Loading...
06-13-2006 (City Council) Agenda Packet Wylie City Council CITY:F WYLIE NOTICE OF MEETING Regular Meeting Agenda Tuesday, June 13, 2006 - 6:00 pm Wylie Municipal Complex - Council Chambers 2000 Highway 78 North John Mondy Mayor Carter Porter Mayor Pro Tern Earl Newsom Place 1 M. G. "Red" Byboth Place 2 Eric Hogue Place 3 Merrill Young Place 4 Rick White Place 5 Mark B. Roath City Manager Richard Abernathy City Attorney Carole Ehrlich City Secretary In accordance with Section 551.042 of the Texas Government Code, this agenda has been posted at the Wylie Municipal Complex, distributed to the appropriate news media, and posted on the City website: www.wvlietexas.gov within the required time frame. As a courtesy, the entire Agenda Packet has also been posted on the City of Wylie website: www.wylietexas.gov. The Mayor and City Council request that all cell phones and pagers be turned off or set to vibrate. Members of the audience are requested to step outside the Council Chambers to respond to a page or to conduct a phone conversation. The Wylie Municipal Complex is wheelchair accessible. Sign interpretation or other special assistance for disabled attendees must be requested 48 hours in advance by contacting the City Secretary's Office at 972.442.8100 or TD 972.442.8170. CALL TO ORDER Announce the presence of a Quorum. INVOCATION & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS Residents may address Council regarding an item that is not listed on the Agenda. Residents must provide their name and address. Council requests that comments be limited to three (3) minutes. In addition, Council is not allowed to converse, deliberate or take action on any matter presented during citizen participation. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. June 13,2006 Wylie City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Page 2 of 6 A. Approval of the Minutes from the May 23, 2006, Regular Meeting of the City Council. (C. Ehrlich, City Secretary) B. Consider, and act upon, a Supplemental Amendment to the Paramedic Ambulance Services Agreement with East Texas Medical Center d/b/a East Texas Medical Center Emergency Medical Service authorizing Wylie Communications to begin primary responsibilities for dispatching all ambulances in the Southeast Collin County EMS Coalition. (N. Flores, Interim Fire Chief) C. Consider, and act upon, a Lease Agreement with Tommy Pulliam for the lease of a building located at 201B Windco Circle, Wylie, Texas for use as a temporary facility to house Fire Station #3. (N. Flores, Interim Fire Chief) D. Consider, and act upon, a Final Plat for the Trout-78 Addition, generally located north of S.H. 78 and west of Eubanks Road. (M. Manson, Assistant City Manager) E. Consider, and act upon, a Final Plat for the Ben Nobles Addition to create four (4) residential lots, generally located west of Thomas Street and south of Stone Road. (M. Manson, Assistant City Manager) F. Consider, and act upon, a Final Plat for the Wylie Retail Office Park Addition, generally located on the southwest corner of S.H. 78 and Kreymer Lane. (M. Manson, Assistant City Manager) G. Consider, and act upon, a request from the Lions Club of Wylie to sell items at the Summer Concert Series. (R. Diaz, Assistant Superintendent, Parks and Recreation) REGULAR AGENDA Public Hearing 1. Conduct a Public Hearing, consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-33 amending the zoning from Community Retail (CR) to Community Retail with a Specific Use Permit (SUP) to allow for a hotel, generally located on the southeast corner of S.H.78 and West Kirby Street. (M. Manson, Assistant City Manager) Executive Summary The subject property is located on the southeast corner of S.H. 78 and West Kirby Street and totals 1.926 acres. The applicant is requesting to rezone the property to allow for a hotel on one lot. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted on May 16, 2006 to recommend approval with stipulations (4-2) for the requested change in zoning. 2. Conduct a Public Hearing, consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-34 amending a portion of the Wylie Comprehensive Master Plan Ordinance No. 2005- 19, adding Brown Street from S.H. 78 to Stone Road to the Thoroughfare Plan. (C. Hoisted, City Engineer) June 13,2006 Wylie City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Page 3 of 6 Executive Summary On May 2, 2006, The Planning & Zoning Commission approved (5-0) the recommendation of adding Brown Street from S.H. 78 to Stone Road to the City's Thoroughfare Plan. There are no improvements to Brown Street on the current Thoroughfare CIP. Design and construction funds for the project were included in the 2005 City Bond Program. 3. Conduct a Public Hearing on the City of Wylie Thoroughfare Capital Improvements Plan. (C. Holsted, City Engineer) Executive Summary The CIP identifies projects necessary over the next ten years to serve the projected growth of the City. On May 9, 2006, City Council adopted an Ordinance establishing the date for a Public Hearing on the Thoroughfare Capital Improvements Plan. General Business 4. Consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-35 adopting the City of Wylie Thoroughfare Capital Improvements Plan. (C. Holsted, City Engineer) Executive Summary Section 395 of the Local Government Code specifies the process necessary for the implementation of impact fees. City Council previously conducted a Public Hearing on the proposed Thoroughfare Capital Improvements Plan. 5. Consider, and act upon, Resolution No. 2006-18(R) setting July 25, 2006 at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chamber of the Wylie City Hall for a Public Hearing on the proposed Thoroughfare Impact Fees. (C. Holsted, City Engineer) Executive Summary In accordance with Section 395 of the Local Government Code, the City Council previously conducted a Public Hearing and considered an ordinance on the proposed CIP. The proposed Resolution sets a date, time and place for a Public Hearing on the proposed Thoroughfare Impact Fees. The Impact Fee Advisory Committee will discuss and provide written comments on the proposed fees. 6. Consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-36 amending Ordinance No. 2005-41 (2005-2006 Budget) and approving $120,623.00, for the purpose of the expansion of the Animal Shelter. (J. Butters, Chief of Police) Executive Summary The proposed budget amendment is to provide funds in the amount of$120,623 for the Animal Shelter expansion. The Construction Manager at Risk, Hisaw & Associates, advertised and accepted bids for this construction project. The original budget for this project was $403,000. However,the lowest bid received was $477,810. Both Brinkley Sargent and Hisaw have been consulted to value engineer the project to the lowest cost without sacrificing quality and capacity. The resulting construction cost is $462,623 plus architect and related fees of$61,000. In order to accept the guaranteed maximum price for construction, a budget amendment of$120,623 would have to be made. 7. Consider, and act upon, Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Hisaw & Associates General Contractors, Inc., in the amount of$462,623.00, as a Guaranteed Maximum Price for the expansion of the Animal Shelter. (I Butters, Chief of Police) Executive Summary The acceptance of the Construction Managers Guaranteed Maximum Price may be considered upon acceptance of Ordinance 2006-36 amending the 2005-2006 Budget and approving an appropriation of funds for the purpose of the Animal Shelter. The Guaranteed Maximum Price of construction for the expansion of the Animal Shelter is$462,623.00. June 13,2006 Wylie City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Page 4 of 6 8. Consider, discuss, and act upon, the recommendation of the Wylie Economic Development Corporation regarding a Financial Standards and Accountability Policy. (S. Satterwhite, WEDC Executive Director) Executive Summary The Financial Standards and Accountability Policy for WEDC was developed with the assistance of WEDC counsel and City Attorney Richard Abernathy to provide checks and balances necessary to ensure an adequate level of oversight for all WEDC expenditures and financial activity. Based upon comments from City Council,the WEDC Board will approve the Policy at the next scheduled Board meeting. 9. Consider, discuss, and act upon, the recommendation of the Wylie Economic Development Corporation regarding a Promotional Expenditures Policy. (S. Satterwhite, WEDC Executive Director) Executive Summary The Promotional Expenditures Policy for WEDC was developed with the assistance of WEDC counsel and City Attorney Richard Abernathy to create more self analysis by staff and the Board for every promotional expense. Based upon comments from City Council, the WEDC Board will approve the Policy at the next scheduled Board meeting. 10. Consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-37 establishing a Public Arts Program, authorizing the allocation of One Percent of the City's Capital Improvement Program Project Costs for Public Art, establishing a Method for Calculating Public Art Appropriations, establishing a Public Art Project Account and establishing a Public Art Advisory Board. (M. Roath, City Manager) Executive Summary Adoption of Ordinance No. 2006-37 establishes a Public Arts Program, funding for the Public Arts Program,and a Public Arts Advisory Board including setting forth its duties. 11. Consider, and act upon, TXU Electric Delivery Letter Agreement, Paragraphs 1-4 and 5-7, related to extending to the City of Wylie benefits comparable to those given other communities through a series of agreements. (M. Roath, City Manager) Executive Summary The TXU Electric Delivery Letter Agreement offers that if the City will not intervene in or participate in any Show Cause Action prior to July 1, 2008, a cash payment of$20,918 will be made on or about March 31 t of 2007, 2008 and 2009. In addition, TXU will make a beneficial public use payment of$36,475.12 for 2006 and 2007 and increase the franchise fee to the City on a scaled ratio, contingent on the PUC not denying their recovery in electric delivery rates for the period mentioned. 12. Consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-38 denying the request of Atmos Energy Corporation, Mid-Texas Division, an Annual Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP) rate increase. (M. Roath, City Manager) Executive Summary Atmos Mid-Tex has filed its third surcharge request under the GRIP statute. This ordinance denies the 2005 surcharge request by Atmos Energy on the grounds that it does not comply with the law, is not reasonable, and because it is duplicative of the Company's Statement of Intent filing for the same period of time. 13. Consider, and act upon, Resolution No. 2006-19(R) denying Atmos Energy Corporation, Mid-Texas Division, Statement of Intent to increase the gas utility rates in the City of Wylie effective July 5,2006. (M. Roath, City Manager) June 13,2006 Wylie City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Page 5 of 6 Executive Summary Atmos Energy Corporation is seeking an increase in revenues of approximately $61 million annually, or 3.6%. This Resolution denies Atmos' Statement of Intent to increase gas utility rates within the City and allows the City to participate, along with the 87 cities involved with the Atmos Cities Steering Committee, in any appeal filed at the Railroad Commission of Texas and/or to otherwise participate in any litigation associated with Atmos' rates charged in the city. 14. Consider, discuss, and act upon, offering either compensation or comp-time for exempt City employees that worked during Hurricane Katrina and the March, 2006 rain storm event. (M. Roath, City Manager) Executive Summary Upon the request of Mayor John Mondy at the May 9, 2006 Regular Meeting, information has been compiled on exempt City employees that performed work during Hurricane Katrina and the rain storm event in March of 2006. 15. Consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-39 amending Ordinance No. 2005-41 (2005-2006 Budget) and approving an appropriation of funds, in the amount of $43,618.98, for the purpose of compensating exempt City employees that worked during Hurricane Katrina and the March, 2006 rain storm event. (M. Roath, City Manager) Executive Summary The acceptance of Ordinance No. 2006-39 would amend the 2005-2006 Budget and approve an appropriation of funds to compensate exempt City employees that worked during Hurricane Katrina and the rain storm event in March of 2006. WORK SESSION • Presentation by the firms of Thomas S. Byrne, Ltd., and Hunt Construction Group, Inc., for construction management services related to the New City Hall, Library and Recreation Center. (M. Roath, City Manager) • Presentation by the architectural firms of Randall Scott Architects and Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects for design services related to Fire Station #3. (M. Manson Assistant City Manager) RECONVENE INTO REGULAR SESSION 16. Consider, and act upon, ranking the finalist construction management firms and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate a contract beginning with the top ranked firm for the New City Hall, Library and Recreation Center. (M. Roath, City Manager) Executive Summary Should the City Council select a construction management firm, from the finalist list, then the City Manager will initiate negotiations relative to scope, services, fee and payment schedules with the top ranked firm. If a tentative agreement is reached,then the City Manager will return with a contract for City Council consideration and possible action. June 13,2006 Wylie City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Page 6 of 6 17. Consider, and act upon, ranking the finalist architectural firms and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate a professional design services contract beginning with the top ranked firm for Fire Station #3. (M. Manson, Assistant City Manager) Executive Summary Should the City Council select an architectural firm, from the finalist lists, the City Manager will initiate negotiations relative to scope, services, and fee and payment schedules with the top ranked firm. If a tentative agreement is reached, then the City Manager will return with a contract for City Council consideration and possible action. READING OF ORDINANCES Title and caption approved by Council as required by Wylie City Charter, Article III, Section 13-D. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION 1 cert16) that this Notice of Meeting was posted on this 9th day of June, 2006 at 5:00 p.m. as required by law in accordance with Section 551.042 of the Texas Government Code and that the appropriate news media was contacted. As a courtesy, this agenda is also posted on the City of Wylie website: www.wylietexas.gov. Carole Ehrlich,City Secretary Date Notice Removed Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE Minutes Wylie City Council Tuesday, May 23, 2006 — 6:00 pm Wylie Municipal Complex— Council Chambers 2000 Highway 78 North CALL TO ORDER Announce the presence of a Quorum. Mayor Mondy called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Council Members present were: Mayor Pro Tern Eric Hogue, Councilwoman Reta Allen, Councilman Earl Newsom, Councilman Rick White, Councilman Carter Porter, and Councilman Merrill Young. Staff present were: City Manager, Mark B. Roath; Assistant City Manager, Mindy Manson; Finance Director, Larry Williamson; City Engineer, Chris Hoisted; Police Chief, Jeff Butters; Public Services Director, Mike Sferra; Library Director Rachel Orozco, City Secretary, Carole Ehrlich, and various support staff. INVOCATION & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Associate Pastor of the Murphy Road Baptist Church, Scott Babb gave the invocation and Councilman White led the pledge of allegiance. PRESENTATIONS • Presentation to 6`h Six Weeks Star Students—Character Trait of"Citizenship" Mayor Mondy and Mayor Pro Tern Hogue presented certificates of recognition to those students nominated for the character trait of "Citizenship". CITIZENS COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS Residents may address Council regarding an item that is not listed on the Agenda. Residents must provide their name and address. Council requests that comments be limited to three (3) minutes. In addition, Council is not allowed to converse, deliberate or take action on any matter presented during citizen participation. Mr. Doyce Taylor of 207 Highway 78 South with a business address of 2207 N. Center Street, Bonham, Texas, addressed Council requesting a change in zoning of Community Retail to include the sale of beer and wine. Mayor Mondy asked Assistant Minutes—May 23, 2006 Wylie City Council Page 1 City Manager, Mindy Manson to meet with Mr. Taylor regarding this issue and, if needed, bring this item back to Council. CANVASS OF ELECTION • Consider, and act upon, Resolution No. 2006-14(R) declaring the results of the Official Canvass of the General Election of May 13, 2006. Staff Comments City Secretary Carole Ehrlich addressed Council stating that Resolution 2006-14(R) makes final approval of the election that was held on May 13, 2006. All of the results were in the Council packets for review and the Resolution has the totals included. Mayor Mondy asked if the results of the General Election and the Special Election could be considered together. City Secretary Ehrlich stated that there are two separate Resolutions and a motion is needed for each. Council Action A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tern Hogue, seconded by Councilman Newsom to accept Resolution No. 2006-14(R) declaring the results of the Official Canvass of the General Election of May 13, 2006. A vote was taken and passed 7-0. • Consider, and act upon, Resolution No. 2006-15(R) declaring the results of the Official Canvass of the Special Election of May 13, 2006. Staff Comments City Secretary Carole Ehrlich addressed Council stating that this is the result of the Local Option Election which was held on May 13, 2006. Both of the Propositions passed and the results of the election are included as part of the proposed Resolution. Council Action A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Hogue, seconded by Councilman White to accept Resolution No. 2006-15(R) declaring the results of the Official Canvass of the Special Election of May 13, 2006. A vote was taken and passed 7-0. ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES TO ELECTED COUNCIL MEMBERS • Presented by Mayor John Mondy. Minutes—May 23, 2006 Wylie City Council Page 2 Mayor Mondy presented a Certificate of Election to newly elected Councilman M. G. "Red" Byboth. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE FOR ELECTED COUNCIL MEMBERS • Administered by Judge Johnny Lewis. Judge Johnny Lewis administered the Oath of Office to the newly elected council member, Councilman M. G. "Red" Byboth, Place 2. Mayor Mondy presented a plaque to Councilwoman Reta Allen as she relinquished her Place 2 seat to Councilman Byboth. The plaque recognizes 16 years of service as Councilwoman and Mrs. Allen's commitment, vision and leadership to the City of Wylie. Mrs. Allen spoke briefly regarding her service to the City and also thanked staff and the citizens of Wylie. ELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEM • Consider, and act upon, appointment of the Mayor Pro Tem for a one year term beginning May 2006 and ending May 2007. Council Action A motion was made by Councilman Newsom, seconded by Councilman White to appoint Councilman Eric Hogue as Mayor Pro Tem for a one year term beginning May 2006 and ending May 2007. A vote was taken and failed — 3 to 4. Councilman Hogue, Councilman Newsom and Councilman White voting for and Mayor Mondy, Councilman Young, Councilman Porter and Councilman Byboth voting against. A motion was made by Councilman Young, seconded by Councilman Byboth to appoint Councilman Carter Porter as Mayor Pro Tem for a one year term beginning May 2006 and ending May 2007. A vote was taken and passed — 4 to 3, with Mayor Mondy, Councilman Byboth, Councilman Young and Councilman Porter voting for and Councilman Newsom, Councilman Hogue and Councilman White voting against. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. A. Approval of the Minutes from the May 9, 2006 Regular Meeting of the City Council. (C. Ehrlich, City Secretary) B. Consider, and act upon, a Preliminary Plat for the Woodbridge Addition, Phase 13, generally located west of Woodbridge Phase 12 and north of Woodbridge Phase Minutes—May 23, 2006 Wylie City Council Page 3 10C, at the intersection of Lost Highlands Lane and Fairland Drive. (M. Manson, Assistant City Manager) C. Consider, and act upon, a Preliminary Plat for Wylie Corners Addition, generally located on the southwest corner of S.H. 78 and Kreymer Lane. (M. Manson, Assistant City Manager) D. Consider, and act upon, a Farm Lease Agreement with Larry Allen for hay production on City property. (M. Sferra, Public Services Director) E. Consider, and act upon, an Encroachment on Easement Agreement with TXU Electric Delivery Company to construct and operate a hike and bike trail in the TXU easement located in Birmingham Farms. (M. Sferra, Public Services Director) F. Consider, and act upon, an amendment to the Engineering Services Agreement to Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, L.L.P., for the Creekside Elevated Storage Tank, in the amount of$22,000.00, to add the design of approximately 1,200 linear feet of 20- inch water line. (C. Holsted, City Engineer) G. Consider, and act upon, an agreement with the United States Army Corp of Engineers, for a sum not to exceed $49,533.00, for the provision of additional law enforcement services from May 26, 2006 to September 9, 2006. (J. Butters, Chief of Police) H. Consider, and act upon, Resolution No. 2006-16(R) ordering a Special Runoff Election to be held on June 17, 2006 for the purpose of electing a City Council member, Place 4, to the Wylie City Council. (C. Ehrlich, City Secretary) I. Consider, and act upon, a contract to administer a Special Runoff Election on June 17,2006, by Collin County Elections Administration. (C. Ehrlich, City Secretary) J. Consider, and place on file, the Quarterly Investment Report, Quarterly Grant Report, and the Monthly Revenue and Expenditures Report ending March 31, 2006. (L. Williamson, Finance Director) Council Action Mayor Mondy announced that Item #D had been requested to be removed, by staff. Councilman Young asked if it was too early to address the height of the fence regarding Item #C., Assistant City Manager, Mindy Manson explained that the height of the fence would be dealt with or reviewed at the time of the site plan. A site plan has been submitted for a portion of the property. It has been reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. We have within our codes a residential adjacency requirement that whenever there is commercial adjacent to residential, it requires solid masonry fence between six and eight feet in height. Councilman Young asked Councilman Byboth how tall a fence would need to be to not allow someone sitting in the cab of a Minutes—May 23, 2006 Wylie City Council Page 4 semi truck to see into a residential backyard. Councilman Byboth stated eight or eight and half feet, depending on the type of tractor. Council Action A motion was made by Councilman Byboth, seconded by Councilman Young to accept the Consent Agenda, with the exception of Item #D which has been removed per the request of staff. A vote was taken and passed 7-0. REGULAR AGENDA GENERAL BUSINESS 1. Consider, and act upon, authorizing the Wylie Economic Development Corporation to expend $102,000 and enter into debt in the amount of $340,000 to purchase ±0.9212 acres from Mr. James L. Hughes. (S. Satterwhite, WEDC Executive Director) Staff Comments WEDC Executive Director Sam Satterwhite addressed Council stated the WEDC is under contract with Mr. James L. Hughes to purchase 0.9 acres on highway 78 at the end of industrial court. This property is made up of two different tracts. A .7 acre tract with two 5000 square foot industrial buildings and a 1400 square foot storage building. That property was under contract for$425,000.00. There is a second parcel which is utilized as KCS Railroad Right-of- Way that was subsequently donated to the County. Mr. Satterwhite explained that Mr. Hughes has just closed on that parcel for$42,000.00. So the total purchase price of both tracts is $467,000.00. The WEDC has interest in this property— two fold; secure industrial buildings along Highway 78 to prepare for the redevelopment, and expand the inventory of smaller industrial buildings for companies to utilize/lease for an interim time while building their own building in Wylie. Mr. Hughes is going to finance $340,000 of this purchase at 6% and the annual debt service is $45,296.00. Council Discussion Mayor Mondy asked WEDC Executive Director Satterwhite if there were tenants on the two tracts of property. Mr. Satterwhite stated that there is a tenant leasing one of the tracts, and WEDC is in communication with a local company to expand their facilities into the second property that, at this time, is not occupied. Mayor Mondy asked for the term of the lease on the property. Mr. Satterwhite explained that the existing lease is a month to month lease and would be renegotiated if Council approved funds to expend monies and enter into debt. Mayor Mondy asked how much notification time would have to be given if it was decided to sell the property or if it is sold. Mr. Satterwhite stated that it has not been determined formally, although there have been informal discussions regarding a (6) month window. Mr. Satterwhite further stated that with the redevelopment process along Highway 78, anything starting probably wouldn't end for a year which would allow a long enough window to give companies proper notice to vacate. Minutes—May 23, 2006 Wylie City Council Page 5 Council Action A motion was made by Councilman Young, seconded by Councilman Byboth to authorize the Wylie Economic Development Corporation to expend $102,000 and enter into debt in the amount of $340,000 to purchase +0.9212 acres from Mr. James L. Hughes. A vote was taken and passed 7-0. 2. Consider, and act upon, Resolution No. 2006-17(R) approving procedures for the 2006 Boards and Commission Interview Process and the appointment of a 2006 City Council Interview Panel to conduct said interviews. (C. Ehrlich, City Secretary) Staff Comments Mayor Mondy stated that in the past, the Mayor Pro Tern and two other Council members participated in this interview process. Councilman Young requested the postponement of this appointment process until after the July 11, 2006 Council meeting so that there would be a set council. City Secretary Ehrlich addressed Council explaining that the Board and Commission members have to be appointed by the end of June to take their positions on the various boards on July 1, 2006. She stated that the interview process has to be completed in June. Mayor Young asked if there were any objections to Mayor Pro Tern Porter, Councilman White and Councilman Byboth serving on this 2006 panel. There were none. Councilman White stated that with schedule conflicts, he would not be able to serve on the Interview panel. Mayor Mondy asked Councilman Newsom if he would be available and Mr. Newsom stated that he would be available. Council Action A motion was made by Councilman Young, seconded by Councilman Byboth to appoint Mayor Pro Tern Porter, Councilman Byboth and Councilman Newsom to the 2006 City Council Interview Panel and approve Resolution No. 2006-17(R) approving procedures for the Boards and Commissions Interview Process. A vote was taken and passed 7-0. Mayor Mondy recessed into Executive Session at 6:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE SESSION Recess into Closed Session in compliance with Section 551.001, et.seq. Texas Government Code, to wit.• Recess into Closed Session in compliance with Section 551.001 et. seq., Texas Government Code, to wit: a. Section 551.071. Meeting with City Attorney (including appointed insurance counsel) regarding a matter(s) in which the duty of the City Attorney under the Texas Disciplinary rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas conflicts with the Open Meetings Act regarding: i. Cause 416-1091-06: Moore v. City of Wylie, Texas; Minutes—May 23, 2006 Wylie City Council Page 6 In addition to any specifically identified Executive Sessions, Council may convene into Executive Session at any point during the open meeting to discuss any item posted on this agenda. The Open Meetings Act provides specific exceptions that require that a meeting be open. Should Council elect to convene into Executive Session, those exceptions will be specifically identified ad announced. Any subsequent action, as a result of this Executive Session, will be taken and recorded in open session. Mayor Mondy and Council reconvened into Open Session at 7:30 p.m. RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION Take any action as a result from Executive Session. No action was taken as a result of Executive Session. Mayor Mondy recessed for a 10 minute break at 7:30 p.m. WORK SESSION • Presentation by the architectural firms of Architexas/Holman Moss Architecture, L.L.P., Brinkley Sargent Architects/PSA Dewberry, and F & S Partners for design services related to the New City Hall, Library and Recreation Center. (M. Roath, City Manager) Mayor Mondy and Council reconvened into a Work Session at 7:40 p.m. for a presentation by the architectural firms of Architexas/Holzman Moss Architecture, L.L.P., Brinkley Sargent Architects/PSA Dewberry, and F & S Partners for design services related to the New City Hall, Library and Recreation Center. Councilman Newsom, Councilman Byboth, Councilman White, Councilman Young and Mayor Pro Tem Porter were in attendance. Councilman Hogue arrived at 7:50 p.m. Staff Comments City Manager Roath addressed Council stating that in moving the facilities of the Bond program forward, a committee was formed in February 2006 and worked on a request for qualifications and put together a qualifications packet which was solicited for qualified architects by the purchasing agent. The Committee received fifteen (15) architectural firm responses and ranked those responses individually; later meeting and narrowing the applicants to a short list (fifteen (15) to six (6) firms). The committee then began the process of reviewing the references of all six firms and scheduled tours of facilities the firms had designed. Ultimately the committee interviewed all six firms and short listed those six down to three firms which are the firms presenting tonight to Council. City Manager Roath stated that the first firm, Architexas/Hozlman Moss will be addressing Council. City Manager Roath stated that Mr. Craig Melde was present Minutes—May 23, 2006 Wylie City Council Page 7 to begin the process and has been asked to limit remarks/presentation to 20 minutes with questions and answers to follow. Representative/Presentation -Architexas/Holzman Moss Craig Melde, Principal representing the firm of Architexas/Holzman Moss addressed Council. Mr. Melde presented Council with an agenda of their presentation. Mr. Melde stated that Architexas is a 26 year old firm and can best be categorized as a firm that somewhat specializes in historic preservation and is known for courthouse restoration projects across the state and has completed 12 projects with 22 clients. Mr. Melde stated that they have worked over 10 years with the City of Grapevine and the City of Dallas in the construction of several of their respective facilities. Mr. Melde gave an overall introduction of Architexas/Holzman Moss staff and their working relationships with municipalities across the state and with construction managers. Mr. Melde introduced Mr. David Chase as the Project Manager. Mr. Melde stated that Holzman Moss Architecture will be primarily responsible for the design of the project. Malcolm Holzman will be the lead designer and Douglas Moss will be a collaborative designer and they will be primarily responsible for the programming, planning and design of the buildings. Architexas/Holzman Moss proceeded with their presentation and design services. Several completed facilities were also presented and reviewed by Council. Council Questions Mayor Mondy asked with costs/expenses being equal, why should the Council select Architexas/Holzman Moss. Mr. Melde and Mr. Holzman that the experience of all three types of buildings can be accomplished by Architexas/Holzman Moss because they have completed all of these types of buildings and worked with construction managers. He explained that the firm's philosophy is to work with the city and community in the design process which makes it unique. He stated that the firms also have a very good relationship with the three construction managers that the City is considering. Council member Hogue asked if the relationship was a social relationship or every day working relationship. Mr. Melde stated that it is a working and a professional relationship. Mayor Mondy asked about the construction manager. City Manager Roath stated that the two construction manager finalist would be brought to Council at the next Council meeting for consideration, and once Council selects that firm, they will work with the design/architect firm during the design phase. The two firms will continue to do cost estimating to make sure that when the City finalizes the agreement with the construction manager, the amount will be the final agreed cost, prior to the construction phase. Mayor Mondy asked if the City was going to take advantage of the 8.25% sales tax exemption for the purchase of raw materials. City Manager Roath stated that this is a very good question and that it hits on an interesting issue and with his past experience legislation was passed that exempted the city from sales tax when buying certain quantities of items, which resulted in savings that the construction manager was able to utilize when they began construction of the buildings. City Manager Roath further stated that staff would have to work with Bond Counsel to enact appropriate legislation to do this. Mayor Mondy asked if Architexas/Holzman had a problem with this exclusion of sales tax. Mr. Holzman stated he did not and that some of their clients had utilized this exemption this in the past. Council member Hogue asked what some of the mistakes Minutes—May 23, 2006 Wylie City Council Page 8 were that cities make when they start to build. He also asked if Architexas/Holzman Moss would be there to tell the City if there was a better way to approach something. Mr. Holzman stated that they would. He explained that the most difficult aspect of this project is the constrained facilities the City is operating under currently. He stated that this is the City of Wylie's opportunity for the next 25 or 50 years to imagine what this community can be. We like to challenge our clients and say that it needs to be better than what you have now but is that really the vision for this community is that what you really want to have here and when you come back in 2025 is this really going to be something that you are going to be proud of. The greatest difficulty that we see is the Council not being open enough to consider something that big. Council member Young asked if there were any projects where their firm went over budget. The response was, other than changes in design, there were none. Staff Comments City Manager Roath addressed Council stating that the second firm on the finalist list recommended to Council is Brinkley Sargent Architects/PSA Dewberry. Mr. Dwayne Brinkley will be addressing Council. Representative/Presentation— Brinkley Sargent Architects/PSA Dewberry Mr. Dwayne Brinkley of Brinkley Sargent Architects/PSA Dewberry addressed Council. Mr. Brinkley stated that the firm will touch on the great opportunity to create a unique sense of space for the city; whether it is a unified site or separate sites. Mr. Brinkley stated municipal projects are usually what they do and they have worked with many cities in expansion mode and they have consistency in their designs. Mr. Brinkley introduced staff of Brinkley Sargent Architects/PSA Dewberry. The presentation consisted of several completed designs/facilities that were completed by Brinkley Sargent Architects/PSA Dewberry. Denelle Wrightson of PSA Dewberry presented completed Library designs to the Council. Brinkley Sargent addressed the issue of "why hire us". It was stated that these are the projects that Brinkley Sargent does. Also budget is a key item which their firm specializes in. Mr. Brinkley stated that they will have a consistency of their design process. Council Questions Mayor Mondy asked why the City should hire Brinkley Sargent Architecture/PSA Dewberry. The response from Brinkley Sargent Architecture/PSA Dewberry was that they understand the community and what the city went through to actually get the Bond passed and this is a tremendous opportunity for the city to give something back to the citizens, in the form of facilities they can use — City Hall, Library, and Recreation Center. We have a grasp of that understanding and with that experience, continuity of the design, etc. Mayor Mondy then asked when it comes to building these projects what was Brinkley Sargent's opinion on the town center or the spacing of buildings. Brinkley Sargent Architecture/PSA Dewberry stated that they have an open mind on either way the city decides to build. Each city is unique. Council member Young asked if the firms are one firm or two separate firms. Mr. Brinkley explained that they are separate firms. Council member Mayor Mondy noted that the question is dealing with multiple firms and explained that it is pretty commonplace that all three companies are good at certain things and they augment their services by partnering with other firms. Councilman Minutes—May 23, 2006 Wylie City Council Page 9 Young asked the City Manager with regards to insurance, what the City's exposure was with these kinds of firms. City Manager Roath explained that the firms were required to carry bonds and insurance to cover the City's liability. City Manager Roath further explained that whatever firm was selected, staff would work with the City Attorney's office, to make sure that there is proper coverage for these facilities. Councilmember Young asked about two projects that were over projection and asked for a reason. Mayor Pro Tem Porter asked the City Manager what happens to monies if the construction of facilities are completed under cost. City Manager Roath stated that the City has the option of not spending the money allowing the voters to pay less in taxes for the bonds that are sold; or the monies could be used for other projects on the second phase when bonds are issued; the City could opt to sell less bonds on the second phase of the projects. Staff Comments City Manager Roath addressed Council stating that this is the third and final firm presenting to Council. City Manager Roath stated that Anita Moran of F&S Partners will begin the presentation. Representative/Presentation — F&S Partners Anita Moran, Principal in charge at F&S Partners addressed Council and gave an overview of F&S Partners and its staff. Kip Jameson, Project Manager at F&S Partners addressed Council explaining that he would be the day to day contact person. David Mills, Project Designer at F&S Partners addressed Council and talked about the sites that have been selected and the proposed buildings for those sites and also architectural image. David Mills presented several concepts of the site — 4 tracts that were identified within the City Master Plan. Council was presented with potential designs for each tract. Lynn Metz, Interior Designer, Library Programmer at F&S Partners addressed Council regarding the space and interior of the Library and also the Recreation Center. It was stated that F&S Partners have designed 22 Recreation Centers. It was also noted that F&S Partners are tremendously interested in this project and it is one architectural firm with the support of consultants and one key core design team. Council Questions Mayor Mondy asked what is going to separate F&S Partners from the other firms. In response, it was stated that F&S Partners have worked together as a team for a long time and that F&S Partners have substantial experience in all three building types. Mayor Mondy asked about higher level education as a firm. F&S Partners noted that they have worked on 25 campuses, most within Texas. Mayor Mondy asked about how large the firm is and it was noted that F&S has a staff of 50. Council member Young asked how many projects are in progress right now. It was noted that there is one project in progress right now and another team is currently working on it. Council member Young asked where the City falls in size with regards to F & S projects. It was noted that projects fall in the 5, 15 and 20 million dollar range and this project is average to other projects F & S has designed. Council member Young asked City Manager Roath what the amount allocated for City Hall was. City Manager Roath stated that the amounts of the projects are: City Hall - $8,645,000.00, Library - $8,140,000.00, and the Minutes—May 23, 2006 Wylie City Council Page 10 Recreation Center $10, 200,000.00. After further discussion, the question and answer period was concluded. Mayor Mondy recessed for a five (5) minute break at 9:50 p.m. Mayor Mondy and Council reconvened into Regular Session at 9:55 p.m. RECONVENE INTO REGULAR SESSION 3. Consider, and act upon, ranking the finalist architectural firms and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate a professional design services contract beginning with the top ranked firm for the New City Hall, Library, and Recreation Center. (M. Roath, City Manager) A motion was made by Councilman Newsom, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Porter to rank the finalist architectural firms as follows: No. 1 - Architexas/Holzman Moss Architecture; No. 2 - F & S Partners, and No. 3 - Brinkley Sargent Architects/PSA Dewberry and authorize the City Manager to negotiate a professional design services contract beginning with the top ranked firm for the New City Hall, Library, and Recreation Center. A vote was taken and passed 7-0. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before Council, consensus of Council was to adjourn at 10:07p.m. John Mondy, Mayor ATTEST: Carole Ehrlich, City Secretary Minutes—May 23, 2006 Wylie City Council Page 11 Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT a Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: B Department: Fire-Rescue (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Captain Robert Ballard Account Code: Date Prepared: May 15, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: One Subject Consider, and act upon, a Supplemental Amendment to the Paramedic Ambulance Services Agreement with East Texas Medical Center d/b/a East Texas Medical Center Emergency Medical Service authorizing Wylie Communications to begin primary responsibilities for dispatching all ambulances in the Southeast Collin County EMS Coalition. Recommendation Motion to approve a Supplemental Amendment to the Paramedic Ambulance Services Agreement with East Texas Medical Center d/b/a East Texas Medical EMS. Discussion The purpose of the Supplemental Amendment is to authorize changes in the way 911 calls for emergency medical services are dispatched to responding units, and to formalize other procedural policies that are current practices. The Coalition studied the process for handling 911 calls from all participating cities and found that a caller may be transferred to as many as four (4) different communication centers before an ambulance is dispatched. The Coalition recommends routing all EMS calls for service to the Wylie 911 Communications Center. The proposed changes do not impact the budget. Wylie Communications already dispatches Coalition ambulances because they are housed at our Fire Stations. The changes proposed improve efficiency of handling EMS calls for service by taking unnecessary call transfers out of the process. Current practices for administration of the EMS service in Wylie are formalized in this document as well. ETMC employees have been under the supervision of Wylie Fire Officers since March of 2004, with Service Quality Assurance monitored by the Wylie EMS Officer. ETMC provides support in these areas with a parallel chain of command, sharing of information, and combined training. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO CONTRACT FOR PARAMEDIC AMBULANCE SERVICES This Supplemental Agreement to Contract for Paramedic Ambulance Services ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Wylie, Texas, a municipal corporation ("Wylie") and East Texas Medical Center d/b/a East Texas Medical Center Emergency Medical Service, a Texas not-for-profit corporation ("ETMC EMS"), (individually a "Party" or collectively the "Parties"). WHEREAS, in 2001 ETMC EMS and Wylie and other cities known as the Southeast Collin County EMS Coalition ("Coalition") entered into a Contract for Paramedic Ambulance Services (the "Coalition Agreement"); WHEREAS, ETMC EMS and Wylie still desire to uphold and abide by the Coalition Agreement; WHEREAS, ETMC EMS will continue to provide Wylie with an ambulance and maintain it as currently agreed to by separate contract and referenced in Section 3.08 of the Coalition Agreement; and WHEREAS, ETMC EMS and Wylie wish to supplement the Coalition Agreement by entering into this Agreement that will impose additional conditions, obligations and duties upon the Parties hereto. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Uniforms. ETMC EMS employees shall wear Wylie Fire Department uniforms when on duty in Wylie and/or when responding to calls within or on behalf of Wylie. 2. Regulations. ETMC EMS employees shall report to a company officer with the Wylie Fire Department for all shifts in which they will be responding to calls within Wylie. ETMC EMS employees shall abide by all Wylie Fire Department station rules while working such shift and shall abide by all ETMC EMS rules, regulations, policies and management direction, including but not limited to ETMC EMS's Policies and Procedures Manual. Wylie shall report all violations of any Wylie Fire Department rule or ETMC EMS rules, regulations, policies and management direction by an ETMC EMS employee to a representative of ETMC EMS for appropriate investigation, action and follow-through of enforcing said policies. 3. Independent Contractor. In performing this Agreement, ETMC EMS, and ETMC EMS's employees, is acting as an independent contractor with respect to Wylie, and no employees of ETMC EMS shall be considered employees of Wylie. It is agreed and acknowledged by the Parties that, as an independent contractor ETMC EMS retains the right to contract with and provide services to entities and individuals other than Wylie, and nothing herein shall be construed as limiting ETMC EMS's right to do so. In no Supplemental Agreement to Contract for Paramedic Ambulance Services Page 1 440342-3 event shall this Agreement be construed as establishing a partnership, association, joint venture or other relationship between the Parties, and nothing shall authorize either Party to act as an agent for the other, except as authorized herein. Each Party shall be liable for its own debts, obligations, acts and omissions, including but not limited to payment of all required payroll, withholding, social security and other taxes and benefits. Neither ETMC EMS nor ETMC EMS's employees shall be eligible for any benefit received by Wylie's employees. 4. On Scene Response. When ETMC EMS and Wylie personnel are on the scene of a call, the ETMC EMS employees assume responsibility of all patient care at that scene. 5. Wylie Dispatch. Wylie agrees to provide dispatch services for ETMC EMS Unit 990 responsible for providing emergency medical service to the South East Collin County Coalition. Wylie shall record all communications relating to such dispatch services and maintain the recordings for one year. The recordings shall be made available to ETMC EMS upon request. 6. Transfer of Calls. Wylie will transfer all first and second party emergency callers to the ETMC EMS Communications Center so ETMC EMS can provide Emergency Medical Dispatch Pre-Arrival Instructions as needed. 7. Accompany ETMC EMS to Hospital. Wylie personnel agree to accompany ETMC EMS to the hospital when requested by ETMC EMS personnel. 8. Testing. Wylie Fire Department may assist ETMC EMS with skills testing and protocol testing of ETMC EMS employees. 9. Quality Control and Response Time Reliability. A. Quality Control will be a three step process: 1) The initial review of all EMS runs shall be by the Wylie Fire Department's Quality Control Officer and any significant finding will be noted on a separate QI form which will be attached to the patient care report. 2) A secondary review will be by the ETMC EMS Director of Clinical Services. 3) All recommendations for improvement will be forwarded to the Wylie Fire Chief to assure patient confidentiality and to assure that all records are safely secured. B. Wylie will maintain response time records and meet the following goals on all primary unit transports for which Wylie has primary dispatch responsibility as set forth below: 1. Life-Threatening Emergency Calls will have a response time 90% or better of 8 minutes and 59 seconds. 2. Non Life-Threatening Emergency Calls will have a response time 90% or better of 12 minutes and 59 seconds. Supplemental Agreement to Contract for Paramedic Ambulance Services Page 2 440342-3 These commitments shall be calculated on a per one-hundred transport basis for the primary unit only, and shall be calculated annually at the end of the contract year. The response time commitments set forth above shall constitute contractually binding performance requirements under this Agreement. In this regard, the protocols set forth in Section 3.2 of the Coalition Agreement shall apply to the reporting requirements of this Agreement. However, for purposed of this Agreement "response time" is defined as: the elapsed time between the moment a request for ambulance service is received at Wylie's ambulance control center (i.e., the moment callback number and location are acquired, either by voice or by ANI/ALI 911 data transmission and confirmed) and the moment a first-arriving, fully-equipped and staffed Wylie paramedic ambulance, paramedic-level Mutual Aid unit, paramedic-level 1st Response team, or advanced life support capable medical helicopter arrives at the scene; provided that in order to "stop the clock" such first-arriving unit shall be operated by Wylie, ETMC EMS or by a Mutual Aid unit or 1st Response Organization approved by the Medical Control Board and operating under this Agreement or the Coalition Agreement. 10. 990 Ambulance Replacement Paramedic. ETMC EMS shall provide a replacement paramedic or EMT to Wylie whenever the paramedic or EMT assigned to the 990 ambulance is on vacation, out sick, or otherwise unavailable. The replacement paramedic or EMT will not be required to wear the Wylie Fire Department uniform. 11. Discretion to Use ETMC EMS Employees. Wylie shall have sole discretion in determining whether it wishes to use the contract services of any particular ETMC EMS employee provided to Wylie pursuant to this Agreement. Should Wylie decline the services of a particular ETMC EMS employee, ETMC EMS will immediately provide a qualified replacement of that employee. Wylie will have the discretion to assign to ETMC EMS employees duties relevant to EMS issues and co-habitation issues such as shared station duties as long as ETMC EMS employees can maintain a clean professional appearance and maintain a prompt readiness status. 12. Indemnification/Hold Harmless By ETMC EMS. ETMC EMS SHALL INDEMNIFY AND SAVE HARMLESS WYLIE AND ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND EMPLOYEES FROM ALL SUITS, ACTIONS, LOSSES, DAMAGES, CLAIMS, OR LIABILITY OF ANY CHARACTER, TYPE, OR DESCRIPTION, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITING THE GENERALITY OF THE FOREGOING ALL EXPENSES OF LITIGATION, COURT COSTS, AND ATTORNEY'S FEES FOR INJURY OR DEATH TO ANY PERSON, OR INJURY TO ANY PROPERTY, RECEIVED OR SUSTAINED BY ANY PERSON OR PERSONS OR PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF, OR OCCASIONED BY, THE ACTS OF EMTC OR ITS AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES, IN THE EXECUTION OR PERFORMANCE OF OBLIGATIONS PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT. ETMC EMS AGREES TO ACCEPT LIABILITY FOR INJURIES TO ITSELF OR OTHERS CAUSED BY ITS, OR ITS AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES, OWN NEGLIGENCE, MALFEASANCE, ACT OR OMISSION. THIS INDEMNIFICATION PROVISION IS ALSO SPECIFICALLY INTENDED TO APPLY TO, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, DEMANDS, DAMAGES, ACTIONS AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF EVERY KIND AND Supplemental Agreement to Contract for Paramedic Ambulance Services Page 3 440342-3 NATURE, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN, EXISTING OR CLAIMED TO EXIST, RELATING TO OR ARISING OUT OF ANY EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ETMC EMS AND ITS EMPLOYEES AS A RESULT OF THAT EMPLOYEES EMPLOYMENT AND/OR SEPARATION FROM EMPLOYMENT WITH ETMC EMS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY DISCRIMINATION CLAIM BASED ON SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION OR PREFERENCE, RACE, RELIGION, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN, AGE OR DISABILITY UNDER FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL LAW, RULE OR REGULATION, AND/OR ANY CLAIM FOR WRONGFUL TERMINATION, BACK PAY, FUTURE WAGE LOSS, OVERTIME PAY, INJURY SUBJECT TO RELIEF UNDER THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, AND ANY OTHER CLAIM, WHETHER IN TORT, CONTRACT OR OTHERWISE. 13. Indemnification/Hold Harmless by Wylie. Wylie shall indemnify and save harmless ETMC EMS and its officers, agents, and employees from all suits, actions, losses, damages, claims, or liability of any character, type, or description, including without limiting the generality of the foregoing all expenses of litigation, court costs, and attorney's fees for injury or death to any person, or injury to any property, received or sustained by any person or persons or property, arising out of, or occasioned by, the acts of Wylie or its agents or employees, in the execution or performance of obligations pursuant to this Agreement. 14. Miscellaneous Provisions. a) Notice. Any notice required to be sent under this Agreement must be in writing and may be served by depositing same in the United States Mail, addressed to the party to be notified, postage pre-paid and registered or certified with return receipt requested, or by delivering the same in person to such party via a hand-delivery service, Federal Express or any courier service that provides a return receipt showing the date of actual delivery of same to the addressee thereof. Notice given in accordance herewith shall be effective upon receipt at the address of the addressee. For purposes of notice, the addresses of the parties shall be as follows: If to Wylie: Wylie Fire Department Attn: Chief Shan English 2000 Highway 78 North Wylie, Texas 75098 If to ETMC EMS to: East Texas Medical Center EMS Attn: Anthony J. Myers, Vice President/COO P.O. Box 387 Tyler, Texas 75710 b) Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the matters contained herein and may not be modified or Supplemental Agreement to Contract for Paramedic Ambulance Services Page 4 440342-3 terminated except upon the provisions hereof or by the mutual written agreement of the parties hereto. c) Venue. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and shall be performable in Collin County, Texas. d) Consideration. This Agreement is executed by the parties hereto without coercion or duress and for substantial consideration, the sufficiency of which is forever confessed. e) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in a number of identical counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original for all purposes. f) Authority to Execute. The individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of the respective parties below represent to each other and to others that all appropriate and necessary action has been taken to authorize the individual who is executing this Agreement to do so for and on behalf of the party for which his or her signature appears, that there are no other parties or entities required to execute this Agreement in order for the same to be an authorized and binding agreement on the party for whom the individual is signing this Agreement and that each individual affixing his or her signature hereto is authorized to do so, and such authorization is valid and effective on the date hereof. g) Savings/Severability. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision thereof, and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. h) Representations. Each signatory represents this Agreement has been read by the party for which this Agreement is executed and that such party has had an opportunity to confer with its counsel. i) Miscellaneous Drafting Provisions. This Agreement shall be deemed drafted equally by all parties hereto. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning, and any presumption or principle that the language herein is to be construed against any party shall not apply. Headings in this Agreement are for the convenience of the parties and are not intended to be used in construing this document. j) Sovereign Immunity. The parties agree that Wylie has not waived its sovereign immunity by entering into and performing their respective obligations under this Agreement. k) Assignment. This Agreement or any part thereof shall not be assigned or transferred by any party without the prior written consent of the other party. Supplemental Agreement to Contract for Paramedic Ambulance Services Page 5 440342-3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement and caused this Agreement to be effective on the latest date as reflected by the signatures below. THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, a Municipal Corporation By: Date: Mark B. Roath Its: City Manager EAST TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER d/b/a EAST TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE a Texas not-for-profit corporation By: Date: Anthony J. Myers Its: Vice President/COO Supplemental Agreement to Contract for Paramedic Ambulance Services Page 6 440342-3 Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: C Department: Fire Department (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: B. Blythe Account Code: 100-5231-56180 Date Prepared: May 24, 2006 Budgeted Amount: $3,600.00 Exhibits: One Subject Consider, and act upon, a Lease Agreement with Tommy Pulliam for the lease of a building located at 201B Windco Circle, Wylie, Texas for use as a temporary facility to house Fire Station#3. Recommendation Motion to approve a Lease Agreement with Tommy Pulliam for the lease of a building located at 201B Windco Circle, Wylie, Texas for use as a temporary facility to house Fire Station#3. Discussion Lease was prepared by a commercial broker representing the owner. Lease was approved by Fire Department Administration and sent to the City Manager's Office. City Manager's Office sent agreement to the City Attorney for review. Lease was returned to broker, edited, and reprinted to reflect the changes and suggestions made by legal. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 o TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® COMMERCIAL LEASE USE OF THIS FORM BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOT MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®IS NOT AUTHORIZED. ©Texas Association of REALTORS®,Inc.2002 Table of Contents No. Paragraph Description Pg_ No. Paragraph Description Plc. 1. Parties 2 22. Holdover 11 2. Leased Premises 2 23. Landlord's Lien & Security Interest 11 3. Term 2 24. Assignment and Subletting 11 A. Term 25. Relocation 11 B. Delay of Occupancy 26. Subordination 11 4. Rent and Expenses 3 27. Estoppel Certificates 12 A. Base Monthly Rent 28. Casualty Loss 12 B. First Full Month's Rent 29. Condemnation 12 C. Prorated Rent 30. Attorney's Fees 12 D. Additional Rent 31. Representations 13 E. Place of Payment 32. Brokers 13 F. Method of Payment 33. Addenda 13 G. Late Charges 34. Notices 14 H. Returned Checks 35. Special Provisions 14 5. Security Deposit 4 36. Agreement of the Parties 14 6. Taxes 4 7. Utilities 4 ADDENDA & EXHIBITS (check all that apply) 8. Insurance 5 9. Use and Hours 6 a Exhibit "A" 10. Legal Compliance 6 ❑ Exhibit 11. Signs 7 ❑ Commercial Lease Addendum for Broker's Fee 12. Access By Landlord 7 ❑ Commercial Lease Expense Reimbursement 13. Move-In Condition 7 Addendum 14. Move-Out Condition 7 ❑ Commercial Lease Addendum for Extension 15. Maintenance and Repairs 8 Option A. Cleaning ❑ Commercial Lease Addendum for Percentage B. Conditions Caused by a Party Rent C. Repair& Maintenance Responsibility ❑ Commercial Lease Parking Addendum D. Repair Persons ❑ Commercial Landlord's Rules and Regulations E. HVAC Service Contract ❑ Commercial Lease Guaranty F. Common Areas ❑ Commercial Lease Right of First Refusal G. Notice of Repairs Addendum H. Failure to Repair ❑ Commercial Lease Addendum for Optional 16. Alterations g Space 17. Liens 9 ❑ Commercial Leasehold Construction Addendum 18. Liability 10 al Info About Brokerage Services 19. Indemnity 10 ❑ 20. Default 10 21. Abandonment, Interruption of Utilities, Removal of Property & Lockout 10 (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , and Landlord: , Page 1 of 15 Locations Realty 231 W.FM 544,Ste 104 Murphy,TX 75094 Phone:(972)423-9812 Fax: (972)423-9814 Deborah Maige Pulliam-City o Produced with ZipFormTM by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® COMMERCIAL LEASE USE OF THIS FORM BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOT MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®IS NOT AUTHORIZED. ©Texas Association of REALTORS®,Inc.2002 1. PARTIES: The parties to this lease are: Tenant: City of Wylie ; and Landlord: Tommy Pulliam ; and 2. LEASED PREMISES: A. Landlord leases to Tenant the following described real property, known as the "leased premises," along with all its improvements (Check only one box): (1) Multiple-Tenant Property: Suite or Unit Number "B" containing approximately 2,250 square feet of rentable area in (building name) at 201 Windco Circle (address) in Wylie (city), Collin (county), Texas, which is legally described on attached Exhibit or as follows: Wyndham Estates #03 Lot 6R ❑ (2) Single-Tenant Property: The real property at: (address) in (city), (county), Texas, which is legally described on attached Exhibit or as follows: B. If Paragraph 2A(1) applies: (1) "Property" means the building or complex in which the leased premises are located, inclusive of any common areas, drives, parking areas, and walks; and (2) the parties agree that the rentable area of the leased premises may not equal the actual or useable area within the leased premises and may include an allocation of common areas in the Property. 3. TERM: A. Term: The term of this lease is 14 months and 0 days, commencing on: July 1, 2006 (Commencement Date) and ending on September 30, 2007 (Expiration Date). (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , and Landlord: , Page 2 of 15 Produced with ZipFormT'by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com Pulliam-City o 201 Windco Circle Commercial Lease concerning: Wylie, TX 75098 B. Delay of Occupancy: If Tenant is unable to occupy the leased premises on the Commencement Date because of construction on the leased premises to be completed by Landlord that is not substantially complete or a prior tenant's holding over of the leased premises, Landlord will not be liable to Tenant for such delay and this lease will remain enforceable. In the event of such a delay, the Commencement Date will automatically be extended to the date Tenant is able to occupy the Property and the Expiration Date will also be extended by a like number of days, so that the length of this lease remains unchanged. If Tenant is unable to occupy the leased premises after the 90th day after the Commencement Date because of construction on the leased premises to be completed by Landlord that is not substantially complete or a prior tenant's holding over of the leased premises, Tenant may terminate this lease by giving written notice to Landlord before the leased premises become available to be occupied by Tenant and Landlord will refund to Tenant any amounts paid to Landlord by Tenant. This Paragraph 3B does not apply to any delay in occupancy caused by cleaning or repairs. C. Unless the parties agree otherwise, Tenant is responsible for obtaining a certificate of occupancy for the leased premises if required by a governmental body. 4. RENT AND EXPENSES: A. Base Monthly Rent: On or before the first day of each month during this lease, Tenant will pay Landlord base monthly rent as described on attached Exhibit or as follows: from July 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007 : $ 1,200.00 ; from to : $ from to : $ ; from to : $ ; from to : $ B. First Full Month's Rent:The first full base monthly rent is due on or before July 1, 2006 C. Prorated Rent: If the Commencement Date is on a day other than the first day of a month, Tenant will pay Landlord as prorated rent, an amount equal to the base monthly rent multiplied by the following fraction: the number of days from the Commencement Date to the first day of the following month divided by the number of days in the month in which this lease commences. The prorated rent is due on or before the Commencement Date. D. Additional Rent: In addition to the base monthly rent and prorated rent, Tenant will pay Landlord all other amounts, as provided by the attached (Check all that apply.): ❑ (1) Commercial Expense Reimbursement Addendum ❑ (2) Commercial Percentage Rent Addendum ❑ (3) Commercial Parking Addendum ❑ (4) All amounts payable under the applicable addenda are deemed to be "rent" for the purposes of this lease. E. Place of Payment: Tenant will remit all amounts due Landlord under this lease to the following person at the place stated or to such other person or place as Landlord may later designate in writing: Name: Tommy Pulliam Address: P 0 Box 1132, Wylie, TX. 75098 (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , and Landlord: Page 3 of 15 Produced with ZipFormT'by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com Pulliam-City o 201 Windco Circle Commercial Lease concerning: Wylie, TX 75098 F. Method of Payment: Tenant must pay all rent timely without demand, deduction, or offset, except as permitted by law or this lease. If Tenant fails to timely pay any amounts due under this lease or if any check of Tenant is returned to Landlord by the institution on which it was drawn, Landlord after providing written notice to Tenant may require Tenant to pay subsequent amounts that become due under this lease in certified funds. This paragraph does not limit Landlord from seeking other remedies under this Lease for Tenant's failure to make timely payments with good funds. G. Late Charges: If Landlord does not actually receive a rent payment at the designated place of payment within 5 days after the date it is due, Tenant will pay Landlord a late charge equal to 5% of the amount due. In this paragraph, the mailbox is not the agent for receipt for Landlord. The late charge is a cost associated with the collection of rent and Landlord's acceptance of a late charge does not waive Landlord's right to exercise remedies under Paragraph 20. H. Returned Checks: Tenant will pay $25.00 (not to exceed$25) for each check Tenant tenders to Landlord which is returned by the institution on which it is drawn for any reason, plus any late charges until Landlord receives payment. 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT: A. Upon execution of this lease, Tenant will pay $ 1,000.00 to Landlord as a security deposit. B. Landlord may apply the security deposit tcY any amounts owed by Tenant under this lease. If Landlord applies any part of the security deposit during any time this lease is in effect to amounts owed by Tenant, Tenant must, within 10 days after receipt of notice from Landlord, restore the security deposit to the amount stated. C. After Tenant surrenders the leased premises to Landlord and provides Landlord written notice of Tenant's forwarding address, Landlord will, not later than the time required by §93.005, Texas Property Code, refund the security deposit less any amounts applied toward amounts owed by Tenant or other charges authorized by this lease. The parties agree that Landlord acts in good faith if Landlord accounts for the security deposit within the time stated. 6. TAXES: Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, Landlord will pay all real property ad valorem taxes assessed against the leased premises. 7. UTILITIES: A. The party designated below will pay for the following utility charges to the leased premises and any connection charges for the utilities. (Check all that apply.) NA Landlord Tenant (1) Water Li ❑ x❑ (2) Sewer ❑ ❑ a (3) Electric ❑ ❑ x❑ (4) Gas El ❑ ❑ (5) Telephone ❑ ❑ x❑ (6) Trash ❑ ❑ [I (7) Cable ❑ ❑ a (8) ❑ ❑ ❑ (9) All other utilities ❑ ❑ d (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , and Landlord: Page 4 of 15 Produced with ZipFormTM by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com Pulliam-City o 201 Windco Circle Commercial Lease concerning: Wylie, TX 75098 B. The party responsible for the charges under Paragraph 7A will pay the charges directly to the utility service provider. The responsible party may select the utility service provider except that if Tenant selects the provider any access or alterations to the Property or leased premises necessary for the utilities may be made only with Landlord's prior consent, which Landlord will not unreasonably withhold. If Landlord incurs any liability for utility or connection charges for which Tenant is responsible to pay and Landlord pays such amount, Tenant will immediately upon written notice from Landlord reimburse Landlord such amount. C. Notice: Tenant should determine if all necessary utilities are available to the leased premises and are adequate for Tenant's intended use. D. After-Hours HVAC Charges: "HVAC services" means the utility expenses to heat and cool the leased premises. (Check one box only.) ❑ (1) Landlord is obligated to provide the HVAC services to the leased premises only during the Property's operating hours specified under Paragraph 9C. ❑ (2) Landlord will provide the HVAC services to the leased premises during the operating hours specified under Paragraph 9C for no additional charge and will, at Tenant's request, provide HVAC services to the leased premises during other hours for an additional charge of$ per hour. Tenant will pay Landlord the charges under this paragraph immediately upon receipt of Landlord's invoice. Hourly charges are charged on a half-hour basis. Any partial hour will be rounded up to the next half hour. Tenant will comply with Landlord's procedures to make a request to provide the additional HVAC services under this paragraph. a (3) Tenant will pay for the HVAC services under this lease. 8. INSURANCE: A. During all times this lease is in effect, Tenant must, at Tenant's expense, maintain in full force and effect from an insurer authorized to operate in Texas: (1) public liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 on an occurrence basis naming Landlord as an additional insured; and (2) personal property damage insurance for Tenant's business operations and contents on the leased premises in an amount sufficient to replace such contents after a casualty loss. B. Before the Commencement Date, Tenant must provide Landlord with a copy of the insurance certificates evidencing the required coverage. If the insurance coverage changes in any manner or degree at any time this lease is in effect, Tenant must, not later than 10 days after the change, provide Landlord a copy of an insurance certificate evidencing the change. C. If Tenant fails to maintain the required insurance in full force and effect at all times this lease is in effect, Landlord may: (1) purchase insurance that will provide Landlord the same coverage as the required insurance and Tenant must immediately reimburse Landlord for such expense; or (2) exercise Landlord's remedies under Paragraph 20. D. Unless the parties agree otherwise, Landlord will, at Landlord's expense, maintain in full force and effect insurance for fire and extended coverage in an amount to cover the reasonable replacement cost of the improvements of the Property and public liability insurance in an amount that Landlord determines reasonable and appropriate. (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , , and Landlord: Page 5 of 15 Produced with ZipFormTM by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com Pulliam-City o 201 Windco Circle Commercial Lease concerning: Wylie, TX 75098 E. If there is an increase in Landlord's insurance premiums for the leased premises or Property or its contents that is caused by Tenant, Tenant's use of the leased premises, or any improvements made by or for Tenant, Tenant will, for each year this lease is in effect, pay Landlord the increase immediately after Landlord notifies Tenant of the increase. Any charge to Tenant under this Paragraph 8D will be equal to the actual amount of the increase in Landlord's insurance premium. 9. USE AND HOURS: A. Tenant may use the leased premises for the following purpose and no other: operations of the Fire Department B. Unless otherwise specified in this lease, Tenant will operate and conduct its business in the leased premises during business hours that are typical of the industry in which Tenant represents it operates. C. The Property maintains operating hours of (specify hours, days of week, and if inclusive or exclusive of weekends and holidays): Operates 24 hrs. per day, 7 days a week 10. LEGAL COMPLIANCE: A. Tenant may not use or permit any part of the leased premises to be used for: (1) any activity which is a nuisance or is offensive, noisy, or dangerous; (2) any activity that interferes with any other tenant's normal business operations or Landlord's management of the Property; (3) any activity that violates any applicable law, regulation, zoning ordinance, restrictive covenant, governmental order, owners' association rules, tenants' association rules, Landlord's rules or regulations, or this lease; (4) any hazardous activity that would require any insurance premium on the Property or leased premises to increase or that would void any such insurance; (5) any activity that violates any applicable federal, state, or local law, including but not limited to those laws related to air quality, water quality, hazardous materials, wastewater, waste disposal, air emissions, or other environmental matters; (6) the permanent or temporary storage of any hazardous material; or (7) 10.A. (1) shall be amended to end with "other than normal fire department operations" . B. "Hazardous material" means any pollutant, toxic substance, hazardous waste, hazardous material, hazardous substance, solvent, or oil as defined by any federal, state, or local environmental law, regulation, ordinance, or rule existing as of the date of this lease or later enacted. C. Landlord does not represent or warrant that the leased premises or Property conform to applicable restrictions, zoning ordinances, setback lines, parking requirements, impervious ground cover ratio requirements, and other matters that may relate to Tenant's intended use. Tenant must satisfy itself that the leased premises may be used as Tenant intends by independently investigating all matters related to the use of the leased premises or Property. Tenant agrees that it is not relying on any warranty or representation made by Landlord, Landlord's agent, or any broker concerning the use of the leased premises or Property. (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , and Landlord: Page 6 of 15 Produced with ZipFormTM by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com Pulliam-City o 201 Windco Circle Commercial Lease concerning: Wylie, TX 75098 11. SIGNS: A. Tenant may not post or paint any signs at, on, or about the leased premises or Property without Landlord's written consent. Landlord may remove any unauthorized sign, and Tenant will promptly reimburse Landlord for its cost to remove any unauthorized sign. B. Any authorized sign must comply with all laws, restrictions, zoning ordinances, and any governmental order relating to signs on the leased premises or Property. Landlord may temporarily remove any authorized sign to complete repairs or alterations to the leased premises or the Property. C. By providing written notice to Tenant before this lease ends, Landlord may require Tenant, upon move-out and at Tenant's expense, to remove, without damage to the Property or leased premises, any or all signs that were placed on the Property or leased premises by or at the request of Tenant. Any signs that Landlord does not require Tenant to remove and that are fixtures, become the property of the Landlord and must be surrendered to Landlord at the time this lease ends. 12.ACCESS BY LANDLORD: A. During Tenant's normal business hours Landlord may enter the leased premises for any reasonable purpose, including but not limited to purposes for repairs, maintenance, alterations, and showing the leased premises to prospective tenants or purchasers. Landlord may access the leased premises after Tenant's normal business hours if: (1) entry is made with Tenant's permission; or (2) entry is necessary to complete emergency repairs. Landlord will not unreasonably interfere with Tenant's business operations when accessing the leased premises. B. During the last n/a days of this lease, Landlord may place a "For Lease" or similarly worded sign in the leased premises. 13. MOVE-IN CONDITION: Tenant has inspected the leased premises and accepts it in its present (as-is) condition unless expressly noted otherwise in this lease. Landlord and any agent have made no express or implied warranties as to the condition or permitted use of the leased premises or Property. 14. MOVE-OUT CONDITION AND FORFEITURE OF TENANT'S PERSONAL PROPERTY: A. At the time this lease ends, Tenant will surrender the leased premises in the same condition as when received, except for normal wear and tear. Tenant will leave the leased premises in a clean condition free of all trash, debris, personal property, hazardous materials, and environmental contaminants. • B. If Tenant leaves any personal property in the leased premises after Tenant surrenders possession of the leased premises, Landlord may: (1) require Tenant, at Tenant's expense, to remove the personal property by providing written notice to Tenant; or (2) retain such personal property as forfeited property to Landlord. C. "Surrender" means vacating the leased premises and returning all keys and access devices to Landlord. "Normal wear and tear" means deterioration that occurs without negligence, carelessness, accident, or abuse. D. By providing written notice to Tenant before this lease ends, Landlord may require Tenant, upon move-out and at Tenant's expense, to remove, without damage to the Property or leased premises, any or all fixtures that were placed on the Property or leased premises by or at the request of Tenant. Any fixtures that Landlord does not require Tenant to remove become the property of the Landlord and must be surrendered to Landlord at the time this lease ends. (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , , and Landlord: , Page 7 of 15 Produced with ZipFormTM by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com Pulliam-City o 201 Windco Circle Commercial Lease concerning: Wylie, TX 75098 15. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS: A. Cleaning: Tenant must keep the leased premises clean and sanitary and promptly dispose of all garbage in appropriate receptacles. ❑ Landlord ❑ Tenant will provide, at its expense, janitorial services to the leased premises that are customary and ordinary for the Property type. B. Repairs of Conditions Caused by a Party: Each party must promptly repair a condition in need of repair that is caused, either intentionally or negligently, by that party or that party's guests, patrons, invitees, contractors or permitted subtenants. C. Repair and Maintenance Responsibility: Except as provided by Paragraph 15B, the party designated below, at its expense, is responsible to maintain and repair the following specified items in the leased premises. The specified items must be maintained in clean and good operable condition. If a governmental regulation or order requires a modification to any of the specified items, the party designated to maintain the item must complete and pay the expense of the modification. The specified items include and relate only to real property in the leased premises. Tenant is responsible for the repair and maintenance of its personal property. (Check all that apply.) NA Landlord Tenant (1) Foundation, exterior walls, roof, and other structural components ❑ a El (2) Glass and windows El ❑ 0 (3) Fire protection equipment and fire sprinkler systems ❑ El a (4) Exterior & overhead doors, including closure devices, molding ❑ El a locks, and hardware (5) Grounds maintenance, including landscaping and ground ❑ El El sprinklers (6) Interior doors, including closure devices, frames, molding, locks, ❑ ❑ x❑ and hardware (7) Parking areas and walks ❑ 0 ❑ (8) Plumbing systems, drainage systems, electrical systems, ballast ❑ El x❑ and lamp replacement, and mechanical systems, except those specifically designated otherwise (9) Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems El ❑ x❑ (10) Signs and lighting: (a) Pylon EllEl ❑ (b) Facia El ❑ ❑ (c) Monument El El El (d) Door/Suite ❑ ❑ El (11) Extermination and pest control, excluding wood-destroying insects ❑ El x❑ (12) Storage yards and storage buildings x❑ ❑ ❑ (13) Wood-destroying insect treatment and repairs El x❑ El (14) Cranes and related systems a ❑ ❑ (15) ❑ El ❑ (16) (17) All other items and systems. El El ElEl D. Repair Persons: Repairs must be completed by trained, qualified, and insured repair persons. (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , , and Landlord: , Page 8 of 15 Produced with ZipFormTM by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com Pulliam-City o 201 Windco Circle Commercial Lease concerning: Wylie, TX 75098 E. HVAC Service Contract: If Tenant maintains the HVAC system under Paragraph 15C(9), Tenant LI is ❑ is not required to maintain, at its expense, a regularly scheduled maintenance and service contract for the HVAC system. The maintenance and service contract must be purchased from a HVAC maintenance company that regularly provides such contracts to similar properties. If Tenant fails to maintain a required HVAC maintenance and service contract in effect at all times during this lease, Landlord may do so and charge Tenant the expense of such a maintenance and service contract or exercise Landlord's remedies under Paragraph 20. F. Common Areas: Landlord will maintain any common areas in the Property in a manner as Landlord determines to be in the best interest of the Property. Landlord will maintain any elevator and signs in the common area. Landlord may change the size, dimension, and location of any common areas, provided that such change does not materially impair Tenant's use and access to the leased premises. Tenant has the non-exclusive license to use the common areas in compliance with Landlord's rules and restrictions. Tenant may not solicit any business in the common areas or interfere with any other person's right to use the common areas. This paragraph does not apply if Paragraph 2A(2) applies. G. Notice of Repairs:Tenant must promptly notify Landlord of any item that is in need of repair and that is Landlord's responsibility to repair. All requests for repairs to Landlord must be in writing. H. Failure to Repair: Landlord must make a repair for which Landlord is responsible within a reasonable period of time after Tenant provides Landlord written notice of the needed repair. If Tenant fails to repair or maintain an item for which Tenant is responsible within 10 days after Landlord provides Tenant written notice of the needed repair or maintenance, Landlord may: (1) repair or maintain the item, without liability for any damage or loss to Tenant, and Tenant must immediately reimburse Landlord for the cost to repair or maintain; or(2) exercise Landlord's remedies under Paragraph 20. 16. ALTERATIONS: A. Tenant may not alter, improve, or add to the Property or the leased premises without Landlord's written consent. Landlord will not unreasonably withhold consent for the Tenant to make reasonable non-structural alterations, modifications, or improvements to the leased premises. B. Tenant may not alter any locks or any security devices on the Property or the leased premises without Landlord's consent. If Landlord authorizes the changing, addition, or rekeying of any locks or other security devices, Tenant must immediately deliver the new keys and access devices to Landlord. C. If a governmental order requires alteration or modification to the leased premises, the party obligated to maintain and repair the item to be modified or altered as designated in Paragraph 15 will, at its expense, modify or alter the item in compliance with the order. D. Any alterations, improvements, fixtures or additions to the Property or leased premises installed by either party during the term of this lease will become Landlord's property and must be surrendered to Landlord at the time this lease ends, except for those fixtures Landlord requires Tenant to remove under Paragraph 11 or 14 or if the parties agree otherwise in writing. 17. LIENS: Tenant may not do anything that will cause the title of the Property or leased premises to be encumbered in any way. If Tenant causes a lien to be filed against the Property or leased premises, Tenant will within 20 days after receipt of Landlord's demand: (1) pay the lien and have the lien released of record; or (2) take action to discharge the lien. Tenant will provide Landlord a copy of any release Tenant obtains pursuant to this paragraph. (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , and Landlord: Page 9 of 15 Produced with ZipFormT"by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com Pulliam-City o 201 Windco Circle Commercial Lease concerning: Wylie, TX 75098 18. LIABILITY:To the extent permitted by law, Landlord is NOT responsible to Tenant or Tenant's employees, patrons, guests, or invitees for any damages, iniuries, or losses to person or property caused by: A. an act, omission, or neglect of: Tenant; Tenant's agent; Tenant's guest; Tenant's employees; Tenant's patrons; Tenant's invitees; or any other tenant on the Property; B. fire, flood, water leaks, ice, snow, hail, winds, explosion, smoke, riot, strike, interruption of utilities, theft, burglary, robbery, assault, vandalism, other persons, environmental contaminants, or other occurrences or casualty losses. 19. INDEMNITY: Each party will indemnify and hold the other party harmless from any property damage, personal injury, suits, actions, liabilities, damages, cost of repairs or service to the leased premises or Property, or any other loss caused, neciligently or otherwise, by that party or that party's employees, patrons, quests, or invitees. 20. DEFAULT; A. If Landlord fails to comply with this lease within 30 days after Tenant notifies Landlord of Landlord's failure to comply, Landlord will be in default and Tenant may seek any remedy provided by law. If, however, Landlord's non-compliance reasonably requires more than 30 days to cure, Landlord will not be in default if the cure is commenced within the 30-day period and is diligently pursued. B. If Landlord does not actually receive at the place designated for payment any rent due under this lease within 5 days after it is due, Tenant will be in default. If Tenant fails to comply with this lease for any other reason within 10 days after Landlord notifies Tenant of its failure to comply, Tenant will be in default. C. If Tenant is in default, Landlord may: (i) terminate Tenant's right to occupy the leased premises by providing Tenant with at least 3 days written notice; and (ii) accelerate all rents which are payable during the remainder of this lease or any renewal period without notice or demand. Landlord will attempt to mitigate any damage or loss caused by Tenant's breach by using commercially reasonable means. If Tenant is in default, Tenant will be liable for: (1) any lost rent; (2) Landlord's cost of reletting the leased premises, including brokerage fees, advertising fees, and other fees necessary to relet the leased premises; (3) repairs to the leased premises for use beyond normal wear and tear; (4) all Landlord's costs associated with eviction of Tenant, such as attorney's fees, court costs, and prejudgment interest; (5) all Landlord's costs associated with collection of rent such as collection fees, late charges, and returned check charges; (6) cost of removing any of Tenant's equipment or fixtures left on the leased premises or Property; (7) cost to remove any trash, debris, personal property, hazardous materials, or environmental contaminants left by Tenant or Tenant's employees, patrons, guests, or invitees in the leased premises or Property; (8) cost to replace any unreturned keys or access devices to the leased premises, parking areas, or Property; (9) any other recovery to which Landlord may be entitled under this lease or under law. 21. ABANDONMENT, INTERRUPTION OF UTILITIES, REMOVAL OF PROPERTY, AND LOCKOUT: Chapter 93 of the Texas Property Code governs the rights and obligations of the parties with regard to: (a) abandonment of the leased premises; (b) interruption of utilities; (c) removal of Tenant's property; and (d) "lock-out" of Tenant. (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , and Landlord: Page 10 of 15 Produced with ZipFormM by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com Pulliam-City o 201 Windco Circle Commercial Lease concerning: Wylie, TX 75098 22. HOLDOVER: If Tenant fails to vacate the leased premises at the time this lease ends, Tenant will become a tenant-at-will and must vacate the leased premises immediately upon receipt of demand from Landlord. No holding over by Tenant, with or without the consent of Landlord, will extend this lease. Tenant will indemnify Landlord and any prospective tenants for any and all damages caused by the holdover. Rent for any holdover period will be 2 times the base monthly rent plus any additional rent calculated on a daily basis and will be immediately due and payable daily without notice or demand. 23. LANDLORD'S LIEN AND SECURITY INTEREST. To secure Tenant's performance under this lease, Tenant grants to Landlord a lien and security interest against all of Tenant's nonexempt personal property that is in the leased premises or Property. This lease is a security agreement for the purposes of the Uniform Commercial Code. Landlord may file a copy of this lease as a financing statement. 24. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING: Landlord may assign this lease to any subsequent owner of the Property. Tenant may not assign this lease or sublet any part of the leased premises without Landlord's written consent. An assignment of this lease or subletting of the leased premises without Landlord's written consent is voidable by Landlord. If Tenant assigns this lease or sublets any part of the leased premises, Tenant will remain liable for all of Tenant's obligations under this lease regardless if the assignment or sublease is made with or without the consent of Landlord. 25. RELOCATION: ❑ A. By providing Tenant with not less than 90 days advanced written notice, Landlord may require Tenant to relocate to another location in the Property, provided that the other location is equal in size or larger than the leased premises then occupied by Tenant and contains similar leasehold improvements. Landlord will pay Tenant's reasonable out-of-pocket moving expenses for moving to the other location. "Moving expenses" means reasonable expenses payable to professional movers, utility companies for connection and disconnection fees, wiring companies for connecting and disconnecting Tenant's office equipment required by the relocation, and printing companies for reprinting Tenant's stationary and business cards. A relocation of Tenant will not change or affect any other provision of this lease that is then in effect, including rent and reimbursement amounts, except that the description of the suite or unit number will automatically be amended. I] B. Landlord may not require Tenant to relocate to another location in the Property without Tenant's prior consent. 26. SUBORDINATION: A. This lease and Tenant's leasehold interest are and will be subject, subordinate, and inferior to: (1) any lien, encumbrance, or ground lease now or hereafter placed on the leased premises or the Property that Landlord authorizes; (2) all advances made under any such lien, encumbrance, or ground lease; (3) the interest payable on any such lien or encumbrance; (4) any and all renewals and extensions of any such lien, encumbrance, or ground lease; (5) any restrictive covenant affecting the leased premises or the Property; and (6) the rights of any owners' association affecting the leased premises or Property. B. Tenant must, on demand, execute a subordination, attornment, and non-disturbance agreement that Landlord may request that Tenant execute, provided that such agreement is made on the condition that this lease and Tenant's rights under this lease are recognized by the lien-holder. (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , and Landlord: Page 11 of 15 Produced with ZipForm1"by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zioform.com Pulliam-City o 201 Windco Circle Commercial Lease concerning: Wylie, TX 75098 27. ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATES:Within 10 days after receipt of a written request from Landlord, Tenant will execute and deliver to Landlord an estoppel certificate that identifies: A. any breach of the lease; B. the then current rent payment and rent schedule; C. the date the next rent payment is due; D. any advance rent payments; E. the amount of the security deposit; F. any claims for any offsets; G. the then current term of the lease; H. any renewal options; I. Tenant's possession and acceptance of the leased premises and improvements; J. any ownership interest by Tenant; and K. any other information reasonably requested in the certificate. 28. CASUALTY LOSS: A. Tenant must immediately notify Landlord of any casualty loss in the leased premises. Within 20 days after receipt of Tenant's notice of a casualty loss, Landlord will notify Tenant if the leased premises are less than or more than 50% unusable, on a per square foot basis, and if Landlord can substantially restore the leased premises within 120 days after Tenant notifies Landlord of the casualty loss. B. If the leased premises are less than 50% unusable and Landlord can substantially restore the leased premises within 120 days after Tenant notifies Landlord of the casualty, Landlord will restore the leased premises to substantially the same condition as before the casualty. If Landlord fails to substantially restore within the time required, Tenant may terminate this lease. C. If the leased premises are more than 50% unusable and Landlord can substantially restore the leased premises within 120 days after Tenant notifies Landlord of the casualty, Landlord may: (1) terminate this lease; or (2) restore the leased premises to substantially the same condition as before the casualty. If Landlord chooses to restore and does not substantially restore the leased premises within the time required, Tenant may terminate this lease. D. If Landlord notifies Tenant that Landlord cannot substantially restore the leased premises within 120 days after Tenant notifies Landlord of the casualty loss, Landlord may: (1) choose not to restore and terminate this lease; or (2) choose to restore, notify Tenant of the estimated time to restore, and give Tenant the option to terminate this lease by notifying Landlord within 10 days. E. If this lease does not terminate because of a casualty loss, rent will be reduced from the date Tenant notifies Landlord of the casualty loss to the date the leased premises are substantially restored by an amount proportionate to the extent the leased premises are unusable. 29. CONDEMNATION: If after a condemnation or purchase in lieu of condemnation the leased premises are totally unusable for the purposes stated in this lease, this lease will terminate. If after a condemnation or purchase in lieu of condemnation the leased premises or Property are partially unusable for the purposes of this lease, this lease will continue and rent will be reduced in an amount proportionate to the extent the leased premises are unusable. Any condemnation award or proceeds in lieu of condemnation are the property of Landlord and Tenant has no claim to such proceeds or award. Tenant may seek compensation from the condemning authority for its moving expenses and damages to Tenant's personal property. 30. ATTORNEY'S FEES:Any person who is_a prevailing party in any legal proceeding brought under or related to the transaction described in this lease is entitled to recover prejudgment interest, reasonable attorney's fees, and all other costs of litigation from the nonprevailing party. (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , and Landlord: Page 12 of 15 Produced with ZipFormTM by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com Pulliam-City o 201 Windco Circle Commercial Lease concerning: Wylie, TX 75098 31. REPRESENTATIONS: Tenant's statements in this lease and any application for rental are material representations relied upon by Landlord. Each party signing this lease represents that he or she is of legal age to enter into a binding contract and is authorized to sign the lease. If Tenant makes any misrepresentation in this lease or in any application for rental, Tenant is in default. Landlord is not aware of any material defect on the Property that would affect the health and safety of an ordinary person or any environmental hazard on or affecting the Property that would affect the health or safety of an ordinary person, except: 32. BROKERS: A. The brokers to this lease are: Locations Realty Vince Maige Cooperating Broker License No. Principal Broker 0168846 License No. 231 W. FM 544,Ste. 104,Murphy, TX. Address Address (972) 423-9812 (972) 423-9814 Phone Fax Phone Fax vince@buylocations.com E-mail E-mail Cooperating Broker represents Tenant. Principal Broker: (Check only one box) O represents Landlord only. ❑ representsTenant only. ❑ is an intermediary between Landlord and Tenant. B. Fees: d (1) Principal Broker's fee will be paid according to: (Check only one box). I] (a) a separate written commission agreement between Principal Broker and: 0 Landlord ❑ Tenant. ❑ (b) the attached Addendum for Broker's Fee. ❑ (2) Cooperating Broker's fee will be paid according to: (Check only one box). ❑ (a) a separate written commission agreement between Cooperating Broker and: ❑ Principal Broker ❑ Landlord ❑ Tenant. ❑ (b) the attached Addendum for Broker's Fee. 33. ADDENDA: Incorporated into this lease are the addenda, exhibits and other information marked in the Addenda and Exhibit section of the Table of Contents. If Landlord's Rules and Regulations are made part of this lease, Tenant agrees to comply with the Rules and Regulations as Landlord may, at its discretion, amend from time to time. (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , , and Landlord: Page 13 of 15 Produced with ZipFormrM by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com Pulliam-City o 201 Windco Circle Commercial Lease concerning: Wylie, TX 75098 34. NOTICES: All notices under this lease must be in writing and are effective when hand-delivered, sent by mail, or sent by facsimile transmission to: Tenant at the leased premises, and a Copy to: City of Wylie c/o Wylie Fire & Rescue, Chief Flores Address: 2000 St Hwy 78 N, Wylie, TX 75098 Phone: (972)442-8110 Fax: (972) 442-8113 Landlord at: Tommy Pulliam Address: Po Box 1132, Wylie, TX.75098 Phone: (469)222-7039 Fax: and a copy to:Vince Maige c/o Locations Realty Address: 231 W. FM 544,Ste. 104,Murphy, TX. Phone: (972)423-9812 Fax: (972) 423-9814 35. SPECIAL PROVISIONS: A. This Lease shall terminate on Septmber 30, 2006 if the Wylie City Council does not approve funds in the 2006-07 budget to fulfill all obligations created hereunder including but not limited to rent, maintenance and insurance, not-withstanding anything herein to the contrary. B. This Lease automatically renews on a month-to-month basis unless Landlord or Tenant provides the other party written notice of termination not less than 30 days before the expiration date. If this Lease automatically renews on a month-to-basis, it will continue to renew on a month-to-month basis until either party provides written notice of termination to the other party and the notice of termination will be effective on the date designated in the notice but not sooner than 30 days after the notice is given. 36. AGREEMENT OF PARTIES: A. Entire Agreement:This lease contains the entire agreement between Landlord and Tenant and may not be changed except by written agreement. B. Binding Effect: This lease is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and permitted assigns. C. Joint and Several: All Tenants are jointly and severally liable for all provisions of this lease. Any act or notice to, or refund to, or signature of, any one or more of the Tenants regarding any term of this lease, its renewal, or its termination is binding on all Tenants. D. Controlling Law: The laws of the State of Texas govern the interpretation, performance, and enforcement of this lease. (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Initialed for Identification by Tenants: , and Landlord: Page 14 of 15 Produced with ZipForm'm by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com Pulliam-City o 201 Windco Circle Commercial Lease concerning: Wylie, TX 75098 E. Severable Clauses: If any clause in this lease is found invalid or unenforceable by a court of law, the remainder of this lease will not be affected and all other provisions of this lease will remain valid and enforceable. F. Waiver: Landlord's delay, waiver, or non-enforcement of acceleration, contractual or statutory lien, rental due date, or any other right will not be deemed a waiver of any other or subsequent breach by Tenant or any other term in this lease. G. Quiet Enjoyment: Provided that Tenant is not in default of this lease, Landlord covenants that Tenant will enjoy possession and use of the leased premises free from material interference. H. Force Maieure: If Landlord's performance of a term in this lease is delayed by strike, lock-out, shortage of material, governmental restriction, riot, flood, or any cause outside Landlord's control, the time for Landlord's performance will be abated until after the delay. I. Time: Time is of the essence. The parties require strict compliance with the times for performance. Brokers are not qualified to render legal advice, property inspections, surveys, engineering studies, environmental assessments, tax advice, or compliance inspections. The parties should seek experts to render such services. READ THIS LEASE CAREFULLY. If you do not understand the effect of this Lease, consult your attorney BEFORE signing. City of Wylie Tommy Pulliam Tenant Landlord By By Date Date Printed Name Printed Name Title Title Tenant Landlord By By Date Date Printed Name Printed Name Title Title (TAR-2101)6-7-02 Page 15 of 15 Produced with ZipFormTM by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.com Pulliam-City o TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® COMMERCIAL LEASE EXHIBIT USE OF THIS FORM BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOT MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®IS NOT AUTHORIZED. ©Texas Association of REALTORS®,Inc.2002 EXHIBIT "A" TO COMMERCIAL LEASE BETWEEN THE UNDERSIGNED CONCERNING THE LEASED PREMISES AT 201 Windco Circle, Wylie, TX 75098 Changes to Lease: 10.A. (1) shall be amended to read "other than normal fire department operations" following the word dangerous. 16.D. amend last line of paragraph to read "under Paragraph 11 or 14, those fixtures unique to a fire station use or if the parties agree otherwise in writing" . 19.Indemnity. amend paragraph to start with "To the extent permitted by law, " . 23.Landlord's Lien and Security Interest. This entire paragraph shall be omitted. 28.A. ,B. ,C. ,D. amend all references to "120 days" to read "60 days". • City of Wylie Tommy Pulliam Tenant Landlord By By Date Date Tenant Landlord By By Date Date (TAR-2115)6-7-02 Page 1 of 1 Locations Realty 231 W.FM 544,Ste 104 Murphy,TX 75094 Phone:(972)423-9812 Fax: (972)423-9814 Deborah Maige Pulliam-City o Produced with ZipFormTM by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zipform.corn Approved by the Texas Real Estate Commission for Voluntary Use Texas law requires all real estate licensees to give the following information about brokerage services to prospective buyers, tenants, sellers and landlords. Information About Brokerage Services efore working with a real estate broker, you should Act. The broker must obtain the written consent of each know that the duties of a broker depend on whom party to the transaction to act as an intermediary. The • the broker represents. If you are a prospective written consent must state who will pay the broker and, in seller or landlord (owner) or a prospective buyer or conspicuous bold or underlined print, set forth the broker's tenant (buyer), you should know that the broker who lists obligations as an intermediary. The broker is required to the property for sale or lease is the owner's agent. A treat each party honestly and fairly and to comply with broker who acts as a subagent represents the owner in The Texas Real Estate License Act. A broker who acts cooperation with the listing broker. A broker who acts as as an intermediary in a transaction: a buyer's agent represents the buyer. A broker may act as (1) shall treat all parties honestly; an intermediary between the parties if the parties (2) may not disclose that the owner will accept a consent in writing. A broker can assist you in locating a price less than the asking price unless authorized in property, preparing a contract or lease, or obtaining writing to do so by the owner; financing without representing you. A broker is obligated (3) may not disclose that the buyer will pay a price by law to treat you honestly. greater than the price submitted in a written offer unless authorized in writing to do so by the buyer; and IF THE BROKER REPRESENTS THE OWNER: (4) may not disclose any confidential information or The broker becomes the owner's agent by entering into an any information that a party specifically instructs the agreement with the owner, usually through a written - broker in writing not to disclose unless authorized in listing agreement, or by agreeing to act as a subagent by writing to disclose the information or required to do so accepting an offer of subagency from the listing broker. A by The Texas Real Estate License Act or a court subagent may work in a different real estate office. A order or if the information materially relates to the listing broker or subagent can assist the buyer but does condition of the property. not represent the buyer and must place the interests of With the parties' consent, a broker acting as an the owner first. The buyer should not tell the owner's intermediary between the parties may appoint a person who agent anything the buyer would not want the owner to is licensed under The Texas Real Estate License Act know because an owner's agent must disclose to the and associated with the broker to communicate with and owner any material information known to the agent. carry out instructions of one party and another person who is licensed under that Act and associated with the broker IF THE BROKER REPRESENTS THE BUYER: to communicate with and carry out instructions of the The broker becomes the buyer's agent by entering into an other party. agreement to represent the buyer, usually through a written buyer representation agreement. A buyer's agent If you choose to have a broker represent you, can assist the owner but does not represent the owner you should enter into a written agreement with the broker and must place the interests of the buyer first. The owner that clearly establishes the broker's obligations and your should not tell a buyer's agent anything the owner would obligations. The agreement should state how and by not want the buyer to know because a buyer's agent must whom the broker will be paid. You have the right to disclose to the buyer any material information known to the choose the type of representation, if any, you wish to agent. receive. Your payment of a fee to a broker does not necessarily establish that the broker represents you. If you IF THE BROKER ACTS AS AN INTERMEDIARY: have any questions regarding the duties and A broker may act as an intermediary between the parties responsibilities of the broker, you should resolve those if the broker complies with The Texas Real Estate License questions before proceeding. Real estate licensee asks that you acknowledge receipt of this information about brokerage services for the licensee's records. Buyer, Seller, Landlord or Tenant Date Texas Real Estate Brokers and Salespersons are licensed and regulated by the Texas Real Estate Commission(TREC).If you have a question or complaint regarding a real estate licensee,you should contact TREC at P.O.Box 12188,Austin,Texas 78711-2188 or 512-465-3960. EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY 01A TREC No. OP-K (TAR-2501) 1/1/96 Page 1 of 1 Locations Realty 231 W.FM 544,Ste 104 Murphy,TX 75094 Phone:(972)423-9812 Fax: (972)423-9814 Deborah Maige Pulliam-City o Produced with ZipFom,TM by RE FormsNet,LLC 18025 Fifteen Mile Road,Clinton Township,Michigan 48035 www.zioform.com Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: D Department: Planning (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Renae' 011ie Account Code: Date Prepared: 05/18/06 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: One Subject Consider, and act upon, a Final Plat for the Trout— 78 Addition, generally located north of S.H. 78 and west of Eubanks Road. Recommendation Motion to approve a Final Plat for the Trout—78 Addition. Discussion The Final Plat creates three retail lots totaling 1.909 acres and is zoned Commercial Corridor (CC) District. A twenty-Four foot mutual access easement is platted by this plat. A mutual fire lane, access and utility easement connects all three lots and allows accessibility to S.H. 78. Lot 1 is 0.503 acres and contains an existing 5,400 square foot one story retail building. The applicant is proposing to construct a 7 bay carwash on lot 2. A concept plan for a 5,000 square foot single story office/retail building is proposed for lot 3. A Site Plan was approved on March 7, 2006. The Final Plat complies with all applicable technical requirements of the City of Wylie. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 .1,tal I4 t4 be i nw.<a,ra, k I Flat a om oo'..n�-s og,t .y — — g. Pf•.1 awa9 9003'wnp 0030 ...7701 t=V. 1f5,a.0K i'1@ 66b4'IS P9030° f-? y ' -__ i x M. .as¢• hh.•Yi1 w p.Itil'AY'ed AOw o Q 4 v�At p PP,*nit*Winn'a1W V'F10•41 u 1Ks —_ (.eq 'w a •1e9, @� BD9Z F egg'a1 laanaav-F9un5 en,a,•0 aatlaua3 m • • • • .1..w•1 M.90ALBL5 _ 'L" •I W a Gwo.tu,'u 3T10801HdYW •0''�� ON B{81$ _ .—" t.n.90514/it'km G1'f9 Irma 4..t. tik$G'9l a'' a-I� Cid Aii NOuiaar 8G-L(102ll 8008_ µ :04▪ — wewS_ lYd,r NV .arin,.., is.e....4r, ,:o,t ..M..w»M wte. IDt Va..I -'\ 9 \ I +•°'+▪ A—y. .J min Al 41 F _•—_ MINA .eVi \ 1 PO= ,may_ ro v .n as loran a,�aa OWN An j d .�I - . • am*.wonw.K,.....w,t,....w.»....vm..,..a•.w,w.,q°. . ,M� ~ r °, . r�mom»»,., r,F., x 011.11 3o 4)003 _ x.nua 3o Lmpa l _. ,v w r a ..7.n m •»,1 a..,a0Kr.00. Mat --,ar--._.—__-...1 min ]aea n rat on»«n,n watt »,.•,., te@,» Y a a is i ` »t nft. KK roof w•,.,3w,'a„bw.a»a.I,KaaK a,».,w.,°.�..Y.,..r.1.. ,.,r=<t...I% Nwa,a..•.P.I.w,.... V..,oft x Val eo RVISAiwa, ,n .al G 5 .rows w a w am.wew H .arioo 30.uxna, ... .,t•.."w.sam.•en w mini. r...e o»ea w a..ro,n...eaa •a . a .p».a..r.9».,11.ruw•..w wp"�nn". .n., .w4030000 tt:'., -- x sr%31 10 31Y1s .111i 1 K11 Io js tK .w+., •� ISM1'i qwi.>n e..r^a.»�. is 9Y1.r.71 �F / _--_ye A a1w $ AM. .u�y�� » ),:.n § Asw@, r R_L m.a v Van oI,a»a v oa.a '.na.v,q V,aa ono; " u fi/'� n4n.ww.nw+ro P.ww.,vK w».».we..w ww.a•.,.ee.w ww»•.p - sy,,.. _... it". �+w ur,wmw.w.w....n.ww sunwa °0arll 1�fu°w�°aa.'.A0°lr@ia / -- Ma ..w,o.-.a-w.n.o».m,ep.w o.,ew , t � 6 ,,,f�SL!• �_ ... _,..,N...,A°:.,w44.r,mono*......o .,Horan.,,Via.,III,P` — — — —_@ A- Li-353w 19.311 31Y MNa _ m..A ww.wr. °rzt•e»nN+r.a w Iww.W w e M Ia.r w 31v0IJU030 5.M.10715 Af @e 1030 tfs. r.a.lw»�w w.I..rI.1 P..wa..r.o'o ono .•..n �...� ., °"°,�.g n".oI„I w"'."'w wwllgr w w xqr w / ..w,� :wAnwl.�w'rW:11Nw.:" °� A`v•t �• 'm., a .a .., a e ,Yw».�. ,..w..r°> .Nnro.,I.•,.•4 .°�» .,...a.0.P.: I:@ _ � , mown.no,u▪mft se ..»a ea•,.i,r .w Pia:.s'.'«I'..y°»:Ina...w.«°.•"@n.. .«ww.@...I�at.1,.»..«* & 7 / , ...10................1..m xa.0— -- wWMw»wery WIwII•.a M�! t N.a ..no+.we a _ °=."+o'.a°y'°,@K�"�.°•.+a�.��w@%»an,w aaa...•.1�a'«Ia'�c. '«ou of aN w1, w»b.m'.'l.n No nw..ro»•war 4- a ..ua W.''''. »w N.»I w,..I"a.m.n,ww..w.ipr.,a(Y �= �. ..N,a'J' w""1.. .s"w"'ro @w:ww I.a•.,aa na33 a•I.a...(w..,,an 0303..000 r oae c a1 51.353ad 353w A9.312 mY nAlq'3NDSiM3Xl'MO. ,."wale I.•n,°°eK ..wwe.a.I.p•w w ma.nu(v 1 / H s.x31.0 3t1/15 o.,e_.o,vft wa w 1n —1— (Y �/ \/ a x emoo 30 0iw100 g _—.Yltt.o33 J a Ma MIS 3t01.aa»9.0.a•wa w y1 -�(I 1 --Y9 000a C / :iN a w n'"t Inn a mon.e1 own n r>n.»>,I0 w. ..i..•".„"tn"a:«:»•0 9 c1 64.n.•ano 1 4 / , / srsR / os�t�s �W / a mnoo°w @rw qaa en Pp,POW • q Y•4• .owl�'aA0°492 '�4.Iw.iro t / /// 'iw�r•w••,oeV•..n w n man .. w 0.1w R.ev wp10'uni'*Anne ____._.._.—_—— ..0... / / / Norma no.a Nona oP w w trr 4w»w Mon awt ' // /'/ 'Nra in w•+»aVaw Kuaoyv e.•n.w yaw q won Manna m1...x•.+t•n+t_.__ ..._..- 011'»w.wI'�'11...,sr M.rvr 7:17,1i'u�I tea=W'ea'iow4aw.'PrPi°'r'wTa' F F. M.roMsI / .jJ .o,...aK 9 ww ...iota 0I.a.°."wr..,0a.ua'"vm.a ww w aat br- r.r^—nw vow .•w. e 0 d� Doti - o»n'3:.iinn:.._ :..�a,.:on....:"a.'::'".w,.w.""�".°.r.1 ..1.. Nor te': onnftv•no/PP on vu men*, so.. //l /y oda' i`=".^ �VO� /, A9 n�, w"°1..@,4.14 `polo _ .w1,41, ,• e.4 o».•t.wa+ +o.Kt4 I.Vim .»n.,11.* waj°. w:+. / 00`,0gU;a w w.+w.°awowl tin. 'i Ina m u N.........a a aw on o..n m w w.;.":".,1et°'etnw qs No w a .IIy • w. / ,,"y ':0.' •a /� s r; N two,.Iw m1 wl%w w 1+w>»u°w»till Faa•.w A.o.,a iwKlt rw M»wI..w....ie�Y.%."'.yV,w 4-i w x c,�I•e.'�a H��'�4M.ry �' .bs`� �• L`.J 7 n,a um' •.0 ww."`L'w v.�•.•+w.l. v w,w�....tr..I� ei J✓ M' ..o.-w-tl�y' iv pi e�wm oo p i.w.Kel win ae�lt +.a r•"Ka w ka(+1wI l //• wI •Imw.1•.10 w,< . vX%r�.w,w.Iw Noya�"1+.�I.+R at °I°•r'q"�n a r» An wp ny �:y uw oo /wlw. .auaq.. - _ \_ I ••a4apw -w�',Hwy w 1»e 2.1'°twla°teeKlain.tt,mK.+s vI1 P1� __ ��,w,Irma.n iw»..is„t ww.m av •••a ^,n•Vn n_g2_''°.jt Q a r=x aortal•ans w wl -w.k.i+vlw.°�:r,r.. %" ..,1w•1,.a 1.elt ow wAua ra.t tern , : inn In.a t•.a wloa N.p»ar»W o-,..,1 e11.a ,/'• 1 u.n n ••ft we in»,»a ww o qcs..w . .na 1.w1 Ka,....aa t N._e.e ion n a.a° .rou.'1�i.o0 vloluw. .)ee•9II°"rWu nits n.iq°"r-lu.••Iw,• v w,.p sewsoas onwwi.w� c _ ,.a/me...@w r mom nu,o,w n an.. non .oaao.Ioa.foot V'WInvo1 ,Wro /• F na" my nun =�°TMY 'wa wwHnwwKewKwn ww,won www.:.*wvVonw,trt aoi,iswrt vaxl++uel 1. .dat•VM .. . wJ'SrM3l 1) )I A 31Y16 .771537"imr99meatc f r•..- 1 x .mpg so ualcu \\L' /�. nr0uaasl ax3ww 1 Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: E Department: Planning (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Renae' 011ie Account Code: Date Prepared: 05/18/06 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: One Subject Consider, and act upon, a Final Plat for the Ben Nobles Addition to create four (4) residential lots, generally located west of Thomas Street and south of Stone Road. Recommendation Motion to approve a Final Plat for the Ben Nobles Addition to create four(4)residential lots. Discussion Property totals 4.5434 acres, and is located west of Thomas Street and south of Stone Road. Abutting properties to the west are platted as the Caldwell Estates and those to the north are within the Eldridge Addition, both created in 1962. WISD and City of Wylie ownership and facilities abut the tract on the south. The plat creates four (4) single family residential lots, with the minimum lot size being 40,581.86 square feet with a minimum dwelling size of 3,500 square feet. The property was the subject of a zoning case which was approved by Council in February 2006, and conforms to the requirements of Single-Family Residential 10/19 of the Zoning Ordinance in place at the time of zoning. A fifty(50) foot easement to State of Texas exists along the entire length of the western property line and along the southern portion of the tract. The Final Plat complies with all applicable technical requirements of the City of Wylie. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 tNIBOO nA1EIHNTxs 3111E OF TEXAS 000*41 OF COWN PLOTTING Iki5 PROPERTY a rIJ)p0 IN9uRANa RATE IMPS xUNBEpO HB06S CM00 O Ynx AN fF(LC1N[DATE M JANWn g.Issa SHOWS 1M2 PROPERTY p WHEREAS,Benjamin Nap•,Is Ms ernes N a Iraq e1 IaM Mooted b CONn County,Texas,wW of M• VN-SN10p ARM DEf0OMrID 1f MM[x(ARMS DRpMNItp TO 5E OmSIOC TOE n Akin AMrDury Survey.;Eby 00 M.23,she being0,M called.5. sass .d aw0.. To TFlmbl• ter YEM[LOw PIAIN.) wooly Inventive,.b44. LID.. .Peed reoatded M Volume 3820 .0•301.Deed Ronnie.CO R. 030 ' .1- )I'7wt.. I•Xss.farm being nnvRrneddle Bw,iam •Tb dnder�i410 b Volume Pogo I eye eevna aa.rOaDert: In .an q men parMvubrh e.sarlh•d 5r meal. _ F FILE v- BpInMn9 at o 1/2 In,M Inn red found Ter eem•r M the South 1-..T)dold-of-way an•of 0 IS TO,slay � � end M Me SeWF.M tamer e1 Thomas sIr•e1(w SO foot MgM-el-ray),end Mnq 1M HarMren "• r .el a IF Co N bol O'emeM b 1M1•CM of Wylie by deed recoMed in Volume 1151,Poll.316, peed Rwards.00 004,001 COINn Coun1Y.lnm: MR Werf �� baN.a dlNenm M IOO.SSPIMnto ont%buna Ew Seronds a omwbr old bNnq 1M emaN EaNMY NwIMeN 1 w al a IreN 04 bna oanyoy.0 l0 WW4 ISO by deed newMd In VNum•004,Ppe 695.M.tl GRAPHIC SCALE Records.Calan Counh.Tows, i Tkew•MMh 71 0ng.ne 35 NImM3 06 SecwM Wen.Nang MO 021Feesf M.el sold Wye.ISO heel,a dlslanc•of STAID 1.N le a I/O Imh Inn rod found for owner, d being 1M 1400Mm VICINTY MAP mad owner of sold Clyne ISO Macl and Ming In IM Earinne of0 15 fool cane: i Ma PM In NOT TO 7dME 'hones North DD Dpnw.17 Minuln 20 Seaanas Wan.atn9 M•Ewl Me o1 sold 15 fool Niel.o d1Nan1.N319.13 feel to a 5/6 Inoh if,n red found Iloto rmr.an b.ln Me MI•n•alln al M• boil n.oI sod 15 Tool allay and IM Sou.Pro of sold olerem.nllan•tl IS foal allay: Thecae North B9 De rose SS MI,Nn 11 Snoods CM,along Me South lino of oak!15 the oII.o dlNaw I.of S06.02 Tess o Ih•PNMI M Bpbnlp end cardalnlng 197,914.53 squats fed or 1.5434 TONED:SF-B.5/1T ■ owns al bed. ELDRIDGE ADDITION_ Sri •,,,,-- VOL.3.PG.97 LOi I NOW THEREFORE,KNOW Ali MEN NT 1MESE PRESENTS: LOT a LOT Le $��A1 JeT 8 1' y $ � 9 WHEREAS. 1�B•dowt hereby weanlol.Bte pb1,CM•Ip olsog M•h•nb above Te aewwnatda A.04 IIOeO' id TAW' f1�a.. a i •Ca Inaaun k els or •r_Eq ;nanny by*Male.In f, pnpl•,to IM u011t use Ton,On 1•rM• d prye•hewn iMnn.The l .(�Irw."' glrla sat�) TB'Y1Ey14 I44Z0 a 00,freeen and s, Me publle udodloaluee•ffors,fr Wren P Msn.ponies'reband Levernenis onnlllds.001M buildings. i ,frees, 1,041 w Aker Improvem141 or growths skill M tonne...reca•NUN•d.or \ I '•NT paned upon, r fa••Me Ran.,as.hewn,except Mal landscape cos may be 1 j 1 BEGINNING Nw e.a 0comma,. ommmaa•.0 If,4000n,lmnw'olo Pob4o WI,.loo*drone 40 o r Eor using Po on.,may LOl .� fern•un.sf an n.en,M am0s Ma me to wr1euler Milan,we 0a by pub0e ul8lln Ming 2 LOT 1 fubaNnwN b�M uNN's ane CNy al Wvlli t uss M•ml.TM CMY e1 Ws«le ana Me.:WllNy eFdNln S. 6 44.1BY4+yolk w Phw hnwamm�l•or n aawlMtwhak removed Inmy way•ndonaw ll or pern of es.inn xe s.Mho IIrmo, ii shrubs $ I IA12B awes NnMnane.,a Nikbnq N IM1.N r•fpwliw ayNerr sold EarmmN.1M CM • and ��Bt 1 ,.,wiyn r.• s;^n Paidn AMP,•MII f all Henn how Ids full rig.o1 morns o soren I r from et. n M• L 8999 T1 '� b•anmen%for the panne a aeMMVNirp, nNrvNMW,M•paMp pNroDing,mnnbinlnq end F ;Is. wr.ls 'S1 edNp b es.nne Ip l4 a Party of M ram,ayn.mf NMW Ids neIn N wry Nor•M {pi $ a I I r lns Ids permission of*mom. Ibm and ns0lolbna o1 Ids cm,of 3 $ a �i Thi.uwe1 Wprend bhal o 0011.0 ordbncn,ruin.,•pule 1 1 1 - Wylie,Ina,. S '�L, LOT 9 I g 7 WITNESS.my nand of Wr41..lea..I.e Ids _day of 2Vo9. =p€ . KKM WOLF!AD lTAN anyone.." Ii11i $ • 0i 1lYaf 4 BB OCK F•tt. I B: B.MarMn Nebo rsc?H III 44434 Mrs 02.I2. STATE Of IEMS W $ COUNTY 02 COWN � umi I ■I BEFORE ME..Ids undersigned.a N. 0 public M end for Ilan County cad plat•00 Ids•do, Pwn LOi 111 y R!j B4amln ein known lab a parson whore name s wen n," a On foregoing 1,10tf•nt 5 R ki I 41AIAAi I 8{ • ZCITy Of WYLIE> cad ac wl•e9•d b me Mal M/sM enoui.tl IM1•ram•for 1M puree,and temlMrallom TMbln III r.I VOL.1151.PO.516 GIVEN UNDER uV 0005 ANO SD/or Or1ICE,Ns the-Sy of 2006. 1.11 WWI, Sn.F3 1= III �0 Notary Pub,b sand for Me Nal•e1 lens. QT it S l� LOT 4 ��ll SUwfVOR's STATEMLIFI: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL 1 1,00 Comblry,o Rpl•fered Prefn•bml Lana Summar.0oennd by M•.....T•n..afOrm '� //,10f.1/561E Thal IMs plot s proper.under Y dlrwl supeM•bn,from rear,.dwumwnblbn,wldsnn UM sow eepM•d an Ids ground turMg Hold werNbns d hem Mbar nibble dwumnlNbn:and Thal Ids• ' • \\\=\` \ Mwmm•naed for Approval M subNanMlly nmpNn wM Me RWn end Made,*of M•Texas.Boon of PnNNenal lend Dale: .n0,9. L'l Awl \\ GTO of WY11•.levawk ZonMg Cemminlon D01.d Mis Ids_ day of �,1� _ RELEASED 04/21/03 FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY.THIS ` t �� `\`\ dared, Approved for Cen•MAMon Dloan 00I SHALL NO`BE RECORO[D FOR 41Y PURPOgC. 1 \ILMen Connally �ageaNT 1. ``_ la w/F� ___ DAP_ __ Tinos Rpl d Pr n•bnal Land Surveyor Na.5613 n w +_/.\ ` uoyw.Clh of Wyn.,lewd. STATE OF TEXAS �> I COUNTY OFF<OWN S \` =- \ neplod BEFORE of.Ids nd•ralg,M,•Notary Publk In weed for 1M saki CeuM0 D.Sb1.,on 1MO dm sans.,awpnd Bryon Connally known to me b be Me person when name b anon..To Me Wt -�- Dole. wpotp In0rwnml and acknowledged la m.MN h•nerul•d Ih•sane•for Ids purer••IMr•b ZONED:SF-8.5/1> 4q acorn,end under Mh Pond EMI 1M Nal•mni•In M.ferpolp nrI1HMe an tree WVIJE ISO *nor.Clay of Wylie,Taw. OMM UNDER 00 HAND AND SEAL Or Or1ICE 1F1s day of VOL 6Bl,PC.8B5 \ ._ Tna unenlg^•e,M.clay Secretary of It..CRY el wYIN.Tern her, 2op6. rennin MN Me teepeMg Thal plat e1 BEM NOBLES AODITIOM,w*Milton 1)0000* 1S THE N3R1H LWE 0r DEED RE00R0ED M wlaN ^ 4 Me sly '200e,and 5.00 ed to Ids<lh Conan on Ihr d der VOLUM0 Aa26.RACE 301,DEED RECORDS.COLIW COUNTY.TEXAS. 2006 sod Ids Cowell.by lermel pollen,Man and IMF• NNery Publk M and for M Stale at Texas w plat Ids demon I of Preen.elms,on fo h In a.•.publlo pban (M•t•SS'ttt) end veld ad ewer Ines Meson end ye to n M end upon Me pM FN0.MT 1X6 RMSON,OR THIS PMi IS i0 CRMR 1 1019. and sold CeumH furl,a• ..Mrh•d es..0. b not.eecepbnm M.r•el bV BEN NOBLE'S ADDITION I)NO STRUCTURESTM ON MOM EPROPERITALL apMnq hot name as nerNneOove MwrRatl. WM 1y B1Ap( «0 EST 00 Oft DRAMA,WILL 4L 01 001 SBf.B14.n I1Gn. 4.N34 at sMO Al 3030 IWW w UISFMO err«01[n(NO ACROSS NEW WNn.n my Mnd MN_des ot A.D.,2006 NSAP .B100 CT Kt A ISM OF COLON auNn,mAB 6)%JUNG A PORTION Of AM LOT N PROMPTED.AND NO at SnJCCI TO WPHDLDNO a 1111LPY SERVICED T3 AMO NOR.Is A ore D[HWYLIEEAM ws Namur'col S.n IS h D/+1 ♦11Drook I)etw NORTH Or THE NaHNMn as 1,401 0 a TROY cry SwurWay1M per un 1Na //�`..//LK�I �y I Ater. COMM ROAD 732.6.5 TUT WEST a THE WNW"CORNER 0a AA 11,9 CJ eT M,Tnss. F a.'z o 70114 Chew LINN FENCE ATM TA[Mr SOUTH 0. et SOUTH CHAP ode L FENCE.(axv..4.4.2>r) Nor.1.e0/OWR Fawn M saki/Jaen•pJssOhl/wow m 00 104/ Wylie City Council CITY of WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: F Department: Planning (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Renae' 011ie Account Code: Date Prepared: May 18, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: One Subject Consider, and act upon, a Final Plat for the Wylie Retail Office Park Addition, generally located on the southwest corner of S.H. 78 and Kreymer Lane. Recommendation Motion to approve a Final Plat for the Wylie Retail Office Park Addition. Discussion The property totals 8.7264 acres and will create 3 commercial/retail lots (Wylie Corners Retail Center). The property is zoned Commercial Corridor (CC) District and has never been platted. The Wyndham Estates Phase I residential subdivision abuts the subject property to the south, therefore a six (6) foot high solid screening wall will be required to separate the CC district from the Residential District. The plat dedicates an existing 9,292 square feet of right-of-way for Kreymer Lane and 2,340 square feet of right-of-way for a portion of S.H. 78. On May 2, 2006, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a Site Plan for Lot 1. No site plan has been submitted for the remaining 2 lots, but will be commercial/retail in nature. Lot 1 will be developed in two phases with phase 1 being an 18,750 s.f. single story building (15,000 s.f. of retail use and 3,750 s.f. for restaurant). The Final Plat complies with all applicable technical requirements of the City of Wylie and conforms to the approved Preliminary Plat. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 al 1 ■€ E 3 fi b 'ibY E �# 0 ' ` ile° 15 a l Ili li E lady # tl€3 s # 3S1 E i $aE p - U I 0. #1 a« i$�`f- ' $ # 5 r II �'. i 1 d0 w . ;a ftp11Sgg § a: $ l# 3� ft# 1 jfa € 4hi a # <''8 13 ip i fa in �Eikf e ii ii ia °aa 1 $ L 1 ►L''�I ti �a-a I. 111• 1-ai `e Ii. 111 I. 1 s�'f rift i a 3 ' tl3 a ma uW fill I!i 33$ Ijh th Lf3# Eg JII! t .ill ;1st $:/1 fr.. $ a f 56 £g ; #fig Pi ¢ i sa ;er ll °f I€ ae i'.31.1 E F 3 a 141 J1. riEsl #iii § #? : � lit it r j�1t 18 1f11i# a i 1 S' 11. Iii 1Ii1 b I. 11'! # #a1J 1 t $a ■ a8Iag I1 ih I= # ; Ii3 €i a !gig1s Si ;1 l i Ia1a 11 IE lii E 8! ! : 3hi ts #! a i 'S,. d;#1 ` A j i 2.0 iiih!iiii 11111 ixi1 i� ! 111 ITI SO 1211 _ rii i, l' i t illif Ilea ; s li_0 8 Iih 1 gl a a NU igg;11 iii 1 " - g: Is tj C I/�` �` __ i5;1$ F. -\." r / /• hi #II 1 I �t = i 1• h 11 8 Jp } ; 1 ; I' j. F:t� 11.11 E 4_ r a� �; II i 12 l Y-->ar--�ii., \ R. a(/g Liiiillfiil�ilil��l�l�l��l� i i a 1 ;tp 9 V. C S Liiiim owassi 8 1 {i• ' il 3 L f L__ kiiii1`iI11i111II11 I :g ';` lit t ll i 11 1 1 I I up iti '�a"a:'u" {i ;a $ r£ a 4 # mai7 °Ile ' � Ir__ [IIIIIIIIIaparrn=a ; d i:: >r z N• ; ;I 1 _._._ __ 141 li eea ;;3 V. i414111.8 1. : !i--,-..--- 0.::.----- r if, MIT! li I ilihi � § 1 ilk 7' 1 <��~ J rr` ; €€ �€; 1� i , 1 a 6 i�1 111��IIIIly1l J $"€ # N S § -ate 1�§ I ,\� I, h__ [7111,�11n41 ,■,�-.':_.._ _ il 1 I J 101 �, : ® i�iili- ,I .. ` �■■■■i Lgi all 0 1 ,_________„ ,), g 1 y_ - 11111111!1111 ` �r = li 1 �s 4'still! .rar+ .�m_eft � ..ravr gE�,j11111111111111 ,A \IIIIII 1 L.' cyyt , � 01 pt. 5 �IIIIIIII.,... ��_ L�� i. "I d II • 'IIPImii •" ,44mit Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: G Department: Parks and Recreation (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Robert Diaz Account Code: Date Prepared: May 25, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: One Subject Consider, and act upon, a request from the Lions Club of Wylie to sell items at the Summer Concert Series. Recommendation Motion to approve a request from the Lions Club of Wylie to sell items at the Summer Concert Series. Discussion This non-profit organization has discussed with staff the possibility of selling items as fundraisers for their organization. This organization did not contact staff prior to the list for the April meeting being submitted, so their request is being placed on the May meeting agenda. Staff has not finalized the specific items to be sold but proposed items would be glow-in-the-dark items such as necklaces. Staff has worked with this organization previously and has no problems in the past. The Parks and Recreation Board approved the request from the Lions Club at their regular May 2006 meeting. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF 4111 p4 Parks&Recreation CITY OF WYLIE PARKS AND RECREATION VENDOR REGISTRATION FORM NAME OF GROUP,ORGANIZATION,INDIVIDUAL,ETC. EVENT INFORMATION Name Lions Club of Wylie Location Wylie Community Park/Founders Park/Dowtown Wylie Date(s) June 1,2006 through July 2006 Start Time 7:30pm • End Time 9:30pm Contact Person Name Robert Diaz Number of Individuals Vending Items Multiple Address 2000 Hwy.78 North Target Audience all ages Phone No.972-442-8197 Anticipated Number in Attendance at Event 3-500 Alternate Phone No. Specific Items to be Sold Emergency Contact Name Mulitple items i.e.cotton candy,glow sticks Address Phone No. Alternate Phone No. Helpful Information The City of Wylie has an exclusive contract that allows the sale of only Pepsi products within all park, recreation, community center facilities, and other city facilities. If food is prepared on-site or if food is prepared off-site and brought to the location to be sold, the vendor must contact the City Inspections Office at 972-442-8150 in order to obtain a Health Permit prior to the sale of such products. An Inspector must examine the food preparation and food storage equipment to assure the health and safety of customers. Section 78-150 of the City Code of Ordinances states: It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit for sale,vend, peddle, sell or offer to sell any cold drinks, cigars, tobaccos, cigarettes, fruits, candies, goods, wares or merchandise of any kind or nature whatsoever within the city park or recreation or community center facility; provided, however, that this section shall not apply to any person, organizations, firms or corporations, or the agents of any person, or organization, firm or corporation, or employees of any person who are recommended by the parks and recreation board and approved by the city council to operate a concession or concessions for the sale of specified goods,wares,and merchandise within the city park or recreation or community center facilities of the city. Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 1 (City Secretary's Use Only) Department: Planning Prepared By: Renae' 011ie Account Code: Date Prepared: May 18, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: Seven Subject Conduct a Public Hearing, consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-33 amending the zoning from Community Retail (CR) to Community Retail, with a Specific Use Permit (SUP), to allow for a hotel, generally located on the southeast corner of S.H. 78 and West Kirby Street. Recommendation Motion to approve Ordinance No. 2006-33 amending the zoning from Community Retail (CR)to Community Retail, with a Specific Use Permit(SUP), to allow for a hotel with the following stipulations: 1. stair-step 6 feet to 8 feet high screen wall to match the masonry wall of the Wylie Senior Care Addition; 2. parking height restriction to prohibit access by oversized vehicles; 3. directional lights on 14 foot poles; 4. the swimming pool shall be placed away from the screen wall. Discussion Owner: Ken Lim Applicant: Pat(Brandon) Fussell The subject property is located on the southeast corner of S.H. 78 and West Kirby Street and totals 1.926 acres (83,927 square feet).The applicant is requesting to rezone the subject property to allow for a hotel on one lot. The proposed two story building will be approximately 25,195 square feet in size and consist of 48 separate rooms where entrance to each room is gained from a completely enclosed area. The main entrance to the hotel will be from the east. A residential subdivision is located directly east of the subject property therefore requiring a masonry screening wall along the length of the eastern property line. The proposed design utilizes the parking lot as a buffer between the main entrance of the hotel and the Holiday Terrace Subdivision. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend approval (4-2) for the requested change in zoning on May 16, 2006 with the following stipulations; stair-step 6 feet to 8 feet high screen wall to match the masonry wall of the Wylie Senior Care Addition located to the south, parking height restriction to prohibit access by oversized vehicles, directional lights on 14 foot poles, and the swimming pool shall be placed away from the screen wall. Notification/Responses: Thirty-four (34) notifications were mailed, with three written responses returned favoring the request and one written response opposing the request at the time of posting. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2006-33 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, SO AS TO CHANGE THE ZONING ON THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PROPERTY, ZONING CASE NUMBER 2006-05, TO COMMUNITY RETAIL (CR) DISTRICT WITH A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT (SUP) ALLOWING FOR A HOTEL; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the governing body of the City of Wylie, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas with reference to the amendment of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, have given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners generally and to owners of the affected property, the governing body of the City is of the opinion and finds that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Map should be amended; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS: SECTION 1: That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Wylie, Texas, be, and the same is hereby, amended by amending the Zoning Map of the City of Wylie, to give the hereinafter described property a new zoning classification of Community Retail (CR) District with a Specific Use Permit (SUP) allowing for hotel uses, said property being described in Exhibit"A", attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. SECTION 2: That all ordinances of the City in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same are hereby, repealed and all other ordinances of the City not in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3: That the above described property shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City, as amended herein by the granting of this zoning classification. SECTION 4: Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance or the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as amended hereby, commits an unlawful act and shall be subject to the general penalty provisions of Section 1.5 of the Zoning Ordinance, as the same now exists or is hereafter amended. SECTION 5: Should any paragraph, sentence, subdivision, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any part or provision thereof, other than the part so declared to be invalid, illegal or unconstitutional, and shall not affect the validity of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as a whole. SECTION 6: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption by the City Council and publication of its caption as the law and the City Charter provide in such cases. SECTION 7: The repeal of any ordinance, or parts thereof, by the enactment of this Ordinance, shall not be construed as abandoning any action now pending under or by virtue of such ordinance; nor shall it have the effect of discontinuing, abating, modifying or altering any penalty accruing or to accrue, nor as effecting any rights of the municipality under any section or provisions of any ordinances at the time of passage of this ordinance. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas, this day of , 2006. John Mondy, Mayor ATTEST: Carole Ehrlich, City Secretary DATE OF PUBLICATION: ,in the Exhibit"A" Legal Description Zone Case#2006-05 BEING a tract of land located at the southeast corner of State Highway No. 78 and West Kirby Street, City of Wylie, Collin County, Texas and being all of Lot 4, Block A in the Martinez Phase 3 Addition. ; 11;%1'1 Subject1:I'!i, iit_ - e•t 6a :1==►`"77iir ��.1: .i■11. t�dII.. —...1 1..11111111 Property ` 1�1„1•MA,'- r �/�//:■ • l�``i�i11/1►t� �: = ll liii y i11rh6 •:�11111111111- - •• -----_.___..__ f_ ..*A, 1111/111i pDir ♦♦ 1111111111111/ ism m �{/► �"'� �►�//1/1//1/// �Ii��1111111111111� m. IN—# ,` ' ;�411111111111/111., :4/��,11, 11iii�Hiii�i�r�i& ibis, I11///1iii/1i/I 1�//111111111111F �� :,/nli ffii11itainn11111tI1tUumz g� 111111111111111 I .. groci/40 llille ,t, C IIIIIIIIIIUIIgHIII o ism : �Ililllllllllllilll,�% Alif.-' %� ss i///11111ar11l� ..r _..- -/III.._ , -ram- �� 2 � ��A/11111111lir: 1111111111 :==�__ _ ,/�' ',-' y?. !.... 1�1111111111111■ �. %11111►. U -_.._.. _._._'. illi .i Ill j ! % j —am it::ply i i ' simr MI I um swam ; i i iMN frpi es sim ., i F ".. : 'i r.. +N �1111111 _.._.r.._.. M 44 •• 1Ing . .444 ,..1 wit NE am„„-ow i , • — Ir. we"-011=Om rt. 1.1 MAI=i 'IV, f r ri,', 4IiLit1t ealrlirrilli...1‘,4t..4aritlx:Iiiiill:'4,19r 1/ 5 p �A O ..... . . . .. .. . ..°.. .... ........_ .. ._..-------••------_.._.._.°..--_.. v4* .-• 4d; 1u11111111111Vi • ° ,••ii ._.. i (1111TfTT1Al1s11111111111 ..��■�_ , r 1 I I I T 1 ,, ■ ID vIu1111n111111 lint: 1 11111111 I711.1 'Iii1l11 1111111/ ■g;m El -,,mI.aim -- -- ��•� ME NI ME MIN AIM IMAM MI ME=ANN M1111111 INII— --'-- ‘111111 - -- --�-- sr'G. SIN' � �� �= /7 • i al r c! '• ; ; wne we a. dn.,Alpn� rrrrr�711 _ --,- �lllllllllll/lllllll/ ; r . • LOCATION MAP ZONING CASE #2006-05 MVO., L Y.Adk.rhrr.•wdMa.r9.rlr rYr+n+Y rwalb.LOS • .. . . - A _ -- - -- - -- — x. + l.r+Y.r:+Y,..,m..,laadoas..a..a. Y na ac..M. PARN111E,Q NEHAL..NQ 1. I ,V. 1.TOTAL PARKING SPACES (7.)PREDICATED oN ..r.Pddw» �•/ , 1 SPACES PER INHABITABLE ROOM, , 4 pllaraeBCTD9E Iwbr..Yrrrnp9werd �'/y �•�� 2.ANDCAP ACC SPACES-.D OF REQTHED TOSE BF. � '.\7. HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE AND CE THESE{S).(i) I I F \!.i RPOUIRED TO BE VAN ACCESSIBLE. 90q;�/j � -P` I 1 CO a 9o•ndws:n9Nsr9'wrwrs+et6oc9lga \) 4.PARKING LOT STRIPING MIN.4'VADE, COLOR SAFETY j • , ,,•�' ,toA�1, ,/LOT.IexKAC YELLOW. ,, -' / LOT .. �y 5.HANDICAP PARKING SPACES AND VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACE f. Lab.d.wbrwrdr wdd..wa•6sr�d•A.7.I.dr _ a/20",'' \o,. STRIPING TO DE PAINTED BLUE. !! ' Ary.u•prylYAlt34060140an6egr9Mlr fNrr.9lM1+9adr Isat^�w,i"i •:War= . ,\$ qt •NO _ I j s. 1MWPr^YIiII�er.9N1•.Ns1piY lop sYi•lll+w rN ,r•` PROPERTY UNE - 9dr.r.0..•A �ly dA Y'/ C ` P VIIUTY EASEMENT — -'- •- __._ � � %P 0 / $ -.-.{---tip- -1`. \... BUILDING LAP T LINE _. -_-_ ___.... _ I I W ., ®.d.I....rrl.wl%l r.elirrh.usyle9nyehnif � /III`.- _ _�-`-_ '�^_.� i v FENCE '-"_'- Le—�_> I � > dd.19off WdbaA�eYrb9lr. -4' •\ GAS LINE "°__ __. I !. O \ IrW Ai �l�Ie Ar�Ib+MM �!0", l \ \-- \ w imAMrrwdrY4ldWY.. S A � A 6. m9aN+lsl+.e9a7w2r..srrrrarb.r+mw• A w �'I 1 I N. `., h .-_k - -.-- --- -_ -- _' ��-1m'L v. xrrDrrrw.d.r.drllrr,..w.�4si _ ,a .• . PROPERfr BUS ii : •rc r�T11. ...} _.-.__ __ — _ I T BACK-. ( Tj 4 t PwW...r..Bwtl.9.m�91gb 191:61. 'T ( 1 11. A • _ ). � A N13,IOri Mbrlrrnsp.rb Mr. ( PAVED W ACCESS EASEMENT I l'' - ..'M.�Y dYiMrny:'w•r+. •I UZ 0U W 29- I , - _. YIi •� I ..._.. - .. _._.-_....__ i- r9•rMiwl9rwmrrlewi w119.+gW14aIM++r.Yl�etwe. s»e \ t5 UIILTY F.AlEMENTiii ---- . .1 .AY.16T .ki h �� �- `� O •• I � A p 14 lerYNr�wrr�pe�r.+ynIIMNYi491M+Ydwlll.roil =I } va.ad: NORTH rc F drnIINA111iatt le �dMl+6etlxMrAarMi lAT0.BIACNA I ,n..w..�.6 .<I .. F ( I a..m9sDEr NI L3 t u rrr..tl wr..rrw6ero-nr.wd. � `.• j I•17.....H (_. 9\ I LL'�.. ! ^ II r �_..... j _._..__. u nwYer.+wamii.orae..abwwrim.lb.9aM.rr g IErlt�i, _J..'.` �_ I _t_�. � �.... _ _ .._.. arrwmrn•9+rnrw+Wow lr. � A9 _._ --...... -- _ — 10'SET HT ... \ N. \It fltYYaerlkllYfrg9b9B+a9r'JYYr9AWn10. i __.... J PRWERre LINE PROPERTY UNE j°"'4` SOOU01 UU E 554,SI' I N w-•,r - ..»w .. M r9.Y1r..AM(.r•.YArdw.WW.me WAND. ,M •*' __........_ __ —__./_.__...-._,� r y.._.._. rdi..dwW....wY...rdwA 3, wwwcr C 7[ _lt SEE7D37'00"E 10.00' a 1r shim wede* O`'I IF. PI_.AN -L2'N02036'26•E 10.00' U. [MCI*.ri immowed r Groat lO M. •�B.-y 13 5670376006E NO 00 • 1c CD R LC C1 57929'52" N2BO4256E 91.14 91,46 j 6]_67J 1. ..rW9a•rr....(drw........N.lrb.aA..} m.. ... .1....,.... __-.._-......____. I - _ `-.. 1 POO.Owned.r.wrb..l 9.y.Y.1.....1Y.tY. !. 'r.lyp.le{.I'....IdsIMel.wr6A'ldbr idL Abw..l 6•a.r,.ae.lr Malabo.rrrrr•B.re. Y� `,' , '.2 mint b.r99.lrappo.aw..9MrWli i r�°Aal s.ntiw'• ti ���� - --- - -.- s- b.....0..q..Y....rr.a.r9/aw...r.s..Y.grad 0. • - l;IJI ILI.I.,. •n me AA r.rr kn. _- 1 y /--•' I, s. waw.w..l..+r++..+N.rw..l..r.. .er.... • • I EiL.".1t d•9«:•:x • - «,." .r..s.rrmuw.tb.P11�s••Ar• 1.1.a.. • f ,. narsw.rr.e+.r.Yr>r«•••lry.orru9. A a HANDICAP RAMP ..rrr... 4 PRECAST CONCRETE BUMPER °CONSTRUCTION JOINT O�Y�: F rirot ae ,�r,,,.r,.,..,,,..rrA�,,, .• °x mu. _ + sulc '__ II �'�iw.sr.:, Ir.....46 b94 lag..r..IrgIl.«Y.1.....1..d.+rira A r• wren .1.-� • • L �li M..9.rr.0iA.Y..dn.0•4%.h/.r+..P,P.d.B• _°1� - ^ - ,.. ..w.n... MILI:11 .I+41•*11..;a9:rax ...a r .,d. 10. n.6sll.r9..rrlw is YN.rr dwr.Y9.irp.r rtrtr.. • .I.Mdrwd9.l.dr6.9....R .r9.r.I6.0.. :"a'1.." !_ -..,•. rr..a.d.Yr13•b••+•4Y►rM041*1d4l!►9.•ol ..IADIMawr. •Z._._ `-r W..Pa.ex lNr .w..t11 rm.. it, lfwlrrYrprr.r.er mow.(Q..1AIW+.M+I.M.rW .wvmu -... -�.ww • Y.we.r.le•. -_-_ • r• I nNu Q I:."".i."G'hw'"73^..`�' ).--n� .- ii .Yr.Or W.a.rY.Mi.Odom.. 8I12 PUN • U. lbw r.Ad or.w.rs Y.dr•.M d...d•r� .II.*.•.r. ®EXPANSION_JOINT ®HANDICAP SIGN DETAIL ®PIPE BOLLARD DETAIL A-03 .SALE: ACME - .wepT.0 S'11" ; 25 12' 6 3/A ,y 12'-6 3/4 "2 6 3/4" 1) 6 3 4k �I E /4" 12 A 3/4"�� 12 6 3/4" 7 B 3/4" 12 3/4 12 B 3/4" 12 S/4" 12 z1/2 16 41/4 v __..—..._ .___T_� _._ __—f--I +-'(r-� ..._. --T,i._ I -_ _.,. ._�iY_ /' ��... �D —' ."'_ __._�. . ....__._...__ _._..--...i" naa'c* Mee L�'.I I _I'2'..._� I w4RCn PH. LAUNDRY 1 .PAR I W >�` q 5 Cf1 i I RCi si G-E51 .L s., .GIla TN 4Y W tk m rc L�� ''UU �LJJ L A� a n 1 1 L N: J! hW% ,,, y ® . ', , t•1 0l n lip j� A I_ --tea, --- ----i 1 I " r 4.4• , ra.u«crpn YEg1: Jt �tiSE i lNf '1'H -L6.� _' O( O Ir,J l� �, C \c\c i) h L (4 i �'` . ,\"' 14 1� C/ to LJ 1�1 REPSR!_TroH yCv !IFNI JI I,4�/ \ Q 4-to I r/ ,' \I~I�\ „ (J .`T \\�.I.= "_ ," » Ur / 1 I'1 7 1"1 �� I a ;) o STAIR I "-1 L i _Ti L liil L+ ] �' �'® LtnJ EMI 6U �11 LLl fOS]R I, E -2 PERSON I _� ACLI2ZI 1UB �' `� ARCHED �i rt u OPENING 1� A ' IN -� '1 r I- l_ '7C j 4. �3'I, Jr'', 93,�' .,�3-f. �.•WE:T BAR'M iH SINK 2-- t" 3 3 I 11 �1 UNDER COUNTER REFRIGERATOR --i--' MUTER UTER TOP MICIIOWASE C'i 1 . I i i 1 1 4.-81/2 2' z5/e"4t tz 101/8" I2' 101/9 12 13/8' „IV 3348' 12 101/8" 2 10'/8" 12 3/8' 12' 33/8' 1?'-1111/R' 12-81/B" 11'-11/8' .J�. I1 s _ --- ..-_......_-- --- 'f g R }"�r-- ...._ __...- _E,....... .._ __.._. -_ - __- _.-__- __. -..- -.... TV-8 t 12 63/4' DI 6_e 1 I'-8" ;6'-8' - L1JEftAL..NfeI... ..�. I W BE S'UENDRY,STORAGE UM ROOMS,STARS.AND MECHANICAL ROOM _444 I� 2. ESTI DIRE RATED GYPSUM BOARD,(1 DIM ASSEMBLY) 1 l _LEPP TYP 12 0"CLEAR T'P 2.ALL EXTERIOR WALLS 244 CONSTRUCTION DIMENSIONED 10 OUTSDE PORTE CACHERE EDGE OF STUD AT BUILDING CORNERS. —I3.ALL INTERIOR CORRIDOR AND SEPARATING GUEST ROOM PART HON ' WALLS 246 CONSTRUI''RON NTH SOUND ABATEMENT. THESE WAI-LS ARE I 0 Qg DIMENSIONED TO THE CENTER LINE OF STUD TIP ALL. 4.ALL()HI INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS 2x4 CONSTRUCTION. I I I 0 I la la 1 DIMENSIONED TO TIE CENTER TINE Of STUB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. m I v PIA DING$0,Ll _ I .^ �[0 i .NAB BAR N Ili Z 2 0 W.4.L».� �' 1 lb i,'_3 3/8" fw.r ro /5\ 1 ,:-- - to:t \l'i et se t iii ................ ... , ..,, t., j 7 VP.. GRAB BAPS 6'-0 1. 2' I 6'-6 1 4' I5•'m.NO _ '-2)TYP.._IH C. Fs)0,0�1._I �`R. �3i1'1'. .INC 4DOl DOUBLE 6-61 J4 / 6-51/44` ROM. 13 0 1/2' / 15T LWAR, AN ) YP. HALLWAY EI\JRY S-)TYF' H.C, TOILET �4�u.M C._, E ._, A-04 116.4.11, 1 6 T 4' 12'-8 3 4' 12'-6 3 4" 12'-6..,/4" y 12E-6 3 4" 12.--6 5/4" 12-ES 3/4" 12'-6 3/4" / it-6 / 121-I 3 4 12'-9 3/4" 12'--7 V_"_ "-4 I/4' / 4.0(60a' COUNYEF SY 'I I 1 I / Ncmm.learuv SHEL0NG-- OMR L CHUTE JANIT]Ft 1O IS i { FLOOR ELEV. LJ L 6'EQUIP, Bal r4 i v. } _- ---1,--ii ,I,F---' li aT-1,43-- li= )../ i )121i(i')aLic_i) q))-1 A G: J.). ,.'i 0 C).f.k:t..—.......r.--- N m Win, ---�. 3y u / STAIR I CW.41011 nm[45-Rww .� 4 .. yea 1-. l� J. V Ci �` �' lJ lL' 11 W+ '° "J ® 4 `�'.-,■py�_p„,'J/■[�'7 ) V + (����w�g'''.-, /1�1'�' r, C` lII (.7) [}� _ fS1AIR 1 •�i-' \ B I!j)\. 1..1 If\J,?,l Vr�i/6 I'.,��' /v'Oil fiL(iiii'. �.. -` l� `t �L -N._.___.. _ w4.w �.+ �w STAIR 11' /4 /B 3 " —� tf_.. ...__ EYEBROW 04' -/ - b ARCH KiNOOW t .'UE.I Wf51 y�g 1 nr" q€�-i cu�51 ty�;1 �x.g us �y PAWL L&] �B ® "E_ IL N''I 1+�.+J h S Idlti L+1+7 cm �:�J �'[ 1 R �- .1 P RS(NJ _- + BA` h JACUZZI TU8^ m i N Q 4-‘) S �.......__ __.._.._-..._.___._.__ { WE 9AF MtH`NK 4',53 "12 S3/4' T- 1.!.-11/< 12'-?1/2' i_ 31/4" LINDERE TR 1. -k3 � ) 'I , '(' FEFR AIlkNG 12' 61i2 1 -101/0 12-J3/R" 12'-33/8 11-1G 1/8" •2 101/B 17'..3/8` 1Y-12,/8" 4,1 12'-101/S" 17'-P1/8" 11-115/6" COUIEFTOP I` '12ND FLOOR OVERALL., ____._. _._.+— 6L 21/8 ` ' a t L ga? i--t- 1,-._....-.-.-_......_ TOE _...... iGRAB �. S [BARS l I 9 i 6 3 7u. ♦ 5 .,�... ROOM�'0 4 �Y I n A8 GI(51 �. /�.. nC.t1Lti ®/� �l d a 1 Kd1Y 10'JYA4 M1OC4 mWb crop , 1 LJ LJ > ii PRINKING FOUNTAINS __. - w-iw w Z' ._ - p� °' (} DA AvOUNTAILE ' a w. '6..w- W - 'I I FLOOR 1..E 1 A veaww 4 I SINK // i�Y - „a tzs,a--- a.e»w- — 1 /='y" . = E: . il ^'� _ mnrAv. --—iry ON,. 4,. 1 ,y L, .N wY. • oM.eo[b w __. ON ` 3'a—.� d k� '-51/a1--2 5/811 11 1/e1.1,'/8. :, ,6eos n w ... q _ _ aww 4r _ ORi g .. as itr a ELEV. Sr �- w �Y"mtl JuttaR r� -PA ONES - =Z " j„,.,, I Lij ,64 Van:-::4-; -- 'rJ iJ SERVICE COUNTER ^ -1 E w-n Q 1K.ww- w-., m --- .L Wow- yrx*w-n - _...___ �.r_n- anw-rt, L) & 4" 1 3/4 E' 111/2 0 _ /^ yy w MI a �� 14-3 3/4 11 3 J/ u !® .+ Z L t� • 5 a( I ow+.'..m asaw•m1u mw. I VW..1 r*pot,.us.µ.en I. - \ COUNTERTOP 0, '..._ v'o w ar. ___I VI.114 Ow N...oximx. ______.._.-..._......__-._.-_._ Cl-DEEP BASIN p,. u rem Aw --' UTILITY SINK . w ,e46 u rem ISM -_ C3Ll 1/� _.. --» as.em ww sm m.nt Cl ` v KAMM u goo mw Aw w,* _._._._ - ����*�1� SHELLING \C RATED DOOR. �+� • # asmAw..nma-r+z ....... �� "„� / -- 1 AND FRAME V , _ �' Q n mr _._. `IJ� ,. .sl uW Band•�moma \ L-I_ �'".r- 11� m 6 719` '� A .._.c iAIR I C L 1. lo ``'DRYER iH 2U • 11 ____ 1..WINDOW SCHEDULE KALI..41/N 8, I i C,) J MI o sewlw _._.-.-. -----mm 9! Nwmralm e laoe _�... _._ ___ / �r 1 -� .._ ___ _-_._.— w NANL oaN.r. 6 8EP>k NOTFS I ME t.WALLS AT LAUNDRY.STORAGE ROOMS,STAIRS.AND MECHANICAL ROOM I TO BE 5/8'FIRE RATED GYPSUM BOARD,(1 HR.A EMBL.Y) �_ IMP_E" 2.ALL EXTERIOR WALLS 244 CONS fRUCT10N DIMENSIONED TO OUTSIDEL EDGE OF STUD AT BUILDING CORNERS. _�� 3.ALL INTERIOR CORRIDOR AND SEPARATING GUEST ROOM PARTITION 2U'-G 1/8" 15'-7" 2O-1 1/2" PLAN WALLS 2.G CONSTRUCTION MTH SOUND ABATEMENT THESE WALLS ARE -{ "'III / DIMENSIONED TO THE CENTER LINE or STUD TIP.ALL. o_[ _ SERVICES / C AREA r A. �05 1.ALL OTHER INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS 2r,4 CONSTRUCTION, l^\I E N A \�7l_�l L R Y v L J '"A I\L-A DIMENSIONED TO THE CENTER LINE OF STUD UNLESS CTHERWiSE NOTED. / ' G .SCALE a Kti vJw. I -----SIGNAGE BY OTHERS PROADE POKER 4 CDUPOLA , 35 YEAR ARCHITECTURAL SF11NG!F.i -----—.-_-"' I 12 2 // III 12 �\I� ----...-_._ / \` •,.� ---------�'�/ ��IJU _.__.. _�+:1�;: � ._-\ _ _1 FIN GLG V CROVE-.� ____; [\ ----� . I^I �BTJCCC-� .� --_ F- ��_._.. -. _�._ _ _ FIN FL COn�n..M .— i I I - IN;lr. IN iil ill L I® �stucco i� f�,�, I�` j m NFL' I LEFTFRIGR COLUMNS / ` )FRONT ELFVA.T ,ION . u OTHERS PROVIDE R OTHERS POWER uloelrsr L-CTUCCC CORNICE ----�-y-- DETAIL I --- 35 YEAR ARrHTEC11RAL Sn1NClF _ STUCCO 12 12 ALL HINDOA/P-TAG B I�U UNITS TYPICAL. ,^'� /'"`•. � \ Ird CO infillilliAllii. b 1�1 I�T---it 11- Q IN -1W-STUCCO ��w.iIN F. STUCCO BAND I 1. L 1 __ ___�E......_ .. ........___ 1_ J_.._-- ._.___ ..—.... __ --"" _-- —'�' N CLG LU ()\EAR ELEVATI0N i 2? uc_.Lie E QUO cc W 2 a 2R o PROVIDE BY OTHERz; __ER 1 r ` V i SIGNAGE BPY 01- .. ___-�-�STUCCO CORNICE �STVCCC CORNICE Z::.MAIMS COUPOLA /,�\ DETAIL DETAIL LI 12 �� TUfCO li \1.... 12 ID LS 09 ill bl - - .��H� R .,� �r� FIN CL.0 UN CL T --- _-.. owm a�nw 1 STUCCO- STUCCO-I � _____-t.. _ ._ �_.._..__-�_._-- STUCCO-,, 1 1 _...� �� CLEARANCE - mn ooc7 ! PURTF.COCHERE FIN CLG I '- -i - 01.1-111. JC N CLG STUCCO-1 PORT COCHERF : ELEVATIOW 7 1 - _ 514 FL ON F. --..- L - _.I _ A _.._.. SOW wnNa 4. LEFT ,ICF ELEVATION A_06 tE_ RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION -;„""' ,-.-0_` • • \ 3-R \,\ - \ /111LO.Q)L. \ 2A C.) 1 I 2C ) I ,7 /. West K • .. . ,. • • 9 , .... -..7,.,-,i. ".'.',• 3,5 3., 41/4,3 „ 41 .1.,2„ ',, .. 3 4,0ii,, ''.i.t'•.4 35 .• '. 0 v ' ' ,; :,,1''''.-‘,1 3 7 " ' '' ' '• .--..!'•'-'4 '":,,:.'..i. -Ls / \ ,,, ‘ # 4-,--?.,,,,i, •••:, .:1 - rio El > .. .• • ••, ., \ .1,, „ .• .,..,:: / ..,:„' #A.. k,%iv, . 5 7. Ae-••&•S;•••;••_t,ft.,• <.‘ - X'5_.'Sj • 4',..v..4:-2a24';s\'VY . 1 ill :' : 0 .,1,=?:*",-,.ii-tt.,,,`,.:. •. 3 L..., .-,,,,4. 32 5 . .t.4,4VZ• ',!\ .• 3 .. .:.L., . • ' • •\\ •:`W; ,l'. , ,.$1.. '0. 7, N2, 31 • .L.-5'V- '''"‹,•C',-, 7" "„,'•-rva,,-N;i.,4',:,,,-",,,-"' ", ..•s_ el \\. (':,1,::';',•::;•;;AvV i'Prt-'‘;',7,"..:' ' ' g--4,.-- ...,„„,..,t,,,,I.:,-.,,,,,,,,,,,, * ,0 ,.,,c,,.. : i'i., 33 — ‘ t,:.:.,4;‘,!4'., r..2-'-‘ - 77 .?-."i!, a \ \ c '"',.'t.,:.W„.:.,,:..',-.• • -A;';i,,,,.';::l.,,'4L . •Rs ',.z.1m,6:-...,'',.-r4-• - I zg \\. 9 L- 0 -.;. ,;,,,#t. . , ; IQ E - 7 ,, - - ';'-:.''''' 27 . .• „ 0.) . • • . 25 I ,.. ,. - ' .;."e..;•.c. 0 \ .• 7 V. \ • . 12 12 • ( \\ 25 IN . .• \ \\• •,& 2 I .- • A°51 '.(a\--• 7 -c) , 0 < ) L._ 0 wirek, 1 - 1 1 \ ..... . ., ZONING CASE #2006-05 NOTIFICATION REPORT APPLICANT: Pat Fussell APPLICATION FILE #2006-05 110 N.Harrison Street San Augustine,Texas 75972 N # , BLK/ABST LOT/TRACT TAX I.D.# PROPERTY OWNER NAME ADDRESS 1 Applicant 110 N.Harrison Street 1 Pat Fussell San Augustine,Texas 75972 Martinez#1 2121 Posey Lane 0 2 BIkA Lot 1 R-2591.00A-0010.1 Henry Martinez Wylie,Texas 75098 Martinez#2 2121 Posey Lane 3 BIK A 2 R-2570-00A-0020-1 Henry Martinez Wylie,Texas 75098 Martinez#2 PO Box 250 4 Blk A 3 R-2570-00A-0030-1 Flying I.Cellular Commerce,Texas 75429 Martinez#3 5608 S.Lamar 5 BIkA 4 R-4620-00A-0040-1 Ken Urn Dallas,Texas 75215 Martinez#2 2121 Posey Lane 6 Blk A 5 R-2570-00A-0050-1 Henry Martinez Wylie,Texas 75098 Martinez#3 9334 Whttehurst Drive 7 BIk A 6 R-4620-00A-0060-1 Zack Ahn Dallas,Texas 75243 Wylie Shopping Village PO Box 1411 8 Bik 1 Lot 1 R-2446-001-0010-1 Brookshire Grocery Company Tyler,Texas 75710 Holiday Terrace PO Box 54 9 Blk 1 Lot 1 R-1163-001.0010.1 Geneva Schultz Wylie,Texas 75098 802 Mardi Gras Lane 10 Bik 1 2 R-1163-001.0020-1 Pete Hernandez Wylie,Texas 75098 PO Box 69 11 Bik 1 3 R-1163-001-0030-1 A.A.Hatfield Wylie,Texas 75098 806 Mardi Gras Lane 12 Bik 1 4 R-1163-001.0040-1 Ngarge Shaw Wylie,Texas 75098 808 Mardi Gras Lane .°11 13 Blk 1 5 R-1163-001-0050-1 Bobby Gathard Wylie,Texas 75098 810 Mardi Gras Lane 14 Bik 1 6 R-1163-001-0060.1 Jerome Allen,Jr. Wylie,Texas 75098 900 Mardi Gras Lane (`) 15 Blk 1 7 R-1163-001-0070-1 Frances Simmons Wylie,Texas 75098 902 Mardi Gras Lane 1.-r t C)V- ^ 16 BM(1 8 1-1163-001-0080-1 Lois Leopard Wylie,Texas 75098 Wells Fargo Bank 3 Ada ti=r C- ltViT 17 BAr 1 9 R-1163-001-0090-1 TR for Option One Mort Loan 2003-1 Irvine,California 92618 906 Mardi Gras Lame 18 Blk 1 10 R-1163-001-0100-1 Dorothy May Wylie,Texas 75098 60C1 Lckesho•e dive -19 8 k 1 '1 R-1163.O01.01 IC-I Hal Portman Rowet,Texas 75089 910 Math Gros Lane 20 Bik: 12 1-1163.001.0123.1 D.W.VJac Wyllie,Texas 75090 1000 Mord'Gras..one 21 Bic 1 I R•1163•OC1.313O-1 Atha WigIngton 1f8e,Texas 75098 _ '302 Mord Gras lone 22 81k 1 14 R-1163.001.0140-: JustoCrtega VMe,Texas 75098 6809 Sob:e Lone 23 Be 2 Lot 26 R-1'63.002.0260.1 Jammer Mangan Soles,leads 75048 (rousing&Jim Develop-nog 5040 Adelson Circle 63:0 24 8k 2 27 R-1163-0O2-027C-1 a/oSoe,ThwestAlanneal Asset tilers Aadscn,Texas 76001 311 Mow Wood 91•ees 25 8k 2 28 R-1163-002.0280•' _ Ralph Roz'er II Plato,Texas 75094 905 Mond Gros!one 26, Bk 2 29 R-1163-0C2.0290.1 , Ramon Ah4zo Wybe,'mos 75098 903 Mad Gras Lore 27 8ik 2 30 R-1163-002.0300.1 .ola Michael Mlle,Texas 75C98 90'Mond Gros Lone 28 85 2 31 . R-1'63.002.0310.1 Biota Lessons WVIe,Texas 75096 'tancdph.hang Tn.s1 5365 FM 1569 29 elk 2 32 R-1163-0O2-032G1 Roy Rondo ph Farrne'st4Fe,Texas 78442 1421 Hain Dee, 30, Be 2 33 R-1 163•CO2-C330-' Jahr•C-owo _ WV e,Terns 78098 807 Mad G'as,.one 31 BFt 2 34 R-1163-002-0340-1 J.R.H'ds-non WyIe,Texas 75098 805 Mad Gras Lore 32 36e2 35 1•'163-002-0350.1 RezaCarr>pbeli Wylie.Texas 75C98 803 Maud Gros Lane 39 8 k 2 36 R-I 163-002-3360-1 Eric Smalley Wylie,Texas 75098 4504 Vllner Pak Dive 34 ADst 267 Tract 26 R-62674000.0260-1 Soars•Gra,;p,LP Rlcha-dson,exas 75082 35 36 37 38 39 40 I i z. West K s" g _ '� a) \\ -0---r;\\ \\ :i L. ...........q4..e. .— 0 _ • \ Tr 24, _-o <, I -_ O 1 `'= 2DQ( t3,- ZONING CASE #2006-05 PITSLTC COMMENT FORM (Mese type or sae black ink) Department of planning 2000 IIigrway 78 North Wylie.Taos 75098 v 1 am FOR the requested zoning as cplamod on the attached public meld air Zoning Case F2006-05. _ I am AGAINST the requested=ling as explained on the attached public notice for Zoning Case#2006.05. Dam,Location g Tune of Planning& Commission meeting Tnteday,May 16,2006,1:00 pm Municipal Complex.2000 HiOmay 78 North,Wylie,Texas Date,Location&runt of City Caucil meeting Tuesday.Juno 13,2006,6:00 pm Municipal Complex,2000 Highway 78 North,Wylie,Texas Oolease pint) Addles 9 96 aggS .96/sue s- COMMENrs: PUBLIC COMMENT FORM (Phase type or one black ink) Ihywtmwt of Nanning 2000 Highway 78 North Wylie.Texas 75098 r I um FOR the requested zoning as explained on the attached public notice for Zoning Case k2006-05. 1 am AGAINST the tequested zoning as explained on the attached public notioc for Zoning Cast#2006-05. Date,Location&Time of Plannitg l2 ZOtwig Cmnmitc on meeting: Tuesday,May 16,2006,7:00 pm Municipal Complex,2000 Highway 78 North,Wylie,Texas Date,Lotaeion A.Time of City Council meeting: t uesday,)cane 13,2006,6:00 pm Municipal Complex,2000 highway 78 Noah,Wylie,Texas Name' iv (please print) Addiess: Z1a..l fir_ _may J- e /f .L.G ;f-X 7S C f_6 rr7 Signuufc' �. _ i. Date: 5- /d-"CC COMMENTS: (r�CL,'r PUBLIC COMMENT FORM ffileesc ewe w etc black ink) Department ofPlanning 2000 Highway 78 North Wylie,Taus 75098 KV I am POE the segoes0ed sating as explained on the attschod public soda for Zoning Case 8200645. — I mu AGAINST die rammed swinges expiaimd on the attached public notice for Zoning Case 8200605. Dams,Location&Time of Planning&Zoning CommisWon meeting: Tuesday.May 16,2006,7:00 pm Municipal Complex,2000 Highway 78 North,Wylie,Texas Dote,1Location&Time of City Couatl mooting Tuesday.Jane 13,7006,6a0 pm Municipal Comae,2000 Highway 78 Nardi,Wylie,Taws Mum' Lois Leg pAkID (please print) Adds: a A4 A-A JJi G-IP 115 Date: Gljoer1i ,. . e COMMENTS: PUBLIC COMMENT FORM Meese ore or IOC bleat a Department of Planning 2000 Highway 78 North Wylie,Texas 75098 I am FOR the requested zoning as explained an the attached public notice for Zoning Case 82006.OS fI am AGAINST the requested zoning as expla1Oed on the mewled public notice for Zoning Case#2006-05. Date.Location&Time of ng Claming m i meeting: Tuesday,May 16,2006,TOO pm Commixsion atwing: Mauicipol Complex.2000 Highway 78 North,Wylie,Texas Date.Location&Tune of City Council meeting Tuesday,lune 13,2006,6:00 pm Municipal Complex,2000 Highway 78 North,Wylie,Texas Nente: mr`,t � dY t'ti (please pri ) Address: 5?Cs re%Q.-Cd_O Signature Date: 4- a7_e) COMMENTS; t 1k- t IV a ri, Zeivfi WO. KG..ues [r ued tt\erts- 'P/8is )e c/ h4 lje• f'o-1- has Q-nc./ -{-rts.se.bk, C_ f,_)�U. 1CI Oa. 4 S @ 4.1` c.Lii-- 1. • Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT g Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 2 Department: Engineering (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Chris Hoisted Account Code: Date Prepared: June 2, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: One Subject Conduct a Public Hearing, consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-34 amending a portion of the Wylie Comprehensive Master Plan Ordinance No. 2005-19, adding Brown Street from S.H. 78 to Stone Road to the Thoroughfare Plan. Recommendation Motion to approve Ordinance No. 2006-34 amending a portion of the Wylie Comprehensive Master Plan Ordinance No. 2005-19, adding Brown Street from S.H. 78 to Stone Road to the Thoroughfare Plan. Discussion Currently, improvements to Brown Street are not on the Thoroughfare Plan and a roadway must be identified on the plan to be included in the Thoroughfare CIP. The traffic impact of the new WISD High School makes expansion of the roadway necessary. Design and construction funds for the project were included in the 2005 City Bond Program. On May 2, 2006 the Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the addition of Brown Street from S.H. 78 to Stone Road to the City's Thoroughfare Plan. The Commission approved the recommendation by a vote of 5-0. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2006-34 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A PORTION OF THE WYLIE COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN ("COMPREHENSIVE PLAN") ORDINANCE NO. 2005-19; ADDING ADDITIONAL STREET(S) TO THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR REPEALING, SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Wylie ("City Council") has investigated and determined that a portion of the Thoroughfare Plan of the Wylie Comprehensive Master Plan ("Comprehensive Plan") Ordinance No. 2005-19 of the City of Wylie, Texas ("Wylie") should be amended in order to add additional street(s); and WHEREAS, Wylie has complied with all notices and public hearings as required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it will be advantageous, beneficial and in the best interest of the citizens of Wylie to amend a portion of the Comprehensive Plan as set forth below. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE,TEXAS: SECTION 1: Findings Incorporated: The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: Amendment to the Comprehensive Master Plan Ordinance No. 2005-19: The portion of Brown Street from SH78 to Stone Road is adopted to be part of the Thoroughfare Plan. SECTION 3: Savings/Repealing Clause: Wylie Ordinance No. 2005-19, Wylie's Comprehensive Plan, shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this or any other resolution or ordinance. All provisions of any ordinance or resolution in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed; but such repeal shall not abate any pending prosecution for violation of the repealed ordinance, nor shall the repeal prevent a prosecution from being commenced for any violation if occurring prior to the repeal of the ordinance. Any remaining portions of said resolutions or ordinances shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4: Severability: Should any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it is expressly provided that any and all remaining portions of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Wylie hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, and phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid. SECTION 5: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage. Brown Street—Thoroughfare Plan Amendment Page 1 451347-1 DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS on this day of , 2006. JOHN MONDY, Mayor ATTESTED TO AND CORRECTLY RECORDED BY: CAROLE EHRLICH City Secretary DATE OF PUBLICATION: , in the Brown Street—Thoroughfare Plan Amendment Page 2 451347-1 L \ r Pass in no � iQ. SO TV L7 b . -....."... ILI'I AN MR maim LEGEND It TON tell AK .---------�------------ ---� --- ---------------- -----�-� � Table 1. Thoroughfare Capital Improvement Plan City of Wylie 2006 Impact Fee Update PROJECT BOUNDARY PROJECT LENGTH CONSTRUCTION COST COST OF TOTAL PROJECT COST ARTERIAL NUMBER FROM TO EXISTING DESCRIPTION (ft) TO THE CITY FINANCING ELIGIBLE FOR RECOVERY_ FM 1378 Wt FM 544 W Brown St 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 3,500 $ 1,032,000.00 $ 650,160.00 $ 1,682,160.00700000.00 $ 6 ,000.00 $ 15,811,000.00 FM 1 9,700,000.00 $ 6,111 378 W2 W Brown St Parker Rd 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 13,200 $ 9 ,111,000.00 $ 15,8 ,000.00 11 W Brown Street W3 FM 1378 Ballard Ave 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 9,500 _$ 2,200,000.00 $ 1,386,000.00 $ 4,670,000.00 Hensley Lane W4 Hensley Hooper --- Build a 3-lane undivided section 3,100 $ 3, 86,000.00 6,500,000.00 $ 4,950,000.00 $ Country Club Road W5 FM 544 Hooper --- Build a 4-lane divided section 5,500 $ 5,000,000.00 $ 3,150,000.00 $ 11,150,000.00 McMillen Road W6 Lewis Country Club(FM 1378) 2 lanes Realign and build a 4-lane divided section 6,000 $ 2,900,000.00 $ 1,827,000.00 $ 4,727,000.00 McCreary Road W7 FM 544 South City Limit --- Build a 4-lane divided section 3,350 $ tub Total $ 36,332,000.00 $ 23,744,160.00 $ 60,076,160.00 - Alanis Drive El Century Way S Ballard 3 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 4,400 _$ 3,550,3,550,00.00 $.00 $ 2,236,500.00 $ 5,786,500.00 ,236,500 00 $ 5,786,500 00 Alanis Drive E2 Twin Lakes FM 544 4 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 2,700 $ Kirby Street E3 SH 78 Birmingham 4 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 1,400 _$ 1,705,792.83 $965,000.00 $ 1,074,649.00 $077 64000 $ 28441.83 .83 Stone Road E4 Birmingham S Ballard 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 8,300 $ 1,70,,572,950.00 Stone Road E5 Ballard Akin 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 2,800 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,260,000.00 $ 4,890,000.00 S Ballard Avenue E6 Stone Rd Alanis Dr 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 3,600 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 1,890,000.00 $ S Ballard Avenue El Alanis Dr County Line 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 6,200 $ 1,070,000.00 $ 674,100.00 $ 1,744,100.00 Stone Road E8 Alkin Vinson 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 13,500 $ 10,400,000.00 $ 6,552,000.00 $ 16,952,000.00 Brown Street E9 SH 78 Stone 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 11,100 $ 6,300,000.00 $ 3,969,000.00 _$ 10,269,000.00 SH 78 E10 Eubanks Spring Creek Pkwy 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided highway section ,b Total $ 33,000,000.00 $$ 21,890,000.00 $ 54,890,000.00 0 $ 70,922,792.83 I $ 45,536,359.00 $ 116,459,151.83 Grand Total: Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT q Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 3 Department: Engineering (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Chris Hoisted Account Code: Date Prepared: June 2, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: Two Subject Conduct a Public Hearing on the City of Wylie Thoroughfare Capital Improvements Plan. Recommendation Discussion On May 9, 2006, City Council adopted an Ordinance establishing the date for a Public Hearing on the Thoroughfare Capital Improvements Plan. Section 395 of the Local Government Code specifies the process necessary for the implementation of impact fees which includes a public hearing to discuss the Thoroughfare CIP. The C1P identifies projects necessary over the next ten (10) years to serve the projected growth of the City. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 t�—a_ I 1 I I >s. .... mo _ . , Ilirr LItElli r-= ii _ . , . ____ °t' ''' ro7,00 'mmon i ''':' !gra Vlik__ u ,. _ mil sr, i -.....pu---.1-in . , _„..„,- - , PIA „--4.,, ,or-Ww:-/ift. :/ , . 1--iiiiiiii 1 !-. -7 ..11 lig-- 1-51.7"-iiii= --------. , -;,-. ---- Agrallila • ��—• t= — ���� /1 !\ 4/' _ . /.;.�_ WOOL 1 (AEI I .,." ..r:1lllll�=,�nll/1 I :I �• �, [ ram 1r'IlI I III■ �' bill I IIMI I Ind _ - RuipmiTuroint. el 0 .17...„4 '4". ‘: .,,. - 1 1:- , r le. , _ ir$$. "II" .'- $' .$. I Pe rP..$1r=:7"."7...:.Ili Mort L-44k!- - , , . '� �S�F'' ; ( 7-tpli ...' I I I II I I I I I 111Mil 1' /j' r /,f IIIIII I�IlmImm - topill!lia ,� . ���/� 3 %i%.,.,�..._._ '� Ififlir`' /% �I Ira" a i 'a y//,-77// , \ • , 47 ( rit, , , .. .... ,._,,, ., ___, . p.„„.p•- C, s I, i ,` .,, ' s / ',Ira 11,111111/14 ,��W..�ILITA ' _„i,� PRELIMINARY DRAFT . \ ,,,.., z \• • �• .iewiwij � FOR REVIEW ONLY rr ,' � is .� �1• °�' � lil I�� , cau+lr ,, CITY OF WYLIE COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTIONAL/PUBLIC & SEMI—PUBLIC COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR I 1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL I I HEAVY INDUSTRIAL I I SCHDDL/CHURCH/PU&JC/sEMI-PUBLIC ;1 THOROUGHFARE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1 I COMMERCIAL RETAIL I 1 MEDUM DENSTY RESOENTIAL I I LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I 1 PARK/OPEN SPACE 9MaOW.IENORICKS&OONVIMY.a a ENGINEERING 0.113..111.0-NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES I I HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FI00DPLNN OVERLAY WY. I I DOWNTOWN HISTORIC CISTRICT OVERLAY Table 1. Thoroughfare Capital Improvement Plan City of Wylie 2006 Impact Fee Update PROJECT BOUNDARY PROJECT LENGTH CONSTRUCTION COST COST OF TOTAL PROJECT COST ARTERIAL NUMBER FROM TO EXISTING DESCRIPTION (ft) TO THE CITY FINANCING ELIGIBLE FOR RECOVERY FM 1378 W1 FM 544 W Brown St 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 3,500 $ 1,032,000.00 $ 650,160.00 $ 1,682,160.00 FM 1378 W2 W Brown St Parker Rd 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 13,200 $ 9,700,000.00 $ 6,111,000.00 $ 15,811,000.00 W Brown Street W3 FM 1378 Ballard Ave 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 9,500 $ 9,000,000.00 $ 5,670,000.00 $ 14,670,000.00 Hensley Lane W4 Hensley Hooper --- Build a 3-lane undivided section 3,100 $ 2,200,000.00 $ 1,386,000.00 $ 3,586,000.00 Country Club Road W5 FM 544 Hooper --- Build a 4-lane divided section 5,500 $ 5,000,000.00 $ 3,150,000.00 $ 8,150,000.00 McMillen Road W6 Lewis Country Club(FM 1378) 2 lanes Realign and build a 4-lane divided section 6,000 $ 6,500,000.00 $ 4,950,000.00 $ 11,450,000.00 McCreary Road W7 FM 544 South City Limit --- Build a 4-lane divided section 3,350 $ 2,900,000.00 $ 1,827,000.00 $ 4,727,000.00 Sub Total $ 36,332,000.00 $ 23,744,160.00 $ 60,076,160.00 Alanis Drive El Century Way S Ballard 3 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 4,400 $ 3,550,000.00 $ 2,236,500.00 $ 5,786,500.00 Alanis Drive E2 Twin Lakes FM 544 4 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 2,700 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 1,638,000.00 $ 4,238,000.00 Kirby Street E3 SH 78 Birmingham 4 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 1,400 $ 1,705,792.83 $ 1,074,649.00 $ 2,780,441.83 Stone Road E4 Birmingham S Ballard 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 8,300 $ 965,000.00 $ 607,950.00 $ 1,572,950.00 Stone Road E5 Ballard Akin 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 2,800 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,260,000.00 $ 3,260,000.00 S Ballard Avenue E6 Stone Rd Alanis Dr 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 3,600 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 1,890,000.00 $ 4,890,000.00 S Ballard Avenue E7 Alanis Dr County Line 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 6,200 $ 1,070,000.00 $ 674,100.00 $ 1,744,100.00 Stone Road E8 Alkin Vinson 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 13,500 $ 10,400,000.00 $ 6,552,000.00 $ 16,952,000.00 Brown Street E9 SH 78 Stone 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 11,100 $ 6,300,000.00 $ 3,969,000.00 $ 10,269,000.00 SH 78 El Eubanks Spring Creek Pkwy 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided highway section 3,200 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 1,890,000.00 $ 4,890,000.00 tub Total $ 34,690,792.83 $ 21,792,199.00 $ 56,382,991.83 Grand Total: $ 70,922,792.83 I$ 45,536,369.00 I $ 116,469,151.83 Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 4 (City Secretary's Use Only) Department: Engineering Prepared By: Chris Hoisted Account Code: Date Prepared: June 13, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: Three Subject Consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-35 adopting the City of Wylie Thoroughfare Capital Improvements Plan. Recommendation Motion to approve Ordinance No. 2006-35 adopting the City of Wylie Thoroughfare Capital Improvements Plan. Discussion On May 9, 2006, City Council adopted an Ordinance setting the date for a Public Hearing on the Thoroughfare Capital Improvements Plan. Section 395 of the Local Government Code specifies the process necessary for the implementation of impact fees, and City Council previously conducted a Public Hearing on the proposed CIP. The CIP identifies thoroughfare projects necessary over the next ten (10) years to serve the projected growth of the City. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1of1 ORDINANCE NO. 2006-35 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE,TEXAS,ADOPTING THE THOROUGHFARE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN; PROVIDING FOR REPEALING, SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, Wylie has fully complied with Chapter 395, Local Government Code, concerning the notice,adoption,promulgation and methodology necessary to update and adopt land use assumptions and a capital improvement plan establishing impact fees; and WHEREAS, the City council previously adopted the City's Land Use Assumptions by Ordinance No. 2006-10 within 30 days of holding a public hearing regarding the Land Use Assumptions; and WHEREAS,Wylie has adopted this Ordinance within thirty(30)days of the public hearing held by the City Council on the proposed thoroughfare capital improvement plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the citizens of Wylie to adopt the thoroughfare capital improvement plan. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE TEXAS: SECTION 1: Findings Incorporated. The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: Capital Improvements Plan Adopted. The City Council finds that the thoroughfare capital improvements plan attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated for all purposes as if fully set forth herein,is hereby adopted and approved and shall supersede any existing thoroughfare capital improvements plan. The City's Land Use Assumptions,adopted by Ordinance No.2006-10 are attached hereto as Exhibit B,and incorporated as if fully set forth herein. Following adoption of this Ordinance,both Exhibit A and Exhibit B may be relied upon to call a public hearing to consider the imposition of a thoroughfare impact fee. SECTION 3: Saving/Repealing Clause. All provisions of any ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed;but such repeal shall not abate any pending prosecution for violation of the repealed Ordinance,nor shall the repeal prevent prosecution from being commenced for any violation if occurring prior to the repeal of the Ordinance. Any remaining portions of conflicting ordinances shall remain in full force and effect. Adoption of Thoroughfare CIP--Page 1 453268.v1 SECTION 4: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason, held to be unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Wylie hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance,and each section,subsection,clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, and phrases be declared unconstitutional. SECTION 5: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS on this 13th day of June, 2006. John Mondy, Mayor ATTESTED TO AND CORRECTLY RECORDED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Carole Ehrlich ABERNATHY, ROEDER, BOYD City Secretary & JOPLIN, P.C. RICHARD M. ABERNATHY JULIE Y. FORT City Attorneys DATE OF PUBLICATION: , in the Adoption of Thoroughfare CIP--Page 2 453268.v 1 EXHIBIT A THOROUGHFARE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Adoption of Thoroughfare CIP--Page 3 453268.v1 ROADWAY IMPACT FEE 2006 - 2015 FINAL DRAFT REPORT Prepared For • 111, CITY OF WYLIE r Prepared By BIRKHOFF,HENDRICKS & CONWAY L.L.P. & LEE ENGINEERING 7502 GREENVILLE AVENUE, #220 17440 DALLAS PARKWAY, #204 DALLAS, TEXAS 75231 DALLAS, TEXAS 75287 May 2006 FINAL DRAFT REPORT CITY OF WYLIE THOROUGHFARE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ROADWAY IMPACT FEES The first step in the development impact fee process is the development of a 10-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). This capital improvement plan includes projects intended for construction by the City of Wylie in the next 10 years to serve existing and future development. The CIP was provided by the City of Wylie. Existing Facilities The City of Wylie arterial and major collector street system is partially developed at this time. Several roadways in developed areas are partially built to current thoroughfare plan standards. Many existing streets are two-lane(20' -40' width)asphalt roadways with open surface drainage. The existing major arterial roadways within the City include State Highway 78 (SH 78), FM 544, FM 1378, Ballard Avenue, Brown Street, and Stone Road. Several arterial roadways including SH 78, FM 544 and FM 1378 are under the operation and maintenance jurisdiction of the Texas Department of Transportation(TxDOT). Proposed Facilities The City of Wylie adopted a revised Comprehensive Plan including an updated thoroughfare plan in 2005 that is the basis for development of the future street system. The thoroughfare system is a conventional network conforming to a hierarchical, functional classification system developed to support the forecast traffic demands of future land use and. The highest classification of roadway is the Principal Arterial type facility. These roadways are generally multi-lane (4 or 6 lanes) with median dividers that serve the function of controlling access, separating opposing traffic movements and providing an area for the storage of left turning vehicles. The lower classifications are the collector facilities that are developed to serve the adjoining development. The character of the developments served should determine the sizes and alignments of collector roadways. City of Wylie-2006 Roadway Impact Fee Page I FINAL DRAFT REPORT Capital Improvement Plan for Impact Fees The thoroughfare facilities determined for inclusion in the Capital Improvement Plan of this study are tabulated in Table 1 and graphically illustrated in Figure 1. Each listed project includes a description of the planned improvements, the project length, and estimated cost to the City. In addition,under existing State Statute, a municipalities' cost associated with TxDOT facilities can be financed with impact fees. All roadways included in the CIP are identified in the City of Wylie Thoroughfare Plan. Construction costs, without the benefit of a detailed preliminary engineering study for each project, have been determined based on data provided by the City of Wylie. Financing costs for the projects in the thoroughfare CIP were also included in the total estimated cost. City of Wylie-2006 Roadway Impact Fee Page 2 FINAL DRAFT REPORT Table 1 Thoroughfare Capital Improvement Plan City of Wylie 2006 Roadway Impact Fee N. PROJECT BOUNDARY PROJECT LENGTH CONSTRUCTION COST COST OF TOTACPROJECT COST ; ARTERIAL NUMBER , FROM TO EXISTING DESCRIPTION (ft) TO THE TOWN FINANCING ELIGIBLE FOR RECOVERY FM 1378 W1 FM 544 W Brown St 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 3,500 $ 1,032,000.00 $ 650,160.00 $ 1,682,160.00, FM 1378 W2 W Brown St Parker Rd 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 13,200 $ 9,700,000,00 $ 6,111,000.00 $ 15,811,000.00 W Brown Street W3 FM 1378 Ballard Ave 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 9,500 $ 9,000,000,00 $ 5,670,000.00 $ 14,670,000.00 i Hensley Lane W4 Hensley Hooper --- Build a 3-lane undivided section 3,100 $ 2,200,000.00 ,$ 1,388,000.00 $ 3,586,000.00 Country Club Road W5 FM 544 Hooper •-- Build a 4-lane divided section 5,500 ' $ 5,000,000.00_$ 3,150,000.00^S 8,150,000.00 McMillen Road W6 Lewis Country Club(FM 1378)_ 2 lanes Realign and build a 4-lane divided section 6,000 , $ 6,500,000.00 $ 4,950,000.00 $ 11,460,000.00 McCreary Road W7 FM 544 South City Limit •-- Build a 4-lane divided section 3,350 $ 2,900,000.00$ 1,827,000.00 $ 4,727,000.00 ub Toter$ 36,332,000.00 $ 23,744,160.00 $ 60,076,160.00 Alanis Drive El Century Way, S Ballard 3 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 4,400 $ 3,550,000.00 $ 2,236,500.00, $ 5,786,500.00 Alanis Drive E2 Twin Lakes FM 544 _4 3 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 2,700 $ 2,800,000.00 $ 1,638,000.00 $ 4,238,000.00 Kirby Street E3 SH 78 Birmingham 4 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 1,400 $ 1,705,792.83 $ 1,074,649.00 $ 2,780,441.83 Stone Road E4 Birmingham S Ballard 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 8,300 $ 965,000.00 $ 607,950.00 $ 1,572,950.00 Stone Road E5 Ballard Akin 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 2,800 '$ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,260,000.00 $ 3,260,000.00 S Ballard Avenue EB Stone Rd Alanis Dr 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 3,600 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 1,890,000.00 $ 4,890,000.00 S Ballard Avenue E7 Alanis Dr County Line 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 6,200 $ 1,070,000.00, $ 674,100.00 $ 1,744,100.00 Stone Road E8 AlkIn Vinson 2 lanes , Build a 4-lane divided section 13,500 ,$ 10,400,000.00 $ 6,552,000.00 $ 16,952,000.00 Brown Street E9 SH 78 Stone 2 lanes Build a 41ane divided section 11,100 '$ 6,300,000.00 $ 3,969,000.00 $ 10,269,000.00 SH 78 El Eubanks Spring Creek Pkwy 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided highway section 3 200 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 1,890,000.00 $ 4,890,000.00 bub lotar$ 34,590,792.83 $ 21,792,199.00 $ 56,382,991,83 Grand Total: $ 70,922,792.83 I $ 45,536,359.00 I $ 116.459.151.83 o_I_�_, ► I I 0 III I 1 ,:///rA.,. ,_ i •• ' ! TT; — O1.16 j ` � lf ..i_,,a_.. -• J=I 0 ,',, Ilill& z -, 4. • 1r^_� III.=,•, it -_ - a I lira I i i I illIE--Isf __.) ,,/ ' M II I 'rill. 1-1711401,41-," ' IIN ger,,,, /., 4 : iij..--- Ait , , IFFirtt 110 „,/ I 4111._t_■kii.J --;-.--1 -.. =1 • t., .. ly IllP 1(1011111 — ; .:74. • -,1' 11111111111141114111 i ILL.. ..:.-- i=__.„*, i— ,,. _, ,_ --. ,- i -,,, - , Th- Y r A ; -,_ , ,.. ......... „ ......, _ _ „„......._,.. , rAll 1 ��I (!l 1 % c , I (� Ij�"Iota �4 .�w—lllm ... \ 4 1"1"—Er , i F/I . Ain,,, , r...,,i ofionil,cr___-_-,.; EJ It J ,1 .. III ?,�w1 may 2 iliii 1111111111r7;111 =-__—====s-",../b,_414'=--ii - - L _(_ ;Fill- /i'l? W. o ' 6 1 Alp ra I� y�iiii J I _ I J' 1•, ill L ,—_.f+i , i �a 2 y nlj,� is 14) 4 ' 1. �Q�RLryi5�111'llrs �. ) ,ii _.,, , I .Miii INA Iij 7 UM= Tr LI!I \ V ./''--- , . . mill,gaim v.10/4. II � � �. PRELIMINARY DRAFT \'�jro I FOR REVIEW ONLY --1 f f- it :• , : IWNI �hAt 7/( . 1 _..., ,,,,, / . „......_ _ _ e „.4 :11 '' CITY OF WYLIE COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTIONAL/PUBLIC & SEMI-PUBLIC I I COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR I I LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL I I HEAVY INDUSTRIAL 1--I sCHDOL/CHURCH/PUBLK/sEMI-Pt Jc THOROUGHFARE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS I I COWERCW.RETAIL I I MEDIUM DENSITY RESDENIUL I I LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I I PARK/OPEN SPACE IIIRICWIFF.Hoamacs•CONWAY.L.LP.&LEE oomo O 0241141.11110.,o...oes NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES I I HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FLOODPLNN OVERLAY MAY.AM I I DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT OVERLAY FINAL DRAFT REPORT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION I. INTRODUCTION The next step of the Development Impact Fee process is the determination of the maximum fee per service unit that can be charged by the City for new developments. The fee is calculated by dividing the costs of the capital improvements identified as necessary to serve growth forecast to occur during the 10-year planning period by the number of service units of growth forecast to occur. The specific steps, as described in following paragraphs of this section include: 1. Determination of a standard service unit; 2. Identification of service areas for the City; 3. Identification of that portion of the total capital improvements necessary to serve the projected growth over the next 10-year period; 4. Analysis of the total capacity, level of current usage, and commitment for usage of capacity of existing improvements; 5. Determination of the "standard service unit" and equivalency tables establishing the ratio of a service unit to the types of land use forecast for growth. II. SERVICE UNIT To determine the impact fee rate applied to thoroughfare facilities the standard service unit selected was "PM Peak Hour Vehicle-Miles." This service unit can be obtained by multiplying the number of trips generated by a specific land use type during the PM peak hour (vehicles) by the average trip length (miles) for that land use. The PM peak hour was chosen because it is usually considered the critical time for roadway analyses. The trip generation data were directly obtained or derived for each defined land use type from "Trip Generation, 7th Edition" of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, which is the standard data reference to determine vehicle trip generation characteristics of particular land use types and densities. Trip length information for each land use specified was based on data developed for the Dallas-Fort Worth area by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). The trip length was set at a maximum of three (3) miles for any land use, as this trip length was assumed to be the maximum average distance a trip would travel on roadways within the City of Wylie. Table 2 shows the typical service units for each land use type. City of Wylie-2006 Roadway Impact Fee Page 5 FINAL DRAFT REPORT Table 2 Service Unit Calculation by Land Use Type City of Wylie 2006 Roadway Impact Fee Variable PM Peak Trips' Trip Length Vehicle-Miles i (vehicles) (miles) Residential Dwelling Unit 1.01 3.0 3.03 y 1 Office 1,000 ft2 1.49 3.0 4.47 Commercial/Retail 1,000 ft2 3.75 2.4 9.00 Industrial 1,000 ft2 0.98 3.0 2.94 i Public and Institutional 1,000 ft2 1.01 2.1 2.12 • Parks and Recreational _ Acre 13.01 2.1 27.32 'Based on ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition 2 Based on NCTCOG data I FINAL DRAFT REPORT III. SERVICE AREAS The State Statute governing the imposition of development impact fees require that collection and expenditure of fees imposed for street facilities "...is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six miles." To comply with this State Law, two service areas (West and East) were established for the City of Wylie to ensure that funds are spent within six miles of where they are collected. The service areas include most of the developable land within the city limits of Wylie. Within Wylie, the growth and intensities of growth for the ultimate development of the City and that portion of the service area expected to occur during the 10-year period, 2006-2015, is forecast. The two service areas are shown in Figure 2. IV. ASSUMPTIONS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA Determination of the eligible costs of capital improvements to serve the forecast growth over the 10-year period, 2005-2014, was based on data provided by the City of Wylie. The basic criteria and assumptions made for this study include the following: 1. Costs of existing facilities constructed to serve new development have been included, and City of Wylie staff identified projects of this type. 2. Bond interest costs are included. 3. Street facility improvements, although necessary for additional capacity by new growth, will logically serve all existing and future growth by improved safety and drainage characteristics. Therefore, the 10 year eligible costs have been proportioned as the ratio of the 10-year growth to the total number of service units determined for the build-out. Table 3 shows the portion of ultimate build-out service units that will be attributable to growth within the next 10 years and is used to pro-rate the identified costs in the service area. In order to maintain the equity of impact fee assessment, the cost for streets included in the 10-year Capital Improvement Plan will include the total cost of the street facilities, not reduced by any expected participation. Rather, construction by a developer of an arterial facility within or off-site should be treated as a credit to the impact fee assessment. City of Wylie-2006 Roadway Impact Fee Page 7 ' . .._ . , , ;,..... I. ._..... WEST _.If` /.v-i... Te I I I _J L. i _ �� " Y 7 --4 r • tf L 1 -'- I1. s' I 4',� 1 I ' 1 �� t ,-- • . :II ,Lil EAsT . ,. ..... —7 _ , _. I t 1 it III r WYLIE ROADWAY FACT FEE • - SERVICE AREAS FINAL DRAFT REPORT Table 3 Summary of Vehicle - Mileage Distribution by Development Period City of Wylie 2006 Roadway Impact Fee Existing 2006-2015 Year 2016-Ultimate Portion of Vehicle-Miles Portion of Vehicle-Miles Portion of Service Vehicle-Miles Ultimate Ultimate Added Ultimate Added Ultimate Area 2005 Vehicle-Miles 2006-2015 Vehicle-Miles 2016-Ultimate Vehicle-Miles J W 30,597 0.443 34,057 0.493 4,431 0.064 69,085 E 16,563 0.422 21,972 0.560 670 0.017 39,205 Total 47,160 56,029 5,100 108,289 FINAL DRAFT REPORT V. ELIGIBLE COSTS Table 4 presents a summary of the roadway capital improvement costs for the two service areas. The 10-year portion of the total costs was calculated using the data from Table 3. Costs of each of the individual street projects were accumulated, or apportioned, for the service area in which they were located. Boundaries of the service areas were located to be coincident with natural barriers,the center of existing or proposed street facilities included in the capital improvements plan or along city limit lines. Costs of these projects included only those costs that will be paid for by the City of Wylie. VI. DETERMINATION OF STANDARD SERVICE UNIT AND EQUIVALENCY The determination of growth of service units and resulting impact fee rates were then made. Table 5 presents the derivation of service unit equivalents for each of the six defined land use types. The service unit equivalents are referenced to and based on the residential land use. Table 6 presents a summary of the calculations and resulting eligible costs per service unit. Under current State law, municipalities are required to administer a detailed fmancial analysis to support the use of an impact fee higher than 50 percent of the eligible costs. As an alternative to performing the financial analysis, the impact fee can be set at or below 50 percent of the total eligible costs. The total eligible costs per service unit are shown in Table 6. These City will use a detailed financial analysis to adjust for tax credits or will use 50 percent of these eligible costs. VIL IMPACT FEE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY The methodology for calculating the maximum allowable impact fee for roadway facilities can be summarized in the following three steps. The first step is to determine the cost of the roadway facilities (existing roadways eligible for recuperation of construction cost and proposed roadways) that can be attributed to new growth over the ten-year period. This calculation for Service Area W is summarized on page 14. City of Wylie-2006 Roadway Impact Fee Page 10 FINAL DRAFT REPORT Table 4 Summary of Capital Improvement Cost by Service Area City of Wylie 2006 Roadway Impact Fee Zone Cost of Portion of Capacity of Cost of Thoroughfare Service Area Thoroughfare Attributed Attributed to Growth Thoroughfare to Growth(2006-2015) (2006-2015) W $60,076,160.00 0.493 $29,617,546.88 E $56,382,991.83 0.560 $31,574,475.42 Totals $116,459,151.83 $61,192,022.30 FINAL DRAFT REPORT Table 5 Thoroughfare Land Use Equivalency City of Wylie 2006 Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Development Veh-Miles/Development Unit SU Equivalency Unit (1) (2) Residential Dwelling Unit 3.03 1.00 1 Office 1,000 ft2 4.47 1.48 Commercial I Retail 1,000 ft2 9.00 2.97 Industrial 1,000 ft2 2.94 0.97 Public and Insitutional 1,000 ft2 2.12 0.70 Parks and Recreational 1,000 ftl 27.32 9.02 Notes: (1) Based on data from the ITE Trip Generation Manual and NCTCOG (2) Ratio of each land use to service unit of Residential 1 1 FINAL DRAFT REPORT Table 6 Impact Fee Calculation for Thoroughfare by Service Area City of Wylie 2006 Roadway Impact Fee Cost of Thoroughfare Number of New Cost Per Service Area Attributed to Growth Service Units Cost Per Service Unit (2008-2015) (2006-2015) Service Unit (Rounded) W $29,617,546.88 34,057 $869.65 $869 E $31,574,475.42 21,972 $1,437.01 $1,437 Totals $61,192,022.30 56,029 FINAL DRAFT REPORT Cost of Roadway Facilities(Table 1 - Service Area W)_$60,076,160 Proportion of Capacity Attributable to New Growth(Table 3 - Service Area W)=0.493 Cost of Roadway Facilities Attributable to Growth(2006-2015 -Service Area W): $60,076,160 x 0.493 =$29,617,546.88 The second step is to determine the maximum calculated impact fee. The maximum calculated impact fee is the ratio of the total cost for roadway facilities attributable to growth in the next 10 years (2006-2015) divided by the total growth in equivalent service units (ESU). The maximum calculated impact fee for Service Area W is: Maximum Roadway Impact Fee=Eligible Thoroughfare Cost Attributed to Growth(Table 4) Total Growth in Equivalent Service Units (Table 3) = $29,617,546.88 34,057 ESU = $869.65 /ESU=$869/ESU(Service Area W) This amount represents the maximum calculated impact fee for roadway facilities. For the final step, the current impact fee legislation requires the City to produce a financial analysis to support a fee greater than 50 percent of the eligible costs or to reduce the maximum calculated impact fee by 50 percent. Impact Fee Calculation Example The land use equivalency table is provided in Table 7. This table identifies the total service units generated by specific uses within each land use category. To obtain the impact fee to be charged for a particular land use, the impact fee per service unit adopted by the City and the service units per development unit generated for that particular land use from Table 7 are used. Examples for calculating the impact fee for both a single family dwelling unit and a 50,000 ft2 shopping center (commercial/retail facility)assuming an impact fee of$232.50 per service unit(50 percent of the maximum allowable impact fee)are shown page 16. City of Wylie-2006 Roadway Impact Fee Page 14 FINAL DRAFT REPORT Table 7 Land Use Equivalency City of Wylie 2006 Roadway impact Fee • CATEGORY LAND USE DEVELOPMENT ITE TRIP TRIP PASS-BY SERVICE • UNITS' RATE2 LENGTH' TRAFFIC` UNITS5 RESIDENTIAL • Single-Family Detached Dwelling Unit 1.01 3.0 0 3.03 Apartment Dwelling Unit 0.62 3.0 0 1.86 OFFICE Office Building 1,000 ft2 GFA 1.49 3.0 0 4.47 COMMERCIAL Convenience Stores/Gas Pumps 1,000 ft2 GFA 60.61 0.4 0.7 7.27 • Drive-In Bank 1,000 ft2 GFA 45.74 1.7 0.5 38.88 Home Improvement Store 1,000 ft2 GFA 2.45 3.0 02 5.88 Hotel Rooms 0.59 3.0 0 1.77 Restaurant 1,000 ft2 GFA 10.92 2.4 02 20.97 Shopping Center 1,000 ft2 GFA 3.75 3.0 0.3 7.88 INDUSTRIAL Industrial 1,000 ft2 GFA 0.98 3.0 0 2.94 INSTITUTIONAL School Students 0.15 2.1 0 0.32 Day Care Center Students 0.82 2.7 0.9 0.22 House of Worship 1,000 ft2 GFA 0.66 2.1 0 1.39 1 GFA=Gross Floor Area 2(Vehicles):Based,on ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition 3(Mlles);Based on NCTCOG Data `Percentage of traffic already passing by site-land use is an intermediate destination 5(Vehide-Miles) 'The land uses and trip generation characteristics listed in this chart are intended as examples.The complete table of land uses and trip generation characteristics is contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers"Trip Generation,Seventh Edition,`which is incorporated herein by reference. 1 i FINAL DRAFT REPORT SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING (Service Area W) • Vehicle-Miles per Development Unit for Single-Family Dwelling Unit (1 Dwelling Unit) x (3.03 Vehicle-Miles/ Dwelling Unit) = 3.03 Vehicle-Miles • Assume 50 percent of the Maximum Calculated Roadway Impact Fee = $434.50 / Service Unit: (3.03 Vehicle-Miles) x ($434.50/ Vehicle-Miles) _ $ 1316.53 50,000 112 SHOPPING CENTER (Service Area W) • Vehicle-Miles per Development Unit for Shopping Center (50,000 ft2) x (7.88 Vehicle-Miles/ 1,000 ft2) = 394 Vehicle-Miles • Assume 50 percent of the Maximum Calculated Roadway Impact Fee = $434.50/ Service Unit: (394 Vehicle-Miles) x ($434.50/ Vehicle-Miles) =$ 171,193.00 City of -20O6 Roadway Impact Fee Pagc I0 Table 1. Thoroughfare Capital Improvement Plan City of Wylie 2006 Impact Fee Update PROJECT BOUNDARY PROJECT LENGTH CONSTRUCTION COST COST OF TOTAL PROJECT COST ARTERIAL NUMBER FROM TO EXISTING DESCRIPTION (ft) TO THE CITY FINANCING ELIGIBLE FOR RECOVERY FM 1378 W1 FM 544 W Brown St 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 3,500 $ 1,032,000.00 $ 650,160.00 $ 1,682,160.00 FM 1378 W2 W Brown St Parker Rd 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 13,200 $ 9,700,000.00 $ 6,111,000.00 $ 15,811,000.00 W Brown Street W3 FM 1378 Ballard Ave 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 9,500 $ 9,000,000.00 $ 5,670,000.00 $ 14,670,000.00 Hensley Lane W4 Hensley Hooper --- Build a 3-lane undivided section 3,100 $ 2,200,000.00 $ 1,386,000.00 $ 3,586,000.00 Country Club Road W5 FM 544 Hooper --- Build a 4-lane divided section 5,500 $ 5,000,000.00 $ 3,150,000.00 $ 8,150,000.00 McMillen Road W6 Lewis Country Club(FM 1378) 2 lanes Realign and build a 4-lane divided section 6,000 $ 6,500,000.00 $ 4,950,000.00 $ 11,450,000.00 McCreary Road W7 FM 544 South City Limit --- Build a 4-lane divided section 3,350 $ 2,900,000.00 $ 1,827,000.00 $ 4,727,000.00 tub4otal $ 36,332,000.00 $ 23,744,160.00 $ 60,076,160.00 Alanis Drive El Century Way S Ballard 3 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 4,400 $ 3,550,000.00 $ 2,236,500.00 $ 5,786,500.00 Alanis Drive E2 Twin Lakes FM 544 4 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 2,700 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 1,638,000.00 $ 4,238,000.00 Kirby Street E3 SH 78 Birmingham 4 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 1,400 $ 1,705,792.83 $ 1,074,649.00 $ 2,780,441.83 Stone Road E4 Birmingham S Ballard 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 8,300 $ 965,000.00 $ 607,950.00 $ 1,572,950.00 Stone Road E5 Ballard Akin 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 2,800 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,260,000.00 $ 3,260,000.00 S Ballard Avenue E6 Stone Rd Alanis Dr 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 3,600 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 1,890,000.00 $ 4,890,000.00 S Ballard Avenue E7 Alanis Dr County Line 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 6,200 $ 1,070,000.00 $ 674,100.00 $ 1,744,100.00 Stone Road E8 Alkin Vinson 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 13,500 $ 10,400,000.00 $ 6,552,000.00 $ 16,952,000.00 Brown Street E9 SH 78 Stone 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided section 11,100 $ 6,300,000.00 $ 3,969,000.00 $ 10,269,000.00 SH 78 E10 Eubanks Spring Creek Pkwy 2 lanes Build a 4-lane divided highway section 3,200 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 1,890,000.00 $ 4,890,000.00 $ubTotal $ 34,690,792.83 $ 21,792,199.00 $ 56,382,991.83 Grand ThAMIIIMEIEMIIMIIMIIMIIIIIIIMIIMIIMIIIMIIMIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIMIIMICIIMILIMBIMI $ 45,536,359.00 $ 116,459,151.83 I , I:2:1 1 r .. a 1YJ� 1i %I � � / ��/110 7 / `, - 1iI lf j�/r. 1�^___ �II II low.. - _ _ ,—, .... , grit, , •• • ,,,,r,I ) VP ' ,.., - --- - - - ..: .7 ,.....4 :,-„, 42 mini! , vi. 6,0 . .,,,,. . . ..._............... i- z , 1 i EN I.M 11 +` 1E r-'� jhrTMlnR'pE -^r ,ppw—lll �` 1. i`1=��rL 11411 �, ,II111� �IIT p ,TIIT.�� illl ' '�� _� _ ��wl� un Tn` f_� I _ I � Ali >L I-_ 7,- .. c 4— IJ — ) 1 T 1 us �� I ---7 Tilliv.......111th............._ _ _ _ i_ 1,1"N." A LII (-)-I i......... yt r i1 /4 r 's ,Ik.n1..-1l1i111:*J. _=t_a,• —1I.-.I"II.I, 7/ tea, o ,fin L __7, f� -ffi mi u Fi % - IIIIII W] :'lIIIIIIIIIIII �,j • r. i / , �' :, iFm m I. III :. 'sI' (•jq ' = ',,mar�r- „,,„„,f /�II __ ( ! + dipp ' tI.. il,',', _ { L. i t --- p'I I �. V41 \, - 1 PRELIMINARY DRAFT V. ' • • Al '' .' * �•. // FOR REVIEW ONLY 1111 u -,,+ ,e, .N o , �`�` __,� ',> = 4ff.-'i‘ 4- '<i _411 CITY OF WYLIE COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTIONAL/PUBLIC & SEMI-PUBLIC g I COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR I I LOW DENSf1Y RESIDENTIAL I I HEAVY INDUSTRIAL L I SCHOOL/CHURCH/PUBLIC/sou-PUBLIC ;! THOROUGHFARE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1 COMMERCIAL RETAIL I I MEDIUM DENSITY RESDENTIAL I I LIGHT INDUSIRML [ I PARK/OPEN SPACE ewaaFF.MINIMS&aaMwAT LLP.•LEE ENGINEERING OOnMTNG DIWm1• 4Y.Y•• I I NEIGHBORHOOD SEANCES I I HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FLOODPIMN OVERLAY r.v.a•w I I DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT OVERLAY EXHIBIT B LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Adoption of Thoroughfare CIP--Page 4 453268.v1 Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,LL,P. III. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS (Provided By: The City Of Wylie) A. Purpose Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code prescribes the process by which cities in Texas must formulate development impact fees. The initial step in this process is the establishment of"land use assumptions" for the City upon which the impact fee program is based. These land use assumptions, which are derived from the Future Land Use Plan and from population projections adopted in the Comprehensive Plan, will become the basis for the preparation of impact fee capital improvement plans for water and wastewater facilities. To assist the City of Wylie in determining the need for, and the timing of, capital improvements to serve future development, a reasonable estimation of future growth is required. The purpose of this report is to formulate growth and development projections based upon assumptions pertaining to the type, location, quantity and timing of various future land uses within the community, and to establish and document the methodology used for preparing the growth and land use assumptions. B. Elements of The Land Use Assumption Report This report contains the following components: 1) Methodology -- Explanation of the general methodology used to prepare the land use assumptions. 2) Service Zone Map (Plate 1) — The impact fee service area for water and wastewater facilities. 3) Base Data — Information on population and land use for Wylie for each capital facility/impact fee service area. 4) Ten-Year Growth Assumptions — Population and land use growth assumptions for ten years for each capital facility/impact fee service area. 5) Ultimate Population Projections — Projections that reflect a completely developed condition,based upon the City's ultimate"build-out" scenario. 6) Summary—Brief synopsis of the laud use assumptions report. j:\clerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fccoNreporte\report-1.doc -7- Birkhoff Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P. C. Methodology Based upon the growth assumptions and the capital improvements that will be needed to support future growth, it is possible to develop an impact fee structure which fairly allocates capital improvement costs to growth areas in relationship to their impact upon the entire infrastructure system. The database and projections in this report have been formulated using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles and methodologies. These land use assumptions and future growth projections take into consideration several factors influencing development patterns, including the following: 1) The character, type, density and quantity of existing development 2) Existing land use patterns 3) Anticipated future land uses(as shown in the City's Future Land Use Plan) 4) Availability of land for future expansion, and the City's physical holding capacity 5) Current growth trends in the City and region 6) Location and configuration of undeveloped(vacant)land 7) Known or anticipated development projects 8) Potential sanitary sewer availability (e.g.,topographical constraints) 9) Growth policies adopted in the Future Land Use Plan A summary of the general methodology used for the preparation of this report follows: 1) Establish impact fee water and wastewater service areas (see Section II — Service Area Map). 2) Collect/determine benchmark(i.e., base year)data on population and land use as of January 2005(see Section III—Base Year Data). 3) Project population and land use growth for ten years by impact fee service areas (see Section IV—Ten-Year Growth Assumptions). 4) Project the ultimate population for a fully developed City, assuming full development of service area(s)(see Section V—Ultimate Population Projections). A more detailed methodology for each is contained within the referenced sections. Pderical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact feeArepott\i pott-l.doc -8- Birkhoff Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P. D. Service Area Maps Figure 1R on the following page shows the proposed service area for water and wastewater facilities. The service area boundary for wastewater includes all land area within the existing City limits, all that land within the Wylie water CCN, and those portions of shared CCNs that Wylie will serve as development occurs. The service area boundary for water includes all that land within the Wylie water CCN, and those portions of shared CCNs that Wylie will serve as development occurs. A recommended priority listing of projects for water and wastewater facilities will be outlined in the City's Capital Improvements Program (CIP). The actual ten-year CIP upon which the impact fee program must be based will be prepared separately,per the requirements of Chapter 395. j:bleucal\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fend eporte ceport-1.doc -9- .11 !. h' ; i1o1 -L � „L•�., 'I : � Lawn Lake _1:9 ` _ • R ;Iasi*EA �t>< III • , �;� - -,- n, :, i vg 1.z=..:.. . . ', Mei 1 ,j fr.... . lop . . ,__ _ _ice- _i uI a Pr __i_..........„:......„ � I �a ,..�•. r-_ip III - l�.,�z�� ', 00,00��. 1 lit,44, p.--.1 I I1. . . ... / It F Iti11111. —AA," ,-- it: - 0...±__ \'- , II 411' !rid . . _____„,....... . .. — , die, Igl � _ .I�. n _ IIII����I •' _ . -- 4 1...,,,...... ,,_ , , ii. �=_ , ,-..„inu III ■ ,�II� ► r _ i�` —=1111111I11/ 1 I _m ..:2..2...! • I:771, . _ ` �- • iTP, - Ilp.zpaff.:-..:1-..... ...., ..'t 1 i 'V 4", _,/ '' OM Le ' • -.\-7 I A'-' e-V I' va Jill' *31111 pri .,/ „i 7),,_4 11111Uh11:1 �. II !!LL'. -. •- �rr�_'''�%l//ail • • -- ; so, • eits _ __ . .. h wi .e. _ r 1 NMI •., , a H.— : ' I 'lle jjI19Iii "i — — 1`'4P'4454". f N •::: t Irk Tn+ILaEGECIrta75111"NIERDLAffsmact'Er 41 1 -3' 41F ill ill ._::: 'dmNrA o s000 woo e000 { I .•� Lnn�'�,t� MI FEET _ I �pI�i I��. ��.� ��,60+:•44it, V.,‘ -li Luke Ray Hubbard ./././X' -1'"?_i) 4 I , , -„, _. *,,,, it 40,.,,-,.... FIGURE IR �E � .>�� �;_ CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS dir.r/rit ��ila um 4101:0//lir ••�,e�0r� �� " WATER AND WASTEWATER `lbw •\wr '4� _ SERVICE ARFA IMP - •'l= = \^ ` ',.�4'�' �C: �IOIpI.IOO•ICXS a OpIMY.t1-?. ` Y, , ;7 ,.. N.K,•F ,ail• ,■. - Birkhoff Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P. E. Base Year Data This section documents historical growth trends and base data for the City. This "benchmark" information provides a starting basis of data, as established in the City's Future Land Use Plan and updated in April 2005,for the ten-year growth assumptions. One method of predicting future growth is looking at past growth. The historical growth rates for Wylie are shown in Table 1 below. Table 1 HISTORICAL GROWTH RATE City of Wylie,Texas Compounded City of % Average Annual Year Wylie Change %Change per Period 1970(1) 2,675 0.0% 0.0% 1980(1) 3,152 17.8% 1.6% 1990(1) 8,716 176.5% 10.7% 2000(1) 14,965 71.7% 5.6% 2004(2) 26,150 174.7% 15.0% (1) Source: U.S. Census. (2) Source: City of Wylie,April 2005. Over the 30-year period of 1970 to 2000, the City of Wylie experienced a significant amount of growth. The City is continuing to experience a significant increase in population,housing, and commercial development activity. As of January 2005, the City of Wylie had a total of 2,852 residential lots in various stages of development, including recently approved zoning cases and plats. The build-out of these lots will increase the existing housing stock as follows: 8,980 existing units (2004)+ 2,852 future units (2005) = 11,832 units or 31.8 %increase. Accordingly, it is anticipated that the City has the lot inventory to maintain the significant increases in population and housing growth experienced over the last ten to twenty years. It is also anticipated that the City will continue to receive petitions for the zoning and platting of new subdivisions. There are a number of pending development cases that will provide for additional new residential units. j:clencel\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fem\rcporta\report-1.doc -11- Birkhoff Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P. Another comparison and useful base data source for population growth is the past trends in residential construction. Table 2 shows the growth trend in residential construction in the City from 2000 to 2004. At the end of 1999 there were approximately 5,340 residential units this is the base number for percentage of growth. Table 2 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS PER YEAR City of Wylie,Texas Year Prior Total Residential Units New Residential Units %Growth 2000 5,340 385(1) 7.2% 2001 5,725 749(1) 13.1% 2002 6,474 1,085 (1) 16.8% 2003 7,559 1,415(2) 18.7% 2004 8,974 1,162(2) 12.9% Average:959 new residential units per year over 5 years Source: (1) Current Housing Estimates, North Central Texas Council of Governments,2000,2001 and 2002. (2) City of Wylie Building Department,2003 and 2004. The growth in housing shown in Table 2 illustrates the recent trend in residential activity for the City of Wylie. The trend shown here reflects that observed for the recent trend in population growth. The City has seen sharp increases in residential growth over the past few years. As mentioned earlier,the City's available lot inventory is increasing. For the purposes of documenting changes in population, land use, density and intensity, the data format to be used as a basis to formulate the land use assumptions will be principally population and land use estimates. These estimates and the land use inventory, from the City's Future Land Use Plan, were used to establish a beginning baseline and updated to January 2005 for the projections for Wylie. 1) Population and Land Use Existing land uses were documented throughout each of the service areas in development of the Land Use Plan. Residential and non-residential building activity for each of the service areas was then analyzed to establish base population and employment estimates for January 2005. �:Ncleueal\wyiie\2002-164w&ww impact� rtkepon-1.doe - 12- Birkhoff Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P. The estimated population in January 2005 for both service areas is: Water Wastewater • Population 25,325 29,427 • Dwelling Units 8,980 10,434 • Households 8,585 9,975 These residential calculations are based on the following assumptions: • Occupancy Rate 95.6 percent(2000 U.S. Census for Wylie); and • Average Household Size 2.95 persons/household(2000 U.S. Census). 2) Land Use Prior to an evaluation and projection of future land use patterns, an understanding of existing conditions is essential. Documentation of existing land use patterns within the City and its ETJ was included as part of the Land Use Plan. This data has been updated to reflect the residential and non-resident development activity that has occurred through January 2005. This documentation provides an overview of the general present physical composition and condition of the City. Table 3 shows a summary of estimated existing land uses for the land area within the water and sanitary sewer service zones. TABLE 3A Existing Land Use For The Water Service Zones—2004 City of Wylie,Texas Acres Used Percent of Land Use (Developed) Developed Area _ . Pam Low Density Residential 1,527 21.71% Medium Density Residential 2,352 33.43% High Density Residential 142 2.02% Commercial/Retail/Office 265 3.77% School,Public/Semi-Public, Services 198 2.81% Downtown Historic District 34 0.48% Utilities/Heavy Industrial 373 5.30% Light Industrial 2 0.03% Parks&Open Space 88 1.25% Agricultural 2,054 29.20% Total Area: 7,035 100.00% Source:City of Wylie,April 2005. JAcieucal\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact feeeeQort 4aporFl.doe -13- Birkhoff Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P. TABLE 3B Existing Land Use For The Sanitary Sewer Service Zones—2004 City of Wylie,Texas Acres Used Percent of Land Use (Developed) Developed Area Low Density Residential 2,799 22.87% Medium Density Residential 3,501 28.60% High Density Residential 186 1.52% Commercial/Retail/Office 482 3.94% School,Public/Semi-Public, Services 334 2.73% Downtown Historic District 34 0.28% Utilities/Heavy Industrial 447 3.65% Light Industrial 155 1.26% Parks &Open Space 213 1.74% Agricultural &Floodplain 4,090 33.41% Total Area: 12,241 100.00% Source:City of Wylie,April 2005. Table 4 shows a summary of estimated existing land uses(as of April 2005), in acres per 100 persons, assuming 3 people per ESFU for the land area within the water and wastewater service areas. TABLE 4A Existing Land Use Per 100 Persons For The Water Service Zones—2004 City of Wylie,Texas(1) Acres Per Land Use Category 100 Persons Low Density Residential 5.84 Medium Density Residential 8.99 High Density Residential 0.54 Commercial/Retail/Office 1.01 School,Public/Semi-Public, Services 0.76 Downtown Historic District 0.13 Utilities/Heavy Industrial 1.43 Light Industrial 0.01 Parks&Open Space 0.34 Agricultural 7.85 Total Area: 26.90 (1)Based upon 2004 population of 26,150 persons. Source:City of Wylie j:tcleucallwylie\2002-164 w&ww impact feea reporta\report-1.doc -14- Birkhoff Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P. TABLE 4B Existing Land Use Per 100 Persons For The Sanitary Sewer Service Zones—2004 City of Wylie,Texas(1) Land Use Category Acres Per 100 Persons Low Density Residential 10.71 Medium Density Residential 13.39 High Density Residential 0.71 Commercial/Retail/Office 1.84 School,Public/Semi-Public, Services 1.28 Downtown Historic District 0.13 Utilities/Heavy Industrial 1.71 Light Industrial 0.59 Parks&Open Space 0.81 Agricultural &Floodplain 15.64 Total Area: 46.81 '1)Based upon 2004 population of 26,150 persons. Source:City of Wylie F. Ten-Year Growth Assumptions Growth is characterized in two forms: population (residential land use) and nonresidential land use. Several assumptions were necessary in order to arrive at reasonable growth rates for population and employment in the City of Wylie. The following assumptions were made as a basis from which 10-year projections are initiated: 1) Future land uses will occur as shown on the Future Land Use Plan. 2) The City will be able to finance the necessary improvements to the water and wastewater systems to accommodate expected growth. 3) School facilities will accommodate expected increases in school-age population. 4) Densities will be as projected, based upon anticipated zoning districts. 5) Known or anticipated development projects will occur as presently planned. The 10-year projections, or land use assumptions, are based upon the establishment of a reasonable growth rate based upon past trends and/or other considerations. Considering the increasing trends in population and housing growth (Table 2) and the City's proximity to the Dallas/Fort Worth metropolitan area and combining these factors with anticipated development projects provides a reasonable indication of growth potential. Based upon these assumptions, the annual average number of residential dwelling units constructed per year over the next 10-year period is projected to be 900. A household size of 2.95 persons per household with an occupancy rate of 95.6 percent was used to j:M.lmical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fe reports4epoit-I.doc —15 Birkhof Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P. calculate the future population based on the projected residential activity. The 2004 population of 26,150 (Table 1) is projected to increase to approximately 51,520 by the year 2015, representing a compounded annual growth rate of 7.02%. This rate would generate an average population increase of about 2,537 persons per year. The following shows the formula for calculating the ten-year growth assumptions: Residential: 900 dwelling units x 0.956 occupancy rate=860 occupied dwelling units/year 860 occupied dwelling units/year x 2.95 household size=2,537 persons/year 2,537 persons/year x 10 years=25,370 persons net 10 year residential growth "Note: It should be noted that the 10 year population and housing projection assumes growth potential within the existing municipal boundaries and the existing extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). These projections do not assume residential growth beyond the existing ETJ." This rate of growth (7.02% compound annual growth rate) is a reasonable rate for Wylie to be expected to grow at over the next 10 years. The growth rate projected for Wylie is less than the compounded annual growth rate over the last 14 years (8.2%) and is consistent with other comparable cities within the region. The region, in which Wylie is located, is one of the State's fastest growing population and employment centers. Table 5 shows the average annual compounded growth rates for other cities in the area and for Collin County from 1990 to 2000: TABLE 5 Populations and Growth Rates of Area Cities and Collin County— 1990 and 2000 Compounded Average City/Jurisdiction 1990 Population 2000 Population Annual% Change Wylie 8,716 14,965 5.6% Allen 19,315 43,544 8.0% Frisco 6,138 33,714 19.0% McKinney 21,283 54,369 10.0% Murphy 1,547 3,099 7.0% Plano 127,885 222,030 6.0% Prosper 1,018 2,097 7.0% Collin County 219,212 415,219 7.0% Source: U.S. Census, 1990 and 2000. j:kleucal\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact feeskeportekeport-1.doc - 16- Birldzof Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P. Table 5 illustrates that the regional growth pattern is continuing to move outward from Dallas toward the City of Wylie. Those cities that experienced the greatest amount of growth from the 1980s to the 1990s have achieved significant levels of build-out and those cities further north have begun to experience significant population and housing increases. Those cities north and west of Wylie are currently experiencing growth rates similar to those projected for Wylie through 2015. The projected annual growth rate for the City of Wylie and the resulting population projection of 51,520 persons for the 10-year planning horizon is considered reasonable for planning purposes. As mentioned, this growth is projected throughout the City's water and wastewater service area, with a substantial amount of the growth being beyond the current municipal boundaries during the next ten years. The above mentioned growth rate represents growth throughout the water and wastewater service zones. It is anticipated that most of this projected growth will ultimately be incorporated into the City service area limits for several reasons: 1) More stringent environmental laws pertaining to septic waste systems. 2) Increasing insurance rates outside corporate City limits. 3) The City's progressive philosophy regarding water and sewer line extensions. 4) Proposed upgrading of construction standards in the City's ETJ. Changes in population affect the use of land. In the case of Wylie, increased population is due to the conversion of vacant or agricultural land into residential and other land uses. Non-residential development will increase in order to provide the goods and services that the increased population will demand. The estimation of the additional acres to be developed for the next 10 years will aid in the determination of demand for additional water and wastewater facilities. j:lclerical\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees\reports\report-J.doc -17- Birkhoff,Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P. Table 6 shows the additional Retail/Office, Commercial, and industrial land uses required for the increase in population projected through 2015 (25,370 people). TABLE 6A TEN-YEAR LAND USE PROJECTIONS—2015 For The Water Service Zones—2015 City of Wylie,Texas Future Acres Acres Required For Land Use Per 100 Persons 25,370 Persons Commercial/Retail/Office 1.80 457 School,Public/Semi-Public, Services 0.67 170 Utilities,Heavy and Light Industrial 2.50 634 Parks& Open Space 1.03 261 Total Acres: 6.00 1,522 Source:City of Wylie,April 2005. The future acres per 100 persons reflect those ratios that have been observed for Texas cities with healthy local economies. It should be noted that these ratios also closely reflect the existing land use mix for Wylie's water and wastewater service areas. The ratios are used to calculate the amount of non-residential development that the local population may support. G. Ultimate Population Projection An ultimate, or holding capacity, land use and population projection was also established in the City of Wylie's Future Land Use Plan. First,known densities of development were considered. Then, based upon the remaining developable vacant land in Wylie and its ETJ, densities of anticipated development projects were applied. The ultimate population of the City of Wylie is a function of anticipated residential land use area(acres), housing density (dwelling units per acre), and population density (persons per dwelling unit). Based upon the land uses identified on the Future Land Use Plan, the total ultimate land use areas of residential development were calculated using the density standards adopted as part of the Future Land Use Plan. The ultimate holding capacity for the planning area, assuming that each residential area is built out to its maximum capacity, generates a maximum population of approximately 75,600 persons for the sewer service area, excluding the unincorporated lake areas. j:cleucallwylie\2002-164 w&ww impactfees`repaa4keport-l.doc -18- Birkhoff Hendricks&Conway,L.L.P. H. Summary The data used to compile these land use assumptions were from three sources, anticipated development for the City of Wylie,residential building data and other data from the City, and information from the Future Land Use Plan. The ten-year growth projections were calculated based upon reasonable growth rates and trends for Wylie and the surrounding area. Ultimate projections were based upon the holding capacity of vacant land using land use types and applying densities as established by development policies, the Future Land Use Plan, and known proposed development plans. The land use assumptions may be summarized as follows: 1) The Wylie wastewater planning area contains approximately 24.19 square miles, about 50%of which is presently undeveloped land or right-of-way. 2) The 2004 estimated population in the existing water service area is 25,325. The 2004 estimated population in the existing wastewater service area is 29,427. 3) The ten-year growth projections were calculated using a compounded average annual growth rate of approximately 7.02%. 4) The ten-year population projection for Wylie is approximately 51,520 persons inside the water service area and 57,996 in the sanitary sewer service area. 5) The ultimate (build-out) population within the water service area is approximately 55,900 persons and 75,600 persons in the wastewater service area, according to the adopted Land Use Plan. j:kleriwl\wylie\2002-164 w&ww impact fees NreportsltepoR'1.doc - 19 Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 5 Department: Engineering (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Chris Hoisted Account Code: Date Prepared: June 2, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: Two Subject Consider, and act upon, Resolution No. 2006-18(R) setting July 25, 2006 at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chamber of the Wylie City Hall for a Public Hearing on the proposed Thoroughfare Impact Fees. Recommendation Motion to approve Resolution No. 2006-18(R) setting July 25, 2006 at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chamber of the Wylie City Hall for a Public Hearing on the proposed Thoroughfare Impact Fees. Discussion On May 9, 2006 Council adopted an Ordinance setting the date for a Public Hearing on the Thoroughfare Capital Improvements Plan. Section 395 of the Local Government Code specifies the process necessary for the implementation of impact fees, and City Council previously conducted a Public Hearing and considered an ordinance on the proposed CIP. The CIP identifies thoroughfare projects necessary over the next ten years to serve the projected growth of the City. The proposed Resolution sets a date, time, and place for a Public Hearing on the proposed Thoroughfare Impact Fees. The Impact Fee Advisory Committee will discuss and provide written comments on the proposed fees. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-18(R) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS SETTING A DATE, TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED THOROUGHFARE IMPACT FEES BY THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARTY OR HER DESIGNEE TO NOTIFY THE PUBLIC OF SUCH PUBLIC HEARING; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS: Section 1. On the 25th day of July, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber of the Wylie City Hall, 2000 N. Highway 78, City of Wylie, Texas, the City Council will hold public hearings giving all interested persons the right to appear and be heard on the proposed water and wastewater impact fees by the City of Wylie, Texas. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the above stated date(s) for public hearing may be changed to any other date(s) that is in accordance with law and for which notice is provided in accordance with law, if it is determined by the City Manager, or his designee, that good reason exists for changing said date. Section 2. The City Secretary or her designee, of the City of Wylie, Texas, is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of such hearing to be published in one or more newspapers having general circulation in Collin, Rockwall and Dallas Counties and send notice by certified mail to any person having given notice to the City by certified or registered mail within two (2) years preceding the date this resolution is adopted in accordance with Section 395.049 of the Texas Local Government Code. Said notices shall be published and mailed before the 30th day before the date of the public hearing. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, on the 13th day of June, 2006. John Mondy, Mayor ATTEST TO: Carole Ehrlich, City Secretary Resolution No.2006-18(R) TIMELINE FOR ADOPTION OF LAND USE PLAN("LUP"1t CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN ("CIP"1 AND IMPACT FEES UNDER LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE ("LGC"1 FOR THE CITY OF WYLIE Required Action Time Required Date Appoint capital improvements On or before the date an ordinance is Complete advisory committee. LGC adopted establishing the public hearing date 395.058 for the LUP and CIP. Adopt ordinance establishing On or after the date the capital 5/09/06 public hearing date for LUP and improvements advisory committee is CIP. LGC 395.042 appointed. Make available to the public the On or before date the Notice of Public 5/09/06 land use assumptions, time period Hearing on LUP and CIP is published. of the projections and a description of the capital improvement facilities that may be imposed. LCG 395.043 Publish Notice of Public Hearing 30 days before the date of the hearing. Must By 5/14/06 on LUP and CIP. LGC 395.044 be in a newspaper in each county in which the city lies and mail by certified mail to any who have requested it. See statute for specific requirements. Conduct Public Hearing on LUP On the date specified in the notice, which 6/13/06 and CIP. must be at least 30 days after the notice is provided. Approve or disapprove the LUP With 30 days of the date of the Public 6/13/06 and CIP. LGC 395.045 Hearing. (Can adopt at the same meeting that Public Hearing is conducted, if adopt after the Public Hearing). Adopt resolution calling public On adoption of the LUP and CIP 6/13/06 hearing on imposition of impact fee. LGC 395.047 Publish Notice of Public Hearing 30 days before the date of the hearing. Must By 6/25/06 on the imposition of an impact fee. be in a newspaper in each county in which LCG 395.049 the city lies and mail by certified mail to any who have requested it. See statute for specific requirements. Advisory Committee must file Before the 5t'business day before the date By 7/18/06 written comments on the proposed of the Public Hearing on Impact Fees. impact fees. LGC 395.050 Conduct Public Hearing on After approval of LUP and CIP and on the 7/25/06 imposition of impact fees. LGC date specified in the notice, which must be 395.047 at least 30 days after the notice is provided. Adopt ordinance imposing impact Within 30 days of the date of the public 7/25/06 fees. LGC 395.051 hearing on the imposition of impact fees. (Can adopt at the same meeting that Public Hearing is conducted, if adopt after the Public Hearing). 438708-1 71 Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 6, 2006 Item Number: 6 Department: Police (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Jeff Butters Account Code: 100-5251-58990 Date Prepared: May 16, 2006 Budgeted Amount: $ 403,000 Exhibits: One Subject Consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-36 amending Ordinance No. 2005-41 (2005-2006 Budget) and approving $120,623.00 for the purpose of the expansion of the Animal Shelter. Recommendation Motion to approve Ordinance No. 2006-36 amending Ordinance No. 2005-41 (2005-2006 Budget) and approving $120,623.00 for the purpose of the expansion of the Animal Shelter. Discussion The budget amendment proposed is necessary to complete the expansion of the Animal Shelter. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2006-36 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2005-41 (2005-2006 BUDGET) AND APPROVING AN APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $120,623.00 FOR THE . PURPOSE OF THE EXPANSION OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER; PROVIDING FOR REPEALING, SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas ("Wylie") has investigated and determined that it will be beneficial and advantageous to the citizens of Wylie to amend the 2005-2006 budget adopted by Ordinance No. 2006-36 for the purpose of the expansion of the Wylie Animal Shelter; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further investigated and determined that the appropriations are needed for additional costs associated with expansion of the Animal Shelter to ensure quality facilities with proper capacity; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further investigated and determined that such an appropriation supports and furthers the public purpose of the citizens of the City of Wylie; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further investigated and determined that it will be beneficial and advantageous to the citizens of Wylie to amend the 2005-2006 budget adopted by Ordinance No. 2005-41 for the purpose of providing for this additional appropriation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS: SECTION 1: Findings Incorporated. The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: Amendment to Ordinance No. 2005-41 (2005-2006 Budget). Ordinance No. 2005-41 (2005-2006 Budget) is hereby amended to allow for the following appropriation: That up to One Hundred twenty Thousand Six Hundred twenty three and no/100 ($120,623.00) from account 58990 be expended for the purpose of the expansion of the Wylie Animal Shelter. SECTION 3: Savings/ Repealing Clause. All provisions of any ordinance in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed; but such repeal shall not abate any pending prosecution for violation of the repealed Ordinance, nor shall the repeal prevent prosecution from being commenced for any violation if occurring prior to the repeal of the Ordinance. Any remaining portions of conflicting ordinances shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4: Severability. Should any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it is Ordinance No. 2006-36 Ordinance Amending 2005-2006 BUDGET (Animal Shelter Expansion) Page 1 expressly provided that any and all remaining portions of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Wylie hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid. SECTION 5: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE,TEXAS, on this 13th day of June, 2006. John Mondy, Mayor ATTEST TO: Carole Ehrlich, City Secretary DATE OF PUBLICATION: , in the Ordinance No. 2006-36 Ordinance Amending 2005-2006 BUDGET (Animal Shelter Expansion) Page 2 Wylie City Council CITY of WYLIE AGENDA REPORT g Meeting Date: June 6, 2006 Item Number: 7 Department: Police Department (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Jeff Butters Account Code: 100-5251-58910 Date Prepared: May 16, 2006 Budgeted Amount: $ 403,000 Exhibits: Three Subject Consider, and act upon, Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Hisaw and Associates General Contractors, Inc., in the amount of$462,623.00, as a Guaranteed Maximum Price for the expansion of the Animal Shelter. Recommendation Motion to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Hisaw and Associates General Contractors, Inc., in the amount of$462,623.00, as a Guaranteed Maximum Price for the expansion of the Animal Shelter. Discussion Our Construction Manager at Risk (Hisaw) advertised and accepted bids for this construction project. Lt. Mike Atkison, a representative from Brinkley Sargent and a representative from Hisaw, witnessed the opening of the bids. In all phases of the project Hisaw is using the lowest bid received. The total of the lowest bids originally came to $477,813. We have meet with Dwayne Brinkley and Hisaw to value engineer the project to the lowest possible cost without sacrificing quality and sufficient capacity. The resulting construction cost is $462,623. Our original budget was 403,000. The architect and related fees will come to $61,000. This leaves $342,000 for construction. In order to accept the guaranteed maximum price for construction a budget amendment of $120,623 will have to be made. In order to understand the need for an additional $120,623 one must examine where the budget number of 403,000 came from. Our 2006 Animal Control budget originally had $3,000 budgeted in account 58990 for the construction of a euthanasia room. The night that the budget was passed $400,000 was taken out of the bond and put into Animal Control budget for the expansion of the shelter. That $400,000 figure came from the Bond Committee. In June of 2005, I was asked to present options to the Bond Committee because the funding for the construction of a new Animal Shelter was a low priority. I had a construction contractor give me prices for remodeling the shelter and adding dog runs in the back. With very few days notice the construction contractor gave me estimates for different scenarios. It has become obvious that there were issues with this project that the construction contractor could not have known about at the time. Items such as a need for a new sewer line, new fire alarm panel, new electrical, and a soils test that indicates a need for concrete peers have contributed much more cost to this project. The Bond Committee chose remodel options based on these estimates and put $400,000 in the Bond for the renovation of the Animal Shelter. I don't believe architectural fees were ever added to the construction estimates. Construction costs have increased approximately 15 % since June of 2005. The Animal Shelter Advisory Board has met and been briefed on this issue. The Advisory Board unanimously recommended that the project be funded at the level needed to construct what was designed. I would also urge Page 1 of 2 Page 2 of 2 Council to add the money needed to build the shelter with the quality needed and with enough capacity so that we don't have to come back in a few years and add on at a much higher cost. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 05/15/06 MON 17:16 FAX 9729609751 BRINKLEY SARGENT 11 001 B R 1 May 15,2006 N K Chief Jeff Butters ` Wylie Police Department 2000 Hwy 78 North E Wylie,TX 75098 Y RE: Wylie Animal Shelter Bid Summary s Dear Chief Butters: 0 0 The purpose of this letter is to summarize the bids received for the animal shelter. Hisaw 0 &Associates received bids and were witnessed by Gary Beeman from our office as well as Lt.Mike Atkinson representing you. The bids were then tabulated per trade. ° OT T Following this, we met with Hisaw and reviewed any value engineering opportunities as RE well as the identification of scope increases not taken into account when a previous u L contractor gave the city an estimate of costs. M Based upon the bidding, the review of those bids and the value engineering, we would s 7 recommend the guaranteed price as a qualified low bid (S462,623)for the scope of the U 2 t project. T 9 Please let us know if you have any questions. E s 0 e . w ASincerely, 0 9 w o 9w 1-4OLVIAke� 7 . DOB A A R Dwayne M. Brinkley,AIA L I T L FNE AARX S XL A ' , ES T 7 S C T E 2 A O X . R R E A 9 G P S 6 E O ON R C 7 . T A 5 9 . T T 2 7 C 1 S 5 O 0 4 1 M N 05/15/06 MON 17:16 FAX 9729609751 BRINKLEY SARGENT g002 4/2012006 updated May 15,2006 WYLIE ANIMAL SHELTER VALUE ENGINEERING PREPARED BY: HISAW&ASSOCIATES REVIEWED BY BRINKLEY SARGENT ARCHITECTS DESCRIPTION ITEM AMOUNT ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF VS METAL ROOFING $ (10,500.00) INTERIOR DEMOLITION REDUCTION DEMOLITION $ (1.500.00) PLACE EXCESS PIER SPOILS AND DIRT ON SITE SITE $ (2,000.00) SUBTOTAL $ (14,000.00) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S FEE& BOND @ 8.5% $ (1,190.00) NET DEDUCT $ (15,190.00) BUDGET RECAP AMOUNT BUILDING BUDGET TARGET $ 342,000.00 BID RESULTS $ 477,813.00 VARIANCE FROM BUDGET $ 135,813.00 LESS VE ADJUSTMENTS $ (15,190.00) tt® Document A121 TMCMc — 2003 Amendment No. 1 AMENDMENT NO. I TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Agreement,dated May 15,2006 between City of Wylie (Owner)and Hisaw&Associates General Contractors,Inc. (the Construction Manager), for WYLIE ANIMAL SHELTER-EXPANSION (the Project),the Owner and Construction Manager establish a Guaranteed Maximum Price and Contract Time for the ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS: Work as set forth below. The author of this document has added information needed for its ARTICLE I GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE completion.The author may also rev The Construction Manager's Guaranteed Maximum Price for the Work,including the have ised the text of the estimated Cost of the Work as defined in Article 6 and the Construction Manager's Fee as original AIA standard form.An defined in Article 5,is Four Hundred Sixty-two Thousand Six Hundred Twenty-three Addtions and Deletions Report Dollars and Zero Cents (S462,623.00 ).This Price is for the performance of the Work in that notes added information as `Nell as revisions to the standard accordance with the Contract Documents listed and attached to this Amendment and form text is available from the marked Exhibits A through F,as follows: author and should be reviewed. A vertical line in the left margin of Exhibit A Drawings,Specifications,addenda and General, this document indicates where Supplementary and other Conditions of the Contract on which the Guaranteed the author has added necessary Maximum Price is based,pages 1 through 1 ,dated 05/24/2006. information and where the author has added to or deleted from the Exhibit B Allowance items,pages 1 through 1 ,dated 05/24/2006. originai AIA text. Exhibit C Assumptions and Clarifications made in preparing the This document has important Guaranteed Maximum Price,pages 1 through 1 ,dated 05/24/2006. legal consequences. Consultation with an attorney Exhibit D Completion Schedule,pages 1 through 1 ,dated 05/24/2006. is encouraged with respect to its completion or modification. Exhibit E Alternate Prices,pages 1 through 1 ,dated 05/24/2006. Exhibit F Unit Prices,pages 1 through 1 ,dated 05/242006 . AIA Document Al 21 TyCMc-2003 Amendment No.1.Copyright®1991,1998 and 2003 by The American Institute of Architects and The Associated General Contractors of America. All rights reserved. WARNING:This document is protected by U.S.Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this document,or any portion of it,may result In severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 15:34:50 on 05/15/2006 under Order No.1000194648_1 which expires on 8/23/2006,and is not for resale. User Notes: (2851672465) ARTICLE II CONTRACT TIME I The date of Substantial Completion established by this Amendment is: September 15,2006 OWNER CONSTRUCTION MANAGER (Signature) (Si .nature) (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) C) Date Dates { ATTEST ATTEST AIA Document Al217eCMc—2003 Amendment No.1.Copyright ©1991,1998 and 2003 by The American Institute of Architects and The Associated General Contractors of America. All rights reserved. WARNING:This document is protected by US.Copyright Law and International Trestles. 2 Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this document,or any portion of lt,may result in severe civil and criminal penalties,and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by MA software at 1534:50 on 05/15/2006 under Order No.1000194648_1 which expires on 8/23/2006,and is not for resale. User Notes: (2851672465) May 24 , 2006 Amendment No. 1 to Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager Wylie Animal Shelter Renovations and Addition Exhibit "A" Page 1 of 1 Listing of Drawings, Specifications, Addenda and General, Supplemental and other Conditions of the Contract on which the Guaranteed Maximum Price is based: 1 . 1 General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, AIA Document A201 , 1997 Edition, Pages 1-40. 1 .2 Project Manual, prepared by Brinkley Sargent Architects, dated February 8, 2006 for the Wylie Animal Shelter Renovations and Addition - Specifications Sections, as listed in the Table of Contents, Pages 1 through 3. Including Sections as noted for Divisions 1 through 16, and Section 00800, Supplementary Conditions. 1 . 3 Construction Drawings, prepared by Brinkley Sargent Architects, dated February 27, 2006, Sheets CVR, Cl, C2, C3, C4, S1. 01, S1. 02 , A000, A001, A200, A201 , A202, A401, M201, M202, P200, P201, P202, E200, E201 & E202. 1 . 4 Addenda - None May 24 , 2006 Amendment No. 1 to Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager Wylie Animal Shelter - Renovations and Addition Exhibit "B" Page 1 of 1 Allowance Listing 1 . 1 Owner' s Contingency Allowance $ 8 ,000.00 May 24, 2006 Amendment No. 1 to Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager Wylie Animal Shelter - Renovations and Addition Exhibit "C" Page 1 of 1 Listing of Assumptions and Clarifications: The following assumptions, clarifications and value engineering items are included in, and made a part of the Guaranteed Maximum Price: 1.1 Notwithstanding the final grades and elevations for earthwork shown on the Civil Drawings, the intent of this Agreement is to "balance" the site, including wasting of utility, grade beam and piers spoils on or adjacent to the site, as necessary to eliminate either hauling-off or importing of common fills. 1.2 Construction Manager will pay for any necessary City of Wylie registration fees, related to general building, mechanical, electrical and plumbing. Permit fees, impact fees, inspection fees (except for re-inspection due to non-compliant work) , utility company charges and other municipal fees are not included. 1.3 The attached letter from Hisaw & Associates, and the attached detailed cost break down, dated 5/15/06, enumerates the Subcontractors/Suppliers and the bids included in the Guaranteed Maximum Price. H1SAW & ASSOCIATES Nevada License Number 32940 New Mexico License Number 50325 GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT May 15, 2006 Mr. Dwayne Brinkley Brinkley Sargent Architects 5000 Quorum Drive, Suite 500 Dallas, Texas 75254 Re: Wylie Animal Shelter Renovations and Addition Dear Dwayne, We appreciate the opportunity to submit our Guaranteed Maximum Price for the above referenced project. Our GMP, in the amount of$462,623.00, is based on the Plans and Specifications, dated 2/27/06, prepared by Brinkley Sargent Architects, and is subject to the following Clarifications: Base Bid Amount: $477,813.00 Less Interior Demolition Adjustment: ($1,500.00) Less Deduct for Wasting Earth Spoils on Site: ($2,000.00) Less Deduct for Asphalt Shingles (in lieu of metal roof): ($10,500.00) Less Fee, Bond& Insurance of Deducts: ($1,190.00) TOTAL GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE: $462,623.00 We have attached a detailed cost breakdown and subcontractor/supplier listing for your review and approval. Thank you for choosing Hisaw& Associates for your construction services on this project. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Hisaw& Associates, Inc. Bill Morgan r'J Vice President New Mexico 3116 KELLWAY DRIVE Nevada SUITE 116 CARROLLTON. TEXAS 75006 PHONE: (9721 380-4448 • FAX: (972) 380-4397 SPEC/SE $477,813 1 SUB Qoute . Labor : Matl : Subc :: Cost III ° i III EST : 05/15/2006 PROJECT NAME : WYLIE ANIMAL SHELTER-CITY OF WYLIE LOCATION : WYLIE,TEXAS AREA : 3500 COST PER SF : $136.52 CONSTRUCTION TIME : 3 MONTHS Total Description SUB Qoute : Labor Matl Subc :: Cost III DIVISION 1 GEN REQUIREMENTS : : .. I GENERAL CONDITIONS HISAW : 0 : 0 : 0 :: $39,825 I TESTING BY OWNER 0 : : : 0 :: $0 I BUILDING PERMIT FEE WAIVED 0 : 0 :: $0 I OWNER CONTIGENCY ALLOWANCE 8000 : : 8,000 :: $8,000 I SWPPP STORM WATER 750 : 750 :: $750 I Division 1 0 0 8,750 :: 48,575 1 DIVISION 2 SITE WORK I • 2210 EXCAVATION 16,551 :: $16,551 I 2211 ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : :: I BID HARRINGTON 16551 : : :: I BID HOLBROOK 28600 : : :: I BID JRJ PAVING 16584 : : : :: I LIME STABILIZED SUBGRADE : : 6,494 :: $6,494 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID JRJ 8484 : : :: I BID HARRINGTON 6494 : I BID : I 2250 SOIL TREATMENT : 450 :: $450 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID FINLEY 695 : : I BID PRIME PEST 450 : : I BID BIG COUNTRY 600 : : :: I TRAFFIC MARKINGS : : 281 :: $281 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID STRIPING PLUS 727 : : : :: I BID STRIPEAZONE 705 : : : :: I BID BTA SERVICES 281 : : •:: I • I LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION : 1,500 :: $1,500 I ESTIMATE ALLOWANCE 1500 : 0 : 0 : :: I BID : I BID : •: I BID : : I 2050 INTERIOR DEMOLITION : 7,107 :: $7,107 I, ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : :: l BID ACME 7107 : : : :: I BID : : :. I BID I 2822 CHAIN LINK FENCING : : 15,087 :: $15,087 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID PDQ 15087 : : : I BID A&M 19483 : : :: I BID RICHARDSON 22960 : : I OTHER 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID : : :: I BID I BID : I OTHER : : : 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : : I BID : •:: I BID : I BID :: • • t OTHER : : 0 :: $0 II ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : II BID : : it BID I BID I OTHER 0 :: $0 1 ESTIMATE 0 0 0 .: I BID •: .• : I BID : :: I BID .. I OTHER Q :: $0 1 ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : :: I BID : : I BID :: I BID : : .: I Division 2 : 0 : 0 : 47,470 :: $47,470 I DIVISION 3 CONCRETE : : :: I 2520 TURNKEY CONCRETE : : 78,50D :: $78,500 I 3366 ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : :: I 7195 BID CORTEZ 82000 : :: I BID AD CONCRETE 84592 :: i BID STRAND 78500 : .: I PIER DRILLING 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 0 0 .: 1 BID 1 BID : .. I BID : : .. I MASONRY REINFORCING : : : 1,500 :: $1,500 I ESTIMATE 1500 : 0 : 0 : I BID : : I BID : : .. BID • DIAMOND GRINDING : : 0 :: $0 I, ESTIMATE ALTERNATE#1 0 : 0 : 0 : :: II BID : : : l BID .. II BID : :. II Division 3 0 0 80,000 :: $80,000 II II DIVISION 4 MASONRY : II 4100 MASONRY 43,000 :: $43,000 II 4220 ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I 4270 BID PRYOR&PRYOR 43000 : : I BID MORGAN 55203 : : .. 1 BID TEXAS STONE 51437 .. Division 4 0 0 43,000 :: $43,000 DIVISION 5 METALS : : I 5010 STRUCTURAL STEEL 1 : 1,500 :: $1,500 I ESTIMATE 1500 : 0 : 0 : I BID : : :. I BID : •: I BID : : 1 ERECTION : 0 :: $0 I. ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : :: I BID .: BID : .: 1 BID : • I Division 5 0 0 1,500 :: $1,500 I DIVISION 6 CARPENTRY : I 6100 ROOF FRAME/CARPENTRY 25,617 :: $25,617 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID MAVERICK 25617 : II BID F&A CONSTRUCT 28011 : : II BID II 6400 FINISH CARPENTRY/MILLWK 945 :: $945 II ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : III BID LUTZ(FOB) 945 : III BID ALLEN COMM 1281 : •: III BID JC&CO. 1525 : I OTHER •: 0 :: $0 1 ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID • I BID : I BID : : I OTHER : 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID I BID I BID II OTHER 0 :: $0 1 ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID • I BID : : 1 BID : II Division 6 0 : 0 : 26,562 :: $26,562 I DIVISION 7 THERM&MOIST PROT I 7920 WATERPROOF/SEALANTS : : : 2,427 :: $2,427 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : •: I BID ARTISAN 2427 : : : : I BID LEWISVILLE W/P 7250 : BID : 1 7610 METAL ROOFING 22,800 :: $22,800 I ESTIMATE ASPHALT SHINGLE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID ALLSTATE 23310 : : I BID MILLER S/M 22800 : : : I BID CLEBURNE 24000 : : :: I 7200 INSULATION •: : 0 $0 I ESTIMATE ALTERNATE#2 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID : I BID l BID : I OTHER : 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I, BID : II BID : :: II BID : II OTHER 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : :: I BID : :: I BID : I BID : :. I Division 7 0 : 0 : 25,227 :: $25,227 I — — I DIVISION 8 DOORS&WINDOWS it 8112 METAL DOORS/FRAMES : 2,530 :: $2,530 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID DFW DOOR 2530 : :: I BID WOODARD 2530 : : I BID : : I WOOD DOORS 2,200 $2,200 1 ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : :: I BID DFW DOOR 2200 : : : I BID WOODARD 2200 : : : I BID : : I OTHER : : : 0 :: $0 1 ESTIMATE D : 0 : 0 : II BID : : .. II BID : II BID : II 8700 FINISH HARDWARE 3,630 :: $3.630 II ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : :: II BID : II BID DFW DOOR 6715 : II BID WOODARD 3630 : II GLASS&GLAZING 1,500 $1,500 II ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : :: II BID GLASS TECH 1500 I BID :: 1 BID • OTHER 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 0 : I BID .: II BID : : : I BID : :: I OTHER 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID .. 1 BID I BID • Division 8 0 : 0 : 9,860 :: $9,860 I DIVISION 9 FINISHES : : : I LATH&PLASTER : : : 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I, BID • I BID I BID : I 9260 DRYWALL/ACOUST CEILINGS 15,720 :: $15.720 I 9510 ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : :: I 9986 BID NCC DRYWALL 15720 : : I BID : : I BID : •: : I. TILE : : : 0 :: $0 II ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : II BID : : : : 11 BID • BID : :: I 9650 VCT, CARPET&BASE : 1,896 :: $1,896 i ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : 1 BID MANN 1997 : : ,1 BID T&G 1896 I BID ALLIED 2138 : : : I 9900 PAINTING : : : 13,912 :: $13,912 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : ;; BID TEXAS QUALITY 21900 : : II BID BENNY BROS 13912 : I BID JTB 14227 :. OTHER : : 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID : : .. BID il : .. BID : : II OTHER : : : 0 :: $0 II ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : III BID :: III BID : III BID : : •::• l Division 9 0 : 0 : 31,528 :: $31,528 I DIVISION 10 SPECIALTIES : :: I 10000 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS/CAB'S 189 :: $189 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID CF WILLIAMS 189 : : I BID GEC 333 : : : I BID ROCKY DURON 450 : : I 10000 SIGNAGE : 520 :: $520 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : li BID BENCHMARK 520 : : : II BID : : .. 11 BID : :: II 10000 PRESSURE WASHER : 3,080 :: $3,080 II ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : :: II BID ROCKY DURON 3080 : : : II BID : : :. II BID : :: I OTHER 0 :: $0 II ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : II BID : - II BID : I BID : : : : I OTHER : : 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID : I BID : I BID : :: I OTHER 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID I BID : : I BID : :. I OTHER 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID I BID :: I BID : :. I OTHER : : 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID : :: I BID • I BID • I OTHER : 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : : I BID :. I BID : I BID : : I Division 10 0 0 3,789 :: $3;789 I DIVISION 11 EQUIPMENT : I NOT USED 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 :: I BID : :: I BID : :: I BID I I Division 11 0 : 0 : 0 :: $0 I I DIVISION 12 FURNISHINGS : : : I, HORIZONTAL BLINDS : : 484 :: $484 II ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : II BID BORIACK 484 : : II BID : II BID .. n Division 12 0 0 484 :: $484 I - - I DIVISION 13 SPEC CONSTRUCTION : : I NOT USED : 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID : : : :. I BID : : : I BID : : I Division 13 : 0 : 0 : 0 :: $0 I I DIVISION 14 CONVEYING SYSTEMS : : I NOT USED : 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID : : I BID : I BID : : :. I, II Division 14 : 0 : 0 : 0 :: $0 II DIVISION 15 MECHANICAL : : II II 15000 PLUMBING : : : 37.940 :: $37.940 II ESTIMATE 0 0 0 .. BID DAUM PLUMBING 37940 : I BID DFW PLUMBING 48116 : I BID I 15000 UTILITIES 26,950 :: $26,950 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID FIRE LINE SVS 39884 .. BID N TEXAS UTILITIES 26950 : I BID TRIDAL UTILITIES 39950 .. I 15000 HVAC : 27,700 :: $27,700 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : :: I BID DUCTWORKS 30584 BID OHLEN AIR 31665 : : I BID SUBURBAN 27700 : I 15000 TAB : 1,600 :: $1,600 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : :: I BID ADVANCE AIR 1600 : :.• I BID HVAC TESTING 1894 : I BID AIR ENGINEERING 3700 : : : I FIRE SPRINKLER 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE NOT USED 0 : 0 : 0 : :: I BID I BID : I BID I COMBINED MECHANICAL 0 :: $0 I ESTIMATE 67240 : : I BID H&G SYSTEMS 78900 : : I BID .. I BID I Division 15 0 : 0 : 94,190 :: $94,190 I DIVISION 16 ELECTRICAL I 16000 ELECTRICAL : 28,650 :: $28,650 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : : I BID S&R ELECTRIC 28650 : :: I BID BLACKLAND 32500 : : •:: I BID DOUBLE R 31881 : I 15721 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 5,719 :: $5,719 I ESTIMATE 0 : 0 : 0 : I BID FACILITY ASSOC 5,719 : : I BID DSS FIRE 7425 : I BID ALPHA SYSTEMS 6704 : I Division 16 0 0 34,369 :: $34,369 I Construction Costs 0 : 0 : 406,729 :: 446,554 I Labor Burdens (INCLUDED GC'S) 38.00°%0 0 : 0 : $0 I, Sales Taxes-NEW CONSTRUCTION 0.00% 0 : 0 : $0 II Subtotal 0 0 406,729 :: $446,554 I Builders Risk(INCLUDED GC'S) 0 :: $0 I Subtotal 0 0 406,729 :: $446,554 I Fee 7.00% 31,259 :: $31,259 I Subtotal 0 0 437,988 :: $477,813 I Performance Bond(INCLUDED GC'S) 0 :: $0 I Sales Tax-REMODEL 0.00% : : 0 :: $0 I TOTAL 0 0 437,988 :: $477,813 DEDUCT FOR INTERIOR DEMOLITION (1,500) DEDUCT FOR EARTHWORK(SPOILS) (2,000) DEDUCT FOR ASPHALT SHINGLES ($10,500) DEDUCT FEE, BONDS&INSURANCE ($1,190) NET GMP $462,623 May 24, 2006 Amendment No. 1 to Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager Wylie Animal Shelter - Renovations and Addition Exhibit "D" Page 1 of 1 Completion Schedule Construction of the Project will commence, either within ten (10) calendar days of the date of Notice to Proceed from the Architect, or receipt of the Building Permit from the City of Wylie, whichever is' the later date. Substantial Completion of the Project, in accordance with Amendment No. 1 to Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager will be on or before three calendar months, subject to extensions of time as described in the Conditions of the Agreement. May 24, 2006 Amendment No. 1 to Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager Wylie Animal Shelter - Renovations and Addition Exhibit "E" Page 1 of 1 Alternate Prices: The following alternate pricing is included in the GMP, as noted in Exhibit 1 . 1 Alternate Number One: Omit haul-off of earth spoils, place adjacent to job site, as directed by the Owner. DEDUCT: $2,000. 00 1 .2 Alternate Number Two: Provide and install asphalt shingle roofing, in lieu of metal roofing as specified. DEDUCT: $10,500 .00 Bonds , Insurance and Fee for above: DEDUCT: $1,190 . 00 TOTAL FOR DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATES: DEDUCT: $15,190 .00 May 24 , 2006 Amendment No. 1 to Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager Wylie Animal Shelter - Renovations and Addition Exhibit "F" Page 1 of 1 Unit Prices 1. 1 No Unit Prices Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT g Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 8 Department: WEDC (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Sam Satterwhite Account Code: Date Prepared: June 5, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: One Subject Consider, discuss, and act upon, the recommendation of the Wylie Economic Development Corporation regarding a Financial Standards and Accountability Policy. Recommendation Motion to approve a Financial Standards and Accountability Policy for the Wylie Economic Development Corporation. Discussion On May 12, 2006, after reviewing the attached Financial Standards and Accountability Policy (the Policy), the WEDC Board directed its staff to forward the Policy to the Wylie City Council for comment. Based upon comments from Council, the WEDC Board will approve the Policy at their next regularly scheduled Board meeting. Developed with the assistance of WEDC Counsel and City Attorney Richard Abernathy, the Board believes that the Policy provide checks and balances necessary to ensure an adequate level of oversight for all WEDC expenditures and financial activity. Addressed within the Policy are purchasing limits for the Executive Director ($5,000), reimbursement and credit card expenditures, gifts, personal expenditures, and reporting requirements. Addressing the latter, the Board directed staff to not lose sight of the importance of communication with the Department of Finance to ensure that all financial activity is documented properly. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 WYLIE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FINANCIAL STANDARDS & ACCOUNTABILITY POLICY DRAFT MAY 3, 2006 The following Policy will govern all WEDC expenditures and financial activity. Purchasing limits for the Executive Director The Executive Director is authorized to approve any PO or Payment Authorization Request (PAR) in an amount up to and including $5,000. Any expenditure in excess of $5,000 will require the additional signature of WEDC President or WEDC Treasurer and be presented to the City of Wylie Finance Director, and or their designated representative, prior to processing said PO or PAR. Reimbursements and Credit Card Expenditures Personal reimbursements and credit card expenditures by the Executive Director, and or their representative, will require submission of a receipt and documentation providing the specific business purpose for the expenditure. An expense report providing said documentation will be attached to the WEDC Treasurer's report each month for review and approval by the WEDC Board of Directors. Gifts The giving of gifts purchased with WEDC funds is strictly prohibited. A gift is identified as an item or service purchased for an individual or organization which has no identifiable promotional or business purpose. Personal Expenditures Expenditures made outside the course of business activities are strictly prohibited. Personal expenditures are identified as the funding of activities or the purchase of services which have no identifiable promotional, business, or public purpose and do not develop new or expanded business enterprise. Reporting Requirements The WEDC Executive Director shall meet with the City of Wylie Finance Director, and or their designated representative, on a monthly basis to review all WEDC financial activity so that such activity can be accounted for properly. Financial Standards&Accountability Policy Page 2 of 2 Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 9 Department: WEDC (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Sam Satterwhite Account Code: Date Prepared: June 5, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: One Subject Consider, discuss, and act upon, the recommendation of the Wylie Economic Development Corporation regarding a Promotional Expenditures Policy. Recommendation Motion to approve a Promotional Expenditures Policy for the Wylie Economic Development Corporation. Discussion On May 12, 2006, after reviewing the attached Promotional Expenditures Policy(the Policy), the WEDC Board directed its staff to forward the Policy to the Wylie City Council for comment. Based upon comments from Council, the WEDC Board will approve the Policy at their next regularly scheduled Board meeting. Developed with the assistance of WEDC Counsel and City Attorney Richard Abernathy, staff believes that the documentation requirement within the Policy will create more self analysis by staff and the Board for each and every promotional expenditure. The Policy identifies criteria for an expenditure to be considered promotional. As stated, the expenditure must advertise or publicize the City of Wylie for the purpose of developing new and expanded business enterprises and serve a public purpose. Within the Policy, as many promotional expenditures as possible will be specifically identified in the WEDC annual budget. In addition, the WEDC Board believes that monies should be budgeted within a "General Funds" category for unanticipated promotional expenditures. WEDC staff would have the authority to approve expenditures from "General Funds" up to $2,000. All expenditures from General Funds will be approved by the Board of Directors along with the monthly WEDC Treasurer's Report. Finally, WEDC staff must document all expenditures of General Funds so that their promotional status can be verified. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 WYLIE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PROMOTIONAL EXPENDITURES POLICY DRAFT MAY 1, 2006 INTRODUCTION The Development Corporation Act of 1979, in Section 4A(b)(1), provides that a 4A development corporation may spend up to ten percent (10%) of its annual revenues for "promotional purposes". This policy shall govern the use of funds of the Wylie Economic Development Corporation ("WEDC") on expenditures for promotional purposes. ANNUAL BUDGET The annual budget for the WEDC may authorize up to ten percent (10%) of annual revenues to be spent on promotional expenditures. To the extent any particular promotional expenditure is anticipated, it shall be specifically identified in the budget (hereinafter "Line Item Expense"). Any portion of the funds budgeted for promotional expenditures, but not allocated to a particular Line Item Expense shall be identified in the budget as "General Promotional Expenditure Funds" (hereinafter "General Funds"). Promotional expenditures shall only be made in accordance with this Policy. REQUIREMENTS FOR PROMOTIONAL EXPENDITURES Any item included in the annual budget as a Line Item Expense and any expenditure of General Funds shall: 1. advertise or publicize the City of Wylie for the purpose of developing new and expanded business enterprises; and 2. serve a public purpose. EXPENDITURE OF GENERAL FUNDS $2,000 OR LESS To the extent General Funds are available within the WEDC budget, the Executive Director may approve promotional expenditures of General Funds in amounts of $2,000 or less. Before approving an expenditure as a promotional expense, the Executive Director shall determine that the expenditure meets the requirements listed above. All General Fund expenditures shall be presented to the WEDC Board of Directors for approval as part of the monthly WEDC Treasurer's Report. The Executive Director shall support the determination that an expenditure meets the requirements listed above by documenting the purpose(s) for the expenditure. EXPENDITURE OF GENERAL FUNDS OVER $2,000 Any expenditure of General Funds in amounts over $2,000 for promotional purposes must be approved by the Board of Directors. Before approving an Promotional Expenditure Policy Page 2 of 3 451971-2 expenditure as a promotional expense, the Board of Directors shall determine that the expenditure meets the requirements listed above. The Board of Directors shall support the determination that an expenditure meets the requirements listed above by documenting the purpose(s) for the expenditure. VERIFICATION OF PROMOTIONAL EXPENDITURES If a Line Item Expense or use of General Funds is for direct marketing services, such as print or media advertising, then a receipt shall be obtained from the Vendor. To the extent it is practical or efficient, the Executive Director and/or Board of Directors shall obtain a written contract for other expenditures of Line Item Expenses or General Funds. Otherwise, written documentation shall be provided by a recipient of funds that sets forth how the funds will be used and the public purpose served by the recipient's programs or services. Promotional Expenditure Policy Page 3 of 3 451971-2 Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 10 Department: City Manager (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Mark B. Roath Account Code: Date Prepared: June 5, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: Two Subject Consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-37 establishing a Public Arts Program, authorizing the allocation of One Percent of the City's Capital Improvement Program Project Costs for Public Art, establishing a Method for Calculating Public Art Appropriations, establishing a Public Art Project Account and establishing a Public Art Advisory Board. Recommendation Motion to approve Ordinance No. 2006-37 establishing a Public Arts Program. Discussion Public art has the power to change a community, energize its population, inspire enthusiasm about the environment, and bring neighborhoods together. As such, public art can be a powerful tool for communities to use in transforming itself. (See Public Arts Study) Ordinance No. 2006-37 establishes a Public Arts Program, funding for the Public Arts Program, and a Public Arts Advisory Board including setting forth its duties. Attachments: 1. Ordinance for Public Arts Program 2. Public Arts Study developed by the City of Rochester,New York Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/05/06 Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2006-37 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, CREATING A NEW DIVISION OF THE WYLIE CODE OF ORDINANCES; ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC ARTS PROGRAM; AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF ONE PERCENT OF THE CITY'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT COSTS FOR PUBLIC ART; ESTABLISHING A METHOD FOR CALCULATING PUBLIC ART APPROPRIATIONS OF CAPITAL PROJECTS; ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC ART PROJECT ACCOUNT; ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC ART ADVISORY BOARD; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the City of Wylie is renowned for its historic downtown and cultural heritage; and WHEREAS, the aesthetic nature and charm of Wylie is further enhanced by the arts and an awareness of the visual arts; and WHEREAS, cultural and artistic resources enhance the quality of life for individuals living in, working in, and visiting the City of Wylie; and WHEREAS, public art requires and deserves public funding; and WHEREAS, to further enhance public art in the City, the City Council determines it appropriate to provide a program for the City to require that visual art be included in City public works projects, where applicable, and that a portion of the cost of such project, where applicable, be allocated for the acquisition of visual art. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. Findings Incorporated. The findings set forth in the ordinance from which this division is derived are incorporated into the body of this division as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. Definitions. For the purposes of this division, the following terms, phrases, words and their derivation shall have the meaning given herein: (a) Art or Artwork means work in any permanent medium or combination of media produced by artists, who are generally recognized by critics and peers as professionals of serious intent and substantial ability. For the purposes of this division, the terms art and artwork do not include environmental landscaping or Ordinance-Wylie Arts Board and Public Arts Program Page 1 the performing, or literary arts such as dance, music, drama, or poetry unless expressed in a manner defined above. (b) Board when used herein shall mean the Public Art Advisory Board of the City of Wylie, Texas. (c) Board Member when used herein shall mean the members of the Public Art Advisory Board, excluding the City Manager who shall serve as an ex officio member of the board. (d) Capital Improvement Project or CIP when used herein shall mean projects that are funded by the City of Wylie or other government. (e) Capital Project Fund when used herein shall mean funds used for the acquisition of fixed assets or construction of major capital projects not being financed by proprietary or nonexpendable trust funds. (f) City when used herein shall mean the City of Wylie, Texas. (g) City Manager when used herein shall mean the City Manager of the City of Wylie, Texas, or his designee. (h) Enterprise Fund when used herein shall mean funds that are used to account for those operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business or where Council has decided that the determination of revenues earned, cost incurred and/or net income necessary for management and accountability. (i) Wylie Public Art Collection when used herein shall mean all works of art located in the City of Wylie, Texas. (j) Public Arts Master Plan or Plan when used herein shall mean the public arts master plan of the City of Wylie, Texas, as it exists or may exist or may be amended. The public arts master plan shall include guidelines for the systematic selection of pieces of art, project descriptions, budgets, locations of art to be included in public spaces and recommended design approaches. (k) Public Arts Program when used herein shall mean the public arts program of the City of Wylie, Texas. SECTION 3. Establishment of Public Arts Program. The public arts program is hereby established to, among other things, promote and encourage public and private art programs, to further the development and awareness of, and interest in, the visual arts, to create an enhanced visual environment for city residents, to commemorate the city's rich cultural and ethnic diversity, to integrate the design work of artists into the development of the city's capital infrastructure improvements and to promote tourism and economic vitality in the city through the artistic design of public spaces. Ordinance-Wylie Arts Board and Public Arts Program Page 2 SECTION 4. Funding for the Public Arts Program. (a) Funding for the public arts program shall be accomplished by annually designating one (1) percent of eligible CIP funding for public art, which may be derived from the city's capital project fund, the enterprise fund and/or grants, but excluding appropriations for underground infrastructure improvements. The one (1) percent allocation shall be calculated based on the total of pre-design, design, and construction costs, less all costs for real property acquisition, demolition, furniture-fixtures-equipment and library books for any given CIP. In addition, the appropriation for the public arts program will be calculated only on the original appropriation for design and construction services, excluding any subsequent amounts appropriated for amendments and change orders. (b) Funds shall be used for the artist fees and costs related to the production and maintenance of artwork. Funds shall not be used for professional graphics, mass produced work, decorative or functional elements designed by a building architect as opposed to an artist commissioned for that purpose, landscape architecture or landscape gardening except where those elements are designed by an artist, and work not produced by a board-approved artist. (c) Appropriations for art shall be made at the same time that the city appropriates funds for the CIP. The City Council may, in its sole discretion, allocate an amount equal to, less than, or in excess of the one (1) percent of the eligible CIP for the City's public arts program. In addition, the City Council may fund, from general revenues or other eligible revenues, as part of the annual budget an appropriation to the public arts program. (d) All monies appropriated for the public arts program purposes shall be transferred into a special, interest-bearing public art project account. As a project account, any funds not expended at the conclusion of the fiscal year will rollover into the following fiscal year. The City Manager will establish appropriate accounting procedures for the public arts program and shall report to the City Council, periodically, regarding the amounts appropriated, encumbered and expended under the public arts program. (e) The involvement of public art in a capital improvement project is optional for capital projects of less than $200,000; however, one (1) percent of the cost of the projects will be retained for public art and these funds will be pooled for other art projects. (f) For all grants sought by the city for CIP's in the amount of $100,000.00 or more, the city departments shall include, in appropriate grant applications, a request that a certain percentage of the grant amount be authorized for art in keeping with the established public arts master plan. All CIP's financed with Ordinance-Wylie Arts Board and Public Arts Program Page 3 grants and/or contributions from private entities and/or public agencies are subject to this division, unless art expenditures are not authorized by the granting or contributing entity. If art projects are expressly excluded, then only the city-funded portion of the CIP would be subject to this ordinance. (g) The City Manager may request that the City Council exclude certain capital improvement projects from the provisions of this ordinance by the passage of a resolution authorizing such a waiver. SECTION 5. Ownership and Maintenance. (a) Ownership of all works of art acquired by the city shall be vested in the City of Wylie which shall obtain title to each work of art. (b) Artists, as part of any contractual agreement with the city for the provision of a work of art, shall be required to submit to the public art advisory board a "Maintenance and Inventory Sheet," including annual cost projections, which details the maintenance and ongoing care of the artwork. SECTION 6. Establishment of the Public Arts Advisory Board. There is hereby created and established within the city the Public Arts Advisory Board for the purpose of, among other things, promoting art, selecting works of art and artists for commissioned pieces of art and implementing the public arts master plan. The board will, among other things, oversee the public arts program and act in an advisory capacity to the City Council. SECTION 7. Number of Members; Appointment; Terms. The members of the board shall consist of seven members, to be appointed by the City Council for a term of two years; provided, however, that the members of the first board to serve shall be appointed so that three (3) members shall serve one (1) year terms and four (4) members shall serve two (2) year terms. It is further provided that no member may serve more than three (3) consecutive terms on the Public Art Advisory Board; provided, however, should a board member's replacement not be qualified upon the expiration of any term of a board member, then that board member shall holdover on the board until a qualified replacement board member has been appointed. In addition to the seven board members, the City Manager shall serve as an ex officio member of the board, but shall have no right to vote on any matter before the board. Each board member shall serve without compensation, but may be reimbursed for actual expenses approved in advance by the City Council. SECTION 8. Board Member's Qualifications. Each board member shall be a qualified voter of the city and shall not be an employee of the city. Each board member shall have any other qualification as the City Council deems necessary and appropriate. Ordinance-Wylie Arts Board and Public Arts Program Page 4 SECTION 9. Meetings. The board shall meet at least once each month at such time and place as shall be fixed by the board by its standing rules, which meetings shall be open to the public. Special meetings may be called by the chairperson or by written request sent to the chairperson or vice-chairperson by three members of the board. Minutes shall be kept of all such meetings, and any special meetings, with copies of said minutes and any other reports to be transmitted to the City Council and the City Manager. The board shall have technical and logistical support provided as designated by the City Manager. SECTION 10. Vacancies. When vacancies occur on the board, the City Council shall appoint, by majority vote, a replacement to serve the remainder of the term. SECTION 11. Removal. Each board member serves at the pleasure of the City Council and may be removed at the discretion of the City Council. Board member absences shall be controlled by Article VIII of the City's Charter. SECTION 12. Quorum., Voting. Four (4) board members shall constitute a quorum of the board for the purpose of conducting its business, exercising its powers and for all other purposes. No action of the board shall be valid or binding unless adopted by the affirmative vote of a majority of those board members present and voting. SECTION 13. Officers. The board shall have a chairperson and vice-chairperson whose terms shall be one year. The chairperson and vice-chairperson shall be elected by the board members. Neither the chairperson nor vice-chairperson shall serve as an officer for more than two (2) consecutive terms. The chairperson shall preside over meetings and shall be entitled to vote upon each issue. The vice- chairperson shall assist the chairperson in directing the affairs of the board. In the absence of the chairperson, the vice-chairperson shall assume all duties of the chairperson. SECTION 14. Powers and Duties. (a) The board shall act principally in an advisory capacity to the City Council and the city staff in any matter pertaining to art. (b) The board may solicit, on behalf of the city, gifts, revenues, bequests or endowments of money and/or property as donations and/or grants from persons, firms or corporations, subject to the guidance, approval and acceptance by the City Council. (c) The board, through its chairperson, shall make both an oral and written report annually to the City Council concerning its activities during the past year and its proposals for the coming year. Ordinance-Wylie Arts Board and Public Arts Program Page 5 (d) The board's authority shall not extend to the direction, supervision, employment, or termination of the city employees. No supervisory power of the board is created. (e) The board will develop, for City Council approval, a set of bylaws governing rules of procedure for their meetings and operation. (f) The board shall not have the power to obligate the city for funds and/or expenditures or incur any debt on behalf of the city. (g) All powers and duties prescribed and delegated herein are delegated to the board, as a unit, and all action hereunder shall be of the board acting as a whole. No action of any individual board member is authorized, except through the approval of the board or City Council. (h) The board shall advise and make recommendations to City Council pertaining to the execution of the public arts master plan. (i) The board shall advise and make recommendations to the City Council pertaining to, among other things, policies and procedures as identified in the public arts master plan; artist selection juries and process; commission and placement of artworks; and maintenance and removal of artworks. (j) The board shall have any other power and/or duty as prescribed and authorized by the City Council. SECTION 15. Savings/Repealing Clause. All provisions of any ordinance in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent they are in conflict; but such repeal shall not abate any pending prosecution for violation of the repealed ordinance, nor shall the repeal prevent a prosecution from being commenced for any violation if occurring prior to the repeal of the ordinance. Any remaining portions of said ordinances shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 16. Severability. Should any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it is expressly provided that any and all remaining portions of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Wylie hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid. SECTION 17. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and publication as provided by law and the City Charter. Ordinance-Wylie Arts Board and Public Arts Program Page 6 DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, on this 13th day of June, 2006. John Mondy, Mayor ATTEST TO: Carole Ehrlich, City Secretary Date of Publication: , Wylie News Ordinance-Wylie Arts Board and Public Arts Program Page 7 PUBLIC ARTS STUDY FOR THE ARTS & CULTURAL COUNCIL OF GREATER ROCHESTER 49111%11**41110.1"11111114%%.. 111 Air Aar Air Air GENESEE/FINGER LAKES Regional Planning Council City Place 50 West Main Street, Suite 8107 Rochester, New York 14614 January 2003 Public Arts Study January 2003 GENESEE/FENGER LAKES Regional Planning Council Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Mission Statement: The Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council (G/FLRPC) will identify, define and inform its member counties of issues and opportunities critical to the physical, economic and social health of the region. G/FLRPC provides forums for discussion, debate and consensus building and develops and implements a focused action plan with clearly defined outcomes, which include programs, personnel and funding. Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Public Arts Study January 2003 Table of Contents Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Mission Statement Introduction 1 What is Public Art? 1 Art in public places 1 Overview 2 Public Arts Examples 3 Program Administration 5 Public Arts Survey 6 Art and the Economy 10 Economic Analysis: Arts and Public Access 10 Tracking the Impacts: A Local Application 11 Appendicies Comparable Cities: Appendix A A Comparable Cities: Appendix I I Survey Instrument: Appendix a a Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council ii Public Arts Study January 2003 Introduction What is art? Art is a product that evokes the senses and stimulates emotions — it is in the eyes of the beholder. Art may be something thought to be beautiful, interesting, controversial, emotionally moving, educational or displaying historic or cultural meaning. What gives art its vitality? Vitality is derived by the ability of individuals to interpret and transform their language to express new ideas or restate old ones in a compelling way by using several different mediums. What is Public Art? The term public is defined as concerning people in general: common and shared by all: having to do with a community. Art can be defined as that which is produced by human skill and not nature.2 `Public' and 'art' do not belong to different categories or stand for entirely different phenomena. Art is public by definition. Works of art are the result of actions aimed at the public. Metaphorically, the arena of art is a public space. People do not create art without a desire to communicate. All else is a private matter, a hobby, self-fulfillment3. Public Art can be defined as objects in our environment for public use and enjoyment that may display the following characters: • historic • aesthetic • functional Public art can be found in the form of: • Sculpture • Monuments • Murals • Fountains • Amenities such as seating, lights, signs, etc. Art in public places In public places, there are many forms of art that enhance the space and give it character. Sculpture of all kinds can be found in almost any city either representing a historic figure, or expressing a style, thought or culture. Murals are found on the sides of buildings, sometimes advertising a product or event, or 1 The Bloomsbury Concise English Dictionary,Bloomsbury Books:W&R Chambers Ltd., 1985. 2 Ibid. 3 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/1555/public_art.html,accessed May 2,2002. Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 1 Public Arts Study January 2003 expressing something of cultural, historical or visual importance. Fountains celebrate the reflections and coolness of water and add white noise, drowning out the sounds of traffic. Public art identifies the city, displaying persons and events in history by use of historic monuments. This form of art can educate the public about these historically important events. The urban environment can become personalized with art by demonstrating a particular style, activity or culture. Art creates a sense of place, it reflects social theory about the place and it displays a style that is attributed to the space. Art is often used in public places to give it character, to make a space interesting or to simply beautify it. People remember a place because of the artwork that exists in the space - the art acts as a symbol of the place. The Arch in St. Louis is a highly recognized symbol, just as the Statue of Liberty symbolizes New York. This recognition is a place making device4. Overview Art can be a powerful vehicle for communities. The Public Arts Study is a study that has been initiated by the City of Rochester and the Renaissance 2010 Plan to undertake a study to assemble data on Public Arts Programs across the United States and to look at their feasibility and benefit to their respective communities. This study will provide arts and cultural councils, local officials, planners, citizens and other interested or involved stakeholders with the information necessary to understand the aesthetic enhancement Public Art can offer to concrete building facades and sterile streetscapes in metropolitan settings. The end result will be compilation of information and data that will address and support Public Art as a catalyst for economic development and community revitalization, specifically drafted for the Greater Rochester area. In effect, The Public Arts Study will serve as a guide for those actively supporting Arts and Culture, who will ultimately take the vision and translate that into reality. The following objectives guide the Public Arts Study, which are to: • Empower the City of Rochester, the Arts and Cultural Council and other involved parties with information that will help define their Public Arts policy. • Gain an understanding of existing Public Arts initiatives. • Provide Public Arts models that have been presented in other cities that will inform those who will advocate a Public Arts program in the Greater Rochester area. • Encourage the Arts and Cultural Council to work in a coordinated and cooperative fashion with other parties to develop, fund and implement a Public Arts campaign in the Greater Rochester area. 4 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/1555/public_art.html,accessed May 2,2002. Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 2 Public Arts Study January 2003 Public Arts Examples In order to advise Greater Rochester on how it should proceed with regard to developing its Public Art approach, it is useful to briefly look to how others have embraced Public Art as an opportunity to further embellish their city. Below is a bulleted guide to public art as an example of what municipalities can and have dome with regard to their programs. The list looks at Miami, Florida, Duluth, Minnesota, Tampa Bay Florida, Phoenix,Arizona and Austin, Texas. Miami,Florida • Organization: "Art in Public Spaces"established in1973. o Educational Programs: • Tours • Lectures • Artist in Residency • Collaborative Projects with Dade County Schools • 15 Citizen Board • Offer Recommendations • Approve Artists • 11 Member Professional Advisory Committee (PAC) o Makes recommendations for acquisitions to the Art in Public Places Trust. o PAC members are professionals in the field of art, art history, architecture or architectural history. • 1.5%of City Construction Funds go to Public Art. Duluth,Minnesota • Organization: "Duluth Public Commission"founded in1986. o 1% of the construction costs of new building projects in excess of five thousand dollars and funded by City funds, be spent to acquire artwork for display at or near the project site. o Commission also supports the performing arts. o Canal Park Public Arts project. • "Tour of Waterfront Art" • A project designed to coincide with the revitalization of the Duluth Waterfront. o Sister Cities International Sculpture Garden in Lake Place Park. Sister Cities project promotes international peace and understanding through cultural and educational exchange. • Through this project, the Commission will select art for placement in Duluth's sister cities of Petrozavodsk, Russia; Vaxjo, Sweden; Ohara, Japan and Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada. Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 3 Public Arts Study January 2003 o Funding and support for these activities of the Duluth Public Arts Commission: • City of Duluth • The McKnight Foundation • The Arrowhead Regional Arts Council • Minnesota State Arts Board, through an appropriation from the • Minnesota State Legislature. • The National Endowment for the Arts • Participating local and county governmental units in Minnesota • A grant from St. Mary's Medical Center of Duluth • Individual patrons, businesses and corporations o Commission appoints an art selection advisory committee for each project o Number of committee members varies for each project depending on the size and complexity of the project. o Members are chosen from such fields as museum professionals, patrons, art educators, architects, designers, critics or artists. Hillsborough County,Florida(Tampa Bay) • Organization: volunteer"Public Art Committee"Established in1989. • 7member committee cooperates with site advisory committee members, project managers, and architects to select art work. o Members are: • 1 Member of County Commissioners • 1 Member of Arts council • 3 Private Citizens • 1 Member of Board of Trustees-Tampa Museum of Art • 1 Developer active in business in Hillsborough County o Criteria Include: • Artistic significance • Reflection of the County's cultural diversity • Site specific and complementary to environment and structural design o Funded By 1%of Construction Budget Phoenix,Arizona • Organization: "Public Art Program"established in 1986 o Allocates up to 1% of the city's Capital Improvement Program for public art projects o 1988, a public art master plan was created, which divided the city into a series of "urban design systems" and public art "working zones." o The public art program has become internationally recognized for its unique and innovative use of artists on design teams for large projects such as civic buildings, freeways and bridges. • Artists also have been commissioned to create site-specific neighborhood landmarks, sculptures, video artworks and murals. Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 4 Public Arts Study January 2003 Austin,Texas • Organization: "Art in Public Places"established in 1985 • The City of Austin was the first municipality in Texas to make a commitment to include works of art in construction projects. • 1% of budgets are allocated to commission or purchase art for public sites such as the airport, convention center, libraries, parks, police stations and recreation centers. • Austin Arts Commission provides oversight and appoints a seven-member Art in Public Places Panel composed of respected local visual arts and design professionals to make program recommendations. Program Administration In order to further understand the intricacies of developing a Public Art program, one must understand that there is cost associated with administration. Mark Flickinger, Program Director for Public Art and Community Design, Pinellas County Arts Council in Florida inquired via the Public Arts Network about the cost of program administration as a percentage of the total budget dedicated to Public Art. A summary of model approaches towards administration are provided below: • Tempe, AZ - not a separated budget category. • Madison WI-20% - based on a small public art budget (.25% set aside for public art.) • Denver, CO- 0% ("Denver uses 0% for admin"- must use another source of funding.) • Austin, TX - approx. 22.5%. • Columbia, MO - 5% (excluding salaries &finalist fees), additional 10%to maintenance. • Albuquerque,New Mexico - 15-20%(includes maintenance.) • Bernalillo County,New Mexico -Up to 10%(includes maintenance.) • Baton Rouge, LA-20%. • Portland, OR- 33%(1.33%program.) • Ventura, CA -20% (2%program.) • Anchorage,AK-varies by jurisdiction, 10%for school district projects. • Tucson, AZ-varies, approximately 10% (does not include maintenance and some salary costs.) • Stockton, CA-15%. • San Francisco, CA-20%. Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 5 Public Arts Study January 2003 Public Arts Survey As a result of there being so much information out there that could help guide the City of Rochester as it adapts its very own policy towards public art, a survey instrument was designed. The goal of administering this surveys was to abstract information from comparable cities on how to proceed. In order to ensure that the instrument was useful, several drafts of the survey were made. The survey instrument was reviewed by several regional professionals who work in the area of tourism, economic development and arts and cultural advocacy. In addition to this review, a pretest of the survey was conducted. These efforts were done in to get critical feedback regarding the content and length of the survey because we wanted it gather information in both an effective and efficient manner. Before sending out surveys to gain an understanding of existing Public Arts initiatives and identifying Public Arts opportunities and barriers that have been presented in other cities, it was decided that specific information needed to be gathered for municipalities and Metropolitan Statistical Areas that were similar to the City and MSA of Rochester. Forty one (41)municipalities were selected for being comparable to the City of Rochester and the Rochester Metropolitan Statistical Area. Comparability was looked at in terms of urban and metropolitan statistical area, age, ethnicity, median household income and education levels6. In June and July of 2002, surveys were sent via U.S. Postal Service and e-mail to the 41 municipalities that were deemed to be comparable. As of January 2003, 23 of the 41 or 56%of the surveys were returned. A brief summary of the major points of the survey responses appear in the matrices below and on the proceeding three pages. .;. t• Div r a y 36 B '+' a s s a1 igjx 3 i t t 1980 Salt Lake City Municipal Arts $750,000 Yes Percent if public Corporation Commission construction, ,tkNitt indoor,outdoor& building exterior 3 1980 Oklahoma City Municipal $18,847 Yes Art in public Council Government places, performing arts .. .,:.� center 5 Appendix a can be viewed in its entirety in the back of this report. 6 Appendix A and Appendix I can be viewed in its entirety in the back of this report. Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 6 Public Arts Study January 2003 S sf ran t a 6q. v\ a E rm a qa % \ r # \ x �\\ E c ,Aitt �� � �, sue: �� � -�x. �E t.. -� ,„ \ ^` �t/ a", ffi }` 1981 City Alderman— Non-profit $240,000 Yes Art in public a i . Cultural Affairs organization places,percent of @ Department/City public ' of New Haven construction, �\h indoor,outdoor& �,L designated 3\ '�' locations 1997 Private,County Private non- $944,195 Yes Art in public &City Arts profit agency places,percent of Council public construction, 4 . indoor,outdoor, designated El\ s locations& moveable collection 1991 City of Raleigh Municipal $210,000 Being Art in public i Arts Government created places,art in 3 Commission private dev.,city ;4 art collection, performing arts } center, indoor, outdoor& `�'Nz{ ;n building exterior a E 1999 City of Municipal $50,000 Yes Art in public Pittsburgh Government places,city art " Department of collection, Planning building exterior &designated city z $g, t, locations only 1986 City Council& Municipal $1 billion Yes Art in public L E Citizen task Government places,city art , ljr a force collection, i4LAN1 £ building exterior &designated city \' locations only g ,: 1981 City of Charlotte Private non- $250,000 No Art in public a ; and profit places,percent of 4 � Mecklenburg public County construction city ;.AL ; art collection, 0 building,indoor, outdoor& • ;, building exterior 2002 Town of Chapel Municipal Arts $21,600 Yes Art in public LAVOtiiklr4iiiii E Hill Commission places,percent of public construction, I indoor,outdoor& ,ram, performing arts Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 7 January 2003 Public Arts Study '461-11:ti. 1 , a °:°'7,<{ 1990 State Legislature State N/A Yes Percent of public Government construction, „ indoor,outdoor, 4 Aiika building zti, exterior& `r iii designated 3 itt l locations only �[ ,°h 1980 City of Portland Regional Varies Yes Percent of public ili Agency construction,cityiitittkittiittF art collection, 0�k^�5' i f5 ti ' indoor,outdoor& : '__' building exterior iiiiiiiolkiii.itiiiiir1996 City of San Municipal N/A No Art in public Antonio Government places,percent of 14 public construction,art hfwi, in private dev.,art fi Y gallery admin., "'M.- indoor,outdoor, r` building exterior &designated locations only 1985 Task force Municipal $70,000 Government Yes Art in public place,percent of public construction,city \k art collection,art , l lery i indogaor outdoor admin.& t'en building exterior 1980 City of Buffalo Municipal $200- Yes Art in public Arts Government, 250,000 place,percent of env Commission Advisory public s Committee& construction,art l N. Municipal Arts in private dev., ._ Commissions indoor,outdoor& building exterior iti 1973 City of Seattle Municipal $1.8 Yes Art in public Government, million place,percent of Advisorypublic ` Committee&`, construction,art .. ;• Municipal Arts in private dev. Pii zi; Commission at _" ,,, 1987 City Municipal Arts 60%of No Art in public Commission Commission annual places,percent of budget&e4 public y up to 2% construction, of const. indoor&outdoor Er_ �' .,ii projects Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 8 Public Arts Study January 2003 v",,,,,kkic:4:):4;14,,i;:ttk 4-‘,,,,,,. ..4' ., , --,:rt-A0ii, ',`,.!:,,,.i..6,,f,qc:-';-.:Lt :t,tt:,,,,,:e.,-:' 4-004`,•°:, t,; ,, ,i..v.v.,itti.),,,,, 1997 and Jacksonville Private non- $3 million Yes Art in public ,< } } ; revised in City Council profit agency places,percent of 2002 public construction, art 'o'''citt'lt,CI:T'''''': in private dev., a indoor,outdoor& • �, designated -; �` locations ! , 0 a 1997 City City&Office Varies Yes Percent of public E 3 , Government of Cultural construction, 4. Affairs indoor,outdoor, •,}fir , x &project specific 1977 Colorado Municipal N/A Yes Art in public Council on the Government places&City Art ` Arts,Colorado and Council collection ^' General for the Arts Assembly,City R 5 of Wheat Ridge, �y��v \',.:- City Council • E 1977 Arts Private non- Varies Yes Art in public ,` ,,,,,i ., Commission of profit places,City art '. Greater Toledo collection,indoor ram "',K? &outdoor '< 1991 City Council Municipal $2.8 Yes. Art in public a,"'` Government million places,percent of \• public ,r - construction, performing arts center,indoor, ` ' outdoor& '3i performing arts of r e 1978 City of Advisory $1.6 Yes Art in public l@ 4€ ' Albuquerque Committee million places,percent of ,o public ��y � i £ construction,Art \ , 4t Gallery admin., indoor&outdoor 1991 City of San City of $2.2 Yes Art in public Buenaventura Ventura Million places,percent of public :No•i , construction,City 4• \ K ° art collection& Art Gallery • �t , tz.L. ,\i•r admin. Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 9 Public Arts Study January 2003 Art and the Economy The nonprofit arts industry alone generates $36.8 billion annually in economic activity, supports 1.3 million jobs, and returns $3.4 billion to the federal government in income taxes. According to the 1990 U.S. census, the growth rate of artists' occupations in the workforce exceeds that of the overall labor force. America's creative industries are our nation's leading export with over $60 billion in annual overseas sales, including the output of artists and other creative workers in publishing, and the audiovisual, music, recording, and entertainment businesses. Domestically, at $443.9 billion, the arts represent 5.68%of the nation's Gross Domestic Product. Released in June of 2002, Arts & Economic Prosperity: The Economic Impact of Nonprofit Arts Organizations and Their Audiences, reveals that America's nonprofit arts industry generates $134 billion in economic activity every year, including $24.4 billion in federal, state, and local tax revenues. The $134 billion total includes $53.2 billion in spending by arts organizations and $80.8 billion in event-related spending by arts audiences: • The $53.2 billion represents a 45 percent increase (from $36.8 billion) since 1992, when Americans for the Arts last studied spending by arts organizations. • The $80.8 billion in event-related spending by arts audiences reflects an average of $22.87 per person in spending for hotels, restaurants, parking, souvenirs, refreshments, or other similar costs-with non-local attendees spending nearly twice as much as local attendees ($38.05 compared to $21.75). The $134 billion in total economic activity has a significant national impact, generating the following: • 4.85 million full-time equivalent jobs • $89.4 billion in household income • $6.6 billion in local government tax revenues • $7.3 billion in state government tax revenues • $10.5 billion in federal income tax revenues Economic Analysis:Arts and Public Access The value of arts to a community is not always apparent nor is it easy to quantify. In 2001 the Americans for the Arts completed a major nationwide survey of ninety-one areas across the United States ranging from small communities with populations of in Alaska to major cities of 3 to 4 million such as Houston, Texas and San Diego, http://www.americansforthearts.org/default.asp,accesses May 23,2002. Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 10 Public Arts Study January 2003 California. Additional surveys included 3,000 nonprofit arts organizations and 35- 40,000 participants at arts events across the country. At the national level it is estimated that the arts community now generates $134 billion in spending, a 45% increase since the last survey in 1992. This represents 4.85 million jobs and $89.4 billion in incomes nationwide. Over 18% or$24.3 is returned as federal, state and local taxes. The Americans for the Arts survey provided data for key indicators of economic activity starting with arts organization spending combined with visitor and audience spending, Data was also provided which reflected total employment and wages in addition to local and state government revenues. While it is presumed that large metropolitan areas have often cornered the market for arts and the pool of music, visual arts and drama, this is often not the case. The small community of Rockland Maine (7,609 pop.) generated over $21,804,000 in arts spending in 2001 which supported over 637 jobs and provided an additional $10,456,000 in wages and $1.8 million in local and state revenues. A larger community Santa Fe, New Mexico (pop.62, 203) generated $222,608,000 in arts spending which supported 6,545 jobs with$120,397,000 in wages and $19.6 million for local and state governments. The larger metropolitan areas Miami, Phoenix and San Diego with populations ranging from 2.813 to 1.321 million generate $260 to $401 million in arts expenditures. While these expenditures are fairly significant they are only slightly larger than Santa Fe while serving market areas 25-30 times greater. It should be noted that there are several other factors which influence the market draw and expenditures generated by the arts community. Additional factors which affect a community arts capacity and market capability can be related in part to socio- economic factors, locational attributes and environment. Education and income levels are often key to the market and appreciation of the arts which is usually a key factor in larger metropolitan areas and hence the location of major museums, theaters, concert halls and orchestras. The historical change of the arts and economic impacts can be made by using the Model provided by the American's for the Arts. Additional information on the methodology, a listing of the 91 cities surveyed and resulting data is provided on line at www.artsusa.org Tracking the Impacts:A Local Application The Rochester Metropolitan Area has most of the key qualities needed to be a major player in the arts and cultural arena. High median family incomes, high educational levels, and major arts, cultural and educational institutions are the equal of many larger communities. Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 11 Public Arts Study January 2003 Surveys undertaken in the 1990s by the Rochester Business Journal reflect expenditures similar to the larger metropolitan areas noted above. Using median values based on the Americans for the Arts survey estimates for the current Rochester market indicates over $157 million in spending generated by the arts community with audience expenditures over $91 million for a combined impact of $248 million. Over 7,450 full time equivalent positions are directly and indirectly related to the arts in the area which provides for $177.6 million in household incomes. Using the American for the Arts model and survey data, local and state government revenues realized over $22 million in tax income for 2001 in contrast to 1992 when it was estimated $8.268 million was generated by the arts industry and associated businesses. This would indicate while governments have been financial supporters of the arts the return on investment (ROI) is very good with local entities gaining three to four dollars for each dollar invested. Due to the lack of consistency with regard to the information obtained in the survey and the lack of accurate tracking and report ability in the specific area of public arts, an alternative approach was used by using the American's for the Arts Economic Calculator. As an example, local spendin impacts may be more effectively visualized by tracking the flow of $100,000 , within the Rochester/Monroe metro area. Jobs Created (Full time employment) Direct 1.8 In-Direct 1.2 Total Jobs 3.0 Household Incomes $71,370 Local Purchases $18,850 Local/State Taxes $ 10,100 The economic influence of the arts community supports many businesses and in the case of the tourism and visitor businesses and services this impact is very important and a key part of the communities ability to attract conferences and visitors locally and nationally. Indirect jobs and purchases represent over 40% of the local expenditures which is over $125 million expended in the local economy to support restaurants, stores,parking facilities and hotels. The marketing and development of highly visible public art work in conjunction with the promotion of the private collections will continue to increase economic opportunities and increase visitor activity in the City and the Greater Rochester region. 8 http://www.artsusa.org/economicimpact/calculator.asp,accessed November 23,2002. Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 12 Public Arts Study January 2003 Comparable Cities: Appendix A On the following pages is the matrix devised to compare Rochester and other Major MSA's with Public Arts Programs. .•#3A '01illi k 3 F } < ske ,•,r } „ 3 3A\:<£.,. =+ 3 \, .3 E 3 s B 3 3,.a 7. 1098,201 36.4 84.0% 10.3% 1.8% 0.3% N/A N/A N/A Qa ., e ` 60,370 97.4 94.7% 2.1% 0.5% 0.8% $47,771 84.4% 16.3% U ` 64,328 35.3 94.0% 3.0% 0.8% 0.3% $50,513 82.3% 19.2% ,Oe ``,•ita, t. 735,343 36.1 79.1% 13.7% 2.4% 0.3% $55,900 89.9% 17.1% � �� „%' x 100,224 37.9 95.0% 2.1% 0.7% 0.2% $52,698 87.4% 24.7% � :, �i;,;,""' 44,171 36.2 89.1% 7.3% 0.3% 0.5% $42,830 76.4% 13.0% `�a •:; 33,683 38.2 96.0% 2.3% 0.7% 0.2% $37,140 79.1% 17.5% „ 93,765 36.9 93.8% 3.2% 0.5%tr 0.3% $51,495 82.3% 17.0% � 42,507 36.7 91.8/0 5.5/0 0.4/0 0.3/o $39,895 75.0% 11.5/o 0 0 0 0 0 0 22,810 37.9 98.6% 0.8% 0.4% 0.5% 34,640$ 80.0% 18.2% ;, `t " a - 1,309,861 38 84.9% 10.7% 1.2% 0.6% N/A N/A N/A �;,; 219,846 38.2 90.7% 6.1% 0.6% 0.9% $38,136 83.3% 17.4% m " a 950,265 38 82.2% 13.0% 1.5% 0.6% 38,567 82.9% 24.5% i >1VIIC1k ' 139,750 37.9 94.0% 2.2% 0.4% 0.4% 33,458 81.2% 16.9% ' 0.5/o N/A N/A N/A , # 962,886 36.5 88.4% 4.5% 2.3% ° i 621,602 35.4 78.4% 6.5% 2.9% 0.5% $36,950 72.5% 21.3% 4" . . a 123,546 37.4 94.8% 0.9% 1.5% 0.9% $53,103 88.6% 35.5% 0,114illiii,;741:111" 167,090 38.9 95.5% 0.9% 1.3% 0.2% $47,617 83.9% 24.8% 50,648 39.3 96.8% 0.7% 1.0% 0.2% $50,737 80.7% 34.3% #kin 714 1,175,740 37.8 81.6% 9.0% 2.2% 0.2% N/A N/A N/A g 857,183 37.7 76.9% 11.7% 2.4% 0.2% $50,756 82.4% 29.6% �1 : F s Ilk_f� :>E 136,364 35.7 92.3% 2.7% 2.3% 0.2% $59,044 89.2% 32.8% x'} 155,071 36.8 91.3% 4.4% 1.6% 0.2% $59,175 88.7% 33.8% Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council A Public Arts Study January 2003 ;-,- ° { } { \ ..,..�,,,°e 1 a F 3 ' s, ,.. 3 `'., ,,$ l9 3 ,, ..\. ....4kd. E ' 3 x"'3:.•, 1,098,201 36.4 84.0% 10.3% 1.8% 0.3% N/A N/A N/A rif:*",;;;!;i,A .' 60,370 97.4 94.7% 2.1% 0.5% 0.8% $47,771 84.4% 16.3% ;, 64,328 35.3 94.0% 3.0% 0.8% 0.3% $50,513 82.3% 19.2% :a ''''Ik 735,343 36.1 79.1% 13.7% 2.4% 0.3% $55,900 89.9% 17.1% s 100,224 37.9 95.0% 2.1% 0.7% 0.2% $52,698 87.4% 24.7% Or 44,171 36.2 89.1% 7.3% 0.3% 0.5% $42,830 76.4% 13.0% ., 33,683 38.2 96.0% 2.3% 0.7% 0.2% $37,140 79.1% 17.5% :'AiV 93,765 36.9 93.8% 3.2% 0.5% 0.3% $51,495 82.3% 17.0% '�dss ,?`` 42,507 36.7 91.8% 5.5% 0.4% 0.3% $39,895 75.0% 11.5% r 22,810 37.9 98.6% 0.8% 0.4% 0.5% 34,640$ 80.0% 18.2% 732,117 36.2 88.9% 6.5% 1.5% 0.7% N/A N/A N/A $ 122,377 35 97.2% 0.6% 0.4% 0.4% $36,598 80.4% 14.4% m s _ ' 458,336 36.3 84.8% 9.4% 2.1% 0.9% $40,847 85.7% 28.5% F A 69,441 36.1 96.5% 1.3% 0.6% 0.5% $40,184 83.3% 21.6% 3 81,963 37.3 93.3% 4.0% 0.4% 0.3% $37,487 79.1% 15.5% EN IF\'IM 1,083,346 34.1 75.7% 10.6% 2.5% 4.2% N/A N/A N/A !.a 33,924 36.1 81.6% 11.0% 0.3% 2.9% $36,784 81.5% 19.1% Irirksii„VV-°�k"z�} 660,448 34.2 70.4% 15.0% 2.8% 3.4% $35,063 82.5% 25.4% g1 a t ,., 87,697 35.4 87.0% 2.2% 2.4% 4.3% $45,439 87.3% 20.9% itit , "s ` 208,016 32.2 83.6% 3.6% 2.8% 4.4% $41,846 88.1% 28.0% r; 27,740 36.9 87.3% 0.7% 5.6% 0.2% $37,275 79.3% 15.7% 5,,;., _ a 65,521 35.5 79.9% 2.9% 0.6% 11.2% $31,573 79.3% 15.5% f a ' . 1,644,561 35.6 75.0% 13.9% 2.7% 0.3% N/A N/A N/A I!t1!!! II1JII1II 896,344 33.3 68.6% 18.2% 3.4% 0.3% $41,311 81.8% 26.1% a `t�'a; y. 172,493 34.6 77.2% 7.4% 2.2% 0.5% $38,214 79.1% 15.7% 210,528 45.1 87.5% 8.3% 0.8% 0.3% $36,903 79.8% 16.6% aa ¢a l; ', 365,196 36.2 82.4% 9.5% 2.5% 0.3% $49,326 88.7% 31.0% Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council B Public Arts Study January 2003 `� max,.''�\� \x \�` ai'C' ,e��� �& �\ t lit Zii6 1,098,201 36.4 84.0% 10.3% 1.8% 0.3% N/A N/A N/A _ M 60,370 97.4 94.7% 2.1% 0.5% 0.8% $47,771 84.4% 16.3% 64,328 35.3 94.0% 3.0% 0.8% 0.3% $50,513 82.3% 19.2% e1441%, 735,343 36.1 79.1% 13.7% 2.4% 0.3% $55,900 89.9% 17.1% a _Z s %Jy IOQ224 37.9 95.0% 2.1% 0.7% 0.2% $52,698 87.4% 24.7% `, 44,171 36.2 89.1% 7.3% 0.3% 0.5% $42,830 76.4% 13.0% ff 33,683 38.2 96.0% 2.3% 0.7% 0.2% $37,140 79.1% 17.5% P `„h 93,765 36.9 93.8% 3.2% 0.5% 0.3% $51,495 82.3% 17.0% 42,507 36.7 91.8% 5.5% 0.4% 0.3% $39,895 75.0% 11.5% 22,810 37.9 98.6% 0.8% 0.4% 0.5% 34,640$ 80.0% 18.2% F Yam, �� 6 r Es ' 1 544,157 33.6 % % 2.4% 0.3% N/A N/A N/A _"' 32.5 81.3 75.5% 113.47.9% 3.1% 0.3% $42,734 85.7% 31.8% 1,068,978 ` r 36.2 95.1% 2.7% 0.7% 0.2% $47,962 87.6% 20.8% N6 : 122,759 D 35.3 94.2% 2.5% 1.5% 0.1% $67,258 92.9% 41.0% AtigalfliilaiMMA 109,989 a 35.8 91.8% 6.2% 0.4% 0.2% $44,212 79.0% 13.0% " 40,213 " 36 91.9% 6.4% 0.2%•V:i0.3% $42,832 77.2% 11.4% ', 52,727 6 36.6 95.6% 2.1% 0.6% 0.3% $44,124 84.7% 18.4% z\� 145,491 Fa t 1,169,391 33 69.4% 22.7% 2.9% 0.4% N/A N/A N/A lilltrZakitilif ' 627,846 32.9 72.4% 19.7% 3.4% 0.3% $54,998 89.3% 43.9% wg;vitagt a 49,329 38.8 74.9% 17.1% 0.6% 0.4% $42,851 77.9% 27.6% 40.1%30.4 78.0% 13.8% 4.1% 0.4% $43,337 83.0%" 118,227 vwxra §s ,,�.� -: 223,314 32.2 50.9% 39.5% 3.3% 0.3% $42,372 87.6% 51.5% Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council C Public Arts Study January 2003 itiMPatigiat <z,.. � & 9.+yLX: •,.,, `, T_: la ..-. -....�.ECG;' .-:'. y- t . ,.,, - _ lataXPOISAl ' e "- 1,098,201 36.4 84.0% 10.3% 1.8% 0.3% N/A N/A N/A 60,370 97.4 94.7% 2.1% 0.5% 0.8% $47,771 84.4% 16.3% k _k, 64,328 35.3 94.0% 3.0% 0.8% 0.3% $50,513 82.3% 19.2% fl a 735,343 36.1 79.1% 13.7% 2.4% 0.3% $55,900 89.9% 17.1% m t r.;, k,.I 100,224 37.9 95.0% 2.1% 0.7% 0.2% $52,698 87.4% 24.7% thiti,Toitt.:;11, 44,171 36.2 89.1% 7.3% 0.3% 0.5% $42,830 76.4% 13.0% IIi!!!IIII1I1I1IIJCatthitialank 33,683 38.2 96.0% 2.3% 0.7% 0.2% $37,140 79.1% 17.5% V p 93,765 36.9 93.8% 3.2% 0.5% 0.3% $51,495 82.3% 17.0% pistoprk\lk% ',,,, „dfatai a$ 42,507 36.7 91.8% 5.5% 0.4% 0.3% $39,895 75.0% 11.5% lit 22,810 37.9 98.6% 0.8% 0.4% 0.5% 34,640$ 80.0% 18.2% 1 a-a i ``LAI 1,231,311 34.4 79.4% 15.6% 1.6% 0.3% N/A N/A N/A EY , iititgai?Nit 569,891 34.1 67.0% 25.9% 2.3% 0.3% $39,797 81.5% 30.5% �$IMMOil 35,912 35.3 96.6% 1.5% 0.2% 0.4% $45,836 75.4% 15.1% 14 .r.1 a 43,156 35.7 93.3% 4.6% 0.3% 0.4% $39,056 72.6% 11.3% Iliff:MNiiii:1,:;;,:7:10 st as 126,638 36.2 91.6% 5.2% 1.3% 0.2% $69,104 90.1% 44.4% 88,809 36.3 91.5% 6.3% 0.5% 0.3% $50,140 80.9% 19.6% S 130,449 36.1 91.5% 5.8% 0.7% 0.3% $46,030 79.7% 18.6% I!I!!1!IPI11I!!1 54,433 35.4 89.1% 8.6% 0.3% 0.3% $43,174 74.8% 11.9% 0,i8W.�>, ,�,:� Y ;,: 182,023 31.2 85.7% 9.5% 1.9% 0.3% $46,312 81.8% 22.9% Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council D Public Arts Study January 2003 Comparable Cities: Appendix I Comparability was examined as a following step on a more detailed basis. These more focused matrices are listed below. Several additional municipalities were added top this section per the client. Buffalo,New York-MSA Buffalo is comparable to Rochester b ethnicity y< # Fa gg 84.9% 10.7% 1.2% 0.6% 84.0% 10.3% 1.8% 0.3% Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Providence,Rhode Island-MSA Providence is comparable to Rochester by population and median age Fps t +� ! R 962,886 36.5 .,. F ..€.. 1,098,201 36.4 Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Syracuse,New York-MSA Syracuse is comparable to Rochester by median age: S span v. e.. . Syracuse,NY,;�� 36.2 ... ., Ey 36.4 Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Hartford, Connecticut-MSA Hartford is comparable to Rochester by ethnicit and population + 1,175,740 81.6% 9.0% 2.2% H 0.2% 0 1,098,201 84.0% 10.3% 1.8% 0.3% Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council I Public Arts Study January 2003 Columbus,Ohio-MSA Columbus is comparable to Rochester by ethnicity and%high school graduate or higher 3 L 81.3% 13.4% 2.4% 0.3% 85.8% s \\ 81.3% 13.4% 2.4% 0.3% 85.8% Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill,North Carolina-MSA Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill is comparable to Rochester by population and%high school graduate or higher: ril ?.* 1,187,941 85.9% „ r.U.,v 1,098,201 87.7% Source: S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Orlando,Florida-MSA Orlando is comparable to Rochester by median age: y 35.6 3 , 36.4 Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Nashville,Tennessee-MSA Nashville is comparable to Rochester by population e 1,231,311 1,098,201 Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council II Public Arts Study January 2003 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma-MSA Oklahoma Cityis comparable to Rochester by copulation:, tax.. ., t .� 1,083,346 1,098,201 Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Austin,Texas-MSA Austin is comparable to Rochester by population 1,249,763 tin ,..., . ,. s .., 1,098,201 Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Charlotte,North Carolina-MSA Charlotte is comparable to Rochester by%with a bachelors degree or higher: ' r� :4 Ant� �'Z�aa 20.0% Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Greensboro-Winston Salem,North Carolina-MSA Greensboro-Winston Salem is comparable to Rochester by population, median age and% with a bachelors degree or higher: +�g �` �a � � t aka 1 Y�� sN $. 4 _..,. � -�_u..s„A ,w .... .... .•e�'•ix^_ .�Ana: ... __ _ _ .E,. �, R... � ",..,���.�.... 1,251,509 36.0 18.4% 1,098,201 36.4 17.7% Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council III Public Arts Study January 2003 Jacksonville Florida-MSA Jacksonville is comparable to Rochester by population, median age and%with a bachelorss degree or higherr;: 1` 1,100,491 35.3 18.6% e:U Fh1a 1,098,201 36.4 17.7% Sourc .S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Las Vegas,Nevada-MSA Las Vegas is comparable to Rochester b median age: 35.4 36.4 Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council New Orleans,Louisiana-MSA New Orleans is comparable to Rochester by population and%with a bachelors degree or higher: \ t , e . 19.4% 17.7% Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Richmond,Virginia-MSA Richmond is comparable to Rochester by population and median age: 996,512 35.8 l. s 1,098,201 36.4 20 Source:U.S.Census 00 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council IV Public Arts Study January 2003 Salt Lake City,Utah-MSA Salt Lake City is comparable to Rochester by population and%high school graduate or higher: �� f2 'i 4 F t e •� _saw 3�. _ Y :. 1,333,914 85.7 1,098,201 87.7 Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council San Antonio,Texas-MSA San Antonio is comparable to Rochester by %with a bachelors degree or higher: s � ,T 19.2% a t z 17.7% Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council West Palm Beach,Florida-MSA West Palm Beach is comparable to Rochester by population: 1,131,184 s ,, C 1,098,201 Source:U.S.Census 2000 and Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council V Public Arts Study January 2003 Survey Instrument: Appendix a Rochester is a diverse, stimulating, inventive metropolitan community - located in the - Finger Lakes Region of New York State. As the third largest urban area in New York State, the city's population in 2000 was 220,000 and the metropolitan area was 1,100,000. Rochester is world renowned as a center for innovations in technology as the birthplace of such notable companies as Kodak, Bausch & Lomb and Xerox. The city is home to several institutes of higher learning such as the University of Rochester, St. John Fisher, Nazareth, Rochester Institute of Technology and Monroe Community College. The arts and culture are thriving in Rochester with a full range of visual and performing arts offerings available year round. This survey instrument is intended to provide valuable information that will enable the City of Rochester, New York to develop a public arts policy. There are many public arts programs operating successfully throughout the United States and the intent here is to learn from your program and experiences. This survey will focus on the scope, organization and impact of your program. The cumulative responses will enable us to develop the Rochester program on the basis of what works and has produced results. Thank you for your willingness to help by completing this survey. Scope and Organization: 1. What year was your"public arts"program established? 2. What entity established your public arts program? 3. What entity administers your public arts program? 3 Municipal Government Advisory Committee County Government Private non-profit agency Public non-profit agency Regional Arts agency Municipal Arts Commission Other(please specify) Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council a Public Arts Study January 2003 4. Please indicate your total annual arts budget and what percentage is spent on public arts. , 5. Is there a public arts ordinance in your community? If the answer to 5 is yes, is a copy available? Please check off the elements contained in your public arts program. Art in public places Percent of public construction Art in private development City Art Collection Art Gallery Administration Performing Arts Center Indoor Outdoor Building Exterior Designated locations only Performing Arts Other(please specify) 7. How is the mix of art determined? 8. Please indicate which of the following funding sources apply to your annual public arts budget by indicating the dollar amount and percentage. Municipal Capital Bonds Tax Increment Funds General Tax Revenue Private Sponsor's State Funds Federal Funds Foundations Donations Endowments Other(please specify) Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council b Public Arts Study January 2003 9. For your art in public places program please indicate the following: a. What method(s) is used to solicit proposals for public art projects? b. Please check which of the following criteria is used to evaluate proposals. Safety in the right-of-way Materials to be used Size Maintenance Temporary Projects Permanent Installation Cost sharing Location Other(please specify) Would a copy of these criteria be available? c. Is there a permit process and how long does it take? d. How is the public involved in project development, proposal review and selection? e. Who makes the final decision regarding art selection? Is there an advisory committee? f. Does your program provide direction in terms of art content, appropriateness, and thematic guidance to the public including neighborhoods and businesses?Are written guidelines available?If so, are they available? g. Is there a permit process? Is a description available setting forth standards such as indemnification, insurance coverage and handicapped accessibility? How long does the process take? h. What entity is involved in proposal development, review and making recommendations concerning selection? i. Who has maintenance responsibilities? Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council c Public Arts Study January 2003 Impact: 10. Are performance criteria established for the public arts program? If so please indicate what the criteria are. 11. Please indicate for the following five areas how your public arts policies and program have had an impact: a. Utilizing your community's arts and cultural heritage and current assets as an economic development tool to create growth opportunities and a sense of pride and spirit. b. Development of new and/or expanded venues for arts and cultural facilities, entertainment and activities throughout the community, including residential neighborhoods. c. Promotion of the community as the center for arts and cultural activity in the region. d. Encouraging citizens to actively support and participate in diverse arts and cultural activities in a way that encourages more interaction and builds and strengthens the community. e. Encouraging arts and cultural organizations to cooperate with each other in the development and enhancement of the community to become the region's arts and cultural center. 12. Please indicate,which of the following economic impact indictors, apply to your public arts program by including actual current numbers for those that apply. Jobs created Jobs retained Contractors' Expenditures Artist Expenditures Business Receipts Government Revenue Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council d Public Arts Study January 2003 13. Was an economic impact analysis undertaken in order to determine how public art would be expected to have on your community?If so, would a copy of the report be available? Form completed by: Title: Telephone: Name of organization: E-mail address: Forward electronically to:jwa@artsrochester.org Or mail to: ATTN: Jim Anderson Arts and Cultural Council for Greater Rochester 277 North Goodman Street Rochester,New York 14607-1151 7/25/02 Prepared by the Genesee Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council e Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 11 Department: City Manager (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Mark B. Roath Account Code: Date Prepared: May 31, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: Four Subject Consider, and act upon, TXU Electric Delivery Letter Agreement, Paragraphs 1-4 and 5-7, related to extending to the City of Wylie benefits comparable to those given other communities through a series of agreements. Recommendation Motion to approve TXU Electric Delivery Letter Agreement effective July 1, 2006. Discussion The City of Wylie is not a member of the Steering Committee of Cities served by TXU Electric Delivery, which said Steering Committee entered into a series of settlement agreements with TXU in 2006. TXU Electric Delivery, however, is offering non-member cities, like Wylie, benefits comparable to the benefits reflected in those agreements with the Steering Committee. The proposed Letter Agreement, which is attached hereto, is bifurcated in that TXU is offering, in paragraphs one through four, that if the City does not intervene in or participate in any Show Cause Action prior to July 1, 2008 a cash payment will be made of$20,918 on or about March 31 of 2007, 2008 and 2009. If the City does intervene; however, then TXU Electric Delivery would cease any scheduled payment thereafter. In addition, TXU Electric Delivery will make a beneficial public use payment of$36,475.12 for years 2006 and 2007 as well. In Paragraphs five through seven, TXU Electric Delivery would increase the franchise fee to the City on a scaled ratio, which said franchise fee is contingent on the PUC not denying their recovery in electric delivery rates for the period mentioned. Documents attached are: Proposed Letter Agreement; Enclosure 1; Enclosure 2; and Attachment 1. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 05/31/06 Page 1 of 1 % TXU 4 -W Electric Delivery TXU Electric Delivery 7309 Frankford Road Dallas,TX 75252 May 4, 2006 Fax:972-985-2060 The Honorable John Mondy Mayor City of Wylie 2000 Highway 78 North Wylie, Texas 75098 Re: Extension and Modification of Settlement Between TXU Electric Delivery and the Steering Committee of Cities Served by TXU Electric Delivery&Agreement to Resolve Outstanding Franchise Issues Dear Mayor Mondy, As we told you in early January, TXU Electric Delivery Company ("Electric Delivery") and the Steering Committee of Cities Served by TXU Electric Delivery ("Steering Committee") have agreed to extend the February 22, 2005 settlement between Electric Delivery and the Steering Committee and to resolve outstanding franchise issues. Copies of the January 27, 2006 Extension and Modification of Settlement Agreement and the January 27, 2006 Agreement to Resolve Outstanding Franchise Issues that reflect those agreements between Electric Delivery and the Steering Committee are enclosed with this Letter Agreement as Enclosures 1 and 2, respectively. The purpose of this Letter Agreement is to offer your city benefits comparable to the benefits reflected in those agreements. Please note that paragraphs 5 through 7 of this Letter Agreement are available to your city only if your city also agrees to the provisions in paragraphs 1 through 4. Extension and Modification of Settlement Agreement 1. In consideration for your city's continuing agreement not to initiate a Show Cause Action or similar proceeding concerning Electric Delivery's rates before July 1, 2008 and not to intervene in or participate in any manner in any Show Cause Action concerning Electric Delivery's rates initiated at the Public Utility Commission of Texas ("PUC") or in any other jurisdiction prior to July 1, 2008, Electric Delivery will make a cash payment of$20,918.00 to your city on March 31, 2007, March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009. The amounts paid under this Letter Agreement are paid solely in consideration for your city's forbearance from filing, pursuing, or intervening in any Show Cause Action or similar proceeding against Electric Delivery and are not a rate reduction, refund, rebate, discount, preference, or privilege of any kind for services provided by Electric Delivery. 2. Electric Delivery's obligation to make the payments described in paragraph 1 ceases on (1) the date that your city initiates, intervenes in, or participates in a Show Cause Action or similar proceeding, (2) the date that Electric Delivery ceases to have any obligation to pay any amounts to Steering Committee under paragraph 4 of the January 27, 2006 Extension and Modification of Settlement Agreement (Enclosure 1), or (3) the date that the tariffs approved in Electric Delivery's next system-wide rate case at the PUC or in a city rate inquiry become effective on a temporary or permanent basis ("Termination Date"); provided, however, in the year the new tariffs become effective, the annual payment shall be prorated until the Termination Date. 3. Electric Delivery and the Steering Committee have also agreed in the January 27, 2006 Extension and Modification of Settlement Agreement (Enclosure 1) to pursue discussions concerning various subjects. Any improved processes or revised tariffs that result from that agreement will be made available to and will be applicable to your city. 4. Electric Delivery also agrees to pay your city $36,475.12 for beneficial public use 45 days after Electric Delivery receives an executed original of this Letter Agreement. Electric Delivery also agrees to pay your city $36,475.12 for beneficial public use on March 31, 2007. Your city agrees to apply both of these amounts for beneficial public use. The determination of what activities are beneficial to the public is within the discretion of your city. Those activities include, but are not limited to, energy education for citizens, reductions in rates for city services, investments in community facilities, and investments in energy efficiency measures. Agreement to Resolve Outstanding Franchise Issues 5. As described in the enclosed January 27, 2006 Agreement to Resolve Outstanding Franchise Issues (Enclosure 2), to recognize the increasing cost and complexity of managing utilities in public rights-of-way, Electric Delivery agrees to increase the franchise fee factor for your city effective January 1, 2006 by 2%. Electric Delivery will also increase the franchise fee factor for your city an additional 1% on January 1, 2007, on January 1, 2008, and on January 1, 2009, for a total potential increase of 5%above the franchise fee factor in effect on December 31, 2005. Electric Delivery's obligation to increase its franchise fee payments to reflect the increased franchise fee factors described in this paragraph ceases on the date upon which: (1) Electric Delivery is called in for a rate case by any municipality; (2) a proceeding concerning Electric Delivery's rates is initiated under Subchapters C or D of the Public Utility Regulatory Act, Tex. Util. Code Title 2, ("PURA") Chapter 36; (3) a proceeding affecting Electric Delivery's rates is initiated as a result of a settlement; or (4) legislation becomes effective that modifies the franchise fee authorized by the PURA. 6. Your city's acceptance of paragraphs 5 through 7 of this Letter Agreement signifies its agreement that if the PUC denies recovery in Electric Delivery's rates of the fees associated with the increased franchise fee factors described in paragraph 5, then the franchise fee factor in your city immediately reverts to the franchise fee factor in effect in your city on December 31, 2005. Electric Delivery will not seek to impose a refund or credit obligation on your city for franchise fees already paid under the increased franchise fee factors. 2 7. If your city receives its annual franchise fee payments from Electric Delivery on a prospective basis and your city would like to instead receive those prospective franchise fee payments on a quarterly basis, then Electric Delivery agrees to amend your existing franchise agreement in a manner that is consistent with paragraph 5 of the enclosed January 27, 2006 Agreement to Resolve Outstanding Franchise Issues (Enclosure 2). The cities who are not members of the Steering Committee who are eligible to choose this option are listed on Attachment 1 to this Letter Agreement. If your city is not listed on Attachment 1 to this Letter Agreement, then your city is not eligible to choose the option described in this paragraph. Execution Instructions 8. If your city agrees to the provisions of paragraphs 1 through 4 of this Letter Agreement, please have a properly authorized representative of your city sign in the first space reflected below and return the executed original to the undersigned. 9. If your city agrees to the provisions in paragraphs 1 through 4, then your city may also agree to the provisions in paragraph 5 through 7 by having a properly authorized representative of your city sign in the second space reflected below and returning the fully executed original to the undersigned. 10. The offers reflected in this Letter Agreement expire on July 1, 2006. Sincerely, Acitt-‘-ffr PARAGRAPHS 1 THROUGH 4 ARE AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED: City of Wylie By: Its: Date: PARAGRAPHS 5 THROUGH 7 ARE AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED: City of Wylie By: Its: Date: 3 Enclosure 1 Extension and Modification of Settlement Agreement between TXU Electric Delivery and the Steering Committee of Cities Served by TXU Electric Delivery dated January 27, 2006 EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Extension and Modification of Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into between TXU Electric Delivery Company ("Electric Delivery") and the Steering Committee of Cities Served by TXU Electric Delivery Company on behalf of all cities listed on Exhibit A to this Agreement("Cities"),hereinafter referred to jointly herein as"Signatories." WHEREAS, on February 22, 2005, the Signatories entered into a Settlement Agreement that resolved numerous issues, including issues arising out of the resolutions passed in 2004 by 23 cities that are members of Cities requiring Electric Delivery to file with those cities information that demonstrates good cause for showing that Electric Delivery's transmission and distribution rates should not be reduced(hereinafter referred to as"Show Cause Actions"); WHEREAS, as part of that February 22, 2005 Settlement Agreement, Electric Delivery agreed to file a system-wide rate case by July 1,2006; WHEREAS, Cities and Electric Delivery desire to extend certain terms of the February 22, 2005 Settlement Agreement and to resolve all outstanding issues related to the pending and potential Show Cause Actions, the upcoming system-wide rate filing, and other regulatory issues;and WHEREAS, after extensive negotiations, Cities and Electric Delivery have reached a compromise and settlement to resolve those issues. NOW, THEREFORE, the Signatories, through their undersigned representatives, hereby agree to the following: 1. Electric Delivery agrees to propose and support in its next system-wide rate case or city rate inquiry one or more municipal rates, each without a demand ratchet,that together will cover all municipal accounts, including a street lighting rate and municipal pumping rate that will be lower than they otherwise would be. Cities agree to provide to Electric Delivery any information needed to design the rates described in this paragraph. 2. Electric Delivery agrees to file a system-wide rate case at the Public Utility Commission of Texas ("PUC") no later than July 1, 2008, based on a test year ending December 31, 2007 unless Cities and Electric Delivery mutually agree that such a filing is unnecessary. For those cities that do not have a City Council meeting in July, 2008, Electric Delivery will extend its effective date to accomplish suspension by August 31,2008. However, if Electric Delivery files a system-wide rate case at the PUC on or before June 1, 2008, then Electric Delivery will not extend its effective date. 3. Cities agree not to pursue any abated Show Cause Actions and not to initiate similar actions before July 1, 2008,provided the provisions of this Agreement are honored. Cities agree not to intervene in,or participate in any manner in,any show cause action initiated at the PUC or in any other jurisdiction prior to the proceeding described in paragraph 2, or in any appeals of such show cause actions, except as necessary to protect the tariff or tariff-efforts associated with 1 paragraph 1 or to protect the city or its residents from being prejudiced in any show cause action pending on appeal at the PUC. If Cities intervene in a show cause action pending on appeal at the PUC,then Cities agree not to take any position in that proceeding that is inconsistent with its obligations under this Agreement. 4. Cities agree to provide notice to Electric Delivery that(1) all cities listed on Exhibit B to this Agreement have continued their abatements of, or have dismissed, show cause actions pending against Electric Delivery, and (2) each city listed on Exhibit C to this Agreement has passed a resolution ratifying this Agreement or provided to Cities a letter in substantially the same form as Exhibit D to this Agreement that has been signed by an authorized representative of the city. On March 31, 2007, March 31, 2008, and March 31, 2009, Electric Delivery will make a cash payment of $8 million to Cities. Electric Delivery's obligation to make those payments ceases on the date upon which Cities fail to comply with their obligations under this Agreement or the date upon which the tariffs approved in Electric Delivery's next system-wide rate case at the PUC or in a city rate inquiry become effective on a temporary or permanent basis ("Termination Date"); provided, however, in the year the new tariffs become effective, the annual payment shall be prorated until the Termination Date. "System-wide rate case" includes any system-wide change to base rate tariffs as a result of proceedings initiated under Subchapters C or D of PURA Chapter 36 and any proceeding changing Electric Delivery's base rates initiated as a result of a settlement. 5. The Signatories acknowledge and agree that under paragraph 4 of the February 22, 2005 Settlement Agreement,Electric Delivery will pay Cities$8 million on March 31,2006. 6. Electric Delivery agrees to work with Cities to improve the timeliness of streetlight maintenance and to develop a process so that every city-owned and Electric Delivery-owned street light is assigned an identifiable geographic location. Signatories agree to establish a task force of senior employees that will develop the process and planned rollout for the street light assignment project. Electric Delivery also agrees to provide to Cities a specific contact person (or persons)within Electric Delivery who will be responsible for handling all unresolved Cities' requests with respect to streetlights, including, but not limited to, billing, maintenance, installation, removal, and account initiation and closure. Signatories agree to diligently pursue resolution of the issues discussed in this paragraph; however, failure to reach an agreement with respect to these issues will not constitute a breach of this Agreement by either Cities or Electric Delivery. 7. Electric Delivery agrees to work with Cities to establish improved communication, coordination, and timing of construction concerning relocations of Electric Delivery's facilities in public right of way. Signatories agree to establish a task force of senior employees that will develop the process and planned rollout of an improved relocation process. Signatories agree to diligently pursue resolution of the issues discussed in this paragraph;however, failure to reach an agreement with respect to these issues will not constitute a breach of this Agreement by either Cities or Electric Delivery. 2 8. The Signatories acknowledge that they have reached a separate agreement concerning outstanding issues related to franchises. By its terms, that separate agreement becomes effective only upon this Agreement's becoming effective pursuant to the terms of paragraphs 4 and 19. 9. Electric Delivery agrees to negotiate with Cities, and Cities agree to approve, a tariff that permits Cities to request undergrounding of new or existing distribution facilities. The tariff shall ensure full cost recovery by Electric Delivery through a surcharge in the requesting city in the event that no third party is required by Electric Delivery's tariff,or applicable city ordinance, to pay for undergrounding costs. That tariff will also allow Cities to request undergrounding of transmission lines to the extent Electric Delivery determines that (a) such undergrounding is feasible, (b) such undergrounding is consistent with the PUC's Substantive Rules and ERCOT's requirements, and (c) Electric Delivery can recover the costs of such undergrounding through a surcharge in the requesting city. Electric Delivery will not be obligated to file the tariff for city approval until after the expiration of the Price to Beat or the modification of the Price to Beat in a manner that allows pass through of tariff charges to the ultimate consumer. 10. Electric Delivery agrees to provide quarterly updates to representatives designated by Cities and their consultants concerning Electric Delivery's capital expenditure projects and affiliate transactions, the creation and regulatory treatment of a Pension and Health Benefits Reserve for Electric Delivery, possible workable parameters for performance based rates for Electric Delivery, and other topics as agreed upon by the Signatories. Electric Delivery will work with Cities to provide information requested by Cities concerning those topics. 11. Electric Delivery shall pay up to $10,000 per month in regulatory expenses directly to Cities' consultants, after receipt of appropriate documentation and invoices, provided said expenses may be deferred for recovery. Cities agree to support recovery of such costs in Electric Delivery's next rate case. Should recovery be denied by the PUC, then the payments will immediately cease. 12. Electric Delivery shall pay up to $40,000 per month through December 2009 to reimburse Cities for their involvement before ERCOT and the PUC concerning market design issues,after receipt of appropriate documentation and invoices. 13. Electric Delivery agrees to reimburse Cities for the expenses incurred related to the negotiation of this Agreement in an amount not to exceed $25,000 after receipt of appropriate documentation and invoices, and Cities agree that those costs can be deferred for recovery in its next rate case and agree to support deferral and recovery in that case. Notwithstanding paragraph 14, any rights Cities may have under PURA,and any provisions in existing applicable franchise agreements to the contrary, Electric Delivery agrees to reimburse Cities for reasonable and necessary expenses incurred in Electric Delivery's next system-wide rate case in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000. The rate case expense reimbursements will be made monthly, beginning with the first month after the consultants are hired. Cities further agree not to contest the recovery of Cities' rate case expenses and Electric Delivery's reasonable and necessary rate case expenses in Electric Delivery's next system-wide rate case. 3 14. Electric Delivery agrees that, in franchise negotiations, it will not seek to extend the prohibition on reimbursement of municipal rate case expenses beyond June 2008. 15. Electric Delivery agrees to pay Cities $18 million for beneficial public use. The Signatories agree that that amount will be paid in two installments: (1)$9 million will be payable two weeks after Electric Delivery receives the notice from Cities required in paragraph 4 of this Agreement; and (2) $9 million will be payable by January 31, 2007. The Signatories agree that member cities are to apply these funds for beneficial public use and that the determination of what activities are beneficial to the public is within the discretion of each member city. Those activities include, but are not limited to,energy education for citizens,reductions in rates for city services,investments in community facilities,and investments in energy efficiency measures. 16. The Signatories acknowledge that Electric Delivery intends to offer certain terms of this Agreement to cities served by Electric Delivery that'are not listed on Exhibit A("Negotiations"). Electric Delivery agrees that all cities listed on Exhibit A are entitled to Most Favored Nations protection during those Negotiations and that any benefits that Electric Delivery agrees to provide to any city during those Negotiations that are not already included in this Agreement will be offered to all cities listed on Exhibit A. Cities acknowledge and agree that to receive any additional benefits from Electric Delivery, additional consideration from Cities to Electric Delivery may be required. 17. The Signatories agree that the amounts paid by Electric Delivery to Cities pursuant to paragraphs 4, 11, 12, 13, and 15 of this Agreement are paid solely in consideration for Cities' continued abatement or dismissal of, and forbearance from filing or pursuing, Show Cause Actions against Electric Delivery and Cities' agreement to abide by the terms of this Agreement, and to reimburse Cities' expenses associated with the Show Cause Actions and other regulatory proceedings. To the extent that the amounts paid may be in excess of Cities' expenses, the excess is paid solely in order to settle the matters that are the subject of this Agreement. Signatories recognize and agree that the payments specified in this Agreement are not a rate reduction, refund, rebate, discount, preference or privilege of any kind for services provided by Electric Delivery or any of its affiliates or predecessors in interest under any tariff, whether in the past, now, or in the future. As such, the provision of electric delivery service to Cities by Electric Delivery or any affiliate or predecessor has been and will continue to be governed solely by the rates,terms, and conditions of the applicable tariffs. 18. The Signatories agree that the rights, duties, benefits, and obligations set forth in this Agreement are binding upon their successors in interest. 19. This Agreement shall become effective only upon the execution of this Agreement and the entry of resolutions or orders continuing the abatements or dismissing the Show Cause Actions. 20. Each person executing this Agreement represents that he or she is authorized to sign this Agreement on behalf of the party represented. 4 21. The Signatories expressly acknowledge and agree that oral and written statements made by any party or its representative during the course of the settlement negotiations that led to this Agreement cannot be used or portrayed as an admission or concession of any sort and shall not be admissible as evidence in any proceeding in any forum. 22. The Signatories agree that this Agreement extends and modifies the terms of their February 22,2005 Settlement Agreement. To the extent that any terms of that February 22,2005 Settlement Agreement are not restated here, the Signatories agree that those terms have expired. To the extent that there are any inconsistencies between the terms of this Agreement and the terms of the February 22,2005 Settlement Agreement,the Signatories agree that the terms of this Agreement control. Executed on this the 274day of January, 2006, by the Signatories hereto, by and through their undersigned duly authorized representatives. TXU Electric Delivery Company Steering Committee of Cities Served by TXU Electric Delivery Company on behalf of all cities listed on Exhibit A to this Agreement By: (i By: Its: VI ci PitesiDeNtf Its: CALL- 5 Exhibit A City of Addison City of Highland Park City of University Park City of Allen City of Honey Grove City of Venus City of Alvarado City of Howe City of Waco City of Andrews City of Hurst City of Watauga City of Archer City City of Hutto City of White Settlement City of Arlington City of Irving City of Wichita Falls City of Belton City of Jolly City of Woodway City of Benbrook City of Josephine City of Big Spring City of Justin City of Breckenridge City of Kaufman City of Bridgeport City of Keller City of Brownwood City of Kerens City of Buffalo City of Lakeside City of Burkburnett City of Lamesa City of Burleson City of Lindale City of Caddo Mills City of Little River Academy City of Cameron City of Malakoff City of Canton City of Mansfield City of Carrollton City of McKinney City of Celina City of Midland City of Centerville City of Murphy City of Cleburne City of Murchison City of Colleyville City of New Chapel Hill City of Collinsville City of North Richland Hills City of Comanche City of O'Donnell City of Corinth City of Oak Leaf City of Crowley City of Oak Point City of Dallas City of Odessa City of Dalworthington City of Ovilla Gardens City of Palestine City of DeLeon. City of Pantego City of Denison City of Paris City of Early City of Plano City of Eastland City of Ranger City of Edgecliff Village City of Rhome City of Euless City of Richardson City of Farmers Branch City of Richland Hills City of Flower Mound City of Roanoke City of Forest Hill City of Robinson City of Fort Worth City of Rockwall City of Frisco City of Rosser City of Frost City of Rowlett City of Glenn Heights City of Sherman City of Grand Prairie City of Snyder City of Granger City of Southlake City of Grapevine City of Sulphur Springs City of Gunter City of Sunnyvale City of Harker Heights City of Sweetwater City of Heath City of Temple City of Henrietta City of The Colony City of Hewitt City of Tyler Exhibit B City of Arlington City of Benbrook City of Brownwood City of Burleson City of Carrollton City of Dallas City of Dalworthington Gardens City of Denison City of Ft.Worth City of Harker Heights City of Heath City of Pantego • City of Plano City of Richland Hills City of Robinson City of Rockwall City of Snyder City of Sulphur Springs City of The Colony City of Woodway Exhibit C City of Addison City of Tyler City of Allen City of University Park City of Andrews City of Waco City of Archer City City of Watauga City of Belton City of White Settlement City of Big Spring City of Wichita Falls City of Breckenridge City of Bridgeport City of Burkburnett City of Celina City of Cleburne City of Colleyville City of DeLeon City of Early City of Fastland City of Euless City of Farmers Branch City of Flower Mound City of Forest Hill City of Frisco City of Glenn Heights City of Grand Prairie City of Grapevine City of Henrietta City of Highland Park City of Howe City of Hurst City of Irving City of Keller City of Lakeside City of Lamesa City of Lindale City of Little River Academy City of Mansfield City of McKinney City of Midland City of Murphy City of North Richland Hills City of Oak Point City of O'Donnell City of Odessa City of Palestine City of Paris City of Richardson City of Roanoke City of Rowlett City of Sherman City of Southlake City of Sunnyvale City of Sweetwater City of Temple Exhibit D January ,2006 Mr. Geoffrey M. Gay, Esq. Lloyd Gosselink 816 Congress Avenue,Suite 1900 Austin,Texas 78701 RE: Settlement Agreement between Steering Committee of Cities Served by TXU Electric Delivery and TXU Electric Delivery Company Dear Mr. Gay: I hereby acknowledge that the Steering Committee of Cities Served by TXU Electric Delivery has the authority to act on behalf of the City of in the negotiation and execution of a settlement agreement with TXU Electric Delivery Company. I also represent that I am duly authorized by the City of to sign this letter. Sincerely, [Name] [Position] Enclosure 2 Agreement to Resolve Outstanding Franchise Issues between TXU Electric Delivery and the Steering Committee of Cities Served by TXU Electric Delivery dated January 27, 2006 AGREEMENT TO RESOLVE OUTSTANDING FRANCHISE ISSUES This Agreement To Resolve Outstanding Franchise Issues ("Agreement") is made and entered into between TXU Electric Delivery Company ("Electric Delivery") and the Steering Committee of Cities Served by TXU Electric Delivery Company on behalf of all cities listed on Exhibit A to this Agreement ("Cities"), hereinafter referred to jointly herein as "Signatories." The cities listed on Exhibit A to this Agreement are hereinafter referred to as"Member Cities." WHEREAS,several Member Cities have expressed concern about the increasing cost and complexity of managing utilities in public rights-of-way and the desire to receive increased compensation from utilities for their use of such rights-of-way; WHEREAS, several Member Cities who receive their franchise fee payments from Electric Delivery on a prospective yearly basis have expressed interest in transitioning to prospective quarterly payments; WHEREAS,the Signatories desire to resolve outstanding issues related to franchises;and WHEREAS, after extensive negotiations, the Signatories have reached a resolution of those issues. NOW, THEREFORE, the Signatories, through their undersigned representatives, hereby agree to the following: 1. The Signatories agree that this Agreement shall become effective only upon the execution of this Agreement and of the Extension and Modification of Settlement Agreement between the Signatories dated January 27 ,2006. The effectiveness of this Agreement shall be accomplished pursuant to the terms of paragraphs 4 and 19 of the Extension and Modification Settlement Agreement. 2. To recognize the increasing cost and complexity of managing utilities in public rights-of- way, Electric Delivery agrees to increase the franchise fee factor for each Member City on January 1, 2006, by 2%. The franchise fee factor is the amount per kilowatt hour which is multiplied times the number of kilowatt hours of electricity delivered by Electric Delivery to each retail customer whose consuming facility's point of delivery is located within the Member City's municipal boundaries. Electric Delivery will also increase the franchise fee factor to be paid to the Member Cities an additional 1% on January 1, 2007, on January 1, 2008, and on January 1, 2009, for a total potential increase of 5% above the franchise fee factor in effect on December 31, 2005. Exhibit B to this Agreement reflects the franchise fee factors in effect for all Member Cities in 2005,and the increased franchise fee factors for Member Cities provided by this paragraph for 2006, 2007,2008,and 2009. 3. Electric Delivery's obligation to increase its franchise fee payments to reflect the increased franchise fee factors described in paragraph 2 ceases on the date upon which: (1) Electric Delivery is called in for a rate case by any municipality; (2) a proceeding concerning Electric Delivery's rates is initiated under Subchapters C or D of the Public Utility Regulatory Page 1 Act, Tex. Util. Code Title 2 ("PURA")Chapter 36; (3)a proceeding affecting Electric Delivery's rates is initiated as a result of a settlement; or(4) legislation becomes effective that modifies the franchise fee authorized by PURA. 4. The Signatories agree that if the Public Utility Commission of Texas denies recovery in Electric Delivery's rates of the fees associated with the increased franchise fee factors described in paragraph 2, then the franchise fee factors immediately revert to the franchise fee factors in effect on December 31, 2005. Electric Delivery will not seek to impose a refund or credit obligation on Member Cities for franchise fees already paid under the increased franchise fee factors. 5. Electric Delivery agrees to amend its existing franchise agreements with those Member Cities who receive their annual franchise fee payments from Electric Delivery on a prospective basis, and who wish to receive franchise fee payments on a quarterly basis, to reflect the following points. Implementation of this amendment will be at each eligible Member City's option. Exhibit C is a list of Member Cities who are eligible to take advantage of this provision. For the purposes of this Agreement, "privilege period" is the period during which Electric Delivery will have the right to use the public rights-of-way to deliver electricity to a retail customer. `Basis period" is the period during which kWh delivered to each retail customer whose consuming facility's point of delivery is located within the Member City's municipal boundaries is used for the payment calculation. (a.) In calendar year 2006, the annual payment to be made by Electric Delivery to the eligible Member Cities will be paid in full on the date required by the applicable franchise agreement. (b.) Electric Delivery agrees to amend the franchise of eligible Member Cities to make quarterly payments on a prospective basis in lieu of the annual prospective payments as follows: (i.) A quarterly payment schedule will be established with the first quarterly payment due three months after the 2006 annual payment date in the existing franchise. (ii.) If the franchise amendment reflecting this Agreement is not effective prior to the first quarterly payment date,Electric Delivery will pay any quarterly payments due within 30 days of the effective date of the amendment. Subsequent payments will be made in accordance with the schedule established in the franchise amendment. (iii.) The basis period used in determining the first quarterly payment will be the three-month period immediately following the end of the basis period designated in the existing franchise agreement that corresponds to the last annual payment made in 2006. The basis period used in determining each subsequent quarterly payment will be the subsequent three-month period. Page 2 • (iv.) The privilege period covered by the first quarterly payment will be the three-month period immediately following the end of the privilege period designated in the existing franchise agreement that corresponds to the last annual payment made in 2006. The privilege period for each subsequent quarterly payment will be the subsequent three-month period. (c.) For an eligible Member City that chooses to amend its franchise agreement with Electric Delivery in this manner, Electric Delivery will cease to make annual franchise fee payments after December 31,2006. (d.) In no instance will Electric Delivery agree to payment provisions that would require payment for the same privilege period twice. (e.) The franchise amendment must extend the term of the amended franchise agreement for at least five years beyond its current expiration date. (f.) Since the quarterly franchise payments will correspond to a privilege period that is more than 12 months beyond the date of the payment, no franchise payments will be made during the final year of the franchise term unless the franchise is extended as set out herein. The amended franchise agreement will include a provision allowing Electric Delivery to elect to make one or more quarterly payments during the final year of the franchise term that will prepay in full the corresponding number of quarterly franchise periods that extend beyond what would otherwise be the term of the franchise agreement. The amended franchise agreement will include a provision requiring that any subsequent franchise agreement must recognize that any quarterly payments made during the final year of the amended franchise agreement term constitute full payment for the relevant quarterly franchise periods. (g.) Unless the existing franchise agreement is due to expire within 12 months of the date this Agreement is ratified,no other changes to the franchise will be included as part of this franchise amendment. If the existing franchise agreement is due to expire within 12 months of the date this Agreement is ratified, the parties' ability to negotiate other provisions of the franchise at the time the franchise is amended to accommodate this Agreement is not so limited. 6. Each person executing this Agreement represents that he or she is authorized to sign this Agreement on behalf of the party represented. 7. The Signatories expressly acknowledge and agree that oral and written statements made by any party or its representative during the course of the negotiations that led to this Agreement cannot be used or portrayed as an admission or concession of any sort and shall not be admissible as evidence in any proceeding in any forum. Page 3 Executed on this the 277Aday of January,2006, by the Signatories hereto, by and through their undersigned duly authorized representatives. TXU Electric Delivery Company Steering Committee of Cities Served by TXU Electric Delivery Company on behalf of all cities listed on Exhibit A to this Agreement By: Cm'"` i4 By: _Say De Its: U l CE 4 i 'r Its: (I Page 4 Exhibit A City of Addison City of Highland Park City of University Park City of Allen City of Honey Grove City of Venus City of Alvarado City of Howe City of Waco City of Andrews City of Hurst City of Watauga City of Archer City City of Hutto City of White Settlement City of Arlington City of Irving City of Wichita Falls City of Belton City of Jolly City of Woodway City of Benbrook City of Josephine City of Big Spring City of Justin City of Breckenridge City of Kaufman City of Bridgeport City of Keller City of Brownwood City of Kerens City of Buffalo City of Lakeside City of Burkburnett City of Lamesa City of Burleson City of Lindale City of Caddo Mills City of Little River Academy City of Cameron City of Malakoff City of Canton City of Mansfield City of Carrollton City of McKinney City of Celina City of Midland City of Centerville City of Murphy City of Cleburne City of Murchison City of Colleyville City of New Chapel Hill City of Collinsville City of North Richland Hills City of Comanche City of O'Donnell City of Corinth City of Oak Leaf City of Crowley City of Oak Point City of Dallas City of Odessa City of Dalworthington City of Ovilla Gardens City of Palestine City of DeLeon City of Pantego City of Denison City of Paris City of Early City of Plano City of Eastland City of Ranger City of Edgecliff Village City of Rhome City of Euless City of Richardson City of Farmers Branch City of Richland Hills City of Flower Mound City of Roanoke City of Forest Hill City of Robinson City of Fort Worth City of Rockwall City of Frisco City of Rosser City of Frost City of Rowlett City of Glenn Heights City of Sherman City of Grand Prairie City of Snyder City of Granger City of Southlake City of Grapevine City of Sulphur Springs City of Gunter City of Sunnyvale City of Harker Heights City of Sweetwater City of Heath City of Temple City of Henrietta City of The Colony City of Hewitt City of Tyler ' - Exhibit B Steering Committee Cities 2006 2007 2008 2009 # City Name Factor 1 :Addison I 0.002544 0.002595 0.002620 0.002646 0.002671 2 Alien i 0.002794 0.002850 0.002878 0.002906 0.002934 3 :Alvarado 0.003096 0.003158 0.003189 0.003220 0.003251 4 ;Andrews 0.003145 0.003208 0.003239 0.003271 0.003302 5 [Archer City a 0.003274 0.003339 0.003372 0.003405 0.003438 6 :Arlington 0.002766 0.002821 0.002849 0.002877 0.002904 h 7 [Belton 0.003115 0.003177 0.003208 0.003240 0.003271 8 i Benbrook 0.003002 0.003062 0.003092 0.003122 0.003152 9 iBf�Spring 0.002670 0.002723 0.002750 0.002777 0.002804 . 10 'Breckenridge 0.002251 0.002296 0.002319 0.002341 0.002364 11 'Bridgeport 0.002547 0.002598 0.002623 » 0.002649 .« _0.002674 12 I Brownwood 0.003069 0.003130 0.003161 0.003192 0.003222 13 !Buffal0 s 0.003133 0.003196 0.003227 0.003258 0.003290 14 Burkbumett 0.003003 0.003063 0.003093 0.003123 0.003153 15 !Burleson 0.002976 0.003036 0.003065 0.003095 0.003125 16 :Caddo Mills 0.003418'� 0.003486 0.003521, 0.003555 0.003589 17Cameron «..I 0.002873 0.002930 0.002959 0.002988 0.003017 18 "Canton 0.003216 0.003280 0.003312 0.003345 __ 0.003377 19 Carrollton » « «» « 0.002695 .0.002749_ « 0.002776 ....� 0.002803 _ 0.002830 20 iCelina _._»« M 0.003200 0.0032644 0.003296«» 0.003328 .. 0.003360 21 .Centerville € 0.003150 0.003213 0.003245 0.003276 0.003308 22 ':.Clebume € 0.002354 0.002401 0.002425 0.002448 0.002472 23 TColleyville 0.002984 0.003044 0.003074 0.003103 0.003133 24 ;Collinsville 0.003212 0.003276 0.003308, 0.003340 0.003373 25 ;Comanche 0.003203 0.003267 0.003299 0.003331 0.003363 26 :Corinth 0.002901 0.002959 0.002988 0.003017 0.003046 27 [Crowley 0.003095 0.003157 0.003188 0.003219 0.003250 28 :Dallas 0.002622 0.002674 0.002701 0.002727 0.002753 29 iDalworthin9ton Gardens 0A03023 0.03083 0:003114 0.003144 0.00317.1 30 'De Leon g 0.003280 0.003346 0.003378 0.003411 0.003444 31 Denison = µ 0.002766 0.002821 0.002849,___»«« 0.002877» »» 0.002904 32 :Ear1y 0.003221 0.003285 0.003318 0.003350 0.003382 33 [Eastland 0.003148 0.003211 0.003242 0.003274 0.003305 34 Edgediff Village 0.002796 0.002852 0.002880 0.002908 0.002936 35 Euless € 0.002971 0.003030 0.003060 0.003090 0.003120 36 iFarmers Branch 0.002452 0.002501 0.002526 0.002550 0.002575 37 [Flower Mound I 0.003031 0.003092 0.003122 0.003152 0.003183, 38 iForest Hill 0.002915 0.002973 0.003002 0.003032 0.003061 39 [Fort Worth 0.002651 0.002704 0.002731 «_« 0.002757 0.002784 40 ;Frisco 0.002964 0.003023 0.003053 0.003083 0.003112 41 rost 42 'Glenn Heights ...._» 0.003110 »..........._«_..__».»_ ........«..»».«. »..«« .._« .«......««... G 0.003403 0.003436 0.003469 0.603503, 0.003110, 0.003172 0.003203 0.003234 0.003266 43 'Grand Prairie 0.002651 0.002704 0.002731 0.002757 0.002784 44 'Granger 0.003392 0.003460 0.003494 0.003528 0.003562 45 1Grapevine 0.002545 0.002596 0.002621 0.002647 0.002672 46 :Gunter 0.003103 0.003165 0.003196 0.003227 0.003258, 47 Harker Heights 0.003099 0.003161 0.003192 0.003223 0.003254 48 'Heath 0.003072 0.003133 0.003164 0.003195 0.003226 49 Henrietta 0.003226 0.003291 0.003323 0.003355 0.003387 50 :Hewitt 0.003060 0.003121 0.003152 0.003182 0 003213 51 'Highland Park 0.002885 0.002943 0.002972 0.003000 0 003029 52 ;Honey Grove 0.003388 0.003456 0.003490 0.003524 0 003557 53 i Howe 0.003245 0.003310 0.003342 0.003375 0 003407 54 ;Hurst 0.002979 0.003039 0.003068 0.003098 0 003128 - Exhibit B 2006 2007 2008 2009 # City Name Factor 55 `Hutto i 0.003395 0.003463 0.003497 0.003531 0.003565 56 :Irving 0.002650 0.002703 . 0.002730 ... 0.002756 0.002783 57 ;]oily 0.002967 0.003026 0.003056 0.003086 0.003115 513' !Josephine 0.003221 0.003285 0.003318 0.003350 0.003382 59 Justin 0.003243 0.003308 0.003340 0.003373 0.003405 60 .Kaufman 0.003029 0.003090 0.003120 0.003150 0.003180 61 :Keller 0.003061 0.003122 0.003153 0.003183 0.003214 62 iKerens 0.003312 0.003378 0.003411 0.003444 0.003478 63 1Lakeside 0.003168 0.003231 0.003263 0.003295 0.003326 64 ;Lames.. 0.003045 0.003106 0.003136 0.003167 0.003197, 65 Lindale 0.002999 0.003059 0.003089 0.003119 0.003149 66 Little River-Academy € 0.003156 0.003219 0.003251 0.003282 0.003314 67 !Malakoff 0.002847 0.002904 0.002932 0.002961 0.002989 68 Mansfield 0.002834 0.002891 0.002919 0.002947 0.002976 69 3Mckinney 0.002728 0.002783 0:002810 0:002837 0.002864 70 iMidland i 0.002944 0.003003 0.003032 0.003062 0.003091, 71 !Milford 0.003383 0.003451 0.003484 0.003518 0.003552 72 :Murchison E 0.003351 0.003418 0.003452 0.003485 0.003519 73 i Mumhii 0.003078 0.003140 0.003170 0.003201 0.003232 74 New Chapel Hill _ » 0.003156 0.003219 0.003251 0.003282 0.003314 75 ..North Richland Hills I 0.002837'. 0.002894 0.002922 _-__ 0.002950...____.,_,•0.002979 76 10 Donnell 0.003332 0.003399 0.003432 0.003465 0:003499, Oak Leaf _ «_« « 0.002965 0:003024 _...«_ 0.003054*_. . «.. 0.003084 0.003113 78 ;Oak Point 0.003078 _ 0.003140 0.003170 0.003201 0.003232 79 !Odessa 0.003046 0.003107 0.003137 0.003168 0.003198 80 :Ovilla 's. 0.003038 0.003099 0.003129 0.003160_ 0.003190 81 Tiialestine _ 0.003017 0.003077 0.003108 0.003138 0.003168 82 Panto 0.003210 0.003274 0.003306 0.003338 0.003371 83 Paris 0.002407 0.002455 0.002479, 0.002503 0.002527 84 Plano 0.002730 0.002785 0.002812 0.002839 0.002867, 85 jtanger 0.003232 0.003297 0.003329 0.003361 0.003394 86 Rhome € 0.003180 0.003244 0.003275 0.003307 0.003339 87 Richardson = 0.002608 0.002660 0.002686 0.002712 0.002738 88 Richland Hills 0.003094 0.003156 0.003187 0.003218 0.003249 89 !Roanoke 0.003167 0.003230 0.003262 0.003294 0.003325' 90 Robinson 0.003119 0.003181 0.003213 0.003244 0.003275 91 ..Rockwall 0.002813 0.002869 0.002897 0.002926 0.002954 92 €Rosser 0.003258 0.003323 0.003356 0.003388 0.003421 93 €Rowlett 0.003068 0.003129 0.003160 0.003191 0.003221 94 Sherman 0.002281 0.002327 0.002349 0.002372 0.002395 95 iSnyder 0.003173 0.003236 0.003268 0.0003300 0.003332 96 Southlake 0.003031 0.003092 0.003122 0.003152 0.003183 97 ',Sulphur Springs 0.002767 0.002822 0.002850 0.002878 0.002905 98 Sunnyvale 0.002433 « 0.002482 0.002506 0.002530 0.002555 99 Sweetwater 0.003100 0.003162 0.003193 0.003224 0.003255 100;Temple 0.002526 0.002577 0.002602 0.002627 0.002652 101 The Colony 0.002978 0.003038 0.003067 0.003097 0.003127 102;Tyler 0.002648 0.002701 0.002727 0.002754 _ 0.002780 103 juniversitx Park 0.002792 0.002848 0.002876 0.002904 0.002932 104;Venus 0.003313 0.003379 0.003412 0.003446_ 0.003479 105 Waco 0.002630 0.002683 0.002709 0.002735 0.002762 106€Watau9a 0.002968 0.003027 0.003057 0.003087 0.003116 107 White Settlement a 0.002952 0.003011 0.003041 0.003070 _ 0.003100 108Wichita Falls 0.002841 0.002898 0.002926 _ 0.002955 0.002983 109 Woodway i 0.002692 0.002746 0.002773 0.002800 0.002827 Exhibit C City of Addison City of Odessa City of Allen City of Ovilla City of Alvarado City of Pantego City of Andrews City of Paris City of Archer City City of Plano City of Belton City of Rhome City of Benbrook City of Richland Hills City of Big Spring City of Roanoke City of Breckenridge City of Robinson City of Bridgeport City of Rosser City of Brownwood City of Rowlett City of Burkburnett City of Snyder City of Colleyville City of Southlake City of Corinth City of Sunnyvale City of Crowley City of Sweetwater City of Dalworthington Gardens City of Temple City of DeLeon City of The Colony City of Denison City of Watauga City of Early City of White Settlement City of Eastland City of Wichita Falls City of Edgecliff Village City of Woodway City of Euless City of Farmers Branch City of Flower Mound City of Forest Hill City of Glenn Heights City of Grand Prairie City of Granger City of Grapevine City of Heath City of Henrietta City of Hewitt City of Honey Grove City of Irving City of Jolly City of Josephine City of Justin City of Lakeside City of Lamesa City of Little River Academy City of Malakoff City of Mansfield City of McKinney City of Midland City of Murchison City of Murphy City of New Chapel Hill City of North Richland Hills City of O'Donnell City of Oak Leaf City of Oak Point ATTACHMENT 1 Annual Prepay Non-Steering Committee Cities ACKERLY CHANDLER FAIRVIEW KNOLLWOOD NACOGDOCHES RENO-LAMAR VALLEY VIEW ALEDO CHICO FORSAN KRUM NAVARRO RENO-PARKER VAN ALMA CHIRENO GAINESVILLE LACY-LAKEVIEW NEVADA RETREAT WEIR ANGUS CLARKSVILLE GARLAND LAKE BRIDGEPORT NEW FAIRVIEW RICHLAND WELLS ANNETTA COAHOMA GARRETT LAKE DALLAS NEWARK RIESEL WESTBROOK ANNETTA NORTH COLORADO CITY GEORGETOWN LAKE WORTH NEYLANDVILLE RIVER OAKS WESTOVER HILLS WESTWORTH ANNETTA SOUTH COMMERCE GHOLSON LAKESIDE CITY NOLANVILLE ROSCOE VILLAGE APPLEBY COOL GODLEY LATEXO NOONDAY ROXTON WICKETT ARGYLE COOPER GOL.INDA LAVON NORTHLAKE ROYSE CITY WILLOW PARK ATHENS COPPELL GOODLOW LEONA OAK GROVE RUNAWAY BAY WILMER AURORA CORSICANA GORMAN LEROY OAK VALLEY SACHSE WINDOM AZLE CRANDALL GRAFORD LINDSAY OGLESBY SADLER WINK BALCH SPRINGS CRANE GRAHAM LIPAN PARADISE SAGINAW WYLIE BARRY CRESSON GRANDFALLS LORAINE PARKER SALADO YANTIS BARTLETT CROSS ROADS GRAPELAND LORENA PAYNE SPRINGS SANCTUARY ZAVALLA BEDFORD CUMBY GUN BARREL CITY LOVELADY PECAN HILL SANSOM PARK BELLEVUE DEAN HALTOM CITY LOWRY CROSSING PENELOPE SAVOY BELLMEAD DESOTO HASLET MARSHALL CREEK PFLUGERVILLE SHADY SHORES BELLS DIBOLL HEBRON MAYPEARL PLEASANT VALLEY SOUTHMAYD MCLENDON- BEVERLY HILLS DODD CITY HICKORY CREEK CHISHOLM PONDER SPRINGTOWN POST OAK BEND BLUE MOUND DORCHESTER HIDEAWAY MELISSA CITY STANTON BRUCEVILLE-EDDY DUNCANVILLE HOLLIDAY MILANO POTTSBORO SUNSET BUCKHOLTS EDOM HUDSON MILDRED POWELL THORNTONVILLE BURKE ELECTRA HUDSON OAKS MILLSAP POYNOR THRALL BYNUM ELGIN HUTCHINS MOBILE CITY PRINCETON TIRA ENCHANTED CAMPBELL OAKS IOWA PARK MONAHANS PYOTE TOOL MORGANS POINT CANEY CITY EUREKA JOSHUA RESORT QUINLAN TRINIDAD CARBON EUSTACE KEENE MUENSTER RAVENNA TROPHY CLUB CASHION COMMUNITY EVERMAN KENNEDALE MUSTANG RED OAK TROY Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT g Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 12 Department: City Manager (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Mark B. Roath Account Code: Date Prepared: June 1, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: Two Subject Consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-38 denying the request of Atmos Energy Corporation, Mid-Texas Division, an Annual Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program(GRIP)rate increase. Recommendation Motion to approve Ordinance No. 2006-38 denying the request of Atmos Energy Corporation for an Annual Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP) rate increase. Discussion Purpose of the Ordinance: Atmos Mid-Tex filed its third surcharge request under the Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program ("GRIP") statute, seeking to add additional surcharges on top of the 2003 and 2004 GRIP surcharges already approved by the Railroad Commission. The 2005 surcharges are $0.51 on all residential customers, $1.75 for commercial customers and$78.47 for industrial customers. If this third surcharge were to be approved, the total amount of surcharges resulting from the GRIP statute would be $1.09/month for residential customers, $3.68/month for commercial customers, and $151.96/month for industrial customers. The ordinance denies the 2005 surcharge request on the grounds that it does not comply with the law and is not reasonable, and also because it is duplicative of the Company's Statement of Intent filing for the same period of time. What is GRIP: GRIP is piecemeal ratemaking and would be illegal under traditional ratemaking in the public interest. Atmos persuaded the legislature in 2003 to make an exception to the prohibition against piecemeal ratemaking to encourage increased investment in distribution pipe by allowing prompt recovery despite the possibility that increased revenues and declining costs would more than offset increased investment. Observations on the Filing: Page 1 of 2 Page 2 of 2 The following problems have been identified in this filing: (i) the capital structure and component costs used by Atmos do not represent Atmos Energy's costs, but are proxies based on TXU Gas' circumstances; (ii) the rate base amounts used show enormous and unexplained increases over the amounts in both 2003 and 2004 that are not shown to be reasonable; and (iii) the Statement of Intent filed with the Commission and the Cities also includes Atmos' 2005 investment, making the 2005 GRIP filing unnecessary and creating the potential for double-counting and double-recovery for this investment. Once the GRIP surcharge is in place, it is updated annually until the next general rate case; however, that next case can be delayed by the Company for more than five years. On May 31, 2006, the Company filed a Statement of Intent to increase its rates with the Railroad Commission and the Cities. The test year used for that filing is the calendar year ending December 31, 2005, which is the same period of time covered by this latest GRIP filing. Thus, the capital investment made by Atmos during 2005 is the subject of two proceedings —this GRIP filing and the Statement of Intent. Because the 2005 capital investment will be reviewed in the Statement of Intent filing, the GRIP filing for 2005 is superfluous, duplicative, and unnecessary. Explanation of"Be It Resolved" Paragraphs: 1. This paragraph sets out the finding that the Company's request is unreasonable, duplicative, and unnecessary. 2. This paragraph authorizes participation in a Steering Committee and coordinated control over legal counsel and consultants. 3. This paragraph notifies the Company that the City expects reimbursement of its expenses associated with its review of the filing. 4. This paragraph authorizes the City to intervene in the Company's appeal of the ordinance to the Railroad Commission and in any related litigation. 5. This paragraph provides for an immediate effective date. 6. This paragraph cites conformance with the Open Meetings Act. 7. This paragraph directs that a copy of the signed ordinance be sent to a representative of the Company and a representative of the coalition of cities. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/01/06 ORDINANCE NO. 2006-38 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (GRIP) RATE INCREASE IN THIS MUNICIPALITY, AS A PART OF THE COMPANY'S STATEWIDE GAS UTILITY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; APPROVING COOPERATION WITH OTHER CITIES WITHIN THE ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AS PART OF THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE (ACSC); AUTHORIZING ACSC TO HIRE LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES AND TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COMPANY AND DIRECT ANY NECESSARY LITIGATION; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF ACSC IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; PROVIDING A REQUIREMENT FOR A PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about March 30, 2006, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the City a request for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program ("GRIP") rate increase for customers on the Company's statewide gas utility system to be effective May 30, 2006; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code §§ 102.001(b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City to cooperate with other cities in a coalition of cities in opposition to the Company's filing at the Railroad Commission ("Commission"), said coalition being known as Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), in any appeal of the cities' actions to the Commission; and WHEREAS,the Gas Utility Regulatory Act ("GURA") grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission; and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code § 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified and unreasonable; and 1668\15\ord060531 Model Ordinance Denying 1 WHEREAS, the Company has publicly stated that it will receive substantial profit in 2005 and that its expenses are substantially below those on which the GUD No. 9400 rates it is charging were based; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to account for growth in numbers of customers, thereby undercounting the revenues it will receive from its proposed GRIP rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Company's GRIP request fails to recognize that GUD No. 9400 rates included profit based on TXU Corporation's capital structure rather than Atmos Energy Corp.'s current capital structure, which justifies a lower rate of return; and WHEREAS, under the provisions of§ 104.301 of GURA, the interim rate adjustment is subject to true-up in a general rate case filed within five years of the effective date of the interim rate surcharge; and WHEREAS, the Company has, on May 31, 2006, filed a Statement of Intent to increase its distribution rates on a system-wide basis, using calendar year ending December 31, 2005, as its test year; and WHEREAS, the capital investment made by Atmos during 2005 will be reviewed in the Statement of Intent filing, making the 2005 GRIP filing superfluous, duplicative, and unnecessary; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unreasonable, superfluous, duplicative, and unnecessary, and is therefore denied in all respects. SECTION 2. That the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates, and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of a rate ordinance and the rate case filed at the Commission. SECTION 3. That the costs incurred by the City in reviewing the Company's GRIP request shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. SECTION 4. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the City's action filed at the Commission and any related litigation, and to participate in any such appeal or litigation as a member of ACSC. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. 1668\15\ord060531 Model Ordinance Denying 2 SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. SECTION 7. A copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, be forwarded to the following: Richard T. Reis Atmos Energy Corporation 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1800 Dallas, Texas 75240 Lloyd Gosselink Blevins Rochelle & Townsend c/o Geoffrey Gay P.O. Box 1725 Austin, Texas 78767-1725. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas, on this the day of , 2006. APPROVED: John Mondy, Mayor ATTEST: Carole Erhlich, City Secretary 1668\15\ord060531 Model Ordinance Denying 3 RJC May 30,2006 MEMOTO: Geoffrey Gay,Georgia Crump FROM: Karl Nalepa SUBJECT: Atmos Energy Mid Tex 2005 GRIP Recommendation On March 31, 2006 Atmos Energy Mid Tex (Atmos) filed with Cities its latest Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP) request to implement a surcharge to recover its incremental utility investment made during 2005, in accordance with Texas Utilities Code §104.301. This filing follows similar requests to implement a surcharge on investments made in 2003 and 2004. A summary of the request is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 Rate Class 2003 GRIP 2004 GRIP 2005 GRIP (requested) Residential $ 0.29 $ 0.29 $ 0.51 Commercial $ 0.96 $ 0.97 $ 1.75 Industrial / $31.85 $41.64 $78.47 Transport In the two prior filings, the Cities found that the surcharges were excessive and unwarranted and denied implementation. The Company subsequently appealed the Cities' decisions to the Texas Railroad Commission (RRC),which ultimately granted the surcharges. RJ Covington Consulting has reviewed the latest filing and based on the following reasoning, recommends that the Company's request to implement the current GRIP surcharge be denied. Rate of Return As argued in prior filings, the parameters applied by Atmos to calculate its proposed surcharge are based on a different company - TXU Gas — from which the utility assets were acquired effective October 2004. In particular, the capital structure and component costs do not represent Atmos Energy's costs. As a result, the filing overstates the allowed return for Atmos. An example of the impact is shown in Figure 2, where the GUD 9400 approved composite rate of return is compared to Atmos' rate of return based on components reported in its December 31,2005 Form 10Q. R.J. Covington Consulting, LLC (512) 331-4949 11044 Research Boulevard, Suite A-325 Fax: (512)331-5743 Austin, Texas 78759 www.RJCovington.corn June 1,2006 Figure 2 TXU Gas-GUD 9400 Atmos Energy-Form 10Q Ratio Cost Total Ratio Cost Total Debt 48.3% 6.57% 3.173% 57.12% 5.40% 3.086% Preferred 1.9% 5.51% 0.105% - - Stock - Common 49.8% 10.00% 4.980% 42.88% 10.00% 4.288% Equity Return 8.258% 7.374% Rate Base Atmos claims $117 million in incremental investment in 2005. This compares to $88 million in 2004 and $74 million in 2003. Of the 2005 total, $10.9 million is the result of plant additions assigned to Mid Tex from Atmos' shared services. This same issue arose in the analysis of Atmos' show cause filing, and represents plant assets of Atmos Energy that have been allocated to Mid Tex since its acquisition from TXU. Atmos has not shown that it is reasonable to recover these affiliated assets from Mid Tex ratepayers. A related rate base issue is reflected in the Company's associated Earning Monitoring Report. The report more than tripled the booked amount of materials & supplies in rate base (from$633 thousand to $2.4 million) as a result of the assignment of Atmos' shared services amounts. Similarly, Atmos increased prepayments in rate base by $6.9 million (from $140 thousand to $7.0 million) as a result of assigned shared services amounts. Again,these affiliated assets have not been shown to be reasonable. Pending Atmos Mid Texas Rate Filing The overriding problem with implementing the 2005 GRIP surcharge is that the GRIP investment year coincides with the test year of the imminent rate filing. Atmos' rate filing will also include its 2005 investment, so at the very least the GRIP surcharge is unnecessary and creates the opportunity to double count return on these plant investments. If the surcharge is approved, even on an interim basis subject to refund, the Company will be allowed to collect twice on its investment until its next filed rate case some 5 or more years from now. This is clearly not in the public interest. Further,if the GRIP surcharge is approved, it would create a complicated restating of plant assets in the next rate case to undo the over-collection. This is not efficient, nor is it likely to result in refunds to the same customers that originally paid the surcharge. 2 Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 13 Department: City Manager (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Mark B. Roath Account Code: Date Prepared: June 2, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: Two Subject Consider, and act upon, Resolution 2006-19(R) denying Atmos Energy Corporation, Mid-Texas Division, Statement of Intent to increase the gas utility rates in the City of Wylie effective July 5, 2006. Recommendation Motion to approve Resolution 2006-19(R) denying Atmos Energy Corporation Statement of Intent to increase the gas utility rates in the City of Wylie effective July 5, 2006. Discussion Atmos Energy Corporation, according to their information, is seeking an increase in revenues of approximately $61 million annually, or 3.6%. The average residential bill would increase 5.36%, or by approximately $4.02 per month. Commercial customers would also see their average bill increased by 5.25%, or by approximately $17.16 per month. This resolution denies Atmos' Statement of Intent to increase gas utility rates within the City, which they propose to be effective July 5, 2006. In addition, this resolution also allows the City to participate, along with the 87 cities involved with the Atmos Cities Steering Committee, in any appeal filed at the Railroad Commission of Texas and/or to otherwise participate in any litigation associated with Atmos' rates charged in the city. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/02/06 Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2006-19(R) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS DENYING ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION'S STATEMENT OF INTENT TO INCREASE THE GAS UTILITY RATES IN THIS MUNICIPALITY; SUPPORTING THE REDUCTION OF EXISTING NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION RATES CURRENTLY CHARGED BY ATMOS MID-TEX WITHIN THE CITY; ORDERING ATMOS MID-TEX TO REIMBURSE THE CITY FOR ITS REASONABLE COSTS INCURRED IN RATEMAKING PROCEEDINGS OR APPEALS OF SAID PROCEEDINGS; AUTHORIZING THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE TO ACT ON BEHALF OF CITY AND INTERVENE IN ANY PROCEEDINGS BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE OR JUDICIAL BODIES; REQUIRING DELIVERY OF THIS RESOLUTION TO THE COMPANY AND LEGAL COUNSEL; AND FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW. WHEREAS, the City of Wylie, Texas ("City") is a regulatory authority under the Gas Utility Regulatory Act ("GURA") and has original jurisdiction over the gas utility rates of Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division(the "Company"); and WHEREAS, the City, along with 87 other Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC") cities, exercised its authority under §§ 103.001 and 104.151, GURA, to initiate a proceeding to determine whether the existing rates of the Company were unreasonable or in any way in violation of any provision of law and ordered the Company to show cause regarding the reasonableness of its existing natural gas distribution rates within the City; and WHEREAS, the Company filed its rate filing package with the City in response to the City's order on or about December 31, 2005, and the City's representatives obtained additional information from the Company through written requests for information; and WHEREAS, the City's consultants and representatives, through cooperative efforts and under the direction of the ACSC, reviewed the information and recommended that the City reduce the rates charged by the Company within the City; and WHEREAS, by its own action pursuant to GURA § 104.151(a) or by procedural agreement with the Company, the City reduced the current natural gas rates charged by the Company within the City effective May 31, 2006; and WHEREAS, the Company has bonded in its existing rates with the Railroad Commission as part of its appeal of rates set by ACSC cities; and WHEREAS, as part of its appeal of city rate actions taken by ACSC members, the Company filed a Statement of Intent to Increase the Gas Utility Rates within the City effective July 5, 2006; and 1668\14\res060601kpd Denial Res for SC Cities 1 WHEREAS, the Company's request is unreasonable based upon the information already reviewed by the City in response to its action initiating the show cause action; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the Statement of Intent to Increase Gas Utility Rates filed by the Company on or about May 31, 2006, and effective July 5, 2006, is hereby denied. SECTION 2. That the reduction to current rates previously adopted by the City pursuant to ordinance or agreement with the Company is just and reasonable. SECTION 3. That the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the City's action filed at the Railroad Commission of Texas and to otherwise participate in any litigation associated with the Company's rates charged in the City, in conjunction with the ACSC. SECTION 4. That the Company shall promptly reimburse ACSC for ratemaking costs associated with the City's activities related to the show cause proceeding and/or the denial of the Statement of Intent including appeals to the Railroad Commission or Courts, in accordance with GURA § 103.022. SECTION 5. That a copy of this Resolution shall be sent to the Company, care of Richard T. Reis, at Atmos Energy Corporation, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75240, and to Geoffrey Gay, legal counsel to ACSC, at Lloyd Gosselink, P.O. Box 1725, Austin, Texas 78767-1725. SECTION 6. That it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time,place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. DULY PASSED and approved by the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas, on this the day of , 2006. APPROVED: John Mondy, Mayor ATTEST: Carole Ehrlich, City Secretary 1668\14\res060601kpd Denial Res for SC Cities 2 BUSINESS + fir atlas Alvrnina Nrtu DallasNews.com Thursday, June 1,2006 Atmos files for Atmos higher ifies for rates Continuedfrom Page lD • m.crease expensivelinwint comes forftTr an exas natural gas customers. The price of natural gas hit an all- Texas customers would time high after the hurri- •a month p aY about $4 As winter heating bills more for natural gas rose,customers became frus- trated and swamped Atmos By ELIZABETH SOUDER with calls,asking the compa- Staff Writer nyto reread meters and adjust Atmos Energy Corp. on bills. Wednesday asked the Texas Rail- Atmos' request to hike road Commission and the 440 cit- prices includes changes to the ies it serves to allow the natural gas design of its rate structure. Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 14 Department: City Manager (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Mark B. Roath Account Code: Date Prepared: May 31, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: Three Subject Consider, discuss, and act upon, offering either compensation or comp-time for exempt City employees that worked during Hurricane Katrina and the March, 2006 rain storm event. Recommendation Motion to (approve/disapprove) (compensation/comp-time) for exempt City employees that worked during Hurricane Katrina and the March, 2006 rain storm event. Note: If the City Council decides to compensate exempt City employees for these two emergency events, then the motion should also include the waiver of Section 5-6 (D) and 5-7 (B) of the City's Personnel Manual. Discussion Mayor John Mondy, at the May 9, 2006 Regular Meeting, requested the City Manager prepare and present information on exempt City employees that worked during Hurricane Katrina and the recent rain storm event. Hurricane Katrina (September, 2005) Exempt City employees worked a total of 1,355.38 hours during Hurricane Katrina. In dollar costs, the total hours worked, by exempt City employees, equates to $40,959.16. (Exhibit"A") Rain Storm (March, 2006) Exempt City employees worked a total of 41.25 hours during the rain storm event, which equates to $2,659.82 in dollar costs. (Exhibit"C") The advantages and disadvantages of either compensating monetarily or through comp-time these exempt City employees are: 1. Advantages • Exempt City employees would be compensated, for work during these two events, similar to the non-exempt employees. • And, exempt City employees may be more inclined to work in future emergency situations if compensated for work performed during these two events. Page 1 of 2 Page 2 of 2 2. Disadvantages • The Federal Emergency Management Agency did not reimburse the City for work performed by exempt City employees during Hurricane Katrina. (Note: The City was not reimbursed for any costs associated with the rain storm event.) • The City's Personnel Manual does not allow for exempt City employee compensation for these or other activities. 1. Section 5-6 (D) states: "Exempt (salaried) employees will not be compensated for overtime hours worked." 2. Section 5-7 (B), entitled, "Compensatory Time Off for Exempt Personnel" states: "Exempt personnel are paid a salary and are not eligible to receive overtime pay. Exempt personnel are expected to work the hours necessary to complete their job assignments. Department heads may allow compensatory time off as partial compensation for overtime hours worked. Comp time is intended as a benefit to exempt personnel and is not provided on an hour-for-hour even exchange basis. Comp time must be authorized by the department head and cannot be allowed in segments of more than one day. Department heads wishing to take a full day of comp time are expected to obtain approval from the City Manager." • Other area cities, except for McKinney, did not reimburse exempt City employees for work performed during Hurricane Katrina. (Note: The City of Plano did offer, for Hurricane Katrina, comp-time to exempt City employees.) (Exhibit"B") • A budget amendment would be required if the City Council determines that monetary compensation is appropriate in this situation. (See Agenda Item No. 15) The total cost to pay exempt City employees is $43,618.98. • While this Agenda item is specific to Hurricane Katrina and the rain storm event, it might be construed as setting a precedent for future payments or time off for exempt City employees that work during an emergency situation. Alternative 1. Do not approve either compensation or comp-time. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 05/31/06 Hurricane Katrina-Exempt Employees-Incident Command Post-Logistics Period Covering from 8/29/06 to 9/14/05 COSTS DATES AND HOURS WORKED TOTAL HOURLY EMPLOYEE *BENEFIT TOTAL CITY'S Employee Name Job Title 29-Aug 30-Aug 31-Aug 01-Sep 02-Sep 03-Sep 04-Sep 05-Sep 06-Sep 07-Sep 08-Sep 09-Sep 10-Sep 11-Sep 12-Sep 13-Sep 14-Sep HOURS RATE PAY RATE/HR HOURLY COST Tori Hindman Recr Supervisor 6.0 18.5 11.0 7.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 52.50 29.94 1,571.85 1.1776 35.26 1,851.01 Phyllis Floyd Librarian 7.0 1.0 8.00 31.44 251.52 1.1776 37.02 296.19 Donna Shirley Librarian 7.0 7.00 29.94 209.58 1.1776 35.26 246.80 Rachel Orozco Librarian Dir 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 21.00 46.87 984.27 1.1776 55.19 1,159.08 Robert Diaz Asst Supv Parks 5.0 16.0 5.0 11.0 4.0 41.00 39.33 1,612.53 1.1776 46.32 1,898.92 Lynn Fagerstrom HR Manager 1.0 15.0 9.0 2.0 27.00 41.37 1,116.99 1.1776 48.72 1,315.37 Eva Rivera Muni Crt Supv 1.0 15.0 9.5 1.5 2.25 3.0 1.5 33.75 37.47 1,264.61 1.1776 44.12 1,489.21 Jeff Butter Police Chief 11.0 9.0 20.00 67.29 1,345.80 1.1776 79.24 1,584.81 MR Atkinson Police Lt 16.0 16.00 45.95 735.20 1.1776 54.11 865.77 Scott E Stowers Police Lt 16.0 8.0 24.00 45.95 1,102.80 1.1776 54.11 1,298.66 Jim Holcomb PurchAgent 14.0 7.0 1.5 0.5 23.00 45.39 1,043.97 1.1776 53.45 1,229.38 Bill Nelson Parks Director 11.0 16.0 8.0 5.0 40.00 52.80 2,112.00 1.1776 62.18 2,487.09 Mike Sferra Corn Dev Dir 4.0 15.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 25.00 55.83 1,395.75 1.1776 65.75 1,643.64 Jack Jones PW Dir 4.0 12.0 9.0 3.0 3.0 31.00 52.80 1,636.80 1.1776 62.18 1,927.50 Mark Witter Pub Info Off 3.0 15.0 10.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 46.00 36.92 1,698.32 1.1776 43.48 1,999.94 Mark Roath City Manager 7.0 2.5 9.50 87.41 830.40 1.1776 102.93 977.87 Shan English Fire Chief 5.0 16.0 10.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 52.00 67.29 3,499.08 1.1776 79.24 4,120.52 Noe Flores Asst Fire Chief 4.0 16.0 4.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 44.00 54.66 2,405.04 1.1776 64.37 2,832.18 Ron Hutchison Asst Fin Dir 14.0 8.0 10.5 32.50 52.73 1,713.73 1.1776 62.09 2,018.08 R.Daddio PW Foreman 3.0 16.0 11.0 9.0 39.00 39.33 1,533.87 1.1776 46.32 1,806.29 C.Thompson Planning Dir 3.0 15.0 8.5 8.0 8.0 4.0 46.50 55.83 2,596.10 1.1776 65.75 3,057.16 M.Manson Asst City Mgr 2.0 15.0 9.0 2.0 1.0 29.00 70.65 2,048.85 1.1776 83.20 2,412.73 C Hoisted City Engineer 1.0 12.0 9.5 9.0 1.0 32.50 63.78 2,072.85 1.1776 75.11 2,440.99 'TOTALS I I I I I 51.0 f 287.5 1158.5 1103.5 I 30.3 1 22.0 1 21.0 I 13.5 I 5.0 1 4.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 4.0 I 700.251 1,150.971 34,781.901 J 1,355.381 40,959.161 *Benefit Rate includes TMRS 8,Reimbursement for Katrina,FEMA 3216 EMTX. The benefit rate listed is FICA(1.062),Medicare(1.0145)and TMRS(1.1011)to total 1.1776. "Total Cost to City not necessarily amount reimbursable to employee. m x Q Prepared By: Marge Turano Page 1 of 1 Date: 05/30/2006 City of Wylie Hurricane Katrina Exempt Overtime by City February 13, 2005 ' � , The following cities The following cities did not The following cities provided a The following cities offered • compensated exempt compensate exempt provision in their labor policy to comp-time to exempt xemployees for overtime employees for overtime. reimburse exempt employees employees for overtime. k w !I with no labor policy. for overtime. This was e,« ' . ,.;, established prior to event. ALLEN X FRISCO X GARLAND X MCKINNEY X MURPHY X PLANO X X RICHARDSON X ROCKWALL X ROWLETT X m x W Rain Event-Exempt Employees-Incident Command Post-Logistics For Day of March 19, 2006 Dates and Hours Worked Hourly Overtime Employee Benefit City's Employee Name Job Title Days Hours Rate Rate Pay Rate Costs M. Roath City Manager 19-Mar-06 4 61.22 91.83 367.32 1.1776 432.56 M. Manson Assistant City Manager 19-Mar-06 8 50.44 75.66 605.28 1.1776 712.78 E. Rivera Muni Court Supervisor 19-Mar-04 7.25 26.74 40.11 290.80 1.1776 342.44 J. Jones P W Supervisor 19-Mar-06 6 35.9 53.85 323.10 1.1776 380.48 B. Nelson Parks Director 19-Mar-06 5 35.9 53.85 269.25 1.1776 317.07 R. Diaz Asst Supervisor- Parks 19-Mar-06 7 26.74 40.11 280.77 1.1776 330.63 T. Hindman Recreation Supervisor 19-Mar-06 4 20.36 30.54, 122.16 1.1776 143.86 41.25 2,258.68 2,659.82 m x m- C) Hurricane Katrina-Exempt Employees-Incident Command Post-Logistics Period Covering from 8/29/06 to 9/14/05 COSTS DATES AND HOURS WORKED TOTAL HOURLY EMPLOYEE `BENEFIT TOTAL CITY'S Employee Name Job Title 29-Aug 30-Aug 31-Aug 01-Sep 02-Sep 03-Sep 04-Sep 05-Sep 06-Sep 07-Sep 08-Sep 09-Sep 10-Sep 11-Sep 12-Sep 13-Sep 14-Sep HOURS RATE PAY RATE/HR HOURLY COST Tori Hindman Recr Supervisor 6.0 18.5 11.0 7.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 52.50 29.94 1,571.85 1.1776 35.26 1,851.01 Phyllis Floyd Librarian 7.0 1.0 8.00 31.44 251.52 1.1776 37.02 296.19 Donna Shirley Librarian 7.0 7.00 29.94 209.58 1.1776 35.26 246.80 Rachel Orozco Librarian Dir 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 21.00 46.87 984.27 1.1776 55.19 1,159.08 Robert Diaz Asst Supv Parks 5.0 16.0 5.0 11.0 4.0 41.00 39.33 1,612.53 1.1776 46.32 1,898.92 Lynn Fagerstrom HR Manager 1.0 15.0 9.0 2.0 27.00 41.37 1,116.99 1.1776 48.72 1,315.37 Eva Rivera Muni Crt Supv 1.0 15.0 9.5 1.5 2.25 3.0 1.5 33.75 37.47 1,264.61 1.1776 44.12 1,489.21 Jeff Butter Police Chief 11.0 9.0 20.00 67.29 1,345.80 1.1776 79.24 1,584.81 MR Atkinson Police Lt 16.0 16.00 45.95 735.20 1.1776 54.11 865.77 Scott E Stowers Police Lt 16.0 8.0 24.00 45.95 1,102.80 1.1776 54.11 1,298.66 Jim Holcomb PurchAgent 14.0 7.0 1.5 0.5 23.00 45.39 1,043.97 1.1776 53.45 1,229.38 Bill Nelson Parks Director 11.0 16.0 8.0 5.0 40.00 52.80 2,112.00 1.1776 62.18 2,487.09 Mike Sferra Corn Dev Dir 4.0 15.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 25.00 55.83 1,395.75 1.1776 65.75 1,643.64 Jack Jones PW Dir 4.0 12.0 9.0 3.0 3.0 31.00 52.80 1,636.80 1.1776 62.18 1,927.50 Mark Witter Pub Info Off 3.0 15.0 10.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 46.00 36.92 1,698.32 1.1776 43.48 1,999.94 Mark Roath City Manager 7.0 2.5 9.50 87.41 830.40 1.1776 102.93 977.87 Shan English Fire Chief 5.0 16.0 10.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 52.00 67.29 3,499.08 1.1776 79.24 4,120.52 Noe Flores Asst Fire Chief 4.0 16.0 4.0 10.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 44.00 54.66 2,405.04 1.1776 64.37 2,832.18 Ron Hutchison Asst Fin Dir 14.0 8.0 10.5 32.50 52.73 1,713.73 1.1776 62.09 2,018.08 R.Daddio PW Foreman 3.0 16.0 11.0 9.0 39.00 39.33 1,533.87 1.1776 46.32 1,806.29 C.Thompson Planning Dir 3.0 15.0 8.5 8.0 8.0 4.0 46.50 55.83 2,596.10 1.1776 65.75 3,057.16 M.Manson Asst City Mgr 2.0 15.0 9.0 2.0 1.0 29.00 70.65 2,048.85 1.1776 83.20 2,412.73 C Hoisted City Engineer 1.0 12.0 9.5 9.0 1.0 32.50 63.78 2,072.85 1.1776 75.11 2,440.99 TOTALS 51.0 287.5 158.5 103.5 30.3 22.0 21.0 13.5 5.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 700.25 1,150.97 34,781.90 f 1,355.38 40,959.16 `Benefit Rate includes TMRS&Reimbursement for Katrina,FEMA 3216 EMTX. The benefit rate listed is FICA(1.062),Medicare(1.0145)and TMRS(1.1011)to total 1.1776. "Total Cost to City not necessarily amount reimbursable to employee. m x a D Prepared By: Marge Turano Page 1 of 1 Date: 05/30/2006 71 Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 15 Department: City Manager (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Mark B. Roath Account Code: Date Prepared: June 1, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: One Subject Consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2006-39 amending Ordinance No. 2005-41 (2005-2006 Budget) and approving an appropriation of funds, in the amount of$43,618.98, for the purpose of compensating exempt City employees that worked during Hurricane Katrina and the March, 2006 rain storm event. Recommendation Motion to (approve/disapprove) Ordinance No. 2006-39 related to an appropriation of funds, in the amount of $43,618.98, to compensate exempt City employees that worked during Hurricane Katrina and the March, 2006 rain storm event. Discussion Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/01/06 Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2006-39 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2005-41 (2005-2006 BUDGET) AND APPROVING AN APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $43,618.98 FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPENSATING EXEMPT CITY EMPLOYEES THAT WORKED DURING HURRICANE KATRINA AND THE MARCH, 2006 RAIN STORM EVENT; PROVIDING FOR REPEALING, SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas ("Wylie") has determined that it will be beneficial and advantageous to the citizens of Wylie to amend the 2005-2006 budget adopted by Ordinance No. 2005-41 for the purpose of compensating exempt City employees that worked during Hurricane Katrina and the March, 2006 Rain Storm event; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that such an appropriation supports and furthers the public purpose of the citizens of the City of Wylie; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that it will be beneficial and advantageous to the citizens of Wylie to amend the 2005-2006 budget adopted by Ordinance No. 2005-41 for the purpose of providing for this additional appropriation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS: SECTION 1: Findings Incorporated. The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: Amendment to Ordinance No. 2005-41 (2005-2006 Budget). Ordinance No. 2005-41 (2005-2006 Budget) is hereby amended to allow for the following appropriation: That forty three thousand six hundred and eighteen dollars and ninety eight cents ($43,618.98) is hereby authorized to compensate exempt City employees that worked during Hurricane Katrina and the March, 2006 rain storm event. SECTION 3: Savings/ Repealing Clause. All provisions of any ordinance in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed; but such repeal shall not abate any pending prosecution for violation of the repealed Ordinance, nor shall the repeal prevent prosecution from being commenced for any violation if occurring prior to the repeal of the Ordinance. Any remaining portions of conflicting ordinances shall remain in full force and effect. Ordinance No.2006-39 ORDINANCE AMENDING 2005-2006 BUDGET(Hurricane Katrina and Rain Storm Exempt City Employee Compensation) Page 1 SECTION 4: Severability. Should any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it is expressly provided that any and all remaining portions of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Wylie hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid. SECTION 5: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, on this 13th day of June, 2006. John Mondy, Mayor ATTEST TO: Carole Ehrlich, City Secretary DATE OF PUBLICATION: , in the Ordinance No.2006-39 ORDINANCE AMENDING 2005-2006 BUDGET(Hurricane Katrina and Rain Storm Exempt City Employee Compensation) Page 2 Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: Work Session Department: City Manager (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Mark B. Roath Account Code: Date Prepared: May 31, 2006 Budgeted Amount: Exhibits: Two Subject Presentation by the firms of Thomas S. Byrne, Ltd., and Hunt Construction Group, Inc., for construction management services related to the New City Hall, Library and Recreation Center. Recommendation Discussion The process used to identify the possible finalist construction management firms for the New City Hall, Library and Recreation Center was as follows: • A Committee was formed. • Request for Qualifications were developed and solicited. • Statement of Qualifications were received by construction management firms and evaluated. • All firms were ranked by the Committee. • A"short-list" of firms was developed. • And, individual interviews were conducted, and then the firms were ranked to arrive at the finalist list. A formal presentation to the City Council has been arranged by each firm. (Note: The firms have been asked to limit their initial presentation to twenty (20) minutes or less, followed by City Council Question and Answers.) Documents attached are: Thomas S. Byrne, Ltd. Request for Qualifications and Hunt Construction Group, Inc., Request for Qualifications. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 05/31/06 Page 1 of 1 csReauest foQua t„. fo<. r,, :, Construction Mana -, ' .11 t'vi � . the Proposed e . , a , - p ¢ *.M� prLl ' Ril , �' i* .$ fit t,: ,a Y �:'., ems,, r � " ` a" '1 ",;,* ..,yam""z„ `. s +-- '�. • ." 1 _ .�- fis'4,k1 a Y 3' , iJMSTZy2.1f ,\, o k ' . — k• 'wed ,k , -' i liek 'i.,_.;1 1 L ,'.. t ail ,,,,. , .1, . _ tt ,,,,e .E.v. ...., i ..: , 2 , , At ,:,„,.4. i4R , , i Ir Sit#«4 N ` 4 -6 5� d 'i " v0' tea ' ; -, x TT »-,-4f - (--' f:z..,:.4•''''.4,•-i4v1V' - "'''' %kiff-t-''', . 'i • ''''''' "T '''.41:'`.4.k ."-:•;'!,''7% ' BlIFRIE a '1 ; � `.4 w . ,° ` CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Table of Contents Construction Services RFQ for Construction Management Services for the Proposed Wylie City Facilities Section 1 - Letters Section 2 - Firm Information Section 3 - General Company History/Qualifications Section 4 - Financial and Legal Status Section 5 - Experience and References Section 6 - Management and Organizational Approach r CD r* c7 TA EIGHT DECADES OF CONSTRUCTION EXCELLENCE BY ItIG 6600 LBJ Freeway,Suite 175 I Dallas,Texas 75240 THOS.S BYRNE,LTD. 214.267.0920 GENERAL CONTRACTORS Fax 214.267.0926 May 29, 2006 The Honorable John Mondy and Wylie City Council City of Wylie 2000 North Highway 78 Wylie,TX 75098 RE: Response to the RFQ for Construction Management Services for the Proposed Wylie City Facilities The Honorable John Mondy and Wylie City Council, Thos. S. Byrne is pleased to submit our response to your RFQ for Construction Management Services for the Proposed Wylie City Facilities which will remain effective for a period of sixty(60)calendar days. Byrne submits this proposal as the sole provider for the Construction Management Services;we will, however, be subcontracting for some/all of the Construction Scope of the project. These vendors shall be selected through the City of Wylie's and State Requirements. In the past five years, Byrne has successfully completed over$400 million of Construction Management projects for municipalities and other public entities.We believe Byrne is uniquely qualified for this public project and ask that your review committee consider the following: • Byrne has recently completed similar projects for the City of Keller—the Keller Town Hall, Plaza and Lakes, Keller Recreation Center,as well as the Keller Police Department Expansion. In addition, Byrne just completed the City of Frisco's Public Works Facility,and is currently working on the Frisco Central Fire Station and Fire Station#5. • 83 years of continuous construction operations as a Metroplex general contractor and Construction Manager. • Byrne's project team has experience in LEED and sustainable construction. • Byme's strong presence in the Metroplex provides a firm base with the local subcontractor community. • Byrne is a certified M/WBE firm, but we are also recognized in the industry for our award-winning support and utilization of M/WBE firms on all of our projects and consistently exceed established goals. • Multiple municipal project experience for the cities of Frisco, Dallas, Keller and Fort Worth,as well as Dallas, Tarrant and Ellis counties. • Byrne is noted for its award-winning quality at a competitive price. Byrne is a full service construction manager and general contractor with pre-construction,estimating,value engineering,scheduling, and construction services. Seventy-five percent of our$450 million annual volume is acquired through the negotiated delivery method, including Construction Management at Risk requiring preconstruction services. The remaining 25% is earned in the competitive bid market. We look forward to a favorable response,and if you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Keith Bjerke Vice President&General Manager Dallas T.S. Byrne Management, Inc. General Partner KB/am Enclosure T ' B O 3 a) _rt O Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Firm Information Construction Services Corporate Office Phone/Fax Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd 817-335-3394 900 Summit Ave. Fax 817-877-5507 Fort Worth,Texas 76102 Dallas Office 6600 LBJ Freeway, Suite 175 214-267-0920 Dallas, Texas 75240 Fax 214-267-0926 Austin Office 1250 S. Capital of Texas Highway 512-347-1898 Three Cielo, Suite 395 Fax 512-347-0950 Austin, Texas 78746 San Antonio Office The Nowlin Building 210-340-9080 9311 San Pedro, Suite 700 Fax 210-340-9085 San Antonio,Texas 78216 T.S. Byrne Management, Inc. Corporate Officers Construction Experience John Avila Jr. President and CEO 31 years Elias Najjar Sr. VP Estimating 25 years Mike Patterson Sr.VP Operations 35 years John McKay Sr.VP Administration 18 years Jeff Stucker VP Corporate Business Development 26 years Keith Bjerke VP General Manager Dallas 25 years Mall Allen VP Genera! Manager Austin 25 years Steve Gatto VP General Manager San Antonio 26 years Keith Muskrat VP Construction Manager 20 years Bill Scott VP Construction Manager 19 years Bill Saunders VP Construction Manager 23 years Patrick White VP Estimating Fort Worth 29 years Mike Loinette VP Estimating Dallas 34 years Jason Potter VP Controller 22 years Karolene Pittman VP HR& Corporate Secretary 23 years Fiscal Performance Annual Dollar Annual Contract Year Revenue Volume 2005 $146M $400M 2004 $142M $375M 2003 $140M $375M 2002 $140M $375M 2001 $140M $375M Additional Information Primary Contact: Keith Bjerke, VP General Manager Dallas 214-267-0920 Structure of Firm: Limited Partnership Years in Business: 83 Years Size of Firm: 250 Employees Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Executive Overview Construction Services Byrne's Legacy -1- , 7 y x t x :71 ' CC' Lf 6t '4 4.Byrne was founded in 1923 by Thomas Sneed Byrne, a native Texan and a 1913 graduate of may`, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Byrne is now in its third generation of leadership, with T. S. ztkl Byrne Management, Inc. beingdirected byJohn ; , t � t Y 9 i Avila, Jr. as President and CEO. Mission To achieve a level of construction excellence that sets Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. apart from the rest; to provide our clients with the finest quality and instill in them a level of satisfaction that brings them back to us time and time again; to conduct our business with the highest levels of integrity and honesty in everything that we do. To serve our employees as partners in every venture, giving them a level of trust and empowerment that allows them to 'own' their respective projects; to ensure that an environment of trust and open communication exists; and to provide them with benefits that make them secure in the knowledge that they are their families are well cared for. To serve our communities with enthusiasm, providing leadership, our time and financial support, and to mentor and encourage other companies and individuals to do the same. Vision Byrne's Vision is to expand our role as a leader in the construction industry by delivering superior products and services, building relationships with our clients and employees based on pride, trust and confidence, pioneering new markets and innovative construction techniques, and serving our communities with enthusiasm and dedication. Versatility Byrne's Versatility is exemplified by its ability to construct buildings ranging from high-rise office buildings, historic restoration projects, complex hospitals and related healthcare facilities, aviation facilities, sophisticated educational and institutional buildings, major retail centers, distribution and manufacturing facilities to world-renowned museums, performing arts centers, high-end residences and high quality, high finish specialty projects. Specialty Byrne's Specialty is building projects within a negotiated guaranteed maximum price requiring a high degree of personalized management and both pre-construction and construction skills in which one or more of the following is required: • Establishing, controlling and meeting an owner's budget, starting with partially complete design documents through completion of construction; • Unique architectural design and/or high quality of finish; • LEED/Sustainable Construction • Scheduling complexity to meet tight time frames and/or to maintain owner's operations when in, or connecting to, existing facilities; and highly technical, complex facilities such as healthcare, laboratory and aviation. Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Executive Overview Construction Services Capability Byrne has the capability to self-perform those portions of the work historically accomplished by the traditional General Contractor by maintaining a core group of carpenters, laborers, ironworkers and equipment operators for this purpose. The remaining portions of the work on most Byrne projects are subcontracted on an open shop basis utilizing both union and non-union subcontractors, which has proven to be an efficient and effective process. An important factor in the growth and continuity of Byrne is the volume of work it has performed on a negotiated basis for numerous repeat clients. Over the past 81 years, this has amounted to over 200 projects for more than 70 clients. Leadership Byrne's leadership role in the construction industry has been distinguished by more than thirty regional and national awards for excellence and innovation in construction awarded by the Association of Builders and Contractors (ABC) and the Association of General Contractors (AGC). Reputation Byrne's reputation for quality construction is backed by the integrity, stability, and competency of its staff and the desire to provide Byrne clients with finished structures that equal or exceed their expectations. Corporate Organizational Chart Thos.S.Byrne,Ltd T.S.Byrne Management,Inc. General Partner John Avila,Jr. Corporate Organization President 8 CEO I R.John McKay Karolene Jeff Stucker Sr Vice Elias Najjar Vice President Keith Bjerke Mike Patterson Steve Gatto Matt Allen Pittman Sr Vice Sr Vice President Vice President CorpSecretary President Secrets Corporate Vice President Vice President Chief Admin Prtimatint Business Dallas Division Chief Operating San Antonio VP Human Estimating Officer Division Austin Division Officer Resources Development I Jason Potter Mike Loinette Keith Muskrat Bill Scott Ben Robertson Vice President Vice President — Vice President Vice President Chief Estimator Director of Construction Construction Controller Dallas Marketing I.S. Manager Manager Jack Jackson Patrick White Adrienne Bill Saunders Rachael Cost Control Vice President — McLaughlin _ Vice President McDaniel Supervisor Chief Estimator Marketing Construction Marketing Fort Worth Coordinator Manager Coordinator Charles Daniel Eddie Morris Chief Estimator — — Asst.Vice President Austin/SA Safety Director Laura Denman Damon Norman Contract — — Construction Administration Manager G) CD M CD -1 a) F O g a) O. m Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Company History& Construction Services In House Municipal Building Projects Services Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. is an 83-year-old company that has a proven track record of constructing projects for Owners that are very specific in their end use. Properly addressing a project's program and special considerations ensures complete Owner satisfaction upon final delivery. Byrne's focus will be to meticulously plan and deliver the City of Wylie's proposed facilities projects. In the past five years, Byrne has successfully completed over $400 million of Construction Management projects for municipalities, universities and other public entities, including the Cities of Keller, Frisco, Dallas and Fort Worth, as well as Ellis, Collin, Dallas and Tarrant Counties. Byrne recently completed four projects for the City of Keller—the award-winning Town Hall, Plaza and Lakes and the Keller Pointe Recreation and Aquatics Center, as well as the Keller Municipal Service Center and the Keller Police Department Renovation/Expansion. In addition, Byrne has also recently completed the City of Frisco's Public Works Facility, and are currently working on the City of Frisco's new Central Fire Station, as well as Fire Station#5. Byrne's track record in maintaining an aggressive project schedule—on time and within budget— is one of Byrne's most enduring characteristics, and will be of great benefit to the City of Wylie. Byrne's strong financial position and the depth of its resources, with work in progress across the state, offer numerous advantages and benefits to the City of Wylie and the proposed projects. Byrne's most recent recognition for construction excellence includes two 2004 Preservation Texas Historic Rehabilitation Awards, a 2004 Best of Texas Award, a 2004 National Excellence in Construction Award, two 2004 Quoin Summit Awards, six 2004 Regional Excellence in Construction Awards, the 2004 Contractor of the Year Award presented by the City of Southlake, the prestigious 2003 Preservation Texas Honor Award and a 2003 National Excellence in Construction Award. This recognition exemplifies Byrne's commitment to quality construction and meticulous detail. Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. is positioned to commit the necessary resources to the City of Wylie and the proposed facilities projects. Our proposed staff is available to immediately engage in the preconstruction phase of this project, and our principals and project team hereby give our corporate commitment to deliver an exceptional project, on time, and within budget. Byrne is committed to offering value, quality and service over the long term. Byrne provides a variety of services including construction management, complete project management, professional estimating services, pre- construction services and general contractor services. The services provided in-house on municipal building projects include: Preconstruction: Program Analysis and Project Budget, Constructability Analysis, Complete Range of Budget Estimates, Best Value Analysis and Recommendations, Cost History Benchmarking, Prequalification Services, MIS Analysis and Support, Full Scheduling Analysis and Development, MEP Coordination and Estimates, Recommend Safety Procedures, Site Utilization Plans, and Establishing the Guaranteed Maximum Price. Construction: Scheduling, Construction Administration, Self-Performed Work, Quality Assurance/Quality Control, Checkout, Testing & Commissioning Procedures, Project Closeout, Punch List Process, Commissioning, As-built Drawings, Operations Manuals, Final completion, and Warranty Call Back. Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Organizational Chart&Resumes Construction Services Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Proposed Wylie City Facilities Keith Bjerke* Principal-in-charge Damon Norman* Construction Manager Mike Loinette Vice President Martin Lehman Estimating Project Manager Elias Najjar Senior Vice TBD Walt Clopton President Project Engineer Superintendent Estimating Preconstruction Construction *LEED Accredited Professional *The following is a partial listing of the proposed project team's Municipal Project Experience. Complete Resumes are provided for the proposed Project Manager and Superintendent. Other complete resumes will be provided upon request. KEITH BJERKE, LEED AP—PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE (25 Years Experience) Education: Texas A& M University, B. S. Building Construction, 1984 Overview of Municipal Projects Completed: City of Frisco Public Works Facility, Frisco, Texas *Registered LEED Gold Frisco Central Fire Station, Frisco, Texas *Registered LEED Silver Frisco Fire Station#5, Frisco, Texas *Registered LEED Silver Dallas County"Old Red"Courthouse Restoration, Phase Il, Dallas, Texas Ellis County Courthouse Restoration,Waxahachie, Texas Latino Cultural Center and Performance Hall, Dallas, Texas McKinney Performing Arts Center, McKinney, Texas Love Field Parking Garage, Dallas, Texas Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Organizational Chart&Resumes Construction Services ELIAS N. NAJJAR—DIRECTOR OF PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICES (25 Years Experience) Education: University of Texas at Arlington, Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering 1980 Overview of Municipal Projects Estimated: Keller Town Hall, Plaza & Lakes, Keller Keller Police Department Expansion, Keller Keller Recreation/Aquatics Center, Keller Keller Municipal Service Center, Keller Ellis County Courthouse Restoration,Waxahachie Dallas County Old Red Courthouse Renovations Phase II, Dallas Tarrant County Precinct#3 Maintenance Facility, Fort Worth Tarrant County Family Law Center Study, Fort Worth Tan-ant County Convention Center Estimating Study, Fort Worth JPS Tarrant County Public Health Facility, Fort Worth JPS Women's Health Center, Fort Worth Frisco Public Works Facility, Frisco MICHAEL LOINETTE—VICE PRESIDENT ESTIMATING (34 Years Experiencel Education: University of Texas Austin, Bachelor of Science, Architectural Engineering, 1970 Overview of Municipal Projects Estimated: Dallas County"Old Red"Courthouse Restoration, Phase II, Dallas,Texas Frisco Central Fire Station, Frisco, Texas Frisco Fire Station#5, Frisco, Texas City of Frisco Public Works Facility, Frisco,Texas Dallas County Underground Parking Garage, Dallas, Texas Northwest Police Station and Service Center, Dallas,Texas Mobile Convention Center, Mobile Alabama Hershall Payne Bus Maintenance Facility, Fort Worth,Texas MTA Bus Maintenance Facility, Houston,Texas Kipp Aquarium(at Houston Zoo), Houston,Texas DAMON B. NORMAN, LEED AP—CONSTRUCTION MANAGER(21 Years Experience) Education: Oklahoma State University, Bachelor of Science, Construction Management, 1985 Overview of Municipal Projects Completed: City of Frisco Public Works Facility, Frisco,Texas *REGISTERED LEED CERTIFICATION—SILVER LEVEL McKinney Performing Arts Center, McKinney, Texas Latino Cultural Center, Dallas, Texas Frisco Fire Station No. 5, Frisco, Texas Frisco Central Fire Station, Frisco, Texas Dallas County Underground Parking Garage, Dallas, Texas Dallas County"Old Red" Courthouse, Dallas, Texas Dallas County"Old Red" Clock Tower Addition, Dallas, Texas Love Field Parking Garage, Dallas, Texas Ellis County Courthouse Restoration, Waxahachie, Texas Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Resumes Construction Services MARTIN T. LEHMAN PROJECT MANAGER Education: Texas A& M University, College Station,Texas, B. S., Construction Science, 1995 Texas Tech University, Lubbock,Texas 1988-1990 LEED 2.0 Training Seminar&Technical Workshop, 2002 LEED 2.1 Training Seminar&Technical Workshop,2003 Professional Experience: 8 Years Martin is responsible for onsite project coordination and is the Byrne onsite single point of contact for the project. Martin provides constructability/means and methods studies during preconstruction and facilitates the construction of the project onsite including shop drawing and sample submittals, scheduling, scheduling meetings, issuance of monthly payment certificates, as-built records, and daily coordination of field activities through Superintendent Walt Clopton to ensure the overall plan and goals of the project are being executed inclusive of safety and quality requirements. Professional Membership &Awards: Associated General Contractors of America—Quoin, Chapter Activities Committee Member Associated Builders &Contractors—North Texas Chapter United States Green Building Council Graduate Uncommon Leadership Program OSHA Safety Course Habitat for Humanity, Fort Worth Chapter, Executive Board Member Tau Sigma Delta Honor Society—Member Award—for GPA in Architecture &Allied Arts Overview of Projects: City of Keller Town Hall, Plaza & Lakes, Keller,Texas 57,000 sq. ft. two-story city hall facility, 140-acre master planned site. Consists of drilled pier/slab-on-grade foundation, structural steel frame, masonry façade, curtain wall glass system, built up roof system with rooftop HVAC units. Project also includes the building interior finish-out including a 108-seat City Council Chamber, A/V conference rooms, administrative office areas, two management information system rooms, multi- media/studio production room, pedestrian plaza, and a 14-acre man-made lake system. $14,100,000 City of Keller Police Department Expansion, Keller, Texas 14,500 sq. ft. new addition and 5,700 sq. ft. renovation to the Keller Police Department and Municipal Courts Building. The new building addition consists of a drilled pier/slab-on-grade foundation, structural steel framing system, masonry façade, built-up roof system with rooftop AHUs. The interior finishout of the renovation area and new addition include administration, operations, staff services, technical services, communications and court administration areas. The project will also include expansion of the parking area. $4,000,000 City of Keller Municipal Service Center, Keller,Texas A new municipal service center facility to house the City of Keller's public works department. The center includes a 14,000 sq. ft. administrative building, a 2,440 sq. ft. crew shop area, an 11,500 sq. ft. maintenance/warehouse building, and a 6,800 sq. ft. cold storage building. The center also includes fueling islands, material storage bins, a vehicle wash island, vehicle storage yard and parking areas. The project is in preconstruction services phase at this time. $4,750,000 City of Keller Recreation/Aquatics Center, Keller,Texas A 76,250 sq. ft. new recreation center and aquatics center for the City of Keller. Drilled pier/slab-on-grade foundation, structural steel frame system, masonry façade, built-up roof system with rooftop AHUs. The facility will include a gymnasium, an indoor track, multi-purpose rooms, an aerobics and dance room, cardio/weight/fitness area, youth activity room, child care area, administrative offices, pavilion and indoor and outdoor leisure water. $13,353,304 BYRN Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Resumes Construction Services D/FW Consolidated Rental Car Facility, DFW International Airport,Texas This facility consolidated all rental car companies serving the DFW International Airport. It included 130,000 sq. ft. commons building, 1,300,000 sq. ft. parking garage, and ten satellite buildings related to bridges and site work on a 200 acre site. The two-story commons building consisted of a drilled pier/slab-on-grade foundation, precast concrete/curtain wall glazing facade, built-up roof system, and chilled water HVAC system. The interior finish-out included counter areas for vehicle rentals and administrative office space. The parking garage consisted of a drilled pier/slab-on-grade foundation, cast-in-place concrete frame with a precast concrete facade. The satellite buildings consisted of drilled pier/SOG foundations, tilt-wall concrete panel facades, built-up roof systems and serve as maintenance and fueling sites. $125,000,000 Fort Worth Outlet Square,Tandy Towers, Fort Worth,Texas 430,000 sq. ft. retail renovation of three-level retail link connecting the Tandy Corporation Twin Towers. Demolition phase included the removal of interior and exterior finishes, mechanical, electrical, plumbing systems and major structural elements to make way for new construction. New construction phase included new escalators, elevators and stairways. All new mechanical, plumbing, fire protection and electrical systems were installed per building code. Also included was the construction of a food court area as well as finish-out of 80 retail tenant spaces. New construction on the exterior included new brick masonry, cast stone sills, exposed structural steel components, and new storefront glazing. Project was the recipient of the ABC Excellence in Construction Award. $13,600,000 Texas Instruments, Inc., New Fab One Administration Building, Richardson,Texas, *REGISTERED LEED GOLD 274,000 sq. ft. three-story administration building for the new Texas Instruments Fab One computer chip manufacturing facility. The building consists of a drilled pier/slab-on-grade foundation, a poured-in-place concrete pan/joist structural frame, precast concrete panels and masonry façade, a metal panel/curtainwall glazing system, built-up roofing system, and a chilled water HVAC system. The facility will serve as the main administration building for the Fab One complex and will include the engineering, accounting and other administrative functions of the manufacturing campus. The project is to be LEED certified at the Gold Level. $19,500,000 Frito-Lay Office and Distribution Center,Carrollton,Texas 75,000 sq. ft. office and product distribution facility. Project included drilled pier/slab-on-grade foundation structural steel frame with concrete tilt-wall façade, built-up roofing system with rooftop AHUs, interior finish- out and truck court site paving. $5,551,000 Walsh Performing Arts Center,Texas Christian University, Fort Worth,Texas 75,000 sq. ft. performing arts and education center consisting of drilled pier/slab-on-grade foundation, structural steel frame, brick limestone, clay tile and granite façade, vista wall glazing system, EPDM single ply/copper roof system with chilled water HVAC system. The 325-seat recital hall included a wood basilica with rehearsal rooms. The 233-seat studio included audio/visual systems, theatrical lighting system, stage rigging systems and scene shop. The project is the recipient of the AGC award for Outstanding Construction and the ABC award for Excellence in Construction. $9,250,000 Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Resumes Construction Services WALT CLOPTON SUPERINTENDENT Education: University of Texas,Arlington, Texas- Engineering Drafting and Math Construction Related Courses-AGC OSHA Classes Eastfield College-OSHA Orientation Safety Classes One hundred hours in AGC Coordinated Classes Professional Memberships: Carpenters Local Union— 1959 to Present Associated Builders and Contractors, North Texas Chapter Associated General Contractors—Quoin,An AGC Chapter Associated General Contractors-"Superintendent of the Year", 1986 and 2000 Professional Experience: 40 Years Walt will act as field supervisor and have overall responsibility for field activities for the project. He will coordinate, schedule and supervise the work of all subcontractors involved in the project; recommend methods for expediting work and performance of the contract; implements policies for both the Safety and Quality Control Programs, time schedules and construction methods; examine project plans and specifications to insure constructability and construction compliance. Overview of Projects Completed: City of Keller Town Hall, Keller,Texas 57,000 sq. ft. two-story city hall facility, 140-acre master planned site. Consists of drilled pier/slab-on-grade foundation, structural steel frame, masonry façade, curtain wall glass system, built up roof system with rooftop HVAC units. Project also includes the building interior finish-out including a 108-seat City Council Chamber, AN conference rooms, administrative office areas, two management information system rooms, multi- media/studio production room, pedestrian plaza, and a 14-acre man-made lake system. $14,100,000 City of Keller Recreation/Aquatics Center, Keller,Texas A 76,250 sq. ft. new recreation center and aquatics center for the City of Keller. Drilled pier/slab-on-grade foundation, structural steel frame system, masonry façade, built-up roof system with rooftop AHUs. The facility will include a gymnasium, an indoor track, multi-purpose rooms, an aerobics and dance room, cardio/weight/fitness area, youth activity room, child care area, administrative offices, pavilion and indoor and outdoor leisure water. $13,090,000 D/FW Consolidated Rent-A-Car Facility, DFW International Airport,Texas This facility consolidated all rental car companies serving the DFW International Airport. It included 130,000 sq. ft. commons building, 1,300,000 sq. ft. parking garage, and ten satellite buildings related to bridges and site work on a 200 acre site. The two-story commons building consisted of a drilled pier/slab-on-grade foundation, precast concrete/curtain wall glazing façade, built-up roof system, and chilled water HVAC system. The interior finish-out included counter areas for vehicle rentals and administrative office space. The parking garage consisted of a drilled pier/slab-on-grade foundation, cast-in-place concrete frame with a precast concrete facade. The satellite buildings consisted of drilled pier/SOG foundations, tilt-wall concrete panel facades, built-up roof systems and serve as maintenance and fueling sites. $125,000,000 Commerce Street Courthouse, Dallas, Texas Eleven story jail and courthouse facility. Project included drilled pier/three level concrete basement foundation, composite concrete and structural steel frame, cut limestone façade, punched windows, built-up roof system and chilled water HVAC system. Finish-out of jail facilities included thirty-seven courtrooms and a three level concrete parking garage structure. $24,000,000 Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Resumes Construction Services John Peter Smith Tarrant County Hospital, Fort Worth,Texas $27,797,000 Public Health Facility — 82,000 sq. ft. two-story facility. Project includes drilled pier and beam foundation, structural steel framing system, brick masonry façade, built-up roof system, chilled water HVAC suite. Interior finish-out of the facility includes clinical and laboratory facilities, administrative offices, an education center, a fitness center, STD,WIC, TB and Environmental Health departments. $14,737,000 Women's Health Center — 45,500 sq. ft. single-story facility. Project includes drilled pier and beam foundation, structural steel framing system, brick masonry façade, built-up roof system, chilled water HVAC system. Interior finish-out includes clinical facilities, administrative offices, an education center, and a women's health and breast center. $13,060,000 Harris Southlake Center for Diagnostics& Surgery, Southlake,Texas New 35,000 s.f. single-story short-stay hospital and 50,000 s.f. two-story medical office building. The hospital and MOB facility include a drilled pier/slab-on-metal deck with crawl space foundation, structural steel framing system, a stone and stucco facade, a glazed aluminum window wall system, a standing seam metal with built- up roof system, and a chilled water HVAC system. The interior finish-out of the hospital includes six acute care units, six patient suites, six prep suites, three operating rooms, an MRI suite, nurse stations, examination rooms, treatment rooms, and administrative offices. The facility also includes 250,000 s.f. of concrete paving area. The medical office building will be finished out as the space is leased. $10,250,000 Montgomery Plaza, Fort Worth,Texas Project involves the renovation and MEP upgrade of an existing 659,000 sq. ft. 8-story Montgomery Ward building originally built in 1928 into a retail/loft condominium complex the facility includes six-hundred new aluminum punched windows, painting of the entire exterior façade, aluminum storefront system at the first level retail shops, a 3 ply roofing system, a new fire sprinkler system, a new cooling tower with two new HVAC chillers and associated pumps. The project also includes two new freight elevators, parking at levels two and three including a vehicular and pedestrian bridge at level two. $12,000,000 Additional Projects Completed: Walsh Performing Arts Center, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas Weatherford College Marjorie Alkek Fine Arts Building,Weatherford, Texas Baylor All Saints Hospital Addition, Fort Worth, Texas The Parks at Arlington,Arlington, Texas E-Systems Engineering, Grand Prairie, Texas Tandy Parking Garage, Fort Worth, Texas Baylor All Saints Hospital Renovation, Fort Worth, Texas General Motors Assembly Plant Power House,Arlington, Texas Travis Walk, Dallas,Texas Total Energy Plant,Wilford Hall Hospital, San Antonio, Texas GSA Parking Garage, Fort Worth,Texas Housing and Urban Development Office Building, Dallas, Texas Richland Junior College, Richardson, Texas University of Texas at Arlington Science Building, Arlington, Texas Miller Brewing, Fort Worth, Texas Northside Wastewater Plant, Tulsa Oklahoma Miller Brewing, Fort Worth, Texas BYREE Thos. S.Byrne,Ltd. Awards &Recognitions Construction Services The following is a partial listing of Byrne's Municipal Projects Awards and Recognitions 2005 Topping Out Award Ellis County Courthouse, Presented by ARC of Dallas 2004 Urban Design Award Winner—Built Award Latino Cultural Center, Presented by Greater Dallas Planning Council 2004 Excellence in Construction Award—Institutional $10-25 Million Keller Pointe Recreation&Aquatics Center, City of Keller Presented by Associated Builders&Contractors, Inc., North Texas Chapter 2004 Best of Texas Construction Excellence Award Keller Pointe Recreation and Aquatics Center, Presented by McGraw-Hill Construction and Texas Construction Magazine 2004 Topping Out Award Latino Cultural Center, Presented by ARC of Dallas 2003 Excellence in Construction National Award—Commercial $25-99 Million Latino Cultural Center, Presented by Associated Builders&Contractors, Inc. 2003 Excellence in Construction Regional Award—Commercial $25-99 Million Latino Cultural Center, Presented by Associated Builders &Contractors, Inc. 2002 "Best of Texas Award"—Best Public Building Project in the State City of Keller Town Hall, Plaza and Lakes Presented by McGraw-Hill Construction and Texas Construction Magazine 2002 "Best of Texas Award"—Best Renovation/Restoration Project in the State Ellis County Courthouse, Presented by McGraw-Hill Construction and Texas Construction Magazine 2002 Excellence in Construction Regional Award—Commercial $25-$99 Million City of Keller Town Hall, Plaza and Lakes Presented by the North Texas Chapter, Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. 2002 Excellence in Construction National & Regional Award Historical Restoration $2-$99 Million - Ellis County Courthouse Presented by the North Texas Chapter,Associated Builders&Contractors, Inc. ENRNE Financial & Legal Status Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Financial and Legal Status Construction Services Financial Capability: Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. is an 83-year-old Metroplex-based company, with an outstanding reputation for meeting its financial obligations to our employees, subcontractors and suppliers. Byrne's consolidated financial summary sheet is included for review. A complete confidential audited financial statement is available upon request. Byrne's Bank Reference is as follows: Mr. Mike Randall, Senior Vice President Frost Bank, Fort Worth 817-420-5150 Legal Status: Thos. S. Byrne has does not have any current actions taken by any regulatory agency against or involving the firm or its agents or employees with respect to any work performed. During the course of any business year, Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. may have a few minor actions filed by or against the firm as a result of normal construction operations. None of the claims or possible litigations would or will affect Byrne's performance under any contract. Insurance Information: Byrne's insurance certificate is attached at the end of this section. Our insurance company information is: Surety—The Hartford Mike Heidrick 972-807-4686 Agent—The Tucker Agency Tracy Tucker 817-336-8520 Aggregate Bonding Capacity: $975 Million Single Project Bonding Capacity: $150 Million Current Projects in Progress: $450 Million Liability Insurance Limits: General Liability Each Occurrence $1 Million Personal &Adv Injury $1 Million Damage to Rented Premises $300,000 General Aggregate $2 Million Medical Exp. (any 1 person) $10,000 Products-Comp/OP AGG $2 Million Automobile Liability Combined Single Limit $1 Million (Ea accident) Excess Umbrella Liability Each Occurrence $25 Million Aggregate $25 Million Workers Compensation & Employer's Liability Each Accident $1 Million Disease-each employee $1 Million Disease-policy limit $1 Million Jurisdiction Information: Thos. S. Byrne is filed under the following Jurisdictions: Texas and New Mexico Thos. S. Byrne is legally qualified to do business under the following Jurisdictions and Trade Categories: Jurisdiction/State Trade Category License Number Texas Commercial Construction Not Required Oklahoma Commercial Construction Not Required New Mexico Commercial Construction LPF2003121501 Thos.S.Byrne,Ltd.and Subsidiary CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS June 30, 2005 2004 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 8,849,648 $ 5,970,120 Accounts receivable-contracts Current estimates 14,530,585 12,454,674 Retainages 5,122,300 6,351,444 Accounts receivable-related parties 1,64g,015 4,185,499 Accounts receivable-other 290,889 25,415 Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on incomplete contracts 695,187 422,026 Deferred tax asset 287,062 250,184 Prepaid expenses 363,605 383,364 Federal income tax receivable 396,384 - Current assets-Manhattan Joint Venture - 2,438,271 Current assets-Arrow Joint Venture 2,575,760 957,513 Current assets-Graycor Joint Venture 9,449,400 - Total current assets 44,208,835 33,438,510 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT,NET 1,086,150 1,175,429 OTHER ASSETS Accounts receivable-related parties 57,393 56,250 Accounts receivable-insurance premiums 662,692 485,498 Deferred tax asset 260,235 248,787 Cash value of life insurance 178,918 171,299 Deposits and other 31,920 26,178 1,191,158 988,012 $ 46,486,143 $ 35,601,951 LIABILI T1ES AND PARTNERS'CAPITAL CURRENT LIABIL[I hS • Accounts payable Trade $ 16,359,256 $ 14,297,231 Retainage 7,223,723 4,344,152 Related party 37,037 - Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on incomplete contracts 2,019,500 3,156,619 Accrued expenses 2,466,897 2,396,312 Federal income tax payable - 603,213 Current liabilities-Manhattan Joint Venture - 2,133,862 Current liabilities-Arrow Joint Venture 943,735 15,549 Current liabilities-Graycor Joint Venture 9,163,800 Total current liabilities 38,213,948 26,946,938 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - - PARTNERS'CAPITAL 8,272,195 8,655,013 $ 46,486,143 $ 35,601,951 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 2 Experience & References COMPARABLE MUNICIPAL PROJECTS Thos. S. Byrne has completed many Municipal/Government Projects in Texas over the years for entities such as the City of Keller, City of Frisco, City of Dallas, City of McKinney, City of El Paso, City of Ft.Worth, Tarrant County, Ellis County and Dallas County, among many others. Therefore; we understand the importance of the many requirements in working on such projects including: Public Notice, Fair& Competitive Bidding, as well as the Contract Methods. DESCRIPTION CLIENT CONTACT ARCHITECT Evans& Rosedale Public Health Center/Shamblee Branch Library City of Fort Worth Mr. Greg Simmons, Dennehy Architects A new two story 34,000 sq. ft. public 1000 Throckmorton St. P.E. 3464 Blue Bonnet Circle •',° °`' health center, a 7,800 sq. ft. public Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Facilities Manager Fort Worth, Texas 76109 ' .. �t library branch, and the 2,400 sq. ft. I 817/392-7862 Office i 4 - , restoration of the Tommy Tucker 817/392-8488 Fax Mr. Paul Dennehy, AIA, ' Building. Partner s. Cost: $7,000,00-(still in pre-con) 817/922-9933 Office ` >` ' Schedule: TBD 817/922-9997 Fax Completion: TBD PIIIVIIIIIINIMEN=2:71....'.__ .. Keller Pointe Recreation & " mr.=^ ''�'„..r - Aquatics Center City of Keller Lyle Dresher Brinkley Sargent Architects it '' ° 3' = . Pam"` ! A 76,250 sq. ft. new recreation center 158 South Main Street CityManager 5000 Quorum, Suite# 123 .�•• "_* and aquatics center for the City of Keller, Texas 76244 817/743-4001 Office Dallas, Texas 75254 '� Keller. 817/743-4190 Fax h � "' "" Cost: $13,000,000-in budget Dwayne M. Brinkley, AIA ..,,,i' - e , "' Schedule: 12 months 972/960-9970 Office t4`� _ ' 1 tom' ' Completed: 2004-on time 972/960-9751 Fax Keller Town Hall A 57,000 sq. ft. two-story city hall City of Keller Lyle Dresher Beck Architecture facility, 140-acre master planned site. 158 South Main Street City Manager 7001 Preston Road, Suite %am- ;. Facility includes pedestrian plaza, Keller, Texas 76244 817/743-4001 Office 210, LB 17 108-seat City Council Chamber, 14- 817/743-4190 Fax Dallas, Texas 75205 7,..,1, . ..,,r acre man-made lake system, and f irri I,ii1,N1 $ a a multi-media/studio production room. Michael Murray, AIA �I� iq ,k��t Cost: 120,000-in budget Michael 214/522-8494 Office Schedule: months 214/522-8537 Fax Completed: 2002-on time Bob Bullock TX St History Museum Bonnie Campbell, E. Verner Johnson/ HKS Demolition of existing structure and Texas State Preservation former Project Manager 1919 McKinney Ave. ' paving. 2 acre site development with Board 713/639-7768 Office Dallas, Texas 75201 -- a new 1,200 sq. ft. building and 201 E. 14th St. 713/639-7752 Fax 617/437-6262 Office Inman ��le �;' fT11I�1i1fT ti I . associated finish out. Austin, Texas 78711 ; , ,w " ' n;i —1111'Z si .,; Cost: $42,500,000-in budget Lynn Denton, Byron Donelson, AIA/HKS ,1T . , , 1 .; . Schedule: 16 months 512/936-4699 Office Jim Atkins/HKS --' "" - r' =. Completed: 2001-on time 512/936-8746 Fax 214/969-5599 Office COMPARABLE MUNICIPAL PROJECTS Tarrant County Precinct 3 Maintenance Facility Tarrant County Tracy Pelle Freese & Nichols, Inc. __________________________________ 5,908 sq.ft. administration building 1000 Throckmorton Project Architect 4055 International Plaza, j ' 13,206 sq.ft.fleet service and repair Fort Worth, TX 76109 817/884-1155 Office Suite 200, Fort Worth, !\'proproul..-- building 817/884-1178 Fax Texas 76109 , 1 . -- 23,448 sq.ft. storage building `" �`'" 2,842 sq. ft. fueling station 100 East Weatherford Robert Henkel r ="` • Cost: $3,900,000-in budget Street, Fort Worth, Project Manager .:` Schedule: 12 months Texas 76196 817/735-7300 Office Completed: 2005-on time 817/735-7492 Fax McKinney Performing Arts Center _, ,,,,_..-.�-;, :• br a Exterior and interior restoration and City of McKinney Jack Carr Archi-Texas, Inc. . modernization of the courthouse to its 116 N. Tennessee Street Director of Engineering 3601 South Congress fig* 1927 condition. Interior includes Suite#200 972/547-74210ffice Avenue, Austin, Texas administrative offices and a large McKinney, Texas 75069 972/547-2604 Fax 78704 _:,.11 - x .i ,.. auditorium. �11�` "4 Cost: $7,800,000-in budget Craig Melde �-- Schedule: 12 months 214/748-4561 Office Completed: 2006-on time 214/748-4241 Fax v �,:" , z. ,, Ellis County Courthouse -- � -,3 Full interior renovation and Ellis County Joe White Archi-Texas , modernization of historic courthouse 101 W. Main Street Construction Program 1907 Mariila Street, 2nd >I< -- “' that will be used to house county and Waxahachie, TX 75165 Manager Floor == selected municipal courts and elected 972-935-1731 Office Dallas, Texas 75201 .. .. fir • ..ii county official offices. 972/923-1351 Fax Cost: $7,000,000-in budget Larry Irsik Schedule: 20 months 214/748-4561Office Completed: 2002-on time 214/748-4241 Fax Dallas County "Old Red" Courthouse Restoration, Phase II Dallas County Dan Savage James Pratt Architecture 4-story Historical Restoration of Commissioner's Court Assistant Administrator 1645 Stemmons Freeway t -+ .^-,. Courthouse to 1892 Condition. 411 Elm Street, 3rd Floor 214/653-6517 Office Dallas, Texas 75207 L y ., - N Restoration includes the fabrication Dallas, Texas 75202 214/653-7650 Fax --k ;� :' - and installation of the original since- James Pratt, AIA - rf.1 fir• ? f P removed grand stairway. 214/939-0508 Office :..> eft h Vi; - Cost: $10,000,000-in budget 214/939-0519 Fax V. Schedule: 18 months .; w`, - Completed: 2005-on time COMPARABLE MUNICIPAL PROJECTS Dallas County "Old Red" Clock Tower Addition Dallas County Dan Savage James Pratt Architecture l ' v Reconstruction of the original clock Commissioner's Court Assistant Administrator 1645 Stemmons Freeway , . ., tower removed in 1919. The 91 foot 411 Elm Street, 3`d Floor 214/653-6517 Office Dallas, Texas 75207 �d t � � ^' � clock tower addition will add to the Dallas, Texas 75202 214/653-7650 Fax r t T E.0.0 t.zt . f 4 K , top of the existing courthouse raising James Pratt, AIA " '�'sg ° � ' , ¢` the total courthouse height to 210 ft. �su'� a �,� ����-��-,v� �� � g 214/939-0508 Office ... ,pil« aor j' c r r } ' t Cost: $4,000,000-in budget 214/939-0519 Fax t .1 ., " . ; of _ '` Schedule: 12 months L -, _< . Y . .. °'- Completed: 2006-on schedule Dallas County Underground Jacobs Facilities, Inc. !Fill Parking Garage Dallas County Dan Savage 6688 N. Central Expwy, Anew correctional health service unit Commissioner's CourtAssistant Administrator Ste 400 M613 at il. containing a 20-bed inpatient wing, 411 Elm Street, 3rdFloor 214/653-6517 Office Dallas, Texas 75206 65-bed long-term care area, physical Dallas, Texas 75202 214/653-7650 Fax therapy and administrative offices. David White Cost: $12,000,000-in budget Project Architect Schedule: 14 months 214/424-7553 Office Completed: 2006-on schedule 214/653-6729 Fax DFW Consolidated Rental Car Facility D/FW International Airport John LaRue, Corgan Associates, Inc. ' " ` > �`' -"" A 260,000 sq. ft. family law center Post Office Box 619428 (Formerly with DFW) 501 Elm Street, Suite 500 'µ """' ° ' includin courtrooms,justice offices DFW Airport, TX 75261 Carter Burgess, Inc. Dallas, TX 75202 -ay.. , = and administrative support areas. 214/573-4250 Office w ;, ," _ Also includes court reporter, domestic 214/573-4201 Fax Brenda Stubel, AIA ryrt relations and family district clerk 214/653-8281 Office ' ' offices. Terry Cassidy 214/748-2000 Fax Al.^_ vim. Cost: $132,000,000-in budget 972/586-6085 Office< ' ' , Schedule: 18 months 972/586-6021 Fax .. .. ''' _ Completed: 2000-on time DFW International Airport _ . L.- Multiple projects including: D/FW International Airport John LaRue, -:�.»._. .�:..�. x. HKS Architects � a. \ "— 0' 4 Automated People Mover; Work on Post Office Box 619428 (Formerlywith DFW) 1919 McKinneyAvenue wcs• ,,. �. Terminal D and B; Terminal B, C, E DFW Airport, TX 75261 Carter Burgess, Inc. Dallas, TX 75201 �; +\ '� Parking Garages; DFW 214/573-4250 Office — • -, 1 "" ^`. Transporation Facility, and many 214/573-4201 Fax Bob Cline,AIA r.. =ate...' •snaa, .. . iothers 214/969-3044 Office Total Cost: $185,000,000-in budget Terry Cassidy 214/969-3397 Fax Schedule: Various 972/586-6085 Office _-"" Commencement: 1996 972/586-6021 Fax Completed: 2004-on time COMPARABLE MUNICIPAL PROJECTS El Paso Plaza Theater Restoration " 1,- 4. V"r & Expansion City of El Paso, Municipal Rick Mojica Martinez&Johnson • � --- - Project includes the historic Services Department of Project Manager Architecture ••- :i i restoration of the existing2200-seat El Engineering •-- �,� "� g' g (ECM International, 1238 Wisconsin Av NW ••* i I i Paso Theatre building and service 414 Executive Center Inc.) Washington DC 20007 a - areas as well as the 45,000 square Blvd., Suite 200 915/351-1900 Office will -.." , >.. _•_; foot new addition to the theatre. El Paso, Texas 79902 915/351-1908 Fax Gary Martinez, AIA : ';_. `"' Cost: 28,000,000-in budget, 202/333-4481 Office -----_:--- - Schedule: 10 months 202/333-4480 Fax Completed: 2006-on schedule Frisco Public Works Facility New municipal service center facility City of Frisco Scott Young Quorum Architects, Inc. r to house the City of Frisco PublicAPT 6891 Main Street, Frisco Assistant City Manager 707 W. Vickery Blvd., Suite *,- Works Department. Project included: Texas 75034 972/335-5551 Office # 101, Fort Worth ' ` . et.{ '*' Admin Bldg; Fleet Maint. Bldg; 972/335-5559 Fax Texas 76104 , t:. `"" - Enclosed Storage Bldg; Covered t ,-� �',.... - Storage Bldg; Vehicle Wash Bldg; David Duman ` � and Fuelling Station 817/738-8095 Office i �-4 Cost: $9,000,000-in budget I�� � ���, � 9 817/738-9524 Fax I Schedule: 16 months —ram �/►0,-. .. Completed: 2005-on time �� �� Frisco Central Fire Station ►�'® ' l --~ A 40,000 sq.ft. two-storyFire Station Cityof Frisco Mack Borchardt Phelps/Wood Architects . building, an 8,460 sq. ft. one-story 6891 Main Street, Frisco Fire Chief 8992 Taft Powell Road i+"_ fir.. O1 Safety House, and a 1,335 sq. ft. Texas 75034 972/335-5525 Office Frisco, Texas 75035 Al "`'i'Qtio- EP .N. Vehicle Storage building, constructed 972/335-5528 Fax ► .� Rh�. s lb,.. ' on a 5.2 acre site. Lawrence Wood, RA, AIA, 1�...�HIV .V1 i.. !1 Cost: $9,000,000-in budget CSI ®'�'� " •k ^,� 11 Schedule: 12 months _ 972/335-9382 Office — - -.. '-':-.... V Completed: 2006-on schedule 972/335-6811 Fax w x, Frisco Fire Station No. 5 .Y"} A 14,000 sq. ft., single story, 3-bay City of Frisco Mack Borchardt Phelps/Wood Architects ; fire station building constructed on a 6891 Main Street, Frisco Fire Chief 8992 Taft Powell Road ;•;101�� 2.8 acre site. Includes dormitory, Texas 75034 972/335-5525 Office Frisco, Texas 75035 . ° 1R..fi-wi:IA�1 .M.I "'""'-��''�'"'=" restrooms, full kitchen, training room, 972/335-5528 Fax k� a safety training room, and Lawrence Wood, RA, AIA, ��' ' apparatus support space. CSI Cost: $2,500,000-in budget 972/335-9382 Office - --_. , • Schedule: 12 months 972/335-6811 Fax "�-# Completed: 2006-on schedule COMPARABLE MUNICIPAL PROJECTS JPS Health Center for Women & `' Public Health, Ft.Worth, Texas JPS Health Network David Cecero, FSB/Texas, Inc. -•. New Construction on the John Peter 1500 South Main Street President 3311 Hamilton Avenue Smith Health Network Campus. An Fort Worth, TX 76104 817/927-1235 Office Fort Worth, TX 76107 82,000 sq. ft. two-story facility. 817/924-1207 Fax Women's Center is a 45,500 sq. ft. Dwayne Loftice, AIA 1 1„.frioli!• M ' single-story facility. 817/877-1731 Office Cost: 28,000,000-in budget 817/332-8464 Fax Schedule: 10 months "' _ ,, . '. Completed: 2004-on time Keller Municipal Service Center A new municipal service center City of Keller Lyle Dresher Bucher,Willis & Ratliff _"` l facility to house the City of Keller's 158 South Main Street City Manager 7920 Ward Pkwy, Suite 100 v, Public Works and Parks and Keller, Texas 76244 817/743-4001 Office Kansas City, Missouri 1 . 14 i- - Recreation Departments—admin 817/743-4190 Fax 64114 w <u 1,,,,,,,, offices, maintenance/warehouse µ , ' , bldg, crew shop, fueling station Dennis Warnecke rr,: Cost: $5,000,000-in budget 816/363-2696 Office Schedule: 16 months 816/363-0027 Fax Completed: 2003-on time Tarrant County Family Law Center i & Parking Garage Tarrant County Facilities Al Gregor Gideon Toal The project consists of a new 625 car Management 817/884-3394 Office 500 W. 7th St. parking garage for the public and 1000 Throckmorton 817/884-3078 Fax Suite 1400 L., :, , • a County employees. The Center will Fort Worth, TX 76109 Fort Worth, TX 76102 ' 1- ? include 32 courtrooms & space for 100 E Weatherford "'of ,, I i.1 '41 °°!�t .ii r,1� the District Clerk& Domestic „�.,.�., ,�.�es.e. .. ..�,�� Street, Fort Worth Cecil Smith 4- in:: :,'l ,may. la 1... I +*''" Relations. Texas 76196 Kevin Krumpler .. . ,,„„ Cost: $5,000,000-in budget 817/335-4991 Office ., - », ��. - Schedule: 12 months - �°� -� -4 -. 817/877-1861 Fax Completion: January 2004-on time ,,,-° h �. � Keller Police/Detention Facility ",�z ` 14,500 sf addition/5,700 sf renovation Cityof Keller Lyle Dresher BrinkleySargent Architects � � ••kR �� y� r ,��,;���a Y 9 s� *°tt, ''" • ,,, ,4 : A 1::,� to police department and municipal Keller Town Hall City Manager 5000 Quorum Drive i4 ".-v : +it' 't' .� courts building. Drilled pier/slab-on 1100 Bear Creek Pkwy817/743-4001 Office Suite 123 w� ,G ,���+ : s,,� _ ! t grade foundation, structural steel Keller, TX 76244 817/743-4190 Fax Dallas, TX 75254 .2 IAA . , /t 4�' framing, masonry façade, built-up Ago if t, _ - - roof with rooftop AHUs. Keller Police Station Dwayne M. Brinkley 4 . ,,- : n Cost: $4,409,044-in budget 330 Rufe Snow Drive Principal f, 4 Schedule: 12 months Keller, TX 76244 972/960-9970 Office = - -e _ -- Completion: February 2005-on time 972/960-9751 Fax COMPARABLE MUNICIPAL PROJECTS New Mexico State History '� ` Museum, Santa Fe, New Mexico State of New Mexico Fran Levine Conron and Woods .\,' A new, 100,000 square foot facility P.O. Box 2087, Santa Fe, 505/476-5093 Office Architects ,, will feature historic and interactive New Mexico 87504 1222 Luisa Street, Suite A ' • ,:;;, displays. Includes a 375-seat Santa Fe, New Mexico performing arts theater which can 87505 �� _4 v., ., '' • ' also be used as a movie theater. '`'� s Cost: 25,000,000-in budget RoyWoods s • ,' , ., t Schedule: 15 months (Pre-con in 505/983-6948 Office .-- , . ''• - . Progress) >-�� . Completed: 2008-on schedule + � , ,4„ F Santa Fe Railyard Underground ,„� 1� E F . i �vF; f : FF,,'; , 04'�`ftx i Parking Structure, Santa Fe, NM Railyard Company, LLC Steve Duran, Lloyd &Associates E i t 't , a.Gi4 ti.�, a x , x i , trt,. Y xtci, i. tk y A 160,000 Sq. Ft., three-level, 400- 228 East Palace rd Principal Member Architects -`�*{• a*: x;P.E �r<f t i F., t)tn, H.Adlr ', . Ave.,, 4H� �,',,- j104 4i4ta:t4{{ space underground parking structure Floor 505/470-7021 Office 501 Halona Street 3 74• ` "�,y,�*y-� x /. 14- ., tfF ; i{,,F l in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Parking Santa Fe, New Mexico 505/983-0657 Fax Santa Fe, New Mexico ,, i t hot .Y. alia ie$1.` FG ��t .714 , , r,. `1,4i � structure supports a two story retail 87504 87501 Sir F At Thifs Time` ��F 4{t .t, t tiii E , ,,, 31 E ;e�F r tr center and plaza above. w ;r* kt f ,', t i(y 0 ti•kt� Cost: $12,500,000-in budget Allan Baer '.4' � 4-, art ;tt` i,404, �,kc" ,0� 41 Schedule: 12 months 505/988-9789 Office Completed: 2007—on time 505/986-1165 Fax Latino Cultural Center, Dallas, . , � Texas City of Dallas David Trevino Brinkley Sargent Architects A 33,000 Sq.Ft. community cultural 320 E. Jefferson Blvd., 214/948-4529 Office 5000 Quorum, Suite# 123 center and performing arts theater Room 108 214/948-4524 Fax Dallas, Texas 75254 designed by AIA Gold Medal-winning Dallas, Texas 75203 ,. _ -°: '� i architect Ricardo Legoretta. Dwayne M. Brinkley, AIA - ,• Cost: $8,000,000-in budget 972/960-9970 Office Y 972/960-9751 Fax '-:- =°-�--°'"'4'� Schedule: 13 months . ,4� Completed: 2003-on time _ �, Love Field Parking Garage, Dallas, ;4 , „ Texas Oak Cliff Municipal Center David C. Dybala, P.E. Huitt-Zollars �= t A 1,400,000 sq.ft. five-level parking City of Dallas 214/948-4650 Office 3131 McKinney Avenue, •1 . • m k' garage structure consisting of a 320 E. Jefferson Blvd., 214/948-4653 Fax Suite 600 `t drilled pier slab-on-grade foundation, Room 108 Dallas, Texas 75204 • -'1° . � -. post tensioned flat slab concrete Dallas, Texas 75203 Wade Ellison n k ;1 - _- -' �' y _ structure with a precast spandrel 214/948-4593 Office James Fullmer — , façade. 214/948-4524 Fax 214/871-3311 Office Cost: $42,000,000-in budget 214/871-0757 Fax rti*C': Schedule: 16 months Completed: 2003-on time Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Major Projects in Progress Construction Services Byrne's projects in progress represents current projects acquired as of April 2006 and are listed with the project owner's permission. This list may not represent projects pending permission to release information to the public. Municipal Projects are highlighted in red. Projects Listed: 26 Total Project Value: $354,986,254 Project Title: Three Legacy Town Center&Garage Expansion Location: Plano,Texas Description: New 6 story Office building with 5 level parking garage Project Title: Trinity Terrace Phase II Tower Addition Location: Fort Worth,Texas Description: 17 story,250,000 Sq. Ft. Independent Care Facility Project Title: Cresta Bella Private Estates Location: Dallas,Texas Description: 22-Story high rise with 4-story below grade parking garage Project Title: Dallas County Underground Parking Garage Location: Dallas,Texas Description: 588-space underground parking garage in Downtown Dallas Central Business District Project Title: Dallas County "Old Red" Courthouse Restoration Location: Dallas,Texas Description: 4-story Historical Restoration of Courthouse to 1892 Condition Project Title: Dallas County "Old Red" Courthouse Clock Tower Addition Location: Dallas,Texas Description: Reconstruction of the original clock tower removed in 1919 Project Title: Evans& Rosedale Public Health Center/Shamblee Branch Library Location: Fort Worth,Texas Description: New public health center and branch library Project Title: New Mexico State History Museum &Theater Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico Description: New History Museum &Theater Facility Project Title: Santa Fe Railyard Underground Parking Structure Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico Description: 400-space, three level underground parking structure Project Title: Frisco Central Fire Station & Frisco Fire Station #5 Location: Frisco,Texas Description: 2-story Central Fire Station, 1-story safety house, and vehicle storage building; 1-story fire station on 2.8 acre site Project Title: Booker T.Washington High School for the Performing and Visual Arts Location: Dallas,Texas Description: 2-story existing high school with addition of a performing arts center and new academic wing as well as restoration to other parts of the building Project Title: Lake Worth ISD New Middle School Location: Lake Worth,Texas Description: New 600-student middle school RN Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Major Projects in Progress Construction Services Project Title: Lake Worth ISO New Elementary School Location: Lake Worth,Texas Description: New 750-student elementary school Project Title: University of North Texas Wellness &Career Center Location: Denton,Texas Description: New clinical outpatient and career center Project Title: Lake Travis ISD Elementary#5 Location: Lakeway,Texas Description: New elementary school for Lake Travis ISD Project Title: Lake Travis ISO, Hudson Bend Middle School Renovation Location: Lakeway,Texas Description: Renovation/Addition to Hudson Bend Middle School Project Title: Lake Travis ISD,Transportation Building Location: Lakeway,Texas Description: New transportation building for Lake Travis ISD Project Title: University of Texas at Austin,Job Order Contracting Location: Austin, Texas Description: Multiple renovation and construction projects to be completed during five-year contract. Project Title: Sunrise Senior Living Location: Plano,Texas Description: Three story 155,000 sq.ft., 156 unit, 193 bed assisted and independent living facility. Project Title: Trinity Bluffs Parking Garage Location: Fort Worth,Texas Description: New four level parking garage Project Title: Amarillo Specialty Hospital Location: Amarillo,Texas Description: A 78-bed, ground-up specialty hospital with additional area for a clinic, physician offices, and outpatient services Project Title: Abilene Specialty Hospital Location: Abilene,Texas Description: A 60-bed, ground-up specialty hospital and an addition to an existing medical office/multi-specialty clinic. SeniorHealth, Inc. Project Title: 37th Street MOB and Radiation Treatment Bunker Location: Austin, Texas Description: One-story office building with radiation treatment bunker Project Title: LCRA Red Bud Center Location: Austin, Texas Description: New Emergency, Public Safety and River Management Center Project Title: LifeCare -LTAC Location: San Antonio,Texas Description: New Long Term Acute Care Hospital Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. References Construction Services References: The City of Keller Lyle Dresher, City Manager Phone 817-743-4001 Fax 817-743-4190 Mark Hafner, Police Chief Phone 817.743.4500 Ed Ilschner, Director of Public Works Phone 817.743.4080 Tarrant County Tracy Pelle Phone 817-884-1155 Architect Fax 817-884-1178 Dallas County Dan Savage Phone 214-653-7650 Assistant Administrator—Operations Fax 214-653-6517 Ellis County Joe White Phone 972-935-1731 County Engineer/Project Manager Fax 972-923-1351 The City of Frisco Scott Young,Assistant City Manager Phone 972-335-5551 x120 Fax 972-335-5559 Mack Borchardt, Fire Chief Phone 972-335-5525 Fax 972-335-5528 City of McKinney Jack Carr, Director of Engineering Phone 972-547-7421 Fax 972-547-2604 The City of El Paso Rick Mojica Phone 915-351-1900 Project Manager Fax 915-351-1908 wianayement & Organizational Approach Thos. S. Byrne, Ltd. Management& Organizational Construction Services Approach Thos.S. Byrne has an extensive background in working on Municipal and Government Projects in the State of Texas. With this experience, Byrne has developed a great sense of understanding of the policies and procedures that take place while working on projects similar to those proposed for the City of Wylie. As a part of that, Byrne recognizes the significance of implementing Public Notice, Fair&Competitive Bidding,and the Contract Methods. Project Scope We will utilize CSI(Construction Standards Institute)and customized checklists to define the project scope for elements such as site information,civil/structural requirements,window,architectural millwork, mechanical, and electrical equipment for the project. Since we have recently completed City Halls, Recreation Centers, Libraries,and have these same teams proposed for the City of Wylie projects,we have a thorough understanding of the project scope and know the issues and pitfalls to avoid. Partnering Byrne believes a partnering approach is critical to the overall success of the City of Wylie's Proposed Projects.Therefore, our entire management approach to this project will focus on engendering teamwork and creative collaboration to accomplish overall project goals. Communication Communication will be paramount to the success of this project. Thos.S. Byrne, Ltd. proposes to utilize the following methods of communication during the Preconstruction and Construction phases of the project: emails,faxes, phone calls, on site appointments and in office conferences. Scheduling Developing a solid plan for achieving project goals and managing them in a timely manner is essential to a successful completion.The Construction Manager will coordinate all scheduling activities through both the Preconstruction and Construction phases of the project. His expertise,combined with Primavera P3 and SureTrak software programs, produces various Critical Path Method(CPM)diagrams, bar charts,and reports used to set milestones and track progress. Byrne maintains the schedules and monitors the project by Short Duration Scheduling. These schedules are prepared by the project staff and include input and"buy-in"from our subcontractors. When,for whatever reason,time is lost on the schedule, Byrne utilizes the following techniques to regain the schedule: • Weekend make-up days for inclement weather • Double shifts • Selected enforced overtime for subcontractors • Situational increased manpower for subcontractors • Increase manpower for self-performed work • Additional equipment Cost Modeling Byrne is a strong advocate of cost modeling.We view it as a simple way to impose design discipline and control costs during the Preconstruction Phase. By knowing exactly where costs are exceeding historical averages,the City of Mesquite can make intelligent choices concerning the extra cost for a particular building component.This process avoids budget "surprises"or"scope creep"when the design is completed and eliminates any time-consuming re-drawing of plans. Value Engineering The senior members of our Preconstruction Team will attend regular meetings with the City of Wylie and the Architect during conceptual and preliminary design,to advise on alternative systems and materials,site use and functional improvements, foundation and structural issues,selection of final materials, MEP systems and equipment.We will provide recommendations on construction feasibility,availability of labor and materials,time requirements for various phases of construction,and factors related to costs,including costs of alternate designs or materials. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Quality assurance during construction begins with a commitment to quality by all individuals associated with the project. Throughout construction,the project executives monitor projects with frequent visits to the site. Byrne encourages the entire project team to walk the job before each project meeting to inspect all facets of work. Unacceptable work will be caught early through continuous field inspection by Byrne personnel and proactive use of mock-ups as various trades begin their work. The purpose of the Quality Control Plan is to define the process and procedure by which the individuals responsible for Quality Control assure conformance of the construction with the contract requirements with respect to material,workmanship,acceptable construction practice,finish and functional performance. Code Analysis&Jurisdictional Approvals Byrne will work diligently to comply with all code analysis and jurisdictional approvals and requirements for each of the City of Wylie's proposed facilities. Byrne relies on the Architect to do all Code Analysis—this would be industry standard. Byrne does,however, have a thorough understanding of the required approvals as they apply to the Construction Management Scope. ----- City of Wylie , Texas I ... _.„....„...4.:,_,.__.,,....:,„.../....„,,-,._,. .,„,,N_P!:^'..S,•*:4 .i,.-, ---‘114-%:NTIM`,;- , 4,,e,,* -4... Vi! ,--,-,.i...-0',•:-•40e:ce.4-9r17,'•,,,I),241- V''''',-''"'''''''''5'1- '-'_,e-" I'''•sir,-"'Q--- s t•-,-- -..,4,.- ; . ' , _ , .„..„5,..,,,,,,,,-,,,-,,-3.v.;•„4,,a0,,,,,',41,-,;;Ici"ZP:fifil4gfOA0 Of" f''' ; '.-ik-.',P-4'4-......IkW,f1.,,'',W".',..,:o.'4'. --1-:!..-',;1„.4i.,!'....."--r•;,"•;"„g•,f„74';,'-74V.,;?",;14.4...Wt...,,t&lf_. '-:k;%:-.1e7p.,'t:;,;,707',;;W:t!Tx4.04a.V.P,46114--,:fl..;'7,4 &'7-'.'„,,,Sp*,.„--;,.'eit,?,,r',W.' ' '' & ,''''• : ' i ....- te,}"'004',.,,Z,5,41^4?,if-_'411;,„, ir-d.4, 1-k:.7;zi-,,,..--Ir"-",,,,,:af_,,...-41) ..-&'-•ZOiir,,,-.4.&.."';'Vo'-vr' 3,0, .--,,,t-.1,4„Mir,,,,..,4,, i•-i,,,"..i,-,;',..,,,,.5,,-A,-':::.1.",:,,i-,`,W,,O*p,4'1,h,.-....41,:i.,',.,.?,,,, ,,,,, .. . ,., ,,. . ,...,, -. ..,..e --0,,,,cv,,r.,,, ,,:,,,,: ,..'4,4:.,...,r,r-,..,*,,,., .10.,;..7-.- ,1',.,1--- -..:.',..:pk.*A:,..7-,,,...."Iit.rff,13'41r.„grat ,,..,;,„‘. ,,,, -.414.1piii-,,,,:4t't,,,,i,, , .4 ."-..%,....:Iii...7..&:,r.r'..f.if 4„-'474#4., ',..'... . ,..., ,;, :1, -.'It / ..,, , .11:::,,,n1, ,,,,,,,vr.,,,c-...'",'0040.-.s_v0-,,,,,,,i;:y„it,%•-,70L4e;,;.--;,,,0-,„0.1.,--,;,•J ..,ztEff,4,2,,, ,s,, .,,,, 1-,-i.,.'0.- -,,,,,':",";ii-j'Ai],,,..'''....4.4,",,: -;;47,-.4:i'r4A1.-":4.;+•:,,t4N-A--- - ,• :- •-•4,,,,-,--- ,-;.3, .- .• tt :•:.-..- • -.• ..., ,...„ ..3.,,r.,-.; 4,,,,.... ,,,,,,..,70.....4,,,,,,,,,,p, - -.... „..-,,,..„ . 4 r - -. '-',.;...,-;:z.:'..1,,',46,'„ ..,..:-...-4;-, ..,...•.. ,.., 1... ,,... .- : .._...,--„, : . . ..... . .. ., : ;4.-„•'• -,....L. '..i.',---" •-•:--,'- ,4,--'.',.; '..,,,-*,-.:••'-i' ..; - ''''''''''''',foi•'' ".- ' ,,,,,,,40,,44.,,,14•Z` ^i4:':!'',-;:"!,.,i-i4i-C.-;,;„,..,.•_:::-;..•' . , '. .--1 , •.';';'-''•,•,:, ' ., •'..':tilr-,',, -. •'.', P.t011, ' '--4,--!:Rk-t',I'AX4'-• eit -,,,-*•., - , • ' ,'.,:''-' '' ' . --.-.01';+-:,':':$1.0.4'''',4,-4:0;',:','-,-,-.•:."-.:••••-0.-'i -4, ' .- - . ''''f--..74•-•',.-',"- ,4.-.*.‘X- ' " :---r-'-' `--- - ,,,_,_.-444'''`-----'":. ' ''''.. - v'''' 4:i- di,:,`„ ..;2..1.4.4-. :::.,,,,, ....*-:,-- ,,-.7,,,,,,:...,...;"...,.:.0 . ' .^. --,.. . ' , , ..7„. -r.'.',P.•..,','..'p,...,.. .'•-•-1,;`:,:V..' .... ., V. ',,,..?...T.;;.i'41.:' -, ,, •• -,' '"-- , -,',.':,,,, - .t... ' ..,. ,...r.':-.,-..'.-... 14i 7,...'i'.r...: "'7,-:'',. :' ' '''-:'. f.-''',-.7*.:-..,.... --` -4's .c.,6 '' ' '4.ki;.''' - ''.. 4.„-.4.-,, - .- --,:•,..-'," - ---",---?....'..7''' '-= .':..,• !7-. ,...1 V...., '' , :,''',74.-.:4-,.,;---7,, -fall"ri-' -^5. '''.''.'-:;-.' ' '-' ''''''''':...1''-',..-t,?'.:•.;V:',-, - '-'• ' -,4.,'-;' •":::- - 8 '.. ' " ''''''"-'-'4'.,-;.:''' ."•-',;:, ' ----'''''W'''''41' . . , . . .. . '.;,-;:.:. - ''.,-,C`,...'7,f4P..,',„ 1,,:,,, :' _,_.. ".••'••.,,,i, Vz4-;,•:',N;,*'•'• , .- - • I', " - --,-- - 'i - . , :.. ,,,y,..f.-.-,,,..??„.7:,/,,,,,,,,,,..4,-,„ . ,,........ ,.... .:,.... . ."',,.. ,• .... , ,,..?. ....,,,,,,:';f..,;.::.4,t.,.'' ' 't ,''''7' ' ,.,, , IP"' •' - ''''.-4!-44;f:: . .,...,............. ' •• .. , .... - . . , . --,4r,...•,PacA's,2;..;/3.?.44.77-I'C;ic.i'C''''''T,J..t-4...111...V .. '—''''.?;-.;'•-.r..7,Z4-t 1,',4,1-‘4.4,1,Vzi.',.:' ,4....,-I.r.-,ft''' - •'' -''' --;''.1.-- --.7'.4.•;‘,4',,,,' ---"At-:':',:ii.c,..4gi- ir..,.- 1141:124..-',,-3/4,,,S1;;;;==gt..- 2r,44,tt• ...‘• -41.4., •- 41;'; '.1Y:,. 44.t. - ' --r$ -.,..,--ii•,. ..1....'t,t0t...,` e,,,tj,:!.;40.0:44-.c-.., !..)W?.* -r. '....:4'3f.:AZV,Cint 14.,,'•41:',..k.-• , --y.r. .,,,,‘.'4 .• r,4 ts - 4.. ':C.4.1)14.,*'7C''.. .,..„;,,,:::,.,t A.,:.:'.;•,,,,,,, ,, .g,,IT;Y.7..t.,q1'.--t=1:4'''''ri*"' ''-' '' . , . . City Hall, Library and Recreation Center • Request for Qualifications . .• • • April 29, 2006 . . . . • • . ,. • • . , . , . , . . , . , . . .., ... . , , . . . . , . . . . . . , , mi- .. , J-1_ UML .1 1 . . ., • CONSTRUCTION GROUP . . . , . , .,, Contents Contents 1 1. Letter 2 2. Firm Information 3 _ _ ril 3. General Company History/Qualifications 4-6 .; ° = -uw Project Organization ChartKey Individual Resumes 8-11 "From the beginning of our relationships with Hunt Construction,we have found that the construction management approach with this company has been quite 4. Financial and Legal Status 12-13 beneficial to our City and to our ability to deliver completed Financial Statement 14-18 buildings at the costs identified by the preconstruction Qualifications/Licenses By State/City 19 process made available to us." —Richard Crowley 5. Experience and References 20 Assistant City Manager Project Profile Datasheets 21-22 City of Rockwall City Hall South Region Current Projects 23 6. Management and Organizational Approach .24-25 ._FL uhk, Letter The Honorable John Mondy and Wylie City Council City of Wylie Office of Purchasing Manager 2000 North Highway 78 Wylie,Texas 75098 RE: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS WYLIE CITY HALL, LIBRARY AND RECREATION CENTER Dear Honorable John Mondy and Wylie City Council: Hunt Construction Group (Hunt) is pleased to provide this response to your Request for Qualifications for Construction Management Services for the City of Wylie facilities. Hunt is extremely qualified to perform as your Construction Manager for the new City of Wylie City Hall, Public Library and Recreation Center facilities for the following reasons: • Hunt has successfully managed similar facilities bond programs for the local cities of Carrollton ($45 million), Cedar Hill ($27 million), and Rockwall ($10 million). • Hunt is one of the top 15 Construction Managers in the nation in annual volume. • Hunt is the 5th largest contractor in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex,with a local annual construction volume of$250 million. • Hunt has 120 local, salaried construction professionals to serve and support your projects. • Hunt has excellent local subcontractor relationships which will guarantee the City of Wylie competitive subcontractor pricing on your projects. • The staff we have proposed is well qualified and experienced in municipal building construction. As requested in the Request for Qualifications, please note that the terms of our proposal and qualifications remain effective for a period of 60 calendar days. We do not intend to subcontract any of our proposed Construction Management Services. All of our estimating, scheduling and management systems are performed in-house, or on-site with our proposed construction management team. We are excited about the opportunity to present our team to you in person, and to discuss how Hunt can best assist you with your facilities bond program. Sincerely, HUNT CON UCTION G P, INC. MARK E. LAVOY Executive Vice President nf1nL J 2 Firm In formation Firm name,addresses,and telephone numbers of all firm offices. Secretary's name: S.W. Atkins Treasurer's name: D.B. Smith The City of Wylie City Hall,Library and Recreation Center will be managed solely through the South Regional Office: Primary contact. Kevin J. Cain,Contract Manager South Regional Office 972.788.1000 Phone 4099 McEwen, Suite 400, Dallas,TX 75244 972.788.1302 Facsimile 972.788.1000 kcain@huntconstructiongroup.com Other National Hunt offices are as follows: Organizational Description. Hunt is ranked by Engineering News-Record as one of the Midwest Regional Office nation's top 25 builders.We are proud to be in our third 2450 South Tibbs Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46241 generation of Hunts.Today,we are led by Robert G. Hunt, 317.227.7800 our CEO.We complete$1.8 billion of work annually,and average between$6 billion and$8 billion of work under Southeast Regional Office contract at any given time.We have never failed to complete a 7650 Courtney Campbell Causeway,Ste 1150,Tampa, FL project. Not in the last 62 years. Not ever. 33607 813.287.6301 Our portfolio encompasses nearly every type of construction project. Hunt's vast experience building government facilities, Southeast Regional Branch Office sports arenas,stadiums, convention halls, manufacturing 9000 Universal Boulevard, Orlando, Florida 32819 facilities,hospitals, office buildings,schools, and laboratories is 407.352.8182 punctuated by landmark projects. Hunt has been in the Dallas/Fort Worth area for 27-years, and currently constructs Northeast Regional Office about$250 million annually in this market. With over 120 214 Carnegie Center, Suite 103, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 local, salaried professionals, Hunt has become a leader in 609.936.7100 municipal building construction projects. Western Regional Office Description of firm's philosophy. 426 North 44th Street,Suite 410, Phoenix,Arizona 85008 The key to the successful Construction Management of a 602.225.9500 project is the delivery of accurate services in the preconstruction phase. Specifically,supporting the Architect Western Regional Branch Office and Owner with timely and accurate budget estimates, true 100 Pine Street,Suite 2260,San Francisco, California 94111 value engineering,constructability reviews, detailed scheduling 415.391.3930 of preconstruction and construction phases, and a high level of competitive pricing during the procurement of all trade Structure of firm,i.e.sole proprietorship,partnership or corporation. subcontractors. The ultimate success of the project is Corporation determined in the preconstruction phase. Years firm has been in business. Hunt has unparalleled personnel and experience with 62 Years preconstruction services. We believe in the early involvement of the construction team in the preconstruction phase so there Names of principals of the firm. is a"seamless transition" from design and procurement to President's name(s): R.G. Hunt building the project. Hunt insists and highly encourages the Executive Vice President's name(s): Owner to be an active part of our preconstruction effort to R.S.Aylesworth,Jr. M.J. Gausden insure that we deliver the Owner' expectations for the project. R.M. Decker M.E. LaVoy B.A. Leiter W.F. Mullen M.D. Fratianni Vice President's name(s): S.W.Atkins W.J. Palmer P.R. Clark J.M. Pienknagura R.R. DeJean M.J.Thurmond K.L.Johnson L.T.Vaughn K.J. Keller B.A.Wylam LP . j lig MU R.L. Ket R.E. Zunino L.S. New R.D.Wildermuth 3 General Company History/Qualifications A brief history of the Construction Manager and the services routinely - Submit a detailed list of value engineering suggestions for provided in-house on municipal building projects construction Owner and Architect consideration projects. - Prepare a site use study to be used for allocation of space Hunt is a 62-year old construction management and general for storage contracting firm. We have been serving the Dallas Fort Worth - Identify parking and temporary facilities Metroplex since 1979. Nationally and locally,we have always - Develop cash flow analysis for both the design and maintained a broad scope of project types, from sports facilities construction phases to biomedical research facilities. The majority of our projects • Construction Documents have historically been done under a Construction Management - Prepare and update estimates in the CSI format at the delivery method,which requires effective preconstruction 50%and 90%working drawing stage services(budgeting,estimates, etc). We have outlined our - Review details and systems for constructability typical preconstruction and construction phase services below: - Review the drawings and specifications relative to bid packages Preconstruction Phase Services - Schedule and conduct pre-bid conferences - Review and analyze bids • Establish project Goals and Priorities - Update project budget and schedule consistent with actual • Establish overall Project Budget bids • Prepare and Operating System - Develop a detailed CPM network schedule - Establish procedures for decision making, review,etc. • Establish the Budget By Bid Package - Outline responsibilities of the Owner,Architect, Hunt, • Prepare a detailed Schedule derived from detailed quantities contractors and third parties. for each bid package to satisfy milestones. • Develops an Overall Management Schedule identifying all • Site Utilization Study: critical design and construction milestone dates required to - Coordinate mobilization and plan logistical accomplish the stated objective. requirements • Design Cost Planning - Project office and material staging locations - Prepare computerized conceptual estimating system - Ingress,egress and safety - Develop, implement, and monitor cost model for - Security requirements of Owner continuous budget control • Prepare Trade Contractor Bid Packages, including: - Provide design change order control system for elected - Project Manual, outlining the requirements of the modifications construction • Schematic Design - Schedule (by bid package interface) - Prepare conceptual estimate - Detailed scope of work - Obtain special surveys and soil readings as needed - Detailed document listing - Hold technical review sessions with Owner and Architect - Proposal forms for each bid package - Monitor evolving design and make suggestions with regard - Form of contract and purchase order forms to equipment, material, and systems selections - Insurance requirements - Analyze the potential for use of systems components - Bonding requirements - Consult with the Owner and Architect on means and - Prequalification of bidders methods of construction - Other special requirements - Review schematic design documents • Conduct Pre-Bid Meetings for each bid package, addressing: - Submit to the Owner and the Architect special inputs - Project requirements relative to time and cost control - Document review for specific questions - Identify certain areas of phased construction - Sequence/schedule review - Prepare "trade-off" studies relative to value engineering - Site restrictions - Revise the critical data schedule - Other questions raised during discussions - Prepare a professional construction CPM network for the • Receive Bids: issuance of bid packages - Advertise and solicit for bids • Design Development - Conduct bid openings - Prepare a detailed estimate based on available design - Prepare bid tabulations for each bid package drawings in a CSI or subcontractor bid format - Review proposals for compliance with contract documents - Review the design development documents with the - Review apparent low bidders' qualifications, past Owner and the Architect experience and liquidity - Revise and update the critical data schedule - Prepare a market analysis regarding local suppliers and VFL gi material Develop and arrange bid packages 4 Glen , ral Company History/Qualifications (continued) Construction Phase Services - Project the coming month's construction activities - Present status report on change orders-delays and time • Conduct Proper Award of Contracts/Purchase Orders extensions - Conduct pre-award meetings - Identify problems that threaten construction quality, cost - Review schedule of values and schedule - Review subcontractors'general conditions • Provide Change Order Control - Review scope of work - Implement system for change orders - Identify shop drawing requirements - Allocate change order responsibilities - Perform document review and specifications review - Review change order requests from subcontractors - Review contractors'personnel: - Negotiate change orders with subcontractors • Project Managers - Submit recommendations to Owner • Superintendents • Establish a Quality Management Program: • Foremen - Establish project commissioning and start-up program - Implement Partnering Program if Owner elects to do so - All members of the team participate in the quality control - Reinforce quality requirements and standards effort - Review sequence and schedule - Project scope review: - Identify accounting requirements • Intended purpose - Review insurance requirements • Are the project needs met? - Review safety and security requirements • Existing conditions reviewed - Recommend award of contracts • Future needs • Prepare and Issue Construction Commitments: - Incorporation of Restrictive Conditions in documentation - Contracts include: - Purchase orders • Social environment, influence of neighbors, - Rental agreements environmental impact - Budget adjustments for all transactions • Natural conditions,grounds and peripherals - Computerized accounting for tracking and projections • Research on legal requirements • Provide Coordination and Management of Subcontractors: • Research on existing structures, facilities - Establish site organization, including work and storage - Review of Design Development for: areas • Complete construction documents in the order they - Establish jobsite management organization and jobsite are to be purchased and constructed procedures • Complete documents for pre-purchased equipment - Maintain daily log for jobsite record • Design compatibility with future operation and - Provide general conditions work to meet project maintenance requirements • Constructability - Prepare and issue change orders and contracts - Recommend selection, monitor and assist outside testing - Prepare subcontractor change orders and contracts and inspection agencies: - Monitor construction cost and projections • Underground piping - Prepare and maintain cash flow projection for Owner • Soils - Monitor and maintain quality control • Concrete - Manage submittal review and approval process • Rebar - Maintain equipment and material control logs • Miscellaneous steel - Provide and monitor overall progress and short interval • Structural steel scheduling • Mechanical systems - Prepare billings and progress payments • Electrical - Conduct subcontractor coordination meetings • Life safety systems - Provide coordination between subcontractors • Energy management systems - Prepare and receive requests for information • Others as required - Prepare agendas and conduct weekly safety and progress - Work with area superintendents of subcontractors: meeting minutes • Prepare operations to minimize quality control - Establish subcontractor progress payment procedure for problems processing and payment - Require formalized quality management program from - Monitor subcontractor pay applications subcontractors: • Monthly Report: - Summarize project financial status (� � - Review and summarize past month's construction TTP X U I \� performance � 5 General Company History/Qualifications (a:ntinued) • Ensure conformance to project's quality standards maintenance procedures previously established - Assist in actual start-up of equipment - Follow-up to assure correction of deficiencies on test - Implement close-out procedures and ensure requirements reports are met: • Accounting Functions: • Subcontractors' and Vendors' final payment - Insurance requirements • Final change orders - Schedule of values review • Lien releases - Labor cost reports • Final lien waivers - Material cost reports • Consent of sureties - Unit cost reports - Assist Owner in enforcement of warranties or guaranties - Monthly detail cost sheet - Conduct walk-through with Owner after a year - Monthly job costs - Accounts payable An organizational chart that explains team member responsibilities. - Monthly project billing Please refer to the attached Project Organization Chart. • Jobsite Safety Objectives: - Conduct weekly safety meeting: The resumes of all persons to be assigned to the project with their • Implement project safety requirements prospective roles identified. • Review subcontractor safety programs Please refer to the attached resumes for Hunt's on-site team. - Subcontractor conformance,initiate knowledge of OSHA requirements: List all related awards and recognition that the Construction Manager • Subcontractor responsible for costs and damages or key team members of the construction management firm have • Submission of accident and injury reports received. • Subcontractor safety programs Please refer to the attached resumes. • Require subcontractor safety representative • Require forty-eight hour reports • Require weekly tool box safety meeting - Maintain safety meeting minutes: Co- • Inform subcontractors of procedures - Enforce alcohol and drug programs by subcontractors - Implement and maintain clean-up program • Jobsite Security functions: - Monitor and control employee vendor and public access to the Jobsite l:11 m m:' �Q 0� .II j - Monitor and control material and equipment deliveries to yl l the Jobsite �^ - Monitor and control material and equipment being = ,x removed from jobsite-material release form - Monitor and control site traffic - , '7 - Monitor and perform periodic checks for substance abuse - - Monitor and control tools A 6,000 SF renovation of the old City Hall building and a new - Monitor material storage - Monitor trailers and all equipment within two-story,6,500SF office office space addition. - Maintain proficient first-aid and CPR programs • Human Resources —City of Carrollton Gravely Center As Construction Managers we provide assistance and policies Carrollton,Texas on Equal Employment Opportunity, minority and women- owned business enterprises,sexual harassment or discrimination,drug abuse program, labor relations, employment transfers or reassignments and assuring proper personnel for project requirements. • Project Close Out services: - Perform project commissioning - Provide operating and maintenance manuals - Secure and assemble warranties or guarantees - Provide check-out of equipment (11rd - Instruct operating personnel in equipment operating and 6 Project Organization Chart r___ __�. ., CITY OF WYLIE HUNT DALLAS OFFICE SUPPORT CORE MANAGEMENT ON-SITE TEAM MARK E.LAVOY .41 Executive Vice President C.DOUGLAS JOLLEY KEVIN J.CAIN LARRY A.STEFFEN Preconstruction Services Project Executive Design Development Manager Estimating Manager STEVE D.BELL Project Manager DAVID F.EISELE CURTIS W.MCMINN KENNETH S.DUMENIL Superintendent Superintendent Library 6 City Hall Lead Project Engineer Recreation Center DAVID W.GOSS Project Engineer Mark E. LaVoy Executive Vice President City of Wylie Responsibilitie s: Years Experience • Overall corporate responsibility for the performance of the 29 project team • Provides corporate leadership, experience and technical Education expertise • l • Anticipates and resolves construction issues B.S., Business Administration • Ensures that client expectations are met Ohio State University ;. • Resource allocation and daily communication with the con • - tract/construction manager to facilitate on-time,within 1 budget project delivery Licensing/Training/ Professional Affiliations • Dallas Arboretum Architecture/Construction Steering Relevant Experience(Abbreviated resume.) Carrollton Gravely Center; Carrollton, Texas Committee • Carrollton Hebron/Josey Library; Carrollton, Texas Dallas AGC Board Member 1999-2000 • Hearts and Hammers Board Member 1988-1991 Carrollton Josey Ranch Lake Library&Senior Center; • The Hunt College of Construction Knowledge Carrollton, Texas - Contract Highlights&Risk Carrollton Rosemeade Recreation Center; Carrollton, Texas Management City of Cedar Hill Bond Program; Cedar Hill, Texas City of Lewisville Library;Lewisville, Texas City of Rockwall City Hall;Rockwall, Texas Collin County Justice Center;McKinney, Texas Valley View Municipal Complex;Irving, Texas Kevin J.Cain Project Executive City of Wylie Responsibilities Years Experience • Performance of the project team both home office and 24 on-site • Provides leadership, experience and technical expertise Education E ;' • Foresees and resolves construction issues • B.S., Building Construction " � �- • Ensures client's expectations are met • Resource allocation and Contracting Technology • Daily involvement with the project manager to facilitate Purdue University f on-time,within budget delivery of the project • Project planning and logistical considerations Licensing/Training/ Relevant Experience(Abbreviated resume.) Professional Affiliations • ASHE Healthcare Construction Certificate City of Cedar Hill Bond Program; Cedar Hill, Texas • Total Quality Management for Front-Line Managers City of Rockwall Center;Rockwall, Texas • Total Quality Management in Construction for Senior City of Rockwall City Hall;Rockwall, Texas Management City of Rockwall Police&Courts;Rockwall, Texas • City of Plano Board of Adjustment 2000-2004 The Charles W.Eisemann Center for Performing Arts and Corporate • Plano Sunrise Rotary Board Member 2002-2005 Presentations;Richardson, Texas • Plano Symphony Orchestra Board 2004 -present Education Service Center Region 10;Richardson, Texas • The Hunt College of Construction Knowledge Love Field Parking Garage Expansion;Dallas, Texas - Client Relationship& Plano Courtyard Theatre;Plano, Texas Corporate Image - Contract Highlights&Risk Management - Hunt Connect _FL RD RN Steve D. Bell Project Manager City of Wylie Responsibilities Years Experience 14 • On-site manager • On-site management to ensure successful, safe and timely ¢ completion Education 2 x • Supervises jobsite staff • w • Implements policies and procedures B•S.,Architecture • Makes on-site day-to-day decisions regarding cost analysis Ohio State University • and budget control,scheduling, quality and safety M.A, Construction • Oversees field operations Management • Monitors all reports for timeliness and accuracy Texas Tech Universi • Maintains communications with owners,architects,and trade/sub contractors • Coordination and supervision of trade/subcontractors Licensing/Training/ionallia Professional Affiliations • Relevant Experience(Abbreviated resume.) OSHA 10 hour training • City of Rockwall Center;Rockwall, Texas The Leaders Course City of Rockwall City Hall;Rockwall, Texas • The Hunt College of Construction Knowledge - Career Opportunities t City of Rockwall Police&Courts;Rockwall., Texas Performance Requirements Valley View Municipal Complex;Irving, Texas - Client Relationship& Myers Park Expansion;Rockwall, Texas Corporate Image Rio Rancho Multi-Purpose Event Center;Rio Rancho, New Mexico - Construction Done Right -Hunt Connect Curtis W. McMinn Lead Project Engineer City of Wylie Responsibilities Years Experience • Control, processing and distribution of all project 22 documentation (contract drawings, submittals, contract documents,other technical data) Education • Records and distributes any changes • A.S.,Applied Arts and Science • Reviews shop drawings for conformance to specifications .`, • Prepares or reviews as-built drawings Mountain View Community • Assembles equipment operation and maintenance manuals College and Cedar Valley • Assists the project manager with cost control,verification of Community College , .} trade/subcontractors invoices and monitors the schedule • Assists the project manager with coordination of the trade/ subcontractors Licensing/Training/ Professional Affiliations Relevant Experience(Abbreviated resume.) • OSHA 10 Hour Training • City of Cedar Hill Bond Program; Cedar Hill, Texas The Hunt College of Construction Knowledge -Valley View Municipal Complex;Irving, Texas Career Opportunities Performance Requirements Dallas Convention Center;Dallas, Texas - Client Relationship th Dallas Convention Center Heliport;Dallas, Texas Corporate Image - Construction Done Right Other Project Experience -Hunt Connect Alcon Sterile Products Expansion;Fort Worth, Texas Arco E/PRC Expansion;Plano, Texas DeSoto Woodridge Elementary School;DeSoto, Texas • —n �J 9 David F. Eisele Superintendent, Library &City Hall City of Wylie Responsibilities Years Experience • Supervision and control of all construction activities 24 • Coordinates and schedules trade/subcontractors and PP Su Tiers `' via • Licensing/Training Monitors performance to ensure that work is performed correctly and on time • Construction Law and Contract Documents • Oversees project quality control and safety programs project • CPR delivery • First Aid • Relevant Experience(Abbreviated resume.) Leadership Training • City of Lewisville Library;Lewisville,Texas The Hunt College of Construction Knowledge Denton County Pre-Trial Facility; Denton,Texas - Career Opportunities 6' Education Service Center Region 10;Richardson,Texas Performance Requirements - Client Relationship 6 Other Project Experience Corporate Image Ben Dial Athletic Complex;DeSoto, Texas - Construction Done Right First United Methodist Church of Carrollton-Phase II Parkway -Hunt Safety Campus; Carrollton, Texas Southern Methodist University Gerald J.Ford Stadium&Paul B.Loyd Jr.All Sports Center;Dallas, Texas Tollway Plaza;Dallas, Texas Kenneth S. Dumenil Superintendent, Recreation Center City of Wylie Responsibilities Years Experience • Supervision and control of all construction activities �3 • Coordinates and schedules trade/subcontractors and • suppliers — • Monitors performance to ensure that work is performed Education • Associate Degree Business • correctly and on time • Oversees project quality control and safety programs project Management delivery Mountain View College Relevant Experience(Abbreviated resume.) L The University of Texas at Arlington Activities Building Addition and Professional lia Renovation;Arlington, Texas Professional Affiliations • OSHA Training Crandall ISD 1998 Bond Program-High School; Crandall, Texas • Certified in First Aid/CPR Las Colinas Country Club;Las Colinas, Texas • Certified Forklift/Light Equipment Operator • The Hunt College of Construction Knowledge Other Project Experience - Career Opportunities 6 Anna May Daulton Elementary&Cora Spencer Elementary; Grand Performance Requirements Prairie, Texas - Construction Done Right Duncanville ISD 2001 Bond Program-Renovation&Band Hall - Contract Highlights&Risk Addition;Duncanville, Texas Management Kaufman ISD 2002 Bond Program-Junior High School;Kaufman, -Hunt Safety Texas Lindale ISD 2000 Bond Program-Junior High School;Lindale, Texas Terrell ISD 2001 Bond Program; Terrell, Texas [ ]LJ. to Douglas Jolley Preconstruction Services &Estimating Manager City of Wylie Responsibilities Years Experience • Responsible for various estimating tasks through all phases 44 tr of preconstruction and construction activities • Evaluation of various construction alternatives �: LU Education • Solicitation and preparation of bids • Civil Engineering Technology • Quantity takeoffs and pricing Purdue University Relevant Experience(Abbreviated resume.) Carrollton Gravely Center; Carrollton, Texas Licensing/Training Carrollton Hebron/Josey Library; Carrollton, Texas •The Hunt College of Carrollton Josey Ranch Lake Library&Senior Center; Construction Knowledge Carrollton, Texas - Career Opportunities& Carrollton Rosemeade Recreation Center; Carrollton, Texas Performance Requirements City of Cedar Hill Bond Program; Cedar Hill, Texas - Client Relationship 6. City of Lewisville Library;Lewisville, Texas Corporate Image City of Rockwall City Hall;Rockwall., Texas Contract Highlights&Risk Collin County Justice Center;McKinney, Texas Management - Denton County Courthouse;Denton, Texas Hunt Safety Valley View Municipal Complex;Irving, Texas Larry A. Steffen Design Development Manager City of Wylie Responsibilities Years Experience • Responsible for providing preconstruction services 19 • Provides cost estimating,value engineering, constructability evaluation,schedule input and material/methods analysis Education • B.S.,Building Construction Texas Ad M Relevant Experience(Abbreviated resume.) Carrollton Gravely Center; Carrollton, Texas Carrollton Josey Ranch Lake Library&Senior Center; Licensing/Training/ Carrollton, Texas Professional Affiliations Carrollton Rosemeade Recreation Center; Carrollton, Texas • LEED Accredited Professional City of Cedar Hill Bond Program; Cedar Hill, Texas • MC2 Estimating System City of Lewisville Library;Lewisville, Texas Duncanville ISD 2001 Bond Program Phases IV and V;Duncanville, Texas Lewisville ISD Administration Facility;Lewisville, Texas Pagenet Headquarters;Addison, Texas University of North Texas Dallas Multi-Purpose Building; Dallas, Texas 11) 11 Financial and Legal Status Describe the general financial capability of the Respondent and attach Willis was to assume "that all metal and membrane roofing a current financial statement and balance statement. operations shall use the prevailing wage rate of a'roofers' Hunt has maintained a history of stable growth and designation." Plaintiffs' claims totaled about$200,000.00. profitability,which is a substantial benefit to our clients in Willis cross-claimed against Hunt for indemnity, arguing that terms of certainty of performance and overall risk reduction. if Plaintiffs prevailed, Hunt should be responsible for satisfying Hunt's bonding capacity is in excess of$1 billion. In summary, the damages because it required Willis to include the Hunt has significant financial resources that make it a solid, contractual language that the employees were to be paid as long-term partner in any construction project. roofers. Plaintiffs and Hunt settled for$175,000.00 in early 2005,with most of the amount contributed by the Owner. Please refer to our attached audited Financial Statement. We have included this settled action because Willis has the right to pursue its cross-claim in arbitration. We do not List any actions taken by any regulatory agency against or involving believe it will. the firm or its agent or employees with respect to any work performed. D&A Irrigation,Inc. v. The City of Carrollton, Texas, Dallas In 2003 we were cited and settled an other-than-serious County, TX, 134th District Court Case No. 05-10468-G. This citation on the SBC center for a penalty of$150.00. In litigation was filed on or about October 12, 2005. D&A was February of 2006,we were cited with a settlement for one low an irrigation trade contractor on a municipal project known as gravity serious violation of$2,500 and one other-than-serious Senior Community Center and Library at josey Ranch in violation for$1,750. Carrollton,Texas. The owner is the City of Carrollton. Hunt was the construction manager for the project. D &A seeks to List all litigation against or involving the firm or its agents or recover from the City an amount "over$63,000.00" for employees with respect to any work performed. alleged breach of contract, fraud, and other theories. D &A's In today's litigious society, any major firm doing business of trade contract was assigned to Hunt by the City. Hunt is any magnitude will be involved in some litigation. Hunt providing a defense to the City. D &A's claim should have Construction Group, Inc. is no exception. We are proud to been asserted against Hunt. The City filed a plea in say,however, that in nearly all situations,we are insured and as abatement arguing that subject matter jurisdiction was reflected by opinion of our legal counsel and CPA firms, there wanting because the City enjoys governmental immunity. The is no significant impact to net worth due to any pending case has been abated pending a ruling by the Texas Supreme litigation. Almost all litigation in which we become a party Court on a similar issue of governmental immunity. Hunt involves design issues or insolvency on the part of Owners and maintains that D &A is not entitled to any monies; that, in Trade Contractors. There are obviously, in addition, the usual fact, D &A and its surety owe Hunt for the cost to workers compensation claims and other minor personal injury repair/complete D &A's work. Correspondence has been sent claims that are also covered by insurance. These claims are not to both D &A and its surety setting forth Hunt's claim. It included in this summary. appears that either Hunt will sue D &A and it will counterclaim for the monies it currently seeks from the City, As a matter of policy, Hunt favors the use of Alternative or vice-versa (D &A will sue Hunt and Hunt will Dispute Resolution ("ADR") mechanisms. Hunt's policy is to counterclaim). utilize,suggest, and proactively participate in devising creative methods for resolving disputes in order to avoid the expense Jesse Diaz, Rebecca Tovar,June Diaz, individually&ANF and adversarial relationships,which arise in the context of Ernesto Rodriguez,Jr., and ANFBrianna Rodriguez v. contested litigation. Community Arena Management, Ltd, d/b/a SBC Center, et al., Bexar County, 7X, Court at Law 3 Case No. 299678. This The following is Hunt's list of all pending litigation for the litigation (filed on or about February 9, 2005) alleges that Dallas Division: Plaintiffs were injured when the seating they were on collapsed during a boxing event at the SBC Center project in San Juan Antonio Bernal, et al. v.A.D. Willis Company, Inr.,Hunt Antonio,Texas. The matter is being handled by insurance. Construction Group,Arena Project Developer, L.L.C., and the San Antonio Spurs, L.L.C., U.S. District Court, Western District Mr. Steel, Inc. v. Corporate Metals, Inc., Hunt Construction of Texas, San Antonio Division, Case No. SA-03-01-0196 OG. Group, Inc., and Zurich American Insurance Company, Tarrant This case arose out of the prevailing wage agreement for the County, TX 48th Judicial District Court Case No. 048-208684- SBC Center in San Antonio,Texas. Plaintiffs were employees of Defendant A.D.Willis Company, Inc., the roofing subcontractor. They sued to recover the difference between the prescribed hourly wage for roofers and that for sheetmetal , n n workers. Willis' subcontract concerned the roofing and metal J..L U `� wall panels work. The subcontract expressly provided that LLLJJJ VVV uuu 12 Financial and LegzI Status (continued) 04. Mr. Steel, Inc.,a subcontractor to Corporate Metals, Inc., a subcontractor to Hunt,commenced this non-payment action on or about November 19,2004. Corporate Metals was to erect the structural steel for the Saginaw High School project (which it was to fabricate pursuant to a separate purchase order). Corporate Metals apparently subcontracted the erection work to Mr. Steel. Mr. Steel alleges that it is owed at least$174,041.44 and that Hunt and Zurich, its surety, are liable under the payment bond. Hunt has made demand on Corporate Metals to defend and indemnify Hunt and Zurich. It also made demand on Corporate Metals' performance bond surety that it complete Corporate Metals'work. Corporate Metals' performance bond surety has agreed to defend and indemnify Hunt and its surety. All insurance coverage that the firm has which would be applicable to this project. For the additional benefit and security of our Owners, Hunt maintains General Liability insurance coverage on all of our projects in the amount of$25 million. In addition, Hunt will provide Workers' Compensation insurance coverage for all of our employees while on-site, and automobile coverage for all of our owned vehicles. Hunt also typically provides, at the Owner's option, Builder's Risk/All-Risk insurance coverage against loss or damage to the building during construction. Jurisdictions in which your organization's partnership or trade name is filed. N/A Jurisdictions and trade categories in which your organizations legally qualified to do business(please indicate registration or license numbers). Please refer to the attached licenses listing. fffl 13 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET Hunt Construction Group, Inc. For the year ended December 31, 2005 Hunt Construction Group, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheet Year ended December 31, 2005 Contents Report of Independent Auditors 1 Consolidated Balance Sheet 2 Notes to Consolidated Balance Sheet 3 ElERNST&YOUNG Q Ernst&Young LLP x Phone: (602)322-3000 Ernst&Young Tower www.ey.com One Renaissance Square 2 North Central Avenue Suite 2300 Phoenix,Arizona 85004 Report of Independent Auditors The Board of Directors Hunt Construction Group, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Hunt Construction Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2005. This balance sheet is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this balance sheet based on our audit. We did not audit the financial statements of certain proportionate share construction Joint Venture partnerships, which statements reflect total assets of 15.2% and 0% as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for certain proportionate share construction Joint Ventures partnerships is based solely on the reports of other auditors. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the balance sheet is free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit of the balance sheet and the reports of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors,the balance sheet referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Hunt Construction Group, Inc. at December 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. 1-LP March 1.0, 2006 1 A Member Practice of Ernst &Young Global Hunt Construction Group, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheet December 31, 2005 Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 89,955,768 Accounts receivable due on construction contracts, including$111,575,217 retained by customers in accordance with contract provisions 278,030,987 Accounts receivable, other 1,372,377 Unbilled construction cost on uncompleted contracts 20,762,613 Receivable from affiliates 1,010,417 Deferred federal income tax 1,314,000 Prepaid expenses 474,223 Total current assets 392,920,385 Construction property and equipment 8,768,099 Investments in equity securities, at fair market value 2,692,799 Total assets $ 404,381.283 Liabilities and stockholder's equity Current liabilities: Accounts payable,trade, including$105,283,790 retained by company in accordance with contract provisions $ 300,292,068 Accrued liabilities 6,043,580 Deferred construction revenue on uncompleted contracts 42,425,110 Payable to affiliates 3,084,643 Equipment notes payable 48,029 Total current liabilities 351,893,430 Equipment notes payable 85,288 Deferred federal income tax 696,000 Stockholder's equity: Common capital stock,no par value; authorized 83,680 shares; 58,825 shares issued and outstanding, at stated value 2,044,741 Class A common stock,nonvoting, no par value; authorized 482,605 shares; 184,060 shares issued and outstanding, at stated value 260,971 Unrealized gain on investments in equity securities 301,827 Retained earnings 49,099,026 Total stockholder's equity 51,706,565 Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $ 404,381,283 See accompanying notes. 2 Hunt Construction Group, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Balance Sheet December 31, 2005 1. Basis of Presentation and Principal Accounting Policies Hunt Construction Group, Inc. (the Company) is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Hunt Corporation. The Company is a general contractor and construction manager that constructs industrial, medical, commercial, sports, and entertainment facilities throughout the continental United States and Canada. The Company's customers include major corporations, developers, and government entities. The consolidated balance sheet includes the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiary, and its proportionate share of the assets, liabilities, participants' equity, and income and expense of construction joint venture partnerships. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.- Revenue from construction contracts is recognized on the percentage of completion method of accounting. The percentage of completion of individual contracts is determined by relating the actual cost of work performed to date to the current estimated total cost of the contract. Contracts generally extend over one or more years, and revisions in cost and profit estimates are reflected in the accounting period in which they become known. Revenue relating to unsettled claims is recorded in the year the claims are resolved. When the estimate on a contract indicates a loss, the Company's policy is to record the entire estimated loss in the year determined. Revenue from preconstruction phase services and post construction phase services is recognized over those phases of a project. Construction incentive income is recognized when earned. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes, and amounts used for income tax purposes. The significant components of deferred income taxes relate to construction contracts, construction property and equipment, and accrued liabilities. 3 Hunt Construction Group, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Balance Sheet (continued) 1. Basis of Presentation and Principal Accounting Policies (continued) The Company invests its temporarily idle cash primarily in deposits with major national banks, governmental securities, money market mutual funds, municipal bonds, and highly liquid debt instruments of companies with strong credit ratings. These securities typically mature within ninety days and,therefore, bear minimal risk. The Company considers all highly liquid debt investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. All investments in equity securities are classified as available for sale and, as a result, are stated at fair market value. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of applicable deferred taxes, are included as a component of stockholder's equity. Realized gains or losses from the sale of equity securities are based on the specific identification method. The Company is a participant in its parent company's non-contributory pension plan for eligible office and field personnel. Benefits are based on compensation and length of service. The Company's policy is to fund pension costs so that sufficient assets will be available to meet future benefit requirements. Pension plan accumulated benefits an.d net assets information is not available for the Company since it is a participant in its parent company's pension plan. Contributions to union administered pension funds, in accordance with various union agreements, are generally based on hours worked. 2. Construction Property and Equipment Construction property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful service lives of the related assets, which range from three to ten years. The following is a summary of the cost and accumulated depreciation of construction property and equipment at December 31, 2005: Land $ 327,228 Buildings 5,147,965 Machinery and equipment 20,460,913 Leasehold improvements 491,228 26,427,334 Less accumulated depreciation 17,659,235 $ 8,768,099 4 Hunt Construction Group, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Balance Sheet (continued) • 3. Credit Agreement At December 31, 2005, the Company had a $30,000,000 revolving line of credit with a bank. No compensating balances are required or maintained. While there were no borrowings under this line of credit at December 31, 2005, $5,696,000 has been used to cover an outstanding letter of credit as required under a certain construction contract. 4. Federal and State Income Taxes The Company's taxable results will be included in consolidated tax returns filed by its parent, The Hunt Corporation. For financial reporting purposes, the provision for federal income tax is calculated as though the Company filed a separate tax return. The current taxes due are included as an element of the payable to affiliates. 5. Leases The Company leases various buildings and construction equipment under operating leases. Most leases have noncancelable lease terms of less than one year. 6. Contingent Liabilities There are various lawsuits and claims pending against the Company in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management and legal counsel for the Company,the outcome of these lawsuits and claims will not have a significant effect on the Company's consolidated financial position. 5 Qualifications and Licenses E3y State/City HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP,INC. QUALIFICATIONS AND LICENSES BY STATE/CITY As of March 1,2006 State General Local Date License Hunt Contractor's Contractor's to be Renewed Qualified to License License if Hunt has License When Jurisdiction do Business Required Required One Number Qualified Alabama Yes Yes Yes 08/31/06 7863 04-07-60 Alaska Yes Yes No N/A N/A 11-13-00 Arizona(Class A-) Yes Yes Yes(1) 02-28-08 ROC112492 08-27-64 Arizona(Class B-01) Yes Yes Yes(1) 09-30-07 R00071224 08-27-64 Arkansas Yes Yes No 04-30-06 23970406 12-31-87 California Yes Yes Yes(1) 02-28-07 136502 12-15-52 CA Qualifier-R.G.Hunt Colorado Yes No Yes N/A N/A 01-27-75 Connecticut Yes Yes No 06-30-06 900283 03-30-67 Delaware Yes Yes No 12-31-06 1989008053 11-07-77 Florida Yes Yes Yes(1) 08-31-07 QB0005983 06-18-74 FL Qualifier-Morthland Yes Yes Yes(1) 08-31-06 CGC1510528 08-31-05 Georgia Yes No Yes(1) N/A N/A 08-03-64 Hawaii Yes Yes No N/A N/A 11-03-00 Idaho Yes Yes No 04-30-06 11000-AAA-3 10-12-00 Illinois Yes No No N/A N/A 08-14-61 Indiana Yes Yes Yes(1) 12-21-07 N/A 10-19-44 Indianapolis Yes N/A Yes 12-31-06 C654 12-01-70 Iowa Yes No No N/A N/A 05-27-66 Kansas Yes No Yes(1) N/A N/A 11-27-00 Kentucky Yes No Yes(1) N/A N/A 08-25-53 Louisiana Yes Yes No 12-31-06 2366 02-22-71 LA Qualifier-J.Sovern Maine Yes No No N/A N/A 12-04-00 Maryland Yes No Yes N/A N/A 03-14-69 Massachusetts Yes No Yes(1) N/A N/A 06-06-95 Michigan Yes No Yes(1) N/A N/A 04-09-54 Minnesota Yes No No N/A N/A 11-08-00 Mississippi Yes Yes No 10-11-06 3037 07-13-87 Missouri Yes No No N/A N/A 10-15-58 Montana Yes No No N/A N/A 10-24-00 Nebraska Yes Yes No Perpetual 32-1378902 08-05-58 Nevada Yes Yes Yes(1) *10-31-06 56521 01-22-63 NV Qual-M.Gausden New Hampshire No(3) No No N/A N/A N/A New Jersey Yes No(2) Yes(1) N/A N/A 05-16-68 New Mexico Yes Yes No 11-29-07 18270 06-06-79 NM Qualifier-RG Hunt New York Yes No No N/A N/A 11-01-63 North Carolina Yes Yes Yes(1) 12-31-06 3413 10-29-78 NC Qualifier-D.Utt North Dakota No(3) Yes No N/A N/A N/A Ohio Yes No Yes(1) N/A N/A 02-14-47 Oklahoma Yes No Yes(1) N/A 510662 03-06-59 Oregon Yes Yes Yes(1) 03-29-07 72711 06-10-91 OR Qual-R.Aylesworth Pennsylvania Yes No No N/A N/A 12-21-60 Rhode Island Yes No No N/A N/A 11-17-00 South Carolina Yes Yes No 10-31-06 G-10750 12-19-00 SC Qualifier-D.Utt South Dakota No(3) No No N/A N/A N/A Tennessee Yes Yes No 01-31-08 6950 03-28-60 TN Qual-Decker/Mullen Texas Yes No No N/A N/A 08-30-74 Utah Yes Yes No 07-31-07 226607-5501 07-14-94 UT Qual-M.Gausden Vermont Yes No No N/A N/A 09-14-64 Virginia Yes Yes No 05-31-07 2701 005665A 01-22-63 VA Qualifer-Pending Washington Yes Yes No 10-26-07 HUNTCGI995CW 01-26-76 Washington,D.C. Yes N/A No N/A N/A 01-08-01' West Virginia Yes Yes Yes(1) 08-07-06 WV001566 04-13-73 Wisconsin Yes No No N/A N/A 03-02-70 Wyoming Yes No No N/A N/A 10-02-00 (1) In some local jurisdictions. (2) Prequalification required for some government work. (3) Application in procass. t^' L J L IIM\" I' *License in the name of Hunt Group,Inc. Experience and References Discussion of Construction Manager experience in working with City of Carrollton(Multiple Projects) Government Agencies in Texas. Mr. Bob Scott 1945 East Jackson Road Government Agencies Carrollton,TX 75006 972.466.3103 Hunt has worked as a Construction Manager on three local City of Cedar Hill(Bond Program) bond programs similar to the City of Wylie projects, in Mr.Alan Sims addition to a number of single projects for local cities and P.O. Box 96 counties. The three local municipal bond programs that Hunt Cedar Hill,TX 75106 has managed are: 972.291.5100 City of Carrollton-$45 million bond program, including two City of Corpus Christi(Whataburger Field) libraries,a recreation center, a city hall and justice center. Mr.Kevin Stowers City of Cedar Hill-$27 million bond program, including a City Hall,P.O. Box 9277 Corpus Christi,TX 78469 new city hall and police facility, a library addition, and 361.882.0469 renovations to existing facilities. City of Rockwall-$10 million bond program, including a new City of Dallas(Love Field Parking Garage Expansion) city hall and community center, and additions and renovations Mr.David Dybala to the existing police facility. City of Dallas Oakcliff Municipal Center Individual local city projects Hunt has managed as a 320 East Jefferson Boulevard,Suite 108 Construction Manager include: Dallas,TX 75203 214.946.4650 City of Dallas-$55 million Love Field Parking Garage, City of Frisco(Dr Pepper/Seven Up Ballpark) Concourse and Skybridge. Reference Retired City of Lewisville- $9 million new library 6891 Mary Street City of Plano-Municipal Center and Civic Center Frisco,TX 75034 City of Richardson-$50 million Charles W. Eisemann Center 972.235.5555 for the Performing Arts and Corporate Presentations. Cities of Allen, Frisco and Plano-$60 million Arts of Collin City of Irving(Valley View Municipal Complex) County Performing Arts Center Mr.Todd Reck 825 West Irving Boulevard List of all comparable municipal projects,whether on-going or Irving,TX 75060 972.721.2281 completed,including references. Please begin with projects in Texas, For each,please provide. City of Lewisville(City of Lewisville Library) Mr.Gary Davis Project name and location,Year completed,Short description of 151 West Church Street project,Names,addresses,and phone numbers of owner and contact Lewisville,TX 75029 person tasked with daily responsibilities of project Names,addresses 972.219.3536 and telephone numbers of general contractor and engineer Design and construction cost and whether or not it was within the City of Plano(Municipal Building,Civic Center) Mr.Tom Muehlenbeck project budget,Construction time and whether or not it was P.O. Box 860358 completed on time. Plano,TX 76026 Please refer to the attached listing of comparable municipal 972.941.7000 projects. City of Rockwall(City Hall,Police and Courts,Senior Center) List all projects currently under contract. Ms.Julie Couch Please refer to the attached listing. 385 South Goliad Street Rockwall,TX 75087 List of ten(10)government references,which list is to contain an equal 972.771.7700 number of positive as well as negative references. City of Allen(Arts of Collin County Performing Arts Center) David Hoover 305 Century Parkway Allen,TX. 75013 Zr n n M 214.509.4162 v U\J 20 Project Profile Datasheets Rockwall City Hall Josey Ranch Lake Library and Senior Center Rockwall Texas Carrollton,Texas PROJECT DESCRIPTION:A 22,000 SF,3-story new City Hall. IPIIIIqIII., PROJECT DESCRIPTION:A new 42,500 SF public library with an undergroundSERVICE PROVIDED: Construction Manager At-Risk,GMP parking garage and an 18,000 SF new senior community center. Project _ f 4 CONSTRUCTION COST:$6.4 million(within budget) Iqpiplii I includes development of a 25 acre site with trails,bridges,partitions, E i ' .a>;= - -_ piers,and fountains for the City of Carrollton, ---.�_ SCHEDULE: 12 months(on-time) SERVICE PROVIDED: Construction Manager At-Risk,GMP - COMPLETION:06/2002 -_ _-- --' - OWNER REFERENCE:City of Rockwall,Mr.Rick Crowley,972.771.7700 =-- CONSTRUCTION COST:$11.2 Million(below budget) ARCHITECT REFERENCE:Ron Hobbs Architects,Mr.Ron Hobbs,972.494.0174 SCHEDULE: 16 months(on-time) COMPLETION:03/2004 Rockwall Police Complex OWNER REFERENCE:City of Carrollton,Mr,Bob Scott,972.466.3103 Rockwall,Texas ARCHITECT REFERENCE:F&S Partners,Mr.Ron Shaw,214.559.4851 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:A 16,000 SF Police/Courtroom addition and ' renovations for the City of Rockwall. - ,tr 1, Valley View Municipal Complex , i j Irving,Texas SERVICE PROVIDED: Construction Manager At-Risk,GMP - I{' - " ,'. _ r CONSTRUCTION COST:$1.5 Mi llion(within budget) 1 \ '-, PROJECT DESCRIPTION:A new 98,229 SF,seven-building municipal complex - SCHEDULE:10 months(on-time) - including a 52,000 SF,2-story administration building with _ y- accompanying vehicle maintenance area,warehouse,bulk material - — COMPLETION:07/2004 _, - storage,vehicle wash and vehicle fueling support buildings for the Streets _ --'-.-_ OWNER REFERENCE:City of Rockwall,Mr.Rick Crowley,972.771.7700 and Water Department and a police administration building with an - <- - -» ARCHITECT REFERENCE:Ron Hobbs Architects,Mr.Ron Hobbs,972.494.0174 impound and auction yard. ' SERVICE PROVIDED: Lump Sum Bid,General Contractor s Rockwall Center CONSTRUCTION CooT•.$16.5 Million Rockwall Texas CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE:16 Months PROJECT DESCRIPTION:An 11,000 SF senior/community center. COMPLETION:07/2005 SERVICE PROVIDED: Construction Manager At-Risk,GMP OWNER REFERENCE:City of Irving,Mr.Todd Reck,972.721.2281 CONSTRUCTION Cost$1.5 Million(within budget) , 4� �^ - -- - -_ Love Field Parking Garage r - SCHEDULE:10 months(on-time) -+� linere'"+' - Carrollton,Texas I- w-r;, :i ; COMPLETION:07/2004 --'per' PROJECT DESCRIPTION:A new 4,006-car parking garage and renovations to the -,r 2-7 OWNER REFERENCE:City of Rockwall,Mr.Rick Crowley,972.771.7700 i t a existing garage featuring a people mover,sidewalks,sky bridge,new - >- ARCHTTECT REFERENCE:Ron Hobbs Architects,Mr.Ron Hobbs,972.494.0174 'fi roadways and utilities. T� "? -+ » n SERVICE PROVIDED: Construction Manager At-Risk,GMP f h -_ - — Carrollton Justice Center " .• g — _ Carrollton,Texas - CONSTRUCTION COST:$57 Million(within budget) ` a ti SCHEDULE:36 months(on-time) PROJECT DESCRIPTION:A 48,000 SF project,including a new jail,jail renova- t -- _-- tions and new courtroom additions and renovation. COMPLETION:01/2002 SERVICE PROVIDED: Construction Manager At-Risk,GMP OWNER REFERENCE:City of Dallas,Mr.David Dybala,214.948.4650 CONSTRUCTION COST:$7.37 Million(below budget) - ARCHITECT REFERENCE:Huitt-Zollars,Mr.Jim Fullmer,817.335.3000 SCHEDULE 14 months(on-time) COMPLETION:08/2002 OWNER REFERENCE:City of Carrollton,Mr.Bob Scott,972.466.3103 ARCHITECT REFERENCE:Brinkley Sargent Architects,Mr.Dwayne Brinkley, 972.960.9970 NUR[I'IT' 21 Project Profile Datasheets(continued) Charles W.Eisemann Center for the Performing Arts and Corporate City of Cedar Hill Bond Program Cedar Mild Texas Presentations -`- Richardson,Texan - . • 1.a D • � PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Program management for $27,100,000 bond program €- i li {! r including a$11,500,000 City Hall,$8,400,000 Police Facility, I PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Multiple projects including an auditorium,a parking t _ P P I g P B r It I I $4,600,000 Library Expansion,and$2,600,000 of renovations. I- garage and pedestrian plaza for the City of Richardson. The performing r�--Fitz�'. `, c'�: arts center is a 117,500 SF,5-level auditorium with 1,500 seats and ,S I ' 1_ M ,a, SERVICE PROVIDED: Program Manager houses three performance venues. The 252,000 SF parking garage J CONSTRUCTION COST:$27.1 Million(in progress) fi. consists of 6 levels,750 parking spaces and an access driveway. it,,jim♦--.J SCHEDULE:20 Months SERVICE PROVIDED: Construction Manager At-Risk,GMP aa. t +- -'qv *_K ItS .- - - COMPLETION:12/2007 CONSTRUCTION COST:$54 Million(within budget) OWNER REFERENCE:Mr.Alan Sims,City of Cedar Hill,972.291.5100 ..i 01 1 SCHEDULE:21 Months(on-time) ARCHITECT REFERENCE:Wiginton,Hooker,Jeffries Architects,Mr.Greg Schon, t • '�` I i f_ Ef r=,I COMPLETION:09/2002 214.349.5558 ^- OWNER REFERENCE:City of Richardson,Mr.Dan Johnson,972.744.4201 - • _- ARCHITECT REFERENCE:RTKL,Mr.Eurico Francisco,214.871.8877 - _1 City of Lewisville Library T. w Lewisville,Texas- -. '- Arts of Collin County Performing Arts Center ,. :-.- Allen,Texas •,.. �' fa � �r PROJECT DESCRIPTION:An 86,OOO SF addition and renovation to the two-story I' PROTECT DESCRIPTION:A 115,000 GSF 2,100-seat performing arts center local 'Di(w, f t;'I;1 t_+ existing library. - - ed ona 100-acre site. k{ t +1- ,.«I ,0 - - k{ r SERVICE PROVIDED: Construction Mana er At-Risk,GMP ijfw{+'A' n� ANTICIPATED ESTIMATED SCHEDULE:19 months$8.6 Million g ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION COST:ont9 Million Hager At-Risk,GMP r 2-° •I,. t.�; 4 ANTICIPATED COMPLETION:02/2OO7 - - - ANTICIPATED COMPLETION:07/2009 OWNER REFERENCE:City of Lewisville,Mr.Gary Davis,972.219.3536 OWNER REFERENCE:Arts of Collin County(a cooperative of the Cities of ARCHITECT REFERENCE:F&S Partners,Mr.Ron Shaw,214.559.4851 Allen,Frisco and Plano),Mr.Robbie Robinson,214.495.5801 ARCHITECT REFERENCE:Boora Architects,Mr.Michael Tingley,503.226.1575 City of Carrollton Gravely Center Carrollton,Texas PROJECT DESCRIPTION:A 6,000 SF renovation of the old City Hall building i and a new two-story,6,500 SF office space addition. I SERVICE PROVIDED: Construction Manager At-Risk,GMP Collin County Justice Center ,nFri h �• #{'+ , McKinney,Texas �= Y' CONSTRUCTION COST:$2.2 Million(within budget) ' 1 SCHEDULE:11 months(on-time) �+ - PROJECT DESCRIPTION:A 300,000 SF,five-story court fadlity ona 30-acre site. 2Si �i� Pf«. tE Z.L,�' COMPLETION:01/2003 ■ _ t SERVICE PROVIDED: LSB I ' OWNER REFERENCE:City of Carrollton,Mr.Bob Scott,972.466.3103 CONSTRUCTION COST:$40 Million ��� ARCHITECT REFERENCE:Calvert&Co.Architects Mr.Dick Calvert, ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE:20 months • 972.446.0493 ' ANTICIPATED COMPLETION:O3/2007 { '•R • OWNER REFERENCE:Collin County Texas,Ms.Sarah Hoagland,972.548.4104 `.. ARCHITECT REFERENCE:PGAL,Mr.Charlie Kearns,214.880.0100 i::::)1 MUHL! 22 South Region Current Projects Alcon ASPEX Line E Expansion Collin County Justice Center Installation of compounding,fill suite and other sterile areas including A 300,000 SF,five-story court facility on a 30-acre site. High Purity and Facility Piping,HVAC,and finishes in existing McKinney,TX ASPEX Building. Fort Worth,TX Grapevine-Colleyville ISD 2005 Bond Program Over 3,000,000 SF of renovations,66,000 SF of additions and a new Alton Huntington Phase 3 74,100 SF elementary school. Renovations to an existing 95,000 SF manufacturing plant. Grapevine,TX Huntington,WV Hospice and Palliative Care Facility Alton Manufacturing Line 9 A 22,000 SF,one-story, 18-bed hospice consisting of masonry/cast Renovations to the existing Line 9. stone veneer and shingle roof. Fort Worth,TX Fort Worth,TX Alcon R&D HVAC Upgrade,C1/C2 Janie Stark Elementary School Mechanical/HVAC upgrades to the Conner Building Research and An 85,000 SF,two-story replacement elementary school including a Development Laboratories. computer lab,music room,art room,library,interior courtyard, Fort Worth,TX administration offices and a cafetorium. Farmers Branch,TX Alcon RDAAC Towers Renovation A 200,000 SF interior renovation of an office and training space. Lakeland Elementary School Fort Worth,TX A 30,000 SF,one-story addition and renovations to the existing school. Anna May Daulton Elementary&Cora Spencer Elementary Lewisville,TX The project consists of two,79,274 SF,one-story elementary schools including computer labs,cafeteria and kitchen. Lewisville ISD Aquatic Center Grand Prairie,TX A 39,000 SF,single-story natatorium facility with a 50-meter diving pool. Arts of Collin County Performing Arts Center Lewisville,TX A 115,000 GSF,2,100-seat performing arts center located on a 100- acre site. Mansfield Legacy High School Allen,TX A new 432,000 SF high school,including all sitework,athletic fields, and football stadium. Blanton Elementary Renovations and Additions Mansfield,TX A 50,000 SF renovation of the existing facility and a 30,000 SF addition including a kitchen,cafeteria and gymnasium. Raytheon Warehouse Expansion&Site Security Carrollton,TX A 25,000 SF warehouse expansion for shipping and receiving operations,the conversion of existing warehouse into manufacturing Brazos County Exposition Center space and site security upgrades. A multi-building exposition center including an exhibit hall,a 3,500- Dallas,TX seat covered arena and a 60,000 SF stall barn. Bryan,TX Rio Rancho Multi-Purpose Event Center A 160,000 SF,6,500-seat,multi-purpose event center for the City of Brazos County Sheriffs Office Rio Rancho. Future home of the NBA's Developmental League,the A new 30,000 SF,two-story sheriff's office. Albuquerque Thunderbirds. Bryan,TX Rio Rancho,NM City of Cedar Hill Bond Program The Prescott Valley Convention&Events Center Program management for a bond program including a city hall,police A 135,000 SF,two level, 5,000-seat hockey and events center facility,library expansion,and renovations. featuring 24 suites. Future home of the CHI's Sundogs. Cedar Hill,TX Prescott Valley,AZ City of Lewisville Library University of North Texas Dallas Multi-Purpose Building An 86,000 SF addition and renovation to the two-story existing A new 70,000 SF,three-story education and multipurpose building. library. Dallas,TX Lewisville,TX Guaranteed Maximum Price(GMP) Design Build(DB) Fixed Fee(FF) Construction Manager(CM) Consulting(CON) Owner's Representative(OR) n I I� k Lump Sum Bid(LSB) Cost Plus(CP) Construction Manager at Risk(CMR) t L LLLJJJ VVV General Contractor(GC) Joint Venture(JV) Revised: 3123/2005 23 Management and Organizational.Approach On two pages or less,please describe your management and Refine Overall Schedule organizational approach to the project.The following should be addressed within this description. Once the priorities for the work have been established, Hunt -Please describe your firm's understanding of the project(s) will develop the Overall Program Schedule for the Wylie bond -Describe how the firm will organize to perform services program. Hunt will work closely with the City and the -Provide procedures for assisting in the development of project Architect during this phase to schedule the design and the scheduling,coordination of consultants,quality and cost control construction activities for each project to fit within the City's -Describe the construction management teams'approach to annual budget. The Overall Program Schedule will detail the communication with the City and Architect consultant selection,design,bidding, awarding,and -Description of Construction Manager approach to code analysis and construction activities for each of the City's planned projects. jurisdictional approvals. As described in the Request for Qualifications,the Overall Program Overview and Understanding Program Schedule will be reviewed and updated on an annual basis by City Council until all projects have been completed. Hunt understands the importance of this facility bond program to the City of Wylie. We recognize that the facilities Confirm Budgets designed and constructed from these bond funds will shape the image of Wylie for many years to come. Hunt also recognizes Early in the process, Hunt would recommend that the budget and accepts our responsibility to keep City Council, the City and scope of each project be reconfirmed. We would not only staff, user groups and the public involved and well informed confirm the budget limitation approved by the voters for each throughout this process. From the very beginning of our project,but provide our own independent review and opinion involvement, through completion and turnover of the last of the approximate project size, scope,and level of quality each project,we will help build consensus, keep the team focused approved budget will allow. Hunt will research our cost on the goal,and promote an overall attitude of enthusiasm and history database for projects similar to those planned by Wylie, excitement about the growth of Wylie. and assemble a cost range per square foot analysis for comparable facilities. From this, Hunt can reasonably and We understand the role of a successful Construction independently estimate the approximate facility size each of Management Services firm to be working with the City your budgets will support. through the design and construction of approximately$27 million of capital improvement projects on a phased schedule The results of this effort will then be presented to staff and over the course of several years based upon community City Council for review and confirmation. This will assure a priorities and the City's financial capability. Anticipated consistent level of expectation by all team members before projects and budgets include the following: proceeding into the design phase. City Hail $8,645,000 Manage the Preconstruction Process Public Library $8,140,000 Recreation Center $10,200,000 This is the most critical phase in the entire process. This is also where Hunt Construction Group excels. Project Approach All of the important decisions affecting the cost, quality, From Hunt's experience assisting other local municipal Owners constructability and maintainability of your facilities will be with design and construction on exactly these type facilities,we determined during the early stages of the design process. would suggest the following general sequence of activities upon Hunt is extremely experienced at managing the design process our selection as your Construction Manager: effectively to a predetermined budget on public projects. We work in this role on a daily basis with other public owners 1) Refine Overall Program Schedule throughout the DFW area. The primary management tool we 2) Confirm Budgets utilize is our detailed estimates,beginning with the early 3) Manage Preconstruction Process to Agreed Upon Budget conceptual or schematic design drawings, and continuing and Schedule 4) Manage Construction Process to Agreed Upon Budget and Schedule 5) Turn Over Facilities On Time and Under Budget 24 Management and Organizational Appr. rich (continued) through the construction documents. We have an excellent ,, ; ' track record of accurately predicting the final cost of public facilities from very limited design information. x JA M Ykr �� '' Equally important throughout the design process is appropriate " involvement by the user groups and the public, to seek guidance and confirmation that the facilities being designed '" ' •1._ �-.-- will meet the needs and expectations of those utilizing the facilities. Public involvement will be closely coordinated between Hunt, the Architect, City Council and staff s i I f - Manage the Construction Process As one of the nation's top 20 general contracting and construction management firms, Hunt is extremely qualified to successfully manage the construction process. Our proven processes of effective and clear contracts,change item control, A new 42,500 SF public library with an underground parking scheduling, safety management and document control,provide garage and an 18,000 SF new senior community center. assurance to the City of Wylie that your expectations will be Project includes development of a 25-acre site with trails, met or exceeded on every project. Every month,we will bridges,partitions,piers,and fountains for the City of provide to City Council and staff a detailed monthly report of Carrollton. all construction activities,in presentation form with written back-up. —City of Carrollton Josey Ranch Lake Library and We would suggest you contact our references and ask diem Senior Center about their experience with Hunt. (Please See References in Carrollton,Texas Section 4.) members to clearly express their goals for the projects,and to Turn Over Facilities discuss lines of communication and authority. Once the project goals are established by the team,weekly This is the most rewarding part of our work,and is the main Owner/Architect/Contractor(OAC) meetings will keep everyone focused. Action item logs will be utilized to track reason many of us at Hunt continue to work in the field of construction. We also understand that our work is not done as responsibilities assigned in these OAC meetings to make sure soon as you occupy the facility either. In order for Wylie to all parties understand their responsibilities and deadlines. effectively manage and maintain a new or renovated facility, Jurisdictional Approvals Hunt must provide the operation and maintenance data in an organized manner,with sufficient Owner training. We are Hunt works closely with the local City Officials, Building always available throughout and after the warrantyperiod to Inspectors and Fire Marshall on every project we build. It is assist our clients in any way we can. essential to keep these individuals completely informed as to our schedule and occupancy deadlines on the facility,so that Organization for Services we can meet their interim goals. Hunt is organized to provide these services under the direction With regard to code analysis, Hunt stays well versed and and leadership of our Project Executive, Mr. Kevin Cain. During the preconstruction portion of our work, Hunt will informed on the latest codes and revisions affecting construction. We will advise the design team of areas of support the project, through our in-house estimating and concern regarding codes as the design progresses, and allow scheduling personnel located in our Dallas office. As the them time to research and addresses such issues. design nears completion and we move into the bidding, awarding and construction phase, the workload is shifted to our full-time,on-site, Project Manager and his support staff. Communication Hunt is a strong proponent of open,honest communication at all times. We suggest that early in the program, Hunt sponsor FL Qr} a"partnering" or"team building"session allowing the team = 25 Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: Work Session Department: (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Mindy Manson Account Code: Date Prepared: June 1, 2006 Budgeted Amount: $1,500,000 (Bond Program) Exhibits: Four Subject Presentation by the architectural firms of Randall Scott Architects and Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects for design services related to Fire Station#3. Recommendation Discussion The process used to identify the possible finalist architectural firms for the design of Fire Station #3 was as follows: - A committee was appointed by the City Manager consisting of Captain Robert Ballard, Captain Brent Parker, Captain Jeff Scribner, Linda Seumalo — Finance Department, and Mindy Manson — Assistant City Manager. - Request for Qualifications (RFQ)were developed and solicited. - Statements of Qualifications were received from 7 firms. - All firms were ranked by the Committee. - A short-list of 3 firms was developed. - The Committee toured representative projects then interviewed each of the 3 firms. - The Committee narrowed the list to 2 firms to recommend to Council. The 2 firms will make a formal presentation to the City Council of approximately 15 minutes followed by time for questions and answers. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 THE CITY OF WYLIE MANAGER'S MEMORANDUM DATE ISSUED: February 21, 2006 MEMORANDUM NO. 06-25 ATTENTION: Robert Ballard, Captain, Fire Brent Parker, Captain, Fire Jeff Scribner, Captain, Fire Lida Seumalo, Payroll/Accounting, Finance Andy Manson, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Fire Station #3 Architect Selection This memorandum is to appoint each of you to a Committee to develop a Request for Qualifications (and/or Request for Proposals); to solicit for an Architectural Firm to design the above fire station; to interview prospective architectural firms, if necessary and to make a recommendation to me and the City Council on the firm to be hired. Note: If you need the assistance of the Purchasing Agent, Mr. Jim Holcomb, please feel free to do so. This task should be completed within sixty (60) days or less. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. / AZ— ,S el Vt., MARK B. ROATH, City Manager c. Mr. Jim Holcomb, Purchasing Agent Mr. Shan English, Fire Chief Mr. Larry Williamson, Final ice Director CITY OF WYLIE , TEXAS Request for Qualifications Project Architect Fire Station Number 3 • Contents Acknowledgement of Receipt Section 1 Introduction Section 2 Overview of Project Section 2 Statement of Qualifications Questionnaire Section 3 Acknowledgement and Certification Section 4 Acknowledgment of Receipt Re: City of Wylie,Texas Request for Qualifications Project Architect for Fire Station Number 3 Please fill in the requested information below as acknowledgment that you have received the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) noted above, including the related RFQ Questionnaire. If your firm has an interest in participating, it is required that this sheet be completed and returned to Jim Holcomb, Purchasing Manager, City of Wylie, 2000 North Highway 78, Wylie, Texas 75098, or faxed to 972-442-8148. Acknowledgement and an affirmative statement of interest will ensure that your firm receives any addenda to this solicitation. RESPONDENT: (Company responding to this RFQ.) Name Address Phone Fax: POINT OF CONTACT: (Respondent's representative and designated point of contact for Add- enda and other communications regarding this RFQ) Name Title: Phone Fax: Email ❑❑ Yes. Our Company DOES have an interest in responding. ❑❑ No. Our Company DOES NOT have an interest in responding. SIGNED: Printed Name and Title Signature Date Introduction In November of 2005, the citizens of the City of Wylie (City) approved seven bond propositions for various capital improvement projects, including construction of a new Fire Station. This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Architectural Services is to select the Architect for the Fire Station project. Ten (10) copies of your Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) must be submitted. SOQ submittals will be accepted by the City of Wylie Purchasing Division at the following address,until 2:00 PM local time April 26, 2006: City of Wylie Office of the Purchasing Manager 2000 North Highway 78 Wylie,Texas 75098 Overview of Project PROJECT LOCATION The site for the new Fire Station is located at the intersection of Brown Street and W. A. Allen Blvd. in Wylie. PROJECT SCHEDULE Following receipt of the SOQ's, a "Short List" will be determined, and an interview process will be undertaken for those making the short list, which will result in the selection and approval of the Project Architect by the City Council. It is anticipated that the evaluation and selection process will be completed by June 1, 2006, and that design and construction of the project will be substantially completed by December 2007. Design and construction timelines will be further defined after the Project Architect is selected. PROJECT ARCHITECT It is expected that the selected Project Architect will execute an Agreement for all services similar in content to the standard AIA B141 Owner— Architect Agreement. The Architect's Scope of Work will include: Pre-Design Services; Schematic Design; Design Development; Construction Documents; Bidding and Negotiation; Construction Administration; and Post- Construction Services. PROJECT BUDGET The approved bond proposition for a new Fire Station provides funding in the amount of $1,500,000.00 for the design and construction of the approximate 11,500 square foot facility. CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY METHOD The project will be delivered utilizing the traditional"design-bid-build" method. EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCEDURE An Evaluation and Selection Committee (the "Committee") has been appointed. This Committee is charged with making the final recommendation for Project Architect to the City Council for their confirmation and approval. The final decision on the selection of the Project Architect rests with the City Council. The Committee's activities will be as follows: - Review, analyze and evaluate every Statement of Qualifications submitted. - From this evaluation,select a "Short List" of no more than 5 respondents. - Interview in depth each selected respondent from the short list. - Make final evaluations to determine the selected Architect. - Recommend their selection to the City Council for approval. Throughout their review and evaluation process, the Committee will be looking for hard evidence, and demonstrated ability to perform, in a number of key areas. To accomplish this task, the Committee will prepare its own list of Selection Criteria based on content of SOQ as related to the attached questionnaire. This list will include the following areas of interest: • Demonstrated capability of the architect and its team in similar projects,with references and contact information for those municipalities. (weighted 25% for evaluation) • Current and anticipated projects with explanation of the team's ability to complete the work of this project in a timely manner. (weighted 25% for evaluation) • Expertise and experience of key individuals relative to similar successful projects, including knowledge of applicable municipal building codes,ADA,EPA and NFPA standards as they apply to Fire Stations. (weighted 25% for evaluation) • Applicable insurance information. (weighted 5% for evaluation) • Consultant information to include references and contact information. (weighted 5% for evaluation) • Demonstrated ability to design similar projects within a fixed budget. (weighted 15% for evaluation) ATTACHMENTS Following this document, attachments include: o Statement of Qualifications Questionnaire, to be prepared and submitted o Acknowledgement and Certification, to be completed&submitted with the SOQ END OF REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS Statement of Qualifications Questionnaire In order to provide the Evaluation and Selection Committee with comparable information about each respondent, we ask that you prepare your own attachment responding to the following areas of inquiry: A. Describe each of your municipal Fire Station projects completed in the last 5 years including: 1.) Name and Location of Fire Station. 2.) Size, Scope and Dollar Value of Construction. 3.) Contact name and telephone number for the municipalities. B. Describe the number and scope of current and anticipated projects and how your firm plans to complete this Fire Station project in a timely manner. C. List all members of the Architectural firm that will be assigned this project, including resumes and statement of experience with similar projects: 1.) List all Licensed Architects that may be assigned this project. 2.) List other licensed professionals that may be assigned this project 3.) List other staff members that may be assigned this project. D. Describe your Professional Liability Insurance status and 5 year history including: 1.) Current coverage limits. 2.) Claims in the past 5 years. 3.) Active claims. E. Describe the potential Sub-Consultants that you might consider for this project including: 1.) Structural Engineers 2.) Mechanical Engineers 3.) Electrical Engineers 4.) Civil Engineers 5.) Specialty Discipline Consultants F. Describe how you expect to manage the many challenging, diversified and unique needs of Fire Station design within a fixed budget. G. Attach any material that you wish to have considered for your firm and your consultants, including photographs, brochures, recommendations, awards, etc. END OF STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE Acknowledgement and Certification We have received Addenda Numbers through All portions of this Statement of Qualifications are true and correct. The undersigned is authorized to sign for and legally bind the Respondent. The undersigned authorizes the City of Wylie, Texas and their representatives to contact any firm, organization, or person listed in this Statement of Qualifications regarding the Respondent's performance, financial condition and other information regarding the Respondent's Capability. Firm: Name: Title: Signed: Date: CITY of . wyLIE STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS Fo R FIRE STATION No. 3 a y gar ,,, * g, �yy a $x 1 d K p�, av # ;Jti ykr t o +Ft a t v rc� uP ^--k te r,. ., RK• �' $ " , r r e -7.4 ,,?'!,-P:..',-",:„ ,;•,:, , :""ft Bali ' 1 .,. �';.�� 7sf1. .. tea 1��'b-.:_-. .,- 111111:10B",e: Irl *r i , t . , -„c:.0.- •--•--;- ,,,4---•_.•:.• ,- lipitillitt 11111111 1, .,,,,,.,z.,..;',.•, ,,,:::..;,'..4,,,i„,:!•,---,1 ,-,7 ,i,,,....,• .4 _ Pi , Ill iiii nill ! ,'L - 't , . haft APRIL 26, SubnliTTFd by: •• a WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY ARCHITECTS 111 1 ■ � WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY ARCHITECTS April 26, 2006 Mark B. Roath, City Manager City of Wylie 2000 North Highway 78 Wylie, Texas 75098 Dear Mr. Roath and Members of the Selection Committee: Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects is pleased to submit the following "Statement of Qualifications" for your consideration. This proposal will remain effective for a period of 60 calendar days. We have enjoyed visiting with members of the Wylie Fire Department at the conferences over the past few years and listening to the needs of the City of Wylie and its Fire Department. We have listened to your concerns about your upcoming project and would like to let you know that we develop creative design solutions for these issues and more on a daily basis, working with various Fire Departments across Texas. As such, we believe Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects is the most qualified architecture firm to work with the City and its Fire Department on this important project. Please allow us to point out a few of the reasons why we believe we are the most qualified architects for your fire station project. • The WHJ Team has demonstrated experience in designing over 50 fire stations, fire administration and EOC facilities in Texas. This unequaled expertise is available to be applied to create a successful project for the City of Wylie. • Our Team is led by Tony Jeffry, AIA who has designed many fire stations, and led numerous Municipal projects similar to this for over 20 years. Project Manager Doug Edney has worked on dozens of fire station projects for over 13 years with WHJ. • Our continuing commitment to our Municipal Clients throughout Texas is reflected in our long-term relationships with many Cities — some of which have been ongoing for over 20 years. We encourage you to contact our references on previous projects; we believe you'll be pleased with what they say about working with us. • We continually support the municipal associations such as the Texas Fire Chiefs Association and the Texas Municipal League, year after year. Additionally, we have written articles published in Texas Fire Chief • The WHJ design team has earned a reputation for creative design solutions that meet the particular needs of each community. Our designs reflect the individual and unique character of the community which they serve. We have won several design awards that attest to our commitment to design excellence. Please accept this submittal as our sincere desire to serve as your architect on this important project. We look forward to the opportunity to demonstrate our resolve and commitment to serve you on this exciting project. Sincerely, Anthony M. Je y, AIA r Wiginton Hooker Jeffry, P.C. —A ( ects Dallas: 9696 Skillman St. sure 255 Dc k 1s, Texas /5743 2 14-349 ,`,8 Fc x 2 1 4- =19-2522 Austin: 51 13 Scrshwa.°t P9. y Suito 260 Austin, Texas 78735 512-447-1418 Fax 5 1 2-448 0 107 Houston: 2425\A,-�st 1ckhp S`. r.1tP1 S1_ittt-: 20) 1 kCAr.vl, I xc_s 77027 713-297-8892 Fclx: 713-297-8864 tri/1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 FIRM QUALIFICATIONS SECTION 2 PROJECT EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 PROJECT TEAM SECTION 4 INSURANCE SECTION 5 PROJECT APPROACH SECTION 6 REFERENCES & AWARDS .„.•••••14.4,,,vi.,•. ,,. , ,. t •. • .c-.i:...•,-:.,:',,- -•F tr. •• s:- +• • :. i'-' '); .,-., !-‘'..,-.;:•.,.., ' ' \`-:44'.1"- . ----.--,v-•...'',0414, . I. -41. , , •-.• •biz;„ .• .)'.• , • ,, •.:,.... , ,... . , ';',*,,04' ;; ' ' ' ,; ' :, ,) i ,-.I . • , • -* liti.4b ...lI . .. . . ;:,-{t-4,-=-A i , i • a•a• i' 1;.. , .•iPs tiv;,7. ' , ; °4'Ai .-. .":1 ‘ 2 . 4. - ' .. .-(‘- . ,• . ' . . 'Xig. -.7j' ,,•". ',It: ., 1 . *, t.*. 34- •, •' . '..44" ,..,:' "IC t• i** , •-•-',ZAI:•4... ' -,i'' :.'.'; ".-/'- : ir 44. 1 _,,,,,,,,-...,,..,:t.:;51. ,.. .. • ga 416 I r : •'7„ '"' .., 1 1 I 1 II • 1 -..... • 1 1 r._ , 3 . . -..,... \I.% ..... ,., . ,,.., ..A ik: . : " • ",I e;__ .16,41 - - ---*^,;-•v-,..:......-:,:r-v:-..,-,, ,H121 set. ........_- - o is N s WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY tti( I FIRM QUALIFICATIONS WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY, P.C. - ARCHITECTS Dallas Austin 9696 Skillman, Suite 255 5113 Southwest Pkwy, Suite 260 Dallas, Texas 75243 Austin, Texas 78735 oo'�//,,,,,, Phone: Ph Fax: (214)349-2522 Fax: (512)448-0102 ilk__ '' Houston 2425 West Loop South, Suite 200 Contact Houston, Texas 77027 Tony Jeffry, AIA - Phone: (713)297-8892 jeffryt@whjarch.com Fax: (713)297-8864 (214)349-5559 Professional Corporation Principals of the Firm Partnership Established James O. Wiginton, AIA 1978 Thomas A. Hooker, AIA Incorporated Anthony M. Jeffry, AIA 1994 Donald I. Greer, AIA Gregory G. Schon, AIA Donald F. Olson, AIA Charlie Kearns, RCDD SERVICES Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects has been providing architectural services to Texas Municipalities for over 28 years. As a full service architectural firm, we have built our 40 person staff with multifaceted capabilities. The WHJ staffs uniqueness comes from their diverse fields of specialization. Services include: Architecture, Needs Analysis, Facilities Programming, Master Planning, Space Planning, Site Feasibility/Selection/Planning, Interior Design, Technology Planning, and Construction Management. BACKGROUND Wiginton Hooker Jeffry (WHJ) Architects has focused its practice on public projects since its founding in Dallas in 1978. WHJ specializes in Municipal Needs Assessments, Planning, and Design projects such as the new Fire Station for The City of Wylie. STRENGTHS Our approach capitalizes on specific strengths and efficiencies, in order to maximize the speed of the Facilities Programming and Design process. This is done without sacrificing thorough, functional Planning, Design Quality, Value Analysis and Cost Management, and without sacrificing the management principles behind the Planning. Our strengths include Organization, Project Approach, Communications Plan, Management Plan, Partnering, Cost Control Plans and Total Quality Control. ii WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY V( I FIRM QUALIFICATIONS Particular efficiencies to be employed include: ❑ A Project Team that is complete. -1 Every expertise needed to provide a successful project exists within the Team: Needs �� Analysis, Facilities Programming, Operations Analysis, Fire Station Design, long range Master l . M C 6°° Planning, Space Planning, Architecture, Engineering, Cost Analysis, and Scheduling. 11 ,i_ ❑ A Project Team that is already through the'learning curve". This Team consists of individuals that have successful previous experience working together; . no project time needs to be wasted in a familiarization process. The Team will be productive -'';, immediately. • .7r4 ❑ Continuous project involvement by key personnel. A consistent core of experienced staff will be dedicated to the project, including Principals. We know that maintaining a relatively tight core of personnel will simplify coordination within the Team, and enhance project continuity. ❑ A Project Team that leverages past relevant experience. Key Team members have experience on Municipal projects in Texas for 25 or more years. The availability of this relevant experience will greatly assist our Team in maintaining a fast- paced schedule. Our Team members will not need to spend time trying to discover basic func- tional and economic design principles and, instead, can concentrate on addressing the needs of the City of Wylie. ❑ An established, organized Communications Plan. The Plan keeps critical information flowing smoothly between the Client and all Team members, and enhances coordination of Team efforts. This process, developed over the course of many years and numerous previous projects, includes effective procedures utilizing both verbal and written means of communication. The result is written, chronological cataloging of all information passed among all parties. A corollary result is the elimination of reliance on verbal conversations and human memory. ❑ A comprehensive continuous Quality Control Plan. This ensures that the project goals are continually monitored and ultimately met. Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects is committed to the quality control process. 461 r c ma WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY tit I PROJECT EXPERIENCE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE • Central Fire Station-Flower Mound, TX* • Central Fire Station-Haltom City, TX* • Central Fire Station-Colleyville, TX* • ARFF Station No. 5-DFW Airport, TX* • Fire Station No. 39-Dallas, TX* • Fire Station No. 1 -North Richland Hills, TX* • Fire Station No. 4-North Richland Hills, TX* -` `A • Fire Station No. 1 -Carrollton,TX* rd. i '.; I: i • Fire Station No. 2-Carrollton, TX* Fire Station No. 2-Lewisville,TX • Fire Station No. 3-Sherman, TX • Fire Station No. 2-Seguin, TX* • Fire Station No. 12-Waco, TX* • Fire Station No. 14-Waco, TX* ,, • Fire Station No. 3-Flower Mound, TX* j� • Fire Station No. 3-Colleyville,TX • Fire Station No. 2-Colleyville, TX* • Fire Station No. 5-Irving, TX* N. I • Fire Station No. 2-Converse,TX* " `t • Fire Station No. 11 -Plano, TX* _- • Fire Station No. 3-Longview, TX* '`. ° - • Fire Station No. 4-Longview, TX* • Fire Station No. 2-Little Elm, TX* • Williamson County Fire Station ESD No. 3-Hutto, TX* / • Austin Ranch Fire Station-The Colony, TX* • North Colony Fire Station-The Colony, TX* x=« - • Beltline Road Fire Station-Lancaster, TX* • Fire Station Prototype Design-Del Rio, TX I ' • Fire Station No. 11 and Police Substation No. 1 - Irving, TX on • Fire Station No. 3 Remodel and Addition-Plano, TX* ;= • Fire Station No. 4 Remodel and Addition- Plano, TX* 1— • Fire and EMS Training Facility-Carrollton, TX* ' .y. • Fire Station No. 3 Remodel and Addition-Carrollton, TX* ' : 3" • Fire Station No. 4 Remodel and Addition-Carrollton, TX* ::•._ ii WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY rti I PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Fire Station No. 2 Remodel and Addition—Longview, TX* • Central Fire Station Expansion—Lancaster, TX • Central Fire Station, Training Center, and Fire Administration Remodel and Addition—Lewisville, TX* � % '� Fire Station No. 12 and EOC Master Plan and Programming—Plano, TX* • Fire Station No. 1 and Administrative Office Programming and Planning Study— I Sugar Land, TX* . .Yzy i • Nacogdoches Fire Department Stations Needs Assessment and Feasibility ' '- ' - In Study— Nacogdoches, TX* ___ • Cedar Hill Fire Department Programming and Planning Study—Cedar Hill, TX* :rgiiiiitiliiwar • Public Safety Building (Central Fire Station, Police Headquarters, and Municipal Courts) Planning and Design—Mexia, TX* • Public Safety Building (Central Fire, Police Headquarters, and Municipal Courts) . ,._. . ,-X Needs Analysis, Programming, Schematic Design—Flower Mound, TX* rk� ci • Fire Station, Police, Courts, and City Hall Programming and Space Planning- Mesquite, TX* ,' ' * • Fire Station, Jail, Courts, City Hall and Administrative Offices—Lancaster, TX* ll 'pitil t ` • Fire and Police 911 Communications Center—Garland, TX ;„ 1 • Travis County 911 Dispatch Center(Fire and EMS)Study Programming and '+ 1 1k 4�' Planning—Austin TX* s ` , s4111111r. • Fire Administration and Municipal Court—Seguin, TX* II Missouri City EOC and Municipal Court—Missouri City, TX* na1 ' 1i 5 t *INCLUDED PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING ,v,-,,, ' ', ,,: , ,` ,':‘fs'-it"-‘,',7,44...- irt::,-"i';':si f 1 f'7104g,t4i:i..1-3:?';':'-: ' — ' ' 't`a� a k 5 +.2 w,'i vim'` o'- A3 " _ , s 7 of v a,,*•x rF b ,,-, i } e A� x,. ii WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY PROJECT EXPERIENCE DESIGN PHILOSOPHY Wiginton Hooker Jeffry believes that design is problem solving. As such, design is a process that responds to the many forces and variables that influence the project. Our Design Process begins with responding to these many influences by first defining, and then prioritizing them. Purpose of the building and functional demands of the Users are usually the greatest form giver to design and planning, a fundamental part of design. Therefore, our design process is a team effort wherein the Client and building's Users are an integral part. Good ideas and design concepts come from well defined needs and understanding of the problems that must be solved. Who better to define them than the Client and Users. Ultimately, we believe that every design project has the responsibility to make a contribution to the community and setting in which it is located. It must respect the intrinsic values that may exist, and bridge the transitions of the community's aspirations. On the following pages are images illustrating some of our recent facilities. Though similarities may exist, no two projects are alike because we design to meet the Owner's and Client's specific needs for each project. This is true for the building designs and landscaping as well. Each project responds to the unique conditions of the site and operational requirements of the facilities. There is more than one right way to solve a problem, meet a requirement and satisfy the demands of a project. We look forward to working closely with you in finding the best possible solutions to all the needs of your project. , ..--Ph;? • y . ? m I I ; i i a �I — -4 :. i31 WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY V( PROJECT EXPERIENCE ,L Na"'`.: Dallas Fire Station No. 39 p„ • , !_3,>! ta,,t Lt. Jerry Minter ;e No. 214-670-3098 Ccr ',�;,; Cc,:' $2,160,000 Sizo 12,140 GSF T✓c New Construction S;onstruut_: ,_,i(, c,_r July 2003 P' 1 '`-' Project is a 12,000 square-foot 4 bay fire station, 2 of which are double deep bays. This station is replacing the current Station No. 39 that is over 50-years-old. This project includes office and sleeping quarters for the Battalion Chief and Captain, with an additional 12 beds for firefighters. The facility also includes a fitness room and study, and has an all stainless steel kitchen. i r G = r I t -j� yj77 .:j it • a le , y y`. • N a •f J1 ' ,. ; ,•• 11 1 is WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY rill PROJECT EXPERIENCE Project Nam, ARFF Station No. 5 — Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Project Coated Chief Alan Black or James Wallace Phone (e'o 972-574-5560 Construction Cc,:-: $5,105,000 S 23,280 GSF Iy r New Construction Tonstructron Compiai _: August 2003 Project De ct,' This 23,000 square-foot facility contains a total of 6 drive-thru bays, split in location with 3 apparatus bays on one side and 3 EMS Response on the other side. It was also designed with 15 private sleeping quarters, offices, multi-purpose training rooms, study area, and fitness / wellness center. This facility was constructed to increase response capability to DFW's terminals and other airport buildings. K ► _ ,,pit-' , , tom,," a. r.'° �'4* _ v r;�' ?:= T ., y„ + � .I t -a }44. ar 1 r 4. KG oily Y C '" "Y�fC�' '" - MINI;'��,- . .yy 4 r.-$4. rd' ' i® WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY PI/1 PROJECT EXPERIENCE i "ct'Nair Haltom City Central Fire Station ' . i Contact. Chief Jerry McEntire `k '' ' .91;e No. 817-222-7727 T l['�I � ' on Cot $3,000,000 II S; 20,000 GSF 4 . r'I�' Ti.., , New Construction i _ ;1 c July 2004 1 s le e-i,�) This 20,000 square-foot facility is a new Central Fire Station that includes both administrative and fire response functions. Fire response amenities include living quarters for 11 firefighters, 4 double deep drive-thru apparatus bays and a full service Community Exam Room. Administrative Functions include offices, copy, storage and break area. Also included is a training/community room with full multimedia capabilities. Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Atz completed all Programming and Design for this fire station. WHJ served as the Fire Station li Specialist, and advised the Architect of Record Randall Scott on issues specific to fire stations as he prepared documents and performed Construction Administration services. • I , ��- _ - 1Y /�14 . 4M ZOO" 7,1 10 ___, .. 1 1. ate' 1.. i • T !i ce 1 `1. �. iJI ?'J ` .a :, , � ,� JCL n7 5a /10,1.' ;ft yr, �i,, r It ; .`� -Y. '`y �.a >T..v 'ram R t ..,-, �+ ..A41v,, .- ea k+ , . _ ,..t i 4 .. -' 3'r 11 a':„,,:,,,,4,1..- +g. 7�, s• }_Y 4 13 "� 4 -v • rf x `+. _ f e 1..f4 -7'. *Pet:4,*I'r,.44'7.,'*-71 4 ---ell--- 1 'r,L4-1 xw �� '\ �..::3 r, r µ Nt r..�)♦I♦ '.4r -:Y. �° 1 % i) NIA ' � r_ ! • • Y i2 WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY PiI PROJECT EXPERIENCE Project Name: North Richland Hills Fire Stations No. 1 and No. 4 elk , Project Contact: Chief Andy Jones s: Phone No.: 817-427-6918 Construction Cost: Station 1: $1,900,000 Station 4: $1,660,000 ' ': t a -_ Size: Station 1: 11,925 GSF Station 4: 14,320 GSF 1 _ Type: New Construction 'Nia _ _ ;onstruction Completed �' + p Summer and Fall 2005 4 `. 4. ` . — r' Project Description: Fire Station No. 1 This 12,000 square-foot facility contains 4 drive-thru bays. It is designed with sleeping and living quarters for 8 firefighters. Design includes an Officer office, fitness / wellness center, medical exam room, decontamination room, clean room, and additional support spaces. 1 4` �)y Y 4� j 4 t t Fire Station No.4 This 14,000 square-foot facility contains 5 drive-thru bays. It is designed with sleeping and living quarters for 8 firefighters. Design includes an Officer office, fitness / wellness center, medical exam room, decontamination room, clean room, SCBA testing, compressor room and additional support spaces. Also included is a Battalion Chiefs suite with office and sleeping quarters. ,/. s Wiginton Hooker Jeffry completed all Programming and Design for these two fire stations. WHJ served as the Fire Station Specialist, and advised the Architect of Record Randall Scott on issues specific to fire stations as he prepared documents and performed Construction Administration services. Ili WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY Pit PROJECT EXPERIENCE --.0, Company No,-O n� Project Name. Flower Mound Central Fire Station j Project Contact. Chief Eric Metzger ';. Phone No.: 972-539-7778 ,r.R. Construction Cost: $2,275,000 wpw in Size 18,700 GSF i •'JR �1 _ ' z Type. New Construction ;ter, :ma c ..— ' . s ;onstruction Completed November 1998 -- Project Description Services included programming and full architectural services for an 18,700 square-foot combined central fire station and fire administration facility. The central fire station consists of 3 double deep drive-thru apparatus bays, dayroom, kitchen, dining, study, laundry, dormitories and bathroom facilities for 10 firefighters. There is a separate Officer's quarters, Battalion Chiefs working and living quarters, and fitness room. The training center has an administrative / training wing that includes offices, a conference room, file, copy, storage room, break room, and a large sub dividable multi-purpose training room with full audio-visual system including rear screen projection. a -- - ;o. _ ` ' 2 i .,I,am--:.—i-".'''-l.s::-',a.. ''i.....a-.-.:.1t' ; ) II- _- 40�-Lk- 'V �, e -,t ."• ..i ".gr it.46 ''./'�.y y" py s ,i ' f t3, . 7. _'y,f + ""R fF►- r ti „ ram*"' '' i• WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY Pit I PROJECT EXPERIENCE Project Name: Plano Fire Station No. 11 Protect Contact: Chief Kirk Owen Phone No.: 972-941-7159 Construction Cost: $2,200,000 Size. 11,200 GSF Type: New Construction �r struct,or; Cc n;p ...A,!: Estimated June 2006 Prc'j,ct Dercr i'tt' " This 11,200 square-foot facility contains 3 drive-thru bays. It is designed with living quarters for 8 firefighters and a private Officer's quarters, a study, fitness room, decontamination room, and additional support spaces. This fire station is currently under construction, and is estimated for completion in the spring of 2006. 4 < �i j t,ziP ' r . y: nr�fQw 6• "e ± i 7- , -firs * .% #• •• - ' -N t e•�D .x i- Ili r• ii WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY tti PROJECT EXPERIENCE F- ot Nam Carrollton Fire Stations No. 1 and No. 2 P; t Contact Gary Nesbit none No.; 972-466-3070 Cc ,onn Cost $3,800,000 (Combined budget for both stations) Station 1: 8,400 GSF Station 2: 12,118 GSF Tys= New Construction Construc C_:'-,pJa1,.; October 2004 Pry This project consisted of the design of two new stations to replace existing facilities. The designs for the two stations used a prototype approach with similar layouts and include the same core areas such as Lobby, Report Room, Study, Kitchen, Laundry, Restrooms, Fitness, Decontamination and Shop. Fire Station No. 1 is an 8,400 square-foot facility that was built adjacent to the existing Station No. 1, includes accommodations for 7 personnel, and has 3 drive-thru bays. .a4i,4( .illitimitt,, .4 pe' :,,i..w.;:f 4:*4 l', ,s,..i.V;:ilf..:Ii: it:.: ,,.:1,: 1 dlt,ji i.,,1 A7, _ ._.: . ° Mat 7.,.. ,., ,, ,,, — i,-. , , :,.... .4_ _,_ s . t.. , i ., . . _ - ,,, _. --- . _ , _ . —� iiiii -- ,, ?.,.; . it Fire Station No. 2 is a 12,118 square-foot facility built on a new site, built to replace the existing Station No. 2. It has accommodations for 13 personnel, including Battalion Chief Quarters, and 4 drive-thru bays. Station No. 2 was also designed to accommodate future expansion of a 1,300 square-foot multi-purpose training suite that could be operated independently of station activities, and would include its own separate entrance, office, restroom, storage and break area. E4 - L,4, -,,,,,?:44,-;,-.,-;.1...1,,,,,,4::,,04.-7(7...-- :,..,,,,,,,.4,..,- , '''''''4,,N„.. ...........L...1 _ ''''."-44, '‘,°.''T.:".._, ';',:;..;:.:,,,,-....;, !-.....„44-t::,, , y tfr,l�f 1 a�( ��� , r na S siy +$-, Or T i; WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY Ptit I PROJECT EXPERIENCE Project Name: Flower Mound Fire Station No. 3 Project Contact: Chief Eric Metzger Phone No.: 972-539-7778 Construction Costa $1,207,000 Size: 9,000 GSF Type: New Construction uiJstruction Completed: June 1999 Project Description: Facility was designed to blend with residences in the neighborhood. Project consists of a new 9,000 square-foot fire station with 2 double deep apparatus bays, living quarters, Officer's quarters, study, fitness room and support spaces. Facility is designed as a proto- type for future Town sub-stations. A separate training / community room located off the main lobby is available for neighborhood meetings and training functions. a'st. rr x U g R M7 S Mf 9 , %--1.,::':-`1,',.-.'i-:A,:it,,,-;-,,,,t,;!:i t, ' ____,4, ., "�w ', , /' k W wf-4pµ #Spy �r Ar \---14141 r.' v ------- f j t i i I I r I I iE WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY MINIIIMI Pi PROJECT EXPERIENCE Project Name: Colleyville Northwest Fire Station Project Contact: Chief Mike Johnston Phone No.: 817-488-6277 Construction Cost: $908,230 Size. 6,200 GSF Type: New Construction Construction Completed. February 2000 Project Description Services included programming and full-service architecture for this 6,200 square-foot substation. This facility consists of 2 double deep drive-thru bays & support areas. It also has a living room, kitchen, dining, fitness, laundry, sleeping rooms, bathroom facilities for 5 firefighters, plus separate Officer's quarters and duty office. The facility is situated on future park land, and was designed to blend-in with a rural farm theme planned for the park. , Ail id63N ,_t__ t , imp] • VN • mow n , , , __ ,,i, ......, . , I ., . .., 4, ". ..z... , 1 . __ _,. f.,... .r., . .„ . ,,... , .74,7. .,. .E...;Ft . a r: fir = 1 /7 CV", . ...... ,,,.1 i .—.:A: 4,21.°t,T.. .....„:', ,„ , . __ , , -v .- . , ___ ,...-. ,. I • ....: 74.- - . _. .. ;,,,,r, , .. , . I +rA t in WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY 1 pi 1 PROJECT EXPERIENCE CURRENT PROJECTS Below is a list of current fire station projects in our office at this time. Our firm has 40 personnel, 30 of whom are in our Dallas office. We have multiple staff which work on this project type. We have ample staff available and ready to work on Fire Station No. 3 for the City of Wylie. Plano Fire Station No. 11 2.20 million 80% Construction complete Plano Fire Station No. 12 and EOC 10.5 million Schematic Design Longview Fire Station No. 2 and 4 2.7 million Bid and Award Little Elm Fire Station No. 2 2 million Bid and Award _ North Colony Fire Station 2.20 million Design Development Colleyville Fire Station 1 and 2 4 million _ Design Development I °°,, t. y s .,.,... t aa, Y i3 WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY PROJECT TEAM PROJECT TEAM Leading this project team as Principal-in-Charge will be Tony Jeffry, AIA. Tony is a Principal and Partner of Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects. With over 23 years of experience, he has led and designed many public projects for Municipalities such as this, including over 20 fire stations. Doug Edney will serve as Project Manager and carry the project through Construction Administration. Doug joined the firm in 1993, and has worked on numerous projects in these roles. He has experience on over 25 fire stations, and has a thorough understanding and knowledge of the unique requirements and operations of this building type. These men offer the City of Wylie and its Fire Department an unequalled level of expertise and service. Also included in this chart are our proposed consultants for this project team. We have chosen these consultants based on their excellent reputation and performance on past projects. We are currently working, and have completed numerous projects, with each of these firms. We believe they will provide superior service to the City of Wylie on the Fire Station No. 3 project. However, if there is a local civil engineering company the City prefers to use for this project team, Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects can negotiate a contract with them. © CITY OF WYLIE TONY JEFFRY DOUG EDNEY PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT DESIGNER CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATOR ® WHJ STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PRODUCTION and ISBELL ENGINEERING 'r SUPPORT STAFF MEP ENGINEERS MD ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERS PACHECO KOCH• �. LANDSCAPES ARCHITECTS' SMR LANDSCAPE ARCH= TECHNOLOGY DESIGN ° WHJ ARCHITECTS III is WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY tifilt i PROJECT TEAM Anthony M. Jeffry, AIA Principal-in-Charge / Project Designer Anthony Jeffry has served as architect and planner on numerous Fire Station projects for over 20 years in the firm of Wiginton Hooker Jeffry, P.C. - Architects. Mr. Jeffry has worked closely with a variety of Clients to help them determine and solve their building needs. He has extensive experience designing and planning Fire Stations, Correctional Facilities, and other public buildings. He has served in the processes of needs analysis, feasibility studies, renovation of existing buildings, and planning and design of new facilities. Mr. Jeffry received his Bachelor of Architecture degree from the University of Arizona. He is registered professionally in the State of Texas. His professional affiliations include the American Institute of Architects, Texas Society of Architects, and the Dallas Chapter American Institute of Architects. The following is a representative listing of Tony Jeffry's extensive Fire Station project experience. Representative Project Examples: L. • ARFF Station No. 5- DFW Airport, TX rii } • Central Fire Station- Haltom City, TX .� , � -----. • Fire Station No. 1 - North Richland Hills, TX '.- '�' A __; • Fire Station No.4- North Richland Hills, TX i�i�' i ■ S E I-; -er • Fire Station No. 5- Irving, TX •.. W. • Fire Station No. 1 -Carrollton, TX W4` . . "` " " • Fire Station No.2-Carrollton, TX • Fire Station No. 11 - Plano, TX • Fire Station No. 12 and EOC Master Plan and Design- Plano, TX • Fire Stations No. 3 Remodel and Addition- Plano, TX • Fire Station No. 4 Remodel and Addition- Plano, TX • Fire Stations No. 2, No. 3, and No.4- Longview, TX • Fire Station No. 2- Little Elm, TX • Fire Station No. 3 - Flower Mound,TX • Central Fire Station/Administration/Training Facility- Flower Mound, TX • Fire Station No. 2-Colleyville, TX • Central Fire Station - Colleyville, TX • Northwest Fire Station No. 3 - Colleyville, TX • Fire Station No. 39- Dallas, TX • Central Fire Station Remodel and Addition - Lewisville, TX • Fire Station No. 2- Lewisville, TX • Prototype Fire Station Design- Del Rio, TX • Fire Department Stations Study- Sugar Land, TX Ell WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY rift 1 PROJECT TEAM Douglas A. Edney Project Manager/ Construction Administrator Mr. Edney has served as Project Manager and Construction Administrator on numerous Municipal / Governmental projects. He joined the Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects team in September of 1993. Mr. Edney has worked closely with a variety of Clients to help them determine and solve their building needs, and has developed a strong technical background in Fire Stations. Mr. Edney received his Bachelor of Environmental Design degree from Texas A&M University. His professional affiliations include Associate Member of the American Institute of Architects. His experience includes needs analysis, feasibility studies, renovation of existing buildings, planning and design of new facilities, and construction administration. A representative list of Doug Edney's project experience is listed below. Representative Project Examples: • Fire Station No. 2- Colleyville, TX • Central Fire Station - Colleyville,TX • Northwest Fire Station No. 3 - Colleyville, TX • Austin Ranch Fire Station-The Colony, TX • North Colony Fire Station -The Colony, TX • Fire Station No. 2- Little Elm, TX • Fire Station No. 39- Dallas, TX • Fire Station No. 1 - North Richland Hills, TX • Fire Station No. 4- North Richland Hills, TX • Fire Station No. 11 - Plano,TX • Fire Station No. 3 Remodel and Addition - Plano, TX • Fire Station No. 4 Remodel and Addition - Plano, TX • Fire Station No. 11 and Police Sub-Station No. 1 - Irving, TX • Fire Station No. 5- Irving, TX • Fire Station No. 1 - Carrollton, TX • Fire Station No. 2 - Carrollton, TX • Central Fire Station/Administration/Training Facility- // Flower Mound, TX C% • Fire Station No. 3- Flower Mound, TX5. • Fire Stations No. 2, No. 3, and No. 4 - Longview, TX _ • Central Fire Station Remodel and Addition - Lewisville, TX /) am • Fire Station No. 2 - Lewisville, TX `,..-- • Prototype Fire Station Design- Del Rio, TX r, 1 MI • Fire Station No. 2 - Seguin, TX L,1 _ • Fire Department Stations Study- Cedar Hill, TX ar.»,, '"At.R - II WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY ri( I PROJECT TEAM ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS These are our proposed consultants for this project team. We have chosen these consultants based on their excellent reputation and performance on past projects. We are currently working, and have completed numerous projects, with each of these firms. We believe they will provide superior service to the City of Wylie on the Fire Station No. 3 project. However, if there is a local civil engineering company the City prefers to use for this project team, Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects can negotiate a contract with them. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ISBELL ENGINEERING GROUP 1405 West Chapman Sanger, Texas 76266 940.458.7503 RIFG I Sift1 EVGI III tI N6 OUour MEP ENGINEERS MD ENGINEERING, LLP 9696 Skillman St., Suite 205 Dallas, Texas 75243 214.340.5966 ihA = 205X I, aIMI 465lS SIdF'r�St She 205�Teem 75243 214343-5%6 roc 2143416163 CIVIL ENGINEERS PACHECO KOCH CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 8350 N. 75 Central, Ste 1000 Dallas, Texas 75206 972. 235.3031 11JPacheco Koch Consulting Engineers LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS SMR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. 1708 N. Griffin St. Dallas, Texas 75202 214.871.0083 smr Landscape Architects, Inc. N M▪ WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY COMPANY BACKGROUND Isbell Engineering Group ("IEG") is a mid-sized, rapidly expanding, multi-disciplined profes- sional firm. IEG offers a full range of services including Structural, Civil, Geotechnical, Envi- ronmental, Construction Materials Testing, Surveying, and Design!Build. Our main office is > located in Sanger, TX—with branch offices in Fort Worth and Denison,TX. z Founded in 1977,IEG has done over 4,000 projects to date. We have provided services across a wide array of industries within 37 states for companies big and small (many of whom have been repeat clients). While no project is too small, we have the resources, talent and experience to handle the largest, most complex requirements. Currently, we have an aggregate staff of over 45 and are licensed to practice engineering in 40 states. SERVICES PROVIDED STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING Educational Pier Inspections Commercial Concrete Placement Observation and Testing Industrial Soil Densities,site work,utility trenches,etc. Financial Aggregates Churches Reinforcing Steel Governmental Structural Steel Multi-Family Living Masonry Medical Facility Mortars/Grouts Concrete Cylinder Testing CIVIL ENGINEERING Full Service Soils Laboratory Site and Land Development Master Planning OTHER SERVICES Urban Planning Environmental GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Phase I Site Geotechnical Investigations Storm Water Pollution Prevention Expansive Soil Prediction Expansive Soil Modification Deep Foundation Design Design/Build Pavement Recommendations and Design Retaining Wall Design Total Project Management, Start To Finish Soil/Structure Interaction Selection& Supervision Of All Project Vendors Geotechnical Forensics Integration Of Design, Engineering&Construction Master Coordination Of Entire Project Life Cycle SURVEYING Topographic Surveying Construction Staking Boundary Line Surveying Platting 151E11 ENGINEERING GROUP S1 i:. ; It R:11 . t I111 • cl'r 011't.11\it \I • c ;1V�iM1'c 110\ \I.\1-I RI \i , • ‘l 14% 1 ': 11641 9695%li rgn St SUte'235 Mks,'Yews 75243 21434 6956 Fax 214-343,5163 FIRM INTRODUCTION Michael Smith, PE, founder and President, established MD Engineering in December of 2003. MD Engineering is a full service Mechanical, Plumbing, Fire Protection and Electrical Engineering firm located in Dallas, Texas, and with additional project management in Starkville, Mississippi. Mr. Cato joined the firm in December, 2003, with David Mindrup, PE,joining the firm in March, 2004. Mr. Smith and Mr. Cato have worked together as a team for over six years at previous firms. Mr. Smith and Mr. Mindrup have worked together as a team at a previous firm for over four years. They have developed a team approach to project management that assures a prompt response to the Client's needs. MD Engineering is committed to: • Engineering Quality - designing systems that perform the result intended. • Energy Conservation - analysis of innovative, as well as proven, design alternatives to determine the most effective use of available energy options. • Owner Involvement - in decisions on how money is to be spent for engineering systems. We evaluate and explain the options to insure that each project dollar is spent most effectively. • Cost Control - designing systems that achieve the required results at minimum initial cost consistent with reliability and economical life cycle costs. • On Time Completion - prompt response throughout each project and scheduling management to assure timely delivery of all engineering documents. • Project Coordination - deliver a coordinated project in accordance to the needs of the final user. Our design team has worked together on several similar projects and has developed the understanding and communication skills to assure their individual trades are well coordinated with the works of other trades. MD Engineering, LLP is comprised of a group of talented experienced individuals who each have experience in the engineering field, and who each embrace a strong sense of professionalism and teamwork. Most of the MD Engineering staff has worked previously for construction companies and are familiar with, and sensitive to, the issue of construction cost. This construction experience is an important consideration with respect to project phasing and systems designed. Individual Position Years of Experience Michael Smith,P.E. Project Manager /Mechanical Engineer 14 David Mindrup,P.E. Project Manager/Electrical Engineer 36 George Cato Project Manager 12 Stan Johnston Electrical Designer 37 Billy Avila Mechanical Designer 25 Laura Braswell CAD 8 Alex Natareno CAD 2 ENGINEERIN LIP 96%SMh'bn St Sate 205 Oaks,Teas 75243 214343-5566 Fa,c 214-340-6163 MD ENGINEERING, LLP and its staff have extensive experience in Municipal and public projects. Below is a very brief and partial listing of that experience. FIRE STATIONS • Fire Station No. 2—Little Elm, Texas • Fire Station No. 12 and EOC—Plano,Texas • Williamson County E.S.D.No. 3 —Hutto,Texas • Fire Station No.2 Renovation—Longview,Texas • Fire Station No.3 Renovation—Longview, Texas • Fire Station No.4—Longview,Texas • Fire Station No. 2—Converse, Texas • Austin Ranch Fire Station—The Colony, Texas • North Colony Fire Station—The Colony, Texas • Central Fire Station—Colleyville,Texas • Fire Station—Colleyville,Texas • Fire Department Renovations—Carrollton,Texas • Highland Park Town Hall Fire Station Addition and Renovation—Highland Park Texas • Dallas Fire Station No. 39—Dallas,Texas • Fire Station—Columbus, Mississippi EDUCATIONAL(UNIVERSITY & K-12) • Texas Southern University, Gray Hall School of Pharmacy Addition and Renovations— Houston, Texas • University of Texas at Tyler, Student Health&Kinesiology Building—Tyler, Texas • Student Center Annex and Renovation, University of Texas at Dallas—Richardson,Texas • DISD 2002 Bond Program, 10 Schools with differing levels of renovation—Dallas,Texas • DISD Sports Complex—Dallas, Texas • MSU Greenhouses, Mississippi State University—Mississippi State, Mississippi • Hastings Hall Renovation, Mississippi University for Women—Columbus, Mississippi • LINT—Administration Building, 3rd Floor Renovation—Denton,Texas • MSU Scales Support, Mississippi State University—Mississippi State, Mississippi • Gentry High School Renovation—Indianola, Mississippi • Houston High School Addition and Renovation—Houston, Mississippi • Houston Lower Elementary School—Houston, Mississippi • West Lowndes High School—Columbus, Mississippi • Tremont Elementary Addition—Tremont, Mississippi • Mantachie High School Addition—Mantachie, Mississippi • Fulton Elementary School— Fulton, Mississippi • Houlka Tech Prep—Houlka, Mississippi • Thrasher School Addition—Thrasher, Mississippi • Wheeler School Addition—Wheeler, Mississippi RECREATIONAL/ENTERTAINMENT • Waxahachie Civic Center Energy Analysis and Improvements—Waxahachie, Texas • Dallas Convention Ctr. Theater/Chilled Water Interconnection—Dallas, Texas FIRM PROFILE Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers, Inc. was formed in Dallas in 1990 to provide quality professional civil engineering and land surveying services to both private and public sector clients. The goal of the company was,and still is,to combine the latest technology in engineering and surveying with a responsive,client-oriented staff to produce the best professional service possible. The principals of the firm,Mark A. Pacheco, P.E., R.P.L.S. and James A. Koch,Jr., P.E., R.P.L.S., as well as the associate principals are personally involved with all phases of every project to help facilitate success of the project and client satisfaction. Due to the involvement of the principals, Pacheco Koch furnishes its clients with a unique, service-oriented product,stressing timeliness and responsiveness,through continuous direct contact between the principal and the client. The combination of Mr. Koch's extensive experience in the private development and surveying fields with Mr. Pacheco's experience in municipal engineering,construction and surveying, allows Pacheco Koch to provide a unique insight to our clients for all civil engineering and surveying projects. Our staff of over seventy employees,including more than a dozen professional and graduate engineers,has the capability and experience to provide civil engineering design and consulting services on a wide variety of projects. Our private sector projects include raw land development,site development for commercial,retail,industrial and institutional projects, and single-family and multi-family residential projects. Our public sector projects include municipal,county, state and federal facilities, K-12 and higher educational facilities, streets, highways and public utilities. Our commitment to technology continues today as our staff performs all services on a network of workstations utilizing only the latest versions of design and drafting software available. To facilitate smooth integration with other design consultants during the design effort,we are capable of operating a variety of platforms including AutoCAD and Microstation. Pacheco Koch personnel receive ongoing training and continuing education to ensure that they are the most qualified staff possible. Comprehensive, in-house,professional land surveying services are an important part of the services offered by Pacheco Koch. Our seven survey crews employ electronic total stations with computerized data collection for all surveying tasks. Pacheco Koch also utilizes the latest technology in Global Positioning System(GPS)surveying equipment when appropriate to meet the project goals. Our surveying department can provide services on a wide variety of projects ranging from small title surveys to large, complex design and control surveys for major developments. Pacheco Koch also has well established professional relationships with a number of consultants to provide landscape architecture, Geotechnical engineering, subsurface utility engineering and lighting design for our projects if requested. Pacheco Koch has received recognition numerous times for the quality and success of our services. Most recently,we were chosen by SMU's Caruth Institute for Entrepreneurship as one of the 2005 Dallas ioo Entrepreneurs. This award recognizes Dallas'fastest growing, most dynamic privately held companies. In 2004, Pacheco Koch received recognition for our valuable contributions to the 2002 DISD Bond Program. In 2001,we were the prime design consultant for the Davis/ Bishop Area Improvement Project which received the Preservation Achievement Award from Preservation Dallas. In addition,we were part of the team awarded the Texas Construction Award of Merit—Public Project for Irving High School Academy. ,j' Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers smr Landscape Architects,Inc. Steven M.Rahn,RLA/ASLA,Principal Brian D.Adams,RLA/ASLA,Principal Allyson R. Rahn,President FIRM PROFILE Founded in 1989 SMR Landscape Architects, Inc. believes in creative, functional design that solves project challenges. Their expertise involves them in a wide variety of projects including retail,office,hotel, multi-family,institutional,industrial park planning,park design,research/planning and residential. SMR has many projects in Texas and throughout the United States. The firm's staff of five design professionals and three support staff allows smr to service the client's requirements and smr takes pride in their history of meeting project deadlines and budget.Smr provides most required services in-house. Services include: * Program Development * Master Planning * Hardscape Design * Construction Documents * Streetscape Design * Construction Observation * Pre-design Budgeting *Schematic Design * Site Graphic Systems * Planting Design * Illustration * Maintenance Guidelines *Site Inventory and Analysis * Design Development * Entry Feature Design * Irrigation Design * Interior Planting Design * Post-Construction Evaluation *Ordinance Evaluations * Phasing Studies * Plaza Design * Cost Analysis *Water Feature and Pool Design * Computer-Aided Drafting SMR Landscape Architects, Inc. produces innovative designs that interweave functional and aesthetic issues of the project with the economic, architectural and physical site conditions to create unique environments. Concern for high quality design of the project environment has established a record of long-term client relationships. Dedication to providing clients with this excellence and expertise makes every project dynamic, rewarding and exciting. PROJECTS WITH WHJ ARCHITECTS CARROLLTON FIRE STATION#1 Carrollton, Texas CARROLLTON FIRE STATION#2 Carrollton, Texas DALLAS FIRE STATION#39 Dallas, Texas IRVING FIRE STATION#5 Irving, Texas PLANO FIRE STATION#11 Plano, Texas PLANO FIRE STATION #12 AND EOC Plano, Texas NORTH COLLEYVILLE FIRE STATION Colleyville, Texas AUSTIN RANCH FIRE STATION STUDY AND DESIGN Colleyville, Texas PLANO ANIMAL SHELTER Plano, Texas SMR Landscape Architects. Inc. INSURANCE INSURANCE COVERAGE AND CLAIMS Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects carries professional liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 per incident. Following this page is a copy of our insurance certificate. Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects has never had an owner file a claim against us in our 28 years of business. We are not now, nor have ever been, involved in any claims or litigation. h � ;.� r�r. . 'r- ' e�� �'ti g a .1 � r.r tL orl'• - : Ifht.444 - j 4 'ice _ ..✓ qq.. I n. li-r. •� is. ... 1 u o : Sim'A = Yr't _ -....,. ..u...n«c"Al..... f. r .i+vim,. —a.'--+ 110 i• WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY ACORD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE TM 12/06/2005 )DUCER McLaughlin Brunson Insurance Agency THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE 9535 Forest Lane HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR Suite 118 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Dallas TX 75243 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE JRED Wiginton Hooker Jeffry,P.C. INSURER A:United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company 9696 Skillman,Suite 255 INSURER B: St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company Dallas TX 75243 INSURER C: Lexington Insurance Company INSURER D: INSURER E: )VERAGES HE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ,NY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR AAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH 'OLICIES.AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATIOND / LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY BK01258144 11/24/2005 11/24/2006 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) $ 1,000,000 CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) $ 10,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 POLICY X PF O LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BK01258144 11/24/2005 11/24/2006 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 ANY AUTO (Ea accident) ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) X HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY X NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY: AGG $ EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ OCCUR CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ $ DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WVA7407989 05/01/2005 05/01/2006 x T(WIRY I IMITS CFR . EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ 500,000 E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 500,000 E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 500,000 OTHERProfessional 2156742 09/08/2005 09/08/2006 $1,000,000 Per Claim/Aggregate Liability ;CRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSIVEHICLESIEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS claims made professional liability coverage is the total aggregate limit for all claims presented within the policy period I is subject to a deductible. :RTIFICATE HOLDER ADDITIONAL INSURED;INSURER LETTER: CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION • Master Certificate DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER,ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE p. :ORD 25-S(7/97) ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 tri( 1 PROJECT APPROACH I OUR UNIQUE AND SYSTEMATIC PROJECT APPROACH USER GROUP INTERACTION Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects has a planning approach that optimizes the Client and Building Users' involvement in the review or development of the Facilities Program and Design. It is during the early stages of the project that the direction is set that leads to a successful i conclusion. Close teamwork with each other, especially in the early phases of the project, assures that all the objectives of the City are achieved. The successful designdesignJ is a direct result of clear objectives. In order to establish project clear objectives for the project, Wiginton Hooker Jeffry Architects (WHJ) has an interactive �,, �, . , program development process to assist the Client in determining the nature of the project goals. Once the basic program has been established, the team (The City of Wylie, WHJ and our specialty Consultants)then moves to determine the particular elements necessary to achieve the goal, or, make the new Fire Station project a reality. This phase draws heavily from the experience of the individual members of the entire team to identify the tangible and intangible characteristics of the functional program. - Having organized the information into a useable format, the team will proceed to establish the xY , `- specific design criteria for the project. This phase will be even more specific to produce a t f :. I balanced functional, financial, and constructible project. These criteria justify the feasibility and itl, guide the subsequent design efforts. l!'-= il''° A. PRE-DESIGN — MASTER PLANNING . i . Our approach to Pre-Design is an important step in the overall process required to build a successful project. Pre-Design Planning lays the foundation for Design by establishing goals and needs for the future. The work performed in this phase will help create a cost-effective, well- designed/constructed facility that satisfies the needs of the City. To this end, WHJ combines the experience of Pre-Design Planning with the practicality of designing a facility that must be constructed and operated within tight fiscal parameters. Pre- design Planning services include: • Facilities Programming W • Options Analysis • Site Master Planning Al. FACILITIES PROGRAMMING 0 . . The Facilities Program is the procedure required to determine the needs of the facility. This work will lead to the development of conceptual plans. The key tasks performed in this phase include: • Program space requirements for each room in the facility • Develop facility options • Site evaluation and recommendation The facility options, concepts, and implementation program (Project Delivery Plan) developed in the Programming phase will be used as a guide in the early phases of Design. The Programming process of WHJ is unique and effective in many ways. Our Programming is , ?_eit accomplished for the most part in your offices or a suitable space nearby. This is for Client ~ convenience, and to help assure participation by all key parties. '�' 'r,r. Programming is a four-step process. Some steps overlap and even occur concurrently. STEP 1. Establish Goals • Conduct an on-site goal-setting session. Obtain input from appropriate Client representatives to develop consensus project goals as a first step. MN WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY MOM I PROJECT APPROACH As the Facilities Programming moves forward, the Specialty Consultants work with the Architects in developing functional, spatial, and technical requirements. This is shared with the Engineering Consultants who begin developing optional engineering systems to meet the project's needs. A Value Analysis workshop is conducted to test the engineering systems to determine the most appropriate selections that best meet the needs and budgetary constraints of the project. This establishes a "palette" of engineering, architectural, and technical systems with which the Design .• team can be assured will meet the program of requirements, while staying within the budget, a rim \. . very important step in starting the project in the correct direction. With the documentation of the Program of Requirements, the engineering systems, and the major - architectural components, the Design phase begins with clear definition of objectives and feasible systems. This document is used throughout the Design process to confirm that we are meeting . -- all expectations, and is used in key reviews of the Designs with the Consultant team members. A4. MASTER PLANNING As the Facilities Program evolves, WHJ begins looking at Planning implications. This begins with the evaluation of the site for highest and best utilization, planning for future growth, analysis of circulation and parking for public and staff. As Programming and Options Analysis conclude, we will review the information, the future programs at the facility, the spaces required, and the newly prioritized project phasing. Following this, WHJ will review the Master Plan and Building Plan with the City for their comments and approval to continue with Schematic Design. B. COST ESTIMATING AND CONTROL As the project moves into the Design phases, all major design decisions are made with cost impact information, and the project evolves within the confines of a set budget. Therefore, a methodical cost control system must be integrated into the decision making progress. Cost control does not begin at Schematic Design, it begins with establishing goals, scope, and project quality. Costing procedures include: Component Budget Development of a Component Budget system occurs at the conclusion of Programming and is based on the program of requirements and the initial budget established by the Client. During this Pre-Design project analysis, any necessary redistribution of component values is made and all members of the team agree to the resultant Component Budget. The cost analysis is based on construction cost per square footage of recent similar projects. Detailed Estimates Concurrent with the completion of the Schematic Design, Design Development and Construction Documents phases, an estimate of project costs is prepared and reviewed with the project team. Discrepancies between the Design and the budget are resolved with the total project team having input to maintain a balanced Design and budget. C. SCHEMATIC DESIGN / DESIGN DEVELOPMENT Design is when all elements of the building are finalized and a more accurate cost estimate is developed. During this phase, the following are defined: • Update work plan/schedule q • Analyze/confirm site issues • Develop space layouts• Develop dimensional/size aspects of the building(s) • Define building materials • Define building systems: r � • Structural r 11•131• ,; • Mechanical • Electrical • Other special systems ■■ WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY 1111111.1111 Pi PROJECT APPROACH • Develop landscape concepts • Refine construction cost estimate Cl. SCHEMATIC DESIGN Schematic Design will create the solutions to the needs and problems identified during Programming. It will arrange all the spaces, and establish the flow of the public and staff into the optimum arrangement for the operations and safety of all occupants, while satisfying the building codes and standards. These solutions will be kept in balance and satisfy the previously developed organizational, operational, and Facilities Programs, especially the construction budget. C2. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT This is the phase when the A&E team develops many of the technical aspects of the building. The team decides on the type and size of the structural system, mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems, and building materials. This information allows the architects to create a detailed Cost Estimate. Modifications are made at this time, if necessary, to keep the project within the budget. Design Development documents include: • site plan/floor plan(s) • typical wall sections/details • reflected ceiling plan • building section • roof plan • preliminary electronic security systems plans • building elevations • preliminary engineering drawings: civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, security and communications Preliminary estimates of probable project costs, including: �� "' " e x µ • site development • building construction . (✓ • built-in equipment , , 0111 Preliminary estimates of"soft" costs including: tt i�3 • loose furnishings and equipment 1 - !' I" Hui i Tail • professional fees I • updated project schedule 4, ,;; '' L .�, �rf _ -...�1 i O C3. MAINTAINABILITY As the project evolves during Design Development, we review the plans with the Client/User for maintenance considerations. With our extensive experience in these facilities, we generally anticipate and allow for durable materials and finishes that can and will take abuse. In the numerous years of designing and revisiting our projects, we have learned a great deal about what works effectively. In meetings about maintenance considerations, we have the opportunity to discuss their procedures and available equipment for maintenance. We explore differences that are unique to this project and how a more cost effective maintenance program can be achieved through materials, finishes, access space, procedures, and equipment. We try to anticipate potential problems and seek the most durable, time/cost-effective solutions. This process is again repeated as the project gets under construction, and again as it nears completion. These meetings include the trade and subcontractors with their materials and equipment maintenance manuals to assure that the maintenance of the facility is at an optimum with regards to first cost, maintenance cost and operations cost. N▪s WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY 11111111.1 PROJECT APPROACH D. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Upon approval of the Design Development, the Construction Documents phase will begin. During this phase, all decisions on how to construct the facility are finalized and documented for bidding and construction. The following materials will be prepared: • Construction drawings • Technical specifications • Bid guidelines • Final construction cost estimate As the Detail Design work proceeds, we will continue to review the plans and specifications with the City on a regular basis. While major components of engineering systems and building materials have been identified during Design Development, it is important for the Client to be kept aware of their detail applications. Regular reviews, in addition to periodic special design review meetings, will be held in your offices for your convenience. E. INTERIOR DESIGN Our team is particularly well qualified to provide the needed interior design of FF&E services for this project. We perform comprehensive interior architectural design work for many of our Clients. Services include: I • User interviews • Procurement documents O • Composite and individual furniture layouts • Database of facilities management • Equipment placement plans and codes • Furnishing, fabric and finish boards ^ • Coordination of existing furniture (if any) . Furniture standards program • Furniture samples and mockups • Phasing development plan • Vendor selection • Custom furniture design • Furniture illustrations • Acoustics • Cost estimates • Sound reinforcement systems ----�' � d • Source list • Lighting rf I` t • Selection and coordination of new • Procurement management in furniture coordination with City procurement staff Our interior design experience will provide you with up-to- — a , __-- date design and furniture selections that consider the unique � �1 requirements and considerations for your facility. ,'�" '0"� Our exceptionally qualified staff provide interior architecture 1 and comprehensive interior design services. The careful integration of engineering services with interior finishes and architectural components (ceilings, walls, furniture) is systematically approached with each discipline (life safety, security, communications, mechanical, electrical) to assure harmony in all design and maintenance aspects. N il• WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY PROJECT APPROACH F. QUALITY ASSURANCE With the completion of the Design Development phase, and at the 50 percent and final completion stages of the Construction Documents, we will have formal quality assurance reviews of the work completed. This consists of a review team of professionals in each design discipline. This adds another layer of quality control for the checking of the plans and specifications. Representatives of the City and special consultants participate in each quality review session to gain the benefit of their background and expertise through the exchange of ideas and comments. G. BID and AWARD This phase is one of the most important elements in the total process. Even prior to the completion of plans and specifications, we will begin to seek out construction firms, both general contractors and subcontractors, to apprise them in some detail about the project. This will allow those contractors we choose to contact (because of their capabilities) an opportunity to plan ahead to include this project in their schedule for bidding. Services provided during this phase: • We will assist in Pre-qualification of General and Specialty Contractors. • We will assist with the preparation of the official advertisement for bids and continue making contacts in the construction industry, and particularly in the technical specialties fields that are so critical to this project and the competitive bidding process. • We will organize and conduct/participate in pre-bid conferences to answer questions about the project from the, prospective bidders. We will have in attendance technical representatives from our design team to cover all aspects of the project design. We will also be available to answer individual questions/RFI Addenda about the project that may arise prior to bidding. • We will assist with the bid opening process. We will review the bids received, answer any questions the City may have of the bids received, and make our recommendations on the acceptance of the bids. • We will assist the City and their legal counsel in the preparation of construction contracts. We will review the signed documents and the required bonds and insurance certificates before making a recommendation to start construction. H. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION The Construction Administration will be organized according to the needs of the project. Our basic Construction Administration services will include professionals from each of the design team disciplines. These representatives will: • Review all contractors' submittals for material and equipment to be included in the project. • The submittals will be reviewed for compliance with the Contract Documents. These Es`g-� Company No professionals will conduct scheduled project site visits and will also be on call during the Construction phase. Should the Client choose to have full-time, on-site construction .. ""• `"' observation, our team will furnish a qualified individual to provide that service. ,4\ / • A reference file for Client use will be prepared and bound that will include pertinent approved rut. material and equipment submittals and operational manuals for equipment and systems. wow t -'•- • Convene a meeting(s) with the primary equipment and materials suppliers to review their �•- ` � .,- - respective products and equipment with the maintenance staff. This will begin the final determination of acceptable substitutions, maintenance procedures, and support equipment requirements, so that the staff will be fully operational with the opening of the facility. Es WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY Pi( 1 PROJECT APPROACH Our firm will: • Review the monthly construction payment requests and measure the amounts requested according to our opinion of the progress of the work. 4 • Manage the paper flow of these requests and make our recommendations to the City as to the amount of payment. itt .. When the project or a phase of the project has reached substantial completion, we will arrange a - _ formal review of the project that will include the Client representatives, our representatives and .' `..' R. the contractor. From this review, we will prepare a list of work to be completed or corrected, and k� . make a recommendation on acceptance of the work and the amount of payment to the contractor. -' '_ .`,. '" - a , 1 Following notification by the contractor that all work has been completed, we will arrange a review ,,;a ! ` of the project to include the Client, our firm and the contractor. With this review, we will prepare a NIMO n. IA , list of work to be completed or corrected. With this completion in hand, we will make a `k'f ai recommendation to the City on final payment to the contractor and/or the amount to be withheld ..` _--''_ with completion of any remaining items of work. I. POST CONSTRUCTION Post-construction services will include our availability to the Client to answer questions or to assist with problems should they arise. We will also assist the Client in monitoring the one-year construction warranty, and arrange a project review prior to the end of the one-year warranty period. DESIGNING FOR THE CHALLENGING, DIVERSIFIED AND UNIQUE NEEDS OF A FIRE STATION WITHIN A FIXED BUDGET Fire Stations do have many unique needs. These needs, along with the fact that fire stations are generally small buildings, means the cost-per-square foot can be fairly high. Cost control is further complicated by rapidly increasing construction costs. Wiginton Hooker Jeffry works almost exclusively on Municipal and other governmental projects. We are accustomed to working on challenging projects with fixed budgets. Wiginton Hooker Jeffry has a specialization in fire station design. Our firm is continuously designing and bidding fire stations of different designs, construction methods and materials—day in and day out for more then the past decade. We also work with various construction delivery methods such as Construction Manager at Risk and Design-Bid-Build with general contractors. This current and ongoing experience enables us to understand the cost implications of decisions made during the early design phases. This experience also allows us to discuss what we see as important issues and trends. Budget control begins at the start of a project, not during the r t, construction drawing phase. We will work closely with you, the ,- ,''' """ ,I.` Client, to understand your goals for the project. You will be a m° °_ , _, 3 , part of the "team". We will ask many questions, we can •., ti - - ° _ 4,r'! facilitate tours of new fire stations, we will discuss your priorities N - for the project and help you understand options which are 1 - ` ;;1 y`-\( ' available. t ' Once needs, goals and budget are balanced, we will produce i ., ' — the Construction Documents, possibly including bid alternates E - . :. 4 for the City's consideration. , a .,r ii WIGINTON HOOKER JEFFRY .41; FIIE THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF FIRE-RESCUE INTERNATIONAL IN a ■ is CHIEF ■ EVERY DEPARTMENT, EVERY LEADER NOVEMBER 2004 SPECIAL SECTION _,., TAT STYLE Fire Station Design and Construction Autumn 2004 , ,.,,,,:,:,,,,,::,,,,,,,iis.,:_: ::. .., . . ', . ,,, -",'• '::!-::: g :. ;;:*:-' ,.„, --''''''' �_ ' - '_..-.-...,'.. '-<..,, , . ,,' t- ti. -'' 1 , '''' 4.k. 7*.bk'' :r--'' �� .STAT/pN eTs>17:! -277."...'".:-. 11111\ \ .'.Nk '• ,] 10 „,,,t C C E '4REER '''4, WIGINTON ' Ji ARCHITECTS NI/INS SIL ' ► -° „ � z: AWARDS way �', I�. '. ill II ,,e= • Jr- -,,y- .( i \ c, so, ,,t,A___y I . - ii-ellill- ,, :. I\\ #*ff \ 7F CAR/ s 1 _ 1 - --41 aye sIII _ .____ •. _.....„LI,..,. _:',_...:7:•,.• =,,,,,,, . " 1 — )4 .,,t;..,-...::I.g..t. -Ivi, .V,,s.: 1,74,_. . _ -- __, 44 ,,,, y- `. r lT• iit _ w __ i- !Tin • .I : voy le m i / i ... ,... ..1- Request for Proposal for .r .0'14 61 Architectural Design Services 1.1 V ii WYLIE For City of Wylie Fire Station No. 3 April 26, 2006 ...„...„,,.....-,-,- --„, .......,NN.;,.. ...„, 41.• 11 al 6 ib.. it dilil 'i iiii 11 ._J -4 .., 1 4 r-.'.."" it •• .. e• • .,,, .ot F 1r _....1 - .• , 0 a ,....... - 4 Anis Amer17733. • - - ,a, -' .rior x- . 41- _ 411111111! . ,'4it - y.--4,.... - A - 1 •is t ...s I ,.- " ,al.. ...„. ..--- -0 - - 'tin' I .• _.4-;.t- 1 S It . ,..--....- - .... pi 1 1 x f ' i ...* —.-- -d.r-'"All.iir ri RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS Architecture Interiors Planning April 26,2006 Mr.Jim Holcomb Purchasing Manager City of Wylie 2000 North Hwy. 78 Wylie,TX 75098 RE: PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR WYLIE FIRE STATION NO. 3 Dear Jim &Selection Committee Members: Randall Scott Architects, Inc.is pleased to submit our Qualifications for the Wylie Fire Station#3 project. RSA is an award winning 19 year old Architectural, Interiors and Planning firm focused on the pursuit of excellence in Municipal Architecture. RSA's Municipal experience includes each of following project types: Central Fire Stations City Halls&Municipal Courts Fire Substations&Training Facilities Service&Operations Centers Fire Administration Facilities Animal Services&Adoption Centers First Responder Training Facilities Recreation Centers Police&Law Enforcement Centers Nocds Assessments&Master Flans Having specialized in Municipal Architecture for 15 of our 19 years, RSA has been the Architect of Record on 5 Fire Stations and over$150M in Municipal projects. RSA's distinguished Municipal Clients include: The City of Dallas,TX The City of North Richland Hills,TX The City of Granbury,TX The City of Richland Hills,TX The City of Commerce,TX The City of Haltom City,TX The City of Corinth,TX The City of Grand Prairie,TX The City of Center,TX The City of Grapevine Town of Prosper, TX Texas Dept. of Transportation In the enclosed Proposal,we intend to communicate the RSA Consulting Team's successes and commitment in the following areas: ► RSA was awarded Second Place by National Fire Chief Design Awards in 2004 for our Haltom City Central Fire Station project ► RSA's expertise and specialization in Municipal Architecture(over$150M) ► RSA's experience together with our proposed Consultants on 5 Fire Station projects in the DFW Area in the past 4 Years ► Randall's commitment to be personally involved in your project from beginning to end and to commit RSA's resources as necessary to provide the City with the finest Fire Station possible) We believe the RSA Consulting Team to be the most highly qualified Design Partner for the Wylie Fire Station No. 3 facility. Thank you for considering the RSA Consulting Team for this vital Project to both the City and RSA! Sincerely, '/ - 4 A-/A • Randall B.Scott,AIA President&CEO TABLE OF CONTENTS RANDAl1_ SCOTT ARCHITECTS INC, , PART ONE RSA FIRM INFORMATION & UNIQUE QUALIFICATIONS A. FIRM INFORMATION &UNIQUE QUALIFICATIONS B. RSA'S MUNICIPAL ARCHITECTURE EXPERIENCE C. RSA'S ABILITY TO UNDERTAKE THE PROJECT D. RSA DESIGN AWARDS E. CONSULTING TEAM INFORMATION 1. RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS-PRIME 2. REED WELLS BENSON-MEP ENGINEERS 3. JASTER QUINTANILLA-STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 4. PACHECO KOCH-CIVIL ENGINEERS&SURVEYORS 5. TALLEY ASSOCIATES-LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PAN IV/0 PROPOSED TEAM A. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART B. CONSULTING TEAM RESUMES 1. RANDALL B. SCOTT,AIA-PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE(RSA) 2. GREGORY J. CONAWAY,AIA-PROJECT DIRECTOR(RSA) 3. VINCENT C. MILLER,AIA-STUDIO LEADER(RSA) 4. CHARLES EDWARD BAILEY, AIA-STUDIO LEADER(RSA) 5. KENNETH FULK, PE-MECHANICAL PRINCIPAL(RWB) 6. JOHN WELLS, PE-ELECTRICAL PRINCIPAL(RWB) 7. STEVE LUCY, PE-STRUCTURAL PRINCIPAL(JQ) 8. JIM KOCH, PE-CIVIL PRINCIPAL(PKCE) PAUl HULL COMM I If I) I I C C ",'/I if I III RINCES A. FIRE STATION NO.40-DALLAS, TX B. CENTRAL FIRE STATION, FIRE ADMINISTRATION, POLICE HEADQUARTERS&EOC-COMMERCE, TX C. CENTRAL FIRE STATION, FIRE ADMINISTRATION &EOC HALTOM CITY, TX D. FIRE STATION NO.4-NORTH RICHLAND HILLS,TX E. FIRE STATION NO. 1 -NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX PART F()UR I ISO 01 ':l!1 P; I'IC HF(,IS PART INVE [VT:: 1,:),". 1 H (.OMI'LFif IT IE FIRE STATION IN A TIMFI_ r �,' \PI l IIMI I '"II- PART SIXA. INSURANCE CERTIFICATE WITH STANDARD COVERAGES B. CLAIMS INFORMATION f O l Si VI t<1 A. DESIGN PHILOSOPHY B. PROPOSED SERVICES C. QUALITY ASSURANCE D. TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT QUALIFICATIONS E. DEVELOPMENT&MAINTENANCE OF WORK SCHEDULES F. METHODS FOR TRACKING OWNER INPUT G. METHODS FOR MANAGING THE UNIQUE ASPECTS OF A FIRE • STATION WITHIN A FIXED BUDGET i`,RI l i�HI : AEON FORM Page 1 PAS i ON INC, A. UNIQUE QUALIFICATIONS Randall Scott Architects, Inc. is keenly interested in providing A/E services for the Wylie Fire Station No. 3 for the following reasons: RSA specializes in Municipal Architecture resulting in the 1) following relevant commissions: E z Fire Stations 41%. A 44 1,l' ► City of Dallas Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver) ► City of Commerce,TX Central Fire Station jimikir7iitli ; i '.,iA : City of Haltom City,TX Central Fire Station Ail. • City of North Richland Hills,TX Station No. 1 ► City of North Richland Hills,TX Station No.4 ► City of Haltom City Central Fire Station Needs Fire Station No.40 Assessment Study&10 Year Master Ran Dallas,TX City Halls&Administration Buildings r.>,:,�r- ► City of Granbury,TX k ► City of Commerce,TX ?•„` ► City of Grapevine,TX(Renovation) "' ► City of Corinth(Needs Assessment&Master Ran) ► TxDOT Office Building,Atlanta,TX • TxDOT Office Building,Gilmer,TX i i i-''1 7';'t. Police Facilities v._ ► City of Granbury,TX • City of Center,TX _. City of Commerce,TX Central Fire Station,Fire Admin.,EOC • City of Corinth(Needs Assessment&Master Ran) &Police Facility-Commerce,TX • San Marcos,TX Service and Operations Centers • City of Dallas,TX • TxDOT Eng. &Maint, Complex-Gilmer,TX ;;. ► City of Haltom City,TX Recreation Centers • Belton,TX '1{ _ 1 Stephenville,TX „ '� .`'1 ' _ Animal Shelters ¢!• r _ " � '. ► City of Haltom City,TX t +? ► City of Richland Hills,TX Central Fire Station,Fire Admin. &EOC Commerce,TX 2) RSA is an Award Winning Fire Station Design Architect, Our Firm was recently awarded Second Place in the Nation by Fire Chief Magazine for the Haltom City Central Fire t.# Station project. ~. 3) We have been the Architect of Record on 5 Fire Stations in 4.0 '` the past 4 Years. 'it 4) RSA has designed over$150M in Municipal Architecture I JI projects and an additional $300M in Public Architecture. 5) Each of RSA's proposed consultants has worked with us for 6-14 years and on Municipal Fire Station Projects, We are Fire Station No. 1 &Community Room a seasoned Consulting Team with a proven track record • North Richland Hills,TX together on Fire Station projects. Paae 1 PARTN (cont.) B. Municipal Experience: City of Granbury,TX ► City Hall,Police Headquarters,Municipal Court&EOC _ "". (27,800 SF;$4M) City of Commerce,TX - ,-...„ 0 ' City Hall&Municipal Court(17,000 SF;$2,1 M) / :. f � �� _ • Police Headquarters,Central Fire Station&EOC(20,000 SF; ' $2,3M) . .vim 4> ' • 1 City of Center,TX . ' _I •I , Police Headquarters,Municipal Court&EOC(10,500 SF; $1,7M) ' --. ` City of Corinth,TX "* !lam••, • City Hall, Police Headquarters,Municipal Court&EOC Program&Master Plan(45,000 SF;$4,5M) Central Fire Station Apparatus Bays San Marcos,TX Haltom City,TX • Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training (ALERRT)Facility($1,5M) '; City of Dallas,TX i.,.14 • Inwood Road Operations/Service Center, Purchasing '.r Warehouse&Heavy Truck Body Rebuild Shop Renovations ^'r &Expansion(66,000 SF;$2,8M) �, lint.,r ----- • Martin Luther King Community Center 10 Year Master Plan •"' u 9•= and Facility Assessment($15M) • •�a��`e `+•n• .'- • Fire Station No. 40 11,000 SF;$2,4M)City of Grapevine,TX • City Hall Utility Billing Renovation&Expansion Belton,TX Police Station,Municipal Court&EOC ► Mayborn Events Center&Recreation Center Renovations& Center,TX Expansion(120,000 SF;$14M) City of Haltom City,TX • Central Fire Station, Fire Administration Offices, and Emergency Operations Center(20,000 SF;$3M) r 7 N " K.i.i : ► Animal Services&Adoption Center(4,500 SF;$831,000) cgs Fv `` '� ; -'-'•,0* • Public Works Facility Master Ran and Needs Assessment r1` _ • Central Fire Station Master Plan and Needs Assessment r r (28,000 SF;$3,5M) M•. :fit • Animal Services Center Master Plan and Needs Assessment r i (4,260 SF;$900,000) ._ ,,`_, City of Richland Hills,TX ` `- • Animal Services&Adoption Center( ,800 SF;$450,000) Central Fire Station,Fire Admin.&EOC • Park Entrance Feature&Gateway Haltom City,TX l. • Animal Services Center Master Plan and Needs Assessment (2,500 SF;$400,000) Stephenville, TX • Recreation Center(85,000 SF;$11,2M) City of Grand Prairie,TX • Tourist Information Center Program&Preliminary Design (2,800 SF;$450,000) Texas Department of Transportation • �, •• Dallas District Laboratory(8,200 SF;$1,4M) r A • Engineering&Maintenance Complex-Gilmer,TX(18,400 SF; ii $1,4M) - Atlanta District ROW Engineering Building(4,500 SF; $450,000) Animal Services&Adoption Center Town of Prosper, TX Haltom City,TX • Municipal Administration Building(10,000 SF;$1 M) Page 2 PART ONE (cont.) RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC. C. RSA'S AVAILABILITY & Randall Scott Architects, Inc. and our Consultants COMMITMENT TO have over 200 professionals at the ready to UNDERTAKE THE begin your project immediately. We are ready, PROJECT willing and able to complete this project within your time line. Our Consultants have worked with us on Municipal Projects for many years and their work is directed by the Principals of their firms. We commit to you that we will maintain the Team and individuals proposed in this Statement of Qualifications throughout the duration of your project! D. DESIGN AWARDS: Randall Scott Architects has received the following design awards for our work: ► 2004 2nd Place- National Fire Chief Design Awards Haltom City Central Fire Station, Haltom City, TX - iv} lP_ ►c ► 2004 Design Award- Dallas t"" County Community College _ District North Lake College Science Building-Irving, TX I- ► 2003 Summit Award for Excellence-Dallas Chapter Assoc. Of General Contractors North Lake College Welcome Center and Student Registration Facility Page 3 PART ONE (cont,) RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC. E. CONSULTING TEAM INFORMATION 1. PRIME FIRM Randall Scott Architects, Inc 14755 Preston Road, Suite 730 Dallas, Texas 75254 972.664.9100 Phone Legal Name&Address: 972.664.9122 Fax Contact: Randall B.Scott,AIA-President&CEO E-Mail: rscott@rsarchitects.com Web Site: www.rsarchitects.com No.Years in Business: 19 Years Type of Operation: Corporation-Type S Employees by Skill Group: Registered Architects:5 Registered Interior Designers:2 Intern Architects:3 CAD Staff: 1 Administrative Staff:4 Total Staff: 15 Firm History Randall Scott Architects was founded in February 1987 by Randall B. Scott,AIA as a general Architectural, Interiors and Planning practice. RSA was incorporated in June of 1993. The firm has grown to three Design Studios and provides state-of-the-art Municipal&Public Architecture Design Services. RSA is a member of Texas Municipal League and exhibits annually at the TML Conference. Area of Specialization: Randall Scott Architects specializes in the pursuit of excellence in Municipal&Public Architecture. Our firm has specialized in Municipal Architecture since 1990 when we received our first Municipal project. Since then, RSA has designed over$150M in Municipal projects in Partnership with the following Clients: RSA's Municipal&Public Clients w City of Dallas,TX • City of Granbury,TX • City of Grapevine,TX • City of Haltom City,TX • City of North Richland Hills,TX • City of Richland Hills,TX • City of Commerce,TX • City of Center,TX • City of Grand Prairie,TX • City of Corinth,TX • Town of Prosper,TX • Texas Department of Transportation Page 4 PART ONE (cont.) RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC. 2. MEP ENGINEERS Reed Wells Benson Engineers 12001 N.Central Expwy,Suite 1100 Dallas,Texas 75243 Legal Name&Address: 972 788 4222 Phone 972.788.0002 Fax kfulkerwb,net E-mail Contact:Kenneth M.Fulk,P.E.-Partner No. Years in Business: 18 Years Type of Operation: Corporation-Type C Firm History: RWB was established in 1986 by Partners Jim Reed and John Wells to provide Mechanical,Electrical,Plumbing and Fire Protection Engineering services. Since then,Ken Fulk,Mike Adcock and Byron Knight have been elevated to Principal status. All RWB principals are personally involved in running the projects designed by RWB. The firm and Principals have extensive Municipal Design Experience. Reed Wells Benson Engineers is a well established highly respected MEP Engineering firm that has provided MEP Engineering Services on Municipal&Public Projects for Randall Scott Architects for over 14 years. Ken Fulk,P.E,A principal of RWB,has over 29 years experience and has always been personally involved in the design and quality assurance of RSA's projects. Firm Size&Personnel By Registered Mechanical Engineers:4 Discipline: Registered Electrical Engineers:3 Mechanical/Electrical Designers:9 Draftsmen:4 Administrative Staff:4 Total Staff Count:30 Areas of Specialty: Mechanical,Electrical&Plumbing&Fire Protection Engineering • Page 5 PART ONE (cont.) RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC. 3. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Jaster Quintanilla (Certified HUB) 2105 Commerce St.,Suite 300 Dallas,Texas 75201 214.752.9098 Phone Legal Name&Address: 214.752.8771 Fax shlucy@igeng.com E-mail www.jcieng.com Web Site Contact:Steve Lucy,P.E.-Principal Years in Business: 20 Years Type of Firm: Corporation Firm History: JQ was established in 1984 by David Quintanilla,P.E.and Gary Jaster,P.E.to provide Structural Engineering Services. Steve Lucy became a Principal of the firm in 1990 and 3 other Principals have been added since. The firm added Civil Engineering to the services it provides in 1992. JQ has offices in Dallas,San Antonio, Houston and Austin. Firm Size&Personnel By Registered Structural Engineers:5 Discipline: Engineers in Training(Structural):3 Registered Civil Engineers:2 Engineers in Training(Civil):3 • Draftsmen: 14 Administrative Staff:3 Total Staff Count in Dallas Office:27 Areas of Specialty: Structural and Civil Engineering • • • Page 6 PART ONE (cont.) RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC, z;. 4. CIVIL ENGINEERS Pacheco Koch Engineers (Certified HUB) 8350 N.Central Expwy,Suite 1000 Dallas,Texas 75206-1612 972.235.3031 Phone Legal Name&Address: 972.235.9544 Fax jkoch@pkce.com E-mail www.pkce.com Web Site Contact:Jim Koch, P.E. -Vice President Years in Business: 14 Years • Type of Firm: Corporation Firm History: PKCE was formed in 1990 by Jim Koch,P.E.,and Mark Pacheco,P.E. to provide Civil Engineering and Land Surveying services to both private and public sector clients. PKCE is a well established highly respected Civil&Surveying Engineering firm that has provided Civil Engineering&Surveying services for Randall Scott Architects on Municipal and Public Architecture projects for over 7 years. Jim Koch,Principal of PKCE with over 20 years experience,is personally involved in the design and quality assurance of RSA's projects. Firm Size and Personnel By Registered CMI Engineers:7 Discipline: Engineers in Training(Civil):7 Registered Surveyors:6 Draftsmen: 16 Surveyors: 18 Administrative Staff 12 Total Staff Count:64 Areas of Specialty: Civil Engineering&Surveying • Page 7 PART ONE (cont.) RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS. INC. 5. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Talley Associates, Inc. 1925 San Jacinto,Suite 400 Dallas,Texas 75201 214.871.7900 Phone Legal Name&Address: 214.871.7985 Fax ctalley@talleyassociates.com E-mail www.talleyassociates.com Web site Contact:Coy Talley,ASLA-President Years in Business: 11 Years Type of Firm: Corporation-Type C Firm History: TAI was established in 1993 by Coy Talley to provide quality Landscape and Planning Design Services to the Public and Private sectors. TAI is an award winning Landscape Architecture firm that has worked with RSA on Municipal projects for over 10 years. Their services include Landscape and Hardscape Design,Irrigation Design,Drainage Analysis&Grading and Master Planning. Firm Size&Personnel By Principals:2 Discipline: Landscape Architects:5 Intern Landscape Architects: 3 Draftsmen:3 Administrative Staff:2 Total Staff Count: 12 Areas of Specialty: Landscape Architecture and Irrigation Design • • Page 8 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Architectl_ir.-I1 ,:-esign Services Fire S Dn No. 3 fe, Texas Randall B.Scott,AIA Randall Scott Architects,Ind'', Principal in Charge Judy Harris Randall Scott Architects,Inc. Project Administrator • Gregory J.Conaway,AIA:::=, Randall Scott Architects,,Itc Vice President I I Jim Koch,PE Steve Lucy,PE Vincent Miller AIA Ken Fulk, PE Pacheco Koch .,' Jaste-Quintanilla . • Randall Scott Architects ti Reed Wells _ Coy Talley,ASLAs Civil Principal kPrimTall Associates Structural Principal Studio Leader Mechanical P Landscape Prim Mark Pacheco PE Tom Scott PE Ed Bailey,AIA 'j John Wells,PE •, 11' , Kevin Bemaurer,ASLA;;54 Pacheco Koch Jaster-Quintanilla t.H. Randall Scott Architects,I Reed Wells Benson Talley Associates }T Surveying Principal Sr.Project Engineer +: Assistant Studio Leader;, Electrical Pnncipai,j Sr.Landscape Architect fir'-; Dan Brantner,AIA Randall Scott Architects,Inc., Production Manager ;n Ryan Burris Randall Scott Architects,l, Intern Architect Ricky Stull Randall Scott Architects, IT Manager/Production O; LL �;OTT, AIi� ; PA -i i • Professional Background & Role andall is President & CEO of RSA and has over 29 years • `experience in Directing, Designing and Managing *, projects up to $70 million. His experience includes Local, k, ' State, National and International projects. Randall has been + 4• -� '.., the Principal-in-Charge and/or Project Designer for over �ik r + a94'4! I„a $150M in Municipal Architecture, Master Planning, Feasibility f Studies, Central Fire Stations, Fire Substations, Fire Administration & Training Facilities, City Halls, Courts Facilities, Emergency Operations Centers, Law Enforcement Centers, Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver Project) Animal Shelters, Service Centers, Engineering & Maintenance Dallas,DC Facilities and Convention &Visitors Bureaus. Randall serves as the Project Designer and coordinates with RSA's Studio Years with Firm: 19 Years Leaders on a daily basis to maintain design quality, schedule and budget throughout the project. Estimated Involvement on Project: 95% Project Responsibilities: Principal-In- Representative Clients & Projects Charge, Programming, Lead Designer, Fire Station Experience Schedule Compliance, Budget Fire Station No.40-City of Dallas,TX($2.62M; 12000 SF) Compliance,Quality Control (Principal in Charge/Project Designer) Education: { Masters of Architecture,Texas Central Fire Station,Fire Admin.Police Hqtrs. &EOC A&M University, 1982 Commerce,TX($2.53M; 19,960 SF)(Principal in • Bachelor of Environmental Charge/Project Designer) Design,Texas A&M University, 1979 Central Fire Station, Fire Administration&EOC Professional Registration: Haltom City,TX($2.6M;20,000 SF)(Principal In Architectural:TX,TN, KS, MO, NC, AR Charge/Interior Designer) Interior Design. TX Fire Station No. 1 -North Richland Hills,TX($2.1 M; 12175 SF) Professional Organizations: (Principal In Charge/Interior Designer) American Institute of Architects Fire Station No.4 -North Richland Hills,TX($2.08M; 12053 Dallas Chapter-American Institute of Architects SF)(Principal In Charge/Interior Designer) Texas Society of Architects •• Central Fire Station,Fire Admin&EOC Feasibility Study Texas Municipal League Haltom City,TX(PrincipalCharge/Project Designer) in Char e/Pro ect Desi ner • Municipal Experience ° Law Enforcement Center, Municipal Court&EOC • Center,DC $1.7M; 10,500 SF)(Principal in Charge/Project a Designer) -4- ' te' City Hall, Municipal Court,Police Headquarters&EOC Granbury,Texas($4M;27,800 SF)(Principal in Charge/Co- Designer) • City Hall&Municipal Court-Commerce,TX($2.2M; 15,833 SF)(Principal in Charge/Project Designer) Central Fire Station,Fire Administration& , EOC Commerce,TX Inwood Road Municipal Service Center&Purchasing Dept.for Fleet Operations-Dallas,TX($2.8M;68,000 SF) (Principal in Charge/Project Designer) MLK Jr. Municipal Community Center Needs Assessment& 10 Yr. Master Plan-Dallas,TX($15M)(Principal in _p i I Charge/Project Designer) Animal Services&Adoption Center-Haltom City,Texas -= '* L -5 ($831,000;4,500 SF)(Principal in Charge/Project Designer) :"2-7-11-13 3 ¢ Animal Services&Adoption Center-Richland Hills,TX Central Fire Station, Fire Administration& ($450,000;2,800 SF)(Principal in Charge/Project Designer) EOC-Haltom City,TX 0 \LOORY J . CO\A1�v,- f- IA - VICE R RLTOLN\I I -i ,, ,,i 1 i = Professional Background & Role reg is Vice President of RSA and has over 30 years '' experience in Directing, Designing and Managing . ..trot, 5::' ;, projects up to $35 million. His experience consists of .. �� Local, State and National; tLprojects including Public y------ •• Architecture, Master Planning, Feasibility Studies, Central Fire �' _i Stations, Fire Substations, City Halls, Courts Facilities, iaa�i %� � i u u ,�. ete ■n_ FA, .1 L!L. Emergency 4.1 ��® _n 9 Y Operations Centers, Law Enforcement Centers, lq Animal Shelters, Service Centers, Engineering & Maintenance . Facilities and Convention &Visitors Bureaus. Greg will serve as 1 Project Director and Co-Designer on this project. His Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver Project) `„ responsibilities include Design, Staff Resources, Code Dallas,TX Compliance and Quality Control. i Years with Firm: 14 Years � Municipal & Relevant Project Experience Estimated Involvement on Project: 95% i Fire Station Experience j Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver Project) Project Responsibilifies: Project Director, f City of Dallas,TX($2.62M; 12000 SF)(Project Director) Co-Designer, Overall Project&Staffing Coordination,Code Compliance& 1 Central Fire Station,Fire Admin.Police Hqtrs.&EOC Quality Control a Commerce,TX($2.53M; 19,960 SF)(Project Director) Education: Central Fire Station,Fire Administration&EOC Masters of Architecture, The University .1 Haltom City,TX($2.6M;20,000 SF)(Project Director) Of Texas At Arlington, 1979 1 Bachelor of Environmental.Design,The I Fire Station No. 1 -North Richland Hills,TX University Of Texas At Arlington, 1974 A ($2.1 M; 12175 SF)(Project Director) Professional Registration: Fire Station No.4-North Richland Hills,TX Architectural.TX (52.08M; 12,053 SF)(Project Director) Central Fire Station,Fire Admin&EOC Feasibility Study .. »ar f Haltom City,TX(Project Director) y. s ' J Municipal i >; ••`` p Experience £• _ :t; Law Enforcement Center, Municipal Court&EOC +f • ; Center,TX($1.7M; 10,500 SF)(Project Director) _ • ^rTh. City Hall, Municipal Court,Police Headquarters&EOC --'.-`�.1---•- ,, ^ . -' 'j., Granbury,Texas($4M;27,800 SF)(Project Director) Att .1 City Hall&Municipal Court Commerce,TX($2.2M; 15,833 SF)(Project Director) Central Fire Station,Fire Administration&EOC Animal Services&Adoption Center Commerce,TX 1 Haltom City,Texas($831,000;4,500 SF)(Project Director) i *,. :ltrr - Q Animal Services&Adoption Center M h-. y, . a Richland Hills,TX($450,000;2,800 SF)(Project Director) j., , [/W1,ni rl'r-1 z''S s➢I .lam 1 4 . ��; "'" City Hall, Municipal Court and Police Headquarters ,; ,• 1 Facilities Program/Feasibility Study($4.5M;30,000 SF) f I -- _1 Corinth,TX(Project Director) ,,to t 1. i : - Mayborn Events&Recreation Center r,.. ! Belton,TX($14M; 120,000 SF)(Project Director) a.. r 1 TxDOT Engineering&Maintenance Facility Gilmer,TX a�w ($1.4M; 18,400 SF)(Project Director) Central Fire Station, Fire Administration&EOC ' TxDOT District Materials Testing Lab Haltom City,TX Dallas,TX($1.4M;8,200 SF)(Project Director) y 'a'� Ei� I C. VIIL' CIS 1� - D _CAD -i i .. ..Y } Professional Background & Role incent is a Studio Leader for Randall Scott ,,;•, -f-. Architects, Inc. with 29 years of experience in �„ % providing Design, Construction Document • preparation and Contract Administration services on '_- _``` "- projects upto $55 million. His -. - ,,; , ., i P"� P 1 experience consists of • Local, State, and National projects including Municipal Architecture, Master Planning, Feasibility Studies, 3 Central Fire Stations, Fire Substations, Fire Administration, City Halls, Courts Facilities, Emergency Operations Central Fire Station, Police Station&EOC ,, Centers, Police Stations & Law Enforcement Centers, Commerce,TX � Service Centers and Vehicle Maintenance Facilities. Vincent prepares all Primavera "Sure-Trac" Project Years with Firm: 5 Years Schedules, Cost Estimates and Project Specifications on his projects. Estimated Involvement on Project: 95% Project Responsibilities: Studio Leader, Municipal & Relevant Project Experience Preparation of Design and Construction Fire Station Experience Documents,Consultant Coordination, Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver Project)-City of Dallas,TX Schedule Preparation,Cost Estimating, ($2.62M; 12,000 SF)(Asst.Studio Leader) Code Compliance&Quality Control Central Fire Station,Fire Admin.Police Hqtrs. &EOC Education: Commerce,TX($2.53M; 19,960 SF)(Studio Leader) Bachelor of Architecture,Texas Tech • University, 1978 Fire Station No. 1 -North Richland Hills,TX($2.1 M; 12175 SF) (Studio Leader) Professional Registration: Architectural TX, LA Fire Station No.4-North Richland Hills,TX($2.08M; 12053 Interior Design:TX SF)(Studio Leader) Professional Organizations: Municipal&Public Architecture Experience American Institute of Architects Mayborn Events&Recreation Center Texas Society of Architects Belton,TX($14M; 120,000 SF)(Studio Leader) Dallas Chapter-AIA City Hall&Municipal Court-Commerce,TX(S2.2M; 15,833 SF)(Studio Leader) Police Station, Municipal Court&EOC-Center,TX($1.6M; 10,500 SF)(Studio Leader) " Seagoville Federal Correction Center-Seagoville,TX t �� (S34M)(Studio Leader) .__ . 7..0- ,, : ti ii - 1_ US Air Force Training Headquarters +'ev``•_ , -- - ` --.. Holloman AFB,Alamogordo, NM(70,000 SF;$7.5M) Fire Station No.4&Community Room ' Squadron Operations Building North Richland Hills,TX } Cannon AFB,Clovis, NM(23,000 SF;$2.5M) Navy Warfare Evaluation Facility Seal Beach,CA(40,000 SF;$8M) I . • n; te~ y•'EJr I ri WI _ : �� Fire Station No. 1 &Community Room r1. North Richland Hills,TX • ,k' . Professional Background & Role y d is a Studio Leader(Project Manager) for Randall Scott '� irk°. l,m_.Architects, Inc. with 29 years experience in providing �•o'> I _„Design, Construction Document t ,� . idi moo. 9 preparation and � ,��� Contract Administration services. His experience consists „, •. •' t ='', of Local, State, and National projects including Municipal mor a .� il" Architecture, Master Planning, Feasibility Studies, Central Fire ----- ICI• I I I � II e'� Stations & Fire Substations, Fire Administration & Training, City "_ Ili sici4,1 I .4, '" - Halls, Courts Facilities, Emergency Operations Centers, Law _'`' = T ,,-= — Enforcement Centers, Service Centers and Maintenance - -_- - Facilities. Ed prepares Primavera"Sure-Trac"Schedules,Cost Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver Project) Estimates and Project Specifications on all of his projects. Dallas,TX -_ Municipal & Relevant Project Experience Years with Firm: 5 Years Fire Station Experience Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver Project) Estimated Involvement on Project: 100% Dallas,TX($2.62M; 12,000 SF)(Studio Leader) Project Responsibilities: Studio Leader, 5 Central Fire Station,Police Station&EOC Preparation of Design and Construction 0 Commerce,TX($2.53M; 19,960 SF)(Asst.Studio Leader) Documents, Consultant Coordination, Schedule Preparation,Cost Estimating, t Central Fire Station,Fire Administration&EOC Code Compliance&Quality Control Haltom City,TX($2.6M;20,000 SF)(Studio Leader) Education tFire Station No. 1 &Community Room-North Richland Hills, Masters of Architecture, Iowa State TX($2.1 M; 12,175 SF)(Co-Studio Leader) University 1978 Bachelor Science, Fire Station No.4&Community Room-North Richland Hills, Iowa State University, 1974 1 TX($2.08M; 12,053 SF)(Co-Studio Leader) Professional Registration Municipal Experience Architectural:TX,AL MO, GA,OK City Hall&Municipal Court Commerce,TX($2.2M; 15,833 SF)(Asst.Studio Leader) z Maybom Events&Recreation Center i ' Belton,TX(120,000 SF; $14M)(Studio Leader) ,� �. a " LaSalle!nth!Housing I7+„�� x St. Louis,MO($8M) i : I c r"— �r�e Defense Mapping Agency Aerospace Center jA St. Louis MO,($1 OM) Chanute Air Force Base Courtroom Renovations Rantoul, IL Central Fire Station, Fire Admin.&EOC St. Louis County Water Treatment Plant Commerce,TX :i St. Louis, MO($20M) .;;;7 Police Academy Renovations Sylvas, IL($350K;3,500 SF) , r'"' r „ I = '.. s ?a , �� �_ ter. Central Fire Station, Fire Admin.&EOC a '�" Haltom City,TX A ;WI", F 1 Ceti iI1 V . ,=JLK, P,L , - ,`,,�A' C .yip 'C'ALPR1NClPAL 1 Professional Background & Role en is a Principal at RWB and has over 29 years 77 ,tee experience in Directing, Designing and Managing Y. m m I .projects up to $50 million. His experience includes Local, "914k ;M ^; State and National projects consisting of Central Fire Stations, �. j Fire Substations, Emergency Operations Centers, Police iaQ:: �n I w ii ? Stations & Law Enforcement Centers, City Halls, Courts 1� ■� 1s� r ,"t j iii,, I � ut .- -� Facilities, Animal Shelters, Service Centers, Engineering & .'•- �. ; Maintenance Facilities and Convention&Visitors Bureaus. Ken ..... will be the Mechanical Principal on this project and will a coordinate with RWB"s engineering staff on a daily basis to Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver Project) design the Mechanical and Plumbing Systems and to maintain Dallas,TX the Quality,Schedule and Budget for the Project. Years with Firm: 19 Years Representative Clients & Projects Estimated Involvement on Project: 75% 3 Fire Station Experience Project Responsibilities: Principal-In- Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver Project)-City of Dallas,TX Charge, Lead Mechanical Engineer, (S2.62M; 12,000 SF)(RSA Project)(Mechanical Principal) Schedule Compliance, Budget Compliance,Quality Control 1 Central Fire Station,Fire Admin.Police Hqtrs. &EOC Commerce,TX($2.53M; 19,960 SF)(RSA Project) Education: (Mechanical Principal) M.A. Business Management, Central Michigan University, 1981 - Central Fire Station,Fire Administration&EOC-Haltom B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Texas City,TX($2.6M;20,000 SF)(RSA Project)(Mechanical A&M University, 1979 3 Principal) j Professional Registration: Fire Station No. 1 -North Richland Hills,TX($2.1 M; 12175 SF) Mechanical Engineer:TX, AZ, AR, FL. i (RSA Project)(Mechanical Principal) MO,OH,OK, NC, SC,OR,GA Fire Station No.4-North Richland Hills,TX($2.08M; 12053 Professional Organizations: I SF)(RSA Project)(Mechanical Principal) National Society Professional Engineers Texas Society of Professional Engineers j 4 ;' Central Fire Station, Fire Admin&EOC Feasibility Study ;, 4 Haltom City,TX(RSA Project)(Mechanical Principal) I Fire Station and Police Station-Richardson,TX `:, r4.4 ,' , (Mechanical Principal) -so A IIIR- Fire Station&Tourist Information Center-Grand Prairie,TX r� i (Mechanical Principal) _ a Fire Station-Plano,TX(Mechanical Principal) t - i Municipal Experience City Hall, Municipal Court, Police Station&EOC Central Fire Station, Police Hqtrs. &EOC Granbury,Texas($4M;27,800 SF)(RSA Project) Commerce,TX (Mechanical Principal) n t-yam City Hall&Municipal Court-Commerce,TX($2.2M; 15,833 - '`' 3 i cyst ` *, , SF)(RSA Project)(Mechanical Principal) Police Station, Municipal Court&EOC-Center,TX($1.7M; r <'' 10,500 SF)(RSA Project)(Mechanical Principal) j _. _ l --t Animal Services&Adoption Center-Haltom City,Texas w • ..-y l ($831,000;4,500 SF)(RSA Project)(Mechanical Principal) Animal Services&Adoption Center Richland Hills,TX i ($450,000;2,800 SF)(RSA Project)(Mechanical Principal) Central Fire Station, Fire Admin. &EOC Haltom City,TX JOHN WELLS, P.E. - ELEC TR CAL ?I\CIPAL Professional Background & Role ohn is a Principal of RWB and has over 30 years ,.k; ,,,.,, ;r j experience in Directing, Designing and Managing projects . • L :k, ;, ',...-up to $750 million. His experience includes Local, State �4 1 and National projects consisting of Central Fire Stations, Fire -• Substations, Emergency Operations Centers, Police Stations & julainismIlirn__L : 1 ice; '. 9 Law Enforcement Centers, City Halls, Courts Facilities, Animal nl- .� Shelters, Service Centers, Engineering& Maintenance Facilities ' - •• 1, and Convention &Visitors Bureaus. John will be the Electrical _ _ __ Principal on this project and will coordinate with RWB's `j Electrical Engineers on a daily basis to design the Electrical Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver Project) 1 Systems and maintain Quality, Schedule and Budget for the Dallas,TX i Project. :1 1 Years with Firm: 19 Years Representative Clients & Projects Estimated Involvement on Project: 75% Fire Station Experience Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver Project)-City of Dallas,TX Project Responsibilities: Electrical ;1 ($2.62M; 12,000 SF)(RSA Project)(Electrical Principal) Engineering Principal&Quality Control : Central Fire Station,Fire Admin.Police Hqtrs.&EOC Education: ,g Commerce,TX($2.53M; 19,960 SF)(RSA Project)(Electrical B.S.Electrical Engineering, University of 7 Principal) Arkansas, 1973 1 -Central Fire Station, Fire Administration&EOC-Haltom Professional Registration: 4i City,TX($2.6M;20,000 SF)(RSA Project)(Electrical Mechanical Engineer: TX, AR, FL. MO, j Principal) OH, NC, SC, OR, GA, NM, NE, LA, CT, _j WA, PA `; Fire Station No. 1 -North Richland Hills,TX($2.1 M; 12,175 SF) (RSA Project)(Electrical Principal) Professional Organizations: National Society Professional Engineers I Fire Station No.4-North Richland Hills,TX(S2.08M; 12,053 Texas Society of Professional Engineers 1 SF)(RSA Project)(Electrical Principal) National Consulting Engineers'Council Consulting Engineers council of Texas Central Fire Station,Fire Admin&EOC Feasibility Study National Fire Protection Association 1 Haltom City,TX(RSA Project)(Electrical Principal) .! u w Fire Station and Police Station-Richardson,TX(Electrical r.. „;•,. , i Principal) -. i Fire Station&Tourist Information Center-Grand Prairie,TX se (Electrical Principal) i-s, •; `y ..•_,i t. !r j Fire Station-Plano,TX(Electrical Principal) i Municipal Experience s City Hall, Municipal Court, Police Station&EOC ' 1 Granbury,Texas($4M;27,800 SF)(RSA Project)(Electrical Central Fire Station, Police Hqtrs. &EOC I Principal) Commerce,TX I ;7: tl-q7 i City Hall&Municipal Court-Commerce,TX($2.2M; 15,833 '` � r) SF)(RSA Project)(Electrical Principal) Police Station, Municipal Court&EOC-Center,TX($1.7M; ,' ;.1 J 10,500 SF)(RSA Project)(Electrical Principal) ' +. ,—e _ Animal Services&Adoption Center-Haltom City,Texas _. .�� : y 4 ($831,000;4,500 SF)(RSA Project)(Electrical Principal) Animal Services&Adoption Center Richland Hills,TX ($450,000;2,800 SF)(RSA Project)(Electrical Principal) Central Fire Station, Fire Admin. &EOC Haltom City,TX ._ LUC, �.0 - STRUC TUR,'`\ P iNCCAL Professional Background & Role r fteve is a Principal of Jaster Quintanilla Engineers and has } .. ;, over 25 years experience in Directing, Designing and ' , A ' I21 ".-- Managing projects up to $100 million. His experience Ti �korFr ^', includes Local, State and National projects consisting of "s `a 7 ", Municipal and Public Architecture, Central Fire Stations, Fire j ■u 1'i u 1, ai---- Sub-stations, EOC's, Police & Law Enforcement Centers, pH WM� I fc '11 Aill. Recreation Centers, ConferencingFacilities, TrainingFacilities .- 11.'0, UR k' f ! n si -' and Food Service/Dining Facilities. Steve will be the Structural _ ,, — =,, •.._ Principal on this�- - p project and will coordinate with JQ's Engineering Team on a daily basis to design the Structural Systems and maintain Quality, Schedule and Budget for the Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver Project) Project. Dallas,TX Years with Firm: 12 Years j Representative Clients & Projects Estimated Involvement on Project: 75% I Fire Station Experience Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver Project)-Dallas,TX($2.62M; Project Responsibilities: Structural . 12,000 SF)(RSA Project)(Structural Principal) Engineering Principal&Quality Control Central Fire Station, Law Enforcement Center&EOC Education: Commerce,TX($2.53M; 19,960SF)(RSA Project)(Structural B S Civil Engineering,Texas A&M Principal) University, 1982 Fire Station No, 38-Dallas,TX($2.4M; 10,000 SF)(Structural Professional Registration: j Principal) Civil Engineer TX, NM,OK t, Fire Station No.39-Dallas,TX(S1.4M; 10,000 SF)(Structural Professional Organizations: 1 Principal) American Society Civil Engineers American Water Works Association Renovations to Fire Stations 4, 18,28,31,35,41,42,43&49 American Concrete Institute-Director, Dallas,TX(Structural Principal) NE Texas Chapter Central Fire Station-Frisco,TX($3.9M;29,000 SF)(Structural .•> +orp, Principal) 'll . Fire Station No.5-Frisco,TX(12,000 SF)(Structural t.r. T'< x . Principal) 74A Fire Station No. 6-McKinney,TX(12,000 SF)(Structural Principal) +'. 1. "'., A'„A; Fire Station No. 8-McKnney,TX($1.2M; 10,000 SF) (Structural Principal) ._ Central Fire Station-Mt.Pleasant,TX($800K; 10,000 SF) 1 (Structural Principal) Central Fire Station, Fire Admin. &EOC -' Commerce,TX Texas A&M Easterwood Airport Fire Station-College Station,TX($1.8M;9,400 SF)(Structural Principal) t 4 Central Fire Station&Police Station-Gainesville,TX($3.2M; 30,000 SF)(Structural Principal) Police Station and Fire House-Burnet,TX($1 M;9,135 SF) r-r'" is, (Structural Principal) 10041 �, Gam. Municipal Experience �ilitimr �`` --� -, City Hall&Municipal Court-Commerce,TX($2.2M; 15,833 .Ji r�� I, ^;' s,y11 SF)(RSA Project)(Structural Principal) City Hall and Municipal Court Building 1.-, Recreational Sports Facility-Stephenville,TX(72,000 SF; Commerce,TX $11.2M)(RSA Project)(Structural Principal) JANA S KOCH, RE. — CIVIL PR NCI �A!— , HRs I N 1 Professional Background & Role z im is one of the founding principals of PKCE and serves as 1 Vice President. He has more than 20 years of Civil ' „;:; Engineering Design and Project Management experience. �L'►.e��i s His expertise includes: Municipal Building Civil Engineering, , Planning, Platting, Zoning, Infrastructure Improvements, Urban 01 i® s 1ry in" Roadways, Thoroughfares, Culvert Crossings, Storm Water ifs ■® I u n .. ii Collection Systems, Storm Water Management Plans and ii iii ■ n ,i Y 9 tI J lUI I ' ' ' Monitoring of Construction Activities. Jim is also a Registered "'- ""a.6K-.—.--_____. Land Surveyor with experience in Land Title Surveys, Boundary Location, Subdivision Platting, Right-of-Way Surveying and Fire Station No.40(LEED Silver Project) 4, Easements. Dallas,TX Representative Clients & Projects Years with Firm: 12 Years Fire Station Experience Estimated Involvement on Project: 75% Fire Station No.40(IFED Silver Project)-Dallas,TX($2.62M; 12,000 SF)(RSA Project)(Civil Principal) Project Responsibilities: Civil Engineering , Principal&Quality Control 1 Central Fire Station,Fire Admin.Police Hqtrs. &EOC I Commerce,TX(S2.53M; 19,960 SF)(RSA Project)(Civil Education: ' Principal) B.S. Civil Engineering, University of Missouri, 1982 Central Fire Station, Fire Administration&EOC-Haltom City,TX(S2.6M;20,000 SF)(RSA Project)(Civil Principal) Professional Registration: Civil Engineer TX, MD, MO, OK Fire Station No. 1-North Richland Hills,TX($2.1 M; 12,175 SF) Professional Land Surveyor.TX (RSA Project)(Civil Principal) Professional Organizations: Fire Station No.4-North Richland Hills,TX(S2.08M; 12,053 Texas Society Professional Engineers SF)(RSA Project)(Civil Principal) Assoc. Member American Institute of Architects Central Fire Station-Piano,TX(Civil Principal) W.--'",r'4 - _ Municipal Experience 4:`'` City Hall&Municipal Court-Commerce,TX($2.2M; 15,833 "�'� r ; SF)(RSA Project)(Civil Principal) Y; 1 r T'-` ; . Mayborn Events&Recreation Center-Belton,TX(120,000 -,i• - SF;$14M)(RSA Project)(Civil Principal) -' '4 '+,' •; ai j+'-1 'i 1i) - Police Station and Courts Building-Coppell,TX(Civil • Principal) Dallas Arboretum Various Projects-Dallas,TX(Civil - - Principal) Central Fire Station,Fire Admin.&EOC Commerce,TX i Dallas Nature Center-Dallas,TX(Civil Principal) '* {y' 4 r Denton County Courthouse-Denton,TX(Civil Principal) $.4J.,; rho ,.'.f.:�'.o-4: �.€ ''r-ma 7 w .e4. I 3 r . "- `�' fi` V x Heights Recreation Center-Richardson,TX(Civil Principal) tie, `` ,-. Richardson Community Center-Richardson,TX(Civil 1 — Principal) ... AllME : , ' ,' — i Fair Park Museum of Natural History-Dallas,TX(Civil n• Principal) DISD Environmental Service Center-Dallas,TX(Civil .. �u* 1 Principal) ='` + - . Central Fire Station, Fire Admin.&EOC ? Haltom City,TX HRE STATION N 0 (LED SILVER PRO • Project Owner&Length of Relationship:City of Dallas; 16 Years ..pry .., Owner Contact: Mr.Pankaj Shaw-Project Manager;Ph.214.948.4554;320 E.Jefferson Blvd., Suite 108,Dallas,TX 76203 ,�•�� Project Construction Cost $2.82 M :r : r , _ �#i�.••l1, Project Delivery Method:CSP f�T III i I cc' --� t.1li'_ ■■■ I -lf ii was - Project Size: 12000 GSF - t ;_ ■■■ �. 11: n •ma■ Type of Construction:New Construction-Shell& Interior Finish Out Design&Construction Dates a. Design&Constr.Documents:9 Mo. b. Design Dates:Apr. '05-Feb. '06 c. Construction Phase: 12 Months d. Construction Dates: Mar. '06-Dec. '06 •`,,:• RSA's Contracted Responsibility on Project: + I DWI Prime Consultant&Architect of Record � ~ _ • Professional Services Provided by RSA on Project � w , •� , Prime Consultant for Design and Construction *� isily i �� ^a 11 ;; • Documents, Bidding/Negotiation and Construction Administration Phase Services& LEED Certification.Furniture and Equipment Planning was part of the project scope. Other services provided through RSA by our Consultants included Structural, Mechanical, Electrical,Plumbing, Landscape Architecture, Civil and Public Artist Selection/Coordination. Project Description:Construction of A New Fire Station for the City of Dallas,TX. The project scope for the Fire Station includes 6 Apparatus Bays,Sleeping Quarters for 12 Firemen, Lieutenant's Quarters, Battalion Chief's Office/ Quarters,Showers/Locker Rooms, Kitchen,Fitness Center,Day Room,Video Training Area, Dispatch Room,EMS Storage, Emergency Operations Center,General Storage, Decon/Extraction Room,S.C.B.A.Facilities,and Washer/Dryer Room. Principal-In-Charge: Randall B.Scott,AIA Silver LEED Certification:The Project was designed by Randall Scott Architects to acquire Project Director:Gregory J.Conaway, AIA Silver LEED Certification. Studio Leader&CA:Charles Edward Bailey,AIA Design Concept. RSA's design consisted of a 'Roundhouse'design that radiates the Consultants Used: Apparatus Bays in an arc providing more space 1 MEP Engineer-Reed Wells Benson • between the bays while displaying Fire 2. Structural Engineer-Jaster Quintanilla Apparatus to the public. The tower element was 3 Civil Engineer-Pacheco Koch designed to be a day time orientation element 4 LEED Consultant-Sebesta Blomberg and nighttime beacon to assist citizens in finding this Emergency Services Facility. Contractor:T.B.D. How this Project is Relevant:This was a 12,000 SF Fire Station with 6 Apparatus Bays for a major Municipality that was a LEED Silver Certified project. Pr `T,(1\ TION & 'DOL ,C E Bi U;LD NG & HOC Project Owner&Length of Relationship: City of Commerce,Texas;2 Years t ; Owner Contact Mr.Bill Shipp-City Manager, A' ,z 1119 Alamo,Commerce,TX 75428,Phone: 903.886.1124 Project Construction Cost $2.53M Vie11111111.11 " & . Project Size: 19,960 GSF . •. Type of Construction: New Construction Design&Construction Dates a. Design&Construction Documents Phase: 7 Months b. Design Phase:Feb.'04-Sep.'04 c. Construction Phase: 10 Months d. Construction Dates: Feb.'05-Dec.'06 •"-• - LEGEND RSA's Contracted Responsibility on Project: ,j� Prime Consultant ` , ----- Professional Services Provided by RSA on _ �-- Project Needs Assessment/Facilities - _ = p Y _ Programming,Architectural Design, Interior Design,Construction Documents, Bidding/Negotiation,Construction Phase r __ Services and Furniture/Equipment Planning. } _ s Other services provided t 4 . �# _ p hroughRSAbyour �I__1 • consultants include Structural, Mechanical, Electrical,Plumbing,Civil,Surveying and Security Coordination. Project Description:Design of a new Historic District Police Headquarters,Central Fire Station, Fire Administration and Emergency Operations Center. Scope of Work for the Central Fire Station&Fire Administration Building consisted of 4 Drive Through Apparatus Bays, Fire Chief's Office,Fire Marshal's Office,Captain's Office/Bunk Room VFD Office, Watch Room,Day Room SCBA Storage,Work Room,Firemens'Bunk Rooms, Restrooms, Laundry,Arson Investigation Room Principal-In-Charge: Randall B.Scott,AIA and Decon Room. The new CFS and LEC will share Central Files, Locker Rooms,a Fitness Project Director:Gregory J.Conaway,AIA Center,EOC/Training Room and Dispatch. Studio Leader&CA:Vincent Miller,AIA Scope of Work for the Police Headquarters • Center included Police Reception,Records Consultants Used: Storage,Dispatch,Police Chief&Asst.Chief's a. MEP Engineer-Reed Wells Benson Offices, Detective's Offices,Sargent's(CID) ` Offices,Patrol/Briefing/Locker Room, h b. Structural Engineer-Jaster Quintanilla c. Civil Engineer-Pacheco Koch Emergency Operation Center, Evidence Storage Room,Crime Lab,Armory,Conference Construction Manager at Risk: Harrison Walker&Harper, Room, Interrogation Rooms,Break Mr.Jim Hunt, Ph.903.785.1653,x.3627 Room/Kitchen, Laundry, Men's and Women's Holding Cells, Booking Area,Sallyport, How this Project is Relevant:The Central Fire Station Juvenile/Mentally III Holding Room,Juvenile contains three double drive through bays,Fire Processing Room,Special Projects Office,and Administration, Dispatch and an Emergency Operations Shop. Center/Training Facility. 4 �I Ff J�. :.__I i T + I�`� ! + �, t_ ! i I V 1 i'� 1� •i;'."�'��• \.,i ,\i 1�� 1 + , "A \ ._ /, , l rf� 1_ ax i Project Owner&Length of Relationship:City of Haltom City,Texas;7 Years ' iii.i...fil Client Contact: Mr.Jerry McEntire-Fire Chief 5024 Broadway, Haltom City,TX 76117 Phone: 817.759.8661 _4 1 # s Design Award: 2ND Place National Fire Chief f {. � .: Design Awards, Nov. '04 .• t111144 Project Construction Cost: $2.6M. Award was ti .v 4 within the Owner's Budget. .. • �-r- `� °"` - w r Project Delivery Method:CSP t Project Size:20,000 GSF r # .,f Type of Construction: New Construction r'1 • T,1 Design&Construction Dates _� i a. Design&Constr.Documents:6 Months ,� d r, �•� • j ;;n b. Design Phase:Apr. '02 Oct. '02 1 CA MN t r c. Construction Phase: 13 Months ` e1Nad. Construction Dat /71 � sm— air .;n. Dates: Apr. '03-Mar. '04 ti RSA's Contracted Responsibility on Project Prime • x Consultant _ tiiiii rii i Professional Services Provided by RSA on Project / ._ > Needs Assessment/Facilities Programming, Architectural Design, Interior Design, Construction Documents,Bidding/Negotiation, Construction Phase Services and ff i ,.Ax ;. Furniture/Equipment Planning. RSA provided -- c. Structural,Civil and MEP Engineering services t , :w through our consultants. r Project Description:Design of a New Central Fire `" ` 4" "`v"' Station with 3 Drive-Through Apparatus Bays,2 Partial Apparatus Bays,Sleeping Quarters, Showers/Locker Rooms, Kitchen,Day Room, Video Training Room,Dispatch Room,Fire Training Room/Public Meeting Room/EOC,Exam i. Room,Decontamination Room,Extraction Room,Fitness Center,Safe Room and Fire Admin Principal-In-Charge: Randall B.Scott,AIA The Chief wanted a traditional Chicago Fire House Station Design with Red Brick and White Project Director:Gregory J.Conaway,AIA Cast Stone Trim. The Fire Administration Offices were located on the Second Floor away from Studio Leader&CA:Edward Bailey,AIA the Emergency Response Units. A traditional fire pole was located in the Second Floor Training Consultants Used: Room for use during training sessions. A 1. Associate Architect-WHJ Architects combination of Sloped and Flat Roofs were 2 MEP Engineer-Reed Wells Benson Engineers utilized to blend with the Residential surroundings 3. Structural Engineer-Zinser Grossman Engineers and provide space for the Roof Top HVAC 4 Civil Engineer-Pacheco Koch Engineers Equipment. Contractor: Hisaw Construction, Mr.Scott Stoltz, Ph. 972.380 4448 How this Project Met the Owner's Goals:The project was a landmark design,won Second Place in the National Fire Chief Design Awards, and was on Time and within Budget. `\ ! '" '° 'T V\ CONY i ,l i U l ! i 7 1 \I.,_...) I`V Project Owner&Length of Relationship: City of North Richland Hills;3 Years Owner Contact: Mr.Thomas Powell-Director '; ,..,, ,rt a�. - — Support Services; Ph.817.427.6918;6110 Dick Fisher Dr.West, North Richland Hills,TX 76180 i . ; . �- i- 1 ' $ ; L Project Construction Cost: $2.08 M 1''�'^`= - --_ ,;, . Project Delivery Method:CSP r .� - ,IP"- E' _.r Project Size: 12,053 GSF - _'� „.- ,F 7. Type of Construction: New Construction- .`. r - , _ `� f otti Shell&Interior Finish Out �`' F — t - - Design&Construction Dates a,4 ,,,_ ,,,...,��, a. Design&Consh.Documents: 10.5 Mo. j - b, Design Dates:Jan. '03-Nov. '03 . c. Construction Phase: 11 Months ,� d. Construction Dates: Apr. '04-May. '05 ~��• )10 ti RSA's Contracted Responsibility on Project: .. - .•'4 ,: Prime Consultant&Architect of Record Professional Services Provided by RSA on n ., Project:RSA was the Prime Consultant on the -i)v:2 • "` t Project. Managed the Design and Design �� ;v�ti Development Phases, Prepared Construction �f-_� ' r Documents and Provided Bidding/ } 4 ` , F rt` • Negotiation and Construction Administration ism Phase Services, Furniture and Equipment �« Planning was part of the project scope. • Other services provided through RSA by our ' - Consultants included Structural, Mechanical i ' ' Electrical, Plumbing and Civil. 1 `r , Project Description: Construction of A New Fire Station for the City of North Richland Hills, TX. The project scope for the Fire Station Principal-In-Charge: Randall B, Scott,AIA included 3 Double Drive-Thru Apparatus Bays,Sleeping Quarters for 10 Firemen, (2) Project Director:Gregory J. Conaway,AIA Battalion Chief's Office/Quarters, Showers/Locker Rooms, Kitchen, Fitness z Studio Leader&CA: Vincent Miller,AIA Center, Day Room,Video Training Area, Dispatch Room, EMS Storage, Emergency Consultants Used: Operations Center,General Storage, 1, MEP Engineer-Reed Wells Benson Decon/Extraction Room,S.C.B.A. Facilities, 2. Structural Engineer-Zinser Grossman and Washer/Dryer Room. Two Additional 3, Civil Engineer-Pacheco Koch Apparatus Bays were bid as an alternate 4. Associate Architect:WHJ Architects and were not taken by the Owner. The exterior envelope consists of a combination Contractor: Harrison Quality Construction,Sherri of two colors of red brick with cast stone Harrison, Ph. 972.939.0925 accents. Both sloped and flat roofs were used to blend with the surrounding How this Project is Relevant: This was a 12,000 SF Fire neighborhood and provide screened areas Station with 3 Double Drive-Thru Bays designed for a for rooftop HVAC equipment. Municipality in the DFW Mid-Cities area with similar needs and scope as yours. c_.,-; )r t ' A Ti `i 1( •" s\N 1 1, ' 1'\ I T` fl r-'1 Project Owner&Length of Relationship: City of North Richland Hills;3 Years 1 Owner Contact: Mr.Thomas Powell-Director Support Services; Ph,817.427,6918;6110 Dick Fisher Dr.West,North Richland Hills,TX 76180 _- r 177 , ,,_ :::: _. Project Construction Cost $2.11 M °" ll i' -a , 11 Project Delivery Method: CSP ��. -1 Mr' Project Size: 12,175 GSF Type of Construction: New Construction Shell&Interior Finish Out 4 le i Design&Construction Dates , I,a-1;111.'' J 1 .y '11= a. Design&Constr.Documents: 10.5 Mo. :. At ,,,- a. Design Dates:Jan. '03-Nov. '03 e c. Construction Phase: 11 Months rJ. d. Construction Dates: Apr. '04-May. '05 RSA's Contracted Responsibility1 z , it" I x - _on Project: - .-y , 1t «, Prime Consultant&Architect of Record � s _.� -' ;..,., , '. 1.j `'•,; ' -' , ] N.F Y -^.. �,,- _(.. w= A r� A .. b41 Professional Services Provided by RSA on j ,t` k t / 4 a � ., It Project RSA was the Prime Consultant on the ,r ;i_ Project. Managed the Design and Design Development Phases, Prepared Construction • .� �� �.�t' Documents and Provided Bidding/ al III Li - till.' Negotiation and Construction Administration _ !" lrwf Zi,T Phase Services. Furniture and Equipment ; Planning was part of the project scope. •,, .d t Other services provided through RSA by our - Consultants included Structural, Mechanical, ' Electrical, Plumbing and Civil. Project Description: Construction of A New Fire Station for the City of North Richland Hills, 1. TX. The project scope for the Fire Station included 4 Double Drive-Thru Apparatus Principal-In-Charge: Randall B. Scott,AIA Bays,Sleeping Quarters for 10 Firemen,a Battalion Chiefs Office/Quarters, ;J Project Director:Gregory J. Conaway,AIA Showers/Locker Rooms, Kitchen, Fitness Center, Day Room,Video Training Area, 4 Studio Leader&CA: Vincent Miller,AIA Dispatch Room, EMS Storage,General Storage, Decon/Extraction Room,S.C.B.A. Consultants Used: Facilities, and Washer/Dryer Room.The j 1. MEP Engineer-Reed Wells Benson exterior skin consisted of a combination of 2. Structural Engineer-Zinser Grossman cultured stone and large format CMU block . 3. Civil Engineer Pacheco Koch resembling cut limestone. A combination of a 4. Associate Architects-WHJ Architects sloped and flat roofs were incorporated to blend with the adjacent residential Contractor: Harrison Quality Construction, Sherri neighborhood and provide screening for ;' Harrison, Ph.972.939.0925 rooftop HVAC equipment. N How this Project is Relevant: This was a 12,000+SF Fire Station with 3 Double Drive-Thru Bays designed by the RSA Consulting Team for a Municipality in the 1 DFW Mid-Cities area. PART FOUR RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS. Ii C. PROJECTS CURRENTLY RSA currently has a window of time in our work load that UNDER CONTRACT RACT would allow us to put our highly experienced Municipal Fire Station Design Studio on the Wylie Fire Station No. 3 Project. We currently have several projects in the Construction Phase but have Design and Construction Documents staff available to begin your project immediately. Our current work load consists of: ► City Hall&Municipal Court for Commerce,IX (Construction Phase) ► Fire Administration&Central Fire Station for Commerce,TX(Construction Phase) ► Fire Station No.40 for Dallas,TX(Construction Phase) ► Recreation Center in Stephenville,TX(Construction Phase) Page 1 PART FIVE RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC. RSA PLAN FOR RSA will submit a Primavera SureTrac Schedule with milestone dates for the City's approval on this project using the dates COMPLETING shown below. Our Consulting Team's expertise with Fire WORK I N A TIMELY Stations and the fact that RSA's premier Fire Station Design Studio will be assigned to this project will assure its timely MANNER completion. We have over 200 professional staff on our Consulting Team ready to begin your project. WORK TIME LINE Randall Scott Architects has reviewed the schedule provided in the RFP and we believe it is achievable. We have broken down the original schedule you provided as follows: TASK PROPOSED TIME ► Kickoff Meeting/Begin Schematic Design Jun. 1, 2006 ► Interviews with Stakeholders 2 Days ► Prepare Facilities Program 1 Week ► On-Site Design Charrette 2 Days ► Complete Schematic Design Phase Jun.30, 2006 ► City Schematic Design Review 1 Week • Complete Design Development Phase Aug.31, 2006 ► City Design Development Review 1 Week ► Complete Construction Documents Oct..31, 2006 ► City Construction Documents Review 1 Week ► Complete Bidding &Negotiation Dec. 15, 2006 ► Council Award of Project Dec.30, 2006 ► Substantial Completion of Construction Nov..30, 2007 ► Owner Furnishings&Contractor Punch Dec. 30. 2007 PART SIX RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC, CLAIMS HISTORY RSA has been involved in one claim in our 19 year existence that went to mediation in 2004. It was a frivolous case where the parties involved attached every conceivable party working on the project. It was primarily an issue between the General Contractor and one if his subcontractors. Since RSA was not at fault,we were completely exonerated. Page 1 PART SEVEN RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC. PROJECT APPROACH 1 . DESIGN PHILOSOPHY o e The above quote from John Ruskin sums up our Design Philosophy. We believe Municipal Facilities should be buildings that last,are timeless in design and inspire citizens and employees of the City to serve in their communities the way our forefathers did. Municipal buildings typically must last 25-40 years before they receive any type of significant renovation. Therefore, materials and equipment must be carefully chosen so that they inspire yet last. Budgets have to be met and the City's design standards have to be incorporated into the project. We have achieved these goals on numerous Municipal projects over the past 19 years. 2. PROPOSED SERVICES Project Scope: The Scope of Work for the City of Wylie Fire Station#3 is presumed to consist of Site Work,On-Site Utility Work,a Public Lobby,Apparatus Bays, Kitchen/Dining Room,Day Room, Firefighter Sleeping Quarters, Dispatch/Watch Room,Training/EOC,SCBA Room Decon Area, Exercise Room Showers,Firefighter Restrooms,Public Restrooms Laundry,Bunker Gear Storage, Fire Administrative Offices and other Support Areas. Services to be provided by the RSA Consulting Team include: • Architectural Design • Interior Design • MEP Engineering • Structural Engineering • Civil Engineering • Landscape Architecture/Irrigation • Cost Estimating • Project Scheduling The final Scope of Work will be determined during the Needs Assessment,Facilities Programming and Design Charrette processes conducted between the Design Team and the City. Needs Assessment Phase During the Needs Assessment Phase,RSA will provide the following services: Meet with City Administration and Fire Department Staff to introduce the key players for the Project Team • Review communications protocol for the Project Team • Meet with and interileiN Project Stakeholders(Fire Dept.Staff, Council Members,City Staff,Concerned Citizens and other groups)to define the Needs,Goals and Requirements for the Station. Page 1 -'{ v i If) -; INC. • Prepare a detailed written Facilities Program of the spaces for the Station including functional,square footage,adjacency, • . equipment, MEP,and data/telecom requirements.Prepare area a/ i T- summary spreadsheets with the Net and Gross Areas totaled for the building t ; * r ,, Prepare Preliminary Site Concepts to assist the City in determining i '" the best configuration for the facility on the site i • *" • Prepare a Preliminary Opinion of Probable Cost for the project ' • Meet with the Stakeholders to review the Detailed Written Facilities •. Program,Site Concepts and Opinion of Probable Cost • Perform a zoning and code review for the Project Randall&Vince working with Small • Prepare a written Needs Assessment/Facilities Program Document Group Stakeholder Meeting on including a Detailed Scope of Work,Executive Summary,Detailed Commerce Central Fire Station& Facilities Program,Square Footage Summary, Project Schedule Fire Administration Building and Opinion of Probable Cost for the project. • ,.'.vet with the Stakeholders to review the Needs Assessment/Facilities Program,Site Concepts, Implementation - \ \ ` _ _ Schedule and Opinion of Probable Cost documents - • • Assist Staff in presenting the Program information to Concerned , Citizens& Council for approval if requested t s . During the Schematic Design Phase, RSA will provide the following __,-..—,-, lee r .. services: - ..�� �..• •- Based on the approved Facilities Program,the Design Team will �' conduct a I-2 day Design,Char e re .vith the Stakeholders to in ?- 1`os ,, = _ collectively generate a minimum of 3 Floor Plan and 3 Site Plan Randall presenting Concepts to the options for the project. Overall Group Stakeholder Meeting • Once the Charrette is complete and the final concept is approved on Commerce Central Fire Station& by the Stakeholders,the Design Team will prepare Preliminary Fire Administration Building Schematic Design drawings illustrating the Design Concept for the Project. The Design Team will return to meet with the Stakeholders to review the Preliminary Schematic Design drawings and receive Stakeholder review comments. • With the this information in hand,the Design Team will prepare Final Schematic Design Documents for the selected concept • RSA will prepare a SD Opinion of Probable Cost for the Consulting .r Teams proposed Design � , • We will Prepare Computer Generated 3D Renderings of the project / W} ' ►�;��; • RSA will prepare a Computer Generated 3D Exterior Animation of k ' .'e 0 * the Final Design for the project :- se • !, „' • We will _et,,,;th the Sta,=holders to review the Final Schematic Design Documents, Renderings,Animation and Opinion of Probable Cost City of Dallas Fire Station No.40 3D • RSA will assist City Staff in presenting the Schematic Design CAD Rendering Prepared by RSA Documents, Renderings,Animation and Opnion of Probable Cost to Concerned Citizens and City Council for approval if requested • We will prepare and distribute Project Meeting Notes documenting the basic issues, resolutions and action items agreed to during this phase. - • RSA will prepare the documents required to assist the City in submitting the project for rezoning approval if required Design Development Phase Based on the approved Schematic Design documents and Opinion of Probable Cost, Randall Scott Architects and our Consultants will provide the following Design Development documents and services: • Site plan illustrating grading and site improvements • Architectural floor plans illustrating the proposed building layout • Partition types Page 2 PART SEVEN (cont.) RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC. • Preliminary wall sections&details • Interior elevations • Millwork elevations • Reflected ceiling plans • Preliminary details • General Notes • Room finish schedule&door schedule • Preliminary mechanical,electrical and plumbing plans and details • Preliminary structural plans and details • Preliminary civil plans and details • Preliminary landscape and irrigation plans and details • Updated Opinion of Probable Cost • Preliminary Project Manual • Attend review meetings with the City to review the Design Development documents and updated Opinion of Probable Cost • Prepare and distribute project meeting notes documenting the basic issues, resolutions and action items agreed to during this phase. • Assist the City in finalizing the rezoning approval(if needed) Construction Document Phase Based on the approved Design Development documents and Opinion of Probable Cost,the RSA Consulting Team will prepare the final drawings,details and specifications required to construct the Project. A final Opinion of Probable Cost will be provided to the City at this phase.The Construction Documents Phase includes attendance by RSA personnel at meetings with the City to coordinate and review the Construction Documents and Opinion of Probable Cost.Any comments received from the City during these meetings will be incorporated into the documents prior to bidding. Services during this phase include the preparation and distribution of project meeting notes documenting the basic issues,resolutions and action items agreed to during this phase. Bidding/Negotiation Phase Once the final Construction Documents and Opinion of Probable Cost are approved by the City,Randall Scott Architects and our Consultants will provide the following services during the Bidding& Negotiation Phase: • Assist the City in preparing a hard bid,Competitive Sealed Proposal(CSP)or CM at Risk(CMR)Request for Proposal and advertising the Project for bidding • Assist in interviewing CSP or CMR candidates(if needed) • Attend a Pre-Bid or Pre-Proposal Conference • Distribute plans and specifications to interested bidders • Answer Contractor questions during the Bidding Phase • Review substitution requests from interested Contractors • Prepare and issue addenda • Review Contractor's bids and bonds • Advise City on most qualified Bidder or Proposer • Prepare and distribute project meeting notes documenting the basic issues, resolutions and action items agreed to in meetings attended by RSA during this phase Construction Administration Once the successful Contractor is given notice to proceed, Phase RSA will provide the following Contract Administration phase services: • Attend a Pre-Construction Conference • Review substitution requests from the Contractor for materials or products which become unavailable during construction due to circumstances beyond the Contractor's control Page 3 PART SEVEN (cont.) RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC. • Provide weekly site visits to review the Work in an effort to determine,in general,whether or not it is being constructed in accordance with the Construction Documents. Make additional site visits to the site during concrete pours,roofing,waterproofing and other critical stages of construction • Review submittals and shop drawings required by the Construction Documents • Prepare Architect's Supplemental Instructions(ASI's)and Drawings when required and issue them to the Contractor • Process Requests for Information(RFI's)Proposal Requests(PR's) and Change Orders when required • Review the Contractor's Schedule and advise the City of construction progress • Review the Contractor's Applications for Payment and transmit them to the City with recommendations and/or adjustments • Prepare a Punch Ust for the Project ▪ Establish dates of Substantial and Final Completion and prepare certificates for same • Coordinate project close-out documents including obtaining Warranty&Maintenance binders from the Contractor • Attend a One Year Warranty Walk Through and Prepare a Warranty Punch Ust 3. QUAI ITY ASSURANCE Documentation RSA is big on documentation. All meetings with the Owner are documented via Meeting Notes with Action Items and distributed to all parties. Prior to sending the final documents out for bidding,these Meeting Notes are reviewed by RSA's Studio Leader to make sure all items were picked up on the Construction Documents prior to issuance. All Project Documentation can be placed on RSA's FTP Site for access and downloading by Project Team Members at their convenience. Quality Control Reviews Prior to submitting drawings or documents at each phase of the work to the University,either a Principal or one of the senior Studio Leaders at RSA will perform a Quality Control Review of the documents. Coordination Meetings RSA holds regular Consultant Coordination Meetings throughout the document preparation process. Meeting Notes are made of these meetings and distributed with Action Items listed to the attendees. Principal Involvement RSA requires each of our Consultants to have their work done by a Principal of the firm or be significantly directed by a Principal of their firm. Randall Scott, Principal of Randall Scott Architects is integrally involved in the day to day work on each project in RSA's office and will accept no less from our Consultants. Extensive Submittals Extensive submittal requirements and review by RSA staff are one of the mainstays of RSA's Quality Control Program. The submittals will be forwarded to the City for their review and approval as well if desired. Field Reports RSA prepares Field Reports with Digital Pictures after each site visit to document the process of construction. Field Reports are e-mailed to the Owner and Contractor generally within 48 hrs. Field Reports can also be placed on RSA's FTP Site for the Project Team members's access. Page 4 PART SEVEN (cont.) RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC. 4 TECHNICAL & RSA's(5)Senior Registered Architects:Randall,Greg, MANAGEMENT Edward,Dan and Vincent,who will be Directing, Designing and Managing this project,each have over 29 QUALIFICATIONS years Experience. We bring over 125 Years of Architectural Experience to bear on the proposed RSA's"A-TEAM" project in addition to another 150 years experience from our Consultants'Management Teams who will be working on your project. RSA has specialized in Municipal Architecture since 1991 having designed over$150M in Municipal Projects. Our consultants are also highly experience in Municipal Project Design. { 55. DEVELOPMENT & Work schedules at RSA are prepared at the beginning of each project by RSA's Studio Leader on Primavera"Sure- MAiNTENANCE OF Trac"software. They are maintained by the Studio WORK SCHEDULES Leader and reviewed with Randall,Greg and Dan Brantner,RSA's Production Manager,at our Staff Meetings each Monday. Randall,Greg and Dan review Primavera Sure-Trac the upcoming Milestone Dates for each project and Scheduling Software assign staff accordingly to accomplish each deadline. Should the project fall behind schedule for any reason, ,rt Dan will assign additional personnel from other Studios In order to maintain the Project Schedule. RSA utilizes several documents on our Municipal projects 6. METHODS FOR TRACKING to track input from the Owner and Contractor and follow OWNER INPUT up on their results. These documents include: • Meeting Notes with action items and responsible parties noted in bold • Construction Meeting Agendas • Construction Meeting Notes • Pending Issues Reports • Construction Change Request Logs • Architect's Supplemental Instruction Logs • Request for Information Logs • Submittal Logs Regular Owner Review Meetings during the Design and Construction Documents Phases and weekly Construction Meetings with the Owner and Contractor allow free communication flow and result in immediate feedback. Documentation of these meetings through the above instruments and review of those documents at the ensuing meeting result in the Owner's comments being incorporated without fail. Page 5 PART SEVEN (cont.) RANDALL SCOTT ARCHITECTS, INC. 7. METHODS FOR MANAGING Because of RSA's experience in Municipal and Fire Station THE UNIQUE ASPECTS OF A Architecture,we have a strong historical cost database from which to draw and are therefore highly successful at FIRE STATION WITHIN A FIXED bringing our Municipal Clients'projects in within budget. BUDGET We monitor Means Cost Guide and Engineering News Report publications closely each month to update our cost data base. RSA prepares 4 Cost Estimates during the course of our services to you,one at each of the Programming,SD, DD and CD phases. RSA will include Add Alternates in the Construction Documents to offset anomalies in the bidding market. We also include a Bidding Contingency in our Cost Estimates to make allowances for bid day irregularities. If the se methods are not sufficient to bring the project into budget(they generally are), RSA will work with the City and Contractor to Value Engineer the project to within the City's budget. Page 6 Acknowledgement and Certification We have received Addenda Numbers through All portions of this Statement of Qualifications are true and correct. The undersigned is authorized to sign for and legally bind the Respondent. The undersigned authorizes the City of Wylie, Texas and their representatives to contact any firm, organization, or person listed in this Statement of Qualifications regarding the Respondent's performance, financial condition and other information regarding the Respondent's Capability. Firm: SG''r) l/ f' C`/-f /%C /S Name: 7 0 6--i 1 S cU Title: P-le /6 CE e,„,,,g...avv4 Signed: Date: ��✓L o �� Ackno`vled• ent of Recei• t Re: City of Wylie,Texas Request for Qualifications Project Architect for Fire Station Number 3 Please fill in the requested information below as acknowledgment that you have received the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) noted above, including the related RFQ Questionnaire. If your firm has an interest in participating, it is required that this sheet be completed and returned to Jim Holcomb, Purchasing Manager, City of Wylie, 2000 North Highway 78, Wylie, Texas 75098, or faxed to 972-442-8148. Acknowledgement and an affirmative statement of interest will ensure that your firm receives any addenda to this solicitation. RESPONDENT: (Company responding to this RFQ.) Name Randall Sr'att �rrhi tPrVts, Tom-_ Address 14755 Preston Rd. , Suite 730 Dallas, Tx 75254 Phone 972-664-9100 Fax: 972-664-9122 POINT OF CONTACT: Respondent's representative and designated point of contact for Addenda and other communications regarding this RFQ. Name Randall B. Scott, AIA Title: President & CEO Phone 972-664-9100 cxt. 2464 Fax: 972-664-9100 Email rscott@rsarchitects.com W-F Yes. Our Company DOES have an interest in responding. ❑❑ No. Our Company DOES NOT have an interest in responding. SIGNED: Randall B. Scott, AIA President & CEO Printed Name and Title Signature Date Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 16 Department: City Manager (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Mark B. Roath Account Code: Date Prepared: May 31, 2006 Budgeted Amount: $26,985,000 (Bond Program) Exhibits: Subject Consider, and act upon, ranking the finalist construction management firms and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate a contract beginning with the top ranked firm for the New City Hall, Library and Recreation Center. Recommendation Discussion Should the City Council select a construction management firm, from the finalist list, then the City Manager will initiate negotiations relative to scope, services, fee and payment schedules with the top ranked firm. If a tentative agreement is reached, then the City Manager will return with a contract for City Council consideration and possible action. If a tentative agreement cannot be reached with the top ranked firm, then negotiations will begin with the second ranked firm, until a tentative agreement can be reached and a contract can be brought to the City Council. Approved By Initial Date Department Director City Manager MBR 05/31/06 Page 1 of 1 Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT 1 Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Item Number: 17 Department: (City Secretary's Use Only) Prepared By: Mindy Manson Account Code: Date Prepared: June 1, 2006 Budgeted Amount: $1,500,000 (Bond Program) Exhibits: Subject Consider, and act upon, ranking the finalist architectural firms and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate a professional design services contract beginning with the top ranked firm for Fire Station#3. Recommendation Discussion Should the City Council select an architectural firm from the finalist lists, the City Manager will initiate negotiations relative to scope, services, and fee and payment schedules with the top ranked firm. If a tentative agreement is reached, the City Manager will return with a contract for City Council consideration and possible action. If a tentative agreement cannot be reached with the top ranked firm, then negotiations will begin with the second ranked firm. Approved By Initial Date Department Director MM June 1, 2006 City Manager MBR 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1 Wylie City Council Agenda Report CITY OF WYLIE TRANSMITTAL REPORT Department Director: Mark B. Roath Prepared By: Mark B. Roath Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Consider, and act upon, Ordinance of the City of Wylie creating a new Chapter of the Wylie Code of Subject/Title: Ordinances Establishing a 1% for Arts Program. Place an"X" in the appropriate box: Presentations Consent Public Hearing Individual Consideration X Work Session Executive Session Approximate Discussion Time: 15 minutes Wylie City Council Agenda Report CITY of WYLIE TRANSMITTAL REPORT Department Director: Mark B. Roath Prepared By: Mark B. Roath Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Consider, and act upon, TXU Electric Delivery Letter Agreement, Paragraphs 1 -4 and 5-7, related outstanding Subject/Title: franchise issues. Place an"X" in the appropriate box: Presentations Consent Public Hearing Individual Consideration X Work Session Executive Session Approximate Discussion Time: 10 minutes Wylie City Council Agenda Report CITY OF WYLIE TRANSMITTAL REPORT Department Director: Mark B. Roath Prepared By: Mark B. Roath Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Presentation by the firms of Thomas S. Byrne, Ltd., and Hunt Construction Group, Inc. for construction management services related to the New City Hall, Subject/Title: Library and Recreation Center. Place an "X" in the appropriate box: Presentations Consent Public Hearing Individual Consideration Work Session X Executive Session Approximate Discussion Time: 30 minutes Wylie City Council Agenda Report CITY OF WYLIE TRANSMITTAL REPORT Department Director: Mark B. Roath Prepared By: Mark B. Roath Meeting Date: June 13, 2006 Consider, and act upon, ranking the finalist construction management firms and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate a contract beginning with the top ranked firm Subject/Title: for the New City Hall, Library and Recreation Center. Place an"X" in the appropriate box: Presentations Consent Public Hearing Individual Consideration X Work Session Executive Session Approximate Discussion Time: 10 minutes