02-21-2006 (Impact Fee Advisory) Agenda Packet AGENDA
Impact Fee Advisory Committee
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS WYLIE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
2000 Highway 78 North Wylie,Texas 75098
Tuesday,February 21,2006
To begin immediately upon the conclusion of the
Planning&Zoning Commission meeting which begins at 7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
ACTION AGENDA
1. Evaluate proposed impact fees and related relevant information and develop written
comments to file with the City regarding the proposed water and sewer impact fees.
2. Consider and Act upon approval of written comments and direct a member of the committee
to file the written comments with the City Engineer and City Manager no later than before the
5th business day before the date of the public hearing to be held by the City Council on the
imposition of water and sewer impact fees.
ADJOURNMENT
............Sc.,
(-2
<<E TO ‘` jc
° �� 1 h�
Posted Friday, ruary 17, 2006 at 5:00 p.m.
THE WYLIE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX IS WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE. SIGN INTERPRETATION OR OTHER SPECIAL ASSISTANCE FOR DISABLED ATTENDEES
MUST BE REQUESTED 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE BY CONTACTING THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 442-8100 OR TDD AT 442-8170.
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
TABLE NO. 19
Alternative Fee per Living Unit Equivalent
Alternative Water Impact Fee per Living Unit Equivalent $1,300.00
Alternative Wastewater Impact Fee per Living Unit Equivalent $1,230.00
Single Family
Residential Simple 3/4" 1.0 $ 1,300.00 $ 1,230.00 $ 2,530.00
Single Family
Residential Simple 1" 1.7 $ 2,210.00 $ 2,091.00 $ 4,301.00
Single Family
Residential Simple 1-1/2" 3.3 $ 4,290.00 $ 4,059.00 $ 8,349.00
Single Family
Residential Simple 2" 5.3 $ 6,890.00 $ 6,519.00 $ 13,409.00
Comm./Retail Compound 2" 5.3 $ 6,890.00 $ 6,519.00 $ 13,409.00
Comm./Retail Turbine 2" 6.7 $ 8,710.00 $ 8,241.00 $ 16,951.00
Comm./Retail
/Multi Family Compound 3" 10.7 $ 13,910.00 $ 13,161.00 $ 27,071.00
Comm./Retail
/Multi Family Turbine 3" 16.0 $ 20,800.00 $ 19,680.00 $ 40,480.00
Comm./Retail
/Multi Family Compound 4" 16.7 $ 21,710.00 $ 20,541.00 $ 42,251.00
Comm./Retail
/Multi Family Turbine 4" 28.0 $ 36,400.00 $ 34,440.00 $ 70,840.00
Industrial Compound 6" 33.3 $ 43,290.00 $ 40,959.00 $ 84,249.00
Industrial Turbine 6" 61.3 $ 79,690.00 $ 75,399.00 $ 155,089.00
Industrial Compound 8" 53.3 $ 69,290.00 $ 65,559.00 $ 134,849.00
Industrial Turbine 8" 106.7 $ 138,710.00 $ 131,241.00 $ 269,951.00
Industrial Compound 10" 153.3 $ 199,290.00 $ 188,559.00 $ 387,849.00
Industrial Turbine 10" 166.7 $ 216,710.00 $ 205,041.00 $ 421,751.00
Industrial Turbine 12" 220.0 $ 286,000.00 $ 270,600.00 $ 556,600.00
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -45-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
TABLE NO. 18
Allowable Maximum Fee per Living Unit Equivalent
50% Maximum Water Impact Fee per Living Unit Equivalent $1,304.97
50% Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee per Living Unit Equivalent $1,231.01
Single Family 5/8" &
Residential Simple 3/4" 1.0 $ 1,304.97 $ 1,231.01 $ 2,535.98
Single Family
Residential Simple 1" 1.7 $ 2,218.45 $ 2,092.72 $ 4,311.17
Single Family
Residential Simple 1-1/2" 3.3 $ 4,306.40 $ 4,062.33 $ 8,368.73
Single Family
Residential Simple 2" 5.3 $ 6,916.34 $ 6,524.35 $ 13,440.69
Comm./Retail Compound 2" 5.3 $ 6,916.34 $ 6,524.35 $ 13,440.69
Comm./Retail Turbine 2" 6.7 $ 8,743.30 $ 8,247.77 $ 16,991.07
Comm./Retail/
Multi Family Compound 3" 10.7 $ 13,963.18 $ 13,171.81 $ 27,134.99
Comm./Retail/
Multi Family Turbine 3" 16.0 $ 20,879.52 $ 19,696.16 $ 40,575.68
Comm./Retail/
Multi Family Compound 4" 16.7 $ 21,793.00 $ 20,557.87 $ 42,350.87
Comm./Retail/
Multi Family Turbine 4" 28.0 $ 36,539.16 $ 34,468.28 $ 71,007.44
Industrial Compound 6" 33.3 $ 43,455.50 $ 40,992.63 $ 84,448.13
Industrial Turbine 6" 61.3 $ 79,994.66 $ 75,460.91 $ 155,455.57
Industrial Compound 8" 53.3 $ 69,554.90 $ 65,612.83 $ 135,167.73
Industrial Turbine 8" 106.7 $ 139,240.30 $ 131,348.77 $ 270,589.07
Industrial Compound 10" 153.3 $ 200,051.90 $ 188,713.83 $ 388,765.73
Industrial Turbine 10" 166.7 $ 217,538.50 $ 205,209.37 $ 422,747.87
Industrial Turbine 12" 220.0 $ 287,093.40 $ 270,822.20 $ 557,915.60
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -44-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
VIII. MAXIMUM IMPACT FEE CALCULATION—WATER& WASTEWATER SYSTEM
The maximum impact fees for the water and wastewater systems are calculated separately by
dividing the cost of the capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated and
attributable to new development in the service area within the ten year period by the number
of living units anticipated to be added to City within the ten year period as shown on Table
No. 8 and Table No. 9. To simplify collection, we recommend the fee remain fixed
throughout the next 5-year period, unless changed by Council.
The water system impact fee is calculated as follows:
Maximum Impact Fee = Eligible Existing Facility Cost + Eligible Proposed Facility Cost
Number of New Living Unit Equivalent over the Next 10-Years
_ + _
11,018 11,018
Water Maximum Impact Fee =
* Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee is 50%of the Calculated Water Maximum Impact Fee.
Allowable Maximum Water Impact Fee = x 50% _
The wastewater system impact fee is calculated as follows:
Maximum Impact Fee = Eligible Existing Facility Cost + Eligible Proposed Facility Cost
Number of New Living Unit Equivalent over the Next 10-Years
_ + _
12,376 12,376
Wastewater Max. Impact Fee = $2,462.01
*Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee is 50%of the Calculated Wastewater Maximum Impact Fee.
Allowable Maximum Wastewater Fee = x 50% _
Based on the Allowable Maximum Impact Fee Calculation for Water and Wastewater, Table
No. 19 calculates the maximum impact fee for the various sizes of water meters.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-l.doc -43-
Birkhoff,Hendricks and Conway,L.L.P.
TABLE NO. 18
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE STUDY
PROPOSED CIP-WASTEWATER COLLECTION LINES
*Average Unit costs are based in 2005 dollars unless otherwise indicated and includes 25%for engineering and contingencies and$15/L.f.of Open Cut for Easements
(%) Utilized Capacity $) Utilized Capacity
Avg.Unit 20 Year Debt Total 20 Year
Pipe Length Diameter Cost Total Capital Service @ 6% Project During During
Number (Ft.) (Inches) Date of Const. ($/Ft.) Cost ($) Simple Interest Cost ($) 2005 2015 Fee Period 2005 2015 Fee Period
Twin Lakes Relief Sewer- Proposed Collection Lines
This Project includes 12,400 LF of new 30"and 42" Transfer Sewer commencing at the Twin Lakes Lift Station and running along Pleasant Valley Road
to the Muddy Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant.
* 4,200 30 2007 $153.72 $645,624 $406,743 $1,052,367 0% 80% 80% $0 $841,894 $841,894
* 8,200 42 $239.56 $1,964,376 $1,237,557 $3,201,933 0% 80% 80% $0 $2,561,546 $2,561,546
Subtotal: 12,400 $2,610,000 $1,644,300 $4,254,360 $0 $3,403,440 $3,403,440
Sanitary Sewer Line-CIP Total
Total I 12,400 k L.F. II I $2,610,0001 $1,644,3601 $4,254,300 $0 $3,403,446 S3,403,440
San Sew Lines CIP.xls Proposed -42- 2/14/2006 3:40 PM
1
Birkhof Hendricks and Conway,L.L.P.
TABLE NO. 17
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE STUDY
EXISTING-WASTEWATER COLLECTION LINES
Avg.Unit Remaining Remaining Total Remaining (%) Utilized Capacity ($) Utilized Capacity
($/Ft.) Principle Debt Service Cost ($) 2005 2015 I %Fee 2005 2015 I Fee Period
2002 Water&Sewer Bond Sales @ 50%Total Bond Amount
Need Breakdown If Possible
$517,500 S220,053 S737,553 50% 95% 45% $368,777 $700,675 S331,899
Subtotal: $517,500 $220,053 $737,553 $368,777 $700,675 $331,899
2000 Water&Sewer Bond Sales @ 80%Total Bond Amount
Need Breakdown If Possible
$1,176,000 $547,838 $1,723,838 50% 95% 45% $861,919 $1,637,646 $775,727
Subtotal: $1,176,000 $547,838 $1,723,838 $861,919 $1,637,646 $775,727
1999 Water&Sewer Bond Sales @ 50%Total Bond Amount
Need Breakdown If Possible
$555,000 $237,065 $792,065 60% 100% 40% $475,239 $792,065 $316,826
Subtotal: $555,000 $237,065 $792,065 $475,239 $792,065 $316,826
1997 General Obligation,Water&Sewer Bond Sales @ 22.2225%Total Bond Amount
Need Breakdow If Possible
$452,228 $160,686 $612,914 65% 100% 35% $398,394 $612,914 $214,520
$0 $0 $0
Subtotal: $452,228 $160,686 $612,914 $398,394 $612,914 $214,520
1988 NTMWD Contract Revenue Bond Sales @ 100%Total Bond Amount
Need Breakdow If Possible
$355,000 $43,924 $398,924 80% 100% 20% $319,139 $398,924 $79,785
Subtotal: S355,000 $43,924 $398,924 $319,139 5398,924 $79,785
Wastewater Collection Lines-Prior Project CIP Total
Total I I II r $3,055,728 I $1,209,566 I $4,265,294 $2,423,468 $4,142,224 $1,718,757
1:1Wyr lmaa-16.ViepnrtAAnswLineaCIP_II-Ensieg -41- 2/14/2006 3:37 PM
Birkhoff,Hendricks and Conway,L.L.P.
TABLE NO. 17
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE STUDY
b
EXISTING - MUDDY CREEK REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE .
$16,250,000 TOTAL BOND SALE (MUDDY CREEK REGIONAL WWTP COSTS)
Wylie Share 61%
Maturity Year Principal Rate Interest(12/01) Interest(6/01) Fiscal Total
2005 $ 341,600.00 5.000% $ 216,548.48 $ 216,548.48 $ 774,696.95
2006 $ 356,850.00 5.000% $ 208,008.48 $ 208,008.48 $ 772,866.95
2007 $ 372,100.00 5.000% $ 199,087.23 $ 199,087.23 $ 770,274.45
2008 $ 390,400.00 5.000% $ 189,784.73 $ 189,784.73 $ 769,969.45 .
2009 $ 405,650.00 5.000% $ 180,024.73 $ 180,024.73 $ 765,699.45
2010 $ 423,950.00 5.000% $ 169,883.48 $ 169,883.48 $ 763,716.95
2011 $ 445,300.00 4.750% $ 159,284.73 $ 159,284.73 $ 763,869.45
2012 $ 463,600.00 3.300% $ 148,708.85 $ 148,708.85 $ 761,017.70
2013 $ 484,950.00 3.500% $ 141,059.45 $ 141,059.45 $ 767,068.90
2014 $ 506,300.00 3.700% $ 132,572.83 $ 132,572.83 $ 771,445.65
2015 $ 530,700.00 3.800% $ 123,206.28 $ 123,206.28 $ 777,112.55
2016 $ 555,100.00 4.000% $ 113,122.98 $ 113,122.98 $ 781,345.95
2017 $ 579,500.00 4.100% $ 102,020.98 $ 102,020.98 $ 783,541.95
2018 $ 603,900.00 4.200% $ 90,141.23 $ 90,141.23 $ 784,182.45
2019 $ 631,350.00 4.300% $ 77,459.33 $ 77,459.33 $ 786,268.65
2020 $ 658,800.00 4.400% $ 63,885.30 $ 63,885.30 $ 786,570.60
2021 $ 689,300.00 4.500% $ 49,391.70 $ 49,391.70 $ 788,083.40
2022 $ 719,800.00 4.600% $ 33,882.45 $ 33,882.45 $ 787,564.90
2023 $ 753,350.00 4.600% $ 17,327.05 $ 17,327.05 $ 788,004.10
TOTALS $ 9,912,500.00 $ 2,415,400.23 $ 2,415,400.23 $ 14,743,300.45
,wy1M,30a7-10\14,orullan S.*Line.cl7.x10-Exi0.6 -40- 2/14/2006 3:37 PM
Birkhoff Hendricks and Conway,L.L.P.
TABLE NO. 17
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE STUDY
EXISTING MUDDY CREEK REGIONAL WASTEWATER SYSTEM DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
$3,520,000 TOTAL BOND SALE (LOWER MUDDY CREEK INTERCEPTOR COSTS)
Wylie Share 61%
Maturity Year Principal Rate Interest(12/01) Interest(6/01) Fiscal Total
2004 $ 37,406.90 $ 37,406.90
2005 $ 76,250.00 4.875% $ 47,650.53 $ 49,509.13 $ 173,409.66
2006 $ 67,1.00.00 4.875% $ 46,014.97 $ 47,650.53 $ 160,765.51
2007 $ 70,150.00 4.875% $ 44,306.28 $ 46,014.97 $ 160,471.25
2008 $ 73,200.00 4.875% $ 42,520.81 $ 44,306.28 $ 160,027.10
2009 $ 79,300.00 4.875% $ 40,587.88 $ 42,520.81 $ 162,408.69
2010 $ 82,350.00 4.875% $ 38,580.60 $ 40,587.88 $ 161,518.47
2011 $ 85,400.00 4.875% $ 36,498.97 $ 38,580.60 $ 160,479.57
2012 $ 91,500.00 4.875% $ 34,268.66 $ 36,498.97 $ 162,267.63
2013 $ 94,550.00 4.875% $ 31,964.00 $ 34,268.66 $ 160,782.66
2014 $ 100,650.00 4.875% $ 29,510.66 $ 31,964.00 $ 162,124.66
2015 $ 103,700.00 4.000% $ 27,436.66 $ 29,510.66 $ 160,647.32
2016 $ 109,800.00 4.125% $ 25,172.03 $ 27,436.66 $ 162,408.69
2017 $ 115,900.00 4.250% $ 22,709.16 $ 25,172.03 $ 163,781.19
2018 $ 122,000.00 4.300% $ 20,086.16 $ 22,709.16 $ 164,795.32
2019 $ 128,100.00 4.400% $ 17,267.96 $ 20,086.16 $ 165,454.12
2020 $ 134,200.00 4.500% $ 14,248.46 $ 17,267.96 $ 165,716.42
2021 $ 143,350.00 4.500% $ 11,023.08 $ 14,248.46 $ 168,621.54
2022 $ 149,450.00 4.625% $ 7,567.05 $ 11,023.08 $ 168,040.13
2023 $ 155,550.00 4.700% $ 3,911.63 $ 7,567.05 $ 167,028.68
2024 $ 164,700.00 4.750% $ - $ 3,911.63 $ 168,611.63
TOTALS $ 2,147,200.00 $ 578,732.45 $ 590,834.68 $ 3,316,767.13
J:Wyre+:oo:-1SCLLLerorts\San Sew Lines CIPAs-Exieung -39- 2/14/2006 3:37 PM
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
must be designed to handle infiltration related flows. The City can embark on
programs to rehabilitate lines that contribute significant infiltration volumes when
economically and environmentally feasible, and/or desirable.
Inflow is generally related to storm based events that increase groundwater and
surface water flow into the sanitary system. The additional flow is generally
recognized to enter through manholes, service lines, roof drains and storm drains.
Inflow related flows could cause surcharged sewers, overflows at manholes and
peak flows to surpass the capacity of the treatment plant. The wastewater
collection system planning calculations include a combined infiltration and inflow
rate of 400 gallons per acre per day (gpad) for the entire wastewater service area.
This flow is not peaked.
The percentage of utilized capacity was calculated for the design flow of each study year
based on the build-out capacity. The utilized capacity during the Impact Fee period is the
difference between the year 2015 capacity and the year 2005 capacity. Table No. 16
below summarizes the project cost and utilized cost over the impact fee period of 2005 -
2015 for each element of the wastewater system. The utilized capacity for each existing
and proposed wastewater facility and collection line is presented in detail in Impact Fee
Capacity Calculation Tables Nos. 17 and 18.
TABLE NO. 16
Summary of Eligible Capital Cost and Utilized Capacity Cost
2004 NTMWD Muddy Creek Interceptor System Bonds (1) $3,316,767 $3,150,929
2004 NTMWD Muddy Creek Interceptor System Bonds (2) $14,743,300 $14,006,135
2002 Wylie Water& Sewer Bonds @ 50%of Total $737,533 $331,899
2000 Wylie Water& Sewer Bonds @ 80%of Total $1,723,838 $775,727
1999 Wylie Water& Sewer Bonds @ 50%of Total $792,065 $316,826
1997 Wylie General,Water& Sewer Bonds @ 22.2225% $612,914 $214,520
1988 NTMWD Contract Revenue Bonds @ 100%of Total $398,924 $79,785
Proposed Wastewater Collection Line $4,254,300 $3,403,440
Proposed Muddy Creek WWTP Expansion $8,150,000 $8,150,000
Planning Expenses $40,600 $40,600
Total $34,770,241 $30,469,861
(1)Muddy Creek Trunk Sewer— Wylie Share at 61%
(2)Muddy Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant— Wylie Share at 61%
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-l.doc -38-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
E. Utilized Capacity
The Land Use Assumptions from the City of Wylie were utilized to calculate the utilized
capacity for the wastewater collection system based on land absorption from population
growth projections. The population and employment growth in each wastewater drainage
basin was determined utilizing the DSA growth projections. These growth rates were
utilized to calculate 2005 and 2015 design flows. The following summarizes each design
flow component utilized to calculate the wastewater design flows.
1) Population Based Flow: For the purpose of this wastewater impact fee study an
average per capita flow of 110 gallons per day (gpcd) is a reasonable basis for the
design of the wastewater collection and treatment facilities. Peak flows associated
with this per capita rate have been estimated for various segments of the collection
system by using the following formula (PF = (5/(population/1000)^0.167). The
formula takes into account the estimated population, and, indirectly, the area of the
drainage basin to be served. This method gives a ratio of peak to average flows
varying from a maximum of 5.0 times the average flow for a population of 1,000 or
less to 2.32 times the average flow for a population of 93,700 (includes 18,000 for
the City of Murphy).
2) Non-Population Based Flow: Non-residential average flows are estimated based on
an average daily flow per acre for each non-residential land use category. The
following were used for average daily flow per acre for each category:
Business/Commercial Corridor: 1,600 gallons Commercial/Retail: 1,400 gallons
Neighborhood Services: 1,200 gallons Public/Semi Private: 1,000 gallons
Heavy Industrial: 2,400 gallons Light Industrial: 2,000 gallons
Parks/Open Space: 5 gallons Floodplains: 0.01 gallons
A 2.0 Peaking factor was used for each non-residential land use. The combination
of per capita and non-residential based flow is the basis for aggregate dry weather
flow in the basins.
3) Infiltration and Inflow: Groundwater can infiltrate into the sanitary sewer system
through faulty sewer pipe joints, tree roots, breaks in sewer pipes and manholes and
faulty service lines. Infiltration creates an average day flow related burden on
wastewater collection systems and treatment plants. Infiltration is fairly constant
and not necessarily based on temporary storm based events. Normal plant capacity
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -37-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
(2/14/2006)
Table No. 15
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
10-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
WASTEWATER COLLECTION LINES
2007 Twin Lakes Relief Sewer 30"&42" $ 2,608,000 $ 1,369,200 $ 3,977,200
$ - $ - $ -
I Subtotal: Wastewater Collection Lines I I $ 2,608,000 I $ 1,369,200 I $ 3,977,200
TREATMENT FACILITIES
2006 Treatment Plant Expansion#2 5 MGD $ 5,000,000 $ 3,150,000 $ 8,150,000
$ - $ - $
Subtotal: Treatment Facilities $ 5,000,000 $ 3,150,000 $ 8,150,000
MUDDY CREEK WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM&PREVIOUS BOND SALES
2004 NTMWD Muddy Creek Interceptor System(Bond 1) 95% $ 2,039,840 $ 1,111,089 $ 3,150,929
2004 NTMWD Muddy Creek Interceptor System(Bond 2) 95% $ 9,416,875 $ 4,589,260 $ 14,006,135
2002 Wylie Water&Sewer Bonds @ 50%of Total 95% $ 491,625 $ 209,050 $ 700,675
2000 Wylie Water&Sewer Bonds @ 80%of Total 95% $ 1,117,200 $ 520,448 $ 1,637,648
1999 Wylie Water&Sewer Bonds @ 50%of Total 95% $ 527,250 $ 225,212 $ 752,462
1997 Wylie Water&Sewer Bonds @ 22.225%of Total 95% $ 429,617 $ 152,652 $ 582,268
1988 NTMWD Contract Revenue Bonds @100%of Total 100% $ 355,000 $ 43,924 $ 398,924
Subtotal: Treatment Facilities $ 14,377,407 $ 6,851,635 $ 21,229,041
PLANNING EXPENSES
Wastewater Master Plan - $ 20,600 $ - $ 20,600
Wastewater Impact Fee Calculation $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000
Subtotal: Planning and Operations $ 40,600 $ - $ 40,600
Wastewater Collection System CIP Grand Total: $ 22,026,007 $ 11,370,835 $ 33,396,841
Notes:
(1)Opinion of Cost includes:
a) Engineer's Opinion of Construction Cost
b) Professional Services Fees(Survey,Engineering,Testing,Legal)
c) Cost of Easement at$15/L.f.of Open Cut Installation
(2)Debt Service based on 20-year simple interest bonds at 5%
Report W-WW CIP.xls -36-
t /
vv /
(01111P
4411.
� F' vw
iiillt \
\\ ` %� may` • !�, MOW
, �
r rl- r�, .i lam,.. ,,\
1115
,loit
P ,11 I _�Si,l�ir ''I_ 1 y�=leli�tS�� f 1�1�- .{ • \ ,/./ Y+ '
,,,- .,-,-, 1 ._,, ., ,..,
e �, I ILL i .�! i I 01 , ,, ' . . �1. �'
_ j• 'V% Cl�li A r �''S •\
‘\.., .,‘ \ ... .., ,,, z--r:IS• II ''461 III)ortrt 1
Is'-=-' ' -4. \ \, -:%,;" i'" 1111074ift !, i " h \"" 1 4 _
.,,.. \ ,-., Pi*. .%\ ti , . ., .,,_ ) ;c:cliI)fiLL-t,--=-_- :,,-,. 1 iii.z----, ' -. - , , , , ,- . , -' ,/
.: ,
_. t 9,.......,...1tr„.g.,--...:„.-7,...,_:.,...N .-IV :::la,T±I 1111. , .
I j it i 1 NNa I rm # '" W 7F 1 1?. �[' �
',> i � t Rlr.y . •mow t. 1111P r
- I #0 \ it
r ,
a�
�ill illi ,��� � f � •
-117
N‘k• eT itii.4
1. r{.I Ic. vI
ro•
� ,eF, . _ • . ' A�.A I! I Jet'.k111(�III{{I !{ll i \,. h ,•\ i /- .• k--)
,,7\ . ) ii �� hima �l� !E . tR• ph \ _
1.. t I,1',tl 11� f � !e, hh , ' 1,"r t y1 � y� I { In # �, �, it
Mr
11
1 \I i, I ' Erh)ilijir ..._ . t 11 f 1:!• 14 I. 11 1 '' -111 \ ' IP. ,.-1 '44 , r i
�I -; ��P •
I+ ! e y �S A ' i 7
i.-,-ti I
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
The natural ground in the area to be served by the Wylie Wastewater Collection System
varies in elevation from approximately 460 feet above mean sea level near the Muddy
Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant to 620 feet above mean sea level near the
northwest City Limit. There is a natural divide running generally North to South near the
Wylie city center(following Ballard Avenue to the Pleasant Valley Road).
Generally speaking, the fall of the land on the west side of this divide is to the southwest
and includes five main basins. These basins are (from south to north) Lower Muddy
Creek, Tributary 1 to Muddy Creek, Tributary 2 to Muddy Creek, Tributary 3 to Muddy
Creek and Upper Muddy Creek. The natural creeks, whose basins will collect
wastewater through the installed system of trunk lines, flow into the geographic area
normally serviced by the North Texas Municipal Water District.
The fall of the land on the east side of this divide is to the southeast and includes three
main basins. The basins are Cottonwood Creek (near the City center), Rush Creek (east
of the City center) and Tributary 1 to Rush Creek (east of the main channel). These
basins flow naturally into Lake Ray Hubbard. Flows in the City of Wylie service areas
are collected in Lift Stations at the downstream limit of the service area and lifted over to
the Muddy Creek basin.
C. Treatment
The Wylie Wastewater Treatment Plant is located near the City center. Currently, this
plant serves the City center through both a gravity flow collection network and a network
of lift stations, force mains and gravity sewers. It also serves some additional developed
through a network of lift stations, force mains and gravity lines. The new Muddy Creek
Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant was constructed southwest of the City center. An
expansion of the Muddy Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant is currently being
designed. The North Texas Municipal Water District operates both treatment plants.
D. Capital Improvement Program
The wastewater facilities shown in Figure 3 include City constructed collection lines,
trunk sewer lines, lift stations and force mains.
The cost of the City constructed treatment plant and gravity sewers that are included in
the Impact Fee Update are itemized in Table No. 15. The project locations are shown in
Figure No. 3. The projects shown in Table No. 15 represent those required to meet the
needs of the projected growth as provided in the Land Use Assumptions for Impact Fees.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -34-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
VII. WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
A. General
At this time, the majority of the wastewater generated in the City of Wylie (concentrating
in areas adjacent to the present city center) flows by gravity and a combination of lift
stations and force mains to the Wylie Wastewater Treatment Plant located near the center
of the City and the new Muddy Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant southwest of
the City center. A small amount of current wastewater flow is handled through local
residential septic systems. The Wylie Wastewater Treatment Plant has an average daily
flow capacity of 1.0 MGD and a peak flow capacity of approximately 2.0 MGD. The
average daily flow capacity of the new Muddy Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment
Plant is 2.5 MGD and the peak flow capacity is 5.0 MGD. A planned expansion to the
Muddy Creek Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant will provide an average daily flow
capacity of 5.0 MGD and a peak flow capacity of 10.0 MGD.
For the purpose of this impact fee study, the Lake Side Collection Basins are not
expected to commence development, to a significant degree prior to 2015. Therefore,
infrastructure improvements are not planned or included in the impact fee calculation.
Muddy Creek, Cottonwood Creek and Rush Creek Basins are anticipated growth areas.
1) Muddy Creek: Muddy Creek includes the bulk of the existing development and
produces the predominant volume of wastewater flow to the Wylie Treatment plant.
The Muddy Creek Basin will add approximately 18,398 to the population by 2015.
2) Cottonwood Creek: Generally south of the City center is an expected growth area
where approximately 4,342 will be added to the population by 2015.
3) Rush Creek: Generally east of the City center is an expected growth area where
approximately 5,829 will be added to the population by 2015.
B. Collection Lines
The wastewater collection system analysis, a more static system than the dynamic water
distribution model, covered all of the drainage basins within the study area. The
wastewater project cost includes necessary appurtenances, purchase of easements, utility
relocation, pavement removal and replacement, and engineering costs. For existing
Impact Fee projects, actual costs were utilized where known. Future project cost
estimates were based on 2005 average unit cost per linear foot and include engineering
and construction cost. An allowance of$15 per linear foot was included for easements.
j:Aclerical\wylieA2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -33-
Birkhoff Hendricks and Conway,L.L.P.
2/01/2006
TABLE NO.14
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WATER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE STUDY
PROPOSED CIP-WATER LINES
•Average Unit costs are based in 2005 dollars unless otherwise indicated. Projects not in Phase 1 of CIP include 25%for engineering and miscellaneous contingencies. Projects in Phase I of CIP include proposed engineering fee and 15%for miscellaneous contingencies. All projects
include$15/L.f.of open cut installation for easements unless they are planned to be constructed within existing right-of-way.
Debt (%) Utilized Ca acity �$) Utilized Capaci
Avg.Unit 20 Year Debt Total 20 Year
Pipe Length Diameter Total Capital Service
Date or Coast. Cost Service Utilizing Project
Number (Ft.) (Inches) Cost ($) Interest
($/Ft.) Rate Y Simple Interest Cost 0) During During
2005 2015 Fee Period 2005 2015 Fee Period
Project No.L14-Pressure Reducing Valve Vaults [679 Service Area&730 Service Area]
This project will allow interconnection between service zones for emergencies and temporary service.
2 $314,500 $198,135 $512,635 0% 90% 90% $0 $461,372 $461,372
Subtotal: 2007 $314,500 6% $198,135 $512,635 $0 $461,372 $461,372
Water Line CIP Total
70,240 8,658,000 5,428,292 14,086,292 0 12,143,440 12,143,440
1-City Participate in Cost Oversize
2-City Initiated and Funded
r:Ckardwyi,znortca d.tv cd w.kr uM:aehad c in'.•l•woposed
Birkhoff,Hendricks and Conway,L.L.P.
1/01/1006
TABLE NO.14
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WATER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE STUDY
PROPOSED CIP-WATER LINES
Average Unit costs are based in 2005 dollars unless otherwise indicated. Projects not in Phase I of CIP include 15%for engineering and miscellaneous contingencies. Projects in Phase I of CIP include proposed engineering fee and 15%for miscellaneous contingencies. All projects
include$15/L.f.of open cut installation for easements unless they are planned to be constructed within existing right-of-way.
Debt (%) Utilized Ca acity t5) Utilized Capacity
Avg.Unit 20 Year Debt Total 20 Year
Pipe Length Diameter Total Capital Service
Number (Ft.) (Inches) Date of Coast. Cost Cost ($) Interest Service Utilizing Project
(s/Ft.) Rate Y Simple interest Cost (5) During During
2005 2015 Fee Period 2005 2015 Fee Period
Project No.L8-State Highway 78 Distribution Line No.2 [679 Service Area]
This project parallels the existing 14"waterline in Brown Street and from the NTMWD Puna.Station to F.M.544 and the 8"waterline along F.M.544
2 378 3,050 16 $121.66 $371,077 $233,779 $604,856 0% 90% 90% SO $544,370 $544,370
2 389 400 18 5204.99 $81,995 $51,657 S133,652 0% 90% 90% SO $120,287 $120,287
2 377 2,400 24 5157.26 $377,428 $237,780 5615,208 0% 90% 90% 50 $553,687 $553,687
Subtotal: 5,850 2007 $830,500 6% $523,216 $1,353,716 50 S1,218,344 S1,218,344
Project No.L9-Hensley Lane Distribution Line {679 Service Area]
This project connects the existing 12"waterline along Maxwell Creek Road to the existing 12"waterline along Hensley Lane '
2 310 9,750 12 $93.95 $916,000 $577,080 $1,493,080 0% 85% 85% $0 S1,269,118 S1,269,118
2 311 $0 0% 0% 0"/0 $0 $0 SO
2 312 $0 0% 0% 0% $0 $0 $0
•
2 313 $0 0%. 0% 0% SO $0 $0
Subtotal: 9,750 2008 - $916,000 6% S577,080 S1,493,080 $0 51,269,118 $1,269,118
Project No.L11-Lake Travis Drive and Canyon Lake Drive Waterlines [679 Service Area]
This project will loop the existing 8"waterlines in the subdivision to provide better pressures and chlorine residuals.
2 340 1,250 8 • $7920 599,000 S62,370 $161,370 0% 85% 85%' S0 $137,165 $137,165
2 343 S0 0% 0% 0% $0 $0 S0
Subtotal: 1,250 2010 $99,000 6% S62,370 S161,370 50 $137,165 $137,165
Project No.L12-East Side Water Distributions- Lines [679 Service Areal
This project will extend water service to the east of Spring Creek Parkway
2 349 4,700 12 $100.64 $473,000 $297,990 5770,9901 0% 85% 85% 50 S655,342 $655,342
2 347 So 0% 0% 0% $0 SO S0
Subtotal: 4,700 2012 $473,000 6% S297,990 S770,990 $0 $655,342 $655,342
Project No.L13-Woodbridge Water Distribut-ion Line [679 Service Area]
This water line will connect water in Alanis Drive to Woodbridge Property
2 331 5,500 12 595.76 $526,700 $331,821 S858,521 0% 85% 85% S0 $729,743 S729,743
2 354 $0 0% 0% 0% S0 $0 S0
2 355 S0 0% 0% 0% S0 $0 S0
2 329 3,450 8 $61.83 $213,300 $134,379 S347,679 0% 85% 85% 50 $295,527 5295,527
Subtotal: 8,950 2012 $740,000 6% 5466,200 S1,206,200 50 S1,025,270 $1,025,270
Project No.L10-East Alanis Drive Distribution Line [679 Service Area]
This project will connect the existing 20"waterline along South Ballard Avenue to the existing 12"waterline along Alanis Drive west of Martinez Lane
2 221 3,920 12 $63.78- $250,000 $131,250 $381,250 0% 85% 85% $0 $324,063 $324,063
2 222 $0 0% 0% 0% $0 $0 $0
2 381 $0 0% 0% 0% SO S0 $0
2 387 $0 0% 0% 0% $0 $0 $0
2 388 S0 0% 0% 0% $0 S0 $0
Subtotal: 3,920 2005 $250,000 5% 5131,250 S381,250 _ $0 $314,063 S324,063
Project No.L15-Brown Street&Sanden Water Lines [679 Service Area]
This project will connect the existing 12"waterline along from the existing Nortex Pump Station to 12"waterlines in Sanden Boulevard and Westgate Way
2 405 2,600 12 $115.38 S300,000 $189,000 $489,000 0% 85% 85% $0 $415,650 $415,650 •
2 407 SO 0% 0% 0% $0 SO $0
Subtotal: 2,600 2007 5300,000 6% $189,000 $489,000 50 $415,650 5415,650t
rcieisdtw,is'700t1647s9e,n'tn, rewmru.e..truer<4C.t,..;y.rstw,p"mu -31-
Birkhofj Hendricks and Conway,L.L.P.
2/01/2006
TABLE NO.14
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WATER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE STUDY
PROPOSED CIP-WATER LINES
"Average Unit costs are based in 2005 dollars unless otherwise indicated. Projects not in Phase 1 afar'include 25%for engineering and miscellaneous contingencies. Projects in Phase I of CfP include proposed engineering fee and 15%for miscellaneous contingencies. All projects
include b15/L.1 of open cut installation for easements unless they are planned to be constructed within existing right-of-way.
Debt (%) Utilized Ca acity ($) Utilized Capacity
Avg.Unit 20 Year Debt Total 20 Year
Pipe Length Diameter Total Capital Service
Date of Const. Cost Service Utilizing Project
Number (Ft.) (Inches) Cost ($) Interest
(S/Ft.) Rate/ Simple Interest Cost ($) During During
2005 2015 Fee Period 2005 2015 Fee Period
Project No.Ll-Creekside Distribution Line No.1 [730 Service Area]
This ject connects the existing 16"waterline east of the Creekside Estates Subdivision to the existing 12"waterline at Creekside Estates Drive
1 352 5,100 20 S121.91 S621,750 $391,703 S1,013,453- 0% 85% 85% $0 S861,435 $861,435
1 199 1,400 24 S174.46 $244,250 $153,878 $398,128 0% 85% 85% SO $338,409 $338,409
1 375 S0 0% 85% 85% S0 S0 S0
Subtotal: 6,500 2005 S866,000 6% $545,581 $1,411,581 $0 $1,199,844 S1,199,844
Project No.2-Creekside Distribution Line No.L2 [730 Service Area]
This.eject connects the existing 12"waterline along McMillan Road and McCreary Road to the existing 12"waterline south of Creekside Estates Phase?
2 223 140 16 $403.64 S56,510 $35,601 S92,111 0% 85% 85% $0 S78,294 $78,294
2 335 2,500 20 S144.00 S359,990 $226,794 $586,784 0% 85% 85% $0 $498,766 $498,766
Subtotal: 2,640 2005 5416,500 6% $262,395 $678,895 SO $577,060 $577,060
Project No.L3-Newport Harbor Distribution Line No. 1 [730 Service Areal
The Newport Harbor Pump Station will serve the High Pressure Service Area. The Newport Harbor Distribution Line will allow for future growth in the High Pressure Service Area.
2 399 740 20 $208.31 $154,152 $97,116 S251,268 0% 85% 85% $0 $213,578 S213,578
2 386 5,150 15 S146.99 S757,010 5476,916 S1,233,926 0% 85% 85%. 50 S1,048,837 $1,048,837
2 25 $0 0% 0% 0% SO $0 SO
2 24 $0 0% 0% o% $O $0 SO
2 403 $0 0% 0% 0% $0 $o So
2 400 1,590 lfi $145.30 $231,031 $145,550 $376,581 0% 85% 85% $0 $320,094 $320,094
2 401 $0 0% 0% 0% $0 $0 $0
2 - 219 2,400 12 $105.75 $253,807 $159,898 $413,705 0% 85% 85% $0 $351,649 S351,649
Subtotal: 9,880 2006 $1,396,000 6% $879,480 $2,275,480 SO 51,934,158 $1,934,158
Project No.L4-Creekside Distribution Line No.3 [730 Service Area]
This project begins west of the Creekside Elevated Storage Tank and connects to the existin 16"waterline along McCreary Road.
2 218 5,100 t6 $111.37 $568,000 $357,840 $925,840 0% 85% 85% $0 $786,964 $786,964
2 371 $0 0% 0% $0 $0 $0
Subtotal: 5,100 2006 5568,000 6% $357,840 5925,840 80 $786,964 $786,964
Project No.LS-F.M.1378 Distribution Line [730 Service Area]
This project connects the existing 12"waterline along F.M.1378 at Brown Street to the existing 12"waterline in Lakefield Drive
2 361 4,900 12 $91.63 S449,000 $282,870 $731,870 0% 85% 85% $0 $622,090_ S622,090
2 360 $0 0% 0% 0% SO $0 $0
2 153 $0 0% 0% 0% $0 $0 $0
Subtotal: 4,900 2008 $449,000 6% $282,870 S731,870 SO $622,090 $622,090
Project No.L6-Westgate 20"Waterline Crossing F.M.544 [679 Service Area]
This project connects the existing 20"waterline along Westgate Way north of F.M.544 to the existing 12"waterline south of F.M.544
2 385 150 20 I $650.00 S97,500 S61,425 $158,925 0% 85% 85% 50 $135,086 $135,086
Subtotal: 150, 2006 S97,500 6% S61,425 $158,925 SO S135,086 5135,086
Project No.L7-State Highway 78 Distribution Line No. 1 [679 Service Area]
This project connects the existing waterline near Birmingham Avenue to the existing 14"waterline in Brown Street
2 374 2,900 20 S232.06 $672,970 S423,971 S1,096,941 0% 90% 90% S0 $987,247 $987,247
2 376 S0 0% 0% 0% S0 $0 SO
2 379 1,150 24 S233.94 $269,030 5169,489 S438,519 0% 90% 90% S0 S394,667 S394,667
2 362 S0 0% 0% 0% S0 $0 S0
Subtotal: 4,050 2006 S942,090 6% __ --_ - S593,460_ S1,535,460 _ SO 31,381,914 51,381,914
ttr awtna azt6anepe,o'oov,a Won
o.. -30-
Birkhoff Hendricks and Conway,L.L.P.
2/14/2006
TABLE NO.13
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WATER DISTRIBUTION IMPACT FEE STUDY
PROPOSED WATER FACILITIES
Pump Station Cost($) Capacity Utilized(%) Capacity Utilized ($)
Debt Service 20 Year Debt In The In The
Project Year Projected Engineering& Interest Rate Service Utilizing Total 20 Yr. CRF CRF
No. Pump Station Improvements Const. Capacity Const. Testing % Simple Interest Project Cost$ 2005 2015 Period 2005 2015 Period
Newport Harbor Pump Station
S2 (1) Ground Storage Reservoir(Conc.) [4] 2006 2.0 MG $1,185,000 $70,200 6% $790,776 $2,045,976 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% $0 $2,045,976 $2,045,976
P4 (1) Phase I Improvements [4] 2007 8.32MGD $140,000 $20,000 6% $100,800 $260,800 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% $0 $260,800 $260,800
P5 (1) Phase II Improvements [4] 2008 11.52 MGD $140,000 $20,000 6% $100,800 $260,800 0.0% 90.0% 90.0% $0 $234,720 $234,720
S5 (1) Ground Storage Reservoir(Conc.) [4] 2011 1.0 MG $784,000 $60,000 6% $531,720 $1,375,720 0.0% 90.0% 90.0% $0 $1,238,148 $1,238,148
Nortex Pump Station
P1 (1) Phase I Improvements [3] 2006 2.30MGD $144,150 $18,850 6% $102,690 $265,690 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% $0 $265,690 $265,690
P2 (1) Phase II Improvements [4] 2007 5.90 MGD $316,600 $41,400 6% $225,540 $583,540 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% $0 $583,540 $583,540
S3 (1) Ground Storage Reservoir 2(Steel) [4] 2008 1.5 MG $863,700 $49,300 6% $575,190 $1,488,190 0.0% 90.0% 90.0% $0 $1,339,371 $1,339,371
P7 (1) Phase III Improvements [4] 2011 9.07 MGD $120,000 $15,000 6% $85,050 $220,050 0.0% 90.0% 90.0% $0 $198,045 $198,045
S6 (1) Replace Ground Storage 1(Steel) [4] 2012 1.0 MG $625,000 $50,000 6% $425,250 $1,100,250 90.0% 100.0% 10.0% $990,225 $1,100,250 $110,025
NTMWD Pump Station
P3 (1) Phase I Improvements [4] 2006 6.05MGD $850,550 $90,450 6% $592,830 $1,533,830 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% $0 $1,533,830 $1,533,830
P6 (1) Phase II Improvements [5] 2009 9.22 MGD $118,000 $12,000 6% $81,900 $211,900 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% $0 $211,900 $211,900
P8 (1) Phase III Improvements [6] 2013 10.94MGD $123,500 $12,500 6% $85,680 $221,680 0.0% 90.0% 90.0% $0 $199,512 $199,512
Proposed Elevated Storage
S1 2.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank(Creekside) 2005 2.0 MG $2,737,260 $146,000 6% $1,816,454 $4,699,714 0.0% 90.0% 90.0% $0 $4,229,743 $4,229,743
S4 (1) 1.5 MG Elevated Storage Tank(S.Ballard) 2010 1.5 MG $2,540,000 $135,000 6% $1,685,250 $4,360,250 33.3% 90.0% 56.7% $1,453,417 $3,924,225 $2,470,808
Proposed Facility Total I I I $10,687,760 5740,700 57,199,930 $18,628,390 5990,225 $17,365,750 $14,922,108
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WATER DISTRIBUTION IMPACT FEE STUDY
EXISTING WATER FACILITIES
Pump Station Cost($) Capacity Utilized(%) Capacity Utilized ($)
Debt Service 20 Year Debt In The In The
Year Projected Engineering& Interest Rate Service Utilizing Total 20 Yr. CRF CRF
Pump Station Improvements Const. Capacity Const. Testing % Simple Interest Project Cost$ 2005 2015 Period 2005 2015 Period
Facilities Total Existing+Proposed S11,887,760 $825,700 57,996,630 $20,710,090 52,655,585 $19,447,450 $15,338,448
(1)Estimated Cost
[2]Number of Pumps
S.Cluical\Wylie\2002164�Reports\Faolities Utilized Qpaotyxls\Water P.S. -29-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
E. Utilized Capacity
Utilized capacity for the water distribution system was calculated based on the water line
size required for each model year (2005, 2015 and build out). Master planning of the
water distribution system is based on the maximum daily demand, maximum hourly
demand, and the minimum hourly demand. Pump station capacity is generally based on
the maximum daily system demand while transmission and distribution facilities are sized
based on either the maximum hourly demand or the minimum hourly demand, whichever
demand is greater for a particular water line. Often times, the capacity of a water line is
determined by the flows generated by the minimum hourly demand. The minimum hourly
flows are usually higher in those lines that are used to refill elevated storage. For each line
segment in the water distribution model, the build-out flow rate in the line was compared
to the flow rate in the same line segment for the 2005 and the 2015 models.
The percentage of utilized capacity was calculated for each year based on the build-out
capacity. The utilized capacity during the Impact Fee period is the difference between the
year 2015 capacity and the year 2005 capacity. Table No. 12 below summarizes the
project cost and utilized cost over the impact fee period of 2005 - 2015 for each element of
the Water Distribution System. The utilized capacity for each water distribution facility,
both existing and proposed, is presented in detail in Impact Fee Capacity Calculation
Tables Nos. 13, and 14.
TABLE NO. 12
Summary of Eligible Capital Cost and Utilized Capacity Cost
Existing Water System Bond Projects $2,386,391 $1,228,321
Existing Regency Elevated Tank $2,081,700 $416,340
Proposed Pumping, Storage& CCN $18,628,390 $14,922,108
Proposed Transmission/Distribution Lines $14,086,292 $12,143,440
Planning Expenses $46,000 $46,000
Total $37,228,773 $28,756,209
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -28-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
(2/14/2006)
Table No. 11
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
10-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Previous Water System Bonds
2002 Wylie Water&Sewer Bonds @ 50%of Total 45% $ 232,875 $ 99,024 $ 331,899
2000 Wylie Water&Sewer Bonds @ 20%of Total 45% $ 132,300 $ 61,632 $ 193,932
2000 Regency Elevated Storage Tank 20% $ 257,000 $ 159,340 $ 416,340
1999 Wylie Water&Sewer Bonds @ 50%of Total 50% $ 277,500 $ 118,533 $ 396,033
1999 Wylie General,Water&Sewer Bonds @ 22.2225%of Total 50% $ 226,114 $ 80,343 $ 306,457
Subtotal:Previous Water System Bonds $ 1,125,789 $ 518,871 $ 1,644,661
Planning Expenses
2005 Update Water System Master Plan $ 26,000 $ - $ 26,000
2005 Water Impact Fee $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000
Subtotal,Planning Expenses: $ 46,000 $ 46,000
Total Expenses For Impact Fees
Water Transmission Lines 86.2075% $ 8,658,000 $ 5,428,292 $ 12,143,440
Pumping and Storage Facilities 80.1041% $ 11,428,460 $ 7,199,930 $ 14,922,108
Utilized Percentage of Previous Water System Bonds 100.000% $ 1,125,789 $ 518,871 $ 1,644,661
Planning Expenses 100.000% $ 46,000 $ - $ 46,000
Subtotal:Previous Water System Bonds $ 21,258,249 $ 13,147,093 $ 28,756,209
Notes:
(1)Opinion of Cost includes:
a) Engineer's Opinion of Construction Cost
b) Professional Services Fees(Survey,Engineering&Testing)
c) Cost of Easements based on$15/L.f.of Open Cut Installation unless planned installation in existing right-of-way
(2)Debt Service based on 20-year simple interest bonds at 6%
JAClerical\Wylie\2002164\Reports\Report W-WW CJP.xls\Water -27-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
(2/14/2006)
Table No. 11
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
10-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Water Lines
L1 2005 Creekside Distribution Line No. 1 20" $ 866,000 $ 545,581 $ 1,411,581
L2 2005 Creekside Distribution Line No.2 16"-20" $ 416,500 $ 262,395 $ 678,895
L3 2006 Newport Harbor Distribution Line No. 1 12"-24" $ 1,396,000 $ 879,480 $ 2,275,480
L4 2007 Creekside Distribution Line No.3 16" $ 568,000 $ 357,840 $ 925,840
L5 2008 F.M. 1378 Distribution Line No. 1 12" $ 449,000 $ 282,870 $ 731,870
L6 2006 Westgate 20"Waterline Crossing at F.M.544 20" $ 97,500 $ 61,425 $ 158,925
L7 2007 State Highway 78 Distribution Line No. 1 20"-24" $ 942,000 $ 593,460 $ 1,535,460
L8 2008 State Highway 78 Distribution Line No.2 16"-24" $ 830,500 $ 523,216 $ 1,353,716
L9 2009 Hensley Lane Distribution Line No. 1 12" $ 916,000 $ 577,080 $ 1,493,080
L10 2005 East Alanis Drive Distribution Line 12" $ 250,000 $ 131,250 $ 381,250
L11 2010 Lake Travis Drive and Canyon Lake Drive Waterlines 8" $ 99,000 $ 62,370 $ 161,370
L12 2012 East Side Water Distribution Lines 12" $ 473,000 $ 297,990 $ 770,990
L13 2012 Woodbridge Water Distribution Line 8"- 12" $ 740,000 $ 466,200 $ 1,206,200
L14 2007 Pressure Reducing Valve Vaults 8"- 12" $ 314,500 $ 198,135 $ 512,635
L15 2007 Brown Street and Sanden Water Lines 12" $ 300,000 $ 189,000 $ 489,000
Subtotal: Water Lines $ 8,658,000 $ 5,428,292 $ 14,086,292
Pumping and Storage Facilities
P1 2005 Nortex Pump Station Improvements-Phase 1 2.3 MGD $ 163,000 $ 102,690 $ 265,690
S 1 2005 Creekside Elevated Storage Tank 2.0 MG $ 2,883,260 $ 1,816,454 $ 4,699,714
P2 2006 Nortex Pump Station Improvements-Phase 2 5.9 MGD $ 358,000 $ 225,540 $ 583,540
S2 2006 Newport Harbor Ground Storage Reservoir No.2 2.0 MG $ 1,255,200 $ 790,776 $ 2,045,976
P3 2006 NTMWD Pump Station Improvements-Phase 1 6.1 MGD $ 941,000 $ 592,830 $ 1,533,830
P4 2007 Newport Harbor Pump Station Improvements-Phase 1 8.3 MGD $ 160,000 $ 100,800 $ 260,800
S3 2007 Nortex Ground Storage Reservoir No.2 1.5 MG $ 913,000 $ 575,190 $ 1,488,190
P5 2008 Newport Harbor Pump Station Improvements-Phase 2 11.5 MGD $ 160,000 $ 100,800 $ 260,800
P6 2009 NTMWD Pump Station Improvements-Phase 2 9 MGD $ 130,000 $ 81,900 $ 211,900
P7 2012 Nortex Pump Station Improvements-Phase 3 8.8 MGD $ 135,000 $ 85,050 $ 220,050
S4 2012 Ballard Elevated Storage Tank Replacement 1.5 MG $ 2,675,000 $ 1,685,250 $ 4,360,250
S5 2012 Newport Harbor Ground Storage Reservoir No. 1(New) 1.0 MG $ 844,000 $ 531,720 $ 1,375,720
S6 2012 Nortex Ground Storage Reservoir No. 1(Replace) 1.0 MG $ 675,000 $ 425,250 $ 1,100,250
P8 2014 NTMWD Pump Station Improvements-Phase 3 10.9 MGD $ 136,000 $ 85,680 $ 221,680
Subtotal: Pumping and Storage Facilities $ 11,428,460 $ 7,199,930 $ 18,628,390
J:\Clerical\Wylie\2002164\Reports\Report W-WW CJP.xls\Water -26-
:.tee:aes-'�
-�' _1 -„ I] ' 1 2.711-316."701.1:
I MINN"UM
_ -..a-r u.prrrrm
J YY�GlY Y • � • YYIYY_LY tt/ift:
moms.iimasS .
El—— ..... ,...r:i!..,' --"1- - ilii..7-lai.,ifet.--24:11. 1=. f _.- . w,"
_ I 1 r.': 1I. +- Afi/-r-.--- ..../'.11 --- _ _ .,.,
R , 1 IIII(T _`4.
1 i — -:IMFV4
/. `! ; =1 4. r," --_ — I 11 I!M11.1.lq"!M n BRMOFF,I00,136•COXIMI,..LP.
ON ' /I r
. tr.: „.........,
, s
_....... I :-. I )
i.. �uullnat ra4ln4 �:� 16
o _o :r_ __
____ I � '�, n1 '^-' ®� �`II4IaI�, off' - ` —I F 0 a a (-. �. --
•
_--- -,.`�,. I 11, _ .•---.4 �� A'i I �J'�P1J '. 77. c1iP�'oiillPm` .- _ i Iry r b r.
— ---_r,'.`t"� =max LII-Cr.Gam. •_w.,! •S�: 410'OM ••. - 1 =i -- �I _ —-
ivS�i v.. I�� - :liar-
1 11•04.111.OM Yv. �...,
� lp _
.. -. N MW PUMP STATION
3. I* / � g (� ri r !<i_II � �I C I'" "li
,J � _1 2
. I -
- _- - I,r a a a cy
.. - ._ _ 1. lu�l 1 .,-..-
t. . r.._ ___. i_.-- ,,..: .,-..7.-. :.,,, ,::.:- x v..,_,...----
_7 __ I ti�� (- NEWPORT HARBOR PUMP STATION
k:e ., —— l � •b. .. *
c �'d l
_ 1 l L� �� . ��.r LEGEND —� a a
=.I i f, , ,.. ._
iF o
y
\ rnslrNc,��,��
F
\ /r S PRCP06ED WATER LIE NO 5� —-'
_ �f. _' '� �� V �,A1 TAI«- - _
COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL �` INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTIONAL/PUBLIC & SEMI-PUBLIC `I 4 PROPOSED OEVAIED STOMGE TANK _ �' '-` -
I I CauuERCW.CORRIDOR I 1 i Damn I ]HEAVY wOuSTRN. I I SCHOOL/CHURCl'/PuBUC/se�waic O °� GROUND S1 T"Ix NORTEX PUMP STATION
I I COERCME RErx I I INEDI-* won'RESDE41W I I urea MDUS'RI#L I I PARK/OPEN SPADE C PROPOSED MIND STOwcE vArc
MI
: Luc air SrAnow
I I ++000 SERAMS I pow CONsrn RESIOEARNL FLOOMPRI°REPLAY
F
I I X 4P1 I%h Msl rncT WERLAY SNRYCE!REA I)0,1DARr
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
D. Water Distribution System Capital Improvement Projects
In order to meet the demands of the anticipated growth over the next 10-years, as provided
in the Land Use Assumptions, certain water distribution system improvements are
required. Figure 2 shows the recommended system improvements and Table No. 11
itemizes each project and the project cost. These recommended improvements form the
basis for the Water System Impact Fee Calculation.
Actual capital cost, including construction, engineering and easements of the various
elements of the existing water distribution system was utilized where the information was
known. The existing cost of facilities was determined from records provided by the City
of Wylie. Where actual costs are not known, an average cost in 2004 dollars has been
calculated. The average unit cost is from a limited survey of projects, which bid recently,
plus an estimated cost for engineering and easements. There are many variable factors that
can have a significant impact on the actual construction cost of a project such as local
conditions, material cost increases and fuel cost increases to name a few.
The capital improvement plan provides for system improvements within the defined service
area. Some of the system improvements may be physically located beyond the boundaries
of the services area, but are necessary to provide adequate system service and capacity.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-l.doc -24-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
B. Distribution Lines
The distribution lines consist of all lines within the service area boundary supplying water
to customers in the City of Wylie. Lines vary in size from 5/8-inch and 3/4-inch services
to 24-inch transmission lines. Unless it is expected a smaller diameter water line will be
constructed by the City of Wylie, only those water lines 12-inches and larger in diameter
were considered in the Impact Fee calculations. The cost of water lines includes
construction cost, appurtenances (water valves, fire hydrants, taps and the like), utility
relocations, purchase of easements and engineering costs. Financing cost over a 20-year
term is included for each project.
Records for existing water lines were unavailable and existing distribution lines were not
included in the impact fee analysis. Unit cost for proposed capital improvement water
lines 12-inches and larger in diameter were classified as City initiated water lines including
the full cost of the facility. Developer initiated water line projects, 12-inches or less in
diameter, were not included in this Impact Fee analysis, as the cost for these size lines are
the responsibility of the developer.
C. Water Supply
The City of Wylie currently receives all of its water supply from the North Texas
Municipal Water District (NTMWD). Wylie's allocation of the capital cost of services as
a customer of the NTMWD was specifically excluded from the impact fee analysis.
If included, Wylie's share of the NTMWD capital cost could include the original
construction cost, expansion cost, financing cost, engineering cost and real estate cost of
the following components:
1) Water Rights Cost in Lake Lewisville and Other Reservoirs
2) Raw Water Intake Structures
3) Raw Water Pump Stations
4) Water Treatment Plant and Expansions
5) High Service Pump Stations
6) Transmission Lines
7) NTMWD Owned Ground Storage Facilities
8) Metering Facilities
j:Aclerical\wylieA2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -23-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
VI. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P. Consulting Engineers prepared computer models for the
years 2005 and 2015. The models were developed from residential population projections and
planning units provided by the City of Wylie. Employment population was considered in a
similar manner. The land areas follow closely to the construction of major facilities in the
system as outlined in Figure 2. These facilities include major distribution lines, pump stations,
ground storage reservoirs and elevated storage tanks.
All computer models were run for the Maximum Hourly Demand and the Minimum Hourly
Demand to insure proper sizing of the facilities to meet peak demand periods.
A. Existing Pump Stations, Ground Storage Reservoirs & Elevated Storage Tanks
For purposes of this Impact Fee, the existing Nortex, North Texas Municipal Water
District and Newport Harbor Pump Stations, ground storage reservoirs and two elevated
storage tanks are considered fully utilized in the impact fee calculation.
TABLE NO. 10
Water Distribution System -- Existing Pump Stations & Ground Storage
Nortex 2 0.86 1 900,000
NTMWD 4 2.88 1 *1,700,000
Newport Harbor 4 5.84 1 500,000
Total: 10 9.58 3 3,100,000
* -As directed, 1,700,000 gallons of 10 million gallon clear wells are assumed to be available for the City.
Elevated Storage Tanks Capacity in Gallons
South Ballard Elevated Storage Tank 250,000
Regency Elevated Storage Tank 750,000
Total 1,000,000
The pump stations and ground storage facilities were analyzed with the maximum daily
demand, while elevated storage act dynamically and therefore are analyzed utilizing the
difference between the Maximum Hourly Demand and the Maximum Daily Demand.
j:Aclerical\wylieA2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -22-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
V. CALCULATION OF WATER& WASTEWATER- LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENTS
The City of Wylie provided the existing water meter count by size category as of January 2005.
In total, there are 9,344 water meters serving the existing population of 25,325 residents and
business. Table No. 8 shows the number of existing meters, the living unit equivalent factor
and the total number of living unit equivalents for water accounts.
The City also provided wastewater accounts as of December 2004. There are 10,743 accounts
serving 29,427 residents. Table No. 9 illustrates the existing account and SFLUE's.
Using the growth rate provided by the Land Use Assumptions prepared by the City, a straight-
line extrapolation of water meters and wastewater accounts were calculated for the year 2015.
Living unit equivalents were then applied to the water meters and wastewater accounts for
2005 and 2015 resulting in a total number of living units. The difference in the total number of
2005 and 2015 living units results in the new living unit equivalents during the impact fee
period. The calculation of living unit equivalents is summarized in Table Nos. 8 and 9.
TABLE NO. 8
Water Living Unit Equivalents 2005 - 2015
5/8"&3/4" 8,991 1 8,991 17,720 1 17,720 8,729
1" 148 1.7 252 292 1.7 496 244
2" 185 6.7 1,240 365 6.7 2,445 1,205
4" 12 28.0 336 24 28.0 672 336
6" 8 63.0 504 16 63.0 1,008 504
Totals: 9,344 11,323 18,382 20,413 11,018
TABLE NO. 9
Wastewater Living Unit Equivalents 2005-2015
5/8"&3/4" 10,390 1 10,390 20,477 1 20,477 10,087
1" 148 1.7 252 292 1.7 496 244
2" 185 6.7 1,240 365 6.7 2,445 1,205
4" 12 28.0 336 24 28.0 672 336
6" 8 63.0 504 16 63.0 1,008 504
Totals: 10,743 12,722 _ 21,134 22,938 12,376
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-l.doc -21 -
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
IV. DEFINITION OF A SERVICE UNIT — WATER AND WASTEWATER
Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code requires that impact fees be based on a defined
service unit. A "service unit" means a standardized measure of consumption, use generation,
or discharge attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with
generally accepted engineering or planning standards. This update defines a water and
wastewater service unit to be a 3/4-inch water meter and has referred to this service unit as a
Single Family Living Unit Equivalent (SFLUE). The SFLUE is based on the continuous duty
capacity of a 1-inch water meter. This is the typical meter used for a single-family detached
dwelling, and therefore is considered to be equivalent to one "living unit". Many single-family
dwellings were constructed with 5/8-inch meters in the City; therefore, 5/8-inch meters are also
considered one "living unit". Other meter sizes can be compared to the 3/4-inch meter through
a ratio of water flows as published by the American Water Works Association as shown in
Table No. 7 below. This same ratio is then used to determine the proportional water and
wastewater impact fee amount for each water meter size.
TABLE NO. 7
Living Unit Equivalencies
For
Various Types and Sizes Of Water Meters
Simple 3/4" 15 1.0
Simple 1" 25 1.7
Simple 11/2" 50 3.3
Simple 2" 80 5.3
Compound 2" 80 5.3
Turbine 2" 100 6.7
Compound 3" 160 10.7
Turbine 3" 240 16.0
Compound 4" 250 16.7
Turbine 4" 420 28.0
Compound 6" 500 33.3
Turbine 6" 920 61.3
Compound 8" 800 53.3
Turbine 8" 1,600 106.7
Compound 10" 2,300 153.3
Turbine 10" 2,500 166.7
Turbine 12" 3,300 220.0
(a) Source: AWWA Standard C700(1995) -C703 (1996)
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -20-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
H. Summary
The data used to compile these land use assumptions were from three sources, anticipated
development for the City of Wylie, residential building data and other data from the City,
and information from the Future Land Use Plan. The ten-year growth projections were
calculated based upon reasonable growth rates and trends for Wylie and the surrounding
area. Ultimate projections were based upon the holding capacity of vacant land using
land use types and applying densities as established by development policies, the Future
Land Use Plan, and known proposed development plans.
The land use assumptions may be summarized as follows:
1) The Wylie wastewater planning area contains approximately 24.19 square miles,
about 50% of which is presently undeveloped land or right-of-way.
2) The 2004 estimated population in the existing water service area is 25,325. The 2004
estimated population in the existing wastewater service area is 29,427.
3) The ten-year growth projections were calculated using a compounded average annual
growth rate of approximately 7.02%.
4) The ten-year population projection for Wylie is approximately 51,520 persons inside
the water service area and 57,996 in the sanitary sewer service area.
5) The ultimate (build-out) population within the water service area is approximately
55,900 persons and 75,600 persons in the wastewater service area, according to the
adopted Land Use Plan.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-l.doc - 19-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
Table 6 shows the additional Retail/Office, Commercial, and industrial land uses
required for the increase in population projected through 2015 (25,370 people).
TABLE 6A
TEN-YEAR LAND USE PROJECTIONS -- 2015
For The Water Service Zones—2015
City of Wylie, Texas
Commercial/Retail/Office 1.80 457
School, Public/Semi-Public, Services 0.67 170
Utilities, Heavy and Light Industrial 2.50 634
Parks & Open Space 1.03 261
Total Acres: 6.00 1,522
Source: City of Wylie, April 2005.
The future acres per 100 persons reflect those ratios that have been observed for Texas
cities with healthy local economies. It should be noted that these ratios also closely
reflect the existing land use mix for Wylie's water and wastewater service areas. The
ratios are used to calculate the amount of non-residential development that the local
population may support.
G. Ultimate Population Projection
An ultimate, or holding capacity, land use and population projection was also established
in the City of Wylie's Future Land Use Plan. First, known densities of development were
considered. Then, based upon the remaining developable vacant land in Wylie and its
ETJ, densities of anticipated development projects were applied. The ultimate population
of the City of Wylie is a function of anticipated residential land use area (acres), housing
density (dwelling units per acre), and population density (persons per dwelling unit).
Based upon the land uses identified on the Future Land Use Plan, the total ultimate land
use areas of residential development were calculated using the density standards adopted
as part of the Future Land Use Plan. The ultimate holding capacity for the planning area,
assuming that each residential area is built out to its maximum capacity, generates a
maximum population of approximately 75,600 persons for the sewer service area,
excluding the unincorporated lake areas.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc - 18-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
Table 5 illustrates that the regional growth pattern is continuing to move outward from
Dallas toward the City of Wylie. Those cities that experienced the greatest amount of
growth from the 1980s to the 1990s have achieved significant levels of build-out and
those cities further north have begun to experience significant population and housing
increases. Those cities north and west of Wylie are currently experiencing growth rates
similar to those projected for Wylie through 2015.
The projected annual growth rate for the City of Wylie and the resulting population
projection of 51,520 persons for the 10-year planning horizon is considered reasonable
for planning purposes. As mentioned, this growth is projected throughout the City's
water and wastewater service area, with a substantial amount of the growth being beyond
the current municipal boundaries during the next ten years. The above mentioned growth
rate represents growth throughout the water and wastewater service zones.
It is anticipated that most of this projected growth will ultimately be incorporated into the
City service area limits for several reasons:
1) More stringent environmental laws pertaining to septic waste systems.
2) Increasing insurance rates outside corporate City limits.
3) The City's progressive philosophy regarding water and sewer line extensions.
4) Proposed upgrading of construction standards in the City's ETJ.
Changes in population affect the use of land. In the case of Wylie, increased population
is due to the conversion of vacant or agricultural land into residential and other land uses.
Non-residential development will increase in order to provide the goods and services that
the increased population will demand. The estimation of the additional acres to be
developed for the next 10 years will aid in the determination of demand for additional
water and wastewater facilities.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc - 17-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
calculate the future population based on the projected residential activity. The 2004
population of 26,150 (Table 1) is projected to increase to approximately 51,520 by the
year 2015, representing a compounded annual growth rate of 7.02%. This rate would
generate an average population increase of about 2,537 persons per year. The following
shows the formula for calculating the ten-year growth assumptions:
Residential:
900 dwelling units x 0.956 occupancy rate = 860 occupied dwelling units/year
860 occupied dwelling units/year x 2.95 household size = 2,537 persons/year
2,537 persons/year x 10 years = 25,370 persons net 10-year residential growth
"Note: It should be noted that the 10 year population and housing projection assumes growth potential
within the existing municipal boundaries and the existing extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ).
These projections do not assume residential growth beyond the existing ETJ"
This rate of growth (7.02% compound annual growth rate) is a reasonable rate for Wylie
to be expected to grow at over the next 10 years. The growth rate projected for Wylie is
less than the compounded annual growth rate over the last 14 years (8.2%) and is
consistent with other comparable cities within the region. The region, in which Wylie is
located, is one of the State's fastest growing population and employment centers.
Table 5 shows the average annual compounded growth rates for other cities in the area
and for Collin County from 1990 to 2000:
TABLE 5
Populations and Growth Rates of Area Cities
and Collin County-- 1990 and 2000
Wylie 8,716 14,965 5.6%
Allen 19,315 43,544 8.0%
Frisco 6,138 33,714 19.0%
McKinney 21,283 54,369 10.0%
Murphy 1,547 3,099 7.0%
Plano 127,885 222,030 6.0%
Prosper 1,018 2,097 7.0%
Collin County 219,212 415,219 7.0%
Source: U.S. Census, 1990 and 2000.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-l.doc - 16-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
TABLE 4B
Existing Land Use Per 100 Persons
For The Sanitary Sewer Service Zones—2004
City of Wylie, Texas (1)
Low Density Residential 10.71
Medium Density Residential 13.39
High Density Residential 0.71
Commercial /Retail/Office 1.84
School, Public/Semi-Public, Services 1.28
Downtown Historic District 0.13
Utilities/Heavy Industrial 1.71
Light Industrial 0.59
Parks & Open Space 0.81
Agricultural & Floodplain 15.64
Total Area: 46.81
(1)Based upon 2004 population of 26,150 persons. Source: City of Wylie
F. Ten-Year Growth Assumptions
Growth is characterized in two forms: population (residential land use) and
nonresidential land use. Several assumptions were necessary in order to arrive at
reasonable growth rates for population and employment in the City of Wylie. The
following assumptions were made as a basis from which 10-year projections are initiated:
1) Future land uses will occur as shown on the Future Land Use Plan.
2) The City will be able to finance the necessary improvements to the water and
wastewater systems to accommodate expected growth.
3) School facilities will accommodate expected increases in school-age population.
4) Densities will be as projected, based upon anticipated zoning districts.
5) Known or anticipated development projects will occur as presently planned.
The 10-year projections, or land use assumptions, are based upon the establishment of a
reasonable growth rate based upon past trends and/or other considerations. Considering
the increasing trends in population and housing growth (Table 2) and the City's
proximity to the Dallas/Fort Worth metropolitan area and combining these factors with
anticipated development projects provides a reasonable indication of growth potential.
Based upon these assumptions, the annual average number of residential dwelling units
constructed per year over the next 10-year period is projected to be 900. A household
size of 2.95 persons per household with an occupancy rate of 95.6 percent was used to
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc - 15-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
TABLE 3B
Existing Land Use For The Sanitary Sewer Service Zones—2004
City of Wylie, Texas
Low Density Residential 2,799 22.87%
Medium Density Residential 3,501 28.60%
High Density Residential 186 1.52%
Commercial/Retail/Office 482 3.94%
School, Public/Semi-Public, Services 334 2.73%
Downtown Historic District 34 0.28%
Utilities/Heavy Industrial 447 3.65%
Light Industrial 155 1.26%
Parks & Open Space 213 1.74%
Agricultural & Floodplain 4,090 33.41%
Total Area: 12,241 100.00%
Source: City of Wylie,April 2005.
Table 4 shows a summary of estimated existing land uses (as of April 2005), in acres
per 100 persons, assuming 3 people per ESFU for the land area within the water and
wastewater service areas.
TABLE 4A
Existing Land Use Per 100 Persons
For The Water Service Zones—2004
City of Wylie, Texas (1)
Low Density Residential 5.84
Medium Density Residential 8.99
High Density Residential 0.54
Commercial /Retail/Office 1.01
School, Public/Semi-Public, Services 0.76
Downtown Historic District 0.13
Utilities/Heavy Industrial 1.43
Light Industrial 0.01
Parks & Open Space 0.34
Agricultural 7.85
Total Area: 26.90
(1)Based upon 2004 population of 26,150 persons. Source: City of Wylie
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-l.doc - 14-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
The estimated population in January 2005 for both service areas is:
Water Wastewater
• Population 25,325 29,427
• Dwelling Units 8,980 10,434
• Households 8,585 9,975
These residential calculations are based on the following assumptions:
• Occupancy Rate 95.6 percent(2000 U.S. Census for Wylie); and
• Average Household Size 2.95 persons/household (2000 U.S. Census).
2) Land Use
Prior to an evaluation and projection of future land use patterns, an understanding
of existing conditions is essential. Documentation of existing land use patterns
within the City and its ETJ was included as part of the Land Use Plan. This data
has been updated to reflect the residential and non-resident development activity
that has occurred through January 2005. This documentation provides an overview
of the general present physical composition and condition of the City.
Table 3 shows a summary of estimated existing land uses for the land area within
the water and sanitary sewer service zones.
TABLE 3A
Existing Land Use For The Water Service Zones—2004
City of Wylie, Texas
Low Density Residential 1,527 21.71%
Medium Density Residential 2,352 33.43%
High Density Residential 142 2.02%
Commercial/Retail/Office 265 3.77%
School, Public/Semi-Public, Services 198 2.81%
Downtown Historic District 34 0.48%
Utilities/Heavy Industrial 373 5.30%
Light Industrial 2 0.03%
Parks & Open Space 88 1.25%
Agricultural 2,054 29.20%
Total Area: 7,035 100.00%
Source: City of Wylie,April 2005.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc - 13-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
Another comparison and useful base data source for population growth is the past trends
in residential construction. Table 2 shows the growth trend in residential construction in
the City from 2000 to 2004. At the end of 1999 there were approximately 5,340
residential units this is the base number for percentage of growth.
Table 2
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS PER YEAR
City of Wylie, Texas
2000 5,340 385 (1) 7.2%
2001 5,725 749 (1) 13.1%
2002 6,474 1,085 (1) 16.8%
2003 7,559 1,415 (2) 18.7%
2004 8,974 1,162 (2) 12.9%
Average: 959 new residential units per year over 5 years
Source: (1) Current Housing Estimates, North Central Texas Council
of Governments, 2000, 2001 and 2002.
(2) City of Wylie Building Department, 2003 and 2004.
The growth in housing shown in Table 2 illustrates the recent trend in residential activity
for the City of Wylie. The trend shown here reflects that observed for the recent trend in
population growth. The City has seen sharp increases in residential growth over the past
few years. As mentioned earlier, the City's available lot inventory is increasing.
For the purposes of documenting changes in population, land use, density and intensity,
the data format to be used as a basis to formulate the land use assumptions will be
principally population and land use estimates. These estimates and the land use
inventory, from the City's Future Land Use Plan, were used to establish a beginning
baseline and updated to January 2005 for the projections for Wylie.
1) Population and Land Use
Existing land uses were documented throughout each of the service areas in
development of the Land Use Plan. Residential and non-residential building
activity for each of the service areas was then analyzed to establish base population
and employment estimates for January 2005.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc - 12-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
E. Base Year Data
This section documents historical growth trends and base data for the City. This
"benchmark" information provides a starting basis of data, as established in the City's
Future Land Use Plan and updated in April 2005, for the ten-year growth assumptions.
One method of predicting future growth is looking at past growth. The historical growth
rates for Wylie are shown in Table 1 below.
Table 1
HISTORICAL GROWTH RATE
City of Wylie, Texas
1970 (1) 2,675 0.0% 0.0%
1980 (1) 3,152 17.8% 1.6%
1990 (1) 8,716 176.5% 10.7%
2000 (1) 14,965 71.7% 5.6%
2004 (2) 26,150 174.7% 15.0%
(1) Source: U.S. Census.
(2) Source: City of Wylie,April 2005.
Over the 30-year period of 1970 to 2000, the City of Wylie experienced a significant
amount of growth. The City is continuing to experience a significant increase in
population, housing, and commercial development activity. As of January 2005, the City
of Wylie had a total of 2,852 residential lots in various stages of development, including
recently approved zoning cases and plats. The build-out of these lots will increase the
existing housing stock as follows: 8,980 existing units (2004) + 2,852 future units (2005)
= 11,832 units or 31.8 % increase. Accordingly, it is anticipated that the City has the lot
inventory to maintain the significant increases in population and housing growth
experienced over the last ten to twenty years.
It is also anticipated that the City will continue to receive petitions for the zoning and
platting of new subdivisions. There are a number of pending development cases that will
provide for additional new residential units.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc - 11 -
---7_1- — Ai - ___
111 i
11
Lrs
Ir,M�1 ,�t �i
1
•----..1—.0.— (-'-:_. 11""INN. .1.:!1 a
.....„,,,,__;__,riii. ,, litimomip'— ,..,1 1 T ,11../r.1.11:1,3„: i 1,i , i it,II'2f4 1 .. ..::'14.011/4.,......
..v. e , j_ ,r.11.110 i _ ___ - •1 1 .. 11\1 rie
III %Wm ' 1 la \- ..=--Abh•-----
1..1..._,.
:..• _-7..1, i
".f
117..... . „.„,...
s111 1 .
111111111 114.b
11111A411.,-•--ff .i.i� �4.1111� �—! :7 .�� ■r
—T
ir
=.gl,,,-/ ___
illift " 1✓L" r,ti r
i.r.iiia -=-1- -i.--=- Jr
` _` ,g #""-- :==,,ii p .Z='r:E — —,, _
ir.. ,„._
,,,,,,ii,..,,,,,,,
_, _ ,
- , _ , = Ill .-==-....,„:".1,-=-L
; 1 P,r _,I��l• E f _I■-111.1111 ya !III!"
Ille III
mint Ai " IIIIIIi —Ai=mom -
�f1!®°wal�lll�N■El
i �,I�rr� %%%�;r� •
,_ it=
)�., •
END
LEGEND
"Lir T-- I:
cirr`"r
0 2000 1000 6000 IL
_ �.•��� ,_..' -- ■■■ +�.` rC f •...
SCALE N FEET
�� �,.. •� � 1I j ,
J [1LQ‘' j
. ��'� FIGURE 1 R
'�, I CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS
, L.. / ;,,..,,' - A
_�� I 4i ,y WATER AND WASTEWATER
'' SERVICE AREA f lAP
\'. _rettiiit , ,- � o�.•., - •- BIRICHOFF. NErDRICKS 3 CONWAY.LLP.
—�k _:' >e02�rKu m I OCT.. 2005
f.-, owu.AS.TOL. 75231 .1-7900
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
D. Service Area Maps
Figure 1R on the following page shows the proposed service area for water and
wastewater facilities. The service area boundary for wastewater includes all land area
within the existing City limits, all that land within the Wylie water CCN, and those
portions of shared CCNs that Wylie will serve as development occurs. The service area
boundary for water includes all that land within the Wylie water CCN, and those portions
of shared CCNs that Wylie will serve as development occurs. A recommended priority
listing of projects for water and wastewater facilities will be outlined in the City's Capital
Improvements Program (CIP). The actual ten-year CIP upon which the impact fee
program must be based will be prepared separately, per the requirements of Chapter 395.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-l.doc -9-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
C. Methodology
Based upon the growth assumptions and the capital improvements that will be needed to
support future growth, it is possible to develop an impact fee structure which fairly
allocates capital improvement costs to growth areas in relationship to their impact upon
the entire infrastructure system. The database and projections in this report have been
formulated using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles and
methodologies.
These land use assumptions and future growth projections take into consideration several
factors influencing development patterns, including the following:
1) The character, type, density and quantity of existing development
2) Existing land use patterns
3) Anticipated future land uses (as shown in the City's Future Land Use Plan)
4) Availability of land for future expansion, and the City's physical holding capacity
5) Current growth trends in the City and region
6) Location and configuration of undeveloped (vacant) land
7) Known or anticipated development projects
8) Potential sanitary sewer availability (e.g., topographical constraints)
9) Growth policies adopted in the Future Land Use Plan
A summary of the general methodology used for the preparation of this report follows:
1) Establish impact fee water and wastewater service areas (see Section II — Service
Area Map).
2) Collect/determine benchmark(i.e., base year) data on population and land use as of
January 2005 (see Section III—Base Year Data).
3) Project population and land use growth for ten years by impact fee service areas
(see Section IV— Ten-Year Growth Assumptions).
4) Project the ultimate population for a fully developed City, assuming full
development of service area(s) (see Section V—Ultimate Population Projections).
A more detailed methodology for each is contained within the referenced sections.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -8-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
III. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS (Provided By: The City Of Wylie)
A. Purpose
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code prescribes the process by which cities
in Texas must formulate development impact fees. The initial step in this process is the
establishment of"land use assumptions" for the City upon which the impact fee program
is based. These land use assumptions, which are derived from the Future Land Use Plan
and from population projections adopted in the Comprehensive Plan, will become the
basis for the preparation of impact fee capital improvement plans for water and
wastewater facilities.
To assist the City of Wylie in determining the need for, and the timing of, capital
improvements to serve future development, a reasonable estimation of future growth is
required. The purpose of this report is to formulate growth and development projections
based upon assumptions pertaining to the type, location, quantity and timing of various
future land uses within the community, and to establish and document the methodology
used for preparing the growth and land use assumptions.
B. Elements of The Land Use Assumption Report
This report contains the following components:
1) Methodology -- Explanation of the general methodology used to prepare the land
use assumptions.
2) Service Zone Map (Plate 1) — The impact fee service area for water and
wastewater facilities.
3) Base Data — Information on population and land use for Wylie for each capital
facility/impact fee service area.
4) Ten-Year Growth Assumptions — Population and land use growth assumptions
for ten years for each capital facility/impact fee service area.
5) Ultimate Population Projections — Projections that reflect a completely
developed condition, based upon the City's ultimate "build-out" scenario.
6) Summary—Brief synopsis of the land use assumptions report.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -7-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
26. Wastewater facility means a wastewater interceptor or main, lift station or other facility
included within and comprising an integral component of the City's collection system for
wastewater. Wastewater facility includes land, easements or structure associated with
such facilities. Wastewater facility excludes site-related facilities.
27. Wastewater facility expansion means the expansion of the capacity of any existing
wastewater improvement for the purpose of serving new development, but does not
include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing sewer facility
to serve existing development.
28. Wastewater capital improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended from
time to time, which identifies the wastewater facilities or wastewater expansions and
their associated costs which are necessitated by and which are attributable to new
development, for a period not to exceed 10 years.
29. Water facility means a water interceptor or main, pump station, storage tank or other
facility included within and comprising an integral component of the City's water storage
or distribution system. Water facility includes land, easements or structures associated
with such facilities. Water facility excludes site-related facilities.
30. Water facility expansion means the expansion of the capacity of any existing water
facility for the purpose of serving new development, but does not include the repair,
maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing water improvement to serve
existing development.
31. Water improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended from time to time,
which identifies the water facilities or water expansions and their associated costs which
are necessitated by and which are attributable to new development, for a period not to
exceed 10 years.
32. Water meter means a device for measuring the flow of water to a development, whether
for domestic or for irrigation purposes.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -6-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
19. Roadway capital improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended from
time to time, which identifies the roadway facilities or roadway expansions and their
costs for each road service area, which are necessitated by and which are attributable to
new development, for a period not to exceed 10 years.
20. Roadway expansion means the expansion of the capacity of an existing roadway in the
City, but does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an
existing roadway to better serve existing development.
21. Roadway facility means an improvement or appurtenance to a roadway that includes, but
is not limited to, rights-of-way, whether conveyed by deed or easement; intersection
improvements; traffic signals; turn lanes; drainage facilities associated with the roadway;
street lighting or curbs.
22. Service area means either a water service area or wastewater benefit area within the City,
within which impact fees for capital improvements or facility expansion will be collected
for new development occurring within such area, and within which fees so collected will
be expended for those types of improvements or expansions identified in the type of
capital improvements plan applicable to the service area.
23. Service unit means the applicable standard units of measure shown on the land use
equivalency table in the Impact Fees Capital Improvements Plan that can be converted to
water meter equivalents, for water or for wastewater facilities, which serves as the
standardized measure of consumption, use or generation attributable to the new unit of
development.
24. Site-related facility means an improvement or facility which is for the primary use or
benefit of a new development, and/or which is for the primary purpose of safe and
adequate provision of water or wastewater facilities to serve the new development, and
which is not included in the impact fees capital improvements plan and for which the
property owner is solely responsible under subdivision or other applicable development
regulations.
25. Utility connection means installation of a water meter for connecting a new development
to the City's water system, or connection to the City's wastewater system.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -5-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
10. Impact fee capital improvements plan means either a water capital improvements plan or
a wastewater capital improvements plan, adopted or revised pursuant to the impact fee
regulations.
11. Land use assumptions means the projections of population and growth, and associated
changes in land uses, densities and intensities over at least a ten-year period, as adopted
by the City and as may be amended from time to time, upon which the capital
improvements plans are based.
12. Land use equivalency table means a table converting the demands for capital
improvements generated by various land uses to numbers of service units, as may be
amended from time to time.
13. New development means the subdivision of land; the construction, reconstruction,
redevelopment, conversion, structural alteration, relocation, or enlargement of any
structure; or any use or extension of the use of land; any of which increases the number
of service units.
14. Plat has the meaning given the term in the City's subdivision regulations. Plat includes
replat.
15. Platting has the meaning given the term in the City's subdivision regulations. Platting
includes replatting.
16. Property owner has the meaning given the term in the City's subdivision regulations.
Property owner includes the developer for a new development.
17. Recoupment means the imposition of an impact fee to reimburse the City for capital
improvements that the City had previously oversized to serve new development.
18. Roadway means any freeway, expressway, principal or minor arterial or collector
roadways designated in the City's adopted Thoroughfare Plan, as may be amended from
time to time. Roadway does not include any roadway designated as a numbered highway
on the official Federal or Texas highway system.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -4-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
II. GLOSSARY
1. Advisory Committee means the capital improvements advisory committee established by
the City for purposes of reviewing and making recommendations to the City Council on
adoption and amendment of the City's impact fee program.
2. Area-related facility means a capital improvement or facility expansion which is
designated in the impact fee capital improvements plan and which is not a site-related
facility. Area-related facility may include a capital improvement that is located off-site,
or within or on the perimeter of the development site.
3. Assessment means the determination of the amount of the maximum impact fee per
service unit that can be imposed on new development.
4. Capital improvement means either a water facility or a wastewater facility, with a life
expectancy of three or more years, to be owned and operated by or on behalf of the City.
5. City means the City of Wylie, Texas.
6. Credit means the amount of the reduction of an impact fee due, determined under this
ordinance or pursuant to administrative guidelines, that is equal to the value of area-
related facilities provided by a property owner pursuant to the City's subdivision or
zoning regulations or requirements, for the same type of facility.
7. Facility expansion means either a water facility expansion or a sewer facility expansion.
8. Final plat approval means the point at which the applicant has complied with all
conditions of approval in accordance with the City's subdivision regulations, and the plat
has been approved for filing with Collin County.
9. Impact fee means either a fee for water facilities or a fee for wastewater facilities,
imposed on new development by the City pursuant to Chapter 395 of the Texas Local
Government Code in order to generate revenue to fund or recoup the costs of capital
improvements or facility expansion necessitated by and attributable to such new
development. Impact fees do not include the dedication of rights-of-way or easements
for such facilities, or the construction of such improvements, imposed pursuant to the
City's zoning or subdivision regulations.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -3-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
The Act allows the maximum impact fee to be charged if revenues from future ad valorem
taxes, and water and sewer bills are included as a credit in the analysis. If not, the Act allows
the maximum fee to be set at 50% of the calculated maximum fee. The following items were
included in the impact fee calculation:
A. The portion of the cost of the new infrastructure that is to be paid by the City, including
engineering, property acquisition and construction cost.
B. Existing excess capacity in lines and facilities that will serve future growth and which
were paid for in whole or part by the City.
C. Engineering and quality control fees for construction projects.
D. Interest and other finance charges on bonds issued by the City to cover its portion of cost.
The engineering analysis portion of the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee review determines
utilized capacity cost of the major water distribution and wastewater collection facilities
between the year 2005 and the year 2015. Facilities in this analysis include, water pump
stations, water storage tanks, water transmission lines, wastewater treatment plants,
wastewater lift stations and wastewater collection lines. The North Texas Municipal Water
District (NTMWD) water treatment and distribution components were excluded from this
analysis. The study period is a ten-year period with 2005 as the base year. The impact fee
calculation for the water and wastewater systems is based on land uses provided by the City
of Wylie. The City's Water Distribution and Wastewater Collection Master Plans were
updated prior to this impact fee update. The Master Plans are available for review from the
City of Wylie. The equivalency factors utilized in this analysis conform to the latest
American Water Works Association Standards (C700 - C703).
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-1.doc -2-
Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P.
CITY OF WYLIE
WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE UPDATE
I. INTRODUCTION
On April 24, 2001, the City of Wylie adopted Ordinance No. 2001-19 "Establishing Water and
Wastewater Impact Fees" in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code. The
ordinance and associated impact fees were established and based on the Service Area Land Use
Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan prepared by Hunter Associates of Texas, Ltd.,
dated March 2001. The maximum calculation fee and current imposed fees are summarized
below:
Fee Per Service Unit
Calculated Fees Imposed
Maximum (Ordinance 2001-19)
Water $1,212 $606
Wastewater $2,446 $1,223
Since the adoption of the Impact Fee Ordinance 2001-19, the City of Wylie has expanded its
corporate boundaries and environmental jurisdiction. The City adopted a new
Comprehensive Land Use Plan in April 2005. These changes in the boundaries and proposed
land use prompt the requirement for an impact fee update.
In accordance with the requirements of Chapter 395.052 of the Local Government Code, this
report updates the City of Wylie's Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvement Plan.
Chapter 395, of the Local Government Code is an act that provides guidelines for financing
capital improvements required by new development in municipalities, counties, and certain
other local governments. The basis for determination of an impact fee requires the
preparation and adoption of a land use plan and growth assumption, and the preparation of a
10-year capital improvement plan. A master plan of the water and wastewater systems is
necessary to prepare a 10-year capital improvement plan. From these two phases, a maximum
impact fee is calculated.
j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-l.doc - 1 -
WATER AND WASTEWATER
IMPACT FEE UPDATE
2005 - 2015
Prepared For
I/VI: .
CITY OF WYLIE
q
Prepared By
BIRKHOFF, HENDRICKS & CONWAY, L.L.P.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
DALLAS, TEXAS
February 2006
PRELIMINARY
CITY OF WYLIE
IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Agenda Item No. Meeting Date: February 21, 2006
Consent Case Name:
Action X Prepared By: Mindy Manson
Public Hearing Exhibits: Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update
Miscellaneous
Other
AGENDA SUBJECT:
1. Evaluate proposed impact fees and related relevant information and develop written comments to file
with the City regarding the proposed water and sewer impact fees.
2. Consider and Act upon approval of written comments and direct a member of the committee to file the
written comments with the City Engineer and City Manager no later than before the 5th business day
before the date of the public hearing to be held by the City Council on the imposition of water and sewer
impact fees.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the proposed impact fees and related
relevant information.
SUMMARY: The Local Government Code governs the process by which a municipality may adopt impact
fees. As a part of that process, the Planning Commission, plus one addition member, serves as the Impact Fee
Advisory Committee. For the purpose of this and previous updates to the fee, Mr. Tommy Pulliam has served as
the additional member to the Committee.
The Advisory Committee is defined as the capital improvements advisory committee established by the City for
purposes of reviewing and making recommendations to the City Council on adoption and amendment of the
City's impact fee program.
The basis for determination of an impact fee requires the preparation and adoption of a land use plan and growth
assumption, and the preparation of a 10-year capital improvement plan. A master plan of the water and
wastewater systems is necessary to prepare a 10-year capital improvement plan. From these two phases, a
maximum impact fee is calculated.
APPROVED BY: Initial Date
Department Director: MM \ 02/16/06
1
AGENDA
Impact Fee Advisory Committee
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS WYLIE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX
2000 Highway 78 North Wylie, Texas 75098
Tuesday,February 21,2006
To begin immediately upon the conclusion of the
Planning&Zoning Commission meeting which begins at 7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
ACTION AGENDA
1. Evaluate proposed impact fees and related relevant information and develop written
comments to file with the City regarding the proposed water and sewer impact fees.
2. Consider and Act upon approval of written comments and direct a member of the committee
to file the written comments with the City Engineer and City Manager no later than before the
5th business day before the date of the public hearing to be held by the City Council on the
imposition of water and sewer impact fees.
ADJOURNMENT
Posted Friday, February 17, 2006 at 5:00 p.m.
THE WYLIE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX IS WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE. SIGN INTERPRETATION OR OTHER SPECIAL ASSISTANCE FOR DISABLED ATTENDEES
MUST BE REQUESTED 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE BY CONTACTING THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 442-8100 OR TDD AT 442-8170.
Planning & Zoning
Commission
CITY OF WYLIE
February 21 , 2006
Impact Fee Advisory Committee