08-29-2005 (City Council) Agenda Packet J
Wylie City Council
CITY OF WYLIE NOTICE OF MEETING
Special Called Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, August 29, 2006 — 6:00 pm
Wylie Municipal Complex
Council Chambers/Council Conference Room
2000 Highway 78 North
John Mondy Mayor
Carter Porter Mayor Pro Tern
Earl Newsom Place I
M. G. "Red" Byboth Place 2
Eric Hogue Place 3
Merrill Young Place 4
Rick White Place 5
Mindy Manson Asst. City Manager
Richard Abernathy City Attorney
Carole Ehrlich City Secretary
In accordance with Section 551.042 of the Texas Government Code, this agenda has been posted at the Wylie
Municipal Complex, distributed to the appropriate news media, and posted on the City website:
www.wvlietexa,s'.gov within the required time frame. As a courtesy, the entire Agenda Packet has also been posted
on the City of Wylie website: www.wylietexas.gov.
The Mayor and City Council request that all cell phones and pagers be turned off or set to vibrate. Members of the
audience are requested to step outside the Council Chambers to respond to a page or to conduct a phone
conversation.
The Wylie Municipal Complex is wheelchair accessible. Sign interpretation or other special assistance for disabled
attendees must be requested 48 hours in advance by contacting the City Secretary's Office at 972.442.8100 or TD
972.442.8170.
CALL TO ORDER
Announce the presence of a Quorum.
INVOCATION & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Recess into Closed Session in compliance with Section 551.001, et.seq. Texas Government Code,
to wit:
SS 551.071 Consultation with Attorney; Closed Meeting
A governmental body may not conduct a private consultation with its attorney except:
(1) When the governmental body seeks the advise of its attorney
(A) pending or contemplated litigation;or
(B) a settlement offer;or
August 29,2006 Wylie City Council Special Called Meeting Agenda Page 2 of 3
(2) On a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules
of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with this chapter.
1. Discussion with the City Attorney regarding canceling the Employment
Agreement dated July 19, 2004 between Mark Roath and the City of Wylie, Texas
and any amendments thereto and terminating Mr. Roath's employment as city
manager without cause by giving notice of such termination in accordance with the
terms of the Employment Agreement, authorizing the Mayor or his designee to give
such notice, and to pay Mr. Roath severance in accordance with his
Employment Agreement and any amendments thereto.
2. Discussion with the City Attorney regarding designating an interim city manager in
the event Mark Roath is absent or disabled.
3. Discussion with the City Attorney regarding a Severance Agreement and Release
between Mark Roath and the City of Wylie, Texas and authorizing the Mayor to
execute the same.
4. Discussion with the City Attorney regarding the resignation of Mark Roath as city
manager.
RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION
Take any action as a result from Executive Session.
1. Consider, and act upon, canceling the Employment Agreement dated July 19, 2004
between Mark Roath and the City of Wylie, Texas and any amendments thereto and
terminating Mr. Roath's employment as city manager without cause by giving
notice of such termination in accordance with the terms of the Employment
Agreement, authorizing the Mayor or his designee to give such notice, and to pay
Mr. Roath severance in accordance with his Employment Agreement and any
amendments thereto.
2. Consider, and act upon, designating an interim city manager in the event Mark
Roath is absent or disabled.
3. Consider, and act upon, approving a Severance Agreement and Release between
Mark Roath and the City of Wylie, Texas and authorizing the Mayor to execute the
same.
4. Consider, and act upon, the resignation of Mark Roath as city manager.
REGULAR AGENDA
Public Hearings
1. Hold the Second Public Hearing on the proposed tax rate for fiscal year 2006-2007
and provide taxpayers an opportunity to express their views on the tax rate. At the
end of the hearing, the City Council must set and announce the date, time, and place
August 29,2006 Wylie City Council Special Called Meeting Agenda Page 3 of 3
of the meeting at which it will vote on the final proposed tax rate. (L. Williamson,
Finance Director)
Executive Summary
In accordance with the"Truth in Taxation"laws of the State of Texas,on August 8,2006,the City Council
took a roll call vote on the proposed tax rate and scheduled two public hearings on the tax rate. The first
public hearing was held on August 22, 2006. The second public hearing is scheduled for August 29, 2006.
The notice of the two public hearings was published in the McKinney Courier-Gazette on August 14, 2006,
and the Wylie News on August 16, 2006. The purpose of the second public hearing on August 29, 2006, is
to give the taxpayers an additional opportunity to express their views on the tax rate. At the end of the
hearing, the City Council must set and announce the date, time, and place of the meeting at which it will
vote on the final proposed tax rate.
2. Hold a Public Hearing on the fiscal year 2006-2007 Proposed Budget. All interested
persons shall be given an opportunity to be heard, either for or against any item on
the proposed budget. At the end of the hearing, the City Council will schedule the
time and place that the vote will be taken on the proposed budget. (L. Williamson,
Finance Director)
Executive Summary
The City Council must schedule and announce the meeting to adopt the proposed budget currently set for
September 12, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. at City Council Chambers, Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Highway 78
North,Wylie,Texas 75098
General Business
3. (MOTION TO REMOVE FROM TABLE): Consider, and act upon, authorizing
the Mayor to sign a Development Agreement between the City of Wylie and the
Skorburg Company for a tract known as the Hood property or Alanis Crossing. (M.
Manson, Assistant City Manager)
Executive Summary
The land subject to the proposed Development Agreement is a 61.26 acre tract of land known as the Hood
property,or Alanis Crossing. The purpose of the proposed Development Agreement is to address the
dedication of right-of-way and construction of Alanis Drive.
WORKSESSION
• (MOTION TO REMOVE FROM TABLE): Discussion, and possible
direction, on 2006 Water and Wastewater Rate Study prepared by McLain
Decision Support Systems.
ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION ���,:,�►��'�'�������
I certifythat this Notice of Meeting was post t '. , u st, 2006 at 5:00 p.m. as required bylaw in
• •
accordance with Section 551.042 ofthe :'U�overnmse 2e and that the appropriate news media was
contacted. a courtesy, .r,enda is alibMiltedethr5ity.e2IWRie website: www.wy lietexas.tau.
7. . r� •L • �
• • r.
■ �`'� •
�Carole E rlich ity Secretary : , Date Notice Removed
/. . s
7/. Wylie City Council
CITYdF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: August 29, 2006 Item Number: 1
Department: Finance Department (City Secretary's Use Only)
Prepared By: Larry Williamson Account Code:
Date Prepared: August 22, 2006 Budgeted Amount:
Exhibits:
Subject
Hold the Second Public Hearing on the proposed tax rate for fiscal year 2006-2007 and provide taxpayers an
opportunity to express their views on the tax rate. At the end of the hearing, the City Council must set and
announce the date, time, and place of the meeting at which it will vote on the final proposed tax rate.
Recommendation
Hold the Second Public Hearing on the proposed tax rate of $.715 for fiscal year 2006-2007 and provide
taxpayers an opportunity to express their views on the tax rate. City Council must set and announce the date,
time, and place of the meeting at which it will vote on the final proposed tax rate. Currently the date has been
set for September 12, 2006 at 6:00 pm at City Council Chambers, Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Highway 78
North, Wylie, Texas 75098.
Discussion
In accordance with the "Truth in Taxation" laws of the State of Texas, on August 8, 2006, the City Council took
a roll call vote on the proposed tax rate and scheduled two public hearings on the tax rate. The first public
hearing was held on August 22, 2006. The second public hearing is scheduled for August 29, 2006. The notice
of the two public hearings were published in the McKinney Courier-Gazette on August 14, 2006, and the Wylie
News on August 16, 2006. The purpose of the second public hearing on August 29, 2006, is to give the
taxpayers an additional opportunity to express their views on the tax rate. At the end of the hearing, the City
Council must set and announce the date, time, and place of the meeting at which it will vote on the final
proposed tax rate.
The official detailed effective tax rate calculations are available in the office of the Collin County Tax
Assessor/Collector (Kenneth L. Maun) in McKinney. A copy is also maintained in the Finance Department for
the Council and public to view.
The proposed budget is based on the proposed tax rate of$0.715 per $100 valuation. This is the rate previously
discussed by the Council. Any change in the proposed tax rate will require revision of the proposed budget.
The City is required by law to follow certain meeting and notice (publication) guidelines.
Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
Approved By
Initial Date
Department Director
City Manager g Olk I fias".-0
?At: Wylie City Council
CiTYdF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: August 29, 2006 Item Number: 2
Department: Finance (City Secretary's Use Only)
Prepared By: Larry Williamson Account Code:
Date Prepared: August 22, 2006 Budgeted Amount:
Exhibits:
Subject
Hold a Public Hearing on the fiscal year 2006-2007 Proposed Budget. All interested persons shall be given an
opportunity to be heard, either for or against any item on the proposed budget. At the end of the hearing, the
City Council will schedule the time and place that the vote will be taken on the proposed budget.
Recommendation
The City Council must schedule and announce the meeting to adopt the proposed budget currently set for
September 12, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. at City Council Chambers, Wylie Municipal Complex, 2000 Highway 78
North, Wylie, Texas 75098.
Discussion
The City is required by law to follow certain meeting and notice (publication) guidelines.
Approved By
Initial Date
Department Director
City Manager fift Oft g , a1:06
Page 1 of 1
Wylie City Council
CITY OF WYLIE AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: August 29, 2006 Item Number: 3
Department: Planning (City Secretary's Use Only)
Prepared By: Mindy Manson Account Code:
Date Prepared: August 22, 2006 Budgeted Amount:
Exhibits: One
Subject
Consider, and act upon, authorizing the Mayor to sign a Development Agreement between the City of Wylie
and the Skorburg Company for a tract known as the Hood property or Alanis Crossing.
Recommendation
Motion to authorize the Mayor to sign a Development Agreement between the City of Wylie and the Skorburg
Company.
Discussion
This item was tabled from the August 22, 2006 City Council Meeting.
The land subject to the proposed Development Agreement is a 61.26 acre tract of land known as the Hood
property, or Alanis Crossing. The 2005 Bond Election included funding for the extension of Alanis Drive
which bisects this property from its current terminus in the Twin Lake Subdivision to the future intersection
with F.M. 544.
The purpose of the proposed Development Agreement is to address the dedication of right-of-way and
construction of Alanis Drive. As it is set out in the Agreement, the Skorburg Company (the developer) will sell
the required right-of-way to the City at an agreed upon price and construct the full width of Alanis Drive with
100% reimbursement from the City, with construction to begin by December 2007. The developer will not
receive credits on either street or sewer impact fees, and will pay full parkland dedication fees as required by
ordinance.
Approved By
Initial Date
Department Director
City Manager �-25'4 6
Page 1 of 1
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF WYLIE AND
ALANIS CROSSING, LTD.
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into by
and between Alanis Crossing , Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership and Alanis Crossing Holdings,
Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership (collectively the "Developer"), and the City of Wylie, Texas
(the "City"). The Developer and the City are hereinafter collectively called the "Parties".
WHEREAS, Developer desires to and shall develop the Property as a Planned
Development in accordance with the City's Ordinance No. 2006-11, the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance No. 2001-48 (the "Zoning Ordinance"), the Subdivision Regulation Ordinance No.
2003-03 (the "Subdivision Regulations") and any other applicable City ordinance, as theyall
currently exist, including amendments, or may be amended; To the extent there is any conflict
between Planned Development Ordinance No. 2006-11 and the Zoning Ordinance, the terms of
Planned Development Ordinance No. 2006-11 shall prevail; and
WHEREAS, Subchapter C, Chapter 212, Local Government Code, provides, in pertinent
part, that City and Developer may, among other things, contract to allow the Developer to
construct public improvements; and
WHEREAS, Alanis Drive is to be constructed between Twin Lakes subdivision and FM
544 as reflected on Exhibit "B" and for which 100% funding has been approved by the City of
Wylie in the 2005 Bond Program; and
WHEREAS, the Developer and Wylie have agreed that this Agreement is the best way to
proportionately share in costs of the necessary infrastructure to serve the Project in accordance
with the terms set forth below; and
WHEREAS, City is entitled to collect impact fees for sewer utilities, as described in City
y
Ord
inance ance No. 90-10, as amended or supplemented by City Ordinance Nos. 93-4 and 97-4, 2001-
19, 2001-42, and 2001-5 6 and any other Ordinances amending or supplementing impact fees,
whether now existing or in the future arising, including but not limited to any ordinance adopted
to establish roadway impact fees after execution of this Agreement (collectively, the "Impact Fee
p
Ordinances"); and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions contained in this
Agreement, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Land Subject to Agreement. The land that is the subject of this Agreement is a 61.26 acre tract
of land in the Allen Atterbery Survey, more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached
hereto and incorporated as if fully set forth herein (the "Property"). Developer represents it will
be the sole owner of the Property. If the Developer does not acquire Title to said ro ert
p p y
within 60 days, this Agreement is null and void.
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 1
459449v3 8/25/2006
2. Alanis Drive. Developer acknowledges that the construction of Alanis Drive from the eastern
boundary of Twin Lakes subdivision to FM 544 will be constructed in conjunction with the
Project("Alanis Drive").
A. Dedication of Right-of-Way for Alanis Drive. The City of Wylie shall use the
acquisition funds approved in the 2005 Bond Program to purchase from Developer a 100' Right-
of-way (approximately 5.74 acres) through the east/west length of the property. The purchase
price shall be based on an independent market appraisal and will be paid to Developer at the time
of dedication. City shall initiate the appraisal process upon receipt of notice from the Developer
p
that clear title has been obtained. City and Developer shall work together to complete the
transaction to facilitate the construction schedule as identified in Section 2.B. Developer
acknowledges that City must spend the bond funds for acquisition, design and construction
within three (3) years of the Phase I Bond Sale, which occurred in May 2006.
In the event that minor modifications to the right-of-way are needed at the time of
preliminary plat for the subdivision, City and Developer shall work together to accommodate
land swaps. In the event that more right-of-way is required, City may purchase additional right-
of-way at a mutually agreed upon valuation.
B. Construction of Alanis Drive. To facilitate the development of Alanis Drive,
Developer shall obtain a detailed quote or offer of costs for Developer to construct Alanis Drive
("Developer's Quote"). Developer's Quote shall be obtained by Developer and submitted to the
City upon receipt, but not later than one hundred and eighty (180) days after Developer receives
informationp
from the City the and documents necessary to obtain the quote or offer. City shall
review Developer's Quote and may compare it with bids received by the City. If Citydoes not
its
award a contract to one of bidders, then Developer shall construct Alanis Drive in accordance
with Developer's Quote and dedicate it to the City. City shall notify Developer that it has
awarded a contract or that it has rejected all bids within three (3) business days of making such
decision. If City notifies Developer that it has rejected all bids, Developer shall submit its final
contract for construction to City for approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Should
the City require easements and/or right-of-way for construction related issues, includingbut not
limited to, temporary construction easements, slope easements, drainage easements, traffic
control easements, the Developer shall provide, at its sole cost, said property days
3 0 da s
written notice by the City.
Construction costs for Alanis Drive shall include, but are not limited to: engineering,
staking,
excavation, erosion control, concrete pavement and sidewalks, street lights, si na e, irrigation in
g g g
median and storm sewer within the right-of-way. The parties agree that the acquisition, design
q �
and construction costs shall not exceed the amount of bond funds available for Alanis Drive.
Developer shall cause construction of Alanis Drive to begin prior to December 31, 2007,
and will actively continue construction until Alanis Drive is complete and accepted bythe City.
p Y
In the event that the Developer fails to comply with its obligations in this City Y ma Y
continue with its own plans and timeline for construction of the Alanis Drive that it had prior to
this Agreement.
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 2
459449v3 8/25/2006
C. Reimbursement of Alanis Drive Costs. If Developer constructs Alanis Drive in
accordance with paragraph 2.B. above, Developer will be entitled to reimbursement bythe City
y
of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the amount of Developer's Quote or Developer's actual
costs, whichever is less, as approved by the City Engineer. The Cityagrees to reimburse
Developer g
every 45 days for costs incurred within twenty (20) days of receipt of invoice for the
p
portion of Alanis Drive that is constructed. Developer shall not cause work to be performed, or
approve any contract amendments (or series or group of amendments), without prior approval of
the City Engineer, which will result in an aggregate increase in the contract price in an amount
greater than twenty percent (20%) of Developer's Quote, or which will result in expenses in
excess of available bond funds or result in an extension of the time for completion of Alanis
Drive or change in types of materials or methods of construction beingused under the contract,
,
unless the Developer shall have received City's prior written approval of such amendment. In
the event that the Developer fails to secure such approval, the contract shall be deemed not to
have been modified by such amendment and Developer shall not be entitled to reimbursement
for any amounts contained in the amendment. The City represents to Developer that sufficient
funds are available to fully reimburse Developer for the cost of the Project.
3. 2005 Bond Program. City represents to Developer that the Alanis Drive improvement is
included in the City's approved 2005 Bond Program and that funds for the construction of Alanis
Crossing are available for three (3) years from the Phase I Bond Sale, which occurred in May
2006.
4. Impact Fees. Developer acknowledges that the Property is subject to the Impact Fee
Ordinances. Developer is not receiving any credit towards impact fees under this Agreement and
this Agreement ' g
g ent does not alter the City's right to assess and collect impact fees against the
g
Property pursuant to the Impact Fee Ordinances. All phases of the Project shall be assessed and
shall J
a l pay sewer impact fees in accordance with the Impact Fee Ordinances.
5. Road Improvements and Impact Fees. All phases of the Project shall be assessed and shall
pay roadway impact fees in accordance with the Impact Fee Ordinances.
6. Park Fees. The Developer shall pay the required park fees and satisfythe requirements of
Chapter
78, Article IV of the City's Code of Ordinances (the "Parkland Dedication Ordinance").
7. Open Ditch Road Section: In blocks where the lot size is a minimum of 18,000 square feet the
road section shall be open ditch with a 26 foot wide pavement section within a 60 foot Right-of-
Way as shown on Exhibit"D". No sidewalks shall be required.
8. Formation of Homeowner's Association and Landscaping alongAlanis Drive and FM
544.
Developer shall provide for the formation of a homeowners' association. The homeowners'
s
association shall own and be responsible for the maintenance of the common areas and
greenbelts located within the boundaries of the Property (to be described on the subjectplats),
p ),
including any and all respective appurtenances (such as, without limitation, landscaping,
p g,
screening berm irrigation, equipment, related structures, other homeowners' association
infrastructure, etc.) (the "HOA Property"). Every owner of a lot within the Property shall be a
p y
member of the homeowners' association. The homeowners' association shall provide for the
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 3
459449v3 8/25/2006
payment of dues and assessments required to maintain the HOA Property. The homeowners'
association documents must be filed for record with the county concurrently with the filing of
each final plat for the Property.
9. Continuity. This Agreement shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding
upon the Developer, its officers, directors, partners, employees, representatives, agents,
successors, assignees, vendors, grantees and/or trustees. In addition, the parties shall cause this
Agreement to be filed in the Land Records of Collin County.
10. Sovereign Immunity. Except for the obligations set forth in this Agreement, Developer and
City agree that City has not waived its sovereign immunity by entering into and performing its
obligations under this Agreement. This Agreement is only for the benefit of the parties and the
City has not waived its sovereign immunity as to any third parties. The parties do not intend to
create any third party beneficiaries by entering into this Agreement.
11. Notices. Any notice provided or permitted to be given under this Agreement must be in
writing and may be served by depositing same in the United State Mail, addressed to the party to
be notified, postage pre-paid and registered or verified with return receipt requested, or by
delivering the same in person to such party via a hand-delivery service, Federal Express or any
courier service that provides a return receipt showing the date factual delivery of same to the
addressee thereof. Notice given in accordance herewith shall be effective upon receipt at the
address of the addressee. For purposes of notice, the addresses of the parties shall be as follows:
If to Developer to:
Alanis Crossing, Ltd.
3838 Oak Lawn, Suite 1212
Dallas, Texas 75219
Attention: Richard M. Skorburg
With a copy to:
Art Anderson.
Winstead Sechriest& Minick
5400 Rennaisance Tower
Dallas, Texas 75201
If to City, to:
Mark B. Roath
City Manager
2000 Highway 78 North
Wylie, Texas 75098
With a copy to:
Julie Y. Fort
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 4
459449v3 8/25/2006
Abernathy, Roeder, Boyd& Joplin, P.C.
1700 Redbud Blvd., Suite 300
McKinney, TX 75069
12. PARTIES' ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CITY'S COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE
CONSTITUTIONS, STATUTES AND CASE LAW AND FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL
ORDINANCES,
RULES AND REGULATIONS/DEVELOPER'S WAIVER AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS FOR
OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED BY THIS AGREEMENT.
A. THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT:
1. THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND/OR PAID FOR BY
THE DEVELOPER AND/OR THE FEES TO BE IMPOSED BY THE CITY
REGARDING THE PROPERTY DO NOT CONSTITUTE A:
(a) TAKING UNDER THE TEXAS OR UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION;
(b) VIOLATION OF THE TEXAS WATER CODE, AS IT EXISTS OR MAY
BE AMENDED;
(C) NUISANCE; AND/OR
(d) CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AND/OR REIMBURSEMENT AGAINST THE
CITY FOR A VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL AND/OR STATE
CONSTITUTION, STATUTE AND/OR CASE LAW AND/OR FEDERAL,
STATE AND/OR LOCAL ORDINANCE,RULE AND/OR REGULATION.
2. THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPER'S FINANCIAL OR INFRASTRUCTURE
CONTRIBUTION (AFTER RECEIVING ALL CONTRACTUAL OFFSETS,
CREDITS AND REIMBURSEMENTS, IF ANY) AGREED TO IN THIS
AGREEMENT IS ROUGHLY PROPORTIONAL TO THE DEMAND THAT
DEVELOPER'S DEVELOPMENT PLACES ON THE ROADWAY, WATER
AND/OR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM OF THE CITY.
3. DEVELOPER SHALL INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY FROM
ANY CLAIMS AND SUITS OF THIRD PARTIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO DEVELOPER'S PARTNERS, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES,
REPRESENTATIVES, AGENTS, SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES, VENDORS,
GRANTEES, AND/OR TRUSTEES, BROUGHT PURSUANT TO THIS
PARAGRAPH.
B. DEVELOPER RELEASES THE CITY FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR CAUSES OF
ACTION BASED ON EXCESSIVE OR ILLEGAL EXACTIONS.
C. DEVELOPER WAIVES ANY CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AND/OR REIMBURSEMENT
AGAINST THE CITY FOR A VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL AND/OR STATE
CONSTITUTION,STATUTE AND/OR CASE LAW AND/OR FEDERAL,STATE AND/OR
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 5
459449v3 8/25/2006
LOCAL ORDINANCE,RULE AND/OR REGULATION RELATED TO THIS
AGREEMENT.
THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL SURVIVE THE TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT.
13. Construction. All construction will be in accordance with applicable Ordinances and
Codes of City. Evidence of any bonds required by Section 212.073 of the Texas Local
Government Code, or other applicable law, shall be provided by Developer to the City.
14. Compliance with Ordinances. City ordinances covering on-site improvements, property
taxes, tap fees, utility rates, subdivision regulations and the like are not affected by this
Agreement. Unless expressly stated herein, this Agreement does not waive or limit the
obligations of Developer to City under any other ordinance, whether now existing or in the future
arising.
15. Miscellaneous.
a. Assignment. This Agreement is assignable upon the following
conditions:
i. the assignment of the Agreement must be evidenced by a recordable
document. The recordable document referred to in this paragraph is
subject to the approval of City;
ii. at the time of any assignment, Developer must give the assignee
written notice that any and all obligations, covenants and/or conditions
contained in the Agreement will be assumed solely and completely by
the assignee;
iii. Developer will file any approved, executed assignment in the Land
Records of Collin County, Texas; and
iv. Developer shall provide City with the name, address, phone number,
fax number and the name of a contact person for the assignee.
b. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the
parties with respect to the matters contained herein and may not be modified or terminated
except upon the mutual written agreement of the parties hereto.
c. Venue. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of
the State of Texas and shall be performable in Collin County, Texas.
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 6
459449v3 81251200E
d. Consideration. This Agreement is executed by the parties hereto without
coercion or duress and for substantial consideration, the sufficiency of which is forever
confessed.
e. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in a number of identical
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original for all purposes.
f. Authority to Execute. The individuals executing this Agreement on behalf
of the respective parties below represent to each other and to others that all appropriate ro riate and
necessary action has been taken to authorize the individual who is executing this Agreement to
do so for and on behalf of the party for which his or her signature appears, that there are no other
. pp
parties or entities required to execute this Agreement in order for the same to be an authorized
and binding agreement on the party for whom the individual is signing this Agreement and that
each individual affixing his or her signature hereto is authorized to do so, and such authorization
is valid and effective on the date hereof.
g. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal
g
representatives, successors and assigns.
h. Savings/Severability. In case any one or more of the provisions contained
in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid illegal or unenforceable in any
respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision thereof,
and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid illegal or unenforceable provision had
never been contained herein.
i. Representations. Each signatory represents this Agreement has been read
by the party for which this Agreement is executed and that such party has had an opportunity to
confer with its counsel.
j. Miscellaneous Drafting Provisions. This Agreement shall be deemed
drafted equally by all parties hereto. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall be
construed as a whole according to its fair meaning and any or presumption principle that the
p p p
language herein is to be construed against any party shall not apply. Headings in this Agreement
g g t
are for the convenience of the parties and are not intended to be used in construing this
document.
k. Waiver. Waiver by either party of any breach of this Agreement, or the
failure of either party to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, at anytime, shall not
. g � in
any way affect, limit or waive such party's right thereafter to enforce and compel strict
compliance.
1. Force Majeure. If performance by either party of any term, condition or
covenant in this Agreement is delayed or prevented by an act of God, strike, lockout, shortage of
material or labor, any federal or state law or any order, rule or regulation or governmental
g
authority, civil riot, flood, or any other cause not within the control of the the period for
party,
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 7
459449v3 8/25/2006
performance of the term, condition or covenant shall be extended for a period equal to the period
said party is so delayed or prevented.
m. Reference to Developer. When referring to "Developer" herein, this
Agreement shall refer to and be binding upon the Developer, and its respective, officers,
directors, partners, employees, representatives, contractors, agents, successors, assignees,
vendors, grantees and/or trustees.
n. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals set forth above are incorporated as if
set forth herein and the parties relied upon the accuracy of the recitals when entering into this
Agreement.
o. Exhibits Incorporated. Each exhibit attached to this Agreement and
referenced above is incorporated into this Agreement for all purposes as if fully set forth herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement and caused this
Agreement to be effective on the last date written below.
CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, ALANIS CROSSING, LTD.,
a municipal corporation a Texas limited partnership
By: Alanis Crossing GP Corporation,
its general partner
By: By:
John Mondy, Mayor Richard M. Skorburg, President
Date: Date:
ALANIS CROSSING HOLDINGS, LTD.
a Texas limited partnership
By: Alanis Crossing Holdings GP Corporation,
its general partner
By:
Richard M. Skorburg, President
Date:
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 8
459449v3 8/25/2006
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF COLLIN §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared John Mondy,
y
the Mayor of the CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, a municipal corporation, known to me to be one of
the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument; he acknowledged to me he
is the duly authorized representative for the CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS and he executed said
instrument for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS day of
2006.
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
My Commission Expires:
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Richard M.
Skorburg, the President of ALANIS CROSSING GP CORPORATION, partner artner of
general
ALANIS CROSSING LTD., a Texas limited partnership, known to me to be one of the persons
whosep names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument; he acknowledged to me he is the duly
authorized representative for ALANIS CROSSING, LTD., and he executed said instrument for
the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS day of
2006.
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
My Commission Expires:
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 9
459449v3 8/25/2006
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF §
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Richard M.
Skorburg, the President of ALANIS CROSSING HOLDINGS GP Corporation, general partner
of ALANIS CROSSING HOLDINGS, LTD, a Texas limited partnership, known to me to be one
of the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument; he acknowledged to me
he is the duly authorized representative for ALANIS CROSSING HOLDINGS, LTD., and he
executed said instrument for the purposes and consideration therein expressed.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS day of
, 2006.
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
My Commission Expires:
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 10
459449v3 8/25/2006
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Being a 61.26 acre tract of land located in the Allen Atterbery Survey, Abstract No.
23, and a portion part of a called 86.6 acre tract described to S.H. Hood, as recorded in
Volume 291, Page 167, Collin County Deed Records (C.C.D.R.), and being described by
metes and bounds as follows;
COMMENCING at a found 3/8 inch diameter iron rod located on the South line of said
Allen Atterbery Survey, the North line of the D.W. Williams Survey,Abstract No. 980, the
Northeast corner of a tract of land described to Thelma Rice, as recorded in Volume 561,
Page 266, C.C.D.R., the Southeast corner of a tract of land recorded to Tommy & Toni
Pulliam, as recorded in Volume 4590, Page 1895, C.C.D.R., and the West right-of-way line
of F.M. 544 (90' ROW), as recorded in Volume 568, Page 21, C.C.D.R.;
THENCE North 89 degrees 32 minutes 50 seconds West, along the South line of said
Atterbury Survey and the North line of said Williams Survey, a distance of 648.87 feet to a
5/8 inch diameter iron rod marking the POINT OF BEGINNING and being the Southwest
corner of said Pullium tract;
THENCE North 89 degrees 32 minutes 50 seconds West, continuing along the South line of
said Atterbury Survey and the North line of said Williams Survey,the North line of said
Rice tract, the North line of a tract of land described to Darlene R. Ceilley, as recorded in
Volume 4977, Page 504, C.C.D.R.,North line of a tract of land described to Edwin W.
Klingbeil, as recorded in Volume 4977, Page 504, C.C.D.R., and the North line of a tract of
land descibed to Robert L. Klingbeil, as recorded in Volume 5250, Page 3809, C.C.D.R., a
distance of 1635.45 feet to a found 1/2 inch iron rod in concrete being the Southeast corner
of the Twin Lakes Phase V subdivision, as recorded in Volume 5588, Page 3164, Collin
County Plat Records, and marking the Southwest corner of the herein described tract;
THENCE North 00 degrees 51 minutes 52 seconds East, leaving said common Survey line
and along the East line of said Twin Lakes Phase V subdivision a distance of 1405.70 feet to
a 5/8 inch diameter iron rod being the Northeast corner of said Twin Lakes Phase V
Subdivision, and the South line of a tract of land described to Steven Combest, as recorded
in Volume 3743, Page 219, C.C.D.R., marking the Northeast corner of herein described
tract;
THENCE South 89 degrees 18 minutes 39 seconds East, along the south lines of said
Combest tract, a tract of land described to Jesse Cardenas, as recorded in Volume 4871,
Page 1327, C.C.D.R, a tract of land described to Martha Sheppard, as recorded in Plat
Book 84, Page 338, C.C.D.R., a tract of land described to Terry and Casaundra Calisle, as
recorded in Volume 3011, Page 202, C.C.D.R., a tract of land described to James Heintz, as
recorded in Volume 5400, Page 2520, C.C.D.R., a tract of land described to Billy D.
Duncan, a tract of land described to James & Donna Trevino, as recorded in Volume 4501,
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 11
459449v3 8/25/2006
Page 1617, C.C.D.R., a tract of land described to Sandra Benton, as recorded in Volume
4761, Page 1510, C.C.D.R., a tract of land described to Close Family Living Trust, as
recorded in Volume 5249, Page 5919, C.C.D.R., a tract of land described to Sam Terry, a
tract of land described to David & Julie Black, as recorded in 94-0063489, C.C.D.R., and a
tract of land described to Merie & Sheri Little, as recorded in 93-0080940, C.C.D.R., a
distance of 1492.50 feet to a found 1/2 inch diameter iron rod in a pecan tree, being the
Northwest corner of a tract of land described to Brent & Beverly Bates, as recorded in 96-
0018275, C.C.D.R., for the North Northeast corner of the herein described tract;
THENCE South 02 degrees 39 minutes 12 seconds East, along the west line of said Bates
tract, a distance of 331.53 feet to a set 1/2 inch diameter iron rod with cap stamped "TRI-
TECH" being the Southwest corner of said Bates tract and an interior corner of the herein
described tract;
THENCE South 89 degrees 27 minutes 31 seconds East, along the south line of Said Bates
tract, a distance 684.24 feet to a set 1/2 inch diameter iron rod with cap stamped "TRI-
TECH" being the Southeast corner of said Bates tract and on the West right-of-way line of
said F.M. 544, marking the East Northeast corner of the herein described tract;
THENCE South 02 degrees 37 minutes 38 seconds East, along the West right-of-way line of
said F.M. 544, a distance of 179.98 feet to a found 5/8 inch diameter iron rod;
THENCE South 04 degrees 02 minutes 47 seconds East, continuing along the West right-
of-way line of said FM. 544, a distance 534.62 feet to a found 5/8 inch diameter iron rod
being the Northeast corner of said Pullium tract and marking the East Southeast corner of
herein described tract;
THENCE North 89 degrees 32 minutes 51 seconds West, leaving said right-of-way and
along the North line of said Pullium tract, a distance of 621.02 feet to a found 5/8 inch
diameter iron rod being the Northwest corner of said Pullium tract and an interior corner
of herein described tract;
THENCE South 00 degrees 26 minutes 32 seconds West, along the West line of said
Pullium tract, a distance of 354.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing
61.26 acres or 2,668,568 square feet.
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 12
459449v3 8/25/2006
Exhibit"B"
Alanis Drive Bond Package
Mattis (Twin Lakes to FM 544)
. Construction of new 4-lane concrete.
... . .. . .
.
Estimated Cost: $ 2.6 million ;,..._ • _ i or.- - .,..ii.,-.„,,,,-..,,..... , . ... il.„..,,AF..... .
!: ....-...--...,.: !..-. ....: .. . . ...,_,L-' i.:__.....i .• _,.....,_.-,1
-:....r.: 1. . :...1111111.%•7 IfiaPh
SpeiffiCA . • • .. . • : .
Ail an I a
!::-..-., ,-":',i%' ' 1'.= '..::.,'•,:,'--:s::..-- -.,..- • ' if._ v •
' "''''''-'''''.' :""',:"' :--.'i':„,'•-•:','. * r:tl'i:.
i'-''''':;::-:'•-:t:',.•:-'A':',C.:',.':1,i',:'.:,,:...j:;.:' •,:':.(.:.,.:, i 011n--7
• Approximately 2,700 linear :,....-,f,i.i.:•::: . ...,:z.,1.„........,,,,,,,.....„:::..,...i...,:.:-....7_,,:n.,-.., ,244.-.---
feet .,.....•:......E,:.::-.4....,..i..,...-.:-....-A..i.........:...,::::::::..:......./.;:::i,: ,..,,,-,.,.....::.-:,. .. ...,._ _...r. .,,,,:,..,!•,.
, ...._
• Sidewalks Included L.' :-+Iffilipunalvmm,... i.
....._.„,:.,...,,
:„..
. ... ,
,- '4 i=a111111 1
,
74. fil,
. 1
. , 14.
,fsigiAril ..
•- • -• --• •--
_.
-4 7.---,---igig, •
,....1,...r......',en*,
., . .... ..,
0-..-a e 7.177.-'-'-'11""".'".*". •:::1;...,Tr.:i.::::i,,I.::1
Z : : . ,..................
in
1 i
,........4.__Lir_ ...: .. .......:.:•:: !.,...
, 1 r 1 ri. ;„...,.....„. ....i. . _.
i,,........ -.........-,,,. ---, :.
I-4 —I 1 ; •:::=........7:-.;,• '.:-.:.:,' ,4,4_, ....
1— i t ; 1 It 1 ,.-':!:1. •-••••••".. ..-:..: .: 1
t t 1 ',..i tr: . --,,;-..-“ •,:...-:: . i
I i —1 9 e- : •••••:-..;..-: -:::,:-1-:::-.:.... it :
4 i ;
1 , i 4 ::::•.1-.,:--.:•-•.,:.%. '-',.:'"
I I il ' H . : :=•.: ,,,.; ,.'.,,i,.• .....-....
I ..., 1. ...... ...,......,•.,.•.........A....,
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 13
459449v3 8/25/2006
ExhibituTII
Concept Plan
Ile
wit 40*"1
�
~
i
! '
� F ~
!
/ ---~ ! ~~ '-' — �----'--- --- i
\
� � \
sit
IP
31.4
' -'-----'---------------~-------'-'-'---- l ` i
In,:we �*° i
_i-
' | i -------'-----!
| �:���' � i �1��"
-~' --'
Development Agreement Between the City oy Wylie and Alaois Crossing,Ltd. Psgm }4
45944e0 8/25/200*
Exhibit "D"
Open Ditch Rd Section
VARIABLEVARIABLE
WIDTH U.D.E. 50' R.O.W.
M WIDTH U.D.E.
...
�►�s
C.VARIES 2'VARIES 21 13' 131 21 vAR!E5 Z'VARIES
r rr 4. ...I r~-, r« -r•- I
S' Porolroik
Crown—
/... (9 <V VZ
V/‘ ,6427 .'I--.77;'-'-', //. :104,
, //, , ,A*,e,e
, .* ,N,
. ,.„,,,,,,,,,,, .t-*-4, , LN,N, N4 sk A e4e,(
St's."/)#,:i A#9,‘Y‘YVVNV?*•W*V‘)>W*
W- ''' * * f
‘teisiyieb s I W-e kof,
V.N‘4>
'V water !N1r : Fr-cinch ct Ise
� ut��tl�
r f
___ .� _ . .. 671 51 / " Lime Stabilized Subgrade
The design and construction of street grades shall be at 0.3%and greater. The City's current design
standards allow for a minimum of 0.5%. However the natural topography of the site is less than
0.5%. Skorburg Company has developed other projects under similar constraints. In those instances,
the municipalities have allowed a minimum slope of 0.3%on street and bar ditch grades.
Development Agreement Between the City of Wylie and Alanis Crossing,Ltd. Page 15
459449v3 8/25/2006
Wylie City Council
CITY6FWYLIE AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: August 29, 2006 Item Number: Work Session
(City Secretary's Use Only)
Department: Engineering
Prepared By: Chris Hoisted Account Code:
Date Prepared: August 22, 2006 Budgeted Amount:
Exhibits: One
Subject
Discussion, and possible direction, on 2006 Water and Wastewater Rate Study prepared by McLain Decision
Support Systems.
Recommendation
Discussion
The 2006 Water and Wastewater Rate Study, prepared by McLain Decision Support Systems, updates and
includes the City's capital improvement program for utilities. In addition, the proposed Study incorporates the
anticipated increases from the North Texas Municipal Water District as well.
Mr. Robert McLain, consultant, will be presenting the Study and its findings (see attached).
Approved By
Initial Date
Department Director
City Manager Ak(ivi
Page 1 of 1
City of Wylie, Texas
Development of
Water & Wastewater
Rates
August 2006
McLain Decision Support Systems
Government Utility Rate Practice
201 W. Southwest Pkwy., #4105
Lewisville, TX 75067
(972) 436-6181 —Fax (972) 692-5397
■. McLain •
Decision
support
syeems
F
l�1< I A I I`J
I I,t I'ttti tijal• I r tr1t�=ts
� I S,40.111�i°xt I't+ y.,4.410i•I.p'w.ills,IX i S 4 t
On)#irvnle41 t •i47.t 09 i97 I'•,*•i 14)A*ai s 1.'1,6.00,44hti.tr3
August 9, 2006
Mark Roath
City Manager
City of Wylie
2000 HWY 78
Wylie, TX 75098
Dear Mr. Roath:
Enclosed is the final report titled, Development of Water & Sewer Rates, reared
prepared by
McLain Decision Support Systems (McLainDSS). The report conveys the findings,
conclusions, and recommendations of our firm with respect to the development of water
and sewer rates to cover the projected water and sewer enterprise fund costs for the
period 2007 -2016.
The report includes a significant amount of assumptions and detailed tables and
worksheets. The detailed tables, exhibits, and worksheets provide an understanding of
where the numbers come from and the related impact the rate design alternatives rates
will have on the system's customers.
We have appreciated the courtesies and professional relationship extended to us during
this engagement by City management and staff.
Very truly yours,
Robert McLain, Director
Government Utility Rate Division
McLain
Decision
Support
Systems
Mc.I. AIN
Rr►hctt MclAtn,Prtnc Eprl•4ic l I4n I txik 3n Sy,:vin,
I W.Southwe,t Pkwv.,.410•l..cwiwii1c,TX 75067
tQ7 4 tt,b181 OM,•( 721 0)2-S W7 F.•t 214)SO 3.3t$!N•lohkr•hobiattiannli,com
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary 1
1.1.Introduction 1
1.2.Financial Plan Key Management Assumptions
1.3 Financial Plan Findings
3
1.4 Financial Plan Notice
3
1.5 Financing Scenarios 3
1.6 Rate Design Objectives 6
1.7 Overview of Rate Design Alternatives
6
1.8 Customer Impact
8
II. Identification of the Revenue Requirements 9
2.1.Introduction
9
2.2 Key Cost of Service Assumptions
9
2.2.1. Growth Assumptions
9
2.2.2.NTMWD Water Purchase Costs
11
2.2.3. NTMWD Wastewater Treatments
12
2.2.4. Additional Staffing
14
2.2.5. Inflation Drivers
15
2.2.6. Water Capital Improvement Program
16
2.2.7. Wastewater Capital Improvement Program
16
2.2.8. Use of Impact Fees
16
2.2.9. Collection of Impact Fees
26
2.2.10. Renewal & Replacement Costs
27
2.2.11. General Fund Transfers
28
► McLain
ADecision
Support
CP' Systems
Mc I AIN
Robert McLsrn,F't incipra1•Mk Lim I kc9c t.0 n S.ri+1 ort S,trtn•MI W Soathwr,t T'5:►+-►•.,•4 k 5•Lco.aviiic.TX 7'5067
( 7'I 416.61S1 Office•0721 02 S i}7 Fix•(2 14)!.N 3.165_'Mc tic 14m lntin.k}b.ic•rn
List of Figures
1.1.Recap of the Impact of Each Financing Scenario 4
1.2.Key Adequacy Tests—Financing Scenario 1 4
1.3.Key Adequacy Tests—Financing Scenario 2 5
I.4.Key Adequacy Tests—Financing Scenario 3 5
1.5.Rate Alternatives
6
1.6.Existing&Alternative Rate Structures - Water
7
I.7.Existing&Alternative Rate Structures - Wastewater
7
1.8 Illustration of Monthly.Impact: Water& Sewer Monthly Bills 8
2.1 Growth - Water 10
2.2 Growth - Wastewater 10
2.3 Water Loss Percentages—Inflow/Infiltration Percentages
11
2.4 Water Purchases from NTMWD 11
2.5 NTMWD Wastewater Treatment Costs (Wylie Wastewater Treatment Plant Costs) 12
2.6 NTMWD Wastewater Treatment Costs (Muddy Creek Interceptor Costs)) 12
2.7 NTMWD Wastewater Treatment Costs (Muddy Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant) 13
2.8 Recap of NTMWD Wastewater Treatment Costs
13
2.9 City of Wylie Utility Staffing Levels 14
2.10 Personnel-Related Costs
14
2.11 Total Departmental Operating and Maintenance Costs (ExcludingNTMWD Costs) 15
2.12 Recap of Operating and Maintenance Costs 15
2.13 Revenue Debt—Existing—Water& Sewer
16
2.14 Revenue Debt—Existing—Water Portion
17
2.15 Revenue Debt—Existing—Water Portion Eligible for Impact Fees
p 17
2.16 Revenue Debt—Existing—Wastewater Portion
18
2.17 Revenue Debt—Existing—Wastewater Portion Eligible for Impact Fees
p 18
2.18 Non-Revenue Debt—Existing—Water& Sewer
19
2.19 Non-Revenue Debt—Existing—Water Portion
I9
2.20 Non-Revenue Debt—Existing—Water Portion Eligible for Impact Fees
p 20
2.21 Non-Revenue Debt—Existing— Wastewater Portion
20
2.22 Non-Revenue Debt—Existing—Wastewater Portion Eligible for Impact Fees
p 21
2.23 Water Capital Improvement Plan 21
2.24 Revenue Debt—Planned—Water Portion 22
2.25 Revenue Debt— Planned—Water Portion Eligible for Impact Fees
p 23
2.26 NTMWD Contract Revenue Debt 23
■ McLain
Decision
Support
4111L-Air Systems
Mc I. AIN
Rr hcrt M(Lun,F'rn.Epaۥ cL,itn i)....1'rr'.rt S rent.
_'C!I W.SAithxrtr I'6:w„4,41ii•Lawi..rtlly,TX 75067
(472)4 64,iKi l�ttfcc-•(47)64:•iit7 F.•(214)+ i,ftSS?A,ia hl=•■i 4ti+traclaoruld,,,Ytti
2.27 NTMWD Contract Revenue Debt—Portion Eligible for Impact Fees 24
2.28 Recap of Use of Impact Fees - Water 24
2.29 Recap of Use of Impact Fees - Wastewater 25
2.30 Recap of Debt Service 25
2.31 Recap of Impact Fees—Water—Sources& Uses of Funds 26
2.32 Recap of Impact Fees—Wastewater—Sources & Uses of Funds 26
2.33 Recap of Non-Operating Costs—Transfer to Renewal & Replacement Fund 27
2.34 Recap of Non-Operating Costs 27
2.35 Recap of the Total Gross Cost of Service 28
2.36 Recap of Non-Rate Operating Revenues 29
2.37 Recap of Non-Rate Non-Operating Revenues 29
2.38 Recap of Revenue Offsets 30
16. McLain
Decision
Support
Systems
McLAIN
R.hert Mc Lan,F'r►ncggal•,.kLain IXXi.tn Supp.ci SN kilt.
01 W Soothwot I''i:w•, •4l05•Lc u' ilk.TX 75067
072)436.M1S1(Vice•l`)i)692.5iW77 Fax•(210 89,;65?M.►t •l+, rr►clmtul i,com
SECTION I—EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 INTRODUCTION:
The following report describes the findings of the water and wastewat
er rate study
performed for the City of Wylie and makes recommendations with respect p to the rates to
be charged to the City's municipal utility customers. The objectives J to be achieved
within the scope of the engagement are as follows:
• To develop the bases to be used to project the units of service and cost of se
rvice for
each utility over a ten-year planning period, FY 2007 - 2016;
• To identify the full cost of water and wastewater services over the ten-year
y planning
period based on the FY 2007 proposed budget:
• To develop proposed alternative water and wa
stewater rates which will provide
sufficient annual revenues to meet expenditures for all operating and non-operating
costs;
p g operating
• To prepare financial, projections using the cost-based rates, supplemented
pp d by a
description of the key assumptions underlying the ections;J ro'
p a
• To create an executive summary documenting our findings and recommendations;
ons;
1.2 FINANCIAL PLAN KEY MANAGEMENT ASSUMPTIONS:
The following major key planning assumptions were used to drive the ten-year
costof
service:
• Growth 1: 907 additional water meters annually, which
w ch results in a customer growth
rate of about 4% - 9% annually. Furthermore, 1,041 to 1,042 additional
tonal annual
wastewater accounts will be added over the planning period. (See Tables 2.1 and 2.2
in Section 2);
• NTMWD Water Costs. Table 2.4 in Section 2 illustrates the growth in NTMWD
water costs, assuming the rate per thousand gallons will increase incremental) per
00�.
the NTMWD presentation dated March 20 2 y,
1 Based on growth assumptions in Impact Fee Study update,Table No. 8,Table No.9,
21,confirmed
by Chris Hoisted.
SECTION 1—EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PAGE 1
McLain
Decision
Support
IL,low PPS
Systems
M L.AIN
Robert McLain,1'rtnct:.i•McLain Ik'i,s:nt`support Sy,rertt•
;i?l W.Southwr.t I'l:u .,.4105•Ltwtwilk,TX f 53L 7
(972)4(6-61t(1(*t .•0972)692-5;07 Flit•014)=$9(-(M2 Mob k•bokt last is.cMttt
• NTMWD Wastewater Costs. Tables 2.5 through 2.8 in Section 2 illustrate to the
reader the increases in wastewater treatment costs over the next ten years. It should
be noted that the additional debt service associated with the Muddy Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion is incorporated into these cost estimates.
• Additional staffing. Table 2.9 in Section 2 illustrates the addition of three (3)
additional positions in FY 2009.
• Inflation: Salaries were increased annually using expenditure drivers of 6%,based on
the FY 2007 budget. Medical insurance was increased at the rate of 7% annually.
y
Most other operating and maintenance costs were driven by an annual inflation factor
of 3°r°.
• Water Capital Improvement Program: A $17.653 million water capital
improvement plan has been incorporated into the financial plan. The capital
improvement plan calls for two (2) bond issues totaling $13,480,700 over the next
three years, beginning with a $6,500,000 issue in FY 2007. Table 2.23 and Table 2.24
in Section 2 show the water capital improvement program.
• Wastewater Capital Improvement Program: The wastewater capital improvement
l an p
plans calls for $12,250,000 debt issue, related to the expansion of the Muddy Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant. This debt issue will be NTMWD contract revenue debt,
and will be shared with the City of Murphy. Wylie will pay approximately 73% of
the debt service, and Murphy will pay 27%. This debt issue will be paid the NTMWD
as part of the wastewater treatment bill for Muddy Creek.
• Use of Impact Fees: The most critical assumption incorporated into the financial
plan is the use of impact fees to partially fund debt service payments. Tables 2.15 —
2.29 in Section 2 of this report illustrate the importance of this funding source.
• Transfer to the Renewal and Replacement Fund. We have incorporated into the
revenue requirements the cost of funding the renewal, rehabilitation, and replacement
of the infrastructure of the water and wastewater system, beginning with FY 2007-08.
Table 2.33 shows the basis for these transfers.
• Transfer to the General Fund - This transfer increases 4%per year. (This transfer is
shown on Table 2.34 in Section 2).
SECTION I—EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE 2
McLain
Decision
Support
411L JP' Systems
McLA N
RE 4,c rt McLain,Print ira •McLain I\.i;m-Surr.tt Sy,teno
201 W S.►tnhw&:F[PLw%'.,.4105•L,twilit.,T TX 7 I ?.h
■
(91.)4.6-61S1�nri4r*(472)69—539 Fax•(214)$94.%652 Mobil,:•bolvdn:1;un{ .c.ni
• Reserve Levels — We have targeted reserve levels of 25% (90 days of the cost of
service), per the financial policy of the City.
1.3 FINANCIAL PLAN FINDINGS:
• The water and wastewater fund is in excellent financial condition. The water and
wastewater fund ended FY 2005 with $5,769,268 in operating reserves (304 days),
(Table 1.2). However, it is expected that the water and wastewater fund will end FY
2006 with $4,609,111 in operating reserves(188 days).
1.4 FINANCIAL PLAN NOTICE:
• Water and wastewater costs have been projected for the period FY 2007 through FY
2016, based on the proposed FY 2007 budget. We believe the underlying assumptions
that drive the cost of service through the FY 2016 provide a reasonable basis for
management's forecast. However, some assumptions inevitably will not materialize
as presented and anticipated events and circumstances may not occur; therefore, the
actual results achieved during the forecast periods will vary from the forecast, and the
variances may be material. Monitor expenditures very carefully over the planning
g
period, compared to the expenditure levels shown in this report. Because the
forecasts are developed upon expenditure levels outlined in this report, any
y
significant increases of expenditures over the planned expenditure levels will affect
the sufficiency of revenues over the study period.
• Note — because the financial plan is so heavily dependent on growth, we strongly
gy
recommend that the rate study should be updated annually.
1.5 FINANCING SCENARIOS:
• Three financing scenarios have been developed for the City's consideration. They
y
Scenario 1: Do not raise rates until absolutely necessary;
Scenario 2: Increase rates annually over several years;
Scenario 3: Increase rates every other year.
SECTION I—EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE 3
k. McLain
�A Decision
Support
IL.0.- PPS
Systems
McLAIN
Robert,Sid Ain,un,Principal•? kL,,in 1) .n Supt',,►t'r,tstn:
201 W. aRo l m, Fkw}.,.4105•Ler%milk,TX 75
('7!)4 ,-t 181 Ottic.•i'72 6 2-5 W7 F,. •('14)t+,M%652 10,4,31k•l ktrtx:and ,„,,iii
Table 1.1
Key Findings
Recap of the Impact of Each Financing Scenario
Scenario I Scenario 2 Scenario 3
Average Residential Average Residential Average Residential
Water&Sewer Bill Water&Sewer Bill Water&Sewer Bill
5,000 gals WS 5,000 gals WS 5,000 gals WS
Change Winter, Bill Change Winter, - Bill Change Winter, Bill
Fiscal In 13,000 gals $$ In 13,000 gals $$ In 13,000 gals $$
Year _ Rates Summer Change _ Rates Summer Change Rates Summer Change
2005 N/A $ 55.07 $ - N/A $ 55.07 $ - N/A $ 55.07 $
2006 55.07 - - 55.07 - - 55.07
2007 - 55.07 - 3.25% 56.86 1.79 5.50% 58.10 3.03
2008 - 55.07 - 3.25% 58.71 1.85 - 58.10
2009 12.50% 61.95 6.88 3.25% 60.62 1.91 5.50% 61.29 3.20
2010 6.00% 65.67 3.72 3.25% 62.59 1.97 - 61.29
2011 - 65.67 - 3.25% 64.62 2.03 5.50% 64.67 3.37
2012 - 65.67 - - 64.62 - - - 64.67
2013 - 65.67 - - 64.62 - - 64.67
2014 - 65.67 - - 64.62 - - 64.67
2015 - 65.67 - - 64.62 - - 64.67 -
2016 - 65.67 - - 64.62 - - 64.67
18.50% $ 10.60 16.25% $ 9.55 16.50%
_ $ 9.60
• Financing Scenario 1: The City does not need to increase overall rates until
10/01/2008, if all key planning assumptions do not drastically change. However, if
g
the City chooses to wait until 10/01/08, then the rate increases will need to be 12.5%,
as shown on Table 1.2.
Table 1.2
Key Adequacy Tests
Financing Scenario
Don't Raise Rates Until You Have To
Average Residential
Water&Sewer Bill
Percentage Changes 5,000 gals WS
Changes in Ending Days of Operating Winter, Bill
Fiscal In Operating Operating Operating Reserve 13,000 gals $$
Year_ Rates Reserves Reserves Reserves Percent Summer Change
2005 N/A $1,410,395 $5,769,268 304 83.3% $ 55.07
2006 - (1,160,157) 4,609,111 188 51.5% 55.07
-
2007 - (265,916) 4,343,195 178 48.9% 55.07
2008 - (1,181,319) 3,161,876 112 30.6% 55.07 -
2009 12.50% (327,901) 2,833,975 92 25.1% 61.95 6.88
2010 6.00% 195,435 3,029,411 91 25.0% 65.67 3.72
2011 - 468,055 3,497,465 103 28.1% 65.67
2012 - 501,512 3,998,978 112 30.7% 65.67 -
2013 - 535,125 4,534,102 122 33.3% 65.67
2014 - 469,866 5,003,969 128 35.1% 65.67 -
2015 - 417,957 5,421,925 133 36.4% 65.67
2016 - 819,037 6,240,962 151 41.4% 65.67 -
_ 18.50% $10.60
SECTION I-EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PAGE 4
I. McLain
..,,,'A 'Derision
Support
PPo
Systems
Mc:LAIN
R4,brn McL;in.1'riric tr al•hkL..in I k,',ion Support u SN qCm,
201 W Santtliwcq Pkw,.,£4h •Lcw/wlllc.TX 750(
(971)4t,.i,l81 t i%,•(97.D 692.53')7 Fix•(?1-P 894-1652 Mobile•1,140mx h,rk ,.a:,,n1
• Financing Scenario 2: If the City decides to raise ratesgraduallyover theplanning
period, every year, then the revenue increases will need to be as shown on Table 1.3.
Table 1.3
Key Adequacy Tests
Financing Scenario 2
Raise Rates Incrementally Every Year
Average Residential
Water&Sewer Bill
Percentage Changes 5,000 gals WS
Changes in Ending Days of Operating Winter, Bill _
Fiscal In Operating Operating Operating Reserve 13,000 gals $$
Year Rates Reserves Reserves Reserves Percent Summer Change
2005 N/A 1,410,395 5,769,268 304 83.3% $ 55.07
2006 - (1,160,157) 4,609,111 188 51.5% 55.07
2007 3.25% 3,779 4,612,890 190 51.9% 56.86 1.79
2008 3.25% (583,689) 4,029,201 142 39.0% 58.71 1.85
2009 3.25% (559,191) 3,470,010 112 30.8% 60.62 1.91
2010 3.25% (383,989) 3,086,021 93 25.5% 62.59 1.97
2011 3.25% 252,619 3,338,640 98 26.8% 64.62 2.03
2012 - 270,821 3,609,462 101 27.7% 64.62
2013 - 289,077 3,898,539 105 28.7% 64.62
2014 - 208,259 4,106,797 105 28.8% 64.62 -
-
2015 - 140,594 4,247,392 104 28.5% 64.62
2016 - 525,824 4,773,216 116 31.7% 64.62 -
-
16.25%
- $ 9.55
• Financing Scenario 3: If the City decides to raise rates gradually over the planning
g
period, every other year, then the revenue increases will need to be as shown on
Table 1.4.
Table 1.4
Key Adequacy Tests
Financing Scenario 3
Raise Rates Incrementally Every Other Year
Average Residential
Water&Sewer Bill
Percentage Changes 5,000 gals WS
Changes in Ending Days of Operating Winter, Bill
Fiscal In Operating Operating Operating Reserve 13,000 gals $$
Year Rates Reserves Reserves Reserves Percent Summer Change
2005 N/A 1,410,395 5,769,268 304 83.3% $ 55.07
2006 - (1,160,157) 4,609,111 188 51.5% 55.07
2007 5.50% 190,490 4,799,602 197 54.0% 58.10 3.03
2008 - (684,297) 4,115,305 145 39.8% 58.10
2009 5.50% (441,282) 3,674,023 119 32.6% 61.29 3.20
2010 (627,842) 3,046,181 92 25.2% 61.29
2011 5.50% 258,156 3,304,337 97 26.6% 64.67 3.37
2012 - 276,895 3,581,232 100 27.5% 64.67
2013 - 295,689 3,876,921 104 28.5% 64.67
2014 - 215,407 4,092,328 105 28.7% 64.67
2015 - 148,280 4,240,608 104 28.5% 64.67
2016 - 534,047 4,774,655 116 31.7% 64.67
16.50%
$ 9.60
SECTION I-EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE 5
McLain
Decision
Add
Support
PPS
Systems
Mc L_A N
Robeffi Mi Lurt,Pfinc lr:1i•?ki,L.n( in Support S gent•
201 W.Southwi',t P1 w%„e.4 j 05•Lewtwtil.TX 75067
f i'1416-nit l C?ltii.••107?)6'?-5 W7 Fax•SM(4)893•(t 52 Mob&•boNtrucLunli,com
1.6 RATE DESIGN OBJECTIVES:
Several rate design alternatives were developed for the City's consideration. However,
based on prior discussions with City staff and Council, we have n brought two rate design
g
alternatives to the City Council for consideration. Following is a recap ofthe objectives
�
we wished to achieve with these alternatives:
• All alternatives recover the revenues necessary to fund the cost of service for FY
2007. We have brought to the City rate design alternatives which should last for at
least the next two years, assuming the overall cost of service does not differ
materially than planned. Note — the existing water rate design could last until
10/01/2008,per Table 1.2 g
.
• However, we have assumed any changes in rates would be implemented on
October 1,2006.
1.7 OVERVIEW OF RATE DESIGN ALTERNATIVES:
We are bringing rate design alternatives that have the following characteristics:
Table 1.5 -Rate Alternatives
Existing Alt Alt Alt
. 1 .
2 3
Includes 1,000 gallons in the monthly minimum bill .I 1 1 1
Across-the-board increase to existing rate design ,I
Includes existing monthly minimum bills with no change .I 1 1
Incorporates a stronger conservation rate design for residential and 1
irrigation meters
Incorporates a seasonal conservation rate design for residential and 1 1
irrigation meters
SECTION I—EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE 6
,, McLain
Sian
41111
Support
PPo
Systems
f
McLAIN
Rr►14ert McLain,Principal•McLain 1'cctsi n Stil+port S,t*rn.+
201 W S tiihwe i PI ws.,'4105•Li °hvillrk.TX 750(17
(972)436.6181 k){icc•072.)692-5397 Fax•(214)t493-3652 M;4 Ik•holiidinclainJJ.tern
Table 1.6
Existing&Alternative Rate Structures-Water
FY 2007
Financing Scenario 2 Financing Scenario 3
Existing 1 2 3 1 2 3
Note(1) Note(1)
Revenues Generated $4,752,920 $4,907,390 $4,907,390 $4,907,390 $5,014,331 $5,014,331 $5,014,331
3.25% 3.25% 3.25% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50%
Monthly Minimum Bills:
Residential $ 8.90 $ 9.19 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 9.39 $ 8.90 $ 8.90
Commercial 8.90 9.19 8.90 8.90 9.39 8.90 8.90
Multi-Family 8.90 9.19 8.90 8.90 9.39 8.90 8.90
Volumetric Rates per Th.Gallons
Residential:
1,001 to 2,000 Gallons $ 2.17 $ 2.24 $ 2.58 $ 2.62 $ 2.29 $ 2.66 .$ 2.70
2,001 to 10,000 Gallons 2.90 2.99 2.58 2.62 3.06 2.66 2.70
Over 10,000 Gallons 2.90 2.99 3.37 3.42 3.06 3.47 3.52
Irrigation Meters:
1,001 to 2,000 Gallons $ 2.17 $ 2.24 $ 3.73 $ 3.79 $ 2.29 $ 3.84 $ 3.90
Over 2,000 Gallons 2.90 2.99 3.73 3.79 3.06 3.84 3.90
Commercial&Multi-Family:
1,001 to 2,000 Gallons $ 2.17 $ 2.24 $ 2.95 $ 2.99 $ 2.29 $ 3.03 $ 3.08
Over 2,000 Gallons 2.90 2.99 2.95 2.99 3.06 3.03 3.08
(1)-Peak months are June-October. With Alternative 3,the higher rate above 10,000 gallons will only be charged during the peak months.
Table 1.7
Existing&Alternative Rate Structures-Wastewater
Financing Scenario 1 Financing Scenario 2
Existing 1 2&3 1 2&3
Revenues Generated $ 3,545,379 $ 3,660,604 $ 3,660,604 $ 3,740,375 $ 3,740,375
Percentage Increase 3.25% 3.25% 5.50% 5.50%
Monthly Minimum Bills:
Residential $ 15.00 $ 15.49 $ 15.00 $ 15.83 $ 15.00
Commercial 21.50 22.20 21.50 22.68 21.50
Multi-Family 23.00 23.75 23.00 24.27 23.00
Volumetric Rates per Th.Gallons
1,001 to 2,000 Gallons $ 1.45 $ 1.50 $ 1.57 $ 1.53 $ 1.65
Over 2,000 Gallons(Note 1) 1.45 1.50 1.57 1.53 1.65
Note-Residential volume for wastewater is capped at 14,500 gallons.
SECTION I-EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE 7
McLain
DeCIsiOn
Support
CPFa
Systems
J�'
McLAIN
Robert Ms L iin.Principal■McLain f�cw i.'n sly ►u S.i:ni
1 W.S..►thw.bt 1'1cw..•4l C •Lewisville,TX 75067
(9723 41t•61$1 Office•(972)692 S39 Fax•(214)S91-1652 Moils&•1 ►}.Cnicla:rxkia,c►*rn
1.8 CUSTOMER IMPACT:
Table 1.8 illustrates the impact of the rate design alternatives on customers at the average
consumption levels:
Table 1.8
Illustration of Monthly Impact
Water&Sewer Monthly Bills
Residential Commercial
Average Monthly Consumption-June-October 13,000 66,000
Average Monthly Consumption-Nov-May 5,000 39000,
Average Monthly Water&Sewer Bill: Existing $ 55.07 $ 247.16
Average Monthly Water&Sewer Bill:Alternative 1 -(3.25%): $ 56.86 $ 255.19
Difference-$ $ 1.79 $ 8.03
Difference-% 3.25% 3.25%
Average Monthly Water&Sewer Bill:Alternative 1 -(5.50%): $ 58.10 $ 260.75
Difference-$ $ 3.03 $ 13.59
Difference-% 5.50% 5.50%
Average Monthly Water&Sewer Bill:Alternative 2-(3.25%): $ 55.33 $ 255.93
Difference-$ $ 0.26 $ 8.77
Difference-% 0.47% 3.55%
Average Monthly Water&Sewer Bill:Alternative 2-(5.50%): $ 56.49 $ 264.10
Difference-$ $ 1.42 $ 16.95
Difference-% 2.59% 6.86%
Average Monthly Water&Sewer Bill:Alternative 3-(3.25%): $ 56.22 $ 262.07
Difference-$ $ 1.15 $ 14.91
Difference-% 2.08% 6.03%
Average Monthly Water&Sewer Bill:Alternative 3-(5.50%): $ 56.80 $ 266.33
Difference-$ $ 1.73 $ 19.17
Difference-% 3.14% 7.76%
SECTION I-EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAGE 8
McLain
Decision
Support
PPa
Systems
CP`
McLAIN
Robert McLain,Principal•McLain won Nippon n S}',tentk
201 11V.: .ithu•c t Pkw3_,.4105•L:% TX 75067
(972)4'i1+•6lrfl Office•07 692'5197 Fax•(214)M9 3652 Mobile•1 incl.aa:sJ.is, +tra
SECTION II--IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS
2.1.INTRODUCTION:
A combined ten-year financial plan has been created for the water and wastewater fund
using a "bottom-up" approach. Highlights of the City's water and wastewater cost of
service over the planning period is presented in this section. Salaries have been supported
by staffing tables. Operating and maintenance costs have been calculated in considerable
detail.
2.2 KEY COST OF SERVICE ASSUMPTIONS:
Water and wastewater costs were projected for the period FY 2007 through FY 2016,
based on the proposed FY 2006 budget. We believe the underlying assumptions that
drive the cost of service through the FY 2016. provide a reasonable basis for
management's forecast. However, some assumptions inevitably will not materialize as
presented and anticipated events and circumstances may not occur; therefore, the actual
results achieved during the forecast periods will vary from the forecast, and the variances
may be material. These financial projections were based on the following essential
assumptions:
• Growth;
• Inflation;
• Additional staffing;
• Funding of capital program
• 2.2.1. Growth assumptions. There is no assumption more critical than the growth
assumptions that drive the financial plan. A substantial negative change in this
growth forecast will have an adverse financial result, possibly requiring additional
rate increases beyond what is shown in this report. Table 2.1 shows 9,073 water
meters will be added over the planning period, which will increase water revenues
substantially. Furthermore, Table 2.2 shows 10,431 wastewater accounts will be
added over the planning period.
SECTION II---IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 9
McLain
-��",A Decision
Support
PPa
Systems
J.'
MCt__AIN
R34 rt McL iirr,1'rinc iri1•Mc Lamm 1 k tali.Supl t SN,tcnr+
201 W.tisntihwe.Pkw.,w4105•Lcwiw ille,TX 750o
1721436-6181 Chit.:•0721 692-5307 F.•i 141 93-4)52 N1.►1,41k•1okttnclairkla,...m
Table 2.1
Key Findings
Growth- Water
Average Average Annual
Number Gals/ Volume
Fiscal Additional of % Meter/ % Billed %
Year Meters Meters Growth Month Growth (Th.Gals.) Growth
2005 N/A 10,246 N/A 11,043 N/A 1,357,777 N/A
2006 488 10,734 4.8% 10,418 -6% 1,341,982 -1.2%
2007 907 11,641 8.4% 10,302 -1% 1,439,042 7.2%
2008 907 12,548 7.8% 10,201 -1% 1,536,100 6.7%
2009 907 13,455 7.2% 10,115 -1% 1,633,160 6.3%
2010 907 14,362 6.7% 10,039 -1% 1,730,220 5.9%
2011 907 15,269 6.3% 9,973 -1% 1,827,279 5.6%
_ 2012 907 16,176 5.9% 9,914 -1% 1,924,339 5.3%
2013 907 17,083 5.6% 9,861 -1% 2,021,398 5.0%
2014 907 17,990 5.3% 9,813 0% 2,118,457 4.8%
2015 907 18,897 5.0% 9,770 0% 2,215,517 4.6%
2016 907 19,804 4.8% 9,731 0% 2,312,677 4.4%
Table 2.2
Key Findings
Growth- Water Billed for Wastewater
Average Average Annual
Number Gals/ Volume
Fiscal Additional of % Meter/ % Billed %
Year Meters Meters Growth Month Growth (Th.Gals.) Growth
2005 N/A 9,653 N/A 9,955 N/A 1,153,144 N/A
2006 559 .10,212 5.8% 9,396 -5.6% 1,151,364 -0.2%
2007 1,041 11,253 10.2% 9,298 -1% 1,255,498 9.0%
2008 1,044 12,297 9.3% 9,216 -1% 1,359,906 8.3%
2009 1,044 13,341 8.5% 9,147 -1% 1,464,306 7.7%
2010 1,043 14,384 7.8% 9,088 -1% 1,568,614 7.1%
2011 1,043 15,427 7.3% 9,037 -1% 1,672,923 6.6%
2012 1,043 16,470 6.8% 8,992 0% 1,777,231 6.2%
2013 1,043 17,513 6.3% 8,953 0% 1,881,548 5.9%
2014 1,044 18,557 6.0% 8,918 0% 1,985,948 5.5%
2015 1,043 19,600 5.6% 8,887 0% 2,090,248 5.3%
2016 1,042 20,642 5.3% 8,859 0% 2,194,456 5.0%
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 10
■ McLain
ADecision
Support
Systems
411L.fir-
Mcl__AIN
Robert McLain.Principal•McLain Dec bi=n S11 +t,!,,`+tt::ti.,
201 W S t..Pkw,.,-4 L5•Lemmille. 75-067
197 2)4 36-i 1 S 1 t ttii e•07)692.5347 Fax•(114)*91:5 i5?Mobile■bob4 c l.aiti.l i.com
• 2.2.2. NTMWD water purchase costs. We have assume
d the rate per thousand
gallons charged by the North Texas Municipal Water District will increase as
follows, beginning in FY 2007. Table 2.4 illustrates the impact on water costs.
Table 2.3
Key Findings
Water Loss Percentages
Inflowllnfiltration Percentages
Water
Annual Billed
Water Percent Annual For Actual& Wastewater
Billed of Water Wastewater Projected Flow
Fiscal (Th.Gals.) Water Purchased (Th.Gals.) Inflow/ Treated
Year Table 2.1 Loss (Th.Gals.) Table 2.2 Infiltration (Th.Gals.)
2006 1,341,982 9.1% 1,476,180 1,151,364 9.1% 1,266,500
2007 1,439,042 9.1% 1,582,946 1,255,498 9.1% 1,381,048
2008 1,536,100 9.1% 1,689,710 1,359,906 9.1% 1,495,897
2009 1,633,160 9.1% 1,796,476 1,464,306 9.1% 1,610,737
2010 1,730,220 9.1% 1,903,242 1,568,614 9.1% 1,725,475
2011 1,827,279 9.1% 2,010,007 1,672,923 9.1% 1,840,215
2012 1,924,339 9.1% 2,116,773 1,777,231 9.1% 1,954,954
2013 2,021,398 9.1% 2,223,538 1,881,548 9.1% 2,069,703
2014 2,118,457 9.1% 2,330,303 1,985,948 9.1% 2,184,543
2015 2,215,517 9.1% 2,437,069 2,090,248 9.1% 2,299,273
2016 2,312,577 9.1% 2,543,835 2,194,456 9.1% 2,413,902
Table 2.4
Key Findings
Water Purchases from NTMWD
Planned Annual Consumption
Actual Planned Rates
Take-or- Planned Amount Take-or- Actual NTMWD
Fiscal Pay Usage(000's) Over/(Under) Pay Planned Annual %
Year Minimum_ Table 2.3 Minimum Minimum Usage Charges Change
2005 1,266,615 1,387,214 120,599 $ 0.97 $ 0.23 $1,252,736 24.8%
2006 1,387,214 1,476,180 88,966 0.97 0.23 1,380,000 10.2%
2007 1,476,180 1,582,946 106,766 1.02 0.24 1,531,328 11.0°A,
2008 1,582,946 1,689,710 106,764 1.08 0.25 1,736,273 13.4%
2009 1,689,710 1,796,476 106,766 1.14 0.26 1,954,029 12.5%
2010 1,796,476 1,903,242 106,766 1.21 0.27 2,202,563 12.7%
2011 1,903,242 2,010,007 106,765 1.29 0.28 2,485,076 12.8%
2012 2,010,007 2,116,773 106,766 1.37 0.29 2,784,672 12.1%
2013 2,116,773 2,223,538 106,765 1.45 0.30 3,101,350 11.4%
2014 2,223,538 2,330,303 106,765 1.53 0.31 3,435,110 10.8%
2015 2,330,303 2,437,069 106,766 1.61 0.32 3,785,952 10.2%
2016 2,437,069 2,543,835 106,766 1.61 0.33 3,958,913 4.6%
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 1 1
,, McLain
ADerision
Support
4161011°- Systems
1M1cLAIN
R,.rr Mc L.0 n.I'rssw s .si•Mc Lien I k�isu m Support Sv gcnx•
'?I NV.Snithwi t Pkw.,•41i15•14,4wtlie,TX 75067
(972)43+-ti+i Ott,, •072 692.5397 7 F:sx•(214) 95-5652 Mobsi,•1rt nuci:tsu,.i_t4xsrs
• 2.2.3. NTMWD wastewater treatment costs. Tables 2.5 through 2.8 illustra
te ate the
assumptions used to forecast the wastewater treatment costs. O&M costs have been
forecast, using an inflation factor of 3%per year. However, the major cost of each of
the wastewater treatment plants is debt service, and NTMWD has provided us with
amortization schedules for each of the outstanding issues.
Table 2.5
Key Findings
NTMWD Wastewater Treatment Costs
Wylie Wastewater Treatment Plant Costs
Fiscal O&M Debt Total Projected Flow(000's) Projected Costs
Year Costs Service Costs Wylie Murphy _ Wylie Murphy
2005 $ 657,323 $ 196,325 $ 853,648 1,055,703 183,983 $ 726,957 $ 126,691
2006 330,721 198,847 529,568 1,055,703 183,983 450,974 78,594
2007 388,956 - 388,956 904,971 334,715 283,938 105,018
2008 358,048 - 358,048 904,971 334,715 261,375 96,673
2009 371,113 - 371,113 904,971 334,715 270,913 100,201
2010 384,727 - 384,727 904,971 334,715 280,851 103,876
2011 398,917 - 398,917 904,971 334,715 291,209 107,708
2012 413,709 - 413,709 904,971 334,715 302,008 111,701
2013 429,133 - 429,133 904,971 334,715 313,267 115,866
2014 445,218 - 445,218 904,971 334,715 325,009 120,209
2015 461,996 - 461,996 904,971 334,715 337,257 124,739
2016 479,502 - 479,502 904,971 334,715 350,036 129,465
Table 2.6
Key Findings
NTMWD Wastewater Treatment Costs
Muddy Creek Interceptor Costs
Projected Flow(000's)
Fiscal O&M Debt Total (Take-Or-Pay) Projected Costs
Year Costs Service Costs Wylie Murphy Wylie _ Murphy
2005 $ 21,172 $ 267,485 $ 288,657 2,153,500 1,387,000 $ 175,575 $ 113,082
2006 46,129 266,231 312,360 '2,153,500 1,387,000 189,992 122,368
2007 (22,727) 265,869 243,142 2,584,565 955,935 177,493 65,648
2008 (21,156) 265,263 244,107 2,584,565 955,935 178,198 65,909
2009 (19,537) 269,413 249,876 2,584,565 955,935 182,409 67,466
2010 (17,870) 268,075 250,205 2,584,565 955,935 182,650 67,555
2011 (16,152) 266,494 250,341 2,584,565 955,935 182,749 67,592
2012 (14,384) 269,669 255,285 2,584,565 955,935 186,358 68,927
2013 (12,562) 267,356 254,795 2,584,565 955,935 186,000 68,795
2014 (10,685) 269,800 259,115 2,584,565 955,935 189,154 69,961
2015 (8,752) 266,756 258,004 2,584,565 955,935 188,343 69,661
2016 (6,761) 269,956 263,195' 2,584,565 955,935 192,132 71,063
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 12
■ McLain
-,.,"`Al Decision
Support
OLP' Systems
MGL_AIN
8.,hcrt McLain,Principal•McLain[h,ist,,n Suntan S sttiu,
201 W. mttihwc,t I'Ru.,•4105•Le.',yolk,TX 75067
(972)4364481 Oiticc•t 72) 2•S397 fax•(214)$9 3‘JS2 Mt►Stle•IN,14troclirnJi1.ii rn
Table 2.7
Key Findings
NTMWD Wastewater Treatment Costs
Muddy Creek Wastewater Treatment Costs
Projected Flow M000`s)
Fiscal O&M Debt Total (Take-Or-Pay) Projected Costs
Year Costs Service Costs Wylie Murphy _ Wylie Murphy
2005 $ 561,826 $1,269,995 $1,831,821 146,000 73,000 $1,221,214 $ 610,607
2006 1,039,580 1,266,995 2,306,575 210,797 73,000 1,713,265 593,310
2007 1,484,347 2,227,259 3,711,605 207,172 76,625 2,709,472 1,002,133
2008 1,896,834 2,225,745 4,122,579 1,065,703 76,625 3,843,602 278,977
2009 1,951,857 2,219,745 4,171,602 1,055,703 76,625 3,889,307 282,295
2010 2,008,993 2,216,495 4,225,488 1,055,703 76,625 3,939,547 285,941
2011 2,068,334 2,215,746 4,284,079 1,055,703 76,625 3,994,173 289,906
2012 2,129,977 2,214,070 4,344,047 1,055,703 76,625 4,050,082 293,964
2013 2,194,020 2,225,740 4,419,760 1,055,703 76,625 4,120,672 299,088
2014 2,260,570 2,228,415 4,488,985 1,055,703 76,625 4,185,213 303,772
2015 2,329,736 2,242,205 4,571,941 1,055,703 76,625 4,262,555 309,386
2016 2,401,635 2,247,145 4,648,780 1,055,703 76,625 4,334,194 314,586
Table 2.8
Key Findings
Recap of NTMWD Wastewater Treatment Costs
Muddy Muddy
Wylie Creek Creek
WWTP Interceptor WWTP
Fiscal Costs Costs Costs Total
Year Table 2.5 Table 2.6 Table 2.7 Costs
2005 $ 726,957 $ 175,575 $ 1,221,214 $ 1,774,798
2006 450,974 189,992 1,713,265 2,354,231
2007 283,938 177,493 2,709,472 3,170,903
2008 261,375 178,198 3,843,602 4,283,176
2009 270,913 • 182,409 3,889,307 4,342,629
2010 280,851 182,650 3,939,547 4,403,047
• 2011 291,209 182,749 3,994,173 4,468,132
2012 302,008 186,358 4,050,082 4,538,448
2013 313,267 186,000 4,120,672 4,619,939
2014 325,009 189,154 4,185,213 4,699,376
2015 337,257 188,343 4,262,555 4,788,156
2016 350,036 192,132 4,334,194 4,876,363
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 13
McLain
�``All Decision
Support
tiii.-PY PPa
Systems
McLAIN
Rs►lcri McLain,Crone iral•McLain I X own Stipp►tt.Sy s;r in..
01 W.S.tnhwc t PtwN.,•410i•Leutwilk.TX 75067
['7 4364,I$1 016,•(4 2)6)2 53)7 Eix•(214)M94-i652 kiAm •IN4401nai. 16..►►n
• 2.2.4. Additional staffing. Table 2.9 illustrates the additional of three (3)positions in
FY 20092.
Table 2.9
Key Findings
City of Wylie Utility Staffing Levels
Utility Utility
Fiscal Admin. Utilities Eng. Billing Total
Year (711) (712) (713) (715) Staffing
2005 2.50 14.00 3.00 5.50 25.00
2006 2.50 17.00 3.00 5.50 28.00
2007 2.50 17.00 3.00 5.50 28.00
2008 2.50 17.00 3.00 5.50 28.00
2009 2.50 20.00 3.00 5.50 31.00
2010 2.50 20.00 3.00 5.50 31.00
2011 2.50 20.00 3.00 5.50 31.00
2012 2.50 20.00 3.00 5.50 31.00
2013 2.50 20.00 3.00 5.50 31.00
2014 2.50 20.00 3.00 5.50 31.00
2015 2.50 20.00 3.00 5.50 31.00
2016 2.50 20.00 3.00 5.50 31.00
Table 2.10
Key Findings
Personnel-Related Costs
Utility Water Sewer Utility
Fiscal Inflation Admin. Utilities Eng. Utilities Billing
Year Driver (711) (712) (713) (714) (715) Total
2005 6.00% $ 313,860 $ 575,380 $ 303,670 $ 248,040 $ 404,470 $1,845,420
2006 6.00% 271,290 592,280 318,720 241,010 423,500 1,846,800
2007 6.00% 317,250 627,817 266,187 255,471 379,774 1,846,498
2008 6.00% 336,284 665,486 282,158 270,799 402,561 1,957,288
2009 6.00% 356,462 829,900 299,088 337,702 426,716 2,249,868
2010 6.00% 377,851 879,694 317,034 357,964 452,318 2,384,861
2011 6.00% 400,523 932,476 336,057 379,442 479,459 2,527,955
2012 6.00% 424,555 988,424 356,219 402,209 508,227 2,679,634
2013 6.00% 450,028 1,047,730 377,592 426,341 538,720 2,840,411
2014 6.00% 477,031 1,110,593 400,248 451,922 571,043 3,010,837
2015 6.00% 505,651 1,177,229 424,265 479,037 605,306 3,191,488
2016 6.00% 535,991 1,247,863 449,721 507,779 641,625 3,382,978
2 Per City staff.
SECTION II--IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 14
b. McLain
Derision
Support
Systems
Mc:L_AIN
Robert MCLAin,Principal•MCL.in Dec►si in Stipixot Si tcmmm+
01 'Srluthwe,t PtcVHv.,•41i'?5•Lrwi vklle.TX 75067
072).0641181 Clt+cr•072 692.5197 Fax•(214)r 71-31,52 Mobile•boRtiniclattilko,411
• 2.2.5. Inflation drivers. Salaries were increased annually using expenditure drivers
of 6%, based on the FY 2006 budget. Most other operating and maintenance costs
were driven by an annual inflation factor of 3%. Medical insurance was increased 7%
per year. Tables 2.11 and 2.12 illustrate the impact of these inflation drivers on the
operating and maintenance costs over the planning period.
Table 2.11
Key Findings
Total Departmental Operating and Maintenance Costs
Including Departmental Capital
Excluding NTMWD Costs
Utility Water Sewer Utility Combined
Fiscal Admin. Utilities Eng. Utilities Billing Services
Year (711) (712) (713) _ (714) (715) (719) Total
2005 $ 365,835 $ 996,506 $ 390,626 $ 425,020 $ 542,457 $ 116,578 $2,837,022
2006 340,580 1,049,880 419,670 492,010 2,441,460 110,960 4,854,560
2007 421,800 1,078,180 433,130 600,360 974,620 115,960 3,624,050
2008 374,706 1,127,928 386,136 625,238 777,241 123,335 3,414,583
2009 395,858 1,301,859 406,588 701,406 812,863 131,039 3,749,615
2010 418,243 1,364,239 428,194 731,764 850,303 139,086 3,931,829
2011 441,936 1,429,953 451,019 763,636 889,663 147,491 4,123,698
2012 467,012 1,499,182 475,134 797,105 931,045 156,267 4,325,745
2013 493,556 1,572,128 500,615 832,260 974,561 165,429 4,538,549
2014 521,654 1,649,004 527,544 869,192 1,020,328 174,994 4,762,716
2015 551,394 1,730,022 556,007 907,993 1,068,474 184,977 4,998,866
2016 582,881 1,815,431 586,085 948,771 1,119,123 195,394 5,247,686
Table 2.12
Key Findings
Recap of Operating&Maintenance Costs
Departmental Water Wastewater
O&M Purchases Treatment
Fiscal From From From
Year Table 2.11 Table 2.4 Table 2.8 Total
2005 $ 2,837,022 $1,252,736 $1,774,798 $5,864,556
2006 4,854,560 1,380,000 2,354,231 8,588,791
2007 3,624,050 1,518,000 3,170,903 8,312,953
2008 3,414,583 1,736,273 4,283,176 9,434,032
2009 3,749,615 1,954,029 4,342,629 10,046,272
2010 3,931,829 2,202,563 4,403,047 10,537,440
2011 4,123,698 2,485,076 4,468,132 11,076,906
2012 4,325,745 2,784,672 4,538,448 11,648,865
2013 4,538,549 3,101,350 4,619,939 12,259,838
2014 4,762,716 3,435,110 4,699,376 12,897,201
2015 4,998,866 3,785,952 4,788,156 13,572,974
2016 5,247,686 3,958,913 4,876,363 14,082,962
SECTION II--IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 15
bk. McLain
..` Decision
aild Support
PPa
Systems
MCL_A1N
Robert McLain.['ren. I•McLatn Defctmon Sil ,err S.rrtrt•
201 W.S,uthwc►r natl..,4105•',twin,.TX 75067
(972)436-6181 Ott •(972)642.5W FAX•(214)S91-;652 Mi,111c•1,1-4tinclatrkla,c:nt
• 2.2.6. Water Capital Improvement Program: A $17.653 million water
capital
improvement plan has been incorporated into the financial .lan capital
The capital
improvement plan calls for two (2) bond issues totaling $13,480,000 over the next
three,years, beginning with a $6,500,000 issue in FY 2006. Table 2.23 and Table 2.24
shows the impact of these debt issues.
• 2.2.7. Wastewater Capital Improvement wastewater Program: Theca
pital
capital
improvement plans calls for a $12,250,000 debt issue, related to the exp
ansion of the
Muddy Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. This debt issue will be NTMWD
contract revenue debt, and will be shared with the City of Murphy. W l Wylie will a
approximately y pay
a
pp y 73% of the debt service, and Murphy will pay 27%. This debt issue
will be paid the NTMWD as part of the wastewater treatment bill for Mudd
y Creek.
• 2.2.8. Use of Impact Fees: The most critical assumption incorporated p rp ed into the
financial plan is the use of impact fees to partiallyfund debt service
Tables - payments.
2.15 2.29 illustrate the importance of this funding source.
Table 2.13
Key Findings
Revenue Debt-Existing
Water&Sewer
Fiscal Series Series Series
Year 1999 2000 2002 Total
2005 $ 112,505 $ 137,149 $ 86,775 $ 336,429
2006 114,093 138,628 84,775 337,495
2007 110,518 139,799 82,775 333,092
2008 111,930 140,665 85,650 338,245
2009 113,473 141,224 83,400 338,097
2010 110,158 141,828 86,025 338,010
2011 111,680 142,549 83,663. 337,892
2012 112,910 143,065 86,574 342,549
2013 113,840 143,324 84,566 341,731
2014 114,468 143,290 87,365 345,123
2015 114,785 142,908 84,995 342,688
2016 114,790 147,078 87,463 349,330
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS
PAGE I6
► McLain
-'�'` Dedsivn
All Support
4116.- System
r
s
Mc:I__AlN
K bcn McLain.Prince tI•I.kL.ain Dec-own Support ,,,tc:riry
_201 W. ►uthwc81 Pkwt'...4105•L.w'i.!'idkk,TX 1506
21 ►•6181(Vice•t) 2)692.51 i Fax•5 214)SO, ,52 Mi bi1r•bobratnautulds.com
Table 2.14
Key Findings
Revenue Debt-Existing
Water Portion
Series Series Series
Fiscal 1999 2000 2002
Year 50.00% 20.00% 50.00% Total
2005 $ 56,253 $ 27,430 $ 43,388 127,070
2006 57,046 27,726 42,388 127,159
2007 55,259 27,960 41,388 124,606
2008 55,965 28,133 42,825 126,923
2009 56,736 28,245 41,700 126,681
2010 55,079 28,366 43,013 126,457
2011 55,840 28,510 41,831 126,181
2012 56,455 28,613 43,287 128,355
2013 56,920 28,665 42,283 127,868
2014 57,234 28,658 43,683 129,574
2015 57,393 28,582 42,498 128,472
2016 57,395 29,416 43,731 130,542
Table 2.15
Key Findings
Revenue Debt-Existing
Water Portion
Portion Eligible for Impact Fees
%-> 50.0% 45.0% 45.0%
yo-> 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Fiscal Series Series Series
Year 1999 2000 2002 Total
2005 $ 14,063 $ 6,172 $ 9,762 $ 29,997
2006 14,262 6,238 9,537 30,037
2007 13,815 6,291 9,312 29,418
2008 13,991 6,330 9,636 29,957
2009 14,184 6,355 9,383 29,922
2010 13,770 6,382 9,678 29,830
2011 13,960 6,415 9,412 29,787
2012 14,114 6,438 9,740 30,291
2013 14,230 6,450 9,514 30,193
2014 14,308 6,448 9,829 30,585
2015 14,348 6,431 ' 9,562 30,341
2016 14,349 6,618 9,840 30,807
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 17
McLain
-,,i`A Decision
Support
PPS
Systems
P.
McL._A1N
R,,hrn McLain.I'raiui'.,I•McLain IX,1xuf4)Surpin Syq.ia, .
201 W,S uthwclr tt %•.,%41L*i5•L4w►,wilit.TX 775067
(9 )436M1M1 OtiFcc•i972 (192.5;97 Fax•(214)893.5652 Mo iie•he raaclAin.a,....
Table 2.16
Key Findings
Revenue Debt-Existing
Wastewater Portion
Series Series Series
Fiscal 1999 2000 2002
Year 50.00% 80.00% 50.00% Total
2005 $ 56,253 $ 109,720 $ 43,388 $ 209,360
2006 57,046 110,902 42,388 210,336
2007 55,259 111,840 41,388 208,486
2008 55,965 112,532 42,825 211,322
2009 56,736 112,980 41,700 211,416
2010 55,079 113,462 43,013 211,553
2011 55,840 114,040 41,831 211,711
2012 56,455 114,452 43,287 214,194
2013 56,920 114,660 42,283 213,863
2014 57,234 114,632 43,683 215,548
2015 57,393 114,326 42,498 214,216
2016 57,395 117,662 43,731 218,788
Table 2.17
Key Findings
Revenue Debt-Existing
Wastewater Portion
Portion Eligible for Impact Fees
%-> 95.0% 95.0% 95.0%
%-> 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Fiscal Series Series Series
Year 1999 2000 2002 Total
2005 $ 26,720 $ 52,117 $ 20,609 $ 99,446
2006 27,097 52,678 20,134 -99,909
2007 26,248 53,124 19,659 99,031
2008 26,583 53,453 20,342 100,378
2009 26,950 53,665 19,808 100,422
2010 26,162 53,894 20,431 100,488
2011 26,524 54,169 19,870 100,563 •
2012 26,816 54,365 20,561 101,742
2013 27,037 54,463 20,084 101,585
2014 27,186 54,450 20,749 102,385
2015 27,261 54,305 20,186 101,753
2016 27,263 55,889 20,772 103,924
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 18
I,, McLain
All Decision
Support
C �Fa
Systems
F
IM c L A I N
Robert McL un,F rinc.tjal•McLain Decision S►ippota Ss,teni,
201 W.Southwest Pkwy.,•4h S•Lewisville,TX 7506
(97 )44,6181 O1#Kc•(072)692wS%'7 Fax•(214)SO.iti52 Mobile.•b+l tai1,ui ikc.ynn
Table 2.18
Key Findings
Non-Revenue Debt-Existing
Water& Sewer
Fiscal Series Series Series Series Series
Year 1993 1995 1997 2005 2005 Total
2005 $ 395,145 $ 230,115 $ 97,776 $ - $ - $ 723,035
2006 364,528 228,643 99,263 - - 692,434
2007 - - 98,791 443,275 151,454 693,520
2008 - - 100,332 442,025 151,454 693,810
2009 - - 101,610 366,600 151,454 619,663
2010 - - 100,472 367,000 151,454 618,926
2011 - - 101,342 214,200 . 151,454 466,995
2012 - - 101,936 213,038 151,454 466,427
2013 - - 102,297 215,900 151,454 469,651
2014 - - 104,589 217,900 151,454 473,942
2015 - - 104,310 224,400 151,454 480,163
2016 - - 105,900 - 75,727 181,627
Table 2.19
Key Findings
Non-Revenue Debt-Existing
Water Portion
Series Series Series Series Series
Fiscal 1993 1995 1997 2005 2005
Year 0.00% 90.02% 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% Total
2005 $ - $ 207,143 $ 48,888 $ -. $ - $ 256,031
2006 - 205,819 49,632 - - 255,450
2007 - - 49,396 221,638 75,727 346,760
2008 - - 50,166 221,013 75,727 346,905
2009 - - 50,805 183,300 75,727 309,832
2010 - - 50,236 183,500 75,727 309,463
2011 - - 50,671 107,100 75,727 233,498
2012 - - 50,968 106,519 75,727 233,214
2013 - - 51,149 107,950 75,727 234,825
2014 - - 52,294 108,950 75,727 236,971
2015 - - 52,155 112,200 75,727 240,082
2016 - - 52,950 - 37,863 90,813
SECTION II---IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 19
,, McLain
-.",,kA Decision
Support
I�Po
Systems
McL_A I N
Robert McLain,F'rtnct1+a1•Ntatain I..,.1(41 Support SN•tcrtt,
201 W S.Ithw&-t R.I.,*4105•Le.iwillc.TX 75067
(972)416-61S1 Chltcc•[`72)6 1.5%47 Eix•{.7.10 S94.%65#Mobile•1,44rowlatiuld,,om
Table 2.20
Key Findings
Non-Revenue Debt- Existing
Water Portion
Portion Eligible for Impact Fees
%-> 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0%
%-> 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Fiscal Series Series Series Series Series
Year 1993 1995 1997 2005 2005 Total
2005 $ - $ - $ 12,222 $ - $ - $ 12,222
2006 - - 12,408 - - 12,408
2007 - - 12,349 - - 12,349
2008 - - 12,541 - - 12,541
2009 - - 12,701 - - 12,701
2010 - - 12,559 - - 12,559
2011 - - 12,668 - - 12,668
2012 - - 12,742 - - 12,742
2013 - - 12,787 - - 12,787
2014 - - 13,074 - - 13,074
2015■5 - - 13,039 - - 13,039
2016 - - 13,238 - - 13,238
Table 2.21
Key Findings
Non-Revenue Debt- Existing
Wastewater Portion
Series Series Series Series Series
Fiscal _ 1993 1995 1997 2005 2005
Year 100.00% 9.98% 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% Total
2005 $ 395,145 $ 22,971 $ 48,888 $ - $ - $ 467,004
2006 364,528 22,824 49,632 - - 436,984
2007 - - 49,396 221,638 75,727 346,760
2008 - - 50,166 221,013 75,727 346,905
2009 - - 50,805 183,300 75,727 309,832
2010 - - 50,236 183,500 75,727 309,463
2011 - - 50,671 107,100 75,727 233,498
2012 - - 50,968 106,519 75,727 233,214
2013 - - 51,149 107,950 75,727 234,825
2014 - - 52,294 108,950 75,727 236,971
2015 - - 52,155 112,200 75,727 240,082
2016 - - 52,950 - 37,863 90,813
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 20
McLain
`''A 'Dedsivn
Support
IL..P' Systems
McLAIN
IL,ben McLain.Principal•McL.un 1kx:1xi.n►-Support.tir-+t*:m
201 W.Southwest Pkwl.,•4105•Lewisville,1 TX 75067
')i2}-06.6181(Vice•(072)692-5 i97 lax•(21.0$91,in52 Mobile•1,14tincl;aituk a.con
Table 2.22
Key Findings
Non-Revenue Debt- Existing
Wastewater Portion
Portion Eligible for Impact Fees
%-> 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 0.0% 0.0%
%-> 0.0°Ia 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Fiscal Series Series Series Series Series
Year 1993 1995 1997 2005 2005 Total
2005 $ - $ - $ 23,222 $ - $ - $ 23,222
2006 - - 23,575 - - 23,575
2007 - - 23,463 - - 23,463
2008 - - 23,829 - - 23,829
2009 - - 24,132 - - 24,132
2010 - - 23,862 - - 23,862
2011 - - 24,069 - - 24,069
2012 - - 24,210 - - 24,210
2013 - - 24,29E - - 24,296
2014 - - 24,840 - - 24,840
2015 - - 24,774 - - 24,774
2016 - - 25,151 - - 25,151
•
Table 2.23
Key Findings
Water Capital Improvement Plan(from Impact Fee Study)
Table 1 of 2
Newport South
Automated Harbor Nortex NTMWD Ballard
Fiscal Meter Ease- Pump Pump Pump Elevated Water
Year Reading ments _ Station Station Station Tank Lines Total
2006 $ - $ 89,350 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 89,350
2007 1,000,000 89,350 1,255,200 163,000 941,000 - 4,448,500 7,897,050
2008 - 89,350 160,000 358,000 - - 1,365,000 1,972,350
2009 - 89,350 160,000 913,000 130,000 - - 1,292,350
2010 - 89,350 - - - 2,675,000 99,000 2,863,350
2011 - 89,350 844,000 135,000 - - - 1,068,350
2012 - 89,350 - 675,000 136,000 . - 1,213,000 2,113,350
2013 - 89,350 - - - - - 89,350
2014 - 89,350 - - - - - 89,350
2015 - 89,350 - - - - - 89,350
2016 - 89,350 - - - - - 89,350
$1,000,000 $ 982,850 $2,419,200 $2,244,000 $1,207,000 $2,675,000 $7,125,500 $17,653,550
' SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 21
McLain
- �' Decision
Alii Support
Systems
M c L A l N
Robert?chain,Principal•McLain l cc►iiiin Support SN,trttt..,
20 1 W Sottth►►c t I:w..•i41LlS•1.eva ilk.TX 7506
tt)T 2)4 36-6181.)ftic •(`7 )i92•S W 7 fix•12141 S93-i6i2 Whit.•1,14tmclatnliNxoni
Table 2.23
Key Findings
Water Capita!lmpro vemen t Plan
Table 2 of 2
Total Sources
Drawdown Drawdown Total Uses Minus
Planned of of Sources of Uses
Fiscal Bond Impact Operating of Funds of Ending
Year Issues Fees Reserves Funds Table 2.23 Funds Balance
2006 $ - $ - $ 89,350 $ 89,350 $ 89,350 $ - $ -
2007 6,500,000 4,000,000 89,350 10,589,350 7,897,050 2,692,300 2,692,300
2008 - - 89,350 89,350 1,972,350 (1,883,000) 809,300
2009 6,980,000 - 89,350 7,069,350 1,292,350 5,777,000 6,586,300
2010 - • - 89,350 89,350 2,863,350 (2,774,000) 3,812,300
2011 - 89,350 89,350 1,068,350 (979,000) 2,833,300
2012 - - 89,350 89,350 2,113,350 (2,024,000) 809,300
2013 - - 89,350 89,350 89,350 - 809,300
2014 - - 89,350 89,350 89,350 - 809,300
2015 - - 89,350 89,350 89,350 - 809,300
2Q16 - - 89,350 89,350 89,350 - 809,300
$13,480,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 982,850 $18,462,850 $17,653,550
Table 2.24
Key Findings
Planned Annual New Debt Service
2007 2009
Water-> $ 6,500,000 $ 6,980,000
Sewer-> - -
Year $ 6,500,000 $ 6,980,000 Total
2006 $ - $ - $ -
2007 390,000 - 390,000 .
2008 715,000 - 715,000
2009 695,500 418,800 1,114,300
2010 676,000 767,800 1,443,800
2011 656,500 746,860 1,403,360
2012 702,000 725,920 1,427,920
2013 678,600 704,980 1,383,580
2014 655,200 753,840 1,409,040
2015 631,800 728,712 1,360,512
2016 608,400 703,584 1,311,984
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 22
McLain
-,'`A Decision
Support
Systems
allibb.Pr
Mcl__A1N
Robert McLam,4'rrrtstral•MlcLatrt Decision Support Sv,tern,
201 W.Southwest Pkw s,*4105•Lt wtwiltc.TX 75067
(97 2)416•64 I Orrice•(9 2)692,5397 Fax•(214)893.1652 M,,I,c•boktrod.urrilb.corn
Table 2.25
Key Findings
Planned Annual New Debt Service-Water
Portion Eligible for Impact Fees
2007 2009
Water-> $ 6,500,000 $ 6,980,000
%-> 60.9% 34.4%
%.> 50.0% 50.0%
Year $ 1,980,756 $ 1,199,433 Total
2005 $ - $ - $ -
2006 - _ -
2007 118,845 - 118,845
2008 217,883 - 217,883
2009 211,941 71,966 283,907
2010 205,999 131,938 337,936
2011 200,056 128,339 328,396
2012 213,922 124,741 338,663
2013 206,791 121,143 327,934
2014 199,660 129,539 329,199
2015 192,530 125,221 317,750
2016 185,399 120,903 306,302
Table 2.26
Key Findings
NTMWD Wastewater Contract Revenue Debt
Wylie's Share-Paid as part of NTMWD Payments
Muddy
Wylie Creek
WWTP Muddy Muddy WWTP
Fiscal Series Creek Creek Expansion
Year 1988 Interceptor WWTP $12,250,000 Total
2005 $ 196,325 $ - $ - $ - $ 196,325
2006 198,847 162,401 772,867 - 1,134,115
2007 - 162,180 770,274 588,353 1,520,808
2008 - 161,810 769,969 587,735 1,519,515
2009 - 164,342 765,699 588,345 1,518,386
2010 - 163,526 763,717 588,345 1,515,588
2011 - 162,561 763,869 587,735 1,514,166
2012 - 164,498 761,018 589,565 1,515,081
2013 - 163,087 767,069 590,633 1,520,789
2014 - 164,578 771,446 587,888 1,523,911
2015 - 162,721 777,113 590,633 1,530,466
2016 - 164,673 781,346 589,413 1,535,432
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 23
McLain
Decision
Support
CP' Systems
McL.AIN
R bi rt Nictun.Prtnc.tlal•?.kLiin I Vrwon StirpOrt W'►yat47110
201 W Snith.cst l'Lw-t.,.4105•Leur iw ilk,TX 75i.167
(972)4164,181()f}«•t')')fib i19t Fix•WO St)i-1651 10,441e•b+t+tkrod;itn.Us.,,rt
Table 2.27
Key Findings
NTMWD Wastewater Contract Revenue Debt
Wylie's Share-Paid as part of NTMWD Payments
Portion Eligible for impact Fees
%-> 95.0% 95.0% 95.0% 95.0%
%-> 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Wylie Muddy
WWTP Muddy Muddy Creek
Fiscal Series Creek Creek WWTP
Year 1988 Interceptor WWTP Expansion Total
2005 $ 93,254 $ - $ - $ - $ 93,254
2006 94,452 77,141 367,112 - 538,705
2007 - 77,035 365,880 279,468 722,384
2008 - 76,860 365,735 279,174 721,769
2009 - 78,062 363,707 279,464 721,233
2010 - 77,675 362,766 279,464 719,904
2011 - 77,217 362,838 279,174 719,229
2012 - 78,137 361,483 280,043 719,663
2013 - 77,466 364,358 280,550 722,375
2014 - 78,175 366,437 279,247 723,858
2015 - 77,293 369,128 280,550 726,972
2016 - 78,220 371,139 279,971 729,330
Table 2.28
Key Findings
Recap of Use of Impact Fees- Water
Water Portion
For
For Existing For
Existing Non- Planned
Revenue Revenue Revenue
Fiscal Debt Debt Debt
Year Table 2.15 Table 2.20 Table 2.25 Total
2005 $ 29,997 $ 12,222 $ - $ 42,219
2006 30,037 12,408 - 42,445
2007 29,418 12,349 118,845 160,612
2008 29,957 12,541 217,883 260,381
2009 29,922 12,701 283,907 326,530
2010 29,830 12,559 337,936 380,325
2011 29,787 12,668 328,396 370,850
2012 30,291 12,742 338,663 381,696
2013 30,193 12,787 327,934 370,914
2014 30,585 13,074 329,199 372,858
2015 30,341 13,039 317,750 361,130
2016 30,807 13,238 306,302 350,346
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 24
McLain
Dedsion
Support
Systems
McL_AIN
Robert Md-as r+,Prtttc t.t1•Nic L ur,l ac taa o n Support Sin•
201 W,ti,utthwrg t'kwv.,'#105.Ltwrort1k,TX 75067
(97 )43t+-t+181 Ott •('i a)692,5107 F,1%•(214)$93.)M2 Nit,'ik•l u multi t,,rtt
Table 2.29
Key Findings
Recap of Use of Impact Fees- Wastewater
For For
For Existing NTMWD
Existing Non- Contract
Revenue Revenue Revenue
Fiscal Debt Debt Debt
Year Table 2.17 Table 2.22 Table 2.27 Total
2005 $ 99,446 $ 23,222 $ 93,254 $ 215,922
2006 99,909 23,575 538,705 662,189
2007 99,031 23,463 722,384 844,877
2008 100,378 23,829 721,769 845,976
2009 100,422 24,132 721,233 845,788
2010 100,488 23,862 719,904 844,254
2011 100,563 24,069 719,229 843,860
2012 101,742 24,210 719,663 845,615
2013 101,585 24,296 722,375 848,255
2014 102,385 24,840 723,858 851,083
2015 101,753 24,774 726,972 853,498
2016 103,924 25,151 729,330 858,406
Table 2.30
Key Findings
Recap of Debt Service
Non-
Revenue
Revenue Debt Service Debt
Fiscal Existing Planned Existing
Year Table 2.13 Table 2.24 Table 2.18 Total
2005 $ 336,429 $ - $ 723,035 $1,059,465
2006 337,495 - 692,434 1,029,929
2007 333,092 390,000 693,520 1,416,612
2008 338,245 715,000 693,810 1,747,055
2009 338,097 1,114,300 619,663 2,072,060
2010 338,010 1,443,800 618,926 2,400,736
2011 337,892 1,403,360 466,995 2,208,247
2012 342,549 1,427,920 466,427 2,236,896
2013 341,731 1,383,580 469,651 2,194,961
2014 345,123 1,409,040 473,942 2,228,105
2015 342,688 1,360,512 480,163 2,183,363
2016 349,330 1,311,984 181,627 1,842,941
SECTION 1I-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 25
McLain
Decision
Support
Systems
F,
McLAIN
Robert McLain.Principal•I.kLain Decision Support Syatartrs
2t.1 fir'.`olithwt,t Pkw, #4105•L cwill,TX 75067
(972)436-t1t4l[:71ti4t•072 692.5197 Fax•(214)S93A i,652 Mobile•i, rnc:lain i lx.conn
• 2.2.9. Collection of Impact Fees. In order to give the reader some perspective, the
next two tables illustrate the key planning assumptions used, related to the collection
and use of water and sewer impact fees.
Table 2.31
Key Findings
Recap of Impact Fees-Water
Sources&Uses of Funds
Sources of Funds Uses of Funds
Water For
Impact Debt
Fiscal Beginning Fees Interest Service For Ending
Year Balance + Collected + Earned Table 2.28 CIP Balance
2006 $4,279,513 + $ 295,779 + $ 128,385 $ (42,445) $ - $4,661,231
2007 4,661,231 + 1,252,119 + 139,837 (160,612) (4,000,000) 1,892,575
2008 1,892,575 + 1,252,119 + 56,777 (260,381) - 2,941,090
2009 2,941,090 + 1,252,119 + 88,233 (326,530) - 3,954,911
2010 3,954,911 + 1,252,119 + 118,647 (380,325) - 4,945,352
2011 4,945,352 + 1,252,119 + 148,361 (370,850) - 5,974,982
2012 5,974,982 + 1,252,119 + 179,249 (381,696) - 7,024,654
2013 7,024,654 + 1,252,119 + 210,740 (370,914) - 8,116,598
2014 8,116,598 + 1,252,119 + 243,498 (372,858) - 9,239,357
2015 9,239,357 + 1,252,119 + 277,181 (361,130) - 10,407,527
2016 10,407,527 + 1,252,119 + 312,226 (350,346) - 11,621,525
Table 2.32
Key Findings
Recap of Impact Fees- Wastewater
Sources& Uses of Funds
Sources of Funds Uses of Funds
Wastewater For
impact Debt
Fiscal Beginning Fees Interest Service Ending
Year Balance + Collected + Earned Table 2.29 Balance
2006 $6,478,647 + $ 683,963 + $ 194,359 $ (662,189) $6,694,780
2007 6,694,780 + 1,281,789 + 200,843 (844,877) 7,332,536
2008 7,332,536 + 1,285,174 + 219,976 (845,976) 7,991,710
2009 7,991,710 + 1,285,072 + 239,751 (845,788) 8,670,745
2010 8,670,745 + 1,283,943 + 260,122 (844,254) 9,370,557
2011 9,370,557 + 1,283,943 + 281,117 (843,860) 10,091,757
2012 10,091,757 + 1,283,943 + 302,753 (845,615) 10,832,838
2013 10,832,838 + 1,284,046 + 324,985 (848,255) 11,593,614
2014 11,593,614 + 1,285,072 + 347,808 (851,083) 12,375,411
2015 12,375,411 + 1,283,841 + 371,262 (853,498) 13,177,017
2016 13,177,017 + 1,282,712 + 395,310 (858,406) 13,996,634
SECTION II---IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 26
IL McLain
Decision
ASupport
COP- Systems
McLA N
/L4,en McLain.Prim ipal•McLain 1}cam won,n Support SN 4trim
?ill W S.'tihwc,t pkw),.4105•Lew iw illt,TX'75067
(972)416.6181 06 •0 U?12 i W Fax•(214)S91- M2 M bi k•1r4n lasnJJ...c.,rtm
• 2.2.10. Renewal and Replacement Costs. The City will have an opportunity,
beginning in FY 2008, to begin incorporating the cost of funding the renewal and
replacement of the infrastructure of the water and wastewater system out of rates.
This is a sound financial policy, which is looked upon favorably by the rating
agencies. The basis for the calculation of this transfer is annual depreciation expense.
The initial cost for FY 2008 will be $262,500. We are showing this cost in Table
2.33.
Table 2.33
Key Findings
Recap of Non-Operating Costs
Transfers to the Infrastructure Renewal and Replacement Fund
Fiscal Annual Depreciation Percentage Funded Transfers
Year Water Sewer Water Sewer Water Sewer
2005 $ 620,000 $ 280,000 0.0% 0.0% $ - $ -
2006 645,000 305,000 0.0% 0.0% - -
2007 670,000 330,000 0.0% 0.0% - -
2008 695,000 355,000 25.0% 25.0% 173,750 88,750
2009 720,000 380,000 35.0% 35.0% 252,000 133,000
2010 745,000 405,000 45.0% 45.0% 335,250 182,250
2011 770,000 430,000 55.0% 55.0% 423,500 236,500
2012 795,000 455,000 65.0% 65.0% 516,750 295,750
2013 820,000 480,000 75.0% 75.0% 615,000 360,000
2014 845,000 505,000 85.0% 85.0% 718,250 429,250
2015 870,000 530,000 95.0% 95.0% 826,500 503,500
2016 895,000 555,000 105.0% 105.0% 939,750 582,750
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 27
McLain
Decision
41111
Support
4116,fir Systems
McL_A I N
R.bc i McL.irn.1'rtnrir..1• c1..41n I iaiD'n*Too S,rsni
201 W ti►rtllvi:mot 11,41.,•4105•Lcx'iat'i11k,TX 7506
[)72)436.61S1 t)if •0721642.5197 Fax•(214)$93.1t52 Mobile•1.,%hitancbtintikoim
Table 2.34
Key Findings
Recap of Non-Operating Costs
Transfer
Transfer To
Debt To R&R
Fiscal Service General Fund
Year Table 2.30 Fund Table 2.33 Total
2005 $1,059,465 $ 420,000 $ - $1,479,465
2006 1,029,929 420,000 - 1,449,929
2007 1,416,612 450,000 - 1,866,612
2008 1,747,055 468,000 262,500 2,477,555
2009 2,072,060 487,000 385,000 2,944,060
2010 2,400,736 506,000 517,500 3,424,236
2011 2,208,247 526,000 660,000 3,394,247
2012 2,236,896 547,000 812,500 3,596,396
2013 2,194,961 569,000 975,000 3,738,961
2014 2,228,105 592,000 1,147,500 3,967,605
2015 2,183,363 616,000 1,330,000 4,129,363
2016 1,842,941 641,000 1,522,500 4,006,441
• 2.2.11. General Fund Transfers. We have assumed the transfer to the general fund
will increase 4%annually. Table 2.34 shows this transfer.
SECTION II—IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 28
McLain
Decision
Support
Systems
McLA N
Robert McI-um Prince jl•M1c Simon SN,t nt.
201 W.Soullme,t 1'w.,•4105•L.:►rmillr,TX 75067
(972.4 6- 181 Off.,•(97)692-5197 fax•(214)S93-1652 Molile•boNitinclairtlis.com
Table 2.35
Key Findings
Recap of Total Gross Cost of Service
Total
Total Non-
Operating Operating Total
Costs Costs Gross
Fiscal From From Cost of
Year Table 2.12 Table 2.30 Service
2005 $5,864,556 $ 1,479,465 $7,344,021
2006 8,588,791 1,449,929 10,038,720
2007 8,312,953 1,866,612 10,179,564
2008 9,434,032 2,477,555 11,911,587
2009 10,046,272 2,944,060 12,9 90,332
2010 10,537,440 3,424,236 13,961,676
2011 11,076,906 3,394,247 14,471,153
2012 11,648,865 3,596,396 15,246 261
2013 12,259,838 3,738,961 15,998,799
2014 12,897,201 3,967,605 16,8 64,806
2015 13,572,974 4,129,363 17,70 2,337
2016 14,082,962 4,006,441 18,089,403
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 29
McLain
-'�` Dedsion
All Support
11111■ Systems
y"`
McLAIN
Robert McLain,Prtiicii-rl•lkkkL.ain IX'ist,m Simon System,
:cal W,S uthwr'i rkwv.,•4105•Lew'i+e'iIle,TX 75ANS7
{972)436•61t 1 Office•0721 69:ri97 Fix•(214)894•3652 Mob&•hohltinciatillt,orit
Table 2.36
Key Findings
Recap of Non-Rate Operating Revenues
Fiscal Water Sewer Reconnect
Year Taps Taps Fees Totals
2005 $ 136,169 $ 21,770 $ 35,820 $ 193,759
2006 200,000 29,700 22,000 251,700
2007 150,000 25,000 40,000 215,000
2008 200,000 29,700 43,117 272,817
2009 200,000 29,700 46,233 275,933
2010 200,000 29,700 49,350 279,050
2011 200,000 29,700 52,466 282,166
2012 200,000 29,700 55,583 285,283
2013 200,000 29,700 58,699 288,399
2014 200,000 29,700 61,816 291,516
2015 200,000 29,700 64,932 294,632
2016 200,000 29,700 68,049 297,749
Table 2.37
Key Findings
Recap of Non-Rate Non-Operating Revenues
Interest Utility Gain on
Fiscal from Pretreatment Sale of Misc.
Year Investments Fees Assets Income Totals
2005 $ 441,638 $ 36,000 $ 193,305 $ 129,976 $ 800,919
2006 60,000 38,000 - 40,000 138,000
2007 50,000 38,000 - 136,860 224,860
2008 50,000 38,000 - 136,860 224,860
2009 43,700 38,000 - 136,860 218,560
2010 37,600 38,000 - 136,860 212,460
2011 33,400 38,000 - 136,860 208,260
2012 36,100 38,000 - 136,860 210,960
2013 39,000 38,000 - 136,860 213,860
2014 42,100 38,000 - 136,860 216,960
2015 44,300 38,000 - 136,860 219,160
2016 45,800 38,000 - 136,860 220,660
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 30
■ McLain
+`A Decision
Support
OLP' FPo
Systems
Mc L A N
R fin McL.un,Pruicitm1•Nict_ain Decision Support S stein'
201 W Southwest Ptws.,.4105•Lewisville,TX 75061
(972 3 4 36-6181{ltf ii,•is f?3 692-5 397 F.n),•(214)891652 Mobile•t kiirraa3irnl.lw..orn
Table 2.38
Key Findings
Recap of Revenue Offsets
Drawdown Drawdown
of of
Non-Rate Non-Rate Water Wastewater
Operating Non-Operating Impact Impact
Fiscal Revenues Revenues Fees Fees
Year Table 2.36 Table 2.37 Table 2.28 Table 2.29 Totals
2005 $ 193,759 $ 800,919 $ 42,219 $ 215,922 $ 1,252,819
2006 251,700 138,000 42,445 662,189 1,094,334
2007 215,000 224,860 160,612 844,877 1,445,349
2008 272,817 224,860 260,381 845,976 1,604,034
2009 275,933 218,560 326,530 845,788 1,666,811
2010 279,050 212,460 380,325 844,254 1,716,089
2011 282,166 208,260 370,850 843,860 1,705,136
2012 285,283 210,960 381,696 845,615 1,723,554
2013 288,399 213,860 370,914 848,255 1,721,428
2014 291,516 216,960 372,858 851,083 1,732,416
2015 294,632 219,160 361,130 853,498 1,728,420
2016 297,749 220,660 350,346 858,406 1,727,160
SECTION II-IDENTIFICATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PAGE 31