Loading...
03-11-1997 (City Council) Agenda Packet AGENDA WYLIE CITY COUNCIL Wylie Municipal Complex March 11 , 1997 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION - Rev. A. L. Draper, First Baptist Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Consider Approval of Minutes for February 24 and March 4, 1997 2. Consider Approval of Work Order No. WYL-18 Authorizing the Hogan Corporation to Proceed with the Storm Drainage Master Plan ACTION ITEM 3. Hold Public Hearing and Consider an Ordinance Approving the Zone Change Request from Roy Neely for Approval of a Zone Change from "A" Agriculture to "B-2" Business District for Property Located on the South Side of State Highway 78 North, East of Kreymer Lane and More Particularly Described as Lots 6, 7 and 8 of Wylie Ranch East Commercial Park 4. Hold Public Hearing to Receive Public Input Regarding the 10 Year Capital Improvements Program (1997-2006) and the Maximum Calculated Impact Fees Recommended by the Impact Fee Advisory Committee and Consider Adoption of the 10-Year Capital Improvements Program (1997-2006) and Consider Adopting or Amending the Impact Fees STAFF REPORTS CITIZEN PARTICIPATION EXECUTIVE SESSION 5. Hold Executive Session Under Sections 551.071 Consultation with Attorney; 551.072 Deliberations about Real Property; and 551.075 Conference With Employees To Receive Information and Question Employees Regarding Pending Litigation, City of Parker v. City of Wylie, Cause No. 219.458.96, District Court of Collin County, Texas 219 Judicial District RECONVENE INTO OPEN MEETING 6. Take Any Necessary Action as a Result of the Executive Session ADJOURNMENT ' 21(40,4( Posted on this the th day of March, 1997 at 5:00 p.m. THE WYLIE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX IS WHEELCHAIR ACCESSIBLE. SIGN INTERPRETATION OR OTHER SPECIAL ASSISTANCE FOR DISABLED ATTENDEES MUST BE REQUESTED 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE BY CONTACTING THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE AT 442-8100 OR TDD 442-8170 WYLI E CITY COUNCIL CONSENT AGENDA COMMUNICATION ITEM NO 2 March 11, 1997 Issue Consider and act upon approval for Work Order No. WYL-18 authorizing The Hogan Corporation to proceed with the Storm Drainage Master Plan. Background The Hogan Corporation will perform a drainage study and review, storm drainage analysis, and a storm drainage plan for the preparation of the Storm Drainage Master Plan. The drainage study will consist of a drainage survey whereby a review will be made of all information on storm drainage as provided by the City. A survey will be made of the existing storm drainage system to include the location and size of the existing inlets and outlets, location and size of the existing lines, and the location of existing drainage ways. A study will be made to determine major drainage areas within the planning area and their approximate acreage. Existing runoff calculations will be made as well as projections of fully developed runoff flows. A storm drainage analysis will be made of the storm drainage system and a listing and ranking of problems identified to the system will be prepared. Prioritization criteria will be established and will include cost of improvements, value of property affected, number of citizens affected, history of problems or age, and size and scope of problem. A study and analysis of the topography, the areas subject to flooding and the essential portions of the storm drainage system will be made to determine the adequacy of the system to meet existing and forecasted needs. The storm drainage plan will consist of preparing a general plan for the improvements and extensions to the drainage system, for the elimination of existing deficiencies and provide for the present and forecasted needs during the planning period. The existing system and proposed storm drainage and flood protection plan will be prepared on a topographic map to include the ETJ and the limits of each drainage basin. The final map will be compatible with the City's digital base map. Board Recommendations N/A Consent Agenda Item No 2 Page 1 Financial Considerations The Engineering design costs to prepare the Storm Drainage Master Plan under Work Order No. WYL-18 is $3,300. No cost estimates have been furnished by Hogan Corporation for services outside of engineering design. Additional costs could include engineering consultant hours, survey work, and lab testing. The proposed work order will require a General Fund budget amendment. Legal Considerations The services described herein are to be performed in accordance with the applicable sections of the Agreement for Engineering Services by and between the City of Wylie, Texas (Owner), and The Hogan Corporation (Engineer), as approved on July 27, 1993. Staff Recommendations Staff recommends approval of Work Order No. WYL-18. Attachments Work Order No. WYL-18 t1 � , ems/ Prepared Rev' ed by Finan e Cit Manager Approval Consent Agenda Item No 2 Page 2 March 4, 1997 WORK ORDER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WORK ORDER NO.WYL-18 This will constitute authorization by the City of Wylie, Texas (Owner), for The Hogan Corporation, Engineers-Planners-Consultants, Dallas, Texas (Engineer), to proceed with the following described engineering services. STORM DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Engineer shall perform the Drainage Survey and Review, Storm Drainage Analysis, and Storm Drainage Plan and such other related Additional Services that may be authorized by the Owner for the preparation of the Storm Drainage Master Plan. The services described herein are to be performed in accordance with the applicable sections of the Agreement for Engineering Services by and between the City of Wylie, Texas(Owner), and The Hogan Corporation(Engineer), as approved on July 27, 1993. B. PRE-WORK CONFERENCE The Engineer will meet with the Owner and other appropriate entities to discuss the City's criteria, work program and schedule, procedures of communication, additional surveys, assignments of personnel, and any other matters that may have a direct or indirect effect upon the completion and results of this project. Other work and review conferences will be scheduled throughout the progress of developing the project. C. DRAINAGE STUDY 1. Drainage Survey and Review a. A review shall be made of all information on storm drainage as provided by the municipality. Engineering and Planning Studies prepared on drainage shall be listed with the firm name and date. -1- March 4. 1997 b. A survey shall be made of the existing storm drainage system to include: 1) Location and size of existing inlets; 2) Location and size of existing outlets; 3) Location and size of existing lines; 4) Location of existing drainage ways. c. A study shall be made to determine major drainage areas within the planning area and their approximate acreage. Existing runoff calculations will be made as well as projections of fully developed runoff flows. d. Standards or criteria from the City's Storm Drainage Design Manual will be used in determining storm drainage needs. Comments will also be made on the standards where appropriate. 2. Storm Drainage Analysis a. Analysis shall be made of the storm drainage system and a listing and ranking of problems identified to the system will be prepared. Special attention will be made to known problem areas reported by staff and citizens. Prioritization criteria will be established and will include, but not be limited to: 1) Cost of improvements; 2) Value of property affected; 3) Number of citizens affected; 4) History of problems or age; 5) Size and scope of problem. b. Make a study and analysis of the topography, the areas subject to flooding and the essential portions of the storm drainage system to determine the adequacy of the system to meet existing and forecasted needs. Data, as available through the Flood Insurance Administration, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development shall be utilized to the fullest extent possible. 3. Storm Drainage Plan a. Prepare a general plan for the improvements and extensions to the drainage system, for the elimination of existing deficiencies and provide for the present and forecasted needs during the planning period. Recommended -2- March 4, 1997 community improvements shall be stated and include as a minimum the following: 1) Priorities; 2) Projected costs; 3) Sources of possible funding. b. The existing system and proposed storm drainage and flood protection plan shall be prepared on a clearly legible topographic map(s) at an appropriate scale for the planning area, to include at a minimum, the ETJ and the limits of each drainage basin. c. The final map shall be submitted to the City in digital format and be compatible with the City's digital base map. E. RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER Unless otherwise authorized in writing by the Owner for the Engineer to perform such other additional or special services, the Owner shall be responsible for the following services: 1. Provide the Engineer the assistance needed for collecting data from Owner's records for the research and analysis of the City's systems. The acceptance and use of the data furnished by the Owner to the Engineer shall not operate to impose any obligation upon the Engineer to determine that the data is true, accurate, complete, or correct. 2. Provide the services of a qualified surveyor to furnish the necessary field data for the analysis of the system. 3. Prepare field note descriptions for right-of-way acquisition where it may be required. 4. Prepare applications for routine permits required by Collin County or other agencies. 5. Arrange for and coordinate the subcontract services of a Geotechnical Consultant for the soils investigation, as may be required. 6. Authorize the Engineer to print, collate, and assemble an agreed number of plans, and other documents for distribution to interested parties. -3- March 4, 1997 F. BASIS OF COMPENSATION 1. Availability of Funds The Owner agrees that funds, to the extent required, are currently available and sufficient to complete all phases of the proposed engineering services authorized under this Proposal. All invoices submitted by the Engineer and approved by the Owner shall be paid within thirty(30) days of the invoice date. For any payments not made within thirty (30) days, a charge will be made monthly in the amount of one and one-half percent (1-1/2%) of the unpaid balance, beginning thirty(30) days from the date of the statement. 2. Drainage Study a. Engineering The Owner shall make payments to the Engineer for performing the engineering services described in the Design Phase, Section C.1., 2., 3., 4., on a monthly billing basis in proportion to that part of the services proposed herein which has been accomplished, as evidenced by monthly statements submitted by the Engineer and approved by the Owner. Final payment shall be due upon completion of these services. The compensation for the engineering design services performed shall be based on a lump sum amount of$3,300.00. b. Additional Services For Design Phase For performing the Additional Services For the Drainage Study as described under Section C, the Engineer will assist the Owner, as directed, and is to be paid on a monthly billing basis at a per diem rate of the personnel's salary cost times a multiplier of 2.5. The Engineer is to be reimbursed for all direct non- labor, field surveys, and other subcontract expenses at the invoice cost plus 10 per cent for coordination and handling. 4. Other Special Services- (As Directed By The Owner) If authorized in writing by the Owner, the Engineer shall furnish other services or tasks in addition to the scope of services proposed herein. For performing these special services, the Engineer shall be paid on a monthly billing basis at a per diem rate of the -4- March 4, 1997 personnel's Salary Cost times a multiplier of 2.5, with the reimbursement of all direct non-labor and subcontract expenses at the invoice cost plus 10 per cent for coordination and handling. G. TIME FOR COMPLETION The design work to be performed, as authorized herein, is projected to be completed within sixty(60) calendar days after receipt of field survey information. APPROVED: ACCEPTED: CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS THE HOGAN CORPORATION By By Mike Collins Gre . MacLean, P.E. City Manager Vice esident Attest Attest (hhc(, Date Date 3'(p - 1 7 -5- WYLIE CITY COUNCIL //VI' ACTION AGENDA COMMUNICATION ITEM NO 3 March 11, 1997 Issue Consider and act upon a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission to the City Council a request from Roy Neely for approval of a zone change from "A" Agriculture to "B-2" Business District for property located on the south side of State Highway 78 North, east of Kreymer Lane and more particularly described as lots 6, 7 and 8 of Wylie Ranch East Commercial Park. Background Mr. Roy Neely is requesting that the above referenced property's zoning classification be changed from "A" Agriculture to "B-2" Business District. The City of Wylie Comprehensive Plan's land use designation for the property in question is Retail/Commercial/Business. These districts are generally defined as follows: "R" Retail District - intended for neighborhood shopping facilities which provide limited business service and office facilities predominantly for the convenience of residents of the community. "B-1" Business District - intended predominantly for commercial activities of a service nature which typically have operating characteristics (limited outside or open storage) or traffic service requirements of greater intensity than retail shopping and residential environments. "B-2" Business District- intended to provide a zoning category similar to the "B-1" district with additional uses permitted which are not generally carried on completely within a building or structure and an expanded range of service and repair uses. When determining what is an appropriate land use, consideration should be given to the existing development in the immediate area. This area has been developed with single family residences directly to the south of the property. The land on both sides (east and west)of the property in question is zoned as "B-1" Business District. There is also the possibility of single family development to the east of this property where it is zoned "SF-2". There have been discussions between staff and interested developers about the development of the "SF-2" property (please see the attached zoning map). Action Agenda Item No 3 Page 1 Background - Continued It also must be noted that there are additional development standards that apply to non- residential districts (R, B-1, B-2, I). These standards include requiring 75% brick, stone brick veneer, custom treated tilt wall or decorative concrete block for any exterior wall facing a thoroughfare or residential district. There are also landscaping and screening requirements that must be met. These standards are in place to protect adjacent properties and the community as a whole from unsightly commercial development. Many of the existing businesses located in Wylie today were in existence before these standards were adopted. Therefore, the development that is in existence today is not truly representative of what future Retail/Commercial/Business development will look like. The City Council in the past has taken action on similar requests for "B-2" Business Districts located on Highway 78 North. The more recent examples are listed below: June 13, 1995 - Request by Robert Heath for a zone change from "B-1" to "B-2" for property located at 1890 Hwy. 78 North. Council Action - Denied June 11, 1996 - Request by Western Auto for zone change from "R" to "B-2" for property located at 709 Hwy. 78 North. Council Action -Approved Note: This approval allowed the addition of a garage bay to the Western Auto facility which was already in existence and conducting business. Request by Dennis Bell for zone change from "R" to "B-2" for property located at 707 Hwy. 78 North. Council Action - Denied Request by Greens Auto Parts for zone change from "R" to "B-2" for property located at 703 Hwy. 78 North. Council Action - Denied Request by Doug and Guy Poole for zone change from "R" to "B-2" for property located at 703 Hwy. 78 North. Council Action - Approved "B-1" with a specific use permit On January 6, 1997, Mr. Neely filed a Zone Change Request to change the zoning classification of this property from "A" Agriculture to "I" Industrial District. Citizens attending the Public Hearing raised concerns about allowable uses in industrial zoned districts, screening and aesthetics. This request was recommended for denial by the Wylie Planning and Zoning Commission. Subsequently, Mr. Neely withdrew the request. Action Agenda Item No 3 Page 2 Background -_Continued On February 3, 1997, The Planning and Zoning Commission satisfied the Public Hearing requirement on this matter by opening the meeting up to the public for comments regarding this request. The Hearing was then closed and consideration of the request ensued. A motion was made to table the matter until the February 17, 1997 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at which absent Commission members may be present to consider the item. On February 17, 1997, The Planning and Zoning Commission removed the tabled item for consideration. Staff gave a brief overview of why this meeting was not considered a Public Hearing and also made a statement as to staff's recommendation of approval of this request (see Staff Recommendation). A motion was made to deny the zone change request and was defeated by a vote of 2 (in favor) and 4 (against). A second motion was made to approve the zone change request and was passed by a vote of 4 (in favor) and 2 (against). Financial Considerations There are no financial considerations tied to this request except that of required filing fees. Legal Considerations Article 9, Section 2 (B2) of the Wylie Home Rule Charter, states that the Planning and Zoning Commission will recommend to Council proposed ordinances and amendments regarding planning and zoning changes. Per State and Local ordinances, a three-fourths favorable vote of all members of the City Council shall be required to approve this change in zoning. This is a result of written objections filed with the City Secretary's office by the owners of twenty percent of the area ( extending 200 feet from said property's boundaries) immediately adjacent to the area in question. Staff Recommendation The Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this area as being appropriate for Retail/Commercial/Business zoning. Therefore, B-2 zoning is an allowable use. Because of this fact, staff recommends approval of the request. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan's land use designation for this area as "commercial" is to provide retail/commercial activities to serve the area and to provide a buffer area between the residential development to the south and the major thoroughfare of State Highway 78. There are many uses in the "B-2" Business District classification that are of an intensive nature that may not be desirable at this particular location. In many other cities, there is a classification such as light industry that addresses these type of land uses. Action Agenda Item No 3 Page 3 Staff Recommendation_-_Continued Therefore, careful consideration must be given to the following: • What is allowable in the "B-2" District. • What currently exists in the immediate area. • What is shown as future land uses in the area (as illustrated in theComprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map) Property notifications were sent to all persons shown by the City of Wylie's most recent Property Tax Role as owning land within 200 feet of the property in question. At this time one favorable response and three responses opposing the request have been received. Attachments Zone Change Application Public Hearing Notice (s) Property Owners List and Responses Written Opposition (20% Rule) Location Map Area Zoning Map A? I/ Prepa by (4 Revi ed by Finanve Ci Manager Approval Action Agenda Item No 3 Page 4 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF LOTS 6, 7 AND 8 OF WYLIE RANCH EAST COMMERCIAL PARK, IN THE CITY OF WYLIE, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF KREYMER LANE AND SOUTH OF STATE HWY. 78 NORTH, FROM "A"AGRICULTURE TO "B-2" BUSINESS DISTRICT; AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 85-23A); AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP (ORDINANCE 91-12, ORDINANCE 91-13); AND REPEALING ALL CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the zoning of the properly hereinafter described is presently zoned as "A" Agriculture; and, WHEREAS, the owners of the property have properly filed a request with the City to change the zoning classification from "A" Agriculture to "B-2" Business District; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, after first having given all requisite notices, by publication and otherwise, and conducting all requisite hearings thereon, has recommended to the City Council that the request for change in zoning classification be granted; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore conducted a public hearing on the proposed change and determined that the change should be granted; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined, in its legislative capacity, that the proposed change is appropriate and in the best interest of the orderly development of the City in that it is based on recognition of changed or changing conditions or circumstances in the locality and/or recognizes changes in technology, the style of living, or manner of doing business, as required by Section 35 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and therefore not in derogation of any of the purposes therein expressed; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, as follows: SECTION I That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as Codified by Section 1 , of Chapter 12 of the Wylie City Code, be, and it hereby is, amended by amending the Zoning District Map, as the same currently exists, so as to change the zoning classification on the following described property, commonly described as , to wit: Lots 6, 7 and 8 of Wylie Ranch East Commercial Park, City of Wylie, Collin County, Texas, from "A" Agriculture to "B-2" Business District, SECTION II That the property herein described shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes authorized by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Wylie, as amended. SECTION III Any person violating the provisions of this ordinance, or any part hereof, commits an unlawful act and shall be subject to the general penally provisions of Section 37 of the Zoning Ordinance, as the same now exists or is hereafter amended. SECTION IV Should any paragraph, sentence, sub-division, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any part or provision thereof, other than the part or parts as declared to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional. SECTION V This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption by the City Council and publication of its caption as the law and the City Charter provide in such cases. SECTION VI That all other ordinances and code provisions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict or inconsistency and all other provisions of the Wylie City Code not in conflict herewith shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION VII The repeal of any ordinance, or parts thereof, by the enactment of this Ordinance, shall not be construed as abandoning any action now pending under or by virtue of such ordinance; nor shall it have the effect of discontinuing, abating, modifying or altering any penalty accruing or to accrue, nor as effecting any rights of the municipality under any section or provisions of any ordinances at the time of passage of this ordinance. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas, this day of , 1997. By James D. Swartz, Mayor ATTEST Susan Shuler, City Secretary Page 1 of 2 (5/93) CITY OF WYLIE P.O. BOX 428 WYLIE, TEXAS 75098 APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Case No. Filing Fee Date y70 l 7 Applicant Phone No. Q y� �j Mailing Address: Work No. &c- ;,_ 420-1Le_J - 7,50 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SOUGHT TO BE REZONED: (If additional space is needed for description, the description may be put on a separate sheet and attached hereto).1 7-I A)/ /,e , .-� �-.aaZL, I hereby re uest that the above described property be c anged from its present zoning which is District Classification to ��, District Classification for the folio ing reasons: (attach separate sheet if necessary) There (are) (are not) deed restrictions pertaining to the intended use of the property. 2 Status of Applicant Owner Tenant Prospective Purchaser I have attached hereto as Exhibit "A" a plat showing the property which is the subject of this requested zoning change and have read the following concerning the importance of my submitting to the City a sufficient legal description. Signed 4 Page 2 of 2 Note: 1 The legal description is used to publish notice of the required hearing and in the preparation of the final ordinance granting the zoning change. The description must be sufficient so as to allow a qualified surveyor to take the description and locate and mark off the tract on the ground. Each applicant should protect himself by having a surveyor or his attorney approve his legal description. Failure to do so by the applicant may result in delay in passage of the final ordinance or the ordinance being declared invalid at some later date because of an insufficient legal description. 2 If the applicant is someone other than the owner, written acknowledgement by the owner of the zoning request must also be submitted. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Wylie, Texas will hold a Public Hearing on Monday, February 3, 1997 at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the Wylie Municipal Complex located at 2000 Highway 78 North to consider the following: Approval of a zone change from "A" Agriculture to "B-2" Business District for Roy Neely for property located on the south side of State Highway 78 North, east of Kreymer Lane and more particularly described as lots 6, 7 and 8 of Wylie Ranch East Commercial Park. If action is taken, the City Council will hold a Public Hearing on Monday, February 24, 1997 at 7:00 in the Wylie City Council Chambers for action on the item referenced above. RE: PZ/CC -Morgan Return this form to: Kelley Shaw, Planner City of Wylie • 2000 N. Highway 78 Wylie, TX 75098 ❑ I am in favor of the request for the reasons listed below. ❑ I am opposed to the request for the reasons listed below. 1. 2. 3. Signature Printed Name Address CHANGE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE It was advertised in the Wylie News on January 15, 1997 that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Wylie, Texas would hold a Public Hearing on Monday, February 3, 1997 at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers to consider the following: Approval of a Zone Change from"A"Agriculture to`B-2"Business District requested by Roy Neely for property located on the south side of State Highway 78 North, east of Kreymer Lane and more particularly described as lots 6, 7 and 8 of Wylie Ranch East Commercial Park. The Public Hearing portion of the February 3, 1997 Panning and Zoning Commission was opened and closed and consideration on the above referenced matter was tabled until the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on February 17, 1997 at 6:30 p.m. in the Wylie City Council Chambers. After action has been taken on this item, the Wylie City Council will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, March 11, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. in the Wylie City Council Chambers for consideration of approval of the zone change request. NOTIFICATION REPORT APPLICANT: Roy Neely, 316 Callie Ct. , Wylie, TX 75098 APPLICATION FILE# Name &Address ATTORNEY, AGENT: Name &Address BLK/ABST LOT/TRACT SUBDIVISION PROPERTY OWNER NAME ADDRESS 688 3 Wylie Ranch East 1 John W. Anderson (330 Callie Ct.) PO Box 831154, Richardson, TX 75080 688 4 Wylie Ranch East 1 Harlan W. Routon 340 Callie Ct. , Wylie, TX 75098 688 5 Wylie Ranch East 1 Henry Nelson 350 Callie Ct. , Wylie, TX 75098 688 Bl 2, Tr 196 Wylie Ranch East 1 Alumet Corp. 5655 Peachtree Pkwy, Norcross, GA 30092-2812 Amy & Buffy Parker 688 Bl 3, Tr 44 Wylie Ranch East 1 c/o Sarah Parker 1103 Dodd Dr. , Wylie, TX 75098 Wylie Hwy. 78 Joint Venture 688 Bl 3, Tr 35 Wylie Ranch East 1 Bobby C. Beilue 5949 Sherry Ln, #1225, Dallas, TX 75225-8008 688 4 Wylie Ranch East Commercial Park Myran Corp. 3831 Turtle Creek, #106, Dallas, TX 75219-4417 Wylie Ranch East 688 5 Commercial Park Myran Corp. tut liar-05-97 04: 18P P. 01 � Wylie Highway 78South Joint Venture March 3, 1997 FAX TO 972-442-8154 Mr- Kelley Shaw, Planner City Hall 2(U) Highway 78 North Wylie, TX 7509€3 Dear Mr. Shaw: This letter supersedes our recent response to your public hearing notice on lots 6, 7, and 8 of Wylie Ranch last. Commercial Park. Our partnership, which owns 142 acres of land along the south side of I lighway 78--diagonally south and east from City Hall—is opposed to B-2 zoning for our locale. We feel that it. is in our best. interest, and in the best interest of the city, to provide that commercial activity along Highway 78 be targeted to local consumers. Businesses erecting metal buildings and not catering to the general public would hurt property values and negatively affect the tax city's tax base. We continue to be concerned with the city's discussions underway with Kansas City Southern Railway Company. While we support the long-range concept of a business park, safeguards must be taken to insure that the contemplated near- term use will not bring noise pollution and greatly increased truck traffic along 1 lighway 78. Both myself and Mr. George Jackman, 15735 Overmead Circle North, Dallas, Texas 75248, telephone 972-596-1555, pager 214-359-5287, are authorized spokesmen li>r our partnership. We would appreciate being kept informed by the appropriate off icials_ Very truly yours, Bobby C. lIeilue, Venture Manager Copy: Mr. George Jackman 5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 12W 0 Dallas, TX 75225-t3564 0 (214) 868-6416 Fax (214)96P,--&975 FEBRUARY 4, 1997 HENRY NELSON 350 CALLIE CT. WYLIE, TX. 75098 429-0361 CITY OF WYLIE 2000 N. HIGHWAY 78 WYLIE, TX. 75098 ATTN: KELLY SHAW WE ARE HIGHLY OPPOSED TO THE ZONE CHANGE FROM "A" AGRICULTURE TO "B-2" BUSINESS DISTRICT FOR ROY NEELY. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 78 NORTH, EAST OF KREYMER LANE, DIRECTLY BEHIND OUR PROPERTY. SI CERELY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Wylie, Texas will hold a Public Hearing on Monday, February 3, 1997 at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the Wylie Municipal Complex located at 2000 Highway 78 North to consider the following: Approval of a zone change from "A" Agriculture to "B-2" Business District for Roy Neely for property located on the south side of State Highway 78 North, east of Kreymer Lane and more particularly described as lots 6, 7 and 8 of Wylie Ranch East Commercial Park. If action is taken, the City Council will hold a Public Hearing on Monday, February 24, 1997 at 7:00 in the Wylie City Council Chambers for action on the item referenced above. RE: PZ/CC -Morgan Return this form to: Kelley Shaw, Planner City of Wylie 2000 N. Highway 78 Wylie, TX 75098 [] I am in favor of the request for the reasons listed below. am opposed to the request for the reasons listed below. 1. tv/p/v7--- ,, ,-,-4-Jfiii, s iwzrzo0Ail)ma, 1 5l DE-AirZL i /" ' l VA-1-4/ 5 GUtGL DR--Ty /o "T�, 2. 77-if <<`f 4/E. /A/ OtAte.y4 bti, //Vf,'i9ir- T , - lr2ow701 6,F xy/y Mi1dd1 Zit /Z L au SIA//-SS/.S /A( nif . ,4- Mtefo5rr A/2/ 3. riff- , 0a s(r;s iy w y/1/,5. Ace A-ACX0P4.4-ry b /=o rli'/L 7 j''p, op )3OSl .liS k ,f l-oR wt{r(c,/{�/�G6f d4X /c / 1 cp1) Signature( Al Printed N e Jo f4J ki, I,g,es Address �73v 6t-GL/f£ 4 v / `j/4I/I/ 7�'°1� PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Wylie, Texas will hold a Public Hearing on Monday, February 3, 1997 at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the Wylie Municipal Complex located at 2000 Highway 78 North to consider the following: Approval of a zone change from "A" Agriculture to "B-2" Business District for Roy Neely for property located on the south side of State Highway 78 North, east of Kreymer Lane and more particularly described as lots 6, 7 and 8 of Wylie Ranch East Commercial Park. If action is taken, the City Council will hold a Public Hearing on Monday, February 24, 1997 at 7:00 in the Wylie City Council Chambers for action on the item referenced above. RE: PZ/CC - Morgan Return this form to: Kelley Shaw, Planner City of Wylie 2000 N. Highway 78 Wylie, TX 75098 EI I am in favor of the request for the reasons listed below. I am opposed to the request for the reasons listed below. 1. G{j ajz,�L� ��Z�� . 7 /k dd ,-cam ,,f 2. 4 ',� 3. at-t 1' L C- ,,4 /,/4, 62 2cr��- iu _ZGa4 Signature Printed Name A17/ 6 4-e/7/6.7,c/ Address ,3VD Lam/ ' 7Gleta& yiriL Azi-zz-L;- ato 6e2,,,. 6 z-z,(a,7/ y=t2-, a/a,L22 Itodz4x44 . 1, �-�-cf/LuAr} tA-) 6z-t, �-� 6./ u/. �' Q r za,& -7,7/,0/7( a ?Le . PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Wylie, Texas will hold a Public Hearing on Monday, February 3, 1997 at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the Wylie Municipal Complex located at 2000 Highway 78 North to consider the following: Approval of a zone change from "A" Agriculture to "B-2" Business District for Roy Neely for property located on the south side of State Highway 78 North, east of Kreymer Lane and more particularly described as lots 6, 7 and 8 of Wylie Ranch East Commercial Park. If action is taken, the City Council will hold a Public Hearing on Monday, February 24, 1997 at 7:00 in the Wylie City Council Chambers for action on the item referenced above. RE: PZ/CC - Morgan Return this form to: Kelley Shaw, Planner City of Wylie 2000 N. Highway 78 Wylie, TX 75098 D I am in favor of the request for the reasons listed below. (i I am opposed to the request for the reasons listed below. I- 5 � 2. J. Signature Printed Name f ti (‘ Address 3 3C QJ ) I i C �� THIS IS NOT ABOUT ROY NEELY'S BUSINESS IN PARTICULAR, BUT THE PRESIDENCE IT WILL STATE FOR OTHERS. HIS OR ANY OTHERS BUSINESS OPENS TOO MANY BLIND DOORS, AND THE DOORS ARE RIGHT OUT OUR BACKYARD. 1 . OUR PROPERTY VALUE WILL DECREASE, FOR NO REASON ON THE OWNERS PART. THESE ARE NICE HOMES IN A NICE AREA. WHAT INCENTIVE DO WE HAVE TO PUT MORE IN OUR HOMES WHEN INDUSTRY SO QUICKLY DRAGS US DOWN. NATURALLY HIS BUSINESS PROPERTY WILL INCREASE OFF OF OURS DECREASING. 2. CRIME IS OF MAJOR CONCERN!!! CRIME WILL RISE!!! IT IS A PROVEN FACT THAT EVEN THE SMALLEST CRIMES WILL INCREASE WITH BUSINESS' MOVING IN. 3. TRAFFIC FLOW WILL MULTIPLY, AT ALL DIFFERENT TIMES DURING THE DAY, MAYBE EVEN THE NIGHT. THE EMPLOYEES GOING IN AND OUT, SALESMEN CALLING ON THE BUSINESS, PEOPLE APPLYING FOR JOBS. 4. TRUCK DELIVERIES-UNKNOWN PEOPLE TO OUR COMMUNITY, DELIVERING PRODUCT AND WATCHING OUR HOMES WHEN WE ARE THERE, OR NOT THERE. WE ARE TRYING TO KEEP IN CONTROL OF OUR SITUATION, AND KEEP OUR NEIGHBORHOOD SAFE, AND CRIME FREE. WE KNOW THAT COMMERCIAL BUSINESS IS OUT THERE, BUT WE WOULD LIKE TO KEEP IT OUT OF OUR BACKYARDS. MR. NEELY HAS OTHER OPTIONS TO TURN TO, WHEREAS WE DO NOT. HE COULD EXPAND HIS SHOP NOW, OR MOVE TO ANOTHER LOCATION THAT IS ALREADY SET UP FOR BUSINESS. WE DO NOT WANT TO RAISE OUR CHILDREN OR LIVE IN A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT THESE TYPES OF BUSINESS' ATTRACT, AND WE WOULD CERTAINLY HATE TO MOVE, BUT TO KEEP OUR FAMILIES SAFE, WE WOULD. FEBRUARY 4, 1997 HENRY NELSON 350 CALLIE CT. WYLIE, TX. 75098 429-0361 CITY OF WYLIE 2000 N. HIGHWAY 78 WYLIE, TX. 75098 WE ARE HIGHLY OPPOSED TO THE ZONE CHANGE FROM "A" AGRICULTURE TO "B-2" BUSINESS DISTRICT FOR ROY NEELY. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 78 NORTH, EAST OF KREYMER LANE, DIRECTLY BEHIND OUR PROPERTY. SINCERELY ?clee_gc-v-P--W-- 2//3/9 7 /i30 '`-' t(4 i4e-or.thz-17 February 8, 1997 City Council of Wylie Hwy 78 Wylie, Texas 75098 Dear Council Members: I would like for this letter to be put on Public Record in regards to a Zone change for the property located on Hwy 78 East of Kreymer Lane and North of the subdivision of Wylie Ranch East also known as lots 7, 8, 9 Wylie Ranch East Commercial. The Zone at the present is Agriculture and a prospective buyer wants a B2 Zoning. If I read the layout of the City maps-right the property to the West and East of the lots in question have a B 1 Zoning to the South and everything else around the property is residential. I am strongly opposed to the Zoning change for the following reasons: 1. The residential property to the south is 3 and 1/2 inches lower than 78 now. The water run off when it rains comes straight towards the residential area. We have several homes that almost flood. We also understand the City is aware of the problem and just does not have the money to fix it. 2. We have a couple of homes that already have septic problems and when it rains the septic comes to the top and sits in the ditches. These ditches are a haven for crawdads and the kids love to fish for them. This has also been brought to the attention of the City Code Inspector to which the reply was it is FRESH WATER because he had the City run a test on the water, but the smell says differently. 3. If the lots behind are allowed to build now BEFORE the City has solved the water problems and the owner builds the land up any at all I guess I do not have to tell you where the water will go in full force when it rains. 4. I understand there will be barrels of waste stored until they are picked up and emptied. Can you at all with a clear conscience tell the people out here there will be no leakage, spills; cracks or holes in or from the barrels being picked up and dropped back down. (I use this phrase only because I have watched them pick up the trash and no pains are taken to assure there is no spillage and we are only talking trash at this point,) 5. I also want to state that I am full aware that this land WILL BE developed at some point, and when we bought our land about 15 years ago we were told this would someday be a retail strip shopping center and this was something we could live with. 6. We the homeowners have come to the 2 PZ meetings and voice our concerns only to be told that this would be addressed at the Platting Phase. Won't this be just a little late? Will we then be told that we should have made our concerns known before? 7. The potential owner also has stated in both of the previous PZ meetings that they would like to stay in Wylie but we also as homeowners and taxpayers would like to stay in the city of Wylie. We also know that we don't produce the amount of tax dollars that a business does but we want a CLEAN AND NICE place to live and raise our kids and not have to worry when they wade water in the ditches. 8. We have been told several times that the City has inspectors that will keep up with spillage and requirements imposed by the City on all property to see that they conform with City standards but one only has to drive around town and look and wonder about this also. 9. I also thought that City Council Members were there to help and listen to the voice concerns of those that elected them to speak and respensent us and that they also to keep a clear and open mind until ALL sides were heard from on a matter in question, But our Council repensentive has come to both of the PZ meetings with his mind made up, he has also spoken out at the 3 homeowners directly connected to the land. At the first meeting he told us in belittling tone we needed to know that something would be built on that property and he was all for the proposed Zone change which was at the time for INDUSTRIAL ZONING. We asked the PZ committee to please not put anything in our backyards that they would not put in theirs. They were very understanding and did not approve that zone change. At the end of the meeting the proposed property owner was quite upset and said she would get her B2 Zone on the property and there was not a thing the homeowners could do about it and that SHE owned the only thing out there that was worth having and if we did not like it she would buy us out. I may not have the money that she does but I have put all I do have in my home and property and very PROUD of what I do have, I came to Wylie 11 years ago after owning the 2 acres for 4 years prior to that. 10. At the town meeting for the railroad the people around it was concerned about their property value if the switching station is allowed to be put in. I also worry about my property value with the B2 Zone directly behind me and the switching yard across the Hwy. what do you think our property will be worth then? How long might it be before ALL of the property along Hwy.78 is changed to a B2 if this zoning change takes place? Isn't a B2 zoning the same as LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ? 11. In closing I plead with you to consider the Zoning of retail as a buffer between the Railroad and our homes as was intended and give us a chance to live in harmony with all. Sincerely, i‘;77 - 4-A--(" 7111-±c-'- Marie Routon 340 Callie Court (lot 4) Wylie, Texas 75098 2/1 ~ g [ U B l5 TO: 1) Wylie, Texas, City Council j � il 2) Wylie, Texas, Zoning Board 3) Wylie, Texas, City Planner FEB 17 1997 2000 Hwy. 78 North /o:35- _J Wylie, Tx. 75098 SIRS: BY We are ADAMANTLY AGAINST the proposed zoning change for Lots 6 , 7 , and 8 in Wylie Ranch East Commercial Park, whereby said lots, currently zoned "Agricultural" , would be re-zoned "B2" . Our reasons for opposition to this zoning change are given below: 1) Absolutely without question, every residential property owner on Callie Court will experience significant and lasting devaluation of his/her home if the zoning change is approved and • construction of an industrial facility such as a machine shop is permitted, as is currently planned. While all property owners along Callie Court will suffer lasting devaluation of their property, the homeowners in closest proximity to the land for which the zoning change is requested will be most adversely affected. I am one of the ( 3) homeowners most affected. 2) The adverse effects of this zoning change will ultimately, if not immediately, be felt beyond the Callie Court locale. If a machine shop, which is basically an industrial facility, is allowed to be constructed AS A RESULT OF THE ZONING CHANGE, other such facilities will eventually find their way into the area. As the area thus takes on an increasingly industrial character, residential values will continue to erode, and at an accelerating pace. Not only that, but the size of the residential area which is negatively affected will increase, also in accelerating fashion. 3 ) If enhanced tax revenue is a reason for the City considering a zoning change as significant as the change requested, we are not convinced that in the long run the City will attain its objective. Since it is historically proven that over a long period of time, residential values generally tend to appreciate at a faster rate than do manufacturing entities, the City will be exchanging a tax base with faster growth potential for a tax base which may tend to remain essentially stagnant, or whose growth rate is, at best, slow. In short, the City will not be creating a new tax base in addition to a favorable (existing) tax base; the City will be creating a new tax base at the expense of a favorable (existing) tax base . 4) It must be pointed out that the machine shop for which the zoning change is requested is CURRENTLY located in the Wylie Industrial Park, WHICH IS SPECIFICALLY ZONED FOR THESE TYPES OF BUSINESSES. If a move is necessary, there may well be other sites already appropriately zoned for this type of business . Therefore, there is no necessity for a zoning change that will significantly and permanently affect a number of homeowners adversely. 5) There is a real concern over the disposition of certain chemicals, pollutants, toxins, and wastes that are either used in production or created during production in a machine shop operation. At this point, we have only verbal assurances that these items will be properly disposed of; that if stored for either use or disposal , such storage will be in appropriate containers which won't leak or break. Such verbal assurances concerning such an important issue are inadequate . 6) The area in question will automatically qualify as a higher-risk, more hazardous area, quite possibly more susceptible to accidents, spillage, fire, etc. , SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASING THE EXPOSURE OF, AND DANGER TO, the currently existing residential properties adjacent to the property in question. 7) There currently exists on Callie Court a severe water drainage • problem, which manifests itself in the form of standing water along both sides of Callie Court every time there is a substantial rainfall . When the rainfall is severe enough, sections of Callie Court are entirely under water and at- least one resident may possibly have suffered flooding in his house. The City has been aware of this problem for quite some time (years) and to date has done nothing about it. In fact, it is my understanding that in the past there has been bond money allocated to upgrade the drainage capability along Kreymer Road and at the Kreymer Road/Callie Court intersection; said money was diverted from this project and the problem remains . In light of this problem, it would be criminal of the Council to approve a zoning change allowing the construction of facilities which would, as a result of their very construction, increase the run-off problem along Callie Court. WE SUPPORT AND WELCOME economic growth for Wylie . Those of us who built or bought in Wylie Ranch East did so recognizing the "Bl" zoning which allows general retail shops, specialty shops , restaurants, etc. , for the (5) lots west of the lots in question. Thus, we can accept a change to "B1" zoning for lots 6, 7, and 8 in the Commercial Park, allowing for the SAME TYPE of retail growth we knew would eventually be there. The Wylie City Council has a public duty and a moral responsibility NOT to permit an after-the-fact change in zoning that will have such devastating consequences for so many people. We therefore strongly urge the Council to deny the "B2" zoning request for lots 6, 7 , and 8 in Wylie Ranch East Commercial Park. 'ncerely, c4iVc4 John W. Anderson Joyce Anderson 330 Callie Ct. Wylie, Texas 75098 O TOPEKA BERT FREEMAN ,___ ; 2/38 AC. - • , TE KANA LIMITED INC S-C' • / �TC.HISON IAa J!• 92.84 -7... i Otwe a% r •x.' CRY . HALL Y SITE m L. U CT G • ` n. co RGENCY ICAL MGHT- . . • O.AC 1 — 1 STATE HWY. 78 ;R WALTER RAY MILLET, Ai1CHIE RAY ARTHUR ARCHIE PARKER PARKER PAIR 104 AC. EUBANKS MILLER KNAPP EUBANKS EL EC ELEC CO. to 1.0 AC. IT,AC. 1.II AC. I J AC I U AC.0 Af. 10 AC. WYLII RANCH EAST 'HST MIII LH I 2)MNERC5L EWR1,4 5 6 7 8 I I04 AC ALTER PAIR V !0 AC ARCHIE EUBANKS ^ 13.925 AC ---SITE--- ARCHIE EUBANKS k -4 DAVIO H PARENT TRUSTEE 13.925 AC. 2•• 3 r/1 2C 19 18 17 16 • 4 1 103:831 AC. 25 •evons ire Lane Ad 3 1 2 3 4 - NOLAND EUBANKS NOL19 G4 EUBANKS ANKS 26 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 11 6 4 14.64 AC. 27 28 I I61T18 19r•21 .2 2g25� Collie Court > 'I�A : I WYLIE HA CH EAST 10 AC. L.7 . • ♦f • ©© r III 310 ;1015 14 13 12 11 10 9 g16©O 10 9 8 7 6 12 UNAscoIENTR INC. IIA A 14 s q31 3. r.�::: 33 -!-F2321zzes24252627 :293031 1i c 008 AC. 15 c. _ Sheo ardn one IO `— I ® '�— �18171615141312111098765432 1 ; I 121 13 14 15 3 4 8 m ti)1098 7 6 5 4 3 2 I 3 36 Y av1D 25 N II 12131415 16 1718 19 2d 19Q�21 2223 24 25 26 27 23 29 3O3132 " 'airs 2pp1�• 24 Y` J � �� Donna Drive Hit-dive 3 22 2 � 6Td Kno 1 l3rlve - - lc 2 1 23f 221ZI2181716151413121110987- 65432I � 765420 19 18 17 1.6 Crf u1F?r*M.Q�Yd®®�� MA Mg • 24 TEMBAR CORP <lff V MIEI Figilill .34 5D AC TR ACFE_�: WV=.PM' 21 22 23 24 25 F. 2L1. OLD HWY. TO' E. . Brown Street J �' I ,''�'' r • , • Fncri 2 S :, f -,, , , , , • , �,' I CC° Q 'j, i . . City Limits 8 /i;— __—_ / ' - • _ ,_ ✓ 2 — � _ Wr"11""7"" t � ' A %"�;;� 86 88 City Limits 7 - 39 y, _ 3 I00000. . 6„ °) c`' , , „ ‘ _ 86 - 88 0 1 p._•\. __________________ a, • , •• ,- ____ , , 0., . 87 - 39 _ �'�-w U- 86 - 88 �, s _ - -- 86 88 NVIK0 - 21I5 �11� ss-ss 5 - 104 ii 8 5,,,/,/,/ 1, ,./ • — :-... I5 3 I 6 _ - „/, 8 6, 21 ll1J1_] _W1 ' �' • I A ,_, �� -- ' SITE ' 4 - 4 0S F 3 �., I ,,„ _ ,�.f =_------------__, — ,,,,•2. • , 85 711 ti •,�,M � A ► = A. - III r - -T, , ,/0A SF 3 .4! / --_:-._ ._. .". ► fm iii � - �I 86„21 s3 I 6 - 2iiii MF F A ;; P D 86-62 _ 70 EaINN 85 -71 8-3 -45 " 86 -84A 1 _ A A .._ _. . I MN IA, 01110111., • __I , . 0 ., I I A ■, niuw. F — * s 86; 8 A 1 ' "-- 7 _________I � 1r- 83 -2 `,0� 1 L. L______-________1 1Tf f Tl-f11141 I. , �` . WYLIE CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA COMMUNICATION ITEM NO 4 March 11, 1997 Issue Hold a Public Hearing to receive public input regarding the 10-Year Capital Improvements Program (1997-2006) and Maximum Calculated Impact Fees recommended by the Impact Fee Advisory Committee and consider adoption of the 10-Year Capital Improvements Program (1997-2006) and consider adopting or amending the Impact Fees. Background The review process for updating the Impact Fees by the Impact Fee Advisory Committee is now complete. The committee has reviewed and made a recommendation to the City Council for approval of the Land Use Assumptions, 1997-2006. A Public Hearing was held at the January 28, 1997 City Council meeting on the recommendation of the Land Use Assumptions by the Advisory Committee. The Council agreed with that recommendation and adopted those Assumptions by resolution that evening. The adoption of the resolution approving the Land Use Assumptions, 1997-2006 allowed the City Council to set a Public Hearing on the 10-Year Capital Improvements Program (1997-2006) (CIP) and the Impact Fees calculated from that CIP. The Notice of the Public Hearing to consider the CIP and the Impact Fees was published more than 30 days prior to the Hearing and was published for three consecutive weeks. The final meeting of the Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFAC) was held on January 16, 1997. At that meeting, the IFAC reviewed the CIP and determined that all of the projects on the CIP were appropriate infrastructure improvements for the estimated growth of development in the upcoming ten years. The IFAC made a recommendation to City Council to adopt the CIP. The City Council must evaluate the projects listed on the CIP and, if they agree with the IFAC, should adopt the CIP. The 10-Year Capital Improvements Program (1997-2006) (CIP) outlines the Capital projects required to support the future development in the City based on the Land Use Assumptions, 1997-2006 and the Water and Waste Water Master Plan Update. This CIP, prepared by The Hogan Corporation, outlines six water projects and four sewer projects. The water projects include current water system improvements being built under the 1995 Bond Program, a future 12" main along Sanden Blvd., a future 8" line along Hensley Lane, a 12" main along Kirby St., a future 12" main along future Park Blvd., and a future oversized 12" main through the Woodbridge Addition. The sewer projects include a future sewer main from Newport Harbor to the Muddy Creek Interceptor. Also included are a group of sewer mains: A future 48" sewer from Muddy Creek south, a future 30" sewer from the existing waste water treatment plant, and a future 54" sewer to a proposed, future waste water treatment plant south on Muddy Creek. The current Capital projects in the 1995 Bond program are also included. Action Agenda Item No 4 Page 1 Background - Continued We have an existing plant capacity of almost two million gallons per day that will be fully utilized very soon. During the next ten year period, new growth will create a requirement for an additional two to four million gallon capacity. We are unable to determine today if the capacity of the existing/current facility can be utilized in the future until the city completes a permitting process through the TNRCC. Therefore, for planning purposes in the ten year CIP, we must plan for a worst case scenario in which none of the capacity of the current plant can be used. We must budget for a four or six million gallon per day plant. A detailed explanation is provided as an attachment regarding Wastewater Treatment Plant issues. The new plant will be required as a direct result of development within the City and as a result of Discharge Permit quality standards. Therefore, 100% of the projected $6,984,750 is eligible for Impact Fee consideration. The IFAC also recognized the Maximum Calculated Impact Fees allowable for adoption. These Impact Fees were calculated from the estimated costs of the CIP projects and may, by State Law, "be imposed against new development to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs for capital improvements or facility expansions". State Law also requires that the published Impact Fees in the advertising for the Public Hearing be the Maximum Calculated Impact Fee. Council must determine whether the actual Impact Fee will be established at or below the Maximum Calculated Impact Fee. If the cost of the Capital projects is not recouped through Impact Fee assessment, then alternate funding for those infrastructure requirements will have to be realized. Additional funding requirements would have to be met by issuing bonds that will be paid for by increasing water and sewer rates. Those additional burdens will be shared by all the residential and commercial customers. Board Recommendations The Impact Fee Advisory Committee recommends adopting the 10-year Capital Improvements Program (1997-2006) and recognizes the maximum Calculated Impact Fees at $1,412 for sewer and $700 for water with a total of $2,112 maximum. Financial Considerations Impact Fee means "a charge of assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development". It does not include "the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing facility to better serve existing development". The current Impact Fees charged by the City of Wylie are $600 per LUE for water and $500 per LUE for sewer. The Maximum Calculated Impact Fees at that time were $1267 per LUE for water and $957 per LUE for sewer. Action Agenda Item No 4 Page 2 Financial Considerations - Continued The total cost of the capital improvements to the water system is an estimated $4,246,000. The amount eligible for inclusion in the Impact Fee calculation is $3,954,000. The reduced number is a result of the capacity of the system being calculated and attributed to future development. Over sizing and existing capacity are not allowed to be included in the computations for Impact Fees. Using the 10-year Marginal Living Unit Equivalents (LUEs) of 5646, the Maximum Calculated Water Impact Fee would be $700 per LUE or 3,954,000 divided by 5,646. (The LUE is a unit that consumes the amount of water or discharges the amount of waste water equal to that of a standard low density residential unit). The total cost of the capital improvements to the waste water system is $12,585,160. The amount eligible for inclusion in the Impact Fee calculation is $7,969,712. Once again using the 10-year Marginal LUEs, the Maximum Calculated Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee for water and wastewater is $1,412 or 7,969,712 divided by 5646. The total Maximum Allowable Impact Fees would be $2,112. Attached is a draft of the 10-Year Capital Improvements Plan (1997-2006) which will detail all of the specific water projects (Table 3) and the sanitary sewer projects(Table 4). The Tables give a description of the projects, their estimated costs, and the percentages of the projects which will be directly attributable to new development and therefore eligible to be included in the calculation of the impact fees. City Council has been provided with supplemental financial information included in the March 4, 1997 Work Session packet. A matrix has been provided showing Impact Fee reconciliation and how optional funding in lieu of Impact Fees will affect bond purchases or other funding. A comparison of the water and sewer rates of area cities is also included attached herein. A comparison of Impact Fees charged by other cities was also made available. A thorough understanding of where a city is in its development cycle must be appreciated when trying to make any relevant comparisons. Each city has its own infrastructure needs, amount of developable property remaining and financial resources. Wylie is young city with major infrastructure requirements necessary to compete in the future. Development assumptions regarding the number of new dwellings calculated are available in the new Land Use Assumptions adopted by the City Council at the January 28, 1997 Council meeting. Legal Considerations The Texas Local Government Code, Section 395 establishes the City's authority to establish or amend Impact Fees. Notice of the Public Hearing must be published once a week for three consecutive weeks in a paper of general circulation in the counties where the City lies. The first notice will appear before the 30th day but on or after the 60th day before the date set for the hearing. The notice of public hearing may not be in the part of the paper in which legal notices and classified ads appear and may not be smaller than on-quarter page of a standard size or tabloid size newspaper, and the headline on the notice must be in 18-point or larger type. The notice must contain: (1) A headline to read as follows: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON ADOPTION OF IMPACT FEES; (2) the time, date, and location of the hearing; (3) a statement that the purpose of the hearing is to consider the adoption of an impact fee; (4) an easily understandable map Action Agenda Item No 4 Page 3 Legal Considerations - Continued of the service area on which the proposed fee will be levied; (5) the amount of the proposed impact fee per LUE; (6) a statement that any member of the public has the right to appear at the hearing and present evidence for or against the plan and the proposed fee. Staff Recommendations Staff recommends adopting the 10-Year Capital Improvements Program (1997-2006) and the Maximum Calculated Impact Fees of $1,412 for sewer and $700 for water. Attachments 10-Year Capital Improvements Program (1997-2006) Draft. Impact Fee Matrix. Minutes from the final Impact Fee Advisory Committee meeting. Comparison of area cities Impact Fees. Comparison of water and sewer rates. Ordinance approving CIP and amending Impact Fees for water and sewer. Detailed Explanation of Wastewater Treatment Plant Issues Prepared by Revi ed by Financ ity Manager Approval Action Agenda Item No 4 Page 4 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, AMENDING ORD. 90-10 OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, ADOPTING IMPACT FEES; AMENDING DEFINITION "ADVISORY COMMITTEE"; APPROVING AN UPDATED 10-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN (1997-2006); AMENDING THE IMPACT FEES; REPEALING CONFLICTING PORTIONS OF ALL OTHER ORDINANCES; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas has given notices and held the public hearings required by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code for the imposition of impact fees for the financing of capital improvements required by new developments in the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas has heretofore adopted land use assumptions within the designated service area, and such assumptions have been used to develop the capital improvements plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the City has complied with Chapter 395 in all respects necessary to amend impact fees; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, as follows: SECTION I Section 1.a. of Ord. 90-10 be amended to add to the definition of "Advisory Committee" the wording "or a committee of not less than five members that contains not less than 40 percent membership from representatives of the real estate, development, or building industries who shall be appointed by a majority vote of the City Council" after the wording ". . . Planning or Zoning Commission". SECTION II The "Land Use Assumptions, 1997-2006" heretofore approved by resolution by the City Council on January 28,1997 and is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and is approved hereby and incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. SECTION III A capital improvement plan styled "10-Year Capital Improvements Plan (1997- 2006)" is hereby adopted and is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "B" for all purposes. SECTION IV An impact fee of$ per service unit or Living Unit Equivalent(LUE) for water supply, treatment, and distribution facility is hereby imposed in accordance with the LUE for water set out in Table 3, Exhibit"B". An impact fee of$ per service unit or LUE of new development for sanitary sewer collection and treatment facilities is hereby imposed in accordance with the LUE for sanitary sewer set out in Table 4, Exhibit "B". SECTION V Should any paragraph, sentence, sub-division, clause, phrase or section of this ordinance be adjudged or held to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any part or provision thereof, other than the part or parts as declared to be invalid, illegal or unconstitutional. SECTION VI This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from March 19, 1997 after its adoption by the City Council and publication of its caption as the law and the City Charter provide in such cases. SECTION VII That all other ordinances and code provisions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of any such conflict or inconsistency and all other provisions of the Wylie City Code not in conflict herewith shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION VIII The repeal of any ordinance, or parts thereof, by the enactment of this Ordinance, shall not be construed as abandoning any action now pending under or by virtue of such ordinance; nor shall it have effect of discontinuing, abating, modifying or altering any penalty accruing or to accrue, nor as effecting any rights of the municipality under any section or provisions of any ordinances at the time of passage of this ordinance. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Wylie, Texas, this day of , 1996. By James D. Swartz Mayor ATTEST Susan Shuler City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Minutes of Impact Fee Advisory Committee Meeting January 16, 1997 CALL TO ORDER Richard Parker, Chairman called the Impact Fee Advisory Committee Meeting to order, January 16, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. with the following committee members present: James Blakey, Rita Smith, Tom Pritzkau and Don Raburn. Richard Eckman, Merrill Young and Beth Fultz came after the minutes were approved. Bart Peddicord was absent. Staff members present were: Susan Shuler, Mike Phillips, Mike Collins, Jim Jenks, Greg MacLean and Brady Snellgrove. APPROVAL OF MINUTES With no corrections to the minutes, Smith made the motion to approve the minutes and Pritzkau seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and passed unanimously. REVIEW OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN (C.I.P.) AND IMPACT FEES MacLean gave an overview of the City's Master Plan. He stated that he had made a presentation to Council to update the City's overall Water and Sewer Master Plans. These are used as guidelines when developers and others that come into the city to make sure the infrastructure that is already installed is part of the new development and to make sure the current citizens and service connections are not compromised. He said in order to update the Capital Improvements Plan, a review of the Comprehensive Plan and Master Plan were studied. MacLean stated that growth with the proposed Woodbridge Development and Newport Harbor Development was used in the planning process. He also said the Capital Improvements Plan is developed from the Master Plan. MacLean then displayed a current map of the Sewer System and identified future development. He stated that there was a proposed interceptor plan for Newport Harbor. He also stated that a new wastewater treatment plan will be needed. MacLean then gave an overview of the Water Master Plan. He said that lines have been completed to the new water storage tank. He also said that this plan does not take into consideration areas served by Wylie Northeast and East Fork Water Supply Corporation. Smith asked if one day the City would take over these corporation. MacLean said that if the provider could not provide a development water, it may require steps to ensure that the area is being adequately handled. He also went over the summary of the projected cost for water services. MacLean said that the two main areas of growth have been identified, one being the Woodbridge Development and the Newport Harbor Development. He stated that the new development would require a new wastewater treatment plant down stream. He said a site has been recommended off of Elm Grove Road and Pleasant Valley. The Century Park Lift Station would be eliminated. He said a 54" sewer would serve the lower half of the City. Phase II of Newport Harbor will use the existing lift station and at some point they would need to either build a bigger lift station Minutes from the Impact Fee Advisory Committee,January 16,1997,Page 1 or tie on to the new wastewater treatment plant. MacLean stated that projects eligible for impact fees were a future sewer from Newport Harbor, future 48" sewer from Muddy Creek South, future 30" sewer from existing WWTP South, future 54" sewer to future WWTP, future 6" MGD WWTP, and current capital projects(1995 bond program). He stated that the construction and engineering make up the Sewer System total projected cost and the per cent eligible for impact fees which are proportioned out because you can not charge new development the full cost since others in the City are using these services. He said these amounts are carried forward to represent the amount of dollars that are eligible for impact fees. MacLean said that the total maximum calculated sanitary sewer impact fees would be $1,412. MacLean then explained the services eligible for the charge of impact fees concerning the Water System. He described the projects as current water system improvements projects (1995 bond program), future 12" water main along Sanden Blvd., future 8" line along Hensley Lane, 12" water main along Kirby St., future 12" water main along future Park Blvd. Ext., and future oversize 12" water main through Woodbridge Development. He said the maximum calculated water impact fee would be $700. He then described the 10 year living unit equivalents summary. He stated as part of the summary was based on land use category, 10 year marginal acres, number of living unit equivalents per acre and the 10 year marginal LUE's. He said listed under the land use category was residential; public and semi-public, schools, library etc.; parks and open space; retail and office; commercial; railroad; industrial and street/alley rights of way and parking. He said in calculating the total for water and sewer connections you use the 10 year marginal acres multiply by the #LUE's per acre for a total of the 10 year marginal LUE's. He said total LUE's for the next ten years are 5,646 which could equate to the number of water/sewer connections. MacLean explained to figure the projected impact fee the 10 year marginal LUE's are divided into the total 10 year Capital Improvement Plan Project and in the case of water is $700 and $1,412 which would be the maximum the City could charge. He emphasized that this was the maximum. Parker asked for an explanation of the new wastewater treatment plant and what determines the need and the time frame for the treatment plant. MacLean explained that there is a law of the 75- 90 rule which is when a wastewater plant has a MPDS permit and when the plant exceeds the 90% capacity for 10% of the time, then the City is required by law to begin planning for improvements, either expansion or new facility. He said the current plant has been expanded a couple of times and it is not feasible to expand to due to its physical size. He also stated there is a new development that would not be able to use the current plant. He said that the current plant is 3 MGD and the new plant would be planned to be 6 MGD. Parker wanted to know when would Wylie need to think about expansion. MacLean stated that the current plant has been notified they are close to capacity. Collins stated that whatever development is using the current facility and is paying their share. He said that from this day forward any new development that comes on line would take up additional capacity from the existing sewer plant, then you are all ready creating the need today for capacity that is needed in the new plant. He said if you don't start paying for the sewer plant until it is actually built in two to three years when a bond election is passed, then the impact fee in four years would be higher because you did not start paying for it today. He stated that do you agree with the capital Minutes from the Impact Fee Advisory Committee,January 16,1997,Page 2 projects in the 10 year plan identified and do you agree that the cost are reasonable and whether you think it is too high or too low for the developer, do you believe the number has creditability. Pritzkau wanted to know why two plants can't be used and divide the sewer lines with 3 MGD going to each and phase out one plant a little at a time. MacLean said that this could be done but the old plant would be operating off of old equipment and in need of consistent repair. He said you would need to operate off of two permits, and NTMWD may not want to operate two plants. He said if the plant was dropped off to a 4 MGD plant the new plant would be about $7 million and would only drop the impact fees to $1,000 which only be a savings of about $400. MacLean stated that it was his understanding that the committee would like to see a smaller plant built initially and use the existing plant but then phase the old plant out and add to the new plant. Young asked if the impact fees could be graduated. Phillips stated that the graduated fees would be a bookkeeping nightmare due to the different fees that would be charged. Parker stated that he would like the committee to pull together and make a decision on whether the figures are accurate and instruct MacLean on the direction to take. Young asked that if the committee accepts the capital improvements plan would that be close to $18 million. Parker stated that it would be the maximum. Young made the motion to accept the figures for the capital improvement plan and Pritzkau seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and passed unanimously. Eckman made the motion to recommend to Council the Capital Improvements Plan. Pritzkau seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and passed unanimously. Pritzkau made the motion to recognize the maximum of$700 for water and $1412 for sewer. Eckman seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and passed unanimously. Collins asked if the committee wanted to make a specific amount recommendation for impact fees and Parker stated that they did not. Parker said he felt like it was up to the elected officials to make the final decision. ADJOURNMENT With no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned. Richard Parker, Chairman Susan Shuler, City Secretary Minutes from the Impact Fee Advisory Committee,January 16,1997,Page 3 Memorandum DATE: February 28, 1997 TO: Mike Collins, City Manager FROM: Brady Snellgrove, Director of Finance • RE: IMPACT FEE MATRIX Attached to this memo is the Impact Fee Matrix that has been prepared for the City Council. Also included with the memo are debt schedules that have been used in the preparation of the matrix and the assumptions used in the development of the impact fee matrix. A table of contents is listed below. Impact Fee Matrix 1. $6,000,000 Sewer Bonds - 10 Year Pay 2. $6,000,000 Sewer Bonds - 20 Year Pay 3. $2,000,000 Water Bonds - 10 Year Pay 4. $2,000,000 Water Bonds - 20 Year Pay 5. Matrix Development Assumptions 6. IMPACT FEE MATRIX - 1997 IMPACT FEE versus MARGINAL LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENT (MLUE) $6,000,000 in BONDS MONTHLY 10 YR DEBT 20 YR DEBT MLUE MLUE MLUE REVENUE SEWER BILL MONTHLY MONTHLY FEE REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE SHORTFALL INCREASE SEWER BILL SEWER BILL AMOUNT (MLUE x FEE) REQUIRED SHORTFALL PER MLUE (10 YEARS) INCREASE INCREASE SEWER 200 1,129,200 7,972,152 (6,842,952) 1,212 5.66 5.87 3.85 1,693,800 , "7, O , ( ,2 52 1•t 3 400 2,258,400 7,972,152 (5,713,752) 1,012 4.73 4.92 3.38 4441114 ` rifts 5,149,152) 9 4 t 44 : 600 3,387,600 7,972,152 (4,584,552) 812 3.79 3.97 2.92 800 4,516,800 7,972,152 (3,455,352) 612 2.86 3.02 2.45 :Ni.., :: . 1,,40 : ...,::..rVi2,ASr. 2, 52) tg,.. M. 3S :: al 2 { ,- 1,000 5,646,000 7,972,152 (2,326,152) 412 1.93 2 07 1.98 1,200 6,775,200 7,972,152 (1,196,952) 212 0.99 1.12 1.51 $1,412 $7,972,152 $7,972,152 $0 $0 $0.00 $0.12 $1.02 TOTAL BOND COSTS $8,111,300 $10,434,875 $2,000,000 in BONDS MONTHLY 10 YR DEBT 20 YR DEBT MLUE MLUE MLUE REVENUE SEWER BILL MONTHLY MONTHLY FEE REVENUE REVENUE REVENUE SHORTFALL INCREASE SEWER BILL SEWER BILL AMOUNT (MLUE x FEE) REQUIRED SHORTFALL PER MLUE (10 YEARS) INCREASE INCREASE WATER 200 $1,129,200 3,952,200 (2,823,000) 500 2.37 1.32 0.97 400 $2,258,400 3,952,200 (1,693,800) 300 1.42 0.37 0.50 600 $3,387,600 3,952,200 (564,600) 100 0.47 -0.57 0.04 Aqfiazl00 * , 5 ,2 0 , S$3,9 ,200 r.... gI::. $0.00 TOTAL BOND COSTS $2,703,767 $3,478,292 PROPOSED SEWER FEE $1,412 CURRENT CUSTOMER BASE: PROPOSED WATER FEE $700 SEWER 4,422 MLUE 5,646 WATER 4,272 03/11/97'MARGLEUS.WK4(07:38 AM) 1 • $6,000,000- 10 YEAR PAY CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS SEWER BONDS REVENUE CERTIFCATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1999 DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST TOTAL P& I - - 134,000.00 134,000.00 9/30/1999 450,000.00 6.000% 346,500.00 796,500.00 9/30/2000 480,000.00 6.000% 318,600.00 798,600.00 9/30/2001 510,000.00 6.000% 288,900.00 798,900.00 9/30/2002 540,000.00 6.000% 257,400.00 797,400.00 9/30/2003 573,750.00 6.000% 223,987.50 797,737.50 9/30/2004 607,500.00 6.000% 188,550.00 796,050.00 9/30/2005 648,750.00 6.000% 150,862.50 799,612.50 9/30/2006 686,250.00 6.000% 110,812.50 797,062.50 9/30/2007 727,500.00 6.000% 68,400.00 795,900.00 9/30/2008 776,250.00 6.000% 23,287.50 799,537.50 9/30/2009 6,000,000.00 2,111,300.00 8,111,300.00 2. $6,000,000-20 YEAR PAY CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS SEWER BONDS REVENUE CERTIFCATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1999 DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST TOTAL P & I 9/30/1999 - - 134,000.00 134,000.00 9/30/2000 161,250.00 6.000% 355,162.50 516,412.50 9/30/2001 168,750.00 6.000% 345,262.50 514,012.50 9/30/2002 180,000.00 6.000% 334,050.00 514,050.00 9/30/2003 191,250.00 6.000% 323,662.50 514,912.50 9/30/2004 202,500.00 6.000% 311,850.00 514,350.00 9/30/2005 217,500.00 6.000% 299,250.00 516,750.00 9/30/2006 228,750.00 6.000% 285,862.50 514,612.50 9/30/2007 243,750.00 6.000% 271,687.50 515,437.50 9/30/2008 258,750.00 6.000% 256,612.50 515,362.50 9/30/2009 273,750.00 6.000% 240,637.50 514,387.50 9/30/2010 292,500.00 6.000% 223,650.00 516,150.00 9/30/2011 307,500.00 6.000% 205,650.00 513,150.00 9/30/2012 330,000.00 6.000% 186,525.00 516,525.00 9/30/2013 348,750.00 6.000% 166,162.50 514,912.50 9/30/2014 371,250.00 6.000% 144,562.50 515,812.50 9/30/2015 393,750.00 6.000% 121,612.50 515,362.50 9/30/2016 416,250.00 6.000% 97,312.50 513,562.50 9/30/2017 442,500.00 6.000% 72,300.00 514,800.00 9/30/2018 472,500.00 6.000% 44,100.00 516,600.00 9/30/2019 498,750.00 6.000% 14,962.50 513,712.50 TOTAL 6,000,000.00 4,434,875.00 10,434,875.00 3. $2,000,000- 10 YEAR PAY CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS WATER BONDS REVENUE CERTIFCATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1999 DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST TOTAL P & I - - 44,666.67 44,666.67 9/30/1999 150,000.00 6.000% 115,500.00 265,500.00 9/30/2000 160,000.00 6.000% 106,200.00 266,200.00 9/30/2001 170,000.00 6.000% 96,300.00 266,300.00 9/30/2002 180,000.00 6.000% 85,800.00 265,800.00 9/30/2003 191,250.00 6.000% 74,662.50 265,912.50 9/30/2004 202,500.00 6.000% 62,850.00 265,350.00 9/30/2005 216,250.00 6.000% 50,287.50 266,537.50 9/30/2006 228,750.00 6.000% 36,937.50 265,687.50 9/30/2007 242,500.00 6.000% 22,800.00 265,300.00 9/30/2008 258,750.00 6.000% 7,762.50 266,512.50 9/30/2009 2.000.000.00 703,766.67 2,703,766.67 4. $2,000,000-20 YEAR PAY CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS WATER BONDS REVENUE CERTIFCATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 1999 DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST TOTAL P & I 9/30/1999 - - 44,666.67 44,666.67 9/30/2000 53,750.00 6.000% 118,387.50 172,137.50 9/30/2001 56,250.00 6.000% 115,087.50 171,337.50 9/30/2002 60,000.00 6.000% 111,350.00 171,350.00 9/30/2003 63,750.00 6.000% 107,887.50 171,637.50 9/30/2004 67,500.00 6.000% 103,950.00 171,450.00 9/30/2005 72,500.00 6.000% 99,750.00 172,250.00 9/30/2006 76,250.00 6.000% 95,287.50 171,537.50 9/30/2007 81,250.00 6.000% 90,562.50 171,812.50 9/30/2008 86,250.00 6.000% 85,537.50 171,787.50 9/30/2009 91,250.00 6.000% 80,212.50 171,462.50 9/30/2010 97,500.00 6.000% 74,550.00 172,050.00 9/30/2011 102,500.00 6.000% 68,550.00 171,050.00 9/30/2012 110,000.00 6.000% 62,175.00 172,175.00 9/30/2013 116,250.00 6.000% 55,387.50 171,637.50 9/30/2014 123,750.00 6.000% 48,187.50 171,937.50 9/30/2015 131,250.00 6.000% 40,537.50 171,787.50 9/30/2016 138,750.00 6.000% 32,437.50 171,187.50 9/30/2017 147,500.00 6.000% 24,100.00 171,600.00 9/30/2018 157,500.00 6.000% 14,700.00 172,200.00 9/30/2019 166,250.00 6.000% 4,987.50 171,237.50 TOTAL 2,000,000.00 1,478,291.67 3,478,291.67 5. IMPACT FEE ASSUMPTIONS 1. MLUE - Marginal Living Unit Equivalent as defined in the Hogan Corporation calculations. The MLUE calculations were used as the basis for developing the matrix. 2. It was assumed that the impact fee revenues/growth would be even over a ten year period. 3. The monthly sewer/water bill increase assumes a period of ten years. 4. The bond schedules were prepared on a level payment basis for ten and twenty years. The bond interest rate used was six percent. 5. The customer base used in the calculations was a combination of current customers plus the number of MLEU's identified in the study. 6 IMPACT FEE COMPARISON EST. SERVICE WATER SEWER TOTAL CITY POPULATION UNIT FEE FEE TOTAL MAXIMUM ALLOWED ADDISON 10,150 none none none none none ALLEN 30,119 5/8" meter $547.00 $92.00 $639.00 CARROLLTON 92,514 acre $920.00 $310.00 $1,230.00 $2,502.00 CEDAR HILL 24,150 5/8" meter $769.00 $231.00 $1,000.00 COLLEYVILLE 16,000 per lot $815.00 $51.00 $866.00 COPPELL 25,700 5/8" meter $450.00 $450.00 $900.00 CORINTH 6,100 5/8" meter $896.00 $368.00 $1,264.00 $2,335.00 DESOTO 35,650 5/8" meter $325.00 $75.00 $400.00 DUNCANVILLE 35,100 none none none none none FLOWER MOUND 33,800 3/4" meter $674.00 $1,396.00 $2,070.00 $5,000.00 FRISCO 20,000 acre $3,178.00 $3,178.00 GARLAND 192,200 5/8" meter $238.00 $0.00 $238.00 $953.00 GEORGETOWN 18,500 3/4" meter $825.00 $600.00 $1,425.00 GRAND PRAIRIE 110,000 5/8" meter $290.00 $145.00 $435.00 $637.00 GRAPEVINE 33,358 per lot $764.00 $140.00 $904.00 HEATH 2,800 5/8" meter $2,250.00 $5,000.00 $7,250.00 KELLER 18,850 5/8" meter $750.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 KERRVILLE 17,384 3/4" meter $500.00 $475.00 $975.00 LANCASTER 22,500 3/4" meter $615.00 $606.00 $1,221.00 $3,306.00 LEWISVILLE 57,500 3/4" meter $900.00 $1,103.00 $2,003.00 MANSFIELD 18,250 3/4" meter $680.00 $350.00 $1,030.00 $2,476.52 MCKINNEY 34,000 3/4" meter $385.00 $490.00 $875.00 , $1,365.00 MESQUITE 111,550 5/8" meter $408.00 $286.00 $694.00 PLANO 176,408 3/4" meter $758.00 $378.00 $1,136.00 RICHARDSON 79,800 none none none none none ROCKWALL 14,000 5/8" meter $412.00 $1,640.00 $2,052.00 $4,189.00 ROWLETT 31,800 5/8" meter $525.00 $270.00 $795.00 $1,596.00 SACHSE 7,200 per lot $693.00 $372.00 $1,065.00 $4,648.00 SCHERTZ 13,500 5/8" meter $750.00 $1,300.00 $2,050.00 SOUTHLAKE 14,950 1" meter $1,250.00 $1,000.00 $2,250.00 SUNNYVALE 2,232 $2,995.00 $834.00 $3,829.00 THE COLONY 24,300 per lot $125.00 $450.00 $575.00 CURRENT WYLIE 11,698 5/8" meter $600.00 $500.00 $1,100.00 $2,224.00 PROPOSED WYLIE 11,698 5/8" meter $700.00 $1,412.00 $2,112.00 $2,192.00 Comparison of Monthly Bills for Water & Sewer Service Selected Area Cities March 3, 1997 8,000 GALLON CONSUMPTION RESIDENTIAL 80 � 70 � I 60 'm 50 40 c 2 30 20 10 0 - I Wylie Plano-Winter Rockwall Sachse Allen Plano-Summer Rowlett Winter averages are used by Rockwall&Sachse for Sewer Billing. COMMERCIAL 80 70 60 w in 50 r 40 o 2 30 20 10 0 Wylie Plano-Winter Rockwall Sachse Allen Plano-Summer Rowlett No Commercial rates are based on Winter averages. 03/04/97 04:51 PM UTILRATE.WK4 Comparison of Monthly Bills for Water & Sewer Service Selected Area Cities March 3, 1997 15,000 GALLON CONSUMPTION RESIDENTIAL 110 ..,, 100 90 80 to 70 m a 60 0 50 2 40 30 20 10 0 Ad A A Wylie Plano-Winter Rockwall Sachse Allen Plano-Summer Rowlett Winter averages are used by Rockwall&Sachse for Sewer Billing. COMMERCIAL 110 100 90 80 70 m i >, 60 s c 50 o r ; 2 40 30 20 10 . 0 Wylie Plano-Winter Rockwall Sachse Allen Plano-Summer Rowlett No Commercial rates are based on Winter averages. 03/04/97 04:51 PM UTILRATE.WK4 Comparison of Monthly Bills for Water & Sewer Service Selected Area Cities March 3, 1997 RESIDENTIAL RATES for WATER & SEWER COMBINED Consumption (Gallons) Wylie Allen Plano-Winter Plano-Summer Rockwall Rowlett Sachse 2,000 22.27 19.34 19.66 19.80 17.20 18.82 26.52 4,0001 30.47 25.14 27.88 28.30 24.90 28.00 38.36 6,000 38.67 30.94 36.10 36.80 32.60 37.18 50.20 8,000 46.87 36.74 44.32 45.30 40.30 46.36 62.04 10,000 55.07 42.54 49.39 50.65 48.00 55.54 73.88 12,000 63.27 47.26 51.31 52.85 55.70 59.72 85.721 15,000 74.84 54.34 54.19 56.15 67.25 65.99 94.50 20,000 88.09 66.14 58.99 62.75 86.50 76.44 107.00 25,000 101.34 77.94 63.79 69.35 105.75 86.89 119.50 30,000 114.59 89.74 68.59 77.10 125.00 97.34 132.00 40,0001 141.09 113.34 78.19 92.60 163.50 118.24 157.00 50,000 167.59 136.94 88.79 109.20 202.00 139.14 182.00 75,000 ! 233.84 195.94 115.29 150.70 298.25 191.39 244.50 100,000 300.09 254.94 141.79 192.20 394.50 24.3.64 307.001 COMMERCIAL RATES for WATER & SEWER COMBINED Consumption (Gallons) 1 T Wylie Allen Plano-Winter Plano-Summer Rockwall Rowlett Sachse 2,000 29.62 19.34 20.10 20.13 20.95 18.82 26.52 4,000 37.82 25.14 29.20 29.29 28.65 28.00 38.36 6,000 ', 46.02 30.94 38.30 38.45 36.35 37.18 50.20 8,0001 54.22 36.74 47.40 47.61 44.05 46.36 62.04 10,0001 62.42 42.54 56.50 56.77 51.75 55.54 73.88 12,0001 70.62 48.34 65.60 65.93 59.45 64.72 85.72 15,000 82.92 57.04 79.25 79.67 71.00 78.49 103.48 20,000 103.42 71.54 102.00 103.87 90.25 101.44 133.08 25,0001 123.92 86.04 124.75 128.07 109.50 124.39 162.68 30,000 144.42 100.54 147.50 152.27 128.75 147.34 192.28 40,0001 185.42 129.54 193.00 200.67 167.25 193.24 251.48 50,000 226.42 158.54 239.80 249.07 205.75 239.14 310.68 75,000 328.92 231.04 356.80 370.07 302.00 353.89 458.68 100,000 431.42 303.54 473.80 491.07 398.25 468.64 606.68 03/04/97 04:49 PM UTILRATE.WK4 Comparison of Monthly Bills for Water & Sewer Service Selected Area Cities March 3, 1997 WATER RESIDENTIAL RATES Consumption (Gallons) Wylie Allen Plano-Winter Plano-Summer Rockwall Rowlett Sachse 2,000 10.82 8.93 9.36 9.50 7.40 11.11 12.00 4,000 16.12 13.65 11.28 11.70 12.70 15.29 17.00 6,000 21.42 18.37 13.20 13.90 18.00 19.47 22.00 8,000 26.72 23.09 15.12 16.10 23.30 23.65 27.00 10,000 32.02 27.81 17.04 18.30 28.60 27.83 32.00 12,000 37.32 32.53 18.96 20.50 33.90 32.01 37.00 15,000 45.27 39.61 21.84 23.80 41.85 38.28 44.50 20,0001 58.52 51.41 26.64 30.40 55.10 48.73 57.00 25,000 ! 71.77 63.21 31.44 37.00 68.35 59.18 69.501 30,000 85.02 75.01 36.24 44.75 81.60 69.63 82.00 40,000 111.52 98.61 45.84 60.25 108.10 90.53 107.00 50,000 138.02 122.21 56.44 76.85 134.60 111.43 132.00 75,000 204.27 181.21 82.94 118.35 200.85 163.68 194.501 100,000 j 270.52 240.21 109.44 159.85 267.10 215.93 257.00 SEWER RESIDENTIAL RATES Based on Water Consumption (Gallons) Wylie _ Allen Plano-Winter Plano-Summer Rockwall Rowlett Sachse 2,0001 11.45 10.41 10.30 10.30 9.80 7.71 14.52 4,000 14.35 11.49 16.60 16.60 12.20 12.71 21.36 6,000 17.25 12.57 22.90 22.90 14.60 17.71 28.20 8,000 20.15 13.65 29.20 29.20 17.00 22.71 35.04 10,000 23.05 14.73 32.35 32.35 19.40 27.71 41.88 12,000 25.95 14.73 32.35 32.35 21.80 27.71 48.72 15,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 25.40 27.71 50.00 20,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 31.40 27.71 50.0011 25,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 37.40 27.71 50.00 30,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 43.40 27.71 50.00 40,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 55.40 27.71 50.00 i 50,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 67.40 27.71 50.00I 75,000 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 97.40 27.71 50.00 100,000 ', 29.57 14.73 32.35 32.35 127.40 27.71 50.00 03/04/97 04:49 PM UTILRATE.WK4 Comparison of Monthly Bills for Water & Sewer Service Selected Area Cities March 3, 1997 WATER COMMERCIAL RATES Consumption - i (Gallons) i Wylie Alien Plano-Winter Plano-Summer Rockwall Rowlett Sachse 2,0001 14.17 8.93 9.65 9.68 7.40 11.11 12.00 4,000 19.47 13.65 12.15 12.24 12.70 15.29 17.00 6,000 24.77 18.37 14.65 14.80 18.00 19.47 22.00 8,000 30.07 23.09 17.15 17.36 23.30 23.65 27.00 10,000 35.37 27.81 19.65 19.92 28.60 27.83 32.00 12,000 40.67 32.53 22.15 22.48 33.90 32.01 37.00 15,000 48.62 39.61 25.90 26.32 41.85 38.28 44.50 20,000 61.87 51.41 32.15 34.02 55.10 48.73 57.00 25,000 75.12 63.21 38.40 41.72 68.35 59.18 69.501 30,000 88.37 75.01 44.65 49.42 81.60 69.63 82.00 40,000 ! 114.87 98.61 57.15 64.82 108.10 90.53 107.00 50,000 141.37 122.21 70.95 80.22 134.60 111.43 132.00 75,000 207.62 181.21 105.45 118.72 200.85 163.68 194.50 100,000 273.87 240.21 139.95 157.22 267.10 215.93 257.00 SEWER COMMERCIAL RATES Based on Water Consumption (Gallons) Wylie Allen Plano-Winter Plano-Summer Rockwall Rowlett Sachse,! 2,000 15.45 10.41 10.45 10.45 13.55 7.71 14.521 4,000 18.35 11.49 17.05 17.05 15.95 12.71 21.36 6,000 21.25 12.57 23.65 23.65 18.35 17.71 28.20 8,000 24.15 13.65 30.25 30.25 20.75 22.71 35.04 10,000I 27.05 14.73 36.85 36.85 23.15 27.71 41.88 '. 12,000 29.95 15.81 43.45 43.45 25.55 32.71 48.72 15,000 34.30 17.43 53.35 53.35 29.15 40.21 58.98 20,000 ', 41.55 20.13 69.85 69.85 35.15 52.71 76.08I 25,0001 48.80 22.83 86.35 86.35 41.15 65.21 93.18 30,000 56.05 25.53 102.85 102.85 47.15 77.71 110.28 40,0001 70.55 30.93 135.85 135.85 59.15 102.71 144.48 50,000 85.05 36.33 168.85 168.85 71.15 127.71 178.681 75,000 121.30 49.83 251.35 251.35 101.15 190.21 264.18 100,000 157.55 63.33 333.85 333.85 131.15 252.71 349.681 03/04/97 04:49 PM UTILRATE.WK4 Waste Water Treatment Plant Detailed Summary The highlight of the sewer system summary is the proposed, future four million gallons a day waste water treatment plant, located on our southern boundary on Muddy Creek. The proposed plant will be necessary because the current plant is beginning to approach its design limits. The current waste water treatment plant is permitted by the State to treat 2 million gallons per day (mgd). State regulations require that an owner/permittee of a waste water treatment plant must begin planning a new facility, or improvements to an existing plant, if the monthly average flow through the current facility exceeds 75% of its permitted average daily flow capacity for three consecutive months. The owner/permittee of a facility must have construction under way if that facility reaches 90% of its capacity. The current facility has reached the 75% range on two or more occasions over the last several years, and the TNRCC is aware of and has notified North Texas Municipal Water District of this condition. The permit application process, according to NTMWD in a recent case, could take three years for approval. Application for a permit may begin after the acquisition of the real estate. The design phase for a new facility could run concurrently with the permit process and would take approximately six months to a year to complete. The actual construction, depending on topography and design, would take an estimated one to one and a half years to finish. The existing plant capacity will be reached with the addition of approximately 700 LUE's within the City's service area. Using the projected growth rate in the recently adopted Land Use Assumptions, the new plant should be under construction within the next three to four years. In addition, existing Discharge Permits must be periodically renewed and a new Discharge Permit must be obtained to continue to operate the current plant. Effluent water quality standards defined in the Discharge Permit are set when the permit is obtained and can be made more stringent when permits are up for renewal. If the effluent quality standards of the Discharge Permit for the existing plant are made more stringent when the permit is up for renewal, the viability of the existing plant may be in doubt altogether. If not, the City may be able to rely on the available capacity in the plant today (approximately 1.7 mgd according to NTMWD) for the ten year planning period. Regardless of whether the current facility's capacity can be depended upon through the ten year period, a new plant will be required. Attachment Action Item No 3