY, P.E. GARY C. HENDRICKS, P.E. JOE R. CARTER. P.E. PAUL A. CARLINE, P .E. MATI HICKEY, P.E. DOUGLAS K. SHOWERS. P.E. March 2, 2006 Chris HoIsted, P.E. City Engineer City of Wylie 949 Hensley Lane Wylie, Texas 75098 Re: Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2005-2015 Dear Mr. HoIsted: We are pleased to present the results of the City of Wylie Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update for the planning years 2005 through 2015. This report includes discussions on Land Use Assumptions, impact fee methodology, the Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan, Capital Improvement Plan maps, utilized capacity calculations, and maximum impact fee by service unit equivalent tabulations. The maximum allowable fees per service unit (defined as a Y.-inch water meter), adjusted to fifty percent (50%) of the maximum calculated fees are as follows: Maximum Water Impact Fee per Service Unit ................................ $1,304.97 Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee per Service Unit ....................... $1,231.01 . Table Number 18 summarizes the findings and maximum allowable impact fee for water and wastewater services based on various size water meters. We have enjoyed working with the City of Wylie on this important project. The cooperation and input we received from you and the City staff was invaluable. We are available to discuss the findings and conclusions of this impact fee update further at your convenience and look forward to our continued working relationship. ~""""" 44'i~oFr~ '. .:-...~:.'t:...*...........t11S'.., Sincerely yours, ~...."" ......,~ ,. . '.'1 . F?~~~I~~.R.D:~A.".~~"..~ ~&- ~-Q"" 64008 ....Cl:~ . , ~Q"?~ V,,-Q,.,~- Joe Richard Carter, P.E. 't ~;...,CJ./ST~?:....-#~ .,...,s,s .........~~('j - ',,'ONAL ......- """"... Enclosures Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:lclericallwylic\2002.llW w""","-, fca\roponslcovcr lel..r_finaLdoc CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. INTRODUCTION ..........'..............."............ ................................. ................ ...... .... .......,....... 1 II. GLOSSARy...,...,. ........., ............. ..,.." .., ..........., ..."., ....... ........... ......... ....... ...................... ...... 3 In. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS (provided By City of Wylie) ............................................... 7 A. Purpose ..................................................................... ................................... .........,.......... 7 B. Elements of This Land Use Assumption Report ............................................................. 7 C. Methodology......................., .... ... .............. ..,. ......... ..........,. .............,. .........., .........., ,....... 8 D. Service Area Maps ....... ............,................ ............... ............. ......... ................... .............. 9 · Figure 1 R ,...................................................... ........................................................... 10 E. Base Year Data .................... .............................................................. .................... ........ 11 1) Population and Land Use ....................................................................................... 12 2) Land Use ........... . ....... .... , ... .... .... .......... . . . ......... . .. .... , . .. ........... .... . . ................... ... . . ... 13 F. Ten-Year Growth Assumption ....... ................... ........ ........................................ ............ 15 G. Ultimate Population Projection .......... ....................... ............. .......................... ...... ....... 18 H. Summary ............................,... ...... ......................................................... ..... ................... 19 IV. DEFINITION OF A SERVICE UNIT - WATER & WASTEWATER ....................... 20 V. CALCULATION OF WATER & WASTEWATER - LNlNG UNIT EQUN ALENTS...... 21 VI. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ................................................................................ 22 A. Existing Pump Stations, Ground Storage Reservoirs & Elevated Storage Tanks .......... 22 B. Distribution Lines ......... ................................,..,....... ................. ............................. ........ 23 C. Water Supply ..... .............. ............ ......,.. ........... ......... ............... ................... .................... 23 D. Water Distribution System Capital Improvement Projects ........................................... 24 · Figure 2 - Water Distribution Master Plan ................................................................ 25 · Table 11 - 1 0- Year Capital Improvement Plan Water............................................... 26 E. Utilized Capacity .............................. ............................... ................................... ........... 28 · Table 13 - Proposed and Existing Water Facilities Projects...................................... 29 · Table 14 - Proposed Capital Improvements Waterlines ............................................ 30 Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:lcJcrica~wylic\2002.164 wllww irqloct fealreporU\indcx.doc Page No. VII. WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM ..................................................................... 33 A. General...... ......... .............................................................................. ........ ..................... 33 B. Collection Lines ......... .......... .......................................................... ............ ................... 33 C. Treatment .... .......... ......... .............. .................... ..... ... ........... .... ...... ....... ..... ...... .............. 34 D. Capital Improvement Program ............. .............. ........... ................ ............ .................... 34 . Figure 3 - Wastewater System Master Plan .............................................................. 35 . Table 15 - 10- Year Capital Improvement Plan Wastewater...................................... 36 E. Utilized Capacity . .......................................................................................................... 37 · Table 16 - Proposed ~d Existing Wastewater Facilities .......................................... 38 . Table 17 - Wastewater System Bonds Debt Service Schedules ................................ 39 VIII. MAXIMUM IMP ACT FEE CALCULATION - WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEMS. 43 A. Table 18 - Allowable Maximum Fee Per Living Unit Equivalent ................................. 44 B. Table 19 - Alternative Fee Per Living Unit Equivalent.................................................. 45 Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:lcJcric:a~wyIie\2002-164 w.tww.......' r...lreponslindex.doc ii Birkhojf, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. CITY OF WYLIE WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE I. INTRODUCTION On April 24, 2001, the City of Wylie adopted Ordinance No. 2001-19 "Establishing Water and Wastewater Impact Fees" in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code. The ordinance and associated impact fees were established and based on the Service Area Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan prepared by Hunter Associates of Texas, Ltd., dated March 200 I. The maximum calculation fee and current imposed fees are summarized below: Fee Per Service Unit Calculated Fees Imposed Maximum (Ordinance 2001-19) Water $1,212 $606 Wastewater $2,446 $1,223 Since the adoption of the Impact Fee Ordinance 2001-19, the City of Wylie has expanded its corporate boundaries and environmental jurisdiction. The City adopted a new Comprehensive Land Use Plan in April 2005. These changes in the boundaries and proposed land use prompt the requirement for an impact fee update. In accordance with the requirements of Chapter 395.052 ofthe Local Government Code, this report updates the City of Wylie's Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvement Plan. Chapter 395, of the Local Government Code is an act that provides guidelines for financing capital improvements required by new development in municipalities, counties, and certain other local governments. The basis for determination of an impact fee requires the preparation and adoption of a land use plan and growth assumption, and the preparation of a 10-year capital improvement plan. A master plan of the water and wastewater systems is necessary to prepare a 1 O-year capital improvement plan. From these two phases, a maximum impact fee is calculated. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\clericall")'lie\2002-164 w&ww impact reeslreportslrepon-I.doc - 1 - Birkhojf, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. The Act allows the maximum impact fee to be charged if revenues from future ad valorem taxes, and water and sewer bills are included as a credit in the analysis. If not, the Act allows the maximum fee to be set at 50% of the calculated maximum fee. The following items were included in the impact fee calculation: A. The portion of the cost of the new infrastructure that is to be paid by the City, including engineering, property acquisition and construction cost. B. Existing excess capacity in lines and facilities that will serve future growth and which were paid for in whole or part by the City. C. Engineering and quality control fees for construction projects. D. Interest and other finance charges on bonds issued by the City to cover its portion of cost. The engineering analysis portion of the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee review determines utilized capacity cost of the major water distribution and wastewater collection facilities between the year 2005 and the year 2015. Facilities in this analysis include, water pump stations, water storage tanks, water transmission lines, wastewater treatment plants, wastewater lift stations and wastewater collection lines. The North Texas Municipal Water District (NTMWD) water treatment and distribution components were excluded from this analysis. The study period is a ten-year period with 2005 as the base year. The impact fee calculation for the water and wastewater systems is based on land uses provided by the City of Wylie. The City's Water Distribution and Wastewater Collection Master Plans were updated prior to this impact fee update. The Master Plans are available for review from the City of Wylie. The equivalency factors utilized in this analysis conform to the latest American Water Works Association Standards (C700 - C703). Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:lclericaJl")'lie\2002-164 w&ww impact feeslreportslrepon-I.doc -2- Birkhojf. Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. II. GLOSSARY 1. Advisorv Committee means the capital improvements advisory committee established by the City for purposes of reviewing and making recommendations to the City Council on adoption and amendment of the City's impact fee program. 2. Area-related facility means a capital improvement or facility expansion which is designated in the impact fee capital improvements plan and which is not a site-related facility. Area-related facility may include a capital improvement that is located off-site, or within or on the perimeter of the development site. 3. Assessment means the determination of the amount of the maximum impact fee per service unit that can be imposed on new development. 4. Capital imorovement means either a water facility or a wastewater facility, with a life expectancy of three or more years, to be owned and operated by or on behalf of the City. 5. City means the City of Wylie, Texas. 6. Credit means the amount of the reduction of an impact fee due, determined under this ordinance or pursuant to administrative guidelines, that is equal to the value of area- related facilities provided by a property owner pursuant to the City's subdivision or zoning regulations or requirements, for the same type of facility. 7. Facilitv exoansion means either a water facility expansion or a sewer facility expansion. 8. Final olat aporoval means the point at which the applicant has complied with all conditions of approval in accordance with the City's subdivision regulations, and the plat has been approved for filing with Collin County. 9. Imoact fee means either a fee for water facilities or a fee for wastewater facilities, imposed on new development by the City pursuant to Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code in order to generate revenue to fund or recoup the costs of capital improvements or facility expansion necessitated by and attributable to such new development. Impact fees do not include the dedication of rights-of-way or easements for such facilities, or the construction of such improvements, imposed pursuant to the City's zoning or subdivision regulations. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:lclericaJl")'lie\2002.164 w&ww impacl reeslreportslreporH.doc - 3 - Birkhoj[. Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. 10. Impact fee capital improvements plan means either a water capital improvements plan or a wastewater capital improvements plan, adopted or revised pursuant to the impact fee regulations. 11. Land use assumptions means the projections of population and growth, and associated changes in land uses, densities and intensities over at least a ten-year period, as adopted by the City and as may be amended from time to time, upon which the capital improvements plans are based. 12. Land use equivalency table means a table converting the demands for capital improvements generated by various land uses to numbers of service units, as may be amended from time to time. 13. New development means the subdivision of land; the construction, reconstruction, redevelopment, conversion, structural alteration, relocation, or enlargement of any structure; or any use or extension of the use of land; any of which increases the number of service units. 14. Plat has the meaning given the term in the City's subdivision regulations. Plat includes replat. 15. Platting has the meaning given the term in the City's subdivision regulations. Platting includes replatting. 16. Property owner has the meaning given the term in the City's subdivision regulations. Property owner includes the developer for a new development. 17. Recoupment means the imposition of an impact fee to reimburse the City for capital improvements that the City had previously oversized to serve new development. 18. Roadway means any freeway, expressway, principal or minor arterial or collector roadways designated in the City's adopted Thoroughfare Plan, as may be amended from time to time. Roadway does not include any roadway designated as a numbered highway on the official Federal or Texas highway system. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\clericaJ\wylie\2002.164 w&ww impact fees\repons\report-I.doc - 4- Birkhojf. Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. 19. Roadway capital improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended from time to time, which identifies the roadway facilities or roadway expansions and their costs for each road service area, which are necessitated by and which are attributable to new development, for a period not to exceed 10 years. 20. Roadway expansion means the expansion of the capacity of an existing roadway in the City, but does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing roadway to better serve existing development. 21. Roadway facility means an improvement or appurtenance to a roadway that includes, but is not limited to, rights-of-way, whether conveyed by deed or easement; intersection improvements; traffic signals; turn lanes; drainage facilities associated with the roadway; street lighting or curbs. 22. Service area means either a water service area or wastewater benefit area within the City, within which impact fees for capital improvements or facility expansion will be collected for new development occurring within such area, and within which fees so collected will be expended for those types of improvements or expansions identified in the type of capital improvements plan applicable to the service area. 23. Service unit means the applicable standard units of measure shown on the land use equivalency table in the Impact Fees Capital Improvements Plan that can be converted to water meter equivalents, for water or for wastewater facilities, which serves as the standardized measure of consumption, use or generation attributable to the new unit of development. 24. Site-related facility means an improvement or facility which is for the primary use or benefit of a new development, and/or which is for the primary purpose of safe and adequate provision of water or wastewater facilities to serve the new development, and which is not included in the impact fees capital improvements plan and for which the property owner is solely responsible under subdivision or other applicable development regulations. 25. Utility connection means installation of a water meter for connecting a new development to the City's water system, or connection to the City's wastewater system. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:lclericall",ylie\2002-164 w&ww impact reeslreportslreport-I.doc - 5 - Birkhojf. Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. 26. Wastewater facility means a wastewater interceptor or main, lift station or other facility included within and comprising an integral component of the City's collection system for wastewater. Wastewater facility includes land, easements or structure associated with such facilities. Wastewater facility excludes site-related facilities. 27. Wastewater facility expansion means the expansion of the capacity of any existing wastewater improvement for the purpose of serving new development, but does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing sewer facility to serve existing development. 28. Wastewater capital improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended from time to time, which identifies the wastewater facilities or wastewater expansions and their associated costs which are necessitated by and which are attributable to new development, for a period not to exceed 10 years. 29. Water facility means a water interceptor or main, pump station, storage tank or other facility included within and comprising an integral component of the City's water storage or distribution system. Water facility includes land, easements or structures associated with such facilities. Water facility excludes site-related facilities. 30. Water facility expansion means the expansion of the capacity of any existing water facility for the purpose of serving new development, but does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing water improvement to serve existing development. 31. Water improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended from time to time, which identifies the water facilities or water expansions and their associated costs which are necessitated by and which are attributable to new development, for a period not to exceed 10 years. 32. Water meter means a device for measuring the flow of water to a development, whether for domestic or for irrigation purposes. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\clericallwylie\2002-164 w&ww impact reeslreportslreport-I.doc - 6- Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. III. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS (Provided By: The City Of Wylie) A. Purpose Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code prescribes the process by which cities in Texas must formulate development impact fees. The initial step in this process is the establishment of "land use assumptions" for the City upon which the impact fee program is based. These land use assumptions, which are derived from the Future Land Use Plan and from population projections adopted in the Comprehensive Plan, will become the basis for the preparation of impact fee capital improvement plans for water and wastewater facilities. To assist the City of Wylie in determining the need for, and the timing of, capital improvements to serve future development, a reasonable estimation of future growth is required. The purpose of this report is to formulate growth and development projections based upon assumptions pertaining to the type, location, quantity and timing of various future land uses within the community, and to establish and document the methodology used for preparing the growth and land use assumptions. B. Elements of The Land Use Assumption Report This report contains the following components: 1) Methodology -- Explanation of the general methodology used to prepare the land use assumptions. 2) Service Zone Map (Plate I) - The impact fee service area for water and wastewater facilities. 3) Base Data - Information on population and land use for Wylie for each capital facility/impact fee service area. 4) Ten-Year Growth Assumptions - Population and land use growth assumptions for ten years for each capital facility/impact fee service area. 5) Ultimate Population Projections - Projections that reflect a completely developed condition, based upon the City's ultimate "build-out" scenario. 6) Summary - Brief synopsis of the land use assumptions report. Ordinance No. 2006-25 J:\clericall\\)'lie\2002-164 w&:ww impact feeslreportslreport-I.doc - 7 - BirkhofJ. Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. c. Methodoloev Based upon the growth assumptions and the capital improvements that will be needed to support future growth, it is possible to develop an impact fee structure which fairly allocates capital improvement costs to growth areas in relationship to their impact upon the entire infrastructure system. The database and projections in this report have been formulated using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles and methodologies. These land use assumptions and future growth projections take into consideration several factors influencing development patterns, including the following: 1) The character, type, density and quantity of existing development 2) Existing land use patterns 3) Anticipated future land uses (as shown in the City's Future Land Use Plan) 4) Availability of land for future expansion, and the City's physical holding capacity 5) Current growth trends in the City and region 6) Location and configuration of undeveloped (vacant) land 7) Known or anticipated development projects 8) Potential sanitary sewer availability (e.g., topographical constraints) 9) Growth policies adopted in the Future Land Use Plan A summary of the general methodology used for the preparation ofthis report follows: 1) Establish impact fee water and wastewater service areas (see Section II - Service Area Map). 2) Collect/determine benchmark (i.e., base year) data on population and land use as of January 2005 (see Section III - Base Year Data). 3) Project population and land use growth for ten years by impact fee service areas (see Section IV - Ten-Year Growth Assumptions). 4) Project the ultimate population for a fully developed City, assuming full development of service area(s) (see Section V - Ultimate Population Projections). A more detailed methodology for each is contained within the referenced sections. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:lclericallwylie\200Z-I64 w&ww impact feeslrepor1Slreport-l.doc - 8 - Birkhojf, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. D. Service Area Maps Figure lR on the following page shows the proposed service area for water and wastewater facilities. The service area boundary for wastewater includes all land area within the existing City limits, all that land within the Wylie water CCN, and those portions of shared CCNs that Wylie will serve as development occurs. The service area boundary for water includes all that land within the Wylie water CCN, and those portions of shared CCNs that Wylie will serve as development occurs. A recommended priority listing of projects for water and wastewater facilities will be outlined in the City's Capital Improvements Program (CIP). The actual ten-year CIP upon which the impact fee program must be based will be prepared separately, per the requirements of Chapter 395. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:lclericallwyJie\2002-164 w&ww impact feeslreportslreport-I.doc - 9- I l )r'Tj~ ~! ll~ ~I (~_,x" , l -I ~ T{-" :' . i.. .' ,;(;i~%;JIi ~! ~ ~ ~. 1 ,~~. ~~~.j:i r II \ ' " "111 ..: 'C",,, n ~ ~ Iii! (~ N ,_ +li'1 ~ ''',---" J;f u ,II J ~~; 1;jt",Illj -1 ~~' I · -~ ~ I\. l \ " ,_, ~ ,.,-c 1-\IiI,\lClil' - r~ ~ l&),RJ, i~; I,. I ~ir/' Dri ~(.~~-I~;" wlj~, ~'r 'i' l.J .!' " " ,,: ~~ I .A ~l ...;:' ~ """r : ~-k~' ~jrf/> [rl " ...Ji" '" ,i UdJL ~r ,me "F-' ~ j , " f ,........~ ' 'I -r'T { S:;\;!~ i>.ii!ifli,1ll ~ · - fL~' <,),', , ' III'" i Ie Ii I -I' jJ" 1 ,,' 1~1"1Ii" ,,:, ,-!~ '.. I~i t~~ / ).,. ~ ~ eL' U " t="" ....'\ '" . : I -~ : j. ILl..JTi:" A.y , _;... .-.,.~ ~i '- · -:, ' ,. '" ' ...,..~ ~ ..JliJ11 iI i" ~lll ~ ~ .. ~!o-4I- i ..' ". '-c. .i 1.:'1' ~ 11 j:i'" NJ :,r ~ ":',- .. .I - I ~ ~ }~ ',' ~ ",..iJ :1, r j, f ' I ~,,' /1' ,,' r I .. ~i ' ... .,i ,V I j ," T} / IJ 7' ~ '~~r". fi-"fi!"' 1 -',.: '\U~II 7_'J~ ) Lwr / - :~_ N" ~ Q}~ ',Q";'li' :~ ' ~ I~ iL ,J]j ~ ' ,): Jii I L T"" J I ""u I , ,,~~. r · II ! ~ ''f=I'1b,7m,~. '. · - 8 :d o~;nm"INn 2006." r ' I ,.' ".; .;.,.,--- L · ~\ ~ i F<' !," -.1 ~ r)'~, Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. E. Base Year Data This section documents historical growth trends and base data for the City. This "benchmark" information provides a starting basis of data, as established in the City's Future Land Use Plan and updated in April 2005, for the ten-year growth assumptions. One method of predicting future growth is looking at past growth. The historical growth rates for Wylie are shown in Table 1 below. Table 1 HISTORICAL GROWTH RATE City of Wylie, Texas Compounded City of % Average Annual Year Wylie Chanee % Chan2e per Period 1970 (I) 2,675 0.0% 0.0% 1980 (I) 3,152 17.8% 1.6% 1990 (I) 8,716 176.5% 10.7% 2000 (I) 14,965 71.7% 5.6% 2004 (2) 26,150 174.7% 15.0% (J) Source: u.s. Census. (1) Source: City of Wylie, Apri/2005. Over the 30-year period of 1970 to 2000, the City of Wylie experienced a significant amount of growth. The City is continuing to experience a significant increase in population, housing, and commercial development activity. As of January 2005, the City of Wylie had a total of 2,852 residential lots in various stages of development, including recently approved zoning cases and plats. The build-out of these lots will increase the existing housing stock as follows: 8,980 existing units (2004) + 2,852 future units (2005) = 11,832 units or 31.8 % increase. Accordingly, it is anticipated that the City has the lot inventory to maintain the significant increases in population and housing growth experienced over the last ten to twenty years. It is also anticipated that the City will continue to receive petitions for the zoning and platting of new subdivisions. There are a number of pending development cases that will provide for additional new residential units. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\clericaJl")'lie\2002-164 w&ww impact reeslreportslrepon-I.doc - 11 - Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. Another comparison and useful base data source for population growth is the past trends in residential construction. Table 2 shows the growth trend in residential construction in the City from 2000 to 2004. At the end of 1999 there were approximately 5,340 residential units this is the base number for percentage of growth. Table 2 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS PER YEAR City of Wylie, Texas Year Prior Total Residential Units New Residential Units % Growth 2000 5,340 385 (I) 7.2% 2001 5,725 749 (I) 13.1% 2002 6,474 1,085 (I) 16.8% 2003 7,559 1 ,415 (2) 18.7% 2004 8,974 1,162 (2) 12.9% Average: 959 new residential units per year over 5 years Source: (I) Current Housing Estimates, North Central Texas Council of Governments, 2000, 2001 and 2002. (2) City of Wylie Building Department, 2003 and 2004. The growth in housing shown in Table 2 illustrates the recent trend in residential activity for the City of Wylie. The trend shown here reflects that observed for the recent trend in population growth. The City has seen sharp increases in residential growth over the past few years. As mentioned earlier, the City's available lot inventory is increasing. For the purposes of documenting changes in population, land use, density and intensity, the data format to be used as a basis to formulate the land use assumptions will be principally population and land use estimates. These estimates and the land use inventory, from the City's Future Land Use Plan, were used to establish a beginning baseline and updated to January 2005 for the projections for Wylie. 1) Population and Land Use Existing land uses were documented throughout each of the service areas In development of the Land Use Plan. Residential and non-residential building activity for each of the service areas was then analyzed to establish base population and employment estimates for January 2005. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:lclericaJl")'lie\2002-164 w&ww impacl feeslreponslrepon-I.doc - 12 - Birkhoj[. Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. The estimated population in January 2005 for both service areas is: Water Wastewater · Population ........................... 25,325 · Dwelling Units ...................... 8,980 · Households ............................ 8,585 29,427 10,434 9,975 These residential calculations are based on the following assumptions: · Occupancy Rate .................... 95.6 percent (2000 U.S. Census for Wylie); and · Average Household Size 2.95 personslhousehold (2000 U.S. Census). 2) Land Use Prior to an evaluation and projection of future land use patterns, an understanding of existing conditions is essential. Documentation of existing land use patterns within the City and its ETJ was included as part of the Land Use Plan. This data has been updated to reflect the residential and non-resident development activity that has occurred through January 2005. This documentation provides an overview of the general present physical composition and condition of the City. Table 3 shows a summary of estimated existing land uses for the land area within the water and sanitary sewer service zones. TABLE 3A Existing Land Use For The Water Service Zones - 2004 City of Wylie, Texas Acres Used Percent of Land Use IDeveloDed) DeveloDed Area Low Density Residential 1,527 21.71 % Medium Density Residential 2,352 33.43% High Densitv Residential 142 2.02% Commercial/Retail/Office 265 3.77% School, Public/Semi-Public, Services 198 2.81% Downtown Historic District 34 0.48% Utilities/Heavv Industrial 373 5.30% Light Industrial 2 0.03% Parks & Open Space 88 1.25% Agricultural 2,054 29.20% Total Area: 7,035 100.00% Source: City of Wylie, April 2005. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\c1erical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impacl fees\reportslrepon-I.doc - 13 - BirkhofJ. Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. TABLE 3B Existing Land Use For The Sanitary Sewer Service Zones - 2004 City of Wylie, Texas Acres Used Percent of Land Use IDevelooed) Developed Area Low Density Residential 2,799 22.87% Medium Density Residential 3,501 28.60% High Density Residential 186 1.52% Commercial /Retail/Office 482 3.94% School, Public/Semi-Public, Services 334 2.73% Downtown Historic District 34 0.28% UtilitiesIHeavy Industrial 447 3.65% Light Industrial 155 1.26% Parks & Open Space 213 1.74% Agricultural & Floodplain 4,090 33.41 % Total Area: 12,241 100.00% Source: City of Wylie, April 2005. Table 4 shows a summary of estimated existing land uses (as of April 2005), in acres per 100 persons, assuming 3 people per ESFU for the land area within the water and wastewater service areas. TABLE 4A Existing Land Use Per 100 Persons For The Water Service Zones - 2004 City of Wylie, Texas (1) Acres Per Land Use Catel!ory 100 Persons Low Densitv Residential 5.84 Medium Density Residential 8.99 High Density Residential 0.54 Commercial /Retail/Office 1.01 School, Public/Semi-Public, Services 0.76 Downtown Historic District 0.13 Utilities/Heavy Industrial 1.43 Light Industrial 0.01 Parks & Open Space 0.34 Agricultural 7.85 Total Area: 26.90 (1) Based upon 2004 population of26,J50 persons. Source: City of Wylie Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\clencal\")'lie\2002-164 w&ww impacl rees\reponslreport.l.doc - 14- BirkhofJ, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. TABLE 4B Existing Land Use Per 100 Persons For The Sanitary Sewer Service Zones - 2004 City of Wylie, Texas (1) Land Use Catee:ory Acres Per 100 Persons Low Density Residential 10.71 Medium Density Residential 13.39 High Density Residential 0.71 Commercial/Retail/Office 1.84 School, Public/Semi-Public, Services 1.28 Downtown Historic District 0.13 Utilities/Heavy Industrial 1.71 Light Industrial 0.59 Parks & Open Space 0.81 Agricultural & Floodplain 15.64 Total Area: 46.81 (1) Based upon 2004 population of26. 150 persons. Source: City ofWy1ie F. Ten-Year Growth Assumptions Growth is characterized in two forms: population (residential land use) and nonresidential land use. Several assumptions were necessary in order to arriye at reasonable growth rates for population and employment in the City of Wylie. The following assumptions were made as a basis from which 10-year projections are initiated: 1) Future land uses will occur as shown on the Future Land Use Plan. 2) The City will be able to finance the necessary improvements to the water and wastewater systems to accommodate expected growth. 3) School facilities will accommodate expected increases in school-age population. 4) Densities will be as projected, based upon anticipated zoning districts. 5) Known or anticipated development projects will occur as presently planned. The 10-year projections, or land use assumptions, are based upon the establishment of a reasonable growth rate based upon past trends and/or other considerations. Considering the increasing trends in population and housing growth (Table 2) and the City's proximity to the Dallas/Fort Worth metropolitan area and combining these factors with anticipated development projects provides a reasonable indication of growth potential. Based upon these assumptions, the annual average number of residential dwelling units constructed per year over the next 10-year period is projected to be 900. A household size of 2.95 persons per household with an occupancy rate of 95.6 percent was used to Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:lclericallwylie\2002-164 w&:ww impact reeolreportslreport-I.doc - 15 - Birkhojf, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. calculate the future population based on the projected residential activity. The 2004 population of 26,150 (Table 1) is projected to increase to approximately 51,520 by the year 2015, representing a compounded annual growth rate of 7.02%. This rate would generate an average population increase of about 2,537 persons per year. The following shows the formula for calculating the ten-year growth assumptions: Residential: 900 dwelling units x 0.956 occupancy rate = 860 occupied dwelling units/year 860 occupied dwelling units/year x 2.95 household size = 2,537 persons/year 2,537 persons/year x 10 years = 25,370 persons net 1 O-year residential growth "Note: It should be noted that the 10-year population and housing projection assumes growth potential within the existing municipal boundaries and the existing extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). These projections do not assume residential growth beyond the existing ETJ. " This rate of growth (7.02% compound annual growth rate) is a reasonable rate for Wylie to be expected to grow at over the next 10 years. The growth rate projected for Wylie is less than the compounded annual growth rate over the last 14 years (8.2%) and is consistent with other comparable cities within the region. The region, in which Wylie is located, is one of the State's fastest growing population and employment centers. Table 5 shows the average annual compounded growth rates for other cities in the area and for Collin County from 1990 to 2000: TABLE 5 Populations and Growth Rates of Area Cities and Collin County --1990 and 2000 Compounded Average City/Jurisdiction 1990 Population 2000 PODulation Annual % Chanl!e Wylie 8,716 14,965 5.6% Allen 19,315 43,544 8.0% Frisco 6,138 33,714 19.0% McKinney 21,283 54,369 10.0% Murphy 1,547 3,099 7.0% PIano 127,885 222,030 6.0% Prosoer 1,018 2,097 7.0% Collin County 219,212 415,219 7.0% Source: Us. Census, 1990 and 2000. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\clericaJ\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\repons\repon~ I.doc - 16- BirkhojJ, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. Table 5 illustrates that the regional growth pattern is continuing to move outward from Dallas toward the City of Wylie. Those cities that experienced the greatest amount of growth from the ] 980s to the ] 990s have achieved significant levels of build-out and those cities further north have begun to experience significant population and housing increases. Those cities north and west of Wylie are currently experiencing growth rates similar to those projected for Wylie through 20]5. The projected annual growth rate for the City of Wylie and the resulting population projection of 5] ,520 persons for the ] O-year planning horizon is considered reasonable for planning purposes. As mentioned, this growth is projected throughout the City's water and wastewater service area, with a substantial amount of the growth being beyond the current municipal boundaries during the next ten years. The above mentioned growth rate represents growth throughout the water and wastewater service zones. It is anticipated that most of this projected growth will ultimately be incorporated into the City service area limits for several reasons: I) More stringent environmental laws pertaining to septic waste systems. 2) Increasing insurance rates outside corporate City limits. 3) The City's progressive philosophy regarding water and sewer line extensions. 4) Proposed upgrading of construction standards in the City's ETJ. Changes in population affect the use of land. In the case of Wylie, increased population is due to the conversion of vacant or agricultural land into residential and other land uses. Non-residential development will increase in order to provide the goods and services that the increased population will demand. The estimation of the additional acres to be developed for the next ] 0 years will aid in the determination of demand for additional water and wastewater facilities. Ordinance No. 2006-25 ):\clerical\")'lie\2002-164 w&ww impacl fee,lreportslreport-I.doc - 17 - Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. Table 6 shows the additional Retail/Office, Commercial, and industrial land uses required for the increase in population projected through 2015 (25,370 people). TABLE 6A TEN-YEAR LAND USE PROJECTIONS -- 2015 For The Water Service Zones - 2015 City of Wylie, Texas Future Acres Acres Required For Land Use Per 100 Persons 25,370 Persons Commercial/Retail/Office 1.80 457 School, Public/Semi-Public, Services 0.67 170 Utilities, Heavy and Light Industrial 2.50 634 Parks & Open Space 1.03 261 Total Acres: 6.00 1,522 Source: City a/Wylie, April 2005. The future acres per 100 persons reflect those ratios that have been observed for Texas cities with healthy local economies. It should be noted that these ratios also closely reflect the existing land use mix for Wylie's water and wastewater service areas. The ratios are used to calculate the amount of non-residential development that the local population may support. G. Ultimate Population Projection An ultimate, or holding capacity, land use and population projection was also established in the City of Wylie's Future Land Use Plan. First, known densities of development were considered. Then, based upon the remaining developable vacant land in Wylie and its ETJ, densities of anticipated development projects were applied. The ultimate population of the City of Wylie is a function of anticipated residential land use area (acres), housing density (dwelling units per acre), and population density (persons per dwelling unit). Based upon the land uses identified on the Future Land Use Plan, the total ultimate land use areas of residential development were calculated using the density standards adopted as part of the Future Land Use Plan. The ultimate holding capacity for the planning area, assuming that each residential area is built out to its maximum capacity, generates a maximum population of approximately 75,600 persons for the sewer service area, excluding the unincorporated lake areas. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\clerical\")'lie\2002-164 w&ww impacl fee,lreportslreport-I.doc - 18 - BirkhofJ. Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. H. SUmmary The data used to compile these land use assumptions were from three sources, anticipated development for the City of Wylie, residential building data and other data from the City, and information from the Future Land Use Plan. The ten-year growth projections were calculated based upon reasonable growth rates and trends for Wylie and the surrounding area. Ultimate projections were based upon the holding capacity of vacant land using land use types and applying densities as established by development policies, the Future Land Use Plan, and known proposed development plans. The land use assumptions may be summarized as follows: 1) The Wylie wastewater planning area contains approximately 24.19 square miles, about 50% of which is presently undeveloped land or right-of-way. 2) The 2004 estimated population in the existing water service area is 25,325. The 2004 estimated population in the existing wastewater service area is 29,427. 3) The ten-year growth projections were calculated using a compounded average annual growth rate of approximately 7.02%. 4) The ten-year population projection for Wylie is approximately 51,520 persons inside the water service area and 57,996 in the sanitary sewer service area. 5) The ultimate (build-out) population within the water service area is approximately 55,900 persons and 75,600 persons in the wastewater service area, according to the adopted Land Use Plan. Ordinance No. 2006-25 r\c1erical\\\)'lie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reportslreport-I.doc - 19- Birkho./f. Hendricks & Conway, LLP. IV. DEFINITION OF A SERVICE UNIT - WATER AND WASTEWATER Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code requires that impact fees be based on a defined service unit. A "service unit" means a standardized measure of consumption, use generation, or discharge attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards. This update defines a water and wastewater service unit to be a 3/4-inch water meter and has referred to this service unit as a Single Family Living Unit Equivalent (SFLUE). The SFLUE is based on the continuous duty capacity of a I-inch water meter. This is the typical meter used for a single-family detached dwelling, and therefore is considered to be equivalent to one "living unit". Many single-family dwellings were constructed with 5/8-inch meters in the City; therefore, 5/8-inch meters are also considered one "living unit". Other meter sizes can be compared to the 3/4-inch meter through a ratio of water flows as published by the American Water Works Association as shown in Table No.7 below. This same ratio is then used to determine the proportional water and wastewater impact fee amount for each water meter size. TABLE NO.7 Living Unit Equivalencies For Various Types and Sizes Of Water Meters Continuous Duty Meter Type Meter Size Maximum Rate (l!pm) (a) Ratio to %" Meter Simple %" 15 1.0 Simple I" 25 1.7 Simple 1 Yz" 50 3.3 Simple 2" 80 5.3 Compound 2" 80 5.3 Turbine 2" 100 6.7 Compound 3" 160 10.7 Turbine 3" 240 16.0 Compound 4" 250 16.7 Turbine 4" 420 28.0 Compound 6" 500 33.3 Turbine 6" 920 61.3 Compound 8" 800 53.3 Turbine 8" 1,600 106.7 Compound 10" 2,300 153.3 Turbine 10" 2,500 166.7 Turbine 12" 3,300 220.0 (a) Source: A WWA Standard C700 (1995) - C703 (1996) Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\c1erical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impacl fees\repons\repon-I.doc - 20- Birkhoj[. Hendricks & Conway, LLP. V. CALCULATION OF WATER & W ASTEW A TER - LIVING UNIT EOUIV ALENTS The City of Wylie provided the existing water meter count by size category as of January 2005. In total, there are 9,344 water meters serving the existing population of 25,325 residents and business. Table No.8 shows the number of existing meters, the living unit equivalent factor and the total number of living unit equivalents for water accounts. The City also provided wastewater accounts as of December 2004. There are 10,743 accounts serving 29,427 residents. Table No.9 illustrates the existing account and SFLUE's. Using the growth rate provided by the Land Use Assumptions prepared by the City, a straight- line extrapolation of water meters and wastewater accounts were calculated for the year 2015. Living unit equivalents were then applied to the water meters and wastewater accounts for 2005 and 2015 resulting in a total number ofliving units. The difference in the total number of 2005 and 2015 living units results in the new living unit equivalents during the impact fee period. The calculation ofliving unit equivalents is summarized in Table Nos. 8 and 9. TABLE NO.8 Water Living Unit Equivalents 2005 - 2015 2005 2015 Number Living Total Number of Living Total New SFLUE's Meter of Water Unit Number of Water Unit Number of During Impact Fee Size Meters Equivalent SFLUE's Meters Equivalent SFLUE's Period 5/8"&3/4" 8,991 I 8,991 17,720 I ]7,720 8,729 I" ]48 1.7 252 292 1.7 496 244 2" ]85 6.7 ],240 365 6.7 2,445 1,205 4" 12 28.0 336 24 28.0 672 336 6" 8 63.0 504 16 63.0 ],008 504 Totals: 9,344 11,323 18,382 20,413 11,018 TABLE NO. 9 Wastewater Living Unit Equivalents 2005 - 2015 2005 2015 Equivalent Number Living Total Number of Living Total New SFLUE's Meter of Water Unit Number of Water Unit Number of During Impact Fee Size Meters Equivalent SFLUE's Meters Eauivalent SFLUE's Period 5/8"&3/4" 10,390 ] 10,390 20,477 I 20,4 77 10,087 I" ]48 1.7 252 292 1.7 496 244 2" ]85 6.7 1,240 365 6.7 2,445 ],205 4" 12 28.0 336 24 28.0 672 336 6" 8 63.0 504 ]6 63.0 ],008 504 Totals: 10,743 12,722 21,134 22,938 12,376 Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\clerical\\\ylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\repon-I.doc - 21 - BirkhofJ. Hendricks & Conway, LLP. VI. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. Consulting Engineers prepared computer models for the years 2005 and 2015. The models were developed from residential population projections and planning units provided by the City of Wylie. Employment population was considered in a similar manner. The land areas follow closely to the construction of major facilities in the system as outlined in Figure 2. These facilities include major distribution lines, pump stations, ground storage reservoirs and elevated storage tanks. All computer models were run for the Maximum Hourly Demand and the Minimum Hourly Demand to insure proper sizing of the facilities to meet peak demand periods. A. Existine: Pump Stations. Ground Storae:e Reservoirs & Elevated Storae:e Tanks For purposes of this Impact Fee, the existing Nortex, North Texas Municipal Water District and Newport Harbor Pump Stations, ground storage reservoirs and two elevated storage tanks are considered fully utilized in the impact fee calculation. TABLE NO. 10 Water Distribution System -- Existing Pump Stations & Ground Storage Number of Total Number Rated Ground Ground Storage of Capacity Storage Available Pump Station Pumps (MGD) Tanks (Gallons) Nortex 2 0.86 1 900,000 NTMWD 4 2.88 1 * 1,700,000 Newport Harbor 4 5.84 1 500,000 Total: 10 9.58 3 3,100,000 * - As directed, 1,700,000 gallons of 10 million gallon clear wells are assumed to be available for the City. Elevated Storae:e Tanks South Ballard Elevated Storage Tank Regency Elevated Storage Tank Capacity in Gallons 250,000 750.000 1,000,000 Total The pump stations and ground storage facilities were analyzed with the maximum daily demand, while elevated storage act dynamically and therefore are analyzed utilizing the difference between the Maximum Hourly Demand and the Maximum Daily Demand. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\clericallwylie\2002.164 w&ww impacl feeslreportslrepon.l.doc - 22- Birkhojf, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. B. Distribution Lines The distribution lines consist of all lines within the service area boundary supplying water to customers in the City of Wylie. Lines vary in size from 5/8-inch and 3/4-inch services to 24-inch transmission lines. Unless it is expected a smaller diameter water line will be constructed by the City of Wylie, only those water lines 12-inches and larger in diameter were considered in the Impact Fee calculations. The cost of water lines includes construction cost, appurtenances (water valves, fire hydrants, taps and the like), utility relocations, purchase of easements and engineering costs. Financing cost over a 20-year term is included for each project. Records for existing water lines were unavailable and existing distribution lines were not included in the impact fee analysis. Unit cost for proposed capital improvement water lines 12-inches and larger in diameter were classified as City initiated water lines including the full cost of the facility. Developer initiated water line projects, 12-inches or less in diameter, were not included in this Impact Fee analysis, as the cost for these size lines are the responsibility of the developer. C. Water Supply The City of Wylie currently receives all of its water supply from the North Texas Municipal Water District (NTMWD). Wylie's allocation of the capital cost of services as a customer of the NTMWD was specifically excluded from the impact fee analysis. If included, Wylie's share of the NTMWD capital cost could include the original construction cost, expansion cost, financing cost, engineering cost and real estate cost of the following components: I) Water Rights Cost in Lake Lewisville and Other Reservoirs 2) Raw Water Intake Structures 3) Raw Water Pump Stations 4) Water Treatment Plant and Expansions 5) High Service Pump Stations 6) Transmission Lines 7) NTMWD Owned Ground Storage Facilities 8) Metering Facilities Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:lclericallwylie\2002-164 w&ww impact feeslreportslrepon.l.doc - 23- Birkhojf, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. D. Water Distribution System Capital Improvement Projects In order to meet the demands of the anticipated growth over the next 1 a-years, as provided in the Land Use Assumptions, certain water distribution system improvements are required. Figure 2 shows the recommended system improvements and Table No. II itemizes each project and the project cost. These recommended improvements form the basis for the Water System Impact Fee Calculation. Actual capital cost, including construction, engineering and easements of the vanous elements of the existing water distribution system was utilized where the information was known. The existing cost of facilities was determined from records provided by the City of Wylie. Where actual costs are not known, an average cost in 2004 dollars has been calculated. The average unit cost is from a limited survey of projects, which bid recently, plus an estimated cost for engineering and easements. There are many variable factors that can have a significant impact on the actual construction cost of a project such as local conditions, material cost increases and fuel cost increases to name a few. The capital improvement plan provides for system improvements within the defined service area. Some of the system improvements may be physically located beyond the boundaries of the services area, but are necessary to provide adequate system service and capacity. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\c1ericall"1'lie\2002.164 w&ww impact feeslIeportslIeport-l.doc - 24- I , I I I I I I , I I.- I I ,. I. I I I j III II II I. ,. I I i [)I [)I II II I.- I. .L I t 9' [)I III /I ii' ~ nUl ' '-.--.-. X ()l ()l C\j ~',. ~I . C1 I ~ .. ""i 'd1W UIl !l!! i .. _, Co ... ~ \I" II... 1111 .. 111I Cl II~' 4:: I Q Cl "" Cl I liii II I . "II .1 I .1-.: iii, " II' .Ic -, II II ~~, r-tr.... J:JJ,J.L , I I ~li/III I' ::1 II i ai ill I ;I~;; ~11111111;i 1\ ill ~I! JOt ()lc c",' ,: ~ < , H ./ -IlL ~~ Q.. I ;" ~ . w pt:~~ ! i -r'/ /0~ 2 i I i'I' "'j A ~II ~ i i I I.. '\ I ~ ~ 10 I :"k", I~ II k." a:ii -- ~j-, '~'''~\'' ~ i ~ /,1 \ \. ~ DO ,.,..--" ..-/ -, ~ III ~ ! II ~ ~ i i ~ DDD ~I~i J illl I 8 DDD )1 I \." !; '0'--- r::::?'-, . .. ~-r"-I' JJn:t:.,~ 1=" / ! ["I H ....., Ordinance No. 2006-25 Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, LLV (2//4/2006) Table No, 11 CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 10-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Water Lines Up'D1on or Project Construction Debt Service No. Year Proiect Size Cost (1) (2) Total Project Cost LI 2005 Creekside Distribution Line No. I 20" $ 866,000 $ 545,581 $ 1,411,581 L2 2005 Creekside Distribution Line NO.2 16" - 20" $ 416,500 $ 262,395 $ 678,895 L3 2006 Newport Harbor Distribution Line No. I 12" - 24" $ 1,396,000 $ 879,480 $ 2,275,480 L4 2007 Creekside Distribution Line NO.3 16" $ 568,000 $ 357,840 $ 925,840 L5 2008 F.M. \378 Distribution Line No. I 12" $ 449,000 $ 282,870 $ 731,870 L6 2006 Westgate 20" Waterline Crossing at F.M. 544 20" $ 97,500 $ 61,425 $ 158,925 L7 2007 State Highwav 78 Distribution Line No. I 20" - 24" $ 942,000 $ 593,460 $ 1,535,460 L8 2008 State Highwav 78 Distribution Line NO.2 16" - 24" $ 830,500 $ 523,216 $ 1,353,716 L9 2009 Henslev Lane Distribution Line No. I 12" $ 916,000 $ 577,080 $ 1,493,080 LlO 2005 East Alanis Drive Distribution Line 12" $ 250,000 $ \31,250 $ 381,250 LlI 2010 Lake Travis Drive and Canvon Lake Drive Waterlines 8" $ 99,000 $ 62,370 $ 161,370 Ll2 2012 East Side Water Distribution Lines 12" $ 473,000 $ 297,990 $ 770,990 Ll3 2012 Woodbridge Water Distribution Line 8" - 12" $ 740,000 $ 466,200 $ 1,206,200 LI4 2007 Pressure Reducing Valve Vaults 8" - 12" $ 314,500 $ 198,\35 $ 512,635 Ll5 2007 Brown Street and Sanden Water Lines 12" $ 300,000 $ 189,000 $ 489,000 Subtotal: Water Lines $ 8 658.000 $ 5 428.292 $ 14 086,292 P dS F T' umpmg an to rage ac. Itles upmlOn or Project Construction Debt Service No. Year Pro.i ect Capacity Cost (1) (2) Total Project Cost PI 2005 Nortex Pump Station Improvements - Phase I 2.3 MGD $ 163,000 $ 102,690 $ 265,690 SI 2005 Creekside Elevated Storage Tank 2.0MG $ 2,883,260 $ 1,816,454 $ 4,699,714 P2 2006 Nortex Pump Station Improvements - Phase 2 5.9 MGD $ 358,000 $ 225,540 $ 583,540 S2 2006 Newport Harbor Ground Storage Reservoir NO.2 2.0MG $ 1,255,200 $ 790,776 $ 2,045,976 P3 2006 NTMWD Pump Station Improvements - Phase I 6.1 MGD $ 941,000 $ 592,830 $ 1,533,830 P4 2007 Newport Harbor Pump Station Improvements - Phase I 8.3 MGD $ 160,000 $ 100,800 $ 260,800 S3 2007 Nortex Ground Storage Reservoir NO.2 1.5 MG $ 9\3,000 $ 575,190 $ 1,488,190 P5 2008 Newport Harbor Pump Station Improvements - Phase 2 11.5 MGD $ 160,000 $ 100,800 $ 260,800 P6 2009 NTMWD Pump Station Improvements - Phase 2 9MGD $ 130,000 $ 81,900 $ 211,900 P7 2012 Nortex Pump Station Improvements - Phase 3 8.8 MGD $ 135,000 $ 85,050 $ 220,050 S4 2012 Ballard Elevated Storage Tank Replacement 1.5MG $ 2,675,000 $ 1,685,250 $ 4,360,250 S5 2012 Newport Harbor Ground Storage Reservoir No. I (New) 1.0 MG $ 844,000 $ 531,720 $ 1,375,720 S6 2012 Nortex Ground Storage Reservoir No. I (ReDlace) 1.0 MG $ 675,000 $ 425,250 $ 1,100,250 P8 2014 NTMWD Pump Station Improvements - Phase 3 10.9 MGD $ \36,000 $ 85,680 $ 221,680 Subtotal: Pumpin!!: and Stora!!:e Facilities $ 11,428,460 $ 7,199,930 $ 18,628,390 Ordinance No. 2006-25 J:\Clerical\Wylie\2002164\ReponslRcport w. WW CIP.:..;lsIWlllcr - 26. Table No. 11 CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 10-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. (2//4/2006) Previous Water Svstem Bonds Debt Service Year Proi ect % Utilized Principle (Actual) Total Cost 2002 Wylie Water & Sewer Bonds (ZiJ 50% ofTotal 45% $ 232,875 $ 99,024 $ 331,899 2000 Wylie Water & Sewer Bonds (ZiJ 20% of Total 45% $ \32,300 $ 61,632 $ 193,932 2000 Regency Elevated Storage Tank 20% $ 257,000 $ 159,340 $ 416,340 1999 Wylie Water & Sewer Bonds (ZiJ 50% of Total 50% $ 277,500 $ 118,533 $ 396,033 1999 Wylie General, Water & Sewer Bonds (ZiJ 22.2225% ofTotal 50% $ 226,114 $ 80,343 $ 306,457 Subtotal: Previous Water System Bonds $ 1,125,789 $ 518,871 $ 1,644,661 s PI E annmg XDenses Opinion of Debt Service Year Proiect Cost (l)(b) (2) Total Project Cost 2005 Update Water Svstem Master Plan $ 26,000 $ - $ 26,000 2005 Water Impact Fee $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000 Subtotal, Planning Expenses: $ 46,000 $ 46,000 Total Expenses For Imnact Fees Debt Service Proiect % Utilized Principle (2) Total Cost Water Transmission Lines 86.2075% $ 8,658,000 $ 5,428,292 $ 12,143,440 Pumping and Storal!:e Facilities 80.1041% $ 11,428,460 $ 7,199,930 $ 14,922,1 08 Utilized Percenta!!e of Previous Water System Bonds 100.000% $ 1,125,789 $ 518,871 $ 1,644,661 Planning Expenses 100.000% $ 46,000 $ - $ 46,000 Subtotal: Previous Water System Bonds $ 21,258,249 $ 13,147,093 $ 28,756,2; Notes: (1) Opinion of Cost includes: a) Engineer's Opinion of Construction Cost b) Professional Services Fees (Survey, Engineering & Testing) c) Cost of Easements based on $15/L.f. of Open Cut Installation unless planned installation in existing right-of-way (2) Debt Service based on 20-year simple interest bonds at 6% Ordinance No. 2006-25 J:\ClcricaJIWylic\2002I 64\Rcports\Report w.ww CIP.xlslWater - 27- Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. E. Utilized Capacity Utilized capacity for the water distribution system was calculated based on the water line size required for each model year (2005, 2015 and build out). Master planning of the water distribution system is based on the maximum daily demand, maximum hourly demand, and the minimum hourly demand. Pump station capacity is generally based on the maximum daily system demand while transmission and distribution facilities are sized based on either the maximum hourly demand or the minimum hourly demand, whichever demand is greater for a particular water line. Often times, the capacity of a water line is determined by the flows generated by the minimum hourly demand. The minimum hourly flows are usually higher in those lines that are used to refill elevated storage. For each line segment in the water distribution model, the build-out flow rate in the line was compared to the flow rate in the same line segment for the 2005 and the 2015 models. The percentage of utilized capacity was calculated for each year based on the build-out capacity. The utilized capacity during the Impact Fee period is the difference between the year 2015 capacity and the year 2005 capacity. Table No. 12 below summarizes the project cost and utilized cost over the impact fee period of 2005 - 2015 for each element of the Water Distribution System. The utilized capacity for each water distribution facility, both existing and proposed, is presented in detail in Impact Fee Capacity Calculation Tables Nos. 13, and 14. TABLE NO. 12 Summary of Eligible Capital Cost and Utilized Capacity Cost Utilized 20- Year or Capacity ($) in Outstanding the Water System Facility Proiect Cost CRP Period Existing Water System Bond Proiects $2,386,391 $1,228,321 Existing Regency Elevated Tank $2,081,700 $416,340 Proposed Pumping, Storage & CCN $18,628,390 $14,922,108 Proposed Transmission/Distribution Lines $14,086,292 $12,143,440 Planning Expenses $46,000 $46,000 Total $37,228,773 $28,756,209 Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:lclericallwylie\2002.164 w&ww impact feeslreportslreport.l.doc - 28- 'l..;g "c -..:Sf ~' ~ ~ c " 5 ~ ~ :l: "" . ~ <i; ~ ;.. ~ 0;; f-o rJ:J ~rJ:J rJ:J!i:~ ae~ f-o-<~ .Il. ~ ~~!ei Zf-o ~~ ~~~ ;"~rJ:J f-of-oO u~:5 ~!:l: !:l:1l. ~ f-o -< ~ o Z ~ .... = -< f-o ~ " ~ ~.~ c U ~ - ... ~ ~ .~ '" ;; .~ ~ . U t. ~ " ~ l:!.~ c U ~ - ... " ~ ;6 ;; .~ ~ . U ~ ..~ Z.5 tl ~;6.!! ;;5..5 >.~ i ~ b .!~ ",'" ~ o U c o '" . ~ ~ = ... ~ ~ 'E ~ ~ t: ~ '" .. Q~ ~ ~ ~ :! '4gi~ ~&:C:2 on ;; .... ~ ~ ~ ~ gg~~~~ ~C:C:2 o 0 0 0 "" "" "" "" on C> C> .... ~ ~ ~ g 2 2 g 3' on ;; .... ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ on C> C> .... ~ ~ ; ~ ci 0 ci 0 a.:~ ... ~ c>U .... ~ - ~ ~ ';;- f- ~ ... ~ 8 8 ~ 0"\ 00 00 r-- ~g~~~~. ~ c: c: ~ .... .... ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~. M 1:;; "" "" ~ ;!. ~ ;!? ~ ~ \0 \0 \0 oll .. c .. t .s li :; 'N~ c r..l ~ 888 ~ a ~ ~ c o U 888 8 .,.; 0 0 ~. 00 'V v 00 - - r- ;;; "" Vt "" ~c t .~ '~ Q. ~~ " 0 (5 " ::E ~ ::E ::E o N N 0 N M If'l ..... 00 = a ~ "'U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ii =-: 5 ~ g , .:! ~ ~ ~i5 ! e ~ .i == ~ ; ~ ~ ci$ ,.g ~ ~ - g = I:IJ Vi ... == '" 1:: 8 ~ 0 ... Z ~__~ u c o !:::- '15 1: E ~ ~ ~ ~ €5 [ ~ ! .5 ~ _ = "'0 .. .. c ~ ~ ,g ... ... <,;i u .~~ ... N '<t Vi Vi r.n ~ ~ r.n $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~o "'" "'" v; "'" "'" $ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~~~5~~~~ "'" ~ ~ ... v; o 0 0 0 Vi "'" ~ "'" Vt N N o '" '" .... g ~ ~ $ ~ 2 2 g 3' :2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 2 g g 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 ci 0 ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~:~~{g ~ ~ 3- u .... ;;; $ ~ ~ 8 ~ 8~~~a~ v; ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 00 .o\~~ ;;; ;I; ;I; .... .... ~ g g 8 8 '<t \0 M 6 ..-) '<t~~~~~ v; z;; ...-. ...-. ...-. @ (5 " (5 " ::E ::E ::E ::E ::E g ~ ~ b ~ N Vi 0\ 8 8 8 :; ~ NNNNN M~~~~ II ~ N = .~ .. c en ~ S e = Q. Il. .5 ~ f-o ~~__~Z 15 ~ c 5 ~ 1] 0 E5~E~ "p>R~-g ea.Ea.~ ~.5~.5~ "Q S 8 ~ ~ 8 ~ i f if (; if ~ = .51 B rJ:J S = - Il. .. ... 1:: o Z ii: ~ M r- ~ <J) ... <J) ~ j 11 ~ ~~ -'" -'" 4.l ~ ~ : f-o f-o ; ~~-; 00 0 0 ~ 11 ~~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ?i '0 i::i <il <il ~ .. ] ~ ~ ] f ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~... ~~_ 1l.~1l. ~ ~. ~ ~. ~. u v; ;;; ~ ~. ~ ~. N ~~ .... ;;; ;;; 000 .... .... .... ~ ~ ~ 223' g ~ ~ g g g g ~ g ci 0 ci g 0 ~ 00 3'. :'} ~ ~ ~ ;;; ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 6 N N ~ ;; v; ~ 8 ~ ~~ rJO Ef .., ;; Vt (5 (5 (5 ::E ::E ::E on N ...,. ON'" 'D 0. ;:: ~ ~ ~ ~~~ II ~ ~ '5 c E ~ ~ ~ ~ j ; s .. .. ~ ~ -" -" ... ... M ~ 00 ... ... ... MOO'" r! ~ ~ gf ~ ~ N ...,. '" ~tit: .... M on c> ~ ~ ~ O\~ ...; ..,.r N N '" N '" ~ ,;~~ .. ~ r-- ~ ...,. 'i ~ = :- ~ .... g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3' g ~ ~ :5 M ci ~ ~ ~ ~ 0\ o~ ~ $ ~ ~ ii: .... -:A ~ :; ...,. N .., \() ..-) 0\ ;~~ v; .., Vt ~ '$. ~ ~ 8 8 ~ ~'[J;~ v; v; t;; ~ 8 ::& NO.... r-:'6r: r.... 'If" CIC r- on '" c-f c-f ~ .... .... - .... " " ::E ::E o on N - on 0 8 0 N N Vi ~ ;.. ~ 0;; f-o rJ:J ~ rJ:J rJ:J!i: ~ ~ f-o 5 ~ u.... f-o-<u \J~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f-o ~ 00;;" ;..!:l ~ .... '" f-o .... f-o rJ:J U ~ ~ ~ ~ !:l: ~ f-o -< ~ :<: r;. 1;; E 0(5; u.... '" 0 J; - ~ .. E" 'f;; g ...z I() N -.b o o N o Z ., <.) @ r:: ~ o .::.~ ... lil~ ill !W ..~:;f:t ~~~~a !:... ~ .lj"'IO;! J i ~ u_.!! -e "0 - ~ 5 ~ 1 ~~'ii 111 ~..( 'i g '. Q; g i.. ]~.~. ii]m.~ ~~~ ~ a"';<f=,,,,i:;,,,,. ..(.;;; ..(.........._Q;.il~f3 GI ~~;l Q; ;....::l~VJ ~...... .~ -l! .~ 's Q . i:; :5 i:; ,!!! ;:2 l GI~ GI~ - VJu VJ~ o -5 0 9_..... .., 9_~ ;:2 -g~~ 0 !i;;;S; !:::. ,~ ~ ;t - ~ 8; Z! 18 ~ ," _ _ ! .. _ GI:Z N - .....0. jtl't.... ~ .,,"'" .s ~""'.... "7' ~ . ",,=..J .... Yl 0 ~ c ~ GlB Zl ~< .5.ll !!!GI on,=,~ ..J~ i!S.=18.o'E ~~ N-;j N~.llJ E c!l .2 ~- is PC~ ~u .. - p~ o;i ~ ;0...... C lj...o -e :Eo 00 u.... 1;;.. - ... .... - ~ ,~ is ,~ = ~ 1 ~ l~ 1:: Q ~ ~ 8!i1 S!'';; ~ ~ !i1 2 &. ;= ~ ~ Q;...:; v;v},-::O;~:.i~- Q; :.;;;..: "'';I -; .....: t g .,; u ,r ~a Z ~ .: '6 r..; '6 ~ ~ ..J~ N~-,..lll; o fi~~~ 0 U~~ c> ..88i:::i:~~~8o~ Z c....-..... Z c~~..z lif"'l..... i"''''M -s ~""s 3....0:: .!t III ~ .!t ,i ~ .!t i e _'" e ~_'" e ! '* , '* ,~ '* ~ ~NiN ~NNNNNNNN NO, LUUo-L ~~ ...j~ f~ . a " ~ .ll ~ ~ l!;\ f .. .1 { ~ ,Ii ,~ ~ I 1 l ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 'r '~ I i "t ,5 ~ 'a- ~ ,5 @ >- F ~ V) ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ><~- ~ ~ ~!:l: 8 ~r:~~ ~ o ~ :: ~ ~ Z ;..:t I ,~ ~ ~ .. Il. l =~:ttil ~ o~~,~ ;.. <Il V) e !:: ~ ~t Uei~ ~i' f-o ~ ~"k. -< ~! ~ ~10 lr ~ij ~: ~ .i ~1l ~ ~ n ,6~ II ~-I. .~ ~ 11 . ";;; c- ,p ....!! li ~ ! " d ,n l~ s~ ...~ .5 "is ]~ ~ a " ~ ij'Qo !~ 1'.;;; H ~"t . ,5 Ordinance '~ .. v ! ;;; ~ i'j .. v II .!:i :a ;J ~ i ~ .i e; ... eo- ~...e I-' ~l~ ...;:),S ~lli ~ ~.9 ",'" 2St:i~ ... 'f ; ~ QJl.!~ Ii -. ;Ji' ~u~ < ='~ 'C .. 15" l ~~a~ .. II: i~ - l:II:' ..: .. ~~aaas:q~ ~t :;f;;:;~ ~~ ~~;; ~~! . . j:: 5!t:: III o .... ~~al .. s: i Ill: - ""'~ ;; ---::: ~~~ ~t~ ....~.. ~~aaasa~~. !i~ a- ~~ t:t~ ..~;; aaaa ----=- aaa aaaaaaaa:i: ~ ft~ 1: " ,,'" Q a: ... ~~~ n= .. 00 ~~~~qt~~~ CIOOC QOocOoc 7r ... '" 00 .. ~~s~~~s~ OOCICI 00 co III ;; N ~H ~ .. .. .. ~s~ Tr sss~ss~s ~ < j~~aaa~a~.~. ~;;:;~ ~ ~~ ~;l;; "' ~a j. 0:: ./l",... 'I: :='5 ..r- ...~ j 8 N ~.r!.a~ ::l ~ _ ~~ ~ ... .. I::.~. S s: ~ I- ""'a~ ~ .. ;; ;; 'a.lE v- - rl .f!v {? ~ ~ ;l ~ vi .. ;; ~ " o v 'lS .. ;g ~j E ... .!I c QC :!! ... .." 5S ~ ,,~ ,~ e ... = 2: ~a~ '" .. .. l- t:; .. ~ r'l - aa= IT"" .. I~ u ~ Sl ~ ... .. ~i aa fo--;;- ~ ill ..: I- ~ ~ .... .. l- .~ ~ U I-g';"~.~ ~!i1 i.. Q; a<5 0 ,:<5 ~~< ~ocr r! ~o\ ~~G.};:!~ ::"::"~~ 4l"t U :.= ~... .. .- B ~ ~ i:; ~ ..( N ~ ~ t i o ~-'- Oil '" .... -s r- i:; 'i< ~ .... r---.\:2 '1 ~ u ~ 8 -ti cn.s~ ;; ....Jl... ~g '0 r--~ ~i===-'" Glc ~~ ....58 ~.-e 8,.;j" ;S..J1Il Ng~ N;~ ;::a ._~ ":....1-; , .0 .0 ::l: 'C 'C ,.; - '" 1;; 11 ~ .~"2\O ._ ON ~ Qj- Q-:- GI ~ ClO ,: '0 ill I'- 1i .;; u-=-- tt") it ~=~]~ !-:!~ .....,; ~ ~.,; '" ~ :;..; U U "" 'a Iii. "6 :si-::s~ Q ~~t: 0 fi:O$~ ~ ]....M ~ ~~~- ..... ,ll~ ..... ,llg co ' 0 ' .. .. '* ,~ '* ~, t:~N N "$. ... ~ is " "il 'ij ~ ';"~-- ~ e: ~ ~..(~ "$.- ... Q;" "'..( .~ il GI C> i:; '~TI'~ E c> !~S~""t~~ I~ ~~~: p~ ::f. -: r-- III 'i ~,~ ~'~ ..... ,S ~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~ ""~~ Q;~a a Cl.O ,~ .5,," c~ ..J:@ "e ~F=-= c ~ 0... .2 -5 V ~ '=' s g~i 8:!2~ ....cit Nl::~ ] '1_ is j ",j! ClO!! ~ '; ';. '~ t ~:i3 w i62 ~ ~,~ ~ ~ :l Ii =- .~ ~ 5l;!~:;:e:'5~ ~. ~ II> <:> - _ -.;" ..~ I ~ ~ N ~il VJ ,- I 'II "6 ~~-:3~ c fi~ e ij;!~~N ~ ~~3~ ~~~~~ u 8 2 &l 8 .~ ,i i.... ,1l~ e"ts, fI) e . '*~ '*~ EN ~NN~N ~~al ~ i ~aa~ ~ ::: ~ ~ aaa:i: ~z;~ ~~~ 00 s~s s~~a5 a ~ s 00 .... .. ~J "'~ "'- .... - !.! ...'" "'- .... -.. a.... r r ~ ~ n .. .. ~ ~ :!l .. ;;;-;;; .... .... ".' ~~ ~a~a~ ..: t ~ ~ ~ vt ~~!8~~ ,..: i. ;: z; ::l 2 SlaSlafl ~z;~~ ~s~~ s~s~ ~. ~ Vi. ~ ~ :l? .. on l> '" ... ..: ;I; :! ... .. ~ ::l ~ ill ii ;; ~ ~ Iii l:l ~ o ; ... ~ i ~ ~ I J I i . J } I ~ ..: :j~ t~ ~ " ~ .J2 i :t l!;\ ~ iil ~ l Ii 1 .s ~ I ,g ,~ l l . 'r 't ;:. ~! ~'t "'.., i ,~ l ~r ;., ,5 i:l = 'Qo~ -;;l ~l ~ 8 6.li l~ Ii ~ 8-! 'i ~ .; .F li o . ! ~ ~ G ] ti ~~ 8 .~ ....!! ~l .8 '~ ~ e ~ ~ ~'Qo ~'"" ~~ l'... ~j :: .s Ordinanc ,. Q ~~ V)<Il;z; ~~::i 1Il"'~ :!....~~ O 1Il.....-< ~ ::i ii; ~ ~~:g~ ~ '" :t U ... 0 ~ &1 i>'~~ !:V)ll. UCl:O IIlCl: ...ll. -< ~ 1 , ~ ! ,~ ~ i c -!! 1l 'I ~ ~ ~ t ,l u "2 a ;s II:; l . .!. 'r '~ 'll l ~ ~ ,5 ti 'Qo I~ .. v ] ... ;J ~ .s ~ li >~ie ~ f"i ~"'v I-' .c E l! ~:!! .. Q...- ... :::;) .5 ~l!i <> ~ E "',)lu; ~- Jl l! ~ E .. -'i ,)l!~ 'a ~ :::> - ' ~e ~ < - 8,J ii: Ii! ~ e No, 2UU6- r~ ~:: Q t: "" ~ I;;; r- ; '"\l"1.~~ ~~~ft MMio't;: ~lilaa= ~ 3 ;; ... '" ;; '" o........~ l;1!l.I:!.... ~~~~ "''''''''''M ~aaa~ ;;; $ ~. ::! ;;; ... aaa~ aaaa:i: III ~ ~~ 'C .. ojl;, Q~ !~ ~ ~ ~s~s :!l <> ... "~ ~~s~ ~nn; ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ... ~~~t:: ~' ::f:!f:;f -"'''l. ......- ... l6aaalil o. 'lit '" '" '" '" ~ ~ ... ... .~ - ~!C. Ut: - " ~U I-' 3;~~!n! ~8;;&~~ ~;.!"';:;l g ;; ~ i - ; l1 . u .< ~ ~ ~ fj 1 ~ :;: :!~......, 5s< :: "" ::;.g:.~~'ii =: i:5;. - ::!!--J;:"" .... V'.l .~~f"'laa.~; ~ ~... ... ..( ~... ::2. 8 e ii 'p .- i f'l~ i:;~ I ~ b ~ ,!!~S;:ll CI'I ~l'i: ~ ~~~~ ~ ji~ ~ ~ ......... :-]'" c ~ C 9 ,il ... ;:l 1l .E ~ :;; g .:l 'El ~E] .12 l! .0 ~ ~ ~ 1 .- e is " ~~~!::~ CUJM ~ ';; ; -:- 'fc ,5 ..J :E .-li >,11 ::!~~~~~~~ E:!:M C"'lvrC_o\ VJ ,g == .~ , 'B I 'j( =S,s 5.i - 'ilWO\f- ...: ilo_-_",_,"_ i. i~~~ i. I!"'~"'~ lill liS 'f'1 'f' ,I IIlo. ~ '* .~ ~NMM ~NMMN li 0, ~ ... i v - " .. d t'ij" ~1l .. " Ci'=' .0 ..~ " .. ~I:, ::laS! ~ ~ '" - ;; .. ~a; 8:;:aalil~ . " a a '"aa....p:: f!:& &:t.. :t ~ ...... ~q. ...- ... ~ \Qtoi\~ ~ ~ '" - ;t ... ----::: "'a !;I ;1;, ::l ~ ~ '"aar-I! i!. ~. :r ~ ~s t; ~= 8aaaai , " ;:!j .. ~ ::l ~ ~ aaaa~ aa:;::;:a~ rr rr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~s~~ err .. err .. ~~~~ .. .. ~~~~~ Tr Tr ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ 3~5 ~ ~ IT! .... ... C; t; tlllllll~~ .. ....:g a a'1 ;t 51l11l1........:l .. .. ::l ::l 1; .,- ~ ~. - 0"" l!o 0 ~~ ~~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~i j~ ~ J~ i 'f ~] ~ i i CI\ - - ~ 1'-- l' ~ ~::2. '" "'i '" ~ 'J'.-.H 'J'. Ill. ...i....... "'';i''~ "'~~... Q; ..( ~< ... g~rr"1..( r1e ~ ~g..(g8 ~~ff"l :!"'~g: g:tl ;:[ 1i'S: :ll ::!~tl~~ :;:'-1i88 ~-;j~'" "'E ~;J;~ ~ t;;:;;.>~;: ;:i:;:::l::l ~.~ 41 VJ ti~ Jll. lloI.E VJ CI'I VJ. >'5 CI'I r-- CI'I}, ~g 'C 1 1;; ::2. r-- -; ~ .~ ~ ~-- -Q; '" ~'i B- ~~~ rl ~ ,5 Ie ~ Q;'B~ tl~~ j~~ .5 - ..J ~ ~ .S~~ .5,!!'" =" ..J'" g ..Jg -:~... ~ Jl=== l; === ~ c ~ ~ z'S= = ~ Cl ::s J -.2l ~ .. ,~ g~'~ ;~~;;~ ;;~i ~~:! s N"OS .....cl ....0- ..........11 24.l ~ ; ,~ .ii 1 ': ~ ~ i 'g ~ ~~-~u_~Jl _ell ~j- 'C 1 ~ .~ -; ~ .~ g ~ ] Qu ..Jl 9 Q~ _. <n~DO ~"S~ ~u~ 00 (IlI~~ ~~N 'S:~ ,,!:28 'at ~~- f-_ 'Ou ..~ s~ VJ1l E-< 1- ti5 -!if--:g j ..( . C .~- L~.~~ ~1;;~~ ~g<~ ~~1;;~ri! ~~;~ $ 0; j ~ -' ..: ~ '6 ". .. ~ ,a on ,.;.. ~ ,i,.; ::; .. 'i" .. . :s ' .. , I I '5 ~ oS :::~ ~! ~g e~ :!l~ ..J o5-..J f--..J" ..J ~ ... y- o ilg~ ci 1l",~ 0 ~-;:l;"'''' 0 ~-:::l-~'" 0 i",~ Z ~;>,;1. Z ~;1.;1. Z 'i:::~~::::.. Z .:!:::lN~~~",Z .:!~~ ....'i -'i t::~ '3-i it::'i ~ ~ ill:: a~ -ill" e ,I 'f' 'I 'f' j ~ 'f' '1 ~ 'f'i 1Ilo.~ 1Ilo.~ '*~ 1Ilo.~ '*.J!! ~NM ~NM ~NNrlN ~f"fMMM"" J::NN :;:a~ ~ on ~ i I:;: a Ii: '0. ~ i ~ ~ rr tr .. 1T r1 ;:J; ! I J ~ ] I ; I J l .S I :J I 8 I 1 1 .tI' ,~ If ~"f :::J; 'p. ].r ~ '0 'a-J -1 ,il ~I a 8 p '~l! II l{ i ~ :5 t q 1 5 i I ] U :u. iil.~ >;,5 ,5 'i l: it ~~ t;:; ~1 Ordinance No. :lUUo- ~~ -.ir;: t~ ~ 1 oS i ~ os:. ~ Ai >- Q i: VJ "'1Ol::i ~~ ..., ~ ~ - U o el<~ ;Z;!>l~1 ~ ~- ~ ~::!: u ~ 0 ~ Q t:~ u" ~ ~ 1 ~ t I . ~ 1 .1, :J 1 t ~ ';0 'II ~ . u I ;;> ... i l:3 ! :5 ~ j~i~ Jl.!lcll :1'!~ >-ljl:!. ~ fi -e""u po ! Itj .J! IIi .. >- is. <> E N v.; ic:;- 'l5._ ~i iu po ~i2 ~u~ -< II i!!~ t~ !E. 8,.8 it ~ z :.'1 "c... ! t: ro. !:;; t !i ~ = '" ~ N f! !! r-"l. ~ ~i ~ '" ::: all · III co lil '3 li is I 1&0 ~ :!l <> H ~ ~ ~ !s ~ ~ ii5 ~ :!; I a '5 .!! a ~~ ~ e .... ~ < on ~ "E ~ o tf'l r-- ~ ft ~~ '" l: .. .. ~ < El a ill ~ . ] .~ ~j ~1 ::l ;: .~ ~ I i >.!l uUf-- "s ! il '$J ~I :3 .J cd ! z ~ 'i;l eo t1 ~o "e') !! a. l ! ~ ::: ~ .~ ~ ~ 61 ~~ .S "1! ~ ;; .ft 1 !] Be , , -N I j I I f I Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. VII. WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM A. General At this time, the majority of the wastewater generated in the City of Wylie (concentrating in areas adjacent to the present city center) flows by gravity and a combination of lift stations and force mains to the Wylie Wastewater Treatment Plant located near the center of the City and the new Muddy Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant southwest of the City center. A small amount of current wastewater flow is handled through local residential septic systems. The Wylie Wastewater Treatment Plant has an average daily flow capacity of 1.0 MGD and a peak flow capacity of approximately 2.0 MGD. The average daily flow capacity of the new Muddy Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant is 2.5 MGD and the peak flow capacity is 5.0 MGD. A planned expansion to the Muddy Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant will provide an average daily flow capacity of 5.0 MGD and a peak flow capacity of 10.0 MGD. For the purpose of this impact fee study, the Lake Side Collection Basins are not expected to commence development, to a significant degree prior to 2015. Therefore, infrastructure improvements are not planned or included in the impact fee calculation. Muddy Creek, Cottonwood Creek and Rush Creek Basins are anticipated growth areas. 1) Muddv Creek: Muddy Creek includes the bulk of the existing development and produces the predominant volume of wastewater flow to the Wylie Treatment plant. The Muddy Creek Basin will add approximately 18,398 to the population by 2015. 2) Cottonwood Creek: Generally south of the City center is an expected growth area where approximately 4,342 will be added to the population by 2015. 3) Rush Creek: Generally east of the City center is an expected growth area where approximately 5,829 will be added to the population by 2015. B. Collection Lines The wastewater collection system analysis, a more static system than the dynamic water distribution model, covered all of the drainage basins within the study area. The wastewater project cost includes necessary appurtenances, purchase of easements, utility relocation, pavement removal and replacement, and engineering costs. For existing Impact Fee projects, actual costs were utilized where known. Future project cost estimates were based on 2005 average unit cost per linear foot and include engineering and construction cost. An allowance of $15 per linear foot was included for easements. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\clericallwylie\2002-164 w&ww impact feeslreportslreport-I.doc - 33 - Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, LLP. The natural ground in the area to be served by the Wylie Wastewater Collection System varies in elevation from approximately 460 feet above mean sea level near the Muddy Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant to 620 feet above mean sea level near the northwest City Limit. There is a natural divide running generally North to South near the Wylie city center (following Ballard Avenue to the Pleasant Valley Road). Generally speaking, the fall of the land on the west side of this divide is to the southwest and includes five main basins. These basins are (from south to north) Lower Muddy Creek, Tributary 1 to Muddy Creek, Tributary 2 to Muddy Creek, Tributary 3 to Muddy Creek and Upper Muddy Creek. The natural creeks, whose basins will collect wastewater through the installed system of trunk lines, flow into the geographic area normally serviced by the North Texas Municipal Water District. The fall of the land on the east side of this divide is to the southeast and includes three main basins. The basins are Cottonwood Creek (near the City center), Rush Creek (east of the City center) and Tributary 1 to Rush Creek (east of the main channel). These basins flow naturally into Lake Ray Hubbard. Flows in the City of Wylie service areas are collected in Lift Stations at the downstream limit of the service area and lifted over to the Muddy Creek basin. C. Treatment The Wylie Wastewater Treatment Plant is located near the City center. Currently, this plant serves the City center through both a gravity flow collection network and a network of lift stations, force mains and gravity sewers. It also serves some additional developed through a network of lift stations, force mains and gravity lines. The new Muddy Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant was constructed southwest of the City center. An expansion of the Muddy Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant is currently being designed. The North Texas Municipal Water District operates both treatment plants. D. Caoital Imorovement Proe:ram The wastewater facilities shown in Figure 3 include City constructed collection lines, trunk sewer lines, lift stations and force mains. The cost of the City constructed treatment plant and gravity sewers that are included in the Impact Fee Update are itemized in Table No. 15. The project locations are shown in Figure No.3. The projects shown in Table No. 15 represent those required to meet the needs of the projected growth as provided in the Land Use Assumptions for Impact Fees. Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\clericallwylie\2002.164 w&"w impact feeslreportslreport.l.doc - 34- ..- '~ / ~:,;,~,~, I Y/~~~~t.. 0 I ~ ~~1'~ ' ~AS'f~;~: :~~.\\,--~~:\,~~~pl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~.2j)r;~ r---H ~~~~'-~~:':~ill- <: ;l~~~'->~, , ~ ~ ~ al B :~ ~D reM:' '.' - ~" -,~;:;..; '.., .., '\ I I ~ ~ ~ 41 J . @:;~ ' "a:".,:/', ' ., '. . . ~ ~ """ I ~ :1 / F= ::::\< .<<,"\'.<'::;:~<~~?:'-:S:.;\:-., I I 9 (<'~.'~ ~",'.'~. II' ~1Pi.~'"'=..' ,'. to I: : ........'..'-:,..........:::-\.-0.. s..":':..<'......'. . . '" ~ :~~ ~ 1MlI. ,{',~ ;./ II ~ '<S~~~~~~:~~~;~~.~~~~~"~,".~;\o.. ~~ ~ ~,~ i' Ar~~r \ :j,' '0. ..;'~'~::;..'S:'.~" I;~~\.\:~':c, (' I ~ ~ <= ~ r=. j. - jl .. .,. . , \)kS:<~;<'''~ g @'.qJ I " ~~, JJ..: l. . r ,,'i!il~ ~ ~}~.. _ R', L " . I ~ ~,:..: '., t,', f, !:~1~1Bfj~ il.. II \. ~ ~ ~ . ':! . ~ ~.J, ..! · q~;-li~ ,\ I l= ~ ~J::; ,;.:\. 'J. .", k. ~ "~~ , I, , I __. ~ ,~_" .... ..' ~:..ji~ . ..~, Ii ~I'" ~ . I I I' ,Lo.. L 11 i /"\ 't.V. tt11..:c I .\l..l' r: l~.F ili' ~ " /:' ~~". I -- Ii IlfI, 1 j ill_ ", ~'::j" -:.< ~ '-'. ". \~:~ It-- -. ,'~Jl1I1 -,.!! i ,'j", : ':,:~ ," '....1 ~ ,".,,' I /. ',' , I I.J ': t ' .,.' ::; . / ---- --- t<' h ' ~h' E I: ~., / <1 '~l:..d r' ,- l,t' ,.,' r . /~ ,0. >---- ~=._ [' II / ^ ...0': ~ -" :,~,. L ,,' " t ~ I: _ ,,'~, ~ .. ~!',~/ ~,(\'" , r;; [ " ,. ~.~ 'f. 1~~7\\, :~>''1\'' ") :. ~ in "0-,~' ~..,:: 1 II: J ,: I ,~~, ~! iI, i ; ~. r . Uill.:- !tl~' y,' I , , I I I ~" ,'/"". , I -I"" \4"" II. ~ 'C" " " ,J. .' l~ ~ "~OJ" J "'," '.W;f: /'- riiT'i L.H I",!! ~ rr ~ r '_ .)" , I ~~"" :~', ... II)". ,~ , , t'~ 1/ .. . : ..;' .....,'" ...." ~...<7' :'o\.;~ 'r" / · ., ! I ' ,~." ';1 .. 1111 ' ,~. · ,'a1'- / )i1. ,'.@ ;~f.;\:.: .~ .' ,I, i! ~l , l Di, ~ : r\' "'I~~: IJ I ~. r'-1 --,;"~i ~~::},. ':2:;' \.1.\ I ,\ "-i-", ':.lJ. -~ ,I ~""'" ""l~\'-,\c rll......,~;; ,M,~ >~\\~ (!!f' V ' i' - (:'~ ~.'\;. il;t~U-'" > ~" i{~ ~ '~'+':~l'''~ .10 \...~.r:.) . IF.ItJ"~ - " 1. ~, '" ..., , ! LL., '1 I' I,':'~o/":-\",,.JI^ Jd'1 l! ~',~~(l:i~ ./~ L n " O~:..":..f--' I".,~ ~ 5 ~l;I.~J'Jk" ;.:~ ]-, J ~7'F';"~ ,'-'-'';'1 l~ i: I .,~. '.Jh ~ .-:YF~ _ r\. jl 1~ tJjJ"" , I Ii I' fli I j J : ' ). ,a I ii' ,u-:;, I' I ;rI1!~'.'v~, '., \.......... /j1 ( P,,' hi~~ 'r' I ''1,., \y,- '; I;:,. ~.~ ~. '!jll Iw -'I'~(II' "H I - ,Ie,,,.,,,,,,,, I,. -" ~,: ~ ... r... . . t ,-:.:r , .", :, 'l ~ '~' ,., ~ .' I~' ~TTIT .....~ t . ,it ',(tir~1 J II/J ~' ""I" i;'~" ~' . ~L; / ; I. . ..... ~._, ..,.:.. _1.!IT\:: .r! , .' i _~ r .._, " Ji.1lI!' ~' <., Tl,>.,;'j;1 I . IS :> ~ r.! Ordinance No. 200~~( ..r~" . BlrkhofJ, Hendricks & Conway, LLY (2/14/2006) Table No. 15 CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM 10- YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WASTEWATER COLLECTION LINES UplDlOn of Construction Total Project Year Pro.iect Size Cost (1) Debt Service (2) Cost 2007 Twin Lakes Relief Sewer 30" & 42" $ 2,608,000 $ 1,369,200 $ 3,977,200 $ - $ - $ - Subtotal: Wastewater Collection Lines $ 2.608.000 $ 1 369 200 $ 3 977 200 TREATMENT FACILITIES UplDlOn OJ Construction Total Project Year Project Capacity Cost (l) Debt Service (2) Cost 2006 Treatment Plant Expansion #2 5MGD $ 5,000,000 $ 3,150,000 $ 8,150,000 $ - $ - $ - Subtotal: Treatment Facilities $ 5,000,000 $ 3,150,000 $ 8,150,000 MUDDY CREEK WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM & PREVIOUS BOND SALES utilized Amount of Total Project Year Pro.iect Capacity Bond Sale (1) Debt Service (2) Cost 2004 NTMWD Muddy Creek Interceptor System (Bond I) 95% $ 2,039,840 $ 1,111,089 $ 3,150,929 2004 NTMWD Muddy Creek Interceptor System (Bond 2) 95% $ 9,416,875 $ 4,589,260 $ 14,006,135 2002 Wylie Water & Sewer Bonds @ 50% of Total 95% $ 491,625 $ 209,050 $ 700,675 2000 Wylie Water & Sewer Bonds @ 80% of Total 95% $ 1,117,200 $ 520,448 $ 1,637,648 1999 Wylie Water & Sewer Bonds @ 50% of Total 95% $ 527,250 $ 225,212 $ 752,462 1997 Wylie Water & Sewer Bonds @ 22.225% of Total 95% $ 429,617 $ 152,652 $ 582,268 1988 NTMWD Contract Revenue Bonds @IOO%ofTotal 100% $ 355,000 $ 43,924 $ 398,924 Subtotal: Treatment Facilities $ 14,377,407 $ 6,851,635 $ 21,229,041 PLANNING EXPENSES UplDlOn of Cost Total Project Year Project Capacity (1 )(b) Debt Service (2) Cost Wastewater Master Plan - $ 20,600 $ - $ 20,600 Wastewater Impact Fee Calculation $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000 Subtotal: Planninl! and Operations $ 40,600 $ - $ 40,600 Wastewater Collection System CIP Grand Total: $ 22,026,007 $ 11,370,835 $ 33,396,841 Notes: (\) Opinion of Cost includes: a) Engineer's Opinion of Construction Cost b) Professional Services Fees (Survey, Engineering, Testing, Legal) c) Cost of Easement at $15/L.f. of Open Cut Installation (2) Debt Service based on 20-year simple interest bonds at 5% Ordinance No. 2006-25 Report W-WW CIP,xls .36. Birkhojf, Hendricks & Conway, LLP. E. Utilized Capacity The Land Use Assumptions from the City of Wylie were utilized to calculate the utilized capacity for the wastewater collection system based on land absorption from population growth projections. The population and employment growth in each wastewater drainage basin was determined utilizing the DSA growth projections. These growth rates were utilized to calculate 2005 and 2015 design flows. The following summarizes each design flow component utilized to calculate the wastewater design flows. 1) Population Based Flow: For the purpose of this wastewater impact fee study an average per capita flow of 110 gallons per day (gpcd) is a reasonable basis for the design of the wastewater collection and treatment facilities. Peak flows associated with this per capita rate have been estimated for various segments of the collection system by using the following formula (PF = (5/(population/l000)^0.167). The formula takes into account the estimated population, and, indirectly, the area of the drainage basin to be served. This method gives a ratio of peak to average flows varying from a maximum of 5.0 times the average flow for a population of 1,000 or less to 2.32 times the average flow for a population of 93,700 (includes 18,000 for the City of Murphy). 2) Non-Population Based Flow: Non-residential average flows are estimated based on an average daily flow per acre for each non-residential land use category. The following were used for average daily flow per acre for each category: Business/Commercial Corridor: 1,600 gallons ... CommerciallRetail: 1,400 gallons Neighborhood Services: 1,200 gallons ............... Public/Semi Private: 1,000 gallons Heavy Industrial: 2,400 gallons .......................... Light Industrial: 2,000 gallons Parks/Open Space: 5 gallons .............................. Floodplains: 0.01 gallons A 2.0 Peaking factor was used for each non-residential land use. The combination of per capita and non-residential based flow is the basis for aggregate dry weather flow in the basins. 3) Infiltration and Inflow: Groundwater can infiltrate into the sanitary sewer system through faulty sewer pipe joints, tree roots, breaks in sewer pipes and manholes and faulty service lines. Infiltration creates an average day flow related burden on wastewater collection systems and treatment plants. Infiltration is fairly constant and not necessarily based on temporary storm based events. Normal plant capacity Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\c1erical\"'Ylie\2002-164 w&~ impact fees\reports\report.l.doc - 37 - Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, LLP. must be designed to handle infiltration related flows. The City can embark on programs to rehabilitate lines that contribute significant infiltration volumes when economically and environmentally feasible, and/or desirable. Inflow is generally related to storm based events that increase groundwater and surface water flow into the sanitary system. The additional flow is generally recognized to enter through manholes, service lines, roof drains and storm drains. Inflow related flows could cause surcharged sewers, overflows at manholes and peak flows to surpass the capacity of the treatment plant. The wastewater collection system planning calculations include a combined infiltration and inflow rate of 400 gallons per acre per day (gpad) for the entire wastewater service area. This flow is not peaked. The percentage of utilized capacity was calculated for the design flow of each study year based on the build-out capacity. The utilized capacity during the Impact Fee period is the difference between the year 2015 capacity and the year 2005 capacity. Table No. 16 below summarizes the project cost and utilized cost over the impact fee period of 2005 - 2015 for each element of the wastewater system. The utilized capacity for each existing and proposed wastewater facility and collection line is presented in detail in Impact Fee Capacity Calculation Tables Nos. 17 and 18. TABLE NO. 16 Summary of Eligible Capital Cost and Utilized Capacity Cost Utilized Capacity $ in CRP Period Total $3,316,767 $14,743,300 $737,533 $1,723,838 $792,065 $612,914 $398,924 $4,254,300 $8,150,000 $40,600 $34,770,241 (J) Muddy Creek Trunk Sewer - Wylie Share at 61% (2) Muddy Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant- Wylie Share at 61% Ordinance No. 2006-25 $3,150,929 $14,006,135 $331,899 $775,727 $316,826 $214,520 $79,785 $3,403,440 $8,150,000 $40,600 $30,469,861 j:lclericallwylie\2002-164 w&ww impact feeslreponslreport-I.doc - 38- ~ ..J ..J f c: 8 ~ " l l :t ~ o ~ iQ ~ 0- .... .., ,;.; 8 c::! .... ~ ~ :g .,., ~ 0\ r-- r-- .... \0 \0 N 0\ ~ N N N .., :l co .... ::! .,., "! \0 .., '" \0 \0 \0 .... \0 .... .., II"! \0 "! '3 ~ ~ vi ~ cO cO 0\ ~ N -.i ~ ~ 00 vi -.i ..; ~ cO - ...: \0 r-- N 0 r-- co N ~ ~ '" '" '" - '" ~ ~ .... .., q ..,. II). ..,. '" r-- ..,. r-- ..,. r-- \0 q \0 r-- .... ...; ~ ~ 0 N ~ ~. N 0 N 0 ",0 ...; ~ vi" vi" 00 co .... 00 '!. B .... !:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \0 ::e ::e ::e ::e ::e ::e ~ ~ - '" t'l ii: ~ "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ~ "" "" ~ ~ ~ "" "" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "" ~ ;:l I-< I/) Iol Iol I/) '" ~!-< Iol IolU l'!--< ..l .... .... r-- co co :zl :;; \0 <:> '0 :g .... '0 ::e '0 '0 co .,., .... co ;:l .-. ~ .,., 0- N eo eo "" 0 '0 <::! 0\ ..,. 0 0 "! 'l! ~~~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g cO cO $ ::: ..; '" 8i ..; ~ cO ...; ~ - ~ S CO 0- \0 .., r-- eo '0 .., N 0: 0- '0 0 .... .,., .,., .,., -.to ..... 0). .,., ..,. r-- 0 "l. "l. q .,., CO ZS:~ ~ 0\ r.: ..0 "i N 0 00 '0 .; 0\ r.: vi" N 0 !:: :! ::: r.: ...; 0 u ..,. .., .., -.t ..,. ,., .., .., ,., ..... N N ..... ..... Sl '" ~~~ I/) '" B ~",I/) Iol .E U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ vt !-<o~ ... ;><a: ~ !:Iol ~ie ul-< -< t~ ~ ~ ,., .... eo eo :zl r-- \0 8 '0 \0 .., ::e ::e '0 \0 eo '" ,., on Iol t.l .-. I-< == ~ '" 0- ..... 00 eo 0\ \0 '0 '0 0 0\ ..,. 0 0 "! .., ~ ~ :! ~ 0 ~ 0 cO cO ~ ~ ..; N g; ..; ~ ~ ...; ~ ... I/) ~~ N 00 eo 0\ \0 .., .... eo '0 N \0 - l::! < :::- -.t \0 0 .... .,., '" '" ..,. N '" -.to .... q N N 00 '" 0- ~ r.: r.: 'i "i N 0 00 ..0 "i, 0\ .... vi" N 0 r.: .; r.: ...; :€ ~Iol 1;; ,., .., ..,. .., ,., .., .., N N ..... N N - I/)~ ~ on ;><101 .E I/)!- ~ "" vt ~ ~ "" ~ ~ .... .... "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ~ ~ ~ .... .... =z Iol- I-<~ <101 ~;! ~v ~I '$. '$. ~ '$. 'f. '$. '$. '$. ~ ~ ~ 'f. ~ ~ ~ ~ '$. '$. '$. ~ 1/)>- 0 0 0 l) l) 8 8 8 ~ '" .,., '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .,., 8 '" 8 <Q .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 8 N '" ~ ~@ co co co co co CO co eo eo CO N ,., -.t .,., .,., ..... ..... ..t ..t -.i ..t ..t ..t ..t ..t ..t -.i ..t -.i ..t ..t ..t -.i -.i -.i -.i ..t ..l~ ~= 0101 -~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 <= ~~ <=! .. ~ g ~ g g ~ g g ~ ~ g g ~ ~ g g ~ ~ ~ g ~ "l. "l. ... ... ..,. II). '" \0 .... co - "l. .., ..,. II). ...... ~101 'u "" r.: ~ ,., 0- N .,; 0: t. ~ ...; ~ vi" N 00 ~ ...; 0\ '" ~ ,.: I .... \0 .... .... co co ~ ~ ~ :! :! ~ .., Iol~ c: - - 011 ;E .... A ;]CIl .:! 0 U~ ~ .... .... .... .... .... ... ~ .... "" ~ vt vt .... .... .., .., vt .., .... vt ! 0 ~ ;><lQ~ =~~ t ~5' ~ \:)!-~ ~ ~ j Z~ > '" "" .... eo g; 0 ... .... .., '" "" .... eo 0\ <:> ..... .... ..,. _ ." ?;o < ! 1-<."::: 'is 8 8 8 0 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 g N ... g g <:> <:> <:> <:> <:> !- ~~:r N ..... ..... ..... '" ..... ..... ..... ... N '" N N N N '" '" N N N N g Ordinan~ t. 200 ~ ..; ..J t a ~ c: " .g 1 ~ ~ o ~ iQ > g I-< V) rol rol v)"- ~t ~~~ oef! :~~ ..l~e! ='""~ ~0V) tel u~ ~ t.l !- V) -< ~ ~ ... .... .... ,;.; 8 ~ ~ '" '" II') '" lI'\ 0\ 0\ -t ..,. -t -fl..;:g..to\s: $eo;~~ ~ ..,'" N 0 C7\ V') ft t""" C""- l""" \0 \0 ~ l""" f' r--. roo. " ii: ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0\ r--: oci lI"I ~ .n r-..i.'6<5.&~ ;3i. ~:i~~r::~oo ,.... roo. ,..... ,.... roo. f"'o l""" :: ~ ~g 00 ... ~ t'! .., - '" '" ~ ..,. N ;;l; eo ,.,;~ co co .... ..... ~ :zl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ "l."l.o.."l. \0 \0 00 I"'- 00 00 00 00 f"'" l""" [' I' ~ ~ ~ .., ~ .." ~ ~ '" ..., .,. ~ .,. "" '" \lilt f.-rt .." ~ "" rol 5 Q rol = ~ rol U > " t.l V) !-< llQ.-. rol~ =CIl ~8 rol ~~ ~~ ~z ~~ ~~ V) -<~ ~rol ..l~ -<v z> OQ -Q ~~ ~rol rol~ IolCll "Q UZ >0 QIQ Q.J~ ;:l<.... H~ !(8 g 8 8 8 ~ ~ !ii~:r JNNNNNNN . ..."'1. Ordmandll: , 2006 roil... 00 eo "": "": o QO 00 ~;;l;8 1;; '!. ~ ~ N N .E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g o f"'" 0 W N f"'" q '" N 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~O~~~ N~MNO~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ "" V) "" "" V) V) ~ "" "" "" ~ "" "" "" .... .... ... ......cooo ~ : : :-. ;)\ 8.. -'000 i N ~ B .E iiiii~!~!~i;~i;i:! lilt .,. ~ 6I"l ~ It'l It'l ~ "" Vi tit foI't "" f.I"t "" "" tfl't Vt ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 888 8 8 8 8 8 8 g - g ~ g g ~ ~ g g ~ g g g g g ~ g g g ~ ~ !.~~ .......~O).tr).~~r'}.r--:. .."l~f"'l~f"'1.ClO.."'1. .- - ~ N 0 ~ M ~ M ... 8 0 ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ M .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ :1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ '" "" '" '" .,. io'i ~ \n if4 ~ ~ iI4 ta4 Wi'l ~ iI4 .,. flit ~ ~ ;: ~ g N N N N M CIl N ..., ~ ~~~!-2 N N N .... N M 'V ~ (5 (; 0 (5 N N N N ~ ..; ..; ;>; i " a l .g {i " ~ ~ C> ~ iii >- Q :::> I-- V,j (ol (ol ~: t'~~ gef~ ~~~ ~~~ I-- V,j ~&S u~ ~ t < ~ f2 z :3 ;z o 8 (oJ ~ ~ o U Ill: (ol ~ ~ (ol 1- ~ ~ c z (: (I) Ordinani N ~ Q ....... 1 ~ .... ~ :ll ~ :il Ii! on l! ~ ::;! .. '^ .. on t ..... 1: ;;; .n '!i .. ~ ~ . .. .... .., t:l !:: l;; t:l ;:; ~ ;:;. ... .., .., .. ~J: .. .. .. .. Vi ~ ;; on I i. '" g '" ~ ., ~ ~ ~ I.llll .... ~ '8. 0:. OJ, ... i ... .... N ~ N ..r ]~ .... .., ~ :0 ll: .., ~ ~ t:l ::!; .. '" ~ ;;; .. ~ '" ::l 'i. 'is .. ;:l I-- !e .... ~ '" ~ '" II: "3- cr; '" '" ~ I:: Q\. '" ~ "'l. .., "l. ::l ~ ~ 13 l! i '" .. m ~ '" .., ~ .... .... '" a ~ ::l ~ ~ .., .., .. '" .. ~ I~ r! C'; C'; ~ '$. ~ F== on ~ . .., =~ ~ I.l '$. ~ ~ ~ ~ ]~ is: is: _N ";:l I-- ;:l ~ ~ ~ ~ t; ::t8 '" .. . ... .., ~ .. a g I ;:!; lj;... ;!i ., f-I""" ~ ::l ... cr; r ;! a '" ~ ::i fl ri .. 01 'r; ~ a ..... ~ III ~ :s ';;~ .. ... .. .. 01 ale. :;; .. ~ ~i iOl.l ~ - :;l ~ .. .. '" '" '" '" '" ~ ~ I- !I',~ .., S ~ '" .. .. .. ~ ~ .. ~ '" '" .,; ,..: !:; ~ ~ ~ - t ... . ~ a i7i ~ ~Jl N c: ::: N ;;; .. .. '" 01 E,! ;;; ~Q I-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! .. '" .. ~ ! I- ~"5 ~ r.. .... '" on on ;;:; ~ 5 on :a 1; '" '" on '" on ~ ~ .., t:l 'il :g. .. .. ! .. Q ';; ~ .. '" Ii Ii 1: 'il ~Il. '8 ~ I ~ 'i ~ <C " ! ." f.;- J i " ~1- ~ "--:- <C ~ ~ ~ ;:l- ." ." ." Il. r~ ~ " ~ '" ~ ~ 0 ~ ! .. ~ I~ ! ! :~ I- ~ e ~ f. f. .. j! ~ ~ ~ ~ <l! .! <9 1 <l! .. ~ ,g .3! ~ 1 ~ .. to ~ " II) II) .. ::i i ." ." ; .. " " " .. Ii ~ ~ Jl " 0 ! '" ~ j .. l oil ~ E .. a .I:l ... II) ~ ! .. oil oil oil .I:l ~ :; R d' il- - ~ ~ i ~ ~ Q ! ~ ~ :is ~ ~ 0 ~ I-- 11 ~ I- ~ ~ li " .. li s s s ~ 2 0 ... ... ... ~ ... :;; " .. " .. " '" '" II) '" '" g ~ .. ~ t- :is .. .!! 'i '8 ! :is ... Il. .. ! '1 ::: - - .. - I ~ " ~ ~ ~ i 0 0 0 Ji! Ji! :ll E ~ il S R III III III III .200 -2 ! ! ! ! ! ~ l>. .... .... ,;; ~ ~ ~ . I ~ D .! 1 I I a.: .J .J f ~ 1 o :8 1 ~ is ~ @ E-< CI.) f;I;1 Cl.)f;I;1 ~~ C1Cf;I;1U ....E-<-< o ~~ ~~~ ~~e E-<O~ ~~ _f;I;1 UE-< -< ~ ~ ~ ~ CI.) ~ ~ E:: U j 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ - U Q f;I;1 CI.) o ~ g ~ cr; '" ~ ... 00 ~ .. :r ,~ :~~ 1: .. .. :;i t:l ,,'" CI .. ~ ,., '0 :. '" ~ ~ .. "!. ~.., I.l III ~ ~ ~ ] ..... .. :;i t:l ~ ~ !r= "" ~ ~ a 8 N 1 ~ t; !/"i: .. co i iot CI .. : l:l ~ ~ I.l ~ ~ ] '" ~ ~ ;; ~ ;:l i 1-; t; t; !~ i ~ ~ ! .... .., g .. ~~. 2 ~ g '" - ... ~i€ ~ :il. '1 1 MTi .; ;;; ::: ~ tl ~iCl.l " '0 j ~ ... " .. 'i to' .., .... '" i~u .!! .... '" ~ .. ..... ~ ~ ~ "" ~ i : ..@)! ! .: ... I .. . .. .. " >ji ~ '\: ~ ~ .! ." . III to .~ . ~ ~ ~ :l ~ ~ g 'ii '" ~ '"'1 q, ~ - II ~ ~ ~ ; '" ...~ ..... ~- ::J B .. . - - ... i 'S B .~ .. .. .I.l ~ .:l 1:1 ... . ,1; ! 1 ~ 'S - I ~ ~ ~ 1 ;:li~ to po; a\ ,8 alll.l to' 'a ::l ... .. j ~ ~ , 1 ,~ ... ~ ~ l! ! 8 . l .. I.l I J .... a ... 8 0 ] .. N ft ] ~ ~ Cl j E ~ .:l l! .!! ~ ti . ...~ ~ 'i . 'i~ t- ~J 8 .l1 .. 'i ! ~ ~ ..... C1e .... .1; ~.;J ] ~ .. 8 88 ... . ! ... '1 . ~ i~ 'Ii ...; - ~ ~e ~l ~ ~ '~ N " ii ~ .. i:; ~ 8.1: i i: ~ ll:g .15 z 'f''" '" ",,:Il <II ll6-25 .. ~;l o . . .J Q ~ a .. Ii ~ ... ~ M t 8 ~ ~ ;:;; t:l Q .. "l. l7; ~ is ...:. ! .. .. ! ::; iii ;; ~ .. o I: ::i J II 1ii J! ::s ~ ..; C> I '- ~ .. " .,,; tl ~ ! ;:J ~ Jl ~ '" Ordinance No. 20 -.: . Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P, VIII. MAXIMUM IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - WATER & WASTEWATER SYSTEM The maximum impact fees for the water and wastewater systems are calculated separately by dividing the cost of the capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated and attributable to new development in the service area within the ten year period by the number of living units anticipated to be added to City within the ten year period as shown on Table No. 8 and Table No.9, To simplify collection, we recommend the fee remain fixed throughout the next 5-year period, unless changed by Council. The water system impact fee is calculated as follows: Maximum Impact Fee Eligible Existing Facility Cost + Eligible Proposed Facility Cost Number of New Living Unit Equivalent over the Next 10- Years $1,644,621 + $27,111,588 11,018 $28,756,209 11,018 Water Maximum Impact Fee = $2,609,93 * * Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee is 50% of the Calculated Water Maximum Impact Fee, Allowable Maximum Water Impact Fee $2,609.93 x 50% = $1,304.97 The wastewater system impact fee is calculated as follows: Maximum Impact Fee Eligible Existing Facility Cost + Eligible Proposed Facility Cost Number of New Living Unit Equivalent over the Next 10- Years $18,875,821 + $11,594,040 12,376 $30,469,861 12,376 Wastewater Max, Impact Fee $2,462,01 *Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee is 50% of the Calculated Wastewater Maximum Impact Fee, Allowable Maximum Wastewater Fee = $2,462.01 x 50% $1,231.01 Based on the Allowable Maximum Impact Fee Calculation for Water and Wastewater, Table No. 19 calculates the maximum impact fee for the various sizes of water meters. Ordinance No, 2006-25 j:\cJericaJ\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-I.doc - 43- BirkhofJ. Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. TABLE NO. 18 Allowable Maximum Fee per Living Unit Equivalent 50% Maximum Water Impact Fee per Living Unit Equivalent 50% Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee per Living Unit Equivalent $1,304.97 $1,231.01 Typical Land Meter Living Unit Maximum Imoact Fee Use Meter Tvoe Size Eauivalent Water Sewer Total Smgle Family 5/8" & Residential Simple 3/4" 1.0 $ 1,304.97 $ 1,231.01 $ 2,535.98 Single Family Residential Simple I" 1.7 $ 2,218.45 $ 2,092.72 $ 4,311.17 Single Family Residential Simple 1-1/2" 3.3 $ 4,306.40 $ 4,062.33 $ 8,368.73 smgle l<amlly Residential Simple 2" 5.3 $ 6,916.34 $ 6,524.35 $ 13,440.69 Comm./Retail Compound 2" 5.3 $ 6,916.34 $ 6,524.35 $ 13,440.69 Comm./Retail Turbine 2" 6.7 $ 8,743.30 $ 8,247.77 $ 16,991.07 Comm./Retail/ Multi Family Compound 3" 10.7 $ 13,963.18 $ 13,171.81 $ 27,134.99 Comm./Retail/ Multi Family Turbine 3" 16.0 $ 20,879.52 $ 19,696.16 $ 40,575.68 Comm./Retaill Multi Family Compound 4" 16.7 $ 21,793.00 $ 20,557.87 $ 42,350.87 Comm./Retail/ Multi Family Turbine 4" 28.0 $ 36,539.16 $ 34,468.28 $ 71,007.44 Industrial Compound 6" 33.3 $ 43,455.50 $ 40,992.63 $ 84,448.13 Industrial Turbine 6" 61.3 $ 79,994.66 $ 75,460.91 $ 155,455.57 Industrial Compound 8" 53.3 $ 69,554.90 $ 65,612.83 $ 135,167.73 Industrial Turbine 8" 106.7 $ 139,240.30 $ 131,348.77 $ 270,589.0" Industrial Compound 10" 153.3 $ 200,051.90 $ 188,713.83 $ 388,765.73 Industrial Turbine 10" 166.7 $ 217,538.50 $ 205,209.37 $ 422,747.8" Industrial Turbine 12" 220.0 $ 287,093.40 $ 270,822.20 $ 557,915.60 Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\c1ericaJ\wylie\2(~)2-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-I.doc - 44- Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. TABLE NO. 19 Alternative Fee per Living Unit Equivalent Alternative Water Impact Fee per Living Unit Equivalent Alternative Wastewater Impact Fee per Living Unit Equivalent $1,300.00 $1,230.00 ~ Meter Living Unit Maximum Imnact Fee Use Meter Tvoe Size Eauivalent Water Sewer Tot",1 Single Family Residential Simple 314" 1.0 $ 1 ,300.00 $ 1,230.00 $ 2,530.0C Single Family Residential Simple 1 " 1.7 $ 2,210.00 $ 2,091.00 $ 4,301.00 Single Family Residential Simple 1-1/2" 3.3 $ 4,290.00 $ 4,059.00 $ 8,349.00 Single Family Residential Simple 2" 5.3 $ 6,890.00 $ 6,519.00 $ 13,409.00 Comm./Retail Compound 2" 5.3 $ 6,890.00 $ 6,519.00 $ 13,409.0C Comm.lRetail Turbine 2" 6.7 $ 8,710.00 $ 8,241.00 $ 16,951.00 Comm./Retail /Multi Familv Compound 3" 10.7 $ 13,910.00 $ 13,161.00 $ 27,071.00 Comm.lRetail /Multi Family Turbine 3" 16.0 $ 20,800.00 $ 19,680.00 $ 40,480.0C Comm.lRetail /Multi Family Compound 4" 16.7 $ 21,710.00 $ 20,541.00 $ 42,251.00 Comm.lRetail /Multi Family Turbine 4" 28.0 $ 36,400.00 $ 34,440.00 $ 70,840.0C Industrial Compound 6" 33.3 $ 43,290.00 $ 40,959.00 $ 84,249.0C Industrial Turbine 6" 61.3 $ 79,690.00 $ 75,399.00 $ 155,089.0C Industrial Compound 8" 53.3 $ 69,290.00 $ 65,559.00 $ 134,849.0C Industrial Turbine 8" 106.7 $ 138,710.00 $ 131,241.00 $ 269,951.0C Industrial Compound 10" 153.3 $ 199,290.00 $ 188,559.00 $ 387,849.0C Industrial Turbine 10" 166.7 $ 216,710.00 $ 205,041.00 $ 421,751.00 Industrial Turbine 12" 220.0 $ 286,000.00 $ 270,600.00 $ 556,600.00 Ordinance No. 2006-25 j:\clerical\"")'lie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\repart-I.doc - 45- ::::: C&S Media, Inc. m:l;l' jfurllll'rsbille \!Cillll'S . Murphy Monitor. The Princeton Herald · The Sachse News · THE WYLIE NEWS STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COLLIN ~l(.1~ 31q .tD Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Chad Engbrock, publisher of The Wylie News} a newspaper regularly published in Collin County, Texas and having general circulation in Collin County, Texas, who being by me duly sworn, deposed and says that the foregoing attached City of Wylie Ordinance No. 2006-25 was published in said newspaper on the following d~il19' 2006 Chad Engbrock, Publisher Subscribed and sworn before me on this, the \C{ day of jpt..\ L ,2006 to certify which witness my hand and seal of office. r" .,\lUJII1 ..,'\\'.''t',Y #'tJ:'~, j! ~ {~""}.."(;:~ ~ j~~:":'~:JJ'- .-(~ I~, p,- ,,,,,,,'.Pf~.."'J::: ~ "^,, . ",'" "'~f;' '\\;':$ 't......:J'.i'~I~\\\I\.. TAMMY BURTON Notary Public. State of Texas My Commission Expires February 21, 2010 Public in and for ate of Texas My commission expires L . Z{ '2-010 RECEIVED MAY 0 2 2006 FINANCE Murphy/Sachse/Wylie Office' 110 N. Ballard' P.O. Box 369' Wylie, TX 75098' 972-442-5515' fax 972-442-4318 Farmersville/Princeton Office' !OI S. Main' P.O. Box 512' Fannersville, TX 75442' 972-784-6397' fax 972-782-7023 '0 ,~ <(f0- r 0 '1 ~I = cyi ~ ~ :;: .. -:s., "' <!. 'Ili ~1 '..,I ~ 00 ~ Z I/; 00 "'IZ .. ~ 00:: ": '" 0 9 ~: N " v .0 ~\ ~u .c ~ :J: (. ~ ' ('-l 1'" '" 'l ~O~\,)fl;l ~fo-O~~ ~ r~' r/J ,.., ,~ .... ,.... '.f.. ...- ~\,;ill";~ oz.~.. ~ <( C;;) ~ ~.....Ill :::- ~ ~ Z- ~!"f', 0 ~ r'l ~ bl); ~:c E ~ ,:} ~ -= ,_, _::: ~ ~ ~ ._ 'J ~:oj:'; ~ .J ~ ~ L;!l ~; :: .c] " ~~ ~ ~~5s:2 >E~~~ . -SW,;~..c ": ~-- S :j~Q. ~ ~~~~~ ~" J~q<E ~5:;1 ~t;=~ ~ o:~~~ ~~ ~~c~ t~~~. -:: ~.. .>.. u, . C 0. z ""; C =":;"~2~,;,:~~,~, = M~~OQ~~~~_~ ~.:._~ ~Z9~5:1t2.fl~u2~zE ; ~ ;E Q. 2 n ~~ ~:; ~ -55: &:s e~~Q.,~~o~~~=~~~~]~.5 Ill~N~v..~~~_~(~~.z=~ U; , '.;, . =' ~ ~ ill r ,.' " r 111 111 ~ ~ ' :: U; ,:, ~ '/) >- ' U; .;, ~~Q1~~~m~~~~~z~~::~~~CO~B>c ~~~8~~~ O~U~~C~~~ ~<~Z~>t~ ~.~C~~~.~ 2illC~~65~~S?~~ZO~~~t~':O ~ - ""':;: , ", U;'; u;,'" C ' < ~ . p ~ ~ f-<, ~ ., Iii U ~ ~" <-( ~ ;; '/) ~ . ~ '''~ C\ :1:"1>- ,U~O~ 1I1cr.~Il.U;::: ",Ci~~ Z ~ . I' " < ~ ill Z <( ^' " " <-( ~ Il., > '> Z ~ ~>-~II1.V~ill~.:::I'~~V~~ill~V^~ ~Z ~~"OZZ~~ ~T... Z~. 'zu"ill~ Z~ZZ<. a>-~Z~. ~~~<~ZIl1~<~ ~~. a hill~~ v Ci fo- ~.Il.J ~~C, Cl:OZQIlI ~ } ~~rllQz ~ vo~~.< cr.O p O U < <Ill ~~ <-( ~z .~1lI ~~llIv >-IlIZ.,.oCih ~U~CiOCi2:""Z~ZIl.C~L ~z zt::~< r IlIZ~{/J~II1Il1;2ZIllZ~~OCglIllZ~O<< <U<Z~Cl:<(.<-(OIll~~<~<~Cl:~U~~<U~QZ ~ OIJ C C '. C " c~L 'I:Iu~~ t:~8 ~,~ ~ B ~ ~ :tJ :) v.c ~ Q .0 "OIJ ~ 8 ~s :: ;:l .,," "=' ~~~'O ~ " . 0. E rll :g E.!l v "'~-.t: ~..... ~... ~. o. ~ ~ rJJ ... ~1 v U t1 ~ ~'i~ e ~ g ., 1~~~~5 1...,; " ~ v C ,~ 8 . ,~ ~ >, ci. 8 ~~~xg II rll oC ':': , .1Il ,..... tl ::0 2~:t.....- '6 ~ rig ;>, '1:1 ~:l ~ <(:Q.oX)~ .. v ''':i .~ If) 0 C ~ 5 '; ~ ~ .3 u 3-5 ;: ;>, ~.c ~ :.:: \., c.. '"0.: c,v~ ~ > V v~ C ~~ < 2" l' .:/) .c t 5 C ~ ('j .~ ;:: t ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ C B ;:l rJJ .~ (/j ~ '" '0 Z ~ .. 8 1 '0 . t: '0 ;> ~ v "E. V '" C Il, . '0 .c. 1 :;,.oU =' "0.... rtJ~~ 1).c-; 0,,,", 1).D..~ w & . ,;,] w ~ p ~ E ........ ,,~ u~0c'~V)'8.t: ~ll"C ~c.w:gc'-'~ ~i, ~~.; "~ZU~.V-5~.sv~ ,. " ~ ~ 5 '= '0 ;>, , ~"-5 S .. ~ ;>,.-;, :0 C v ~ U V.~ ; ~v" C :.a 0 0; U J: ~ Co E ~ ~...; '; ..lI '. '5 ~.t: 8 ~ w 0. " cr~~~..~8~~8.t:~ .t: 0 V ," · "" u ~ "iJ 0 ~ 0. <<( u.of"CI~ 0 ~ O/j" 'J",'/) u ~(/J ~ t 2 ~ ..; . ~ C ~~!J:J U V .Il. Il..s$~ o L8 V Z1l.1~ -; c: ~ t) 1 .S 2 ~ ':t lJ)L llOvr ~~~ o ~.o~~.~8 ~ ~ ,~ ~ .c ~ 1) ~ 8 '0 ~ E~vg;>'8-o .:= . "'" !.l l::.,:: 1) .;>'0.<( C "0 rtJ -; 0 .., 1) g'~~;>, :sg. 1; ~ c: U . I-. c: U 1) d.l:: '0 E :3 !l-5 E ~ ~ 'r; ~ Il;>, V 0."::: E ~ - > 1 '0 -o.~E ~ ~ ~ 8 -: -; '0 '~ 2 wC'~~dv:; <( a.s ~ e e.o ::: ~ tl c:: >. ~ rt. ::: Q d.l "0 tl .... U 0 ..... U == ... ..c: L I"'l ... ~ .c: C"C c- C wi! ~ rt.r.lUO~.or.t: ~1) .. " E 2 u ~ ~ , ~ _ . Vc VC~OIJ-E~v. ~ ~ ~ ;; " ,0 ~E 0 d :g ."" ..... t ~ tf; t C 'C 1):-9 "" r!l rll V " ~ ~ ~ ~ " rll ,c V OIJ -.sIl.U'O_~.c ~4:;c ,:: c ~ u C ~ 0" ~'2 '''I:IC~c''::I808Z~ V .~o rlltl;>";;:. ~o. ~ l., ': '0 'a C'j ~ :8 c:: ~ 0 u '5 u C w '" il..eil.. .; ~ '1:1 .. :l1l'~~C v-vu~ 0 (/Jvt: vv-".oil.~~o", ..'08.s"0 ll'OO\'O ~ CC;>, '0'0 c.t: V .t: 0 0 0 ~ 8 C C~ 0,::"" ~ fo-.oUrllll."~~~U~Oi;;: C: .. tl './; OIJ~ tf..Q ~] ~ ~ ~~ '1:1 V ~~ 'I'. l., o U 0..'1'. , U "'1:1 1:.;>, v::: .c ~ H t) U ~ ~ C ~ ~ .~ U ~- 3 :t; ~ ::r u 0 .c ," z ~ u :0:: C C, 'h 8- ~ .~ ..c u .2 -E :E. [] I 1': ~ ~ 6 I' ';J 1: ~ If) C rtJ 1) ~. C I ...: 1) U U ~ ,~ J 0; ~ ,~ V .t: -S V 0 ~ ~ C V V w > .. 8 0 .~8f., ~"~>c.".~2~i:: CV~ ~!::.t:0 OIJllUc, OC~,;'Oc~ 8iovcc2"'~ U 1 V ~ ~ ," 0 V V C ~ C '5, ~ w 0 C ~ b~uu:cl-.'~wOEU~~U 8o...~chow~ 'i~Sc~,= '> V '-. C 'C .0 OIJ . 0. ':' ;> c w r5 ~ t;.. 0 . ~ C ~ i .S 2 :J '02C'ju~O.~ c:~!.::v""'u.c V '~ ~ .~. C C :l.t: 0.., 'C 0/j!J V 1 V ~UU. "Cw...........~~_~wc ~~~~ "-u_w~~~,-cOO 5.. b ~ ~ '0 '~ ~ ::l ~ e .0 U ? :: .~ ~ C [/j ~ C U :.J ~.= rtJ. 'wi .~ C . ~c -!2 ."~t~~!'O:c ~c ~"~c'.lI ~~ CO :J :; 'P C ~ ~ E - ... C ~ -0 -n d ~ 1; .: .c,,~.:!"O~:o~..:::cc:.::c~ ~C...~~:;~b~~~oo~oc=