Loading...
Ordinance 2006-27 ORDINANCE NO. 2006-27 WHE of Wylie, Te AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, SO AS CHANGE THE ZONING ON THE HEREINAFT SCRIBED PROPERTY, ZONING CASE NUMBER 2 0 LANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) DISTRICT ~ AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL OF VARIED DEN 0 v FOR A PENAL TY FOR THE VIO IS RDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE RDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVI ITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR NOW, THEREFORE BE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS: AINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE SECTION 1: That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Wylie, Texas, be, and the same is hereby, amended by amending the Zoning Map of the City of Wylie, to give the hereinafter described property a new zoning classification of Planned Development (PD) District for Single-Family Residential of varied densities, said property being described in Exhibit "A", Exhibit "B" and Exhibit "C" (Concept Plan) attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. SECTION 2: That all ordinances of the City in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed and all other ordinances of the City not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3: That th~ above described property shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City, as amended herein by the granting of this zoning classification. SECTION 4: Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance or the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended hereby, commits an unlawful act and shall be subject to the general penalty provisions of Section 1.5 of the Zoning Ordinance, as the same now exists or is hereafter amended. Ordinance No. 2006-27 Zoning Case 2006-07 Zoning Amendment SECTION 5: Should any paragraph, sentence, subdivision ~hrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illeg~ ' the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any p pr' t eof, other than the part so declared to be invalid, illegal or unconstituti all \t) fe the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole. SECTION 6: This ordinance sh by the City Council and publicati cases. effect from and after its adoption and the City Charter provide in such Q nactment of this ~\~ or by virtue of ing or altering any y under any section or SECTION 7' Ordinance, shall such ordinance; n penalty accruing or provisions of any ordi DUL Y PASSED AND APPR Texas, this 25th day of April, 2006. John Mondy, Mayor ATTEST: Carole Ehrlich, City Secretary Date of Publication in The Wvlie News - May 3, 2006 Ordinance No. 2006-27 Zoning Case 2006-07 Zoning Amendment grees 32 minutes 50 Survey and th orth line of said diameter iron rod marking the PO Pulliam tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 32 ~ seconds West, continuing along the South line of said Atterberry Survey and the North e of said Williams Survey, the North line of said Rice tract, the North line of a tract of land described to Darlene R. Ceilley, as recorded in Volume 4977, Page 504, C.C.D.R., North line of a tract ofland described to Edwin W. Klingbeil, as recorded in Volume 4977, Page 504, C.C.D.R., and the North line of a tract of land described to Robert L. Klingbeil, as recorded in Volume 5250, Page 3809, C.C.D.R., a distance of 1635.45 feet to a found 1/2 inch iron rod in concrete being the Southeast comer of the Twin Lakes Phase V subdivision, as recorded in Volume 5588, Page 3164, Collin County Plat Records, and marking the Southwest comer of the herein described tract; Exhibit "A" Legal Description Zone Case #2006-07 Being a 61.26 acre tract of land located in the Allen Att portion part of a called 86.6 acre tract described to S 167, Collin County Deed Records (C.C.D.R. , follows; ey, Abstract No. 23, and a rded in Volume 291, Page by metes and bounds as COMMENCING at a found 3/8 . Atterberry Survey, the No comer of a tract of C.C.D.R., the S recorded in ROW), a e South line of said Atterberry i ance of 648.87 feet to a 5/8 inch and being the Southwest comer of said THENCE North 00 degrees 51 minutes 52 seconds East, leaving said common Survey line and along the East line of said Twin Lakes Phase V subdivision a distance of 1405.70 feet to a 5/8 inch diameter iron rod being the Northeast comer of said Twin Lakes Phase V Subdivision, and the South line of a tract ofland described to Steven Combest, as recorded in Volume 3743, Page 219, C.C.D.R., marking the Northeast comer of herein described tract; THENCE South 89 degrees 18 minutes 39 seconds East, along the south lines of said Combest tract, a tract of land described to Jesse Candenas, as recorded in Volume 4871, Page 1327, C.C.D.R, a tract of land described to Martha Sheppard, as recorded in Plat Book 84, Page 338, C.C.D.R., a tract ofland described to Terry and Casaundra Carlisle, as recorded in Volume 3011, Page 202, C.C.D.R., a tract ofland described to James Heintz, as recorded in Volume 5400, Page 2520, C.C.D.R., a tract of land described to Billy D. Duncan, a tract of land described to James & Donna Trevino, as recorded in Volume 4501, Page 1617, C.C.D.R., a tract ofland described to Sandra Benton, as recorded in Volume 4761, Page 1510, C.C.D.R., a tract of land described to Close Family Living Trust, as recorded in Volume 5249, Page 5919, C.C.D.R., a tract of land described to Sam Terry, a tract of land described to David & Julie Black, as recorded in 94- 0063489, C.C.D.R., and a tract of land described to Merie & Sheri Little, as recorded in 93- 0080940, C.C.D.R., a distance of 1492.50 feet to a found 1/2 inch diameter iron rod in a pecan Ordinance No. 2006-27 Zoning Case 2006-07 Zoning Amendment tree, being the Northwest comer of a tract of land described to recorded in 96-0018275, C.C.D.R., for the North Northeast com t & Beverly Bates, as erein described tract; THENCE South 02 degrees 39 minutes 12 seconds Ea distance of 331.53 feet to a set 1/2 inch diameter' the Southwest comer of said Bates tract and of said Bates tract, a THENCE South 89 degrees 27 mi a distance 684.24 feet to a se the Southeast comer of marking the East N "TRI- TECH" being e of said F .M. 544, THENCE Sout 3 i utes 38 seconds Ea t, ~~ F.M. 544, a dista 8 feet to a found 5/8 . cl:l' eter THENCE South 04 degrees 02 minutes~m~' ing along the West right-of-way line of said FM. 544, a distance 5 6 ~ J ~ 18 inch diameter iron rod being the Northeast comer of said Pulliam trac \. '\ ki the East Southeast comer of herein described tract; . \> f-way line of said THENCE North 89 degrees 32 minutes 1 seconds West, leaving said right-of-way and along the North line of said Pulliam tract, a distance of 621.02 feet to a found 5/8 inch diameter iron rod being the Northwest comer of said Pulliam tract and an interior comer of herein described tract; THENCE South 00 degrees 26 minutes 32 seconds West, along the West line of said Pulliam tract, a distance of 354.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 61.26 acres or 2,668,568 square feet. Ordinance No. 2006-27 Zoning Case 2006-07 Zoning Amendment lJ 1 II { \: I I I '1,',FiFil i1TTTT"T! I i , '''' LLJ c:t:H:::ltj d L [ .r. !=rt:i Iii I II11I I I I I I, I 11'11111 .' I I II : I 111.1=r~1 " , I! I , I I,. III It 'lX- Iljl!1111 '~g<3--, \i.ULjl1- _j--~ir:-.j J : l ~ ",'~\ '. i. ~i :c:..// 1,._ TTI! I - ~\ It..'" II II ( : \: ~" . i i I I i 1-- (,J...:::J =H P'I " I '...> L ':' r \ ! : I I I . 1\\.... a:- -H,' \ ,., '[9'; <.'\' ~'''n''''''I---'- , r , I " I I I I I ' '. >. ,.t=:. -', '! I j 11111 ," , ( I I. \ _ \ I 'j ", I Ililll!I!I" liI,\ H'H+r~f + --1- ~ '~l,Jn-YJ..LJ-"-.L I ' l o/zS _-.. 3;r 'rill I . I I I I ! r T ~\ ;- I I I i I ;', - I ~~ "\ "1 i I ! "'.... };~~~H-I, 1 I I "'--; I y. Y/. i I ! \ ~ 1- .....- '11 .11 1\ II ,..: trif:'''1 1111 ,III,. III I I .JJ I ==~L 7kJ~ I ;l. . .. I r:j---- - --..,- l_j -.; / Irr ; /: i ! 'If_~-I ~((/I) Cl j 'J.LI III 1). I 3~ .H -H+ ,II 1+H1+ 1 1...11 I '_I ILl .J)I 7' ( . -:"/'-1#<-'-, 'V':::/", ~,.. ""~ ~:(I' / r, I::..~ ..~[:;ti ~~PJ.~' ~"'f/ .:i 1"< ~ .J<1,-1-:u:.il:.'~ ~ ~..f.''-II:;'';''~::):":::' -- :tIJ:TI.., "'1..(; -- ~:1\~~; ~~- -~ lU.JF t '*'~ ~ .-;)' , ~~?> "\\.1... ',\-- = i-' (l)-!\:"" ~- .!.t. .1 I ~-----'---~' / ! ~'.:...-=::--~~~-..:::.=:=:=.::::.-:-.- , i ....---..--.---.---- ; : :: i ;--1 L_J i 1 ! j 1 i 1---"';--- I ---..I- ; , I ,-_-~---I I I , ! .... t t.J , , . , ........ II I " , : I---~,J , : , r-: . , II I .. II t ! ,--..., . ~-H ~;1 , :..- ; :!: i ! i; --, -'-; riD i -----. ,~--. ---~ ,./ . ,.- /.....././ ....// =11J' '~1 .; '_ ;; : 1 ""~,..: Jj---,---- ---~. ~ I ;..: ~ L~"'\ , ' ---.--.~ -...:, -, --______.. ___l . 1-' f- LOCATION MAP ZONING CASE #2006-07 Ordinance No. 2006-27 Zoning Case 2006-07 Zoning Amendment Exhibit "B" CONDITIONS FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Alanis Crossing Zoning Case - 2006 07 Planned Development Requirements: I. Statement of Purpose: The purpose of this Planned Development District is permit the development of ALANIS CROSSING. II. Statement of Effect: This Planned Development shall not effect any regulation found in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as adopted and amended, except as specifically provided herein; , III. General Regulations: All regulations providing for a Single Family 10/24 as set forth in Section 3.2 Medium Density Residential District of the current Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance are included by reference and shall apply, except as otherwise specified under the special provisions hereunder. The conditions'contained herein and the conditions of the current Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, which are not amended by this Planned Development, shall constitute all the zoning requirements applicable to this Planned Development. Concept Plan: Development shall be in conformance with the Concept Plan to be provided; however, in the event of conflict between the Concept Plan and the written conditions of this ordinance, the written conditions shall apply. Subsequent Submittals: A Development Plan shall be submitted for review and approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. The Development Plan shall conform to the approved Concept Plan and conditions of the Planned Development, and shall serve as the Preliminary Plat. If the Alanis Road ali2:nment is chan2:ed bv the Citv aIld materiallv affects the Concent Plan. then a Develonment Plan containin2: the revised ali2:nmentshall be decreed to conform to the annroved Concent Plan. IV. Specific Regulations: 1. General Residential Regulations 1. Density: The maximum number of Single Family Dwelling units permitted in this Planned Development shall not exceed 135 Single Family Units. 2. Lot Mix: A minimum of 15% of the Single Family Lots will be in excess of 12.000 sf. A minimum of 70% of the Single Family Lots will be 10,000 sf or greater. No Single Family lot shall be less than 7,500. F or the purposes of determining these percentages, all calculations shall be on a cumulative basis. 3. Alleys shall not be required as part of this Planned Development. However, no garages shall face the street in front of each Single Ordinance No. 2006-27 Zoning Case 2006-07 Zoning Amendment '.- Ordinance No. 2006-27 Zoning Case 2006-07 Zoning Amendment Family Lot. This can be accomplished either through swing driveways or alleys. However, when three car garages are constructed on a lot and a "2& 1" configuration is used, the single car door may face the street, Garages may face the street on a corner lot side yard. 4. Distribution of the Single Family Dwelling Unit types shall be distributed within the development as shown on the Development Plan/ Preliminary Plat submitted with each phase. 11. Single Family 1. Lot Area: The minimum permitted lot areas are: a, Lot Type "A": 20,000 square feet b. Lot Type "B": 18,000 square feet c, Lot Type "C": 12,000 square feet d. Lot Type "D": 1 0,000 square feet e. Lot Type "E" : 7 ,500 square feet 2. Lot Width: The minimum building line) are: a. Lot Type "A": b. Lot Type "B": c. Lot Type "C"; d. Lot Type "D": e. Lot Type "E": permitted lot widths (measured at the 90 feet 80 feet 7 5 feet 70 feet 60 feet 3. Lot Width of Corner Lots: The minimum lot widths of comer lots (measured at the building line) are: a. Lot Type "A": b. Lot Type "B": c. Lot Type "C"; d. Lot Type "D": e. Lot Type "E": 95 feet 85 feet 80 feet 7 5 feet 7 5 feet 4. Lot Depth: The minimum permitted lot depths are: a, Lot Type "A": 120 feet b. Lot Type "B": 120 feet c. Lot Type "C"; 1 00 feet d. Lot Type "D": 1 00 feet e. Lot Type "E": 1 00 feet 5, Lot Depth in Double Front Lots: The minimum permitted lot depths on double front lots are: a. Lot Type "A": b. Lot Type "B": c. Lot Type "C"; d, Lot Type "D": e. Lot Type "E": 150 feet 150 feet 120 feet 120 feet 120 feet Ordinance No. 2006-27 Zoning Case 2006-07 Zoning Amendment 6. Minimum Dwelling Unit Square Frontage: a. The minimum permitted square footage is 2,200 s.f for all two- story homes. The minimum permitted square footage for all single story home on lots smaller than 10,000 s.f shall be 1,800 s.L b. For all two-story houses, the first floor shall be at least 60% of the total square footage. c. Architectural grade shingles shall be used throughout the PD. 7. Main Structure Front Yard: a. Lot Type "A": b. Lot Type "B": c. Lot Type "C"; d. Lot Type "D";- e. Lot Type "E": The minimum Front Yard Setbacks are: 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 20 feet 8. Main Structure Side Yard: The minimum permitted (measured at the building line) are: a. Lot Type "A": b. Lot Type "B": c. Lot Type "C"; d. Lot Type "D": e. Lot Type "E": side yards 1 0% of lot width 1 0% of lot width 1 0% of lot width 1 0% of lot width 1 0% of lot width 9. Main Structure Side yard on Corner Lot: The minimum permitted side yard setbacks adjacent to a street are: a. Lot Type "A": b. Lot Type "B": c. Lot Type "C"; d. Lot Type "D": e. Lot Type "E": 15 feet 15 feet . 15 feet 18 feet 15 feet 1 O. Main Structure Rear Yard: shall be the lesser of: a. Lot Type "A": b. Lot Type "B": c. Lot Type "C"; d. Lot Type "D": e. Lot Type "E": The minimum permitted rear yards 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 11. Main Structure Rear Yard on Double Front Lots: The minimum permitted rear yards on double front lots are: a. Lot Type "A": 30 feet b. Lot Type "B": 30 feet c. Lot Type "C"; 30 feet d. Lot Type "D": 30 feet e. Lot Type "E": 30 feet 12. Main Structure Height: The maximum building height of any residential main structure shall not exceed 40 feet on all lot types. 13. Permitted uses: Permitted uses shall include the uses specified in the SF 10/24 District. 14. Accessory Structure Front Yard: Accessory structures shall be located behind the building line of the main structure for all lot types. 15. Accessory Structure Side Yard: The minimum permitted side yard for accessory structures shall be 5 feet for all lot types. 16. Accessory Structure Rear Yard: The minimum permitted rear yard for accessory structures shall be 10% of the lot depth for all lot types. 17. Accessory Structure Rear Yard on Double Front Lots: The minimum permitted rear yard for accessory structures on double front lots shall be 25 feet for all lot types. , 18. Accessory Structure Side Yard on Corner Lots: The minimum accessory structure side yards on corner lots are 10 feet for all lots. 19. Accessory Structure Minimum Distance from Main Building: The minimum separation between the main building and an accessory building shall be 5 feet for all lot types. 20. Accessory Structures Building Area: The maximum cumulative building size for accessory structures on any lot shall not exceed a 600 s.f. maximum. This does not limit, amef!ity centers that are part of a single family development. 21. Accessory Structure Height: The maximum building height of any accessory structure shall not exceed a maximum height of 40 feet or 2 stories on all lot types. V. New Residential Development Requirements (Figure 3-9) shall apply fully to all phases ofthe Planned Development except as follows: 1. Perimeter Screening: The perimeter screening for Alanis Boulevard shall be allowed to be incorporated into lots adjacent to Alanis Boulevard. No platted 40' buffer shall be required. 2. Landscaped Berm: Developer may construct a 5 foot landscaped earthern berm with 3: 1 slope in the rear of lots adjacent to Alanis Boulevard and FM 544. This shall be in place of any required perimeter screening. 3. No Perimeter walkway shall be required on FM 544. 4. No Pedestrian Crosswalks shall be required except for across Alanis Boulevard. 5. No public open space easements shall be required. Ordinance No. 2006-27 Zoning Case 2006-07 Zoning Amendment 6. Medians will not be required at Entries. 7. No sidewalk Lighting shall be required. 8. No sidewalks shall be required for open ditch road sections with lots 18,000 square feet or larger. VI. Common Area Platting: All street medians, green belts and common areas not dedicated to the City must be maintained by the HOA, and shall be clearly delineated as such and the acreage shown for each common area on the final subdivision plat. VII. Open Ditch Road Section: In blocks where the lot size is a minimum of 18,000 square feet the road section shall be open ditch with a 26 foot pavement section and a 60 foot Right-of-Way. VIII. Landscape Zone: In an effort to preserve the agricultural heritage of the Hood Property, as indicated by the existing fence line trees, the developer shall preserve all hardwood trees with a caliper of 8 inches or greater located within an edge zone that extends 5 feet from perimeter property line. IX. Transition Zone: In an effort to make a land use transition from the existing residences north of the Property, the developer shall establish an edge, one lot deep, of lots along the northern property line of this development that have a minimum lot size of of 18,000 square feet. In an effort to make a land use transition from the existing residence at the south ~ast corner of the property owned by Tommy & Toni Pulliam the developer sh~ll establish an edge, one lot deep, of lots along the adjacent property line of this development that have a minimum lot size of of 20,000 square feet. A 30 foot landscape buffer shall be provided between the development and the properties owned by Brent W. & Beverly B. Bates and Tommy & Toni Pulliam. X. Homeowners Association: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any dwelling unit, a set of bylaws and/or other restrictive and appropriate covenants and/or homeowner's agreement as approved by the City Attorney and duly recorded in the Deed Records of Collin County, to establish and maintain a Homeowner's Association for the ownership and maintenance of all non- dedicated common areas and improvements within the Planned Development District, shall be filed with the Building Inspections Department. T)~ l1~o 1 ILl. ')()hh1l1\l ') Ordinance No. 2006-27 Zoning Case 2006-07 Zoning Amendment I k ~ i' lr;![ ~ i , ;~vVl I z -\hi I ~ , ~ [ "'- ~.. " @''', '~ ~I:I} II ~ ':i '[ ~, I I ! 12:< 100!W 10 Iw __z_~'~ S I~ , --.--..----.-.----..-----------.---.------- ---- F .M. 54L , , I i -----------------1 ~.: ". ,tri;::; ~!E :g~ ~g ~ , I 1,__, ~ "i. j ~. ~i-3--- " "",~Il:, '_ ~ ... <:;l ',-----l~ , , .....---' ._____ ~ ~ _u____ ~~ o~ --_.- ~ ~ ------- z o ',]i I () ;-, 2:Z ;:;' S!Ln D:: CL[zg "" j-i Ct:: W 11-' 0..1 u D::: ;: Wi U;;:: ul(fJ <C Z[',Z ~', 0'< u.J U'-.J ('..; '<C ~ CD t" ~c::..... ~~.~ E~c- <.>"'-. <0 ;, ~~ w'o ~~' u ;;; ~~ ~: ~~ u' ~,~ ~: ~o ~" 8 Ordinance No. 2006-27 Zoning Case 2006-07 Zoning Amendment