Loading...
10-09-2007 (City Council) Minutes Wylie City Council CITY OF WYLIE Minutes Wylie City Council Tuesday, October 9, 2007 - 6:00 pm Wylie Municipal Complex - Council Chambers 2000 Highway 78 North CALL TO ORDER Announce the presence of a Quorum. Mayor Mondy called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Council Members present were: Mayor Pro Tem Red Byboth, Councilwoman Kathy Spillyards, Councilman Carter Porter, Councilman David Goss, Councilman Merrill Young, and Councilman Rick White. Staff present were: Assistant City Manager, Jeff Butters; Finance Director, Larry Williamson; Fire Chief, Randy Corbin; City Engineer, Chris Hoisted; Planning Director Renae' 011ie; Public Library Director, Rachel Orozco; Public Information Officer, Craig Kelly, and City Secretary, Carole Ehrlich. INVOCATION & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pro Tem Byboth gave the Invocation and Trey Peterson representing Boy Scout Troup 302 led the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENTATION • Presentation to 1st Six Weeks Star Students—Character Trait of"Responsibility". Mayor Mondy and Mayor Pro Tem Byboth presented certificates to WISD students from each school showing the character trait of"Responsibility". Mayor Mondy announced that the Executive Session would be held later in the meeting when the City Attorney arrived. EXECUTIVE SESSION Recess into Closed Session in compliance with Section 551.001, et.seq. Texas Government Code, to wit: §§ 551.071 Consultation with Attorney; Closed Meeting Minutes—October 9, 2007 Wylie City Council Page 1 • Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code, Consultation with attorney for the city regarding potential litigation by the Homebuilders Association of Greater Dallas against the City regarding the validity of the Fire Station fees provided for under Ordinance 2007-17 of the City of Wylie Texas. CITIZENS COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS Residents may address Council regarding an item that is not listed on the Agenda. Residents must provide their name and address. Council requests that comments be limited to three (3) minutes. In addition, Council is not allowed to converse, deliberate or takes action on any matter presented during citizen participation. No citizens were present to address Council during Citizens Comments. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. A. Consider, and act upon, approval of the Minutes from the September 25, 2007 Regular Meeting of the City Council. (C. Ehrlich, City Secretary) B. Consider, and act upon, award of a concessionaire contract for Founders Park and Community Park to Bethsaida Concessions as of December 1, 2007. (R. Diaz, Superintendent, Parks and Recreation) C. Consider, and act upon, a request from the Wylie High School Jazz Band to have a special performance at Olde City Park on October 23, 2007 (rain date October 30, 2007) and for the Wylie High School Band Boosters to sell various items during the concert as a fundraiser. (R. Diaz, Superintendent, Parks and Recreation) D. Consider, and act upon, accepting the resignation of Municipal Court Judge Sydney Robinson effective December 31, 2007 and approval of Resolution No. 2007-31(R) authorizing the appointment of Art Maldonado as Municipal Court Judge for the City of Wylie effective January 1, 2008, setting terms and stipend of service. (J. Butters, Assistant City Manager) E. Consider, and place on file, the Monthly Revenue and Expense Report for the Wylie Economic Development Corporation as of August 31, 2007. (S. Satterwhite, WEDC Executive Director) Council Action A motion was made by Councilman Young, seconded by Councilman Porter to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. A vote was taken and passed 7-0. Minutes—October 9, 2007 Wylie City Council Page 2 REGULAR AGENDA Public Hearings Tabled from August 28, 2007 1. (MOTION TO REMOVE FROM TABLE) Hold a Public Hearing and consider, and act upon, a change in zoning from Agriculture (A) to Planned Development (PD) District to allow for Townhouse development, generally located on the northeast corner of Lynda Lane (CR 389) and Forrest Ross Road. Zoning Case 2007-06 (R. 011ie, Planning Director) Council Action A motion was made by Councilman Porter to remove Item #1 Zoning Case 2007-06 from the table and consider. Consensus of the Council was to remove and consider. Staff Comments Planning Director 011ie addressed Council stating that the subject property is located on the northeast corner of Lynda Lane (CR 389) and Forrest Ross Road. The applicant is requesting to rezone the subject property to allow for townhouse development. The proposal submitted will include approximately 27 townhouse units on 5 acres. The property is a triangular shaped tract that is bordered by Heavy Industrial (HI) District to the north and west and a Planned Development District (Wylie Lakes) currently under construction for mixed use development including residential of varied densities and commercial uses to the east. The entire tract will be developed to Townhouse(TH) District standards with a minimum of 3,500 square feet for exterior lots with side yards and 3,000 square feet for interior lots without side yards. Minimum dwellings size shall be 1,200 square feet. The applicant is not requesting any variance from the Ordinance. Council Discussion Mayor Pro Tern Byboth stated that during the last discussion regarding this item, there was mention by the Council of moving Lynda Lane to go through the development; there is no mention of that in this proposal. Planning Director 011ie concurred that this was not addressed by the applicant. She reported that the applicant also did not submit a new drawing with fewer lots within the revisions to the original application. Mayor Mondy asked Planning Director 011ie what happened to the conversation regarding larger dwellings of around 2,500 sq. feet. Ms. 011ie replied she did not remember an exact number of square feet but did remember larger dwelling units. She reported the size did not change in the revised paperwork. Councilman Young reported that he did remember a square footage minimum discussed of 2,500 sq. ft. Councilman White asked if the applicant had submitted elevation changes as requested in the original discussion. Planning Director 011ie replied that he had not. Councilwoman Spillyards asked Planning Director 011ie how many total units could be placed on the development. Ms. 011ie replied that it could be up to 40 units. Mayor Mondy asked Council if they felt the applicant had fulfilled the spirit of the request to resubmit. Public Hearings Mayor Mondy opened the Public Hearing at 6:15 p.m. No citizens were present to address Council during the Public Hearing for Zoning Case 2007- 06. Minutes—October 9, 2007 Wylie City Council Page 3 Mayor Mondy closed the Public Hearing at 6:15 p.m. Mayor Mondy asked Council if there was any further discussion. Council Action A motion was made by Councilman White, seconded by Councilman Goss to deny Zoning Case 2007-06 changing zoning from Agriculture (A) to Planned Development (PD) District to allow for Townhouse development, generally located on the northeast corner of Lynda Lane (CR 389) and Forrest Ross Road. A vote was taken and passed 5-2 with Mayor Mondy, Councilwoman Spillyards, Councilman White, Councilman Young, and Councilman Goss voting for denial and Mayor Pro Tern Byboth and Councilman Porter voting against denial. Zoning Case 2007-06 was denied. 2. Hold a Public Hearing on the City of Wylie Thoroughfare Impact Fees. (C. Holsted, City Engineer) Staff Comments City Engineer Hoisted addressed Council stating that on June 13, 2006 Council adopted an Ordinance setting the date for a public hearing on the proposed Thoroughfare Impact Fees. Section 395 of the Local Government Code specifies the process necessary for the implementation of impact fees. The Impact Fee Advisory Committee met on June 20'h to file written comments on the proposed fees. The public hearing allows citizens and developers the chance to provide comments on the proposed capital improvements plan and thoroughfare impact fees. Public Hearings Mayor Mondy opened the Public Hearing for the Thoroughfare Impact Fee amendments at 6:17 p.m. Harry James, representing the Red Group with a business address of 1771 International Plaza #121, Richardson, Texas addressed Council. He asked questions regarding the impact fees. He first asked if the impact fees would be set pro-rata for all residents of Wylie or isolated to new residents of Wylie; if it is isolated to new residents, will the funds be separated from general funds, in a separate account. Last, he asked if the fees paid would be used for maintenance and improvements of thoroughfares and right-of-ways adjacent to the new residents or used for all thoroughfares and right-of-ways in Wylie. City Engineer Hoisted addressed the three questions stating that the fees would be charged on new building permits issued to residents or businesses. He reported that the funds are kept separate in an "Impact Fee Thoroughfare" account and the funds may only be used for new improvements to thoroughfares for increased capacity of a roadway; they can not be used for maintenance. He reported they will be used for all roads within the City as noted in the CIP. Finance Director Williamson reported that all funds for thoroughfare impact fees collected are in a separate fund which can be tracked by expenditures made from the account. With no other citizens wishing to speak on this item, Mayor Mondy closed the Public Hearing at 6:20 p.m. Minutes—October 9, 2007 Wylie City Council Page 4 General Business Tabled from September 25, 2007 3. (MOTION TO REMOVE FROM TABLE) Consider, and act upon, a change in zoning from Planned Development (PD) District with a Specific Use Permit (SUP) to Neighborhood Services District on 2.03 acres, generally located on the northeast corner of Collins Blvd. and F.M. 544 (South Stone Road). Zoning Case 2007-05. (R. 011ie, Planning Director) Council Action A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tern Byboth to remove Item #3, Zoning Case 2007-05 from the table and consider. Consensus of Council was to remove from the table and consider. Staff Comments Planning Director 011ie addressed Council stating that the subject property is located at the northeast corner of Collins Boulevard and F.M. 544 within the Bozman Farms Estates & Lake Trails of Bozman Farms Planned Development (PD2002-52). The 475-acre planned development zoning was adopted by City Council in December 2002 allowing for medium density & multifamily residential uses and some community retail uses in certain areas. In addition, parkland dedications, a pond & landscaped open space areas and other amenities are being provided by the developer. In March 2006, the applicant's requested and City Council adopted an amendment to PD2002-52 assigning a Specific Use Permit (SUP06-14) to allow for a Day Care Facility on the subject property. At that time, developers envisioned this nonresidential use of the property as an appropriate location and a preferable use in providing childcare services to surrounding residential areas. The prospect for a day care facility has yet to materialize and the applicant is proposing other nonresidential uses for the property. This item was tabled at the September 25, 2007 Council meeting to allow the applicant to revise his SUP. She reported that the revised submission had 20% landscaping rather than the minimum of 10%; pedestrian pavers on both sides of Collins Blvd.; 40% stone exterior rather than the 20% minimum, and copy same style entire block, will be developed with a residential look. She reported that the applicant is also omitting dry cleaning services. Applicant/Council Discussion Applicant Phil Clegg representing the Red Group, 1771 International Parkway, Richardson Texas addressed Council stating that the firm had met with staff and revised the Planned Development to meet the desires of the Council. He commented that he hoped the revisions met the desires of the council stated at the last meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Byboth asked the applicant how the area would fit into the residential environment aesthetically. Mr. Clegg replied that within the PD there was a section requiring the development to keep the same block design as the residential. He stated that the proposed PD would meet that requirement. Council Action A motion was made by Councilman Porter, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Byboth to approve a change in zoning from Planned Development (PD) District with a Specific Use Permit (SUP) to Neighborhood Services District on 2.03 acres, generally located on the northeast corner of Collins Blvd. and F.M. 544 (South Stone Road). Zoning Case 2007-05. A vote was taken and passed 6-1 with Mayor Mondy, Mayor Pro Tern Byboth, Councilman Young, Councilman Goss, Councilman White and Councilman Porter voting for approval and Councilwoman Spillyards voting against. Minutes—October 9, 2007 Wylie City Council Page 5 4. Consider, and act upon, selection of initial neighborhood to implement the Neighborhood A.C.T.I.O.N. Plan. (R. 011ie, Planning Director) Staff Comments Planning Director 011ie addressed Council stating that on July 10, 2007 City Council adopted a policy to implement a neighborhood planning program whereas residents and stakeholders are afforded an opportunity to work together in addressing the community's issues through Accountable Communities through the Involvement of Neighborhoods (A.C.T.I.O.N.) Plan. This program encourages community defined plans using a city-guided program. Neighborhood planning is an opportunity for citizens to shape the neighborhoods where they live, work, own property, or manage a business. Staff has compiled an inventory of the older neighborhoods throughout the City. It includes household size and age based on the 2000 census. She reported that staff is requesting that Council evaluate the data and give direction as to which neighborhood to begin the A.C.T.I.O.N Plan process. Council Discussion Mayor Mondy asked Ms. 011ie which neighborhood was the oldest. Planning Director 011ie replied the oldest was the "Railroad Addition". She explained that this addition, due to size, was broken down into the north and south side of S.H. 78. She explained that this section had 32 homes with 13 in poor condition; this may be a good place to start. Mayor Mondy asked if certain properties could be pulled from each addition and combined to begin the plan. Councilwoman Spillyards stated there would be more mileage in picking one neighborhood rather than splitting the homes up. Planning Director 011ie concurred stating that keeping the plan within a neighborhood would make the process of the plan cohesive and would allow neighbors to keep other neighbors on board with the plan. Mayor Mondy asked what funds had been budgeted for the current year. Planning Director 011ie reported that the funding was around $5,000. She noted that these Action Plans would be ongoing over a number of years but the funds denoted this year would initiate the beginning processes. None of the initiatives will be a short term project She stated, if the process on the chosen neighborhood started next week, it would take six months just to meet and determine what initiatives were important to those residents. The first portion of the implementation will be to educate the residents regarding city services and the availability of services to them. Councilman Porter suggested picking a smaller neighborhood based on the current available funds. He suggested the J M Butler Addition with 13 properties. Mayor Mondy asked if any members had additional suggestions. Council Action A motion was made by Councilman Porter seconded by Councilman Young to select the J M Butler Addition (#7 in the agenda packet) as the initial neighborhood to implement the Neighborhood A.C.T.I.O.N. Plan. A vote was taken and passed 7-0. City Attorney Richard Abernathy arrived at 6:23 p.m. Mayor Mondy convened into Closed Session at 6:41 p.m. citing §§ 551.071 Consultation with Attorney; Closed Meeting. EXECUTIVE SESSION Recess into Closed Session in compliance with Section 551.001, et.seq. Texas Government Code, to wit: §§ 551.071 Consultation with Attorney; Closed Meeting Pursuant to Section 551.071, Texas Government Code, Consultation with attorney for the city regarding potential litigation by the Homebuilders Association of Greater Dallas against the City Minutes—October 9, 2007 Wylie City Council Page 6 regarding the validity of the Fire Station fees provided for under Ordinance 2007-17 of the City of Wylie Texas. Mayor Mondy reconvened into Open Session at 7:36 p.m. RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION Take any action as a result from Executive Session, including but not limited to: NO ACTION WAS TAKEN AS A RESULT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION. 5. Consider, and act upon, approval of an Alternative Parking Agreement for A&W Properties Addition, Block A, Lots 1 and 2. Subject property being generally located north of FM 544 and west of FM 1378 (Country Club Drive). (R. 011ie, Planning Director) Staff Comments Planning Director 011ie addressed Council stating that the applicant is requesting approval for special off- site parking alternative in order to meet the minimum on-site parking required for Lot 1. The Zoning Ordinance requires City Council review and approval for special off-site Parking Alternatives. Article 7, Section 7.3 Off-Street Parking Requirements (F) Parking Alternatives. This provision allows for minimum required parking spaces be satisfied in lieu of on-site parking under certain conditions. The conditions as laid out in the ordinance include a legal agreement that runs with the property (land) and subject to City Council review. The applicant is requesting that the excess parking spaces on Lot 2 be counted towards meeting the required parking for Lot 1. Council Discussion Mayor Mondy asked Planning Director 011ie why the City would not require the applicant to replat the two lots to establish the required parking in lieu of a parking agreement. He stated that this would eliminate issues ten years from now when the property sold to another person. Planning Director 011ie explained that if the property was sold and did not have the required parking (Lot 1), the new property owner would have to meet the parking requirements for the business or cease operations. Mayor Mondy asked Planning Director 011ie how the Planning Department would be notified if the property sold and did not comply. Ms. 011ie replied the department would not be notified of the sale of the property. Mayor Mondy asked if the re-platting would not be in the best interest of the City. Planning Director 011ie replied that the parking agreement was allowed by ordinance and therefore she was not sure if re-platting would be in the best interest of the City. She explained that within the agreement, there was a stipulation that for the agreement to remain effective, Tract 1 (A) and Tract 2 (B) must have common ownership. If common ownership ceases, the agreement ceases, and permits become invalid. She noted that the agreement once executed by both parties must be filed with the County to become a legal record. Mayor Mondy asked what the fee was to replat the property. Planning Director 011ie reported it would be $350.00 plus $15.00 per acre. Mayor Mondy asked Planning Director 011ie if the fee could be waived in this case. Planning Director 011ie replied it could, with council approval. Mayor Mondy commented that he believed this was the best process to use. Planning Director 011ie commented that she believed re-platting was the cleanest means to zone property. She explained that unless the City had someone monitoring the agreements, they can fall through the cracks. Mayor Pro Tem Byboth stated that if the property sold, a certificate of occupancy would be required and the parking would have to be met prior to the Certificate being issued. Councilman Porter suggested asking the property owner (A. & W. Properties) which process he would prefer. Minutes—October 9, 2007 Wylie City Council Page 7 Applicant Discussion Mr. Tom Allred owner of A & W Properties (applicant) addressed Council stating that he had applied for the parking agreement in lieu of re-platting because of the cost involved in procuring a surveyor which he estimated would cost in the neighborhood of $3,000 plus new plats and filing which would run an additional $1,400; on top of any additional parkland fees. He stated that while he appreciated the waiving of zoning fees, he requested Council approve the proposed parking agreement. He reported that after reviewing the parking regulations within the zoning ordinance, he found that there were two means of parking arrangements in the event he sold the property. The first was to continue the proposed parking agreement if the same person were to purchase both lots. The second allowed for approval by Council to approve "shared parking" should separate owners purchase the two lots. He commented that at the present time he had no intention of selling the property, but those options would allow for that. He explained that should the property sell, a certificate of occupancy would be required of the new business owners thereby allowing the City a mechanism to check the parking requirements. He noted that he believed the City had ordinances in place that would track the agreements and ownership of the property. Councilman Porter stated that he believed any person wishing to purchase the lots in the future, would research the parking prior to signing a contract. Councilman Goss stated that he believed the tracking of the ownership was in place. Mayor Mondy stated that he believed the property should be re-platted so to not push a problem upstream and have to deal with it in the future. Mayor Pro Tern Byboth stated that he did not consider the lack of one parking space to be of as much importance as the tax revenue this property will generate, now or in the future. Council Action A motion was made by Councilman Porter, seconded by Councilman Goss to approve an Alternative Parking Agreement for A&W Properties Addition, Block A, Lots 1 and 2; Subject property being generally located north of FM 544 and west of FM 1378. A vote was taken and passed 6-1 with Mayor Pro Tern Byboth, Councilwoman Spillyards, Councilman Porter, Councilman White, Councilman Young, and Councilman Goss voting for approval and Mayor Mondy voting against. 6. Consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2007-34 updating the Thoroughfare Impact Fees to be assessed by the City of Wylie and amending Ordinance 2006-47; establishing a collection date; establishing procedures and regulations regarding thoroughfare impact fees; and authorizing the Mayor to sign the appropriate compliance statement. (C. Holsted, City Engineer) Staff Comments City Engineer Hoisted addressed Council stating that on August 28, 2007 Council adopted an Ordinance setting the date for a public hearing on the proposed Thoroughfare Impact Fees. Council also approved the 10-year Capital Improvements Plan at that same meeting. Section 395 of the Local Government Code specifies the process necessary for the implementation of impact fees, and a public hearing was conducted to receive public comments on the proposed Thoroughfare Impact Fees. The impact fee report recommends that the City be divided generally along SH 78, into the west and east service area. He reported that the Impact Fee Advisory Committee had met and made two recommendations. One was to leave the current fees for both east and west in place and the other was to confirm that the fees are comparable to other cities. Mr. Hoisted reported that staff had performed a survey and found the fees to be comparable to other cities and had included that survey in the agenda packets. Minutes—October 9, 2007 Wylie City Council Page 8 Council Action A motion was made by Councilman Porter seconded by Councilman White to approve Ordinance No. 2007-34 updating the Thoroughfare Impact Fees in the amount of $434.50 per service unit for the west zone and $718.50 per service unit for the east zone and amend Ordinance 2006-47; establishing a collection date; establishing procedures and regulations regarding thoroughfare impact fees; and authorizing the Mayor to sign the appropriate compliance statement. A vote was taken and passed 7-0. 7. Consider, and act upon, Resolution No. 2007-32(R) requesting the State of Texas Department of Transportation release ownership and control of FM 1378 from FM 544 to FM 3412, and FM 3412 from FM 1378 to SH 78. (C. Holsted, City Engineer) Staff Comments City Engineer Hoisted addressed Council stating that the reconstruction of FM 1378 from FM 544 to FM 3412 (Brown St.) was funded in the 1999 City of Wylie Bond Program as well as the 1999 Collin County Bond Program. The Texas Department of Transportation also has approximately $900,000 available for the project. Since the project was originally funded, the construction cost of the project has increased significantly. Collin County has submitted a request to the North Central Texas Council of Governments for additional funding in the amount of$5,832,000. The project includes expansion to 6-lanes of concrete with sidewalks and underground storm drainage. He reported that TxDOT was 18 — 24 months from beginning the project; based on the construction of the new municipal buildings, staff is requesting the area be taken off state ownership and allow the construction to begin on schedule. Council Discussion Councilman Young asked if the section went past the railroad tracks. City Engineer Hoisted replied that it did not. Councilman Porter asked if the area at S.H. 544 and 1378 would be realigned. Mr. Hoisted replied that it would when TxDOT completed the 1378 project. Councilman Porter asked if there was any chance of losing the $900,000. Mr. Hoisted replied that could happen if TxDOT determined it did not meet their requirements. Mr. Hoisted commented that he believed it would still be better to move forward with the municipal construction projects than to wait an additional 2 years. Council Action A motion was made by Councilman Young, seconded by Councilman Goss to approve Resolution No. 2007-32(R) requesting the State of Texas Department of Transportation to release ownership and control of FM 1378 from FM 544 to FM 3412, and FM 3412 from FM 1378 to SH 78. A vote was taken and passed 7-0. 8. Consider and act upon award of a contract to Tri-Con Services, Inc. in the amount of $3,713,509.45 for the reconstruction of Ballard Avenue from Stone Road to Alanis Drive. (C. Holsted, City Engineer) Staff Comments City Engineer Hoisted addressed Council stating that the Ballard Ave. paving project includes the reconstruction to a 4-lane concrete roadway with an underground drainage system, the installation of an emergency traffic signal at Fire Station No. 1, and related utility relocations. On September 26, 2007 the City opened five bids with the low base bid and alternate being submitted by Tri-Con Services, Inc. The installation of the emergency signal at Fire Station No. 1 was bid as an alternate. The project includes Minutes—October 9, 2007 Wylie City Council Page 9 approximately 25,305 square yards of 8-inch concrete pavement, 2,833 square yards of concrete sidewalk, 4,800 linear feet of water line replacement, and 1,180 linear feet of sanitary sewer replacement. The water line replacement includes the installation of a 16-inch water line which will serve the future 1.5 million gallon elevated storage tank located at Fire Station No. 1. Council Action A motion was made by Councilman Goss, seconded by Councilman Porter to award a contract to Tri-Con Services, Inc. in the amount of $3,713,509.45 for the reconstruction of Ballard Avenue from Stone Road to Alanis Drive. A vote was taken and passed 7-0. 9. Consider, and act upon, Resolution No. 2007-33(R) suspending the October 25, 2007, effective date of Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division requested rate change to permit the city time to study the request and to establish reasonable rates; approving cooperation with Atmos Cities Steering Committee and other cities in the Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division Service area to hire legal and consulting services and to negotiate with the company and direct any necessary litigation and appeals; requiring reimbursement of cities' rate case expenses; finding that the meeting at which this Resolution is passed is open to the public as required by law; requiring notice of this Resolution to the company and legal counsel. (M. Manson, City Manager) Staff Comments Assistant City Manager Butters addressed Council stating that the Railroad Commission issued a Final Order approving new system-wide rates for customers of Atmos Energy's Mid-Tex Division in May. Residential rates were increased by $10 million annually. Also in May, Atmos Mid-Tex filed its application for its fourth GRIP surcharge in four years, seeking to increase the rates of all customers by $12 million annually. Despite both of these recent actions to increase customers' rates, Atmos Mid-Tex has filed an application with cities retaining original jurisdiction over rates and services to increase system-wide rates by another$52 million. Council Action A motion was made by Councilman Porter, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Byboth to approve Resolution No. 2007-33(R) suspending the October 25, 2007, effective date of Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division requested rate change to permit the city time to study the request and to establish reasonable rates; approving cooperation with Atmos Cities Steering Committee and other cities in the Atmos Energy Corp, Mid-Tex Division Service area to hire legal and consulting services and to negotiate with the company and direct any necessary litigation and appeals; requiring reimbursement of cities' rate case expenses; finding that the meeting at which this Resolution is passed is open to the public as required by law; requiring notice of this Resolution to the company and legal counsel. A vote was taken and passed 7-0. 10. Consider, and possible action, on request for funding by Collin County Children's Advocacy Center, Equest Therapeutic Horsemanship, Friends of the Smith Public Library, Plano Children's Medical Clinic, and Wylie ISD Education Foundation. (M. Manson, City Manager) Minutes—October 9, 2007 Wylie City Council Page 10 Staff Comments Assistant City Manager Butters addressed Council stating that on September 25, 2007 the Council heard presentations from the above listed organizations regarding proposed funding allocations, per Ordinance No. 2005-52. A total of$33,000 has been allocated from the FY 2007/2008 Budget. Council Discussion Mayor Pro Tem Byboth suggested that the funds be divided as follows: $10,000 to Collin County Children's Advocacy Center; $5,000 to Equest Therapeutic Horsemanship; $5,000 to Friends of the Rita & Truett Smith Library; $8,000 to the Plano Children's Medical Clinic, and $5,000 to the WISD Education Foundation. Councilman Young asked if the ordinance required the Council to give these not for profit donations. Mayor Mondy replied that it did not however requests were sent this year for those wishing to apply for the funds. Councilman Young stated that he believed the Council needed to review this process during the next year's budget work sessions to determine if these funds should be given in years of revenue restraints. Council Action A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tern Byboth, seconded by Councilman Porter to allocate funding in the amount of: $10,000 to Collin County Children's Advocacy Center; $5,000 to Equest Therapeutic Horsemanship; $5,000 to Friends of the Rita & Truett Smith Library; $8,000 to the Plano Children's Medical Clinic, and $5,000 to the WISD Education Foundation. A vote was taken and passed 6-1 with Mayor Mondy, Mayor Pro Tem Byboth, Councilwoman Spillyards, Councilman Goss, Councilman Young, and Councilman Porter voting for approval and Councilman White voting against. 11. Consider, and act upon, Resolution No. 2007-34(R) nominating candidates to the Board of Directors for the Central Appraisal District of Dallas County for a two year term beginning January 1,2008. (C. Ehrlich, City Secretary) Staff Comments City Secretary Ehrlich addressed Council stating that recently passed House Bill 1010 has changed the appraisal process for cities in more than one county. Each county is required to appraise for their individual county; cutting off at each county line. Previously, each city could opt to appoint one county to appraise all property within the incorporated city, thus the city will now have three appraisal districts, Rockwall, Dallas and Collin performing appraisal of property within the City of Wylie. Council is asked to consider a Resolution nominating a candidate for the Dallas Central Appraisal District for the Board of Directors which must be delivered to the Chief Appraiser before October 15, 2007 Council Discussion Mayor Mondy asked for nominations from the Council for the Board of Directors for the Central Appraisal District of Dallas County for a two year term beginning January 1, 2008. No nominations were made. NO COUNCIL ACTION WAS TAKEN ON THIS ITEM. READING OF ORDINANCES Title and caption approved by Council as required by Wylie City Charter,Article III, Section 13-D. City Secretary Ehrlich read the caption to Ordinance No. 2007-34 into the official record. Minutes—October 9, 2007 Wylie City Council Page 11 WORK SESSION • Discussion related to the North Texas Municipal Water District (NTMWD) "Take Or Pay" project. (C. Holsted, City Engineer) City Engineer Holsted gave a presentation regarding current proposals being offered by North Texas Municipal Water District and the "Take or Pay" project. He explained that each city within the member cities would be required to agree on one of the ten options being offered by NTMWD. Wylie NTMWD board representation Marvin Fuller explained some of the reasons behind the "Take or Pay" requirements in relation to the ongoing infrastructure needs of NTMWD and the costs of capital improvements to the district. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before Council, Mayor Mondy adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m. Consensus of Council was to adjourn. ohn M nd , Mayor ATTEST: �'�y 1' • • 4!s$ SLY•••.....•• P`' /// Carole Ehrlich, ity Secretary �' /E'„ ��``` Minutes—October 9, 2007 Wylie City Council Page 12 1 NORTH TEXAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Regional Service Through Unity July 11, 2007 Mr. Mindy Manson, City Manager City of Wylie 2000 Highway 78 North Wylie, Texas 75098 RE: Water Supply Contract Amendment Dear Mr. Manson: The North Texas Municipal Water District has received requests from some of its Member Cities for an amendment to the current Water Supply Contract to modify the current rate methodology. In response to these requests and in order to evaluate the potential financial impact of a modification to the current rate methodology to the Member Cities, the NTMWD Board of Directors obtained the services of R. W. Beck, Inc. Enclosed is a copy of R. W. Beck's report entitled "Analysis of Alternative Rate Methodologies" for North Texas Municipal Water District for your review. The report is based on a review of the District's recent operating and financial conditions and includes ten (10) potential modifications or alternatives to the current rate methodology based on suggestions received from NTMWD Member Cities as well as staff and consultants. Also, enclosed is a whitepaper titled "Background for Current Water Rate Methodology." Since a contract amendment involves all thirteen Member Cities, it is important that each city understand and carefully consider the impacts of an amendment. Therefore, the Board of Directors is asking that each Member City review R. W. Beck's report over the next three to four weeks. Once all thirteen Member Cities have reviewed the report, the NTMWD will be pleased to host a meeting of the thirteen Member Cities, if requested. The purpose of such a meeting would be to provide a forum for discussion among the Member Cities in order to determine if a consensus for contract change can be reached. Again, any contract change will require the approval of all thirteen Member Cities and the NTMWD. 505 E.Brown St.,P.O.Box 2408,Wylie,Texas 75098-2408 Telephone:972/442-5405 Fax:9721442-5405 Mr. Mindy Manson July 11, 2007 Page 2 The Board of Directors is asking that each Member City notify the NTMWD in writing by August 6, 2007, if your city wishes to take part in a joint meeting or if you would like for a representative from R. W. Beck to further review the report with you individually. This is a complicated issue that affects each Member City differently. If a consensus can be reached, the NTMWD's Board of Directors can consider the change at its next available Board meeting. Action by each of the thirteen Member Cities could then occur as soon as each city is ready. Should you have any questions or if you need additional information, please contact Mr. Judd Sanderson, Director of Finance for NTMWD, at 972/442-5405. Sincerely, 6E01YVY(NR°4— MES M. PARKS ecutive Director JMP/mcf Enclosures cc: NTMWD Board of Directors BACKGROUND FOR CURRENT WATER RATE METHODOLOGY Financing The North Texas Municipal Water District does not utilize property taxes or any other form of general taxation as a revenue source. Its revenues are generated by the services it provides to the cities. Therefore, it has been necessary to develop effective contractual relationships in order for the District to be able to issue bonds to finance the development of projects needed to provide its services. Contracts The State of Texas has authorized contracts between local governments that allow water providers to issue contract revenue bonds to finance projects. These contracts require the water provider to receive sufficient revenues from the cities it serves to pay the debt service and operation and maintenance costs of the provider's system. The cities must then charge a sufficient amount to cover not only the provider's cost, but the cost of operating their own systems. These contracts must be approved by the Attorney General of the State in order for the water provider to issue bonds. Contract Minimums Contract minimums assure bondholders that water providers will generate sufficient revenues to satisfy their financial commitments and have been accepted in the bond market for many years. Contract minimums are also utilized by water providers to determine the proportional share of cost to be paid by cities and can be established in many different ways such as fixed volumes, maximum day usage, annual average usage over several years, or the previous highest annual usage. The cost allocation method that the District and cities have agreed to utilize is the previous highest annual usage method. This method is generally referred to as the maximum annual demand method. In contractual terms, it is referred to as minimum annual demand. Minimum Annual Demand The minimum annual demand is the greatest annual demand that a city has historically placed on the District's system. The District has been required to provide the raw water, treatment plant capacity, pipeline capacity, and pump capacity to meet this demand. Under the minimum annual demand method, the city that created the demand on the District's system is required to pay its fair proportional share of the increased cost to develop, operate and maintain supplies and facilities. This method ensures that the city that created the demand on the system pays for that demand. Allocation of Cost to Cities The Board of Directors appointed by the cities has the responsibility to see that services are performed in accordance with the contractual relationships and laws of the State of Texas. In fulfilling this responsibility, the Board approves an annual budget that is based on meeting the needs of the cities minimum annual demand requirements. The budget is proportioned among the cities based on each city's minimum annual demand. Should a city consume a greater volume of water than its minimum annual demand, the excess water is purchased at the variable cost for electrical power and chemicals required to produce the additional volume of water. This excess volume of water escalates to the full cost the following year as part of the minimum annual demand requirement. This is fair as the District has budgeted for the minimum annual demands to be produced in the current year. Therefore, the additional volume only requires the District to incur the variable cost of operations (power & chemicals) during the current year. The variable cost charged to the cities allows the cities to benefit from the larger sales in their systems that year. In future years, the additional volume must be reserved in capacity for each city. In recognition of the effects of periods of heavy rainfall and water conservation efforts, the District has established a rebate program. Should a city consume less than its minimum annual demand, the Board of Directors generally rebates back to the city the variable cost of operations (power and chemicals) that were budgeted but not incurred to meet the city's actual consumption. Does a City Pay for Water It Doesn't Consume? Periods of extreme rainfall can cause a city to not fully utilize its minimum annual demand requirement. As a result, it may appear that a city is paying for water that it didn't consume. Yes, it is true that a city must make payments to the District while it isn't consuming up to its minimum annual demand requirement. However, one must realize that these payments are required in order for the District to meet its debt service obligations and to continue to maintain the existing system. Making payments to the District while consuming less than the minimum annual demand requirement is similar to the payments required of a homeowner. When the homeowner is away on vacation, he/she must continue to pay the mortgage and ensure that maintenance of the home continues. One must also realize that if a city didn't participate in a regional system and it operated its own reservoir, treatment plant and transmission facilities, during periods of excessive rainfall or should a major industry not consume expected volumes of water, it would still be expected to pay the debt service on its facilities, keep the personnel to maintain and operate the facilities and continue to develop a program of capital investments to meet its demands for future normal or dry years. What Happens if the Current Minimum Annual Demand Method is Changed? If one accepts that the annual budget is the appropriate amount to be spent, then a change in the method of determining minimum annual demands only changes "who pays what amount". This is the concern with a change to the current method. If all minimums are reduced proportionally, the rate would be proportionally increased and the cities would all pay the same amounts. However, if the methodology changes the relationship of the minimums to each other, then one city will pay more and another city will pay less. In reality, each city has contracted to pay its proportional share of the cost. Conclusion Each city manages the volume of water it uses through its policies and ordinances. Cities which actively encourage water conservation reduce their demand on the District's system. Uncontrolled, a city's usage accelerates the District's construction programs to meet artificial growth caused by fluctuating demand. Through conservation, awareness and the wise use of water, major capital expenditures can be delayed which will minimize the impact of future rate adjustments. The philosophy of the District's Board of Directors over the years has been to provide a high-quality, reliable water supply in the most cost-effective manner to the cities. Due to a variety of factors including rate of growth or maturity of a city at any one point in time, some cities will benefit more or less than others at that instant in time. However, over the long-term, each city should receive relatively equal benefit from a regional system. July 6, 2007 Analysis of Alternative Water Rate Methodologies for North Texas Municipal Water District As Prepared by R.W. Beck, Inc. Table of Contents Executive Summary Section 1. Introduction Section 2. Rate Methodologies 2.1 Current Rate Methodology 1 2.2 Assumptions for Alternative Rate Methodologies 2 2.3 Alternative Rate Methods 2 2.3.1 Method#1 2 2.3.2 Method#2 4 2.3.3 Method#3 5 2.3.4 Method#4 7 2.3.5 Method#5 8 2.3.6 Method#6 10 2.3.7 Method#7 11 2.3.8 Method#8 13 2.3.9 Method#9 14 2.3.10 Method#10 16 2.4 Summary of Method Impacts to Cities 18 Section 3. Findings and Conclusions This report has been prepared for the use of the client for the specific purposes identified in the report. The conclusions, observations and recommendations contained herein attributed to R.W. Beck, Inc. (R.W. Beck) constitute the opinions of R.W. Beck. To the extent that statements, information and opinions provided by the client or others have been used in the preparation of this report, R. W. Beck has relied upon the same to be accurate, and for which no assurances are intended and no representations or warranties are made. R.W. Beck makes no certification and gives no assurances except as explicitly set forth in this report. Copyright 2007, R.W. Beck, Inc. All rights reserved. nifirCK EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In January 2007, R.W. Beck, Inc. (R.W. Beck) was engaged by North Texas Municipal Water District (NTWMD) to review and analyze the District's existing water rate contractual provisions with its Member and Customer Cities. As part of this engagement, R.W. Beck's Project Manager, Mr. Jack Stowe conducted one-on-one interviews with representatives from 12 of the 13 Member Cities. R.W. Beck was also tasked with reviewing and quantifying the historical impact of ten (10) alternative rate methodologies and the impact of each respective method on the charges to the Member Cities. The results of this analysis were presented to the NTMWD Board of Director's Water Committee on June 28th, 2007 and, at their direction, the attached report was prepared detailing the analysis. The methodologies that were considered are summarized below: • Method #1 — Reduce the minimum annual demand by 10% every five (5) years • Method #2 — If current minimum annual demand is not reached for three (3) consecutive years, then minimum annual demand is adjusted to reflect the highest demand during the previous three (3) year period • Method #3 — 3-year rolling average used to determine minimum annual demand • Method #4 — Prior year consumption used to determine minimum annual demand • Method#5 —Eliminate the excess water rate • Method #6 — Eliminate the excess water rate and use prior year consumption to determine minimum annual demand • Method#7 —Transfer excess minimum annual demand between the cities • Method#8 —Two-part rate structure based upon peak day usage • Method#9 —Allocate costs based upon actual consumption • Method #10 — Maintain current rate methodology and establish additional water conservation surcharge The chart contained at the end of the Executive Summary illustrates the total net impact of each method to each of the Member Cities from 2003 to 2006. A positive number on this table indicates additional charges that would be incurred under the respective method. A negative number indicates reduced charges that would be incurred. Hill{[K EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In reviewing the results of this analysis, it is important to remember that under each alternative method, only the cost responsibility between the Cities is changing. The revenue received by NTMWD cannot be significantly reduced unless the services provided by NTMWD are reduced. R.W. Beck would also like to note that this analysis is historical in nature and does not necessarily indicate future results. Additionally, the results of this analysis must be considered in light of the assumptions utilized and presented in Section 2.2 of the attached report. It is also important to note that any change to the current contractual provisions of NTMWD will require significant effort. Specifically, any contract change would require consent of all 13 Member Cities and NTMWD. In addition, the potential also exists that approval from 51% of the NTMWD bondholders may also be required. ES-2 R. W. Beck EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table ES-1 Summary of Rate Methods Total Impact Method #1 Method #2 Method #3 Method #4 Method #5 Allen $ 564,102 $ 582,336 $ 575,153 $ 1,254,432 $ 948,492 Farmersville (2,946) (5,096) (22,466) (49,310) (7,048) Forney 120,771 128,420 3,417 237,505 439,179 Frisco 770,044 785,745 26,277 1,877,352 2,198,060 Frisco#2 6,792 6,305 10,720 10,077 292,337 Garland (78,273) 483,475 1,470,365 801,976 (654,679) McKinney 860,533 883,458 911,781 2,132,148 1,537,125 McKinney#3 15,930 23,052 39,276 36,877 (8,492) Mesquite 1,165,430 373,531 1,253,300 (377,429) (303,174) Mesquite #3 390,130 259,162 650,149 656,960 (105,164) Plano (3,002,389) (3,100,982) (2,507,099) (4,936,816) (1,350,417) Princeton (9,537) 10,187 2,696 7,131 41,441 Richardson (734,479) (85,066) 145,715 (1,317,460) (553,182) Rockwall 305,792 313,370 258,354 549,257 667,816 Royse City 41,803 43,625 34,848 90,182 121,436 Wylie 160,857 171,744 (66,889) 326,685 516,017 Method #6 Method #7 Method #8 Method #9 Method #10 Allen $ 1,227,203 $ 749,886 $ 1,348,910 $ 2,108,689 $ 509,115 Farmersville (50,821) (22,182) (41,430) (39,782) - Forney 231,817 318,042 240,772 672,568 39,446 Frisco 1,841,617 1,815,711 1,946,056 3,753,070 637,638 Frisco#2 10,080 - (18,947) 282,718 1,049 Garland 724,624 (478,693) 1,237,962 602,496 621,771 McKinney 2,090,942 1,308,188 2,284,190 3,312,041 713,314 McKinney#3 36,888 - (173,769) (68,685) 875 Mesquite (407,125) (636,890) 274,874 (1,170,797) - Mesquite #3 644,465 - (1,386,535) 420,670 - Plano (5,073,381) (2,458,735) (4,168,162) (4,776,937) 2,379,897 Princeton 5,293 10,281 14,261 65,998 - Richardson (1,374,872) (1,505,207) (952,507) (2,187,992) 1,460,793 Rockwall 534,744 400,582 578,140 1,284,005 243,502 Royse City 88,153 75,145 93,645 203,712 - Wylie 318,747 423,874 334,954 833,538 - R. W. Beck ES-3 Section 1 Introduction 1 .1 Introduction In January 2007, R.W. Beck, Inc. (R.W. Beck) was engaged by North Texas Municipal Water District (NTWMD) to review and analyze the District's existing water rate contractual provisions with its Member and Customer Cities. As part of this engagement, R.W. Beck's Project Manager, Mr. Jack Stowe conducted one-on-one interviews with representatives from 12 of the 13 Member Cities. R.W. Beck was also tasked with reviewing and quantifying the historical impact of ten (10) alternative rate methodologies and the impact of each respective method on the charges to the Member Cities. The results of this analysis were presented to the NTMWD Board of Director's Water Committee on June 28th, 2007 Per the direction of the NTMWD Board of Director's Water Committee, this report provides an analysis and discussion of each of the rate methodologies considered as well as the projected impact each method historically would have had on the Member Cities of NTMWD. Hill{[K Section 2 Rate Methodologies 2.1 Current Rate Methodology Under the current contractual rate methodology, a Member City is charged the full rate for the volumes included in its minimum annual demand. The minimum annual demand is defined as the highest demand historically placed on the system by that City. For any volumes consumed over the minimum annual demand, the variable operations and maintenance (O&M) cost associated with supplying that additional water is charged. For any volumes included in the minimum annual demand that are not consumed, a City generally receives a refund equivalent to the variable O&M costs for those volumes. The following table demonstrates the charges to each City under the current methodology for 2003 through 2006. Table 2-1 Charges under Current Rate Methodology 2003 2004 2005 2006 Allen $ 3,473,207 $ 3,841,994 $4,296,442 $4,754,388 Farmersville 239,791 258,529 256,866 264,757 Forney 655,932 746,272 898,124 1,109,782 Frisco 4,065,937 5,166,391 5,640,718 6,607,044 Frisco#2 108,146 Garland 11,733,053 12,357,732 13,005,295 13,264,459 McKinney 5,121,839 5,889,188 6,502,087 7,232,155 McKinney#3 394,874 Mesquite 5,162,728 5,312,538 5,628,744 5,794,360 Mesquite#3 1,637,297 1,800,308 1,970,811 2,043,471 Plano 22,451,275 23,668,166 25,060,694 25,813,620 Princeton 277,814 294,578 320,586 343,622 Richardson 9,410,021 9,840,392 10,195,616 10,465,811 Rockwall 1,913,157 2,075,097 2,290,163 2,584,352 Royse City 243,163 271,832 320,142 358,578 Wylie 816,388 1,003,837 1,252,736 1,422,544 Total $ 67,201,602 $ 72,526,856 $ 77,639,024 $ 82,561,966 ti'\'J'II Section 2 2.2 Assumptions for Alternative Rate Methods In attempting to quantify the impacts of the various alternative rate methods that have been proposed, several assumptions have been made. These include: • For customers currently under specialized contracts (i.e, individual delivery points for Frisco, McKinney, and Mesquite), the minimum annual demand of these customers has been held constant to reflect the contract minimum annual demand levels. • In methods where the total minimum annual demand level is reduced, the historical rates have been increased to recover the same amount of revenue under the minimum annual demand charge as was historically recovered. • Any excess revenue generated above the revenue requirement, that is the revenue generated under the current methodology in a given year, was carried over to the following year and used to reduce the budgeted water sales amount upon which rates are based. • In all cases, each rate method was applied beginning in 2003. If excess revenue was generated, it was first carried over and used to reduce budgeted water sales in 2004. • With the exceptions of Methods #7 and #10, all methods were applied to both the Member and the Customer Cities. 2.3 Alternative Rate Methods 2.3.1 Method #1 Reduce the minimum annual demand by 10%every five (5)years The first method considered by R.W. Beck would periodically reduce the minimum annual demand of a City. For purposes of this analysis, it was assumed that a 10% reduction would occur every five (5) years. In the years following the adjustment, the minimum annual demand of a City would be increased if their actual demand exceeded this adjusted amount. Under this method, the excess water rate is maintained, as is the refund of the variable cost component for a City whose actual demand is below the minimum annual demand level. The following table demonstrates the charges to each City under Method #1 for 2003 through 2006. 2-2 R. W. Beck Rate Methodologies Table 2-2 Charges Generated under Method#1 2003 2004 2005 2006 Allen $ 3,529,617 $ 3,971,211 $ 4,477,738 $ 4,951,569 Farmersville 242,389 245,598 260,434 268,576 Forney 666,804 771,369 936,020 1,156,688 Frisco 4,148,991 5,340,159 5,878,730 6,882,255 Frisco#2 114,939 Garland 11,901,142 12,210,913 12,947,593 13,222,617 McKinney 5,210,896 6,087,261 6,776,452 7,531,193 McKinney#3 410,805 Mesquite 5,679,824 5,491,261 5,866,296 6,026,419 Mesquite #3 1,801,269 1,860,861 2,053,977 2,125,910 Plano 22,730,377 22,475,759 23,974,012 24,811,217 Princeton 281,402 280,016 307,727 357,918 Richardson 9,540,158 9,513,578 9,916,573 10,207,052 Rockwall 1,943,407 2,144,888 2,386,802 2,693,464 Royse City 247,062 280,973 333,651 373,830 Wylie 831,240 1,037,594 1,305,597 1,481,930 Total $ 68,754,579 $ 71,711,441 $ 77,421,603 $ 82,616,382 Given the estimated charges above, the following illustrates the increase or decrease in charges to each Member City between Method #1 and the Current Rate Methodology. A positive number indicates additional charges incurred by a City while a negative number indicates a City whose charges would be reduced. Table 2-3 Increase I(Decrease) in Charges between Method#1 and Current Rate Methodology 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Allen $ 56,410 $ 129,216 $ 181,297 $ 197,180 $ 564,102 Farmersville 2,598 (12,932) 3,569 3,819 (2,946) Forney 10,872 25,097 37,896 46,906 120,771 Frisco 83,054 173,768 238,012 275,210 770,044 Frisco#2 6,792 6,792 Garland 168,090 (146,819) (57,702) (41,842) (78,273) McKinney 89,057 198,073 274,366 299,038 860,533 McKinney#3 15,930 15,930 Mesquite 517,096 178,723 237,552 232,059 1,165,430 Mesquite #3 163,972 60,552 83,166 82,440 390,130 Plano 279,102 (1,192,407) (1,086,681) (1,002,403) (3,002,389) Princeton 3,588 (14,562) (12,859) 14,296 (9,537) Richardson 130,137 (326,815) (279,043) (258,759) (734,479) Rockwall 30,250 69,792 96,639 109,111 305,792 Royse City 3,899 9,142 13,509 15,252 41,803 Wylie 14,852 33,757 52,861 59,387 160,857 R. W. Beck 2-3 Section 2 As illustrated above, this method results in reduced charges for five (5) of the Member Cities, while eight (8) of the Member Cities would incur additional charges above what they pay under the current rate methodology. Detailed calculations for Method #1 can be found in Appendix A. 2.3.2 Method #2 If the current minimum annual demand is not reached for three (3) consecutive years, then the minimum annual demand is adjusted to reflect the highest demand during the previous three (3)year period. The second method analyzed by R.W. Beck also seeks to apply a periodic reduction to the minimum annual demand. Under this method, it is assumed that if a City does not reach their current minimum annual demand level for three (3) consecutive years, then their minimum annual demand will be adjusted to reflect the City's highest demand over the previous three (3) years. In the years following the adjustment, the minimum annual demand level will be increased should the City's actual demand exceed this adjusted amount. The following table demonstrates the charges to each City under Method #2 for 2003 through 2006. Table 2-4 Charges Generated under Method #2 2003 2004 2005 2006 Allen $ 3,474,479 $ 3,845,055 $ 4,596,912 $ 5,031,922 Farmersville 239,879 258,736 254,934 261,298 Forney 656,172 746,866 960,930 1,174,562 Frisco 4,067,422 5,170,508 6,035,185 6,992,721 Frisco#2 114,452 Garland 11,737,354 12,367,591 13,292,212 13,446,857 McKinney 5,123,713 5,893,880 6,956,805 7,654,329 McKinney#3 417,926 Mesquite 5,164,621 5,316,784 6,022,451 5,768,045 Mesquite#3 1,637,896 1,801,743 2,108,645 2,162,764 Plano 22,459,516 23,687,071 23,538,749 24,207,436 Princeton 277,916 294,813 310,377 363,681 Richardson 9,413,472 9,848,249 10,180,536 10,384,517 Rockwall 1,913,858 2,076,750 2,450,326 2,735,205 Royse City 243,252 272,048 342,531 379,508 Wylie 816,687 1,004,635 1,340,345 1,505,582 Total $ 67,226,237 $ 72,584,729 $ 78,390,939 $ 82,600,806 Given the estimated charges above, the following illustrates the increase or decrease in charges to each Member City between Method #2 and the Current Rate Methodology. A positive number indicates additional charges incurred by a City while a negative number indicates a City whose charges would be reduced. 2-4 R. W. Beck Rate Methodologies Table 2-5 Increase I(Decrease) in Charges between Method#2 and Current Rate Methodology 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Allen $ 1,272 $3,060 $ 300,470 $ 277,533 $ 582,336 Farmersville 88 206 (1,931) (3,459) (5,096) Forney 240 594 62,806 64,780 128,420 Frisco 1,485 4,117 394,467 385,677 785,745 Frisco#2 0 0 0 6,305 6,305 Garland 4,301 9,859 286,917 182,398 483,475 McKinney 1,874 4,692 454,718 422,174 883,458 McKinney#3 0 0 0 23,052 23,052 Mesquite 1,893 4,245 393,707 (26,315) 373,531 Mesquite#3 600 1,435 137,834 119,293 259,162 Plano 8,241 18,906 (1,521,945) (1,606,184) (3,100,982) Princeton 102 235 (10,209) 20,059 10,187 Richardson 3,451 7,857 (15,080) (81,294) (85,066) Rockwall 701 1,653 160,163 150,853 313,370 Royse City 89 216 22,390 20,930 43,625 Wylie 299 798 87,609 83,039 171,744 As illustrated above, this method results in reduced charges for three (3) of the Member Cities, while ten (10) of the Member Cities would incur additional charges above what they pay under the current rate methodology. Detailed calculations for Method#2 can be found in Appendix B. 2.3.3 Method #3 3-year rolling average used to determine minimum annual demand The third method considered seeks to adjust the minimum annual demand of a City by using a rolling average. For this method, a 3-year rolling average of actual consumption is used to determine the minimum annual demand level for a City for a given year. Under this method, the excess water rate is maintained, as is the refund of the variable cost component for a City whose actual demand is below the minimum annual demand level. The following table demonstrates the charges to each City under Method #3 for 2003 through 2006. R. W. Beck 2-5 Section 2 Table 2-6 Charges Generated under Method #3 2003 2004 2005 2006 Allen $ 3,537,078 $ 3,927,315 $ 4,490,816 $ 4,985,976 Farmersville 238,755 241,993 252,074 264,656 Forney 667,746 747,520 897,059 1,101,202 Frisco 4,034,170 4,798,898 5,865,288 6,808,012 Frisco #2 118,867 Garland 12,150,499 12,518,667 13,399,166 13,762,572 McKinney 5,291,297 5,930,807 6,863,381 7,571,566 McKinney#3 434,151 Mesquite 5,570,886 6,099,932 5,882,661 5,598,191 Mesquite #3 1,766,716 1,911,517 2,177,079 2,246,724 Plano 22,501,344 23,031,883 24,052,847 24,900,582 Princeton 281,523 289,435 316,934 351,404 Richardson 9,719,191 9,905,715 10,237,539 10,195,111 Rockwall 1,908,683 2,100,466 2,372,812 2,739,161 Royse City 250,599 278,837 321,857 377,269 Wylie 824,456 973,810 1,192,583 1,437,767 Total $ 68,742,944 $ 72,756,796 $ 78,322,093 $ 82,893,211 Given the estimated charges above, the following illustrates the increase or decrease in charges to each Member City between Method #3 and the Current Rate Methodology. A positive number indicates additional charges incurred by a City while a negative number indicates a City whose charges would be reduced. Table 2-7 Increase I(Decrease) in Charges between Method#3 and Current Rate Methodology 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Allen $ 63,871 $ 85,320 $ 194,374 $ 231,587 $ 575,153 Farmersville (1,036) (16,536) (4,792) (102) (22,466) Forney 11,814 1,248 (1,066) (8,580) 3,417 Frisco (31,767) (367,493) 224,569 200,967 26,277 Frisco #2 10,720 10,720 Garland 417,446 160,935 393,871 498,113 1,470,365 McKinney 169,458 41,618 361,294 339,411 911,781 McKinney#3 39,276 39,276 Mesquite 408,158 787,394 253,917 (196,168) 1,253,300 Mesquite #3 129,419 111,209 206,268 203,254 650,149 Plano 50,070 (636,283) (1,007,847) (913,038) (2,507,099) Princeton 3,709 (5,143) (3,652) 7,782 2,696 Richardson 309,170 65,323 41,923 (270,700) 145,715 Rockwall (4,474) 25,369 82,649 154,809 258,354 Royse City 7,436 7,006 1,715 18,691 34,848 Wylie 8,068 (30,027) (60,153) 15,223 (66,889) 2-6 R. W. Beck Rate Methodologies As illustrated above, this method results in reduced charges for three (3) of the Member Cities, while ten (10) of the Member Cities would incur additional charges above what they pay under the current rate methodology. Detailed calculations for Method#3 can be found in Appendix C. 2.3.4 Method #4 Prior year consumption used to determine minimum annual demand Similar to the previous method, Method #4 utilizes the actual demand of a customer from the previous year as their new minimum annual demand. Under this method, the excess water rate is maintained, as is the refund of the variable cost component for a City whose actual demand is below the minimum annual demand level. The following table demonstrates the charges to each City under Method #4 for 2003 through 2006. Table 2-8 Charges Generated under Method#4 2003 2004 2005 2006 Allen $ 3,698,710 $ 4,043,104 $4,680,307 $ 5,198,343 Farmersville 221,679 222,667 259,559 266,728 Forney 670,516 785,333 978,364 1,213,403 Frisco 4,551,944 5,436,838 6,144,676 7,223,984 Frisco#2 118,223 Garland 11,929,483 12,431,988 13,288,733 13,512,310 McKinney 5,689,454 6,197,464 7,083,012 7,907,486 McKinney#3 431,751 Mesquite 5,780,189 5,237,973 5,102,672 5,400,107 Mesquite#3 1,833,091 1,894,551 2,146,898 2,234,308 Plano 21,940,226 21,895,504 23,466,243 24,754,965 Princeton 273,250 278,765 316,008 375,709 Richardson 9,600,946 9,685,822 9,859,418 9,448,194 Rockwall 1,907,873 2,183,719 2,494,779 2,825,655 Royse City 257,033 286,060 348,745 392,057 Wylie 845,779 1,056,376 1,364,661 1,555,374 Total $ 69,200,172 $ 71,636,164 $ 77,534,076 $ 82,858,598 Given the estimated charges above, the following illustrates the increase or decrease in charges to each Member City between Method #4 and the Current Rate Methodology. A positive number indicates additional charges incurred by a City while a negative number indicates a City whose charges would be reduced. R. W. Beck 2-7 Section 2 Table 2-9 Increase I(Decrease) in Charges between Method#4 and Current Rate Methodology 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Allen $ 225,502 $201,109 $ 383,865 $443,954 $ 1,254,432 Farmersville (18,112) (35,862) 2,693 1,970 (49,310) Forney 14,584 39,061 80,240 103,621 237,505 Frisco 486,007 270,448 503,957 616,940 1,877,352 Frisco#2 10,077 10,077 Garland 196,430 74,256 283,439 247,851 801,976 McKinney 567,615 308,276 580,926 675,331 2,132,148 McKinney#3 36,877 36,877 Mesquite 617,461 (74,566) (526,072) (394,252) (377,429) Mesquite#3 195,794 94,242 176,087 190,837 656,960 Plano (511,049) (1,772,662) (1,594,450) (1,058,655) (4,936,816) Princeton (4,565) (15,813) (4,578) 32,086 7,131 Richardson 190,924 (154,570) (336,198) (1,017,616) (1,317,460) Rockwall (5,284) 108,622 204,616 241,303 549,257 Royse City 13,871 14,228 28,604 33,480 90,182 Wylie 29,391 52,539 111,925 132,830 326,685 As illustrated above, this method results in reduced charges for three (3) of the Member Cities, while ten (10) of the Member Cities would incur additional charges above what they pay under the current rate methodology. Detailed calculations for Method#4 can be found in Appendix D. 2.3.5 Method #5 Eliminate the excess water rate The fifth method reviewed by R.W. Beck consisted of implementing full rate costing and eliminating the excess water charge. Under this method, all consumption is charged at the full rate, and the excess revenue generated is used to offset the budgeted water sales, which is used to develop rates, in the subsequent rate year. Under this method, the refund of the variable cost component for a City whose actual demand is below the defined minimum annual demand level is maintained. It is also important to note that under this method, growing cities will lose the benefit of the excess water charge which the mature cities have experienced in the past. The following table demonstrates the charges to each City under Method #5 for 2003 through 2006. 2-8 R. W. Beck Rate Methodologies Table 2-10 Charges Generated under Method#5 2003 2004 2005 2006 Allen $ 3,588,225 $ 3,927,023 $ 4,495,242 $ 5,304,034 Farmersville 239,791 252,979 253,923 266,202 Forney 686,361 802,344 1,015,780 1,344,804 Frisco 4,878,321 5,082,633 6,201,412 7,515,784 Frisco#2 400,483 Garland 11,733,053 12,092,429 12,856,337 13,024,041 McKinney 5,525,280 5,926,092 6,872,366 7,958,656 McKinney#3 386,382 Mesquite 5,162,728 5,198,466 5,564,266 5,669,736 Mesquite #3 1,637,297 1,761,662 1,948,241 1,999,523 Plano 22,451,275 23,159,980 24,773,632 25,258,450 Princeton 277,814 288,253 323,184 388,790 Richardson 9,410,021 9,629,117 10,078,819 10,240,701 Rockwall 1,943,777 2,099,624 2,369,988 3,117,196 Royse City 249,230 295,159 324,524 446,238 Wylie 906,871 1,140,271 1,330,187 1,634,192 Total $ 68,690,046 $ 71,656,032 $ 78,407,902 $ 84,955,213 Given the estimated charges above, the following illustrates the increase or decrease in charges to each Member City between Method #5 and the Current Rate Methodology. A positive number indicates additional charges incurred by a City while a negative number indicates a City whose charges would be reduced. Table 2-11 Increase I(Decrease) in Charges between Method#5 and Current Rate Methodology 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Allen $ 115,018 $ 85,028 $ 198,800 $ 549,645 $ 948,492 Farmersville 0 (5,551) (2,942) 1,445 (7,048) Forney 30,429 56,072 117,656 235,022 439,179 Frisco 812,384 (83,757) 560,694 908,739 2,198,060 Frisco#2 292,337 292,337 Garland 0 (265,303) (148,958) (240,419) (654,679) McKinney 403,441 36,904 370,279 726,502 1,537,125 McKinney#3 (8,492) (8,492) Mesquite 0 (114,072) (64,478) (124,624) (303,174) Mesquite #3 0 (38,646) (22,570) (43,948) (105,164) Plano 0 (508,186) (287,061) (555,170) (1,350,417) Princeton 0 (6,325) 2,598 45,168 41,441 Richardson 0 (211,276) (116,797) (225,110) (553,182) Rockwall 30,620 24,528 79,825 532,844 667,816 Royse City 6,067 23,327 4,382 87,660 121,436 Wylie 90,484 136,434 77,451 211,648 516,017 R. W. Beck 2-9 Section 2 As illustrated above, this method results in reduced charges for five (5) of the Member Cities, while eight (8) of the Member Cities would incur additional charges above what they pay under the current rate methodology. Detailed calculations for Method #5 can be found in Appendix E. 2.3.6 Method #6 Eliminate the excess water rate and use prior year consumption to determine minimum annual demand Method #6 combines features of the two previous methods. Specifically, under this method the minimum annual demand is determined using the prior year actual demand. Additionally, the excess water rate is eliminated and the full rate is charged for all consumption. However, to maintain the performance of the excess water rate, a two-step refund program has been applied. First, the variable operations and maintenance costs associated with volumes included in a City's minimum annual demand that are not consumed are refunded. Second, the fixed costs associated with any volumes consumed in excess of a customer's minimum annual demand are also refunded. The following table demonstrates the charges to each City under Method #6 for 2003 through 2006. Table 2-12 Charges Generated under Method #6 2003 2004 2005 2006 Allen $ 3,698,710 $ 4,043,104 $ 4,652,942 $ 5,198,480 Farmersville 221,679 222,667 258,041 266,735 Forney 670,516 785,333 972,644 1,213,435 Frisco 4,551,944 5,436,838 6,108,751 7,224,174 Frisco#2 118,226 Garland 11,929,483 12,431,988 13,211,027 13,512,665 McKinney 5,689,454 6,197,464 7,041,599 7,907,694 McKinney#3 431,763 Mesquite 5,780,189 5 237 973 5 072,835 5 400,249 Mesquite#3 1,833,091 1 894 551 2 134,344 2 234,366 Plano 21,940,226 21 895 504 23 329,027 24 755,616 Princeton 273,250 278 765 314,161 375,719 Richardson 9,600,946 9 685 822 9 801,758 9 448,443 Rockwall 1,907,873 2 183 719 2 480,192 2 825,729 Royse City 257,033 286,060 346,706 392,068 Wylie 845,779 1 056,376 1 356,682 1 555,415 Total $ 69,200,172 $ 71 636,164 $ 77 080,708 $ 82 860,777 Given the estimated charges above, the following illustrates the increase or decrease in charges to each Member City between Method #6 and the Current Rate Methodology. A positive number indicates additional charges incurred by a City while a negative number indicates a City whose charges would be reduced. 2-10 R. W. Beck Rate Methodologies Table 2-13 Increase I(Decrease) in Charges between Method#6 and Current Rate Methodology 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Allen $ 225,502 $201,109 $ 356,500 $444,091 $ 1,227,203 Farmersville (18,112) (35,862) 1,176 1,977 (50,821) Forney 14,584 39,061 74,520 103,653 231,817 Frisco 486,007 270,448 468,032 617,130 1,841,617 Frisco#2 10,080 10,080 Garland 196,430 74,256 205,732 248,206 724,624 McKinney 567,615 308,276 539,512 675,539 2,090,942 McKinney#3 36,888 36,888 Mesquite 617,461 (74,566) (555,910) (394,110) (407,125) Mesquite#3 195,794 94,242 163,533 190,896 644,465 Plano (511,049) (1,772,662) (1,731,667) (1,058,004) (5,073,381) Princeton (4,565) (15,813) (6,425) 32,096 5,293 Richardson 190,924 (154,570) (393,858) (1,017,368) (1,374,872) Rockwall (5,284) 108,622 190,029 241,377 534,744 Royse City 13,871 14,228 26,564 33,490 88,153 Wylie 29,391 52,539 103,946 132,871 318,747 As illustrated above, this method results in reduced charges for five (5) of the Member Cities, while eight (8) of the Member Cities would incur additional charges above what they pay under the current rate methodology. Detailed calculations for Method #6 can be found in Appendix F. 2.3.7 Method #7 Transfer excess minimum annual demand between the Member Cities The seventh method analyzed by R.W. Beck involves transferring volumes included in the minimum annual demand between Member Cities. For example, Member City A experiences actual demand which is 10,000 gallons less their minimum annual demand, while Member City B experiences actual demand which is 10,000 gallons greater than their minimum annual demand. Under this scenario, 10,000 gallons would be deducted from Member City A's minimum annual demand, while 10,000 gallons would be added to Member City B's minimum annual demand. Volumes are redistributed between Cities based upon the percentage to which their actual demand was above or below their applicable minimum annual demand. In addition, as part of this method, the excess water rate was maintained, as was the refund of the variable cost component for a City whose actual demand is below the minimum annual demand level. However, it should be noted that a City loses the benefit of the excess water rate to the extent that their minimum annual demand is increased. The following table demonstrates the charges to each City under Method #7 for 2003 through 2006. R. W. Beck 2-11 Section 2 Table 2-14 Charges Generated under Method #7 2003 2004 2005 2006 Allen $ 3,588,225 $ 4,013,172 $ 4,547,319 $4,967,201 Farmersville 224,106 254,850 251,717 267,088 Forney 686,361 819,945 1,027,548 1,194,298 Frisco 4,878,321 5,194,133 6,273,256 6,950,092 Frisco#2 108,146 Garland 11,551,209 12,270,438 12,781,097 13,279,101 McKinney 5,525,280 6,056,095 6,951,982 7,520,099 McKinney#3 394,874 Mesquite 5,050,731 5,210,298 5,417,103 5,583,348 Mesquite#3 1,637,297 1,800,308 1,970,811 2,043,471 Plano 21,494,940 23,287,263 24,275,719 25,477,099 Princeton 267,896 291,277 326,928 360,780 Richardson 9,197,356 9,716,472 9,744,218 9,748,587 Rockwall 1,943,777 2,145,685 2,397,444 2,776,445 Royse City 249,230 301,634 328,284 389,712 Wylie 906,871 1,165,286 1,345,598 1,501,624 Total $ 67,201,602 $ 72,526,856 $ 77,639,024 $ 82,561,966 As previously mentioned, while this method provides a relief mechanism for those who do not utilize their full minimum annual demand level, this method would also reduce the benefit of the excess water charge in as much as a City's minimum annual demand is increased. Given the estimated charges above, the following illustrates the increase or decrease in charges to each Member City between Method #7 and the Current Rate Methodology. A positive number indicates additional charges incurred by a City while a negative number indicates a City whose charges would be reduced. 2-12 R. W. Beck Rate Methodologies Table 2-15 Increase I(Decrease) in Charges between Method#7 and Current Rate Methodology 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Allen $ 115,018 $ 171,177 $ 250,878 $ 212,813 $ 749,886 Farmersville (15,685) (3,680) (5,148) 2,330 (22,182) Forney 30,429 73,673 129,424 84,515 318,042 Frisco 812,384 27,742 632,537 343,047 1,815,711 Frisco#2 0 0 Garland (181,844) (87,294) (224,198) 14,642 (478,693) McKinney 403,441 166,907 449,896 287,944 1,308,188 McKinney#3 0 0 Mesquite (111,997) (102,240) (211,641) (211,012) (636,890) Mesquite#3 0 0 Plano (956,335) (380,903) (784,975) (336,522) (2,458,735) Princeton (9,918) (3,301) 6,342 17,158 10,281 Richardson (212,665) (123,921) (451,398) (717,224) (1,505,207) Rockwall 30,620 70,588 107,281 192,093 400,582 Royse City 6,067 29,802 8,142 31,134 75,145 Wylie 90,484 161,448 92,861 79,081 423,874 As illustrated above, this method results in reduced charges for five (5) of the Member Cities, while eight (8) of the Member Cities would incur additional charges above what they pay under the current rate methodology. Detailed calculations for Method #7 can be found in Appendix G. 2.3.8 Method #8 Two-part rate structure based upon peak day usage Method #8 is a rate method that is common among other wholesale water suppliers in the Dallas - Ft. Worth area. This involves establishing a two-part rate with a demand component and a volumetric component. The demand component is based upon an individual City's peak day demand. This portion of the rate recovers the fixed operations and maintenance cost of NTMWD along with the annual debt service payment and is paid over 12 equal monthly installments. The volumetric component seeks to recover the variable operations and maintenance costs of NTMWD and is applied per 1,000 gallons of actual consumptions. In applying this method, the applicable rate has been calculated based upon prior year's actual demand along with the rate year budgeted costs. For example, for 2003, the rate is based upon 2002 demand and 2003 budgeted cost levels. Additionally, as information concerning each City's individual peak day demand was not available, the system peak day has been used in calculating this example. It is important to note that while this method eliminates the excess water charge and directly ties the charges incurred by a City to that City's use of the system, this method will result in additional costs to NTMWD. Specifically, in order to implement this rate method, NTMWD would most likely need to install rate of flow controllers at system delivery points. Additionally, for a City to reduce their peak demand level, R. W. Beck 2-13 Section 2 additional storage would need to be constructed so that water could be delivered during off-peak periods. The following table demonstrates the charges to each City under Method #8 for 2003 through 2006. Table 2-16 Charges Generated under Method #8 2003 2004 2005 2006 Allen $ 3,748,380 $ 4,030,486 $ 4,706,294 $ 5,229,781 Farmersville 226,186 221,698 261,887 268,742 Forney 676,623 780,947 979,771 1,213,541 Frisco 4,575,743 5,429,564 6,162,943 7,257,896 Frisco#2 89,199 Garland 12,117,659 12,428,445 13,406,893 13,645,504 McKinney 5,765,392 6,182,695 7,118,669 7,962,703 McKinney#3 221,105 Mesquite 6,336,389 5,258,487 5,142,457 5,435,912 Mesquite#3 1,745,219 1,206,670 1,657,687 1,455,776 Plano 22,355,705 21,892,087 23,650,921 24,926,878 Princeton 278,121 278,404 316,723 377,614 Richardson 9,769,952 9,696,016 9,981,192 9,512,173 Rockwall 1,925,994 2,177,951 2,510,014 2,826,951 Royse City 260,495 284,320 351,233 391,311 Wylie 850,164 1,047,491 1,371,208 1,561,597 Total $ 70,632,024 $ 70,915,263 $ 77,617,893 $ 82,376,682 Given the estimated charges above, the following illustrates the increase or decrease in charges to each Member City between Method #8 and the Current Rate Methodology. A positive number indicates additional charges incurred by a City while a negative number indicates a City whose charges would be reduced. 2-14 R. W. Beck Rate Methodologies Table 2-17 Increase I(Decrease) in Charges between Method#8 and Current Rate Methodology 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Allen $ 275,173 $ 188,492 $409,853 $475,392 $ 1,348,910 Farmersville (13,605) (36,831) 5,022 3,985 (41,430) Forney 20,692 34,675 81,647 103,758 240,772 Frisco 509,806 263,173 522,225 650,851 1,946,056 Frisco#2 (18,947) (18,947) Garland 384,606 70,713 401,598 381,045 1,237,962 McKinney 643,553 293,507 616,582 730,548 2,284,190 McKinney#3 (173,769) (173,769) Mesquite 1,173,661 (54,051) (486,288) (358,448) 274,874 Mesquite#3 107,922 (593,638) (313,125) (587,694) (1,386,535) Plano (95,569) (1,776,079) (1,409,772) (886,742) (4,168,162) Princeton 307 (16,174) (3,863) 33,991 14,261 Richardson 359,931 (144,376) (214,424) (953,638) (952,507) Rockwall 12,837 102,855 219,850 242,599 578,140 Royse City 17,332 12,488 31,092 32,733 93,645 Wylie 33,776 43,653 118,471 139,053 334,954 As illustrated above, this method results in reduced charges for five (5) of the Member Cities, while eight (8) of the Member Cities would incur additional charges above what they pay under the current rate methodology. Detailed calculations for Method #8 can be found in Appendix H. 2.3.9 Method #9 Allocate costs based upon actual consumption Method #9 consists of allocating costs to each City based upon actual consumption. Rates under this method are based upon budgeted water sales and projected consumption for the rate year. Then, at the end of the rate year, a true-up calculation is performed to reflect the actual costs and consumption that occurred. While this method is desirable in that it ties revenue recovery to cost causation, if the estimates used to set rates vary significantly from actual performance, significant monies may need to be collected or refunded to each City at the end of the rate year, thus potentially creating financial instability for a City. The following table demonstrates the charges to each City under Method #9 for 2004 through 2006. R. W. Beck 2-15 Section 2 Table 2-18 Charges Generated under Method #9 2003 2004 2005 2006 Allen $ 4,111,084 $ 4,296,123 $ 4,859,599 $ 5,207,914 Farmersville 224,689 242,728 251,365 261,378 Forney 786,375 877,756 1,098,113 1,320,434 Frisco 5,589,167 5,560,349 6,704,062 7,379,583 Frisco #2 390,864 Garland 12,862,568 12,421,723 12,890,724 12,788,020 McKinney 6,330,398 6,483,084 7,429,399 7,814,430 McKinney#3 326,190 Mesquite 5,557,691 4,741,577 5,064,040 5,364,266 Mesquite #3 1,875,875 1,927,240 2,106,153 1,963,288 Plano 22,671,597 21,814,287 23,253,519 24,477,414 Princeton 286,653 284,822 349,379 381,744 Richardson 10,102,700 9,388,170 8,866,912 9,366,067 Rockwall 2,227,015 2,296,967 2,562,085 3,060,706 Royse City 285,546 322,901 350,828 438,151 Wylie 1,039,016 1,247,445 1,438,004 1,604,577 Total $ 73,950,375 $ 71,905,172 $ 77,224,185 $ 82,145,027 Given the estimated charges above, the following illustrates the increase or decrease in charges to each Member City between Method #9 and the Current Rate Methodology. A positive number indicates additional charges incurred by a City while a negative number indicates a City whose charges would be reduced. Table 2-19 Increase I(Decrease) in Charges between Method#9 and Current Rate Methodology 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Allen $ 637,877 $454,128 $ 563,158 $ 453,526 $ 2,108,689 Farmersville (15,101) (15,801) (5,500) (3,379) (39,782) Forney 130,443 131,484 199,989 210,652 672,568 Frisco 1,523,230 393,958 1,063,343 772,539 3,753,070 Frisco #2 282,718 282,718 Garland 1,129,515 63,991 (114,570) (476,440) 602,496 McKinney 1,208,558 593,895 927,312 582,275 3,312,041 McKinney#3 (68,685) (68,685) Mesquite 394,963 (570,961) (564,704) (430,094) (1,170,797) Mesquite #3 238,579 126,932 135,342 (80,183) 420,670 Plano 220,322 (1,853,879) (1,807,175) (1,336,206) (4,776,937) Princeton 8,839 (9,756) 28,793 38,122 65,998 Richardson 692,679 (452,222) (1,328,704) (1,099,744) (2,187,992) Rockwall 313,858 221,871 271,922 476,354 1,284,005 Royse City 42,383 51,069 30,686 79,573 203,712 Wylie 222,628 243,608 185,268 182,034 833,538 2-16 R. W. Beck Rate Methodologies As illustrated above, this method results in reduced charges for five (5) of the Member Cities, while eight (8) of the Member Cities would incur additional charges above what they pay under the current rate methodology. Detailed calculations for Method #9 can be found in Appendix I. 2.3.10 Method #10 Maintain current rate methodology and establish additional water conservation surcharge The final method analyzed by R.W. Beck does not involve changing the current rate structure. Instead, it seeks to apply an additional surcharge to the contractual rates already in place. Under this method, each City would pay at least the same amount they are paying under the current methodology and, to the extent that a City is not meeting conservation targets, additional surcharge revenue would be collected from that City. Under this method, the risk of monetary loss to a City is greater, as the refund of surcharge revenue is directly related to a City's conservation efforts. For purposes of analysis, R.W. Beck assumed a S0.05 surcharge per 1,000 gallons of actual consumption. These charges would be collected monthly from each customer. At the end of the year, if a City's average residential gallons per capita per day (gpcpd) consumption was 140 or below, they would receive a full refund of the surcharge. If a City's average residential gpcpd consumption was above 140, but their average residential gpcpd consumption was reduced from the previous year, then they would receive a refund of the water conservation surcharge based upon the sliding scale illustrated below: Table 2-20 Water Conservation Surcharge Refund Criteria % Decrease in Residential % of Surcharge Refunded GPCPD Consumption 1% 50% 2% 55% 3% 60% 4% 65% 5% 70% 6% 75% 7% 80% 8% 85% 9% or greater 95% Residential GPCPD Consumption 100% equal to or less than 140 R. W. Beck 2-17 Section 2 The following table demonstrates the total charges to each City under Method #10 for 2004 through 2006. Table 2-21 Charges Generated under Method #10 2003 2004 2005 2006 Allen $ 3,679,427 $ 3,896,521 $ 4,530,840 $ 4,768,359 Farmersville 239,791 258,529 256,866 264,757 Forney 695,378 746,272 898,124 1,109,782 Frisco 4,346,300 5,180,505 5,964,082 6,626,841 Frisco #2 109,195 Garland 11,733,053 12,357,732 13,627,066 13,264,459 McKinney 5,439,384 5,905,645 6,860,436 7,253,118 McKinney#3 395,749 Mesquite 5,162,728 5,312,538 5,628,744 5,794,360 Mesquite #3 1,637,297 1,800,308 1,970,811 2,043,471 Plano 23,588,525 23,723,540 26,182,304 25,879,283 Princeton 277,814 294,578 320,586 343,622 Richardson 9,916,792 9,864,223 10,623,302 10,968,315 Rockwall 2,024,869 2,075,097 2,413,743 2,592,563 Royse City 243,163 271,832 320,142 358,578 Wylie 816,388 1,003,837 1,252,736 1,422,544 Total $ 69,800,909 $ 72,691,158 $ 80,849,782 $ 83,194,997 Given the estimated charges above, the following illustrates the additional surcharge revenues collected from each Member City under Method #10. Detailed calculations for Method#10 can be found in Appendix J. 2-18 R. W. Beck Rate Methodologies Table 2-22 Surcharge Revenue Collected under Method #10 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Allen $206,220 $ 54,527 $ 234,398 $ 13,971 $ 509,115 Farmersville - - - - - Forney 39,446 - - - 39,446 Frisco 280,363 14,114 323,364 19,796 637,638 Frisco#2 - - - 1,049 1,049 Garland - - 621,771 - 621,771 McKinney 317,545 16,457 358,350 20,963 713,314 McKinney#3 - - - 875 875 Mesquite - - - - - Mesquite#3 - - - - - Plano 1,137,251 55,374 1,121,610 65,663 2,379,897 Princeton - - - - - Richardson 506,771 23,831 427,687 502,505 1,460,793 Rockwall 111,711 - 123,580 8,211 243,502 Royse City - - - - - Wylie - - - - - 2.4 Summaryof Method Impacts to Cities The following tables summarize the impact each method would have on the individual Member Cities and delivery points. These tables illustrate the increase or decrease in charges a City would experience, using the current rate methodology as the baseline. Additionally, the annual impacts have been totaled to illustrate the net, four-year impact of each method. As presented in earlier tables, a positive number indicates additional charges to be incurred, while a negative number illustrates a reduction in charges. Table 2-23 Summary of Impacts to the City of Allen 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $56,410 $ 129,216 $ 181,297 $ 197,180 $ 564,102 Method 2 1,272 3,060 300,470 277,533 582,336 Method 3 63,871 85,320 194,374 231,587 575,153 Method 4 225,502 201,109 383,865 443,954 1,254,432 Method 5 115,018 85,028 198,800 549,645 948,492 Method 6 225,502 201,109 356,500 444,091 1,227,203 Method 7 115,018 171,177 250,878 212,813 749,886 Method 8 275,173 188,492 409,853 475,392 1,348,910 Method 9 637,877 454,128 563,158 453,526 2,108,689 Method 10 206,220 54,527 234,398 13,971 509,115 R. W. Beck 2-19 Section 2 Table 2-24 Summary of Impacts to the City of Farmersville 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $ 2,598 $ (12,932) $ 3,569 $3,819 $ (2,946) Method 2 88 206 (1,931) (3,459) (5,096) Method 3 (1,036) (16,536) (4,792) (102) (22,466) Method 4 (18,112) (35,862) 2,693 1,970 (49,310) Method 5 0 (5,551) (2,942) 1,445 (7,048) Method 6 (18,112) (35,862) 1,176 1,977 (50,821) Method 7 (15,685) (3,680) (5,148) 2,330 (22,182) Method 8 (13,605) (36,831) 5,022 3,985 (41,430) Method 9 (15,101) (15,801) (5,500) (3,379) (39,782) Method 10 - - - - - Table 2-25 Summary of Impacts to the City of Forney 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $ 10,872 $ 25,097 $37,896 $46,906 $ 120,771 Method 2 240 594 62,806 64,780 128,420 Method 3 11,814 1,248 (1,066) (8,580) 3,417 Method 4 14,584 39,061 80,240 103,621 237,505 Method 5 30,429 56,072 117,656 235,022 439,179 Method 6 14,584 39,061 74,520 103,653 231,817 Method 7 30,429 73,673 129,424 84,515 318,042 Method 8 20,692 34,675 81,647 103,758 240,772 Method 9 130,443 131,484 199,989 210,652 672,568 Method 10 39,446 - - - 39,446 Table 2-26 Summary of Impacts to the City of Frisco 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $ 83,054 $ 173,768 $ 238,012 $ 275,210 $ 770,044 Method 2 1,485 4,117 394,467 385,677 785,745 Method 3 (31,767) (367,493) 224,569 200,967 26,277 Method 4 486,007 270,448 503,957 616,940 1,877,352 Method 5 812,384 (83,757) 560,694 908,739 2,198,060 Method 6 486,007 270,448 468,032 617,130 1,841,617 Method 7 812,384 27,742 632,537 343,047 1,815,711 Method 8 509,806 263,173 522,225 650,851 1,946,056 Method 9 1,523,230 393,958 1,063,343 772,539 3,753,070 Method 10 280,363 14,114 323,364 19,796 637,638 2-20 R. W. Beck Rate Methodologies Table 2-27 Summary of Impacts to the City of Frisco#2 Delivery Point 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 - - - $ 6,792 6,792 Method 2 - - - 6,305 6,305 Method 3 - - - 10,720 10,720 Method 4 - - - 10,077 10,077 Method 5 - - - 292,337 292,337 Method 6 - - - 10,080 10,080 Method 7 - - - - - Method 8 - - - (18,947) (18,947) Method 9 - - - 282,718 282,718 Method 10 - - - 1,049 1,049 Table 2-28 Summary of Impacts to the City of Garland 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $ 168,090 $ (146,819) $ (57,702) $ (41,842) $ (78,273) Method 2 4,301 9,859 286,917 182,398 483,475 Method 3 417,446 160,935 393,871 498,113 1,470,365 Method 4 196,430 74,256 283,439 247,851 801,976 Method 5 0 (265,303) (148,958) (240,419) (654,679) Method 6 196,430 74,256 205,732 248,206 724,624 Method 7 (181,844) (87,294) (224,198) 14,642 (478,693) Method 8 384,606 70,713 401,598 381,045 1,237,962 Method 9 1,129,515 63,991 (114,570) (476,440) 602,496 Method 10 - - 621,771 - 621,771 Table 2-29 Summary of Impacts to the City of McKinney 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $ 89,057 $ 198,073 $ 274,366 $ 299,038 $ 860,533 Method 2 1,874 4,692 454,718 422,174 883,458 Method 3 169,458 41,618 361,294 339,411 911,781 Method 4 567,615 308,276 580,926 675,331 2,132,148 Method 5 403,441 36,904 370,279 726,502 1,537,125 Method 6 567,615 308,276 539,512 675,539 2,090,942 Method 7 403,441 166,907 449,896 287,944 1,308,188 Method 8 643,553 293,507 616,582 730,548 2,284,190 Method 9 1,208,558 593,895 927,312 582,275 3,312,041 Method 10 317,545 16,457 358,350 20,963 713,314 R. W. Beck 2-21 Section 2 Table 2-30 Summary of Impacts to the City of McKinney#3 Delivery Point 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 - - - $ 15,930 $ 15,930 Method 2 - - - 23,052 23,052 Method 3 - - - 39,276 39,276 Method 4 - - - 36,877 36,877 Method 5 - - - (8,492) (8,492) Method 6 - - - 36,888 36,888 Method 7 - - - - - Method 8 - - - (173,769) (173,769) Method 9 - - - (68,685) (68,685) Method 10 - - - 875 875 Table 2-31 Summary of Impacts to the City of Mesquite 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $ 517,096 $ 178,723 $ 237,552 $ 232,059 $ 1,165,430 Method 2 1,893 4,245 393,707 (26,315) 373,531 Method 3 408,158 787,394 253,917 (196,168) 1,253,300 Method 4 617,461 (74,566) (526,072) (394,252) (377,429) Method 5 0 (114,072) (64,478) (124,624) (303,174) Method 6 617,461 (74,566) (555,910) (394,110) (407,125) Method 7 (111,997) (102,240) (211,641) (211,012) (636,890) Method 8 1,173,661 (54,051) (486,288) (358,448) 274,874 Method 9 394,963 (570,961) (564,704) (430,094) (1,170,797) Method 10 - - - - - Table 2-32 Summary of Impacts to the City of Mesquite#3 Delivery Point 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $ 163,972 $ 60,552 $83,166 $ 82,440 $ 390,130 Method 2 600 1,435 137,834 119,293 259,162 Method 3 129,419 111,209 206,268 203,254 650,149 Method 4 195,794 94,242 176,087 190,837 656,960 Method 5 0 (38,646) (22,570) (43,948) (105,164) Method 6 195,794 94,242 163,533 190,896 644,465 Method 7 - - - - - Method 8 107,922 (593,638) (313,125) (587,694) (1,386,535) Method 9 238,579 126,932 135,342 (80,183) 420,670 Method 10 - - - - - 2-22 R. W. Beck Rate Methodologies Table 2-33 Summary of Impacts to the City of Plano 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $ 279,102 $ (1,192,407) $ (1,086,681) $ (1,002,403) $ (3,002,389) Method 2 8,241 18,906 (1,521,945) (1,606,184) (3,100,982) Method 3 50,070 (636,283) (1,007,847) (913,038) (2,507,099) Method 4 (511,049) (1,772,662) (1,594,450) (1,058,655) (4,936,816) Method 5 0 (508,186) (287,061) (555,170) (1,350,417) Method 6 (511,049) (1,772,662) (1,731,667) (1,058,004) (5,073,381) Method 7 (956,335) (380,903) (784,975) (336,522) (2,458,735) Method 8 (95,569) (1,776,079) (1,409,772) (886,742) (4,168,162) Method 9 220,322 (1,853,879) (1,807,175) (1,336,206) (4,776,937) Method 10 1,137,251 55,374 1,121,610 65,663 2,379,897 Table 2-34 Summary of Impacts to the City of Princeton 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $ 3,588 $ (14,562) $ (12,859) $ 14,296 $ (9,537) Method 2 102 235 (10,209) 20,059 10,187 Method 3 3,709 (5,143) (3,652) 7,782 2,696 Method 4 (4,565) (15,813) (4,578) 32,086 7,131 Method 5 0 (6,325) 2,598 45,168 41,441 Method 6 (4,565) (15,813) (6,425) 32,096 5,293 Method 7 (9,918) (3,301) 6,342 17,158 10,281 Method 8 307 (16,174) (3,863) 33,991 14,261 Method 9 8,839 (9,756) 28,793 38,122 65,998 Method 10 - - - - - Table 2-35 Summary of Impacts to the City of Richardson 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $ 130,137 $ (326,815) $ (279,043) $ (258,759) $ (734,479) Method 2 3,451 7,857 (15,080) (81,294) (85,066) Method 3 309,170 65,323 41,923 (270,700) 145,715 Method 4 190,924 (154,570) (336,198) (1,017,616) (1,317,460) Method 5 0 (211,276) (116,797) (225,110) (553,182) Method 6 190,924 (154,570) (393,858) (1,017,368) (1,374,872) Method 7 (212,665) (123,921) (451,398) (717,224) (1,505,207) Method 8 359,931 (144,376) (214,424) (953,638) (952,507) Method 9 692,679 (452,222) (1,328,704) (1,099,744) (2,187,992) Method 10 506,771 23,831 427,687 502,505 1,460,793 R. W. Beck 2-23 Section 2 Table 2-36 Summary of Impacts to the City of Rockwall 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $ 30,250 $ 69,792 $96,639 $ 109,111 $ 305,792 Method 2 701 1,653 160,163 150,853 313,370 Method 3 (4,474) 25,369 82,649 154,809 258,354 Method 4 (5,284) 108,622 204,616 241,303 549,257 Method 5 30,620 24,528 79,825 532,844 667,816 Method 6 (5,284) 108,622 190,029 241,377 534,744 Method 7 30,620 70,588 107,281 192,093 400,582 Method 8 12,837 102,855 219,850 242,599 578,140 Method 9 313,858 221,871 271,922 476,354 1,284,005 Method 10 111,711 - 123,580 8,211 243,502 Table 2-37 Summary of Impacts to the City of Royse City 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $ 3,899 $ 9,142 $ 13,509 $ 15,252 $41,803 Method 2 89 216 22,390 20,930 43,625 Method 3 7,436 7,006 1,715 18,691 34,848 Method 4 13,871 14,228 28,604 33,480 90,182 Method 5 6,067 23,327 4,382 87,660 121,436 Method 6 13,871 14,228 26,564 33,490 88,153 Method 7 6,067 29,802 8,142 31,134 75,145 Method 8 17,332 12,488 31,092 32,733 93,645 Method 9 42,383 51,069 30,686 79,573 203,712 Method 10 - - - - - Table 2-38 Summary of Impacts to the City of Wylie 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total Impact Method 1 $ 14,852 $ 33,757 $52,861 $ 59,387 $ 160,857 Method 2 299 798 87,609 83,039 171,744 Method 3 8,068 (30,027) (60,153) 15,223 (66,889) Method 4 29,391 52,539 111,925 132,830 326,685 Method 5 90,484 136,434 77,451 211,648 516,017 Method 6 29,391 52,539 103,946 132,871 318,747 Method 7 90,484 161,448 92,861 79,081 423,874 Method 8 33,776 43,653 118,471 139,053 334,954 Method 9 222,628 243,608 185,268 182,034 833,538 Method 10 - - - - - 2-24 R. W. Beck Section 3 Findings and Conclusions In examining the results of the above analysis, it is important to remember that under each scenario, only the cost responsibility between the Cities is changing. The revenue received by NTMWD cannot be significantly reduced unless services provided by NTMWD are reduced. Additionally, it is also important to note that this analysis only reflects a four (4) year, historical time-period. If this same analysis was performed on the ten-year period prior to the analyzed time-period, the result could have been dramatically different. Additionally, simply because one City benefits from a particular methodology during the time-period analyzed does not necessarily mean that that result will continue. This analysis merely represents a snapshot of the effect of a particular methodology given certain assumptions. It should be remembered that past performance may not be indicative of future results. R.W. Beck would also like to point out that implementation of any of the above considered methods may also increase the costs to NTMWD. For example, Method #8 may require NTMWD to install rate of flow controllers. The additional cost associated with changing the current methodology may also result in overall increased rates, in addition to the excess charges a City may experience as a result of the methodology change. As previously mentioned, changing the current contractual provisions will also require significant effort. Specifically, any contract change would require consent of all 13 Member Cities and NTMWD. The potential also exists that approval from 51% of the bondholders may also be required. It is R.W. Beck's understanding that the issues surrounding the current NTWMD contractual provisions have been reviewed and examined since at least 1991. Each time, the conclusion has been the same — any change to the current provisions will result in some Cities paying more, and others paying less. However, it is our opinion that the principles of equality and equity should continue to be applied and utilized as the guiding force behind any change to the current rate methodology. While the near- term financial impact will no doubt be a significant determining factor in any decision, it is important to remember the long-term implications of any contract change. li 1 1{[K North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix A Page 1 of 4 Method 1 -2003 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 03 FY 03 FY 03 Wtr Yr 03 10% Adjusted Wtr Yr 03 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate Adjusted Annual Full Excess FY 03 FY 03 Ann Min Reduction Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.957 $ 0.957 $ 0.220 $ 0.220 Allen 3,952,728 (395,273) 3,557,455 4,124,397 566,942 - - 566,942 - 3,557,455 $ 3,404,943 $ - $ 124,673 $ - $ 3,529,617 Farmersville 290,608 (29,061) 261,547 225,417 (36,130) - - - (36,130) 261,547 $ 250,334 $ - $ - $ (7,945) $ 242,389 Forney 743,504 (74,350) 669,154 788,921 119,767 - - 119,767 - 669,154 $ 640,466 $ - $ 26,337 $ - $ 666,804 Frisco 4,394,752 (439,475) 3,955,277 5,607,266 1,651,989 - - 1,651,989 - 3,955,277 $ 3,785,710 $ - $ 363,281 $ - $ 4,148,991 Garland 13,660,013 (1,366,001) 12,294,012 12,904,220 610,208 - - 610,208 - 12,294,012 $ 11,766,954 $ - $ 134,188 $ - $ 11,901,142 McKinney 5,748,746 (574,875) 5,173,871 6,350,897 1,177,026 - - 1,177,026 - 5,173,871 $ 4,952,062 $ - $ 258,834 $ - $ 5,210,896 Mesquite(1) 6,041,180 B - 6,041,180 5,575,688 (465,492) - - - (465,492) 6,041,180 $ 5,782,188 $ - $ - $ (102,364) $ 5,679,824 Mesquite#3(') 1,881,950 B - 1,881,950 1,170,130 (711,820) 2,256,486 c - - - 1,881,950 $ 1,801,269 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,801,269 Plano 26,719,809 (2,671,981) 24,047,828 22,745,013 (1,302,815) - - - (1,302,815) 24,047,828 $ 23,016,872 $ - $ - $ (286,496) $ 22,730,377 Princeton 328,803 (32,880) 295,923 287,581 (8,342) - - - (8,342) 295,923 $ 283,236 $ - $ - $ (1,834) $ 281,402 Richardson 11,019,311 (1,101,931) 9,917,380 10,135,415 218,035 - - 218,035 - 9,917,380 $ 9,492,211 $ - $ 47,947 $ - $ 9,540,158 Rockwall 2,188,525 (218,853) 1,969,673 2,234,227 264,555 - - 264,555 - 1,969,673 $ 1,885,231 $ - $ 58,177 $ - $ 1,943,407 Royse City 277,416 (27,742) 249,674 286,471 36,797 - - 36,797 - 249,674 $ 238,971 $ - $ 8,092 $ - $ 247,062 Wylie 907,331 (90,733) 816,598 1,042,381 225,783 - - 225,783 - 816,598 $ 781,589 $ - $ 49,651 $ - $ 831,240 Total 78,154,676 (7,023,155) 71,131,521 73,478,024 2,346,503 - 4,871,102 (1,812,779) 71,131,521 $ 68,082,038 $ - $ 1,071,180 $ (398,639) $ 68,754,579 Customers $ 1.007 $ 1.007 $ 0.270 $ 0.220 Caddo Basin 252,318 (25,232) 227,086 245,280 18,194 - - 18,194 - 227,086 $ 228,705 $ - $ 4,911 $ - $ 233,616 Cash SUD A 237,267 (23,727) 213,540 221,385 7,845 - - 7,845 - 213,540 $ 215,063 $ - $ 2,117 $ - $ 217,180 College Mound WSC A 66,769 (6,677) 60,092 62,017 1,925 - - 1,925 - 60,092 $ 60,520 $ - $ 520 $ - $ 61,040 Copeville WSC 65,737 (6,574) 59,163 68,468 9,305 113,866.6 c 9,305 - - 59,163 $ 59,585 $ 9,371 $ - $ - $ 68,956 East Fork SUD 183,632 (18,363) 165,269 188,012 22,743 280,831 c 22,743 - - 165,269 $ 166,447 $ 22,905 $ - $ - $ 189,352 Fairview 364,741 (36,474) 328,267 394,901 66,634 - - 66,634 - 328,267 $ 330,607 $ - $ 17,985 $ - $ 348,592 Fate 69,529 (6,953) 62,576 77,744 15,168 - - 15,168 - 62,576 $ 63,022 $ - $ 4,094 $ - $ 67,116 Forney Lake WSC 153,126 (15,313) 137,813 131,507 (6,306) - - - (6,306) 137,813 $ 138,796 $ - $ - $ (1,387) $ 137,409 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 110,490 (11,049) 99,441 101,254 1,813 - - 1,813 - 99,441 $ 100,150 $ - $ 489 $ - $ 100,639 Josephine 40,978 (4,098) 36,880 33,301 (3,579) 45,400 c - - (3,579) 36,880 $ 37,143 $ - $ - $ (787) $ 36,356 Kaufman 419,999 (42,000) 377,999 392,227 14,228 - - 14,228 - 377,999 $ 380,694 $ - $ 3,840 $ - $ 384,534 Kaufman Four One A 396,327 (39,633) 356,694 356,603 (91) - - - - 356,694 $ 359,237 $ - $ - $ - $ 359,237 Lavon WSC(1) 142,389 B - 142,389 124,858 (17,531) 142,389 c - - - 142,389 $ 143,404 $ - $ - $ - $ 143,404 Little Elm 210,964 (21,096) 189,868 368,734 178,866 - - 178,866 - 189,868 $ 191,221 $ - $ 48,277 $ - $ 239,498 Lucas 337,693 (33,769) 303,924 271,766 (32,158) - - - (32,158) 303,924 $ 306,090 $ - $ - $ (7,072) $ 299,019 Melissa(1) 48,664 B - 48,664 32,160 (16,504) 73,000 c - - - 60,833 $ 61,267 $ - $ - $ - $ 61,267 Milligan WSC 121,388 (12,139) 109,249 149,894 40,645 155,938 c 40,645 - - 109,249 $ 110,028 $ 40,935 $ - $ - $ 150,963 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 (12,549) 112,937 100,946 (11,991) - - - (11,991) 112,937 $ 113,743 $ - $ - $ (2,637) $ 111,106 Murphy 496,860 (49,686) 447,174 655,870 208,696 - - 208,696 - 447,174 $ 450,362 $ - $ 56,328 $ - $ 506,690 Nevada WSC 69,001 (6,900) 62,101 71,043 8,942 - - 8,942 - 62,101 $ 62,544 $ - $ 2,414 $ - $ 64,957 North Collin WSC 287,568 (28,757) 258,811 274,347 15,536 300,000 c 15,536 - - 258,811 $ 260,656 $ 15,647 $ - $ - $ 276,303 Parker 228,969 (22,897) 206,072 306,201 100,129 - - 100,129 - 206,072 $ 207,541 $ - $ 27,025 $ - $ 234,566 Rose Hill WSC A 43,271 (4,327) 38,944 16,160 (22,784) 48,000 c - - - 38,944 $ 39,222 $ - $ - $ - $ 39,222 Rowlett 2,920,333 (292,033) 2,628,300 2,772,637 144,337 4,051,017 c 144,337 - - 2,628,300 $ 2,647,037 $ 145,366 $ - $ - $ 2,792,403 Sachse 724,857 (72,486) 652,371 612,776 (39,595) - - - (39,595) 652,371 $ 657,022 $ - $ - $ (8,707) $ 648,315 Sachse#2(1) 130,646 B - 130,646 388,403 257,757 522,585 c 257,757 - - 130,646 $ 131,577 $ 259,595 $ - $ - $ 391,172 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 (8,272) 74,447 74,712 265 - - 265 - 74,447 $ 74,978 $ - $ 71 $ - $ 75,049 Sunnyvale 439,743 (43,974) 395,769 362,405 (33,364) 910,969 c - - (33,364) 395,769 $ 398,590 $ - $ - $ (7,337) $ 391,253 Wylie NE WSC 130,896 (13,090) 117,806 118,559 753 - - 753 - 117,806 $ 118,646 $ - $ 203 $ - $ 118,849 Total 8,902,360 (858,066) 8,044,294 8,974,170 929,876 490,323 623,457 (126,994) 8,056,463 $ 8,113,897 $ 493,818 $ 168,274 $ (27,927) $ 8,748,063 Total 87,057,036 (7,881,221) 79,175,815 82,452,194 3,276,379 490,323 5,494,559 (1,939,773) 79,187,984 $ 76,195,935 $ 493,818 $ 1,239,454 $ (426,566) $ 77,502,642 Revenue Requirement $ 75,674,582 Notes: (1)Not eligible for adjustment because Annual Minimum is specified by contract Over/(Under)Recovery $ 1,828,060 (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix A Page 2 of 4 Method 1 -2004 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 04 FY 04 FY 04 Wtr Yr 04 Wtr Yr 04 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 04 Annual Full Excess FY 04 FY 04 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.951 $ 0.951 $ 0.207 $ 0.207 Allen 4,124,397 4,362,143 237,746 - - 237,746 - 4,124,397 $ 3,922,070 $ - $ 49,141 $ - $ 3,971,211 Farmersville 261,547 246,458 (15,089) - - - (15,089) 261,547 $ 248,717 $ - $ - $ (3,119) $ 245,598 Forney 788,921 891,245 102,324 - - 102,324 - 788,921 $ 750,219 $ - $ 21,150 $ - $ 771,369 Frisco 5,607,266 5,645,797 38,531 - - 38,531 - 5,607,266 $ 5,332,195 $ - $ 7,964 $ - $ 5,340,159 Garland 12,904,220 12,612,613 (291,607) - - - (291,607) 12,904,220 $ 12,271,187 $ - $ - $ (60,274) $ 12,210,913 McKinney 6,350,897 6,582,712 231,815 - - 231,815 - 6,350,897 $ 6,039,346 $ - $ 47,915 $ - $ 6,087,261 Mesquite 6,041,180 4,814,443 (1,226,737) - - - (1,226,737) 6,041,180 $ 5,744,822 $ - $ - $ (253,561) $ 5,491,261 Mesquite#3 1,956,857 B 1,597,147 (359,710) 2,256,486 c - - - 1,956,857 $ 1,860,861 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,860,861 Plano 24,047,828 22,149,517 (1,898,311) - - - (1,898,311) 24,047,828 $ 22,868,132 $ - $ - $ (392,373) $ 22,475,759 Princeton 295,923 289,199 (6,724) - - - (6,724) 295,923 $ 281,406 $ - $ - $ (1,390) $ 280,016 Richardson 10,135,415 9,532,442 (602,973) - - - (602,973) 10,135,415 $ 9,638,209 $ - $ - $ (124,632) $ 9,513,578 Rockwall 2,234,227 2,332,266 98,039 - - 98,039 - 2,234,227 $ 2,124,624 $ - $ 20,264 $ - $ 2,144,888 Royse City 286,471 327,863 41,392 - - 41,392 - 286,471 $ 272,418 $ - $ 8,556 $ - $ 280,973 Wylie 1,042,381 1,266,615 224,234 - - 224,234 - 1,042,381 $ 991,246 $ - $ 46,348 $ - $ 1,037,594 Total 76,077,530 72,650,460 (3,427,070) - 974,081 (4,041,441) 76,077,530 $ 72,345,451 $ - $ 201,338 $ (835,348) $ 71,711,441 Customers $ 1.001 $ 1.001 $ 0.257 $ 0.207 Caddo Basin 245,280 223,734 (21,546) - - - (21,546) 245,280 $ 245,511 $ - $ - $ (4,453) $ 241,058 Cash SUD A 221,385 257,909 36,524 - - 36,524 - 221,385 $ 221,594 $ - $ 9,376 $ - $ 230,969 College Mound WSC A 62,017 52,093 (9,924) - - - - 62,017 $ 62,076 $ - $ - $ - $ 62,076 Copeville WSC 68,468 73,935 5,467 113,866.6 c 5,467 - - 68,468 $ 68,533 $ 5,472 $ - $ - $ 74,005 East Fork SUD 188,012 202,927 14,915 280,831 c 14,915 - - 188,012 $ 188,189 $ 14,929 $ - $ - $ 203,119 Fairview 394,901 420,325 25,424 - - 25,424 - 394,901 $ 395,274 $ - $ 6,526 $ - $ 401,800 Fate 77,744 113,197 35,453 - - 35,453 - 77,744 $ 77,817 $ - $ 9,101 $ - $ 86,918 Forney Lake WSC 153,126 B 135,370 (17,756) 227,800 c - - - 153,126 $ 153,271 $ - $ - $ - $ 153,271 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 101,254 98,508 (2,746) - - - (2,746) 101,254 $ 101,350 $ - $ - $ (568) $ 100,782 Josephine 36,880 38,203 1,323 45,400 c 1,323 - - 36,880 $ 36,915 $ 1,324 $ - $ - $ 38,239 Kaufman 392,227 419,659 27,432 - - 27,432 - 392,227 $ 392,597 $ - $ 7,042 $ - $ 399,639 Kaufman Four One A 356,694 396,336 39,642 - - 39,642 - 356,694 $ 357,031 $ - $ 10,176 $ - $ 367,207 Lavon WSC 142,389 B 141,538 (851) 142,389 c - - - 142,389 $ 142,523 $ - $ - $ - $ 142,523 Little Elm 368,734 504,167 135,433 - - 135,433 - 368,734 $ 369,082 $ - $ 34,765 $ - $ 403,847 Lucas 303,924 301,984 (1,940) - - - (1,940) 303,924 $ 304,211 $ - $ - $ (401) $ 303,810 Melissa 73,000 B 59,467 (13,533) 73,000 c - - - 73,000 $ 73,069 $ - $ - $ - $ 73,069 Milligan WSC 149,894 127,646 (22,248) 155,938 c - - (22,248) 149,894 $ 150,035 $ - $ - $ (4,599) $ 145,437 Mt.Zion WSC 112,937 108,816 (4,121) - - - (4,121) 112,937 $ 113,044 $ - $ - $ (852) $ 112,192 Murphy 655,870 792,811 136,941 - - 136,941 - 655,870 $ 656,489 $ - $ 35,152 $ - $ 691,641 Nevada WSC 71,043 71,813 770 - - 770 - 71,043 $ 71,110 $ - $ 198 $ - $ 71,308 North Collin WSC 274,347 284,428 10,081 300,000 c 10,081 - - 274,347 $ 274,606 $ 10,091 $ - $ - $ 284,696 Parker 306,201 344,660 38,459 - - 38,459 - 306,201 $ 306,490 $ - $ 9,872 $ - $ 316,362 Rose Hill WSC A 38,944 7,689 (31,255) 48,000 c - - - 38,944 $ 38,981 $ - $ - $ - $ 38,981 Rowlett 2,772,637 2,772,411 (226) 4,051,017 c - - (226) 2,772,637 $ 2,775,254 $ - $ - $ (47) $ 2,775,207 Sachse 652,371 762,689 110,318 - - 110,318 - 652,371 $ 652,987 $ - $ 28,318 $ - $ 681,305 Sachse#2 388,403 B 194,171 (194,232) 522,585 c - - - 388,403 $ 388,770 $ - $ - $ - $ 388,770 Seis Lagos MUD 74,712 76,473 1,761 - - 1,761 - 74,712 $ 74,783 $ - $ 452 $ - $ 75,235 Sunnyvale 395,769 376,311 (19,458) 910,969 c - - (19,458) 395,769 $ 396,142 $ - $ - $ (4,022) $ 392,120 Wylie NE WSC 118,559 120,048 1,489 - - 1,489 - 118,559 $ 118,671 $ - $ 382 $ - $ 119,053 Total 9,197,723 9,479,318 281,596 31,786 589,645 (72,285) 9,197,723 $ 9,206,403 $ 31,816 $ 151,359 $ (14,941) $ 9,374,637 Total 85,275,253 82,129,778 (3,145,475) 31,786 1,563,726 (4,113,726) 85,275,253 $ 81,551,854 $ 31,816 $ 352,698 $ (850,289) $ 81,086,078 Revenue Requirement $ 80,121,192 Notes: (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD Over/(Under)Recovery $ 964,886 (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix A Page 3 of 4 Method 1 -2005 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY05 Excess Rate FY 05 FY 05 FY 05 Wtr Yr 05 Wtr Yr 05 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 05 Annual Full Excess FY 05 FY 05 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 1.011 $ 1.011 $ 0.208 $ 0.208 Allen 4,362,143 4,687,958 325,815 - - 325,815 - 4,362,143 $ 4,409,833 $ - $ 67,905 $ - $ 4,477,738 Farmersville 261,547 242,487 (19,060) - - - (19,060) 261,547 $ 264,407 $ - $ - $ (3,972) $ 260,434 Forney 891,245 1,059,328 168,083 - - 168,083 - 891,245 $ 900,989 $ - $ 35,031 $ - $ 936,020 Frisco 5,645,797 6,467,274 821,477 - - 821,477 - 5,645,797 $ 5,707,521 $ - $ 171,210 $ - $ 5,878,730 Garland 12,904,220 12,435,423 (468,797) - - - (468,797) 12,904,220 $ 13,045,298 $ - $ - $ (97,705) $ 12,947,593 McKinney 6,582,712 7,166,992 584,280 - - 584,280 - 6,582,712 $ 6,654,679 $ - $ 121,774 $ - $ 6,776,452 Mesquite 6,041,180 4,885,178 (1,156,002) - - - (1,156,002) 6,041,180 $ 6,107,226 $ - $ - $ (240,930) $ 5,866,296 Mesquite#3 2,031,764 B 1,351,516 (680,248) 2,256,486 c - - - 2,031,764 $ 2,053,977 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,053,977 Plano 24,047,828 22,432,203 (1,615,625) - - - (1,615,625) 24,047,828 $ 24,310,735 $ - $ - $ (336,723) $ 23,974,012 Princeton 295,923 337,039 41,116 - - 41,116 - 295,923 $ 299,158 $ - $ 8,569 $ - $ 307,727 Richardson 10,135,415 8,553,732 (1,581,683) - - - (1,581,683) 10,135,415 $ 10,246,222 $ - $ - $ (329,649) $ 9,916,573 Rockwall 2,332,266 2,471,592 139,326 - - 139,326 - 2,332,266 $ 2,357,764 $ - $ 29,038 $ - $ 2,386,802 Royse City 327,863 338,437 10,574 - - 10,574 - 327,863 $ 331,447 $ - $ 2,204 $ - $ 333,651 Wylie 1,266,615 1,387,214 120,599 - - 120,599 - 1,266,615 $ 1,280,463 $ - $ 25,135 $ - $ 1,305,597 Total 77,126,518 73,816,373 (3,310,145) - 2,211,270 (4,841,167) 77,126,518 $ 77,969,718 $ - $ 460,866 $ (1,008,980) $ 77,421,603 Customers $ 1.061 $ 1.061 $ 0.258 $ 0.208 Caddo Basin 245,280 240,325 (4,955) - - - (4,955) 245,280 $ 260,226 $ - $ - $ (1,033) $ 259,193 Cash SUD A 257,909 256,282 (1,627) - - - - 257,909 $ 273,624 $ - $ - $ - $ 273,624 College Mound WSC A 62,017 9,825 (52,192) - - - - 62,017 $ 65,796 $ - $ - $ - $ 65,796 Copeville WSC 73,935 66,320 (7,615) 113,866.6 c - - (7,615) 73,935 $ 78,440 $ - $ - $ (1,587) $ 76,853 East Fork SUD 202,927 221,755 18,828 280,831 c 18,828 - - 202,927 $ 215,292 $ 19,975 $ - $ - $ 235,267 Fairview 420,325 478,582 58,257 - - 58,257 - 420,325 $ 445,937 $ - $ 15,055 $ - $ 460,991 Fate 113,197 155,139 41,942 - - 41,942 - 113,197 $ 120,094 $ - $ 10,839 $ - $ 130,933 Forney Lake WSC 171,795 B 164,447 (7,348) 227,800 c - - - 171,795 $ 182,263 $ - $ - $ - $ 182,263 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 101,254 107,566 6,312 - - 6,312 - 101,254 $ 107,424 $ - $ 1,631 $ - $ 109,055 Josephine 38,203 41,031 2,828 45,400 c 2,828 - - 38,203 $ 40,531 $ 3,000 $ - $ - $ 43,531 Kaufman 419,659 409,164 (10,495) - - - (10,495) 419,659 $ 445,230 $ - $ - $ (2,187) $ 443,043 Kaufman Four One A 396,336 382,065 (14,271) - - - - 396,336 $ 420,486 $ - $ - $ - $ 420,486 Lavon WSC 142,389 B 148,610 6,221 142,389 c - 6,221 - 142,389 $ 151,065 $ - $ 1,608 $ - $ 152,673 Little Elm 504,167 610,479 106,312 - - 106,312 - 504,167 $ 534,887 $ - $ 27,473 $ - $ 562,360 Lucas 303,924 308,034 4,110 - - 4,110 - 303,924 $ 322,443 $ - $ 1,062 $ - $ 323,505 Lucas#3 - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Melissa 73,000 B 86,408 13,408 73,000 c - 13,408 - 73,000 $ 77,448 $ - $ 3,465 $ - $ 80,913 Milligan WSC 149,894 128,680 (21,214) 155,938 c - - (21,214) 149,894 $ 159,027 $ - $ - $ (4,421) $ 154,606 Mt.Zion WSC 112,937 108,196 (4,741) - - - (4,741) 112,937 $ 119,819 $ - $ - $ (988) $ 118,831 Murphy 792,811 906,941 114,130 - - 114,130 - 792,811 $ 841,119 $ - $ 29,493 $ - $ 870,612 Nevada WSC 71,813 68,787 (3,026) - - - (3,026) 71,813 $ 76,189 $ - $ - $ (631) $ 75,558 North Collin WSC 284,428 290,010 5,582 300,000 c 5,582 - - 284,428 $ 301,759 $ 5,922 $ - $ - $ 307,681 Parker 344,660 392,852 48,192 - - 48,192 - 344,660 $ 365,661 $ - $ 12,454 $ - $ 378,115 Prosper 236,575 B 95,406 (141,169) 236,575 c - - - 275,000 $ 291,756 $ - $ - $ - $ 291,756 Rose Hill WSC A 38,944 12,847 (26,097) 48,000 c - - - 38,944 $ 41,317 $ - $ - $ - $ 41,317 Rowlett 2,772,637 2,734,709 (37,928) 4,051,017 c - - (37,928) 2,772,637 $ 2,941,581 $ - $ - $ (7,905) $ 2,933,676 Sachse 762,689 611,056 (151,633) - - - (151,633) 762,689 $ 809,162 $ - $ - $ (31,603) $ 777,559 Sachse#2 388,403 B 385,477 (2,926) 522,585 c - - - 388,403 $ 412,069 $ - $ - $ - $ 412,069 Seis Lagos MUD 76,473 71,594 (4,879) - - - (4,879) 76,473 $ 81,133 $ - $ - $ (1,017) $ 80,116 Sunnyvale 395,769 391,036 (4,733) 910,969 C - - (4,733) 395,769 $ 419,884 $ - $ - $ (986) $ 418,898 Wylie NE WSC 120,048 143,816 23,768 - - 23,768 - 120,048 $ 127,363 $ - $ 6,142 $ - $ 133,505 Total 10,074,398 10,027,439 (46,959) 27,238 422,652 (251,219) 10,112,823 $ 10,729,024 $ 28,898 $ 109,220 $ (52,358) $ 10,814,784 Total 87,200,916 83,843,812 (3,357,104) 27,238 2,633,923 (5,092,386) 87,239,341 $ 88,698,742 $ 28,898 $ 570,086 $ (1,061,339) $ 88,236,387 Revenue Requirement $ 87,319,806 Notes: (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD Over/(Under)Recovery $ 916,581 (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix A Page 4 of 4 Method 1 -2006 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY06 Excess Rate FY 06 FY 06 FY 06 Wtr Yr 06 Wtr Yr 06 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 06 Annual Full Excess FY 06 FY 06 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 1.009 $ 1.009 $ 0.245 $ 0.245 Allen 4,687,958 5,588,259 900,301 - - 900,301 - 4,687,958 $ 4,730,771 $ - $ 220,797 $ - $ 4,951,569 Farmersville 261,547 280,467 18,920 - - 18,920 - 261,547 $ 263,936 $ - $ 4,640 $ - $ 268,576 Forney 1,059,328 1,416,868 357,540 - - - 357,540 1,059,328 $ 1,069,002 $ - $ - $ 87,686 $ 1,156,688 Frisco 6,467,274 7,918,529 1,451,255 - - 1,451,255 - 6,467,274 $ 6,526,337 $ - $ 355,918 $ - $ 6,882,255 Frisco#2 3,116 B 419,410 416,294 12,465 c 9,349 406,945 - 5,650 $ 5,702 $ 9,434 $ 99,803 $ - $ 114,939 Garland 12,904,220 13,721,955 817,735 - - 817,735 - 12,904,220 $ 13,022,069 $ - $ 200,548 $ - $ 13,222,617 McKinney 7,166,992 8,385,134 1,218,142 - - 1,218,142 - 7,166,992 $ 7,232,445 $ - $ 298,747 $ - $ 7,531,193 McKinney#3 171,228 B 350,012 178,784 684,910 c 178,784 - - 228,303 $ 230,388 $ 180,417 $ - $ - $ 410,805 Mesquite 6,041,180 5,756,029 (285,151) - - (285,151) - 6,041,180 $ 6,096,352 $ - $ (69,933) $ - $ 6,026,419 Mesquite#3 2,106,671 B 1,359,175 (747,496) 2,256,486 c - - - 2,106,671 $ 2,125,910 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,125,910 Plano 24,047,828 26,265,050 2,217,222 - - 2,217,222 - 24,047,828 $ 24,267,448 $ - $ 543,770 $ - $ 24,811,217 Princeton 337,039 409,624 72,585 - - 72,585 - 337,039 $ 340,117 $ - $ 17,801 $ - $ 357,918 Richardson 10,135,415 10,050,090 (85,325) - - - (85,325) 10,135,415 $ 10,227,978 $ - $ - $ (20,926) $ 10,207,052 Rockwall 2,471,592 3,284,236 812,644 - - 812,644 - 2,471,592 $ 2,494,164 $ - $ 199,300 $ - $ 2,693,464 Royse City 338,437 470,150 131,713 - - 131,713 - 338,437 $ 341,528 $ - $ 32,302 $ - $ 373,830 Wylie 1,387,214 1,721,763 334,549 - - 334,549 - 1,387,214 $ 1,399,883 $ - $ 82,048 $ - $ 1,481,930 Total 79,587,039 87,396,751 7,809,712 188,133 8,096,860 272,215 79,646,648 $ 80,374,030 $ 189,851 $ 1,985,741 $ 66,760 $ 82,616,382 Customers $ 1.059 $ 1.059 $ 0.295 $ 0.245 Caddo Basin SUD 245,280 293,451 48,171 - - 48,171 - 245,280 $ 259,784 $ - $ 14,222 $ - $ 274,006 Cash SUD A 257,909 305,643 47,734 - - 47,734 - 257,909 $ 273,160 $ - $ 14,093 $ - $ 287,253 College Mound WSC A 62,017 62,710 693 - - 693 - 62,017 $ 65,684 $ - $ 205 $ - $ 65,889 Copeville WSC 73,935 77,927 3,992 113,867 c 3,992 - - 73,935 $ 78,307 $ 4,228 $ - $ - $ 82,535 East Fork SUD 221,755 324,226 102,471 280,831 c 59,076 43,395 - 221,755 $ 234,868 $ 62,569 $ 12,812 $ - $ 310,250 Fairview 478,582 721,185 242,603 - - 242,603 - 478,582 $ 506,882 $ - $ 71,628 $ - $ 578,510 Fate 155,139 279,932 124,793 - - 124,793 - 155,139 $ 164,313 $ - $ 36,845 $ - $ 201,158 Fate#2 - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Forney Lake WSC 182,996 B 295,577 112,581 227,800 c 44,804 67,777 - 182,996 $ 193,817 $ 47,453 $ 20,011 $ - $ 261,281 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 107,566 107,875 309 - - 309 - 107,566 $ 113,927 $ - $ 91 $ - $ 114,018 Josephine 41,031 57,407 16,376 45,400 c 4,369 12,007 - 41,031 $ 43,457 $ 4,627 $ 3,545 $ - $ 51,630 Kaufman 419,659 438,403 18,744 - - 18,744 - 419,659 $ 444,475 $ - $ 5,534 $ - $ 450,009 Kaufman Four One A 396,336 450,363 54,027 - - 54,027 - 396,336 $ 419,772 $ - $ 15,951 $ - $ 435,724 Lavon WSC 148,610 217,256 68,646 - - 68,646 - 148,610 $ 157,398 $ - $ 20,268 $ - $ 177,665 Little Elm-Interim 559,606 925,163 365,557 - - 365,557 - 457,859 $ 484,933 $ - $ 107,930 $ - $ 592,863 Little Elm-Permanent 51,667 B 107,415 55,748 162,917 c 55,748 - - 155,000 $ 164,166 $ 59,045 $ - $ - $ 223,210 Lucas 308,034 212,681 (95,353) - - - (95,353) 308,034 $ 326,249 $ - $ - $ (23,385) $ 302,864 Lucas#3 63,969 B 290,897 226,928 255,878 c 191,909 35,019 - 63,969 $ 67,752 $ 203,257 $ 10,339 $ - $ 281,348 Melissa 86,408 135,737 49,329 - - 49,329 - 86,408 $ 91,518 $ - $ 14,564 $ - $ 106,082 Milligan WSC 149,894 147,744 (2,150) 155,938 c - - (2,150) 149,894 $ 158,758 $ - $ - $ (527) $ 158,230 Mt.Zion WSC 112,937 159,302 46,365 - - 46,365 - 112,937 $ 119,616 $ - $ 13,689 $ - $ 133,305 Murphy 906,941 1,193,806 286,865 1,145,000 c 238,059 48,806 - 906,941 $ 960,571 $ 252,136 $ 14,410 $ - $ 1,227,117 Nevada WSC 71,813 56,413 (15,400) - - - (15,400) 71,813 $ 76,059 $ - $ - $ (3,777) $ 72,283 Nevada WSC#2 30,766 31,766 1,000 44,925 c 1,000 - - 30,766 $ 32,585 $ 1,059 $ - $ - $ 33,644 North Collin WSC 290,010 318,780 28,770 300,000 c 9,990 18,780 - 290,010 $ 307,159 $ 10,581 $ 5,545 $ - $ 323,285 Parker 392,852 470,812 77,960 - - 77,960 - 392,852 $ 416,082 $ - $ 23,018 $ - $ 439,100 Prosper 275,000 B 208,182 (66,818) 275,000 c - - - 275,000 $ 291,261 $ - $ - $ - $ 291,261 Rose Hill SUD A 38,944 42,818 3,874 48,000 c 3,874 - - 38,944 $ 41,247 $ 4,103 $ - $ - $ 45,350 Rowlett 2,772,637 3,192,039 419,402 4,051,017 c 419,402 - - 2,772,637 $ 2,936,590 $ 444,202 $ - $ - $ 3,380,793 Sachse 762,689 734,691 (27,998) - - - (27,998) 762,689 $ 807,789 $ - $ - $ (6,866) $ 800,922 Sachse#2 388,403 B 431,099 42,696 522,585 c 42,696 - - 388,403 $ 411,370 $ 45,221 $ - $ - $ 456,591 Seis Lagos MUD 76,473 111,094 34,621 - - 34,621 - 76,473 $ 80,995 $ - $ 10,222 $ - $ 91,217 Sunnyvale 395,769 559,135 163,366 910,969 c 163,366 - - 395,769 $ 419,172 $ 173,027 $ - $ - $ 592,198 Wylie NE SUD 143,816 197,289 53,473 - - 53,473 - 143,816 $ 152,320 $ - $ 15,788 $ - $ 168,108 Total 10,669,443 13,158,818 2,489,375 1,238,285 1,458,809 (140,901) 10,671,029 $ 11,302,035 $ 1,311,508 $ 430,711 $ (34,556) $ 13,009,698 $ - $ - $ - $ - $Total 90,256,482 100,555,569 10,299,087 1,426,418 9,555,668 131,314 90,317,677 $ 91,676,065 $ 1,501,360 $ 2,416,452 $ 32,205 $ 95,626,081 Revenue Requirement $ 94,215,209 Notes: (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD Over/(Under)Recovery 1,410,871 (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met Appendix B Page 1 of 8 North Texas Municipal Water District Method 2-Determination of 2003 Annual Minimum 2000 2001 2002 2003 Annual Actual Annual Actual Annual Actual Annual Minimum Consumption Variance Minimum Consumption Variance Minimum Consumption Variance Minimum (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) Members Allen 2,670,251 3,331,824 661,573 3,331,824 3,952,728 620,904 3,952,728 3,699,752 (2-12 22E, 3,952,728 Farmersville 266,268 270,005 3,737 260,516 290,608 30,092 290,608 228,235 (2 373, 290,608 Forney 588,487 662,542 74,055 662,542 743,504 80,962 743,504 658,408 ( -C2E, 743,504 Frisco 2,313,642 3,199,458 885,816 3,199,458 4,125,696 926,238 4,125,696 4,394,752 269,056 4,394,752 Garland 12,893,316 13,152,152 258,836 13,152,152 13,660,013 507,861 13,660,013 12,051,601 (1 5 4'2, 13,660,013 McKinney 4,034,143 4,832,225 798,082 4,832,225 5,748,746 916,521 5,748,746 5,689,078 52 566 5,748,746 Mesquite 6,806,243 7,582,774 776,531 7,582,774 7,798,284 215,510 7,798,284 6,550,839 (-247 4 - See Note 1 Plano 18,958,824 23,822,845 4,864,021 23,822,845 26,719,809 2,896,964 26,719,809 22,459,418 (4 29C 39-, 26,719,809 Princeton 307,345 303,432 919, 307,345 328,803 21,458 328,803 278,431 ( 572, 328,803 Richardson 9,276,286 10,461,074 1,184,788 10,461,074 11,019,311 558,237 11,019,311 9,773,780 (1-24 3- 11,019,311 Rockwall 1,640,630 1,854,564 213,934 1,854,564 2,188,525 333,961 2,188,525 1,876,570 (31-933, 2,188,525 Royse City 239,172 248,799 9,627 248,799 277,416 28,617 277,416 257,149 (2026 ) 277,416 Wylie 702,088 764,087 61,999 764,087 907,331 143,244 907,331 816,417 (0 1 ) 907,331 Customers Caddo Basin 168,829 191,657 22,828 191,657 252,318 60,661 252,318 197,652 (f4=66). 252,318 Cash WSC 214,762 228,754 13,992 228,754 237,267 8,513 237,267 211,830 (27-437, 237,267 College Mound WSC 65,911 47,463 (-3,445, 65,911 66,769 858 66,769 56,135 (-c_esL, 66,769 Copeville WSC 47,444 54,675 7,231 56,933 65,478 8,545 65,478 65,737 259 65,737 East Fork WSC 170,633 180,316 9,683 180,316 183,632 3,316 183,632 150,055 ( 7, 183,632 Fairview 258,486 328,592 70,106 328,592 364,741 36,149 364,741 352,745 (--ccec? 364,741 Fate 42,838 45,866 3,028 45,866 65,173 19,307 65,173 69,529 4,356 69,529 Forney Lake WSC 128,905 137,008 8,103 137,008 153,126 16,118 153,126 112,745 ( 34 153,126 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 110,490 70,764 (35 72E) 110,490 78,397 2 423,, 110,490 80,336 (3C'5`, 80,336 Josephine 29,653 28,414 '-232, 29,653 32,879 3,226 32,879 40,978 8,099 40,978 Kaufman 352,073 374,829 22,756 374,829 406,317 31,488 406,317 419,999 13,682 419,999 Kaufman Four One 263,641 327,291 63,650 327,291 396,327 69,036 396,327 337,611 3 7-9, 396,327 Lavon WSC 94,973 115,308 20,335 115,308 130,385 15,077 142,389 96,660 (43 529, See Note 1 Little Elm 122,061 84,889 '7--2) 122,061 210,964 88,903 210,964 Lucas 125,449 145,973 20,524 145,973 118,740 E27 EE=E=) 337,693 243,856 ( 337,693 Lucus No 2 141,009 120,611 (29,995, 141,009 191,720 50,711 Milligan WSC 112,677 116,195 3,518 116,195 121,388 5,193 121,388 115,787 (5 01): 121,388 125,486 3,425 125,486 97,279 `1( 125,486 Mt.Zion WSC 122,061 114,498 �_ 122,061 (��,���} Murphy 169,045 227,701 58,656 227,701 371,527 143,826 371,527 496,860 125,333 496,860 Nevada WSC 56,638 64,318 7,680 64,318 69,001 4,683 69,001 66,189 (2 5-2) 69,001 North Collin WSC 279,014 272,432 _ 279,014 287,568 8,554 287,568 245,779 ( -_759, 287,568 Parker 162,520 204,433 41,913 204,433 211,304 6,871 211,304 228,969 17,665 228,969 Rose Hill WSC 37,783 33,378 32 4=E, 37,783 43,271 5,488 43,271 40,056 ( .2-2) 43,271 Rowlett 2,433,906 2,564,479 130,573 2,564,479 2,920,333 355,854 2,920,333 2,564,207 ( 55.125 2,920,333 Sachse 480,229 584,301 104,072 584,301 724,857 140,556 724,857 521,439 ( 0 -4'5, 724,857 Sachse#2 130,288 62,697 1 f2' See Note 1 Seis Lagos MUD 65,943 75,227 9,284 75,227 82,719 7,492 82,719 60,814 (2-2CE, 82,719 Sunnyvale 286,600 323,191 36,591 323,191 439,743 116,552 439,743 314,893 1'4. 9EC, 439,743 Wylie NE WSC 109,792 115,831 6,039 115,831 130,896 15,065 130,896 87,351 (-3 5 4) 130,896 Notes: (1)Ineligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix B Page 2 of 8 Method 2-2003 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 03 FY 03 FY 03 Wtr Yr 03 Wtr Yr 03 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 03 Annual Full Excess FY 03 FY 03 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.870 $ 0.870 $ 0.200 $ 0.200 Allen 3,952,728 4,124,397 171,669 - - 171,669 3,952,728 $ 3,440,133 $ - $ 34,346 $ - $ 3,474,479 Farmersville 290,608 225,417 (65,191) - - - (65,191) 290,608 $ 252,922 $ - $ - $ (13,043) $ 239,879 Forney 743,504 788,921 45,417 - - 45,417 743,504 $ 647,085 $ - $ 9,087 $ - $ 656,172 Frisco 4,394,752 5,607,266 1,212,514 - - 1,212,514 4,394,752 $ 3,824,835 $ - $ 242,587 $ - $ 4,067,422 Garland 13,660,013 12,904,220 (755,793) - - - (755,793) 13,660,013 $ 11,888,565 $ - $ - $ (151,211) $ 11,737,354 McKinney 5,748,746 6,350,897 602,151 - - 602,151 5,748,746 $ 5,003,241 $ - $ 120,472 $ - $ 5,123,713 Mesquite(2) 6,041,180 5,575,688 (465,492) - - - (465,492) 6,041,180 $ 5,257,752 $ - $ - $ (93,131) $ 5,164,621 Mesquite#3(2) 1,881,950 B 1,170,130 (711,820) 2,256,486 c - - - 1,881,950 $ 1,637,896 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,637,896 Plano 26,719,809 22,745,013 (3,974,796) - - - (3,974,796) 26,719,809 $ 23,254,750 $ - $ - $ (795,235) $ 22,459,516 Princeton 328,803 287,581 (41,222) - - - (41,222) 328,803 $ 286,163 $ - $ - $ (8,247) $ 277,916 Richardson 11,019,311 10,135,415 (883,896) - - - (883,896) 11,019,311 $ 9,590,313 $ - $ - $ (176,840) $ 9,413,472 Rockwall 2,188,525 2,234,227 45,702 - - 45,702 - 2,188,525 $ 1,904,714 $ - $ 9,144 $ - $ 1,913,858 Royse City 277,416 286,471 9,055 - - 9,055 - 277,416 $ 241,440 $ - $ 1,812 $ - $ 243,252 Wylie 907,331 1,042,381 135,050 - - 135,050 - 907,331 $ 789,667 $ - $ 27,019 $ - $ 816,687 Total 78,154,676 73,478,024 (4,676,652) - 2,221,558 (6,186,390) 78,154,676 $ 68,019,478 $ - $ 444,466 $ (1,237,707) $ 67,226,237 Customers $ 0.920 $ 0.920 $ 0.250 $ 0.200 Caddo Basin 252,318 245,280 (7,038) - - - (7,038) 252,318 $ 232,213 $ - $ - $ (1,408) $ 230,805 Cash SUD A 237,267 221,385 (15,882) - - - - 237,267 $ 218,361 $ - $ - $ - $ 218,361 College Mound WSC A 66,769 62,017 (4,752) - - - - 66,769 $ 61,449 $ - $ - $ - $ 61,449 Copeville WSC 65,737 68,468 2,731 113,866.6 c 2,731 - - 65,737 $ 60,499 $ 2,513 $ - $ - $ 63,012 East Fork SUD 183,632 188,012 4,380 280,831 c 4,380 - - 183,632 $ 169,000 $ 4,031 $ - $ - $ 173,031 Fairview 364,741 394,901 30,160 - - 30,160 - 364,741 $ 335,678 $ - $ 7,542 $ - $ 343,220 Fate 69,529 77,744 8,215 - - 8,215 - 69,529 $ 63,989 $ - $ 2,054 $ - $ 66,043 Forney Lake WSC 153,126 131,507 (21,619) - - - (21,619) 153,126 $ 140,925 $ - $ - $ (4,325) $ 136,599 Gasonia-Scurry WSC(1) 80,336 101,254 20,918 - - 20,918 - 80,336 $ 73,935 $ - $ 5,231 $ - $ 79,166 Josephine 40,978 33,301 (7,677) 45,400 c - - (7,677) 40,978 $ 37,713 $ - $ - $ (1,536) $ 36,177 Kaufman 419,999 392,227 (27,772) - - - (27,772) 419,999 $ 386,533 $ - $ - $ (5,556) $ 380,977 Kaufman Four One A 396,327 356,603 (39,724) - - - - 396,327 $ 364,747 $ - $ - $ - $ 364,747 Lavon WSC(2) 142,389 B 124,858 (17,531) 142,389 c - - - 142,389 $ 131,043 $ - $ - $ - $ 131,043 Little Elm 210,964 368,734 157,770 - - 157,770 - 210,964 $ 194,154 $ - $ 39,453 $ - $ 233,608 Lucas 337,693 271,766 (65,927) - - - (65,927) 337,693 $ 310,785 $ - $ - $ (13,190) $ 297,595 Melissa(2) 48,664 B 32,160 (16,504) 73,000 c - - - 60,833 $ 55,986 $ - $ - $ - $ 55,986 Milligan WSC 121,388 149,894 28,506 155,938 c 28,506 - - 121,388 $ 111,716 $ 26,235 $ - $ - $ 137,950 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 100,946 (24,540) - - - (24,540) 125,486 $ 115,487 $ - $ - $ (4,910) $ 110,577 Murphy 496,860 655,870 159,010 - - 159,010 - 496,860 $ 457,270 $ - $ 39,764 $ - $ 497,033 Nevada WSC 69,001 71,043 2,042 - - 2,042 - 69,001 $ 63,503 $ - $ 511 $ - $ 64,014 North Collin WSC 287,568 274,347 (13,221) 300,000 c - - (13,221) 287,568 $ 264,654 $ - $ - $ (2,645) $ 262,009 Parker 228,969 306,201 77,232 - - 77,232 - 228,969 $ 210,724 $ - $ 19,313 $ - $ 230,038 Rose Hill WSC A 43,271 16,160 (27,111) 48,000 c - - - 43,271 $ 39,823 $ - $ - $ - $ 39,823 Rowlett 2,920,333 2,772,637 (147,696) 4,051,017 c - - (147,696) 2,920,333 $ 2,687,637 $ - $ - $ (29,549) $ 2,658,088 Sachse 724,857 612,776 (112,081) - - - (112,081) 724,857 $ 667,099 $ - $ - $ (22,424) $ 644,676 Sachse#2(2) 130,646 B 388,403 257,757 522,585 c 257,757 - - 130,646 $ 120,236 $ 237,219 $ - $ - $ 357,455 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 74,712 (8,007) - - - (8,007) 82,719 $ 76,128 $ - $ - $ (1,602) $ 74,526 Sunnyvale 439,743 362,405 (77,338) 910,969 C - - (77,338) 439,743 $ 404,704 $ - $ - $ (15,473) $ 389,231 Wylie NE WSC 130,896 118,559 (12,337) - - - (12,337) 130,896 $ 120,466 $ - $ - $ (2,468) $ 117,998 Total 8,872,206 8,974,170 101,964 293,374 455,347 (525,253) 8,884,375 $ 8,176,457 $ 269,998 $ 113,868 $ (105,087) $ 8,455,236 Total 87,026,882 82,452,194 (4,574,688) 293,374 2,676,905 (6,711,643) 87,039,051 $ 76,195,935 $ 269,998 $ 558,334 $ (1,342,794) $ 75,681,473 Revenue Requirement $ 75,674,582 Notes: (1)Eligible for adjustment to Minimum Annual Demand Over/(Under)Recovery $ 6,891 (2)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met Appendix B Page 3 of 8 North Texas Municipal Water District Method 2-Determination of 2004 Annual Minimum 2001 2002 2003 2004 Annual Actual Annual Actual Annual Actual Annual Minimum Consumption Variance Minimum Consumption Variance Minimum Consumption Variance Minimum (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) Minimum Allen 3,331,824 3,952,728 620,904 3,952,728 3,699,752 122,2 ) 3,952,728 4,124,397 171,669 4,124,397 Farmersville 260,516 290,608 30,092 290,608 228,235 _=`__'=f 290,608 225,417 ;- - 290,608 Forney 662,542 743,504 80,962 743,504 658,408 5 056f 743,504 788,921 45,417 788,921 Frisco 3,199,458 4,125,696 926,238 4,125,696 4,394,752 269,056 4,394,752 5,607,266 1,212,514 5,607,266 Garland 13,152,152 13,660,013 507,861 13,660,013 12,051,601 1-_ -2, 13,660,013 12,904,220 '---,' 13,660,013 McKinney 4,832,225 5,748,746 916,521 5,748,746 5,689,078 1 e8) 5,748,746 6,350,897 602,151 6,350,897 Mesquite 7,582,774 7,798,284 215,510 7,798,284 6,550,839 -- -) 6,041,180 5,575,688 -- 6,041,180 Mesquite#3 1,881,950 1,170,130 1 i'-5 0) See Note 2 Plano 23,822,845 26,719,809 2,896,964 26,719,809 22,459,418 6 -) 26,719,809 22,745,013 E -) 26,719,809 Princeton 307,345 328,803 21,458 328,803 278,431 EC 372, 328,803 287,581 -, ) 328,803 Richardson 10,461,074 11,019,311 558,237 11,019,311 9,773,780 2 53_f 11,019,311 10,135,415 127E7275, e, 11,019,311 Rockwall 1,854,564 2,188,525 333,961 2,188,525 1,876,570 1- 13) 2,188,525 2,234,227 45,702 2,234,227 Royse City 248,799 277,416 28,617 277,416 257,149 2C 267,0 277,416 286,471 9,055 286,471 Wylie 764,087 907,331 143,244 907,331 816,417 (90. 14; 907,331 1,042,381 135,050 1,042,381 Caddo Basin 191,657 252,318 60,661 252,318 197,652 ) 252,318 245,280 7,= ) 252,318 Cash WSC 228,754 237,267 8,513 237,267 211,830 123,- , 237,267 221,385 153 2, 237,267 College Mound WSC 65,911 66,769 858 66,769 56,135 10 3 ) 66,769 62,017 ii2,752, 66,769 Copeville WSC 56,933 65,478 8,545 65,478 65,737 259 65,737 68,468 2,731 68,468 East Fork SUD 180,316 183,632 3,316 183,632 150,055 33 7, 183,632 188,012 4,380 188,012 Fairview 328,592 364,741 36,149 364,741 352,745 1 9967 364,741 394,901 30,160 394,901 Fate 45,866 65,173 19,307 65,173 69,529 4,356 69,529 77,744 8,215 77,744 Forney Lake WSC 137,008 153,126 16,118 153,126 112,745 0 351 f 153,126 131,507 21,=1 2, See Note 2 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 110,490 78,397 3;: 110,490 80,336 1SC 1 S4: 80,336 101,254 20,918 See Note 1 Josephine 29,653 32,879 3,226 32,879 40,978 8,099 40,978 33,301 7,- 7) 40,978 Kaufman 374,829 406,317 31,488 406,317 419,999 13,682 419,999 392,227 127,27 419,999 Kaufman Four One 327,291 396,327 69,036 396,327 337,611 7 1--) 396,327 356,603 ) 396,327 Lavon WSC 115,308 130,385 15,077 142,389 96,660 =(23 ) 142,389 124,858 -sEE37) See Note 2 Little Elm 122,061 84,889 : - ) 122,061 210,964 88,903 210,964 368,734 157,770 368,734 Lucas 145,973 118,740 J3, 337,693 243,856 -3-,riSi, 337,693 271,766 33, 271,766 Lucus No 2 141,009 191,720 50,711 Melissa 48,664 32,160 -3 r ;_ ) See Note 2 Milligan WSC 116,195 121,388 5,193 121,388 115,787 ( _=---) 121,388 149,894 28,506 149,894 Mt.Zion WSC 122,061 125,486 3,425 125,486 97,279 (2( 2(0) 125,486 100,946 (2,-E,EfEc, 125,486 Murphy 227,701 371,527 143,826 371,527 496,860 125,333 496,860 655,870 159,010 655,870 Nevada WSC 64,318 69,001 4,683 69,001 66,189 3-2, 69,001 71,043 2,042 71,043 North Collin WSC 279,014 287,568 8,554 287,568 245,779 --7 9, 287,568 274,347 - , -) 287,568 Parker 204,433 211,304 6,871 211,304 228,969 17,665 228,969 306,201 77,232 306,201 Rose Hill WSC 37,783 43,271 5,488 43,271 40,056 2 2-32f 43,271 16,160 _'---) 43,271 Rowlett 2,564,479 2,920,333 355,854 2,920,333 2,564,207 3' -1 E26, 2,920,333 2,772,637 1-7,69=) 2,920,333 Sachse 584,301 724,857 140,556 724,857 521,439 E21E 3. 15f 724,857 612,776 11 ,=5-) 724,857 Sachse#2 130,288 62,697 -#'3 -f 130,646 388,403 257,757 See Note 2 Seis Lagos MUD 75,227 82,719 7,492 82,719 60,814 - 0) 82,719 74,712 -3 Cc ) 82,719 Sunnyvale 323,191 439,743 116,552 439,743 314,893 `- =-j 439,743 362,405775) 439,743 Wylie NE WSC 115,831 130,896 15,065 130,896 87,351 (42 545) 130,896 118,559 1 2 ) 130,896 Notes: (1)Received Adjustment to Minimum Annual Demand in 2003.Eligible for Adjustment again in 2006 (2)Ineligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix B Page 4 of 8 Method 2-2004 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 04 FY 04 FY 04 Wtr Yr 04 Wtr Yr 04 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 04 Annual Full Excess FY 04 FY 04 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.921 $ 0.921 $ 0.200 $ 0.200 Allen 4,124,397 4,362,143 237,746 - - 237,746 4,124,397 $ 3,797,469.57 $ - $ 47,584.96 $ - $ 3,845,054.53 Farmersville 290,608 246,458 (44,150) - - - (44,150) 290,608 $ 267,572.46 $ - $ - $ (8,836.64) $ 258,735.81 Forney 788,921 891,245 102,324 - - 102,324 788,921 $ 726,385.82 $ - $ 20,480.19 $ - $ 746,866.01 Frisco 5,607,266 5,645,797 38,531 - - 38,531 5,607,266 $ 5,162,796.40 $ - $ 7,712.00 $ - $ 5,170,508.40 Garland 13,660,013 12,612,613 (1,047,400) - - - (1,047,400) 13,660,013 $ 12,577,228.55 $ - $ - $ (209,637.56) $ 12,367,590.98 McKinney 6,350,897 6,582,712 231,815 - - 231,815 6,350,897 $ 5,847,482.21 $ - $ 46,397.87 $ - $ 5,893,880.09 Mesquite 6,041,180 4,814,443 (1,226,737) - - - (1,226,737) 6,041,180 $ 5,562,315.46 $ - $ - $ (245,531.94) $ 5,316,783.52 Mesquite#3(2) 1,956,857 B 1,597,147 (359,710) 2,256,486 c - - - 1,956,857 $ 1,801,743.36 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,801,743.36 Plano 26,719,809 22,149,517 (4,570,292) - - - (4,570,292) 26,719,809 $ 24,601,817.33 $ - $ - $ (914,745.93) $ 23,687,071.40 Princeton 328,803 289,199 (39,604) - - - (39,604) 328,803 $ 302,739.86 $ - $ - $ (7,926.76) $ 294,813.11 Richardson 11,019,311 9,532,442 (1,486,869) - - - (1,486,869) 11,019,311 $ 10,145,846.34 $ - $ - $ (297,597.47) $ 9,848,248.86 Rockwall 2,234,227 2,332,266 98,039 - - 98,039 - 2,234,227 $ 2,057,127.15 $ - $ 19,622.55 $ - $ 2,076,749.70 Royse City 286,471 327,863 41,392 - - 41,392 - 286,471 $ 263,763.38 $ - $ 8,284.63 $ - $ 272,048.01 Wylie 1,042,381 1,266,615 224,234 - - 224,234 - 1,042,381 $ 959,754.87 $ - $ 44,880.53 $ - $ 1,004,635.41 Total 80,451,141 72,650,460 (7,800,681) - 974,081 (8,415,052) 80,451,141 $ 74,074,042.76 $ - $ 194,962.73 $ (1,684,276.31) $ 72,584,729.19 Customers $ 0.971 $ 0.971 $ 0.250 $ 0.200 Caddo Basin 252,318 223,734 (28,584) - - - (28,584) 252,318 $ 244,933.48 $ - $ - $ (5,721.10) $ 239,212.38 Cash SUD A 237,267 257,909 20,642 - - 20,642 - 237,267 $ 230,322.97 $ - $ 5,163.61 $ - $ 235,486.58 College Mound WSC A 66,769 52,093 (14,676) - - - - 66,769 $ 64,814.89 $ - $ - $ - $ 64,814.89 Copeville WSC 68,468 73,935 5,467 113,866.6 c 5,467 - - 68,468 $ 66,464.17 $ 5,307.00 $ - $ - $ 71,771.16 East Fork SUD 188,012 202,927 14,915 280,831 c 14,915 - - 188,012 $ 182,509.51 $ 14,478.49 $ - $ - $ 196,987.99 Fairview 394,901 420,325 25,424 - - 25,424 - 394,901 $ 383,343.54 $ - $ 6,359.82 $ - $ 389,703.37 Fate 77,744 113,197 35,453 - - 35,453 - 77,744 $ 75,468.69 $ - $ 8,868.58 $ - $ 84,337.27 Forney Lake WSC(2) 153,126 B 135,370 (17,756) 227,800 c - - - 153,126 $ 148,644.50 $ - $ - $ - $ 148,644.50 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 101,254 98,508 (2,746) - - - (2,746) 101,254 $ 98,290.63 $ - $ - $ (549.61) $ 97,741.01 Josephine 40,978 38,203 (2,775) 45,400 c - - (2,775) 40,978 $ 39,778.71 $ - $ - $ (555.42) $ 39,223.29 Kaufman 419,999 419,659 (340) - - - (340) 419,999 $ 407,707.01 $ - $ - $ (68.05) $ 407,638.95 Kaufman Four One A 396,327 396,336 9 - - 9 - 396,327 $ 384,727.81 $ - $ 2.25 $ - $ 384,730.06 Lavon WSC(2) 142,389 B 141,538 (851) 142,389 C - - - 142,389 $ 138,221.74 $ - $ - $ - $ 138,221.74 Little Elm 368,734 504,167 135,433 - - 135,433 - 368,734 $ 357,942.36 $ - $ 33,878.62 $ - $ 391,820.99 Lucas(1) 271,766 301,984 30,218 - - 30,218 - 271,766 $ 263,812.30 $ - $ 7,559.05 $ - $ 271,371.35 Melissa(2) 73,000 B 59,467 (13,533) 73,000 c - - - 73,000 $ 70,863.53 $ - $ - $ - $ 70,863.53 Milligan WSC 149,894 127,646 (22,248) 155,938 C - - (22,248) 149,894 $ 145,507.09 $ - $ - $ (4,452.95) $ 141,054.15 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 108,816 (16,670) - - - (16,670) 125,486 $ 121,813.44 $ - $ - $ (3,336.51) $ 118,476.93 Murphy 655,870 792,811 136,941 - - 136,941 - 655,870 $ 636,674.83 $ - $ 34,255.85 $ - $ 670,930.69 Nevada WSC 71,043 71,813 770 - - 770 - 71,043 $ 68,963.80 $ - $ 192.62 $ - $ 69,156.42 North Collin WSC 287,568 284,428 (3,140) 300,000 c - - (3,140) 287,568 $ 279,151.83 $ - $ - $ (628.47) $ 278,523.35 Parker 306,201 344,660 38,459 - - 38,459 - 306,201 $ 297,239.50 $ - $ 9,620.54 $ - $ 306,860.04 Rose Hill WSC A 43,271 7,689 (35,582) 48,000 c - - - 43,271 $ 42,004.60 $ - $ - $ - $ 42,004.60 Rowlett 2,920,333 2,772,411 (147,922) 4,051,017 c - - (147,922) 2,920,333 $ 2,834,864.43 $ - $ - $ (29,606.65) $ 2,805,257.77 Sachse 724,857 762,689 37,832 - - 37,832 - 724,857 $ 703,642.81 $ - $ 9,463.69 $ - $ 713,106.50 Sachse#2(2) 388,403 B 194,171 (194,232) 522,585 c - - - 388,403 $ 377,035.72 $ - $ - $ - $ 377,035.72 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 76,473 (6,246) - - - (6,246) 82,719 $ 80,298.09 $ - $ - $ (1,250.14) $ 79,047.95 Sunnyvale 439,743 376,311 (63,432) 910,969 C - - (63,432) 439,743 $ 426,873.16 $ - $ - $ (12,695.94) $ 414,177.22 Wylie NE WSC 130,896 120,048 (10,848) - - - (10,848) 130,896 $ 127,065.10 $ - $ - $ (2,171.23) $ 124,893.87 Total 9,579,336 9,479,318 (100,018) 20,382 461,181 (304,951) 9,579,336 $ 9,298,980.24 $ 19,785.49 $ 115,364.63 $ (61,036.07) $ 9,373,094.27 Total 90,030,477 82,129,778 (7,900,699) 20,382 1,435,262 (8,720,003) 90,030,477 $ 83,373,023.00 $ 19,785.49 $ 310,327.36 $ (1,745,312.38) $ 81,957,823.47 Revenue Requirement $ 81,942,360.79 Notes: (1)Eligible for adjustment to Minimum Annual Demand Over/(Under)Recovery $ 15,463 (2)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met Appendix B Page 5 of 8 North Texas Municipal Water District Method 2-Determination of 2005 Annual Minimum 2002 2003 2004 2005 Annual Actual Annual Actual Annual Actual Annual Minimum Consumption Variance Minimum Consumption Variance Minimum Consumption Variance Minimum (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) Minimum Minimum Allen 3,952,728 3,699,752 2 97 ) 3,952,728 4,124,397 171,669 4,124,397 4,362,143 237,746 4,362,143 Farmersville 290,608 228,235 _ _ 290,608 225,417 ( 290,608 246,458 (44:5 , 246,458 Forney 743,504 658,408 `5-99e, 743,504 788,921 45,417 788,921 891,245 102,324 891,245 Frisco 4,125,696 4,394,752 269,056 4,394,752 5,607,266 1,212,514 5,607,266 5,645,797 38,531 5,645,797 Garland 13,660,013 12,051,601 _' `-£ 2) 13,660,013 12,904,220 1 13,660,013 12,612,613 £,,z7; , 12,904,220 McKinney 5,748,746 5,689,078 (Es.-6 ) 5,748,746 6,350,897 602,151 6,350,897 6,582,712 231,815 6,582,712 - 6,041,180 5,575,688 ( _E, , , 2 6,041,180 4,814,443 (-22_73 Mesquite 7,798,284 6,550,839 �-� ����- , t See Note 4 Mesquite#3 1,881,950 1,170,130 (7--. 2 ) 1,956,857 1,597,147 9399 7-2, See Note 3 Plano 26,719,809 22,459,418 ( 2_2 ) 26,719,809 22,745,013 ( _) 26,719,809 22,149,517 ( S _-292, 22,745,013 Princeton 328,803 278,431 if-,3,372, 328,803 287,581 ( £;922, 328,803 289,199 (9- , 289,199 Richardson 11,019,311 9,773,780 (- '=z 11,019,311 10,135,415 ( Q- 11,019,311 9,532,442 (£r 9-=,8 10,135,415 Rockwall 2,188,525 1,876,570 (3--- ) 2,188,525 2,234,227 45,702 2,234,227 2,332,266 98,039 2,332,266 Royse City 277,416 257,149 (2-.2 , 277,416 286,471 9,055 286,471 327,863 41,392 327,863 Wylie 907,331 816,417 -. -5, 907,331 1,042,381 135,050 1,042,381 1,266,615 224,234 1,266,615 Caddo Basin 252,318 197,652 (54666, 252,318 245,280 (7, 38:) 252,318 223,734 2_--,5 , 245,280 Cash SUD 237,267 211,830 (2 _-7, 237,267 221,385 }£ ,__ 237,267 257,909 20,642 257,909 College Mound WSC 66,769 56,135 _4 66,769 62,017 (', - 66,769 52,093 (-4,67E, 62,017 Copeville WSC 65,478 65,737 259 65,737 68,468 2,731 68,468 73,935 5,467 73,935 East Fork SUD 183,632 150,055 33 5 g) 183,632 188,012 4,380 188,012 202,927 14,915 202,927 Fairview 364,741 352,745 1-SSE, 364,741 394,901 30,160 394,901 420,325 25,424 420,325 Fate 65,173 69,529 4,356 69,529 77,744 8,215 77,744 113,197 35,453 113,197 Forney Lake WSC 153,126 112,745 (L2._3', 153,126 131,507 (_-,_- ) 153,126 135,370 -l, t_) See Note 3 80,336 101,254 20,918 101,254 98,508 2 7 _t See Note 2 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 110,490 80,336 _ -- ,) Josephine 32,879 40,978 8,099 40,978 33,301 (7,e77, 40,978 38,203 1 ,1 it, 40,978 Kaufman 406,317 419,999 13,682 419,999 392,227 (27,772, 419,999 419,659 (?A:, 419,999 Kaufman Four One 396,327 337,611 - ) 396,327 356,603 (S912 , 396,327 396,336 9 396,336 Lavon WSC 142,389 96,660 729, 142,389 124,858 1-7; -) 142,389 141,538 8t-) See Note 3 Little Elm 122,061 210,964 88,903 210,964 368,734 157,770 368,734 504,167 135,433 504,167 Lucas 337,693 243,856 - 37) 337,693 271,766 (-27) 271,766 301,984 30,218 See Note 1 Melissa 48,664 32,160 (£_, {) 73,000 59,467 - _5 ) See Note 3 Milligan WSC 121,388 115,787 ( .60-) 121,388 149,894 28,506 149,894 127,646 2 ,2- ) 149,894 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 97,279 ( 2 2 7) 125,486 100,946 (2L,SLE, 125,486 108,816 (-,,,,` = 108,816 Murphy 371,527 496,860 125,333 496,860 655,870 159,010 655,870 792,811 136,941 792,811 Nevada WSC 69,001 66,189 ( .5-2-) 69,001 71,043 2,042 71,043 71,813 770 71,813 North Collin WSC 287,568 245,779 (z2 SS, 287,568 274,347 "£ -; , 287,568 284,428 (5,-4,, 284,428 Parker 211,304 228,969 17,665 228,969 306,201 77,232 306,201 344,660 38,459 344,660 Rose Hill WSC 43,271 40,056 2'E 43,271 16,160 (', 43,271 7,689 (_ ,t,E2) 40,056 Rowlett 2,920,333 2,564,207 E.E,E_-2E, 2,920,333 2,772,637 (£47 r 2,920,333 2,772,411 (£4.{,922, 2,772,637 Sachse 724,857 521,439 293 - , 724,857 612,776 (£-2,- £ 724,857 762,689 37,832 762,689 Sachse#2 130,288 62,697 _ - -) 130,646 388,403 257,757 388,403 194,171 (-54,2H, See Note 3 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 60,814 ,, 82,719 74,712 (=; 82,719 76,473 (=,_ , 76,473 Sunnyvale 439,743 314,893 ('2,2 329, 439,743 362,405 ( 439,743 376,311 ( 3, 32, 376,311 Wylie NE WSC 130,896 87,351 _ E) 130,896 118,559 (£2, 7, 130,896 120,048 (£0,3 3, 120,048 Notes: (1)Received Adjustment to Minimum Annual Demand in 2004.Eligible for Adjustment again in 2007 (2)Received Adjustment to Minimum Annual Demand in 2003.Eligible for Adjustment again in 2006 (3)Ineligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract (4)Mesquite revised contract in 2003,resulting in a lower Minimum Annual Demand than the amount it would eligible for under this scenario North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix B Page 6 of 8 Method 2-2005 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY05 Excess Rate FY 05 FY 05 FY 05 Wtr Yr 05 Wtr Yr 05 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 05 Annual Full Excess FY 05 FY 05 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 1.038 $ 1.038 $ 0.214 $ 0.214 Allen 4,362,143 4,687,958 325,815 - - 325,815 4,362,143 $ 4,527,205 $ - $ 69,708 $ - $ 4,596,912 Farmersville(1) 246,458 242,487 (3,971) - - - (3,971) 246,458 $ 255,784 $ - $ - $ (850) $ 254,934 Forney 891,245 1,059,328 168,083 - - 168,083 891,245 $ 924,969 $ - $ 35,961 $ - $ 960,930 Frisco 5,645,797 6,467,274 821,477 - - 821,477 5,645,797 $ 5,859,431 $ - $ 175,754 $ - $ 6,035,185 Garland(1) 12,904,220 12,435,423 (468,797) - - - (468,797) 12,904,220 $ 13,392,510 $ - $ - $ (100,298) $ 13,292,212 McKinney 6,582,712 7,166,992 584,280 - - 584,280 6,582,712 $ 6,831,799 $ - $ 125,006 $ - $ 6,956,805 Mesquite 6,041,180 4,885,178 (1,156,002) - - - (1,156,002) 6,041,180 $ 6,269,776 $ - $ - $ (247,325) $ 6,022,451 Mesquite#3(2) 2,031,764 B 1,351,516 (680,248) 2,256,486 c - - - 2,031,764 $ 2,108,645 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,108,645 Plano(1) 22,745,013 22,432,203 (312,810) - - - (312,810) 22,745,013 $ 23,605,674 $ - $ - $ (66,925) $ 23,538,749 Princeton(1) 289,199 337,039 47,840 - - 47,840 - 289,199 $ 300,142 $ - $ 10,235 $ - $ 310,377 Richardson(1) 10,135,415 8,553,732 (1,581,683) - - - (1,581,683) 10,135,415 $ 10,518,935 $ - $ - $ (338,399) $ 10,180,536 Rockwall 2,332,266 2,471,592 139,326 - - 139,326 - 2,332,266 $ 2,420,518 $ - $ 29,809 $ - $ 2,450,326 Royse City 327,863 338,437 10,574 - - 10,574 - 327,863 $ 340,269 $ - $ 2,262 $ - $ 342,531 Wylie 1,266,615 1,387,214 120,599 - - 120,599 - 1,266,615 $ 1,314,543 $ - $ 25,802 $ - $ 1,340,345 Total 75,801,890 73,816,373 (1,985,517) - 2,217,994 (3,523,263) 75,801,890 $ 78,670,199 $ - $ 474,536 $ (753,796) $ 78,390,939 Customers $ 1.088 $ 1.088 $ 0.264 $ 0.214 Caddo Basin(1) 245,280 240,325 (4,955) - - - (4,955) 245,280 $ 266,825 $ - $ - $ (1,060) $ 265,765 Cash SUD A 257,909 256,282 (1,627) - - - - 257,909 $ 280,564 $ - $ - $ - $ 280,564 College Mound WSC(1) A 62,017 9,825 (52,192) - - - - 62,017 $ 67,465 $ - $ - $ - $ 67,465 Copeville WSC 73,935 66,320 (7,615) 113,866.6 c - - (7,615) 73,935 $ 80,429 $ - $ - $ (1,629) $ 78,800 East Fork SUD 202,927 221,755 18,828 280,831 c 18,828 - - 202,927 $ 220,752 $ 20,482 $ - $ - $ 241,234 Fairview 420,325 478,582 58,257 - - 58,257 - 420,325 $ 457,246 $ - $ 15,377 $ - $ 472,623 Fate 113,197 155,139 41,942 - - 41,942 - 113,197 $ 123,140 $ - $ 11,071 $ - $ 134,211 Forney Lake WSC(2) 171,795 B 164,447 (7,348) 227,800 c - - - 171,795 $ 186,885 $ - $ - $ - $ 186,885 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 101,254 107,566 6,312 - - 6,312 - 101,254 $ 110,148 $ - $ 1,666 $ - $ 111,814 Josephine 40,978 41,031 53 45,400 c 53 - - 40,978 $ 44,577 $ 58 $ - $ - $ 44,635 Kaufman 419,999 409,164 (10,835) - - - (10,835) 419,999 $ 456,892 $ - $ - $ (2,318) $ 454,573 Kaufman Four One A 396,336 382,065 (14,271) - - - - 396,336 $ 431,150 $ - $ - $ - $ 431,150 Lavon WSC(2) 142,389 B 148,610 6,221 142,389 c - 6,221 - 142,389 $ 154,896 $ - $ 1,642 $ - $ 156,538 Little Elm 504,167 610,479 106,312 - - 106,312 - 504,167 $ 548,453 $ - $ 28,061 $ - $ 576,514 Lucas 301,984 308,034 6,050 - - 6,050 - 301,984 $ 328,510 $ - $ 1,597 $ - $ 330,107 Lucas#3 - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Melissa(2) 73,000 B 86,408 13,408 73,000 c - 13,408 - 73,000 $ 79,412 $ - $ 3,539 $ - $ 82,951 Milligan WSC 149,894 128,680 (21,214) 155,938 c - - (21,214) 149,894 $ 163,061 $ - $ - $ (4,539) $ 158,522 Mt.Zion WSC(1) 108,816 108,196 (620) - - - (620) 108,816 $ 118,374 $ - $ - $ (133) $ 118,242 Murphy 792,811 906,941 114,130 - - 114,130 - 792,811 $ 862,451 $ - $ 30,124 $ - $ 892,576 Nevada WSC 71,813 68,787 (3,026) - - - (3,026) 71,813 $ 78,121 $ - $ - $ (647) $ 77,474 North Collin WSC(1) 284,428 290,010 5,582 300,000 c 5,582 - - 284,428 $ 309,412 $ 6,072 $ - $ - $ 315,484 Parker 344,660 392,852 48,192 - - 48,192 - 344,660 $ 374,935 $ - $ 12,720 $ - $ 387,655 Prosper'2) 236,575 B 95,406 (141,169) 236,575 c - - - 275,000 $ 299,156 $ - $ - $ - $ 299,156 Rose Hill WSC(1) A 40,056 12,847 (27,209) 48,000 c - - - 40,056 $ 43,575 $ - $ - $ - $ 43,575 Rowlett(1) 2,772,637 2,734,709 (37,928) 4,051,017 c - - (37,928) 2,772,637 $ 3,016,184 $ - $ - $ (8,115) $ 3,008,070 Sachse 762,689 611,056 (151,633) - - - (151,633) 762,689 $ 829,683 $ - $ - $ (32,442) $ 797,242 Sachse#2(2) 388,403 B 385,477 (2,926) 522,585 c - - - 388,403 $ 422,520 $ - $ - $ - $ 422,520 Seis Lagos MUD(1) 76,473 71,594 (4,879) - - - (4,879) 76,473 $ 83,190 $ - $ - $ (1,044) $ 82,146 Sunnyvale(1) 376,311 391,036 14,725 910,969 c 14,725 - - 376,311 $ 409,366 $ 16,018 $ - $ - $ 425,384 Wylie NE WSC(1) 120,048 143,816 23,768 - - 23,768 - 120,048 $ 130,593 $ - $ 6,274 $ - $ 136,866 Total 10,053,106 10,027,439 (25,667) 39,188 424,592 (242,705) 10,091,531 $ 10,977,967 $ 42,630 $ 112,070 $ (51,926) $ 11,080,741 Total 85,854,996 83,843,812 (2,011,184) 39,188 2,642,586 (3,765,968) 85,893,421 $ 89,648,166 $ 42,630 $ 586,607 $ (805,723) $ 89,471,680 Notes: Revenue Requirement $ 88,269,230 (1)Eligible for adjustment to Minimum Annual Demand (2)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract Over/(Under)Recovery $ 1,202,450 (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met Appendix B Page 7 of 8 North Texas Municipal Water District Method 2-Determination of 2006 Annual Minimum 2003 2004 2005 2006 Annual Actual Annual Actual Annual Actual Annual Minimum Consumption Variance Minimum Consumption Variance Minimum Consumption Variance Minimum (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) Minimum Minimum Minimum Allen 3,952,728 4,124,397 171,669 4,124,397 4,362,143 237,746 4,362,143 4,687,958 325,815 4,687,958 Farmersville 290,608 225,417 =r -9-, 290,608 246,458 ( ,- , 246,458 242,487 (3,9 £) See Note 1 Forney 743,504 788,921 45,417 788,921 891,245 102,324 891,245 1,059,328 168,083 1,059,328 Frisco 4,394,752 5,607,266 1,212,514 5,607,266 5,645,797 38,531 5,645,797 6,467,274 821,477 6,467,274 Garland 13,660,013 12,904,220 `_' 13,660,013 12,612,613 1-CLTLEC, 12,904,220 12,435,423 VE5,797, See Note 1 McKinney 5,748,746 6,350,897 602,151 6,350,897 6,582,712 231,815 6,582,712 7,166,992 584,280 7,166,992 Mesquite 6,041,180 5,575,688 (LEE L92, 6,041,180 4,814,443 ( 22_,7 7 6,041,180 4,885,178 -,-EE,CC2, I 5,575,688 Mesquite#3 1,881,950 1,170,130 7'' 1,956,857 1,597,147 c f 2,031,764 1,351,516 c 7t See Note 3 Plano 26,719,809 22,745,013 (3 97 g 26,719,809 22,149,517 IL,573292, 22,745,013 22,432,203 -2, t See Note 1 Princeton 328,803 287,581 L',E222 328,803 289,199 (3999C , 289,199 337,039 47,840 See Note 1 Richardson 11,019,311 10,135,415 (333 11,019,311 9,532,442 ( 10,135,415 8,553,732 (- 9983, See Note 1 Rockwall 2,188,525 2,234,227 45,702 2,234,227 2,332,266 98,039 2,332,266 2,471,592 139,326 2,471,592 Royse City 277,416 286,471 9,055 286,471 327,863 41,392 327,863 338,437 10,574 338,437 Wylie 907,331 1,042,381 135,050 1,042,381 1,266,615 224,234 1,266,615 1,387,214 120,599 1,387,214 Caddo Basin 252,318 245,280 (7 CS5,' 252,318 223,734 ( 5;954, 245,280 240,325 ,955, See Note 1 Cash SUD 237,267 221,385 .__ 237,267 257,909 20,642 257,909 256,282 (-,E9L9917 257,909 College Mound WSC 66,769 62,017 2 66,769 52,093 (- = _ 62,017 9,825 ,£92, See Note 1 Copeville WSC 65,737 68,468 2,731 68,468 73,935 5,467 73,935 66,320 ( , - ) 73,935 East Fork SUD 183,632 188,012 4,380 188,012 202,927 14,915 202,927 221,755 18,828 221,755 Fairview 364,741 394,901 30,160 394,901 420,325 25,424 420,325 478,582 58,257 478,582 Fate 69,529 77,744 8,215 77,744 113,197 35,453 113,197 155,139 41,942 155,139 Forney Lake WSC 153,126 131,507 (=1._1 9, 153,126 135,370 1 _ 171,795 164,447 17,949, See Note 3 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 80,336 101,254 20,918 101,254 98,508 (2,7 E) 101,254 107,566 6,312 107,566 Josephine 40,978 33,301 ._ 40,978 38,203 (2,77E, 40,978 41,031 53 41,031 Kaufman 419,999 392,227 127 772, 419,999 419,659 04,, 419,999 409,164 E(9,535, I 419,659 Kaufman Four One 396,327 356,603 139,72L, 396,327 396,336 9 396,336 382,065 (- 2 -) 396,336 Lavon WSC 142,389 124,858 (17 1 142,389 141,538 (SE-,-, 142,389 148,610 6,221 148,610 Little Elm 210,964 368,734 157,770 368,734 504,167 135,433 504,167 610,479 106,312 See Note 3 Lucas 337,693 271,766 1 -927 271,766 301,984 30,218 301,984 308,034 6,050 See Note 2 Melissa 48,664 32,160 (1 50 73,000 59,467 (1 5 ) 73,000 86,408 13,408 86,408 Milligan WSC 121,388 149,894 28,506 149,894 127,646 (22,2L93) 149,894 128,680 (91,21 L, 149,894 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 100,946 12 5Lc, 125,486 108,816 (- £4_ 108,816 108,196 1629, See Note 1 Murphy 496,860 655,870 159,010 655,870 792,811 136,941 792,811 906,941 114,130 906,941 Nevada WSC 69,001 71,043 2,042 71,043 71,813 770 71,813 68,787 (3,925, See Note 3 North Collin WSC 287,568 274,347 )1 1 287,568 284,428 "=,1 : 284,428 290,010 5,582 See Note 1 Parker 228,969 306,201 77,232 306,201 344,660 38,459 344,660 392,852 48,192 392,852 Prosper 236,575 95,406 - £,£9, See Note 3 Rose Hill WSC 43,271 16,160 `.111 43,271 7,689 (35,552, `2, 40,056 12,847 ( , ;9, See Note 1 Rowlett 2,920,333 2,772,637 g � � '._ _ 2,920,333 2,772,411 1 ,�=$��=$, 2 772 637 2,734,709 (`_ ,c t See Note 1 Sachse 724,857 612,776 12-}=1 724,857 762,689 37,832 762,689 611,056 (1 _€==-t 762,689 Sachse#2 130,646 388,403 257,757 388,403 194,171 (-94,232, 388,403 385,477 _, 2E, See Note 3 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 74,712 (E.CC ' 82,719 76,473 (E,2iitE, 76,473 71,594 (49579, See Note 1 Sunnyvale 439,743 362,405 €=€= 439,743 376,311 )_`_, `_ ) 376,311 391,036 14,725 See Note 1 Wylie NE WSC 130,896 118,559 (1 .€_€_ 130,896 120,048 (-C,399 120,048 143,816 23,768 See Note 1 Notes: (1)Received Adjustment to Minimum Annual Demand in 2005.Eligible for Adjustment again in 2008 (2)Received Adjustement to Minimum Annual Demand in 2004. Eligble for Adjustment again in 2007 (3)Ineligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix B Page 8 of 8 Method 2- 2006 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY06 Excess Rate FY 06 FY 06 FY 06 Wtr Yr 06 Wtr Yr 06 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 06 Annual Full Excess FY 06 FY 06 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 1.027 $ 1.027 $ 0.243 $ 0.243 Allen 4,687,958 5,588,259 900,301 - - 900,301 - 4,687,958 $ 4,812,781.87 $ - $ 219,139.95 $ - $ 5,031,921.82 Farmersville 246,458 280,467 34,009 - - 34,009 - 246,458 $ 253,020.31 $ - $ 8,278.04 $ - $ 261,298.35 Forney 1,059,328 1,416,868 357,540 - - 357,540 - 1,059,328 $ 1,087,534.19 $ - $ 87,027.89 $ - $ 1,174,562.08 Frisco 6,467,274 7,918,529 1,451,255 - - 1,451,255 - 6,467,274 $ 6,639,474.81 $ - $ 353,246.24 $ - $ 6,992,721.05 Frisco#2(2) 3,116 B 419,410 416,294 12,465 c 9,349 406,945 - 5,650 $ 5,800.44 $ 9,597.93 $ 99,053.44 $ - $ 114,451.81 Garland 12,904,220 13,721,955 817,735 - - 817,735 - 12,904,220 $ 13,247,814.08 $ - $ 199,042.77 $ - $ 13,446,856.86 McKinney 7,166,992 8,385,134 1,218,142 - - 1,218,142 - 7,166,992 $ 7,357,823.84 $ - $ 296,504.81 $ - $ 7,654,328.65 McKinney#3(2) 171,228 B 350,012 178,784 684,910 c 178,784 - - 228,303 $ 234,381.91 $ 183,544.39 $ - $ - $ 417,926.30 Mesquite') 5,575,688 5,756,029 180,341 - - 180,341 - 5,575,688 $ 5,724,149.00 $ - $ 43,896.34 $ - $ 5,768,045.34 Mesquite#3(2) 2,106,671 a 1,359,175 (747,496) 2,256,486 c - - - 2,106,671 $ 2,162,764.25 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,162,764.25 Plano 22,745,013 26,265,050 3,520,037 - - 3,520,037 - 22,745,013 $ 23,350,632.86 $ - $ 856,803.15 $ - $ 24,207,436.01 Princeton 337,039 409,624 72,585 - - 72,585 - 337,039 $ 346,013.17 $ - $ 17,667.73 $ - $ 363,680.89 Richardson 10,135,415 10,050,090 (85,325) - - - (85,325) 10,135,415 $ 10,405,285.53 $ - $ - $ (20,768.74) $ 10,384,516.79 Rockwall 2,471,592 3,284,236 812,644 - - 812,644 - 2,471,592 $ 2,537,401.82 $ - $ 197,803.58 $ - $ 2,735,205.40 Royse City 338,437 470,150 131,713 - - 131,713 - 338,437 $ 347,448.39 $ - $ 32,059.92 $ - $ 379,508.31 Wylie 1,387,214 1,721,763 334,549 - - 334,549 - 1,387,214 $ 1,424,150.64 $ - $ 81,431.71 $ - $ 1,505,582.35 Total 77,803,643 87,396,751 9,593,108 188,133 10,237,796 (85,325) 77,863,252 $ 79,936,477.09 $ 193,142.32 $ 2,491,955.57 $ (20,768.74) $ 82,600,806.25 Customers $ 1.077 $ 1.077 $ 0.293 $ 0.243 Caddo Basin SUD 245,280 293,451 48,171 - - 48,171 - 245,280 $ 264,074.95 $ - $ 14,133.73 $ - $ 278,208.67 Cash SUD A 257,909 305,643 47,734 - - 47,734 - 257,909 $ 277,671.66 $ - $ 14,005.51 $ - $ 291,677.17 College Mound WSC A 62,017 62,710 693 - - 693 - 62,017 $ 66,769.15 $ - $ 203.33 $ - $ 66,972.48 Copeville WSC 73,935 77,927 3,992 113,866.6 c 3,992 - - 73,935 $ 79,600.38 $ 4,297.89 $ - $ - $ 83,898.27 East Fork SUD 221,755 324,226 102,471 280,831 c 59,076 43,395 - 221,755 $ 238,747.31 $ 63,602.79 $ 12,732.42 $ - $ 315,082.51 Fairview 478,582 721,185 242,603 - - 242,603 - 478,582 $ 515,254.06 $ - $ 71,181.52 $ - $ 586,435.58 Fate 155,139 279,932 124,793 - - 124,793 - 155,139 $ 167,026.76 $ - $ 36,615.19 $ - $ 203,641.95 Fate#2 - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Forney Lake WSC(2) 182,996 B 295,577 112,581 227,800 c 44,804 67,777 - 182,996 $ 197,018.34 $ 48,237.17 $ 19,886.28 $ - $ 265,141.79 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 107,566 107,875 309 - - 309 - 107,566 $ 115,808.41 $ - $ 90.66 $ - $ 115,899.07 Josephine 41,031 57,407 16,376 45,400 c 4,369 12,007 - 41,031 $ 44,175.06 $ 4,703.78 $ 3,522.94 $ - $ 52,401.79 Kaufman(1) 419,659 438,403 18,744 - - 18,744 - 419,659 $ 451,816.00 $ - $ 5,499.63 $ - $ 457,315.62 Kaufman Four One A 396,336 450,363 54,027 - - 54,027 - 396,336 $ 426,705.84 $ - $ 15,851.92 $ - $ 442,557.76 Lavon WSC 148,610 217,256 68,646 - - 68,646 - 148,610 $ 159,997.46 $ - $ 20,141.25 $ - $ 180,138.71 Little Elm-Interim(2) 559,606 925,163 365,557 - - 365,557 - 457,859 $ 492,943.13 $ - $ 107,257.14 $ - $ 600,200.27 Little Elm-Permanent(2) 51,667 B 107,415 55,748 162,917 c 55,748 - - 155,000 $ 166,877.11 $ 60,019.77 $ - $ - $ 226,896.88 Lucas 308,034 212,681 (95,353) - - - (95,353) 308,034 $ 331,637.56 $ - $ - $ (23,209.63) $ 308,427.94 Lucas#3(2) 63,969 B 290,897 226,928 255,878 c 191,909 35,019 - 63,969 $ 68,870.72 $ 206,614.31 $ 10,274.83 $ - $ 285,759.87 Melissa 86,408 135,737 49,329 - - 49,329 - 86,408 $ 93,029.14 $ - $ 14,473.49 $ - $ 107,502.64 Milligan WSC 149,894 147,744 (2,150) 155,938 c - - (2,150) 149,894 $ 161,379.85 $ - $ - $ (523.33) $ 160,856.53 Mt.Zion WSC 108,816 159,302 50,486 - - 50,486 - 108,816 $ 117,154.19 $ - $ 14,812.97 $ - $ 131,967.16 Murphy 906,941 1,193,806 286,865 1,145,000 c 238,059 48,806 - 906,941 $ 976,436.71 $ 256,300.63 $ 14,320.04 $ - $ 1,247,057.37 Nevada WSC 45,802 56,413 10,611 - - 10,611 - 38,969 $ 41,955.06 $ - $ 3,113.35 $ - $ 45,068.40 Nevada WSC#2 30,766 31,766 1,000 44,925 c 1,000 - - 38,849 $ 41,825.86 $ 1,076.63 $ - $ - $ 42,902.49 North Collin WSC 290,010 318,780 28,770 300,000 c 9,990 18,780 - 290,010 $ 312,232.45 $ 10,755.50 $ 5,510.19 $ - $ 328,498.14 Parker 392,852 470,812 77,960 - - 77,960 - 392,852 $ 422,954.87 $ - $ 22,874.04 $ - $ 445,828.91 Prosper(2) 275,000 B 208,182 (66,818) 275,000 c - - - 275,000 $ 296,072.28 $ - $ - $ - $ 296,072.28 Rose Hill SUD A 40,056 42,818 2,762 48,000 c 2,762 - - 40,056 $ 43,125.35 $ 2,973.64 $ - $ - $ 46,098.99 Rowlett 2,772,637 3,192,039 419,402 4,051,017 c 419,402 - - 2,772,637 $ 2,985,094.44 $ 451,539.30 $ - $ - $ 3,436,633.74 Sachse 762,689 734,691 (27,998) - - - (27,998) 762,689 $ 821,131.18 $ - $ - $ (6,814.92) $ 814,316.26 Sachse#2(2) 388,403 a 431,099 42,696 522,585 c 42,696 - - 388,403 $ 418,164.96 $ 45,967.64 $ - $ - $ 464,132.60 Seis Lagos MUD 76,473 111,094 34,621 - - 34,621 - 76,473 $ 82,332.86 $ - $ 10,158.06 $ - $ 92,490.92 Sunnyvale 391,036 559,135 168,099 910,969 c 168,099 - - 391,036 $ 420,999.72 $ 180,979.84 $ - $ - $ 601,979.55 Wylie NE SUD 143,816 197,289 53,473 - - 53,473 - 143,816 $ 154,836.12 $ - $ 15,689.38 $ - $ 170,525.49 Total 10,635,690 13,158,818 2,523,128 1,241,906 1,473,541 (125,501) 10,638,526 $ 11,453,718.91 $1,337,068.90 $ 432,347.87 $ (30,547.88) $ 13,192,587.80 Total 88,439,333 100,555,569 12,116,236 1,430,039 11,711,337 (210,826) 88,501,778 $ 91,390,196.00 $1,530,211.22 $ 2,924,303.45 $ (51,316.61) $ 95,793,394 Notes: Revenue Requirement 93,929,340 (1)Eligible for adjustment to Minimum Annual Demand (2)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract Over/(Under)Recovery $ 1,864,054 (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met Appendix C Page of North Texas Municipal Water Method 3 ~ Determination of 2003 Annual Minimum 2000 2001 2002 2003 Actual Actual Actual Annual Consumption Consumption Consumption Minimum (1.000gm|.) (1.000gm|.) (1.000gm|.) Members Allen 31331^824 31952^728 31699^752 31661^435 FannersviUe 270^005 290^608 228^235 262^949 Forney 662^542 743^504 658^408 688^151 Frisco 31199^458 43125^696 41394^752 31906^635 Garland 13^152^152 13^660^013 12^051^601 12^954^589 McKinney 41832^225 51748^746 51689^078 51423^350 Mesquite 71582^774 73798^284 61550^839 See Note 1 Plano 23^822^845 26^719^809 223459^418 24^334^024 Princeton 303^432 328^803 278^431 303^555 Richardson 10^461^O74 11,019,311 91773^780 10^418^055 Rockwall 11854,564 23188^525 11876,570 11973,220 Royae City 248^799 2773416 2573149 2613121 Wylie 764^087 907^331 816^417 829^278 Customers Caddo Basin 191,657 252^318 197^652 213^876 CaahVVSC 228^754 2373267 211^830 225^950 College Mound WSC 473463 66^769 56^135 56^789 CopeviUe VVSC 54^675 65^478 65^737 61^963 East Fork VVSC 180^316 183^632 150^055 171^334 Fairview 328^592 3643741 3523745 348^693 Fate 45^866 65^173 69^529 60^189 Forney Lake VVSC 137^008 153^126 1123745 1343293 Gaaonia'Scurry VVSC 70^764 78^397 80^336 76^499 Josephine 28^414 32^879 40^978 34^090 Kaufman 374^829 406^317 419^999 400^382 Kaufman Four One 3273291 396^327 337,611 353^743 LavonVVSC 115^308 130^385 96^660 See Note 1 Little Elm 84^889 210^964 147^927 Lucas 145^973 118^740 243^856 169^523 Lucua No 2 120^61 1 1913720 156^166 Milligan VVSC 116,195 121,388 115,787 1173790 Mt. Zion VVSC 1143498 125^486 973279 1123421 Murphy 2273701 371^527 496^860 365^363 Nevada WSC 64^318 69^001 66^189 66^503 North Collin WSC 2723432 287^568 245^779 268^593 Parker 2043433 211^304 228^969 214^902 Rose Hill VVSC 33^378 43^271 40^056 38^902 Rowlett 21564^479 21920^333 21564^207 21683^006 Sachae 584^301 724^857 5213439 610^199 Seis Lagoa MUD 75^227 823719 60^814 72^920 Sunnyvale 323^191 439^743 314^893 359^276 Wylie NE VVSC 115,831 130^896 87^351 111,359 Notes: (1) |meligble for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix C Page 2 of 8 Method 3-2003 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 03 FY 03 FY 03 Wtr Yr 03 Wtr Yr 03 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 03 Annual Full Excess FY 03 FY 03 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.939 $ 0.939 $ 0.216 $ 0.216 Allen 3,661,435 4,124,397 462,962 - - 462,962 3,661,435 $ 3,437,240 $ - $ 99,839 $ - $ 3,537,078 Farmersville 262,949 225,417 (37,532) - - - (37,532) 262,949 $ 246,849 $ - $ - $ (8,094) $ 238,755 Forney 688,151 788,921 100,770 - - 100,770 688,151 $ 646,015 $ - $ 21,731 $ - $ 667,746 Frisco 3,906,635 5,607,266 1,700,631 - - 1,700,631 3,906,635 $ 3,667,426 $ - $ 366,744 $ - $ 4,034,170 Garland 12,954,589 12,904,220 (50,369) - - - (50,369) 12,954,589 $ 12,161,361 $ - $ - $ (10,862) $ 12,150,499 McKinney 5,423,350 6,350,897 927,547 - - 927,547 5,423,350 $ 5,091,270 $ - $ 200,027 $ - $ 5,291,297 Mesquite 6,041,180 5,575,688 (465,492) - - - (465,492) 6,041,180 $ 5,671,270 $ - $ - $ (100,384) $ 5,570,886 Mesquite#3(1) 1,881,950 B 1,170,130 (711,820) 2,256,486 c - - - 1,881,950 $ 1,766,716 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,766,716 Plano 24,334,024 22,745,013 (1,589,011) - - - (1,589,011) 24,334,024 $ 22,844,017 $ - $ - $ (342,673) $ 22,501,344 Princeton 303,555 287,581 (15,974) - - - (15,974) 303,555 $ 284,968 $ - $ - $ (3,445) $ 281,523 Richardson 10,418,055 10,135,415 (282,640) - - - (282,640) 10,418,055 $ 9,780,143 $ - $ - $ (60,952) $ 9,719,191 Rockwall 1,973,220 2,234,227 261,007 - - 261,007 - 1,973,220 $ 1,852,397 $ - $ 56,287 $ - $ 1,908,683 Royse City 261,121 286,471 25,350 - - 25,350 - 261,121 $ 245,133 $ - $ 5,467 $ - $ 250,599 Wylie 829,278 1,042,381 213,103 - - 213,103 - 829,278 $ 778,500 $ - $ 45,956 $ - $ 824,456 Total 72,939,493 73,478,024 538,531 - 3,691,370 (2,441,018) 72,939,493 $ 68,473,304 $ - $ 796,050 $ (526,410) $ 68,742,944 Customers $ 0.989 $ 0.989 $ 0.266 $ 0.216 Caddo Basin 213,876 245,280 31,404 - - 31,404 - 213,876 $ 211,474 $ - $ 8,343 $ - $ 219,816 Cash SUD A 225,950 221,385 (4,565) - - - - 225,950 $ 223,413 $ - $ - $ - $ 223,413 College Mound WSC A 56,789 62,017 5,228 - - 5,228 - 56,789 $ 56,151 $ - $ 1,389 $ - $ 57,540 Copeville WSC 61,963 68,468 6,505 113,866.6 c 6,505 - - 61,963 $ 61,267 $ 6,432 $ - $ - $ 67,699 East Fork SUD 171,334 188,012 16,678 280,831 c 16,678 - - 171,334 $ 169,410 $ 16,490 $ - $ - $ 185,900 Fairview 348,693 394,901 46,208 - - 46,208 - 348,693 $ 344,776 $ - $ 12,275 $ - $ 357,052 Fate 60,189 77,744 17,555 - - 17,555 - 60,189 $ 59,513 $ - $ 4,663 $ - $ 64,177 Forney Lake WSC 134,293 131,507 (2,786) - - - (2,786) 134,293 $ 132,785 $ - $ - $ (601) $ 132,184 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 76,499 101,254 24,755 - - 24,755 - 76,499 $ 75,640 $ - $ 6,576 $ - $ 82,216 Josephine 34,090 33,301 (789) 45,400 c - - (789) 34,090 $ 33,707 $ - $ - $ (170) $ 33,537 Kaufman 400,382 392,227 (8,155) - - - (8,155) 400,382 $ 395,885 $ - $ - $ (1,759) $ 394,126 Kaufman Four One A 353,743 356,603 2,860 - - 2,860 - 353,743 $ 349,770 $ - $ 760 $ - $ 350,530 Lavon WSC(1) 142,389 B 124,858 (17,531) 142,389 c - - - 142,389 $ 140,790 $ - $ - $ - $ 140,790 Little Elm 147,927 368,734 220,808 - - 220,808 - 147,927 $ 146,265 $ - $ 58,658 $ - $ 204,923 Lucas 169,523 271,766 102,243 - - 102,243 - 169,523 $ 167,619 $ - $ 27,161 $ - $ 194,780 Melissa(1) 48,664 B 32,160 (16,504) 73,000 c - - - 60,833 $ 60,150 $ - $ - $ - $ 60,150 Milligan WSC 117,790 149,894 32,104 155,938 c 32,104 - - 117,790 $ 116,467 $ 31,743 $ - $ - $ 148,210 Mt.Zion WSC 112,421 100,946 (11,475) - - - (11,475) 112,421 $ 111,158 $ - $ - $ (2,475) $ 108,684 Murphy 365,363 655,870 290,507 - - 290,507 - 365,363 $ 361,259 $ - $ 77,174 $ - $ 438,433 Nevada WSC 66,503 71,043 4,540 - - 4,540 - 66,503 $ 65,756 $ - $ 1,206 $ - $ 66,962 North Collin WSC 268,593 274,347 5,754 300,000 c 5,754 - - 268,593 $ 265,576 $ 5,689 $ - $ - $ 271,266 Parker 214,902 306,201 91,299 - - 91,299 - 214,902 $ 212,488 $ - $ 24,254 $ - $ 236,742 Rose Hill WSC A 38,902 16,160 (22,742) 48,000 c - - - 38,902 $ 38,465 $ - $ - $ - $ 38,465 Rowlett 2,683,006 2,772,637 89,631 4,051,017 c 89,631 - - 2,683,006 $ 2,652,872 $ 88,624 $ - $ - $ 2,741,496 Sachse 610,199 612,776 2,577 - - 2,577 - 610,199 $ 603,346 $ - $ 685 $ - $ 604,030 Sachse#2(1) 130,646 B 388,403 257,757 522,585 c 257,757 - - 130,646 $ 129,179 $ 254,862 $ - $ - $ 384,041 Seis Lagos MUD 72,920 74,712 1,792 - - 1,792 - 72,920 $ 72,101 $ - $ 476 $ - $ 72,577 Sunnyvale 359,276 362,405 3,129 910,969 c 3,129 - - 359,276 $ 355,240 $ 3,094 $ - $ - $ 358,335 Wylie NE WSC 111,359 118,559 7,200 - - 7,200 - 111,359 $ 110,109 $ - $ 1,913 $ - $ 112,021 Total 7,798,184 8,974,170 1,175,987 411,557 848,976 (23,205) 7,810,353 $ 7,722,631 $ 406,935 $ 225,532 $ (5,004) $ 8,350,094 Total 80,737,676 82,452,194 1,714,518 411,557 4,540,346 (2,464,223) 80,749,845 $ 76,195,935 $ 406,935 $ 1,021,582 $ (531,414) $ 77,093,038 Revenue Requirement $ 75,674,582 Notes: (1)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract Over/(Under)Recovery $ 1,418,456 (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met Appendix C Page 3 of 8 North Texas Municipal Water District Method 3 - Determination of 2004 Annual Minimum 2002 2002 2003 2004 Actual Actual Actual Annual Consumption Consumption Consumption Minimum (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) Members Allen 3,952,728 3,699,752 4,124,397 3,925,626 Farmersville 290,608 228,235 225,417 248,087 Forney 743,504 658,408 788,921 730,278 Frisco 4,125,696 4,394,752 5,607,266 4,709,238 Garland 13,660,013 12,051,601 12,904,220 12,871,945 McKinney 5,748,746 5,689,078 6,350,897 5,929,574 Mesquite 7,798,284 6,550,839 5,575,688 6,641,604 Mesquite#3 1,170,130 See Note 1 Plano 26,719,809 22,459,418 22,745,013 23,974,747 Princeton 328,803 278,431 287,581 298,272 Richardson 11,019,311 9,773,780 10,135,415 10,309,502 Rockwall 2,188,525 1,876,570 2,234,227 2,099,774 Royse City 277,416 257,149 286,471 273,679 Wylie 907,331 816,417 1,042,381 922,043 Customers Caddo Basin 252,318 197,652 245,280 231,750 Cash WSC 237,267 211,830 221,385 223,494 College Mound WSC 66,769 56,135 62,017 61,640 Copeville WSC 65,478 65,737 68,468 66,561 East Fork SUD 183,632 150,055 188,012 173,900 Fairview 364,741 352,745 394,901 370,796 Fate 65,173 69,529 77,744 70,815 Forney Lake WSC 153,126 112,745 131,507 See Note 1 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 78,397 80,336 101,254 86,662 Josephine 32,879 40,978 33,301 35,719 Kaufman 406,317 419,999 392,227 406,181 Kaufman Four One 396,327 337,611 356,603 363,514 Lavon WSC 130,385 96,660 124,858 See Note 1 Little Elm 84,889 210,964 368,734 221,529 Lucas 118,740 243,856 271,766 211,454 Lucus No 2 191,720 191,720 Melissa 32,160 See Note 1 Milligan WSC 121,388 115,787 149,894 129,023 Mt. Zion WSC 125,486 97,279 100,946 107,904 Murphy 371,527 496,860 655,870 508,086 Nevada WSC 69,001 66,189 71,043 68,744 North Collin WSC 287,568 245,779 274,347 269,231 Parker 211,304 228,969 306,201 248,825 Rose Hill WSC 43,271 40,056 16,160 33,162 Rowlett 2,920,333 2,564,207 2,772,637 2,752,392 Sachse 724,857 521,439 612,776 619,691 Sachse#2 62,697 388,403 See Note 1 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 60,814 74,712 72,748 Sunnyvale 439,743 314,893 362,405 372,347 Wylie NE WSC 130,896 87,351 118,559 112,269 Notes: (1) lneligble for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix C Page 4 of 8 Method 3-2004 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 04 FY 04 FY 04 Wtr Yr 04 Wtr Yr 04 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 04 Annual Full Excess FY 04 FY 04 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.977 $ 0.977 $ 0.212 $ 0.212 Allen 3,925,626 4,362,143 436,517 - - 436,517 3,925,626 $ 3,834,670.40 $ - $ 92,644.38 $ - $ 3,927,314.78 Farmersville 248,087 246,458 (1,629) - - - (1,629) 248,087 $ 242,338.59 $ - $ - $ (345.66) $ 241,992.93 Forney 730,278 891,245 160,967 - - 160,967 730,278 $ 713,357.41 $ - $ 34,162.95 $ - $ 747,520.36 Frisco 4,709,238 5,645,797 936,559 - - 936,559 4,709,238 $ 4,600,126.73 $ - $ 198,770.87 $ - $ 4,798,897.60 Garland 12,871,945 12,612,613 (259,332) - - - (259,332) 12,871,945 $ 12,573,706.57 $ - $ - $ (55,039.33) $ 12,518,667.24 McKinney 5,929,574 6,582,712 653,138 - - 653,138 5,929,574 $ 5,792,187.68 $ - $ 138,619.00 $ - $ 5,930,806.68 Mesquite 6,641,604 4,814,443 (1,827,161) - - - (1,827,161) 6,641,604 $ 6,487,720.22 $ - $ - $ (387,787.96) $ 6,099,932.25 Mesquite#3(1) 1,956,857 B 1,597,147 (359,710) 2,256,486 c - - - 1,956,857 $ 1,911,517.36 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,911,517.36 Plano 23,974,747 22,149,517 (1,825,230) - - - (1,825,230) 23,974,747 $ 23,419,260.84 $ - $ - $ (387,378.14) $ 23,031,882.70 Princeton 298,272 289,199 (9,073) - - - (9,073) 298,272 $ 291,360.82 $ - $ - $ (1,925.54) $ 289,435.28 Richardson 10,309,502 9,532,442 (777,060) - - - (777,060) 10,309,502 $ 10,070,634.73 $ - $ - $ (164,919.55) $ 9,905,715.18 Rockwall 2,099,774 2,332,266 232,492 - - 232,492 - 2,099,774 $ 2,051,123.03 $ - $ 49,343.01 $ - $ 2,100,466.04 Royse City 273,679 327,863 54,184 - - 54,184 - 273,679 $ 267,337.64 $ - $ 11,499.83 $ - $ 278,837.46 Wylie 922,043 1,266,615 344,572 - - 344,572 - 922,043 $ 900,679.61 $ - $ 73,130.34 $ - $ 973,809.95 Total 74,891,223 72,650,460 (2,240,763) - 2,818,430 (4,699,483) 74,891,223 $ 73,156,021.64 $ - $ 598,170.36 $ (997,396.18) $ 72,756,795.83 Customers $ 1.027 $ 1.027 $ 0.262 $ 0.212 Caddo Basin 231,750 223,734 (8,016) - - - (8,016) 231,750 $ 237,967.94 $ - $ - $ (1,701.28) $ 236,266.66 Cash SUD A 223,494 257,909 34,415 - - 34,415 - 223,494 $ 229,490.43 $ - $ 9,024.83 $ - $ 238,515.26 College Mound WSC A 61,640 52,093 (9,547) - - - - 61,640 $ 63,294.17 $ - $ - $ - $ 63,294.17 Copeville WSC 66,561 73,935 7,374 113,866.6 c 7,374 - - 66,561 $ 68,346.86 $ 7,571.85 $ - $ - $ 75,918.70 East Fork SUD 173,900 202,927 29,027 280,831 c 29,027 - - 173,900 $ 178,565.46 $ 29,806.15 $ - $ - $ 208,371.61 Fairview 370,796 420,325 49,529 - - 49,529 - 370,796 $ 380,744.25 $ - $ 12,988.34 $ - $ 393,732.59 Fate 70,815 113,197 42,382 - - 42,382 - 70,815 $ 72,715.34 $ - $ 11,113.97 $ - $ 83,829.30 Forney Lake WSC(1) 153,126 B 135,370 (17,756) 227,800 c - - - 153,126 $ 157,234.43 $ - $ - $ - $ 157,234.43 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 86,662 98,508 11,846 - - 11,846 - 86,662 $ 88,987.52 $ - $ 3,106.35 $ - $ 92,093.87 Josephine 35,719 38,203 2,484 45,400 c 2,484 - - 35,719 $ 36,677.70 $ 2,550.30 $ - $ - $ 39,228.00 Kaufman 406,181 419,659 13,478 - - 13,478 406,181 $ 417,078.99 $ - $ 3,534.41 $ - $ 420,613.40 Kaufman Four One A 363,514 396,336 32,822 - - 32,822 - 363,514 $ 373,266.88 $ - $ 8,607.17 $ - $ 381,874.05 Lavon WSC(1) 142,389 B 141,538 (851) 142,389 c - - - 142,389 $ 146,209.35 $ - $ - $ - $ 146,209.35 Little Elm 221,529 504,167 282,638 - - 282,638 - 221,529 $ 227,472.71 $ - $ 74,117.66 $ - $ 301,590.36 Lucas 211,454 301,984 90,530 - - 90,530 - 211,454 $ 217,127.39 $ - $ 23,740.16 $ - $ 240,867.55 Melissa(1) 73,000 B 59,467 (13,533) 73,000 c - - - 73,000 $ 74,958.62 $ - $ - $ - $ 74,958.62 Milligan WSC 129,023 127,646 (1,377) 155,938 c - - (1,377) 129,023 $ 132,484.74 $ - $ - $ (292.25) $ 132,192.49 Mt.Zion WSC 107,904 108,816 912 - - 912 - 107,904 $ 110,798.76 $ - $ 239.25 $ - $ 111,038.01 Murphy 508,086 792,811 284,725 - - 284,725 - 508,086 $ 521,717.80 $ - $ 74,665.03 $ - $ 596,382.83 Nevada WSC 68,744 71,813 3,069 - - 3,069 - 68,744 $ 70,588.77 $ - $ 804.71 $ - $ 71,393.48 North Collin WSC 269,231 284,428 15,197 300,000 c - 15,197 - 269,231 $ 276,454.91 $ - $ 3,985.10 $ - $ 280,440.01 Parker 248,825 344,660 95,835 - - 95,835 - 248,825 $ 255,500.73 $ - $ 25,131.41 $ - $ 280,632.13 Rose Hill WSC A 33,162 7,689 (25,473) 48,000 c - - - 33,162 $ 34,052.09 $ - $ - $ - $ 34,052.09 Rowlett 2,752,392 2,772,411 20,019 4,051,017 c 20,019 - - 2,752,392 $ 2,826,240.06 $ 20,555.78 $ - $ - $ 2,846,795.83 Sachse 619,691 762,689 142,998 - - 142,998 - 619,691 $ 636,317.20 $ - $ 37,499.21 $ - $ 673,816.41 Sachse#2(1) 388,403 B 194,171 (194,232) 522,585 c - - - 388,403 $ 398,824.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 398,824.00 Seis Lagos MUD 72,748 76,473 3,725 - - 3,725 - 72,748 $ 74,700.20 $ - $ 976.74 $ - $ 75,676.94 Sunnyvale 372,347 376,311 3,964 910,969 c 3,964 - - 372,347 $ 382,337.21 $ 4,070.36 $ - $ - $ 386,407.57 Wylie NE WSC 112,269 120,048 7,779 - - 7,779 - 112,269 $ 115,280.88 $ - $ 2,040.02 $ - $ 117,320.89 Total 8,575,355 9,479,318 903,963 62,868 1,111,881 (9,393) 8,575,355 $ 8,805,435.36 $ 64,554.43 $ 291,574.34 $ (1,993.53) $ 9,159,570.60 Total 83,466,578 82,129,778 (1,336,800) 62,868 3,930,311 (4,708,876) 83,466,578 $ 81,961,457.00 $ 64,554.43 $ 889,744.71 $ (999,389.71) $ 81,916,366.43 Revenue Requirement $ 80,530,795.47 Notes: (1)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract Over/(Under)Recovery $ 1,385,571 (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met Appendix C Page 5 of 8 North Texas Municipal Water District Method 3 - Determination of 2005 Annual Minimum 2002 2003 2004 2005 Actual Actual Actual Annual Consumption Consumption Consumption Minimum (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) Members Allen 3,699,752 4,124,397 4,362,143 4,062,097 Farmersville 228,235 225,417 246,458 233,370 Forney 658,408 788,921 891,245 779,525 Frisco 4,394,752 5,607,266 5,645,797 5,215,938 Garland 12,051,601 12,904,220 12,612,613 12,522,811 McKinney 5,689,078 6,350,897 6,582,712 6,207,562 Mesquite 6,550,839 5,575,688 4,814,443 5,646,990 Mesquite#3 1,170,130 1,597,147 See Note 1 Plano 22,459,418 22,745,013 22,149,517 22,451,316 Princeton 278,431 287,581 289,199 285,070 Richardson 9,773,780 10,135,415 9,532,442 9,813,879 Rockwall 1,876,570 2,234,227 2,332,266 2,147,688 Royse City 257,149 286,471 327,863 290,494 Wylie 816,417 1,042,381 1,266,615 1,041,804 Customers Caddo Basin 197,652 245,280 223,734 222,222 Cash SUD 211,830 221,385 257,909 230,375 College Mound WSC 56,135 62,017 52,093 56,748 Copeville WSC 65,737 68,468 73,935 69,380 East Fork SUD 150,055 188,012 202,927 180,331 Fairview 352,745 394,901 420,325 389,324 Fate 69,529 77,744 113,197 86,823 Forney Lake WSC 112,745 131,507 135,370 See Note 1 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 80,336 101,254 98,508 93,366 Josephine 40,978 33,301 38,203 37,494 Kaufman 419,999 392,227 419,659 410,628 Kaufman Four One 337,611 356,603 396,336 363,517 Lavon WSC 96,660 124,858 141,538 See Note 1 Little Elm 210,964 368,734 504,167 361,288 Lucas 243,856 271,766 301,984 272,535 Melissa 32,160 59,467 See Note 1 Milligan WSC 115,787 149,894 127,646 131,109 Mt. Zion WSC 97,279 100,946 108,816 102,347 Murphy 496,860 655,870 792,811 648,514 Nevada WSC 66,189 71,043 71,813 69,682 North Collin WSC 245,779 274,347 284,428 268,185 Parker 228,969 306,201 344,660 293,277 Rose Hill WSC 40,056 16,160 7,689 21,302 Rowlett 2,564,207 2,772,637 2,772,411 2,703,085 Sachse 521,439 612,776 762,689 632,301 Sachse#2 62,697 388,403 194,171 See Note 1 Seis Lagos MUD 60,814 74,712 76,473 70,666 Sunnyvale 314,893 362,405 376,311 351,203 Wylie NE WSC 87,351 118,559 120,048 108,653 Notes: (1) lneligble for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix C Page 6 of 8 Method 3-2005 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY05 Excess Rate FY 05 FY 05 FY 05 Wtr Yr 05 Wtr Yr 05 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 05 Annual Full Excess FY 05 FY 05 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 1.072 $ 1.072 $ 0.221 $ 0.221 Allen 4,062,097 4,687,958 625,861 - - 625,861 4,062,097 $ 4,352,624 $ - $ 138,191 $ - $ 4,490,816 Farmersville 233,370 242,487 9,117 - - 9,117 - 233,370 $ 250,061 $ - $ 2,013 $ - $ 252,074 Forney 779,525 1,059,328 279,803 - - 279,803 779,525 $ 835,277 $ - $ 61,781 $ - $ 897,059 Frisco 5,215,938 6,467,274 1,251,336 - - 1,251,336 5,215,938 $ 5,588,990 $ - $ 276,298 $ - $ 5,865,288 Garland 12,522,811 12,435,423 (87,388) - - - (87,388) 12,522,811 $ 13,418,461 $ - $ - $ (19,296) $ 13,399,166 McKinney 6,207,562 7,166,992 959,430 - - 959,430 6,207,562 $ 6,651,536 $ - $ 211,844 $ - $ 6,863,381 Mesquite 5,646,990 4,885,178 (761,812) - - - (761,812) 5,646,990 $ 6,050,871 $ - $ - $ (168,210) $ 5,882,661 Mesquite#3(1) 2,031,764 B 1,351,516 (680,248) 2,256,486 c - - - 2,031,764 $ 2,177,079 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,177,079 Plano 22,451,316 22,432,203 (19,113) - - - (19,113) 22,451,316 $ 24,057,067 $ - $ - $ (4,220) $ 24,052,847 Princeton 285,070 337,039 51,969 - - 51,969 - 285,070 $ 305,459 $ - $ 11,475 $ - $ 316,934 Richardson 9,813,879 8,553,732 (1,260,147) - - - (1,260,147) 9,813,879 $ 10,515,782 $ - $ - $ (278,243) $ 10,237,539 Rockwall 2,147,688 2,471,592 323,904 - - 323,904 - 2,147,688 $ 2,301,293 $ - $ 71,519 $ - $ 2,372,812 Royse City 290,494 338,437 47,943 - - 47,943 - 290,494 $ 311,271 $ - $ 10,586 $ - $ 321,857 Wylie 1,041,804 1,387,214 345,410 - - 345,410 - 1,041,804 $ 1,116,316 $ - $ 76,267 $ - $ 1,192,583 Total 72,730,310 73,816,373 1,086,063 - 3,894,772 (2,128,460) 72,730,310 $ 77,932,088 $ - $ 859,974 $ (469,969) $ 78,322,093 Customers $ 1.122 $ 1.122 $ 0.271 $ 0.221 Caddo Basin 222,222 240,325 18,103 - - 18,103 - 222,222 $ 249,227 $ - $ 4,902 $ - $ 254,129 Cash SUD A 230,375 256,282 25,907 - - 25,907 - 230,375 $ 258,370 $ - $ 7,016 $ - $ 265,386 College Mound WSC A 56,748 9,825 (46,923) - - - - 56,748 $ 63,644 $ - $ - $ - $ 63,644 Copeville WSC 69,380 66,320 (3,060) 113,866.6 c - - (3,060) 69,380 $ 77,811 $ - $ - $ (676) $ 77,136 East Fork SUD 180,331 221,755 41,424 280,831 C 41,424 - - 180,331 $ 202,245 $ 46,458 $ - $ - $ 248,703 Fairview 389,324 478,582 89,258 - - 89,258 - 389,324 $ 436,635 $ - $ 24,171 $ - $ 460,806 Fate 86,823 155,139 68,316 - - 68,316 - 86,823 $ 97,374 $ - $ 18,500 $ - $ 115,874 Forney Lake WSC(1) 171,795 B 164,447 (7,348) 227,800 c - - - 171,795 $ 192,672 $ - $ - $ - $ 192,672 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 93,366 107,566 14,200 - - 14,200 - 93,366 $ 104,712 $ - $ 3,845 $ - $ 108,557 Josephine 37,494 41,031 3,537 45,400 c 3,537 - - 37,494 $ 42,050 $ 3,967 $ - $ - $ 46,017 Kaufman 410,628 409,164 (1,464) - - - (1,464) 410,628 $ 460,528 $ - $ - $ (323) $ 460,205 Kaufman Four One A 363,517 382,065 18,548 - - 18,548 - 363,517 $ 407,692 $ - $ 5,023 $ - $ 412,715 Lavon WSC(1) 142,389 B 148,610 6,221 142,389 C - 6,221 - 142,389 $ 159,692 $ - $ 1,685 $ - $ 161,377 Little Elm 361,288 610,479 249,191 - - 249,191 - 361,288 $ 405,193 $ - $ 67,481 $ - $ 472,674 Lucas 272,535 308,034 35,499 - - 35,499 - 272,535 $ 305,654 $ - $ 9,613 $ - $ 315,267 Lucas#3 - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Melissa(1) 73,000 B 86,408 13,408 73,000 C - 13,408 - 73,000 $ 81,871 $ - $ 3,631 $ - $ 85,502 Milligan WSC 131,109 128,680 (2,429) 155,938 C - - (2,429) 131,109 $ 147,042 $ - $ - $ (536) $ 146,505 Mt.Zion WSC 102,347 108,196 5,849 - - 5,849 - 102,347 $ 114,784 $ - $ 1,584 $ - $ 116,368 Murphy 648,514 906,941 258,427 - - 258,427 - 648,514 $ 727,322 $ - $ 69,983 $ - $ 797,305 Nevada WSC 69,682 68,787 (895) - - - (895) 69,682 $ 78,149 $ - $ - $ (198) $ 77,952 North Collin WSC 268,185 290,010 21,825 300,000 C 21,825 - - 268,185 $ 300,775 $ 24,478 $ - $ - $ 325,252 Parker 293,277 392,852 99,575 - - 99,575 - 293,277 $ 328,916 $ - $ 26,965 $ - $ 355,881 Prosper"' 236,575 B 95,406 (141,169) 236,575 C - - - 275,000 $ 308,418 $ - $ - $ - $ 308,418 Rose Hill WSC A 21,302 12,847 (8,455) 48,000 c - - - 21,302 $ 23,890 $ - $ - $ - $ 23,890 Rowlett 2,703,085 2,734,709 31,624 4,051,017 c 31,624 - - 2,703,085 $ 3,031,568 $ 35,467 $ - $ - $ 3,067,035 Sachse 632,301 611,056 (21,245) - - - (21,245) 632,301 $ 709,140 $ - $ - $ (4,691) $ 704,448 Sachse#2(1) 388,403 B 385,477 (2,926) 522,585 c - - - 388,403 $ 435,602 $ - $ - $ - $ 435,602 Seis Lagos MUD 70,666 71,594 928 - - 928 - 70,666 $ 79,254 $ - $ 251 $ - $ 79,505 Sunnyvale 351,203 391,036 39,833 910,969 c 39,833 - - 351,203 $ 393,882 $ 44,674 $ - $ - $ 438,555 Wylie NE WSC 108,653 143,816 35,163 - - 35,163 - 108,653 $ 121,856 $ - $ 9,522 $ - $ 131,379 Total 9,186,517 10,027,439 840,922 138,243 938,594 (29,093) 9,224,942 $ 10,345,970 $ 155,042 $ 254,173 $ (6,424) $ 10,748,762 Total 81,916,826 83,843,812 1,926,986 138,243 4,833,365 (2,157,554) 81,955,251 $ 88,278,058 $ 155,042 $ 1,114,148 $ (476,393) $ 89,070,855 Notes: Revenue Requirement $ 86,899,122 (1)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD Over/(Under)Recovery $ 2,171,734 (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met Appendix C Page 7 of 8 North Texas Municipal Water District Method 3 - Determination of 2006 Annual Minimum 2003 2004 2005 2006 Actual Actual Actual Annual Consumption Consumption Consumption Minimum (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) Members Allen 4,124,397 4,362,143 4,687,958 4,391,499 Farmersville 225,417 246,458 242,487 238,121 Forney 788,921 891,245 1,059,328 913,165 Frisco 5,607,266 5,645,797 6,467,274 5,906,779 Garland 12,904,220 12,612,613 12,435,423 12,650,752 McKinney 6,350,897 6,582,712 7,166,992 6,700,200 Mesquite 5,575,688 4,814,443 4,885,178 5,091,770 Mesquite#3 1,170,130 1,597,147 1,351,516 See Note 1 Plano 22,745,013 22,149,517 22,432,203 22,442,244 Princeton 287,581 289,199 337,039 304,606 Richardson 10,135,415 9,532,442 8,553,732 9,407,196 Rockwall 2,234,227 2,332,266 2,471,592 2,346,028 Royse City 286,471 327,863 338,437 317,590 Wylie 1,042,381 1,266,615 1,387,214 1,232,070 Customers Caddo Basin 245,280 223,734 240,325 236,446 Cash SUD 221,385 257,909 256,282 245,192 College Mound WSC 62,017 52,093 9,825 41,312 Copeville WSC 68,468 73,935 66,320 69,574 East Fork SUD 188,012 202,927 221,755 204,231 Fairview 394,901 420,325 478,582 431,269 Fate 77,744 113,197 155,139 115,360 Forney Lake WSC 131,507 135,370 164,447 See Note 1 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 101,254 98,508 107,566 102,443 Josephine 33,301 38,203 41,031 37,512 Kaufman 392,227 419,659 409,164 407,017 Kaufman Four One 356,603 396,336 382,065 378,335 Lavon WSC 124,858 141,538 148,610 138,335 Little Elm 368,734 504,167 610,479 See Note 1 Lucas 271,766 301,984 308,034 293,928 Melissa 32,160 59,467 86,408 59,345 Milligan WSC 149,894 127,646 128,680 135,407 Mt. Zion WSC 100,946 108,816 108,196 105,986 Murphy 655,870 792,811 906,941 785,207 Nevada WSC 71,043 71,813 68,787 70,548 North Collin WSC 274,347 284,428 290,010 282,928 Parker 306,201 344,660 392,852 347,904 Rose Hill WSC 16,160 7,689 12,847 12,232 Rowlett 2,772,637 2,772,411 2,734,709 2,759,919 Sachse 612,776 762,689 611,056 662,174 Sachse#2 388,403 194,171 385,477 See Note 1 Seis Lagos MUD 74,712 76,473 71,594 74,260 Sunnyvale 362,405 376,311 391,036 376,584 Wylie NE WSC 118,559 120,048 143,816 127,474 Notes: (1) lneligble for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix C Page 8 of 8 Method 3- 2006 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY06 Excess Rate FY 06 FY 06 FY 06 Wtr Yr 06 Wtr Yr 06 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 06 Annual Full Excess FY 06 FY 06 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 1.066 $ 1.066 $ 0.253 $ 0.253 Allen 4,391,499 5,588,259 1,196,760 - - 1,196,760 - 4,391,499 $ 4,683,450.29 $ - $ 302,525.52 $ - $ 4,985,975.81 Farmersville 238,121 280,467 42,346 - - 42,346 - 238,121 $ 253,951.15 $ - $ 10,704.61 $ - $ 264,655.76 Forney 913,165 1,416,868 503,703 - - 503,703 - 913,165 $ 973,872.70 $ - $ 127,329.75 $ - $ 1,101,202.46 Frisco 5,906,779 7,918,529 2,011,750 - - 2,011,750 - 5,906,779 $ 6,299,467.16 $ - $ 508,544.64 $ - $ 6,808,011.80 Frisco#2(1) 3,116 B 419,410 416,294 12,465 C 9,349 406,945 - 5,650 $ 6,025.62 $ 9,970.53 $ 102,870.49 $ - $ 118,866.63 Garland 12,650,752 13,721,955 1,071,203 - - 1,071,203 - 12,650,752 $ 13,491,785.75 $ - $ 270,786.40 $ - $ 13,762,572.15 McKinney 6,700,200 8,385,134 1,684,934 - - 1,684,934 - 6,700,200 $ 7,145,635.88 $ - $ 425,929.66 $ - $ 7,571,565.53 McKinney#3(1) 171,228 B 350,012 178,784 684,910 C 178,784 - - 228,303 $ 243,480.80 $ 190,669.73 $ - $ - $ 434,150.52 Mesquite 5,091,770 5,756,029 664,259 - - 664,259 - 5,091,770 $ 5,430,275.25 $ - $ 167,916.25 $ - $ 5,598,191.50 Mesquite#3(1) 2,106,671 B 1,359,175 (747,496) 2,256,486 c - - - 2,106,671 $ 2,246,724.45 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,246,724.45 Plano 22,442,244 26,265,050 3,822,806 - - 3,822,806 - 22,442,244 $ 23,934,225.59 $ - $ 966,356.33 $ - $ 24,900,581.92 Princeton 304,606 409,624 105,018 - - 105,018 - 304,606 $ 324,856.85 $ - $ 26,547.12 $ - $ 351,403.97 Richardson 9,407,196 10,050,090 642,894 - - 642,894 - 9,407,196 $ 10,032,595.49 $ - $ 162,515.29 $ - $ 10,195,110.77 Rockwall 2,346,028 3,284,236 938,208 - - 938,208 - 2,346,028 $ 2,501,994.48 $ - $ 237,166.89 $ - $ 2,739,161.36 Royse City 317,590 470,150 152,560 - - 152,560 - 317,590 $ 338,704.03 $ - $ 38,565.13 $ - $ 377,269.16 Wylie 1,232,070 1,721,763 489,693 - - 489,693 - 1,232,070 $ 1,313,979.16 $ - $ 123,788.12 $ - $ 1,437,767.28 Total 74,223,036 87,396,751 13,173,715 188,133 13,733,078 - 74,282,645 $ 79,221,024.62 $ 200,640.26 $ 3,471,546.20 $ - $ 82,893,211.08 Customers $ 1.116 $ 1.116 $ 0.303 $ 0.253 Caddo Basin SUD 236,446 293,451 57,005 - - 57,005 - 236,446 $ 263,987.82 $ - $ 17,260.28 $ - $ 281,248.11 Cash SUD A 245,192 305,643 60,451 - - 60,451 - 245,192 $ 273,752.19 $ - $ 18,303.79 $ - $ 292,055.98 College Mound WSC A 41,312 62,710 21,398 - - 21,398 - 41,312 $ 46,123.69 $ - $ 6,479.14 $ - $ 52,602.83 Copeville WSC 69,574 77,927 8,353 113,866.6 c 8,353 - - 69,574 $ 77,678.42 $ 9,325.59 $ - $ - $ 87,004.01 East Fork SUD 204,231 324,226 119,995 280,831 C 76,600 43,395 - 204,231 $ 228,020.39 $ 85,522.07 $ 13,139.45 $ - $ 326,681.91 Fairview 431,269 721,185 289,916 - - 289,916 - 431,269 $ 481,503.99 $ - $ 87,782.75 $ - $ 569,286.74 Fate 115,360 279,932 164,572 - - 164,572 - 115,360 $ 128,797.24 $ - $ 49,830.29 $ - $ 178,627.53 Fate#2 - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Forney Lake WSC(1) 182,996 B 295,577 112,581 227,800 c 44,804 67,777 - 182,996 $ 204,311.54 $ 50,022.81 $ 20,522.01 $ - $ 274,856.36 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 102,443 107,875 5,432 - - 5,432 - 102,443 $ 114,375.28 $ - $ 1,644.84 $ - $ 116,020.12 Josephine 37,512 57,407 19,895 45,400 c 7,888 12,007 - 37,512 $ 41,881.06 $ 8,807.17 $ 3,635.57 $ - $ 54,323.80 Kaufman 407,017 438,403 31,386 - - 31,386 - 407,017 $ 454,426.35 $ - $ 9,503.38 $ - $ 463,929.73 Kaufman Four One A 378,335 450,363 72,028 - - 72,028 - 378,335 $ 422,403.44 $ - $ 21,809.26 $ - $ 444,212.70 Lavon WSC 138,335 217,256 78,921 - - 78,921 - 138,335 $ 154,448.76 $ - $ 23,896.17 $ - $ 178,344.93 Little Elm-Interim(1) 559,606 925,163 365,557 - - 365,557 - 457,859 $ 511,190.84 $ - $ 110,685.98 $ - $ 621,876.82 Little Elm-Permanent(1) 51,667 B 107,415 55,748 162,917 c 55,748 - - 155,000 $ 173,054.54 $ 62,241.58 $ - $ - $ 235,296.12 Lucas 293,928 212,681 (81,247) - - - (81,247) 293,928 $ 328,165.01 $ - $ - $ (20,538.20) $ 307,626.81 Lucas#3 63,969 B 290,897 226,928 255,878 c 191,909 35,019 - 63,969 $ 71,420.17 $ 214,262.74 $ 10,603.30 $ - $ 296,286.21 Melissa 59,345 135,737 76,392 - - 76,392 - 59,345 $ 66,257.56 $ - $ 23,130.52 $ - $ 89,388.08 Milligan WSC 135,407 147,744 12,337 155,938 C 12,337 - - 135,407 $ 151,178.96 $ 13,774.40 $ - $ - $ 164,953.36 Mt.Zion WSC 105,986 159,302 53,316 - - 53,316 - 105,986 $ 118,331.35 $ - $ 16,143.40 $ - $ 134,474.75 Murphy 785,207 1,193,806 408,599 1,145,000 C 359,793 48,806 - 785,207 $ 876,669.01 $ 401,701.65 $ 14,777.83 $ - $ 1,293,148.50 Nevada WSC 70,548 56,413 (14,135) - - - (14,135) 38,969 $ 43,508.15 $ - $ - $ (3,573.06) $ 39,935.08 Nevada WSC#2(1) 30,766 B 31,766 1,000 44,925 C 1,000 - - 38,849 $ 43,374.17 $ 1,116.48 $ - $ - $ 44,490.65 North Collin WSC 282,928 318,780 35,852 300,000 C 17,072 18,780 - 282,928 $ 315,884.09 $ 19,060.19 $ 5,686.34 $ - $ 340,630.62 Parker 347,904 470,812 122,908 - - 122,908 - 347,904 $ 388,428.55 $ - $ 37,214.87 $ - $ 425,643.42 Prosper(') 275,000 B 208,182 (66,818) 275,000 C - - - 275,000 $ 307,032.26 $ - $ - $ - $ 307,032.26 Rose Hill SUD A 12,232 42,818 30,586 48,000 c 30,586 - - 12,232 $ 13,656.79 $ 34,148.69 $ - $ - $ 47,805.48 Rowlett 2,759,919 3,192,039 432,120 4,051,017 c 432,120 - - 2,759,919 $ 3,081,396.93 $ 482,453.74 $ - $ - $ 3,563,850.67 Sachse 662,174 734,691 72,517 - - 72,517 - 662,174 $ 739,304.27 $ - $ 21,957.32 $ - $ 761,261.59 Sachse#2(1) 388,403 B 431,099 42,696 522,585 c 42,696 - - 388,403 $ 433,644.54 $ 47,669.27 $ - $ - $ 481,313.81 Seis Lagos MUD 74,260 111,094 36,834 - - 36,834 - 74,260 $ 82,909.50 $ - $ 11,152.96 $ - $ 94,062.47 Sunnyvale 376,584 559,135 182,551 910,969 c 182,551 - - 376,584 $ 420,448.85 $ 203,814.71 $ - $ - $ 624,263.56 Wylie NE SUD 127,474 197,289 69,815 - - 69,815 - 127,474 $ 142,322.66 $ - $ 21,138.99 $ - $ 163,461.65 Total 10,053,329 13,158,818 3,105,489 1,463,456 1,804,232 (95,382) 10,031,419 $ 11,199,888.38 $ 1,633,921.09 $ 546,298.45 $ (24,111.26) $ 13,355,996.65 Total 84,276,365 100,555,569 16,279,204 1,651,589 15,537,310 (95,382) 84,314,065 $ 90,420,913.00 $ 1,834,561.34 $ 4,017,844.65 $ (24,111.26) $ 96,249,208 Notes: Revenue Requirement $ 92,960,057 (1)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD Over/(Under)Recovery $ 3,289,151 (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix D Page 1 of 4 Method 4-2003 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 03 FY 03 FY 03 Wtr Yr 03 Wtr Yr 03 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 03 Annual Full Excess FY 03 FY 03 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.974 $ 0.974 $ 0.224 $ 0.224 Allen 3,699,752 4,124,397 424,645 - - 424,645 3,699,752 $ 3,603,699 $ - $ 95,010 $ - $ 3,698,710 Farmersville 228,235 225,417 (2,818) - - - (2,818) 228,235 $ 222,310 $ - $ - $ (631) $ 221,679 Forney 658,408 788,921 130,513 - - 130,513 658,408 $ 641,314 $ - $ 29,201 $ - $ 670,516 Frisco 4,394,752 5,607,266 1,212,514 - - 1,212,514 4,394,752 $ 4,280,655 $ - $ 271,289 $ - $ 4,551,944 Garland 12,051,601 12,904,220 852,619 - - 852,619 - 12,051,601 $ 11,738,717 $ - $ 190,766 $ - $ 11,929,483 McKinney 5,689,078 6,350,897 661,819 - - 661,819 5,689,078 $ 5,541,378 $ - $ 148,076 $ - $ 5,689,454 Mesquite(1) 6,041,180 5,575,688 (465,492) - - - (465,492) 6,041,180 $ 5,884,339 $ - $ - $ (104,150) $ 5,780,189 Mesquite#3(1) 1,881,950 B 1,170,130 (711,820) 2,256,486 c - - - 1,881,950 $ 1,833,091 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,833,091 Plano 22,459,418 22,745,013 285,595 - - 285,595 - 22,459,418 $ 21,876,327 $ - $ 63,899 $ - $ 21,940,226 Princeton 278,431 287,581 9,150 - - 9,150 - 278,431 $ 271,202 $ - $ 2,047 $ - $ 273,250 Richardson 9,773,780 10,135,415 361,635 - - 361,635 - 9,773,780 $ 9,520,033 $ - $ 80,913 $ - $ 9,600,946 Rockwall 1,876,570 2,234,227 357,657 - - 357,657 - 1,876,570 $ 1,827,850 $ - $ 80,023 $ - $ 1,907,873 Royse City 257,149 286,471 29,322 - - 29,322 - 257,149 $ 250,473 $ - $ 6,561 $ - $ 257,033 Wylie 816,417 1,042,381 225,964 - - 225,964 - 816,417 $ 795,221 $ - $ 50,557 $ - $ 845,779 Total 70,106,721 73,478,024 3,371,303 - 4,551,433 (468,310) 70,106,721 $ 68,286,611 $ - $ 1,018,342 $ (104,780) $ 69,200,172 Customers $ 1.024 $ 1.024 $ 0.274 $ 0.224 Caddo Basin 197,652 245,280 47,628 - - 47,628 - 197,652 $ 202,403 $ - $ 13,038 $ - $ 215,441 Cash SUD A 211,830 221,385 9,555 - - 9,555 - 211,830 $ 216,922 $ - $ 2,616 $ - $ 219,538 College Mound WSC A 56,135 62,017 5,882 - - 5,882 - 56,135 $ 57,484 $ - $ 1,610 $ - $ 59,095 Copeville WSC 65,737 68,468 2,731 113,867 c 2,731 - - 65,737 $ 67,317 $ 2,797 $ - $ - $ 70,114 East Fork SUD 150,055 188,012 37,957 280,831 c 37,957 - - 150,055 $ 153,662 $ 38,869 $ - $ - $ 192,531 Fairview 352,745 394,901 42,156 - - 42,156 - 352,745 $ 361,224 $ - $ 11,540 $ - $ 372,764 Fate 69,529 77,744 8,215 - - 8,215 - 69,529 $ 71,200 $ - $ 2,249 $ - $ 73,449 Forney Lake WSC 112,745 131,507 18,762 - - 18,762 112,745 $ 115,455 $ - $ 5,136 $ - $ 120,591 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 80,336 101,254 20,918 - - 20,918 - 80,336 $ 82,267 $ - $ 5,726 $ - $ 87,993 Josephine 40,978 33,301 (7,677) 45,400 c - - (7,677) 40,978 $ 41,963 $ - $ - $ (1,718) $ 40,245 Kaufman 419,999 392,227 (27,772) - - - (27,772) 419,999 $ 430,095 $ - $ - $ (6,214) $ 423,881 Kaufman Four One A 337,611 356,603 18,992 - - 18,992 - 337,611 $ 345,726 $ - $ 5,199 $ - $ 350,925 Lavon WSC(1) 142,389 B 124,858 (17,531) 142,389 c - - - 142,389 $ 145,812 $ - $ - $ - $ 145,812 Little Elm 210,964 368,734 157,770 - - 157,770 - 210,964 $ 216,035 $ - $ 43,188 $ - $ 259,223 Lucas 243,856 271,766 27,910 - - 27,910 - 243,856 $ 249,718 $ - $ 7,640 $ - $ 257,358 Melissa(1) 48,664 B 32,160 (16,504) 73,000 c - - - 60,833 $ 62,295 $ - $ - $ - $ 62,295 Milligan WSC 115,787 149,894 34,107 155,938 c 34,107 - - 115,787 $ 118,570 $ 34,927 $ - $ - $ 153,497 Mt.Zion WSC 97,279 100,946 3,667 - - 3,667 - 97,279 $ 99,617 $ - $ 1,004 $ - $ 100,621 Murphy 496,860 655,870 159,010 - - 159,010 - 496,860 $ 508,804 $ - $ 43,528 $ - $ 552,331 Nevada WSC 66,189 71,043 4,854 - - 4,854 - 66,189 $ 67,780 $ - $ 1,329 $ - $ 69,109 North Collin WSC 245,779 274,347 28,568 300,000 c 28,568 - - 245,779 $ 251,687 $ 29,255 $ - $ - $ 280,942 Parker 228,969 306,201 77,232 - - 77,232 - 228,969 $ 234,473 $ - $ 21,142 $ - $ 255,615 Rose Hill WSC A 40,056 16,160 (23,896) 48,000 c - - - 40,056 $ 41,019 $ - $ - $ - $ 41,019 Rowlett 2,564,207 2,772,637 208,430 4,051,017 c 208,430 - - 2,564,207 $ 2,625,845 $ 213,440 $ - $ - $ 2,839,286 Sachse 521,439 612,776 91,337 - - 91,337 - 521,439 $ 533,973 $ - $ 25,003 $ - $ 558,976 Sachse#2(1) 130,646 B 388,403 257,757 522,585 c 257,757 - - 130,646 $ 133,786 $ 263,953 $ - $ - $ 397,739 Seis Lagos MUD 60,814 74,712 13,898 - - 13,898 - 60,814 $ 62,276 $ - $ 3,804 $ - $ 66,080 Sunnyvale 314,893 362,405 47,512 910,969 c 47,512 - - 314,893 $ 322,462 $ 48,654 $ - $ - $ 371,116 Wylie NE WSC 87,351 118,559 31,208 - - 31,208 - 87,351 $ 89,451 $ - $ 8,543 $ - $ 97,994 Total 7,711,494 8,974,170 1,262,676 617,062 738,994 (35,449) 7,723,663 $ 7,909,324 $ 631,895 $ 202,293 $ (7,931) $ 8,735,581 Total 77,818,215 82,452,194 4,633,979 617,062 5,290,427 (503,759) 77,830,384 $ 76,195,935 $ 631,895 $ 1,220,635 $ (112,711) $ 77,935,753 Revenue Requirement $ 75,674,582 Notes: (1)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract Over/(Under)Recovery $ 2,261,171 (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix D Page 2 of 4 Method 4-2004 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 04 FY 04 FY 04 Wtr Yr 04 Wtr Yr 04 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 04 Annual Full Excess FY 04 FY 04 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.968 $ 0.968 $ 0.210 $ 0.210 Allen 4,124,397 4,362,143 237,746 - - 237,746 4,124,397 $ 3,993,076.11 $ - $ 50,027.80 $ - $ 4,043,103.90 Farmersville 225,417 246,458 21,041 - - 21,041 - 225,417 $ 218,239.72 $ - $ 4,427.56 $ - $ 222,667.28 Forney 788,921 891,245 102,324 - - 102,324 788,921 $ 763,801.74 $ - $ 21,531.57 $ - $ 785,333.31 Frisco 5,607,266 5,645,797 38,531 - - 38,531 5,607,266 $ 5,428,730.52 $ - $ 8,107.90 $ - $ 5,436,838.43 Garland 12,904,220 12,612,613 (291,607) - - - (291,607) 12,904,220 $ 12,493,349.34 $ - $ - $ (61,361.52) $ 12,431,987.83 McKinney 6,350,897 6,582,712 231,815 - - 231,815 6,350,897 $ 6,148,684.30 $ - $ 48,779.76 $ - $ 6,197,464.06 Mesquite 5,575,688 4,814,443 (761,245) - - - (761,245) 5,575,688 $ 5,398,157.97 $ - $ - $ (160,185.28) $ 5,237,972.69 Mesquite#3(1) 1,956,857 B 1,597,147 (359,710) 2,256,486 c - - - 1,956,857 $ 1,894,550.63 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,894,550.63 Plano 22,745,013 22,149,517 (595,496) - - - (595,496) 22,745,013 $ 22,020,811.27 $ - $ - $ (125,307.48) $ 21,895,503.79 Princeton 287,581 289,199 1,618 - - 1,618 287,581 $ 278,424.41 $ - $ 340.47 $ - $ 278,764.88 Richardson 10,135,415 9,532,442 (602,973) - - - (602,973) 10,135,415 $ 9,812,703.16 $ - $ - $ (126,880.83) $ 9,685,822.33 Rockwall 2,234,227 2,332,266 98,039 - - 98,039 - 2,234,227 $ 2,163,089.16 $ - $ 20,629.90 $ - $ 2,183,719.06 Royse City 286,471 327,863 41,392 - - 41,392 - 286,471 $ 277,349.76 $ - $ 8,709.93 $ - $ 286,059.68 Wylie 1,042,381 1,266,615 224,234 - - 224,234 - 1,042,381 $ 1,009,191.57 $ - $ 47,184.53 $ - $ 1,056,376.09 Total 74,264,751 72,650,460 (1,614,291) - 996,740 (2,251,321) 74,264,751 $ 71,900,159.66 $ - $ 209,739.41 $ (473,735.12) $ 71,636,163.95 Customers $ 1.018 $ 1.018 $ 0.260 $ 0.210 Caddo Basin 245,280 223,734 (21,546) - - - (21,546) 245,280 $ 249,734.28 $ - $ - $ (4,533.83) $ 245,200.45 Cash SUD A 221,385 257,909 36,524 - - 36,524 - 221,385 $ 225,405.35 $ - $ 9,511.78 $ - $ 234,917.12 College Mound WSC A 62,017 52,093 (9,924) - - - (9,924) 62,017 $ 63,143.23 $ - $ - $ (2,088.26) $ 61,054.97 Copeville WSC 68,468 73,935 5,467 113,866.6 c 5,467 - - 68,468 $ 69,711.38 $ 5,566.28 $ - $ - $ 75,277.66 East Fork SUD 188,012 202,927 14,915 280,831 c 14,915 - - 188,012 $ 191,426.29 $ 15,185.86 $ - $ - $ 206,612.15 Fairview 394,901 420,325 25,424 - - 25,424 - 394,901 $ 402,072.39 $ - $ 6,621.06 $ - $ 408,693.45 Fate 77,744 113,197 35,453 - - 35,453 - 77,744 $ 79,155.83 $ - $ 9,232.86 $ - $ 88,388.69 Forney Lake WSC(1) 153,126 B 135,370 (17,756) 227,800 c - - - 153,126 $ 155,906.76 $ - $ - $ - $ 155,906.76 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 101,254 98,508 (2,746) - - - (2,746) 101,254 $ 103,092.77 $ - $ - $ (577.83) $ 102,514.94 Josephine 33,301 38,203 4,902 45,400 c 4,902 - - 33,301 $ 33,905.75 $ 4,991.02 $ - $ - $ 38,896.77 Kaufman 392,227 419,659 27,432 - - 27,432 - 392,227 $ 399,349.83 $ - $ 7,143.99 $ - $ 406,493.82 Kaufman Four One A 356,603 396,336 39,733 - - 39,733 - 356,603 $ 363,078.90 $ - $ 10,347.48 $ - $ 373,426.38 Lavon WSC(1) 142,389 B 141,538 (851) 142,389 C - - - 142,389 $ 144,974.78 $ - $ - $ - $ 144,974.78 Little Elm 368,734 504,167 135,433 - - 135,433 - 368,734 $ 375,430.20 $ - $ 35,270.19 $ - $ 410,700.39 Lucas 271,766 301,984 30,218 - - 30,218 - 271,766 $ 276,701.26 $ - $ 7,869.53 $ - $ 284,570.80 Melissa(1) 73,000 B 59,467 (13,533) 73,000 c - - - 73,000 $ 74,325.68 $ - $ - $ - $ 74,325.68 Milligan WSC 149,894 127,646 (22,248) 155,938 C - - (22,248) 149,894 $ 152,616.07 $ - $ - $ (4,681.54) $ 147,934.53 Mt.Zion WSC 100,946 108,816 7,870 - - 7,870 - 100,946 $ 102,779.18 $ - $ 2,049.55 $ - $ 104,828.72 Murphy 655,870 792,811 136,941 - - 136,941 - 655,870 $ 667,780.58 $ - $ 35,662.91 $ - $ 703,443.50 Nevada WSC 71,043 71,813 770 - - 770 - 71,043 $ 72,333.14 $ - $ 200.53 $ - $ 72,533.67 North Collin WSC 274,347 284,428 10,081 300,000 C - 10,081 - 274,347 $ 279,329.14 $ - $ 2,625.35 $ - $ 281,954.48 Parker 306,201 344,660 38,459 - - 38,459 - 306,201 $ 311,761.60 $ - $ 10,015.70 $ - $ 321,777.30 Rose Hill WSC A 16,160 7,689 (8,471) 48,000 c - - - 16,160 $ 16,453.47 $ - $ - $ - $ 16,453.47 Rowlett 2,772,637 2,772,411 (226) 4,051,017 c - - (226) 2,772,637 $ 2,822,988.03 $ - $ - $ (47.56) $ 2,822,940.47 Sachse 612,776 762,689 149,913 - - 149,913 - 612,776 $ 623,904.00 $ - $ 39,041.15 $ - $ 662,945.15 Sachse#2(1) 388,403 B 194,171 (194,232) 522,585 c - - - 388,403 $ 395,456.39 $ - $ - $ - $ 395,456.39 Seis Lagos MUD 74,712 76,473 1,761 - - 1,761 - 74,712 $ 76,068.77 $ - $ 458.61 $ - $ 76,527.38 Sunnyvale 362,405 376,311 13,906 910,969 C 13,906 - - 362,405 $ 368,986.27 $ 14,158.53 $ - $ - $ 383,144.80 Wylie NE WSC 118,559 120,048 1,489 - - 1,489 - 118,559 $ 120,712.03 $ - $ 387.77 $ - $ 121,099.80 Total 9,054,160 9,479,318 425,158 39,190 677,501 (56,690) 9,054,160 $ 9,218,583.34 $ 39,901.69 $ 176,438.47 $ (11,929.02) $ 9,422,994.48 Total 83,318,911 82,129,778 (1,189,133) 39,190 1,674,241 (2,308,011) 83,318,911 $ 81,118,743.00 $ 39,901.69 $ 386,177.88 $ (485,664.13) $ 81,059,158.44 Revenue Requirement $ 79,688,080 Notes: (1)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract Over/(Under)Recovery $ 1,371,078 (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix D Page 3 of 4 Method 4-2005 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY05 Excess Rate FY 05 FY 05 FY 05 Wtr Yr 05 Wtr Yr 05 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 05 Annual Full Excess FY 05 FY 05 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 1.057 $ 1.057 $ 0.218 $ 0.218 Allen 4,362,143 4,687,958 325,815 - - 325,815 - 4,362,143 $ 4,609,333 $ - $ 70,975 $ - $ 4,680,307 Farmersville 246,458 242,487 (3,971) - - - (3,971) 246,458 $ 260,424 $ - $ - $ (865) $ 259,559 Forney 891,245 1,059,328 168,083 - - 168,083 - 891,245 $ 941,749 $ - $ 36,615 $ - $ 978,364 Frisco 5,645,797 6,467,274 821,477 - - 821,477 - 5,645,797 $ 5,965,727 $ - $ 178,948 $ - $ 6,144,676 Garland 12,612,613 12,435,423 (177,190) - - - (177,190) 12,612,613 $ 13,327,332 $ - $ - $ (38,599) $ 13,288,733 McKinney 6,582,712 7,166,992 584,280 - - 584,280 - 6,582,712 $ 6,955,735 $ - $ 127,278 $ - $ 7,083,012 Mesquite 4,814,443 4,885,178 70,735 - - 70,735 - 4,814,443 $ 5,087,263 $ - $ 15,409 $ - $ 5,102,672 Mesquite#3(1) 2,031,764 B 1,351,516 (680,248) 2,256,486 c - - - 2,031,764 $ 2,146,898 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,146,898 Plano 22,149,517 22,432,203 282,686 - - 282,686 - 22,149,517 $ 23,404,664 $ - $ 61,580 $ - $ 23,466,243 Princeton 289,199 337,039 47,840 - - 47,840 - 289,199 $ 305,587 $ - $ 10,421 $ - $ 316,008 Richardson 9,532,442 8,553,732 (978,710) - - - (978,710) 9,532,442 $ 10,072,617 $ - $ - $ (213,199) $ 9,859,418 Rockwall 2,332,266 2,471,592 139,326 - - 139,326 - 2,332,266 $ 2,464,429 $ - $ 30,350 $ - $ 2,494,779 Royse City 327,863 338,437 10,574 - - 10,574 - 327,863 $ 346,442 $ - $ 2,303 $ - $ 348,745 Wylie 1,266,615 1,387,214 120,599 - - 120,599 - 1,266,615 $ 1,338,390 $ - $ 26,271 $ - $ 1,364,661 Total 73,085,077 73,816,373 731,296 - 2,571,415 (1,159,871) 73,085,077 $ 77,226,589 $ - $ 560,150 $ (252,663) $ 77,534,076 Customers $ 1.107 $ 1.107 $ 0.268 $ 0.218 Caddo Basin 223,734 240,325 16,591 - - 16,591 - 223,734 $ 247,599 $ - $ 4,444 $ - $ 252,043 Cash SUD A 257,909 256,282 (1,627) - - - - 257,909 $ 285,419 $ - $ - $ - $ 285,419 College Mound WSC A 52,093 9,825 (42,268) - - - - 52,093 $ 57,650 $ - $ - $ - $ 57,650 Copeville WSC 73,935 66,320 (7,615) 113,866.6 c - - (7,615) 73,935 $ 81,821 $ - $ - $ (1,659) $ 80,163 East Fork SUD 202,927 221,755 18,828 280,831 c 18,828 - - 202,927 $ 224,573 $ 20,836 $ - $ - $ 245,409 Fairview 420,325 478,582 58,257 - - 58,257 - 420,325 $ 465,160 $ - $ 15,603 $ - $ 480,763 Fate 113,197 155,139 41,942 - - 41,942 - 113,197 $ 125,271 $ - $ 11,234 $ - $ 136,505 Forney Lake WSC(1) 171,795 B 164,447 (7,348) 227,800 c - - - 171,795 $ 190,120 $ - $ - $ - $ 190,120 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 98,508 107,566 9,058 - - 9,058 - 98,508 $ 109,016 $ - $ 2,426 $ - $ 111,442 Josephine 38,203 41,031 2,828 45,400 c 2,828 - - 38,203 $ 42,278 $ 3,130 $ - $ - $ 45,408 Kaufman 419,659 409,164 (10,495) - - - (10,495) 419,659 $ 464,423 $ - $ - $ (2,286) $ 462,137 Kaufman Four One A 396,336 382,065 (14,271) - - - - 396,336 $ 438,612 $ - $ - $ - $ 438,612 Lavon WSC(') 142,389 B 148,610 6,221 142,389 c - 6,221 - 142,389 $ 157,577 $ - $ 1,666 $ - $ 159,243 Little Elm 504,167 610,479 106,312 - - 106,312 - 504,167 $ 557,945 $ - $ 28,474 $ - $ 586,419 Lucas 301,984 308,034 6,050 - - 6,050 - 301,984 $ 334,196 $ - $ 1,620 $ - $ 335,816 Lucas#3 - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Melissa(1) 73,000 B 86,408 13,408 73,000 c - 13,408 - 73,000 $ 80,787 $ - $ 3,591 $ - $ 84,378 Milligan WSC 127,646 128,680 1,034 155,938 C 1,034 - - 127,646 $ 141,262 $ 1,144 $ - $ - $ 142,406 Mt.Zion WSC 108,816 108,196 (620) - - - (620) 108,816 $ 120,423 $ - $ - $ (135) $ 120,288 Murphy 792,811 906,941 114,130 - - 114,130 - 792,811 $ 877,378 $ - $ 30,568 $ - $ 907,946 Nevada WSC 71,813 68,787 (3,026) - - - (3,026) 71,813 $ 79,473 $ - $ - $ (659) $ 78,814 North Collin WSC 284,428 290,010 5,582 300,000 c 5,582 - - 284,428 $ 314,767 $ 6,177 $ - $ - $ 320,944 Parker 344,660 392,852 48,192 - - 48,192 - 344,660 $ 381,424 $ - $ 12,908 $ - $ 394,331 Prosper 1'1 236,575 B 95,406 (141,169) 236,575 c - - - 275,000 $ 304,333 $ - $ - $ - $ 304,333 Rose Hill WSC A 7,689 12,847 5,158 48,000 c 5,158 - - 7,689 $ 8,509 $ 5,708 $ - $ - $ 14,217 Rowlett 2,772,411 2,734,709 (37,702) 4,051,017 c - - (37,702) 2,772,411 $ 3,068,136 $ - $ - $ (8,213) $ 3,059,923 Sachse 762,689 611,056 (151,633) - - - (151,633) 762,689 $ 844,043 $ - $ - $ (33,031) $ 811,011 Sachse#2(1) 388,403 B 385,477 (2,926) 522,585 c - - - 388,403 $ 429,833 $ - $ - $ - $ 429,833 Seis Lagos MUD 76,473 71,594 (4,879) - - - (4,879) 76,473 $ 84,630 $ - $ - $ (1,063) $ 83,567 Sunnyvale 376,311 391,036 14,725 910,969 c 14,725 - - 376,311 $ 416,451 $ 16,296 $ - $ - $ 432,747 Wylie NE WSC 120,048 143,816 23,768 - - 23,768 - 120,048 $ 132,853 $ - $ 6,366 $ - $ 139,219 Total 9,960,934 10,027,439 66,505 48,155 443,929 (215,970) 9,999,359 $ 11,065,961 $ 53,292 $ 118,901 $ (47,046) $ 11,191,107 Total 83,046,011 83,843,812 797,801 48,155 3,015,344 (1,375,841) 83,084,436 $ 88,292,550 $ 53,292 $ 679,050 $ (299,709) $ 88,725,183 Revenue Requirement $ 86,913,615 Notes: (1)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract Over/(Under)Recovery $ 1,811,568 (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix D Page 4 of 4 Method 4- 2006 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY06 Excess Rate FY 06 FY 06 FY 06 Wtr Yr 06 Wtr Yr 06 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 06 Annual Full Excess FY 06 FY 06 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 1.061 $ 1.061 $ 0.251 $ 0.251 Allen 4,687,958 5,588,259 900,301 - - 900,301 - 4,687,958 $ 4,971,986.94 $ - $ 226,355.95 $ - $ 5,198,342.89 Farmersville 242,487 280,467 37,980 - - 37,980 - 242,487 $ 257,178.54 $ - $ 9,549.03 $ - $ 266,727.57 Forney 1,059,328 1,416,868 357,540 - - 357,540 - 1,059,328 $ 1,123,509.42 $ - $ 89,893.61 $ - $ 1,213,403.03 Frisco 6,467,274 7,918,529 1,451,255 - - 1,451,255 - 6,467,274 $ 6,859,106.22 $ - $ 364,878.19 $ - $ 7,223,984.41 Frisco#2(1) 3,116 B 419,410 416,294 12,465 C 9,349 406,945 - 5,650 $ 5,992.32 $ 9,915.43 $ 102,315.14 $ - $ 118,222.88 Garland 12,435,423 13,721,955 1,286,532 - - 1,286,532 - 12,435,423 $ 13,188,846.99 $ - $ 323,463.12 $ - $ 13,512,310.11 McKinney 7,166,992 8,385,134 1,218,142 - - 1,218,142 - 7,166,992 $ 7,601,217.98 $ - $ 306,268.33 $ - $ 7,907,486.31 McKinney#3(1) 171,228 B 350,012 178,784 684,910 C 178,784 - - 228,303 $ 242,135.18 $ 189,615.97 $ - $ - $ 431,751.15 Mesquite 4,885,178 5,756,029 870,851 - - 870,851 - 4,885,178 $ 5,181,155.89 $ - $ 218,951.55 $ - $ 5,400,107.45 Mesquite#3(1) 2,106,671 B 1,359,175 (747,496) 2,256,486 c - - - 2,106,671 $ 2,234,307.71 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,234,307.71 Plano 22,432,203 26,265,050 3,832,847 - - 3,832,847 - 22,432,203 $ 23,791,301.11 $ - $ 963,664.05 $ - $ 24,754,965.16 Princeton 337,039 409,624 72,585 - - 72,585 - 337,039 $ 357,459.16 $ - $ 18,249.50 $ - $ 375,708.66 Richardson 8,553,732 10,050,090 1,496,358 - - 1,496,358 - 8,553,732 $ 9,071,976.28 $ - $ 376,218.10 $ - $ 9,448,194.38 Rockwall 2,471,592 3,284,236 812,644 - - 812,644 - 2,471,592 $ 2,621,338.15 $ - $ 204,317.00 $ - $ 2,825,655.15 Royse City 338,437 470,150 131,713 - - 131,713 - 338,437 $ 358,941.86 $ - $ 33,115.61 $ - $ 392,057.47 Wylie 1,387,214 1,721,763 334,549 - - 334,549 - 1,387,214 $ 1,471,261.02 $ - $ 84,113.15 $ - $ 1,555,374.18 Total 74,745,872 87,396,751 12,650,879 188,133 13,210,242 - 74,805,481 $ 79,337,714.75 $ 199,531.40 $ 3,321,352.33 $ - $ 82,858,598.48 Customers $ 1.111 $ 1.111 $ 0.301 $ 0.251 Caddo Basin SUD 240,325 293,451 53,126 - - 53,126 - 240,325 $ 266,901.80 $ - $ 16,013.37 $ - $ 282,915.17 Cash SUD A 256,282 305,643 49,361 - - 49,361 - 256,282 $ 284,623.44 $ - $ 14,878.52 $ - $ 299,501.95 College Mound WSC A 9,825 62,710 52,885 - - 52,885 - 9,825 $ 10,911.52 $ - $ 15,940.73 $ - $ 26,852.25 Copeville WSC 66,320 77,927 11,607 113,866.6 C 11,607 - - 66,320 $ 73,654.12 $ 12,890.58 $ - $ - $ 86,544.71 East Fork SUD 221,755 324,226 102,471 280,831 C 59,076 43,395 - 221,755 $ 246,278.20 $ 65,609.03 $ 13,080.23 $ - $ 324,967.47 Fairview 478,582 721,185 242,603 - - 242,603 - 478,582 $ 531,506.91 $ - $ 73,126.01 $ - $ 604,632.92 Fate 155,139 279,932 124,793 - - 124,793 - 155,139 $ 172,295.34 $ - $ 37,615.42 $ - $ 209,910.76 Fate#2 - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Forney Lake WSC(1) 182,996 B 295,577 112,581 227,800 C 44,804 67,777 - 182,996 $ 203,232.96 $ 49,758.74 $ 20,429.51 $ - $ 273,421.21 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 107,566 107,875 309 - - 309 - 107,566 $ 119,461.39 $ - $ 93.14 $ - $ 119,554.53 Josephine 41,031 57,407 16,376 45,400 c 4,369 12,007 - 41,031 $ 45,568.49 $ 4,852.15 $ 3,619.18 $ - $ 54,039.83 Kaufman 409,164 438,403 29,239 - - 29,239 - 409,164 $ 454,412.19 $ - $ 8,813.29 $ - $ 463,225.48 Kaufman Four One A 382,065 450,363 68,298 - - 68,298 - 382,065 $ 424,316.39 $ - $ 20,586.56 $ - $ 444,902.95 Lavon WSC 148,610 217,256 68,646 - - 68,646 - 148,610 $ 165,044.32 $ - $ 20,691.45 $ - $ 185,735.77 Little Elm-Interim(1) 559,606 925,163 365,557 - - 365,557 - 457,859 $ 508,492.22 $ - $ 110,187.11 $ - $ 618,679.33 Little Elm-Permanent(1) 51,667 B 107,415 55,748 162,917 c 55,748 - - 155,000 $ 172,140.97 $ 61,913.00 $ - $ - $ 234,053.97 Lucas 308,034 212,681 (95,353) - - - (95,353) 308,034 $ 342,098.53 $ - $ - $ (23,973.89) $ 318,124.64 Lucas#3(1) 63,969 B 290,897 226,928 255,878 c 191,909 35,019 - 63,969 $ 71,043.13 $ 213,131.63 $ 10,555.52 $ - $ 294,730.28 Melissa 86,408 135,737 49,329 - - 49,329 - 86,408 $ 95,963.59 $ - $ 14,868.87 $ - $ 110,832.47 Milligan WSC 128,680 147,744 19,064 155,938 C 19,064 - - 128,680 $ 142,910.32 $ 21,172.23 $ - $ - $ 164,082.55 Mt.Zion WSC 108,196 159,302 51,106 - - 51,106 - 108,196 $ 120,161.06 $ - $ 15,404.50 $ - $ 135,565.56 Murphy 906,941 1,193,806 286,865 1,145,000 C 238,059 48,806 - 906,941 $ 1,007,236.81 $ 264,385.21 $ 14,711.23 $ - $ 1,286,333.25 Nevada WSC 68,787 56,413 (12,374) - - - (12,374) 38,969 $ 43,278.46 $ - $ - $ (3,111.10) $ 40,167.36 Nevada WSC#2(1) 30,766 31,766 1,000 44,925 c 1,000 - - 38,849 $ 43,145.19 $ 1,110.59 $ - $ - $ 44,255.78 North Collin WSC 290,010 318,780 28,770 300,000 C 9,990 18,780 - 290,010 $ 322,081.31 $ 11,094.76 $ 5,660.71 $ - $ 338,836.79 Parker 392,852 470,812 77,960 - - 77,960 - 392,852 $ 436,296.29 $ - $ 23,498.90 $ - $ 459,795.19 Prosper(1) 275,000 B 208,182 (66,818) 275,000 C - - - 275,000 $ 305,411.40 $ - $ - $ - $ 305,411.40 Rose Hill SUD A 12,847 42,818 29,971 48,000 c 29,971 - - 12,847 $ 14,267.71 $ 33,285.40 $ - $ - $ 47,553.11 Rowlett 2,734,709 3,192,039 457,330 4,051,017 c 457,330 - - 2,734,709 $ 3,037,132.05 $ 507,904.72 $ - $ - $ 3,545,036.76 Sachse 611,056 734,691 123,635 - - 123,635 - 611,056 $ 678,630.80 $ - $ 37,266.37 $ - $ 715,897.17 Sachse#2(1) 388,403 B 431,099 42,696 522,585 c 42,696 - - 388,403 $ 431,355.29 $ 47,417.62 $ - $ - $ 478,772.91 Seis Lagos MUD 71,594 111,094 39,500 - - 39,500 - 71,594 $ 79,511.36 $ - $ 11,906.19 $ - $ 91,417.55 Sunnyvale 391,036 559,135 168,099 910,969 c 168,099 - - 391,036 $ 434,279.47 $ 186,688.55 $ - $ - $ 620,968.02 Wylie NE SUD 143,816 197,289 53,473 - - 53,473 - 143,816 $ 159,720.17 $ - $ 16,117.97 $ - $ 175,838.13 Total 10,324,037 13,158,818 2,834,781 1,333,722 1,675,604 (107,727) 10,303,888 $ 11,443,363.25 $ 1,481,214.21 $ 505,064.78 $ (27,084.99) $ 13,402,557.24 Total 85,069,909 100,555,569 15,485,660 1,521,855 14,885,846 (107,727) 85,109,369 $ 90,781,078.00 $ 1,680,745.61 $ 3,826,417.11 $ (27,084.99) $ 96,261,156 Notes: Revenue Requirement 93,320,223 (1)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD Over/(Under)Recovery $ 2,940,933 (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix E Page 1 of 4 Method 5- 2003 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 03 FY 03 FY 03 Wtr Yr 03 Wtr Yr 03 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 03 Annual Full Excess FY 03 FY 03 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.870 $ 0.870 $ 0.870 $ 0.200 Allen 3,952,728 4,124,397 171,669 - - 171,669 3,952,728 $ 3,438,873 $ - $ 149,352 $ - $ 3,588,225 Farmersville 290,608 225,417 (65,191) - - - (65,191) 290,608 $ 252,829 $ - $ - $ (13,038) $ 239,791 Forney 743,504 788,921 45,417 - - 45,417 743,504 $ 646,848 $ - $ 39,513 $ - $ 686,361 Frisco 4,394,752 5,607,266 1,212,514 - - 1,212,514 4,394,752 $ 3,823,434 $ - $ 1,054,887 $ - $ 4,878,321 Garland 13,660,013 12,904,220 (755,793) - - - (755,793) 13,660,013 $ 11,884,211 $ - $ - $ (151,159) $ 11,733,053 McKinney 5,748,746 6,350,897 602,151 - - 602,151 5,748,746 $ 5,001,409 $ - $ 523,871 $ - $ 5,525,280 Mesquite 6,041,180 5,575,688 (465,492) - - - (465,492) 6,041,180 $ 5,255,827 $ - $ - $ (93,098) $ 5,162,728 Mesquite#3 1,881,950 B 1,170,130 (711,820) 2,256,486 c - - - 1,881,950 $ 1,637,297 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,637,297 Plano 26,719,809 22,745,013 (3,974,796) - - - (3,974,796) 26,719,809 $ 23,246,234 $ - $ - $ (794,959) $ 22,451,275 Princeton 328,803 287,581 (41,222) - - - (41,222) 328,803 $ 286,059 $ - $ - $ (8,244) $ 277,814 Richardson 11,019,311 10,135,415 (883,896) - - - (883,896) 11,019,311 $ 9,586,801 $ - $ - $ (176,779) $ 9,410,021 Rockwall 2,188,525 2,234,227 45,702 - - 45,702 - 2,188,525 $ 1,904,017 $ - $ 39,761 $ - $ 1,943,777 Royse City 277,416 286,471 9,055 - - 9,055 - 277,416 $ 241,352 $ - $ 7,878 $ - $ 249,230 Wylie 907,331 1,042,381 135,050 - - 135,050 - 907,331 $ 789,378 $ - $ 117,494 $ - $ 906,871 Total 78,154,676 73,478,024 (4,676,652) - 2,221,558 (6,186,390) 78,154,676 $ 67,994,568 $ - $ 1,932,755 $ (1,237,278) $ 68,690,046 Customers $ 0.920 $ 0.920 $ 0.920 $ 0.200 Caddo Basin 252,318 245,280 (7,038) - - - (7,038) 252,318 $ 232,133 $ - $ - $ (1,408) $ 230,725 Cash SUD A 237,267 221,385 (15,882) - - - - 237,267 $ 218,286 $ - $ - $ - $ 218,286 College Mound WSC A 66,769 62,017 (4,752) - - - - 66,769 $ 61,427 $ - $ - $ - $ 61,427 Copeville WSC 65,737 68,468 2,731 113,866.6 c 2,731 - - 65,737 $ 60,478 $ 2,513 $ - $ - $ 62,991 East Fork SUD 183,632 188,012 4,380 280,831 c 4,380 - - 183,632 $ 168,941 $ 4,030 $ - $ - $ 172,971 Fairview 364,741 394,901 30,160 - - 30,160 - 364,741 $ 335,562 $ - $ 27,747 $ - $ 363,309 Fate 69,529 77,744 8,215 - - 8,215 - 69,529 $ 63,967 $ - $ 7,558 $ - $ 71,524 Forney Lake WSC 153,126 131,507 (21,619) - - - (21,619) 153,126 $ 140,876 $ - $ - $ (4,324) $ 136,552 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 110,490 101,254 (9,236) - - - (9,236) 110,490 $ 101,651 $ - $ - $ (1,847) $ 99,804 Josephine 40,978 33,301 (7,677) 45,400 c - - (7,677) 40,978 $ 37,700 $ - $ - $ (1,535) $ 36,164 Kaufman 419,999 392,227 (27,772) - - - (27,772) 419,999 $ 386,399 $ - $ - $ (5,554) $ 380,845 Kaufman Four One A 396,327 356,603 (39,724) - - - - 396,327 $ 364,621 $ - $ - $ - $ 364,621 Lavon WSC 142,389 B 124,858 (17,531) 142,389 c - - - 142,389 $ 130,998 $ - $ - $ - $ 130,998 Little Elm 210,964 368,734 157,770 - - 157,770 - 210,964 $ 194,087 $ - $ 145,148 $ - $ 339,235 Lucas 337,693 271,766 (65,927) - - - (65,927) 337,693 $ 310,678 $ - $ - $ (13,185) $ 297,492 Melissa 48,664 B 32,160 (16,504) 73,000 c - - - 60,833 $ 55,966 $ - $ - $ - $ 55,966 Milligan WSC 121,388 149,894 28,506 155,938 c 28,506 - - 121,388 $ 111,677 $ 26,226 $ - $ - $ 137,902 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 100,946 (24,540) - - - (24,540) 125,486 $ 115,447 $ - $ - $ (4,908) $ 110,539 Murphy 496,860 655,870 159,010 - - 159,010 - 496,860 $ 457,111 $ - $ 146,289 $ - $ 603,400 Nevada WSC 69,001 71,043 2,042 - - 2,042 - 69,001 $ 63,481 $ - $ 1,879 $ - $ 65,360 North Collin WSC 287,568 274,347 (13,221) 300,000 c - - (13,221) 287,568 $ 264,563 $ - $ - $ (2,644) $ 261,918 Parker 228,969 306,201 77,232 - - 77,232 - 228,969 $ 210,651 $ - $ 71,053 $ - $ 281,705 Rose Hill WSC A 43,271 16,160 (27,111) 48,000 c - - - 43,271 $ 39,809 $ - $ - $ - $ 39,809 Rowlett 2,920,333 2,772,637 (147,696) 4,051,017 c - - (147,696) 2,920,333 $ 2,686,706 $ - $ - $ (29,539) $ 2,657,167 Sachse 724,857 612,776 (112,081) - - - (112,081) 724,857 $ 666,868 $ - $ - $ (22,416) $ 644,452 Sachse#2 130,646 B 388,403 257,757 522,585 c 257,757 - - 130,646 $ 120,194 $ 237,136 $ - $ - $ 357,331 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 74,712 (8,007) - - - (8,007) 82,719 $ 76,101 $ - $ - $ (1,601) $ 74,500 Sunnyvale 439,743 362,405 (77,338) 910,969 c - - (77,338) 439,743 $ 404,564 $ - $ - $ (15,468) $ 389,096 Wylie NE WSC 130,896 118,559 (12,337) - - - (12,337) 130,896 $ 120,424 $ - $ - $ (2,467) $ 117,957 Total 8,902,360 8,974,170 71,810 293,374 434,429 (534,489) 8,914,529 $ 8,201,367 $ 269,904 $ 399,675 $ (106,898) $ 8,764,048 Total 87,057,036 82,452,194 (4,604,842) 293,374 2,655,987 (6,720,879) 87,069,205 $ 76,195,935 $ 269,904 $ 2,332,430 $ (1,344,176) $ 77,454,093 Current Budget $ 76,195,935 Revenue Requirement $ 75,674,582 Excess Revenue $ 1,779,511 North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix E Page 2 of 4 Method 5- 2004 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 04 FY 04 FY 04 Wtr Yr 04 Wtr Yr 04 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 04 Annual Full Excess FY 04 FY 04 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.900 $ 0.900 $ 0.900 $ 0.196 Allen 4,124,397 4,362,143 237,746 - - 237,746 4,124,397 $ 3,712,992 $ - $ 214,031 $ - $ 3,927,023 Farmersville 290,608 246,458 (44,150) - - - (44,150) 290,608 $ 261,620 $ - $ - $ (8,642) $ 252,979 Forney 788,921 891,245 102,324 - - 102,324 788,921 $ 710,227 $ - $ 92,117 $ - $ 802,344 Frisco 5,607,266 5,645,797 38,531 - - 38,531 5,607,266 $ 5,047,946 $ - $ 34,688 $ - $ 5,082,633 Garland 13,660,013 12,612,613 (1,047,400) - - - (1,047,400) 13,660,013 $ 12,297,438 $ - $ - $ (205,009) $ 12,092,429 McKinney 6,350,897 6,582,712 231,815 - - 231,815 6,350,897 $ 5,717,400 $ - $ 208,692 $ - $ 5,926,092 Mesquite 6,041,180 4,814,443 (1,226,737) - - - (1,226,737) 6,041,180 $ 5,438,577 $ - $ - $ (240,111) $ 5,198,466 Mesquite#3 1,956,857 B 1,597,147 (359,710) 2,256,486 c - - - 1,956,857 $ 1,761,662 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,761,662 Plano 26,719,809 22,149,517 (4,570,292) - - - (4,570,292) 26,719,809 $ 24,054,530 $ - $ - $ (894,550) $ 23,159,980 Princeton 328,803 289,199 (39,604) - - - (39,604) 328,803 $ 296,005 $ - $ - $ (7,752) $ 288,253 Richardson 11,019,311 9,532,442 (1,486,869) - - - (1,486,869) 11,019,311 $ 9,920,144 $ - $ - $ (291,027) $ 9,629,117 Rockwall 2,234,227 2,332,266 98,039 - - 98,039 - 2,234,227 $ 2,011,365 $ - $ 88,260 $ - $ 2,099,624 Royse City 286,471 327,863 41,392 - - 41,392 - 286,471 $ 257,896 $ - $ 37,263 $ - $ 295,159 Wylie 1,042,381 1,266,615 224,234 - - 224,234 - 1,042,381 $ 938,404 $ - $ 201,867 $ - $ 1,140,271 Total 80,451,141 72,650,460 (7,800,681) - 974,081 (8,415,052) 80,451,141 $ 72,426,206 $ - $ 876,917 $ (1,647,091) $ 71,656,032 Customers $ 0.950 $ 0.950 $ 0.950 $ 0.196 Caddo Basin 252,318 223,734 (28,584) - - - (28,584) 252,318 $ 239,765 $ - $ - $ (5,595) $ 234,171 Cash SUD A 237,267 257,909 20,642 - - 20,642 - 237,267 $ 225,463 $ - $ 19,615 $ - $ 245,078 College Mound WSC A 66,769 52,093 (14,676) - - - - 66,769 $ 63,447 $ - $ - $ - $ 63,447 Copeville WSC 68,468 73,935 5,467 113,866.6 c 5,467 - - 68,468 $ 65,062 $ 5,195 $ - $ - $ 70,257 East Fork SUD 188,012 202,927 14,915 280,831 c 14,915 - - 188,012 $ 178,659 $ 14,173 $ - $ - $ 192,832 Fairview 394,901 420,325 25,424 - - 25,424 - 394,901 $ 375,255 $ - $ 24,159 $ - $ 399,414 Fate 77,744 113,197 35,453 - - 35,453 - 77,744 $ 73,876 $ - $ 33,689 $ - $ 107,566 Forney Lake WSC 153,126 B 135,370 (17,756) 227,800 c - - - 153,126 $ 145,508 $ - $ - $ - $ 145,508 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 110,490 98,508 (11,982) - - - (11,982) 110,490 $ 104,993 $ - $ - $ (2,345) $ 102,648 Josephine 40,978 38,203 (2,775) 45,400 c - - (2,775) 40,978 $ 38,939 $ - $ - $ (543) $ 38,396 Kaufman 419,999 419,659 (340) - - - (340) 419,999 $ 399,104 $ - $ - $ (67) $ 399,038 Kaufman Four One A 396,327 396,336 9 - - 9 - 396,327 $ 376,610 $ - $ 9 $ - $ 376,619 Lavon WSC 142,389 B 141,538 (851) 142,389 c - - - 142,389 $ 135,305 $ - $ - $ - $ 135,305 Little Elm 368,734 504,167 135,433 - - 135,433 - 368,734 $ 350,390 $ - $ 128,695 $ - $ 479,085 Lucas 337,693 301,984 (35,709) - - - (35,709) 337,693 $ 320,893 $ - $ - $ (6,989) $ 313,904 Melissa 73,000 B 59,467 (13,533) 73,000 c - - - 73,000 $ 69,368 $ - $ - $ - $ 69,368 Milligan WSC 149,894 127,646 (22,248) 155,938 c - - (22,248) 149,894 $ 142,437 $ - $ - $ (4,355) $ 138,082 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 108,816 (16,670) - - - (16,670) 125,486 $ 119,243 $ - $ - $ (3,263) $ 115,980 Murphy 655,870 792,811 136,941 - - 136,941 - 655,870 $ 623,241 $ - $ 130,128 $ - $ 753,369 Nevada WSC 71,043 71,813 770 - - 770 - 71,043 $ 67,509 $ - $ 732 $ - $ 68,240 North Collin WSC 287,568 284,428 (3,140) 300,000 c - - (3,140) 287,568 $ 273,262 $ - $ - $ (615) $ 272,647 Parker 306,201 344,660 38,459 - - 38,459 - 306,201 $ 290,968 $ - $ 36,546 $ - $ 327,513 Rose Hill WSC A 43,271 7,689 (35,582) 48,000 c - - - 43,271 $ 41,118 $ - $ - $ - $ 41,118 Rowlett 2,920,333 2,772,411 (147,922) 4,051,017 c - - (147,922) 2,920,333 $ 2,775,049 $ - $ - $ (28,953) $ 2,746,096 Sachse 724,857 762,689 37,832 - - 37,832 - 724,857 $ 688,796 $ - $ 35,950 $ - $ 724,746 Sachse#2 388,403 B 194,171 (194,232) 522,585 c - - - 388,403 $ 369,080 $ - $ - $ - $ 369,080 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 76,473 (6,246) - - - (6,246) 82,719 $ 78,604 $ - $ - $ (1,223) $ 77,381 Sunnyvale 439,743 376,311 (63,432) 910,969 c - - (63,432) 439,743 $ 417,866 $ - $ - $ (12,416) $ 405,451 Wylie NE WSC 130,896 120,048 (10,848) - - - (10,848) 130,896 $ 124,384 $ - $ - $ (2,123) $ 122,261 Total 9,654,499 9,479,318 (175,181) 20,382 430,963 (349,896) 9,654,499 $ 9,174,196 $ 19,368 $ 409,523 $ (68,486) $ 9,534,601 Total 90,105,640 82,129,778 (7,975,862) 20,382 1,405,044 (8,764,948) 90,105,640 $ 81,600,402 $ 19,368 $ 1,286,440 $ (1,715,577) $ 81,190,633 Current Budget $ 83,379,914 Revenue Requirement $ 81,949,252 Excess from Prior Year $ (1,779,511) $ (1,779,511) Adjusted Budget $ 81,600,402 Adjusted Revenue Requirement $ 80,169,740 Excess Revenue $ 1,020,893 North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix E Page 3 of 4 Method 5-2005 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY05 Excess Rate FY 05 FY 05 FY 05 Wtr Yr 05 Wtr Yr 05 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 05 Annual Full Excess FY 05 FY 05 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.959 $ 0.959 $ 0.959 $ 0.198 Allen 4,362,143 4,687,958 325,815 - - 325,815 4,362,143 $ 4,182,821 $ - $ 312,421 $ - $ 4,495,242 Farmersville 270,608 242,487 (28,121) - - - (28,121) 270,608 $ 259,484 $ - $ - $ (5,560) $ 253,923 Forney 891,245 1,059,328 168,083 - - 168,083 891,245 $ 854,607 $ - $ 161,173 $ - $ 1,015,780 Frisco 5,645,797 6,467,274 821,477 - - 821,477 5,645,797 $ 5,413,705 $ - $ 787,707 $ - $ 6,201,412 Garland 13,660,013 12,435,423 (1,224,590) - - - (1,224,590) 13,660,013 $ 13,098,466 $ - $ - $ (242,129) $ 12,856,337 McKinney 6,582,712 7,166,992 584,280 - - 584,280 6,582,712 $ 6,312,105 $ - $ 560,261 $ - $ 6,872,366 Mesquite 6,041,180 4,885,178 (1,156,002) - - - (1,156,002) 6,041,180 $ 5,792,834 $ - $ - $ (228,568) $ 5,564,266 Mesquite#3 2,031,764 B 1,351,516 (680,248) 2,256,486 C - - - 2,031,764 $ 1,948,241 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,948,241 Plano 26,719,809 22,432,203 (4,287,606) - - - (4,287,606) 26,719,809 $ 25,621,390 $ - $ - $ (847,758) $ 24,773,632 Princeton 328,803 337,039 8,236 - - 8,236 - 328,803 $ 315,286 $ - $ 7,897 $ - $ 323,184 Richardson 11,019,311 8,553,732 (2,465,579) - - - (2,465,579) 11,019,311 $ 10,566,321 $ - $ - $ (487,501) $ 10,078,819 Rockwall 2,332,266 2,471,592 139,326 - - 139,326 - 2,332,266 $ 2,236,389 $ - $ 133,598 $ - $ 2,369,988 Royse City 327,863 338,437 10,574 - - 10,574 - 327,863 $ 314,385 $ - $ 10,139 $ - $ 324,524 Wylie 1,266,615 1,387,214 120,599 - - 120,599 - 1,266,615 $ 1,214,546 $ - $ 115,641 $ - $ 1,330,187 Total 81,480,129 73,816,373 (7,663,756) - 2,178,390 (9,161,898) 81,480,129 $ 78,130,580 $ - $ 2,088,839 $ (1,811,516) $ 78,407,902 Customers $ 1.009 $ 1.009 $ 1.009 $ 0.198 Caddo Basin 272,318 240,325 (31,993) - - - (31,993) 272,318 $ 274,739 $ - $ - $ (6,326) $ 268,413 Cash SUD A 257,909 256,282 (1,627) - - - - 257,909 $ 260,202 $ - $ - $ - $ 260,202 College Mound WSC A 66,769 9,825 (56,944) - - - - 66,769 $ 67,363 $ - $ - $ - $ 67,363 Copeville WSC 73,935 66,320 (7,615) 113,866.6 c - - (7,615) 73,935 $ 74,592 $ - $ - $ (1,506) $ 73,087 East Fork SUD 202,927 221,755 18,828 280,831 c 18,828 - - 202,927 $ 204,731 $ 18,995 $ - $ - $ 223,727 Fairview 420,325 478,582 58,257 - - 58,257 - 420,325 $ 424,062 $ - $ 58,775 $ - $ 482,837 Fate 113,197 155,139 41,942 - - 41,942 - 113,197 $ 114,203 $ - $ 42,315 $ - $ 156,518 Forney Lake WSC 171,795 B 164,447 (7,348) 227,800 C - - - 171,795 $ 173,322 $ - $ - $ - $ 173,322 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 110,490 107,566 (2,924) - - - (2,924) 110,490 $ 111,472 $ - $ - $ (578) $ 110,894 Josephine 40,978 41,031 53 45,400 C 53 - - 40,978 $ 41,342 $ 53 $ - $ - $ 41,396 Kaufman 419,999 409,164 (10,835) - - - (10,835) 419,999 $ 423,733 $ - $ - $ (2,142) $ 421,591 Kaufman Four One A 396,336 382,065 (14,271) - - - - 396,336 $ 399,860 $ - $ - $ - $ 399,860 Lavon WSC 142,389 B 148,610 6,221 142,389 C - 6,221 - 142,389 $ 143,655 $ - $ 6,276 $ - $ 149,931 Little Elm 504,167 610,479 106,312 - - 106,312 - 504,167 $ 508,650 $ - $ 107,257 $ - $ 615,907 Lucas 337,693 308,034 (29,659) - - - (29,659) 337,693 $ 340,696 $ - $ - $ (5,864) $ 334,831 Lucas#3 - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Melissa 73,000 B 86,408 13,408 73,000 c - 13,408 - 73,000 $ 73,649 $ - $ 13,527 $ - $ 87,176 Milligan WSC 149,894 128,680 (21,214) 155,938 C - - (21,214) 149,894 $ 151,227 $ - $ - $ (4,194) $ 147,032 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 108,196 (17,290) - - - (17,290) 125,486 $ 126,602 $ - $ - $ (3,419) $ 123,183 Murphy 792,811 906,941 114,130 - - 114,130 - 792,811 $ 799,860 $ - $ 115,145 $ - $ 915,005 Nevada WSC 71,813 68,787 (3,026) - - - (3,026) 71,813 $ 72,452 $ - $ - $ (598) $ 71,853 North Collin WSC 287,568 290,010 2,442 300,000 c 2,442 - - 287,568 $ 290,125 $ 2,464 $ - $ - $ 292,589 Parker 344,660 392,852 48,192 - - 48,192 - 344,660 $ 347,724 $ - $ 48,620 $ - $ 396,345 Prosper 236,575 B 95,406 (141,169) 236,575 c - - - 275,000 $ 277,445 $ - $ - $ - $ 277,445 Rose Hill WSC A 43,271 12,847 (30,424) 48,000 c - - - 43,271 $ 43,656 $ - $ - $ - $ 43,656 Rowlett 2,920,333 2,734,709 (185,624) 4,051,017 c - - (185,624) 2,920,333 $ 2,946,298 $ - $ - $ (36,702) $ 2,909,596 Sachse 762,689 611,056 (151,633) - - - (151,633) 762,689 $ 769,470 $ - $ - $ (29,981) $ 739,489 Sachse#2 388,403 E 385,477 (2,926) 522,585 C - - - 388,403 $ 391,856 $ - $ - $ - $ 391,856 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 71,594 (11,125) - - - (11,125) 82,719 $ 83,454 $ - $ - $ (2,200) $ 81,255 Sunnyvale 439,743 391,036 (48,707) 910,969 C - - (48,707) 439,743 $ 443,653 $ - $ - $ (9,630) $ 434,022 Wylie NE WSC 130,896 143,816 12,920 - - 12,920 - 130,896 $ 132,060 $ - $ 13,035 $ - $ 145,095 Total 10,381,088 10,027,439 (353,649) 21,323 401,382 (521,645) 10,419,513 $ 10,512,155 $ 21,513 $ 404,951 $ (103,141) $ 10,835,477 Total 91,861,217 83,843,812 (8,017,405) 21,323 2,579,772 (9,683,543) 91,899,642 $ 88,642,735 $ 21,513 $ 2,493,790 $ (1,914,658) $ 89,243,380 Current Budget $ 89,663,628 Revenue Requirement $ 88,284,693 Excess from Prior Year $ (1,020,893) $ (1,020,893) Adjusted Budget $ 88,642,735 Adjusted Revenue Requirement $ 87,263,800 Excess Revenue $ 1,979,580 North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix E Page 4 of 4 Method 5- 2006 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY06 Excess Rate FY 06 FY 06 FY 06 Wtr Yr 06 Wtr Yr 06 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 06 Annual Full Excess FY 06 FY 06 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.949 $ 0.949 $ 0.949 $ 0.225 Allen 4,687,958 5,588,259 900,301 - - 900,301 - 4,687,958 $ 4,449,523 $ - $ 854,511 $ - $ 5,304,034 Farmersville 270,608 280,467 9,859 - - 9,859 - 270,608 $ 256,845 $ - $ 9,358 $ - $ 266,202 Forney 1,059,328 1,416,868 357,540 - - 357,540 - 1,059,328 $ 1,005,449 $ - $ 339,355 $ - $ 1,344,804 Frisco 6,467,274 7,918,529 1,451,255 - - 1,451,255 - 6,467,274 $ 6,138,341 $ - $ 1,377,443 $ - $ 7,515,784 Frisco#2 3,116 B 419,410 416,294 12,465 c 9,349 406,945 - 5,650 $ 5,363 $ 8,873 $ 386,247 $ - $ 400,483 Garland 13,660,013 13,721,955 61,942 - - 61,942 - 13,660,013 $ 12,965,249 $ - $ 58,792 $ - $ 13,024,041 McKinney 7,166,992 8,385,134 1,218,142 - - 1,218,142 - 7,166,992 $ 6,802,471 $ - $ 1,156,186 $ - $ 7,958,656 McKinney#3 171,228 B 350,012 178,784 684,910 c 178,784 - - 228,303 $ 216,691 $ 169,691 $ - $ - $ 386,382 Mesquite 6,041,180 5,756,029 (285,151) - - - (285,151) 6,041,180 $ 5,733,919 $ - $ - $ (64,183) $ 5,669,736 Mesquite#3 2,106,671 B 1,359,175 (747,496) 2,256,486 c - - - 2,106,671 $ 1,999,523 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,999,523 Plano 26,719,809 26,265,050 (454,759) - - - (454,759) 26,719,809 $ 25,360,809 $ - $ - $ (102,358) $ 25,258,450 Princeton 337,039 409,624 72,585 - - 72,585 - 337,039 $ 319,897 $ - $ 68,893 $ - $ 388,790 Richardson 11,019,311 10,050,090 (969,221) - - - (969,221) 11,019,311 $ 10,458,856 $ - $ - $ (218,155) $ 10,240,701 Rockwall 2,471,592 3,284,236 812,644 - - 812,644 - 2,471,592 $ 2,345,884 $ - $ 771,312 $ - $ 3,117,196 Royse City 338,437 470,150 131,713 - - 131,713 - 338,437 $ 321,224 $ - $ 125,014 $ - $ 446,238 Wylie 1,387,214 1,721,763 334,549 - - 334,549 - 1,387,214 $ 1,316,659 $ - $ 317,533 $ - $ 1,634,192 Total 83,907,770 87,396,751 3,488,981 188,133 5,757,475 (1,709,131) 83,967,379 $ 79,696,702 $ 178,564 $ 5,464,643 $ (384,696) $ 84,955,213 Customers $ 0.999 $ 0.999 $ 0.999 $ 0.225 Caddo Basin SUD 272,318 293,451 21,133 - - 21,133 - 272,318 $ 272,083 $ - $ 21,115 $ - $ 293,198 Cash SUD A 257,909 305,643 47,734 - - 47,734 - 257,909 $ 257,687 $ - $ 47,693 $ - $ 305,380 College Mound WSC A 66,769 62,710 (4,059) - - - - 66,769 $ 66,712 $ - $ - $ - $ 66,712 Copeville WSC 73,935 77,927 3,992 113,866.6 c 3,992 - - 73,935 $ 73,871 $ 3,989 $ - $ - $ 77,860 East Fork SUD 221,755 324,226 102,471 280,831 c 59,076 43,395 - 221,755 $ 221,564 $ 59,025 $ 43,358 $ - $ 323,947 Fairview 478,582 721,185 242,603 - - 242,603 - 478,582 $ 478,170 $ - $ 242,394 $ - $ 720,564 Fate 155,139 279,932 124,793 - - 124,793 - 155,139 $ 155,005 $ - $ 124,686 $ - $ 279,691 Fate#2 - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Forney Lake WSC 182,996 B 295,577 112,581 227,800 c 44,804 67,777 - 182,996 $ 182,838 $ 44,765 $ 67,719 $ - $ 295,322 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 110,490 107,875 (2,615) - - - (2,615) 110,490 $ 110,395 $ - $ - $ (589) $ 109,806 Josephine 41,031 57,407 16,376 45,400 c 4,369 12,007 - 41,031 $ 40,996 $ 4,365 $ 11,997 $ - $ 57,358 Kaufman 419,999 438,403 18,404 - - 18,404 - 419,999 $ 419,637 $ - $ 18,388 $ - $ 438,025 Kaufman Four One A 396,336 450,363 54,027 - - 54,027 - 396,336 $ 395,995 $ - $ 53,980 $ - $ 449,975 Lavon WSC 148,610 217,256 68,646 - - 68,646 - 148,610 $ 148,482 $ - $ 68,587 $ - $ 217,069 Little Elm-Interim 559,606 925,163 365,557 - - 365,557 - 457,859 $ 457,465 $ - $ 365,242 $ - $ 822,707 Little Elm-Permanent 51,667 B 107,415 55,748 162,917 c 55,748 - - 155,000 $ 154,867 $ 55,700 $ - $ - $ 210,567 Lucas 337,693 212,681 (125,012) - - - (125,012) 337,693 $ 337,402 $ - $ - $ (28,138) $ 309,264 Lucas#3 63,969 B 290,897 226,928 255,878 c 191,909 35,019 - 63,969 $ 63,914 $ 191,744 $ 34,989 $ - $ 290,646 Melissa 86,408 135,737 49,329 - - 49,329 - 86,408 $ 86,334 $ - $ 49,287 $ - $ 135,620 Milligan WSC 149,894 147,744 (2,150) 155,938 c - - (2,150) 149,894 $ 149,765 $ - $ - $ (484) $ 149,281 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 159,302 33,816 - - 33,816 - 125,486 $ 125,378 $ - $ 33,787 $ - $ 159,165 Murphy 906,941 1,193,806 286,865 1,145,000 c 238,059 48,806 - 906,941 $ 906,160 $ 237,854 $ 48,764 $ - $ 1,192,778 Nevada WSC 45,802 56,413 10,611 - - 10,611 - 38,969 $ 38,935 $ - $ 10,602 $ - $ 49,537 Nevada WSC#2 30,766 31,766 1,000 44,925 c 1,000 - - 38,849 $ 38,816 $ 999 $ - $ - $ 39,815 North Collin WSC 290,010 318,780 28,770 300,000 c 9,990 18,780 - 290,010 $ 289,760 $ 9,981 $ 18,764 $ - $ 318,505 Parker 392,852 470,812 77,960 - - 77,960 - 392,852 $ 392,514 $ - $ 77,893 $ - $ 470,407 Prosper 275,000 B 208,182 (66,818) 275,000 c - - - 275,000 $ 274,763 $ - $ - $ - $ 274,763 Rose Hill SUD A 43,271 42,818 (453) 48,000 c - - - 43,271 $ 43,234 $ - $ - $ - $ 43,234 Rowlett 2,920,333 3,192,039 271,706 4,051,017 c 271,706 - - 2,920,333 $ 2,917,818 $ 271,472 $ - $ - $ 3,189,290 Sachse 762,689 734,691 (27,998) - - - (27,998) 762,689 $ 762,032 $ - $ - $ (6,302) $ 755,730 Sachse#2 388,403 E 431,099 42,696 522,585 c 42,696 - - 388,403 $ 388,069 $ 42,659 $ - $ - $ 430,728 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 111,094 28,375 - - 28,375 - 82,719 $ 82,648 $ - $ 28,351 $ - $ 110,998 Sunnyvale 439,743 559,135 119,392 910,969 c 119,392 - - 439,743 $ 439,364 $ 119,289 $ - $ - $ 558,654 Wylie NE SUD 143,816 197,289 53,473 - - 53,473 - 143,816 $ 143,692 $ - $ 53,427 $ - $ 197,119 Total 10,922,937 13,158,818 2,235,881 1,042,741 1,422,245 (157,775) 10,925,773 $ 10,916,364 $ 1,041,843 $ 1,421,020 $ (35,512) $ 13,343,715 $ - $ - $ - $Total 94,830,707 100,555,569 5,724,862 1,230,874 7,179,720 (1,866,906) 94,893,152 $ 90,613,066 $ 1,220,407 $ 6,885,663 $ (420,208) $ 98,298,929 Current Budget $ 92,592,646 Revenue Requirement $ 95,131,790 Excess from Prior Year $ (1,979,580) $ (1,979,580) Adjusted Budget $ 90,613,066 Adjusted Revenue Requirement $ 93,152,210 Excess Revenue $ 5,146,718 North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix F Page 1 of 4 Method 6-2003 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 03 FY 03 FY 03 Wtr Yr 03 Wtr Yr 03 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 03 Annual Full Excess FY 03 FY 03 FY 03 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate(2) Rebate(3) Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.974 $ 0.974 $ 0.974 $ 0.224 $ 0.750 Allen 3,699,752 4,124,397 424,645 - - 424,645 3,699,752 $ 3,603,699 $ - $ 413,620 $ - $ (318,610) $ 3,698,710 Farmersville 228,235 225,417 (2,818) - - - (2,818) 228,235 $ 222,310 $ - $ - $ (631) $ - $ 221,679 Forney 658,408 788,921 130,513 - - 130,513 658,408 $ 641,314 $ - $ 127,125 $ - $ (97,924) $ 670,516 Frisco 4,394,752 5,607,266 1,212,514 - - 1,212,514 4,394,752 $ 4,280,655 $ - $ 1,181,035 $ - $ (909,746) $ 4,551,944 Garland 12,051,601 12,904,220 852,619 - - 852,619 - 12,051,601 $ 11,738,717 $ - $ 830,483 $ - $ (639,718) $ 11,929,483 McKinney 5,689,078 6,350,897 661,819 - - 661,819 5,689,078 $ 5,541,378 $ - $ 644,637 $ - $ (496,561) $ 5,689,454 Mesquite(') 6,041,180 5,575,688 (465,492) - - - (465,492) 6,041,180 $ 5,884,339 $ - $ - $ (104,150) $ - $ 5,780,189 Mesquite#3(1) 1,881,950 B 1,170,130 (711,820) 2,256,486 c - - - 1,881,950 $ 1,833,091 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,833,091 Plano 22,459,418 22,745,013 285,595 - - 285,595 - 22,459,418 $ 21,876,327 $ - $ 278,180 $ - $ (214,281) $ 21,940,226 Princeton 278,431 287,581 9,150 - - 9,150 - 278,431 $ 271,202 $ - $ 8,912 $ - $ (6,865) $ 273,250 Richardson 9,773,780 10,135,415 361,635 - - 361,635 - 9,773,780 $ 9,520,033 $ - $ 352,246 $ - $ (271,334) $ 9,600,946 Rockwall 1,876,570 2,234,227 357,657 - - 357,657 - 1,876,570 $ 1,827,850 $ - $ 348,372 $ - $ (268,349) $ 1,907,873 Royse City 257,149 286,471 29,322 - - 29,322 - 257,149 $ 250,473 $ - $ 28,561 $ - $ (22,000) $ 257,033 Wylie 816,417 1,042,381 225,964 - - 225,964 - 816,417 $ 795,221 $ - $ 220,098 $ - $ (169,540) $ 845,779 Total 70,106,721 73,478,024 3,371,303 - 4,551,433 (468,310) 70,106,721 $ 68,286,611 $ - $ 4,433,269 $ (104,780) $ (3,414,927) $ 69,200,172 Customers $ 1.024 $ 1.024 $ 1.024 $ 0.224 $ 0.750 Caddo Basin 197,652 245,280 47,628 - - 47,628 - 197,652 $ 202,403 $ - $ 48,773 $ - $ (35,735) $ 215,441 Cash SUD A 211,830 221,385 9,555 - - 9,555 - 211,830 $ 216,922 $ - $ 9,785 $ - $ (7,169) $ 219,538 College Mound WSC A 56,135 62,017 5,882 - - 5,882 - 56,135 $ 57,484 $ - $ 6,023 $ - $ (4,413) $ 59,095 Copeville WSC 65,737 68,468 2,731 113,867 c 2,731 - - 65,737 $ 67,317 $ 2,797 $ - $ - $ - $ 70,114 East Fork SUD 150,055 188,012 37,957 280,831 c 37,957 - - 150,055 $ 153,662 $ 38,869 $ - $ - $ - $ 192,531 Fairview 352,745 394,901 42,156 - - 42,156 - 352,745 $ 361,224 $ - $ 43,169 $ - $ (31,630) $ 372,764 Fate 69,529 77,744 8,215 - - 8,215 - 69,529 $ 71,200 $ - $ 8,412 $ - $ (6,164) $ 73,449 Forney Lake WSC 112,745 131,507 18,762 - - 18,762 112,745 $ 115,455 $ - $ 19,213 $ - $ (14,077) $ 120,591 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 80,336 101,254 20,918 - - 20,918 - 80,336 $ 82,267 $ - $ 21,421 $ - $ (15,695) $ 87,993 Josephine 40,978 33,301 (7,677) 45,400 c - - (7,677) 40,978 $ 41,963 $ - $ - $ (1,718) $ - $ 40,245 Kaufman 419,999 392,227 (27,772) - - - (27,772) 419,999 $ 430,095 $ - $ - $ (6,214) $ - $ 423,881 Kaufman Four One A 337,611 356,603 18,992 - - 18,992 - 337,611 $ 345,726 $ - $ 19,449 $ - $ (14,250) $ 350,925 Lavon WSC(1) 142,389 B 124,858 (17,531) 142,389 c - - - 142,389 $ 145,812 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 145,812 Little Elm 210,964 368,734 157,770 - - 157,770 - 210,964 $ 216,035 $ - $ 161,562 $ - $ (118,374) $ 259,223 Lucas 243,856 271,766 27,910 - - 27,910 - 243,856 $ 249,718 $ - $ 28,581 $ - $ (20,941) $ 257,358 Melissa(1) 48,664 B 32,160 (16,504) 73,000 c - - - 60,833 $ 62,295 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 62,295 Milligan WSC 115,787 149,894 34,107 155,938 c 34,107 - - 115,787 $ 118,570 $ 34,927 $ - $ - $ - $ 153,497 Mt.Zion WSC 97,279 100,946 3,667 - - 3,667 - 97,279 $ 99,617 $ - $ 3,755 $ - $ (2,751) $ 100,621 Murphy 496,860 655,870 159,010 - - 159,010 - 496,860 $ 508,804 $ - $ 162,832 $ - $ (119,305) $ 552,331 Nevada WSC 66,189 71,043 4,854 - - 4,854 - 66,189 $ 67,780 $ - $ 4,971 $ - $ (3,642) $ 69,109 North Collin WSC 245,779 274,347 28,568 300,000 c 28,568 - - 245,779 $ 251,687 $ 29,255 $ - $ - $ - $ 280,942 Parker 228,969 306,201 77,232 - - 77,232 - 228,969 $ 234,473 $ - $ 79,089 $ - $ (57,947) $ 255,615 Rose Hill WSC A 40,056 16,160 (23,896) 48,000 c - - - 40,056 $ 41,019 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 41,019 Rowlett 2,564,207 2,772,637 208,430 4,051,017 c 208,430 - - 2,564,207 $ 2,625,845 $ 213,440 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,839,286 Sachse 521,439 612,776 91,337 - - 91,337 - 521,439 $ 533,973 $ - $ 93,533 $ - $ (68,530) $ 558,976 Sachse#2(1) 130,646 B 388,403 257,757 522,585 c 257,757 - - 130,646 $ 133,786 $ 263,953 $ - $ - $ - $ 397,739 Seis Lagos MUD 60,814 74,712 13,898 - - 13,898 - 60,814 $ 62,276 $ - $ 14,232 $ - $ (10,428) $ 66,080 Sunnyvale 314,893 362,405 47,512 910,969 c 47,512 - - 314,893 $ 322,462 $ 48,654 $ - $ - $ - $ 371,116 Wylie NE WSC 87,351 118,559 31,208 - - 31,208 - 87,351 $ 89,451 $ - $ 31,958 $ - $ (23,415) $ 97,994 Total 7,711,494 8,974,170 1,262,676 617,062 738,994 (35,449) 7,723,663 $ 7,909,324 $ 631,895 $ 756,758 $ (7,931) $ (554,465) $ 8,735,581 Total 77,818,215 82,452,194 4,633,979 617,062 5,290,427 (503,759) 77,830,384 $ 76,195,935 $ 631,895 $ 5,190,027 $ (112,711) $ (3,969,392) $ 77,935,753 Revenue Requirement $ 75,674,582 Notes: (1)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract Over/(Under)Recovery $ 2,261,171 (2)Rebate for Actual Consumption that is less than the Annual minimum (3)Rebate for Actual Consumption that is greater than the Annual Minimum (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix F Page 2 of 4 Method 6-2004 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 04 FY 04 FY 04 Wtr Yr 04 Wtr Yr 04 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 04 Annual Full Excess FY 04 FY 04 FY 04 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate(2) Rebate(3) Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.968 $ 0.968 $ 0.968 $ 0.210 $ 0.758 Allen 4,124,397 4,362,143 237,746 - - 237,746 4,124,397 $ 3,993,076.11 $ - $ 230,176.16 $ - $ (180,148) $ 4,043,103.90 Farmersville 225,417 246,458 21,041 - - 21,041 - 225,417 $ 218,239.72 $ - $ 20,371.05 $ - $ (15,943) $ 222,667.28 Forney 788,921 891,245 102,324 - - 102,324 788,921 $ 763,801.74 $ - $ 99,066.00 $ - $ (77,534) $ 785,333.31 Frisco 5,607,266 5,645,797 38,531 - - 38,531 5,607,266 $ 5,428,730.52 $ - $ 37,304.17 $ - $ (29,196) $ 5,436,838.43 Garland 12,904,220 12,612,613 (291,607) - - - (291,607) 12,904,220 $ 12,493,349.34 $ - $ - $ (61,361.52) $ - $ 12,431,987.83 McKinney 6,350,897 6,582,712 231,815 - - 231,815 6,350,897 $ 6,148,684.30 $ - $ 224,434.01 $ - $ (175,654) $ 6,197,464.06 Mesquite 5,575,688 4,814,443 (761,245) - - - (761,245) 5,575,688 $ 5,398,157.97 $ - $ - $ (160,185.28) $ - $ 5,237,972.69 Mesquite#3(1) 1,956,857 B 1,597,147 (359,710) 2,256,486 c - - - 1,956,857 $ 1,894,550.63 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,894,550.63 Plano 22,745,013 22,149,517 (595,496) - - - (595,496) 22,745,013 $ 22,020,811.27 $ - $ - $ (125,307.48) $ - $ 21,895,503.79 Princeton 287,581 289,199 1,618 - - 1,618 287,581 $ 278,424.41 $ - $ 1,566.48 $ - $ (1,226) $ 278,764.88 Richardson 10,135,415 9,532,442 (602,973) - - - (602,973) 10,135,415 $ 9,812,703.16 $ - $ - $ (126,880.83) $ - $ 9,685,822.33 Rockwall 2,234,227 2,332,266 98,039 - - 98,039 - 2,234,227 $ 2,163,089.16 $ - $ 94,917.44 $ - $ (74,288) $ 2,183,719.06 Royse City 286,471 327,863 41,392 - - 41,392 - 286,471 $ 277,349.76 $ - $ 40,074.08 $ - $ (31,364) $ 286,059.68 Wylie 1,042,381 1,266,615 224,234 - - 224,234 - 1,042,381 $ 1,009,191.57 $ - $ 217,094.38 $ - $ (169,910) $ 1,056,376.09 Total 74,264,751 72,650,460 (1,614,291) - 996,740 (2,251,321) 74,264,751 $ 71,900,159.66 $ - $ 965,003.78 $ (473,735.12) $ (755,264) $ 71,636,163.95 Customers $ 1.018 $ 1.018 $ 1.018 $ 0.210 $ 0.758 Caddo Basin 245,280 223,734 (21,546) - - - (21,546) 245,280 $ 249,734.28 $ - $ - $ (4,533.83) $ - $ 245,200.45 Cash SUD A 221,385 257,909 36,524 - - 36,524 - 221,385 $ 225,405.35 $ - $ 37,187.28 $ - $ (27,675) $ 262,592.62 College Mound WSC A 62,017 52,093 (9,924) - - - (9,924) 62,017 $ 63,143.23 $ - $ - $ (2,088.26) $ - $ 61,054.97 Copeville WSC 68,468 73,935 5,467 113,866.6 c 5,467 - - 68,468 $ 69,711.38 $ 5,566.28 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,277.66 East Fork SUD 188,012 202,927 14,915 280,831 c 14,915 - - 188,012 $ 191,426.29 $ 15,185.86 $ - $ - $ - $ 206,612.15 Fairview 394,901 420,325 25,424 - - 25,424 - 394,901 $ 402,072.39 $ - $ 25,885.70 $ - $ (19,265) $ 427,958.09 Fate 77,744 113,197 35,453 - - 35,453 - 77,744 $ 79,155.83 $ - $ 36,096.83 $ - $ (26,864) $ 115,252.65 Forney Lake WSC(1) 153,126 B 135,370 (17,756) 227,800 c - - - 153,126 $ 155,906.76 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 155,906.76 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 101,254 98,508 (2,746) - - - (2,746) 101,254 $ 103,092.77 $ - $ - $ (577.83) $ - $ 102,514.94 Josephine 33,301 38,203 4,902 45,400 c 4,902 - - 33,301 $ 33,905.75 $ 4,991.02 $ - $ - $ - $ 38,896.77 Kaufman 392,227 419,659 27,432 - - 27,432 - 392,227 $ 399,349.83 $ - $ 27,930.16 $ - $ (20,786) $ 427,280.00 Kaufman Four One A 356,603 396,336 39,733 - - 39,733 - 356,603 $ 363,078.90 $ - $ 40,454.55 $ - $ (30,107) $ 403,533.45 Lavon WSC(1) 142,389 B 141,538 (851) 142,389 c - - - 142,389 $ 144,974.78 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 144,974.78 Little Elm 368,734 504,167 135,433 - - 135,433 - 368,734 $ 375,430.20 $ - $ 137,892.46 $ - $ (102,622) $ 513,322.66 Lucas 271,766 301,984 30,218 - - 30,218 - 271,766 $ 276,701.26 $ - $ 30,766.76 $ - $ (22,897) $ 307,468.02 Melissa(1) 73,000 B 59,467 (13,533) 73,000 c - - - 73,000 $ 74,325.68 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 74,325.68 Milligan WSC 149,894 127,646 (22,248) 155,938 c - - (22,248) 149,894 $ 152,616.07 $ - $ - $ (4,681.54) $ - $ 147,934.53 Mt.Zion WSC 100,946 108,816 7,870 - - 7,870 - 100,946 $ 102,779.18 $ - $ 8,012.92 $ - $ (5,963) $ 110,792.10 Murphy 655,870 792,811 136,941 - - 136,941 - 655,870 $ 667,780.58 $ - $ 139,427.85 $ - $ (103,765) $ 807,208.43 Nevada WSC 71,043 71,813 770 - - 770 - 71,043 $ 72,333.14 $ - $ 783.98 $ - $ (583) $ 73,117.12 North Collin WSC 274,347 284,428 10,081 300,000 c - 10,081 - 274,347 $ 279,329.14 $ - $ 10,264.07 $ - $ (7,639) $ 289,593.21 Parker 306,201 344,660 38,459 - - 38,459 - 306,201 $ 311,761.60 $ - $ 39,157.41 $ - $ (29,142) $ 350,919.02 Rose Hill WSC A 16,160 7,689 (8,471) 48,000 c - - - 16,160 $ 16,453.47 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 16,453.47 Rowlett 2,772,637 2,772,411 (226) 4,051,017 c - - (226) 2,772,637 $ 2,822,988.03 $ - $ - $ (47.56) $ - $ 2,822,940.47 Sachse 612,776 762,689 149,913 - - 149,913 - 612,776 $ 623,904.00 $ - $ 152,635.42 $ - $ (113,594) $ 776,539.42 Sachse#2(1) 388,403 B 194,171 (194,232) 522,585 c - - - 388,403 $ 395,456.39 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 395,456.39 Seis Lagos MUD 74,712 76,473 1,761 - - 1,761 - 74,712 $ 76,068.77 $ - $ 1,792.98 $ - $ (1,334) $ 77,861.75 Sunnyvale 362,405 376,311 13,906 910,969 c 13,906 - - 362,405 $ 368,986.27 $ 14,158.53 $ - $ - $ - $ 383,144.80 Wylie NE WSC 118,559 120,048 1,489 - - 1,489 - 118,559 $ 120,712.03 $ - $ 1,516.04 $ - $ (1,128) $ 122,228.07 Total 9,054,160 9,479,318 425,158 39,190 677,501 (56,690) 9,054,160 $ 9,218,583.34 $ 39,901.69 $ 689,804.40 $ (11,929.02) $ (513,366) $ 9,936,360.42 Total 83,318,911 82,129,778 (1,189,133) 39,190 1,674,241 (2,308,011) 83,318,911 $ 81,118,743.00 $ 39,901.69 $1,654,808.18 $ (485,664.13) $ (1,268,630) $ 81,572,524.37 Revenue Requirement $ 79,688,080 Notes: (1)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract Over/(Under)Recovery $ 1,884,444 (2)Rebate for Actual Consumption that is less than the Annual Minimum (3)Rebate for Actual Consumption that is greater than that Annual Minimum (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix F Page 3 of 4 Method 6-2005 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY05 Excess Rate FY 05 FY 05 FY 05 Wtr Yr 05 Wtr Yr 05 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 05 Annual Full Excess FY 05 Fy 05 FY 05 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate(2) Rebate(3) Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 1.050 $ 1.050 $ 1.050 $ 0.217 $ 0.834 Allen 4,362,143 4,687,958 325,815 - - 325,815 - 4,362,143 $ 4,582,380 $ - $ 342,265 $ - $ (271,703) $ 4,652,942 Farmersville 246,458 242,487 (3,971) - - - (3,971) 246,458 $ 258,901 $ - $ - $ (860) $ - $ 258,041 Forney 891,245 1,059,328 168,083 - - 168,083 - 891,245 $ 936,242 $ - $ 176,569 $ - $ (140,167) $ 972,644 Frisco 5,645,797 6,467,274 821,477 - - 821,477 - 5,645,797 $ 5,930,843 $ - $ 862,952 $ - $ (685,044) $ 6,108,751 Garland 12,612,613 12,435,423 (177,190) - - - (177,190) 12,612,613 $ 13,249,401 $ - $ - $ (38,374) $ - $ 13,211,027 McKinney 6,582,712 7,166,992 584,280 - - 584,280 - 6,582,712 $ 6,915,061 $ - $ 613,779 $ - $ (487,241) $ 7,041,599 Mesquite 4,814,443 4,885,178 70,735 - - 70,735 - 4,814,443 $ 5,057,515 $ - $ 74,306 $ - $ (58,987) $ 5,072,835 Mesquite#3(1) 2,031,764 B 1,351,516 (680,248) 2,256,486 c - - - 2,031,764 $ 2,134,344 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,134,344 Plano 22,149,517 22,432,203 282,686 - - 282,686 - 22,149,517 $ 23,267,806 $ - $ 296,958 $ - $ (235,737) $ 23,329,027 Princeton 289,199 337,039 47,840 - - 47,840 - 289,199 $ 303,800 $ - $ 50,255 $ - $ (39,895) $ 314,161 Richardson 9,532,442 8,553,732 (978,710) - - - (978,710) 9,532,442 $ 10,013,718 $ - $ - $ (211,960) $ - $ 9,801,758 Rockwall 2,332,266 2,471,592 139,326 - - 139,326 - 2,332,266 $ 2,450,018 $ - $ 146,360 $ - $ (116,186) $ 2,480,192 Royse City 327,863 338,437 10,574 - - 10,574 - 327,863 $ 344,416 $ - $ 11,108 $ - $ (8,818) $ 346,706 Wylie 1,266,615 1,387,214 120,599 - - 120,599 - 1,266,615 $ 1,330,564 $ - $ 126,688 $ - $ (100,570) $ 1,356,682 Total 73,085,077 73,816,373 731,296 - 2,571,415 (1,159,871) 73,085,077 $ 76,775,009 $ - $ 2,701,241 $ (251,194) $ (2,144,348) $ 77,080,708 Customers $ 1.100 $ 1.100 $ 1.100 $ 0.217 $ 0.834 Caddo Basin 223,734 240,325 16,591 - - 16,591 - 223,734 $ 246,217 $ - $ 18,258 $ - $ (13,836) $ 250,639 Cash SUD A 257,909 256,282 (1,627) - - - - 257,909 $ 283,826 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 283,826 College Mound WSC A 52,093 9,825 (42,268) - - - - 52,093 $ 57,328 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 57,328 Copeville WSC 73,935 66,320 (7,615) 113,866.6 C - - (7,615) 73,935 $ 81,365 $ - $ - $ (1,649) $ - $ 79,715 East Fork SUD 202,927 221,755 18,828 280,831 C 18,828 - - 202,927 $ 223,319 $ 20,720 $ - $ - $ - $ 244,039 Fairview 420,325 478,582 58,257 - - 58,257 - 420,325 $ 462,563 $ - $ 64,111 $ - $ (48,582) $ 478,092 Fate 113,197 155,139 41,942 - - 41,942 - 113,197 $ 124,572 $ - $ 46,157 $ - $ (34,976) $ 135,752 Forney Lake WSC(1) 171,795 B 164,447 (7,348) 227,800 C - - - 171,795 $ 189,058 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 189,058 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 98,508 107,566 9,058 - - 9,058 - 98,508 $ 108,407 $ - $ 9,968 $ - $ (7,554) $ 110,821 Josephine 38,203 41,031 2,828 45,400 C 2,828 - - 38,203 $ 42,042 $ 3,112 $ - $ - $ - $ 45,154 Kaufman 419,659 409,164 (10,495) - - - (10,495) 419,659 $ 461,830 $ - $ - $ (2,273) $ - $ 459,557 Kaufman Four One A 396,336 382,065 (14,271) - - - - 396,336 $ 436,163 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 436,163 Lavon WSC(1) 142,389 B 148,610 6,221 142,389 C - 6,221 - 142,389 $ 156,697 $ - $ 6,846 $ - $ (5,188) $ 158,356 Little Elm 504,167 610,479 106,312 - - 106,312 - 504,167 $ 554,830 $ - $ 116,995 $ - $ (88,655) $ 583,169 Lucas 301,984 308,034 6,050 - - 6,050 - 301,984 $ 332,330 $ - $ 6,658 $ - $ (5,045) $ 333,943 Lucas#3 - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Melissa(') 73,000 B 86,408 13,408 73,000 c - 13,408 - 73,000 $ 80,336 $ - $ 14,755 $ - $ (11,181) $ 83,910 Milligan WSC 127,646 128,680 1,034 155,938 C 1,034 - - 127,646 $ 140,473 $ 1,138 $ - $ - $ - $ 141,611 Mt.Zion WSC 108,816 108,196 (620) - - - (620) 108,816 $ 119,751 $ - $ - $ (134) $ - $ 119,616 Murphy 792,811 906,941 114,130 - - 114,130 - 792,811 $ 872,479 $ - $ 125,599 $ - $ (95,175) $ 902,903 Nevada WSC 71,813 68,787 (3,026) - - - (3,026) 71,813 $ 79,029 $ - $ - $ (655) $ - $ 78,374 North Collin WSC 284,428 290,010 5,582 300,000 C 5,582 - - 284,428 $ 313,010 $ 6,143 $ - $ - $ - $ 319,153 Parker 344,660 392,852 48,192 - - 48,192 - 344,660 $ 379,294 $ - $ 53,035 $ - $ (40,188) $ 392,141 Prosper") 236,575 B 95,406 (141,169) 236,575 C - - - 275,000 $ 302,634 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 302,634 Rose Hill WSC A 7,689 12,847 5,158 48,000 c 5,158 - - 7,689 $ 8,462 $ 5,676 $ - $ - $ - $ 14,138 Rowlett 2,772,411 2,734,709 (37,702) 4,051,017 C - - (37,702) 2,772,411 $ 3,051,006 $ - $ - $ (8,165) $ - $ 3,042,840 Sachse 762,689 611,056 (151,633) - - - (151,633) 762,689 $ 839,330 $ - $ - $ (32,839) $ - $ 806,491 Sachse#2(1) 388,403 B 385,477 (2,926) 522,585 c - - - 388,403 $ 427,433 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 427,433 Seis Lagos MUD 76,473 71,594 (4,879) - - - (4,879) 76,473 $ 84,158 $ - $ - $ (1,057) $ - $ 83,101 Sunnyvale 376,311 391,036 14,725 910,969 C 14,725 - - 376,311 $ 414,126 $ 16,205 $ - $ - $ - $ 430,330 Wylie NE WSC 120,048 143,816 23,768 - - 23,768 - 120,048 $ 132,111 $ - $ 26,156 $ - $ (19,821) $ 138,447 Total 9,960,934 10,027,439 66,505 48,155 443,929 (215,970) 9,999,359 $ 11,004,176 $ 52,994 $ 488,539 $ (46,773) $ (370,200) $ 11,128,736 Total 83,046,011 83,843,812 797,801 48,155 3,015,344 (1,375,841) 83,084,436 $ 87,779,185 $ 52,994 $ 3,189,780 $ (297,967) $ (2,514,549) $ 88,209,444 Revenue Requirement $ 86,400,249 Notes: (1)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract Over/(Under)Recovery $ 1,809,195 (2)Rebate for Actual Consumption that is less than the Annual Minimum (3)Rebate for Actual Consumption that is greater than that Annual Minimum (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix F Page 4 of 4 Method 6- 2006 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY06 Excess Rate FY 06 FY 06 FY 06 Wtr Yr 06 Wtr Yr 06 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 06 Annual Full Excess FY 06 FY 06 FY 06 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate(2) Rebate(3) Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 1.061 $ 1.061 $ 1.061 $ 0.251 $ 0.809 Allen 4,687,958 5,588,259 900,301 - - 900,301 - 4,687,958 $ 4,972,118 $ - $ 954,873 $ - $ (728,511) $ 5,198,480 Farmersville 242,487 280,467 37,980 - - 37,980 - 242,487 $ 257,185 $ - $ 40,282 $ - $ (30,733) $ 266,735 Forney 1,059,328 1,416,868 357,540 - - 357,540 - 1,059,328 $ 1,123,539 $ - $ 379,212 $ - $ (289,316) $ 1,213,435 Frisco 6,467,274 7,918,529 1,451,255 - - 1,451,255 - 6,467,274 $ 6,859,287 $ - $ 1,539,223 $ - $ (1,174,335) $ 7,224,174 Frisco#2(1) 3,116 B 419,410 416,294 12,465 c 9,349 406,945 - 5,650 $ 5,992 $ 9,916 $ 431,612 $ - $ (329,294) $ 118,226 Garland 12,435,423 13,721,955 1,286,532 - - 1,286,532 - 12,435,423 $ 13,189,194 $ - $ 1,364,515 $ - $ (1,041,043) $ 13,512,665 McKinney 7,166,992 8,385,134 1,218,142 - - 1,218,142 - 7,166,992 $ 7,601,418 $ - $ 1,291,979 $ - $ (985,703) $ 7,907,694 McKinney#3(1) 171,228 B 350,012 178,784 684,910 c 178,784 - - 228,303 $ 242,142 $ 189,621 $ - $ - $ - $ 431,763 Mesquite 4,885,178 5,756,029 870,851 - - 870,851 - 4,885,178 $ 5,181,292 $ - $ 923,637 $ - $ (704,680) $ 5,400,249 Mesquite#3(1) 2,106,671 B 1,359,175 (747,496) 2,256,486 c - - - 2,106,671 $ 2,234,366 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,234,366 Plano 22,432,203 26,265,050 3,832,847 - - 3,832,847 - 22,432,203 $ 23,791,927 $ - $ 4,065,174 $ - $ (3,101,485) $ 24,755,616 Princeton 337,039 409,624 72,585 - - 72,585 - 337,039 $ 357,469 $ - $ 76,985 $ - $ (58,735) $ 375,719 Richardson 8,553,732 10,050,090 1,496,358 - - 1,496,358 - 8,553,732 $ 9,072,215 $ - $ 1,587,059 $ - $ (1,210,832) $ 9,448,443 Rockwall 2,471,592 3,284,236 812,644 - - 812,644 - 2,471,592 $ 2,621,407 $ - $ 861,902 $ - $ (657,580) $ 2,825,729 Royse City 338,437 470,150 131,713 - - 131,713 - 338,437 $ 358,951 $ - $ 139,697 $ - $ (106,580) $ 392,068 Wylie 1,387,214 1,721,763 334,549 - - 334,549 - 1,387,214 $ 1,471,300 $ - $ 354,828 $ - $ (270,712) $ 1,555,415 Total 74,745,872 87,396,751 12,650,879 188,133 13,210,242 - 74,805,481 $ 79,339,801 $ 199,537 $ 14,010,978 $ - $ (10,689,539) $ 82,860,777 Customers $ 1.111 $ 1.111 $ 1.111 $ 0.251 $ 0.809 Caddo Basin SUD 240,325 293,451 53,126 - - 53,126 - 240,325 $ 266,909 $ - $ 59,003 $ - $ (42,989) $ 282,922 Cash SUD A 256,282 305,643 49,361 - - 49,361 - 256,282 $ 284,631 $ - $ 54,821 $ - $ (39,942) $ 299,509 College Mound WSC A 9,825 62,710 52,885 - - 52,885 - 9,825 $ 10,912 $ - $ 58,735 $ - $ (42,794) $ 26,853 Copeville WSC 66,320 77,927 11,607 113,866.6 c 11,607 - - 66,320 $ 73,656 $ 12,891 $ - $ - $ - $ 86,547 East Fork SUD 221,755 324,226 102,471 280,831 c 59,076 43,395 - 221,755 $ 246,284 $ 65,611 $ 48,195 $ - $ (35,115) $ 324,976 Fairview 478,582 721,185 242,603 - - 242,603 - 478,582 $ 531,520 $ - $ 269,438 $ - $ (196,311) $ 604,648 Fate 155,139 279,932 124,793 - - 124,793 - 155,139 $ 172,300 $ - $ 138,597 $ - $ (100,981) $ 209,916 Fate#2 - - - - - - - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Forney Lake WSC(1) 182,996 B 295,577 112,581 227,800 c 44,804 67,777 - 182,996 $ 203,238 $ 49,760 $ 75,274 $ - $ (54,844) $ 273,428 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 107,566 107,875 309 - - 309 - 107,566 $ 119,464 $ - $ 343 $ - $ (250) $ 119,558 Josephine 41,031 57,407 16,376 45,400 c 4,369 12,007 - 41,031 $ 45,570 $ 4,852 $ 13,335 $ - $ (9,716) $ 54,041 Kaufman 409,164 438,403 29,239 - - 29,239 - 409,164 $ 454,424 $ - $ 32,473 $ - $ (23,660) $ 463,237 Kaufman Four One A 382,065 450,363 68,298 - - 68,298 - 382,065 $ 424,327 $ - $ 75,853 $ - $ (55,266) $ 444,914 Lavon WSC 148,610 217,256 68,646 - - 68,646 - 148,610 $ 165,048 $ - $ 76,239 $ - $ (55,547) $ 185,740 Little Elm-Interim(1) 559,606 925,163 365,557 - - 365,557 - 457,859 $ 508,505 $ - $ 405,993 $ - $ (295,804) $ 618,695 Little Elm-Permanent(1) 51,667 B 107,415 55,748 162,917 c 55,748 - - 155,000 $ 172,145 $ 61,915 $ - $ - $ - $ 234,060 Lucas 308,034 212,681 (95,353) - - - (95,353) 308,034 $ 342,107 $ - $ - $ (23,975) $ - $ 318,133 Lucas#3(1) 63,969 B 290,897 226,928 255,878 c 191,909 35,019 - 63,969 $ 71,045 $ 213,137 $ 38,893 $ - $ (28,337) $ 294,738 Melissa 86,408 135,737 49,329 - - 49,329 - 86,408 $ 95,966 $ - $ 54,786 $ - $ (39,916) $ 110,835 Milligan WSC 128,680 147,744 19,064 155,938 c 19,064 - - 128,680 $ 142,914 $ 21,173 $ - $ - $ - $ 164,087 Mt.Zion WSC 108,196 159,302 51,106 - - 51,106 - 108,196 $ 120,164 $ - $ 56,759 $ - $ (41,354) $ 135,569 Murphy 906,941 1,193,806 286,865 1,145,000 c 238,059 48,806 - 906,941 $ 1,007,262 $ 264,392 $ 54,205 $ - $ (39,493) $ 1,286,366 Nevada WSC 68,787 56,413 (12,374) - - - (12,374) 38,969 $ 43,280 $ - $ - $ (3,111) $ - $ 40,168 Nevada WSC#2(1) 30,766 31,766 1,000 44,925 c 1,000 - - 38,849 $ 43,146 $ 1,111 $ - $ - $ - $ 44,257 North Collin WSC 290,010 318,780 28,770 300,000 c 9,990 18,780 - 290,010 $ 322,089 $ 11,095 $ 20,857 $ - $ (15,197) $ 338,845 Parker 392,852 470,812 77,960 - - 77,960 - 392,852 $ 436,307 $ - $ 86,584 $ - $ (63,084) $ 459,807 Prosper(1) 275,000 B 208,182 (66,818) 275,000 c - - - 275,000 $ 305,419 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 305,419 Rose Hill SUD A 12,847 42,818 29,971 48,000 c 29,971 - - 12,847 $ 14,268 $ 33,286 $ - $ - $ - $ 47,554 Rowlett 2,734,709 3,192,039 457,330 4,051,017 c 457,330 - - 2,734,709 $ 3,037,208 $ 507,917 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,545,126 Sachse 611,056 734,691 123,635 - - 123,635 - 611,056 $ 678,648 $ - $ 137,311 $ - $ (100,044) $ 715,915 Sachse#2(1) 388,403 B 431,099 42,696 522,585 c 42,696 - - 388,403 $ 431,366 $ 47,419 $ - $ - $ - $ 478,785 Seis Lagos MUD 71,594 111,094 39,500 - - 39,500 - 71,594 $ 79,513 $ - $ 43,869 $ - $ (31,963) $ 91,420 Sunnyvale 391,036 559,135 168,099 910,969 c 168,099 - - 391,036 $ 434,290 $ 186,693 $ - $ - $ - $ 620,984 Wylie NE SUD 143,816 197,289 53,473 - - 53,473 - 143,816 $ 159,724 $ - $ 59,388 $ - $ (43,270) $ 175,842 Total 10,324,037 13,158,818 2,834,781 1,333,722 1,675,604 (107,727) 10,303,888 $ 11,443,651 $ 1,481,251 $ 1,860,951 $ (27,086) $ (1,355,875) $ 13,402,892 $ - $ - $ - $Total 85,069,909 100,555,569 15,485,660 1,521,855 14,885,846 (107,727) 85,109,369 $ 90,783,452 $ 1,680,788 $ 15,871,929 $ (27,086) $ (12,045,414) $ 96,263,669 Notes: Revenue Requirement 93,322,596 (1)Not eligible for Minimum Annual Demand Adjustment due to Contract (2)Rebate for Actual Consumption that is less than the Annual Minimum Over/(Under)Recovery $ 2,941,074 (3)Rebate for Actual Consumption that is greater than the Annual Minimum (A)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because not all Potable Water is received from NTMWD (B)Not eligible for Rebate Rate because Annual Minimum,as specified by Contract,has not been met (C)Not eligible for Excess Rate to the extent that Contract Minimum has not been met North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix G Method 7-2003 Page 1 of 4 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 03 FY 03 FY 03 Wtr Yr 03 Wtr Yr 03 Increase Added Deducted Adjusted Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 03 Annual Full Excess FY 03 FY 03 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) to Minimum from Minimum Minimum Minimum Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.870 $ 0.870 $ 0.200 $ 0.200 Allen 3,952,728 4,124,397 171,669 171,669 4,124,397 - - - - 4,124,397 $ 3,588,225.39 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,588,225.39 Farmersville 290,608 225,417 (65,191) (23,410) 267,198 - - - (41,781) 267,198 $ 232,461.95 $ - $ - $ (8,356.13) $ 224,105.82 Forney 743,504 788,921 45,417 45,417 788,921 - - - - 788,921 $ 686,361.27 $ - $ - $ - $ 686,361.27 Frisco 4,394,752 5,607,266 1,212,514 1,212,514 5,607,266 - - - - 5,607,266 $ 4,878,321.42 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,878,321.42 Garland 13,660,013 12,904,220 (755,793) (271,408) 13,388,605 - - - (484,385) 13,388,605 $11,648,086.03 $ - $ - $ (96,876.93) $11,551,209.11 McKinney 5,748,746 6,350,897 602,151 602,151 6,350,897 - - - - 6,350,897 $ 5,525,280.39 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,525,280.39 Mesquite 6,041,180 5,575,688 (465,492) (167,160) 5,874,020 - - - (298,332) 5,874,020 $ 5,110,397.33 $ - $ - $ (59,666.38) $ 5,050,730.94 Mesquite#3(1) 1,881,950 B 1,170,130 (711,820) 1,881,950 2,256,486 c - - 1,881,950 $ 1,637,296.50 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,637,296.50 Plano 26,719,809 22,745,013 (3,974,796) (1,427,366) 25,292,443 - - - (2,547,430) 25,292,443 $22,004,425.82 $ - $ - $ (509,486.09) $21,494,939.72 Princeton 328,803 287,581 (41,222) (14,803) 314,000 - - - (26,419) 314,000 $ 273,180.01 $ - $ - $ (5,283.80) $ 267,896.21 Richardson 11,019,311 10,135,415 (883,896) (317,411) 10,701,900 - - - (566,485) 10,701,900 $ 9,310,653.28 $ - $ - $ (113,297.06) $ 9,197,356.22 Rockwall 2,188,525 2,234,227 45,702 45,702 2,234,227 - - - - 2,234,227 $ 1,943,777.49 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,943,777.49 Royse City 277,416 286,471 9,055 9,055 286,471 - - - - 286,471 $ 249,229.77 $ - $ - $ - $ 249,229.77 Wylie 907,331 1,042,381 135,050 135,050 1,042,381 - - - - 1,042,381 $ 906,871.47 $ - $ - $ - $ 906,871.47 Total 78,154,676 73,478,024 (4,676,652) 2,221,558 (2,221,558) 78,154,676 - - (3,964,832) 78,154,676 $67,994,568.12 $ - $ - $ (792,966.40) $67,201,601.72 Total Amount Over Minimum 2,221,558 Total Amount under Minimum (6,186,390) Notes: (1)Not eligible for Minimum Adjustment due to Contract North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix G Method 7-2004 Page 2 of 4 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 04 FY 04 FY 04 Wtr Yr 04 Wtr Yr 04 Increase Added Deducted Adjusted Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 04 Annual Full Excess FY 04 FY 04 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) to Minimum from Minimum Minimum Minimum Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.920 $ 0.920 $ 0.200 $ 0.200 Allen 4,124,397 4,362,143 237,746 237,746 4,362,143 - - - - 4,362,143 $ 4,013,171.56 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,013,171.56 Farmersville 290,608 246,458 (44,150) (5,111) 285,497 - - - (39,039) 285,497 $ 262,657.64 $ - $ - $ (7,807.89) $ 254,849.75 Forney 788,921 891,245 102,324 102,324 891,245 - - - - 891,245 $ 819,945.40 $ - $ - $ - $ 819,945.40 Frisco 5,607,266 5,645,797 38,531 38,531 5,645,797 - - - - 5,645,797 $ 5,194,133.24 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,194,133.24 Garland 13,660,013 12,612,613 (1,047,400) (121,241) 13,538,772 - - - (926,159) 13,538,772 $12,455,669.90 $ - $ - $ (185,231.73) $12,270,438.17 McKinney 6,350,897 6,582,712 231,815 231,815 6,582,712 - - - - 6,582,712 $ 6,056,095.04 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,056,095.04 Mesquite 6,041,180 4,814,443 (1,226,737) (142,000) 5,899,180 - - - (1,084,737) 5,899,180 $ 5,427,245.18 $ - $ - $ (216,947.31) $ 5,210,297.87 Mesquite#3(1) 1,956,857 B 1,597,147 (359,710) 1,956,857 2,256,486 c - - - 1,956,857 $ 1,800,308.44 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,800,308.44 Plano 26,719,809 22,149,517 (4,570,292) (529,032) 26,190,777 - - - (4,041,260) 26,190,777 $24,095,514.53 $ - $ - $ (808,251.93) $23,287,262.60 Princeton 328,803 289,199 (39,604) (4,584) 324,219 - - - (35,020) 324,219 $ 298,281.16 $ - $ - $ (7,003.93) $ 291,277.23 Richardson 11,019,311 9,532,442 (1,486,869) (172,112) 10,847,199 - - - (1,314,757) 10,847,199 $ 9,979,423.14 $ - $ - $ (262,951.41) $ 9,716,471.73 Rockwall 2,234,227 2,332,266 98,039 98,039 2,332,266 - - - - 2,332,266 $ 2,145,684.72 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,145,684.72 Royse City 286,471 327,863 41,392 41,392 327,863 - - - - 327,863 $ 301,633.96 $ - $ - $ - $ 301,633.96 Wylie 1,042,381 1,266,615 224,234 224,234 1,266,615 - - - - 1,266,615 $ 1,165,285.80 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,165,285.80 Total 80,451,141 72,650,460 (7,800,681) 974,081 (974,081) 80,451,141 - - (7,440,971) 80,451,141 $74,015,049.72 $ - $ - $(1,488,194.20) $72,526,855.52 Total amount Over Minimum 974,081 Total amount Under Minimum (8,415,052) Notes: (1)Not eligible for Minimum Adjustment due to Contract North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix G Method 7-2005 Page 3 of 4 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY05 Excess Rate FY 05 FY 05 FY 05 Wtr Yr 05 Wtr Yr 05 Increase Added Deducted Adjusted Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 05 Annual Full Excess FY 05 FY 05 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) to Minimum from Minimum Minimum Minimum Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.970 $ 0.970 $ 0.200 $ 0.200 Allen 4,362,143 4,687,958 325,815 325,815 4,687,958 - - - - 4,687,958 $ 4,547,319.26 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,547,319.26 Farmersville 270,608 242,487 (28,121) (6,686) 263,922 - - - (21,435) 263,922 $ 256,004.12 $ - $ - $ (4,286.96) $ 251,717.17 Forney 891,245 1,059,328 168,083 168,083 1,059,328 - - - - 1,059,328 $ 1,027,548.16 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,027,548.16 Frisco 5,645,797 6,467,274 821,477 821,477 6,467,274 - - - - 6,467,274 $ 6,273,255.78 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,273,255.78 Garland 13,660,013 12,435,423 (1,224,590) (291,166) 13,368,847 - - - (933,424) 13,368,847 $12,967,781.44 $ - $ - $ (186,684.77) $12,781,096.67 McKinney 6,582,712 7,166,992 584,280 584,280 7,166,992 - - - - 7,166,992 $ 6,951,982.24 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,951,982.24 Mesquite 6,041,180 4,885,178 (1,156,002) (274,858) 5,766,322 - - - (881,144) 5,766,322 $ 5,593,332.10 $ - $ - $ (176,228.75) $ 5,417,103.35 Mesquite#3 2,031,764 B 1,351,516 (680,248) 2,031,764 2,256,486 c - - - 2,031,764 $ 1,970,811.08 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,970,811.08 Plano 26,719,809 22,432,203 (4,287,606) (1,019,448) 25,700,361 - - - (3,268,158) 25,700,361 $24,929,350.23 $ - $ - $ (653,631.61) $24,275,718.62 Princeton 328,803 337,039 8,236 8,236 337,039 - - - - 337,039 $ 326,927.83 $ - $ - $ - $ 326,927.83 Richardson 11,019,311 8,553,732 (2,465,579) (586,231) 10,433,080 - - - (1,879,348) 10,433,080 $10,120,087.18 $ - $ - $ (375,869.51) $ 9,744,217.66 Rockwall 2,332,266 2,471,592 139,326 139,326 2,471,592 - - - - 2,471,592 $ 2,397,444.24 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,397,444.24 Royse City 327,863 338,437 10,574 10,574 338,437 - - - - 338,437 $ 328,283.89 $ - $ - $ - $ 328,283.89 Wylie 1,266,615 1,387,214 120,599 120,599 1,387,214 - - - - 1,387,214 $ 1,345,597.58 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,345,597.58 Total 81,480,129 73,816,373 (7,663,756) 2,178,390 (2,178,390) 81,480,129 - - (6,983,508) 81,480,129 $79,035,725.13 $ - $ - $(1,396,701.60) $77,639,023.53 Total Amount over Minimum 2,178,390 Total Amount Under Minimum (9,161,898) North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix G Method 7- 2006 Page 4 of 4 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY06 Excess Rate FY 06 FY 06 FY 06 Wtr Yr 06 Wtr Yr 06 Increase Added Deducted Adjusted Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 06 Annual Full Excess FY 06 FY 06 Ann Min Actual (Decrease) to Minimum from Minimum Minimum Minimum Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.970 $ 0.970 $ 0.230 $ 0.230 Allen 4,687,958 5,588,259 900,301 287,585 4,975,543 - - 612,716 - 4,975,543 $ 4,826,276.74 $ - $ 140,924.67 $ - $ 4,967,201.41 Farmersville 270,608 280,467 9,859 3,149 273,757 - - 6,710 - 273,757 $ 265,544.56 $ - $ 1,543.24 $ - $ 267,087.80 Forney 1,059,328 1,416,868 357,540 114,210 1,173,538 - - 243,330 - 1,173,538 $ 1,138,331.62 $ - $ 55,965.96 $ - $ 1,194,297.58 Frisco 6,467,274 7,918,529 1,451,255 463,577 6,930,851 - - 987,678 - 6,930,851 $ 6,722,925.88 $ - $ 227,165.84 $ - $ 6,950,091.72 Frisco#2 3,116 B 419,410 416,294 3,116 12,465 c 9,349 406,945 - 5,650 $ 5,480.50 $ 9,068.53 $ 93,597.35 $ - $ 108,146.38 Garland 13,660,013 13,721,955 61,942 19,786 13,679,799 - - 42,156 - 13,679,799 $13,269,405.28 $ - $ 9,695.82 $ - $13,279,101.10 McKinney 7,166,992 8,385,134 1,218,142 389,114 7,556,106 - - 829,028 - 7,556,106 $ 7,329,422.48 $ - $ 190,676.52 $ - $ 7,520,099.00 McKinney#3 171,228 B 350,012 178,784 171,228 684,910 C 178,784 - - 228,303 $ 221,453.91 $ 173,420.48 $ - $ - $ 394,874.39 Mesquite 6,041,180 5,756,029 (285,151) (285,151) 5,756,029 - - - - 5,756,029 $ 5,583,348.13 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,583,348.13 Mesquite#3 2,106,671 B 1,359,175 (747,496) 2,106,671 2,256,486 C - - - 2,106,671 $ 2,043,470.87 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,043,470.87 Plano 26,719,809 26,265,050 (454,759) (454,759) 26,265,050 - - - - 26,265,050 $25,477,098.50 $ - $ - $ - $25,477,098.50 Princeton 337,039 409,624 72,585 23,186 360,225 - - 49,399 - 360,225 $ 349,418.23 $ - $ 11,361.77 $ - $ 360,780.00 Richardson 11,019,311 10,050,090 (969,221) (969,221) 10,050,090 - - - - 10,050,090 $ 9,748,587.30 $ - $ - $ - $ 9,748,587.30 Rockwall 2,471,592 3,284,236 812,644 259,585 2,731,177 - - 553,059 - 2,731,177 $ 2,649,241.28 $ - $ 127,203.67 $ - $ 2,776,444.94 Royse City 338,437 470,150 131,713 42,073 380,510 - - 89,640 - 380,510 $ 369,095.05 $ - $ 20,617.12 $ - $ 389,712.17 Wylie 1,387,214 1,721,763 334,549 106,866 1,494,080 - - 227,683 - 1,494,080 $ 1,449,257.30 $ - $ 52,367.16 $ - $ 1,501,624.46 Total 83,907,770 87,396,751 3,488,981 1,709,131 (1,709,131) 83,907,770 188,133 4,048,344 - 83,967,379 $81,448,357.63 $ 182,489.01 $ 931,119.12 $ - $82,561,965.76 Total Amount Over Minimum 5,350,530 Total Amount Under Minimum (1,709,131) North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix H Page 1 of 5 Method 8-2002 Wtr Yr 02 Wtr Yr 02 2003 Ann Min Actual Avg Peak Demand (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (MGD) (MGD) Charge Members Allen 3,952,728 3,699,752 10 22 3,030,621 Farmersville 290,608 228,235 1 1 186,957 Forney 743,504 658,408 2 4 539,329 Frisco 4,125,696 4,394,752 12 27 3,599,925 Garland 13,660,013 12,051,601 33 73 9,871,970 McKinney 5,748,746 5,689,078 16 34 4,660,161 Mesquite 7,798,284 6,550,839 18 40 5,366,066 Mesquite#3 - - - - - Plano 26,719,809 22,459,418 62 136 18,397,447 Princeton 328,803 278,431 1 2 228,074 Richardson 11,019,311 9,773,780 27 59 8,006,111 Rockwall 2,188,525 1,876,570 5 11 1,537,177 Royse City 277,416 257,149 1 2 210,641 Wylie 907,331 816,417 2 5 668,761 Total 77,760,774 68,734,430 188 415 56,303,242 Customers Caddo Basin 252,318 197,652 1 1 161,905 Cash WSC 237,267 211,830 1 1 173,519 College Mound WSC 66,769 56,135 0 0 45,983 Copeville WSC 65,478 65,737 0 0 53,848 East Fork SUD 183,632 150,055 0 1 122,916 Fairview 364,741 352,745 1 2 288,948 Fate 65,173 69,529 0 0 56,954 Forney Lake WSC 153,126 112,745 0 1 92,354 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 110,490 80,336 0 0 65,807 Josephine 32,879 40,978 0 0 33,567 Kaufman 406,317 419,999 1 3 344,039 Kaufman Four One 396,327 337,611 1 2 276,551 Lavon WSC 142,389 96,660 0 1 79,178 Little Elm 122,061 210,964 1 1 172,809 Lucas 337,693 243,856 1 1 199,753 Milligan WSC 121,388 115,787 0 1 94,846 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 97,279 0 1 79,685 Murphy 371,527 496,860 1 3 406,999 Nevada WSC 69,001 66,189 0 0 54,218 North Collin WSC 287,568 245,779 1 1 201,328 Parker 211,304 228,969 1 1 187,558 Rose Hill WSC 43,271 40,056 0 0 32,812 Rowlett 2,920,333 2,564,207 7 15 2,100,449 Sachse 724,857 521,439 1 3 427,132 Sachse#2 130,288 62,697 0 0 51,358 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 60,814 0 0 49,815 Sunnyvale 439,743 314,893 1 2 257,942 Wylie NE WSC 130,896 87,351 0 1 71,553 Total 8,595,041 7,549,152 21 46 6,183,826 Total 86,355,815 76,283,582 209 461 62,487,068 Average 209 Peak 461 2.21 2002 Actuals 2003 Rates Variable O&M 11,950,062 18% Demand Charge(per Peak MGD) $ 135,547 Fixed O&M&Debt 54,693,458 82% Subtotal 66,643,520 Volumetric Charge Members $ 0.17 2003 Budgeted Water Sales 76,139,968 Customers $ 0.22 Variable Component 13,652,900 Fixed Component 62,487,068 North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix H Page 2 of 5 Method 8-2003 Demand Volumetric 2003 2004 Wtr Yr 03 Wtr Yr 03 Charge Charge Total Demand Ann Min Actual Revenue Revenue Revenue Avo Peak Charge (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (MGD) (MGD) Members Allen 3,952,728 4,124,397 3,030,621 717,759 3,748,380 11 22 3,263,962 Farmersville 290,608 225,417 186,957 39,229 226,186 1 1 178,390 Forney 743,504 788,921 539,329 137,294 676,623 2 4 624,336 Frisco 4,394,752 5,607,266 3,599,925 975,819 4,575,743 15 30 4,437,473 Garland 13,660,013 12,904,220 9,871,970 2,245,689 12,117,659 35 69 10,212,130 McKinney 5,748,746 6,350,897 4,660,161 1,105,231 5,765,392 17 34 5,025,967 Mesquite 6,041,180 5,575,688 5,366,066 970,323 6,336,389 15 30 4,412,483 Mesquite#3 1,881,950 1,170,130 1,541,584 203,635 1,745,219 3 6 926,016 Plano 26,719,809 22,745,013 18,397,447 3,958,258 22,355,705 62 121 17,999,929 Princeton 328,803 287,581 228,074 50,047 278,121 1 2 227,586 Richardson 11,019,311 10,135,415 8,006,111 1,763,841 9,769,952 28 54 8,020,956 Rockwall 2,188,525 2,234,227 1,537,177 388,817 1,925,994 6 12 1,768,121 Royse City 277,416 286,471 210,641 49,854 260,495 1 2 226,707 Wylie 907,331 1,042,381 668,761 181,403 850,164 3 6 824,919 Total 78,154,676 73,478,024 57,844,826 12,787,198 70,632,024 201 390 58,148,975 Customers Caddo Basin 252,318 245,280 161,905 54,949 216,854 1 1 194,109 Cash SUD 237,267 221,385 173,519 49,596 223,115 1 1 175,199 College Mound WSC 66,769 62,017 45,983 13,894 59,876 0 0 49,079 Copeville WSC 65,737 68,468 53,848 15,339 69,187 0 0 54,184 East Fork SUD 183,632 188,012 122,916 42,120 165,036 1 1 148,789 Fairview 364,741 394,901 288,948 88,469 377,417 1 2 312,516 Fate 69,529 77,744 56,954 17,417 74,371 0 0 61,525 Forney Lake WSC 153,126 131,507 92,354 29,461 121,815 0 1 104,072 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 110,490 101,254 65,807 22,684 88,490 0 1 80,130 Josephine 40,978 33,301 33,567 7,460 41,027 0 0 26,354 Kaufman 419,999 392,227 344,039 87,870 431,908 1 2 310,400 Kaufman Four One 396,327 356,603 276,551 79,889 356,440 1 2 282,208 Lavon WSC 142,389 124,858 79,178 27,972 107,150 0 1 98,810 Little Elm 210,964 368,734 172,809 82,607 255,416 1 2 291,808 Lucas 337,693 271,766 199,753 60,883 260,636 1 1 215,070 Melissa 48,664 32,160 39,863 7,205 47,067 0 0 25,451 Milligan WSC 121,388 149,894 94,846 33,580 128,426 0 1 118,623 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 100,946 79,685 22,615 102,300 0 1 79,887 Murphy 496,860 655,870 406,999 146,933 553,932 2 3 519,042 Nevada WSC 69,001 71,043 54,218 15,916 70,134 0 0 56,222 North Collin WSC 287,568 274,347 201,328 61,461 262,789 1 1 217,112 Parker 228,969 306,201 187,558 68,597 256,156 1 2 242,321 Rose Hill WSC 43,271 16,160 32,812 3,620 36,432 0 0 12,789 Rowlett 2,920,333 2,772,637 2,100,449 621,147 2,721,596 8 15 2,194,207 Sachse 724,857 612,776 427,132 137,279 564,411 2 3 484,938 Sachse#2 130,646 388,403 51,358 87,013 138,371 1 2 307,374 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 74,712 49,815 16,738 66,553 0 0 59,126 Sunnyvale 439,743 362,405 257,942 81,189 339,131 1 2 286,800 Wylie NE WSC 130,896 118,559 71,553 26,560 98,113 0 1 93,825 Total 8,902,360 8,974,170 6,223,688 2,010,461 8,234,149 25 48 7,101,971 Total 87,057,036 82,452,194 64,068,514 14,797,659 78,866,173 226 438 65,250,946 Average 226 Revenue Requirement 75,674,582 Peak 438 Peaking Factor 1.94 Over/(Under)Recovery 3,191,591 2003 Actuals Variable O&M 13,953,844 19% 2004 Rates Fixed O&M&Debt 60,954,580 81% Demand Charge(per Peak MGD) $ 148,975 Subtotal 74,908,424 Volumetric Charge 2004 Budgeted Water Sales 83,379,914 Members $ 0.18 2003 Over/(Under)Recovery (3,191,591) Customers $ 0.23 Adjusted 2004 Budgeted Water Sale: 80,188,323 Variable 14,937,377 Fixed 65,250,946 North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix H Page 3 of 5 Method 8-2004 Demand Volumetric 2004 2005 Wtr Yr 04 Wtr Yr 04 Charge Charge Total Demand Ann Min Actual Revenue Revenue Revenue Avo Peak Charge (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (MGD) (MGD) (1,000 gall) Members Allen 4,124,397 4,362,143 3,263,962 766,525 4,030,486 12 25 3,865,276 Farmersville 290,608 246,458 178,390 43,308 221,698 1 1 218,385 Forney 788,921 891,245 624,336 156,611 780,947 2 5 789,728 Frisco 5,607,266 5,645,797 4,437,473 992,091 5,429,564 15 33 5,002,716 Garland 13,660,013 12,612,613 10,212,130 2,216,314 12,428,445 35 73 11,175,980 McKinney 6,350,897 6,582,712 5,025,967 1,156,728 6,182,695 18 38 5,832,912 Mesquite 6,041,180 4,814,443 4,412,483 846,004 5,258,487 13 28 4,266,057 Mesquite#3 1,956,857 1,597,147 926,016 280,654 1,206,670 4 9 1,415,225 Plano 26,719,809 22,149,517 17,999,929 3,892,159 21,892,087 61 128 19,626,589 Princeton 328,803 289,199 227,586 50,819 278,404 1 2 256,258 Richardson 11,019,311 9,532,442 8,020,956 1,675,060 9,696,016 26 55 8,446,654 Rockwall 2,234,227 2,332,266 1,768,121 409,831 2,177,951 6 13 2,066,611 Royse City 286,471 327,863 226,707 57,613 284,320 1 2 290,518 Wylie 1,042,381 1,266,615 824,919 222,572 1,047,491 3 7 1,122,342 Total 80,451,141 72,650,460 58,148,975 12,766,288 70,915,263 199 420 64,375,250 Customers Caddo Basin 252,318 223,734 194,109 50,502 244,611 1 1 198,250 Cash SUD 237,267 257,909 175,199 58,216 233,415 1 1 228,532 College Mound WSC 66,769 52,093 49,079 11,759 60,837 0 0 46,159 Copeville WSC 68,468 73,935 54,184 16,689 70,873 0 0 65,513 East Fork SUD 188,012 202,927 148,789 45,805 194,594 1 1 179,813 Fairview 394,901 420,325 312,516 94,877 407,393 1 2 372,448 Fate 77,744 113,197 61,525 25,551 87,076 0 1 100,303 Forney Lake WSC 153,126 135,370 104,072 30,556 134,628 0 1 119,951 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 110,490 98,508 80,130 22,235 102,366 0 1 87,288 Josephine 40,978 38,203 26,354 8,623 34,977 0 0 33,852 Kaufman 419,999 419,659 310,400 94,726 405,127 1 2 371,858 Kaufman Four One 396,327 396,336 282,208 89,462 371,670 1 2 351,192 Lavon WSC 142,389 141,538 98,810 31,948 130,758 0 1 125,416 Little Elm 368,734 504,167 291,808 113,802 405,610 1 3 446,740 Lucas 337,693 301,984 215,070 68,164 283,234 1 2 267,587 Melissa 73,000 59,467 25,451 13,423 38,874 0 0 52,693 Milligan WSC 149,894 127,646 118,623 28,813 147,436 0 1 113,107 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 108,816 79,887 24,562 104,449 0 1 96,421 Murphy 655,870 792,811 519,042 178,955 697,997 2 5 702,506 Nevada WSC 71,043 71,813 56,222 16,210 72,432 0 0 63,633 North Collin WSC 287,568 284,428 217,112 64,202 281,314 1 2 252,030 Parker 306,201 344,660 242,321 77,797 320,118 1 2 305,402 Rose Hill WSC 43,271 7,689 12,789 1,736 14,524 0 0 6,813 Rowlett 2,920,333 2,772,411 2,194,207 625,794 2,820,001 8 16 2,456,621 Sachse 724,857 762,689 484,938 172,156 657,094 2 4 675,815 Sachse#2 388,403 194,171 307,374 43,829 351,203 1 1 172,054 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 76,473 59,126 17,262 76,387 0 0 67,762 Sunnyvale 439,743 376,311 286,800 84,942 371,741 1 2 333,448 Wylie NE WSC 130,896 120,048 93,825 27,097 120,923 0 1 106,374 Total 9,654,499 9,479,318 7,101,971 2,139,691 9,241,662 26 55 8,399,582 Total 90,105,640 82,129,778 65,250,946 14,905,979 80,156,925 225 475 72,774,831 Average 225 Revenue Requirement 78,757,660 Peak 475 Peaking Factor 2.11 Over/(Under)Recovery 1,399,264 2004 Actuals Variable O&M 14,354,930 17% 2005 Rates Fixed O&M&Debt 68,692,490 83% Demand Charge(per Peak MOD;$ 153,210 Subtotal 83,047,420 Volumetric Charge 2005 Budgeted Water Sales 89,382,128 Members $ 0.18 2004 Over/(Under)Recovery (1,399,264) Customers $ 0.23 Adjusted 2004 Budgeted Water Sales 87,982,864 Variable 15,208,032 Fixed 72,774,831 North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix H Method 8-2005 Page 4 of 5 Demand Volumetric 2004 2006 Wtr Yr 05 Wtr Yr 05 Charge Charge Total Demand Ann Min Actual Revenue Revenue Revenue Aiv, Peak Charge (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (MGD) (MGD) (1,000 gall) Members Allen 4,362,143 4,687,958 3,865,276 841,019 4,706,294 13 25 4,077,391 Farmersville 270,608 242,487 218,385 43,502 261,887 1 1 210,905 Forney 891,245 1,059,328 789,728 190,043 979,771 3 6 921,359 Frisco 5,645,797 6,467,274 5,002,716 1,160,228 6,162,943 18 34 5,624,966 Garland 13,660,013 12,435,423 11,175,980 2,230,912 13,406,893 34 66 10,815,814 McKinney 6,582,712 7,166,992 5,832,912 1,285,757 7,118,669 20 38 6,233,552 Mesquite 6,041,180 4,885,178 4,266,057 876,400 5,142,457 13 26 4,248,925 Mesquite#3 2,031,764 1,351,516 1,415,225 242,462 1,657,687 4 7 1,175,492 Plano 26,719,809 22,432,203 19,626,589 4,024,333 23,650,921 61 119 19,510,598 Princeton 328,803 337,039 256,258 60,465 316,723 1 2 293,143 Richardson 11,019,311 8,553,732 8,446,654 1,534,538 9,981,192 23 45 7,439,681 Rockwall 2,332,266 2,471,592 2,066,611 443,403 2,510,014 7 13 2,149,688 Royse City 327,863 338,437 290,518 60,716 351,233 1 2 294,358 Wylie 1,266,615 1,387,214 1,122,342 248,866 1,371,208 4 7 1,206,541 Total 81,480,129 73,816,373 64,375,250 13,242,643 77,617,893 202 390 64,202,413 Customers Caddo Basin 272,318 240,325 198,250 55,131 253,380 1 1 209,025 Cash SUD 257,909 256,282 228,532 58,791 287,323 1 1 222,903 College Mound WSC 66,769 9,825 46,159 2,254 48,413 0 0 8,545 Copeville WSC 73,935 66,320 65,513 15,214 80,727 0 0 57,682 East Fork SUD 202,927 221,755 179,813 50,871 230,683 1 1 192,873 Fairview 420,325 478,582 372,448 109,787 482,235 1 3 416,251 Fate 113,197 155,139 100,303 35,589 135,892 0 1 134,933 Forney Lake WSC 171,795 164,447 119,951 37,724 157,675 0 1 143,029 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 110,490 107,566 87,288 24,676 111,963 0 1 93,556 Josephine 40,978 41,031 33,852 9,413 43,264 0 0 35,687 Kaufman 419,999 409,164 371,858 93,862 465,720 1 2 355,874 Kaufman Four One 396,336 382,065 351,192 87,646 438,837 1 2 332,304 Lavon WSC 142,389 148,610 125,416 34,091 159,507 0 1 129,255 Little Elm 504,167 610,479 446,740 140,044 586,784 2 3 530,969 Lucas 337,693 308,034 267,587 70,663 338,250 1 2 267,915 Lucas#3 - - - - - - - Melissa 73,000 86,408 52,693 19,822 72,515 0 0 75,154 Milligan WSC 149,894 128,680 113,107 29,519 142,626 0 1 111,921 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 108,196 96,421 24,820 121,242 0 1 94,104 Murphy 792,811 906,941 702,506 208,052 910,558 2 5 788,820 Nevada WSC 71,813 68,787 63,633 15,780 79,413 0 0 59,828 North Collin WSC 287,568 290,010 252,030 66,528 318,559 1 2 252,239 Parker 344,660 392,852 305,402 90,120 395,522 1 2 341,686 Prosper 236,575 95,406 209,628 21,886 231,514 0 1 82,980 Rose Hill WSC 43,271 12,847 6,813 2,947 9,760 0 0 11,174 Rowlett 2,920,333 2,734,709 2,456,621 627,342 3,083,963 7 14 2,378,536 Sachse 762,689 611,056 675,815 140,176 815,991 2 3 531,471 Sachse#2 388,403 385,477 172,054 88,428 260,482 1 2 335,272 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 71,594 67,762 16,424 84,186 0 0 62,269 Sunnyvale 439,743 391,036 333,448 89,704 423,151 1 2 340,107 Wylie NE WSC 130,896 143,816 106,374 32,991 139,365 0 1 125,085 Total 10,381,088 10,027,439 8,609,210 2,300,293 10,909,502 27 53 8,721,450 Total 91,861,217 83,843,812 72,984,459 15,542,935 88,527,395 230 443 72,923,863 Average 230 Revenue Requirement 86,885,428 Peak 443 Peaking Factor 1.93 Over/(Under)Recovery 1,641,966 2005 Actuals Variable O&M 17,713,742 20% 2006 Rates Fixed O&M&Debt 72,605,844 80% Demand Charge(per Peak MGD) $ 164,614 Subtotal 90,319,586 Volumetric Charge 2006 Budgeted Water Sales 92,357,159 Members $ 0.21 2005 Over/(Under)Recovery (1,641,966) Customers $ 0.26 Adjusted 2004 Budgeted Water Sales 90,715,193 Variable 17,791,330 Fixed 72,923,863 North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix H Page 5 of 5 Method 8-2006 Wtr Yr 06 Wtr Yr 06 Demand Volumetric Total Ann Min Actual (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) Members Allen 4,687,958 5,588,259 4,077,391 1,152,390 5,229,781 Farmersville 270,608 280,467 210,905 57,837 268,742 Forney 1,059,328 1,416,868 921,359 292,181 1,213,541 Frisco 6,467,274 7,918,529 5,624,966 1,632,930 7,257,896 Frisco#2 3,116 419,410 2,710 86,489 89,199 Garland 13,660,013 13,721,955 10,815,814 2,829,690 13,645,504 McKinney 7,166,992 8,385,134 6,233,552 1,729,151 7,962,703 McKinney#3 171,228 350,012 148,927 72,178 221,105 Mesquite 6,041,180 5,756,029 4,248,925 1,186,987 5,435,912 Mesquite#3 2,106,671 1,359,175 1,175,492 280,284 1,455,776 Plano 26,719,809 26,265,050 19,510,598 5,416,281 24,926,878 Princeton 337,039 409,624 293,143 84,471 377,614 Richardson 11,019,311 10,050,090 7,439,681 2,072,492 9,512,173 Rockwall 2,471,592 3,284,236 2,149,688 677,263 2,826,951 Royse City 338,437 470,150 294,358 96,953 391,311 Wylie 1,387,214 1,721,763 1,206,541 355,056 1,561,597 Total 83,907,770 87,396,751 64,354,051 18,022,632 82,376,682 Customers Caddo Basin SUD 272,318 293,451 209,025 75,187 284,212 Cash SUD A 257,909 305,643 222,903 78,311 301,214 College Mound WSC A 66,769 62,710 8,545 16,067 24,613 Copeville WSC 73,935 77,927 57,682 19,966 77,649 East Fork SUD 221,755 324,226 192,873 83,072 275,945 Fairview 478,582 721,185 416,251 184,779 601,030 Fate 155,139 279,932 134,933 71,723 206,657 Fate#2 - - - - Forney Lake WSC 182,996 295,577 143,029 75,732 218,761 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 110,490 107,875 93,556 27,639 121,196 Josephine 41,031 57,407 35,687 14,709 50,396 Kaufman 419,999 438,403 355,874 112,326 468,200 Kaufman Four One A 396,336 450,363 332,304 115,390 447,695 Lavon WSC 148,610 217,256 129,255 55,665 184,919 Little Elm-Interim 559,606 925,163 486,722 237,042 723,764 Little Elm-Permanent 51,667 107,415 44,938 27,521 72,459 Lucas 337,693 212,681 267,915 54,492 322,408 Lucas#3 63,969 290,897 55,638 74,533 130,170 Melissa 86,408 135,737 75,154 34,778 109,932 Milligan WSC 149,894 147,744 111,921 37,854 149,775 Mt.Zion WSC 125,486 159,302 94,104 40,816 134,920 Murphy 906,941 1,193,806 788,820 305,873 1,094,692 Nevada WSC 45,802 56,413 59,828 14,454 74,282 Nevada WSC#2 30,766 31,766 26,759 8,139 34,898 North Collin WSC 290,010 318,780 252,239 81,677 333,915 Parker 392,852 470,812 341,686 120,630 462,316 Prosper 275,000 208,182 82,980 53,340 136,320 Rose Hill SUD A 43,271 42,818 11,174 10,971 22,144 Rowlett 2,920,333 3,192,039 2,378,536 817,852 3,196,389 Sachse 762,689 734,691 531,471 188,240 719,711 Sachse#2 388,403 431,099 335,272 110,455 445,726 Seis Lagos MUD 82,719 111,094 62,269 28,464 90,734 Sunnyvale 439,743 559,135 340,107 143,259 483,366 Wylie NE SUD 143,816 197,289 125,085 50,549 175,634 Total 10,922,937 13,158,818 8,804,537 3,371,503 12,176,040 Total 94,830,707 100,555,569 73,158,587 21,394,135 94,552,723 Revenue Requirement 93,489,824 Over/(Under)Recovery 1,062,899 North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix Page 1 of 4 Method 9-2003 Wtr Yr 03 Adjustments for Adjusted 2003 Actual Contracts Actual Total (1,000 gall) (1,000 gal.) (1,000 gal.) Members $ 0.997 Allen 4,124,397 - 4,124,397 $ 4,111,084 Farmersville 225,417 - 225,417 $ 224,689 Forney 788,921 - 788,921 $ 786,375 Frisco 5,607,266 - 5,607,266 $ 5,589,167 Garland 12,904,220 - 12,904,220 $ 12,862,568 McKinney 6,350,897 - 6,350,897 $ 6,330,398 Mesquite 5,575,688 - 5,575,688 $ 5,557,691 Mesquite#3 1,170,130 711,820 1,881,950 $ 1,875,875 Plano 22,745,013 - 22,745,013 $ 22,671,597 Princeton 287,581 - 287,581 $ 286,653 Richardson 10,135,415 - 10,135,415 $ 10,102,700 Rockwall 2,234,227 - 2,234,227 $ 2,227,015 Royse City 286,471 - 286,471 $ 285,546 Wylie 1,042,381 - 1,042,381 $ 1,039,016 Total 73,478,024 711,820 74,189,844 $ 73,950,375 Customers $ 1.047 Caddo Basin 245,280 - 245,280 $ 256,752 Cash SUD 221,385 - 221,385 $ 231,740 College Mound WSC 62,017 - 62,017 $ 64,918 Copeville WSC 68,468 - 68,468 $ 71,670 East Fork SUD 188,012 - 188,012 $ 196,806 Fairview 394,901 - 394,901 $ 413,371 Fate 77,744 - 77,744 $ 81,380 Forney Lake WSC 131,507 - 131,507 $ 137,658 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 101,254 - 101,254 $ 105,990 Josephine 33,301 - 33,301 $ 34,859 Kaufman 392,227 - 392,227 $ 410,572 Kaufman Four One 356,603 - 356,603 $ 373,282 Lavon WSC 124,858 17,531 142,389 $ 149,049 Little Elm 368,734 - 368,734 $ 385,981 Lucas 271,766 - 271,766 $ 284,477 Melissa 32,160 16,504 48,664 $ 50,940 Milligan WSC 149,894 - 149,894 $ 156,905 Mt.Zion WSC 100,946 - 100,946 $ 105,667 Murphy 655,870 - 655,870 $ 686,546 Nevada WSC 71,043 - 71,043 $ 74,366 North Collin WSC 274,347 - 274,347 $ 287,179 Parker 306,201 - 306,201 $ 320,523 Rose Hill WSC 16,160 - 16,160 $ 16,916 Rowlett 2,772,637 - 2,772,637 $ 2,902,319 Sachse 612,776 - 612,776 $ 641,437 Sachse#2 388,403 - 388,403 $ 406,569 Seis Lagos MUD 74,712 - 74,712 $ 78,206 Sunnyvale 362,405 - 362,405 $ 379,355 Wylie NE WSC 118,559 - 118,559 $ 124,104 Total 8,974,170 34,035 9,008,205 $ 9,429,539 Total 82,452,194 745,855 83,198,049 $ 83,379,914 Revenue Requirement $ 83,379,914 Member Rate $ 1.00 Customer Rate $ 1.05 74,189,844 73,950,375 9,008,205 9,429,539 83,379,914 North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix Page 2 of 4 Method 9- 2004 Wtr Yr 04 Adjustments for Adjusted 2004 Actual Contracts Actual Total (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.985 Allen 4,362,143 - 4,362,143 $ 4,296,123 Farmersville 246,458 - 246,458 $ 242,728 Forney 891,245 - 891,245 $ 877,756 Frisco 5,645,797 - 5,645,797 $ 5,560,349 Garland 12,612,613 - 12,612,613 $ 12,421,723 McKinney 6,582,712 - 6,582,712 $ 6,483,084 Mesquite 4,814,443 - 4,814,443 $ 4,741,577 Mesquite#3 1,597,147 359,710 1,956,857 $ 1,927,240 Plano 22,149,517 - 22,149,517 $ 21,814,287 Princeton 289,199 - 289,199 $ 284,822 Richardson 9,532,442 - 9,532,442 $ 9,388,170 Rockwall 2,332,266 - 2,332,266 $ 2,296,967 Royse City 327,863 - 327,863 $ 322,901 Wylie 1,266,615 - 1,266,615 $ 1,247,445 Total 72,650,460 359,710 73,010,170 $ 71,905,173 Customers $ 1.035 Caddo Basin 223,734 - 223,734 $ 231,535 Cash SUD 257,909 - 257,909 $ 266,901 College Mound WSC 52,093 - 52,093 $ 53,909 Copeville WSC 73,935 - 73,935 $ 76,513 East Fork SUD 202,927 - 202,927 $ 210,002 Fairview 420,325 - 420,325 $ 434,980 Fate 113,197 - 113,197 $ 117,144 Forney Lake WSC 135,370 17,756 153,126 $ 158,465 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 98,508 - 98,508 $ 101,942 Josephine 38,203 - 38,203 $ 39,535 Kaufman 419,659 - 419,659 $ 434,290 Kaufman Four One 396,336 - 396,336 $ 410,154 Lavon WSC 141,538 851 142,389 $ 147,353 Little Elm 504,167 - 504,167 $ 521,745 Lucas 301,984 - 301,984 $ 312,513 Melissa 59,467 13,533 73,000 $ 75,545 Milligan WSC 127,646 - 127,646 $ 132,096 Mt.Zion WSC 108,816 - 108,816 $ 112,610 Murphy 792,811 - 792,811 $ 820,452 Nevada WSC 71,813 - 71,813 $ 74,317 North Collin WSC 284,428 - 284,428 $ 294,345 Parker 344,660 - 344,660 $ 356,677 Rose Hill WSC 7,689 - 7,689 $ 7,957 Rowlett 2,772,411 - 2,772,411 $ 2,869,072 Sachse 762,689 - 762,689 $ 789,280 Sachse#2 194,171 194,232 388,403 $ 401,945 Seis Lagos MUD 76,473 - 76,473 $ 79,139 Sunnyvale 376,311 - 376,311 $ 389,431 Wylie NE WSC 120,048 - 120,048 $ 124,233 Total 9,479,318 226,372 9,705,690 $ 10,044,080 Total 82,129,778 586,082 82,715,860 81,949,253 Revenue Requirement $ 81,949,252 Member Rate $ 0.98 Customer Rate $ 1.03 73,010,170 71,905,172 9,705,690 10,044,080 81,949,252 North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix Page 3 of 4 Method 9-2005 Wtr Yr 05 Adjustments for Adjusted 2005 Actual Contracts Actual Total (1,000 gall) Members $ 1.04 Allen 4,687,958 - 4,687,958 $ 4,859,599 Farmersville 242,487 - 242,487 $ 251,365 Forney 1,059,328 - 1,059,328 $ 1,098,113 Frisco 6,467,274 - 6,467,274 $ 6,704,062 Garland 12,435,423 - 12,435,423 $ 12,890,724 McKinney 7,166,992 - 7,166,992 $ 7,429,399 Mesquite 4,885,178 - 4,885,178 $ 5,064,040 Mesquite#3 1,351,516 680,248 2,031,764 $ 2,106,153 Plano 22,432,203 - 22,432,203 $ 23,253,519 Princeton 337,039 - 337,039 $ 349,379 Richardson 8,553,732 - 8,553,732 $ 8,866,912 Rockwall 2,471,592 - 2,471,592 $ 2,562,085 Royse City 338,437 - 338,437 $ 350,828 Wylie 1,387,214 - 1,387,214 $ 1,438,004 Total 73,816,373 680,248 74,496,621 $ 77,224,186 Customers $ 1 Caddo Basin 240,325 - 240,325 $ 261,140 Cash SUD 256,282 - 256,282 $ 278,479 College Mound WSC 9,825 - 9,825 $ 10,676 Copeville WSC 66,320 - 66,320 $ 72,064 East Fork SUD 221,755 - 221,755 $ 240,962 Fairview 478,582 - 478,582 $ 520,034 Fate 155,139 - 155,139 $ 168,576 Forney Lake WSC 164,447 7,348 171,795 $ 186,675 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 107,566 - 107,566 $ 116,883 Josephine 41,031 - 41,031 $ 44,585 Kaufman 409,164 - 409,164 $ 444,603 Kaufman Four One 382,065 - 382,065 $ 415,157 Lavon WSC 148,610 - 148,610 $ 161,482 Little Elm 610,479 - 610,479 $ 663,355 Lucas 308,034 - 308,034 $ 334,714 Lucas#3 - - - $ - Melissa 86,408 - 86,408 $ 93,892 Milligan WSC 128,680 - 128,680 $ 139,825 Mt.Zion WSC 108,196 - 108,196 $ 117,567 Murphy 906,941 - 906,941 $ 985,494 Nevada WSC 68,787 - 68,787 $ 74,745 North Collin WSC 290,010 - 290,010 $ 315,129 Parker 392,852 - 392,852 $ 426,878 Prosper 95,406 141,169 236,575 $ 257,066 Rose Hill WSC 12,847 - 12,847 $ 13,960 Rowlett 2,734,709 - 2,734,709 $ 2,971,571 Sachse 611,056 - 611,056 $ 663,982 Sachse#2 385,477 2,926 388,403 $ 422,044 Seis Lagos MUD 71,594 - 71,594 $ 77,795 Sunnyvale 391,036 - 391,036 $ 424,905 Wylie NE WSC 143,816 - 143,816 $ 156,272 Total 10,027,439 151,443 10,178,882 $ 11,060,508 Total 83,843,812 831,691 84,675,503 $ 88,284,694 Revenue Requirement $ 88,284,693 Member Rate $ 1.04 Customer Rate $ 1.09 74,496,621 $ 77,224,185 10,178,882 $ 11,060,508 $ 88,284,693 North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix I Page 4 of 4 Method 9-2006 Wtr Yr 06 Adjustments for Adjusted FY 06 Actual Contracts Actual Total (1,000 gall) Members $ 0.93 Allen 5,588,259 - 5,588,259 $ 5,207,914 Farmersville 280,467 - 280,467 $ 261,378 Forney 1,416,868 - 1,416,868 $ 1,320,434 Frisco 7,918,529 - 7,918,529 $ 7,379,583 Frisco#2 419,410 - 419,410 $ 390,864 Garland 13,721,955 - 13,721,955 $ 12,788,020 McKinney 8,385,134 - 8,385,134 $ 7,814,430 McKinney#3 350,012 - 350,012 $ 326,190 Mesquite 5,756,029 - 5,756,029 $ 5,364,266 Mesquite#3 1,359,175 747,496 2,106,671 $ 1,963,288 Plano 26,265,050 - 26,265,050 $ 24,477,414 Princeton 409,624 - 409,624 $ 381,744 Richardson 10,050,090 - 10,050,090 $ 9,366,067 Rockwall 3,284,236 - 3,284,236 $ 3,060,706 Royse City 470,150 - 470,150 $ 438,151 Wylie 1,721,763 - 1,721,763 $ 1,604,577 Total 87,396,751 747,496 88,144,247 $ 82,145,027 Customers $ 0.98 Caddo Basin SUD 293,451 - 293,451 $ 288,151 Cash SUD 305,643 - 305,643 $ 300,123 College Mound WSC 62,710 - 62,710 $ 61,577 Copeville WSC 77,927 - 77,927 $ 76,520 East Fork SUD 324,226 - 324,226 $ 318,370 Fairview 721,185 - 721,185 $ 708,159 Fate 279,932 - 279,932 $ 274,876 Fate#2 - - - $ - Forney Lake WSC 295,577 - 295,577 $ 290,238 Gasonia-Scurry WSC 107,875 - 107,875 $ 105,927 Josephine 57,407 - 57,407 $ 56,370 Kaufman 438,403 - 438,403 $ 430,485 Kaufman Four One 450,363 - 450,363 $ 442,229 Lavon WSC 217,256 - 217,256 $ 213,332 Little Elm-Interim 925,163 - 925,163 $ 908,453 Little Elm-Permanent 107,415 - 107,415 $ 105,475 Lucas 212,681 - 212,681 $ 208,840 Lucas#3 290,897 - 290,897 $ 285,643 Melissa 135,737 - 135,737 $ 133,285 Milligan WSC 147,744 - 147,744 $ 145,076 Mt.Zion WSC 159,302 - 159,302 $ 156,425 Murphy 1,193,806 - 1,193,806 $ 1,172,244 Nevada WSC 56,413 - 56,413 $ 55,394 Nevada WSC#2 31,766 - 31,766 $ 31,192 North Collin WSC 318,780 - 318,780 $ 313,022 Parker 470,812 - 470,812 $ 462,308 Prosper 208,182 66,818 275,000 $ 270,033 Rose Hill SUD 42,818 - 42,818 $ 42,045 Rowlett 3,192,039 - 3,192,039 $ 3,134,386 Sachse 734,691 - 734,691 $ 721,421 Sachse#2 431,099 - 431,099 $ 423,313 Seis Lagos MUD 111,094 - 111,094 $ 109,087 Sunnyvale 559,135 - 559,135 $ 549,036 Wylie NE SUD 197,289 - 197,289 $ 193,726 Total 13,158,818 66,818 13,225,636 $12,986,762.67 Total 100,555,569 814,314 101,369,883 $95,131,790.00 Revenue Requirement $ 95,131,790 $95,131,790.39 Member Rate $ 0.93 Customer Rate $ 0.98 88,144,247 $ 82,145,027 13,225,636 $ 12,986,763 $ 95,131,790 Appen ix J North Texas Municipal Water District Page ldot 4 Method 10-2003 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 03 FY 03 FY 03 Gallons per Gallons per Percentage Surcharge Surchage Total Wtr Yr 03 Wtr Yr 03 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 03 Annual Full Excess FY 03 FY 03 Capita per Capita per Change in Amount Amount Adjusted Total Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total Day Consumption Day Consumption GPCPD (Per 1,000 gal.) Rebated Surcharge Revenue (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (Current Year) (Prior Year) Consumption $0.05 Members $ 0.870 $ 0.870 $ 0.200 $ 0.200 Allen 3,952,728 4,124,397 171,669 - - 171,669 3,952,728 $ 3,438,873 $ - $ 34,334 $ - $ 3,473,207 173 166 4% $ 206,220 $ - $ 206,220 $ 3,679,427 Farmersville 290,608 225,417 (65,191) - - - (65,191) 290,608 $ 252,829 $ - $ - $ (13,038) $ 239,791 114 99 15% $ 11,271 $ (11,271) $ - $ 239,791 Forney 743,504 788,921 45,417 - - 45,417 743,504 $ 646,848 $ - $ 9,083 $ - $ 655,932 145 122 19% $ 39,446 $ - $ 39,446 $ 695,378 Frisco 4,394,752 5,607,266 1,212,514 - - 1,212,514 4,394,752 $ 3,823,434 $ - $ 242,503 $ - $ 4,065,937 255 242 5% $ 280,363 $ - $ 280,363 $ 4,346,300 Garland 13,660,013 12,904,220 (755,793) - - - (755,793) 13,660,013 $ 11,884,211 $ - $ - $ (151,159) $ 11,733,053 136 126 8% $ 645,211 $ (645,211) $ - $ 11,733,053 McKinney 5,748,746 6,350,897 602,151 - - 602,151 5,748,746 $ 5,001,409 $ - $ 120,430 $ - $ 5,121,839 187 174 7% $ 317,545 $ - $ 317,545 $ 5,439,384 Mesquite 6,041,180 5,575,688 (465,492) - - - (465,492) 6,041,180 $ 5,255,827 $ - $ - $ (93,098) $ 5,162,728 124 115 8% $ 278,784 $ (278,784) $ - $ 5,162,728 Mesquite#3 1,881,950 1,170,130 (711,820) 2,256,486 - - - 1,881,950 $ 1,637,297 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,637,297 124 115 8% $ 58,507 $ (58,507) $ - $ 1,637,297 Plano 26,719,809 22,745,013 (3,974,796) - - - (3,974,796) 26,719,809 $ 23,246,234 $ - $ - $ (794,959) $ 22,451,275 220 216 2% $ 1,137,251 $ - $ 1,137,251 $ 23,588,525 Princeton 328.803 287,581 (41,222) - - - (41,222) 328,803 $ 286,059 $ - $ - $ (8,244) $ 277,814 84 84 0% $ 14.379 $ (14.379) $ - $ 277,814 Richardson 11,019,311 10,135,415 (883,896) - - - (883,896) 11,019,311 $ 9,586,801 $ - $ - $ (176,779) $ 9,410,021 238 235 1% $ 506,771 $ - $ 506,771 $ 9,916,792 Rockwall 2,188,525 2,234,227 45,702 - - 45,702 - 2,188,525 $ 1,904,017 $ - $ 9,140 $ - $ 1,913,157 176 160 10% $ 111,711 $ - $ 111,711 $ 2,024,869 Royse City 277,416 286,471 9,055 - - 9,055 - 277,416 $ 241,352 $ - $ 1,811 $ - $ 243,163 131 117 12% $ 14,324 $ (14,324) $ - $ 243,163 Wylie 907,331 1,042,381 135,050 - - 135,050 - 907,331 $ 789,378 $ - $ 27,010 $ - $ 816,388 131 107 22% $ 52,119 $ (52,119) $ - $ 816,388 Total 78,154,676 73,478,024 (4,676,652) - 2,221,558 (6,186,390) 78,154,676 $ 67,994,568 $ - $ 444,312 $ (1,237,278) $ 67,201,602 $ 3,673.901 $ (1,074,594) $ 2,599,307 $ 69,800,909 Appen ix J North Texas Municipal Water District Page 2dot 4 Method 10-2004 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) Excess Rate FY 04 FY 04 FY 04 Gallons per Gallons per Percentage Surcharge Surchage Total Wtr Yr 04 Wtr Yr 04 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 04 Annual Full Excess FY 04 FY 04 Capita per Capita per Change in Amount Amount Adjusted Total Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total Day Consumption Day Consumption GPCPD (Per 1,000 gal.) Rebated Surcharge Revenue (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (Current Year) (Prior Year) Consumption $0.05 Members $ 0.920 $ 0.920 $ 0.200 $ 0.200 Allen 4,124,397 4,362,143 237,746 - - 237,746 4,124,397 $ 3,794,445 $ - $ 47,549 $ - $ 3,841,994 162 173 -6% $ 218,107 $ (163,580)$ 54,527 $ 3,896,521 Farmersville 290,608 246,458 (44,150) - - - (44,150) 290,608 $ 267,359 $ - $ - $ (8,830) $ 258,529 110 114 -4% $ 12,323 $ (12,323)$ - $ 258,529 Forney 788,921 891,245 102,324 - - 102,324 788,921 $ 725,807 $ - $ 20,465 $ - $ 746,272 85 145 -41% $ 44,562 $ (44,562)$ - $ 746,272 Frisco 5,607,266 5,645,797 38,531 - - 38,531 5,607,266 $ 5,158,685 $ - $ 7,706 $ - $ 5,166,391 209 255 -18% $ 282,290 $ (268,175)$ 14,114 $ 5,180,505 Garland 13,660,013 12,612,613 (1,047,400) - - - (1,047,400) 13,660,013 $ 12,567,212 $ - $ - $ (209,480) $ 12,357,732 123 136 -10% $ 630,631 $ (630,631)$ - $ 12,357,732 McKinney 6,350,897 6,582,712 231,815 - - 231,815 6,350,897 $ 5,842,825 $ - $ 46,363 $ - $ 5,889,188 156 187 -17% $ 329,136 $ (312,679)$ 16,457 $ 5,905,645 Mesquite 6,041,180 4,814,443 (1,226,737) - - - (1,226,737) 6,041,180 $ 5,557,886 $ - $ - $ (245,347) $ 5,312,538 106 124 -15% $ 240,722 $ (240,722)$ - $ 5,312,538 Mesquite#3 1,956,857 1,597,147 (359,710) 2,256,486 - - - 1,956,857 $ 1,800,308 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,800,308 106 124 -15% $ 79,857 $ (79,857)$ - $ 1,800,308 Plano 26,719,809 22,149,517 (4,570,292) - - - (4,570,292) 26,719,809 $ 24,582,224 $ - $ - $ (914,058) $ 23,668,166 192 220 -13% $ 1,107,476 $ (1,052,102)$ 55,374 $ 23,723,540 Princeton 328.803 289,199 (39,604) - - - (39,604) 328,803 $ 302,499 $ - $ - $ (7,921) $ 294,578 85 84 1% $ 14.460 $ (14,460)$ - $ 294,578 Richardson 11,019,311 9,532,442 (1,486,869) - - - (1,486,869) 11,019,311 $ 10,137,766 $ - $ - $ (297,374) $ 9,840,392 200 238 -16% $ 476,622 $ (452,791)$ 23,831 $ 9,864,223 Rockwall 2,234,227 2,332,266 98,039 - - 98,039 - 2,234,227 $ 2,055,489 $ - $ 19,608 $ - $ 2,075,097 130 176 -26% $ 116,613 $ (116,613)$ - $ 2,075,097 RoyseCity 286,471 327,863 41,392 - - 41,392 - 286,471 $ 263,553 $ - $ 8,278 $ - $ 271,832 117 131 -11% $ 16,393 $ (16,393)$ - $ 271,832 Wylie 1,042,381 1,266,615 224,234 - - 224,234 - 1,042,381 $ 958,991 $ - $ 44,847 $ - $ 1,003,837 114 131 -13% $ 63,331 $ (63,331)$ - $ 1,003,837 Total 80,451,141 72,650,460 (7,800,681) - 974,081 (8,415,052) 80,451,141 $ 74,015,050 $ - $ 194,816 $ (1,683,010) $ 72,526,856 $ 3,632,523 $ (3,468,220)$ 164,303 $ 72,691,158 Appen ix J North Texas Municipal Water District Page 3dot 4 Method 10-2005 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY05 Excess Rate FY 05 FY 05 FY 05 Gallons per Gallons per Percentage Surcharge Surchage Total Wtr Yr 05 Wtr Yr 05 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 05 Annual Full Excess FY 05 FY 05 Capita per Capita per Change in Amount Amount Adjusted Total Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total Day Consumption Day Consumption GPCPD (Per 1,000 gal.) Rebated Surcharge Revenue (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (Current Year) (Prior Year) Consumption $0.05 Members $ 0.970 $ 0.970 $ 0.200 $ 0.200 Allen 4,362,143 4,687,958 325,815 - - 325,815 4,362,143 $ 4,231,279 $ - $ 65,163 $ - $ 4,296,442 188 162 16% $ 234,398 $ - $ 234,398 $ 4,530,840 Farmersville 270,608 242,487 (28,121) - - - (28,121) 270,608 $ 262,490 $ - $ - $ (5,624) $ 256,866 127 110 15% $ 12,124 $ (12,124)$ - $ 256,866 Forney 891,245 1,059,328 168,083 - - 168,083 891,245 $ 864,508 $ - $ 33,617 $ - $ 898,124 123 85 45% $ 52,966 $ (52,966)$ - $ 898,124 Frisco 5,645,797 6,467,274 821,477 - - 821,477 5,645,797 $ 5,476,423 $ - $ 164,295 $ - $ 5,640,718 254 209 22% $ 323,364 $ - $ 323,364 $ 5,964,082 Garland 13,660,013 12,435,423 (1,224,590) - - - (1,224,590) 13,660,013 $ 13,250,213 $ - $ - $ (244,918) $ 13,005,295 141 123 15% $ 621,771 $ - $ 621,771 $ 13,627,066 McKinney 6,582,712 7,166,992 584,280 - - 584,280 6,582,712 $ 6,385,231 $ - $ 116,856 $ - $ 6,502,087 194 156 24% $ 358,350 $ - $ 358,350 $ 6,860,436 Mesquite 6,041,180 4,885,178 (1,156,002) - - - (1,156,002) 6,041,180 $ 5,859,945 $ - $ - $ (231,200) $ 5,628,744 125 106 18% $ 244,259 $ (244,259)$ - $ 5,628,744 Mesquite#3 2,031,764 1,351,516 (680,248) 2,256,486 - - - 2,031,764 $ 1,970,811 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,970,811 125 106 18% $ 67,576 $ (67,576)$ - $ 1,970,811 Plano 26.719,809 22,432,203 (4,287,606) - - - (4,287,606) 26,719,809 $ 25,918.215 $ - $ - $ (857,521) $ 25,060,694 238 192 24% $ 1,121.610 $ - $ 1,121,610 $ 26,182,304 Princeton 328,803 337,039 8,236 - - 8,236 - 328,803 $ 318,939 $ - $ 1,647 $ - $ 320,586 109 85 28% $ 16,852 $ (16,852)$ - $ 320,586 Richardson 11,019,311 8,553,732 (2,465,579) - - - (2,465,579) 11,019,311 $ 10,688,732 $ - $ - $ (493,116) $ 10,195,616 223 200 12% $ 427,687 $ - $ 427,687 $ 10,623,302 Rockwall 2,332,266 2,471,592 139,326 - - 139,326 - 2,332,266 $ 2,262,298 $ - $ 27,865 $ - $ 2,290,163 191 130 47% $ 123,580 $ - $ 123,580 $ 2,413,743 Royse City 327,863 338,437 10,574 - - 10,574 - 327,863 $ 318,027 $ - $ 2,115 $ - $ 320,142 129 117 10% $ 16,922 $ (16,922)$ - $ 320,142 Wylie 1,266,615 1,387,214 120,599 - - 120,599 - 1,266,615 $ 1,228,617 $ - $ 24,120 $ - $ 1,252,736 137 114 20% $ 69,361 $ (69,361)$ - $ 1,252,736 Total 81,480,129 73,816,373 (7,663,756) - 2,178,390 (9,161,898) 81,480,129 $ 79,035,725 $ - $ 435,678 $ (1,832,380) $ 77,639,024 $ 3,690,819 $ (480,060)$ 3,210,759 $ 80,849,782 North Texas Municipal Water District Appendix) Method 10-2006 Page 4 of 4 Increase/(Decrease) Wtr Yr Increase/(Decrease) FY06 Excess Rate FY 06 FY 06 FY 06 Gallons per Gallons per Percentage Surcharge Surchage Total Wtr Yr 06 Wtr Yr 06 Increase Contract Full Excess Rebate FY 06 Annual Full Excess FY 06 FY 06 Capita per Capita per Change in Amount Amount Adjusted Total Ann Min Actual (Decrease) Minium Rate Rate Rate Ann Min Billing Billing Billing Rebate Total Day Consumption Day Consumption GPCPD (Per 1,000 gal.) Rebated Surcharge Revenue (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1.000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1,000 gall) (1.000 gall) (Current Year) (Prior Year) Consumption $0.05 Members $ 0.970 $ 0.970 $ 0.230 $ 0.230 Allen 4,687,958 5,588,259 900,301 - - 900,301 - 4.687,958 $ 4,547,319 $ - $ 207,069 $ - $ 4,754,388 159 188 -15% $ 279,413 $ (265,442)$ 13,971 $ 4.768,359 Farmersville 270,608 280,467 9,859 - - 9,859 - 270.608 $ 262,490 $ - $ 2,268 $ - $ 264,757 111 127 -13% $ 14,023 $ (14,023)$ - $ 264,757 Forney 1,059,328 1,416,868 357,540 - - 357,540 - 1.059.328 $ 1,027,548 $ - $ 82,234 $ - $ 1,109,782 102 123 -17% $ 70,843 $ (70,843)$ - $ 1.109,782 Frisco 6,467,274 7,918,529 1.451,255 - - 1,451,255 - 6.467.274 $ 6,273,256 $ - $ 333,789 $ - $ 6,607,044 214 254 -16% $ 395,926 $ (376,130)$ 19,796 $ 6.626,841 F8sco#2 3,116 419,410 416,294 12,465 9,349 406,945 - 5.650 $ 5,481 $ 9,069 $ 93,597 $ - $ 108,146 214 254 -16% $ 20,971 $ (19,922)$ 1,049 $ 109,195 Garland 13,660,013 13,721,955 61.942 - - 61,942 - 13.660.013 $ 13,250,213 $ - $ 14,247 $ - $ 13,264,459 135 141 -4% $ 686,098 $ (686,098)$ - $ 13.264,459 McKinney 7,166,992 8,385,134 1.218.142 - - 1,218,142 - 7.166.992 $ 6,951,982 $ - $ 280,173 $ - $ 7,232,155 169 194 -13% $ 419,257 $ (398,294)$ 20,963 $ 7.253,118 McKinney#3 171,228 350,012 178.784 684.910 178.784 - - 228.303 $ 221.454 $ 173,420 $ - $ - $ 394.874 169 194 -13% $ 17.501 $ (16,626)$ 875 $ 395.749 Mesquite 6,041,180 5,756,029 (285.151) - - - (285,151) 6.041.180 $ 5.859.945 $ - $ - $ (65,585)$ 5.794.360 110 125 -12% $ 287.801 $ (287,801)$ - $ 5.794.360 Mesquite#3 2,106,671 1,359,175 (747.496) 2,256,486 - - - 2.106.671 $ 2,043,471 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,043,471 110 125 -12% $ 67,959 $ (67,959)$ - $ 2.043,471 Plano 26,719,809 26,265,050 (454.759) - - - (454,759) 26.719.809 $ 25,918,215 $ - $ - $ (104,595)$ 25,813,620 217 238 -9% $ 1,313,253 $ (1,247,590)$ 65,663 $ 25.879.283 Princeton 337,039 409,624 72.585 - - 72,585 - 337.039 $ 326,928 $ - $ 16,695 $ - $ 343,622 84 109 -23% $ 20,481 $ (20,481)$ - $ 343.622 Richardson 11,019,311 10,050,090 (969.221) - - - (969,221) 11.019.311 $ 10,688,732 $ - $ - $ (222,921)$ 10,465,811 232 223 4% $ 502,505 $ - $ 502,505 $ 10.968.315 Rockwall 2,471,592 3,284,236 812.644 - - 812,644 - 2.471.592 $ 2,397,444 $ - $ 186,908 $ - $ 2,584,352 174 191 -9% $ 164,212 $ (156,001)$ 8,211 $ 2.592.563 Royse City 338,437 470,150 131.713 - - 131,713 - 338.437 $ 328,284 $ - $ 30,294 $ - $ 358,578 107 129 -17% $ 23,508 $ (23,508)$ - $ 358.578 Wylie 1,387,214 1,721,763 334.549 - - 334,549 - 1.387.214 $ 1,345,598 $ - $ 76,946 $ - $ 1,422,544 122 137 -11% $ 86,088 $ (86,088)$ - $ 1.422.544 Total 83,907,770 87,396,751 3.488.981 188,133 5,757,475 (1,709,131) 83.967.379 $ 81,448,358 $ 182,489 $ 1,324,219 $ (393,100)$ 82,561,966 $ 4,369,838 $ (3,736,806)$ 633,031 $ 83.194.997